Terreno Realty Corp - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

OR

For the transition period from                     to                    

Commission file number 001-34603

Terreno Realty Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (415) 655-4580

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☑    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☑    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☑

The registrant had 52,362,553 shares of its common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding as of July 31, 2017.

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Table of Contents

1

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements of Terreno Realty Corporation

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands – except share and per share data)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands – except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Statement of Equity

(in thousands – except share data)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying condensed notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Terreno Realty Corporation

Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Terreno Realty Corporation (“Terreno”, and together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) acquires, owns and operates industrial real estate in six major coastal U.S. markets: Los Angeles, Northern New Jersey/New York City, San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, Miami, and Washington, D.C. All square feet, acres, occupancy and number of properties disclosed in these notes to the consolidated financial statements are unaudited. As of June 30, 2017, the Company owned 178 buildings (including three buildings held for sale) aggregating approximately 12.7 million square feet and seven improved land parcels consisting of approximately 40.5 acres.

The Company commenced operations upon completion of an initial public offering and a concurrent private placement of common stock purchased by the Company’s executive management on February 16, 2010. The Company is an internally managed Maryland corporation and elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010.

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. In management’s opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The interim consolidated financial statements include all of the Company’s accounts and its subsidiaries and all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements contained in the Company’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the notes thereto, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2017.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Capitalization of Costs. The Company capitalizes costs directly related to the redevelopment, renovation and expansion of its investment in real estate. Costs associated with such projects are capitalized as incurred. If the project is abandoned, these costs are expensed during the period in which the redevelopment or expansion project is abandoned. Costs considered for capitalization include, but are not limited to, construction costs, interest, real estate taxes and insurance, if appropriate. These costs are capitalized only during the period in which activities necessary to ready an asset for its intended use are in progress. In the event that the activities to ready the asset for its intended use are suspended, the capitalization period will cease until such activities are resumed. Costs incurred for maintaining and repairing properties, which do not extend their useful lives, are expensed as incurred.

Interest is capitalized based on actual capital expenditures from the period when redevelopment, renovation or expansion commences until the asset is ready for its intended use, at the weighted average borrowing rate during the period.

Investments in Real Estate. Investments in real estate, including tenant improvements, leasehold improvements and leasing costs, are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation, unless circumstances indicate that the cost cannot be recovered, in which case, an adjustment to the carrying value of the property is made to reduce it to its estimated fair value. The Company also reviews the impact of above and below-market leases, in-place leases and lease origination costs for acquisitions and records an intangible asset or liability accordingly.

7

Table of Contents

Impairment. Carrying values for financial reporting purposes are reviewed for impairment on a property-by-property basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a property may not be fully recoverable. Examples of such events or changes in circumstances may include classifying an asset to be held for sale, changing the intended hold period or when an asset remains vacant significantly longer than expected. The intended use of an asset either held for sale or held for use can significantly impact how impairment is measured. If an asset is intended to be held for the long-term, the recoverability is based on the undiscounted future cash flows. If the asset carrying value is not supported on an undiscounted future cash flow basis, then the asset carrying value is measured against the lower of cost or the present value of expected cash flows over the expected hold period. An impairment charge to earnings is recognized for the excess of the asset’s carrying value over the lower of cost or the present values of expected cash flows over the expected hold period. If an asset is intended to be sold, impairment is determined using the estimated fair value less costs to sell. The estimation of expected future net cash flows is inherently uncertain and relies on assumptions, among other things, regarding current and future economic and market conditions and the availability of capital. The Company determines the estimated fair values based on its assumptions regarding rental rates, lease-up and holding periods, as well as sales prices. When available, current market information is used to determine capitalization and rental growth rates. If available, current comparative sales values may also be used to establish fair value. When market information is not readily available, the inputs are based on the Company’s understanding of market conditions and the experience of the Company’s management team. Actual results could differ significantly from the Company’s estimates. The discount rates used in the fair value estimates represent a rate commensurate with the indicated holding period with a premium layered on for risk. There were no impairment charges recorded during the three or six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016.

Property Acquisitions. Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-1, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business which requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the integrated set of assets and activities is not considered a business. To be a business, the set of acquired activities and assets must include inputs and one or more substantive processes that together contribute to the ability to create outputs. The Company has determined that its real estate property acquisitions will generally be accounted for as asset acquisitions under the clarified definition. Prior to January 1, 2017 the Company generally accounted for property acquisitions as business combinations, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations. Upon acquisition of a property the Company estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets (consisting generally of land, buildings and improvements) and intangible assets and liabilities (consisting generally of the above and below-market leases and the origination value of all in-place leases). The Company determines fair values using Level 3 inputs such as replacement cost, estimated cash flow projections and other valuation techniques and applying appropriate discount and capitalization rates based on available market information. Mortgage loans assumed in connection with acquisitions are recorded at their fair value using current market interest rates for similar debt at the date of acquisition. Acquisition-related costs associated with asset acquisitions are capitalized to individual assets (typically land and building) and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis and acquisition-related costs associated with business combinations are expensed as incurred.

The fair value of the tangible assets is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Land values are derived from current comparative sales values, when available, or management’s estimates of the fair value based on market conditions and the experience of the Company’s management team. Building and improvement values are calculated as replacement cost less depreciation, or management’s estimates of the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flow analyses or similar methods. The fair value of the above and below-market leases is based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amounts to be received pursuant to the acquired leases (using a discount rate that reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) and the Company’s estimate of the market lease rates measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the leases plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options. The above and below-market lease values are amortized to rental revenues over the remaining initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed rate renewal options that are considered bargain renewal options of the respective leases. The total net impact to rental revenues due to the amortization of above and below-market leases was a net increase of approximately $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and approximately $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. The origination value of in-place leases is based on costs to execute similar leases, including commissions and other related costs. The origination value of in-place leases also includes real estate taxes, insurance and an estimate of lost rental revenue at market rates during the estimated time required to lease up the property from vacant to the occupancy level at the date of acquisition. The remaining weighted average lease term related to these intangible assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2017 is 9.2 years. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s intangible assets and liabilities, including properties held for sale (if any), consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

8

Table of Contents

Depreciation and Useful Lives of Real Estate and Intangible Assets. Depreciation and amortization are computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets or liabilities. The following table reflects the standard depreciable lives typically used to compute depreciation and amortization. However, such depreciable lives may be different based on the estimated useful life of such assets or liabilities.

Discontinued Operations. The Company considers a property to be classified as discontinued operations when it meets the criteria established under ASU 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360), Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. Disposals that represent a strategic shift that should have or will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results qualify as discontinued operations.

Held for Sale Assets. The Company considers a property to be held for sale when it meets the criteria established under ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment (Note 5). Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are not depreciated while they are held for sale.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consists of cash held in a major banking institution and other highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are generally invested in U.S. government securities, government agency securities or money market accounts.

Restricted Cash. Restricted cash includes cash held in escrow in connection with property acquisitions and reserves for certain capital improvements, leasing, interest and real estate tax and insurance payments as required by certain mortgage loan obligations.

9

Table of Contents

The following summarizes the reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows:

Revenue Recognition. The Company records rental revenue from operating leases on a straight-line basis over the term of the leases and maintains an allowance for estimated losses that may result from the inability of its tenants to make required payments. If tenants fail to make contractual lease payments that are greater than the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts, security deposits and letters of credit, then the Company may have to recognize additional doubtful account charges in future periods. The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants on an on-going basis by reviewing their financial condition periodically as appropriate. Each period the Company reviews its outstanding accounts receivable, including straight-line rents, for doubtful accounts and provides allowances as needed. The Company also records lease termination fees when a tenant has executed a definitive termination agreement with the Company and the payment of the termination fee is not subject to any conditions that must be met or waived before the fee is due to the Company. If a tenant remains in the leased space following the execution of a definitive termination agreement, the applicable termination will be deferred and recognized over the term of such tenant’s occupancy.

Tenant expense reimbursement income includes payments and amounts due from tenants pursuant to their leases for real estate taxes, insurance and other recoverable property operating expenses and is recognized as revenues during the same period the related expenses are incurred.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, approximately $26.5 million and $21.6 million, respectively, of straight-line rent and accounts receivable, net of allowances of approximately $0.2 million and $0.4 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were included as a component of other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Deferred Financing Costs. Costs incurred in connection with financings are capitalized and amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the related loan. Deferred financing costs associated with the revolving credit facility are classified as an asset and deferred financing costs associated with debt liabilities are reported as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the debt liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Deferred financing costs related to the revolving credit facility and debt liabilities are shown at cost, net of accumulated amortization in the aggregate of approximately $5.1 million and $4.5 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Mortgage Premiums. Mortgage premiums represent the excess of the fair value of debt assumed over the principal value of debt assumed in connection with property acquisitions. The mortgage premiums are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the related debt instrument using the effective interest method. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the mortgage premiums were fully amortized.

Income Taxes. The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Code and operates as such beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 2010. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to its stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax to the extent it distributes qualifying dividends to its stockholders. If it fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost unless the IRS grants it relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes it is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT.

10

Table of Contents

ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740-10 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold are recorded as a tax expense in the current year. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and does not believe that there will be any material changes in unrecognized tax positions over the next 12 months. The Company’s tax returns are subject to examination by federal, state and local tax jurisdictions beginning with the 2010 calendar year.

Stock-Based Compensation and Other Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The Company follows the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation, to account for its stock-based compensation plan, which requires that the compensation cost relating to stock-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements and that the cost be measured on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company has adopted the Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, which provides for the grant of restricted stock awards, performance share awards, unrestricted shares or any combination of the foregoing. Stock-based compensation is recognized as a general and administrative expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and measured at the fair value of the award on the date of grant. The Company estimates the forfeiture rate based on historical experience as well as expected behavior. The amount of the expense may be subject to adjustment in future periods depending on the specific characteristics of the stock-based award.

In addition, the Company has awarded long-term incentive target awards (the “Performance Share awards”) to its executives that may be payable in shares of the Company’s common stock after the conclusion of each pre-established performance measurement period, which is generally three years. The amount that may be earned under the Performance Share awards is variable depending on the relative total shareholder return of the Company’s common stock as compared to the total shareholder return of the MSCI U.S. REIT Index (RMS) and the FTSE NAREIT Equity Industrial Index over the pre-established performance measurement period. The Company estimates the fair value of the Performance Share awards using a Monte Carlo simulation model on the date of grant and at each reporting period. The Performance Share awards are recognized as compensation expense over the requisite performance period based on the fair value of the Performance Share awards at the balance sheet date and vary quarter to quarter based on the Company’s relative share price performance.

Use of Derivative Financial Instruments. ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (Note 7), provides the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedging activities with the intent to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of: (a) how and why the Company uses derivative instruments, (b) how the Company accounts for derivative instruments and related hedged items, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the Company’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. Further, qualitative disclosures are required that explain the Company’s objectives and strategies for using derivatives, as well as quantitative disclosures about the fair value of and gains and losses on derivative instruments.

The Company records all derivatives on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had three interest rate caps to hedge the variable cash flows associated with its existing $150.0 million of variable-rate term loans. The caps have a notional value of $150.0 million and will effectively cap the annual interest rate at 4.0% plus 1.30% to 1.85%, depending on leverage, with respect to $50.0 million for the period from December 1, 2014 (effective date) to May 1, 2021, $50.0 million for the period from September 1, 2015 (effective date) to April 1, 2019, and $50.0 million for the period from September 1, 2015 (effective date) to February 3, 2020. The Company records all derivative instruments on a gross basis in other assets on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, and accordingly, there are no offsetting amounts that net assets against liabilities. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of the interest rate caps was approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

11

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments. ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Note 8), defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 also provides guidance for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).

New Accounting Standards. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, which created ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which is their final standard on revenue from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenues arising from contracts with customers. The effective date of ASU 2014-09 was deferred by the issuance of ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, by one year to make the guidance of ASU 2014-09 effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim period therein. Early adoption is permitted but not prior to the original effective date, which was for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company will adopt the guidance effective January 1, 2018 and is currently assessing the impact, including the transition method that will be used, on its consolidated financial statements and notes to its consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which clarifies how to apply the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations related to the sale of goods or services to a customer as updated by ASU 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing, which clarifies two aspects of Topic 606: (1) identifying performance obligations and (2) the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-10 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in ASU 2015-14. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, which makes narrow scope amendments to Topic 606 including implementation issues on collectability, non-cash consideration and completed contracts at transition. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which make additional narrow scope amendments to Topic 606 including loan guarantee fees, impairment testing of contract costs, provisions for losses on construction-type and production-type contracts. The FASB allows two adoption methods under ASU 2014-09. Under one method, a company will apply the rules to contracts in all reporting periods presented, subject to certain allowable exceptions. Under the other method, a company will apply the rules to all contracts existing as of January 1, 2018, recognizing in beginning retained earnings an adjustment for the cumulative effect of the change and providing additional disclosures comparing results to previous rules (“modified retrospective method”). The Company will adopt these updates beginning with the first quarter of its fiscal year 2018 and anticipates doing so using the modified retrospective method. Currently, the Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company’s assessment efforts to date have included reviewing current accounting policies and processes, as well assigning internal resources to assist in the process. Additionally, the Company is in the process of reviewing historical contracts and other arrangements to identify potential differences that could arise from the adoption of ASU 2014-09. The Company believes the effects on its existing accounting policies will be associated with the amount and timing of historical real estate sales contracts and associated gain recognitions. As the Company progresses further in its analysis, the scope of this assessment could be expanded to include other contract elements that could have an accounting impact under the new standard. The Company is also continuing to assess the potential effects that this new standard is expected to have on its consolidated financial statements as it relates to its leasing arrangements with its tenants and in concert with its assessment and anticipated adoption of the new leasing guidance under ASU 2016-02, Leases (see below). The ultimate impacts are currently unknown or not reasonably estimable at this time. The Company continues to evaluate other areas of the standard and is currently assessing the impact on its consolidated financial statements and notes to its consolidated financial statements and cannot reasonably estimate quantitative information related to the impact of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements at this time.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The ASU increases transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The standard requires that non-lease components, such as tenant expense reimbursement revenues, be accounted for in accordance with ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (see above), which could change the classification and timing of its non-lease components. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years, which for the Company would be the first quarter of 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential changes to its accounting and whether such changes will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements and notes to its consolidated financial statements.

12

Table of Contents

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides clarified guidance on the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adopting ASU 2016-15 on its consolidated financial statements and notes to its consolidated financial statements, but does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. As a result, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments do not provide a definition of restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. The Company elected to early adopt the provisions of ASU 2016-18 as of March 31, 2017, and has revised its consolidated statements of cash flows for the period ended June 30, 2016 to reflect amounts described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents included with cash and cash equivalents in the reconciliation of beginning of period and end of period total amounts shown on the consolidated statements of cash flows. Consequently, transfers between cash and restricted cash will not be presented as a separate line item in the operating, investing or financing sections of the cash flow statement. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash as presented on the consolidated balance sheets to the consolidated statements of cash flows is included in the significant accounting policies above.

Segment Disclosure. ASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segments. The Company has determined that it has one reportable segment, with activities related to investing in real estate. The Company’s investments in real estate are geographically diversified and the chief operating decision makers evaluate operating performance on an individual asset level. As each of the Company’s assets has similar economic characteristics, the assets have been aggregated into one reportable segment.

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company may maintain deposits in federally insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. However, the Company’s management believes the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company owned 52 buildings and approximately 3.1 million square feet located in Northern New Jersey/New York City, which accounted for approximately 24.8% of its annualized base rent and 28 buildings and approximately 2.8 million square feet located in Washington, D.C., which accounted for approximately 21.6% of its annualized base rent. Such annualized base rent percentages are based on contractual base rent from leases in effect as of June 30, 2017, excluding any partial or full rent abatements.

Other real estate companies compete with the Company in its real estate markets. This results in competition for tenants to occupy space. The existence of competing properties could have a material impact on the Company’s ability to lease space and on the level of rent that can be achieved. The Company had no tenants that accounted for greater than 10% of its rental revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company acquired 11 industrial buildings containing approximately 807,000 square feet and two land parcels containing approximately 17.8 acres. The total aggregate initial investment, including acquisition costs, was approximately $140.8 million, of which $102.7 million was recorded to land, $31.2 million to buildings and improvements, $6.9 million to intangible assets and $17.3 million to intangible liabilities.

13

Table of Contents

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the company acquired 13 industrial buildings containing approximately 898,000 square feet and two land parcels containing approximately 17.8 acres. The total aggregate initial investment, including acquisition costs, was approximately $155.9 million, of which $112.3 million was recorded to land, $36.7 million to buildings and improvements, $6.9 million to intangible assets and $17.3 million to intangible liabilities.

The Company recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended June 30, 2017 of approximately $1.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and recorded revenues and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2017 of approximately $1.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to the 2017 acquisitions.

During the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company acquired four industrial buildings containing approximately 162,000 square feet. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $21.4 million, of which $9.9 million was recorded to land, $9.7 million to buildings and improvements, $1.8 million to intangible assets and $0.5 million to intangible liabilities.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company acquired seven industrial buildings containing approximately 287,000 square feet and one improved land parcel containing approximately 4.5 acres. The total aggregate initial investment was approximately $49.3 million, of which $26.6 million was recorded to land, $19.6 million to buildings and improvements, $3.1 million to intangible assets and $1.2 million to intangible liabilities.

The Company recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended June 30, 2016 of approximately $0.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively, and recorded revenues and net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 of approximately $0.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to the 2016 acquisitions.

The above assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value, which uses Level 3 inputs. The properties were acquired from unrelated third parties using existing cash on hand, proceeds from property sales, issuance of common stock and borrowings on the revolving credit facility. Effective January 1, 2017, the Company adopted ASU 2017-1, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business under which property acquisitions are generally accounted for as asset acquisitions resulting in the capitalization of acquisition costs as part of the purchase price of the acquisition, instead of being expensed as incurred. Prior to January 1, 2017 the Company accounted for property acquisitions as business combinations, in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, resulting in the expense of acquisition costs as incurred.

During 2016, the Company completed redevelopment of its South Main Street property in Carson, California. The Company demolished three buildings totaling approximately 186,000 square feet, constructed a new front-load industrial distribution building containing approximately 210,000 square foot and renovated an existing approximately 34,000 square foot office building. The Company capitalized interest associated with redevelopment and expansion activities of approximately $0 and $0.2 million, respectively, during the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and $0 and $0.4 million, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. The redevelopment cost was approximately $17.8 million for a total investment of approximately $39.3 million, excluding approximately $2.3 million of intangible liabilities.

Pro Forma Financial Information:

The following supplementary pro forma financial information presents the results of operations of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 as if all of the Company’s acquisitions during the six months ended June 30, 2017 occurred on January 1, 2016. The following pro forma results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 have been presented for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had all transactions taken place on January 1, 2016, or of future results of operations (dollars in thousands, except per share data).

14

Table of Contents

The Company considers a property to be held for sale when it meets the criteria established under ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. Properties held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are not depreciated while they are held for sale. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has entered into an agreement with a third-party purchaser to sell two properties located in the Washington, D.C. market for an aggregate sales price of approximately $40.5 million (net book value of approximately $23.2 million). The sales of the properties are subject to various closing conditions.

The following summarizes the condensed results of operations of the properties held for sale as of June 30, 2017, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company sold one property located in the Los Angeles market for a sales price of approximately $25.3 million, resulting in a gain of approximately $10.1 million.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had $50.0 million of senior unsecured notes that mature in September 2022, $50.0 million of senior unsecured notes that mature in July 2026, $50.0 million of senior unsecured notes that mature in October 2027 (collectively, the “Senior Unsecured Notes”), and a credit facility (the “Facility”), which consists of a $200.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility that matures in August 2020, a $50.0 million term loan that matures in August 2021 and a $100.0 million term loan that matures in January 2022. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there was $21.0 million and $51.5 million, respectively, of borrowings outstanding on the revolving credit facility and $150.0 million and $150.0 million, respectively, of borrowings outstanding on the term loans. As of both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had three interest rate caps to hedge the variable cash flows associated with its existing $150.0 million of variable-rate term loans. See “Note 7-Derivative Financial Instruments” for more information regarding the Company’s interest rate caps.

The aggregate amount of the Facility may be increased to a total of up to $600.0 million, subject to the approval of the administrative agent and the identification of lenders willing to make available additional amounts. Outstanding borrowings under the Facility are limited to the lesser of (i) the sum of the $150.0 million of term loans and the $200.0 million revolving credit facility, or (ii) 60.0% of the value of the unencumbered properties. Interest on the Facility, including the term loans, is generally to be paid based upon, at the Company’s option, either (i) LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin or (ii) the applicable base rate which is the greatest of the administrative agent’s prime rate, 0.50% above the federal funds effective rate, or thirty-day LIBOR plus the applicable LIBOR margin for LIBOR rate loans under the Facility plus 1.25%. The applicable LIBOR margin will range from 1.35% to 1.90% (1.35% as of June 30, 2017) for the revolving credit facility and 1.30% to 1.85% (1.30% as of June 30, 2017) for the $50.0 million term loan that matures in August 2021 and the $100.0 million term loan that matures in January 2022, depending on the ratio of the Company’s outstanding consolidated indebtedness to the value of the Company’s consolidated gross asset value. The Facility requires quarterly payments of an annual unused facility fee in an amount equal to 0.20% or 0.25% depending on the unused portion of the Facility.

15

Table of Contents

The Facility and the Senior Unsecured Notes are guaranteed by the Company and by substantially all of the current and to-be-formed subsidiaries of the borrower that own an unencumbered property. The Facility and the Senior Unsecured Notes are unsecured by the Company’s properties or by interests in the subsidiaries that hold such properties. The Facility and the Senior Unsecured Notes include a series of financial and other covenants with which the Company must comply. The Company was in compliance with the covenants under the Facility and the Senior Unsecured Notes as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The Company has mortgage loans payable which are collateralized by certain of the properties and require monthly interest and principal payments until maturity and are generally non-recourse. The mortgage loans mature between 2019 and 2021. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had three mortgage loans payable, net of deferred financings costs, totaling approximately $65.7 million, which bear interest at a weighted average fixed annual rate of 4.0%. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had four mortgage loans payable, net of deferred financing costs, totaling approximately $66.6 million, which bore interest at a weighted average fixed annual interest rate of 4.0%. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the total net book value of the properties securing the debt was approximately $133.8 million and $144.4 million, respectively.

The scheduled principal payments of the Company’s debt as of June 30, 2017 were as follows (dollars in thousands):

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives

The Company is exposed to certain risk arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing, and duration of its known or expected cash payments principally related to its borrowings.

Derivative Instruments

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate caps involve the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty at the end of each period in which the interest rate exceeds the agreed fixed price. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. The Company requires that hedging derivative instruments be highly effective in reducing the risk exposure that they are designated to hedge. As a result, there is no significant ineffectiveness from any of its derivative activities.

16

Table of Contents

The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. For a derivative that is designated and that qualifies as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”). Amounts recorded in AOCI are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had three interest rate caps to hedge the variable cash flows associated with its existing $150.0 million of variable-rate term loans. The caps have a notional value of $150.0 million and will effectively cap the annual interest rate payable at 4.0% plus 1.30% to 1.85%, depending on leverage, with respect to $50.0 million for the period from December 1, 2014 (effective date) to May 1, 2021, $50.0 million for the period from September 1, 2015 (effective date) to April 1, 2019 and $50.0 million for the period from September 1, 2015 (effective date) to February 3, 2020. The Company is required to make certain monthly variable rate payments on the term loans, while the applicable counterparty is obligated to make certain monthly floating rate payments based on LIBOR to the Company in the event LIBOR is greater than 4.0%, referencing the same notional amount.

The Company records all derivative instruments on a gross basis in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets, and accordingly, there are no offsetting amounts that net assets against liabilities. The following table presents a summary of the Company’s derivative instruments designated as hedging instruments (dollars in thousands):

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualified as cash flow hedges is recorded in AOCI and will be reclassified to interest expense in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings on the Company’s variable rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings into interest expense.

17

Table of Contents

The following table presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on its accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

The Company estimates that approximately $0.2 million will be reclassified from AOCI as an increase to interest expense over the next twelve months.

ASC 820 requires disclosure of the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, including measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1), quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active (Level 2), and significant valuation assumptions that are not readily observable in the market (Level 3).

Recurring Measurements – Interest Rate Contracts

Fair Value of Interest Rate Caps

Currently, the Company uses interest rate cap agreements to manage its interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivatives. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves. As of June 30, 2017, the Company applied the provisions of this standard to the valuation of its interest rate caps.

The following sets forth the Company’s financial instruments that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

Financial Instruments Disclosed at Fair Value

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these investments or liabilities based on Level 1 inputs. The fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments were evaluated based on Level 2 inputs. The fair values of the Company’s mortgage loans payable and Senior Unsecured Notes were estimated by calculating the present value of principal and interest payments, based on borrowing rates available to the Company, which are Level 2 inputs, adjusted with a credit spread, as applicable, and assuming the loans are outstanding through maturity. The fair value of the Company’s Facility approximated its carrying value because the variable interest rates approximate market borrowing rates available to the Company, which are Level 2 inputs.

18

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the Company’s debt as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

The Company’s authorized capital stock consists of 400,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share. The Company had an at-the-market equity offering program (the “ATM Program”) pursuant to which the Company could issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $150.0 million in amounts and at times determined by the Company from time to time. The ATM Program was fully utilized as of June 30, 2017. Prior to the implementation of the ATM Program, the Company had a $100.0 million ATM program (the “Prior ATM Program”), which was fully utilized as of December 31, 2016. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,788,986 and 4,836,086 shares, respectively, of common stock at a weighted average offering price of $32.05 and $30.06 per share, respectively, under the ATM Program, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $88.1 million and $143.3 million, respectively, and paying total compensation to the applicable sales agents of approximately $1.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,578,640 and 2,629,608 shares, respectively, of common stock at a weighted average offering price of $24.27 and $24.26 per share, respectively, under the Prior ATM Program, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $61.6 million and $62.8 million, respectively, and paying total compensation to the applicable sales agents of approximately $1.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

The Company has a share repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to 2,000,000 shares of its outstanding common stock from time to time through December 31, 2018. Purchases made pursuant to the program will be made in either the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by federal securities laws and other legal requirements. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchases will be determined by the Company in its discretion and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The program may be suspended or discontinued at any time. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has not repurchased any shares of stock pursuant to its share repurchase authorization.

In connection with the annual meeting of stockholders on May 2, 2017, the Company granted a total of 10,988 shares of unrestricted common stock to its independent directors under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Incentive Plan with a grant date fair value per share of $30.95. The grant date fair value of the unrestricted common stock was determined using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. The Company recognized approximately $0.3 million in compensation costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 related to this issuance.

As of both June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, 1,840,000 shares of 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) were issued and outstanding. Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are payable when, as and if authorized by the Company’s board of directors quarterly in arrears on or about the last day of March, June, September and December of each year. The Series A Preferred Stock ranks, with respect to dividend rights and rights upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding-up, senior to the Company’s common stock.

On July 19, 2017, the Company redeemed all 1,840,000 outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock for cash at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends of $0.096875 per share. The Company will recognize a charge of approximately $1.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 representing the write-off of original issuance costs related to the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock.

19

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2017, there were 1,705,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance as restricted stock grants, unrestricted stock awards or Performance Share awards under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), of which 577,365 were remaining. The grant date fair value per share of restricted stock awards issued during the period from February 16, 2010 (commencement of operations) to June 30, 2017 ranged from $14.20 to $26.52. The fair value of the restricted stock that was granted during the six months ended June 30, 2017 was approximately $0.9 million and the vesting period for the restricted stock is five years. As of June 30, 2017, the Company had approximately $5.7 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock issuances, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of approximately 3.2 years. The Company recognized compensation costs of approximately $0.5 million for both the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and approximately $0.9 million and $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to the restricted stock issuances.

The following is a summary of the total restricted shares granted to the Company’s executive officers and employees with the related weighted average grant date fair value share prices for the six months ended June 30, 2017:

Restricted Stock Activity:

The following is a vesting schedule of the total non-vested shares of restricted stock outstanding as of June 30, 2017:

Long-Term Incentive Plan:

As of June 30, 2017, there are three open performance measurement periods for the Performance Share awards: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017, January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018 and January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued 0 and 195,233 shares, respectively, of common stock at a price of $28.84 per share related to the Performance Share awards for the performance period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016. The expense related to the open Performance Share awards varies quarter to quarter based on the Company’s relative share price performance.

20

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes certain information with respect to the Performance Share awards (dollars in thousands):

Dividends:

The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid or payable per share during the six months ended June 30, 2017:

Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities, unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are participating securities and are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method of computing earnings per share allocates earnings per share for common stock and any participating securities according to dividends declared (whether paid or unpaid) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The Company’s non-vested shares of restricted stock are considered participating securities since these share-based awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends irrespective of whether the awards ultimately vest or expire. The Company had no dilutive restricted stock awards outstanding for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

In accordance with the Company’s policies of determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities and accounting for earnings per share, the net income (loss) per common share is adjusted for earnings distributed through declared dividends (if any) and allocated to all participating securities (weighted average common shares outstanding and unvested restricted shares outstanding) under the two-class method. Under this method, allocations were made to 374,842 and 397,114 of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and 384,614 and 399,981 of weighted average unvested restricted shares outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Contractual Commitments. As of August 2, 2017, the Company has four outstanding contracts with third-party sellers to acquire four industrial properties consisting of approximately 424,000 square feet. There is no assurance that the Company will acquire the properties under contract because the proposed acquisitions are subject to the completion of satisfactory due diligence and various closing conditions.

21

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes certain information with respect to the properties the Company has under contract:

As of August 2, 2017, the Company has executed one non-binding letter of intent with a third-party seller to acquire one industrial property consisting of approximately 38,000 square feet. The total purchase price for this industrial property is approximately $7.1 million. In the normal course of its business, the Company enters into non-binding letters of intent to purchase properties from third parties that may obligate the Company to make payments or perform other obligations upon the occurrence of certain events, including the execution of a purchase and sale agreement and satisfactory completion of various due diligence matters. There can be no assurance that the Company will enter into a purchase and sale agreement with respect to this property or otherwise complete any such prospective purchase on the terms described or at all.

As of August 2, 2017, the Company has two outstanding contracts with third-party purchasers to sell three properties, consisting of approximately 583,000 square feet, located in the Washington, D.C. market for an aggregate sales price of approximately $52.0 million (net book value of approximately $29.3 million). There is no assurance the Company will sell the properties under contract because the proposed dispositions are subject to various closing conditions.

On July 6, 2017, the Company acquired two industrial buildings located in Santa Fe Springs, CA containing approximately 87,000 square feet for a total purchase price of approximately $14.9 million. The property was acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand and borrowings on the revolving credit facility.

On July 7, 2017, the Company acquired one industrial building located in Seattle, WA containing approximately 13,000 square feet for a total purchase price of approximately $4.0 million. The property was acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand and borrowings on the revolving credit facility.

On July 14, 2017, the Company issued in a private placement $100.0 million of senior unsecured notes (the “2024 Senior Unsecured Notes”) with a seven-year term. The 2024 Senior Unsecured Notes bear interest at a fixed annual interest rate of 3.75% and mature in July 2024. The 2024 Senior Unsecured Notes are guaranteed by the Company and by substantially all of the current and to-be-formed subsidiaries of the borrower that own an unencumbered property. These 2024 Senior Unsecured Notes are unsecured by the Company’s properties or by interests in the subsidiaries that hold such properties. The 2024 Senior Unsecured Notes include a series of financial and other covenants with which the Company must comply.

On July 19, 2017, the Company redeemed all 1,840,000 outstanding shares of its Series A Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus an amount per share of $0.096875 representing all accrued and unpaid dividends per share from July 1, 2017 to, but excluding July 19, 2017, without interest. The Company will recognize a charge of approximately $1.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2017 representing the write-off of original issuance costs related to the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock.

On July 21, 2017, the Company acquired one industrial building located in Compton, CA containing approximately 58,000 square feet for a total purchase price of approximately $9.4 million. The property was acquired from an unrelated third party using existing cash on hand and borrowings on the revolving credit facility.

On August 1, 2017, the Company’s board of directors declared a cash dividend in the amount of $0.22 per share of its common stock payable on October 20, 2017 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 6, 2017.

22

Table of Contents

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We caution investors that forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and on assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “might”, “plan”, “project”, “result”, “should”, “will”, “seek”, “target”, “see”, “likely”, “position”, “opportunity” and similar expressions which do not relate solely to historical matters are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties, and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

Some of the risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

23

Table of Contents

Overview

Terreno Realty Corporation (“Terreno”, and together with its subsidiaries, “we”, “us”, “our”, “our Company”, or “the Company”) acquires, owns and operates industrial real estate in six major coastal U.S. markets: Los Angeles, Northern New Jersey/New York City, San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, Miami, and Washington, D.C. We invest in several types of industrial real estate, including warehouse/distribution, flex (including light industrial and research and development, or R&D) and transshipment. We target functional buildings in infill locations that may be shared by multiple tenants and that cater to customer demand within the various submarkets in which we operate. Infill locations are geographic locations surrounded by high concentrations of already developed land and existing buildings. As of June 30, 2017, we owned a total of 178 buildings (including three buildings held for sale) aggregating approximately 12.7 million square feet that were approximately 96.9% leased to 382 customers, the largest of which accounted for approximately 5.5% of our total annualized based rent and seven improved land parcels consisting of 40.5 acres. We are an internally managed Maryland corporation and elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 2010.

The following table summarizes by market our investments in real estate as of June 30, 2017:

We also own seven improved land parcels totaling approximately 40.5 acres that are 56.8% leased to six tenants. Such land is used for truck, trailer and container storage and/or car parking. In the future, we may consider redeveloping such land either by expansion of adjacent buildings or the construction of new buildings.

24

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes by market our investments in improved land as of June 30, 2017:

The following table summarizes our capital expenditures incurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands):

Our industrial properties are typically subject to leases on a “triple net basis,” in which tenants pay their proportionate share of real estate taxes, insurance and operating costs, or are subject to leases on a “modified gross basis,” in which tenants pay expenses over certain threshold levels. In addition, approximately 91.3% of our leased space includes fixed rental increases or Consumer Price Index-based rental increases. Lease terms typically range from three to ten years. We monitor the liquidity and creditworthiness of our tenants on an on-going basis by reviewing outstanding accounts receivable balances, and as provided under the respective lease agreements, review the tenant’s financial condition periodically as appropriate. As needed, we hold discussions with the tenant’s management about their business and we conduct site visits of the tenant’s operations.

25

Table of Contents

Our top 20 customers based on annualized base rent as of June 30, 2017 are as follows: