Terreno Realty Corp - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 001-34603

Terreno Realty Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 655-4580

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The registrant had 24,990,446 shares of its common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of November 6, 2013.

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Table of Contents

1

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands – except share and per share data)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands – except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Statement of Equity

(in thousands – except share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Terreno Realty Corporation (“Terreno”, and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) acquires, owns and operates industrial real estate in six major coastal U.S. markets: Los Angeles; Northern New Jersey/New York City; San Francisco Bay Area; Seattle; Miami; and Washington, D.C./Baltimore. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned 85 buildings aggregating approximately 6.3 million square feet.

The Company commenced operations upon completion of an initial public offering (“IPO”) and a concurrent private placement of common stock purchased by the Company’s executive management on February 16, 2010. The Company is an internally managed Maryland corporation and elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010.

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In management’s opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The interim consolidated financial statements include all of the Company’s accounts and its subsidiaries and all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements contained in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the notes thereto, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2013.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Capitalization of Costs. The Company capitalizes costs directly related to the redevelopment and renovation of its investment in real estate. Costs associated with redevelopment projects are capitalized as incurred. If the project is abandoned, these costs are expensed during the period in which the redevelopment project is abandoned. Costs considered for capitalization include, but are not limited to, construction costs, interest, real estate taxes and insurance, if appropriate. These costs are capitalized only during the period in which activities necessary to ready an asset for its intended use are in progress. In the event that the activities to ready the asset for its intended use are suspended, the capitalization period will cease until such activities are resumed. Costs incurred for maintaining and repairing properties, which do not extend their useful lives, are expensed as incurred.

Interest is capitalized based on actual capital expenditures from the period when redevelopment commences until the asset is ready for its intended use, at the weighted average borrowing rate during the period.

Investments in Real Estate. Investments in real estate, including tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing costs, are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless circumstances indicate that the cost cannot be recovered, in which case, an adjustment to the carrying value of the property is made to reduce it to its estimated fair value. The Company also reviews the impact of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and lease origination costs for acquisitions and records an intangible asset or liability accordingly.

Impairment. Carrying values for financial reporting purposes are reviewed for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a property may not be fully recoverable. Examples of such events or changes in circumstances may include classifying an asset to be held for sale, changing the intended hold period or when an asset remains vacant significantly longer than expected. The intended use of an asset either held for sale or held for use can significantly impact how impairment is measured. If an asset is intended to be

6

Table of Contents

held for the long-term, the recoverability is based on the undiscounted future cash flows. If the asset carrying value is not supported on an undiscounted future cash flow basis, then the asset carrying value is measured against the lower of cost or the present value of expected cash flows over the expected hold period. An impairment charge to earnings is recognized for the excess of the asset’s carrying value over the lower of cost or the present values of expected cash flows over the expected hold period. If an asset is intended to be sold, impairment is determined using the estimated fair value less costs to sell. The estimation of expected future net cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on assumptions, among other things, regarding current and future economic and market conditions and the availability of capital. The Company determines the estimated fair values based on its assumptions regarding rental rates, lease-up and holding periods, as well as sales prices. When available, current market information is used to determine capitalization and rental growth rates. If available, current comparative sales values may also be used to establish fair value. When market information is not readily available, the inputs are based on the Company’s understanding of market conditions and the experience of the Company’s management team. Actual results could differ significantly from the Company’s estimates. The discount rates used in the fair value estimates represent a rate commensurate with the indicated holding period with a premium layered on for risk. There were no impairment charges recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Property Acquisitions. Upon acquisition of a property, which are accounted for as business combinations, the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting generally of land, buildings and improvements) and intangible assets and liabilities (consisting generally of the above and below-market leases and the origination value of all in-place leases). The Company determines fair values using replacement cost, estimated cash flow projections and other valuation techniques and applying appropriate discount and capitalization rates based on available market information. Mortgage loans assumed in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their fair value using current market interest rates for similar debt at the date of acquisition. Acquisition-related costs associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred.

The fair value of the tangible assets is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Land values are derived from current comparative sales values, when available, or management’s estimates of the fair value based on market conditions and the experience of the Company’s management team. Building and improvement values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation, or management’s estimates of the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flows analyses or similar methods. The fair value of the above and below-market leases is based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts to be received pursuant to the acquired leases (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) and the Company’s estimate of the market lease rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the leases plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options. The above and below-market lease values are amortized to rental revenues over the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options that are considered bargain renewal options of the respective leases. The total net impact to rental revenues due to the amortization of above and below-market leases was a net increase (decrease) of approximately $0.2 million and ($0.1 million), respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, and approximately $0.7 million and ($0.3 million), respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012. The origination value of in-place leases is based on costs to execute similar leases including commissions and other related costs. The origination value of in-place leases also includes real estate taxes, insurance and an estimate of lost rental revenue at market rates during the estimated time required to lease up the property from vacant to the occupancy level at the date of acquisition. The remaining weighted average lease term related to these intangible assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2013 is 4.6 years. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company’s intangible assets and liabilities consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

7

Table of Contents

Depreciation and Useful Lives of Real Estate and Intangible Assets. Depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets or liabilities. The following table reflects the standard depreciable lives typically used to compute depreciation and amortization. However, such depreciable lives may be different based on the estimated useful life of such assets or liabilities.

Discontinued Operations. The Company separately reports as discontinued operations the historical operating results attributable to properties sold or held for sale and the applicable gain or loss on the disposition of the properties. Although this application may affect the presentation of the Company’s results of operations for the periods that it has already reported, there will be no effect on its previously reported consolidated financial position, net income (loss) or cash flows.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents is comprised of cash held in a major banking institution and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are generally invested in U.S. government securities, government agency securities or money market accounts.

Restricted Cash. Restricted cash includes cash held in escrow in connection with property acquisitions and reserves for certain capital improvements, leasing, interest and real estate tax and insurance payments as required by certain mortgage loan obligations.

Revenue Recognition. The Company records rental revenue from operating leases on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases and maintains an allowance for estimated losses that may result from the inability of its tenants to make required payments. If tenants fail to make contractual lease payments that are greater than the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts, security deposits and letters of credit, then the Company may have to recognize additional doubtful account charges in future periods. The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants on an on-going basis by reviewing their financial condition periodically as appropriate. Each period the Company reviews its outstanding accounts receivable, including straight-line rents, for doubtful accounts and provides allowances as needed. The Company also records lease termination fees when a tenant has executed a definitive termination agreement with the Company and the payment of the termination fee is not subject to any conditions that must be met or waived before the fee is due to the Company. If a tenant remains in the leased space following the execution of a definitive termination agreement, the applicable termination will be deferred and recognized over the term of such tenant’s occupancy.

Tenant expense reimbursement income includes payments and amounts due from tenants pursuant to their leases for real estate taxes, insurance and other recoverable property operating expenses and is recognized as revenues during the same period the related expenses are incurred.

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, approximately $7.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively, of straight-line rent and accounts receivable, net of allowances were included as a component of other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Deferred Financing Costs. Costs incurred in connection with financings are capitalized and amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the related loan. Deferred financing costs in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are shown at cost, net of accumulated amortization of approximately $1.7 million and $1.2 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Mortgage Premiums. Mortgage premiums represent the excess of the fair value of debt assumed over the principal value of debt assumed in connection with property acquisitions. The mortgage premiums are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument using the effective interest method. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the net unamortized mortgage premiums were approximately $0.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and were included as a component of mortgage loans payable on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

8

Table of Contents

Income Taxes. The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code and operates as such beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to its stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes qualifying dividends to its stockholders. If it fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants it relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes it is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT.

ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740-10 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax expense in the current year. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and does not believe that there will be any material changes in unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months. The Company’s tax returns are subject to examination by federal, state and local tax jurisdictions beginning with the 2010 calendar year.

Stock-Based Compensation and Other Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Company follows the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, to account for its stock-based compensation plan, which requires that the compensation cost relating to stock-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements and that the cost be measured on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company has adopted the 2010 Equity Plan, which provides for the grant of restricted stock awards, performance share awards, unrestricted shares or any combination of the foregoing. Stock-based compensation is recognized as a general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and measured at the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The Company estimates the forfeiture rate based on historical experience as well as expected behavior. The amount of the expense may be subject to adjustment in future periods depending on the specific characteristics of the stock-based award.

In addition, the Company has awarded long-term incentive target awards (the “LTIP awards”) to its executives that may be payable in shares of the Company’s common stock after the conclusion of each pre-established performance measurement period. The amount that may be earned under the LTIP awards is variable depending on the relative total shareholder return of the Company’s common stock as compared to the total shareholder return of the MSCI U.S. REIT Index and the FTSE NAREIT Equity Industrial Index over the pre-established performance measurement period. The Company estimates the fair value of the LTIP awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant and at each reporting period. The LTIP awards are recognized as compensation expense over the requisite performance period based on the fair value of the LTIP awards at the balance sheet date.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also provides guidance for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).

As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these investments or liabilities based on Level 1 inputs. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, based on borrowing rates available to the Company, which are Level 2 inputs, the estimated fair values of the mortgage loans payable were approximately $108.6 million and $113.0 million, respectively.

9

Table of Contents

New Accounting Standards. Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. This standard requires an entity to disaggregate the total change of each component of other comprehensive income and separately present reclassification adjustments and current period other comprehensive income. The provisions of this standard also require that entities present, either in a single note or parenthetically on the face of the financial statements, the effect of significant amounts reclassified from each component of accumulated other comprehensive income based on its source and the income statement line item affected by such reclassification. The adoption of this standard had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Segment Disclosure. ASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segment. The Company has determined that it has one reportable segment, with activities related to investing in real estate. The Company’s investments in real estate are geographically diversified and the chief operating decision makers evaluate operating performance on an individual asset level. As each of the Company’s assets has similar economic characteristics, the assets have been aggregated into one reportable segment.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company may maintain deposits in federally insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. However, the Company’s management believes the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held.

As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned ten properties located in Northern New Jersey/New York City, which accounted for approximately 32.5% of its annualized base rent, which is based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of September 30, 2013, excluding any partial or full rent abatements.

Other real estate companies compete with the Company in its real estate markets. This results in competition for tenants to occupy space. The existence of competing properties could have a material impact on the Company’s ability to lease space and on the level of rent that can be achieved. The Company had ten tenants that accounted for approximately 34.1% of the revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the largest of which accounted for approximately 7.5% of rental revenues for the period.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company acquired 5 industrial buildings containing 249,613 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $37.9 million, of which $16.1 million was recorded to land, $19.7 million to buildings and improvements, $2.1 million to intangible assets and $0.1 million to intangible liabilities.

The Company recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 of approximately $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to the above acquisitions.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company acquired 18 industrial buildings containing 1,236,263 square feet, including one redevelopment property that is expected to contain 67,800 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $112.0 million, of which $50.7 million was recorded to land, $56.4 million to buildings and improvements, $4.9 million to intangible assets and $0.5 million to intangible liabilities.

The Company recorded revenues and net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of approximately $2.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively, related to the above acquisitions.

During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company acquired nine industrial building containing 577,261 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $75.6 million, of which $35.8 million was recorded to land, $34.6 million to buildings and improvements, $5.2 million to intangible assets and $1.2 million to intangible liabilities.

The Company recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended September 30, 2012 of approximately $1.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to the above acquisitions.

10

Table of Contents

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company acquired 16 industrial buildings containing 1,353,159 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $150.4 million, of which $73.0 million was recorded to land, $68.9 million to buildings and improvements, $8.5 million to intangible assets and $1.4 million to intangible liabilities.

The Company recorded revenues and net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 of approximately $3.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, related to the above acquisitions.

The above assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value, which uses Level 3 inputs. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand and borrowings under the credit facility and were accounted for as business combinations.

Pro Forma Financial Information:

The following supplementary pro forma financial information presents the results of operations of the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 as if all of the Company’s acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 occurred on January 1, 2012. The following pro forma results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 have been presented for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had all transactions taken place on January 1, 2012, or of future results of operations (dollars in thousands, except per share data).

The Company considers a property to be held for sale when it meets the criteria established under ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are not depreciated while they are held for sale. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has entered into an agreement with a third-party purchaser to sell one property located in the Northern New Jersey/New York City market for a sales price of approximately $19.0 million (net book value of approximately $15.0 million). The sale of the property is subject to the purchaser’s completion of satisfactory due diligence and various closing conditions.

The Company separately reports as discontinued operations the historical operating results attributable to properties sold or held for sale and the applicable gain or loss on the disposition of the properties. Although this application may affect the presentation of the Company’s results of operations for the periods that it has already reported, there will be no effect on its previously reported consolidated financial position, net income (loss) or cash flows.

The following summarizes the condensed results of operations of the property sold in 2012 and the property held for sale as of September 30, 2013, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands):

11

Table of Contents

On January 17, 2013, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Senior Credit Agreement (the “Facility”) with KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent and as a lender, KeyBanc Capital Markets, as a lead arranger and PNC Bank, National Association, Union Bank, N.A. and Regions Bank as lenders (collectively the “Lenders”) to add a five-year $50.0 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) and amend the existing $100.0 million revolving credit facility. The five-year $50.0 million Term Loan maturity date under the Facility is January 16, 2018 and the Term Loan was fully funded during the three months ended June 30, 2013. The aggregate amount of the Facility may be increased to a total of up to $300.0 million, subject to the approval of the administrative agent and the identification of lenders willing to make available additional amounts. The maturity date of the revolving credit facility under the Facility is January 2016, with one 12-month extension option exercisable by the Company, subject, among other things, to there being an absence of an event of default under the Facility and to the payment of an extension fee. Outstanding borrowings under the Facility are limited to the lesser of (i) the sum of the $100.0 million revolving credit facility and the $50.0 million Term Loan amount or (ii) 60.0% of the value of the borrowing base properties. The Facility is secured by a pledge of the borrower’s equity interests in the subsidiaries that hold each of the borrowing base properties. Interest on the Facility, including the Term Loan, is generally to be paid based upon, at the Company’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable base rate which is the greater of the administrative agent’s prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50% above the federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate loans under the Facility. The applicable LIBOR margin will range from 1.65% to 2.65%, depending on the ratio of the Company’s outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of the Company’s consolidated gross asset value. The Facility requires quarterly payments of an annual unused facility fee in an amount equal to 0.25% or 0.35% depending on the unused portion of the Facility. The Facility is guaranteed by the Company and by substantially all of the borrower’s current and to-be-formed subsidiaries that own a “borrowing base property.” The Facility includes a series of financial and other covenants that the Company must comply with in order to borrow under the Facility. As of September 30, 2013, there were no outstanding borrowings on the revolving credit facility under the Facility and $50.0 million of borrowings outstanding on the Term Loan and 16 properties were in the borrowing base. As of December 31, 2012, there were $65.4 million of borrowings outstanding under the Facility. The Company was in compliance with the covenants under the Facility at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

The mortgage loans payable are collateralized by certain of the properties and require monthly interest and principal payments until maturity and are generally non-recourse. The mortgage loans mature between 2014 and 2021. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had nine mortgage loans payable totaling approximately $109.2 million, which bear interest at a weighted average fixed annual rate of 4.5%. As of December 31, 2012 the Company had nine mortgage loans payable totaling approximately $111.6 million, which bore interest at a weighted average fixed annual interest rate of 4.6%. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the total net investment book value of the properties securing the debt was $217.8 million and $219.5 million, respectively.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company capitalized approximately $0.1 million and $0, respectively, and approximately $0.2 million and $0, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, of interest associated with redevelopment activities.

The scheduled principal payments of the Company’s debt as of September 30, 2013 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

12

Table of Contents

The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. On July 11, 2013, the Company completed a public follow-on offering of 5,750,000 shares of its common stock at a price per share of $18.25 including 43,250 shares that were sold in the offering to the Company’s executive and senior officers and members of the board of directors. No underwriting discount or commission was paid on the shares sold to such officers and directors. The net proceeds of the follow-on offering were approximately $99.9 million after deducting the full underwriting discount and offering costs of approximately $5.0 million. The Company used approximately $6.5 million of the net proceeds to repay outstanding borrowings under the Facility and intends to use the remaining net proceeds to acquire industrial properties and for general corporate purposes, which may include the repayment of indebtedness. On February 19, 2013, the Company completed a public follow-on offering of 5,750,000 shares of its common stock at a price per share of $16.60 including 90,325 shares that were sold in the offering to the Company’s executive and senior officers and members of the board of directors. No underwriting discount or commission was paid on the shares sold to such officers and directors. The net proceeds of the follow-on offering were approximately $90.8 million after deducting the full underwriting discount and offering costs of approximately $4.6 million. The Company used approximately $65.4 million of the net proceeds to repay outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the remaining net proceeds to invest in industrial properties and for general business purposes. As of September 30, 2013, 24,990,446 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, including 157,438 non-vested restricted stock awards. As of December 31, 2012, 13,434,558 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, including 149,125 non-vested restricted stock awards.

In connection with the annual meeting of stockholders on May 7, 2013, the Company granted a total of 15,793 shares of unrestricted common stock to its independent directors under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan with a grant date fair value per share of $19.00. The grant date fair value of the unrestricted common stock was determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. The Company recognized approximately $0.3 million in compensation costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 related to this issuance.

On July 19, 2012, the Company completed a public offering of 1,840,000 shares of its 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), including 240,000 shares sold upon the exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional shares, at a price per share of $25.00. The net proceeds of the offering were approximately $44.3 million after deducting the underwriting discount of approximately $1.4 million and other offering expenses of approximately $0.3 million. The Company used the net proceeds to reduce outstanding borrowings under the Facility. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are payable when, as and if authorized by the Company’s board of directors quarterly in arrears on or about the last day of March, June, September and December of each year. The Series A Preferred Stock ranks, with respect to dividend rights and rights upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, senior to the Company’s common stock.

Generally, the Company may not redeem the Series A Preferred Stock prior to July 19, 2017, except in limited circumstances relating to the Company’s ability to qualify as a REIT, and pursuant to a special optional redemption related to a specified change of control (as defined in the articles supplementary for the Series A Preferred Stock). On and after July 19, 2017, the Company may, at its option, redeem the Series A Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus any accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not authorized or declared) up to but excluding the redemption date.

As of September 30, 2013, there were 455,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance as restricted stock grants, unrestricted stock awards or LTIP awards under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, of which 122,126 were remaining to be issued. The grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards issued during the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013 ranged from $14.20 to $20.00. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock was determined using the initial public offering price of $20.00 for grants issued on February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) and for all grants issued after the commencement of operations, the Company uses the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of the restricted stock that was granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $0.8 million and the vesting period for the restricted stock is five years. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had approximately $2.2 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock issuances, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of approximately 2.9 years. The Company recognized compensation costs of approximately $0.2 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and approximately $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 related to the restricted stock issuances. The following is a summary of the total restricted shares granted to the Company’s executive officers and employees with the related weighted average grant date fair value share prices for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

13

Table of Contents

Restricted Stock Activity:

The following is a vesting schedule of the total non-vested shares of restricted stock outstanding as of September 30, 2013:

Long-Term Incentive Plan:

As of September 30, 2013, there are three open performance measurement periods for the LTIP awards: January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013, January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 and January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015. The LTIP awards related to the performance measurement periods from February 16, 2010 to December 31, 2012 resulted in no compensation expense as the compensation committee determined that the Company’s total shareholder return did not exceed the applicable metrics during the performance measurement period. The Company recorded compensation costs of approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and approximately $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 related to the LTIP awards.

Dividends:

The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid or payable per share during the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method of computing earnings per share allocates earnings per share for common stock and any participating securities

14

Table of Contents

according to dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The Company’s non-vested shares of restricted stock are considered participating securities since these share-based awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends irrespective of whether the awards ultimately vest or expire. The Company had no dilutive restricted stock awards outstanding for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

In accordance with the Company’s policies of determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities and accounting for earnings per share, the net and comprehensive income (loss) per common share is adjusted for earnings distributed through declared dividends (if any) and allocated to all participating securities (weighted average common shares outstanding and unvested restricted shares outstanding) under the two-class method. Under this method, allocations were made to 157,562 and 0 of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 155,946 and 0 of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Contractual Commitments. As of November 6, 2013, the Company had five outstanding contracts with third-party sellers to acquire five industrial properties consisting of 351,851 square feet. There is no assurance that the Company will acquire the properties under contract because the proposed acquisitions are subject to the completion of satisfactory due diligence, various closing conditions and with respect to one of the properties, the consent of the mortgage lender. The following table summarizes certain information with respect to the properties the Company has under contract:

As of November 6, 2013, the Company has entered into an agreement with a third-party purchaser to sell one property located in the Northern New Jersey/New York City market for a sales price of approximately $19.0 million. There is no assurance that the Company will complete the sale of the property under contract because the proposed sale is subject to the purchaser’s completion of satisfactory due diligence and various closing conditions.

On October 17, 2013, the Company acquired two industrial buildings located in Carlstadt, New Jersey containing 90,225 square feet for a total purchase price of approximately $9.9 million. The properties were acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand.

On November 5, 2013, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.13 per share of its common stock payable on January 14, 2014 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2013.

On November 5, 2013, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.484375 per share of its Series A Preferred Stock payable on December 31, 2013 to the preferred stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 11, 2013.

15

Table of Contents

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We caution investors that forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and on assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “might”, “plan”, “project”, “result”, “should”, “will”, “seek”, “target”, “see”, “likely”, “position”, “opportunity” and similar expressions which do not relate solely to historical matters are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties, and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

16

Table of Contents

Overview

Terreno Realty Corporation (“Terreno”, and together with its subsidiaries, “we”, “us”, “our”, “our Company”, or “the Company”) acquires, owns and operates industrial real estate in six major coastal U.S. markets: Los Angeles; Northern New Jersey/New York City; San Francisco Bay Area; Seattle; Miami; and Washington, D.C./Baltimore. We invest in several types of industrial real estate, including warehouse/distribution, flex (including light industrial and research and development, or R&D) and trans-shipment. We target functional buildings in infill locations that may be shared by multiple tenants and that cater to customer demand within the various submarkets in which we operate. Infill locations are geographic locations surrounded by high concentrations of already developed land and existing buildings. As of September 30, 2013, we owned a total of 85 buildings aggregating approximately 6.3 million square feet, which we purchased for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $532.9 million, including the assumption of mortgage loans payable of approximately $55.1 million, which includes mortgage premiums of approximately $1.5 million. As of September 30, 2013, our properties were approximately 88.6% leased to 172 tenants, the largest of which accounted for approximately 7.0% of our total annualized based rent. We are an internally managed Maryland corporation and elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2010.

The following table summarizes by market our investments in real estate as of September 30, 2013:

17

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes our capital expenditures incurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands):

Our industrial properties are typically subject to leases on a “triple net basis,” in which tenants pay their proportionate share of real estate taxes, insurance and operating costs, or are subject to leases on a “modified gross basis,” in which tenants pay expenses over certain threshold levels. In addition, approximately 76.9% of our leased space includes fixed rental increases or Consumer Price Index-based rental increases. Lease terms typically range from three to ten years. We monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of our tenants on an on-going basis by reviewing outstanding accounts receivable balances, and as provided under the respective lease agreements, review the tenant’s financial condition periodically as appropriate. As needed, we hold discussions with the tenant’s management about their business and we conduct site visits of the tenant’s operations.

Our top 20 tenants based on annualized base rent as of September 30, 2013 are as follows:

18

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the anticipated lease expirations for leases in place at September 30, 2013, without giving effect to the exercise of unexercised renewal options or termination rights, if any, at or prior to the scheduled expirations:

Our ability to re-lease or renew expiring space at rental rates equal to or in excess of current rental rates will impact our results of operations. As of September 30, 2013, leases representing approximately 2.8% of the total rentable square footage of our portfolio are scheduled to expire during the year ending December 31, 2013. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we signed 37 leases, comprising approximately 1.6 million square feet, of which approximately 0.5 million square feet commences in future quarters. In general, we continue to see improving demand for industrial space in most of our markets. We currently expect that, on average, the rental rates we are likely to achieve on any new (re-leased) or renewed leases for our 2013 expirations will generally be at or above the rates currently being paid for the same space. Our past performance may not be indicative of future results, and we cannot assure you that leases will be renewed or that our properties will be re-leased at all or at rental rates equal to or slightly below the current average rental rates. Further, re-leased/renewed rental rates in a particular market may not be consistent with rental rates across our portfolio as a whole and re-leased/renewed rental rates for particular properties within a market may not be consistent with rental rates across our portfolio within a particular market, in each case due to a number of factors, including local real estate conditions, local supply and demand for industrial space, the condition of the property, the impact of leasing incentives, including free rent and tenant improvements and whether the property, or space within the property, has been redeveloped.

Recent Developments

Acquisition Activity

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we acquired 5 industrial buildings containing 249,613 square feet for a total purchase price of approximately $37.8 million. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand and borrowings under our credit facility. The following table sets forth the wholly-owned industrial properties we acquired during the three months ended September 30, 2013:

19

Table of Contents

Subsequent to September 30, 2013, we acquired two industrial buildings for a total purchase price of approximately $9.9 million. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand. The following table sets forth the wholly-owned industrial properties we acquired subsequent to September 30, 2013:

Public Follow-on Offering

On July 11, 2013, we completed a public follow-on offering of 5,750,000 shares of our common stock at a price per share of $18.25, including 43,250 shares that were sold in the offering to our executive and senior officers and members of our board of directors. No underwriting discount or commission was paid on the shares sold to such officers and directors. The net proceeds of the offering were approximately $99.9 million after deducting the underwriting discount and offering costs of approximately $5.0 million. We used approximately $6.5 million of the net proceeds to repay outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility and intend to use the remaining net proceeds to acquire industrial properties and for general corporate purposes, which may include the repayment of indebtedness.

Term Loan and Amendment to Senior Credit Agreement

On January 17, 2013, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Senior Credit Agreement (the “Facility”) with KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent and as a lender, KeyBanc Capital Markets, as a lead arranger, and PNC Bank, National Association, Union Bank, N.A. and Regions Bank as lenders to add a five-year $50.0 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) and amend our existing $100.0 million revolving credit facility.

The $50.0 million Term Loan maturity date under the Facility is January 16, 2018 and the Term Loan was fully funded during the three months ended June 30, 2013. The amendment extends the maturity date for the $100.0 million revolving credit facility under the Facility to January 2016 and provides for one 12-month extension option exercisable by us, subject, among other things, to there being an absence of an event of default under the Facility and to our payment of an extension fee. Interest on the Facility, including the Term Loan, will continue to generally be paid based upon, at our option, either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable base rate which is the greater of the administrative agent’s prime rate plus 1.00%, 0.50% above the federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate loans under the Facility. The applicable LIBOR margin was reduced to a range from 1.65% to 2.65% depending on the ratio of our outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of our consolidated gross asset value. The aggregate amount of the Facility may be increased to a total of up to $300.0 million, subject to the approval of the administrative agent and the identification of lenders willing to make available additional amounts. The Facility continues to be guaranteed by the Company and by substantially all of the borrower’s current and to-be-formed subsidiaries that own a “borrowing base property.” In addition, the Facility continues to be secured by a pledge of the equity interests of the borrower (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company) in the subsidiaries that hold each of the borrowing base properties. Outstanding borrowings under the Facility are limited to the lesser of (i) the sum of the $100.0 million revolving credit facility amount and the $50.0 million Term Loan amount or (ii) 60% of the value of the borrowing base properties. As of September 30, 2013, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility under the Facility and $50.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the Term Loan.

20

Table of Contents

Tenant Default

On January 29, 2013, we filed a one count eviction action against Banah International Group (“Banah”), our tenant at 10^th Avenue located in Hialeah, FL for failure to pay December 2012 and January 2013 rent. On February 21, 2013, the state court entered a default judgment for possession against Banah. Later that same day, Banah filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and has subsequently extended the deadline to affirm or reject the lease until November 18, 2013. Banah may move for an extension of the deadline to affirm or reject the lease, subject to court approval, and we have agreed to permit such extension as long as Banah remains current on its rent obligations. Banah has paid rent for the period from February 21, 2013 through November 30, 2013. It cannot be determined currently if Banah will affirm or reject the lease, or continue to pay rent, in bankruptcy. Therefore, at September 30, 2013, the lease is recorded as a month-to-month lease and revenue is recognized as cash is received. Any ultimate recovery of damages, including past due rent, is undetermined at this time.

Dividend and Distribution Activity

On August 6, 2013, our board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.13 per share of our common stock payable on October 21, 2013 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 7, 2013.

On August 6, 2013, our board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.484375 per share of our Series A Preferred Stock payable on September 30, 2013 to the preferred stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 11, 2013.

On November 5, 2013, our board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.13 per share of its common stock payable on January 14, 2014 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2013.

On November 5, 2013, our board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.484375 per share of its Series A Preferred Stock payable on December 31, 2013 to the preferred stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 11, 2013.

Contractual Commitments

As of November 6, 2013, we had five outstanding contracts with third-party sellers to acquire six industrial buildings and one outstanding contract with a third-party purchaser to sell one property as described under the heading “Contractual Obligations” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There is no assurance that we will acquire or sell the properties under contract because the proposed acquisitions and disposition are subject to the completion of satisfactory due diligence, various closing conditions and, with respect to the acquisitions, the consent of the mortgage lender.

Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We derive substantially all of our revenues from rents received from tenants under existing leases on each of our properties. These revenues include fixed base rents and recoveries of certain property operating expenses that we have incurred and that we pass through to the individual tenants. Approximately 76.9% of our leased space includes fixed rental increases or Consumer Price Index-based rental increases. Lease terms typically range from three to ten years.

Our primary cash expenses consist of our property operating expenses, which include: real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance, management expenses, insurance, utilities, general and administrative expenses, which include compensation costs, office expenses, professional fees and other administrative expenses, acquisition costs, which include third-party costs paid to brokers and consultants, and interest expense, primarily on mortgage loans and our Facility.

Our consolidated results of operations often are not comparable from period to period due to the impact of property acquisitions at various times during the course of such periods. The results of operations of any acquired property are included in our financial statements as of the date of its acquisition.

The analysis of our results below for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 includes the changes attributable to same store properties. The same store pool for the comparison of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 includes all properties that were owned and in operation as of September 30, 2013 and since January 1, 2012 and excludes properties that were either disposed of or held for sale to a third party. As of September 30, 2013, the same store pool consisted of 44 buildings aggregating approximately 3.1 million square feet. As of September 30, 2013, the non-same store properties, which we acquired or disposed of during the course of 2012 and 2013, consisted of 41 buildings aggregating approximately 3.2 million square feet. As of September 30, 2013, the consolidated same store pool occupancy was approximately 90.2%.

21

Table of Contents

Our future financial condition and results of operations, including rental revenues, straight-line rents and amortization of lease intangibles, may be impacted by the acquisitions of additional properties, and expenses may vary materially from historical results.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012: