Annual Statements Open main menu

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES INC/TX - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)

e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
     
o   Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission file number 001-34657
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
     
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
  75-2679109
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
     
2000 McKinney Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.
(Address of principal executive officers)
  75201
(Zip Code)
214/932-6600
(Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code)
N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þ Yes o No
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer” and “accelerated filer” Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large Accelerated Filer o   Accelerated Filer þ   Non-Accelerated Filer o   Smaller Reporting Company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
     On July 20, 2011, the number of shares set forth below was outstanding with respect to each of the issuer’s classes of common stock:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share                37,330,496
 
 

 


 

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
Index
         
       
 
       
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    7  
    21  
 
    23  
 
    36  
 
    39  
 
       
 
    39  
 
    40  
 
    41  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME — UNAUDITED

(In thousands except per share data)
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Interest income
                               
Interest and fees on loans
  $ 73,509     $ 64,935     $ 141,549     $ 126,504  
Securities
    1,680       2,491       3,526       5,217  
Federal funds sold
    5       40       33       42  
Deposits in other banks
    65       6       262       15  
     
Total interest income
    75,259       67,472       145,370       131,778  
Interest expense
                               
Deposits
    3,417       8,420       8,288       16,178  
Federal funds purchased
    94       244       201       609  
Repurchase agreements
    2       2       4       6  
Other borrowings
    14       1       14       48  
Trust preferred subordinated debentures
    638       920       1,271       1,824  
     
Total interest expense
    4,165       9,587       9,778       18,665  
     
Net interest income
    71,094       57,885       135,592       113,113  
Provision for credit losses
    8,000       14,500       15,500       28,000  
     
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
    63,094       43,385       120,092       85,113  
Non-interest income
                               
Service charges on deposit accounts
    1,608       1,539       3,391       3,022  
Trust fee income
    1,066       980       2,020       1,934  
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income
    539       481       1,062       952  
Brokered loan fees
    2,558       2,221       5,078       4,125  
Equipment rental income
    676       1,196       1,459       2,540  
Other
    1,504       1,619       2,625       2,411  
     
Total non-interest income
    7,951       8,036       15,635       14,984  
Non-interest expense
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    24,109       21,393       48,281       41,462  
Net occupancy expense
    3,443       3,032       6,753       6,046  
Leased equipment depreciation
    447       1,035       1,003       2,094  
Marketing
    2,733       1,101       4,856       1,888  
Legal and professional
    4,264       3,298       6,987       5,248  
Communications and technology
    2,584       2,186       4,931       4,112  
FDIC insurance assessment
    1,972       2,241       4,483       4,109  
Allowance and other carrying costs for OREO
    1,023       808       5,053       3,100  
Other
    4,688       4,024       9,315       8,245  
     
Total non-interest expense
    45,263       39,118       91,662       76,304  
     
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    25,782       12,303       44,065       23,793  
Income tax expense
    9,074       4,187       15,418       8,077  
     
Income from continuing operations
    16,708       8,116       28,647       15,716  
Loss from discontinued operations (after-tax)
    (54 )     (54 )     (114 )     (109 )
     
Net income
  $ 16,654     $ 8,062     $ 28,533     $ 15,607  
     
 
                               
Basic earnings per common share
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.45     $ 0.22     $ 0.77     $ 0.43  
Net income
  $ 0.45     $ 0.22     $ 0.77     $ 0.43  
 
                               
Diluted earnings per common share
                               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.44     $ 0.22     $ 0.75     $ 0.42  
Net income
  $ 0.43     $ 0.22     $ 0.74     $ 0.42  
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except per share data)
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
    (Unaudited)          
Assets
               
Cash and due from banks
  $ 89,326     $ 104,866  
Federal funds sold
          75,000  
Securities, available-for-sale
    157,821       185,424  
Loans held for sale
    1,122,330       1,194,209  
Loans held for sale from discontinued operations
    396       490  
Loans held for investment (net of unearned income)
    5,164,293       4,711,330  
Less: Allowance for loan losses
    67,748       71,510  
 
           
Loans held for investment, net
    5,096,545       4,639,820  
Premises and equipment, net
    12,118       11,568  
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
    210,406       225,309  
Goodwill and intangible assets, net
    20,792       9,483  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 6,709,734     $ 6,446,169  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
Liabilities:
               
Deposits:
               
Non-interest bearing
  $ 1,483,159     $ 1,451,307  
Interest bearing
    3,196,108       3,545,146  
Interest bearing in foreign branches
    742,459       458,948  
 
           
Total deposits
    5,421,726       5,455,401  
 
               
Accrued interest payable
    1,032       2,579  
Other liabilities
    47,744       48,577  
Federal funds purchased
    203,969       283,781  
Repurchase agreements
    14,634       10,920  
Other borrowings
    343,299       3,186  
Trust preferred subordinated debentures
    113,406       113,406  
 
           
Total liabilities
    6,145,810       5,917,850  
 
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation value
               
Authorized shares — 10,000,000
               
Issued shares
           
Common stock, $.01 par value:
               
Authorized shares — 100,000,000
               
Issued shares — 37,330,143 and 36,957,104 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
    373       369  
Additional paid-in capital
    343,997       336,796  
Retained earnings
    214,340       185,807  
Treasury stock — shares at cost: 417 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
    (8 )     (8 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes
    5,222       5,355  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    563,924       528,319  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 6,709,734     $ 6,446,169  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands except share data)
                                                                                 
    Preferred Stock     Common Stock                     Treasury Stock              
                                                                    Accumulated        
                                                                    Other        
                                    Additional                             Comprehensive        
                                    Paid-in     Retained                     Income, Net of        
    Shares     Amount     Shares     Amount     Capital     Earnings     Shares     Amount     Taxes     Total  
   
Balance at December 31, 2009
        $       35,919,941     $ 359     $ 326,224     $ 148,620       (417 )   $ (8 )   $ 6,165     $ 481,360  
Comprehensive income:
                                                                               
Net income (unaudited)
                                  15,607                         15,607  
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $324 (unaudited)
                                                    602       602  
 
                                                                             
Total comprehensive income (unaudited)
                                                                            16,209  
Tax expense related to exercise of stock options (unaudited)
                            286                               286  
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in earnings (unaudited)
                            3,166                               3,166  
Issuance of stock related to stock-based awards (unaudited)
                125,077       2       596                               598  
Issuance of common stock (unaudited)
                732,235       7       12,452                               12,459  
     
Balance at June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
        $       36,777,253     $ 368     $ 342,724     $ 164,227       (417 )   $ (8 )   $ 6,767     $ 514,078  
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2010
        $       36,957,104     $ 369     $ 336,796     $ 185,807       (417 )   $ (8 )   $ 5,355     $ 528,319  
Comprehensive income:
                                                                               
Net income (unaudited)
                                  28,533                         28,533  
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $72 (unaudited)
                                                    (133 )     (133 )
 
                                                                             
Total comprehensive income (unaudited)
                                                                            28,400  
Tax expense related to exercise of stock options (unaudited)
                            1,616                               1,616  
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in earnings (unaudited)
                            4,185                               4,185  
Issuance of stock related to stock-based awards (unaudited)
                373,039       4       1,400                               1,404  
     
Balance at June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
        $       37,330,143     $ 373     $ 343,997     $ 214,340       (417 )   $ (8 )   $ 5,222     $ 563,924  
     
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

5


Table of Contents

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — UNAUDITED
(In thousands)
                 
    Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Operating activities
               
Net income from continuing operations
  $ 28,647     $ 15,716  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
               
Provision for credit losses
    15,500       28,000  
Depreciation and amortization
    2,822       3,796  
Amortization and accretion on securities
    46       75  
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income
    (1,062 )     (952 )
Stock-based compensation expense
    4,185       3,166  
Tax benefit from stock option exercises
    1,616       286  
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements
    (4,618 )     (816 )
Originations of loans held for sale
    (10,105,686 )     (7,572,908 )
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale
    10,177,565       7,269,262  
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
    (200 )     32  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
    (2,437 )     (7,766 )
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
    (2,306 )     6,375  
     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations
    114,072       (255,734 )
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations
    (20 )     (105 )
     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    114,052       (255,839 )
 
               
Investing activities
               
Maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities
    2,690       3,650  
Principal payments received on available-for-sale securities
    24,661       36,301  
Net increase in loans held for investment
    (472,225 )     (27,725 )
Purchase of premises and equipment, net
    (2,196 )     (1,507 )
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets
    17,599       1,996  
Cash paid for acquisition
    (11,482 )      
     
Net cash provided by (used in)investing activities of continuing operations
    (440,953 )     12,715  
 
               
Financing activities
               
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
    (33,675 )     805,344  
Proceeds from issuance of stock related to stock-based awards
    1,403       598  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
          12,459  
Net increase (decrease) in other borrowings
    343,827       (309,586 )
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements
    4,618       816  
Net decrease in federal funds purchased
    (79,812 )     (270,797 )
     
Net cash provided by financing activities of continuing operations
    236,361       238,834  
     
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (90,540 )     (4,290 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    179,866       125,439  
     
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 89,326     $ 121,149  
     
 
               
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid during the period for interest
  $ 10,784     $ 18,630  
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
    9,854       12,767  
Non-cash transactions:
               
Transfers from loans/leases to OREO and other repossessed assets
    6,593       19,358  
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — UNAUDITED
(1) OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (“the Company”), a Delaware bank holding company, was incorporated in November 1996 and commenced operations in March 1998. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Texas Capital Bank, National Association (the “Bank”). The Bank currently provides commercial banking services to its customers primarily in Texas and concentrates on middle market commercial and high net worth customers.
Basis of Presentation
The accounting and reporting policies of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and to generally accepted practices within the banking industry. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary, the Bank. Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments and the disclosures made are adequate to make interim financial information not misleading. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2010, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2011 (the “2010 Form 10-K”). Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for possible loan losses, the valuation allowance for other real estate owned (“OREO”), the fair value of stock-based compensation awards, the fair values of financial instruments and the status of contingencies are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net
Unrealized gains or losses on our available-for-sale securities (after applicable income tax expense or benefit) are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net. Accumulated comprehensive income, net for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. The fair value estimates of existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments do not include the value of anticipated future business or the value of assets and liabilities not considered financial instruments.

7


Table of Contents

(2) EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands except per share data):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Numerator:
                               
Net income from continuing operations
  $ 16,708     $ 8,116     $ 28,647     $ 15,716  
Loss from discontinued operations
    (54 )     (54 )     (114 )     (109 )
     
Net income
  $ 16,654     $ 8,062     $ 28,533     $ 15,607  
     
Denominator:
                               
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted average shares
    37,281,262       36,669,518       37,186,826       36,431,766  
Effect of employee stock options(1)
    741,569       658,541       850,831       584,649  
Effect of warrants to purchase common stock
    310,057       158,726       301,585       120,779  
     
Denominator for dilutive earnings per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions
    38,332,888       37,486,785       38,339,242       37,137,194  
     
 
Basic earnings per common share from continuing operations
  $ 0.45     $ 0.22     $ 0.77     $ 0.43  
Basic earnings per common share from discontinued operations
                       
     
Basic earnings per common share
  $ 0.45     $ 0.22     $ 0.77     $ 0.43  
     
 
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
  $ 0.44     $ 0.22     $ 0.75     $ 0.42  
Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations
    (0.01 )                  
     
Diluted earnings per common share
  $ 0.43     $ 0.22     $ 0.74     $ 0.42  
     
 
(1)   Stock options, SARs and RSUs outstanding of 50,500 at June 30, 2011 and 1,235,969 at June 30, 2010 have not been included in diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented.
(3) SECURITIES
Securities are identified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale based upon various factors, including asset/liability management strategies, liquidity and profitability objectives, and regulatory requirements. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts. Available-for-sale securities are securities that may be sold prior to maturity based upon asset/liability management decisions. Securities identified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, net of taxes. Amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts on mortgage-backed securities is periodically adjusted for estimated prepayments. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary are included in gain (loss) on sale of securities. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.
Our net unrealized gain on the available-for-sale securities portfolio value decreased from a gain of $8.2 million, which represented 4.65% of the amortized cost at December 31, 2010, to a gain of $8.0 million, which represented 5.36% of the amortized cost at June 30, 2011.

8


Table of Contents

 
The following is a summary of securities (in thousands):
                                 
    June 30, 2011  
            Gross     Gross     Estimated  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
     
Available-for-Sale Securities:
                               
Residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 102,146     $ 6,594     $     $ 108,740  
Corporate securities
    5,000                   5,000  
Municipals
    35,135       1,313             36,448  
Equity securities(1)
    7,506       127             7,633  
     
 
  $ 149,787     $ 8,034     $     $ 157,821  
     
                                 
    December 31, 2010  
            Gross     Gross     Estimated  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
     
Available-for-Sale Securities:
                               
Residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 126,838     $ 6,891     $ (5 )   $ 133,724  
Corporate securities
    5,000                   5,000  
Municipals
    37,841       1,244             39,085  
Equity securities(1)
    7,506       109             7,615  
     
 
  $ 177,185     $ 8,244     $ (5 )   $ 185,424  
     
 
(1)   Equity securities consist of Community Reinvestment Act funds.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities are presented below by contractual maturity (in thousands, except percentage data):
                                         
    June 30, 2011
            After One     After Five              
    Less Than     Through     Through     After Ten        
    One Year     Five Years     Ten Years     Years     Total  
     
Available-for-sale:
                                       
Residential mortgage-backed securities:(1)
                                       
Amortized cost
  $ 2,332     $ 10,201     $ 41,119     $ 48,494     $ 102,146  
Estimated fair value
    2,353       10,619       44,189       51,579       108,740  
Weighted average yield(3)
    4.560 %     4.475 %     4.797 %     3.875 %     4.322 %
Corporate securities:
                                       
Amortized cost
          5,000                   5,000  
Estimated fair value
          5,000                   5,000  
Weighted average yield(3)
          7.375 %                 7.375 %
Municipals:(2)
                                       
Amortized cost
    3,154       23,214       8,767             35,135  
Estimated fair value
    3,188       24,193       9,067             36,448  
Weighted average yield(3)
    5.131 %     5.498 %     5.836 %           5.550 %
Equity securities:
                                       
Amortized cost
    7,506                         7,506  
Estimated fair value
    7,633                         7,633  
 
                                   
Total available-for-sale securities:
                                       
Amortized cost
                                  $ 149,787  
 
                                   
Estimated fair value
                                  $ 157,821  
 
                                   
 
(1)   Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
 
(2)   Yields have been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis assuming a 35% federal tax rate.
 
(3)   Yields are calculated based on amortized cost.

9


Table of Contents

Securities with carrying values of approximately $35.2 million were pledged to secure certain borrowings and deposits at June 30, 2011. Of the pledged securities at June 30, 2011, approximately $17.3 million were pledged for certain deposits, and approximately $17.9 million were pledged for repurchase agreements.
At June 30, 2011 we did not have any investment securities in an unrealized loss position. The following table discloses, as of December 31, 2010, our investment securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more months (in thousands):
December 31, 2010
                                                 
    Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or Longer     Total  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Loss     Value     Loss     Value     Loss  
     
Mortgage-backed securities
  $ 3,681     $ (5 )   $     $     $ 3,681     $ (5 )
     
 
  $ 3,681     $ (5 )         $     $ 3,681     $ (5 )
     
At June 30, 2011, we did not have any investment positions in an unrealized loss position. The unrealized losses at December 31, 2010 are interest rate related, and losses have decreased as rates have decreased in 2009 and remained low during 2010 and 2011. We do not believe these unrealized losses are “other than temporary” as (1) we do not have the intent to sell any of the securities in the table above; and (2) it is not probable that we will be unable to collect the amounts contractually due. We have not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities.
(4) LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, loans were as follows (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
     
Commercial
  $ 2,942,657     $ 2,592,924  
Construction
    414,832       270,008  
Real estate
    1,745,670       1,759,758  
Consumer
    20,653       21,470  
Leases
    72,425       95,607  
     
Gross loans held for investment
    5,196,237       4,739,767  
Deferred income (net of direct origination costs)
    (31,944 )     (28,437 )
Allowance for loan losses
    (67,748 )     (71,510 )
     
Total loans held for investment, net
    5,096,545       4,639,820  
Loans held for sale
    1,122,330       1,194,209  
     
Total
  $ 6,218,875     $ 5,834,029  
     
We continue to lend primarily in Texas. As of June 30, 2011, a substantial majority of the principal amount of the loans held for investment in our portfolio was to businesses and individuals in Texas. This geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions within this area. The risks created by this concentration have been considered by management in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover estimated losses on loans at each balance sheet date.
The reserve for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves for impaired loans and an estimate of losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date, but not yet identified with specified loans. We regularly evaluate our reserve for loan losses to maintain an adequate level to absorb estimated loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Factors contributing to the determination of reserves include the credit worthiness of the borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral, and general economic conditions. All loan commitments rated substandard or worse and greater than $500,000 are specifically reviewed for loss potential. For loans deemed to be impaired, a specific allocation is assigned based on the losses expected to be realized from those

10


Table of Contents

loans. For purposes of determining the general reserve, the portfolio is segregated by product types to recognize differing risk profiles among categories, and then further segregated by credit grades. Credit grades are assigned to all loans. Each credit grade is assigned a risk factor, or reserve allocation percentage. These risk factors are multiplied by the outstanding principal balance and risk-weighted by product type to calculate the required reserve. A similar process is employed to calculate a reserve assigned to off-balance sheet commitments, specifically unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit, and any needed reserve is recorded in other liabilities. Even though portions of the allowance may be allocated to specific loans, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.
We have several pass credit grades that are assigned to loans based on varying levels of risk, ranging from credits that are secured by cash or marketable securities, to watch credits which have all the characteristics of an acceptable credit risk but warrant more than the normal level of monitoring. Within our criticized/classified credit grades are special mention, substandard, and doubtful. Special mention loans are those that are currently protected by sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower, but that are potentially weak and constitute an additional credit risk. The loan has the potential to deteriorate to a substandard grade due to the existence of financial or administrative deficiencies. Substandard loans are inadequately protected by sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower and of the collateral pledged. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Substandard loans can be accruing or can be on nonaccrual depending on the circumstances of the individual loans. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in substandard loans with the added characteristics that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high. All doubtful loans are on nonaccrual.
The reserve allocation percentages assigned to each credit grade have been developed based primarily on an analysis of our historical loss rates. The allocations are adjusted for certain qualitative factors for such things as general economic conditions, changes in credit policies and lending standards. Historical loss rates are adjusted to account for current environmental conditions which we believe are likely to cause loss rates to be higher or lower than past experience. Each quarter we produce an adjustment range for environmental factors unique to us and our market. Changes in the trend and severity of problem loans can cause the estimation of losses to differ from past experience. In addition, the reserve considers the results of reviews performed by independent third party reviewers as reflected in their confirmations of assigned credit grades within the portfolio. The portion of the allowance that is not derived by the allowance allocation percentages compensates for the uncertainty and complexity in estimating loan and lease losses including factors and conditions that may not be fully reflected in the determination and application of the allowance allocation percentages. We evaluate many factors and conditions in determining the unallocated portion of the allowance, including the economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit quality trends and general growth in the portfolio. The allowance is considered adequate and appropriate, given management’s assessment of potential losses within the portfolio as of the evaluation date, the significant growth in the loan and lease portfolio, current economic conditions in the Company’s market areas and other factors.
The methodology used in the periodic review of reserve adequacy, which is performed at least quarterly, is designed to be dynamic and responsive to changes in portfolio credit quality. The changes are reflected in the general reserve and in specific reserves as the collectability of larger classified loans is evaluated with new information. As our portfolio has matured, historical loss ratios have been closely monitored, and our reserve adequacy relies primarily on our loss history. Currently, the review of reserve adequacy is performed by executive management and presented to our board of directors for their review, consideration and ratification on a quarterly basis.

11


Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the credit risk profile of our loan portfolio by internally assigned grades and nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
June 30, 2011
                                                 
    Commercial     Construction     Real Estate     Consumer     Leases     Total  
     
Grade:
                                               
Pass
  $ 2,833,156     $ 379,897     $ 1,593,744     $ 20,271     $ 60,628     $ 4,887,696  
Special mention
    38,826       222       33,051       53       1,060       73,212  
Substandard-accruing
    56,954       12,459       78,167       6       9,859       157,445  
Non-accrual
    13,721       22,254       40,708       323       878       77,884  
     
Total loans held for investment
  $ 2,942,657     $ 414,832     $ 1,745,670     $ 20,653     $ 72,425     $ 5,196,237  
     
December 31, 2010
                                                 
    Commercial     Construction     Real Estate     Consumer     Leases     Total  
     
Grade:
                                               
Pass
  $ 2,461,769     $ 243,843     $ 1,549,400     $ 20,312     $ 78,715     $ 4,354,039  
Special mention
    45,754       19,856       59,294       76       1,552       126,532  
Substandard-accruing
    42,858       6,288       88,567       376       9,017       147,106  
Non-accrual
    42,543       21       62,497       706       6,323       112,090  
     
Total loans held for investment
  $ 2,592,924     $ 270,008     $ 1,759,758     $ 21,470     $ 95,607     $ 4,739,767  
     
The following table details activity in the reserve for loan losses by portfolio segment for the six months ended ended June 30, 2011. Allocation of a portion of the reserve to one category of loans does not preclude its availability to absorb losses in other categories.
                                                         
(in thousands)   Commercial     Construction     Real Estate     Consumer     Leases     Unallocated     Total  
     
Beginning balance
  $ 15,918     $ 7,336     $ 38,049     $ 306     $ 5,405     $ 4,496     $ 71,510  
Provision for possible loan losses
    6,518       (998 )     5,935       93       (1,366 )     5,539       15,721  
Charge-offs
    5,647             13,788       317       996             20,748  
Recoveries
    689       243       153       4       176             1,265  
     
Net charge-offs
    4,958       (243 )     13,635       313       820             19,483  
     
Ending balance
  $ 17,478     $ 6,581     $ 30,349     $ 86     $ 3,219     $ 10,035     $ 67,748  
     
 
                                                       
Period end amount allocated to:
                                                       
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 3,154     $ 370     $ 6,628     $ 55     $ 205     $     $ 10,412  
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
                                         
     
Ending balance
  $ 3,154     $ 370     $ 6,628     $ 55     $ 205     $     $ 10,412  
     
Activity in the reserve for loan losses during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
         
Balance at the beginning of the period
  $ 67,931  
Provision for loan losses
    28,783  
Net charge-offs:
       
Loans charged-off
    21,991  
Recoveries
    158  
 
   
Net charge-offs
    21,833  
 
   
Balance at the end of the period
  $ 74,881  
 
   

12


Table of Contents

Generally we place loans on non-accrual when there is a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally when a loan is 90 days past due. The table below summarizes our non-accrual loans by type and purpose as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
         
Commercial
       
Business loans
  $ 13,721  
Construction
       
Market risk
    22,254  
Real estate
       
Market risk
    37,599  
Commercial
    714  
Secured by 1-4 family
    2,395  
Consumer
    323  
Leases
    878  
 
   
Total non-accrual loans
  $ 77,884  
 
   
A loan held for investment is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement. The following table details our impaired loans, by portfolio class as of June 30, 2011. We had no impaired loans without an allowance at June 30, 2011.
                                         
            Unpaid Principal             Average Recorded     Interest Income  
(in thousands)   Recorded Investment     Balance     Related Allowance     Investment     Recognized  
     
With an allowance recorded:
                                       
Commercial
                                       
Business loans
  $ 13,721     $ 22,061     $ 3,154     $ 19,902     $  
Energy
                      13,334        
Construction
                                       
Market risk
    22,254       22,254       370       9,178        
Real estate
                                       
Market risk
    37,599       49,849       6,013       50,457        
Commercial
    714       714       29       4,727        
Secured by 1-4 family
    2,395       2,395       586       2,501        
Consumer
    323       323       55       554        
Leases
    878       878       205       2,961        
     
Total impaired loans with an allowance recorded
  $ 77,884     $ 98,474     $ 10,412     $ 103,614     $  
     

13


Table of Contents

Average impaired loans outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 totaled $103.6 million and $159.0 million, respectively.
The table below provides an age analysis of our past due loans that are still accruing as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
                                                         
                    Greater                             Greater Than  
    30-59 Days     60-89 Days     Than 90     Total Past                     90 Days and  
    Past Due     Past Due     Days     Due     Current     Total     Accruing(1)  
     
Commercial
                                                     
Business loans
  $ 9,080     $ 10,595     $ 2,947     $ 22,622     $ 2,382,653     $ 2,405,275     $ 2,947
Energy
                            523,664       523,664       -
Construction
                                                     
Market risk
    944                   944       380,320       381,264      
Secured by 1-4 family
                            11,314       11,314      
Real estate
                                                     
Market risk
    10,945       4,642       5,902       21,489       1,285,367       1,306,856       5,902
Commercial
          835             835       315,692       316,527      
Secured by 1-4 family
    209       775       1,484       2,468       79,111       81,579       1,484
Consumer
    62       69             131       20,197       20,328      
Leases
    1,301                   1,301       70,245       71,546      
     
Total loans held for investment
  $ 22,541     $ 16,916     $ 10,333     $ 49,790     $ 5,068,563     $ 5,118,353     $ 10,333
     
 
(1)   Loans past due 90 days and still accruing includes premium finance loans of $2.7 million. These loans are generally secured by obligations of insurance carriers to refund premiums on cancelled insurance policies. The refund of premiums from the insurance carriers can take 180 days or longer from the cancellation date.
The following table summarizes, as of June 30, 2011, loans that have been restructured during 2011 (in thousands):
                         
            Pre-Restructuring     Post-Restructuring  
    Number of     Outstanding Recorded     Outstanding Recorded  
    Contracts     Investment     Investment  
|     | |
Commercial business loans
    3     $ 2,140     $ 2,140  
Construction market risk
    1       2,620       2,566  
Real estate market risk
    7       41,625       38,349  
Real estate - 1-4 family
    1       1,217       1,217  
     
Total new restructured loans in 2011
    12     $ 47,602     $ 44,272  
     
The restructured loans generally include terms to reduce the interest rate and extend payment terms. We have not forgiven any principal on the above loans.

14 


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes, as of June 30, 2011, loans that were restructured within the last 12 months that have subsequently defaulted (in thousands):
                 
    Number of     Recorded  
    Contracts     Investment  
|     |
Construction — market risk
    1     $  
Real estate — market risk
    1       4,371  
     
Total
    2     $ 4,371  
     
Both loans were subsequently foreclosed. One of the properties was subsequently sold, and the other is included in the June 30, 2011 OREO balance.
(5) OREO AND VALUATION ALLOWANCE FOR LOSSES ON OREO
The table below presents a summary of the activity related to OREO (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
|     | | |
Beginning balance
  $ 26,172     $ 28,865     $ 42,261     $ 27,264  
Additions
    5,667       15,207       6,593       19,358  
Sales
    (3,829 )     (1,439 )     (17,524 )     (2,040 )
Valuation allowance for OREO
          (556 )     (1,921 )     (2,394 )
Direct write-downs
    (725 )           (2,124 )     (111 )
     
Ending balance
  $ 27,285     $ 42,077     $ 27,285     $ 42,077  
     
(6) FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit which involve varying degrees of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
The table below summarizes our financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk at June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
         
Commitments to extend credit
  $ 1,568,960  
Standby letters of credit
    104,781  

15 


Table of Contents

(7) REGULATORY MATTERS
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory (and possibly additional discretionary) actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of June 30, 2011, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
Financial institutions are categorized as well capitalized or adequately capitalized, based on minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the tables below. As shown below, the Bank’s capital ratios exceed the regulatory definition of well capitalized as of June 30, 2011 and 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There have been no conditions or events since the notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. Based upon the information in its most recently filed call report, the Bank continues to meet the capital ratios necessary to be well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action and continues to meet the capital ratios necessary to be well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
                 
    June 30,  
    2011     2010  
     
Risk-based capital:
               
Tier 1 capital
    10.16 %     11.00 %
Total capital
    11.25 %     12.26 %
Leverage
    10.46 %     10.69 %
(8) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The fair value of our stock option and stock appreciation right (“SAR”) grants are estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide the best single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
Stock-based compensation consists of options issued prior to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), SARs and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The SARs and RSUs were granted from 2006 through 2010.
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
(in thousands)   2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Stock- based compensation expense recognized:
                               
Unvested options
  $     $ 60     $     $ 170  
SARs
    218       498       724       976  
RSUs
    1,834       1,037       3,462       2,020  
     
Total compensation expense recognized
  $ 2,052     $ 1,595     $ 4,186     $ 3,166  
     

16 


Table of Contents

                 
    June 30, 2011  
    Options     SARs and RSUs  
 
               
Unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards
  $     $ 12,133  
Weighted average period over which expense is expected to be recognized, in years
          3.03  
(9) DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Subsequent to the end of the first quarter of 2007, we and the purchaser of our residential mortgage loan division (“RML”) agreed to terminate and settle the contractual arrangements related to the sale of the division, which had been completed as of the end of the third quarter of 2006. Historical operating results of RML are reflected as discontinued operations in the financial statements.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the loss from discontinued operations was $54,000 and $54,000, net of taxes, respectively. For the six months ended 2011 and 2010, the loss from discontinued operations was $114,000 and $109,000, net of taxes, respectively. The 2011 and 2010 losses are primarily related to continuing legal and salary expenses incurred in dealing with the remaining loans and requests from investors related to the repurchase of previously sold loans. We still have approximately $396,000 in loans held for sale from discontinued operations that are carried at the estimated market value at quarter-end, which is less than the original cost. We plan to sell these loans, but timing and price to be realized cannot be determined at this time due to market conditions. In addition, we continue to address requests from investors related to repurchasing loans previously sold. While the balances as of June 30, 2011 include a liability for exposure to additional contingencies, including risk of having to repurchase loans previously sold, we recognize that market conditions may result in additional exposure to loss and the extension of time necessary to complete the discontinued mortgage operation.
(10) FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on our financial statements except for the expanded disclosures noted below.
We determine the fair market values of our financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as provided below.
     
       Level 1
  Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets include U.S. Treasuries that are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter markets.
 
   
      Level 2
  Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets include U.S. government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities, corporate securities, municipal bonds, and Community Reinvestment Act funds. This category includes derivative assets and liabilities where values are based on internal cash flow models supported by market data inputs.
 
   
      Level 3
  Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair values requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category also includes impaired loans and OREO where collateral values have been based on third party appraisals; however, due to current economic conditions, comparative sales data typically used in appraisals may be unavailable or more subjective due to lack of market activity. Additionally, this category includes certain mortgage loans that were transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment at a lower of cost or fair value.

17


Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value at June 30, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
                         
  Fair Value Measurements Using  
  Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
Available for sale securities:(1)
                       
Mortgage-backed securities
  $     $ 108,740     $  
Corporate securities
          5,000        
Municipals
          36,448        
Other
          7,633        
Loans(2) (4)
                37,470  
OREO(3) (4)
                27,285  
Derivative asset(5)
          8,940        
Derivative liability(5)
          (8,940 )      
 
(1)   Securities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, generally monthly.
 
(2)   Includes certain mortgage loans that have been transferred to loans held for investment from loans held for sale at the lower of cost or market. Also, includes impaired loans that have been measured for impairment at the fair value of the loan’s collateral.
 
(3)   OREO is transferred from loans to OREO at fair value less selling costs.
 
(4)   Fair value of loans and OREO is measured on a nonrecurring basis, generally annually or more often as warranted by market and economic conditions
 
(5)   Derivative assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, generally quarterly.
Level 3 Valuations
Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial instruments also include those for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. Currently, we measure fair value for certain loans on a nonrecurring basis as described below.
Loans
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, certain impaired loans were remeasured and reported at fair value through a specific valuation allowance allocation of the allowance for possible loan losses based upon the fair value of the underlying collateral. The $37.5 million total above includes impaired loans at June 30, 2011 with a carrying value of $38.3 million that were reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations totaling $5.4 million for a total reported fair value of $32.9 million based on collateral valuations utilizing Level 3 valuation inputs. Fair values were based on third party appraisals; however, based on the current economic conditions, comparative sales data typically used in the appraisals may be unavailable or more subjective due to the lack of real estate market activity. Also included in this total are $5.4 million in mortgage warehouse loans that were reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations totaling $795,000, for a total reported fair value of $4.6 million. Certain mortgage loans that were transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment were valued based on third party broker pricing. As the dollar amount and number of loans being valued is very small, a comprehensive market analysis is not obtained or considered necessary. Instead, we conduct a general polling of one or more mortgage brokers for indications of general market prices for the types of mortgage loans being valued, and we consider values based on recent experience in selling loans of like terms and comparable quality.
OREO
Certain foreclosed assets, upon initial recognition, were valued based on third party appraisals. At June 30, 2011, OREO with a carrying value of $36.5 million was reduced by specific valuation allowance allocations totaling $9.2 million for a total reported fair value of $27.3 million based on valuations utilizing Level 3 valuation inputs. Fair values were based on third party appraisals; however, based on the current economic conditions, comparative sales data typically used in the appraisals may be unavailable or more subjective due to the lack of real estate market activity.

18


Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Generally accepted accounting principles require disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. This disclosure does not and is not intended to represent the fair value of the Company.
A summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments is as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    Carrying     Estimated     Carrying     Estimated  
    Amount     Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value  
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 89,326     $ 89,326     $ 179,866     $ 179,866  
Securities, available-for-sale
    157,821       157,821       185,424       185,424  
Loans held for sale
    1,122,330       1,122,330       1,194,209       1,194,209  
Loans held for sale from discontinued operations
    396       396       490       490  
Loans held for investment, net
    5,096,545       5,101,293       4,639,820       4,652,588  
Derivative asset
    8,940       8,940       6,874       6,874  
Deposits
    5,421,726       5,434,514       5,455,401       5,457,692  
Federal funds purchased
    203,969       203,969       283,781       283,781  
Borrowings
    561,902       561,904       14,106       14,107  
Trust preferred subordinated debentures
    113,406       113,406       113,406       113,406  
Derivative liability
    8,940       8,940       6,874       6,874  
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents
The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value.
Securities
The fair value of investment securities is based on prices obtained from independent pricing services which are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar securities.
Loans, net
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are generally based on carrying values. The fair value for all other loans is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value. The carrying amount of loans held for sale approximates fair value.
Derivatives
The estimated fair value of the interest rate swaps are based on internal cash flow models supported by market data inputs.

19


Table of Contents

Deposits
The carrying amounts for variable-rate money market accounts approximate their fair value. Fixed-term certificates of deposit fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities.
Federal funds purchased, other borrowings and trust preferred subordinated debentures
The carrying value reported in the consolidated balance sheet for federal funds purchased and other borrowings approximates their fair value. The fair value of other borrowings and trust preferred subordinated debentures is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on similar borrowings.
Off-balance sheet instruments
Fair values for our off-balance sheet instruments which consist of lending commitments and standby letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. Management believes that the fair value of these off-balance sheet instruments is not significant.
(11) STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
We had comprehensive income of $16.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and comprehensive income of $8.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Comprehensive income during the three months ended June 30, 2011 included a net after-tax gain of $28,000 and comprehensive income during the three months ended June 30, 2010 included a net after-tax gain of $417,000 due to changes in the net unrealized gains/losses on securities available-for-sale.
(12) NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
FASB ASC 310 Receivables (“ASC 310”) was amended to enhance disclosures about credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses. The amendments require an entity to disclose credit quality information, such as internal risk grades, more detailed nonaccrual and past due information, and modifications of its financing receivables. The disclosures under ASC 310, as amended, were effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. This amendment did not have a significant impact on our financial results, but it has significantly expanded the disclosures that we are required to provide.
On April 5, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02 “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”, which clarifies when creditors should classify loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the year. The guidance on measuring the impairment of a receivable restructured in a troubled debt restructuring is effective on a prospective basis. We are currently evaluating the new guidance.

20


Table of Contents

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL SUMMARY — UNAUDITED
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(In thousands)
                                                 
    For the three months ended     For the three months ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
    Average     Revenue/     Yield/     Average     Revenue/     Yield/  
    Balance     Expense(1)     Rate     Balance     Expense(1)     Rate  
Assets
                                               
Securities – taxable
  $ 127,269     $ 1,346       4.24 %   $ 193,542     $ 2,126       4.41 %
Securities – non-taxable(2)
    35,804       514       5.76 %     39,635       562       5.69 %
Federal funds sold
    14,303       5       0.14 %     91,564       40       0.18 %
Deposits in other banks
    77,928       65       0.33 %     12,449       6       0.19 %
Loans held for sale from continuing operations
    808,165       9,591       4.76 %     664,474       8,244       4.98 %
Loans
    4,890,696       63,918       5.24 %     4,459,790       56,691       5.10 %
Less reserve for loan losses
    68,031                   71,536              
 
                                   
Loans, net of reserve
    5,630,830       73,509       5.24 %     5,052,728       64,935       5.15 %
 
                                   
Total earning assets
    5,886,134       75,439       5.14 %     5,389,918       67,669       5.04 %
Cash and other assets
    306,372                       261,668                  
 
                                           
Total assets
  $ 6,192,506                     $ 5,651,586                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
                                               
Transaction deposits
  $ 375,084     $ 55       0.06 %   $ 484,900     $ 389       0.32 %
Savings deposits
    2,465,118       1,700       0.28 %     2,054,199       4,047       0.79 %
Time deposits
    541,337       1,351       1.00 %     832,973       2,808       1.35 %
Deposits in foreign branches
    415,998       311       0.30 %     380,361       1,176       1.24 %
 
                                   
Total interest bearing deposits
    3,797,537       3,417       0.36 %     3,752,433       8,420       0.90 %
Other borrowings
    233,388       110       0.19 %     222,427       247       0.45 %
Trust preferred subordinated debentures
    113,406       638       2.26 %     113,406       920       3.25 %
 
                                   
Total interest bearing liabilities
    4,144,331       4,165       0.40 %     4,088,266       9,587       0.94 %
Demand deposits
    1,455,366                       1,024,292                  
Other liabilities
    40,177                       24,693                  
Stockholders’ equity
    552,632                       514,335                  
 
                                           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 6,192,506                     $ 5,651,586                  
 
                                           
 
                                           
Net interest income
          $ 71,274                     $ 58,082          
 
                                           
Net interest margin
                    4.86 %                     4.32 %
Net interest spread
                    4.74 %                     4.10 %
Additional information from discontinued operations:
                                               
Loans held for sale
  $ 415                     $ 583                  
Borrowed funds
    415                       583                  
Net interest income
          $ 7                     $ 12          
Net interest margin — consolidated
                    4.86 %                     4.32 %
 
(1)   The loan averages include loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and are stated net of unearned income.
 
(2)   Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable.

21 


Table of Contents

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL SUMMARY — UNAUDITED
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(In thousands)
                                                 
    For the six months ended   For the six months ended
    June 30, 2011   June 30, 2010
    Average   Revenue/   Yield/   Average   Revenue/   Yield/
    Balance   Expense(1)   Rate   Balance   Expense(1)   Rate
Assets
                                               
Securities — taxable
  $ 133,603     $ 2,846       4.30 %   $ 202,530     $ 4,467       4.45 %
Securities — non-taxable (2)
    36,475       1,046       5.78 %     40,639       1154       5.73 %
Federal funds sold
    29,230       33       0.23 %     49,750       42       0.17 %
Deposits in other banks
    177,027       262       0.30 %     12,453       15       0.24 %
Loans held for sale from continuing
operations
    772,124       18,268       4.77 %     561,538       13,734       4.93 %
Loans
    4,806,778       123,281       5.17 %     4,437,001       112,770       5.13 %
Less reserve for loan losses
    69,081       -       -       69,144       -        
 
                                               
Loans, net of reserve
    5,509,821       141,549       5.18 %     4,929,395       126,504       5.18 %
 
                                               
Total earning assets
    5,886,156       145,736       4.99 %     5,234,767       132,182       5.09 %
Cash and other assets
    301,742                       286,262                  
 
                                               
Total assets
  $ 6,187,898                     $ 5,521,029                  
 
                                               
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
                                               
Transaction deposits
  $ 360,611     $ 110       0.06 %   $ 425,383     $ 653       0.31 %
Savings deposits
    2,467,265       4,071       0.33 %     1,914,476       7,571       0.80 %
Time deposits
    625,006       3,272       1.06 %     836,875       5,595       1.35 %
Deposits in foreign branches
    396,393       835       0.42 %     367,155       2,359       1.30 %
 
                                               
Total interest bearing deposits
    3,849,275       8,288       0.43 %     3,543,889       16,178       0.92 %
Other borrowings
    196,623       219       0.22 %     341,292       663       0.39 %
Trust preferred subordinated debentures
    113,406       1,271       2.26 %     113,406       1,824       3.24 %
 
                                               
Total interest bearing liabilities
    4,159,304       9,778       0.47 %     3,998,587       18,665       0.94 %
Demand deposits
    1,436,654                       990,513                  
Other liabilities
    43,944                       26,658                  
Stockholders’ equity
    547,996                       505,271                  
 
                                               
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 6,187,898                     $ 5,521,029                  
 
                                               
Net interest income
          $ 135,958                     $ 113,517          
 
                                               
Net interest margin
                    4.66 %                     4.37 %
Net interest spread
                    4.52 %                     4.15 %
Additional information from discontinued operations:
                                               
Loans held for sale
  $ 452                     $ 584                  
Borrowed funds
    452                       584                  
Net interest income
          $ 18                     $ 25          
Net interest margin — consolidated
                    4.66 %                     4.37 %
 
(1)   The loan averages include loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued and are stated net of unearned income.
 
(2)   Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable.

22 


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Forward-Looking Statements
Statements and financial analysis contained in this document that are not historical facts are forward looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). In addition, certain statements may be contained in our future filings with SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with our approval that are not statements of historical fact and constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Act. Forward looking statements describe our future plans, strategies and expectations and are based on certain assumptions. Words such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “targeted”, “continue”, “remain”, “will”, “should”, “may” and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements.
Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in such statements. The important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
  (1)   Changes in interest rates and the relationship between rate indices, including LIBOR and Fed Funds
 
  (2)   Changes in the levels of loan prepayments, which could affect the value of our loans or investment securities
 
  (3)   Changes in general economic and business conditions in areas or markets where we compete
 
  (4)   Competition from banks and other financial institutions for loans and customer deposits
 
  (5)   The failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of and provisions made to the allowance for credit losses and differences in assumptions utilized by banking regulators which could have retroactive impact
 
  (6)   The loss of senior management or operating personnel and the potential inability to hire qualified personnel at reasonable compensation levels
 
  (7)   Changes in government regulations including changes as a result of the current economic crisis. On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Act represents a significant overhaul of many aspects of the regulation of the financial services industry.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. We have no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events. In light of these assumptions, risks and uncertainties, the events discussed in any forward-looking statements in this quarterly report might not occur.
Results of Operations
Except as otherwise noted, all amounts and disclosures throughout this document reflect continuing operations. See Part I, Item 1 herein for a discussion of discontinued operations at Note (9) — Discontinued Operations.
Summary of Performance
We reported net income of $16.7 million, or $0.44 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $8.1 million, or $0.22 per diluted common share, for the second quarter of 2010. Return on average equity was 12.13% and return on average assets was 1.08% for the second quarter of 2011, compared to 6.33% and .58%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2010. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $28.6 million, or $0.75 per diluted common share, compared to $15.7 million, or $0.42 per diluted common share, for the same period in 2010. Return on average equity was 10.54% and return on average assets

23 


Table of Contents

was .93% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 7.23% and .63%, respectively, for the same period in 2010.
Net income increased $8.6 million, or 106%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011, and increased $12.9 million, or 82%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010. The $8.6 million increase during the three months ended June 30, 2011, was primarily the result of a $13.2 million increase in net interest income and a $6.5 million decrease in the provision for credit losses, offset by a $85,000 decrease in non-interest income, a $6.2 million increase in non-interest expense and a $4.9 million increase in income tax expense. The $12.9 million increase during the six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily the result of a $22.5 million increase in net interest income, a $651,000 increase in non-interest income and a $12.5 million decrease in the provision for credit losses, offset by a $15.4 million increase in non-interest expense and a $7.3 million increase in income tax expense.
Details of the changes in the various components of net income are further discussed below.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income was $71.1 million for the second quarter of 2011, compared to $57.9 million for the second quarter of 2010. The increase was due to an increase in average earning assets of $496.2 million as compared to the second quarter of 2010 and an increase in the net interest margin from 4.32% to 4.86%. The increase in average earning assets included a $430.9 million increase in average loans held for investment and a $143.7 million increase in loans held for sale, offset by a $70.1 million decrease in average securities. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, average net loans and securities represented 96% and 3%, respectively, of average earning assets compared to 95% and 4% in the same quarter of 2010.
Average interest bearing liabilities increased $56.1 million from the second quarter of 2010, which included a $45.1 million increase in interest bearing deposits and an $11.0 million increase in other borrowings. The increase in average other borrowings is a result of the growth in loans during the second quarter of 2011. The average cost of interest bearing deposits decreased from         .90% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to .36% for the same period of 2011.
Net interest income was $135.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $113.1 million for the same period of 2010. The increase was due to an increase in average earning assets of $651.4 million as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 and an increase in the net interest margin from 4.37% to 4.66%. The increase in average earning assets included a $369.8 million increase in average loans held for investment and a $210.6 million increase in loans held for sale, offset by a $73.1 million decrease in average securities. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, average net loans and securities represented 94% and 3%, respectively, of average earning assets compared to 95% and 5% in the same period of 2010.
Average interest bearing liabilities increased $160.7 million compared to the first six months of 2010, which included a $305.4 million increase in interest bearing deposits offset by a $144.7 million decrease in other borrowings. The significant decrease in average other borrowings is a result of the growth in demand deposits and interest bearing deposits, reducing the need for borrowed funds. The average cost of interest bearing deposits decreased from .92% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to .43% for the same period of 2011.
The following table presents the changes (in thousands) in taxable-equivalent net interest income and identifies the changes due to differences in the average volume of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the changes due to changes in the average interest rate on those assets and liabilities.

24 


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Three months ended     Six months ended  
    June 30, 2011/2010     June 30, 2011/2010  
            Change Due To             Change Due To(1)  
    Change     Volume     Yield/Rate     Change     Volume     Yield/Rate  
     
Interest income:
                                               
Securities(2)
  $ (828 )   $ (782 )   $ (46 )   $ (1,729 )   $ (1,638 )   $ (91 )
Loans held for sale
    1,347       1,783       (436 )     4,534       5,150       (616 )
Loans held for investment
    7,227       5,479       1,748       10,511       9,399       1,112  
Federal funds sold
    (35 )     (34 )     (1 )     (9 )     (17 )     8  
Deposits in other banks
    59       32       27       247       198       49  
     
Total
    7,770       6,478       1,292       13,554       13,092       462  
Interest expense:
                                               
Transaction deposits
    (334 )     (88 )     (246 )     (543 )     (99 )     (444 )
Savings deposits
    (2,347 )     810       (3,157 )     (3,500 )     2,186       (5,686 )
Time deposits
    (1,457 )     (983 )     (474 )     (2,323 )     (1,416 )     (907 )
Deposits in foreign branches
    (865 )     110       (975 )     (1,524 )     188       (1,712 )
Borrowed funds
    (419 )     12       (431 )     (997 )     (281 )     (716 )
     
Total
    (5,422 )     (139 )     (5,283 )     (8,887 )     578       (9,465 )
     
Net interest income
  $ 13,192     $ 6,617     $ 6,575     $ 22,441       12,514       9,927  
     
 
(1)   Changes attributable to both volume and yield/rate are allocated to both volume and yield/rate on an equal basis.
 
(2)   Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable.
Net interest margin from continuing operations, the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets from continuing operations, was 4.86% for the second quarter of 2011 compared to 4.32% for the second quarter of 2010. This 54 basis point increase was a result of a decline in the costs of interest bearing liabilities and growth in non-interest bearing deposits and stockholders’ equity, as well as improved pricing on loans. Total cost of funding, including demand deposits and stockholders’ equity decreased from .68% for the second quarter of 2010 to .27% for the second quarter of 2011. The benefit of the reduction in funding costs was complimented by a 1 basis point increase in yields on earning assets.
Non-interest Income
The components of non-interest income were as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Service charges on deposit accounts
  $ 1,608     $ 1,539     $ 3,391     $ 3,022  
Trust fee income
    1,066       980       2,020       1,934  
Bank owned life insurance (BOLI) income
    539       481       1,062       952  
Brokered loan fees
    2,558       2,221       5,078       4,125  
Equipment rental income
    676       1,196       1,459       2,540  
Other
    1,504       1,619       2,625       2,411  
     
Total non-interest income
  $ 7,951     $ 8,036     $ 15,635     $ 14,984  
     
Non-interest income decreased $85,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. This decrease is primarily related to a decrease of $520,000 in equipment rental income due to the continued decline in the leased equipment portfolio. Offsetting this decrease is a $337,000 increase in brokered loan fees and small increases in various categories.
Non-interest income increased $651,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $15.6 million compared to $15.0 million during the same period of 2010. The increase is primarily related to an increase of $953,000 in brokered loan fees as compared to the same period in 2010, related to an increase in warehouse lending volumes. Service charges increased $369,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010 related to an increase in the level of demand deposits and treasury management business activity. Other non-interest income increased $214,000 as compared to 2011, also contributing to the

 


Table of Contents

year-over-year increase in non-interest income. Offsetting these increases was a $1.1 million decrease in equipment rental income related to a decline in the leased equipment portfolio.
While management expects continued growth in non-interest income, the future rate of growth could be affected by increased competition from nationwide and regional financial institutions. In order to achieve continued growth in non-interest income, we may need to introduce new products or enter into new lines of business or expand existing lines of business. Any new product introduction or new market entry could place additional demands on capital and managerial resources.
Non-interest Expense
The components of non-interest expense were as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
     
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 24,109     $ 21,393     $ 48,281     $ 41,462  
Net occupancy expense
    3,443       3,032       6,753       6,046  
Leased equipment depreciation
    447       1,035       1,003       2,094  
Marketing
    2,733       1,101       4,856       1,888  
Legal and professional
    4,264       3,298       6,987       5,248  
Communications and technology
    2,584       2,186       4,931       4,112  
FDIC insurance assessment
    1,972       2,241       4,483       4,109  
Allowance and other carrying costs for OREO
    1,023       808       5,053       3,100  
Other
    4,688       4,024       9,315       8,245  
     
Total non-interest expense
  $ 45,263     $ 39,118     $ 91,662     $ 76,304  
     
Non-interest expense for the second quarter of 2011 increased $6.2 million, or 16%, to $45.3 million from $39.1 million in the second quarter of 2010. The increase is primarily attributable to a $2.7 million increase in salaries and employee benefits, which was primarily due to general business growth.
Occupancy expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased $411,000, or 14%, compared to the same quarter in 2010 as a result of general business growth.
Leased equipment depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased $588,000 compared to the same quarter in 2010 as a result of the continued decline in the leased equipment portfolio.
Marketing expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased $1.6 million, or 148%, compared to the same quarter in 2010, which was primarily due to general business growth.
Legal and professional expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased $966,000, or 29%, compared to same quarter in 2010. Our legal and professional expense will continue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter and could increase in the future as we respond to continued regulatory changes, strategic initiatives and increased cost of resolving problem assets under current economic conditions.
FDIC insurance assessment expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 decreased by $269,000 from $2.2 million in 2010 to $2.0 million as a result of changes to the FDIC assessment method.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011, allowance and other carrying costs for OREO increased $215,000, to $1.0 million, $725,000 of which related to deteriorating values of assets held in OREO. All of the $725,000 in valuation expense related to direct write-downs of the OREO balance.
Non-interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $15.4 million, or 20%, compared to the same period in 2010. Salaries and employee benefits increased $6.8 million to $48.3 million from $41.5 million, which was primarily due to general business growth.
Occupancy expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $707,000, or 12%, compared to the same period in 2010 related to general business growth.

26


Table of Contents

Leased equipment depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased $1.1 million as a result of the continued decline in the leased equipment portfolio.
Marketing expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $3.0 million, or 157%, compared to the same period in 2010, which was primarily the result of general business growth.
Legal and professional expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $1.7 million, or 33%, compared to the same period in 2010 mainly related to business growth and continued regulatory and compliance costs.
FDIC insurance assessment expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $374,000 compared to the same period in 2010 due to the increase in our deposit base and assets.
Allowance and other carrying costs for OREO for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased $2.0 million to $5.1 million, $4.0 million of which related to deteriorating values of assets held in OREO. Of the $4.0 million valuation expense, $1.9 million related to increasing the valuation allowance during the period. The remaining $2.1 million related to direct write-downs of the OREO balance.
Analysis of Financial Condition
Loan Portfolio
Total loans net of allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2011 increased $384.8 million from December 31, 2010 to $6.2 billion. Combined commercial, construction, real estate, consumer loans and leases increased $456.5 million. The increase in commercial loans includes a premium finance loan portfolio that was purchased. Loans held for sale decreased $71.9 million from December 31, 2010.
Loans were as follows as of the dates indicated (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
Commercial
  $ 2,942,657     $ 2,592,924  
Construction
    414,832       270,008  
Real estate
    1,745,670       1,759,758  
Consumer
    20,653       21,470  
Leases
    72,425       95,607  
     
Gross loans held for investment
    5,196,237       4,739,767  
Deferred income (net of direct origination costs)
    (31,944 )     (28,437 )
Allowance for loan losses
    (67,748 )     (71,510 )
     
Total loans held for investment, net
    5,096,545       4,639,820  
Loans held for sale
    1,122,330       1,194,209  
     
Total
  $ 6,218,875     $ 5,834,029  
     
We continue to lend primarily in Texas. As of June 30, 2011, a substantial majority of the principal amount of the loans held for investment in our portfolio was to businesses and individuals in Texas. This geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions in Texas. The risks created by these concentrations have been considered by management in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover estimated losses on loans at each balance sheet date.
We originate substantially all of the loans in our portfolio, except participations in residential mortgage loans held for sale, select loan participations and syndications, which are underwritten independently by us prior to purchase and certain USDA and SBA government guaranteed loans that we purchase in the secondary market. We also participate in syndicated loan relationships, both as a participant and as an agent. As of June 30, 2011, we have $708.2 million in syndicated loans, $224.6 million of which we acted as agent. All syndicated loans,

27


Table of Contents

whether we act as agent or participant, are underwritten to the same standards as all other loans originated by us. In addition, as of June 30, 2011, $21.5 million of our syndicated loans were nonperforming.
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
The provision for credit losses is a charge to earnings to maintain the reserve for loan losses at a level consistent with management’s assessment of the loan portfolio in light of current economic conditions and market trends. We recorded a provision of $8.0 million during the second quarter of 2011 compared to $14.5 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $7.5 million in the first quarter of 2011. The amount of reserves and provision required to support the reserve have generally increased over the last two years as a result of credit deterioration in our loan portfolio driven by negative changes in national and regional economic conditions and the impact of those conditions on the financial condition of borrowers and the values of assets, including real estate assets, pledged as collateral. Approximately half of the $8.0 million provision recorded during the second quarter of of 2011 was required to support portfolio growth in loans held for investment.
The reserve for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves for impaired loans and an estimate of losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date, but not yet identified with specified loans. We regularly evaluate our reserve for loan losses to maintain an adequate level to absorb estimated loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Factors contributing to the determination of reserves include the credit worthiness of the borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral, and general economic conditions. All loan commitments rated substandard or worse and greater than $500,000 are specifically reviewed for loss potential. For loans deemed to be impaired, a specific allocation is assigned based on the losses expected to be realized from those loans. For purposes of determining the general reserve, the portfolio is segregated by product types to recognize differing risk profiles among categories, and then further segregated by credit grades. Credit grades are assigned to all loans. Each credit grade is assigned a risk factor, or reserve allocation percentage. These risk factors are multiplied by the outstanding principal balance and risk-weighted by product type to calculate the required reserve. A similar process is employed to calculate a reserve assigned to off-balance sheet commitments, specifically unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. Even though portions of the allowance may be allocated to specific loans, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in management’s judgment, should be charged off.
The reserve allocation percentages assigned to each credit grade have been developed based primarily on an analysis of our historical loss rates. The allocations are adjusted for certain qualitative factors for such things as general economic conditions, changes in credit policies and lending standards. Changes in the trend and severity of problem loans can cause the estimation of losses to differ from past experience. In addition, the reserve considers the results of reviews performed by independent third party reviewers as reflected in their confirmations of assigned credit grades within the portfolio. The portion of the allowance that is not derived by the allowance allocation percentages compensates for the uncertainty and complexity in estimating loan and lease losses including factors and conditions that may not be fully reflected in the determination and application of the allowance allocation percentages. We evaluate many factors and conditions in determining the unallocated portion of the allowance, including the economic and business conditions affecting key lending areas, credit quality trends and general growth in the portfolio. The allowance is considered adequate and appropriate, given management’s assessment of potential losses within the portfolio as of the evaluation date, the significant growth in the loan and lease portfolio, current economic conditions in the Company’s market areas and other factors.
The methodology used in the periodic review of reserve adequacy, which is performed at least quarterly, is designed to be dynamic and responsive to changes in portfolio credit quality. The changes are reflected in the general reserve and in specific reserves as the collectability of larger classified loans is evaluated with new information. As our portfolio has matured, historical loss ratios have been closely monitored, and our reserve adequacy relies primarily on our loss history. Currently, the review of reserve adequacy is performed by executive management and presented to our board of directors for their review, consideration and ratification on a quarterly basis.
The combined reserve for credit losses, which includes a liability for losses on unfunded commitments, totaled $69.4 million at June 30, 2011, $73.4 million at December 31, 2010 and $77.0 million at June 30, 2010. The total reserve percentage decreased to 1.34% at June 30, 2011 from 1.56% of loans held for investment at December 31, 2010 and decreased from 1.73% of loans held for investment at June 30, 2010. The total reserve percentage had increased in 2009 and 2010 as a result of the effects of national and regional economic

28


Table of Contents

conditions on borrowers and values of assets pledged as collateral. The combined reserve is starting to trend down as we recognize losses on loans for which there were specific or general allocations of reserves and see improvement in our overall credit quality. The overall reserve for loan losses continues to result from consistent application of the loan loss reserve methodology as described above. At June 30, 2011, we believe the reserve is sufficient to cover all expected losses in the portfolio and has been derived from consistent application of the methodology described above. Should any of the factors considered by management in evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses change, our estimate of expected losses in the portfolio could also change, which would affect the level of future provisions for loan losses.

29


Table of Contents

Activity in the reserve for loan losses is presented in the following table (in thousands):
                         
    Six months ended     Six months ended     Year ended  
    June 30,     June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010     2010  
Reserve for loan losses:
                       
Beginning balance
  $ 71,510     $ 67,931     $ 67,931  
Loans charged-off:
                       
Commercial
    5,647       14,204       27,723  
Real estate — construction
          6,209       12,438  
Real estate — term
    13,788       766       9,517  
Consumer
    317             216  
Equipment leases
    996       812       1,555  
 
                 
Total charge-offs
    20,748       21,991       51,449  
Recoveries:
                       
Commercial
    689       53       176  
Real estate — construction
    243             1  
Real estate — term
    153       30       138  
Consumer
    4             4  
Equipment leases
    176       75       158  
 
                 
Total recoveries
    1,265       158       477  
 
                 
Net charge-offs
    19,483       21,833       50,972  
Provision for loan losses
    15,721       28,783       54,551  
 
                 
Ending balance
  $ 67,748     $ 74,881     $ 71,510  
 
                 
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit losses:
                       
Beginning balance
  $ 1,897     $ 2,948     $ 2,948  
Provision (benefit) for off-balance sheet credit losses
    (221 )     (783 )     (1,051 )
 
                 
Ending balance
  $ 1,676     $ 2,165     $ 1,897  
 
                 
 
Total reserve for credit losses
  $ 69,424     $ 77,046     $ 73,407  
 
Total provision for credit losses
  $ 15,500     $ 28,000     $ 53,500  
 
Reserve for loan losses to loans held for investment(2)
    1.31 %     1.68 %     1.52 %
Net charge-offs to average loans(1) (2)
    0.82 %     0.99 %     1.14 %
Total provision for credit losses to average loans(2)
    0.65 %     1.27 %     1.20 %
Recoveries to total charge-offs
    6.10 %     0.72 %     0.93 %
Reserve for off-balance sheet credit losses to off-balance sheet credit commitments
    0.10 %     0.17 %     0.14 %
Combined reserves for credit losses to loans held for investment(2)
    1.34 %     1.73 %     1.56 %
                       
Non-performing assets:
                       
Non-accrual loans
  $ 77,884     $ 138,236     $ 112,090  
OREO(4)
    27,285       42,077       42,261  
 
                 
Total
  $ 105,169     $ 180,313     $ 154,351  
 
                 
Restructured loans
  $ 23,540     $     $ 4,319  
 
Loans past due 90 days and still accruing(3)
    10,333       13,962       6,706  
 
Reserve as a percent of non-performing loans(2)
    .9x       .5x       .6x  
 
(1)   Interim period ratios are annualized.
 
(2)   Excludes loans held for sale.
 
(3)   At June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, loans past due 90 days and still accruing includes premium finance loans of $2.7 million, $3.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively. These loans are generally secured by obligations of insurance carriers to refund premiums on cancelled insurance policies. The refund of premiums from the insurance carriers can take 180 days or longer from the cancellation date.
 
(4)   At June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, OREO balance is net of $9.2 million, $12.9 million and $8.9 million valuation allowance, respectively.

30


Table of Contents

Non-performing Assets
Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans and leases and repossessed assets. The table below summarizes our non-accrual loans by type (in thousands):
                         
    June 30,     June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010     2010  
     
Non-accrual loans
                       
Commercial
  $ 13,721     $ 54,862     $ 42,543  
Construction
    22,254       18,701       21  
Real estate
    40,708       57,478       62,497  
Consumer
    323       351       706  
Leases
    878       6,844       6,323  
     
Total non-accrual loans
  $ 77,884     $ 138,236     $ 112,090  
     
The table below summarizes the non-accrual loans as segregated by loan type and type of property securing the credit as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
         
Non-accrual loans:
       
Commercial
       
Lines of credit secured by the following:
       
Various single family residences and notes receivable
  $ 8,431  
Assets of the borrowers
    2,630  
Other
    2,660  
 
     
Total commercial
    13,721  
Construction
       
Secured by:
       
Unimproved land and/or undeveloped residential lots
    22,235  
Other
    19  
 
     
Total construction
    22,254  
Real estate
       
Secured by:
       
Commercial property
    20,084  
Unimproved land and/or undeveloped residential lots
    7,169  
Rental properties and multi-family residential real estate
    2,537  
Single family residences
    7,106  
Other
    3,812  
 
     
Total real estate
    40,708  
Consumer
    323  
Leases (commercial leases primarily secured by assets of the lessor)
    878  
 
     
Total non-accrual loans
  $ 77,884  
 
     
Generally, we place loans on non-accrual when there is a clear indication that the borrower’s cash flow may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, which is generally when a loan is 90 days past due. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized on a cash basis as long as the remaining unpaid principal amount of the loan is deemed to be fully collectible. If collectability is questionable, then cash payments are applied to principal. As of June 30, 2011, $19.7 million of our non-accrual loans were earning on a cash basis.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the original loan agreement. Reserves on impaired loans are measured based on the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the underlying collateral.

31


Table of Contents

At June 30, 2011, we had $10.3 million in loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest. At June 30, 2011, $2.7 million of the loans past due 90 days and still accruing are premium finance loans. These loans are primarily secured by obligations of insurance carriers to refund premiums on cancelled insurance policies. The refund of premiums from the insurance carriers can take 180 days or longer from the cancellation date.
Restructured loans are loans on which, due to the borrower’s financial difficulties, we have granted a concession that we would not otherwise consider. This may include a transfer of real estate or other assets from the borrower, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. Modifications of terms that could potentially qualify as a restructuring include reduction of contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at a contractual interest rate lower than the current rate for new debt with similar risk, or a reduction of the face amount of debt, or either forgiveness of either principal or accrued interest. As of June 30, 2011, we have $23.5 million in loans considered restructured that are not already on nonaccrual. Of the nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2011, $26.9 million met the criteria for restructured. A loan continues to qualify as restructured until a consistent payment history or change in borrower’s financial condition has been evidenced, generally no less than twelve months. A loan is placed back on accrual status when both principal and interest are current and it is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to the terms of the loan agreement.
Potential problem loans consist of loans that are performing in accordance with contractual terms but for which we have concerns about the borrower’s ability to comply with repayment terms because of the borrower’s potential financial difficulties. We monitor these loans closely and review their performance on a regular basis. At June 30, 2011 and 2010, we had $14.7 million and $24.1 million, respectively, in loans of this type which were not included in either non-accrual or 90 days past due categories.
The table below presents a summary of the activity related to OREO (in thousands):
                 
    Six months ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Beginning balance
  $ 42,261     $ 27,264  
Additions
    6,593       19,358  
Sales
    (17,524 )     (2,040 )
Valuation allowance for OREO
    (1,921 )     (2,394 )
Direct write-downs
    (2,124 )     (111 )
     
Ending balance
  $ 27,285     $ 42,077  
     
The following table summarizes the assets held in OREO at June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
         
Unimproved commercial real estate lots and land
  $ 4,867  
Commercial buildings
    1,395  
Undeveloped land and residential lots
    14,176  
Multifamily lots and land
    1,229  
Other
    5,618  
 
     
Total OREO
  $ 27,285  
 
     
When foreclosure occurs, fair value, which is generally based on appraised values, may result in partial charge-off of a loan upon taking property, and so long as property is retained, subsequent reductions in appraised values will result in valuation adjustment taken as non-interest expense. In addition, if the decline in value is believed to be permanent and not just driven by market conditions, a direct write-down to the OREO balance may be taken. We generally pursue sales of OREO when conditions warrant, but we may choose to hold certain properties for a longer term, which can result in additional exposure related to the appraised values during that holding period. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded $4.0 million in valuation expense. Of the $4.0 million, $1.9 million related to increases to the valuation allowance, and $2.1 million related to direct write-downs.

32


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
In general terms, liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet our cash needs. Our objective in managing our liquidity is to maintain our ability to meet loan commitments, purchase securities or repay deposits and other liabilities in accordance with their terms, without an adverse impact on our current or future earnings. Our liquidity strategy is guided by policies, which are formulated and monitored by our senior management and our Balance Sheet Management Committee (“BSMC”), and which take into account the demonstrated marketability of assets, the sources and stability of funding and the level of unfunded commitments. We regularly evaluate all of our various funding sources with an emphasis on accessibility, stability, reliability and cost-effectiveness. For the year ended December 31, 2010 and for six months ended June 30, 2011, our principal source of funding has been our customer deposits, supplemented by our short-term and long-term borrowings, primarily from federal funds purchased and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) borrowings.
Our liquidity needs have typically been fulfilled through growth in our core customer deposits and supplemented with brokered deposits and borrowings as needed. Our goal is to obtain as much of our funding for loans held for investment and other earnings assets as possible from deposits of these core customers. These deposits are generated principally through development of long-term relationships with customers and stockholders and our retail network, which is mainly through BankDirect. In addition to deposits from our core customers, we also have access to incremental deposits through brokered retail certificates of deposit, or CDs. Since December 31, 2009, growth in customer deposits eliminated the need for use of brokered CDs and none were outstanding at June 30, 2011. In prior periods, brokered CDs were generally of short maturities, 30 to 90 days, and were used to supplement temporary differences in the growth in loans, including growth in specific categories of loans, compared to customer deposits. The following table summarizes our core customer deposits and brokered deposits (in millions):
                         
    June 30,     June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010     2010  
     
Deposits from core customers
  $ 5,421.7     $ 4,926.1     $ 5,455.4  
Deposits from core customers as a percent of total deposits
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
Average deposits from core customers(1)
  $ 5,285.9     $ 4,758.8     $ 4,982.6  
 
Average deposits from core customers as a percent of total quarterly average deposits(1)
    100.0 %     99.6 %     99.4 %
Average brokered deposits(1)
  $     $ 17.9     $ 28.6  
Average brokered deposits as a percent of total quarterly average deposits(1)
    0.0 %     0.4 %     0.6 %
 
(1)   Annual averages presented for December 31, 2010.
We have access to sources of brokered deposits of not less than an additional $3.3 billion. Customer deposits (total deposits minus brokered CDs) increased by $495.6 million from June 30, 2010 and decreased $33.7 million from December 31, 2010.
Additionally, we have borrowing sources available to supplement deposits and meet our funding needs. Such borrowings are generally used to fund our loans held for sale, due to their liquidity, short duration and interest spreads available. These borrowing sources include federal funds purchased from our downstream correspondent bank relationships (which consist of banks that are smaller than our bank) and from our upstream correspondent bank relationships (which consist of banks that are larger than our bank), customer repurchase agreements, treasury, tax and loan notes, and advances from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve. The following table summarizes our borrowings as of June 30, 2011 (in thousands):

33


Table of Contents

         
Federal funds purchased
  $ 203,969  
Customer repurchase agreements
    14,634  
Treasury, tax and loan notes
    3,223  
FHLB borrowings
    340,076  
Trust preferred subordinated debentures
    113,406  
 
     
Total borrowings
  $ 675,308  
 
     
 
       
Maximum outstanding at any month-end during the year
  $ 675,308  
 
     
The following table summarizes our other borrowing capacities in excess of balances outstanding at June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
         
FHLB borrowing capacity relating to loans
  $ 582,351  
FHLB borrowing capacity relating to securities
    105,011  
 
     
Total FHLB borrowing capacity
  $ 687,362  
 
     
 
       
Unused federal funds lines available from commercial banks
  $ 393,360  
 
     
Our equity capital averaged $548.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $505.3 million for the same period in 2010. This increase reflects our retention of net earnings during this period. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since we commenced operations and have no plans to do so in the near future.
Our capital ratios remain above the levels required to be well capitalized and have been enhanced with the additional capital raised since 2008 and will allow us to grow organically with the addition of loan and deposit relationships.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The following table presents significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties by payment date. Payments for borrowings do not include interest. Payments related to leases are based on actual payments specified in the underlying contracts. As of June 30, 2011, our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations to third parties were as follows (in thousands):
                                         
            After One but     After Three but              
    Within One     Within Three     Within Five     After Five        
    Year     Years     Years     Years     Total  
     
Deposits without a stated maturity(1)
  $ 4,186,429     $     $     $     $ 4,186,429  
Time deposits(1)
    1,153,328       68,464       12,737       768       1,235,297  
Federal funds purchased(1)
    203,969                         203,969  
Customer repurchase agreements(1)
    14,634                         14,634  
Treasury, tax and loan notes(1)
    3,223                         3,223  
FHLB borrowings(1)
    340,000             76             340,076  
Operating lease obligations(1) (2)
    9,059       17,700       16,092       42,444       85,295  
Trust preferred subordinated debentures(1)
                      113,406       113,406  
     
Total contractual obligations
  $ 5,910,642     $ 86,164     $ 28,905     $ 156,618     $ 6,182,329  
     
 
(1)   Excludes interest.
 
(2)   Non-balance sheet item.
SEC guidance requires disclosure of “critical accounting policies.” The SEC defines “critical accounting policies” as those that are most important to the presentation of a company’s financial condition and results, and require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

34


Table of Contents

We follow financial accounting and reporting policies that are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The more significant of these policies are summarized in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Not all these significant accounting policies require management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments. However, the policy noted below could be deemed to meet the SEC’s definition of critical accounting policies.
Management considers the policies related to the allowance for loan losses as the most critical to the financial statement presentation. The total allowance for loan losses includes activity related to allowances calculated in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310, Receivables, and ASC 450, Contingencies. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to current earnings. The amount maintained in the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of the loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific reserves assigned to certain classified loans and general reserves. Factors contributing to the determination of specific reserves include the credit-worthiness of the borrower, and more specifically, changes in the expected future receipt of principal and interest payments and/or in the value of pledged collateral. A reserve is recorded when the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the discounted estimated cash flows using the loan’s initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. For purposes of determining the general reserve, the portfolio is segregated by product types in order to recognize differing risk profiles among categories, and then further segregated by credit grades. See “Summary of Loan Loss Experience” for further discussion of the risk factors considered by management in establishing the allowance for loan losses.

35


Table of Contents

ITEM 3.   QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is a broad term for the risk of economic loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of a financial instrument. These changes may be the result of various factors, including interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, or equity prices. Additionally, the financial instruments subject to market risk can be classified either as held for trading purposes or held for other than trading.
We are subject to market risk primarily through the effect of changes in interest rates on our portfolio of assets held for purposes other than trading. The effect of other changes, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and/or equity prices do not pose significant market risk to us.
The responsibility for managing market risk rests with the BSMC, which operates under policy guidelines established by our board of directors. The negative acceptable variation in net interest revenue due to a 200 basis point increase or decrease in interest rates is generally limited by these guidelines to +/- 5%. These guidelines also establish maximum levels for short-term borrowings, short-term assets and public and brokered deposits. They also establish minimum levels for unpledged assets, among other things. Compliance with these guidelines is the ongoing responsibility of the BSMC, with exceptions reported to our board of directors on a quarterly basis.
Interest Rate Risk Management
Our interest rate sensitivity is illustrated in the following table. The table reflects rate-sensitive positions as of June 30, 2011, and is not necessarily indicative of positions on other dates. The balances of interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities are presented in the periods in which they next reprice to market rates or mature and are aggregated to show the interest rate sensitivity gap. The mismatch between repricings or maturities within a time period is commonly referred to as the “gap” for that period. A positive gap (asset sensitive), where interest rate sensitive assets exceed interest rate sensitive liabilities, generally will result in the net interest margin increasing in a rising rate environment and decreasing in a falling rate environment. A negative gap (liability sensitive) will generally have the opposite results on the net interest margin. To reflect anticipated prepayments, certain asset and liability categories are shown in the table using estimated cash flows rather than contractual cash flows. The Company employs interest rate floors in certain variable rate loans to enhance the yield on those loans at times when market interest rates are extraordinarily low. The degree of asset sensitivity, spreads on loans and net interest margin may be reduced until rates increase by an amount sufficient to eliminate the effects of floors. The adverse effect of floors as market rates increase may also be offset by the positive gap, the extent to which rates on deposits and other funding sources lag increasing market rates and changes in composition of funding.

36


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Sensitivity Gap Analysis
June 30, 2011

(In thousands)
                                         
    0-3 mo     4-12 mo     1-3 yr     3+ yr     Total  
    Balance     Balance     Balance     Balance     Balance  
     
Securities(1)
  $ 26,337     $ 35,444     $ 45,196     $ 50,844     $ 157,821  
 
Total variable loans
    5,247,410       55,879       27,608       18,843       5,349,740  
Total fixed loans
    358,643       185,492       172,806       252,282       969,223  
     
Total loans(2)
    5,606,053       241,371       200,414       271,125       6,318,963  
     
Total interest sensitive assets
  $ 5,632,390     $ 276,815     $ 245,610     $ 321,969     $ 6,476,784  
     
 
Liabilities:
                                       
Interest bearing customer deposits
  $ 3,445,728     $     $     $     $ 3,445,728  
CDs & IRAs
    410,870       68,464       12,737       768       492,839  
     
Total interest bearing deposits
    3,856,598       68,464       12,737       768       3,938,567  
 
Repurchase agreements, Federal funds purchased, FHLB borrowings
    561,826             76             561,902  
Trust preferred subordinated debentures
                      113,406       113,406  
     
Total borrowings
    561,826             76       113,406       675,308  
     
Total interest sensitive liabilities
  $ 4,418,424     $ 68,464     $ 12,813     $ 114,174     $ 4,613,875  
     
 
GAP
  $ 1,213,966     $ 208,351     $ 232,797     $ 207,795     $  
Cumulative GAP
    1,213,966       1,422,317       1,655,114       1,862,909       1,862,909  
 
Demand deposits
                                  $ 1,483,159  
Stockholders’ equity
                                    563,924  
 
                                     
Total
                                  $ 2,047,083  
 
                                     
 
(1)   Securities based on fair market value.
 
(2)   Loans include loans held for sale and are stated at gross.
The table above sets forth the balances as of June 30, 2011 for interest bearing assets, interest bearing liabilities, and the total of non-interest bearing deposits and stockholders’ equity. While a gap interest table is useful in analyzing interest rate sensitivity, an interest rate sensitivity simulation provides a better illustration of the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates. Earnings are also affected by the effects of changing interest rates on the value of funding derived from demand deposits and stockholders’ equity. We perform a sensitivity analysis to identify interest rate risk exposure on net interest income. We quantify and measure interest rate risk exposure using a model to dynamically simulate the effect of changes in net interest income relative to changes in interest rates and account balances over the next twelve months based on three interest rate scenarios. These are a “most likely” rate scenario and two “shock test” scenarios.
The “most likely” rate scenario is based on the consensus forecast of future interest rates published by independent sources. These forecasts incorporate future spot rates and relevant spreads of instruments that are actively traded in the open market. The Federal Reserve’s Federal Funds target affects short-term borrowing; the prime lending rate and the LIBOR are the basis for most of our variable-rate loan pricing. The 10-year mortgage rate is also monitored because of its effect on prepayment speeds for mortgage-backed securities. These are our primary interest rate exposures. We are currently not using derivatives to manage our interest rate exposure.
The two “shock test” scenarios assume a sustained parallel 200 basis point increase or decrease, respectively, in interest rates. As short-term rates continued to fall during 2009 and remain low in 2010, we could not assume interest rate decreases of any amount as the results of the decreasing rates scenario would not be meaningful. We will continue to evaluate these scenarios as interest rates change, until short-term rates rise above 3.0%.

37


Table of Contents

Our interest rate risk exposure model incorporates assumptions regarding the level of interest rate or balance changes on indeterminable maturity deposits (demand deposits, interest bearing transaction accounts and savings accounts) for a given level of market rate changes. These assumptions have been developed through a combination of historical analysis and future expected pricing behavior. Changes in prepayment behavior of mortgage-backed securities, residential and commercial mortgage loans in each rate environment are captured using industry estimates of prepayment speeds for various coupon segments of the portfolio. The impact of planned growth and new business activities is factored into the simulation model. This modeling indicated interest rate sensitivity as follows (in thousands):
         
    Anticipated Impact Over the Next Twelve Months  
    as Compared to Most Likely Scenario  
    200 bp Increase  
    June 30, 2011  
Change in net interest income
  $ 11,833  
The simulations used to manage market risk are based on numerous assumptions regarding the effect of changes in interest rates on the timing and extent of repricing characteristics, future cash flows, and customer behavior. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely estimate net interest income or precisely predict the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors.

38


Table of Contents

ITEM 4.   CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011, and concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no changes in our internal controls or in other factors known to us that could materially affect these controls subsequent to their evaluation, nor any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. While we believe that our existing disclosure controls and procedures have been effective to accomplish these objectives, we intend to continue to examine, refine and formalize our disclosure controls and procedures and to monitor ongoing developments in this area.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS
There has not been any material change in the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s 2010 Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

39


Table of Contents

ITEM 5.   EXHIBITS
     (a) Exhibits
     
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
   
101
  The following materials from Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

40


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.

Date: July 21, 2011
 
 
  /s/ Peter B. Bartholow    
  Peter B. Bartholow   
  Chief Financial Officer
(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer) 
 

41


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit Number    
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
   
101
  The following materials from Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ***
 
     
***
  Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability under these sections.

42