THOR INDUSTRIES INC - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark one)
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009, Commission File Number 1-9235 | ||
or | ||
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-9235 |
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
93-0768752 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
(I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) |
Identification Number) | |
419 W. Pike Street, Jackson Center, Ohio |
45334-0629 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (937) 596-6849
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class:
|
Name of each exchange on which registered: |
|
Common Stock (par value $.10 per share)
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been
subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Yes þ No o
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions, of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated Filer þ
|
Accelerated Filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 126-2 of the
Exchange Act.)
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the
registrant as of January 30, 2009 was $241,688,282 based on the closing price of the registrants
common shares on January 30, 2009, the last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter. Solely for the purpose of this calculation and for no other
purpose, the non-affiliates of the registrant are assumed to be all shareholders of the registrant
other than (i) directors of the registrant (ii) executive officers of the registrant who are
identified as named executive officers pursuant to Item 11 of the registrants Form 10-K and
(iii) any shareholder that beneficially owns 10% or more of the registrants common stock. Such
exclusion is not intended, nor shall it be deemed, to be an admission that such persons are
affiliates of the registrant. The number of common shares of registrants stock outstanding as of
September 15, 2009 was 55,440,924.
Documents incorporated by reference:
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 8,
2009 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
1 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
13 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
33 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
EX-21.1 | ||||||||
EX-23.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
ii
Table of Contents
PART I
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts presented in thousands except units, square feet, share and
per share data.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General Development of Business
Our company was founded in 1980 and manufactures and sells a wide range of recreation vehicles and
small and mid-size buses in the United States and Canada. We are incorporated in Delaware and are
the successor to a corporation of the same name which was incorporated in Nevada on July 29, 1980.
Our principal executive office is located at 419 West Pike Street, Jackson Center, Ohio 45334 and
our telephone number is (937) 596-6849. Our Internet address is www.thorindustries.com. We maintain
copies of our recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), available free of
charge, on our web site. Unless the context otherwise requires or indicates, all references to
Thor, the Company, we, our, and us refer to Thor Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Our principal recreation vehicle operating subsidiaries are Airstream, Inc. (Airstream), CrossRoads
RV (CrossRoads), Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. (Dutchmen), Four Winds International, Inc. (Four
Winds), Keystone RV Company (Keystone), Komfort Corp. (Komfort), Citair, Inc. (Citair), and Damon
Corporation (Damon). Our principal bus operating subsidiaries are Champion Bus, Inc. (Champion),
General Coach America, Inc., (General Coach), ElDorado National California, Inc. (ElDorado
California), ElDorado National Kansas, Inc. (ElDorado Kansas) and Goshen Coach, Inc. (Goshen
Coach).
Recreation Vehicles
We believe that we are the largest unit and revenue manufacturer of recreation vehicles in North
America based on retail statistics published by Statistical Surveys, Inc. and publicly reported
results.
Airstream
Our Airstream subsidiary manufactures and sells premium and medium-high priced travel trailers and
motorhomes under the trade name Airstream. Airstream vehicles are distinguished by their rounded
shape and bright aluminum finish and, in our opinion, constitute the most recognized product in the
recreation vehicle industry. Airstream, responding to the demands of the market for a lighter,
lower-cost product, also manufactures and sells the Airstream Safari, International, Flying Cloud
and Bambi travel trailers. Airstream also sells the Interstate Class B motorhome.
Dutchmen
Our Dutchmen subsidiary manufactures and sells conventional travel trailers and fifth wheels
primarily under the trade names Dutchmen, Four Winds, Aero, Grand Junction and Colorado.
Four Winds
Our Four Winds subsidiary manufactures and sells gasoline and diesel Class C, Class A and Class B
motorhomes. Its products are sold under trade names such as Four Winds, Hurricane, Windsport,
Mandalay, Dutchmen, Chateau, Serrano, Ventura and Fun Mover.
CrossRoads
Our CrossRoads subsidiary manufactures and sells conventional travel trailers and fifth wheels
under the trade names Cruiser, Seville, Zinger and Sunset Trail and park models under the trade
names Tranquility and Westchester. Park models are factory built second homes designed for
recreational living. They are towed to a destination site such as a lake, woods or park and are
considered a country cottage.
Citair
Our Citair subsidiary manufactures travel trailers, fifth wheels, truck campers and park models. It
operates under the name General Coach and sells recreation vehicles and park models
under various trade names.
1
Table of Contents
Keystone
Our Keystone subsidiary manufactures and sells travel trailers and fifth wheels under trade names
such as Montana, Springdale, Hornet, Sprinter, Outback, Laredo, Everest, Mountaineer, Challenger,
and Cougar.
Komfort
Our Komfort subsidiary manufactures and sells travel trailers and fifth wheels under the trade
names Komfort and Trailblazer primarily in the western United States and western Canada.
Damon
Our Damon subsidiary manufactures and sells gasoline and diesel Class A motor homes under the trade
names Daybreak, Challenger, Astoria, Tuscany and Outlaw. Damon also introduced the Avanti, a new
fuel efficient Class A diesel motorhome, in 2008.
Breckenridge
Breckenridge is the park model division of Damon Corporation. Park models are factory built second
homes designed for recreational living. They are towed to a destination site such as a lake, woods
or park and are considered a country cottage.
Buses
We believe that our bus segment is the largest manufacturer of small and mid-size transit and
commercial buses in North America (those up to 35) based on statistics published by the Mid-size
Bus Manufacturers Association. We also build 40-foot buses for transit and airport shuttle use.
ElDorado National
ElDorado National, comprised of our ElDorado Kansas and ElDorado California subsidiaries,
manufactures and sells buses for transit, airport car rental and hotel/motel shuttles, paramedical
transit for hospitals and nursing homes, tour and charter operations and other uses.
ElDorado National manufactures and sells buses under trade names such as Aerolite, AeroElite,
Aerotech, Escort, MST, Transmark, EZ Rider, and Axess, its 40 foot bus.
Champion Bus
Champion manufactures and sells small and mid-size buses under trade names such as Challenger,
Defender, and Crusader.
General Coach
General Coach manufactures and sells small and mid-sized buses under trade names such as American
Cruiser, Classic Coach, and EZ Trans.
Goshen Coach
Goshen Coach manufactures and sells small and mid-size buses under trade names such as GC II and
Pacer.
Product Line Sales and Segment Information
The Company has three reportable segments: 1.) towable recreation vehicles, 2.) motorized
recreation vehicles, and 3.) buses. The towable recreation vehicle segment consists of product
lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Airstream, Breckenridge,
CrossRoads, Dutchmen, General Coach, Keystone, and Komfort. The motorized recreation vehicle
segment consists of product lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated:
Airstream, Damon, and Four Winds. The bus segment consists of the following operating companies
that have been aggregated: Champion Bus, ElDorado California, ElDorado Kansas, and Goshen Coach.
2
Table of Contents
The table below sets forth the contribution of each of the Companys product lines to net sales in
each of the last three fiscal years:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ 953,279 | 63 | $ 1,763,099 | 67 | $ 1,890,100 | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
161,727 | 10 | 461,856 | 17 | 565,523 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
1,115,006 | 73 | 2,224,955 | 84 | 2,455,623 | 86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
406,890 | 27 | 415,725 | 16 | 400,685 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Net Sales |
$ 1,521,896 | 100 | $ 2,640,680 | 100 | $ 2,856,308 | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles
Overview
We manufacture and sell a wide variety of recreation vehicles throughout the United States and
Canada, as well as related parts and accessories. Recreation vehicle classifications are based upon
standards established by the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA) and park model
classifications are based upon standards established by the Recreation Park Trailer Industry
Association (RPTIA). The principal types of recreation vehicles that we produce include
conventional travel trailers, fifth wheels, Class A, Class C, and Class B motorhomes and park
models.
Travel trailers are non-motorized vehicles which are designed to be towed by passenger automobiles,
pickup trucks, SUVs or vans. Travel trailers provide comfortable, self-contained living facilities
for short periods of time. We produce conventional and fifth wheel travel trailers.
Conventional trailers are towed by means of a frame hitch attached to the towing vehicle. Fifth
wheel trailers, designed to be towed by pickup trucks, are constructed with a raised forward
section that is attached to the bed area of the pickup truck.
Park models are recreational dwellings towed to a permanent site such as a lake, woods or park. The
maximum size of park models in the United States is 400 square feet. They provide comfortable self
contained living and are second homes for their owners, according to RPTIA.
A motorhome is a self-powered vehicle built on a motor vehicle chassis. Motorhomes are
self-contained with their own lighting, heating, cooking, refrigeration, sewage holding and water
storage facilities, so that they can be lived in without being attached to utilities.
Class A motorhomes, constructed on medium-duty truck chassis, are supplied complete with engine and
drive train components by motor vehicle manufacturers such as Workhorse Custom Chassis, Spartan,
Ford and Freightliner. We design, manufacture and install the living area and drivers compartment
of Class A motorhomes. Class C and Class B motorhomes are built on a Ford, General Motors or
Freightliner small truck or van chassis which includes an engine, drive train components, and a
finished cab section. We construct a living area which has access to the drivers compartment and
attaches to the cab section. Although they are not designed for permanent or semi-permanent living,
motorhomes can provide comfortable living facilities for short periods of time.
Production
In order to minimize finished inventory, our recreation vehicles generally are produced to dealer
order. Our facilities are designed to provide efficient assembly line manufacturing of products.
Capacity increases can be achieved at relatively low cost, largely by increasing the number of
production employees or by acquiring or leasing additional facilities and equipment.
We purchase in finished form many of the components used in the production of our recreation
vehicles. The principal raw materials used in the manufacturing processes for motorhomes and travel
trailers are aluminum, lumber, plywood, plastic, fiberglass, and steel purchased from numerous
suppliers. We believe that, except for chassis, substitute sources for raw materials and components
are available with no material impact on our operations.
Our relationship with our chassis suppliers is similar to our other buyer/vendor relationships in
that no special contractual commitments are engaged in by either party. Historically, Ford and
General Motors resort to an industry-wide allocation system during periods when supply is
restricted. These allocations would be based on the volume of chassis previously purchased. Sales
of motorhomes and small buses rely on these chassis and are affected accordingly.
3
Table of Contents
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry, including the recent bankruptcy
filings and reorganizations of General Motors and Chrysler, to have a significant impact on our
supply of motorhome chassis. Supply of motorhome chassis is adequate for now and we believe that
on-hand inventory would compensate for changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we have
not noticed any unusual cost increases from our motorhome chassis suppliers. If the condition of
the U.S. auto industry significantly worsens, this could result in supply interruptions and a
decrease in our sales and earnings while we obtain replacement chassis from other sources.
Generally, all of our operating subsidiaries introduce new or improved lines or models of
recreation vehicles each year. Changes typically include new sizes and floorplans, different decors
or design features, and engineering improvements.
Seasonality
Since recreation vehicles are used primarily by vacationers and campers, our recreation vehicle
sales are seasonal and, in most geographical areas, tend to be significantly lower during the
winter months than in other periods. As a result, recreation vehicle sales are historically lowest
during the second fiscal quarter, which ends on January 31 of each year.
Marketing and Distribution
We market our recreation vehicles through independent dealers located throughout the United States
and Canada. Each of our recreation vehicle operating subsidiaries maintains its own dealer
organization, with some dealers carrying more than one of our product lines. As of July 31, 2009,
there were approximately 1,418 dealers carrying our products in the U.S. and Canada. We believe
that close working relationships between our management and sales personnel and the many
independent dealers we work with provide us with valuable information on customer preferences and
the quality and marketability of our products. Additionally, by maintaining substantially separate
dealer networks for each of our subsidiaries, our products are more likely to be competing against
competitors products in similar price ranges rather than against our other products. Park models
are typically sold by park model dealers as well as by some travel trailer dealers.
Each of our recreation vehicle operating subsidiaries has an independent sales force to call on
their dealers. Our most important sales promotions occur at the major recreation vehicle shows
which take place throughout the year at different locations across the country. We benefit from the
recreation vehicle awareness advertising and major marketing programs sponsored by the RVIA in
national print media and television. We engage in a limited amount of consumer-oriented advertising
for our recreation vehicles, primarily through industry magazines, product brochures, direct mail
advertising campaigns and the internet.
In our selection of individual dealers, we emphasize the dealers ability to maintain a sufficient
inventory of our products, as well as their reputation, experience, and ability to provide service.
Many of our dealers carry the recreation vehicle lines of one or more of our competitors.
Generally, each of our operating subsidiaries has sales agreements with their dealers and these
agreements are subject to annual review.
During fiscal 2009, one of our dealers, FreedomRoads, LLC, accounted for 15% of the Companys
consolidated recreation vehicle net sales and 11% of the Companys consolidated net sales, among
FreedomRoads, LLCs 47 dealership locations in 26 US states. In January 2009 we entered into two credit agreements
with Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee
under the Stephen Adams Living Trust (the Trust) and together with each of the foregoing persons,
the (Borrowers), pursuant to which we made two $10,000 loans to the Borrowers. The first loan is
payable in full on January 15, 2014 and the second loan is payable in full on January 29, 2010. The
Borrowers own approximately 90% of FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC (FreedomRoads Holding) the
parent company of FreedomRoads, LLC. The loans are guaranteed by FreedomRoads Holding and are
secured by a first priority security interest in all of the direct and indirect legal, equitable
and beneficial interests of the Borrowers in FreedomRoads Holding.
Substantially all of our sales to dealers are made on terms requiring cash on delivery or within 15
days of the invoice date. We generally do not finance dealer purchases. Most dealers are financed
on a floorplan basis by an unrelated bank or financing company which lends the dealer all or
substantially all of the wholesale purchase price and retains a security interest in the vehicles
purchased. As is customary in the recreation vehicle industry, we will execute a repurchase
agreement with a lending institution financing a dealers purchase of our products upon the lending
institutions request. Repurchase agreements provide that, for up to 18 months after a unit is
financed and in the event of default by the dealer, we will repurchase the unit repossessed by the
lending institution for the amount then due, which is often less than 100% of the dealers cost.
The risk of loss under repurchase agreements is spread over numerous dealers and is further reduced
by the resale value of the units which we would be required to repurchase. We believe that any
future losses under these agreements would not have a material adverse effect on our Company.
4
Table of Contents
The losses incurred due to repurchase were approximately $5,261, $1,857, and $1,017 in fiscal 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase in losses results from the more difficult current market
for the recreation vehicle business. We increased our reserve for repurchase and guarantees at July
31, 2009 to $6,349 from $5,040 at July 31, 2008 to account for future losses.
Joint Ventures
In March 1996, our Company and Cruise America, Inc. formed a 50/50 owned joint venture, CAT Joint
Venture LLC (CAT), to make short-term rentals of motorized recreation vehicles to the public. As
of July 31, 2009, we were contingently liable for repurchase obligations of CAT inventory in the
amount of approximately $13,537.
In March 1994, the Company and a financial services company formed a joint venture, Thor Credit
Corporation (TCC) to finance the sale of recreation vehicles to consumer buyers. This joint
venture was dissolved in September 2008 after the joint venture partner informed us that it was no
longer providing retail financing for recreation vehicles. We recovered our investment of $1,578
upon dissolution.
Backlog
As of July 31, 2009, the backlog for towable and motorized recreation vehicle orders was $262,072
and $36,256, respectively, compared to $106,792 and $38,774, respectively, at July 31, 2008.
Backlog represents unfilled dealer orders on a particular day which can and do fluctuate on a
seasonal basis. In the recreation vehicle business our manufacturing time is relatively short.
Historically, the amount of our current backlog compared to our backlog in previous periods
reflects general economic and industry conditions and, together with other relevant factors such as
continued acceptance of our products by the consumer, may be an indicator of our revenues in the
near term.
Product Warranties
We currently provide purchasers of our recreation vehicles with primarily a one-year limited
warranty against defects in materials and workmanship and a standard two year limited warranty on
certain major components separately warranted by the suppliers of these components. The chassis and
engines of our motorhomes are warranted for three years or 36,000 miles by their manufacturers.
Buses
Overview
Our buses are sold under the names ElDorado National, Champion Bus, General Coach and Goshen Coach.
Our small and mid-size products consist of mass transit, airport shuttle and commercial and tourist
use buses. Our larger Axess 40 foot bus is designed for transit and airport shuttle uses.
Production
Our bus production facilities in Salina, Kansas; Riverside, California; Imlay City, Michigan; and
Elkhart, Indiana are designed to provide efficient assembly line manufacturing of our buses. The
vehicles are produced according to specific orders which are normally obtained by dealers.
Some of the chassis, all of the engines and auxiliary units, and some of the seating and other
components used in the production of our small and mid-size buses are purchased in finished form.
Our Riverside, California facility assembles chassis for our rear engine buses from industry
standard components and assembles these buses directly on the chassis.
The principal raw materials used in the manufacturing of our buses are fiberglass, steel, aluminum,
plywood, and plastic. We purchase most of the raw materials and components from numerous suppliers.
We purchase most of our bus chassis from Ford, Navistar, Chrysler and General Motors and engines
from Cummins and Caterpillar. We believe that, except for chassis, raw materials and components
could be purchased from other sources, if necessary, with no material impact on our operations.
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry, including the recent bankruptcy
filings and reorganizations of General Motors and Chrysler, to have a significant impact on our
supply of bus chassis. Supply of bus chassis is adequate for now and we believe
5
Table of Contents
that on-hand inventory would compensate for changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we
have not noticed any unusual cost increases from our chassis suppliers. If the condition of the
U.S. auto industry significantly worsens, this could result in supply interruptions and a decrease
in our sales and earnings while we obtain replacement chassis from other sources.
Marketing and Distribution
We market our small and mid-size buses through a network of 70 independent dealers in the United
States and Canada. We select dealers using criteria similar to those used in selecting recreation
vehicle dealers. During fiscal 2009, one of our dealers accounted for 19% of the Companys
consolidated bus net sales and another accounted for 10%. We also sell our small and mid-size buses
directly to certain national accounts such as major rental car companies, hotel chains, and transit
authorities. Most of our bus sales are derived from contracts with state and local transportation
authorities, in some cases with partial funding from federal agencies.
Terms of sale are typically cash on delivery or through national floorplan financing institutions.
Sales to some state transportation agencies and other government agencies may be on longer terms.
Backlog
As of July 31, 2009, the backlog for bus orders was $289,531, compared to $260,805 at July 31,
2008. The time for fulfillment of bus orders is substantially longer than in the recreation
vehicle industry because generally buses are made to customer specification. The existing backlog
of bus orders is expected to be filled in fiscal 2010.
Historically, the amount of our current backlog compared to our backlog in previous periods
reflects general economic and industry conditions and, together with other relevant factors such as
continued acceptance of our products by the consumer, may be an indicator of our revenues in the
near term.
Product Warranties
We currently provide purchasers of our buses with a limited warranty for one year or 12,000 miles
against defects in materials and workmanship, excluding only certain specified components which are
separately warranted by suppliers. We provide body structure warranty on buses ranging from 2 years
or 50,000 miles to 5 years or 75,000 miles. The chassis and engines of our small and mid-size buses
are warranted for 3 years or 36,000 miles by their manufacturers.
Regulation
We are subject to the provisions of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (NTMVSA)
and the safety standards for recreation vehicles, buses and recreation vehicle and bus components
which have been promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Because of our
sales in Canada, we are also governed by similar laws and regulations issued by the Canadian
government.
We are a member of the RVIA, a voluntary association of recreation vehicle manufacturers which
promulgates recreation vehicle safety standards. We place an RVIA seal on each of our recreation
vehicles to certify that the RVIAs standards have been met.
Both federal and state authorities have various environmental control standards relating to air,
water and noise pollution which affect our business and operations. For example, these standards,
which are generally applicable to all companies, control our choice of paints, discharge of air
compressor, waste water and noise emitted by factories. We rely upon certifications obtained by
chassis manufacturers with respect to compliance by our vehicles with all applicable emission
control standards.
We are also subject to the regulations promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA). Our plants are periodically inspected by federal agencies concerned with
health and safety in the work place, and by the RVIA, to ensure that our plants and products comply
with applicable governmental and industry standards.
We believe that our products and facilities comply in all material respects with applicable vehicle
safety, environmental, RVIA and OSHA regulations.
We do not believe that ongoing compliance with the regulations discussed above will have a material
effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.
6
Table of Contents
Competition
Recreation Vehicles
The recreation vehicle industry is generally characterized by ease of entry, although the codes,
standards, and safety requirements introduced in recent years are a deterrent to new competitors.
The need to develop an effective dealer network also acts as a barrier to entry. The recreation
vehicle market is intensely competitive with a number of other manufacturers selling products which
compete directly with our products. Competition in the recreation vehicle industry is based upon
price, design, value, quality and service. We believe that the quality, design and price of our
products and the warranty coverage and service that we provide allow us to compete favorably for
retail purchasers of recreation vehicles. We estimate that we are the largest recreation vehicle
manufacturer in terms of units produced and revenue. According to Statistical Surveys, for the 7
months ending July 31, 2009, our market share for travel trailers and fifth wheels was 31% and our
market share for motorhomes was 18%.
Small and Mid-Size Buses
We estimate that we have a 40% market share of the U.S. and Canadian small and mid-size bus market,
according to the Mid-Size Bus Manufacturers Association. Our competitors offer lines of buses which
compete with all of our products. Price, quality and delivery are the primary competitive factors.
As with recreation vehicles, we believe that the quality, design and price of small and mid-size
buses, the warranty coverage and service that we provide, and the loyalty of our customers allow us
to compete favorably with similar products of our competitors.
Trademarks and Patents
We have registered United States and Canadian trademarks or licenses carrying the principal trade
names and model lines under which our products are marketed. We are not dependent upon any patents
or technology licenses for the conduct of our business.
Employee Relations
At July 31, 2009, we had approximately 5,203 full time employees in the United States and 175
full-time employees in Canada. Of these 5,378 employees, 793 are salaried. Citairs approximately
146 Canadian hourly employees are currently represented by certified labor organizations. Our
Citair Hensall division labor contract was ratified on August 18, 2006 and expired on August 18,
2009. Citair Olivers labor contract was ratified on October 17, 2003 and expired on October 16,
2008, and was subsequently extended to October 16, 2009. Both the Hensall and Oliver labor
contracts are currently in the negotiation process. Employees of our other subsidiaries are not
represented by certified labor organizations. We believe that we maintain a good working
relationship with our employees.
Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales
Sales from our Canadian operations and export sales to Canada from our U.S. operations amounted to
approximately 0.9% and 15.6% in fiscal 2009, 1.1% and 15.9% in fiscal 2008 and 1.2% and 12.7% in
fiscal 2007, respectively, of our total net sales to unaffiliated customers. Export sales to Canada
from our U.S. operations were $237,584, $421,008, and $360,198 in fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively.
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes certain statements that are forward looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. These forward looking statements involve uncertainties
and risks. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from our expectations.
Factors which could cause materially different results include, among others, additional issues
that may arise in connection with the findings of the completed investigation by the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors and the SECs requests for additional information, fuel prices,
fuel availability, lower consumer confidence, interest rate increases, tight lending practices,
increased material costs, the success of new product introductions, the pace of acquisitions, cost
structure improvements, the impact of the recent auction market failures on our liquidity,
competition and general economic conditions and the other risks and uncertainties discussed more
fully in Item 1A. Risk Factors below. We disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate
any updates or revisions to any forward looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form
10-K or to reflect any change in our expectations after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based, except as
required by law.
7
Table of Contents
Available Information
Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and
all amendments to those reports and the Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders are
made available, free of charge, on our web site, http://www.thorindustries.com, as soon as
reasonably practicable after such reports have been filed with or furnished to the SEC. You may
also read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation
of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a
website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information that is filed
electronically with the SEC. The website can be accessed at http://www.sec.gov.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following risk factors should be considered carefully in addition to the other information
contained in this filing. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face
and represent some of the risks that our management believes are material to our Company and our
business. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or
results of operations could be harmed.
Risks Relating to Our Investigation
We have been subject to an SEC review regarding the facts and circumstances giving rise to the
restatement of our previously issued financial statements and related matters.
As previously announced, in connection with an internal review of our Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc.
operating subsidiary in fiscal 2007, we promptly and voluntarily informed the SEC of the Audit
Committees independent investigation, and have from time to time responded to SEC staff requests
for additional information in connection with the staffs investigation. We have cooperated fully
with the SEC. The investigation by the SEC staff could result in the SEC seeking various penalties
and relief, including, without limitation, civil injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties
or administrative relief. The nature of the relief or remedies the SEC may seek, if any, cannot be
predicted at this time.
Risks Relating To Our Business
The recreation vehicle and small and mid-size bus industries are highly competitive.
The recreation vehicle and bus industries that we are currently engaged in are highly competitive
and we have numerous existing and potential competitors. Competition in these industries is based
upon price, design, value, quality and service. Competitive pressures, especially in the recreation
vehicle market for travel trailers and motorhomes, have, from time to time, resulted in a reduction
of our profit margins. Recently, aggressive discounting by our competitors has negatively impacted
our sales and profitability. Sustained increases in these competitive pressures could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations. There can be no assurance that existing or
new competitors will not develop products that are superior to our recreation vehicles or small or
mid-size buses or that achieve better consumer acceptance, thereby adversely affecting our market
share, sales volume and profit margins.
Our businesses are cyclical and this can lead to fluctuations in our operating results.
The industries in which we operate are cyclical and there can be substantial fluctuations in our
manufacturing, shipments and operating results. Consequently, the results for any prior period may
not be indicative of results for any future period.
Our business may be affected by certain external factors beyond our control.
Companies within the recreation vehicle and bus industries are subject to volatility in operating
results due to external factors such as general economic conditions, including credit availability,
consumer confidence, employment rates, prevailing interest rates, inflation, other economic
conditions affecting consumer attitudes and disposable consumer income generally, demographic
changes and political changes. Specific factors affecting the recreation vehicle and bus industries
include:
| overall consumer confidence and the level of discretionary consumer spending; |
||
| inventory levels, including the level of retail sales by our dealers; |
8
Table of Contents
| general economic conditions; |
||
| demographics, such as the retirement of baby boomers |
||
| interest rates and the availability of credit; |
||
| employment trends; |
||
| the amount of backlog, which may be a predictor of near-term future revenues; |
||
| fuel availability and prices; |
||
| public policy on mass transit; |
||
| the adverse impact of terrorism on consumer spending and travel related activities; and |
||
| increases in raw material costs. |
Recently, industry conditions in the recreation vehicle market have been adversely affected by low
consumer confidence and tighter lending practices. As a result of these ongoing concerns, market
conditions continue to be soft and we anticipate this weakness to continue in fiscal 2010. The
motorized market has been significantly impacted by current market conditions. The current economic
climate and the tightening of the retail credit markets are placing pressure on retail sales and
our dealers continue to be cautious in the amount of inventory they are willing to carry. Based on
the foregoing, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $9,717 in the third quarter
of fiscal year 2009 for the goodwill associated with an operating subsidiary in the motorized
reportable segment. The Company also completed an impairment review in the second quarter of fiscal
2009 which resulted in a non-cash trademark impairment charge of $564 for the trademark associated
with an operating subsidiary in the motorized reportable segment. Our towables market has also
softened. The decline in wholesale demand has directly impacted our gross margins.
The loss of one or more of our significant dealers could have a significant effect on our business.
Two dealers accounted for an aggregate of 29% of our bus sales for fiscal year 2009. The loss of
either dealer could have a significant effect on our bus business. One dealer, FreedomRoads, LLC,
accounted for 15% of our Companys consolidated recreation vehicle net sales and 11% of our
Companys consolidated net sales among FreedomRoads, LLCs 47 dealership locations in 26 U.S. states. The loss of
this dealer could have a significant effect on our recreation vehicle business. In addition,
deterioration in the liquidity or credit worthiness of FreedomRoads, LLC could negatively impact
our sales and accounts receivable and could trigger repurchase obligations under our repurchase
agreements.
Certain of our notes may have collectibility risk.
In January 2009 we entered into two credit agreements with Stephen Adams, in his individual
capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust
(the Trust) and together with each of the foregoing persons, the (Borrowers), pursuant to which
we made two $10,000 loans to the Borrowers. The first loan is payable in full on January 15, 2014
and the second loan is payable in full on January 29, 2010. The Borrowers own approximately 90% of
FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC (FreedomRoads Holding) the parent company of FreedomRoads, LLC, one of our largest
dealers. The loans are guaranteed by FreedomRoads Holding and are secured by a first priority security
interest in all of the direct and indirect legal, equitable and beneficial interests of the
Borrowers in FreedomRoads Holding. While we believe that the notes receivable from the Borrowers are
collectible, deterioration in the liquidity or credit worthiness of the Borrowers or FreedomRoads Holding
could impact the collectibility of the notes receivable.
A significant portion of our sales of small and mid-size buses are derived from state and local
transportation authorities.
Approximately 73% of our bus sales for fiscal year 2009 were derived from contracts with state and
local transportation authorities, in most cases with partial funding from federal agencies. There
can be no assurance that these authorities will not reduce their expenditures for our buses in the
future as a result of budgetary constraints, decreased tax revenues or otherwise. A reduction in
the purchase of our buses by these authorities could have an adverse effect on our business and
results of operations.
9
Table of Contents
Fuel shortages, or high prices for fuel, could have a negative effect on sales of our recreation
vehicles and buses.
Gasoline or diesel fuel is required for the operation of recreation vehicles and most buses. There
can be no assurance that the supply of these petroleum products will continue uninterrupted, that
rationing will not be imposed or that the price of or tax on these petroleum products will not
significantly increase in the future. Shortages of gasoline and diesel and substantial increases in
the price of fuel have had a material adverse effect on the recreation vehicle industry as a whole
in the past and could have a material adverse effect on our business in the future.
Our recreation vehicle business is seasonal, and this leads to fluctuations in sales, production
and net income.
We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, significant variability in sales,
production and net income as a result of seasonality in our businesses. Demand in the recreation
vehicle industry generally declines during the winter season, while sales and profits are generally
highest during the spring and summer months. In addition, unusually severe weather conditions in
some markets may delay the timing of shipments from one quarter to another.
Our business is affected by the availability and terms of financing to dealers and retail
purchasers.
Our business is affected by the availability and terms of financing to dealers and retail
purchasers. Generally, recreation vehicle dealers finance their purchases of inventory with
financing provided by lending institutions. The decrease in the availability of this type of
wholesale financing has prevented many dealers from carrying adequate levels of inventory, which
limits product offerings and leads to reduced demand. In addition, two of our financial flooring
institutions held 86% of the total floored dollars outstanding held by major institutions at July
31, 2009, reflecting the reduction in available lending sources. Substantial increases in interest
rates and decreases in the general availability of credit have also had an adverse impact upon our
business and results of operations in the past and may continue to do so in the future. In
particular, the current credit availability crisis may have a significant impact on our business.
Changes in consumer preferences for our products or our failure to gauge those preferences could
lead to reduced sales and additional costs.
We cannot be certain that historical consumer preferences for our products in general, and
recreation vehicles in particular, will remain unchanged. We believe that the introduction of new
features, designs and models will be critical to the future success of our recreation vehicle
operations. Delays in the introduction of new models, designs or product features, or a lack of
market acceptance of new models, designs or product features, could have a material adverse effect
on our business. Products may not be accepted for a number of reasons, including changes in
consumer preferences or our failure to properly gauge consumer preferences. Further, we cannot be
certain that new product introductions will not reduce revenues from existing models and adversely
affect our results of operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that any of these new
models or products will be introduced to the market on time or that they will be successful when
introduced.
If the frequency and size of product liability and other claims against us rises, our business,
results of operations and financial condition may be harmed.
We are subject, in the ordinary course of business, to litigation involving product liability and
other claims against us, including wrongful death, personal injury and warranties. We partially
self-insure our product liability claims and also purchase product liability insurance in the
commercial insurance market. We cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be sufficient to
cover all future claims against us. Any increase in the frequency and size of these claims, as
compared to our experience in prior years, may cause the premium that we are required to pay for
insurance to rise significantly. It may also increase the amounts we pay in punitive damages, not
all of which are covered by our insurance.
We have been named in approximately
300 complaints, some of which were originally styled as putative class actions (with respect to which class certification was ultimately
denied) and some of which were filed by individual plaintiffs, filed against manufacturers of travel trailers and manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) for use as emergency living accommodations in the
wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The complaints have been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the federal panel on multidistrict litigation for consideration
in a matter captioned in re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products
Liability Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaints generally assert claims for damages (for health related problems, medical expenses, emotional distress and lost earnings) and for
medical monitoring costs due to the presence of formaldehyde in the units. Some of the lawsuits also seek punitive and/or exemplary damages. Thus far, however, none of the lawsuits allege a specific amount of damages sought and instead make general allegations about
the nature of the plaintiffs claims without placing a dollar
figure on them. Although we strongly dispute the allegations in these
complaints, and intend to vigorously defend ourself in all such
matters, we may be liable for damages if we receive an unfavorable
outcome.
10
Table of Contents
When we introduce new products into the marketplace we may incur expenses that we did not
anticipate, which, in turn, can result in reduced earnings.
The introduction of new models of recreation vehicles and buses is critical to our future success.
We may incur unexpected expenses, however, when we introduce new models of recreation vehicles and
buses. For example, we may experience unexpected engineering or design flaws that will force a
recall of a new product. The costs resulting from these types of problems could be substantial, and
could have a significant adverse effect on our earnings.
Our repurchase agreements with floor plan lenders could result in increased costs.
In accordance with customary practice in the recreation vehicle industry, upon the request of a
lending institution financing a dealers purchase of our products, we will execute a repurchase
agreement with the lending institution. Repurchase agreements provide that, for up to 18 months
after a recreation vehicle is financed and in the event of default by the dealer, we will
repurchase the recreation vehicle repossessed by the lending institution for the amount then due,
which is usually less than 100% of the dealers cost. The difference between the gross repurchase
price and the price at which the repurchased product can then be resold, which is typically at a
discount to the original sale price, is an expense to us. Thus, if we were obligated to repurchase
a substantially greater number of recreation vehicles in the future, this would increase our costs.
In difficult economic times this amount could become material.
For some of our components, we depend on a small group of suppliers, and the loss of any of these
suppliers could affect our ability to obtain components at competitive prices, which would decrease
our margins.
Most recreation vehicle and bus components are readily available from a variety of sources.
However, a few components are produced by only a small group of quality suppliers that have the
capacity to supply large quantities on a national basis. Primarily, this occurs in the case of
chassis for our motorhomes and buses, where Ford Motor Company and General Motors are the dominant
suppliers. The recreation vehicle industry as a whole has from time to time experienced shortages
of chassis due to the concentration or allocation of available resources by suppliers of chassis to
the manufacturers of vehicles other than recreation vehicles or for other causes. Historically, in
the event of an industry-wide restriction of supply, Ford Motor Company and General Motors have
allocated chassis among us and our competitors based on the volume of chassis previously purchased.
If Ford Motor Company or General Motors were to discontinue the manufacturing of motorhome or bus
chassis, or if as a group all of our chassis suppliers significantly reduced the availability of
chassis to the industry, our business could be adversely affected. Similarly, shortages at, or
production delays or work stoppages by the employees of Ford Motor Company, General Motors or other
chassis suppliers, could have a material adverse effect on our sales. Finally, as is standard in
the industry, arrangements with chassis suppliers are terminable at any time by either our Company
or the chassis supplier. If we cannot obtain an adequate chassis supply, this could result in a
decrease in our sales and earnings.
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry , including the recent bankruptcy
filings and reorganizations of General Motors and Chrysler, to have a significant impact on our supply of chassis.
Supply of chassis is adequate for now and we believe that on-hand inventory would compensate for
changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we have not noticed any unusual cost increases
from our chassis suppliers. If the condition of the U.S. auto industry significantly worsens, this
could result in supply interruptions and a decrease in our sales and earnings while we obtain
replacement chassis from other sources.
Our business is subject to numerous federal, state and local regulations.
We are subject to numerous federal, state and local regulations governing the manufacture and sale
of our products, including the provisions of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, or
NTMVSA, and the safety standards for recreation vehicles and components which have been promulgated
under the NTMVSA by the Department of Transportation. The NTMVSA authorizes the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration to require a manufacturer to recall and repair vehicles which contain
certain hazards or defects. Any recalls of our vehicles, voluntary or involuntary, could have a
material adverse effect on our Company.
We are also subject to federal and numerous state consumer protection and unfair trade practice
laws and regulations relating to the sale, transportation and marketing of motor vehicles,
including so-called Lemon Laws. Federal and state laws and regulations also impose upon vehicle
operators various restrictions on the weight, length and width of motor vehicles, including buses
and motorhomes, that may be operated in certain jurisdictions or on certain roadways. Certain
jurisdictions also prohibit the sale of vehicles exceeding length restrictions. Finally, federal
and state authorities also have various environmental control standards relating to air, water,
noise pollution and hazardous waste generation and disposal which affect our business and
operations. Failure to comply with any of the foregoing laws or regulations could have an adverse
impact on our business.
11
Table of Contents
Risks Relating To Our Company
Provisions in our charter documents and of Delaware law may make it difficult for a third party to
acquire our Company and could depress the price of our common stock.
Our Restated Certificate of Incorporation contains certain supermajority voting provisions that
could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of our Company. These provisions could also make
it more difficult for shareholders to elect directors, amend our Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and take other corporate actions.
We are also subject to certain provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law that could delay,
deter or prevent us from entering into an acquisition, including provisions which prohibit a
Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested shareholder unless
specific conditions are met. The existence of these provisions could limit the price that investors
are willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and may deprive investors of an
opportunity to sell shares at a premium over prevailing prices.
We will continue to be effectively controlled by one of our shareholders.
Wade F. B. Thompson, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of
Directors, owns, directly or indirectly, voting control over an aggregate of 15,753,470 shares of
our common stock, representing 28.4% of our issued and outstanding voting stock as of September 15,
2009. As a result, Mr. Thompson will be able to significantly influence most matters requiring
approval by our shareholders, including the election of board members and the approval of mergers
or other business combination transactions.
Our investments in auction rate securities are subject to risks which may cause losses and affect
the liquidity of these investments.
At July 31, 2009, we held $14,550 (par value) of long-term investments and $107,150 (par value) of
short-term investments with an auction reset feature (ARS), which are variable-rate debt
securities and have a long-term maturity with the interest being reset through Dutch auctions that
are typically held every 7, 28 or 35 days. At July 31, 2009, the majority of the ARS we held were
AAA rated or equivalent, with most collateralized by
student loans substantially backed by the U.S. Federal government. Since February 12, 2008, most
auctions have failed for these securities and there is no assurance that future auctions on the ARS
in our investment portfolio will succeed and, as a result, our ability to liquidate our investment
and fully recover the par value of our investment in the near term may be limited or not exist.
In November 2008, the Company elected to participate in a rights offering by UBS AG (UBS), a
Swiss bank which is one of the Companys investment providers, that provides the Company with the
right to sell to UBS at par value ARS purchased from UBS ($107,150 of our entire ARS portfolio of
$121,700 as of July 31, 2009) at any time during a two-year sale period beginning June 30, 2010.
We believe we will be able to liquidate our investments without significant loss primarily due to
the government guarantee of the underlying securities; however, it could take until the final
maturity of the underlying notes (up to 31 years) to realize our investments par value.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
12
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We own or lease approximately 5,761,000 square feet of plant and office space. We believe that our
present facilities, consisting primarily of steel clad, steel or wood frame, and masonry
construction, and the machinery and equipment contained in these facilities, are well maintained
and in good condition. We believe that these facilities are adequate for our current and
foreseeable purposes and that we would be able to obtain replacements for our leased premises at
acceptable costs should our leases not be renewed.
The following table describes the location, number and size of our principal plants and other
materially important physical properties as of July 31, 2009:
Approximate | |||||||||||
No. of | Building Area | ||||||||||
Locations | Owned or Leased | Buildings | Square Feet | ||||||||
RVs: |
|||||||||||
Jackson Center, OH (Airstream) |
Owned | 9 | 299,000 | ||||||||
Hensall, Ontario, Canada (Citair) |
Owned | 1 | 97,000 | ||||||||
Oliver, B.C., Canada (Citair) |
Owned | 1 | 55,000 | ||||||||
Middlebury, IN (Dutchmen) |
Owned | 1 | 90,000 | ||||||||
Burley, ID (Dutchmen) |
Owned | 5 | 162,000 | ||||||||
Goshen, IN (Dutchmen) |
Owned | 9 | 560,000 | ||||||||
Bristol, IN (Dutchmen) (9) |
Owned | 1 | 54,000 | ||||||||
Syracuse, IN (Aero-Dutchmen) (9) |
Owned | 3 | 133,000 | ||||||||
Syracuse, IN (Aero-Dutchmen) (1) |
Leased | 1 | 49,000 | ||||||||
Elkhart, IN (Four Winds) |
Owned | 9 | 707,000 | ||||||||
Elkhart, IN (Four Winds) (2) |
Leased | 2 | 67,000 | ||||||||
Elkhart, IN (Damon) (9) |
Owned | 8 | 283,000 | ||||||||
Elkhart, IN (Damon) (3) |
Leased | 2 | 26,000 | ||||||||
Nappanee, IN (Breckenridge) |
Owned | 2 | 144,000 | ||||||||
Topeka, IN (CrossRoads) |
Owned | 5 | 250,000 | ||||||||
Clackamas, OR (Komfort) |
Owned | 1 | 107,000 | ||||||||
Moreno Valley, CA (4) |
Leased | 3 | 166,000 | ||||||||
Moreno Valley, CA (5) |
Leased | 1 | 49,000 | ||||||||
Goshen, IN (Keystone) (6) |
Leased | 4 | 220,000 | ||||||||
Goshen, IN (Keystone) |
Owned | 12 | 1,060,000 | ||||||||
Howe, IN (Keystone) (8) |
Leased | 1 | 168,000 | ||||||||
Pendleton, OR (Keystone) |
Owned | 1 | 146,000 | ||||||||
Pendleton, OR (Keystone) (7) |
Leased | 1 | 63,000 | ||||||||
Buses: |
|||||||||||
Salina, KS (ElDorado Kansas) |
Owned | 2 | 252,000 | ||||||||
Riverside, CA (ElDorado California) |
Owned | 1 | 227,000 | ||||||||
Imlay City, Michigan (Champion Bus) |
Owned | 5 | 201,000 | ||||||||
Elkhart, IN (Goshen Coach) |
Owned | 3 | 126,000 | ||||||||
Total |
94 | 5,761,000 | |||||||||
(1) | This location is occupied under a net lease which expires in 2010 with option to purchase.
Location is currently vacant and lease is not expected to be renewed at expiration. |
|
(2) | These locations are occupied under net leases expiring in 2010 and 2011. |
|
(3) | These locations are occupied under net leases expiring in 2013. Location is currently vacant
and is on the market for sub-leasing. |
|
(4) | This location is occupied under a net lease which expires in 2010. This property was sublet
to the buyers of Thor California as of June 2008. |
|
(5) | This location is occupied under a net lease which expires in 2010. |
|
(6) | One location lease expires in December 2009 and is expected to be purchased at the expiration
of the lease. A second location is vacant and the lease expires in December 2009 and is not
expected to be renewed. The other two leased locations expire in 2012 with an option to renew
for 5 years and are currently being utilized. |
|
(7) | This location is occupied under a net lease expiring in November 2011 with an option to renew
for 7 years. |
|
(8) | This location is occupied under a net lease expiring in February 2010. This location is
currently vacant and lease is not expected to be renewed at expiration. |
|
(9) | Locations are vacant and have been placed on the market. |
13
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We have been subject to an SEC review regarding the facts and circumstances giving rise to the
restatement of our previously issued financial statements as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, and for
each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2006, and the financial results in each
of the quarterly periods in 2006 and 2005, and our financial statements as of and for the three
months ended October 31, 2006 and related matters. We have cooperated fully with the SEC,
including from time to time responding to SEC staff requests for additional information. The
investigation by the SEC staff could result in the SEC seeking various penalties and relief,
including, without limitation, civil injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties or
administrative relief. The nature of the relief or remedies the SEC may seek, if any, cannot be
predicted at this time.
We have been named in approximately
300 complaints, some of which were originally styled as putative class actions (with respect to which class certification was ultimately
denied) and some of which were filed by individual plaintiffs, filed against manufacturers of travel trailers and manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) for use as emergency living accommodations in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The complaints have been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the federal panel on multidistrict litigation for consideration
in a matter captioned in re FEMA Trailer Formaidehyde Products Liability Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaints generally assert claims for damages (for health related problems, medical expenses, emotional distress and lost earnings) and for
medical monitoring costs due to the presence of formaidehyde in the units. Some of the lawsuits also seek punitive and/or exemplary damages. Thus far, however, none of the lawsuits allege a specific amount of damages sought and instead make general allegations about
the nature of the plaintiffs claims without placing a dollar figure on them. We strongly dispute the allegations in these complaints, and intend to vigorously defend ourself in all such matters.
In addition, we are involved in certain litigation arising out of our operations in the normal
course of our business, most of which are based upon state lemon laws, warranty claims, other
claims and accidents (for which we carry insurance above a specified deductible amount). We do not
believe that any one of these claims is material.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters submitted.
PART II
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES. |
Market Information
The Companys Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share (Common Stock) is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange(NYSE). Set forth below is the range of high and low prices for the
Common Stock for each quarter during the Companys two most recent fiscal years, as quoted in the
NYSE Monthly Market Statistics and Trading Reports:
Fiscal 2009 | Fiscal 2008 | |||||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 31.85 | $ | 14.68 | $ | 52.31 | $ | 38.68 | ||||||||
Second Quarter |
19.09 | 10.51 | 47.48 | 29.72 | ||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
23.29 | 9.54 | 36.91 | 26.73 | ||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
23.95 | 16.65 | 31.32 | 19.62 |
Holders
As of September 15, 2009, the number of holders of record of the Companys common stock was 133.
Dividends
In fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, we paid a $.07 per share dividend in each quarter. In addition, we
paid a special $2 per share dividend in our first quarter of fiscal 2008. Any payment of cash
dividends in the future will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon
our financial condition, capital requirements, earnings and any other factors which the Board of
Directors may deem relevant. There are no limitations on the Companys ability to pay dividends
pursuant to any credit facility.
14
Table of Contents
Equity
Compensation Plan Information see Item 12
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Fiscal Years Ended July 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||||||
Income statement data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales (3) |
$ | 1,521,896 | $ | 2,640,680 | $ | 2,856,308 | $ | 3,066,276 | $ | 2,558,141 | ||||||||||
Net income (1) (2) (3) (4) |
17,143 | 92,706 | 134,731 | 163,405 | 119,143 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share (1) (2) (3) (4) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
.31 | 1.67 | 2.42 | 2.89 | 2.10 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
.31 | 1.66 | 2.41 | 2.87 | 2.09 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
.28 | 2.28 | 1.28 | .19 | .42 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends paid per common share |
.28 | 2.28 | 1.28 | .49 | .12 | |||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets (1) (2) (3) |
$ | 951,124 | $ | 996,562 | $ | 1,059,297 | $ | 1,004,725 | $ | 853,893 |
(1) | Selected financial data for 2009 includes non-cash goodwill and trademark impairments of
$9,717 and $564, respectively, for the goodwill and trademarks associated with subsidiaries
in our motorized segment. |
|
(2) | Selected financial data for 2008 includes a non-cash goodwill impairment of $7,535 for the
goodwill associated with a subsidiary within our motorized segment, an impairment of $1,962 to
adjust certain properties to fair market value and provisions of $5,411 recorded in connection
with the sale of our Thor California travel trailer and fifth wheel business during fiscal
2008. |
|
(3) | Selected financial data for 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 includes the results of
CrossRoads RV, which was acquired on November 1, 2004, and Goshen Coach, Inc. which was
acquired on May 27, 2005. |
|
(4) | Selected financial data for 2007 includes expenses of $6,858 as a direct result of the
Audit Committees investigation and the Companys review of the accounting practices at
Dutchmen and certain of our other operating subsidiaries. These costs primarily relate to
professional services for legal, accounting and tax guidance. In addition, we incurred costs
relating to the audit of our restated consolidated financial statements. |
15
Table of Contents
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Overview
We were founded in 1980 and have grown to be the largest manufacturer of Recreation Vehicles
(RVs) and a major manufacturer of commercial buses in North America. Our market share in the
travel trailer and fifth wheel segment of the industry (towables) is approximately 31%. In the
motorized segment of the industry we have a market share of approximately 18%. Our market share in
small and mid-size buses is approximately 40%. We also manufacture and sell 40-foot buses at our
facility in Southern California.
Our growth has been internal and by acquisition. Our strategy has been to increase our
profitability in North America in the RV industry and in the bus business through product
innovation, service to our customers, manufacturing quality products, improving our facilities and
acquisitions. We have not entered unrelated businesses and have no plans to do so in the future.
We rely on internally generated cash flows from operations to finance our growth although we may
borrow to make an acquisition if we believe the incremental cash flows will provide for rapid
payback. Capital expenditures of approximately $5,135 in fiscal 2009 were made primarily to upgrade
IT systems and replace machinery and equipment used in the ordinary course of business.
Our business model includes decentralized operating units and we compensate operating management
primarily with cash based upon profitability of the business unit which they manage. Our corporate
staff provides financial management, purchasing services, insurance, legal and human resources,
risk management and internal audit functions. Senior corporate management interacts regularly with
operating management to assure that corporate objectives are understood clearly and are monitored
appropriately.
Our RV products are sold to dealers who, in turn, retail those products. Our buses are sold through
dealers to municipalities and private purchasers such as rental car companies and hotels. We
generally do not directly finance dealers but do provide repurchase agreements in order to
facilitate the dealers obtaining floor plan financing.
Trends and Business Outlook
Industry conditions in the RV market have been adversely affected by low consumer confidence,
tighter lending practices and the general economic downturn. As a result of these continuing
concerns, market conditions continue to be soft and we anticipate this weakness may continue in
fiscal 2010.
The motorized market has been significantly impacted by current market conditions. The tightening
of the retail credit markets, low consumer confidence and the volatility of fuel prices are
continuing to place pressure on retail sales and our dealers continue to be cautious in the amount
of inventory they are willing to carry. Based on the foregoing and with the assistance of an
independent valuation firm, we recognized a non-cash goodwill impairment of $9,717 in the third
quarter of fiscal 2009 for the goodwill associated with an operating subsidiary within our
motorized segment. The Company also completed an impairment review in the second quarter which
resulted in a non-cash trademark impairment charge of $564 for the trademark associated with an
operating subsidiary in our motorized segment. The impairments result from the difficult market
environment and outlook for the motorhome business. For fiscal 2009, net sales in our motorized
segment decreased 65% compared to fiscal 2008. Our towables market has been significantly impacted
as well, albeit less than our motorized market, as the price of a towable recreation vehicle is
generally about one-fourth that of a motorhome and sales of more expensive recreation vehicles have
suffered greater in the current economic downturn. Dealers continue to sell older model-year units
before replacing them with new products. The decline in wholesale demand has directly impacted our
gross margins as we have had to increase our discounts to meet competitive pricing.
The Company has reacted to the difficult business environment by scaling back its activities and
reducing its workforce. If the current market environment persists, we may have to take additional
cost-cutting measures including idling additional plants, if necessary.
When consumer confidence stabilizes and retail and wholesale credit availability improves, we
expect to see a rebound in sales from dealers ordering units for stock and expect to benefit from
our ability to ramp up production in an industry with fewer manufacturing facilities than before,
due to competitor failures or plant consolidations. A short-term positive indicator for us is
reflected in our order backlog, which has increased from $406,371 at July 31, 2008 to $587,859 at
July 31, 2009, an increase of $181,488 or 45%. A longer-term positive outlook for the recreation
vehicle industry is supported by favorable demographics as baby boomers reach the age brackets that
historically have accounted for the bulk of retail RV sales, and an increase in interest has
occurred in the RV lifestyle among both older and younger segments of the population than have
traditionally participated.
16
Table of Contents
We believe an important determinant of demand for recreation vehicles is demographics. The baby
boomer population is now reaching retirement age and retirees are a large market for our products.
The baby boomer retiree population in the United States is expected to grow five times as fast as
the total United States population. We believe a primary indicator of the strength of the
recreation vehicle industry is retail RV sales, which we closely monitor to determine industry
trends. Recently, although the entire RV industry has been weak, the towable segment of the RV
industry has been stronger than the motorized segment. For the towable segment, retail sales as
reported by Statistical Surveys, Inc. were down approximately 31% for the seven months ended July 31, 2009
compared with the same period last year. The motorized segment was down approximately 42%. Tighter
retail credit and lower consumer confidence appear to affect the motorized segment more severely.
Economic or industry-wide factors affecting our recreation vehicle business include raw material
costs of commodities used in the manufacture of our product. Material cost is the primary factor
determining our cost of products sold. Material costs have generally been flat in 2009. Future
increases in raw material costs would impact our profit margins negatively if we were unable to
raise prices for our products by corresponding amounts.
Government entities are the primary users of our buses. Demand in this segment is subject to
fluctuations in government spending on transit. In addition, hotel and rental car companies are
also major users of our small and mid-size buses and therefore travel is an important indicator for
this market. The majority of our buses have a 5-year useful life and are being continuously
replaced by operators. According to the Mid Size Bus Manufacturers Association, unit sales of small
and mid-sized buses are down 12.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the same
period last year. Bus sales may benefit from the U.S. governments emphasis on mass transportation
in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act stimulus package.
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry, including the recent bankruptcy
filings and reorganizations of General Motors and Chrysler, to have a significant impact on our
supply of chassis. Supply of chassis is adequate for now and we believe that on-hand inventory
would compensate for changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we have not noticed any
unusual cost increases from our chassis suppliers. If the condition of the U.S. auto industry
significantly worsens, this could result in supply interruptions and a decrease in our sales and
earnings while we obtain replacement chassis from other sources.
17
Table of Contents
FISCAL 2009 VS. FISCAL 2008
Change | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009 | Fiscal 2008 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
NET SALES |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 953,279 | $ | 1,763,099 | $ | (809,820) | (45.9) | |||||||||
Motorized |
161,727 | 461,856 | (300,129) | (65.0) | ||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
1,115,006 | 2,224,955 | (1,109,949) | (49.9) | ||||||||||||
Buses |
406,890 | 415,725 | (8,835) | (2.1) | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,521,896 | $ | 2,640,680 | $ | (1,118,784) | (42.4) | |||||||||
# OF UNITS |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
43,300 | 78,888 | (35,588) | (45.1) | ||||||||||||
Motorized |
2,165 | 5,863 | (3,698) | (63.1) | ||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
45,465 | 84,751 | (39,286) | (46.4) | ||||||||||||
Buses |
6,145 | 6,280 | (135) | (2.1) | ||||||||||||
Total |
51,610 | 91,031 | (39,421) | (43.3) | ||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009 | Net Sales | Fiscal 2008 | Net Sales | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 111,475 | 11.7 | $ | 246,505 | 14.0 | $ | (135,030) | (54.8) | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
272 | 0.2 | 35,928 | 7.8 | (35,656) | (99.2) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
111,747 | 10.0 | 282,433 | 12.7 | (170,686) | (60.4) | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
40,790 | 10.0 | 39,993 | 9.6 | 797 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 152,537 | 10.0 | $ | 322,426 | 12.2 | $ | (169,889) | (52.7) | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 64,441 | 6.8 | $ | 102,356 | 5.8 | $ | (37,915) | (37.0) | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
19,695 | 12.2 | 28,899 | 6.3 | (9,204) | (31.8) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
84,136 | 7.5 | 131,255 | 5.9 | (47,119) | (35.9) | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
22,782 | 5.6 | 18,088 | 4.4 | 4,694 | 26.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
17,660 | | 27,725 | | (10,065) | (36.3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 124,578 | 8.2 | $ | 177,068 | 6.7 | $ | (52,490) | (29.6) | |||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 47,347 | 5.0 | $ | 146,306 | 8.3 | $ | (98,959) | (67.6) | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
(29,728) | (18.4) | (522) | (0.1) | (29,206) | (5595.0) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
17,619 | 1.6 | 145,784 | 6.6 | (128,165) | (87.9) | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
17,422 | 4.3 | 21,132 | 5.1 | (3,710) | (17.6) | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(11,646) | | (14,509) | | 2,863 | 19.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 23,395 | 1.5 | $ | 152,407 | 5.8 | $ | (129,012) | (84.6) | |||||||||||||||
As of | As of | Change | ||||||||||||||
ORDER BACKLOG | July 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | Amount | % | ||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 262,072 | $ | 106,792 | $ | 155,280 | 145.4 | |||||||||
Motorized |
36,256 | 38,774 | (2,518) | (6.5) | ||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
298,328 | 145,566 | 152,762 | 104.9 | ||||||||||||
Buses |
289,531 | 260,805 | 28,726 | 11.0 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 587,859 | $ | 406,371 | $ | 181,488 | 44.7 | |||||||||
18
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED
Net sales and gross profit for fiscal 2009 decreased 42.4% and 52.7% respectively, compared to
fiscal 2008. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2009 decreased 29.6% compared
to fiscal 2008. Income before income taxes for fiscal 2009 decreased 84.6% compared to fiscal 2008.
The specifics on changes in net sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative expense and income
before income taxes are addressed in the segment reporting below.
Corporate costs in selling, general and administrative were $17,660 for fiscal 2009 compared to
$27,725 for fiscal 2008. This decrease of $10,065 is primarily due to a decrease of $3,142 in
insurance related expense, $1,532 in audit and tax related fees, $1,414 in self-insured workers
compensation costs, $1,569 in legal and professional fees, and $828 in incentive based
compensation. These decreases resulted from the overall decline in our business and cost reduction
efforts. In addition, the Companys expense for probable losses related to vehicle repurchase
commitments decreased by $1,176 due to a decrease in actual and anticipated repurchase activity
resulting from lower dealer inventory. Corporate interest and other income was $6,014 for fiscal
2009 compared to $13,333 for fiscal 2008. The decrease of $7,319 is attributed to a $5,792 decrease
in interest income due to lower interest rates and the contractual terms of our auction rate
securities which restrict the maximum yearly interest earned and a $1,519 decrease in income from
TCC, our former joint venture, which dissolved in September 2008.
The overall annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2009 was 26.7% on $23,395 of income before income
taxes, compared to 39.2% on $152,407 of income before income taxes for fiscal 2008. The primary
reasons for this decrease in rate were (1) the benefit derived from recording Qualified Alternative
Fuel Motor Vehicle (QAFMV) credits for fiscal years ended 2007 and 2008 in the current year
provision and the current year 2009 QAFMV credits received (2) recording the benefit derived from
amending the Companys federal and state income tax returns as a result of the Companys IRS
examination (3) the benefit of changes in legislation relative to the Companys fiscal year 2008
research and development credit and (4) adjustments to the Companys income taxes payable as a
result of entries to correct the Companys prior year deferred taxes and state tax expense. The
income tax payable adjustments are for FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48) deferred tax assets,
accrued dealer incentives, and an adjustment for the difference between state income tax expense
accrued vs. paid.
The changes in costs and price within the Companys business due to inflation were not
significantly different from inflation in the United States economy as a whole. Levels of capital
investment, pricing and inventory investment were not materially affected by changes caused by
inflation.
19
Table of Contents
SEGMENT REPORTING
Towable Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009 | Net Sales | Fiscal 2008 | Net Sales | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Travel Trailers |
$ | 489,637 | 51.3 | $ | 864,796 | 49.0 | $ | (375,159) | (43.4) | |||||||||||||||
Fifth Wheels |
425,826 | 44.7 | 839,168 | 47.6 | (413,342) | (49.3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
37,816 | 4.0 | 59,135 | 3.4 | (21,319) | (36.1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Towables |
$ | 953,279 | 100.0 | $ | 1,763,099 | 100.0 | $ | (809,820) | (45.9) | |||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009 | Shipments | Fiscal 2008 | Shipments | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Travel Trailers |
28,292 | 65.4 | 48,855 | 61.9 | (20,563) | (42.1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Fifth Wheels |
13,823 | 31.9 | 28,169 | 35.7 | (14,346) | (50.9) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1,185 | 2.7 | 1,864 | 2.4 | (679) | (36.4) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Towables |
43,300 | 100.0 | 78,888 | 100.0 | (35,588) | (45.1) | ||||||||||||||||||
IMPACT OF CHANGE IN PRICE ON NET SALES:
% | ||||
Increase /(Decrease) | ||||
Towables |
||||
Travel Trailer |
(1.3) | % | ||
Fifth Wheel |
1.6 | % | ||
Other |
0.3 | % | ||
Total Towables |
(0.8) | % |
The decrease in towable net sales of 45.9% resulted primarily from a 45.1% decrease in unit
shipments and an 0.8% decrease in the impact of the change in the net price per unit. The overall
industry decrease in wholesale unit shipments of towables for August 2008 through July 2009 was
51.2%, according to statistics published by the RVIA.
The impact of the change in net price per unit of towables was a decrease of 0.8%, which included
decreases in travel trailers of 1.3% and increases in fifth wheels of 1.6%, in fiscal year 2009 as
compared to fiscal year 2008. The primary reason for the decrease or nominal increase in the
change in the net price per unit is due to heavier discounting and increased incentives in fiscal
2009 necessitated by prevailing depressed market conditions. This decrease created by discounting
was offset, to varying degrees, by continued consumer demands for additional features or upgrades.
Cost of products sold decreased $674,790 to $841,804 or 88.3% of towable net sales for fiscal 2009
compared to $1,516,594 or 86.0% of towable net sales for fiscal 2008. The change in material,
labor, freight-out and warranty comprised $626,299 of the $674,790 decrease in
20
Table of Contents
cost of products sold and was due to decreased sales volume. In addition, in fiscal 2008 cost of
products sold included an impairment and other charges of $5,711, of which $5,411 related to the
sale of our Thor California subsidiary and $300 related to the write-down of certain properties to
fair value. Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a percentage of net sales increased to
79.8% from 78.7% from fiscal 2008 to 2009. The 1.1% increase as a percentage of net sales is due
primarily to the additional discounting in fiscal 2009. These costs in relation to gross sales
remained consistent with fiscal 2008. Manufacturing overhead decreased $42,780 to $80,837 in fiscal
2009 compared to $123,617 in fiscal 2008. Variable costs in manufacturing overhead decreased
$41,493 to $68,679 or 7.2% of towable net sales for fiscal 2009 compared to $110,172 or 6.2% of
towable net sales for fiscal 2008 due to lower production. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead,
which consist primarily of facility costs and property taxes, decreased $1,287 to $12,158 in fiscal
2009 from $13,445 in fiscal 2008.
Towable gross profit decreased $135,030 to $111,475 or 11.7% of towable net sales for fiscal 2009
compared to $246,505 or 14.0% of towable net sales for fiscal 2008. The decrease in gross profit
was due primarily to the 45.1% decrease in unit sales volume and the additional discounting during
fiscal 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $64,441 or 6.8% of towable net sales for fiscal
2009 compared to $102,356 or 5.8% of towable net sales for fiscal 2008. The primary reason for the
$37,915 decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was decreased net sales, which
caused related commissions, bonuses and other compensation to decrease by $32,385. In addition,
advertising and selling related costs decreased $2,708 due to decreased sales activity and legal
and settlement costs decreased $1,604 due to the resolution of various legal and product disputes.
Towable income before income taxes decreased to 5.0% of towable net sales for fiscal 2009 from 8.3%
of towable net sales for fiscal 2008. The primary factor for this decrease was the reduction in
unit sales coupled with additional discounting.
Motorized Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009 | Net Sales | Fiscal 2008 | Net Sales | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A |
$ | 89,477 | 55.3 | $ | 306,577 | 66.4 | $ | (217,100) | (70.8) | |||||||||||||||
Class C |
62,789 | 38.8 | 152,134 | 32.9 | (89,345) | (58.7) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
9,461 | 5.9 | 3,145 | 0.7 | 6,316 | 200.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Motorized |
$ | 161,727 | 100.0 | $ | 461,856 | 100.0 | $ | (300,129) | (65.0) | |||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009 | Shipments | Fiscal 2008 | Shipments | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A |
913 | 42.2 | 3,192 | 54.4 | (2,279) | (71.4) | ||||||||||||||||||
Class C |
1,131 | 52.2 | 2,631 | 44.9 | (1,500) | (57.0) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
121 | 5.6 | 40 | 0.7 | 81 | 202.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Motorized |
2,165 | 100.0 | 5,863 | 100.0 | (3,698) | (63.1) | ||||||||||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
IMPACT OF CHANGE IN PRICE ON NET SALES:
% | ||||
Increase/(Decrease) | ||||
Motorized |
||||
Class A |
0.6 | % | ||
Class C |
(1.7) | % | ||
Other |
(1.7) | % | ||
Total Motorized |
(1.9) | % |
The decrease in motorized net sales of 65.0% resulted primarily from a 63.1% decrease in unit
shipments and the impact of a 1.9% decrease in the impact of the change in net price per unit. The
overall industry decrease in wholesale unit shipments of motorhomes for the period August 2008
through July 2009 was 70.2% according to statistics published by the RVIA.
The impact of the change in the net price per unit of motorized was a decrease of 1.9%, which
included increases in Class A motorized units of 0.6%, and decreases in Class C motorized units of
1.7% in fiscal year 2009 as compared to fiscal year 2008. The nominal increase or decrease in the
impact in net price per unit is attributable to much greater discounting and increased wholesale
and retail incentives in fiscal 2009 in response to the significant contraction within the
motorized market. The negative effects of the increase in discounting was offset in the Class A
segment by the continued increase in the concentration of diesel units within the Class A line
(30.9% in 2009 and 25.7% in 2008). Diesel units are generally larger and more expensive than gas
units.
Cost of products sold decreased $264,473 to $161,455 or 99.8% of motorized net sales for fiscal
2009 compared to $425,928 or 92.2% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2008. The change in material,
labor, freight-out and warranty comprised $252,347 of the $264,473 decrease in cost of products
sold and was due to decreased sales volume. In addition, in fiscal 2008 cost of products sold
includes charges of $1,526 related to the write-down of certain properties to fair value. Material,
labor, freight-out and warranty as a percentage of net sales increased to 87.4% from 85.2% from
fiscal 2008 to 2009. This 2.2% increase as a percentage of net sales was primarily driven by the
deep discounting done in fiscal 2009 to remain competitive in the difficult motorized market
segment. Labor, freight-out and warranty costs in relation to gross sales remained consistent with
fiscal 2008. Material costs in relation to gross sales decreased by 1.0% in fiscal 2009 primarily
due to the favorable impact of the LIFO inventory liquidations of $4,430. Manufacturing overhead
decreased $10,600 to $20,083 in fiscal 2009 compared to $30,683 in fiscal 2008. Variable costs in
manufacturing overhead decreased $10,889 to $15,920 or 9.8% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2009
compared to $26,809 or 5.8% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2008 due to lower production. Fixed
costs in manufacturing overhead, which consist primarily of facility costs and property taxes,
increased $289 to $4,163 from $3,874 in fiscal 2008.
Motorized gross profit decreased $35,656 to $272 or 0.2% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2009
compared to $35,928 or 7.8% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2008. The decrease in gross profit
was due primarily to the 63.1% decrease in unit sales volume and additional discounting.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $19,695 or 12.2% of motorized net sales for
fiscal 2009 compared to $28,899 or 6.3% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2008. The primary reason
for the $9,204 decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was decreased net sales
which caused related commissions, bonuses and other compensation to decrease by $7,681. In
addition, self-insurance costs decreased $2,650 due to the settlement in fiscal 2008 of a single
self insurance product liability claim, and advertising and selling costs decreased $1,013 due to
decreased sales activity. These decreases were offset by increases of $955 for legal and settlement
costs due to increases in various legal and product disputes and increased costs of $1,537 related
to vehicle repurchase activity.
Motorized income before income taxes was a negative 18.4% of net sales for fiscal 2009 and a
negative 0.1% of net sales for fiscal 2008. This reflects the impact of the decrease in unit sales,
increased discounting, and the related impact on gross profit, and goodwill and trademark
impairments of $9,717 and $564, respectively, at two of our motorized subsidiaries.
22
Table of Contents
Buses
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008
Fiscal 2009 | Fiscal 2008 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 406,890 | $ | 415,725 | $ | (8,835) | (2.1) | |||||||||
# of Units |
6,145 | 6,280 | (135) | (2.1) | ||||||||||||
Impact of Change in Price on Net Sales |
0.0 |
The decrease in buses net sales of 2.1% resulted from a 2.1% decrease in unit shipments.
There was no impact of the change in the price per unit of buses in fiscal year 2009 as compared to
fiscal year 2008 as modest selling price increases were offset by similar nominal increases in
discounting.
Cost of products sold decreased $9,632 to $366,100 or 90.0% of net sales for fiscal 2009 compared
to $375,732 or 90.4% of buses net sales for fiscal 2008. The decrease in material, labor,
freight-out and warranty represents $9,982 of the $9,632 decrease in cost of products sold offset
by an increase of $350 in manufacturing overhead. Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a
percentage of buses net sales decreased slightly to 82.4% from 83.1% from fiscal 2008 to 2009. The
individual relationships of labor, freight-out and warranty to buses net sales did not vary
significantly in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. Manufacturing overhead increased $350 to
$30,795 in fiscal 2009 compared to $30,445 in fiscal 2008. Variable costs in manufacturing overhead
increased $542 to $28,549 or 7.0% of buses net sales for fiscal 2009 compared to $28,007 or 6.7% of
buses net sales for fiscal 2008. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead, which consist primarily of
facility costs and property taxes, decreased $192 to $2,246 in fiscal 2009 from $2,438 in fiscal
2008.
Buses gross profit increased $797 to $40,790 or 10.0% of buses net sales for fiscal 2009 compared
to $39,993 or 9.6% of buses net sales for fiscal 2008. The increase in gross profit resulted
primarily from the change in cost of products sold as discussed above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $22,782 or 5.6% of buses net sales for fiscal
2009 compared to $18,088 or 4.4% of net bus sales for fiscal 2008. The primary reason for the
$4,694 increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was a $3,000 increase in self
insurance reserves related to a single product liability case. Additionally, legal and settlement
costs increased $1,270, a portion of which related to this same product liability case.
Buses income before income taxes decreased to 4.3% of buses net sales for 2009 from 5.1% of buses
net sales for fiscal 2008. This reflects the impact of the increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses, offset in part by the increase in gross profit, each as discussed above.
23
Table of Contents
FISCAL 2008 VS. FISCAL 2007
Change | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2008 | Fiscal 2007 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
NET SALES |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 1,763,099 | $ | 1,890,100 | $ | (127,001) | (6.7) | |||||||||
Motorized |
461,856 | 565,523 | (103,667) | (18.3) | ||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
2,224,955 | 2,455,623 | (230,668) | (9.4) | ||||||||||||
Buses |
415,725 | 400,685 | 15,040 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,640,680 | $ | 2,856,308 | $ | (215,628) | (7.5) | |||||||||
# OF UNITS |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
78,888 | 87,506 | (8,618) | (9.8) | ||||||||||||
Motorized |
5,863 | 7,634 | (1,771) | (23.2) | ||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
84,751 | 95,140 | (10,389) | (10.9) | ||||||||||||
Buses |
6,280 | 6,497 | (217) | (3.3) | ||||||||||||
Total |
91,031 | 101,637 | (10,606) | (10.4) | ||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2008 | Net Sales | Fiscal 2007 | Net Sales | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 246,505 | 14.0 | $ | 273,445 | 14.5 | $ | (26,940) | (9.9) | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
35,928 | 7.8 | 55,334 | 9.8 | (19,406) | (35.1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
282,433 | 12.7 | 328,779 | 13.4 | (46,346) | (14.1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
39,993 | 9.6 | 34,516 | 8.6 | 5,477 | 15.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 322,426 | 12.2 | $ | 363,295 | 12.7 | $ | (40,869) | (11.2) | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 102,356 | 5.8 | $ | 107,804 | 5.7 | $ | (5,448) | (5.1) | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
28,899 | 6.3 | 30,068 | 5.3 | (1,169) | (3.9) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
131,255 | 5.9 | 137,872 | 5.6 | (6,617) | (4.8) | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
18,088 | 4.4 | 14,809 | 3.7 | 3,279 | 22.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
27,725 | | 25,016 | | 2,709 | 10.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 177,068 | 6.7 | $ | 177,697 | 6.2 | $ | (629) | (0.4) | |||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 146,306 | 8.3 | $ | 165,259 | 8.7 | $ | (18,953) | (11.5) | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
(522) | (0.1) | 25,140 | 4.4 | (25,662) | (102.1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
145,784 | 6.6 | 190,399 | 7.8 | (44,615) | (23.4) | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
21,132 | 5.1 | 18,997 | 4.7 | 2,135 | 11.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(14,509) | | (12,536) | | (1,973) | (15.7) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 152,407 | 5.8 | $ | 196,860 | 6.9 | $ | (44,453) | (22.6) | |||||||||||||||
As of | As of | Change | ||||||||||||||
ORDER BACKLOG | July 31, 2008 | July 31, 2007 | Amount | % | ||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 106,792 | $ | 276,136 | $ | (169,344) | (61.3) | |||||||||
Motorized |
38,774 | 84,718 | (45,944) | (54.2) | ||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
145,566 | 360,854 | (215,288) | (59.7) | ||||||||||||
Buses |
260,805 | 228,862 | 31,943 | 14.0 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 406,371 | $ | 589,716 | $ | (183,345) | (31.1) | |||||||||
24
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED
Net sales and gross profit for fiscal 2008 decreased 7.5% and 11.2%, respectively, compared to
fiscal 2007. Selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2008 decreased 0.4% compared
to fiscal 2007. Income before income taxes for fiscal 2008 decreased 22.6% compared to fiscal 2007.
The specifics on changes in net sales, gross profit, general and administrative expense and income
before income taxes are addressed in the segment reporting below.
Corporate selling, general and administrative expenses were $27,725 for fiscal 2008 compared to
$25,016 for fiscal 2007. This increase resulted from increases of $2,033 for self insurance costs
related to products liability and medical claims, $1,984 for legal and accounting expenses due to
increased professional services primarily for tax and growth initiatives, $3,393 for a charge
related to higher vehicle repurchase activity resulting from a decline in the recreation vehicle
industry and $478 for an unclaimed property tax settlement. These increases were offset by a
decrease in legal costs of $5,480 related to the previously disclosed Dutchmen investigation.
Corporate interest income and other income was $13,333 for fiscal 2008 compared to $12,499 for
fiscal 2007.
The overall annual effective tax rate for fiscal 2008 was 39.2% on $152,407 of income before income
taxes, compared to 31.6% on $196,860 of income before income taxes for fiscal 2007. The primary
reasons for this increase in rate were (1) an increase in our liability for unrecognized tax
benefits pursuant to FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of SFAS No. 109 (FIN 48), (2) the increased impact of specific permanent items
when compared to lower income before income taxes, including impairment charges, and (3) the
reversal in fiscal 2007 of income tax reserves due to settlements of an Internal Revenue Service
examination and a tax dispute with the State of Indiana. The tax dispute with the State of Indiana
involved a disagreement on the eligibility of the Company to file a unitary state tax return. The
Company had established reserves for this dispute in fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2006, which it
reversed in fiscal 2007. In the settlement agreement with Indiana, the Company obtained permission
to file a unitary state tax return for fiscal 2006 and thereafter which is expected to be favorable
to the overall annual effective tax rate.
25
Table of Contents
SEGMENT REPORTING
Towable Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2008 vs. Fiscal 2007
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2008 | Net Sales | Fiscal 2007 | Net Sales | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Travel Trailers |
$ | 864,796 | 49.0 | $ | 921,204 | 48.7 | $ | (56,408 | ) | (6.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Fifth Wheels |
839,168 | 47.6 | 902,873 | 47.8 | (63,705 | ) | (7.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
59,135 | 3.4 | 66,023 | 3.5 | (6,888 | ) | (10.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Towables |
$ | 1,763,099 | 100.0 | $ | 1,890,100 | 100.0 | $ | (127,001 | ) | (6.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2008 | Shipments | Fiscal 2007 | Shipments | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Travel Trailers |
48,855 | 61.9 | 53,459 | 61.1 | (4,604 | ) | (8.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Fifth Wheels |
28,169 | 35.7 | 31,720 | 36.2 | (3,551 | ) | (11.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
1,864 | 2.4 | 2,327 | 2.7 | (463 | ) | (19.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Towables |
78,888 | 100.0 | 87,506 | 100.0 | (8,618 | ) | (9.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
IMPACT OF CHANGE IN PRICE ON NET SALES:
% | ||||
Increase |
||||
Towables |
||||
Travel Trailer |
2.5% | |||
Fifth Wheel |
4.1% | |||
Other |
9.5% | |||
Total Towables |
3.1% |
The decrease in towable net sales of 6.7% resulted primarily from a 9.8% decrease in unit shipments
offset by a 3.1% increase in the impact of the change in price per unit. The overall industry
decrease in wholesale unit shipments of towables for August 2007 through July 2008 was 10.7%
according to statistics published by the RVIA.
The impact of the change in price per unit of towables was an increase of 3.1%, which included
increases in travel trailers and fifth wheels of 2.5% and 4.1%, respectively, in fiscal year 2008
as compared to fiscal year 2007. These increases were primarily due to increased freight costs
associated with higher fuel prices, and demand by customers for additional features or upgrades,
offset by decreases resulting from increased discounts and increased wholesale and retail
incentives provided to customers. Additional discounts and incentives were provided as a result of
an overall decline in the recreation vehicle industry.
Cost
of products sold decreased $100,061 to $1,516,594 or 86.0% of towable net sales for fiscal 2008
compared to $1,616,655 or 85.5% of towable net sales for fiscal 2007. The change in material,
labor, freight-out and warranty comprised $93,416 of the $100,061 decrease in
26
Table of Contents
cost of products sold and was due to decreased sales volume. Material, labor, freight-out and
warranty as a percentage of net sales increased to 78.7% from 78.3% from fiscal 2007 to 2008. The
individual relationships of material, labor, freight-out and warranty to net sales did not vary
significantly in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. Manufacturing overhead decreased $12,356 to
$123,617 in fiscal 2008 compared to $135,973 in fiscal 2007. Variable costs in manufacturing
overhead decreased $11,725 to $110,172 or 6.2% of towable net sales for fiscal 2008 compared to
$121,897 or 6.4% of towable net sales for fiscal 2007 due to lower production. Fixed costs in
manufacturing overhead, which consist primarily of facility costs and property taxes, decreased
$631 to $13,445 in fiscal 2008 from $14,076 in fiscal 2007. In addition, cost of products sold in
fiscal 2008 included an impairment and other charges of $5,711, of which $5,411 related to the sale
of our Thor California subsidiary and $300 related to the write-down of certain properties to fair
value.
Towable gross profit decreased $26,940 to $246,505 or 14.0% of towable net sales for fiscal 2008
compared to $273,445 or 14.5% of towable net sales for fiscal 2007. The decrease in gross profit
was due primarily to the 9.8% decrease in unit sales volume. In addition, decreases in gross
profit resulted from the 3.6% increase in the impact of the change in the cost per unit, which
occurred due to the addition of extra product options on units demanded by customers, the costs of
which were not fully recoverable.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $102,356 or 5.8% of towable net sales for fiscal
2008 compared to $107,804 or 5.7% of towable net sales for fiscal 2007. The primary reason for the
$5,448 decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was decreased net sales, which
caused commissions, bonuses and other compensation to decrease by $5,647. In addition, legal and
settlement costs decreased by $2,639 due to resolution of various legal and product disputes during
2007. These decreases were offset by increases of $619 for self insurance costs related to products
liability and medical claims, $777 for vehicle repurchase activities resulting from a decline in
the recreation vehicle industry and $560 for accounting and related expenses due to increased
outsourcing of professional services.
Towable income before income taxes decreased to 8.3% of net sales for fiscal 2008 from 8.7% of net
sales for fiscal 2007. The primary factor for this decrease was the reduction in unit sales and
corresponding margins.
27
Table of Contents
Motorized Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2008 vs. Fiscal 2007
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2008 | Net Sales | Fiscal 2007 | Net Sales | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A |
$ | 306,577 | 66.4 | $ | 383,938 | 67.9 | $ | (77,361) | (20.1) | |||||||||||||||
Class C |
152,134 | 32.9 | 170,709 | 30.2 | (18,575) | (10.9) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
3,145 | 0.7 | 10,876 | 1.9 | (7,731) | (71.1) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Motorized |
$ | 461,856 | 100.0 | $ | 565,523 | 100.0 | $ | (103,667) | (18.3) | |||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fiscal 2008 | Shipments | Fiscal 2007 | Shipments | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A |
3,192 | 54.4 | 4,450 | 58.3 | (1,258) | (28.3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Class C |
2,631 | 44.9 | 3,023 | 39.6 | (392) | (13.0) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
40 | 0.7 | 161 | 2.1 | (121) | (75.2) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Motorized |
5,863 | 100.0 | 7,634 | 100.0 | (1,771) | (23.2) | ||||||||||||||||||
IMPACT OF CHANGE IN PRICE ON NET SALES:
% | ||||||||
Motorized |
Increase | |||||||
Class A |
8.2 | % | ||||||
Class C |
2.1 | % | ||||||
Other |
4.1 | % | ||||||
Total Motorized |
4.9 | % |
The decrease in motorized net sales of 18.3% resulted primarily from a 23.2% decrease in unit
shipments offset by the impact of a 4.9% increase in the impact of the change in price per unit.
The overall industry decrease in wholesale unit shipments of motorhomes for the period August 2007
through July 2008 was 23.0% according to statistics published by the RVIA.
The impact of the change in the price per unit of motorized was an increase of 4.9%, which included
increases in Class A and Class C motorized units of 8.2% and 2.1%, respectively, in fiscal year
2008 as compared to fiscal year 2007. The primary reasons for the increase in price per unit of
Class As was due to a combination of diesel sales making up more of the mix of Class A (25.7% in
2008 and 20.1% in 2007) sales in fiscal year 2008 as compared to fiscal year 2007, increased
freight costs associated with higher fuel prices and demand by customers for additional features.
Diesels are larger and more expensive than gas Class A motorized units. These increases were
offset by decreases resulting from increased discounts and increased wholesale and retail
incentives provided to customers. The primary reason for the increase in Class C unit price was
increased freight costs associated with higher fuel prices, and demand by customers for additional
features or upgrades. Additional discounts and incentives were provided as a result of an overall
decline in the recreation vehicle industry. Cost of products sold decreased $84,261 to $425,928 or 92.2% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2008
compared to $510,189 or 90.2% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2007. The change in material,
labor, freight-out and warranty comprised $82,979 of the $84,261 decrease in
28
Table of Contents
cost of products sold and was due to decreased sales volume. Material, labor, freight-out and
warranty as a percentage of net sales increased to 85.2% from 84.3% from fiscal 2007 to 2008. The
individual relationships of labor, freight-out and warranty to net sales did not vary significantly
in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. However, material costs in relationship to net sales
increased 0.9% due to increased costs for copper, steel, aluminum and wood which were not
immediately passed on to our customers. Manufacturing overhead decreased $2,808 to $30,683 in
fiscal 2008 compared to $33,491 in fiscal 2007. Variable costs in manufacturing overhead decreased
$3,005 to $26,809 or 5.8% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2008 compared to $29,814 or 5.3% of
motorized net sales for fiscal 2007 due to lower production. Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead,
which consist primarily of facility costs and property taxes, increased $197 to $3,874 in fiscal
2008 from $3,677 in fiscal 2007. In addition, cost of products sold includes charges of $1,526 in
fiscal 2008 related to the write-down of certain properties to fair value.
Motorized gross profit decreased $19,406 to $35,928 or 7.8% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2008
compared to $55,334 or 9.8% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2007. The decrease in gross profit
was due primarily to the 23.2% decrease in unit sales volume. In addition, decreases in gross
profit resulted from the 6.7% increase in the impact of the change in the cost per unit, which
occurred due to the addition of extra product options on units demanded by customers, the costs of
which were not fully recoverable. We also experienced increases in the cost of copper, steel,
aluminum and wood which were not immediately passed on to our customers.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $28,899 or 6.3% of motorized net sales for fiscal
2008 compared to $30,068 or 5.3% of motorized net sales for fiscal 2007. The primary reason for the
$1,169 decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was decreased net sales which
caused related commissions, bonuses and other compensation to decrease by $3,559. In addition,
legal and settlement costs decreased by $553 due to resolution of various legal and product
disputes during 2007. These decreases were partially offset by increases of $2,746 primarily for
the settlement of a single self insurance product liability claim in 2008.
Motorized income before income taxes was (0.1)% of net sales for fiscal 2008 and 4.4% of net sales
for fiscal 2007. This reflects the impact of the decrease in net sales and related gross profit,
and goodwill and asset write-downs of $7,535 and $1,662, respectively, at one of our subsidiaries.
Buses
Analysis of Change in Net Sales for Fiscal 2008 vs. Fiscal 2007
Fiscal 2008 | Fiscal 2007 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 415,725 | $ | 400,685 | $ | 15,040 | 3.8 | |||||||||
# of Units |
6,280 | 6,497 | (217 | ) | (3.3) | |||||||||||
Impact of Change in Price on Net Sales | 7.1 |
The increase in buses net sales of 3.8% resulted from a 3.3% decrease in unit shipments which was
offset by the impact of a 7.1% increase in the impact of the change in the price per unit.
The impact of the change in the price per unit of buses increased 7.1% in fiscal year 2008 as
compared to fiscal year 2007, which increase was primarily due to the additional features included
in our buses as a result of our customers requests.
Cost of products sold increased $9,563 to $375,732 or 90.4% of buses net sales for fiscal 2008
compared to $366,169 or 91.4% of buses net sales for fiscal 2007. The increase in material, labor,
freight-out and warranty represents $7,139 of the $9,563 increase in cost of products sold.
Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a percentage of buses net sales decreased to 83.1%
from 84.4% from fiscal 2007 to 2008. The individual relationships of labor, freight-out and
warranty to buses net sales did not vary significantly in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007.
However, material costs in relationship to buses net sales decreased 1.2% due to a combination of
better procurement and higher prices and sales. Manufacturing overhead increased $2,424 to $30,445
in fiscal 2008 compared to $28,021 in fiscal 2007. Variable
costs in manufacturing overhead increased $2,203 to $28,007 or 6.7% of buses net sales for fiscal
2008 compared to $25,804 or 6.4% of buses net sales for fiscal 2007 due to lower unit production.
Fixed costs in manufacturing overhead, which consist primarily of facility costs and property
taxes, increased $221 to $2,438 in fiscal 2008 from $2,217 in fiscal 2007.
29
Table of Contents
Buses gross profit increased $5,477 to $39,993 or 9.6% of buses net sales for fiscal 2008 compared
to $34,516 or 8.6% of buses net sales for fiscal 2007. The increase in gross profit resulted from
the impact of the 7.1% increase in the price per unit, being in excess of the impact of the 5.9%
increase in the cost per unit.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $18,088 or 4.4% of buses net sales for fiscal
2008 compared to $14,809 or 3.7% of buses net sales for fiscal 2007. The primary reasons for the
$3,279 increase in selling, general and administrative expenses were increased net sales which
caused related commissions, bonuses and other compensation to increase by $1,078. Additional
increases of $466 occurred in advertising and selling related costs due to increased sales
activities, and $1,251 primarily for self insurance and legal costs related to a single product
liability case.
Buses income before income taxes increased to 5.1% of buses net sales for 2008 from 4.7% of buses
net sales for fiscal 2007 due to increased net sales and related gross profit.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
As of July 31, 2009, we had $328,834 in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, compared
to $189,620 on July 31, 2008. This increase was primarily due to a reclassification of auction rate
securities (ARS) held at UBS from long-term investments to short-term investments.
Reference is made to Note B to our consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this
report for a description of developments related to our investments in ARS.
Working capital of $419,544 at July 31, 2009 compared to $279,504 at July 31, 2008. We have no
long-term debt. The Company had a $30,000 unsecured revolving line of credit which bore interest
at prime less 2.15% and expired on November 30, 2008. The Company decided not to renew the
unsecured revolving line of credit and allowed it to expire on November 30, 2008. The decision not
to renew the line of credit was based on our strong cash position combined with the expectation
that we will have the ability to borrow at favorable rates against our ARS, if needed. As a result,
we did not anticipate utilizing the line of credit and did not want to incur the cost of
maintaining it. We believe that internally generated funds will be sufficient to meet our current
needs and any additional capital requirements. Capital expenditures of approximately $5,135 for
fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 were primarily to upgrade IT systems and replace machinery and
equipment used in the ordinary course of business. Of this amount, $4,144 was for our recreation
vehicle facilities and $512 was for our bus operations.
The Company anticipates capital expenditures in fiscal 2010 of approximately $10,000, which is
expected to be financed from cash and cash equivalents. These expenditures will be made primarily
for expanding our recreation vehicle facilities and replacing and upgrading machinery, equipment
and other assets to be used in the ordinary course of business.
Cash generated from operating activities for the twelve months ended July 31, 2009 was $48,570, a
decrease of 60% versus the comparable prior year period due to a significant decline in unit
volume, gross profit and net income for the period. The combination of net income and non-cash
items (primarily depreciation, amortization, goodwill and trademark impairment, deferred income
taxes and gains on disposition of assets) provided $47,555 of operating cash compared to $83,462 in
the prior year period due primarily to a decrease in net earnings. The remaining decrease was due
to decreases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities due to lower spending levels partially
offset by a decrease in inventories and receivables due to decreased revenues.
Critical Accounting Principles
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements
requires the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the periods presented. We believe that of our accounting policies, the
following may involve a higher degree of judgment, estimates and complexity.
Impairment of Goodwill, Trademarks and Long-Lived Assets
At least annually we review the carrying value of goodwill and trademarks with indefinite useful
lives. Long-lived assets, identifiable intangibles that are amortized, goodwill and trademarks with
indefinite useful lives are also reviewed for impairment whenever events or
30
Table of Contents
changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from future cash
flows. This review is performed primarily using estimates of future cash flows. If the carrying
value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount
by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Management believes
that the estimates of future cash flows and fair values are reasonable; however, changes in
estimates of such cash flows and fair values could affect the evaluations.
Insurance Reserves
Generally, we are self-insured for workers compensation and group medical insurance. Under these
plans, liabilities are recognized for claims incurred, including those incurred but not reported.
The liability for workers compensation claims is determined by the Company with the assistance of
a third party administrator and actuary using various state statutes and
historical claims experience. Group medical reserves are estimated using historical claims
experience. We have a self-insured retention (SIR) for products liability and personal injury
matters of $5,000 per occurrence. We have established a reserve on our balance sheet for such
occurrences based on historical data and actuarial information. Amounts above the SIR, up to a
certain dollar amount, are covered by our excess insurance policy. We maintain excess liability
insurance aggregating $25,000 with outside insurance carriers to minimize our risks related to
catastrophic claims in excess of our self-insured positions for products liability and personal
injury matters. Any material change in the aforementioned factors could have an adverse impact on
our operating results.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, the self-insurance reserve was increased by $4,000 to
provide for our full $5,000 SIR related to an accident case arising out of our bus operations in
the normal course of business. Based upon advice from outside legal counsel, we concluded that it
was probable that settlement of the case would require us to pay an amount at least equal to the
SIR.
Product Warranty
We generally provide customers of our products with a one-year warranty covering defects in
material or workmanship, with longer warranties on certain structural components. We record a
liability based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims
on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Factors we use in estimating the warranty liability
include a history of units sold, existing dealer inventory, average cost incurred and a profile of
the distribution of warranty expenditures over the warranty period. A significant increase in
dealer shop rates, the cost of parts or the frequency of claims could have a material adverse
impact on our operating results for the period or periods in which such claims or additional costs
materialize. Management believes that the warranty reserve is adequate; however actual claims
incurred could differ from estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves. Warranty reserves are
reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable
or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax
consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax
returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events
that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the
actual outcome of these tax consequences could materially impact the Companys financial position
or its results of operations.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we adopted FIN 48 and related guidance. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, we recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step
process prescribed in the interpretation. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for
recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or
litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit
as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is
inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as we have to determine the
probability of various possible outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a
quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in
facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit, and new audit
activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in the recognition of a tax
benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.
31
Table of Contents
Revenue Recognition
Revenues from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recorded when all of the following
conditions have been met:
1) An order for a product has been received from a dealer;
2) Written or oral approval for payment has been received from the dealers flooring institution;
3) A common carrier signs the delivery ticket accepting responsibility for the product as agent for
the dealer; and
4) The product is removed from our property for delivery to the dealer who placed the order.
Certain shipments are sold to customers on credit or cash on delivery (COD) terms. The Company
recognizes revenue on credit sales upon shipment and COD sales upon payment and delivery. Most
sales are made by dealers financing their purchases under flooring arrangements with banks or
finance companies. Products are not sold on consignment, dealers do not have the right to return
products, and dealers are typically responsible for interest costs to floorplan lenders. On
average, the Company receives payments from floor-plan lenders on products sold to dealers within
15 days of the invoice date.
Repurchase Commitments
It is customary practice for companies in the recreation vehicle industry to enter into repurchase
agreements with financing institutions to provide financing to their dealers. Generally, these
agreements provide for the repurchase of products from the financing institution in the event of a
dealers default. The risk of loss under these agreements is spread over numerous dealers and
further reduced by the resale value of the units which the Company would be required to repurchase.
Management believes that any future losses under these agreements will not have a significant
effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company
records repurchase and guarantee reserves based on prior experience and known current events.
Investments
We have an investment portfolio comprised of taxable and tax-exempt auction rate securities. The
value of these securities is subject to market volatility for the period we hold these investments
and until their sale or maturity. We recognize realized losses when declines in the fair value of
our investments below their cost basis are judged to be other-than-temporary. In determining
whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, we consider various factors including
market price (when available), investment ratings, the length of time and the extent to which the
fair value has been less than our cost basis, auction success and failure rates, and our intent and
ability to hold the investment until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in market value. We make significant judgments in considering these factors.
If it is judged that a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, the investment is valued at
the current fair value and a realized loss equal to the decline is reflected in net income which
could materially adversely affect our operating results.
Principal Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Our principal contractual obligations and commercial commitments at July 31, 2009 are summarized in
the following charts. We have no other off balance sheet commitments:
Payments Due By Period | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Fiscal 2010 | Fiscal 2011-2012 | Fiscal 2013-2014 | After 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases and other |
$ | 5,608 | $ | 2,942 | $ | 2,300 | $ | 366 | $ | | |||||||||||||||||
Consigned Inventory |
31,201 | 31,201 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits (1) |
957 | 957 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 37,766 | $ | 35,100 | $ | 2,300 | $ | 366 | $ | ||||||||||||||||||
(1) | We have included in unrecognized tax benefits approximately $957 for payments expected to be
made in fiscal 2010. Unrecognized tax benefits in the amount of approximately $46,355 have
been excluded from the table because we are unable to determine a reasonably reliable estimate
of the timing of future payment.
|
32
Table of Contents
Total | Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Other Commercial Commitments | Amounts | Less Than | ||||||||||||||||||
Committed | One Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | Over 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
Guarantees |
$ | 7,112 | $ | 7,112 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Standby repurchase obligations |
447,706 | 447,706 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total commercial commitments |
$ | 454,818 | $ | 454,818 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Accounting Pronouncements
Reference is made to Note A to our consolidated financial statements contained in this report for a
summary of our recently adopted accounting pronouncements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency related to its operations in
Canada. However, because of the size of our Canadian operations, a hypothetical 10% change in the
Canadian dollar as compared to the U.S. dollar would not have a significant impact on the Companys
financial position or results of operations. The Company is also exposed to market risks related
to interest rates because of its investments in corporate debt securities. A hypothetical 10%
change in interest rates would not have a significant impact on the Companys financial position or
results of operations.
The Company is also exposed to market risk related to its investment in ARS. Reference is made to
Note B to our consolidated financial statements contained in this report for a description of
developments related to our investments in ARS.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA SEE ITEM 15
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
October 31 | January 31 (1) | April 30 (2)(4) | July 31 (5)(6) | |||||||||||||
Fiscal 2009 |
||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 438,817 | $ | 226,683 | $ | 415,472 | $ | 440,924 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
40,063 | 8,157 | 46,447 | 57,870 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
5,120 | (14,860 | ) | 2,102 | 24,781 | |||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
0.09 | (0.27 | ) | 0.04 | 0.45 | |||||||||||
Diluted |
0.09 | (0.27 | ) | 0.04 | 0.45 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid per common share |
0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||
Market prices per common share |
||||||||||||||||
High |
$ | 31.85 | $ | 19.09 | $ | 23.29 | $ | 23.95 | ||||||||
Low |
$ | 14.68 | $ | 10.51 | $ | 9.54 | $ | 16.65 | ||||||||
October 31 | January 31 | April 30 | July 31 (3) | |||||||||||||
Fiscal 2008 |
||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 763,736 | $ | 599,170 | $ | 707,931 | $ | 569,843 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
101,275 | 69,717 | 89,999 | 61,435 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
38,209 | 21,602 | 27,854 | 5,041 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per common share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
0.69 | 0.39 | 0.51 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
0.68 | 0.39 | 0.50 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
2.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid per common share |
2.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | ||||||||||||
Market prices per common share |
||||||||||||||||
High |
$ | 52.31 | $ | 47.48 | $ | 36.91 | $ | 31.32 | ||||||||
Low |
$ | 38.68 | $ | 29.72 | $ | 26.73 | $ | 19.62 |
33
Table of Contents
(1) | The second quarter ended January 31, 2009 includes a non-cash trademark impairment of
$564 for the trademark associated with a subsidiary within our motorized segment. |
||
(2) | The third quarter ended April 30, 2009 includes a non-cash goodwill impairment of
$9,717 for the goodwill associated with a subsidiary within our motorized segment. |
||
(3) | The fourth quarter ended July 31, 2008 includes a non-cash goodwill impairment of
$7,535 for the goodwill associated with a subsidiary within our motorized segment, an
impairment of $1,962 to adjust certain properties to fair market value and provisions of
$5,411 recorded in connection with the sale of our Thor California travel trailer and fifth
wheels business during fiscal 2008. |
||
(4) | The third quarter ended April 30, 2009 net income was overstated by $3,694, due to the
income taxes related to the $9,717 goodwill impairment charge taken in the third quarter.
The impairment charge was improperly treated as being deductible for tax purposes. The
Company corrected this error in the fourth quarter. |
||
(5) | The fourth quarter net income was decreased by $673 due to the correction of two
out-of-period income tax errors. Net income was decreased by $3,694 due to the third
quarter error referred to in item (4) above. Net income was increased by $3,021 due to
adjustments to the Companys prior year accrual for income taxes payable. |
||
(6) | The fourth quarter ended July 31, 2009 includes a liquidation of LIFO inventory
layers, which are carried at lower costs. The affect of these liquidations was to increase
net income in the fourth quarter of 2009 by approximately $4,300. It is the Companys
policy to record the earning effect of LIFO inventory liquidations in the quarter in which
a decrease for the entire year becomes certain. |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Part A Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and
evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Companys management recognized that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and the Companys management necessarily was
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. The Company has carried out an evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in
the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms and accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Part B Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting
refers to a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that: (i)
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our
transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that our receipts and
expenditures are being made only in
34
Table of Contents
accordance with authorizations of our management and members of
our Board of Directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material
effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are also subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with established policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are also subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with established policies or procedures may deteriorate.
The Companys management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of July 31, 2009, using the criteria set forth in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on its assessment, management believes that as of July 31, 2009, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, has issued an attestation
report on our internal control over financial reporting. The report appears in Part D of this Item
9A.
Part C Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, there have been no material changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
35
Table of Contents
Part D Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Thor Industries, Inc.
Jackson Center, Ohio
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Thor Industries, Inc.
Jackson Center, Ohio
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Thor Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of July 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the companys principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by the companys board of directors, management, and
other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the
possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to
error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of July 31, 2009, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year
ended July 31, 2009 and our report dated September 29, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Dayton, Ohio
September 29, 2009
Dayton, Ohio
September 29, 2009
36
Table of Contents
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Company has adopted a written code of ethics, the Thor Industries, Inc. Business Ethics
Policy which is applicable to all directors, officers and employees of the Company, including the
Companys principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller and other executive officers identified pursuant to this Item 10 who perform similar
functions (collectively, the Selected Officers). In accordance with the rules and regulations of
the SEC, a copy of the code has been posted on the Companys website and is also available in print
to any person, without charge, upon request. The Company intends to disclose any changes in or
waivers from its code of ethics applicable to any Selected Officer on its website at
http://www.thorindustries.com or by filing a Form 8-K.
The other information in response to this Item is included under the captions BUSINESS EXPERIENCE
OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, COMMITTEES AND ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS and
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE, in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy
Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required in response to this Item is contained under the captions EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be
filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy Statement is hereby
incorporated by reference.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is or was formerly an officer or
employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. During fiscal 2009, no executive officer of the
Company or any of its subsidiaries served on the compensation committee (or equivalent), or the
Board of Directors, of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on our Compensation
Committee or Board of Directors.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of July 31, 2009 about the Companys Common Stock that
is authorized for issuance under the Companys equity compensation plans, including the Thor
Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan) and the Thor Industries, Inc. 1999
Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Plan).
(c) Number of securities remaining | ||||||||||||
(a) Number of securities to | (b) Weighted-average | available for future issuance under | ||||||||||
be issued upon exercise of | exercise price of | equity compensation plans | ||||||||||
outstanding options, | outstanding options, | (excluding securities reflected in | ||||||||||
Plan Category | warrants and rights | warrants and rights | column (a)) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
513,561 | (1) | $ 23.47 | 900,000 | (2) | |||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security
holders |
| | | |||||||||
Total |
513,561 | $ 23.47 | 900,000 | |||||||||
(1) | Represents shares underlying stock options granted pursuant to the 2006 Plan and the 1999
Plan. The 1999 Plan was frozen in 2006 upon the adoption of the 2006 Plan. |
|
(2) | Represents shares remaining available for future issuance pursuant to the 2006 Plan. |
37
Table of Contents
The other information required in response to this Item is contained under the captions OWNERSHIP
OF COMMON STOCK and SUMMARIES OF EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS in the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement, to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy
Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required in response to this Item is contained under the captions CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT and BOARD OF DIRECTORS, COMMITTEES AND ATTENDANCE AT
MEETINGS in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC pursuant to
Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required in response to this Item is contained under the caption INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR FEES in the Companys definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Commission pursuant
to Regulation 14A, which portion of said Proxy Statement is hereby incorporated by reference.
38
Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) Financial Statements
(a) (1) Financial Statements
Page | ||||
F-1 | ||||
F-2 | ||||
F-4 | ||||
F-5 | ||||
F-6 | ||||
F-7 |
(b) Exhibits
Exhibit | Description | |
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2001) |
|
3.2
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2004) |
|
3.3
|
By-laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) of the Companys Registration Statement No. 33-13827) |
|
4.1
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 1987) |
|
10.1
|
Thor Industries, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-8 dated November 5, 1999) |
|
10.2
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Restricted Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-8 dated December 3, 1997) |
|
10.3
|
Thor Industries, Inc.
Amended and Restated Select Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008) |
|
10.4
|
Thor Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007) |
|
10.5
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008) |
|
10.6
|
Thor Industries, Inc. 2008 Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 15, 2008) |
|
10.7
|
Offer Letter of Christian G. Farman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form
8-K dated May 6, 2008) |
|
10.8
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Form of Indemnification Agreement for executive officers and directors of the Company (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 6, 2008) |
|
10.9
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated May 6, 2008) |
|
10.10
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Form of Restricted Stock Award Certificate and Restricted Stock Award Agreement for grants to
directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 6, 2008) |
|
10.11 |
Thor Industries, Inc. Form of Restricted Stock Award Certificate and Restricted Stock Award Agreement for grants to
employees and consultants (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
May 6, 2008) |
|
10.12
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors,
as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated January 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 22, 2009). |
|
10.13
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors,
as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated January 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 3, 2009). |
|
14.1
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Business Ethics Policy (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003) |
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries of the Company* |
|
23.1
|
Consent of Deloitte &
Touche LLP, dated September 29, 2009* |
|
31.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
39
Table of Contents
31.2
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002* |
|
32.1
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002** |
|
32.2
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002** |
* Filed herewith ** Furnished herewith
40
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Signed)
|
/S/ Wade F. B. Thompson
|
Wade F. B. Thompson
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Date: September 29, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
(Signed) /S/ Peter B. Orthwein
|
(Signed)
|
/S/ Christian G. Farman
|
||||||
Peter B. Orthwein
|
Christian G. Farman |
|||||||
Vice Chairman, Treasurer and
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|||||||
Director
|
(Principal Financial Officer & Principal |
|||||||
Accounting Officer) |
||||||||
Date: September 29, 2009 |
Date: September 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Signed) /S/ Wade F. B. Thompson
|
(Signed)
|
/S/ Alan Siegel |
||||||
Wade F. B. Thompson
|
Alan Siegel |
|||||||
Chairman, President, Chief Executive
|
Director |
|||||||
Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||||||
Date: September 29, 2009 |
Date: September 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Signed) /S/ William C. Tomson
|
(Signed)
|
/S/ Neil D. Chrisman |
||||||
William C. Tomson
|
Neil D. Chrisman |
|||||||
Director
|
Director |
|||||||
Date: September 29, 2009 |
Date: September 29, 2009 | |||||||
(Signed) /S/ Geoffrey A. Thompson
|
(Signed)
|
/S/ Jan H. Suwinski |
||||||
Geoffrey A. Thompson
|
Jan H. Suwinski |
|||||||
Director
|
Director |
|||||||
Date: September 29, 2009 | Date: September 29, 2009 |
41
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Thor Industries, Inc.
Jackson Center, Ohio
Thor Industries, Inc.
Jackson Center, Ohio
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Thor Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries (the Company) as of July 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended July 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Thor Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries at July 31, 2009 and 2008, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
July 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2009,
based on the criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated September 29,
2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Deloitte
& Touche LLP
Dayton, Ohio
September 29, 2009
Dayton, Ohio
September 29, 2009
F-1
Table of Contents
Consolidated Balance Sheets, July 31, 2009 and 2008
(amounts in thousands except share data)
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 221,684 | $ | 189,620 | ||||
Investments-short term (Note A) |
107,150 | | ||||||
Accounts receivable: |
||||||||
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts $302 in 2009 and $295 in 2008 (Note A) |
111,793 | 136,866 | ||||||
Other |
3,823 | 9,489 | ||||||
Inventories (Note D) |
105,278 | 152,582 | ||||||
Notes receivable (Note Q) |
10,000 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other (Note F) |
44,290 | 39,363 | ||||||
Total current assets |
604,018 | 527,920 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment: |
||||||||
Land |
20,310 | 21,090 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements |
134,161 | 135,167 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
69,566 | 71,965 | ||||||
Total cost |
224,037 | 228,222 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
81,176 | 74,992 | ||||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
142,861 | 153,230 | ||||||
Investments Joint ventures (Note K) |
2,257 | 3,269 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Long term investments |
13,428 | 126,403 | ||||||
Goodwill (Note C) |
148,411 | 158,128 | ||||||
Noncompete agreements Net (Note C) |
617 | 1,093 | ||||||
Trademarks (Note C) |
13,336 | 13,900 | ||||||
Long term notes receivable (Note Q) |
10,000 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other (Note F) |
16,196 | 12,619 | ||||||
Total other assets |
201,988 | 312,143 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 951,124 | $ | 996,562 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-2
Table of Contents
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 78,120 | $ | 96,158 | ||||
Accrued liabilities: |
||||||||
Compensation and related items |
22,548 | 24,845 | ||||||
Product warranties (Note M) |
41,717 | 61,743 | ||||||
Taxes |
5,700 | 26,050 | ||||||
Promotions and rebates |
6,743 | 10,781 | ||||||
Product/property liability and related liabilities |
12,990 | 12,560 | ||||||
Other |
16,656 | 16,279 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
184,474 | 248,416 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
15,262 | 19,118 | ||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits |
46,355 | 29,332 | ||||||
Total long term liabilities |
61,617 | 48,450 | ||||||
Contingent liabilities and commitments (Note I) |
| | ||||||
Stockholders equity (Note J): |
||||||||
Preferred stockauthorized 1,000,000 shares; none outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stockpar value of $.10 a share; authorized,
250,000,000 shares; issued 57,318,263 shares at July 31, 2009
and 57,317,263 shares at July 31, 2008 |
5,732 | 5,732 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
94,367 | 93,683 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
677,548 | 675,928 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,070 | (1,963) | ||||||
Less treasury shares of 1,877,339 in 2009 and in 2008, at cost |
(73,684) | (73,684) | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
705,033 | 699,696 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 951,124 | $ | 996,562 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(amounts in thousands except per share data)
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 1,521,896 | $ | 2,640,680 | $ | 2,856,308 | ||||||
Cost of products sold |
1,369,359 | 2,318,254 | 2,493,013 | |||||||||
Gross profit |
152,537 | 322,426 | 363,295 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
124,578 | 177,068 | 177,697 | |||||||||
Impairment of goodwill and trademarks |
10,281 | 7,535 | | |||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
476 | 813 | 935 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of property |
373 | 2,308 | | |||||||||
Interest income |
5,530 | 11,511 | 11,376 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
525 | 1,315 | 774 | |||||||||
Other income |
815 | 2,893 | 1,595 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes |
23,395 | 152,407 | 196,860 | |||||||||
Income taxes (Note F) |
6,252 | 59,701 | 62,129 | |||||||||
Net income |
$ | 17,143 | $ | 92,706 | $ | 134,731 | ||||||
Earnings per common share (Note A) |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 2.42 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 1.66 | $ | 2.41 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Compre- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury Stock | Common Stock | Paid-In | Comprehensive | Retained | hensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Income (Loss) | Earnings | Income | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 31, 2006 |
1,401,200 | $ | (58,493) | 57,100,286 | $ | 5,710 | $ | 86,538 | $ | 1,772 | $ | 664,322 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 134,731 | $ | 134,731 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares purchased |
40,400 | (1,630) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option activity |
- | - | 123,618 | 12 | 2,623 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity |
- | - | (1,500) | - | 476 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends $1.28 per |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
common share |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (71,324) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment |
- | - | - | - | - | 984 | - | 984 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense |
- | - | - | - | 610 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 31, 2007 |
1,441,600 | (60,123) | 57,222,404 | 5,722 | 90,247 | 2,756 | 727,729 | $ | 135,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 92,706 | $ | 92,706 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares purchased |
435,739 | (13,561) | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option activity |
- | - | 94,859 | 10 | 2,592 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock activity |
- | - | - | - | 488 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends $2.28 per |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
common share |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (127,278) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption of FIN48 |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (17,229) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized depreciation on |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
investments (net of tax) |
- | - | - | - | - | (3,810) | - | (3,810) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment (net of tax) |
- | - | - | - | - | (909) | - | (909) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense |
- | - | - | - | 356 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 31, 2008 |
1,877,339 | (73,684) | 57,317,263 | 5,732 | 93,683 | (1,963) | 675,928 | $ | 87,987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 17,143 | $ | 17,143 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option activity |
- | - | 1,000 | - | 27 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends $.28 per |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
common share |
- | - | - | - | - | - | (15,523) | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation on |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
investments (net of tax) |
- | - | - | - | - | 3,118 | - | 3,118 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment (net of tax) |
- | - | - | - | - | (85) | - | (85) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense |
- | - | - | - | 657 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 31, 2009 |
1,877,339 | $ | (73,684) | 57,318,263 | $ | 5,732 | $ | 94,367 | $ | 1,070 | $ | 677,548 | $ | 20,176 | ||||||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(amounts in thousands)
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 17,143 | $ | 92,706 | $ | 134,731 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation |
13,007 | 16,208 | 12,970 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
476 | 813 | 935 | |||||||||
Goodwill and trademark impairment |
10,281 | 7,535 | - | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
6,411 | (31,791) | (1,324) | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposition of property, plant and equipment |
(420) | (2,365) | 82 | |||||||||
Net impairment on trading investments |
- | - | 104 | |||||||||
Stock based compensation |
657 | 356 | 610 | |||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of trading investments |
- | - | 68,133 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable |
30,739 | 31,040 | 16,348 | |||||||||
Note receivable |
(10,000) | - | - | |||||||||
Inventories |
47,304 | 16,398 | 14,189 | |||||||||
Deferred taxes and other |
(600) | 382 | (3,213) | |||||||||
Accounts payable |
(17,548) | (27,615) | (21,537) | |||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
(45,051) | 10,595 | 7,410 | |||||||||
Other |
(3,829) | 7,846 | 3,315 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
48,570 | 122,108 | 232,753 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
(5,625) | (14,475) | (13,654) | |||||||||
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant and equipment |
2,890 | 5,016 | 232 | |||||||||
Purchase of available for sale investments |
- | (66,650) | (295,765) | |||||||||
Proceeds from disposition of investments |
10,850 | 108,675 | 121,046 | |||||||||
Note receivable |
(10,000) | - | - | |||||||||
Proceeds on dissolution of joint venture |
1,578 | - | - | |||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(307) | 32,566 | (188,141) | |||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Cash dividends |
(15,523) | (127,278) | (71,324) | |||||||||
Purchase of common stock held as treasury shares |
- | (13,561) | (1,630) | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
27 | 3,090 | 3,111 | |||||||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities |
(15,496) | (137,749) | (69,843) | |||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(703) | 806 | 984 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
32,064 | 17,731 | (24,247) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
189,620 | 171,889 | 196,136 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 221,684 | $ | 189,620 | $ | 171,889 | ||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 23,622 | $ | 73,076 | $ | 62,121 | ||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 525 | $ | 1,315 | $ | 774 | ||||||
Non-cash transactions: |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures in accounts payable |
$ | 53 | $ | 543 | $ | 203 | ||||||
Cancellation of restricted stock |
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 35 | ||||||
Deferred taxes, net |
$ | - | $ | 562 | $ | - |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
Table of Contents
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended July 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
(All amounts presented in thousands except share and per share data)
A. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Thor Industries, Inc. and its wholly-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company). All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated upon
consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Interest-bearing deposits and other investments with maturities of
three months or less when purchased are considered cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents of
$177,717 are held by one financial institution. The remaining $43,967 is held at various other
financial institutions.
Investments The Company classifies investments as available-for-sale or trading.
Fair Value of Financial Investments The carrying amount of cash equivalents, investments,
accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the relatively short
maturity of these financial instruments.
Inventories Substantially all inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, determined
on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis. Manufacturing costs include materials, labor, freight-out
and manufacturing overhead. Unallocated overhead and abnormal costs are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Buildings and improvements 10 to 39 years
Machinery and equipment 3 to 10 years
Depreciation expense is recorded in cost of products sold except for $1,728, $1,350 and $1,241, in
fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which is recorded in selling, general and administrative
expenses.
Other Assets Other assets consist of goodwill, trademarks, non-compete agreements and long-term
investments. Non-compete agreements are amortized using the straight-line method over 5 to 10
years. Goodwill and trademarks are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment.
Trademarks are not amortized because they have indefinite useful lives.
Long-lived Assets Long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles that are amortized are reviewed
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable from future cash flows. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is
impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the
long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. The Company assesses the potential impairment of
long-lived assets in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No.
144. Management assessed the fair value of certain properties which will no longer be used for
operational or administrative purposes and are being listed for sale or lease and marketed as such
in the Elkhart, Indiana area. Given the decline of the real estate market in 2008, the fair value
of such properties had indicated an impairment of $1,962 which the Company recorded in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008 of which $1,826 is reported in cost of products sold and $136 is reported in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Income. $1,662 of
this impairment is reported under the motorized recreation vehicles segment and $300 is reported
under the towable recreation vehicles segment.
Product Warranties Estimated warranty costs are provided at the time of sale of the warranted
products. Warranty reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis.
F-7
Table of Contents
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts A summary of bad debt activity is as follows:
Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||
July 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | July 31, 2007 | ||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ 295 | $ 122 | $ 105 | |||||||||
Charged to expense |
326 | 311 | 72 | |||||||||
Write-offs net of recoveries/payments |
(319) | (138) | (55) | |||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ 302 | $ 295 | $ 122 | |||||||||
Insurance Reserves Generally, we are self-insured for workers compensation and group medical
insurance. Under these plans, liabilities are recognized for claims incurred, including those
incurred but not reported, and changes in the reserves. The liability for workers compensation
claims is determined by the Company with the assistance of a third party administrator and actuary
using various state statutes and reserve requirements and historical claims experience. Group
medical reserves are estimated using historical claims experience. We have a self-insured retention
for products liability and personal injury matters of $5,000 per occurrence. We have established a
reserve on our balance sheet for such occurrences based on historical data and actuarial
information. We maintain excess liability insurance aggregating $25,000 with outside insurance
carriers to minimize our risks related to catastrophic claims in excess of all our self-insured
positions.
Revenue Recognition Revenues from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recognized when
title passes, which is when shipped to dealers, distributors, or contract buyers in accordance with
shipping terms, which are FOB shipping point.
Revenues from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recorded when all of the following
conditions have been met:
1) | An order for a product has been received from a dealer; |
|
2) | Written or oral approval for payment has been received from the dealers flooring institution; |
|
3) | A common carrier signs the delivery ticket accepting responsibility for the product as agent for
the dealer; and |
|
4) | The product is removed from the Companys property for delivery to the dealer who placed the
order. |
Certain shipments are sold to customers on credit or cash on delivery (COD) terms. The Company
recognizes revenue on credit sales upon shipment and COD sales upon payment and delivery. Most
sales are made by dealers financing their purchases under flooring arrangements with banks or
finance companies. Products are not sold on consignment, dealers do not have the right to return
products, and dealers are typically responsible for interest costs to floorplan lenders. On
average, the Company receives payments from floorplan lenders on products sold to dealers within 15
days of the invoice date.
Dealer Volume Rebates, Sales Incentives and Advertising Costs Estimated costs related to dealer
volume rebates and sales incentives are accrued as a reduction of revenue at the later of the time
products are sold or the date the rebate or incentive is offered. Advertising costs, which consist
primarily of tradeshows, were $5,770, $8,139, and $8,104 in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the
amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets
for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial
statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events
that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns.
F-8
Table of Contents
Foreign Currency Assets and liabilities of the Companys Canadian operations reported in
the consolidated balance sheets have been translated at current exchange rates. Revenues and
expenses reported in the consolidated statements of income have been translated at the average
exchange rate for the year. Translation adjustments have been included in accumulated other
comprehensive income. Transaction gains and losses are not significant.
Stock Options The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date
fair value of its option grants. The fair value, and related compensation costs are recognized over
the option vesting period which is 3 to 4 years.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per common share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding assuming dilution. The
difference between basic EPS and diluted EPS is the result of outstanding stock options and
restricted stock.
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share |
55,429,373 | 55,593,572 | 55,665,275 | |||||||||
Stock options and restricted stock |
47,097 | 138,135 | 257,833 | |||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution |
55,476,470 | 55,731,707 | 55,923,108 | |||||||||
Subsequent Events We evaluated events occurring between the end of our most recent fiscal year
and September 29, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued.
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R) which is effective
as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. This
standard will significantly change the accounting for business acquisitions both during the period
of the acquisition and in subsequent periods. Among the more significant changes in the accounting
for acquisitions are the following:
§ | Transaction costs, many of which are currently treated as costs of the
acquisition, will generally be expensed. |
§ | In-process research and development will be accounted for as an asset, with the
cost recognized as the research and development is realized or abandoned. These costs are
currently expensed at the time of the acquisition. |
§ | Contingencies, including contingent consideration, will generally be recorded at
fair value with subsequent adjustments recognized in operations. Contingent consideration is
currently accounted for as an adjustment of the purchase price. |
§ | Decreases in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets will be
recognized in operations. Previously such changes were considered to be subsequent changes in
consideration and were recorded as decreases in goodwill. |
The affects of implementing SFAS 141R on the Companys financial position, results of operations,
and cash flows will depend on future acquisitions.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, Accounting Standards Codification (SFAS 168), which
will become the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP.
The Codification will supersede all the existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards upon
its effective date and subsequently, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of
Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. SFAS 168 also replaces
FASB Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles given that once
in effect, the Codification will carry the same level of authority. SFAS 168 is effective for
financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We
believe the adoption of SFAS 168 will not have a material effect on our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1). FSP FAS 107-1 requires disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments in interim and annual financial statements. Prior to the issuance of FSP FAS
107-1, the fair values of those financial instruments were only required to be disclosed on an
annual basis. FSP FAS 107-1 is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.
We believe the adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 will not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
F-9
Table of Contents
B. INVESTMENTS
Effective August 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. Therefore, the Company has adopted the
provisions of SFAS 157 with respect to its financial assets and liabilities only. The adoption of
this statement did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations
or financial condition. On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-3, Determining the Fair
Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, (FSP 157-3), that
clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to
illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market
for that financial asset is not active. The FSP 157-3 is applicable to the valuation of auction
rate securities held by the Company for which there was no active market as of July 31, 2009. FSP
157-3 was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which the financial statements have
not been issued. The adoption of FSP 157-3 effective during the three month period ended October
31, 2008 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations or
financial condition.
Effective August 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows an entity the irrevocable option to
elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for specified financial assets and
liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. The Company did not elect to adopt the fair value
option under this Statement at the adoption date. On November 14, 2008, the Company adopted the
fair value option related to the Put Rights as further discussed in this Note.
INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally
accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value
is defined under SFAS 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation
techniques used to measure fair value under SFAS 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on
three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable,
that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially
the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
In accordance with SFAS 157, the following table represents the Companys fair value hierarchy for
its financial assets (cash equivalents and investments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis
as of July 31, 2009:
Significant | |||||||||||||||||||
Quoted Market | Other | Significant | |||||||||||||||||
Prices in Active | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||||||||||
Markets | Inputs | Inputs | Fair Value at July | ||||||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash & cash equivalents |
$ | 221,684 | $ | | $ | | $ | 221,684 | |||||||||||
Auction rate securities (including Put Rights) |
| | 120,578 | 120,578 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 221,684 | $ | | $ | 120,578 | $ | 342,262 | |||||||||||
Our cash equivalents are comprised of money market funds traded in an active market with no
restrictions.
F-10
Table of Contents
In addition to the above investments, the Company holds non-qualified retirement plan assets of
$6,016 at July 31, 2009 ($12,519 at July 31, 2008). These assets, which are held for the benefit of
certain employees of the Company, represent Level 1 investments primarily in mutual funds which are
valued using observable market prices in active markets. They are included in Other Assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Level 3 assets consist of municipal bonds with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities
or ARS) whose underlying assets are primarily student loans which are substantially backed by the
federal government. Auction-rate securities are long-term floating rate bonds tied to short-term
interest rates. After the initial issuance of the securities, the interest rate on the securities
is reset periodically, at intervals established at the time of issuance based on market demand for
a reset period. Auction-rate securities are bought and sold in the marketplace through a
competitive bidding process often referred to as a Dutch auction. If there is insufficient
interest in the securities at the time of an auction, the auction may not be completed and the
rates may be reset to predetermined penalty or maximum rates based on mathematical formulas in
accordance with each securitys prospectus.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the assets
measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 financial assets):
Fair Value Measurements at | ||||
Reporting Date Using | ||||
Significant Unobservable Inputs | ||||
(Level 3) | ||||
Balances at August 1, 2008 |
$ | 126,403 | ||
Net change in other
comprehensive income |
5,025 | |||
Net loss included in earnings |
--- | |||
Purchases |
--- | |||
Sales/Maturities |
(10,850) | |||
Balances at July 31, 2009 |
$ | 120,578 | ||
Auction Rate Securities
At July 31, 2009, we held $14,550 (par value) of long-term investments and $107,150 (par value) of
short-term investments comprised of taxable and tax-exempt ARS, which are variable-rate debt
securities and have a long-term maturity with the interest being reset through Dutch auctions that
are typically held every 7, 28 or 35 days. The securities have historically traded at par and are
callable at par at the option of the issuer. Interest is typically paid at the end of each auction
period or semi-annually. At July 31, 2009, the majority of the ARS we held were AAA rated or
equivalent, with most collateralized by student loans
substantially backed by the U.S. Federal government.
Since February 12, 2008, most auctions have failed for these securities and there is no assurance
that future auctions on the ARS in our investment portfolio will succeed and, as a result, our
ability to liquidate our investment and fully recover the par value of our investment in the near
term may be limited or not exist. An auction failure means that the parties wishing to sell
securities could not.
In November 2008, the Company elected to participate in a rights offering by UBS AG (UBS), a
Swiss bank which is one of the Companys investment providers, that provides the Company with the
right (the Put Rights) to sell to UBS at par value ARS purchased from UBS ($107,150 of our entire
ARS portfolio of $121,700, as of July 31, 2009) at any time during a two-year sale period beginning
June 30, 2010.
The Put Rights are not transferable or marginable. By electing to participate in the rights
offering the Company granted UBS the right, exercisable at any time prior to June 30, 2010 or
during the two-year sale period, to purchase or cause the sale of the Companys ARS (the Call
Right). UBS has stated that it will only exercise the Call Right for the purpose of
restructurings, dispositions or other solutions that will provide their clients with par value for
their ARS. UBS will pay their clients the par value of their ARS within one day of settlement of
any Call Right transaction. Notwithstanding the Call Right, the Company would be permitted to sell
ARS to parties other than UBS, in which case the Put Rights attached to the ARS that are sold would
be extinguished.
As consideration for this transaction, Thor has released UBS from all claims relating to the
marketing or sale of ARS (except claims for consequential damages) and has agreed not to sue UBS
for such claims. During 2008, UBS was sued by the Massachusetts Securities Division and by the New
York Attorney General in separate civil lawsuits alleging improper sales practices relating to ARS.
The rights offering reflects the terms of a settlement entered into by UBS and various regulators,
including the SEC, the New York Attorney General,
F-11
Table of Contents
and the Massachusetts Securities Division, pursuant to which UBS agreed to pay a fine of $150
million. UBS has also been sued by investors in civil lawsuits and arbitrations seeking damages
relating to sales of ARS.
Through its acceptance of the UBS offer, the Company also became eligible to participate in a no
net cost loan program pursuant to which it may borrow up to the par value of its ARS until June
30, 2010. The Company is still permitted to obtain ARS based financing from lenders other than UBS.
At July 31, 2009, there was insufficient observable ARS market information available to determine
the fair value of our ARS investments, including the Put Rights. Therefore, management, assisted by
Houlihan, Smith & Company, Inc., an independent consultant, determined an estimated fair value. In
determining the estimate, consideration was given to credit quality, final stated maturities,
estimates on the probability of the issue being called prior to final maturity, impact due to
extended periods of maximum auction rates and broker quotes. Based on this analysis, we recorded a
temporary impairment of $1,122 ($692 net of tax in other comprehensive income which is in the
equity section of the balance sheet) related to our long-term ARS investments of $14,550 (par
value) that were not part of the UBS settlement as of July 31, 2009. These same assumptions were
used to estimate the fair value of our UBS ARS portfolio described above, including the Put Rights.
The enforceability of the Put Rights results in a put option which has been recognized as a
separate freestanding instrument that is accounted for separately from the ARS investment. The
Company has elected to account for this put option at fair value under FASB Statement No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (SFAS 159) and elected to treat this
portion of our ARS portfolio as trading securities. As such, we recorded a benefit to operations of
$8,840 related to the Put Rights provided by the settlement and an other-than-temporary impairment
charge to operations of $8,840 on the $107,150 (par value) portion of our ARS portfolio to properly
record our investment at par as we may decide not to hold these ARS until final maturity with the
opportunity provided by the Put Rights.
We have no reason to believe that any of the underlying issuers of our ARS are presently at risk of
default. Through July 31, 2009, we have continued to receive interest payments on the ARS in
accordance with their terms. We believe we will be able to liquidate our investments without
significant loss primarily due to the government guarantee of the underlying securities; however,
it could take until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up to 31 years) to realize our
investments par value. Based on the terms of the UBS Call Right, which is exercisable at any time
after June 30, 2010, effective June 30, 2009, the ARS held by UBS were classified as short-term.
The remaining ARS held by another institution remains classified as long-term at July 31, 2009.
Although there is uncertainty with regard to the short-term liquidity of these securities, the
Company continues to believe that the carrying amount represents the fair value of these marketable
securities because of the overall quality of the underlying investments and the anticipated future
market for such investments. In addition, the Company has the intent and ability to hold these
securities until the earlier of: the market for ARS stabilizes, the issuer refinances the
underlying security, a buyer is found outside of the auction process at acceptable terms, the
underlying securities have matured or the Company exercises its right to put the securities to UBS,
one of the Companys investment providers.
C. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, requires goodwill to be tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if an
event occurs which indicates the goodwill may be impaired. On an annual basis, we test goodwill for
impairment as of April 30.
The components of other intangibles are as follows:
July 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Amortization | Cost | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Amortizable Intangible Assets- Non-compete agreements |
$ | 2,888 | $ 2,271 | $ | 5,938 | $ 4,845 |
Aggregate amortization expense for non-compete agreements for the years ended July 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 were $476, $813 and $935, respectively. Non-compete agreements are amortized on a
straight-line basis.
The weighted average remaining amortization period at July 31, 2009 is 2.1 years.
F-12
Table of Contents
Estimated Amortization Expense:
For the fiscal year ending July 2010 |
$ | 322 | ||
For the fiscal year ending July 2011 |
$ | 238 | ||
For the fiscal year ending July 2012 |
$ | 57 |
In accordance with SFAS 142, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not subject to
amortization. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment by
applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a
potential impairment.
Management engages an independent valuation firm to assist in its impairment assessment reviews.
The value of all indefinite-lived trademarks was determined using a royalty savings methodology
similar to that employed when the associated businesses were acquired but using updated estimates
of sales, cash flow and profitability. The fair value of the Companys reporting units for purposes
of goodwill testing was determined primarily by employing a discounted cash flow methodology.
The Company completed an impairment review as of January 31, 2009 that resulted in a non-cash
trademark impairment of $564 in the second quarter for the trademark associated with an operating
subsidiary in the motorized reportable segment. Another review was also conducted as of April 30,
2009 which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $9,717 in the third quarter for the
goodwill associated with an operating subsidiary in the motorized reportable segment. The
impairments result from the difficult market environment and outlook for the motorhome business.
The Company completed an impairment review as of April 30, 2008 which resulted in a non-cash
goodwill impairment charge of $7,535 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 for the goodwill
associated with an operating subsidiary in the motorized reportable segment.
Goodwill and trademarks by segment were as follows:
July 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill | Trademark | Goodwill | Trademark | |||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 143,795 | $ | 10,237 | $ | 143,795 | $ | 10,237 | ||||||||
Motorized |
- | 2,036 | 9,717 | 2,600 | ||||||||||||
Buses |
4,616 | 1,063 | 4,616 | 1,063 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 148,411 | $ | 13,336 | $ | 158,128 | $ | 13,900 | ||||||||
D. INVENTORIES
Major classifications of inventories are:
As of July 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Finished products |
$ | 6,682 | $ | 13,584 | ||||
Work in process |
38,159 | 51,162 | ||||||
Raw materials |
55,956 | 79,356 | ||||||
Chassis |
28,613 | 37,562 | ||||||
Subtotal |
129,410 | 181,664 | ||||||
Excess of FIFO costs over LIFO costs |
(24,132) | (29,082) | ||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 105,278 | $ | 152,582 | ||||
During 2009 the amount of inventories in certain LIFO pools decreased which resulted in liquidation
of LIFO inventory layers, which are carried at lower costs. The effect of this liquidation was to
increase net income in 2009 by approximately $7,400. The impact of this liquidation was
approximately $2,730, $4,430 and $240 for the towables, motorized and buses segments, respectively.
It is the Companys policy to record the earnings effect of LIFO inventory liquidations in the
quarter in which a decrease for the entire year becomes certain. The Companys reserve for
inventory obsolescence increased $1,760 to $3,053 at July 31, 2009 due to the elimination of
certain product lines.
F-13
Table of Contents
E. LINE OF CREDIT
The Company had a $30,000 unsecured revolving line of credit which bore interest at prime less
2.15% and expired on November 30, 2008. The Company decided not to renew the unsecured revolving
line of credit and allowed it to expire on November 30, 2008. The decision not to renew the line of
credit was based on our strong cash position combined with our expectation that we will have the
ability to borrow at favorable rates against our ARS, if needed. As a result, we did not anticipate
utilizing the line of credit and did not want to incur the cost of maintaining it. There was no
outstanding balance at July 31, 2008.
F. INCOME TAXES
Years ended July 31, | ||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | (2,563) | $ | 79,263 | $ | 66,049 | ||||||
State and local |
3,304 | 11,979 | (3,065) | |||||||||
Foreign |
(900) | 250 | 469 | |||||||||
Total currently payable |
(159) | 91,492 | 63,453 | |||||||||
Federal deferred |
6,163 | (27,981) | (1,396) | |||||||||
State and local deferred |
248 | (3,810) | 72 | |||||||||
Total deferred expense |
6,411 | (31,791) | (1,324) | |||||||||
Income tax |
$ | 6,252 | $ | 59,701 | $ | 62,129 | ||||||
Current Federal Tax Expense
Current federal tax expense decreased $81,826 to $(2,563) from 2008 to 2009. Of this amount,
$45,154 was due to the reduction in pre-tax income of $129,012. Additionally, the Companys
decision to not insure warranty risk through its captive insurance company resulted in current
federal tax expense in 2009 being $21,280 less than in 2008. Also,
current tax expense decreased by $6.331 from 2008 because of the
increased tax deduction for payments of warranty claims. Further,
credits and incentives, refunds from
amended returns and tax exam settlements and reduction for excess accrued taxes payable further
lowered 2009 tax expense by $5,552. Nondeductible goodwill increased 2009 tax expense by $3,235.
The other changes to current federal tax expense, including temporary items, are detailed in the
schedule below.
Current federal tax expense increased $13,214 to $79,263 from 2007 to 2008. Of this amount,
$21,280 of additional current federal tax expense resulted from the Companys decision in 2008 to
not insure its 2009 warranty risk through its captive insurance company. This decision caused an
increase in current federal tax expense and a decrease in deferred tax expense. Additionally, the
federal tax expense and deferred tax benefit increased by $6,701 as a result of other temporary
items as detailed in the table below that summarizes deferred income taxes. The increase in
current federal tax expense in 2008 was offset in part by $15,559 less federal tax because of
$44,453 less pretax income in 2008 than in 2007. Current federal tax expense also decreased by
$4,200 from 2007 to 2008 due to the change in current state tax expense resulting from the
settlement of a tax dispute with the State of Indiana during 2007. The other changes to current
federal tax expense, including Unrecognized Tax Benefits, pursuant to FIN 48, are detailed in the
schedule below.
Current State and Local Tax Expense
Current state tax expense decreased $8,675 to $3,304 from 2008 to 2009. Of this amount, $6,257 was
due to the reduction in pre-tax income of $129,012. Additionally, the Companys decision to not
insure warranty risk through its captive insurance company resulted in current state tax expense in
2009 being $3,810 less than in 2008. Also,
current tax expense decreased by $922 from 2008 because of the
increased tax deduction for payments of warranty claims. The other changes to current state tax expense including
temporary items are detailed in the schedule below.
Current state tax expense increased $15,044 to $11,979 from 2007 to 2008. Of this amount, $12,000
($7,800 net of federal taxes) was due to the 2007 state income tax benefit resulting from the
Indiana Tax Settlement Agreement as detailed below. In addition, $3,810 is because of the
Companys decision in 2008 to not insure its 2009 warranty risk through its captive insurance
company. The
other changes to current state tax expense including temporary items are detailed in the schedule below.
The Company was party to a Tax Court case with the State of Indiana involving a disagreement
on the eligibility of the Company to file a unitary state tax return. The Company requested in
1995 and Indiana denied permission to file a unitary state tax return. After filing Indiana tax
returns for 1995 through 1998, the Company took exception to the denial by Indiana to file a
unitary tax return and filed amended unitary tax returns for these years asking for refunds. Further, the Company filed
tax returns in 1999 and thereafter on a unitary
F-14
Table of Contents
basis. The Company established reserves for these uncertain tax positions under the loss
contingency provisions of SFAS No. 5 in 1999 and later years for the entire amount of the uncertain
tax benefits of the unitary position. The Company filed a suit in Indiana Tax Court in 2003 to
pursue the refunds for 1995 thorough 1998. The Company reversed established reserves following the
provisions of SFAS No. 5 for gain contingencies, when realization was beyond a reasonable doubt,
which was when the statute of limitations expired. In April 2007, the Company reached a verbal
settlement with the Indiana Department of Revenue on these matters, which required the approval by
the Governor of Indiana. The remaining reserves for uncertain tax positions at the time of
resolution with the State of Indiana of approximately $10,800 ($7,000 net of federal tax benefit)
had been established in 2003 through 2006. The Company treated these reserves and a $1,200 refund
($800 net of federal tax benefit) as gain contingencies under the provisions of SFAS No. 5, and did
not reflect the reversal of these reserves in 2007 until realization was assured beyond a
reasonable doubt, which was when the Governor of Indiana signed the Tax Settlement Agreement in
July 2007, closing the tax court case and granting the Company permission to file Indiana unitary
tax returns.
The table below shows the components of the total current income tax expense for fiscal 2009, 2008
and 2007:
July 31, | July 31, | July 31, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Federal Tax Expense at Statutory Rates |
$ 8,188 | $ | 53,342 | $ | 68,901 | |||||||
State Tax Expense at Various State Tax Rates |
738 | 5,310 | 5,363 | |||||||||
Current Tax Expense Effect of Accrued Product Warranties |
(7,253) | 21,280 | (1,397) | |||||||||
Current Tax Expense Effect of Other Temporary Items |
842 | 10,511 | 2,721 | |||||||||
Indiana Tax Settlement Agreement |
| | (7,800) | |||||||||
Income Tax Credits and Incentives |
(3,669) | (521) | (1,150) | |||||||||
Amended Returns and Tax Exam Settlements |
(1,022) | | (1,486) | |||||||||
Domestic Production Activities Deduction |
(420) | (4,099) | (1,988) | |||||||||
Extraterritorial Income Benefit |
| | (362) | |||||||||
Unrecognized Tax Benefits Pursuant to FIN 48 |
1,271 | 5,572 | | |||||||||
Goodwill Impairment |
3,707 | | | |||||||||
Reduction of Excess Current Tax Payable |
(2,308) | | | |||||||||
Tax-Exempt Interest |
(444) | (1,209) | (1,428) | |||||||||
Other Permanent Items |
211 | 1,306 | 2,079 | |||||||||
Total Current Income Taxes |
$ | (159) | $ | 91,492 | $ | 63,453 | ||||||
The differences between income taxes at the federal statutory rate and the actual income taxes are
as follows:
July 31, | July 31, | July 31, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Provision at Statutory Rates |
$ 8,188 | $ 53,342 | $ | 68,901 | ||||||||
State and Local Income Taxes, net of federal benefit |
738 | 5,310 | 5,363 | |||||||||
Extraterritorial Income Benefit |
| | (362) | |||||||||
Income Tax Credits and Incentives |
(3,669) | (521) | (1,150) | |||||||||
Amended Returns and Tax Exam Settlements |
(1,022) | | | |||||||||
Domestic Production Activities Deduction |
(420) | (4,099) | (1,988) | |||||||||
Unrecognized Tax Benefits Pursuant to FIN 48 |
1,271 | 5,572 | | |||||||||
Goodwill Impairment |
3,707 | | | |||||||||
Indiana Tax Settlement Agreement |
| | (7,800) | |||||||||
Reduction of Excess Current Tax Payable |
(2,308) | | ||||||||||
Tax-Exempt Interest |
(444) | (1,209) | (1,428) | |||||||||
Other Permanent Items |
211 | 1,306 | 593 | |||||||||
Income Taxes |
$ 6,252 | $ 59,701 | $ | 62,129 | ||||||||
F-15
Table of Contents
Income before income taxes includes foreign income (loss) of ($2,659), ($573) and $1,226 in fiscal
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
July 31, | July 31, | July 31, | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
A summary of deferred income taxes is as follows: |
||||||||||||
Current deferred tax asset (liability): |
||||||||||||
Inventory basis |
$ (96) | $ (1,305) | $ (1,166 | ) | ||||||||
Employee benefits |
1,015 | 2,375 | 1,454 | |||||||||
Self-insurance reserves |
9,657 | 4,970 | 2,506 | |||||||||
Accrued Product warranties |
16,007 | 23,260 | 1,980 | |||||||||
Accrued incentives |
1,490 | 4,205 | 1,733 | |||||||||
Sales Returns and Allowances |
2,464 | 1,998 | 514 | |||||||||
Settlement Fees |
1,018 | 713 | 444 | |||||||||
Other |
1,786 | (2,325) | (1,460) | |||||||||
Total current net deferred tax asset included in deferred income taxes and other |
$ 33,341 | $ 33,891 | $ 6,005 | |||||||||
Long-term deferred tax asset (liability): |
||||||||||||
Property basis |
(1,867) | (1,908) | (2,203 | ) | ||||||||
Investments |
(486) | 1,410 | 168 | |||||||||
Deferred compensation |
3,559 | 5,169 | 4,773 | |||||||||
Auction rate securities |
431 | 2,337 | | |||||||||
Intangibles |
(5,205) | (3,858) | (6,034 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(1,097) | (1,715) | | |||||||||
Unrecognized Tax Benefits |
15,512 | | | |||||||||
Other |
(720) | (328) | (64 | ) | ||||||||
Total net long-term deferred tax asset (liability) included in deferred income
taxes and other liabilities |
10,127 | 1,107 | (3,360 | ) | ||||||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ | 43,468 | $ | 34,998 | $ | 2,645 | ||||||
The Companys net deferred tax assets increased $8,470 to $43,468 from 2008 to 2009. Of this
increase, $16,168 was due to reclassification of the deferred tax asset related to the liability
for unrecognized tax benefits discussed below. The deferred tax asset for unrecognized tax benefits
decreased due to changes in tax positions during 2009 by $314 to $15,854 of which $342 was current
and $15,512 was long-term. Further, self-insurance reserves increased by $4,687. These increases
were offset in part by lower accrued liabilities of product warranties, $7,253, and incentives,
$2,715. As of July 31, 2009, the Company had a $2,532 capital loss carryover that it expects to
realize.
The Companys 2008 net deferred tax asset for product warranties increased from 2007 as a result of
the Companys decision to not insure warranty risks though its wholly-owned insurance subsidiary.
The Company does not intend to insure any risks through the insurance subsidiary in the future and
is in the process of liquidating the entity. Additionally, the net deferred tax asset increased
because of the impairment of tax deductible goodwill and fixed assets. As of July 31, 2008, the
Company had a $3,600 capital loss carryover that it expects to realize.
The Company does not intend to insure any future risks through its insurance subsidiary because of
the uncertainty of the timing of the deductibility of the insurance premium. Further, the Company
does not believe that the future benefits of the insurance subsidiary, including the risk shifting
and risk distribution among the Companys operating subsidiaries, are in excess of the
administrative cost of maintenance.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits:
The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on August 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainties in income tax law by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax
position is required to meet before being
recognized for financial accounting purposes. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
measurement, classification, interest and penalties and disclosure.
The
amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of July 31, 2009 totaled $47,312, of which $31,458 would
increase income from continuing operations, and thus impact the Companys effective tax rate, if
ultimately recognized into income.
F-16
Table of Contents
As of July 31, 2009, the Company corrected a misclassification in the presentation of the liability
for unrecognized income tax benefits. The Company is no longer reporting the liability for
unrecognized income tax benefits net of the related deferred income tax asset. Therefore, the
liability for unrecognized income tax benefits and deferred tax assets have both been increased by
$16,168 on the Companys consolidated balance sheet. In the table below, the $11,031 reflects the
increase in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits due to the related deferred income
tax asset, exclusive of the deferred tax benefit for interest and penalties.
Changes in the unrecognized tax benefit during fiscal year 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Unrecognized | Unrecognized | |||||||
Tax Benefit | Tax Benefit | |||||||
Beginning balance (Net of federal benefit) |
$ 21,032 | $ 19,463 | ||||||
Increase in liability due to federal benefit |
11,031 | | ||||||
Tax positions related to prior years: |
||||||||
Additions |
1,880 | | ||||||
Reductions |
| (7) | ||||||
Tax positions related to current year: |
||||||||
Additions |
622 | 3,805 | ||||||
Reductions |
| | ||||||
Settlements |
(3,002) | (1,573) | ||||||
Lapses in statute of limitations |
(1,328) | (656) | ||||||
Ending balance |
$ 30,235 | $ 21,032 | ||||||
It is the Companys policy to recognize interest and penalties accrued relative to unrecognized tax
benefits in income tax expense. Interest and penalties are not included in the schedule above of
unrecognized tax benefits. The total amount of liabilities accrued for interest and penalties
related to unrecognized tax benefits as of July 31, 2009, as adjusted to correct the
misclassification referred to above, July 31, 2008, and August 1, 2007, were $17,100, $10,600, and
$6,500, respectively.
The Company and its corporate subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and
multiple state income tax returns. The federal returns are subject to examination by taxing
authorities for all years after fiscal 2006. The Internal Revenue Service audit for fiscal 2006
and fiscal 2007 was completed during 2009. Additionally, the California state income tax audit for
fiscal 2003 through fiscal 2006 was settled during 2009.
The Company anticipates a decrease of approximately $1,401 in unrecognized tax benefits within the
next 12 months from expected settlements or payments of uncertain tax positions and lapses of the
applicable statutes of limitations. Actual results may differ materially from this estimate.
G. LEASES
The Company has operating leases principally for land, buildings and equipment. Future minimum
rental payments required under these operating leases are $5,059 which includes the following
amount due in each of the next five fiscal years ending July 31: $2,656 in fiscal 2010; $1,257 in
fiscal 2011; $780 in fiscal 2012; $254 in fiscal 2013 and $112 thereafter. Rent expense was $3,838
in fiscal 2009, $4,457 in fiscal 2008 and $4,736 in fiscal 2007.
H. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Substantially all non-highly compensated employees are eligible to participate in a 401(k) plan.
Company contributions are at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors. Total expense for
the plan was $332 in fiscal 2009, $597 in fiscal 2008 and $571 in fiscal 2007.
The Company has established a deferred compensation plan for executives who do not participate in a
401(k) plan. This plan allows executives to defer a portion of their compensation and to direct the
Company to invest the funds in mutual fund investments held by the Company. Participant benefits
are limited to the value of the investments held on their behalf. Investments held by the Company
are accounted for at fair market value and reported as other assets. The obligation to the
participants is reported as a liability. No income or loss is recorded through the Consolidated
Statements of Income. The Company does not make contributions to the plan. The balance of
investments held in this plan was $6,016 at July 31, 2009 and $10,948 at July 31, 2008.
F-17
Table of Contents
I. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND COMMITMENTS
It is customary practice for companies in the recreation vehicle industry to enter into repurchase
agreements with financing institutions to provide financing to their dealers. Generally, these
agreements provide for the repurchase of products from the financing institution in the event of a
dealers default.
Our principal commercial commitments at July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008 are summarized in the
following chart:
Total Amount | Total Amount | Term of | ||||||||
Commitment | Committed 2009 | Committed 2008 | Commitments | |||||||
Guarantee on dealer financing |
$ | 7,112 | $ | 1,786 | Various |
|||||
Standby repurchase
obligation on dealer financing |
$ | 447,706 | $ | 817,248 | Up to eighteen months |
The risk of loss under these agreements is spread over numerous dealers and further reduced by the
resale value of the units which the Company would be required to repurchase. Management believes
that any future losses under these agreements will not have a significant effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
The Company records repurchase and guarantee reserves based on prior experience and known current
events. The combined repurchase and guarantee reserve balances are approximately $6,349 as of July
31, 2009 and $5,040 as of July 31, 2008. We have increased our reserve for repurchases and
guarantees to provide for future losses. The increase in losses for fiscal 2009 resulted from the
more difficult market for the recreation vehicle business.
Fiscal 2009 | Fiscal 2008 | Fiscal 2007 | ||||||||||
Cost of units repurchased |
$ 32,913 | $ 11,908 | $ 10,078 | |||||||||
Realization of units resold |
27,652 | 10,051 | 9,061 | |||||||||
Losses due to repurchase |
$ 5,261 | $ 1,857 | $ 1,017 | |||||||||
The Company obtains certain vehicle chassis from automobile manufacturers under converter pool
agreements. These agreements generally provide that the manufacturer will supply chassis at the
Companys various production facilities under the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement.
The manufacturer does not transfer the certificate of origin to the Company and, accordingly, the
Company accounts for the chassis as consigned, unrecorded inventory. Chassis are typically
converted and delivered to customers within 90 days of delivery. If the chassis is not converted
within 90 days of delivery to the Company, the Company generally purchases the chassis and records
the inventory. At July 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008, chassis on hand accounted for as consigned,
unrecorded inventory was approximately $31,201 and $38,639 respectively.
The
Company has been named in approximately 300 complaints,
some of which were originally styled as putative class actions (with
respect to which class certification was ultimately denied) and some
of which were filed by individual plaintiffs,
filed against manufacturers of travel trailers
and manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
for use as emergency living
accommodations in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The complaints
have been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the
federal panel on multidistrict litigation for consideration in a
matter captioned in re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability
Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaints generally assert
claims for damages (for health related problems, medical expenses,
emotional distress and lost earnings) and for medical monitoring
costs due to the presence of formaldehyde in the units. Some of the
lawsuits also seek punitive and/or exemplary damages. Thus far,
however,
none of the lawsuits allege a specific amount of damages sought and
instead make general allegations about the nature of the
plaintiffs claims
without placing a dollar figure on them. The Company strongly
disputes the allegations in these complaints, and intends to
vigorously defend itself in all such matters.
The Company is also involved in various other litigation generally incidental to normal operations.
J. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
The Company did not purchase any shares of Thors common stock in fiscal 2009. In fiscal 2008, the
Company purchased 435,739 shares of Thors common stock at an average cost of $31.12 per share to
be held as treasury shares.
The Board approved the Thor Industries, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Incentive
Plan) on October 16, 2006 and this plan was subsequently approved by shareholders at the 2006
annual meeting. The Equity Incentive Plan is designed, among other things, to replace the Companys
1999 Stock Option Plan (the 1999 Plan) and the Companys 1997 Restricted Stock Plan (the 1997
Plan). Upon approval
F-18
Table of Contents
of the Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Plan and the 1997 Plan were frozen. As
a result, there will be no further grants under options, restricted stock or other equity-based
awards pursuant to either the 1999 Plan or the 1997 Plan. However, outstanding grants of both plans
remain outstanding, subject to the respective terms and conditions of the plans. The maximum number
of shares issuable under the Equity Incentive Plan is 1,100,000. Awards may be in the form of
options (incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options), restricted stock, restricted
stock units, performance compensation awards and stock appreciation rights. 2,000,000 shares were
authorized under the 1999 Plan. Options expire 10 years from the date of grant and are vested
evenly over 3 to 4 years from the date of grant.
Stock
Options A summary of option activity under the 1999 Plan and the Equity Incentive Plan is
as follows:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Exercise Price | Shares | Exercise Price | Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of year |
514,561 | $ 23.48 | 409,420 | $ | 21.92 | 533,038 | $ | 21.29 | ||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(1,000) | 26.91 | (94,859) | 23.25 | (123,618) | 15.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
Canceled |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
| | 200,000 | 26.55 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of year |
513,561 | $ 23.47 | 514,561 | $ | 23.48 | 409,420 | $ | 21.92 | ||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at year-end |
380,227 | $ 22.39 | 313,311 | $ | 21.50 | 388,420 | $ | 21.53 | ||||||||||||||||
The weighted average-remaining contractual life for options outstanding and exercisable at
July 31, 2009, was 5.75 and 4.67 years, respectively.
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable as of July 31 is as follows:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding |
$ | 1,509 | $ | 1,039 | $ | 7,818 | ||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of options exercisable |
$ | 1,509 | $ | 1,039 | $ | 7,571 |
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. Assumptions utilized in the model are evaluated when awards are granted.
Forfeiture assumptions are revised as necessary to reflect experience. The fair value of the stock
options is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock as of the date of the grant,
reduced by the present value of estimated future dividends, and risk-free interest rates. The
risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. treasury
security rate estimated for the expected life of the options at the date of grant. Expected
volatilities are based on the
historical volatility of our stock. The expected term of the options represents the period of time
that options granted are expected to be outstanding and is estimated using historical exercise and
termination behavior.
The weighted average fair value of options granted in fiscal 2008 was $10.54 as calculated by the
Black-Scholes method. The assumptions used in determining the fair value of options granted during
fiscal 2008 are as follows:
2008 | ||
Expected volatility |
40% | |
Expected life of grant |
6 years | |
Risk-free interest rate |
3.3% | |
Expected dividend rate |
0.9% |
In fiscal years 2009, 2008, and 2007 the Company recorded expenses of $589, $179 and $408
respectively for stock option awards. At July 31, 2009, there was $1,429 of total unrecognized
compensation costs related to stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1.79 years.
Cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended July 31, 2009, July 31, 2008, and
July 31, 2007 was $27, $2,205, and $2,373 respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options
exercised in 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $0, $2,025, and $2,923, respectively.
Exercises of options are satisfied with the issuance of new shares from authorized shares.
F-19
Table of Contents
Stock
Awards The Companys 1997 Restricted Stock Plan allowed for the granting of up to 600,000
shares of restricted stock to select executives. Restrictions expire 50% after 5 years following
the date of issue and the balance after six years.
A summary of stock award activity under this Plan is as follows:
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Grant | Average Grant | Average Grant | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Date Fair Value | Shares | Date Fair Value | Shares | Date Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Nonvested, Beginning of year |
32,000 | $ | 19.22 | 71,000 | $ | 16.24 | 94,700 | $ | 14.33 | |||||||||||||||
Granted |
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Vested |
(28,000) | $ | 18.12 | (39,000) | $ | 13.79 | (22,200) | $ | 7.62 | |||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
- | - | - | - | (1,500) | $ | 23.38 | |||||||||||||||||
Nonvested, End of year |
4,000 | $ | 26.91 | 32,000 | $ | 19.22 | 71,000 | $ | 16.24 | |||||||||||||||
In fiscal 2009, 2008, and 2007 the Company recorded expense for restricted stock awards of
$68, $177, and $202 respectively. At July 31, 2009, there was $12 of total unrecognized
compensation costs related to restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 0.3 years.
The total fair value of restricted stock vested during fiscal year 2009, 2008, and 2007 was $480,
$1,747, and $970 respectively.
K. JOINT VENTURES
In March 1996, the Company and Cruise America, Inc., an unrelated third party, formed a joint
venture, CAT Joint Venture LLC (CAT), to make short-term rentals of motorized recreation vehicles
to the public. As of July 31, 2009 we were contingently liable for repurchase obligations of CAT
inventory in the amount of approximately $13,537. Any losses related to these obligations would be
shared equally by the Company and Cruise America. The Companys total investment at July 31, 2009
is $2,257.
In March 1994, the Company and a financial services company formed a joint venture, Thor Credit
Corporation (TCC), to finance sales of recreation vehicles to consumer buyers. This joint venture
was dissolved in September 2008 after the joint venture partner informed us that it was no longer
providing retail financing for recreation vehicles. We recovered our investment of $1,578 upon
dissolution.
These investments are (or, in the case of TCC, were) 50% owned and are accounted for using the
equity method. The Companys share of the combined earnings (loss) for these investments was $566,
$598 and $(66) in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and is included in the other income
caption of the Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, TCC paid the Company a referral fee
based upon the amount of loans generated from Thors dealers. The Company recognized referral
income of $0, $1,506, and $1,519 in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which is included in
the other income caption of the Consolidated Statements of Income.
During fiscal 2009, our Four Winds subsidiary had sales to Cruise America of $13,623 and Cruise
America did not have any sales to CAT. During fiscal 2008, our Four Winds subsidiary had sales to
Cruise America of $19,485 and Cruise America had sales to CAT of $9,106. During fiscal 2007, our
Four Winds subsidiary had sales to Cruise America of $32,688 and Cruise America had sales to CAT of
$11,315.
L. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Company has three reportable segments: 1.) towable recreation vehicles, 2.) motorized
recreation vehicles, and 3.) buses. The towable recreation vehicle segment consists of product
lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Airstream, Breckenridge,
CrossRoads, Dutchmen, General Coach Hensall & Oliver, Keystone, and Komfort. The motorized
recreation vehicle segment consists of product lines from the following operating companies that
have been aggregated: Airstream, Damon, and Four Winds. The bus segment consists of the following
operating companies that have been aggregated: Champion Bus, ElDorado California, ElDorado Kansas
and Goshen Coach.
F-20
Table of Contents
Manufacturing and sales are conducted in the United States and, to a much lesser extent, in
Canada. Identifiable assets are those assets used in the operation of each reportable segment.
Corporate assets primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments, deferred income tax
assets and the cash value of Company-owned life insurance.
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||
Net sales: |
||||||||||||
Recreation vehicles |
||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 953,279 | $ | 1,763,099 | $ | 1,890,100 | ||||||
Motorized |
161,727 | 461,856 | 565,523 | |||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
1,115,006 | 2,224,955 | 2,455,623 | |||||||||
Buses |
406,890 | 415,725 | 400,685 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,521,896 | $ | 2,640,680 | $ | 2,856,308 | ||||||
Income before income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Recreation vehicles |
||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 47,347 | $ | 146,306 | $ | 165,259 | ||||||
Motorized |
(29,728) | (522) | 25,140 | |||||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
17,619 | 145,784 | 190,399 | |||||||||
Buses |
17,422 | 21,132 | 18,997 | |||||||||
Corporate |
(11,646) | (14,509) | (12,536) | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 23,395 | $ | 152,407 | $ | 196,860 | ||||||
Identifiable assets: |
||||||||||||
Recreation vehicles |
||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 358,562 | $ | 409,793 | $ | 449,276 | ||||||
Motorized |
73,969 | 108,740 | 147,598 | |||||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
432,531 | 518,533 | 596,874 | |||||||||
Buses |
106,823 | 110,647 | 105,864 | |||||||||
Corporate |
411,770 | 367,382 | 356,559 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 951,124 | $ | 996,562 | $ | 1,059,297 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense: |
||||||||||||
Recreation vehicles |
||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 8,371 | $ | 10,119 | $ | 8,913 | ||||||
Motorized |
2,979 | 4,729 | 2,916 | |||||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
11,350 | 14,848 | 11,829 | |||||||||
Buses |
1,864 | 2,035 | 1,876 | |||||||||
Corporate |
269 | 138 | 200 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 13,483 | $ | 17,021 | $ | 13,905 | ||||||
Capital expenditures: |
||||||||||||
Recreation vehicles |
||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 2,297 | $ | 6,786 | $ | 7,825 | ||||||
Motorized |
1,847 | 5,055 | 3,913 | |||||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
4,144 | 11,841 | 11,738 | |||||||||
Buses |
512 | 1,094 | 1,226 | |||||||||
Corporate |
479 | 1,880 | 141 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,135 | $ | 14,815 | $ | 13,105 | ||||||
Export sales to Canada from our U.S. operations were $237,584, $421,008, and $360,198 fiscal 2009,
2008, and 2007, respectively.
M. PRODUCT WARRANTY
Thor provides customers of our product with a warranty covering defects in material or workmanship
for primarily one year, with longer warranties of up to five years on certain structural
components. We record a liability based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle
future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Factors we use in
estimating the warranty liability include a history of units sold, existing dealer inventory,
average cost incurred and a profile of the distribution of warranty expenditures over the
F-21
Table of Contents
warranty
period. A significant increase in dealer shop rates, the cost of parts or the frequency of claims could have
a material adverse impact on our operating results for the period or periods in which such claims
or additional costs materialize. Management believes that the warranty reserves are adequate.
However, actual claims incurred could differ from estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves.
Warranty reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary on at least a quarterly basis.
Year Ended | Year Ended | Year Ended | ||||||||||
July 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | July 31, 2007 | ||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 61,743 | $ | 64,310 | $ | 59,795 | ||||||
Provision |
32,236 | 63,525 | 66,324 | |||||||||
Payments |
(52,262) | (66,092) | (61,809) | |||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 41,717 | $ | 61,743 | $ | 64,310 | ||||||
N. SALE OF BUSINESS |
In June 2008, the Company sold its Thor California travel trailer and fifth wheel business to MVP
RV Acquisition Corporation (MVP), a new company owned by Thor Californias former management
team. In connection with the sale, the Company received a note receivable of $2,401 payable over
seven years which bears interest at 6% per annum. The Company subleased a production facility to
MVP but remains an obligor under the lease. The Company also agreed to continue to provide certain
limited financial support to MVP with respect to its flooring arrangements. MVP agreed to assume
certain balance sheet liabilities of Thor California, including liabilities with respect to
warranty claims. As repayment of the note, which constituted the principal consideration in the
transaction, was dependent on future successful operations of the purchaser, and based on the
continuing relationship subsequent to the closing date, the Company determined that it retained
substantial risks of the business. Accordingly, although legal transfer of ownership of the
business occurred, the sale was not treated as a divestiture for accounting purposes. The Company
recorded provisions of $5,411 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 in connection with this sale
transaction relating to asset impairment and pre-existing liabilities. In fiscal 2009 the Company
recorded additional expense of $1,036 related to warranty and other costs associated with Thor
California.
O. THOR CC, INC.
In March 1994, the Company and a financial services company formed a joint venture, Thor Credit
Corporation, to finance the sale of recreation vehicles to consumer buyers. This joint venture was
dissolved in September 2008 after the joint venture partner informed us that it was no longer
providing retail financing for recreation vehicles. We recovered our investment of $1,578 upon
dissolution.
In November 2008, the Company announced that it will again be providing retail financing for
recreation vehicle customers of Thor dealers through the Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Thor
CC, Inc. (Thor CC). The new business, which is led by employees of the former joint venture, will
finance new Thor and used recreation vehicle products sold by our dealers.
The retail financing to be provided by Thor CC will be funded by Thors operating cash flow. We
allocated approximately $2,500 which will be used to fund retail loans. The retail loans will then
be sold to banks with which Thor CC has established relationships, and the proceeds of such sales
will then be available to make new loans. The retail loans will be made to prime and super prime
customers with high credit scores. The Company may need to allocate more capital to Thor CC as its
portfolio grows; however, the Company does not anticipate it will exceed $10,000.
As of September 1, 2009, Thor CC offered retail financing through Thor recreation vehicle dealers
in the following states: Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina,
Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and Washington. We expect that Thor CC
will expand its lending ability beyond these states in the future.
P. CONCENTRATION OF RISK
Two dealers accounted for an aggregate of 29% of the Companys bus sales for fiscal year 2009. The
loss of either dealer could have a significant effect on the Companys bus business. One dealer
accounted for 15% of the Companys consolidated recreation vehicle net sales and 11% of its
consolidated net sales. The loss of this dealer could have a significant effect on the Companys
recreation vehicle business.
F-22
Table of Contents
Q. LOAN TRANSACTIONS AND RELATED NOTES RECEIVABLE
On January 15, 2009, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the First Credit Agreement)
with Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee
under the Stephen Adams Living Trust (the Trust and together with each of the foregoing persons,
the Borrowers), pursuant to which the Company loaned $10,000 to the Borrowers (the First Loan).
The Borrowers own approximately 90% of FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC (FreedomRoads Holding),
the parent company of one of the Companys dealers, and pursuant to the terms of the First Credit
Agreement, the Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the First Loan solely to make an equity
contribution to FreedomRoads Holding to enable FreedomRoads Holding to repay principal obligations
under floorplan financing arrangements with third parties in respect of products of the Company and
its subsidiaries.
The principal amount of the First Loan is payable in full on January 15, 2014 and bears interest at
a rate of 12% per annum. Interest is payable in kind for the first year and is payable in cash on a
monthly basis thereafter.
In connection with the First Loan, the Borrowers caused FreedomRoads Holding and its subsidiaries
(collectively, the FR Dealers), to enter into an agreement pursuant to which the FR Dealers
agreed to purchase additional recreation vehicles from the Company and its subsidiaries. The term
of this agreement continues until the repayment in full of the First Loan under the First Credit
Agreement (including any refinancing or replacement thereof).
On January 30, 2009, the Company entered into a second Credit Agreement (the Second Credit
Agreement and together with the First Credit Agreement, the Credit Agreements) with the
Borrowers pursuant to which the Company loaned an additional $10,000 to the Borrowers (the Second
Loan and together with the First Loan, the Loans). Pursuant to the terms of the Second Credit
Agreement, the Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the Second Loan solely to make an equity
contribution to FreedomRoads Holding to be used by FreedomRoads Holding or its subsidiaries to
purchase the Companys products.
The principal amount of the Second Loan is payable in full on January 29, 2010 and bears interest
at a rate of 12% per annum. Interest is payable in cash and the first two interest payments were
due and paid in full on April 30, 2009 and July 31, 2009. The remaining interest payment dates are:
October 30, 2009 and January 29, 2010.
The Credit Agreements contain customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative
covenants, events of default and acceleration provisions for loans of this type.
The obligations of the Borrowers under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by FreedomRoads Holding
and are secured by a first priority security interest in all of the direct and indirect legal,
equitable and beneficial interests of the Borrowers in FreedomRoads Holding.
In connection with the Second Loan, the FR Dealers and the Company amended their prior agreement
pursuant to which the FR Dealers agreed to purchase additional recreation vehicles from the Company
and its subsidiaries to provide that the term of this agreement now continues until the repayment
in full of the Loans (including any refinancing or replacement thereof).
***********
F-23