TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC/TX - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
o | Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-30533
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 75-2679109 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
2000 McKinney Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. | 75201 | |
(Address of principal executive officers) | (Zip Code) |
214/932-6600
(Registrants telephone number,
including area code)
(Registrants telephone number,
including area code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate
Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filerþ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
On
July 22, 2009, the number of shares set forth below was outstanding with respect to each of
the issuers classes of common stock:
Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per
share
35,697,184
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
Form 10-Q
Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
Index
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME UNAUDITED
(In thousands except per share data)
(In thousands except per share data)
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 56,455 | $ | 56,389 | $ | 108,367 | $ | 118,286 | ||||||||
Securities |
3,544 | 4,550 | 7,395 | 9,410 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
9 | 61 | 24 | 101 | ||||||||||||
Deposits in other banks |
5 | 8 | 33 | 20 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
60,013 | 61,008 | 115,819 | 127,817 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
8,769 | 16,715 | 20,348 | 38,439 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
740 | 1,963 | 1,358 | 4,913 | ||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements |
14 | 54 | 28 | 376 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
570 | 2,652 | 1,748 | 5,979 | ||||||||||||
Trust preferred subordinated debentures |
1,118 | 1,464 | 2,318 | 3,351 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
11,211 | 22,848 | 25,800 | 53,058 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
48,802 | 38,160 | 90,019 | 74,759 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
11,000 | 8,000 | 19,500 | 11,750 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
37,802 | 30,160 | 70,519 | 63,009 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest income |
||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
1,614 | 1,288 | 3,139 | 2,405 | ||||||||||||
Trust fee income |
952 | 1,206 | 1,836 | 2,422 | ||||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income |
423 | 315 | 697 | 626 | ||||||||||||
Brokered loan fees |
2,670 | 671 | 4,702 | 1,144 | ||||||||||||
Equipment rental income |
1,453 | 1,510 | 2,909 | 3,026 | ||||||||||||
Other |
304 | 962 | 1,033 | 2,012 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
7,416 | 5,952 | 14,316 | 11,635 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
18,000 | 15,369 | 34,219 | 30,711 | ||||||||||||
Net occupancy expense |
3,387 | 2,432 | 6,141 | 4,797 | ||||||||||||
Leased equipment depreciation |
1,115 | 1,179 | 2,238 | 2,372 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
655 | 649 | 1,210 | 1,326 | ||||||||||||
Legal and professional |
3,106 | 2,645 | 5,177 | 4,471 | ||||||||||||
Communications and data processing |
979 | 770 | 1,815 | 1,624 | ||||||||||||
FDIC insurance assessment |
3,493 | 359 | 5,040 | 722 | ||||||||||||
Other |
4,638 | 3,853 | 9,839 | 7,510 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
35,373 | 27,256 | 65,679 | 53,533 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
9,845 | 8,856 | 19,156 | 21,111 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
3,363 | 3,056 | 6,549 | 7,281 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
6,482 | 5,800 | 12,607 | 13,830 | ||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations (after-tax) |
(44 | ) | (116 | ) | (139 | ) | (264 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
6,438 | 5,684 | 12,468 | 13,566 | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
4,453 | | 5,383 | | ||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 1,985 | $ | 5,684 | $ | 7,085 | $ | 13,566 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | .06 | $ | .22 | $ | .22 | $ | .52 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | .06 | $ | .21 | $ | .22 | $ | .51 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | .06 | $ | .22 | $ | .22 | $ | .52 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | .06 | $ | .21 | $ | .22 | $ | .51 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
3
Table of Contents
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except per share data)
(In thousands except per share data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 74,478 | $ | 77,887 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
6,000 | 4,140 | ||||||
Securities, available-for-sale |
308,187 | 378,752 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
544,652 | 496,351 | ||||||
Loans held for sale from discontinued operations |
578 | 648 | ||||||
Loans held for investment (net of unearned income) |
4,211,304 | 4,027,871 | ||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
56,893 | 46,835 | ||||||
Loans held for investment, net |
4,154,411 | 3,981,036 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
11,088 | 9,467 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
197,376 | 184,242 | ||||||
Goodwill and intangible assets, net |
7,608 | 7,689 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 5,304,378 | $ | 5,140,212 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Non-interest bearing |
$ | 730,034 | $ | 587,161 | ||||
Interest bearing |
2,530,562 | 2,245,991 | ||||||
Interest bearing in foreign branches |
382,986 | 500,035 | ||||||
Total deposits |
3,643,582 | 3,333,187 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
2,900 | 6,421 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
20,892 | 19,518 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
632,945 | 350,155 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements |
61,816 | 77,732 | ||||||
Other short-term borrowings |
364,811 | 812,720 | ||||||
Long-term borrowings |
| 40,000 | ||||||
Trust preferred subordinated debentures |
113,406 | 113,406 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
4,840,352 | 4,753,139 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value: |
||||||||
Authorized shares 100,000,000 |
||||||||
Issued shares 35,688,661 and 30,971,189 at June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
357 | 310 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
321,987 | 255,051 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
136,936 | 129,851 | ||||||
Treasury stock (shares at cost: 417 at June 30,
2009 and 84,691 at December 31, 2008) |
(8 | ) | (581 | ) | ||||
Deferred compensation |
| 573 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes |
4,754 | 1,869 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
464,026 | 387,073 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 5,304,378 | $ | 5,140,212 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY UNAUDITED
(In thousands except share data)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Paid-in | Retained | Treasury Stock | Deferred | Income (Loss), | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Shares | Amount | Compensation | Net of Taxes | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
| $ | | 26,389,548 | $ | 264 | $ | 190,175 | $ | 105,585 | (84,691 | ) | $ | (581 | ) | $ | 573 | $ | (878 | ) | $ | 295,138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (unaudited) |
| | | | | 13,566 | | | | | 13,566 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on
available-for-sale securities, net of
tax benefit of $176 (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | (326 | ) | (326 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (unaudited) |
13,240 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit related to exercise of stock
options (unaudited) |
| | | | 1,152 | | | | | | 1,152 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
recognized in earnings (unaudited) |
| | | | 2,567 | | | | | | 2,567 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock related to stock-based
awards (unaudited) |
| | 390,838 | 4 | 2,816 | | | | | | 2,820 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2008 (unaudited) |
| $ | | 26,780,386 | $ | 268 | $ | 196,710 | $ | 119,151 | (84,691 | ) | $ | (581 | ) | $ | 573 | $ | (1,204 | ) | $ | 314,917 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
| $ | | 30,971,189 | $ | 310 | $ | 255,051 | $ | 129,851 | (84,691 | ) | $ | (581 | ) | $ | 573 | $ | 1,869 | $ | 387,073 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (unaudited) |
| | | | | 12,468 | | | | | 12,468 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized loss on
available-for-sale securities, net of
taxes of $1,553 (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | 2,885 | 2,885 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (unaudited) |
15,353 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax expense related to exercise of stock
options (unaudited) |
| | | | (129 | ) | | | | | | (129 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
recognized in earnings (unaudited) |
| | | | 2,889 | | | | | | 2,889 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation |
| | | | | | (84,274 | ) | 573 | (573 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock related to stock-based
awards (unaudited) |
| | 117,472 | 1 | 612 | | | | | | 613 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
| | 4,600,000 | 46 | 59,400 | | | | | | 59,446 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock and related
warrant (unaudited) |
75,000 | 70,836 | | | 4,164 | | | | | | 75,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of preferred stock (unaudited) |
(75,000 | ) | (71,069 | ) | | | (3,931 | ) | | | | | (75,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividend and accretion
of preferred stock discount (unaudited) |
| 233 | | | | (1,452 | ) | | | | | (1,219 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2009 (unaudited) |
| $ | | 35,688,661 | $ | 357 | $ | 321,987 | $ | 136,936 | (417 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | | $ | 4,754 | $ | 464,026 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS UNAUDITED
(In thousands)
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 12,607 | $ | 13,566 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
19,500 | 11,750 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,087 | 3,790 | ||||||
Amortization and accretion on securities |
128 | 160 | ||||||
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income |
(697 | ) | (626 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
2,889 | 2,567 | ||||||
Tax benefit (expense) from stock option exercises |
(129 | ) | 1,152 | |||||
Excess tax benefits (expense) from stock-based compensation arrangements |
369 | (3,292 | ) | |||||
Originations of loans held for sale |
(8,990,736 | ) | (3,066,259 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale |
8,942,435 | 2,911,587 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
(14,675 | ) | (11,755 | ) | ||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
(3,700 | ) | (7,791 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) operating activities of continuing operations |
(27,922 | ) | (145,151 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations |
(82 | ) | 7 | |||||
Net cash (used in) operating activities |
(28,004 | ) | (145,144 | ) | ||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Purchases of available-for-sale securities |
| (4,377 | ) | |||||
Maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities |
28,500 | 15,200 | ||||||
Principal payments received on available-for-sale securities |
46,375 | 38,410 | ||||||
Net (increase) in loans held for investment |
(192,862 | ) | (247,766 | ) | ||||
Purchase of premises and equipment, net |
(3,389 | ) | (689 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) investing activities of continuing operations |
(121,376 | ) | (199,222 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
310,395 | 526,700 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of stock related to stock-based awards |
60,059 | 2,820 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and related warrants |
75,000 | | ||||||
Repurchase of preferred stock |
(75,000 | ) | | |||||
Dividends paid |
(1,219 | ) | | |||||
Net (decrease) in other borrowings |
(503,825 | ) | (216,089 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits (expense) from stock-based compensation arrangements |
(369 | ) | 3,292 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased |
282,790 | 53,365 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations |
147,831 | 370,088 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,549 | ) | 25,722 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
82,027 | 89,463 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 80,478 | $ | 115,185 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest |
$ | 28,530 | $ | 52,558 | ||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
10,700 | 13,925 | ||||||
Non-cash transactions: |
||||||||
Transfers from loans/leases to other repossessed assets |
5,501 | 2,943 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS UNAUDITED
(1) OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), a Delaware bank holding company, was incorporated
in November 1996 and commenced operations in March 1998. The consolidated financial statements of
the Company include the accounts of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary,
Texas Capital Bank, National Association (the Bank). The Bank currently provides commercial
banking services to its customers in Texas and concentrates on middle market commercial and high
net worth customers.
Basis of Presentation
The accounting and reporting policies of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States and to generally accepted practices within the
banking industry. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Texas Capital
Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary, the Bank. Certain prior period balances have been reclassified
to conform to the current period presentation.
The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. Certain information
and footnote disclosures presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the interim
financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments and the disclosures made are
adequate to make interim financial information not misleading. The consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q adopted by
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, the financial statements do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2008,
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2009 (the 2008 Form
10-K). Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future
period. We have evaluated subsequent events for potential
recognition and/or disclosure through July 22, 2009, the date the
consolidated financial statements were issued.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for
possible loan losses, the fair value of stock-based compensation awards, the fair values of
financial instruments and the status of contingencies are particularly susceptible to significant
change in the near term.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net
Unrealized gains or losses on our available-for-sale securities (after applicable income tax
expense or benefit) are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net. Accumulated
comprehensive income (loss), net for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is reported in the
accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders equity. We had comprehensive
income of $6.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and comprehensive income of
$106,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Comprehensive income during the three months
ended June 30, 2009 included a net after-tax loss of $352,000, and comprehensive income during the
three months ended June 30, 2008 included a net after-tax loss of $5.6 million due to changes in
the net unrealized gains/losses on securities available-for-sale.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other
assumptions. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment
regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments and other factors, especially in the absence of
broad markets for particular items. Changes in
7
Table of Contents
assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. The fair value
estimates of existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments do not include the value of
anticipated future business or the value of assets and liabilities not considered financial
instruments. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No.
157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have an impact on our
financial statements except for the expanded disclosures noted in Note 9 Fair Value Disclosures.
(2) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands
except per share data):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 6,482 | $ | 5,800 | $ | 12,607 | $ | 13,830 | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
4,453 | | 5,383 | | ||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations
available to common shareholders |
2,029 | 5,800 | 7,224 | 13,830 | ||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
(44 | ) | (116 | ) | (139 | ) | (264 | ) | ||||||||
Net income available to common shareholders |
$ | 1,985 | $ | 5,684 | $ | 7,085 | $ | 13,566 | ||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per
share-weighted average shares |
33,784,178 | 26,706,223 | 32,396,804 | 26,586,135 | ||||||||||||
Effect of employee stock options (1) |
82,059 | 99,135 | 85,018 | 80,496 | ||||||||||||
Denominator for dilutive earnings per
share-adjusted weighted average shares and
assumed conversions |
33,866,237 | 26,805,358 | 32,481,822 | 26,666,631 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per common share from
continuing operations |
$ | .06 | $ | .22 | $ | .22 | $ | .52 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share from
discontinued operations |
(.00 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.00 | ) | (.01 | ) | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | .06 | $ | .21 | $ | .22 | $ | .51 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share from continuing
operations |
$ | .06 | $ | .22 | $ | .22 | $ | .52 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share from discontinued
operations |
(.00 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.00 | ) | (.01 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | .06 | $ | .21 | $ | .22 | $ | .51 | ||||||||
(1) | Stock options and stock appreciation rights (SARs) outstanding of 1,966,330 at June 30, 2009 and 1,585,660 at June 30, 2008 have not been included in diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented. Stock options and SARs are anti-dilutive when the exercise price is higher than the average market price of our common stock. |
(3) SECURITIES
Securities are identified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale based upon various
factors, including asset/liability management strategies, liquidity and profitability objectives,
and regulatory requirements. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at cost, adjusted for
amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts. Available-for-sale securities are securities
that may be sold prior to maturity based upon asset/liability management decisions. Securities
identified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on
available-for-sale securities are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
stockholders equity, net of taxes. Amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts on
mortgage-backed securities is periodically adjusted for estimated prepayments.
8
Table of Contents
Our net unrealized gain on the available-for-sale securities portfolio value increased from a gain
of $2.9 million, which represented 0.77% of the amortized cost at December 31, 2008, to a gain of
$7.3 million, which represented 2.43% of the amortized cost at June 30, 2009.
The following table discloses, as of June 30, 2009, our investment securities that have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more months (in thousands):
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Loss | Value | Loss | Value | Loss | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 3,150 | $ | (75 | ) | $ | 3,150 | $ | (75 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate securities |
4,609 | (391 | ) | | | 4,609 | (391 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Municipals |
6,066 | (131 | ) | | | 6,066 | (131 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
$ | 10,675 | $ | (522 | ) | $ | 3,150 | $ | (75 | ) | $ | 13,825 | $ | (597 | ) | ||||||||||
At June 30, 2009, the number of investment positions in this unrealized loss position totals 18. We
do not believe these unrealized losses are other than temporary as (1) we have the ability and
intent to hold the investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in market
value, and (2) it is not probable that we will be unable to collect the amounts contractually due.
The unrealized losses noted are interest rate related, and losses have decreased as rates decreased
in 2008. We have not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of principal as a
result of credit concerns on these securities.
(4) LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, loans were as follows (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Commercial |
$ | 2,374,098 | $ | 2,276,054 | ||||
Construction |
673,906 | 667,437 | ||||||
Real estate |
1,065,519 | 988,784 | ||||||
Consumer |
28,374 | 32,671 | ||||||
Leases |
96,173 | 86,937 | ||||||
Gross loans held for investment |
4,238,070 | 4,051,883 | ||||||
Deferred income (net of direct origination costs) |
(26,766 | ) | (24,012 | ) | ||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(56,893 | ) | (46,835 | ) | ||||
Total loans held for investment, net |
$ | 4,154,411 | $ | 3,981,036 | ||||
We continue to lend primarily in Texas. As of June 30, 2009, a substantial majority of the
principal amount of the loans held for investment in our portfolio was to businesses and
individuals in Texas. This geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general
economic conditions in Texas. We originate substantially all of the loans in our portfolio, except
in certain instances we have purchased selected loan participations and interests in certain
syndicated credits and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) government guaranteed
loans. The risks created by this concentration have been considered by management in the
determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes the allowance
for loan losses is adequate to cover estimated losses on loans at each balance sheet date.
9
Table of Contents
Non-Performing Assets
Non-performing loans and leases at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 are
summarized as follows (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Non-accrual loans: (1)(3) |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 22,548 | $ | 15,676 | $ | 2,438 | ||||||
Construction |
23,123 | 22,362 | 12,650 | |||||||||
Real estate |
3,617 | 6,239 | 1,339 | |||||||||
Consumer |
96 | 296 | 194 | |||||||||
Equipment leases |
208 | 2,926 | 132 | |||||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
49,592 | 47,499 | 16,753 | |||||||||
Other repossessed assets: |
||||||||||||
Other real
estate owned (3) |
31,404 | 25,904 | 5,615 | |||||||||
Other repossessed assets |
55 | 25 | 25 | |||||||||
Total other repossessed assets |
31,459 | 25,929 | 5,640 | |||||||||
Total non-performing assets |
$ | 81,051 | $ | 73,428 | $ | 22,393 | ||||||
Loans past due (90 days) (2)(3) |
$ | 3,539 | $ | 4,115 | $ | 22,763 |
(1) | The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when there is a clear indication that the borrowers cash flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally when a loan is 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the remaining unpaid principal amount of the loan is deemed to be fully collectible. If collectability is questionable, then cash payments are applied to principal. | |
(2) | At June 30, 2009, $2.3 million of the loans past due 90 days and still accruing are premium finance loans. These loans are generally secured by obligations of insurance carriers to refund premiums on cancelled insurance policies. The refund of premiums from the insurance carriers can take 180 days or longer from the cancellation date. | |
(3) | At June 30, 2009, non-performing assets include $3.0 million of mortgage warehouse loans that were transferred to our loans held for investment portfolio at lower of cost or market, and some subsequently moved to other real estate owned. |
Allowance for Loan Losses
Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Balance at the beginning of the period |
$ | 52,727 | $ | 34,021 | $ | 46,835 | $ | 32,821 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
11,000 | 8,000 | 19,500 | 11,750 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans charged-off |
6,887 | 3,747 | 9,523 | 6,867 | ||||||||||||
Recoveries |
53 | 186 | 81 | 756 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
6,834 | 3,561 | 9,442 | 6,111 | ||||||||||||
Balance at the end of the period |
$ | 56,893 | $ | 38,460 | $ | 56,893 | $ | 38,460 | ||||||||
(5) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit which involve varying degrees of credit
risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Banks exposure to
credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount
of these instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if
deemed necessary, is based on managements credit evaluation of the borrower.
10
Table of Contents
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation
of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may
expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future
cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customers credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public
and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
(In thousands) | June 30, 2009 | |||
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk: |
||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 3,760,103 | ||
Standby letters of credit |
68,495 |
(6) REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the
federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain
mandatory (and possibly additional discretionary) actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could
have a direct material effect on the Companys and the Banks financial statements. Under capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the
Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Companys and
the Banks assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. The Companys and the Banks capital amounts and classification are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other
factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and
the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I
capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital
(as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of June 30, 2009, that the
Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
We participated in the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program in the first quarter 2009 and issued
$75 million of Series A preferred stock and related warrants. In the second quarter 2009, we
repurchased the preferred stock related to the Program and completed a public offering of 4.6
million shares of common stock in May 2009. The new capital from this offering qualifies as Tier 1
capital and increased our Tier 1 and total capital ratios. For additional information regarding the
preferred stock and warrant and the common stock offering, see Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Financial institutions are categorized as well capitalized or adequately capitalized, based on
minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the tables
below. As shown below, the Companys capital ratios exceed the regulatory definition of adequately
capitalized as of June 30, 2009 and 2008. As of June 30, 2008, the most recent notification from
the OCC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. There have been no conditions or events since the notification that management
believes have changed the Banks category. Based upon the information in its most recently filed
call report, the Bank continues to meet the capital ratios necessary to be well capitalized under
the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. Based on the bank capital ratio information
in our most recently filed call report we continue to meet the capital ratios necessary to be well
capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Risk-based capital: |
||||||||
Tier 1 capital |
11.20 | % | 9.28 | % | ||||
Total capital |
12.33 | % | 10.31 | % | ||||
Leverage |
10.56 | % | 9.32 | % |
11
Table of Contents
(7) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The fair value of our stock option and stock appreciation right (SAR) grants are estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation
model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting
restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of
highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our employee
stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate,
in managements opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide the best single measure of
the fair value of its employee stock options.
We recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million and $1.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $2.9 million and $2.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount for the three months ended June 30,
2009 is comprised of $168,000 related to unvested options issued prior to the adoption of SFAS
123R, $413,000 related to SARs issued in 2006, 2007 and 2008, and $884,000 related to restricted
stock units (RSUs) issued in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. The amount for the six months ended June
30, 2009 is comprised of $348,000 related to unvested options issued prior to the adoption of SFAS
123R, $808,000 related to SARs issued in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, and $1,735,000 related to RSUs
issued in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to
unvested options issued prior to adoption of SFAS 123R is $500,000. At June 30, 2009, the weighted
average period over which this unrecognized expense is expected to be recognized was 0.9 years.
Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to grants subsequent to 2005 is $14.3
million. At June 30, 2009, the weighted average period over which this unrecognized expense is
expected to be recognized was 2.0 years.
(8) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Subsequent to the end of the first quarter of 2007, we and the purchaser of our residential
mortgage loan division (RML) agreed to terminate and settle the contractual arrangements related to
the sale of the division, which had been completed as of the end of the third quarter of 2006.
Historical operating results of RML are reflected as discontinued operations in the financial
statements.
During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, the loss from discontinued
operations was $44,000 and $116,000, net of taxes, respectively. For the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, the loss from discontinued operations was $139,000 and $264,000, net of taxes,
respectively. The 2009 losses are primarily related to continuing legal and salary expenses
incurred in dealing with the remaining loans and requests from investors related to the repurchase
of previously sold loans. We still have approximately $578,000 in loans held for sale from
discontinued operations that are carried at the estimated market value at quarter-end, which is
less than the original cost. We plan to sell these loans, but timing and price to be realized
cannot be determined at this time due to market conditions. In addition, we continue to address
requests from investors related to repurchasing loans previously sold. While the balances as of
June 30, 2009 include a liability for exposure to additional contingencies, including risk of
having to repurchase loans previously sold, we recognize that market conditions may result in
additional exposure to loss and the extension of time necessary to complete the discontinued
mortgage operation.
(9) FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS
157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and enhances
disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under SFAS 157 as the price that
would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal
market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the
measurement date. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have an impact on our financial statements
except for the expanded disclosures noted below.
We determine the fair market values of our financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy.
The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as provided
below.
Level 1
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets include U.S. Treasuries that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets. |
12
Table of Contents
Level 2
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets include U.S. government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities, corporate securities, municipal bonds, and Community Reinvestment Act funds. This category also includes impaired loans and OREO where collateral values have been based on third party appraisals and derivative assets and liabilities where values are based on internal cash flow models supported by market data inputs. | |
Level 3
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair values requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category generally includes certain mortgage loans that are transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment at a lower of cost or fair value. |
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||
Available for sale securities: (1) |
||||||||||||
Treasuries |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
| 249,197 | | |||||||||
Corporate securities |
| 4,609 | | |||||||||
Municipals |
| 46,818 | | |||||||||
Other |
| 7,563 | | |||||||||
Loans (2)(4) |
| 56,470 | 5,749 | |||||||||
OREO (3)(4) |
| 31,404 | | |||||||||
Derivative asset (5) |
| 1,922 | | |||||||||
Derivative liability (5) |
| (1,922 | ) | |
(1) | Securities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, generally monthly. | |
(2) | Includes certain mortgage loans that have been transferred to loans held for investment from loans held for sale at the lower of cost or market. Also, includes impaired loans that have been measured for impairment at the fair value of the loans collateral. | |
(3) | Other real estate owned is transferred from loans to OREO at fair value less selling costs. | |
(4) | Fair value of loans and OREO is measured on a nonrecurring basis. | |
(5) | Derivative assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, generally quarterly. |
Level 3 Valuations
Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their values are determined using pricing models,
discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model
assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial instruments also include those for
which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Currently, we measure fair value for certain loans on a nonrecurring basis as described below.
Loans Certain mortgage loans that are transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for
investment are valued based on third party broker pricing. As the dollar amount and number of
loans being valued is very small, a comprehensive market analysis is not obtained or considered
necessary. Instead, we conduct a general polling of one or more mortgage brokers for
indications of general market prices for the types of mortgage loans being valued, and we
consider values based on recent experience in selling loans of like terms and comparable
quality.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Generally accepted accounting principles require disclosure of fair value information about
financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practical to
estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based
on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used,
including the
13
Table of Contents
discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. This disclosure does not and is not
intended to represent the fair value of the Company.
A summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments is as follows
(in thousands):
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
Carrying | Estimated | |||||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 74,478 | $ | 74,478 | ||||||||
Securities, available-for-sale |
308,187 | 308,187 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
544,652 | 544,652 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale from discontinued operations |
578 | 578 | ||||||||||
Loans held for investment, net |
4,154,411 | 4,168,524 | ||||||||||
Derivative asset |
1,922 | 1,922 | ||||||||||
Deposits |
3,643,582 | 3,645,254 | ||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
632,945 | 632,945 | ||||||||||
Borrowings |
426,627 | 426,627 | ||||||||||
Trust preferred subordinated debentures |
113,406 | 114,114 | ||||||||||
Derivative liability |
1,922 | 1,922 |
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value
disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents
approximate their fair value.
Securities
The fair value of investment securities is based on prices obtained from independent pricing
services which are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar securities.
Loans, net
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently with no significant change in credit risk, fair
values are generally based on carrying values. The fair value for other loans is estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar
terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates
its fair value. The carrying amount of loans held for sale approximates fair value.
Derivatives
The estimated fair value of the interest rate swaps are based on internal cash flow models
supported by market data inputs.
Deposits
The carrying amounts for variable-rate money market accounts approximate their fair value.
Fixed-term certificates of deposit fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flow
calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of
aggregated expected monthly maturities.
Federal funds purchased, other borrowings and trust preferred subordinated debentures
The carrying value reported in the consolidated balance sheet for federal funds purchased and
short-term borrowings approximates their fair value. The fair value of term borrowings and trust
preferred subordinated debentures is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates
currently being offered on similar borrowings.
14
Table of Contents
Off-balance sheet instruments
Fair values for our off-balance sheet instruments which consist of lending commitments and standby
letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into
account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties credit standing. Management
believes that the fair value of these off-balance sheet instruments is not significant.
(10) STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
On September 10, 2008, we completed a sale of 4 million shares of our common stock in a private
placement to a number of institutional investors. The purchase price was $14.50 per share, and net
proceeds from the sale totaled $55 million. The new capital has been used for general corporate
purposes, including capital for support of anticipated growth of our bank.
On January 16, 2009, we completed the issuance of $75 million of Series A perpetual preferred stock
and related warrant under the U.S. Department of Treasurys voluntary Capital Purchase Program
(CPP). The warrant represents the right to purchase 758,086 shares of our common stock at an
initial exercise price of $14.84 per share. The warrant was valued at $4.2 million, which was
calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The warrant valuation model required several
inputs, including the risk free rate, and volatility factor. In addition to the Black-Scholes
method we applied the Binomial Lattice Model and determined there was no material difference in
value between the two methods. On May 8, 2009, we repurchased the $75 million in preferred stock
from the Treasury. We recorded a $3.9 million accelerated deemed dividend representing the
unamortized value of the outstanding warrants issued to the U.S. Department of Treasury to account
for the difference between the book value and the carrying value of the preferred stock repurchased
from the Treasury. The $3.9 million accelerated deemed dividend, combined with the previously
scheduled preferred dividend of $523,000 resulted in a total dividend of $4.4 million during the
second quarter of 2009. We did not repurchase the warrants, so the Treasury has the option to sell
the warrants in the open market to a third party.
On May 8, 2009, we completed a sale of 4.6 million shares of our common stock in a public offering.
The purchase price was $13.75 per share, and net proceeds from the sale totaled $59.4 million. The
new capital will be used for general corporate purposes, including capital for support of
anticipated growth of our bank.
(11) NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interest in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB
Statement No. 5, (SFAS 160) amends Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, Consolidated
Financial Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies
that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority
interest, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as a
component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among other requirements, SFAS 160
requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to
both the parent and the non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the face of the
consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent
and to the non-controlling interest. SFAS 160 was effective for us on January 1, 2009 and did not
have a significant impact on our financial statements.
SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133, (SFAS 161) amends SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, to amend and enhance the disclosure requirements of SFAS 133 to provide
greater transparency about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how
derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for under SFAS 133 and its related
interpretations, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, results of operations and cash flows. To meet those objectives, SFAS 161
requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments,
quantitative disclosures about fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features of the derivative instruments and their
potential impact
15
Table of Contents
on an entitys liquidity. SFAS 161 was effective for us on January 1, 2009 and did
not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
SFAS
No. 165, Subsequent Events (SFAS 165) established general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or available to be issued. SFAS 165 defines (i) the period after the balance
sheet date during which a reporting entitys management should evaluate events or transactions that
may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (ii) the circumstances under
which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its
financial statements and (iii) the disclosures an entity should
make about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 became effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009
and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Positions and Interpretations
The FASB issued three related Staff Positions to clarify the application of SFAS 157 to fair value
measurements in the current economic environment, modify the recognition of other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities, and require companies to disclose the fair values of financial
instruments in interim periods. The final Staff Positions are effective for interim and annual
periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March
15, 2009, if all three Staff Positions or both the fair-value measurements and other-than-temporary
impairment Staff Positions are adopted simultaneously. None are expected to have a significant
impact on our financial statements, but each is described in more detail below.
FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-4 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in
accordance with SFAS 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have
significantly decreased. It also provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a
transaction is not orderly. It emphasizes that even if there has been a significant decrease in
the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability and regardless of the valuation
technique used, the objective of a fair value measurement remains the same. Fair value is the
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale), between market participations
at the measurement date under current market conditions.
FSP 115-2 and FSP 124-2 amend the other-than-temporary impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt
securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of
other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. It
does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary
impairments of equity securities.
FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of
publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. It also amends APB Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized information in
interim reporting periods.
FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions
Are Participating Securities provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to
the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 became effective on January 1, 2009 and did not impact our
financial statements
16
Table of Contents
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL SUMMARY UNAUDITED
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(In thousands)
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(In thousands)
For the three months ended | For the three months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense(1) | Rate | Balance | Expense(1) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities taxable |
$ | 280,372 | $ | 3,124 | 4.47 | % | $ | 356,445 | $ | 4,114 | 4.64 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities non-taxable(2) |
45,901 | 646 | 5.64 | % | 48,129 | 671 | 5.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
5,649 | 9 | 0.64 | % | 11,127 | 61 | 2.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits in other banks |
12,268 | 5 | 0.16 | % | 1,103 | 8 | 2.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale from continuing operations |
656,462 | 7,775 | 4.75 | % | 246,026 | 3,654 | 5.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loans |
4,124,937 | 48,680 | 4.73 | % | 3,597,342 | 52,735 | 5.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Less reserve for loan losses |
51,601 | | | 33,181 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of reserve |
4,729,798 | 56,455 | 4.79 | % | 3,810,187 | 56,389 | 5.95 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
5,073,988 | 60,239 | 4.76 | % | 4,226,991 | 61,243 | 5.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and other assets |
251,960 | 198,946 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 5,325,948 | $ | 4,425,937 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction deposits |
$ | 135,756 | $ | 55 | 0.16 | % | $ | 111,587 | $ | 129 | 0.46 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
974,275 | 2,003 | 0.82 | % | 840,933 | 3,563 | 1.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
1,082,691 | 5,105 | 1.89 | % | 930,698 | 8,345 | 3.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits in foreign branches |
394,251 | 1,606 | 1.63 | % | 755,593 | 4,678 | 2.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing deposits |
2,586,973 | 8,769 | 1.36 | % | 2,638,811 | 16,715 | 2.55 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
1,404,881 | 1,324 | 0.38 | % | 830,482 | 4,669 | 2.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred subordinated debentures |
113,406 | 1,118 | 3.95 | % | 113,406 | 1,464 | 5.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
4,105,260 | 11,211 | 1.10 | % | 3,582,699 | 22,848 | 2.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
724,487 | 513,327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
18,899 | 14,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
477,302 | 315,298 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 5,325,948 | $ | 4,425,937 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 49,028 | $ | 38,395 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
3.88 | % | 3.65 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
3.66 | % | 3.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The loan averages include loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and
are stated net of unearned income. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional information from discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 582 | $ | 730 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
582 | 730 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 14 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin consolidated |
3.88 | % | 3.65 | % |
17
Table of Contents
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL SUMMARY UNAUDITED
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(In thousands)
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(In thousands)
For the six months ended | For the six months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | Average | Revenue/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense(1) | Rate | Balance | Expense(1) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities taxable |
$ | 300,973 | $ | 6,555 | 4.39 | % | $ | 368,351 | $ | 8,538 | 4.66 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities non-taxable(2) |
45,978 | 1,292 | 5.67 | % | 48,137 | 1,342 | 5.61 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
10,260 | 24 | 0.47 | % | 7,921 | 101 | 2.56 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits in other banks |
11,740 | 33 | 0.57 | % | 1,177 | 20 | 3.42 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale from continuing operations |
622,122 | 14,262 | 4.62 | % | 208,849 | 6,264 | 6.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loans |
4,073,842 | 94,105 | 4.66 | % | 3,540,591 | 112,022 | 6.36 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Less reserve for loan losses |
49,157 | | | 33,350 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of reserve |
4,646,807 | 108,367 | 4.70 | % | 3,716,090 | 118,286 | 6.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
5,015,758 | 116,271 | 4.67 | % | 4,141,676 | 128,287 | 6.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and other assets |
245,379 | 203,269 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 5,261,137 | $ | 4,344,945 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction deposits |
$ | 132,819 | $ | 99 | 0.15 | % | $ | 109,968 | $ | 274 | 0.50 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
860,447 | 3,423 | 0.80 | % | 815,559 | 8,681 | 2.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
1,179,719 | 13,171 | 2.25 | % | 829,096 | 16,220 | 3.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits in foreign branches |
419,261 | 3,655 | 1.76 | % | 856,098 | 13,264 | 3.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing deposits |
2,592,246 | 20,348 | 1.58 | % | 2,610,721 | 38,439 | 2.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
1,386,389 | 3,134 | 0.46 | % | 801,815 | 11,268 | 2.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred subordinated debentures |
113,406 | 2,318 | 4.12 | % | 113,406 | 3,351 | 5.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
4,092,041 | 25,800 | 1.27 | % | 3,525,942 | 53,058 | 3.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
680,838 | 491,313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
21,247 | 18,342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
467,011 | 309,348 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 5,261,137 | $ | 4,344,945 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 90,471 | $ | 75,229 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
3.64 | % | 3.65 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
3.40 | % | 3.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) The loan averages include loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and
are stated net of unearned income. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2) Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional information from discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
$ | 614 | $ | 731 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
614 | 731 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 28 | $ | 125 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin consolidated |
3.64 | % | 3.65 | % |
18
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements and financial analysis contained in this document that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Act). In addition, certain statements may be contained in our
future filings with SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with our
approval that are not statements of historical fact and constitute forward-looking statement within
the meaning of the Act. Forward-looking statements describe our future plans, strategies and
expectations and are based on certain assumptions. Words such as believes, anticipates,
expects, intends, targeted, continue, remain, will, should, may and other similar
expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of
identifying such statements.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control
that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements. The important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) | Changes in interest rates and the relationship between rate indices, including LIBOR and Fed Funds | ||
(2) | Changes in the levels of loan prepayments, which could affect the value of our loans or investment securities | ||
(3) | Changes in general economic and business conditions in areas or markets where we compete | ||
(4) | Competition from banks and other financial institutions for loans and customer deposits | ||
(5) | The failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of and provisions made to the allowance for credit losses | ||
(6) | The loss of senior management or operating personnel and the potential inability to hire qualified personnel at reasonable compensation levels |
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. We have no
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or
future events. In light of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, the events discussed in any
forward-looking statements in this quarterly report might not occur.
Results of Operations
Except as otherwise noted, all amounts and disclosures throughout this document reflect continuing
operations. See Part I, Item 1 herein for a discussion of discontinued operations at Note (8)
Discontinued Operations.
Summary of Performance
We reported net income of $6.5 million for the second quarter of 2009 compared to $5.8 million for
the second quarter of 2008. We reported net income available to common shareholders of $2.0
million, or $.06 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2009 compared to $5.8 million,
or $.22 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2008. Return on average equity was
5.45% and return on average assets was .49% for the second quarter of 2009, compared to 7.40% and
.53%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2008. Net income for the six months ended June 30,
2009, totaled $12.6 million compared to $13.8 million for the same period in 2008. Net income
available to common shareholders was $7.2 million, or $.22 per diluted common share, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $13.8 million, or $.52 per diluted common share, for the
same period in 2008. Return on average equity was 5.44% and return on average assets was .48% for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to 8.99% and .64%, respectively, for the same period in
2008.
19
Table of Contents
Net income increased $682,000, or 12%, for the three months ended June 30, 2009, and net income
available to common shareholders decreased $3.8 million, or 65% for the three months ended June 30,
2009 compared to
the same period in 2008; and decreased $1.2 million, or 9%, and decreased $6.6 million, or 48%,
respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The
$682,000 increase during the three months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily the result of a $3.0
million increase in the provision for loan losses, an $8.1 million increase in non-interest expense
and a $307,000 increase in income tax expense offset by a $10.6 million increase in net interest
income and a $1.5 million increase in non-interest income. The $1.2 million decrease during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily the result of a $7.8 million increase in the provision for
loan losses and a $12.1 million increase in non-interest expense offset by a $15.3 million increase
in net interest income, a $2.7 million increase in non-interest income and a $732,000 decrease in
income tax expense.
Details of the changes in the various components of net income are further discussed below.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income was $48.8 million for the second quarter of 2009, compared to $38.2 million for
the second quarter of 2008. The increase was due to an increase in average earning assets of $847.0
million as compared to the second quarter of 2008. The increase in average earning assets included
a $527.6 million increase in average loans held for investment and an increase of $410.4 million in
loans held for sale, offset by a $78.3 million decrease in average securities. For the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, average net loans and securities represented 93% and 7%, respectively, of
average earning assets compared to 90% and 10% in the same quarter of 2008.
Average non-interest bearing deposits increased from $513.3 million for the second quarter of 2008
to $724.5 million, and average stockholders equity increased from $315.3 million to $477.3 million
for the same periods. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $522.6 million from the second
quarter of 2008, which included a $51.8 million decrease in interest bearing deposits and a $574.4
million increase in other borrowings. The significant increase in average other borrowings is a
result of the combined effects of maturities of transaction-specific deposits and growth in loans
during the second quarter of 2009. The average cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased from
2.56% for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 to 1.10% for the same period of 2009.
Net interest income was $90.0 million for the six months ended of 2009, compared to $74.8 million
for the same period of 2008. The increase was due to an increase in average earning assets of
$874.1 million as compared to the first quarter of 2008. The increase in average earning assets
included a $533.3 million increase in average loans held for investment and an increase of $413.3
million in loans held for sale, offset by a $69.5 million decrease in average securities. For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, average net loans and securities represented 93% and 7%,
respectively, of average earning assets compared to 90% and 10% in the same quarter of 2008.
Average non-interest bearing deposits increased from $491.3 million for the first six month of 2008
to $680.8 million, and average stockholders equity increased from $309.3 million to $467.0 million
for the same periods. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $566.1 million compared to the
first six months of 2008, which included an $18.5 million decrease in interest bearing deposits and
a $584.6 million increase in other borrowings. The significant increase in average other borrowings
is a result of the combined effects of maturities of transaction-specific deposits and growth in
loans during the first half of 2009. The average cost of interest bearing liabilities decreased
from 3.03% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 to 1.27% for the same period of 2009.
20
Table of Contents
The following table presents the changes (in thousands) in taxable-equivalent net interest income
and identifies the changes due to differences in the average volume of earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities and the
changes due to changes in the average interest rate on those assets and liabilities.
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009/2008 | June 30, 2009/2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change Due To (1) | Change Due To (1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Volume | Yield/Rate | Change | Volume | Yield/Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities(2) |
$ | (1,015 | ) | $ | (899 | ) | $ | (116 | ) | $ | (2,033 | ) | $ | (1,641 | ) | $ | (392 | ) | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
4,121 | 6,128 | (2,007 | ) | 7,998 | 12,335 | (4,337 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment |
(4,055 | ) | 7,487 | (11,542 | ) | (17,917 | ) | 17,121 | (35,038 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
(52 | ) | (30 | ) | (22 | ) | (77 | ) | 30 | (107 | ) | |||||||||||||
Deposits in other banks |
(3 | ) | 81 | (84 | ) | 13 | 166 | (153 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total |
(1,004 | ) | 12,767 | (13,771 | ) | (12,016 | ) | 28,011 | (40,027 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transaction deposits |
(74 | ) | 28 | (102 | ) | (175 | ) | 58 | (233 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
(1,560 | ) | 564 | (2,124 | ) | (5,258 | ) | 478 | (5,736 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
(3,240 | ) | 1,358 | (4,598 | ) | (3,049 | ) | 6,943 | (9,992 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Deposits in foreign branches |
(3,072 | ) | (2,234 | ) | (838 | ) | (9,609 | ) | (6,775 | ) | (2,834 | ) | ||||||||||||
Borrowed funds |
(3,691 | ) | 3,225 | (6,916 | ) | (9,167 | ) | 8,224 | (17,391 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total |
(11,637 | ) | 2,941 | (14,578 | ) | (27,258 | ) | 8,928 | (36,186 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | (10,633 | ) | $ | 9,826 | $ | (807 | ) | $ | (15,242 | ) | $ | 19,083 | $ | (3,841 | ) | ||||||||
(1) | Changes attributable to both volume and yield/rate are allocated to both volume and yield/rate on an equal basis. | |
(2) | Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable. |
Net interest margin from continuing operations, the ratio of net interest income to average earning
assets from continuing operations, was 3.88% for the second quarter of 2009 compared to 3.65% for
the second quarter of 2008. This 23 basis points increase in margin was a result of a steep decline
in the costs of interest bearing liabilities and growth in non-interest bearing deposits and
stockholders equity. Total cost of funding decreased from 2.08% for the second quarter of 2008
compared to .84% for the second quarter 2009. The benefit of the reduction in funding costs was
partially offset by a 107 basis point decline in yields on earning assets.
Non-interest Income
The components of non-interest income were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 1,614 | $ | 1,288 | $ | 3,139 | $ | 2,405 | ||||||||
Trust fee income |
952 | 1,206 | 1,836 | 2,422 | ||||||||||||
Bank owned
life insurance (BOLI) income |
423 | 315 | 697 | 626 | ||||||||||||
Brokered loan fees |
2,670 | 671 | 4,702 | 1,144 | ||||||||||||
Equipment rental income |
1,453 | 1,510 | 2,909 | 3,026 | ||||||||||||
Other |
304 | 962 | 1,033 | 2,012 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
$ | 7,416 | $ | 5,952 | $ | 14,316 | $ | 11,635 | ||||||||
Non-interest income increased $1.4 million compared to the same quarter of 2008. The increase is
primarily related to a $2.0 million increase in brokered loan fees due to an increase in mortgage
warehouse volume. Service charges increased $326,000 due to lower earnings credit rates and some
increases in fees. These increases were offset by a $254,000 decrease in trust fee income, which is
due to the overall lower market values of trust assets.
Non-interest income increased $2.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2008 to $14.3
million compared to $11.6 million during the same period of 2008. The increase is primarily related
to a $3.6 million
21
Table of Contents
increase in brokered loan fees due to an increase in mortgage warehouse volume.
Service charges increased $734,000 due to lower earnings credit rates and some increases in fees.
These increases were offset by a $586,000 decrease in trust fee income, which is due to the overall
lower market values of trust assets.
While management expects continued growth in non-interest income, the future rate of growth could
be affected by increased competition from nationwide and regional financial institutions. In order
to achieve continued growth in non-interest income, we may need to introduce new products or enter
into new markets.
Any new product introduction or new market entry could place additional demands on capital and
managerial resources.
Non-interest Expense
The components of non-interest expense were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 18,000 | $ | 15,369 | $ | 34,219 | $ | 30,711 | ||||||||
Net occupancy expense |
3,387 | 2,432 | 6,141 | 4,797 | ||||||||||||
Leased equipment depreciation |
1,115 | 1,179 | 2,238 | 2,372 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
655 | 649 | 1,210 | 1,326 | ||||||||||||
Legal and professional |
3,106 | 2,645 | 5,177 | 4,471 | ||||||||||||
Communications and data processing |
979 | 770 | 1,815 | 1,624 | ||||||||||||
FDIC insurance assessment |
3,493 | 359 | 5,040 | 722 | ||||||||||||
Other |
4,638 | 3,853 | 9,839 | 7,510 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
$ | 35,373 | $ | 27,256 | $ | 65,679 | $ | 53,533 | ||||||||
Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2009 increased $8.1 million, or 30%, to $35.4
million from $27.3 million. Salaries and employee benefits increased $2.6 million to $18.0 million
from $15.4 million, which was primarily due to general business growth.
Occupancy expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased $955,000, or 39%, compared to
the same quarter in 2008 related to general business growth.
Legal and professional expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased $461,000, or 17%
compared to the same quarter in 2008 mainly related to business growth and continued regulatory and
compliance costs. Regulatory and compliance costs continue to be a factor in our expense growth,
and we anticipate that they will continue to increase.
FDIC insurance assessment expense for the second quarter of 2009 increased $3.1 million compared to
the same period in 2008 due to the rate increase effective for the first quarter 2009. The second
quarter of 2009 also includes a special assessment of $2.4 million. The FDIC assessment rates may
continue to increase and will continue to be a factor in our expense growth.
Non-interest expense for the first six months of 2009 increased $12.2 million, or 23%, to $65.7
million from $53.5 million. Salaries and employee benefits increased $3.5 million to $34.2 million
from $30.7 million, which was primarily due to general business growth.
Occupancy expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $1.3 million, or 27%, compared
to the same quarter in 2008 related to general business growth.
Legal and professional expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $706,000, or 16%
compared to the same quarter in 2008 mainly related to business growth and continued regulatory and
compliance costs. Regulatory and compliance costs continue to be a factor in our expense growth,
and we anticipate that they will continue to increase.
FDIC insurance assessment expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $4.3 million
compared to the same period in 2008 due to the rate increase effective for the first quarter 2009.
The second quarter of 2009 also includes a special assessment of $2.4 million. The FDIC assessment
rates may continue to increase and will continue to be a factor in our expense growth.
22
Table of Contents
Other non-interest expense increased $2.3 million, or 31%, compared to the same period in 2008
mainly related to a $1.1 million increase in OREO-related expenses.
Analysis of Financial Condition
The aggregate loan portfolio at June 30, 2009 increased $222.7 million from December 31, 2008 to
$4.7 billion. Commercial loans, construction loans, real estate loans and leases and loans held for
sale increased $98.0 million, $6.5 million, $76.7 million, $9.2 million and $48.3 million,
respectively. Consumer loans decreased $4.3 million. We anticipate that overall loan growth during
the remainder of 2009 will be down from prior years as a result of tightened credit standards and
reduced demand for credit due to overall economic conditions.
Loans were as follows as of the dates indicated (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Commercial |
$ | 2,374,098 | $ | 2,276,054 | ||||
Construction |
673,906 | 667,437 | ||||||
Real estate |
1,065,519 | 988,784 | ||||||
Consumer |
28,374 | 32,671 | ||||||
Leases |
96,173 | 86,937 | ||||||
Gross loans held for investment |
4,238,070 | 4,051,883 | ||||||
Deferred income (net of direct origination costs) |
(26,766 | ) | (24,012 | ) | ||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(56,893 | ) | (46,835 | ) | ||||
Total loans held for investment, net |
4,154,411 | 3,981,036 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
544,652 | 496,351 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 4,699,063 | $ | 4,477,387 | ||||
We continue to lend primarily in Texas. As of June 30, 2009, a substantial majority of the
principal amount of the loans in our portfolio was to businesses and individuals in Texas. This
geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions within this
area. We originate substantially all of the loans in our portfolio, except in certain instances we
have purchased selected loan participations and interests in certain syndicated credits and USDA
government guaranteed loans. The risks created by this concentration have been considered by
management in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management
believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover estimated losses on loans at each
balance sheet date.
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
During the second quarter of 2009, we recorded net charge-offs in the amount of $6.8 million,
compared to net charge-offs of $3.6 million for the same period in 2008. For the first half of
2009, the ratio of net charge-offs to loans held for investment was .47% compared to .35% for the
same period in 2008. The reserve for loan losses, which is available to absorb losses inherent in
the loan portfolio, totaled $56.9 million at June 30, 2009, $46.8 million at December 31, 2008 and
$38.5 million at June 30, 2008. This represents 1.35%, 1.16% and 1.04% of loans held for investment
(net of unearned income) at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively.
The provision for loan losses is a charge to earnings to maintain the reserve for loan losses at a
level consistent with managements assessment of the loan portfolio in light of current economic
conditions and market trends. We recorded an $11.0 million provision for loan losses during the
second quarter of 2009 compared to $8.0 million in the second quarter of 2008 and $8.5 million in
the first quarter of 2009.
The reserve for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves for impaired loans and an estimate of
losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date, but not yet identified with specified
loans. We regularly evaluate our reserve for loan losses to maintain an adequate level to absorb
estimated loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Factors contributing to the determination of
reserves include the credit worthiness of the borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral,
and general economic conditions. All loan commitments
23
Table of Contents
rated substandard or worse and greater than
$500,000 are specifically reviewed for impairment. For loans deemed to be impaired, a specific
allocation is assigned based on the losses expected to be realized from those loans. For purposes
of determining the general reserve, the portfolio is segregated by product types to recognize
differing risk profiles among categories, and then further segregated by credit grades. Credit
grades are assigned to all loans greater than $50,000. Each credit grade is assigned a risk factor,
or reserve allocation percentage. These risk factors are multiplied by the outstanding principal
balance and risk-weighted by product type to calculate the required reserve. A similar process is
employed to calculate that portion of the required
reserve assigned to unfunded loan commitments. Even though portions of the allowance may be
allocated to specific loans, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in managements
judgment, should be charged off.
The reserve allocation percentages assigned to each credit grade have been developed based
primarily on an analysis of our historical loss rates, and historical loss rates at selected peer
banks, adjusted for certain qualitative factors. Qualitative adjustments for such things as general
economic conditions, changes in credit policies and lending standards, and changes in the trend and
severity of problem loans, can cause the estimation of future losses to differ from past
experience. In addition, the reserve considers the results of reviews performed by independent
third party reviewers as reflected in their confirmations of assigned credit grades within the
portfolio. The portion of the allowance that is not derived by the allowance allocation percentages
compensates for the uncertainty and complexity in estimating loan and lease losses including
factors and conditions that may not be fully reflected in the determination and application of the
allowance allocation percentages. We evaluate many factors and conditions in determining the
unallocated portion of the allowance, including the economic and business conditions affecting key
lending areas, credit quality trends and general growth in the portfolio. The allowance is
considered adequate and appropriate, given managements assessment of potential losses within the
portfolio as of the evaluation date, the significant growth in the loan and lease portfolio,
current economic conditions in the Companys market areas and other factors.
The methodology used in the periodic review of reserve adequacy, which is performed at least
quarterly, is designed to be dynamic and responsive to changes in portfolio credit quality and
anticipated future credit losses. The changes are reflected in the general reserve and in specific
reserves as the collectability of larger classified loans is evaluated with new information. As our
portfolio has matured, historical loss ratios have been closely monitored, and our reserve adequacy
relies primarily on our loss history. Currently, the review of reserve adequacy is performed by
executive management and presented to our board of directors for their review, consideration and
ratification on a quarterly basis.
24
Table of Contents
Activity in the allowance for possible loan losses is presented in the following table (in
thousands):
Six months ended | Six months ended | Year ended | ||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 46,835 | $ | 32,821 | $ | 32,821 | ||||||
Loans charged-off: |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
1,787 | 6,251 | 7,395 | |||||||||
Real estate construction |
1,881 | 118 | 1,866 | |||||||||
Real estate term |
1,486 | 469 | 4,168 | |||||||||
Consumer |
419 | | 193 | |||||||||
Leases |
3,950 | 29 | 12 | |||||||||
Total charge-offs |
9,523 | 6,867 | 13,634 | |||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
69 | 689 | 759 | |||||||||
Real estate term |
| | 47 | |||||||||
Consumer |
5 | | 13 | |||||||||
Leases |
7 | 67 | 79 | |||||||||
Total recoveries |
81 | 756 | 898 | |||||||||
Net charge-offs |
9,442 | 6,111 | 12,736 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
19,500 | 11,750 | 26,750 | |||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 56,893 | $ | 38,460 | $ | 46,835 | ||||||
Reserve to loans held for investment (2) |
1.35 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.16 | % | ||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans (1)(2) |
.47 | % | .35 | % | .35 | % | ||||||
Provision for loan losses to average loans (1)(2) |
.97 | % | .67 | % | .73 | % | ||||||
Recoveries to total charge-offs |
.85 | % | 11.01 | % | 6.59 | % | ||||||
Reserve as a multiple of net charge-offs |
6.0 | x | 6.3 | x | 3.7 | x | ||||||
Non-performing assets (NPAs): |
||||||||||||
Non-accrual (4) |
$ | 49,592 | $ | 16,753 | $ | 47,499 | ||||||
Other real estate owned (OREO) |
31,404 | 5,615 | 25,904 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 80,996 | $ | 22,368 | $ | 73,403 | ||||||
Non-accrual loans to loans (2) |
1.18 | % | .58 | % | 1.18 | % | ||||||
Total NPAs to loans plus OREO |
1.91 | % | .65 | % | 1.81 | % | ||||||
Reserve to non-accrual loans (2) |
1.1 | x | 1.8 | x | 1.0 | x | ||||||
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing (3)(4) |
$ | 3,539 | $ | 22,763 | $ | 4,115 | ||||||
Loans past due 90 days to loans (2) |
.08 | % | .11 | % | .10 | % |
(1) | Interim period ratios are annualized. | |
(2) | Excludes loans held for sale. | |
(3) | At June 30, 2009, $2.3 million of the loans past due 90 days and still accruing are premium finance loans. These loans are generally secured by obligations of insurance carriers to refund premiums on cancelled insurance policies. The refund of premiums from the insurance carriers can take up to 180 days or longer from the cancellation date. | |
(4) | At June 30, 2009, non-performing assets include $3.0 million of mortgage warehouse loans which were transferred to the loans held for investment portfolio at lower of cost or market, and some were subsequently moved to other real estate owned. |
25
Table of Contents
Non-performing Assets
Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans and leases, accruing loans 90 or more days past
due, restructured loans, and other repossessed assets. The table below summarizes our non-accrual
loans by type (in thousands):
June 30, | June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Non-accrual loans: |
||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 22,548 | $ | 2,438 | $ | 15,676 | ||||||
Construction |
23,123 | 12,650 | 22,362 | |||||||||
Real estate |
3,617 | 1,339 | 6,239 | |||||||||
Consumer |
96 | 194 | 296 | |||||||||
Leases |
208 | 132 | 2,926 | |||||||||
Total non-accrual loans |
$ | 49,592 | $ | 16,753 | $ | 47,499 | ||||||
At June 30, 2009, our total non-accrual loans were $49.6 million. Of these, $22.5 million were
characterized as commercial loans. This included a $7.3 million lender finance loan secured by the
borrowers material assets, a $6.1 million residence rehabilitation loan secured by single family
residences, a $4.4 million manufacturing loan secured by the assets of the borrower, a $2.5 million
loan secured by a first lien security interest in the borrowers accounts receivable and assets,
and $1.4 million in auto dealer loans secured by the borrowers accounts receivable and inventory.
Non-accrual loans also included $23.1 million characterized as construction loans. This included a
$6.8 million commercial real estate loan secured by undeveloped lots, a $5.0 million commercial
real estate loan secured by unimproved land, a $3.8 million commercial real estate loan secured by
retail property and $2.8 million in commercial real estate loans secured by single family
residences. Also included in this category is $1.8 million in commercial real estate loans secured
by a developed condo project, a $1.6 million commercial real estate loan secured by unimproved
lots, and a $1.1 million real estate investment loan secured by unimproved lots. Non-accrual loans
also included $3.6 million characterized as real estate loans, $2.4 of which relates to single
family mortgages that were originated in our mortgage warehouse operation. Each of these loans were
reviewed for impairment and specific reserves were allocated as necessary and included in the
allowance for loan losses as of June 30, 2009 to cover any probable loss.
At June 30, 2009, our other real estate owned (OREO) totaled $31.4 million. This included an
unimproved commercial real estate lot valued at $7.5 million, fully-developed residential real
estate lots valued at $1.6 million and undeveloped land valued at $7.1 million, commercial real
estate property consisting of single family residences and developed lots valued at $4.3 million,
commercial real estate property consisting of single family residences and a mix of lots at various
levels of completion valued at $2.0 million, an unimproved commercial real estate lot valued at
$2.9 million and an office building valued at $2.6 million.
At June 30, 2009, we had $3.5 million in loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest. At
June 30, 2009, $2.3 million of the loans past due 90 days and still accruing are premium finance
loans. These loans are generally secured by obligations of insurance carriers to refund premiums on
cancelled insurance policies. The refund of premiums from the insurance carriers can take up to 180
days or longer from the cancellation date.
Generally, we place loans on non-accrual when there is a clear indication that the borrowers cash
flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally when a loan is
90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid
interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the
remaining unpaid principal amount of the loan is deemed to be fully collectible. If collectability
is questionable, then cash payments are applied to principal. As of June 30, 2009, none of our
non-accrual loans were earning on a cash basis.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we
will be unable to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of
the loan agreement. Reserves on impaired loans are measured based on the present value of the
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or the fair value of
the underlying collateral.
Potential problem loans consist of loans that are performing in accordance with contractual terms
but for which we have concerns about the borrowers ability to comply with repayment terms because
of the borrowers potential financial difficulties. We monitor these loans closely and review
their performance on a regular basis. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had $18.4 million
and $22.5 million in loans of this type which were not included in either non-accrual or 90 days
past due categories.
26
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In general terms, liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet our cash needs. Our objective
in managing our liquidity is to maintain our ability to meet loan commitments, purchase securities
or repay deposits and other liabilities in accordance with their terms, without an adverse impact
on our current or future earnings. Our liquidity strategy is guided by policies, which are
formulated and monitored by our senior management and our Balance Sheet Management Committee
(BSMC), and which take into account the marketability of assets, the sources and stability of
funding and the level of unfunded commitments. We regularly evaluate all of our various funding
sources with an emphasis on accessibility, stability, reliability and cost-effectiveness. For the
year ended December 31, 2008 and for the six months ended June 30, 2009, our principal source of
funding has been our customer deposits, supplemented by our short-term and long-term borrowings,
primarily from securities sold under repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased from our
downstream correspondent bank relationships (which consist of banks that are considered to be
smaller than our bank) Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings and Fed borrowings.
Our liquidity needs have typically been fulfilled through growth in our core customer deposits, and
supplemented with brokered deposits and borrowings as needed. Our goal is to obtain as much of our
funding as possible from deposits of these core customers, which as of June 30, 2009, comprised
$2,861.3 million, or 78.5%, of total deposits. On an average basis, for the quarter ended June 30,
2009, deposits from core customers comprised $2,873.9 million, or 86.8%, of total quarterly average
deposits. These deposits are generated principally through development of long-term relationships
with customers and stockholders and our retail network which is mainly through BankDirect.
In addition to deposits from our core customers, we also have access to incremental deposits
through brokered retail certificates of deposit, or CDs. These CDs are generally of short
maturities, 90 to 180 days or less, and are used to supplement temporary differences in the growth
in loans, including growth in specific categories of loans, compared to customer deposits. As of
June 30, 2009, brokered retail CDs comprised $782.3 million, or 21.5%, of total deposits. On an
average basis, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, brokered retail CDs comprised $437.6 million,
or 13.2%, of total quarterly average deposits. We believe the Company has access to sources of
brokered deposits of not less than an additional $2.5 billion.
Additionally, we have borrowing sources available to supplement deposits and meet our funding
needs. These borrowing sources include federal funds purchased from our downstream correspondent
bank relationships (which consist of banks that are smaller than our bank) and from our upstream
correspondent bank relationships (which consist of banks that are larger than our bank), customer
repurchase agreements, treasury, tax and loan notes, and advances from the FHLB and the Fed. The
following table summarizes our borrowings (in thousands):
June 30, 2009 | ||||
Federal funds purchased |
$ | 632,945 | ||
Customer repurchase agreements |
61,816 | |||
Treasury, tax and loan notes |
4,311 | |||
Fed borrowings |
350,000 | |||
TLGP borrowings |
10,500 | |||
Trust preferred subordinated debentures |
113,406 | |||
Total borrowings |
$ | 1,172,978 | ||
Maximum outstanding at any month end during the year |
$ | 1,866,587 | ||
27
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes our other borrowing capacities in excess of balances outstanding at
June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
FHLB borrowing capacity relating to loans |
$ | 1,381,000 | ||
FHLB borrowing capacity relating to securities |
44,000 | |||
Total FHLB borrowing capacity |
$ | 1,425,000 | ||
Unused federal funds lines available from commercial banks |
$ | 693,000 |
In connection with the FDICs Temporary Liability Guarantee Program (TLGP), we have the capacity
to issue up to $1.1 billion in indebtedness which will be guaranteed by the FDIC for a limited
period of time to newly issued senior unsecured debt and non-interest bearing deposits. We may
issue any notes prior to October 31, 2009 with maturities no later than December 31, 2012. As of
June 30, 2009 $10.5 million of these notes was outstanding.
Our equity capital averaged $467.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to
$309.3 million for the same period in 2008. This increase reflects our retention of net earnings
during this period and the proceeds of sales of our common stock. We have not paid any cash
dividends on our common stock since we commenced operations and have no plans to do so in the near
future.
On September 10, 2008, we completed a sale of 4 million shares of our common stock in a private
placement to a number of institutional investors. The purchase price was $14.50 per share, and net
proceeds from the sale totaled $55 million. On May 8, 2009, we completed a sale of 4.6 million
shares of our common stock in a public offering. The purchase price was $13.75 per share, and net
proceeds from the sale totaled $59.4 million. The new capital from these offerings is being used
for general corporate purposes, including capital for support of anticipated growth of our bank.
On January 16, 2009, we completed the issuance of $75 million of Series A perpetual preferred stock
and related warrant under the U.S. Department of Treasurys voluntary Capital Purchase Program
(CPP). The preferred stock was repurchased in May 2009. In connection with the repurchase, we
recorded a $3.9 million accelerated deemed dividend in the second quarter of 2009 representing the
unamortized value of the outstanding warrants issued to the U.S. Department of Treasury to account
for the difference between the book value and the carrying value of the preferred stock repurchased
from the Treasury. The $3.9 million accelerated deemed dividend, combined with the previously
scheduled preferred dividend of $523,000 resulted in a total dividend and reduction of earnings
available to common stock of $4.4 million during the second quarter of 2009.
Our Bank capital ratios remain above the levels required to be well capitalized and our
consolidated capital ratios have been enhanced with $114.4 million from the two common stock
transactions discussed above and will allow us to grow organically with the addition of loan and
deposit relationships.
28
Table of Contents
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The following table presents significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third
parties by payment date. Payments for borrowings do not include interest. Payments related to
leases are based on actual payments specified in the underlying contracts. As of June 30, 2009,
our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties were as follows (in
thousands):
After One | After Three | |||||||||||||||||||
Within | but Within | but Within | After Five | |||||||||||||||||
One Year | Three Years | Five Years | Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits without a stated maturity
(1) |
$ | 1,825,073 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,825,073 | ||||||||||
Time deposits (1) |
1,778,867 | 31,778 | 7,765 | 99 | 1,818,509 | |||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased (1) |
632,945 | | | | 632,945 | |||||||||||||||
Customer repurchase agreements (1) |
61,816 | | | | 61,816 | |||||||||||||||
Treasury, tax and loan notes (1) |
4,311 | | | | 4,311 | |||||||||||||||
Fed borrowings (1) |
350,000 | 350,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
TLGP borrowings (1) |
10,500 | | | | 10,500 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations (1) (2) |
7,437 | 13,495 | 12,669 | 43,248 | 76,849 | |||||||||||||||
Trust preferred subordinated debentures
(1) |
| | | 113,406 | 113,406 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 4,670,949 | $ | 45,273 | $ | 20,434 | $ | 156,753 | $ | 4,893,409 | ||||||||||
(1) | Excludes interest. | |
(2) | Non-balance sheet item. |
Critical Accounting Policies
SEC guidance requires disclosure of critical accounting policies. The SEC defines critical
accounting policies as those that are most important to the presentation of a companys financial
condition and results, and require managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments,
often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently
uncertain.
We follow financial accounting and reporting policies that are in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The more significant of these policies are
summarized in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Not all these significant accounting
policies require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments. However, the policy
noted below could be deemed to meet the SECs definition of critical accounting policies.
Management considers the policies related to the allowance for loan losses as the most critical to
the financial statement presentation. The total allowance for loan losses includes activity related
to allowances calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment
of a Loan, and SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. The allowance for loan losses is
established through a provision for loan losses charged to current earnings. The amount maintained
in the allowance reflects managements continuing evaluation of the loan losses inherent in the
loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves assigned to certain
classified loans and general reserves. Factors contributing to the determination of specific
reserves include the credit-worthiness of the borrower, and more specifically, changes in the
expected future receipt of principal and interest payments and/or in the value of pledged
collateral. A reserve is recorded when the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the discounted
estimated cash flows using the loans initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the
collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. For purposes of determining the general reserve,
the portfolio is segregated by product types in order to recognize differing risk profiles among
categories, and then further segregated by credit grades. See Summary of Loan Loss Experience for
further discussion of the risk factors considered by management in establishing the allowance for
loan losses.
29
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is a broad term for the risk of economic loss due to adverse changes in the fair value
of a financial instrument. These changes may be the result of various factors, including interest
rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, or equity prices. Additionally, the financial
instruments subject to market risk can be classified either as held for trading purposes or held
for other than trading.
We are subject to market risk primarily through the effect of changes in interest rates on our
portfolio of assets held for purposes other than trading. The effect of other changes, such as
foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and/or equity prices do not pose significant market risk
to us.
The responsibility for managing market risk rests with the BSMC, which operates under policy
guidelines established by our board of directors. The negative acceptable variation in net interest
revenue due to a 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates is generally limited by
these guidelines to +/- 5%. These guidelines also establish maximum levels for short-term
borrowings, short-term assets and public and brokered deposits. They also establish minimum levels
for unpledged assets, among other things. Compliance with these guidelines is the ongoing
responsibility of the BSMC, with exceptions reported to our board of directors on a quarterly
basis.
Interest Rate Risk Management
Our interest rate sensitivity is illustrated in the following table. The table reflects
rate-sensitive positions as of June 30, 2009, and is not necessarily indicative of positions on
other dates. The balances of interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities are presented in the
periods in which they next reprice to market rates or mature and are aggregated to show the
interest rate sensitivity gap. The mismatch between repricings or maturities within a time period
is commonly referred to as the gap for that period. A positive gap (asset sensitive), where
interest rate sensitive assets exceed interest rate sensitive liabilities, generally will result in
the net interest margin increasing in a rising rate environment and decreasing in a falling rate
environment. A negative gap (liability sensitive) will generally have the opposite results on the
net interest margin. To reflect anticipated prepayments, certain asset and liability categories are
shown in the table using estimated cash flows rather than contractual cash flows.
30
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis
June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
June 30, 2009
(In thousands)
0-3 mo | 4-12 mo | 1-3 yr | 3+ yr | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance | Balance | Balance | Balance | Balance | ||||||||||||||||
Securities (1) |
$ | 59,679 | $ | 65,144 | $ | 83,872 | $ | 99,492 | $ | 308,187 | ||||||||||
Total variable loans |
4,020,243 | 1,739 | 4,377 | | 4,026,359 | |||||||||||||||
Total fixed loans |
188,952 | 207,361 | 287,334 | 73,294 | 756,941 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans (2) |
4,209,195 | 209,100 | 291,711 | 73,294 | 4,783,300 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest sensitive assets |
$ | 4,268,874 | $ | 274,244 | $ | 375,583 | $ | 172,786 | $ | 5,091,487 | ||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing customer deposits |
$ | 1,478,025 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,478,025 | ||||||||||
CDs & IRAs |
403,598 | 210,018 | 31,778 | 7,864 | 653,258 | |||||||||||||||
Wholesale deposits |
742,987 | 39,278 | | | 782,265 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing deposits |
2,624,610 | 249,296 | 31,778 | 7,864 | 2,913,548 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements, Federal
funds purchased, FHLB borrowings |
1,044,761 | 14,811 | | | 1,059,572 | |||||||||||||||
Trust preferred subordinated
debentures |
| | | 113,406 | 113,406 | |||||||||||||||
Total borrowings |
1,044,761 | 14,811 | | 113,406 | 1,172,978 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest sensitive liabilities |
$ | 3,669,371 | $ | 264,107 | $ | 31,778 | $ | 121,270 | $ | 4,086,526 | ||||||||||
GAP |
599,503 | 10,137 | 343,805 | 51,516 | | |||||||||||||||
Cumulative GAP |
599,503 | 609,640 | 953,445 | 1,004,961 | 1,004,961 | |||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 730,034 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
464,684 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,194,718 | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Securities based on fair market value. | |
(2) | Loans include loans held for sale and are stated at gross. |
The table above sets forth the balances as of June 30, 2009 for interest bearing assets, interest
bearing liabilities, and the total of non-interest bearing deposits and stockholders equity. While
a gap interest table is useful in analyzing interest rate sensitivity, an interest rate sensitivity
simulation provides a better illustration of the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest
rates. Earnings are also affected by the effects of changing interest rates on the value of funding
derived from demand deposits and stockholders equity. We perform a sensitivity analysis to
identify interest rate risk exposure on net interest income. We quantify and measure interest rate
risk exposure using a model to dynamically simulate the effect of changes in net interest income
relative to changes in interest rates and account balances over the next twelve months based on
three interest rate scenarios. These are a most likely rate scenario and two shock test
scenarios.
The most likely rate scenario is based on the consensus forecast of future interest rates
published by independent sources. These forecasts incorporate future spot rates and relevant
spreads of instruments that are actively traded in the open market. The Federal Reserves Federal
Funds target affects short-term borrowing; the prime lending rate and the LIBOR are the basis for
most of our variable-rate loan pricing. The 10-year mortgage rate is also monitored because of its
effect on prepayment speeds for mortgage-backed securities. These are our primary interest rate
exposures. We are currently not using derivatives to manage our interest rate exposure.
The two shock test scenarios assume a sustained parallel 200 basis point increase or decrease,
respectively, in interest rates. As short-term rates continued to fall during 2008, we could not
assume interest rate decreases of any amount as the results of the decreasing rates scenario would
not be meaningful. We will continue to
evaluate these scenarios as interest rates change, until short-term rates rise above 3.0%.
31
Table of Contents
Our interest rate risk exposure model incorporates assumptions regarding the level of interest rate
or balance changes on indeterminable maturity deposits (demand deposits, interest bearing
transaction accounts and savings accounts) for a given level of market rate changes. These
assumptions have been developed through a combination of historical analysis and future expected
pricing behavior. Changes in prepayment behavior of mortgage-backed securities, residential and
commercial mortgage loans in each rate environment are captured using industry estimates of
prepayment speeds for various coupon segments of the portfolio. The impact of planned growth and
new business activities is factored into the simulation model. This modeling indicated interest
rate sensitivity as follows (in thousands):
Anticipated Impact Over the Next Twelve Months | ||||
as Compared to Most Likely Scenario | ||||
200 bp Increase | ||||
June 30, 2009 | ||||
Change in net interest income |
$ | 14,799 |
The simulations used to manage market risk are based on numerous assumptions regarding the effect
of changes in interest rates on the timing and extent of repricing characteristics, future cash
flows, and customer behavior. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the
model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or precisely predict the impact of higher or
lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due
to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions
and management strategies, among other factors.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, have evaluated
our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2009, and concluded that those disclosure
controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in our internal controls or in
other factors known to us that could materially affect these controls subsequent to their
evaluation, nor any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses. While we believe that our existing disclosure controls and procedures have been
effective to accomplish these objectives, we intend to continue to examine, refine and formalize
our disclosure controls and procedures and to monitor ongoing developments in this area.
32
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There has not been any material change in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys
2008 Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On May 19, 2009, we held our annual meeting of stockholders (the Annual Meeting). At the Annual
Meeting, out of 31,014,158 shares of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting, the holders of
26,104,263 shares were present in person or by proxy. At the Annual Meeting, each nominee for
director discussed in our Proxy Statement dated April 9, 2009 regarding the Annual Meeting was
elected a director of the Company and the compensation of the Companys executives was approved, on
an advisory basis. The votes received by each nominee for director and the advisory vote on
compensation are set forth below:
Proposal | Votes For | Votes Against | Votes Withheld | |||||||||
Proposal 1: Election of Directors |
||||||||||||
Peter B. Bartholow |
24,266,481 | 1,837,782 | ||||||||||
Joseph M. Grant |
25,718,815 | 385,448 | ||||||||||
Frederick B. Hegi, Jr. |
25,329,085 | 775,178 | ||||||||||
Larry L. Helm |
23,769,094 | 2,335,169 | ||||||||||
James R. Holland, Jr. |
24,907,539 | 1,196,724 | ||||||||||
George F. Jones, Jr. |
25,777,765 | 326,498 | ||||||||||
Walter W. McAllister III |
24,389,351 | 1,714,912 | ||||||||||
Lee Roy Mitchell |
24,485,305 | 1,618,958 | ||||||||||
Steve Rosenberg |
25,777,825 | 326,438 | ||||||||||
Robert W. Stallings |
25,757,238 | 347,025 | ||||||||||
Ian J. Turpin |
25,777,613 | 326,650 | ||||||||||
Proposal 2: Advisory approval of
executives compensation |
17,796,620 | 8,205,219 | 102,424 |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. | ||
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
33
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC. | ||||
Date: July 23, 2009 |
||||
/s/ Peter B. Bartholow
|
||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) |
34
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | ||
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. | |
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith. |
35