Terreno Realty Corp - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34603
Terreno Realty Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Maryland | 27-1262675 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
101 Montgomery Street, Suite 200 San Francisco, CA |
94104 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (415) 655-4580
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The registrant had 13,434,889 shares of its common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of August 7, 2012.
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
1
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
(in thousands except share and per share data)
June 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Investments in real estate |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 170,687 | $ | 133,464 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
156,420 | 116,287 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
17,913 | 14,833 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total investments in properties |
345,020 | 264,584 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(10,818 | ) | (7,063 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net investments in properties |
334,202 | 257,521 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
4,705 | 3,249 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
4,332 | 2,139 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
1,956 | 770 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
6,239 | 3,370 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 351,434 | $ | 267,049 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Credit facility |
$ | 22,000 | $ | 41,000 | ||||
Term loan payable |
10,050 | 20,050 | ||||||
Mortgage loans payable |
97,391 | 38,265 | ||||||
Security deposits |
2,268 | 1,772 | ||||||
Intangible liabilities, net |
965 | 913 | ||||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
7,382 | 6,038 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
140,056 | 108,038 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
||||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock: $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, and no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock: $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized, and 13,434,889 and 9,308,670 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
133 | 91 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
220,374 | 168,039 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(9,129 | ) | (9,119 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders' equity |
211,378 | 159,011 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 351,434 | $ | 267,049 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
REVENUES |
||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues |
$ | 6,051 | $ | 2,919 | $ | 11,357 | $ | 5,502 | ||||||||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
1,548 | 847 | 2,848 | 1,634 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
7,599 | 3,766 | 14,205 | 7,136 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
2,100 | 1,488 | 4,008 | 2,951 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,918 | 1,042 | 3,743 | 2,001 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,886 | 1,480 | 3,301 | 3,088 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
324 | 1,256 | 1,038 | 1,538 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
6,228 | 5,266 | 12,090 | 9,578 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(1,116 | ) | (464 | ) | (2,128 | ) | (832 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
(1,114 | ) | (461 | ) | (2,125 | ) | (825 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net and comprehensive income (loss) |
257 | (1,961 | ) | (10 | ) | (3,267 | ) | |||||||||
Allocation to participating securities |
(2 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net and comprehensive income (loss) available to common stockholders |
$ | 255 | $ | (1,961 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (3,267 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic and Diluted net income (loss) available to common stockholders per share |
$ | 0.02 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.36 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding |
13,276,892 | 9,164,741 | 12,983,363 | 9,148,890 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Dividends Declared per Common Share |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Equity
(in thousands except share data)
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional Paid- | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Amount | in Capital | Deficit | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2011 |
9,308,670 | $ | 91 | $ | 168,039 | $ | (9,119 | ) | $ | 159,011 | ||||||||||
Net and comprehensive loss |
| | | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs of $305 |
4,083,269 | 42 | 55,007 | | 55,049 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(4,586 | ) | | (79 | ) | | (79 | ) | ||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock |
47,536 | | | | | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 360 | | 360 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends |
| | (2,953 | ) | | (2,953 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2012 |
13,434,889 | $ | 133 | $ | 220,374 | $ | (9,129 | ) | $ | 211,378 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10 | ) | $ | (3,267 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
||||||||
Straight-line rents |
(2,080 | ) | (807 | ) | ||||
Amortization of lease intangibles |
169 | 253 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,743 | 2,001 | ||||||
Deferred financing cost and mortgage premium amortization |
273 | 100 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
701 | 818 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities |
||||||||
Other assets |
(812 | ) | (1,042 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
1,271 | 474 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
3,255 | (1,470 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
7 | (43 | ) | |||||
Cash paid for property acquisitions |
(74,278 | ) | (46,968 | ) | ||||
Cash paid for deposits on property acquisitions |
(2,400 | ) | (250 | ) | ||||
Additions to buildings and improvements |
(6,653 | ) | (2,155 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(83,324 | ) | (49,416 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
55,013 | | ||||||
Issuance costs on issuance of common stock |
(294 | ) | | |||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(79 | ) | | |||||
Borrowings on credit facility |
60,000 | 6,000 | ||||||
Payments on credit facility |
(79,000 | ) | | |||||
Payments on term loan payable |
(10,000 | ) | | |||||
Borrowings on mortgage loans payable |
59,880 | | ||||||
Payments on mortgage loans payable |
(670 | ) | (357 | ) | ||||
Payment of deferred financing costs |
(1,053 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Payment of deferred underwriting fee |
| (7,000 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
(2,272 | ) | (929 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
81,525 | (2,288 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
1,456 | (53,174 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
3,249 | 57,253 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 4,705 | $ | 4,079 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 1,835 | $ | 628 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash transactions |
||||||||
Accounts payable related to capital improvements |
1,992 | 416 | ||||||
Reconciliation of cash paid for property acquisitions |
||||||||
Acquisition of properties |
$ | 74,819 | $ | 61,725 | ||||
Assumption of mortgage loans payable |
| $ | (14,768 | ) | ||||
Assumption of other assets and liabilities |
(541 | ) | 11 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash paid for property acquisitions |
$ | 74,278 | $ | 46,968 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Terreno Realty Corporation
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Terreno Realty Corporation (Terreno, and together with its subsidiaries, the Company) acquires, owns and operates industrial real estate located in six major coastal U.S. markets: Los Angeles; Northern New Jersey/New York City; San Francisco Bay Area; Seattle; Miami; and Washington, D.C./Baltimore. As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned 54 buildings aggregating approximately 4.2 million square feet.
The Company commenced operations upon completion of an initial public offering (IPO) of 8,750,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $20.00 per share and a concurrent private placement of 350,000 shares of common stock purchased by the Companys executive management at a price of $20.00 per share on February 16, 2010. The net proceeds of the IPO and the concurrent private placement were approximately $169.8 million. Prior to the completion of its IPO, the Company had no assets other than cash. On January 13, 2012, the Company completed a public follow-on offering of 4,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price per share of $14.25. On February 13, 2012, the Company sold an additional 61,853 shares of its common stock at a price per share of $14.25 upon the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares. The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering costs, were approximately $54.7 million. The Company is an internally managed Maryland corporation and elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010.
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In managements opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The interim consolidated financial statements include all of the Company and its subsidiaries and all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements contained in the Companys 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the notes thereto, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2012.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Investments in Real Estate. Investments in real estate, including tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing costs, are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless circumstances indicate that the cost cannot be recovered, in which case, an adjustment to the carrying value of the property is made to reduce it to its estimated fair value. The Company also reviews the impact of above and below market leases, in-place leases and lease origination costs for acquisitions and records an intangible asset or liability accordingly.
Impairment. Carrying values for financial reporting purposes are reviewed for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a property may not be fully recoverable. Examples of such events or changes in circumstances may include classifying an asset to be held for sale, changing the intended hold period or when an asset remains vacant significantly longer than expected. The intended use of an asset either held for sale or held for use can significantly impact how impairment is measured. If an asset is intended to be held for the long-term, the recoverability is based on the undiscounted future cash flows. If the asset carrying value is not supported on an undiscounted future cash flow basis, then the asset carrying value is measured against the lower of cost or the present value of expected cash flows over the expected hold period. An impairment charge to earnings is recognized for the excess of the assets carrying value over the lower of cost or the present values of expected cash flows over the expected hold period. If an asset is intended to be sold, impairment is determined using the estimated fair value less costs to sell. The
6
Table of Contents
estimation of expected future net cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on assumptions, among other things, regarding current and future economic and market conditions and the availability of capital. The Company determines the estimated fair values based on its assumptions regarding rental rates, lease-up and holding periods, as well as sales prices. When available, current market information is used to determine capitalization and rental growth rates. If available, current comparative sales values may also be used to establish fair value. When market information is not readily available, the inputs are based on the Companys understanding of market conditions and the experience of the Companys management team. Actual results could differ significantly from the Companys estimates. The discount rates used in the fair value estimates represent a rate commensurate with the indicated holding period with a premium layered on for risk. There were no impairment charges recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Property Acquisitions. Upon acquisition of a property, which are accounted for as business combinations, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting generally of land, buildings and improvements) and intangible assets and liabilities (consisting generally of the above and below market leases and the origination value of all in-place leases). The Company determines fair values using replacement cost, estimated cash flow projections and other valuation techniques and applying appropriate discount and capitalization rates based on available market information. Mortgage loans assumed in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their fair value using current market interest rates for similar debt at the date of acquisition. Acquisition-related costs associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred.
The fair value of the tangible assets is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Land values are derived from current comparative sales values, when available, or managements estimates of the fair value based on market conditions and the experience of the Companys management team. Building and improvement values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation, or managements estimates of the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flows analyses or similar methods. The fair value of the above and below market leases is based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts to be received pursuant to the acquired leases (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) and the Companys estimate of the market lease rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the leases when there is not a bargain renewal option. The capitalized values of above market leases and below market leases are amortized to rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases. The total net impact to rental revenues due to the amortization of above and below market leases was a decrease of approximately $79,000 and $138,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and $169,000 and $253,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The origination value of in-place leases is based on costs to execute similar leases including commissions and other related costs. The origination value of in-place leases also includes real estate taxes, insurance and an estimate of lost rental revenue at market rates during the estimated time required to lease up the property from vacant to the occupancy level at the date of acquisition. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had attributed approximately $2.7 million, $1.4 million, and $15.2 million to above market leases, below market leases and in-place leases, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had attributed approximately $2.3 million, $1.2 million, and $12.5 million to above market leases, below market leases and in-place leases, respectively. These amounts are included in intangible assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had recorded net accumulated amortization of approximately $6.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, related to these intangible assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had recorded net accumulated amortization of approximately $4.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to these intangible assets and liabilities. As of June 30, 2012, the remaining weighted average lease term related to these intangible assets and liabilities is 4.6 years.
Depreciation and Useful Lives of Real Estate and Intangible Assets. Depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets or liabilities. The following table reflects the standard depreciable lives typically used to compute depreciation and amortization. However, such depreciable lives may be different based on the estimated useful life of such assets or liabilities.
Description | Standard Depreciable Life | |
Land |
Not depreciated | |
Building |
40 years | |
Building Improvements |
5-40 years | |
Tenant Improvements |
Shorter of lease term or useful life | |
Leasing Costs |
Lease term | |
In-place leases |
Lease term | |
Above/Below Market Leases |
Lease term |
7
Table of Contents
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents is comprised of cash held in a major banking institution and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are generally invested in U.S. government securities, government agency securities or money market accounts.
Restricted Cash. Restricted cash includes cash held in escrow in connection with property acquisitions and reserves for certain capital improvements, leasing, interest and real estate tax and insurance payments as required by certain mortgage loan obligations.
Revenue Recognition. The Company records rental revenue from operating leases on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases and maintains an allowance for estimated losses that may result from the inability of its tenants to make required payments. If tenants fail to make contractual lease payments that are greater than the Companys allowance for doubtful accounts, security deposits and letters of credit, then the Company may have to recognize additional doubtful account charges in future periods. The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants on an on-going basis by reviewing their financial condition periodically as appropriate. Each period the Company reviews its outstanding accounts receivable, including straight-line rents, for doubtful accounts and provides allowances as needed. The Company also records lease termination fees when a tenant has executed a definitive termination agreement with the Company and the payment of the termination fee is not subject to any conditions that must be met or waived before the fee is due to the Company. If a tenant remains in the leased space following the execution of a definitive termination agreement, the applicable termination will be deferred and recognized over the term of such tenants occupancy.
Tenant expense reimbursement income includes payments and amounts due from tenants pursuant to their leases for real estate taxes, insurance and other recoverable property operating expenses and is recognized as revenues during the same period the related expenses are incurred.
Deferred Financing Costs. Costs incurred in connection with financings are capitalized and amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the related loan. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, deferred financing costs were $2.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively, net of accumulated amortization.
Mortgage Premiums. Mortgage premiums represent the excess of the fair value of debt assumed over the principal value of debt assumed in connection with property acquisitions. The mortgage premiums are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument using the effective interest method. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the net unamortized mortgage premiums were approximately $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and were included as a component of mortgage loans payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Income Taxes. The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code and operates as such beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to its stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes qualifying dividends to its stockholders. If it fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants it relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Companys net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes it is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT.
ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740-10 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the Companys tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax expense in the current year. As of June 30, 2012, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and does not believe that there will be any material changes in unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months. The Companys tax returns are subject to examination by federal, state and local tax jurisdictions beginning with the 2010 calendar year.
8
Table of Contents
Stock-Based Compensation and Other Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Company follows the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, to account for its stock-based compensation plan, which requires that the compensation cost relating to stock-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements and that the cost be measured on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company has adopted the 2010 Equity Plan, which provides for the grant of restricted stock awards, performance share awards, unrestricted shares or any combination of the foregoing. Stock-based compensation is recognized as a general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and measured at the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The Company estimates the forfeiture rate based on historical experience as well as expected behavior. The amount of the expense may be subject to adjustment in future periods depending on the specific characteristics of the stock-based award.
In addition, the Company has awarded long-term incentive target awards (the LTIP awards) to its executives that may be payable in shares of the Companys common stock after the conclusion of each pre-established performance measurement period. The amount that may be earned under the LTIP awards is variable depending on the relative total shareholder return of the Companys common stock as compared to the total shareholder return of the MSCI U.S. REIT Index and the FTSE NAREIT Equity Industrial Index over the pre-established performance measurement period. The Company estimates the fair value of the LTIP awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant and at each reporting period. The LTIP awards are recognized as compensation expense over the requisite performance period based on the fair value of the LTIP awards at the balance sheet date.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also provides guidance for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these investments or liabilities based on Level 1 inputs. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, based on borrowing rates available to the Company, which are Level 2 inputs, the estimated fair values of the mortgage and term loans payable were approximately $111.0 million and $59.2 million, respectively.
New Accounting Standards. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholders equity. The adoption of this standard did not have any impact on the Companys financial statements.
Segment Disclosure. ASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprises reportable segment. The Company has determined that it has one reportable segment, with activities related to investing in real estate. The Companys investments in real estate are geographically diversified and the chief operating decision makers evaluate operating performance on an individual asset level. As each of the Companys assets has similar economic characteristics, the assets have been aggregated into one reportable segment.
Note 3. Concentration of Credit Risk.Note 3. Concentration of Credit Risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company may maintain deposits in federally insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. However, the Companys management believes the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company owned six properties located in Northern New Jersey/New York City, which accounted for approximately 38.7% of its annualized base rent, which is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of June 30, 2012, excluding any partial or full rent abatements.
Other real estate companies compete with the Company in its real estate markets. This results in competition for tenants to occupy space. The existence of competing properties could have a material impact on the Companys ability to lease space and on the level of rent that can be achieved. The Company had ten tenants that accounted for approximately 56.1% of the rental revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
9
Table of Contents
Note 4. Investments in Real Estate.
Note 4. Investments in Real Estate. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company acquired six industrial buildings containing 706,909 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $68.7 million, of which $35.3 million was recorded to land, $30.6 million to buildings and improvements, $2.8 million to intangible assets and $0.2 million to intangible liabilities. These assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value, which uses Level 3 inputs. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand and borrowings on the Companys credit facility and were accounted for as business combinations.
The Company recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 of approximately $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to the above acquisitions.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company acquired seven industrial buildings containing 775,898 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $74.8 million, of which $37.2 million was recorded to land, $34.3 million to buildings and improvements, $3.3 million to intangible assets and $0.2 million to intangible liabilities. These assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value, which uses Level 3 inputs. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand and borrowings on the credit facility and were accounted for as business combinations.
The Company recorded revenues and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 of approximately $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to the above acquisitions.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company acquired five industrial buildings containing 400,078 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $55.9 million, of which $27.5 million was recorded to land, $25.8 million to buildings and improvements and $2.6 million to intangible assets. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand, net of assumed mortgage loans payable and borrowings on the credit facility and were accounted for as business combinations.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company acquired six industrial buildings containing 535,078 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $61.7 million, of which $30.7 million was recorded to land, $28.1 million to buildings and improvements and $2.9 million to intangible assets. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand, net of assumed mortgage loans payable and borrowings on the credit facility and were accounted for as business combinations.
Pro Forma Financial Information:
The following supplementary pro forma financial information presents the results of operations of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 as if all of the Companys acquisitions during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and the July 3, 2012 acquisition (Note 9) occurred on January 1, 2011. The pro forma results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 have been presented for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had all transactions taken place on January 1, 2011, or of future results of operations (dollars in thousands, except per share data).
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 9,280 | $ | 5,934 | $ | 18,086 | $ | 11,472 | ||||||||
Net and comprehensive income (loss) available to common stockholders |
1,395 | (1,320 | ) | 2,854 | (2,376 | ) | ||||||||||
Basic and Diluted net income (loss) available to common stockholders per share |
$ | 0.11 | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.26 | ) |
Note 5. Debt. The Company has a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. On June 15, 2012, the Company entered into a Third Amendment to its Amended and Restated Senior Revolving Credit Agreement (the Facility) with KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent and as a lender, and PNC Bank, National Association, and Union Bank, N.A., as lenders, to increase the Facility from $80.0 million to $100.0 million by exercising the accordion feature under the Facility. The amount available under the Facility may be increased up to $150.0 million, subject to the approval of the administrative agent and the identification of lenders willing to make available additional amounts. The maturity date of the Facility is January 19, 2015, with one 12-month extension option exercisable by the Company, subject to, among other things, there being an absence of an event of default under the Facility and to the payment of an extension fee. The Facility provides that outstanding borrowings are limited to the lesser of $100.0 million and 60.0% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The Facility is secured by a pledge of the equity interests in the subsidiaries that hold each of the borrowing base properties. Interest on the Facility is generally to be paid based upon, at the Companys option, either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable base rate which is the greater of the administrative agents prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50%
10
Table of Contents
above the federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate loans under the Facility. The applicable LIBOR margin will range from 2.50% to 3.50%, depending on the ratio of the Companys outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of the Companys consolidated gross asset value. As of June 30, 2012, the applicable LIBOR margin was 2.50%. The Facility requires quarterly payments of an annual unused facility fee in an amount equal to 0.25% or 0.35% depending on the unused portion of the Facility. The unused facility fee was $56,000 and $101,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and $124,000 and $201,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The Company guarantees the obligations of the borrower (a wholly-owned subsidiary) under the Facility. The Facility includes a series of financial and other covenants that the Company must comply with in order to borrow under the Facility. As of June 30, 2012, there were $22.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Facility and 12 properties were in the borrowing base. As of December 31, 2011, there were $41.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Facility. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Facility at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 the Company had a senior secured term loan with an outstanding balance of approximately $10.1 million and $20.1 million, respectively, that matures on February 22, 2013 (the Term Loan), subject to one six-month extension exercisable by the Company subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. Interest on the Term Loan will generally be based upon, at the Companys option, either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable base rate which is the greater of the administrative agents prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50% above the federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate loans under the Term Loan. As of June 30, 2012, the applicable LIBOR margin was 3.50%. The Term Loan includes a series of financial and other covenants that are similar to the covenants in the Facility. The Company guarantees the obligations of the borrower (a wholly-owned subsidiary) under the Term Loan. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants under the Term Loan at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
On January 30, 2012 the Company entered into a $20.1 million non-recourse mortgage loan at a fixed annual interest rate of 3.79% that matures on February 5, 2019. The mortgage loan is secured by five of the Companys properties. A portion of the loan proceeds was used to pay down the Term Loan. The remaining loan proceeds were used to invest in industrial properties and for general business purposes.
On June 26, 2012 the Company entered into a $39.8 million non-recourse mortgage loan at a fixed annual interest rate of 3.65% that matures on March 5, 2020. The mortgage loan is secured by three of the Companys properties. A portion of the loan proceeds was used to pay down the Facility. The remaining loan proceeds were used to invest in industrial properties and for general business purposes.
The mortgage loans payable are collateralized by certain of the properties and require monthly interest and principal payments until maturity and are generally non-recourse. The mortgage loans mature between 2015 and 2021. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had six mortgage loans payable totaling approximately $97.4 million, which bear interest at a weighted average fixed annual rate of 4.3%. As of December 31, 2011 the Company had four mortgage loans payable totaling approximately $38.3 million, which bore interest at a weighted average fixed annual interest rate of 5.4%. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the total net investment book value of the properties securing the debt was $192.9 million and $84.2 million, respectively.
The scheduled principal payments of the Companys debt as of June 30, 2012 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||
Credit | Term Loan | Loans | ||||||||||||||
` | Facility | Payable | Payable | Total Debt | ||||||||||||
2012 (6 months) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,116 | $ | 1,116 | ||||||||
2013 |
| 10,050 | 2,443 | 12,493 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
| | 2,560 | 2,560 | ||||||||||||
2015 |
22,000 | | 21,690 | 43,690 | ||||||||||||
2016 |
| | 2,076 | 2,076 | ||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | 66,979 | 66,979 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
22,000 | 10,050 | 96,864 | 128,914 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized net premiums |
| | 527 | 527 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 22,000 | $ | 10,050 | $ | 97,391 | $ | 129,441 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
2.8 | % | 3.8 | % | 4.3 | % | 4.0 | % |
11
Table of Contents
Note 6. Stockholders' Equity.Note 6. Stockholders Equity. The Companys authorized capital stock consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. On January 13, 2012, the Company completed a public follow-on offering of 4,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price per share of $14.25 including 93,000 shares that were sold in the offering to the Companys executive and senior officers and members of the board of directors. No underwriting discount or commission was paid on the shares sold to such officers and directors. On February 13, 2012, the Company sold an additional 61,853 shares of its common stock at a price per share of $14.25 upon the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares. The net proceeds of the primary follow-on offering were approximately $54.7 million after deducting the full underwriting discount and offering costs of approximately $3.1 million. The Company used approximately $41.0 million of the net proceeds to repay outstanding borrowings under the Facility on January 13, 2012 and the remaining net proceeds were used to invest in industrial properties and for general business purposes. As of June 30, 2012, 13,434,889 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, including 149,995 non-vested restricted stock awards, and no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.
In connection with the annual meeting of stockholders on May 4, 2012, the Company granted a total of 21,416 shares of unrestricted common stock to its independent directors under the Companys 2010 Equity Incentive Plan with a grant date fair value per share of $14.01. The grant date fair value of the unrestricted common stock was determined using the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of the grant. The Company recognized approximately $0.3 million in compensation costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 related to this issuance.
As of June 30, 2012, there were 455,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance as restricted stock grants, unrestricted stock awards or LTIP awards under the Companys 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, of which 186,810 were remaining. The grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards issued during the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to June 30, 2012 ranged from $14.20 to $20.00. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock was determined using the initial public offering price of $20.00 for grants issued on February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) and for all grants issued after the commencement of operations, the Company uses the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of the restricted stock that was granted during the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $0.7 million and the vesting period for the restricted stock is five years. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $2.4 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock issuances, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of approximately 3.3 years. The Company recognized compensation costs of approximately $0.2 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and approximately $0.4 million for both the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The following is a summary of the total restricted shares granted to the Companys executive officers and employees with the related weighted average grant date fair value share prices for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
Restricted Stock Activity:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average Grant | ||||||||
Shares | Date Fair Value | |||||||
Non-vested shares outstanding at beginning of period |
133,526 | $ | 19.54 | |||||
Granted |
47,536 | 14.20 | ||||||
Forfeited |
(4,586 | ) | 19.85 | |||||
Vested |
(26,481 | ) | 19.85 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-vested shares outstanding at end of period |
149,995 | $ | 17.55 | |||||
|
|
|
|
The following is a vesting schedule of the total non-vested shares of restricted stock outstanding as of June 30, 2012:
Non-vested Shares Vesting Schedule |
Number of Shares | |||
2012 (6 months) |
870 | |||
2013 |
41,443 | |||
2014 |
41,443 | |||
2015 |
41,443 | |||
2016 |
15,288 | |||
Thereafter |
9,508 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Non-vested Shares |
149,995 | |||
|
|
12
Table of Contents
Long-Term Incentive Plan:
As of June 30, 2012, there are three open performance measurement periods for the LTIP awards: February 16, 2010 to December 31, 2012, January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013, and January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. The LTIP awards related to the performance measurement period from February 16, 2010 to December 31, 2011 resulted in no compensation expense as the compensation committee determined that the Companys total shareholder return did not exceed the applicable metrics during the performance measurement period. The Company recorded compensation costs of approximately $110,000 and $11,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and approximately $41,000 and $167,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Dividends:
The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid or payable per share during the six months ended June 30, 2012:
Dividend | ||||||||||
For the Three Months Ended |
per Share | Declaration Date | Record Date | Date Paid | ||||||
June 30, 2012 |
$ | 0.12 | May 4, 2012 | July 9, 2012 | July 23, 2012 | |||||
March 31, 2012 |
$ | 0.10 | February 21, 2012 | April 5, 2012 | April 19, 2012 |
Note 7. Net Income (Loss) Per Share. Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method of computing earnings per share allocates earnings per share for common stock and any participating securities according to dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The Companys non-vested shares of restricted stock are considered participating securities since these share-based awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends irrespective of whether the awards ultimately vest or expire. The Company had no dilutive restricted stock awards outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
In accordance with the Companys policies of determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities and accounting for earnings per share, the net and comprehensive income (loss) per common share is adjusted for earnings distributed through declared dividends (if any) and allocated to all participating securities (weighted average common shares outstanding and unvested restricted shares outstanding) under the two-class method. Under this method, allocations were made to 149,995 and 0 of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and 0 of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding for both the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011.
Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies
Contractual Commitments. As of August 7, 2012, the Company had two outstanding contracts with third-party sellers to acquire two industrial properties consisting of 203,291 square feet. There is no assurance that the Company will acquire the properties under contract because the proposed acquisitions are subject to the completion of satisfactory due diligence, various closing conditions and the consent of the mortgage lender. The following table summarizes certain information with respect to the properties the Company has under contract:
Number of | Purchase Price | Assumed Debt | ||||||||||||||
Market |
Buildings | Square Feet | (in thousands) | (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Los Angeles |
| | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Miami |
2 | 137,594 | 12,350 | 6,100 | ||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey/New York City |
| | | | ||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Seattle |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Washington, D.C./Baltimore |
1 | 65,697 | 6,660 | 3,600 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
3 | 203,291 | $ | 19,010 | $ | 9,700 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Table of Contents
As of August 7, 2012, the Company has entered into an agreement with a third-party purchaser to sell one property located in the Los Angeles market for a sales price of approximately $17.2 million. There is no assurance that the Company will complete the sale of the property under contract because the proposed sale is subject to the purchasers completion of satisfactory due diligence and various closing conditions.
Note 9. Subsequent Events
On July 3, 2012, the Company acquired three industrial buildings containing 171,707 square feet located in Sunnyvale, CA for a total purchase price of approximately $33.7 million. The property was acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand and borrowings under the Facility.
On July 19, 2012, the Company completed a public offering of 1,840,000 shares of its 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the Series A Preferred Stock), including 240,000 shares sold upon the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares, at a price per share of $25.00. The estimated net proceeds of the offering were approximately $44.3 million after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses of approximately $1.7 million. The Company used the net proceeds to reduce outstanding borrowings under the Facility.
On July 23, 2012, the Company acquired one industrial building containing 74,679 square feet located in Doral, FL for a total purchase price of approximately $4.2 million. The property was acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand and borrowings under the Facility.
On July 31, 2012, the Company acquired one industrial building containing 103,200 square feet located in Redondo Beach, CA for a total purchase price of approximately $14.2 million. The property was acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand and borrowings under the Facility.
On August 2, 2012, the Company acquired one industrial building containing 24,277 square feet located in South San Francisco, CA for a total purchase price of approximately $3.6 million. The property was acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand and borrowings under the Facility.
On August 3, 2012, the Companys board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.12 per share of the Companys common stock payable on October 26, 2012 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 5, 2012.
On August 3, 2012, the Companys board of directors declared a dividend in the amount of $0.3875 per share of its Series A Preferred Stock for the period from July 19, 2012 through September 30, 2012 payable on October 1, 2012 to the preferred stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 10, 2012.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). We caution investors that forward-looking statements are based on managements beliefs and on assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, may, might, plan, project, result, should, will, seek, target, see, likely, position, opportunity and similar expressions which do not relate solely to historical matters are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties, and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
14
Table of Contents
Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
| the factors included under the headings Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2012 and in our other public filings; |
| our ability to identify and acquire industrial properties on terms favorable to us; |
| general volatility of the capital markets and the market price of our common stock; |
| adverse economic or real estate conditions or developments in the industrial real estate sector and/or in the markets in which we acquire properties; |
| our dependence on key personnel and our reliance on third parties to property manage the majority of our industrial properties; |
| our dependence upon tenants; |
| our inability to comply with the laws, rules and regulations applicable to companies, and in particular, public companies; |
| our ability to manage our growth effectively; |
| tenant bankruptcies and defaults on or non-renewal of leases by tenants; |
| decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates; |
| increased interest rates and operating costs; |
| declining real estate valuations and impairment charges; |
| our expected leverage, our failure to obtain necessary outside financing, and future debt service obligations; |
| our ability to make distributions to our stockholders; |
| our failure to successfully hedge against interest rate increases; |
| our failure to successfully operate acquired properties; |
| our failure to qualify or maintain our status as a real estate investment trust, or REIT, and possible adverse changes to tax laws; |
| uninsured or underinsured losses relating to our properties; |
| environmental uncertainties and risks related to natural disasters; |
| financial market fluctuations; and |
| changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates. |
Overview
Terreno Realty Corporation (Terreno, and together with its subsidiaries, we, us, our, our Company, or the Company) acquires, owns and operates industrial real estate located in six major coastal U.S. markets: Los Angeles; Northern New Jersey/New York City; San Francisco Bay Area; Seattle; Miami; and Washington, D.C./Baltimore. We invest in several types of industrial real estate, including warehouse/distribution, flex (including light industrial and research and development, or R&D) and trans-shipment. We target functional buildings in infill locations that may be shared by multiple
15
Table of Contents
tenants and that cater to customer demand within the various submarkets in which we operate. Infill locations are geographic locations surrounded by high concentrations of already developed land and existing buildings. As of June 30, 2012, we owned a total of 54 buildings aggregating approximately 4.2 million square feet, which we purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $327.6 million, including the assumption of mortgage loans payable of approximately $39.5 million, which includes mortgage premiums of approximately $0.8 million. As of June 30, 2012, our properties were approximately 91.3% leased to 85 tenants, the largest of which accounted for approximately 10.0% of our total annualized based rent. We are an internally managed Maryland corporation and elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, commencing with our taxable year ending December 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes by market our investments in real estate as of June 30, 2012:
Market |
Number of Buildings |
Rentable Square Feet |
% of Total |
Occupancy % as of June 30, 2012 |
Annualized Base Rent (000s) 1 |
% of Total |
Annualized Base Rent Per Occupied Square Foot |
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term (Years) 2 |
Gross Book Value (000s) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Los Angeles |
10 | 928,773 | 22.2 | % | 86.0 | % | $ | 6,027 | 23.8 | % | $ | 7.54 | 3.4 | $ | 97,550 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey/New York City |
23 | 1,591,250 | 38.0 | % | 93.9 | % | 9,808 | 38.7 | % | 6.56 | 3.8 | 121,618 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
9 | 431,866 | 10.3 | % | 85.5 | % | 3,233 | 12.8 | % | 8.75 | 4.3 | 41,378 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seattle |
3 | 306,662 | 7.3 | % | 100.0 | % | 1,617 | 6.4 | % | 5.27 | 6.8 | 24,748 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miami |
6 | 630,212 | 15.0 | % | 97.7 | % | 3,134 | 12.4 | % | 5.09 | 8.6 | 39,654 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Washington, D.C./Baltimore |
3 | 302,734 | 7.2 | % | 80.2 | % | 1,488 | 5.9 | % | 6.13 | 6.5 | 20,072 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total/Weighted Average |
54 | 4,191,497 | 100.0 | % | 91.3 | % | $ | 25,307 | 100.0 | % | $ | 6.61 | 5.0 | $ | 345,020 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent per the leases, excluding any partial or full rent abatements, as of June 30, 2012, multiplied by 12. |
2 | Weighted average remaining lease term is calculated by summing the remaining lease term of each lease as of June 30, 2012, weighted by the respective square footage. |
The following table summarizes our capital expenditures incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
|||||||
Building improvements |
$ | 2,156 | $ | 4,620 | ||||
Tenant improvements |
529 | 1,031 | ||||||
Leasing commissions |
207 | 543 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total capital expenditures (1) |
$ | 2,892 | $ | 6,194 | ||||
|
|
|
|
1 | Includes approximately $1.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively, related to leasing acquired vacancy and renovation projects at three properties. |
16
Table of Contents
Our top ten tenants as of June 30, 2012 are as follows:
Tenant |
Leases | Rentable Square Feet |
% of Total Rentable Square Feet |
Annualized Base Rent (000s) 1 |
% of Total Annualized Base Rent |
|||||||||||||||||
1 | YRC Worldwide |
3 | 182,803 | 4.4 | % | $ | 2,518 | 10.0 | % | |||||||||||||
2 | H.D. Smith Wholesale Drug Company |
1 | 211,418 | 5.0 | % | 2,008 | 7.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
3 | Home Depot |
1 | 413,092 | 9.9 | % | 1,905 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
4 | Precision Custom Coatings |
1 | 208,000 | 5.0 | % | 1,637 | 6.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
5 | Miami International Freight Solutions |
1 | 181,340 | 4.3 | % | 1,043 | 4.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
6 | Sohnen Enterprises |
1 | 161,610 | 3.9 | % | 994 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
7 | Banah International Group |
1 | 301,983 | 7.2 | % | 906 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
8 | FedEx Corporation |
1 | 72,808 | 1.7 | % | 852 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
9 | JAMN Logistics |
1 | 110,336 | 2.6 | % | 653 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
10 | Maines Paper & Food Service |
1 | 98,745 | 2.3 | % | 636 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
12 | 1,942,135 | 46.3 | % | $ | 13,152 | 52.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent per the leases, excluding any partial or full rent abatements, as of June 30 2012, multiplied by 12. |
The following table summarizes the anticipated lease expirations for leases in place at June 30, 2012, without giving effect to the exercise of renewal options or termination rights, if any, at or prior to the scheduled expirations:
Year |
Rentable Square Feet 1 |
% of Total Rentable Square Feet |
Annualized Base Rent (000s) 1, 2 |
% of Total Annualized Base Rent 1 |
||||||||||||
2012 (6 months) |
87,107 | 2.1 | % | $ | 782 | 2.8 | % | |||||||||
2013 |
804,959 | 19.2 | % | 4,570 | 16.2 | % | ||||||||||
2014 |
502,715 | 12.0 | % | 3,279 | 11.7 | % | ||||||||||
2015 |
439,693 | 10.5 | % | 3,017 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||
2016 |
193,124 | 4.5 | % | 1,329 | 4.7 | % | ||||||||||
2017+ |
1,801,102 | 43.0 | % | 15,159 | 53.9 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
3,828,700 | 91.3 | % | $ | 28,136 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Includes leases that expire on or after June 30, 2012. |
2 | Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly base rent per the leases at expiration, excluding any partial or full rent abatements, as of June 30, 2012, multiplied by 12. |
Recent Developments
Acquisition Activity
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we acquired six industrial buildings containing 706,909 square feet for a total purchase price of approximately $68.5 million. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand and borrowings under our credit facility. The following table sets forth the wholly-owned industrial properties we acquired during the three months ended June 30, 2012:
Property Name |
Location | Acquisition Date | Number of Buildings |
Square Feet | Purchase Price (in thousands) |
|||||||||||||||
Garfield |
Commerce, CA | May 30, 2012 | 5 | 545,299 | 52,400 | |||||||||||||||
Whittier |
Whittier, CA | June 12, 2012 | 1 | 161,610 | 16,100 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Total |
6 | 706,909 | $ | 68,500 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent to June 30, 2012, we acquired six industrial buildings containing 373,863 square feet for a total purchase price of approximately $55.7 million. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand and borrowings under our credit facility. The following table sets forth the wholly-owned industrial properties we acquired subsequent to June 30, 2012:
17
Table of Contents
Property Name |
Location | Acquisition Date | Number of Buildings |
Square Feet | Purchase Price (in thousands) |
|||||||||||
Caribbean |
Sunnyvale, CA | July 3, 2012 | 3 | 171,707 | $ | 33,718 | ||||||||||
78th Avenue |
Doral, FL | July 23, 2012 | 1 | 74,679 | 4,200 | |||||||||||
Manhattan Beach |
Redondo Beach, CA | July 31, 2012 | 1 | 103,200 | 14,150 | |||||||||||
Carlton Court |
South San Francisco, CA | August 2, 2012 | 1 | 24,277 | 3,600 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
6 | 373,863 | $ | 55,668 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock Offering
On July 19, 2012, we completed a public offering of 1,840,000 shares of our 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the Series A Preferred Stock), including 240,000 shares sold upon the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares, at a price per share of $25.00. The estimated net proceeds of the offering were approximately $44.3 million after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses of approximately $1.7 million. We used the net proceeds to reduce outstanding borrowings under our credit facility.
Amendment to Our Senior Revolving Credit Facility
On June 15, 2012, we entered into a Third Amendment to our Amended and Restated Senior Revolving Credit Agreement (the Facility) with KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent and as a lender, and PNC Bank, National Association, and Union Bank, N.A., as lenders, to increase our Facility from $80.0 million to $100.0 million by exercising the accordion feature under the Facility. Outstanding borrowings under the Facility are limited to the lesser of $100.0 million or 60.0% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The amount available under the Facility may be increased up to $150.0 million, subject to the approval of the administrative agent and the identification of lenders willing to make additional amounts available. The Facility requires payment of an annual unused facility fee in an amount equal to 0.25% or 0.35% depending on the unused portion of the Facility. We guarantee the obligations of the borrower (a wholly-owned subsidiary) under the Facility.
Secured Financing
On June 26, 2012 we entered into a $39.8 million non-recourse mortgage loan at a fixed annual interest rate of 3.65% that matures on March 5, 2020. The mortgage loan is secured by three of our properties. The loan proceeds were used to reduce outstanding borrowings under the Facility and for general business purposes.
Distribution Activity
The following table sets forth the cash dividends payable per share during the three months ended June 30, 2012:
For the Three Months Ended |
Dividend per Share |
Declaration Date | Record Date | Date Paid | ||||
June 30, 2012 |
$ 0.12 | May 4, 2012 | July 9, 2012 | July 23, 2012 |
On August 3, 2012, our board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.12 per share of our common stock payable on October 26, 2012 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 5, 2012.
On August 3, 2012, our board of directors declared a dividend in the amount of $0.3875 per share of our Series A Preferred Stock for the period from July 19, 2012 through September 30, 2012 payable on October 1, 2012 to the preferred stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 10, 2012.
Contractual Commitments
As of August 7, we had two outstanding contracts with third-party sellers to acquire two industrial properties and one outstanding contract with a third-party purchaser to sell one property as described under the heading Contractual Obligations in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There is no assurance that we will acquire or sell the properties under contract because the proposed acquisitions and disposition are subject to the completion of satisfactory due diligence, various closing conditions and, with respect to the acquisitions, the consent of the mortgage lender.
18
Table of Contents
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We derive substantially all of our revenues from rents received from tenants under existing leases on each of our properties. These revenues include fixed base rents and recoveries of certain expenses that we have incurred and that we pass through to the individual tenants.
Our primary cash expenses consist of our property operating expenses, which include: real estate taxes; repairs and maintenance; management expenses; insurance; utilities; general and administrative expenses, which include compensation costs, office expenses, professional fees and other administrative expenses; acquisition costs, which include third-party costs paid to brokers and consultants; and interest expense, primarily on mortgage loans, term loans and the Facility.
Our consolidated results of operations often are not comparable from period to period due to the impact of property acquisitions at various times during the course of such periods. The results of operations of any acquired property are included in our financial statements as of the date of its acquisition.
The analysis of our results below includes the changes attributable to same store properties. The same store pool includes all properties that were owned as of June 30, 2012 and since January 1, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, the same store pool consisted of 12 properties aggregating approximately 2.4 million square feet. As of June 30, 2012, the non-same store properties, which we acquired during the course of 2011 and 2012 consisted of 15 properties aggregating approximately 1.8 million square feet.
Our future financial condition and results of operations, including rental revenues, straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, may be impacted by the acquisitions of additional properties, and expenses may vary materially from historical results.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 to the Three Months Ended 2011:
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Same store |
$ | 3,658 | $ | 2,835 | $ | 823 | 29.0 | % | ||||||||
2011 and 2012 Acquisitions |
2,393 | 84 | 2,309 | 2748.8 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total rental revenues |
6,051 | 2,919 | 3,132 | 107.3 | % | |||||||||||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
||||||||||||||||
Same store |
476 | 490 | (14 | ) | (2.9 | )% | ||||||||||
2011 and 2012 Acquisitions |
1,072 | 357 | 715 | 200.3 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total tenant expense reimbursements |
1,548 | 847 | 701 | 82.8 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
7,599 | 3,766 | 3,833 | 101.8 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Property operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Same store |
1,279 | 1,357 | (78 | ) | (5.7 | )% | ||||||||||
2011 and 2012 Acquisitions |
821 | 131 | 690 | 526.7 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total property operating expenses |
2,100 | 1,488 | 612 | 41.1 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net operating income (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Same store |
2,855 | 1,968 | 887 | 45.1 | % | |||||||||||
2011 and 2012 Acquisitions |
2,644 | 310 | 2,334 | 752.9 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net operating income |
$ | 5,499 | $ | 2,278 | $ | 3,221 | 141.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,918 | 1,042 | 876 | 84.1 | % | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,886 | 1,480 | 406 | 27.4 | % | |||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
324 | 1,256 | (932 | ) | (74.2 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other costs and expenses |
4,128 | 3,778 | 350 | 9.3 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other Income (Expense) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
2 | 3 | (1 | ) | (33.3 | )% | ||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(1,116 | ) | (464 | ) | (652 | ) | 140.5 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
(1,114 | ) | (461 | ) | (653 | ) | 141.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net and comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 257 | $ | (1,961 | ) | $ | 2,218 | n/a | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Includes straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of net operating income and same store net operating income from net and comprehensive income (loss) and a discussion of why we believe net operating income and same store net operating income are useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. |
19
Table of Contents
Revenues. Total revenues increased approximately $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year. Approximately $0.8 million of this increase is from same store revenues mainly due to increased occupancy, as same store consolidated occupancy at quarter end increased to 92.7% in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to 69.1% from the same period in 2011. The remaining increase in total revenues is due to property acquisitions during 2011 and 2012. For the quarter ended June 30, 2012, approximately $0.8 million was recorded in straight-line rental revenues related to contractual rent abatements given to certain tenants.
Property operating expenses. Total property operating expenses increased approximately $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year. The increase in total property operating expenses was due to an increase of approximately $0.7 million attributable to property acquisitions during 2011 and 2012, which was partially offset by a decrease in same store property operating expenses of approximately $0.1 million.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased approximately $0.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year due to property acquisitions during 2011 and 2012.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year due primarily to an increase in compensation expense.
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased by approximately $0.9 million from the prior year period due to a lower number of property acquisitions during the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
Interest expense, including amortization. Interest expense increased approximately $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year due primarily to the assumption and origination of mortgage loans payable during 2011 and 2012, as well as borrowings under our Facility and term loan payable.
20
Table of Contents
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 to the Six Months Ended 2011:
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Rental revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Same store |
$ | 7,053 | $ | 5,650 | $ | 1,403 | 24.8 | % | ||||||||
2011 and 2012 Acquisitions |
4,304 | (148 | ) | 4,452 | n/a | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total rental revenues |
11,357 | 5,502 | 5,855 | 106.4 | % | |||||||||||
Tenant expense reimbursements |
||||||||||||||||
Same store |
904 | 1,045 | (141 | ) | (13.5 | )% | ||||||||||
2011 and 2012 Acquisitions |
1,944 | 589 | 1,355 | 230.1 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total tenant expense reimbursements |
2,848 | 1,634 | 1,214 | 74.3 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
14,205 | 7,136 | 7,069 | 99.1 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Property operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Same store |
2,593 | 2,805 | (212 | ) | (7.6 | )% | ||||||||||
2011 and 2012 Acquisitions |
1,415 | 146 | 1,269 | 869.2 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total property operating expenses |
4,008 | 2,951 | 1,057 | 35.8 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net operating income (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Same store |
5,364 | 3,890 | 1,474 | 37.9 | % | |||||||||||
2011 and 2012 Acquisitions |
4,833 | 295 | 4,538 | 1538.3 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net operating income |
$ | 10,197 | $ | 4,185 | $ | 6,012 | 143.7 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,743 | 2,001 | 1,742 | 87.1 | % | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,301 | 3,088 | 213 | 6.9 | % | |||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
1,038 | 1,538 | (500 | ) | (32.5 | )% | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other costs and expenses |
8,082 | 6,627 | 1,455 | 22.0 | % | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other Income (Expense) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
3 | 7 | (4 | ) | (57.1 | )% | ||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
(2,128 | ) | (832 | ) | (1,296 | ) | 155.8 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
(2,125 | ) | (825 | ) | (1,300 | ) | 157.6 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net and comprehensive loss |
$ | (10 | ) | $ | (3,267 | ) | $ | 3,257 | (99.7 | )% | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Includes straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of net operating income and same store net operating income from net and comprehensive loss and a discussion of why we believe net operating income and same store net operating income are useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. |
Revenues. Total revenues increased approximately $7.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year. Approximately $1.3 million of this increase is from same store revenues mainly due to increased occupancy, as same store consolidated occupancy at quarter end increased to 92.7% in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to 69.1% from the same period in 2011. The remaining increase in total revenues is due to property acquisitions during 2011 and 2012. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, approximately $1.5 million was recorded in straight-line rental revenues related to contractual rent abatements given to certain tenants.
Property operating expenses. Total property operating expenses increased approximately $1.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year. The increase in total property operating expenses was due to an increase of approximately $1.3 million attributable to property acquisitions during 2011 and 2012, which was partially offset by a decrease in same store property operating expenses of approximately $0.2 million. The decrease in same store property operating expenses was primarily due to a decrease in snow removal expenses from the prior year period.
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased approximately $1.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year due to property acquisitions during 2011 and 2012.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased approximately $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year due primarily to an increase compensation expense.
21
Table of Contents
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased by approximately $0.5 million from the prior year period due to a lower number of property acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year.
Interest expense, including amortization. Interest expense increased approximately $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period from the prior year due primarily to the assumption and origination of mortgage loans payable during 2011 and 2012, as well as borrowings under our Facility and term loan payable.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The primary objective of our financing strategy is to maintain financial flexibility with a conservative capital structure using retained cash flows, long-term debt and the issuance of common and perpetual preferred stock to finance our growth. Over the long-term, we intend to:
| limit the sum of the outstanding principal amount of our consolidated indebtedness and the liquidation preference of any outstanding perpetual preferred stock to less than 40% of our total enterprise value; |
| maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio in excess of 2.0x; |
| limit the principal amount of our outstanding floating rate debt to less than 20% of our total consolidated indebtedness; and |
| have staggered debt maturities that are aligned to our expected average lease term (5-7 years), positioning us to re-price parts of our capital structure as our rental rates change with market conditions. |
We intend to preserve a flexible capital structure with a long-term goal to obtain an investment grade rating and be in a position to issue unsecured debt and perpetual preferred stock. Prior to attaining an investment grade rating, we intend to primarily utilize non-recourse debt secured by individual properties or pools of properties with a targeted maximum loan-to-value of 65% at the time of financing, or recourse bank term loans and credit facilities. We may also assume debt in connection with property acquisitions which may have a higher loan-to-value.
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by operations, existing cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under the Facility. We believe that our net cash provided by operations will be adequate to fund operating requirements, pay interest on any borrowings and fund distributions in accordance with the REIT requirements of the federal income tax laws. In the near-term, we intend to fund future investments in properties with term loans, mortgages and borrowings under our Facility. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, including with respect to other investments in industrial properties, property acquisitions and scheduled debt maturities, through borrowings under our Facility, periodic issuances of common stock, perpetual preferred stock, and long-term secured and unsecured debt, and with proceeds from the disposition of properties. The success of our acquisition strategy may depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and borrow under our Facility and to access additional capital through issuances of equity and debt securities.
On January 13, 2012, we completed a public follow-on offering of 4,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $14.25. On February 13, 2012, we sold an additional 61,853 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $14.25 upon the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares. The net proceeds of the offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering costs, were approximately $54.7 million. We used approximately $41.0 million of the net proceeds to repay outstanding borrowings under our Facility on January 13, 2012 and the remaining net proceeds were used to invest in industrial properties and for general business purposes.
On July 19, 2012, we completed a public offering of 1,840,000 shares of our 7.75% Series A Preferred Stock, including 240,000 shares sold upon the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares, at a price per share of $25.00. The estimated net proceeds of the offering were approximately $44.3 million after deducting the underwriting discount and other estimated offering expenses of approximately $1.7 million. We used the net proceeds to reduce outstanding borrowings under our Facility.
22
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2012, our market equity capitalization was as follows:
Market Equity Capitalization as of June 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||
Security |
Shares Outstanding1 |
Market Price 2 | Market Value | |||||||||
Common Stock |
13,434,889 | $ | 15.11 | $ | 203,001,173 |
1 | Includes 149,995 shares of unvested restricted stock |
2 | Closing price of our shares of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2012 in dollars per share |
We have a $100.0 million Facility. On June 15, 2012, we entered into a Third Amendment to our Amended and Restated Senior Revolving Credit Agreement with KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent and as a lender, and PNC Bank, National Association, and Union Bank, N.A., as lenders, to increase the Facility from $80.0 million to $100.0 million by exercising the accordion feature under the Facility. The amount available under our Facility may be increased up to $150.0 million, subject to the approval of the administrative agent and the identification of lenders willing to make available additional amounts. The maturity date of our Facility is January 19, 2015, with one 12-month extension option exercisable by us, subject to, among other things, there being an absence of an event of default under the Facility and to our payment of an extension fee. Interest on our Facility is generally to be paid based upon, at our option, either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable base rate which is the greater of the administrative agents prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50% above the federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate loans under the Facility. The applicable LIBOR margin will range from 2.50% to 3.50%, depending on the ratio of our outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of our consolidated gross asset value. As of June 30, 2012, the applicable LIBOR margin was 2.50%. The Facility provides that outstanding borrowings are limited to the lesser of $100.0 million and 60.0% of the value of the borrowing base properties. Our Facility requires payment of an annual unused facility fee in an amount equal to 0.25% or 0.35% depending on the unused portion of our Facility. The unused facility fee was $56,000 and $101,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and $124,000 and $201,000, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Our Facility includes a series of financial and other covenants requiring, among other things, the maintenance of maximum leverage ratios and minimum fixed coverage ratios that we must comply with in order to borrow under the Facility. We guarantee the obligations of the borrower (a wholly-owned subsidiary) under our Facility. See Recent Developments-Amendment to Our Senior Revolving Credit Facility in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information regarding the amendment to our Facility. As of June 30, 2012, there were approximately $22.0 million of borrowings outstanding and 12 properties were in the borrowing base under our Facility. As of December 31, 2011, there were approximately $41.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our Facility. We were in compliance with our financial covenants under the Facility at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
In addition, we have a term loan with an outstanding balance of approximately $10.1 million and $20.1 million, respectively, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 that matures on February 22, 2013, subject to one six-month extension exercisable by us subject to certain conditions (the Term Loan). Interest on the Term Loan will generally be based upon, at our option, either (i) LIBOR plus 3.50% or (ii) the applicable base rate which is the greater of the administrative agents prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50% above the federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus 3.50% for LIBOR rate loans under the Term Loan. As of June 30, 2012, the applicable LIBOR margin was 3.50%. The Term Loan includes a series of financial and other covenants that are similar to the covenants in the Facility. We guarantee the obligations of the borrower (a wholly-owned subsidiary) under the Term Loan. We were in compliance with its financial covenants at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we had outstanding mortgage loans payable of approximately $97.4 million and $38.3 million, respectively, and held cash and cash equivalents totaling approximately $4.7 million and $3.2 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes our debt maturities, principal payments, capitalization ratios, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, interest coverage and debt ratios as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
23
Table of Contents
` | Credit Facility |
Term Loan Payable |
Mortgage Loans Payable |
Total Debt | ||||||||||||
2012 (6 months) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 1,116 | $ | 1,116 | ||||||||
2013 |
| 10,050 | 2,443 | 12,493 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
| | 2,560 | 2,560 | ||||||||||||
2015 |
22,000 | | 21,690 | 43,690 | ||||||||||||
2016 |
| | 2,076 | 2,076 | ||||||||||||
Thereafter |
| | 66,979 | 66,979 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
22,000 | 10,050 | 96,864 | 128,914 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized net premiums |
| | 527 | 527 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 22,000 | $ | 10,050 | $ | 97,391 | $ | 129,441 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted Average Interest Rate |
2.8 | % | 3.8 | % | 4.3 | % | 4.0 | % | ||||||||
Total Debt-to-Total Investments in Properties 1 |
37.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Debt-to-Total Market Capitalization 2 |
38.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Floating Rate Debt as a % of Total Debt |
24.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
EBITDA 3 |
$ | 5,861 | ||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA 4 |
$ | 7,600 | ||||||||||||||
Interest Coverage 5 |
3.6 | x | ||||||||||||||
Total Debt-to-Adjusted EBITDA 6 |
7.7 | x | ||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Maturity (years) |
5.5 |
1 | Total debt-to-total investments in properties is calculated as total debt, including premiums, divided by total investments in properties as of June 30, 2012. |
2 | Total debt-to-total market capitalization is calculated as total debt, including premiums, divided by market equity capitalization plus total debt, including premiums, as of June 30, 2012. |
3 | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) for the six months ended June 30, 2012. EBITDA for such period includes acquisition costs of approximately $1.0 million. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of EBITDA from net and comprehensive income (loss) and a discussion of why we believe EBITDA is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance. |
4 | Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, acquisition costs and stock-based compensation (Adjusted EBITDA) for the six months ended June 30, 2012. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA from net and comprehensive income (loss) and a discussion of why we believe Adjusted EBITDA is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance. |
5 | Interest coverage is calculated as Adjusted EBITDA divided by interest expense, including amortization. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA from net and comprehensive income (loss) and a discussion of why we believe Adjusted EBITDA is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance. |
6 | Total debt-to-Adjusted EBITDA is calculated as total debt, including premiums, divided by annualized Adjusted EBITDA. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA from net and comprehensive income (loss) and a discussion of why we believe Adjusted EBITDA is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance. |
24
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid or payable per share during the six months ended June 30, 2012:
For the Three Months Ended |
Dividend per Share |
Declaration Date |
Record Date | Date Paid | ||||||
June 30, 2012 |
$ | 0.12 | May 4, 2012 | July 9, 2012 | July 23, 2012 | |||||
March 31, 2012 |
$ | 0.10 | February 21, 2012 | April 5, 2012 | April 19, 2012 |
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash are cash from operations, borrowings under mortgage and term loans payable and draws on our Facility. Our principal uses of cash are asset acquisitions, debt service, capital expenditures, operating costs and corporate overhead costs.
Cash From Operating Activities. Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities totaled approximately $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to approximately ($1.5 million) for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase in cash provided by operating activities is attributable to leasing and higher cash flows from property acquisitions during 2011 and 2012.
Cash From Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $83.3 million and $49.4 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, which consists primarily of cash paid for property acquisitions of $74.3 million and $47.0 million, respectively.
Cash From Financing Activities. Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $81.5 million and ($2.3 million), respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, which consists primarily of $54.7 million in net issuance proceeds and borrowings on mortgage loans and the Facility of $119.9 million, less payments on the Facility and Term Loan of approximately $89.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and borrowings on the Facility of approximately $6.0 million, less $7.0 million in deferred underwriting fee payments, $0.9 million in dividend payments and scheduled debt principal payments for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of our critical accounting policies is set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
Contractual Obligations
As of August 7, 2012, we had two outstanding contracts with third-party sellers to acquire two industrial properties. There is no assurance that we will acquire the properties under contract because the proposed acquisitions are subject to the completion of satisfactory due diligence, various closing conditions and the consent of the mortgage lender. The following table summarizes certain information with respect to the properties we have under contract:
Market |
Number of Buildings |
Square Feet | Purchase Price (in thousands) |
Assumed Debt (in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Los Angeles |
| | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Miami |
2 | 137,594 | 12,350 | 6,100 | ||||||||||||
Northern New Jersey/New York City |
| | | | ||||||||||||
San Francisco Bay Area |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Seattle |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Washington, D.C./Baltimore |
1 | 65,697 | 6,660 | 3,600 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
3 | 203,291 | $ | 19,010 | $ | 9,700 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Table of Contents
As of August 7, 2012, we have entered into an agreement with a third-party purchaser to sell one property in our Los Angeles market for a sales price of approximately $17.2 million. There is no assurance that we will complete the sale of the property under contract because the proposed sale is subject to the purchasers completion of satisfactory due diligence and various closing conditions.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations due by period as of June 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations |
1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | Total | |||||||||||||||
Debt |
$ | 12,374 | $ | 5,121 | $ | 23,430 | $ | 65,989 | $ | 106,914 | ||||||||||
Debt Interest Payments |
4,268 | 7,945 | 5,904 | 7,035 | 25,152 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase Obligations |
19,010 | | | | 19,010 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 35,652 | $ | 13,066 | $ | 29,334 | $ | 73,024 | $ | 151,076 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We use the following non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors as a key supplemental measure of our operating performance: funds from operations, or FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, net operating income, or NOI, and same store NOI. FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NOI and same store NOI should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance in accordance with GAAP. Further, our computation of FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NOI and same store NOI may not be comparable to FFO, EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, NOI and same store NOI reported by other companies.
We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income (loss) (determined in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) from sales of property and impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, plus depreciation and amortization on real estate assets and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures (which are calculated to reflect FFO on the same basis). We believe that presenting FFO provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it is a measure of our operations without regard to specified non-cash items, such as real estate depreciation and amortization and gain or loss on sale of assets.
We believe that FFO is a meaningful supplemental measure of our operating performance because historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting alone to be insufficient. As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provide a more complete understanding of our operating performance.
The following table reflects the calculation of FFO reconciled from net and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands except per share data):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Change | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net and comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 257 | $ | (1,961 | ) | $ | 2,218 | n/a | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (3,267 | ) | $ | 3,257 | (99.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total depreciation and amortization |
1,918 | 1,042 | 876 | 84.1 | % | 3,743 | 2,001 | 1,742 | 87.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-real estate depreciation |
(28 | ) | (25 | ) | (3 | ) | 12.0 | % | (57 | ) | (48 | ) | (9 | ) | 18.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Allocation to participating securities (1) |
(23 | ) | | (23 | ) | n/a | (36 | ) | | (36 | ) | n/a | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Funds from operations (2) |
$ | 2,124 | $ | (944 | ) | $ | 3,068 | n/a | $ | 3,640 | $ | (1,314 | ) | $ | 4,954 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Basic and diluted FFO per common share |
$ | 0.16 | $ | (0.10 | ) | $ | 0.26 | n/a | $ | 0.28 | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.42 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Weighted average basic and diluted common shares |
13,276,892 | 9,164,741 | 12,983,363 | 9,148,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | To be consistent with the companys policies of determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities and accounting for earnings per share, the FFO per common share is adjusted for FFO distributed through declared dividends (if any) and allocated to all participating securities (weighted average common shares outstanding and unvested restricted shares outstanding) under the two-class method. Under this method, allocations were made to 149,995 and 0 of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and to 144,594 and 0 of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. |
2 | Includes expensed acquisition costs of approximately $0.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 and approximately $1.0 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. |
26
Table of Contents
We compute EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization. We compute Adjusted EBITDA as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, acquisition costs and stock-based compensation. We believe that presenting EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because they are measures of our operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of tax, non-cash depreciation and amortization expense (and acquisition costs and stock-based compensation with regard to Adjusted EBITDA). By excluding interest expense, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA allow investors to measure our operating performance independent of our capital structure and indebtedness and, therefore, allow for more meaningful comparison of our operating performance between quarters as well as annual periods and for the comparison of our operating performance to that of other companies, both in the real estate industry and in other industries. As we are currently in a growth phase, acquisition costs are excluded from Adjusted EBITDA to allow for the comparison of our operating performance to that of stabilized companies.
The following table reflects the calculation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA reconciled from net and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Change | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net and comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 257 | $ | (1,961 | ) | $ | 2,218 | n/a | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (3,267 | ) | $ | 3,257 | (99.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,918 | 1,042 | 876 | 84.1 | % | 3,743 | 2,001 | 1,742 | 87.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization |
1,116 | 464 | 652 | 140.5 | % | 2,128 | 832 | 1,296 | 155.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 3,291 | $ | (455 | ) | $ | 3,746 | n/a | $ | 5,861 | $ | (434 | ) | $ | 6,295 | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
600 | 467 | 133 | 28.5 | % | 701 | 818 | (117 | ) | (14.3 | )% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
324 | 1,256 | (932 | ) | (74.2 | )% | 1,038 | 1,538 | (500 | ) | (32.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 4,215 | $ | 1,268 | $ | 2,947 | 232.4 | % | $ | 7,600 | $ | 1,922 | $ | 5,678 | 295.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We compute NOI as rental revenues, including tenant expense reimbursements, less property operating expenses. We compute same store NOI as rental revenues, including tenant expense reimbursements, less property operating expenses on a same store basis. NOI excludes depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, acquisition costs and interest expense. We compute cash-basis same store NOI as same store NOI excluding straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles. The same store pool includes all properties that were owned as of June 30, 2012 and since January 1, 2011. As of June 30, 2012, the same store pool consisted of 12 properties aggregating approximately 2.4 million square feet. We believe that presenting NOI, same store NOI and cash-basis same store NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our operating performance of our properties because NOI excludes certain items that are not considered to be controllable in connection with the management of the property, such as depreciation, amortization, general and administrative expenses, acquisition costs and interest expense. By presenting same store NOI and cash-basis same store NOI the operating results on a same store basis are directly comparable from period to period.
The following table reflects the calculation of NOI, same store NOI and cash-basis same store NOI reconciled from net and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | For the Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | % | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Change | Change | 2012 | 2011 | Change | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net and comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 257 | $ | (1,961 | ) | $ | 2,218 | n/a | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (3,267 | ) | $ | 3,257 | (99.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,918 | 1,042 | 876 | 84.1 | % | 3,743 | 2,001 | 1,742 | 87.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,886 | 1,480 | 406 | 27.4 | % | 3,301 | 3,088 | 213 | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs |
324 | 1,256 | (932 | ) | (74.2 | )% | 1,038 | 1,538 | (500 | ) | (32.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total other income and expenses |
1,114 | 461 | 653 | 141.6 | % | 2,125 | 825 | 1,300 | 157.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net operating income |
5,499 | 2,278 | 3,221 | 141.4 | % | 10,197 | 4,185 | 6,012 | 143.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less non same store NOI |
(2,644 | ) | (310 | ) | (2,334 | ) | 752.9 | % | (4,833 | ) | (295 | ) | (4,538 | ) | 1538.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Same store NOI |
$ | 2,855 | $ | 1,968 | $ | 887 | 45.1 | % | $ | 5,364 | $ | 3,890 | $ | 1,474 | 37.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles (1) |
(862 | ) | (291 | ) | (571 | ) | 196.2 | % | (1,439 | ) | (485 | ) | (954 | ) | 196.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cash-basis same store NOI |
$ | 1,993 | $ | 1,677 | $ | 316 | 18.8 | % | $ | 3,925 | $ | 3,405 | $ | 520 | 15.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Includes straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles for the same store pool only. |
27
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business strategies, the primary market risk which we are exposed to is interest rate risk. We are exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of debt used to maintain liquidity, fund capital expenditures and expand our investment portfolio and operations. We seek to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. As described below, some of our outstanding debt bears interest at variable rates, and we expect that some of our future outstanding debt will have variable interest rates. We may use interest rate caps to manage our interest rate risks relating to our variable rate debt. We expect to replace variable rate debt on a regular basis with fixed rate, long-term debt to finance our assets and operations.
As of June 30, 2012, we had $22.0 million of borrowings outstanding under our Facility and $10.1 million under our Term Loan. Amounts borrowed under our Facility and Term Loan bear interest at variable rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable LIBOR margin, which interest rates were 2.75% and 3.75%, respectively, as of June 30, 2012. If the LIBOR rate fluctuates by 0.25%, interest expense would increase or decrease, depending on rate movement, future earnings and cash flows by approximately $80,125 annually on the total of the outstanding balances on our Facility and Term Loan as of June 30, 2012.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), and has concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to give reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We are not involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
28
Table of Contents
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not Applicable.
None.
Exhibit Number |
Exhibit Description | |
10.1 | Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated May 3, 2012, between Dune-Westcore GBP, LLC and Terreno Realty LLC (as previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on May 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
10.2 | Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated June 11, 2012, between Arden Realty Limited Partnership and Terreno Realty LLC (as previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on July 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
10.3* | Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2012. | |
31.1* | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification dated August 7, 2012. | |
31.2* | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification dated August 7, 2012. | |
32.1** | 18 U.S.C. § 1350 Certification dated August 7, 2012. | |
32.2** | 18 U.S.C. § 1350 Certification dated August 7, 2012. | |
101*** | The following materials from Terreno Realty Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Statement of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
* | Filed herewith. |
** | Furnished herewith. |
*** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |
29
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Terreno Realty Corporation | ||||||
August 7, 2012 |
By: | /s/ W. Blake Baird | ||||
W. Blake Baird | ||||||
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
August 7, 2012 |
By: | /s/ Michael A. Coke | ||||
Michael A. Coke | ||||||
President and Chief Financial Officer |
30
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number |
Exhibit Description | |
10.1 | Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated May 3, 2012, between Dune-Westcore GBP, LLC and Terreno Realty LLC (as previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on May 31, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
10.2 | Agreement of Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow Instructions, dated June 11, 2012, between Arden Realty Limited Partnership and Terreno Realty LLC (as previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on July 6, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
10.3* | Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Senior Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of June 15, 2012. | |
31.1* | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification dated August 7, 2012. | |
31.2* | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification dated August 7, 2012. | |
32.1** | 18 U.S.C. § 1350 Certification dated August 7, 2012. | |
32.2** | 18 U.S.C. § 1350 Certification dated August 7, 2012. | |
101*** | The following materials from Terreno Realty Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) Consolidated Statement of Equity, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
* | Filed herewith. |
** | Furnished herewith. |
*** | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections. |
31