THOR INDUSTRIES INC - Quarter Report: 2009 January (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
for
the quarterly period ended January 31, 2009.
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
for the transition period from to .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9235
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 93-0768752 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
419 West Pike Street, Jackson Center, OH | 45334-0629 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(937) 596-6849
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at 1/31/2009 | |
Common stock, par value $.10 per share |
55,440,924 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
PART I Financial Information
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts presented in thousands except units, share and per share data.
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
January 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 191,099 | $ | 189,620 | ||||
Accounts receivable: |
||||||||
Trade |
51,372 | 136,866 | ||||||
Other |
3,270 | 9,489 | ||||||
Inventories |
153,779 | 152,582 | ||||||
Taxes receivable |
2,820 | | ||||||
Note receivable |
10,000 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other |
37,752 | 39,363 | ||||||
Total current assets |
450,092 | 527,920 | ||||||
Property: |
||||||||
Land |
20,296 | 21,090 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements |
132,985 | 135,167 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
73,545 | 71,965 | ||||||
Total cost |
226,826 | 228,222 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
79,664 | 74,992 | ||||||
Property, net |
147,162 | 153,230 | ||||||
Investment in joint ventures |
2,158 | 3,269 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Long term investments |
118,961 | 126,403 | ||||||
Goodwill |
158,128 | 158,128 | ||||||
Non-compete agreements |
801 | 1,093 | ||||||
Trademarks |
13,336 | 13,900 | ||||||
Long term note receivable |
10,000 | | ||||||
Other |
6,205 | 12,619 | ||||||
Total other assets |
307,431 | 312,143 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 906,843 | $ | 996,562 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 68,812 | $ | 96,158 | ||||
Accrued liabilities: |
||||||||
Taxes |
| 26,050 | ||||||
Compensation and related items |
20,011 | 24,845 | ||||||
Product warranties |
49,798 | 61,743 | ||||||
Promotions and rebates |
9,570 | 10,781 | ||||||
Product/property liability and related |
11,907 | 12,560 | ||||||
Other |
16,204 | 16,279 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
176,302 | 248,416 | ||||||
Long Term Liabilities: |
||||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits |
33,267 | 29,332 | ||||||
Other |
13,751 | 19,118 | ||||||
Total long term liabilities |
47,018 | 48,450 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock authorized 250,000,000 shares;
issued 57,318,263 shares @ 1/31/09 and 57,317,263
shares @ 7/31/08; par value of $.10 per share |
5,732 | 5,732 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
93,980 | 93,683 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
658,427 | 675,928 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
(932 | ) | (1,963 | ) | ||||
Less Treasury shares of 1,877,339 @ 1/31/09 & 7/31/08 |
(73,684 | ) | (73,684 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
683,523 | 699,696 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 906,843 | $ | 996,562 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
2
Table of Contents
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2009 AND 2008
STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2009 AND 2008
Three Months Ended January 31 | Six Months Ended January 31 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 226,683 | $ | 599,170 | $ | 665,500 | $ | 1,362,906 | ||||||||
Cost of products sold |
218,526 | 529,453 | 617,280 | 1,191,914 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
8,157 | 69,717 | 48,220 | 170,992 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
30,199 | 39,819 | 64,665 | 85,229 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of trademarks |
564 | | 564 | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of property |
373 | 2,308 | 373 | 2,308 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
1,484 | 3,161 | 3,501 | 7,357 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
112 | 353 | 242 | 713 | ||||||||||||
Net impairment of auction rate securities |
1,853 | | 1,853 | | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
(237 | ) | 192 | 529 | 971 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(22,951 | ) | 35,206 | (14,701 | ) | 95,686 | ||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
(8,091 | ) | 13,604 | (4,961 | ) | 35,875 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (14,860 | ) | $ | 21,602 | $ | (9,740 | ) | $ | 59,811 | ||||||
Average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
55,435,315 | 55,758,534 | 55,421,946 | 55,757,936 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
55,435,315 | 55,910,429 | 55,421,946 | 55,937,211 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (.27 | ) | $ | .39 | $ | (.18 | ) | $ | 1.07 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (.27 | ) | $ | .39 | $ | (.18 | ) | $ | 1.07 | ||||||
Regular dividends declared
and paid per common share: |
$ | .07 | $ | .07 | $ | .14 | $ | .14 | ||||||||
Special dividends declared per common share: |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2.00 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
Table of Contents
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2009 AND 2008
STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2009 AND 2008
Six Months Ended January 31 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (9,740 | ) | $ | 59,811 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
6,680 | 6,692 | ||||||
Amortization |
292 | 413 | ||||||
Trademark impairment |
564 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| (11,961 | ) | |||||
Gain on disposition of assets |
(340 | ) | (2,344 | ) | ||||
Net loss on trading investments |
1,853 | | ||||||
Stock based compensation |
270 | 162 | ||||||
Changes in non cash assets and liabilities,
net of effect from acquisitions: |
||||||||
Proceeds from disposition of trading investments |
5,550 | | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
91,713 | (10,281 | ) | |||||
Note receivable |
(10,000 | ) | | |||||
Inventories |
(1,197 | ) | (31,995 | ) | ||||
Prepaids and other |
7,558 | (5,788 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(26,951 | ) | 14,843 | |||||
Accrued liabilities |
(43,653 | ) | (3,906 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities |
(6,954 | ) | 4,754 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
15,645 | 20,400 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant & equipment |
(3,562 | ) | (9,439 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposition of assets |
2,753 | 4,983 | ||||||
Purchases of available for sale investments |
| (29,900 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of available for sale investments |
4,450 | 58,125 | ||||||
Loan transaction |
(10,000 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds on dissolution of joint venture |
1,578 | | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(4,781 | ) | 23,769 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Cash dividends |
(7,761 | ) | (119,513 | ) | ||||
Purchase of common stock held as treasury shares |
| (11,805 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
27 | 2,185 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(7,734 | ) | (129,133 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes |
(1,651 | ) | 1,010 | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
1,479 | (83,954 | ) | |||||
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
189,620 | 171,889 | ||||||
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
$ | 191,099 | $ | 87,935 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 18,270 | $ | 46,145 | ||||
Interest paid |
242 | 713 | ||||||
Non cash transactions: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures in accounts payable |
$ | 148 | $ | 167 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | The July 31, 2008 amounts are derived from the annual audited financial statements. The interim financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and change in cash flows for the interim periods presented have been made. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2008. The results of operations for the three and six months ended January 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. |
2. | Major classifications of inventories are: |
January 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 73,578 | $ | 79,356 | ||||
Chassis |
37,410 | 37,562 | ||||||
Work in process |
43,350 | 51,162 | ||||||
Finished goods |
28,606 | 13,584 | ||||||
Total |
182,944 | 181,664 | ||||||
Less excess of FIFO costs
over LIFO costs |
29,165 | 29,082 | ||||||
Total inventories |
$ | 153,779 | $ | 152,582 | ||||
3. | Earnings Per Share |
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Weighted average shares
outstanding for basic
earnings per share |
55,435,315 | 55,758,534 | 55,421,946 | 55,757,936 | ||||||||||||
Stock options and
restricted stock |
| 151,895 | | 179,275 | ||||||||||||
Total For diluted shares |
55,435,315 | 55,910,429 | 55,421,946 | 55,937,211 | ||||||||||||
4. | Comprehensive Income |
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | (14,860 | ) | $ | 21,602 | $ | (9,740 | ) | $ | 59,811 | ||||||
Foreign currency
translation adjustment |
(102 | ) | (1,009 | ) | (1,651 | ) | 1,010 | |||||||||
Change in temporary impairment
of investments |
3,047 | | 2,682 | | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | (11,915 | ) | $ | 20,593 | $ | (8,709 | ) | $ | 60,821 | ||||||
As described in Note 6, the Auction Rate Securities (ARS) purchased from UBS were transferred to trading securities and the related other-than-temporary impairment was recorded against operations for the quarter. This resulted in a decrease of the amount previously recorded in other comprehensive income in respect of these securities. |
5. | Segment Information |
The Company has three reportable segments: (1) towable recreation vehicles, (2) motorized recreation vehicles, and (3) buses. The towable recreation vehicle segment consists of product lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Airstream, Breckenridge, CrossRoads, Dutchmen, General Coach, Keystone and Komfort. The motorized recreation vehicle |
5
Table of Contents
segment consists of product lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Airstream, Damon and Four Winds. The bus segment consists of the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Champion Bus, ElDorado California, ElDorado Kansas and Goshen Coach. |
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation vehicles: |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 114,663 | $ | 394,441 | $ | 400,200 | $ | 918,152 | ||||||||
Motorized |
19,910 | 110,825 | 64,775 | 251,325 | ||||||||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
134,573 | 505,266 | 464,975 | 1,169,477 | ||||||||||||
Buses |
92,110 | 93,904 | 200,525 | 193,429 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 226,683 | $ | 599,170 | $ | 665,500 | $ | 1,362,906 | ||||||||
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) Before Income Taxes: |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation vehicles: |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | (9,551 | ) | $ | 30,492 | $ | 2,823 | $ | 81,304 | |||||||
Motorized |
(10,289 | ) | 3,561 | (16,891 | ) | 10,414 | ||||||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
(19,840 | ) | 34,053 | (14,068 | ) | 91,718 | ||||||||||
Buses |
3,723 | 3,556 | 9,020 | 7,695 | ||||||||||||
Corporate |
(6,834 | ) | (2,403 | ) | (9,653 | ) | (3,727 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | (22,951 | ) | $ | 35,206 | $ | (14,701 | ) | $ | 95,686 | ||||||
January 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | |||||||
Identifiable Assets: |
||||||||
Recreation vehicles: |
||||||||
Towables |
$ | 340,907 | $ | 409,793 | ||||
Motorized |
94,643 | 108,740 | ||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
435,550 | 518,533 | ||||||
Buses |
93,377 | 110,647 | ||||||
Corporate |
377,916 | 367,382 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 906,843 | $ | 996,562 | ||||
6. | Investments and Fair Value Measurements |
Effective August 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. Therefore, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 with respect to its financial assets and liabilities only. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations or financial condition. On October 10, 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, (FSP 157-3) that clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. The FSP 157-3 is applicable to the valuation of |
6
Table of Contents
auction rate securities held by the Company for which there was no active market as of January 31, 2009. FSP 157-3 is effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which the financial statements have not been issued. The adoption of FSP 157-3 during the three month period ended January 31, 2009 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated results of operations or financial condition. | ||
Effective August 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for specified financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. The Company did not elect to adopt the fair value option under this Statement at the adoption date. On November 14, 2008, the Company adopted the fair value option related to the Put Rights as further discussed in this Note. |
INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | ||
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under SFAS 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under SFAS 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following: | ||
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||
Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. | ||
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. | ||
In accordance with SFAS 157, the following table represents the Companys fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash equivalents and investments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 31, 2009: |
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Market | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Prices in | Observable | Unobservable | Fair Value at | |||||||||||||
Active Markets | Inputs | Inputs | January 31, | |||||||||||||
(Level1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Cash & cash equivalents |
$ | 191,099 | $ | | $ | | $ | 191,099 | ||||||||
Auction rate securities
(including Put Rights) |
| | 118,961 | 118,961 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 191,099 | $ | | $ | 118,961 | $ | 310,060 | ||||||||
Our cash equivalents are comprised of money market funds traded in an active market with no restrictions and are classified as Level 1. | ||
In addition to the above investments, the Company holds non-qualified retirement plan assets of $4,962 at January 31, 2009 ($13,276 at July 31, 2008). These assets, which are held for the benefit of certain employees of the Company, represent Level 1 investments primarily in mutual funds which are valued using observable market prices in active markets. They are included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
7
Table of Contents
Level 3 assets consist of municipal bonds with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities or ARS) whose underlying assets are primarily student loans which are substantially backed by the federal government. Auction-rate securities are long-term floating rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates. After the initial issuance of the securities, the interest rate on the securities is reset periodically, at intervals established at the time of issuance based on market demand for a reset period. Auction-rate securities are bought and sold in the marketplace through a competitive bidding process often referred to as a Dutch auction. If there is insufficient interest in the securities at the time of an auction, the auction may not be completed and the rates may be reset to predetermined penalty or maximum rates based on mathematical formulas in accordance with each securitys prospectus. | ||
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 financial assets): |
Fair Value Measurements at | ||||
Reporting Date Using | ||||
Significant Unobservable Inputs | ||||
(Level 3) | ||||
Balances at August 1, 2008 |
$ | 126,403 | ||
Net change in other comprehensive income |
4,411 | |||
Net loss included in earnings |
(1,853 | ) | ||
Purchases |
| |||
Sales/Maturities |
(10,000 | ) | ||
Balances at January 31, 2009 |
$ | 118,961 | ||
Auction Rate Securities | ||
At January 31, 2009, we held $122,550 (par value) of long-term investments comprised of taxable and tax-exempt ARS, which are variable-rate debt securities and have a long-term maturity with the interest being reset through Dutch auctions that are typically held every 7, 28 or 35 days. The securities have historically traded at par and are callable at par at the option of the issuer. Interest is typically paid at the end of each auction period or semi-annually. At January 31, 2009, the majority of the ARS we held were AAA rated or equivalent, and none were below A rated or equivalent, with most collateralized by student loans substantially backed by the U.S. Federal government. | ||
Since February 12, 2008, most auctions have failed for these securities and there is no assurance that future auctions on the ARS in our investment portfolio will succeed and, as a result, our ability to liquidate our investment and fully recover the par value of our investment in the near term may be limited or not exist. An auction failure means that the parties wishing to sell securities could not. | ||
In November 2008, the Company elected to participate in a rights offering by UBS AG (UBS), a Swiss bank which is one of the Companys investment providers that provides the Company with the right (the Put Rights) to sell to UBS at par value ARS purchased from UBS (approximately $107,400 of our entire ARS portfolio of $122,550) at any time during a two-year sale period beginning June 30, 2010. | ||
The Put Rights are not transferable or marginable. By electing to participate in the rights offering the Company granted UBS the right, exercisable at any time prior to June 30, 2010 or during the two-year sale period, to purchase or cause the sale of the companys ARS (the Call Right). UBS has stated that it will only exercise the Call Right for the purpose of restructurings, dispositions or other solutions that will provide their clients with par value for their ARS. UBS will pay their clients the par value of their ARS within one day of settlement of any Call Right transaction. Notwithstanding the Call Right, the Company would be permitted to sell ARS to parties other than UBS, in which case the Put Rights attached to the ARS that are sold would be extinguished. |
8
Table of Contents
As consideration for this transaction, Thor has released UBS from all claims relating to the marketing or sale of ARS (except claims for consequential damages) and has agreed not to sue UBS for such claims. During 2008, UBS was sued by the Massachusetts Securities Division and by the New York Attorney General in separate civil lawsuits alleging improper sales practices relating to ARS. The rights offering reflects the terms of a settlement entered into by UBS and various regulators, including the SEC, the New York Attorney General, and the Massachusetts Securities Division, pursuant to which UBS agreed to pay a fine of $150 million. UBS has also been sued by investors in civil lawsuits and arbitrations seeking damages relating to sales of ARS. | ||
Through its acceptance of the UBS offer, the Company also became eligible to participate in a no net cost loan program pursuant to which it may borrow up to the par value of its ARS until June 30, 2010. The Company is still permitted to obtain ARS based financing from lenders other than UBS. | ||
At January 31, 2009, there was insufficient observable ARS market information available to determine the fair value of our ARS investments, including the Put Rights. Therefore, management, assisted by Houlihan, Smith & Company, Inc. an independent consultant, determined an estimated fair value. In determining the estimate, consideration was given to credit quality, final stated maturities, estimates on the probability of the issue being called prior to final maturity, impact due to extended periods of maximum auction rates and broker quotes. Based on this analysis, we recorded a temporary impairment of $1,736 ($1,128 net of tax in other comprehensive income which is in the equity section of the balance sheet) related to our long-term ARS investments of $15,150 (par value) that were not part of the UBS settlement as of January 31, 2009. These same assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of our UBS ARS portfolio described above, including the Put Rights. | ||
The enforceability of the Put Rights results in a put option and is recognized as a separate freestanding instrument that is accounted for separately from the ARS investment. The Company has elected to account for this put option at fair value under FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (SFAS 159) and elected to treat this portion of our ARS portfolio as trading securities. As such, we recorded a benefit to operations of $10,339 related to the Put Rights provided by the settlement and an other-than-temporary impairment charge to operations of $12,192 on the $107,400 (par value) portion of our ARS portfolio for a net loss of $1,853, as we may decide not to hold these ARS until final maturity with the opportunity provided by the Put Rights. | ||
We have no reason to believe that any of the underlying issuers of our ARS are presently at risk of default. Through January 31, 2009, we have continued to receive interest payments on the ARS in accordance with their terms. We believe we will be able to liquidate our investments without significant loss primarily due to the government guarantee of the underlying securities; however, it could take until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up to 31 years) to realize our investments par value. Due to these recent changes and uncertainty in the ARS market, we believe the recovery period for these investments may be longer than twelve months and as a result, we have classified these investments as long-term at January 31, 2009. Although there is uncertainty with regard to the short-term liquidity of these securities, the Company continues to believe that the carrying value represents the fair value of these marketable securities because of the overall quality of the underlying investments and the anticipated future market for such investments. In addition, the Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until the earlier of: the market for ARS stabilizes, the issuer refinances the underlying security, a buyer is found outside of the auction process at acceptable terms, the underlying securities have matured or the Company exercises its right to put the securities to UBS, one of the Companys investment providers. |
9
Table of Contents
7. | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires goodwill to be tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if an event occurs which indicates that goodwill may be impaired. | ||
The components of other intangible assets are as follows: |
January 31, 2009 | July 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Amortization | Cost | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Amortized Intangible Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
$ | 2,938 | $ | 2,137 | $ | 5,938 | $ | 4,845 |
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Non-compete Agreements: |
||||||||||||||||
Amortization Expense |
$ | 92 | $ | 200 | $ | 292 | $ | 413 |
Non-compete agreements are amortized on a straight-line basis. | ||
Estimated Amortization Expense: |
For the year ending July 2009 |
$ | 476 | ||
For the year ending July 2010 |
$ | 322 | ||
For the year ending July 2011 |
$ | 238 | ||
For the year ending July 2012 |
$ | 57 |
In accordance with SFAS 142, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not subject to amortization. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment by applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. | ||
The Company completed an impairment review as of December 31, 2008 which resulted in a non-cash trademark impairment charge of $564 in the second quarter for the trademark associated with an operating subsidiary in the motorized reportable segment. The impairment results from the difficult market environment and outlook for the motorhome business. | ||
As of January 31, 2009, Goodwill and Trademarks by segment are as follows: |
Goodwill | Trademarks | |||||||
Recreation Vehicles: |
||||||||
Towables |
$ | 143,795 | $ | 10,237 | ||||
Motorized |
9,717 | 2,036 | ||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
153,512 | 12,273 | ||||||
Bus |
4,616 | 1,063 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 158,128 | $ | 13,336 | ||||
8. | Warranty |
Thor provides customers of our products with a warranty covering defects in material or workmanship for primarily one year with longer warranties of up to five years on certain structural components. We record a liability based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Factors we use in estimating the warranty liability include a history of units sold, existing dealer inventory, average cost incurred and a profile of the distribution of warranty expenditures over the warranty period. |
10
Table of Contents
A significant increase in dealer shop rates, the cost of parts or the frequency of claims could have a material adverse impact on our operating results for the period or periods in which such claims or additional costs materialize. Management believes that the warranty reserve is adequate. However, actual claims incurred could differ from estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves. Warranty reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis. |
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 58,823 | $ | 66,011 | $ | 61,743 | $ | 64,310 | ||||||||
Provision |
2,418 | 13,525 | 14,031 | 32,075 | ||||||||||||
Payments |
(11,443 | ) | (17,846 | ) | (25,976 | ) | (34,695 | ) | ||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 49,798 | $ | 61,690 | $ | 49,798 | $ | 61,690 | ||||||||
The lower provision for the three months ended January 31, 2009 results primarily from the lower sales activity which the Company is experiencing in the current difficult market environment. | ||
9. | Commercial Commitments | |
Our principal commercial commitments at January 31, 2009 are summarized in the following chart: |
Total | Term of | |||||||
Commitment | Amount Committed | Commitment | ||||||
Guarantee on dealer financing |
$ | 4,166 | various | |||||
Standby repurchase obligation
on dealer financing |
$ | 566,139 | up to eighteen months |
The Company records repurchase and guarantee reserves based on prior experience and known current events. The combined repurchase and recourse reserve balances are approximately $6,427 and $5,040 as of January 31, 2009 and July 31, 2008, respectively. |
Three Months | Three Months | Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||
January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | January 31, 2009 | January 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||
Cost of units repurchased |
$ | 10,526 | $ | 1,650 | $ | 20,707 | $ | 2,754 | ||||||||
Realization on units resold |
8,174 | 1,596 | 16,566 | 2,435 | ||||||||||||
Losses due to repurchase |
$ | 2,352 | $ | 54 | $ | 4,141 | $ | 319 | ||||||||
The increase in losses due to repurchase resulted from the more difficult market for the recreation vehicle business. We increased our reserve for repurchases and guarantees at July 31, 2008 and at January 31, 2009. | ||
10. | Provision for Income Taxes | |
It is the Companys policy to recognize interest and penalties accrued relative to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. For the six months ended January 31, 2009, no material change relative to accrued unrecognized tax benefits was recorded and $1,210 in interest and penalties has been accrued. | ||
The Company anticipates a decrease of approximately $2,450 in unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months from (1) expected settlements or payments of uncertain tax positions, and (2) |
11
Table of Contents
lapses of the applicable statutes of limitations. Actual results may differ materially from this estimate. | ||
The Company has a current deferred tax asset of $33,891 recorded in Deferred income taxes and other on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. | ||
11. | Retained Earnings | |
The components of changes in retained earnings are as follows: |
Balance @ 7/31/08 |
$ | 675,928 | ||
Net loss |
(9,740 | ) | ||
Dividends Paid |
(7,761 | ) | ||
Balance @ 1/31/09 |
$ | 658,427 | ||
12. | Line of Credit | |
The Company had a $30,000 unsecured revolving line of credit which bore interest at prime less 2.15% and expired on November 30, 2008. The Company decided not to renew the unsecured revolving line of credit and allowed it to expire on November 30, 2008. The decision not to renew the line of credit was based on our strong cash position combined with our expectation that we will have the ability to borrow at favorable rates against our ARS if needed. As a result, we did not anticipate utilizing the line of credit and did not want to incur the cost of maintaining it. There was no outstanding balance at July 31, 2008. | ||
13. | Loan Transactions and Related Notes Receivable | |
On January 15, 2009, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the First Credit Agreement) with Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust (the Trust and together with each of the foregoing persons, the Borrowers), pursuant to which the Company loaned $10 million to the Borrowers (the First Loan). The Borrowers own approximately 90% of FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC (FreedomRoads), the parent company of one of the Companys dealers, and pursuant to the terms of the First Credit Agreement, the Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the First Loan solely to make an equity contribution to FreedomRoads to enable FreedomRoads to repay its principal obligations under floorplan financing arrangements with third parties in respect of products of the Company and its subsidiaries. | ||
The principal amount of the First Loan is payable in full on January 15, 2014 and bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. Interest is payable in kind for the first year and is payable in cash on a monthly basis thereafter. | ||
In connection with the First Loan, the Borrowers caused FreedomRoads and its subsidiaries (collectively, the FR Dealers), to enter into an agreement pursuant to which the FR Dealers agreed to purchase additional recreation vehicles from the Company and its subsidiaries. The term of this agreement continues until the repayment in full of the First Loan under the First Credit Agreement (including any refinancing or replacement thereof). | ||
On January 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Second Credit Agreement (the Second Credit Agreement and together with the First Credit Agreement, the Credit Agreements) with the Borrowers pursuant to which the Company loaned an additional $10 million to the Borrowers (the Second Loan and together with the First Loan, the Loans). Pursuant to the terms of the Second Credit Agreement, the Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the Second Loan solely to make an equity contribution to FreedomRoads to be used by FreedomRoads to purchase the Companys products. |
12
Table of Contents
The principal amount of the Second Loan is payable in full on January 29, 2010 and bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. Interest is payable in cash on the following dates: April 30, 2009, July 31, 2009, October 30, 2009 and January 29, 2010. | ||
The Credit Agreements contain customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, events of default and acceleration provisions for loans of this type. | ||
The obligations of the Borrowers under the Credit Agreements are guaranteed by FreedomRoads and are secured by a first priority security interest in all of the direct and indirect legal, equitable and beneficial interests of the Borrowers in FreedomRoads. | ||
In connection with the Second Loan, the FR Dealers and the Company amended their prior agreement pursuant to which the FR Dealers agreed to purchase additional recreation vehicles from the Company and its subsidiaries to provide that the term of this agreement now continues until the repayment in full of the Loans (including any refinancing or replacement thereof). | ||
14. | Thor Credit Corporation, Inc. | |
In March 1994, the Company and a financial services company formed a joint venture, Thor Credit Corporation (TCC), to finance the sale of recreation vehicles to consumer buyers. This joint venture was dissolved in September 2008 after the joint venture partner informed us that it will no longer be providing retail financing for recreation vehicles. We recovered our investment of $1,578 upon dissolution. | ||
In November 2008, the Company announced that it is re-launching Thor Credit on its own to provide retail financing for recreation vehicles of Thor dealers. The new business, which is led by employees of the former joint venture, will finance new Thor and used recreation vehicle products. |
13
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts presented in thousands of dollars except unit, share and
per share data.
Executive Overview
We were founded in 1980 and have grown to be the largest manufacturer of Recreation Vehicles
(RVs) and a major manufacturer of commercial buses in North America. Our market share in the
travel trailer and fifth wheel segment of the industry (towables), is approximately 32%. In the
motorized segment of the industry we have a market share of approximately 15%. Our market share in
small and mid-size buses is approximately 37%. We also manufacture and sell 40-foot buses at our
facility in Southern California as well as for our existing 30-foot and 35-foot buses.
Our growth has been internal and by acquisition. Our strategy has been to increase our
profitability in North America in the recreation vehicle industry and in the bus business through
product innovation, service to our customers, manufacturing quality products, improving our
facilities and acquisitions. We have not entered unrelated businesses and have no plans to do so in
the future.
We rely on internally generated cash flows from operations to finance our growth although we may
borrow to make an acquisition if we believe the incremental cash flows will provide for rapid
payback. We have invested significant capital to modernize, improve and expand our plant facilities
and expended $14,815 for that purpose in fiscal year 2008.
Our business model includes decentralized operating units and we compensate operating management
primarily with cash based upon the profitability of the unit which they manage. Our corporate staff
provides financial management, purchasing services, insurance, legal and human resources, risk
management, and internal audit functions. Senior corporate management interacts regularly with
operating management to assure that corporate objectives are understood clearly and are
monitored appropriately.
Our RV products are sold to dealers who, in turn, retail those products. Our buses are sold through
dealers to municipalities and private purchasers such as rental car companies and hotels. We
generally do not directly finance dealers but do provide repurchase agreements in order to
facilitate the dealers obtaining floor plan financing.
Trends and Business Outlook
Industry conditions in the RV market have been adversely affected by the lack of available
wholesale and retail financing and low consumer confidence. As a result, market conditions continue
to be soft and we anticipate this weakness to continue for the remainder of 2009.
The motorized market has been significantly impacted by current market conditions. The volatility
of fuel prices and the tightening of the retail credit markets are placing pressure on retail sales
and our dealers continue to be cautious in the amount of inventory they are willing to carry. Based
on the foregoing, for the six months ended January 31, 2009 net sales in our motorized segment
decreased 74.2% compared to the six months ended January 31, 2008. Our towables market has also
been significantly impacted. Dealers continue to sell older model-year units before replacing them
with new products. The decline in wholesale demand has directly impacted our gross margins as we
have had to increase our discounts to maintain competitive pricing. For the six months ended
January 31, 2009, net sales in our towables segment decreased 56.4% compared to the six months
ended January 31, 2008. These significant decreases in net sales, offset in part by increases in
net sales in our bus segment, were primarily responsible for the loss before income taxes for the
six months ended January 31, 2009 of $14,701 compared to income before income taxes of $95,686 for
the six months ended January 31, 2008.
14
Table of Contents
The Company is reacting to the difficult business environment by scaling back its activities and
reducing its workforce. If the current market environment persists, we may have to take additional
cost-cutting measures including idling additional plants if necessary.
We believe an important determinant of demand for recreation vehicles is demographics. The baby
boomer population is now reaching retirement age and retirees are a large market for our products.
The baby boomer retiree population in the United States is expected to grow faster than the total
United States population. We believe a primary indicator of the strength of the recreation vehicle
industry is retail RV sales, which we closely monitor to determine industry trends. Recently,
although the entire RV industry has been weak, the towable segment of the RV industry has been
stronger than the motorized segment. For the towable segment, retail unit sales as reported by
Statistical Surveys, Inc. were down approximately 23.4% for the twelve months ended December 31,
2008 compared with the same period last year. The motorized segment retail unit sales were down
approximately 41.6%. A difficult credit environment and declining consumer confidence, have slowed
retail recreation vehicle sales and appear to affect the motorized segment more severely.
Economic or industry-wide factors affecting our recreation vehicle business include raw material
costs of commodities used in the manufacture of our product. Material cost is the primary factor
determining our cost of products sold. Increases in raw material costs would impact our profit
margins negatively if we were unable to raise prices for our products by corresponding amounts.
When consumer confidence improves from its current historic low level and retail and wholesale
credit availability improve, we expect to see a rebound in sales and expect to benefit from our
ability to ramp up production in an industry with fewer competitors than before.
Government entities are primary users of our buses. Demand in this segment is subject to
fluctuations in government spending on transit. In addition, hotel and rental car companies are
also major users of our small and mid-size buses and therefore airline travel is an important
indicator for this market. The majority of our buses have a 5-year useful life and are being
continuously replaced by operators. Bus sales may benefit from the U.S. Governments emphasis on
mass transportation in the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act stimulus package.
15
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended January 31, 2009 vs.
Three Months Ended January 31, 2008
Three Months Ended January 31, 2008
Three Months | Three Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Change | ||||||||||||||
1/31/2009 | 1/31/2008 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 114,663 | $ | 394,441 | $ | (279,778 | ) | (70.9 | ) | |||||||
Motorized |
19,910 | 110,825 | (90,915 | ) | (82.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
134,573 | 505,266 | (370,693 | ) | (73.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Buses |
92,110 | 93,904 | (1,794 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 226,683 | $ | 599,170 | $ | (372,487 | ) | (62.2 | ) | |||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
5,107 | 17,825 | (12,718 | ) | (71.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Motorized |
226 | 1,340 | (1,114 | ) | (83.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
5,333 | 19,165 | (13,832 | ) | (72.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Buses |
1,449 | 1,427 | 22 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Total |
6,782 | 20,592 | (13,810 | ) | (67.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Three Months | % of | Three Months | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Segment | Ended | Segment | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2009 | Net Sales | 1/31/2008 | Net Sales | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 3,915 | 3.4 | $ | 52,079 | 13.2 | $ | (48,164 | ) | (92.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Motorized |
(3,635 | ) | (18.3 | ) | 9,855 | 8.9 | (13,490 | ) | (136.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
280 | 0.2 | 61,934 | 12.3 | (61,654 | ) | (99.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Buses |
7,877 | 8.6 | 7,783 | 8.3 | 94 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,157 | 3.6 | $ | 69,717 | 11.6 | $ | (61,560 | ) | (88.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 13,914 | 12.1 | $ | 24,108 | 6.1 | $ | (10,194 | ) | (42.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Motorized |
6,091 | 30.6 | 6,334 | 5.7 | (243 | ) | (3.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
20,005 | 14.9 | 30,442 | 6.0 | (10,437 | ) | (34.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Buses |
4,076 | 4.4 | 3,872 | 4.1 | 204 | 5.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
6,118 | | 5,505 | | 613 | 11.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 30,199 | 13.3 | $ | 39,819 | 6.6 | $ | (9,620 | ) | (24.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | (9,551 | ) | (8.3 | ) | $ | 30,492 | 7.7 | $ | (40,043 | ) | (131.3 | ) | |||||||||||
Motorized |
(10,289 | ) | (51.7 | ) | 3,561 | 3.2 | (13,850 | ) | (388.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
(19,840 | ) | (14.7 | ) | 34,053 | 6.7 | (53,893 | ) | (158.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Buses |
3,723 | 4.0 | 3,556 | 3.8 | 167 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(6,834 | ) | | (2,403 | ) | | (4,431 | ) | 184.4 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (22,951 | ) | (10.1 | ) | $ | 35,206 | 5.9 | $ | (58,157 | ) | (165.2 | ) | |||||||||||
16
Table of Contents
ORDER BACKLOG:
As of | As of | Change | ||||||||||||||
January 31, 2009 | January 31,2008 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 133,988 | $ | 215,479 | $ | (81,491 | ) | (37.8 | ) | |||||||
Motorized |
40,723 | 102,884 | (62,161 | ) | (60.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
174,711 | 318,363 | (143,652 | ) | (45.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Buses |
217,085 | 249,495 | (32,410 | ) | (13.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 391,796 | $ | 567,858 | $ | (176,062 | ) | (31.0 | ) | |||||||
CONSOLIDATED
Net sales and gross profit for the three months ended January 31, 2009 were down 62.2% and
88.3%, respectively, compared to the three months ended January 31, 2008. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended January 31, 2009 decreased 24.2% compared to the
three months ended January 31, 2008. The loss before income taxes for the three months ended
January 31, 2009 was $22,951as compared to the income before taxes for three months ended January
31, 2008 of $35,206. The specifics on changes in net sales, gross profit, selling, general and
administrative expenses and income before income taxes are addressed in the segment reporting
below.
Corporate costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses were $6,118 for the three
months ended January 31, 2009 compared to $5,505 for the three months ended January 31, 2008.
Corporate interest income and other income was $1,140 for the three months ended January 31, 2009
compared to $3,119 for the three months ended January 31, 2008.
The overall effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, 2009 was 35.3% compared
to 38.6% for the three months ended January 31, 2008. The primary reason for the change in
the effective tax rate is that the Company recorded an overall income tax benefit for the three
months ended January 31, 2009. The overall income tax benefit was reduced by certain adjustments,
the largest of which related to FIN 48 liabilities.
Segment Reporting
RECREATION VEHICLES
Analysis of Percentage Change in Net Sales Versus Prior Year
Average Price | ||||||||||||
Per Unit | Units | Net Change | ||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||
Towables |
.4 | % | (71.3 | )% | (70.9 | )% | ||||||
Motorized |
1.1 | % | (83.1 | )% | (82.0 | )% |
TOWABLE RECREATION VEHICLES
The decrease in towables net sales of 70.9% resulted from a 71.3% decrease in unit shipments offset
by a .4% increase in average price per unit resulting primarily from mix of product.
The overall industry decrease in wholesale unit shipments of towables for November and December of
2008 and January 2009 compared to the same period last year was 71.0% according to statistics
published by the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association.
Towables gross profit percentage was 3.4% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2009
compared to 13.2% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2008. The primary factor for
the
17
Table of Contents
$48,164 decrease in gross profit was decreased sales volume of $279,778 and increased
discounting. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 12.1% of net sales for the three
months ended January 31, 2009 and 6.1% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2008.
Towables income before income taxes decreased to (8.3)% of net sales for the three months ended
January 31, 2009 from 7.7% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2008. The primary
factor for this decrease was the loss of profit on reduced sales volume of $279,778 Selling general
and administrative expenses decreased $10,194 for the three months ended January 31, 2009 as
compared to the same period in the prior year. This was also due to the reduced sales volume.
MOTORIZED RECREATION VEHICLES
The decrease in motorized net sales of 82.0% resulted from an 83.1% decrease in unit shipments
offset by a 1.1% increase in average sales per unit resulting primarily from mix of product. The
overall market decrease in unit shipments of motorhomes was 80.4% for the three month period of
November and December 2008 and January 2009 compared to the same period last year according to
statistics published by the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association.
Motorized gross profit percentage decreased to (18.3)% of net sales for the three months ended
January 31, 2009, from 8.9% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2008. The primary
factor for the $13,490 decrease in gross profit and gross profit percentage was decreased sales
volume of $90,915 and increased discounting. Selling, general and administrative expenses were
30.6% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2009 and 5.7% of net sales for the three
months ended January 31, 2008. The increase in selling general and administrative expense
percentage is the result of a decrease in sales for the same period. The actual selling, general
and administrative expense decreased $243 for the three months ended January 31, 2009 as compared
to the same period in the prior year.
Motorized income before income taxes was (51.7)% of net sales for the three months
ended January 31, 2009 and 3.2% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2008.
The primary factor for this decrease was the loss of profit on reduced sales volume of $90,915.
BUSES
Analysis of Percentage Change in Net Sales Versus Prior Year
Average Price | ||||||||||||
Per Unit | Units | Net Change | ||||||||||
Buses |
(3.4) | % | 1.5 | % | (1.9 | )% |
The decrease in buses net sales of 1.9% resulted from 1.5% increase in unit shipments offset by a
3.4% decrease on average price resulting primarily from mix of product.
Buses gross profit percentage was 8.6% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2009 and
8.3% for the three months ended January 31, 2008. Selling, general and administrative expenses were
4.4% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2009 and 4.1% for the three months ended
January 31, 2008.
Buses income before income taxes was 4.0% of net sales for the three months ended January 31, 2009
compared to 3.8% for the three months ended January 31, 2008.
18
Table of Contents
Six
Months Ended January 31, 2009 vs.
Six Months Ended January 31, 2008
Six Months Ended January 31, 2008
Six Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | Change | ||||||||||||||
1/31/2009 | 1/31/2008 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 400,200 | $ | 918,152 | $ | (517,952 | ) | (56.4 | ) | |||||||
Motorized |
64,775 | 251,325 | (186,550 | ) | (74.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
464,975 | 1,169,477 | (704,502 | ) | (60.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Buses |
200,525 | 193,429 | 7,096 | 3.7 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 665,500 | $ | 1,362,906 | $ | (697,406 | ) | (51.2 | ) | |||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
17,646 | 41,640 | (23,994 | ) | (57.6 | ) | ||||||||||
Motorized |
748 | 3,111 | (2,363 | ) | (76.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
18,394 | 44,751 | (26,357 | ) | (58.9 | ) | ||||||||||
Buses |
3,097 | 2,970 | 127 | 4.3 | ||||||||||||
Total |
21,491 | 47,721 | (26,230 | ) | (55.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Six Months | % of | Six Months | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Segment | Ended | Segment | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
1/31/2009 | Net Sales | 1/31/2008 | Net Sales | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 34,737 | 8.7 | $ | 131,255 | 14.3 | $ | (96,518 | ) | (73.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Motorized |
(4,411 | ) | (6.8 | ) | 23,673 | 9.4 | (28,084 | ) | (118.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
30,326 | 6.5 | 154,928 | 13.2 | (124,602 | ) | (80.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Buses |
17,894 | 8.9 | 16,064 | 8.3 | 1,830 | 11.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 48,220 | 7.2 | $ | 170,992 | 12.5 | $ | (122,772 | ) | (71.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 32,414 | 8.1 | $ | 52,627 | 5.7 | $ | (20,213 | ) | (38.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Motorized |
11,912 | 18.4 | 13,296 | 5.3 | (1,384 | ) | (10.4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
44,326 | 9.5 | 65,923 | 5.6 | (21,597 | ) | (32.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Buses |
8,665 | 4.3 | 7,668 | 4.0 | 997 | 13.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
11,674 | | 11,638 | | 36 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 64,665 | 9.7 | $ | 85,229 | 6.3 | $ | (20,564 | ) | (24.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 2,823 | 0.7 | $ | 81,304 | 8.9 | $ | (78,481 | ) | (96.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Motorized |
(16,891 | ) | (26.1 | ) | 10,414 | 4.1 | (27,305 | ) | (262.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
(14,068 | ) | (3.0 | ) | 91,718 | 7.8 | (105,786 | ) | (115.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Buses |
9,020 | 4.5 | 7,695 | 4.0 | 1,325 | 17.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(9,653 | ) | | (3,727 | ) | | (5,926 | ) | 159.0 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (14,701 | ) | (2.2 | ) | $ | 95,686 | 7.0 | $ | (110,387 | ) | (115.4 | ) | |||||||||||
19
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED
Net sales and gross profit for the six months ended January 31, 2009 were down 51.2% and 71.8%,
respectively, compared to the six months ended January 31, 2008. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the six months ended January 31, 2009 decreased 24.1% compared to the
six months ended January 31, 2008. The specifics on changes in net sales, gross profit, selling,
general and administrative expense and income before income taxes are addressed in the segment
reporting below.
Corporate costs in selling, general and administrative were $11,674 for the six months ended
January 31, 2009 compared to $11,638 in the six months ended January 31, 2008. Corporate interest
income and other income was $3,877 for the six months ended January 31, 2009 compared to $7,900 for
the six months ended January 31, 2008.The overall effective tax rate for the six months ended
January 31, 2009 was 33.7% compared to 37.3% for the six months ended January 31, 2008. The overall
income tax benefit was reduced by certain adjustments, the largest of which related to FIN 48
liabilities.
SEGMENT REPORTING
Recreation Vehicles
Analysis of Percentage Change in Net Sales Versus Prior Year
Average Price | ||||||||||||
Per Unit | Units | Net Change | ||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||
Towables |
1.2 | % | (57.6 | %) | (56.4 | %) | ||||||
Motorized |
1.8 | % | (76.0 | %) | (74.2 | %) |
Towable Recreation Vehicles
The decrease in towables net sales of 56.4% resulted primarily from a 1.2% increase in average
price per unit and mix of product and a 57.6% decrease in unit shipments. The overall industry
decrease in towables for August 2008 through January 2009 was 55.8% according to statistics
published by the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association.
Towables gross profit percentage decreased to 8.7% of net sales for the six months ended January
31, 2009 from 14.3% of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2008. The primary factor for
the $96,518 decrease in gross profit was decreased sales volume of $517,952. Selling, general and
administrative expenses were 8.1% of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2009 and 5.7%
of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2008.
Towables income before income taxes decreased to 0.7% of net sales for the six months ended January
31, 2009 from 8.9% of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2008. The primary factor for
this decrease of $78,481 was the decreased sales volume of $517,952.
Motorized Recreation Vehicles
The decrease in motorized net sales of 74.2% resulted from a 76.0% decrease in unit shipments
offset by a 1.8% increase in average price and product mix. The overall market decrease in
motorhome unit shipments was 71.3% for August 2008 through January 2009 according to statistics
published by the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association. The increase in the average price per
unit resulted from the product mix.
20
Table of Contents
Motorized gross profit percentage decreased to (6.8%) of net sales for the six months ended January
31, 2009 from 9.4% of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2008. The primary reasons for
the decrease in gross profit percentage were the decreased sales volume of $186,550 and
discounting. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 18.4% of net sales for the six
months ended January 31, 2009 and 5.3% of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2008; this
is also due to the decreased sales volume.
Motorized income before income taxes was a negative 26.1% of net sales for the six months ended
January 31, 2009 and a positive 4.1% of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2008.
Buses
Analysis of Percentage Change in Net Sales Versus Prior Year
Average Price Per Unit | Units | Net Change | ||||||||||
Buses |
(.6 | %) | 4.3 | % | 3.7 | % |
The increase in buses net sales of 3.7% resulted from a 4.3% increase in unit shipments offset by a
.6% decrease in average price and product mix.
Buses gross profit percentage increased to 8.9% of net sales for the six months ended January 31,
2009 from 8.3% of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2008. The primary reason for the
increase in gross profit percentage was reduced material cost as a percent of sales and to an
increased average price per unit and the mix of units. Selling, general and administrative expenses
were 4.3% of net sales for the six months ended January 31, 2009 and 4.0% of net sales for the six
months ended January 31, 2008.
Buses income before income taxes increased to 4.5% of net sales for the six months ended January
31, 2009 from 4.0% for the six months ended January 31, 2008.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
As of January 31, 2009, we had $191,099 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $189,620 on
July 31, 2008.
Reference is made to Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere
in this Report for a description of developments related to our investments in ARS.
Working capital at January 31, 2009 was $273,790 compared to $279,504 at July 31, 2008. We have no
long-term debt. Capital expenditures of approximately $3,167 for the six months ended January 31,
2009 were made primarily to upgrade IT systems and replace machinery and equipment used in the
ordinary course of business.
The Company anticipates additional capital expenditures in fiscal 2009 of approximately $4,430.
These expenditures will be made primarily for replacement and upgrading of machinery and equipment
and other assets to be used in the ordinary course of business.
21
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Principles
The consolidated financial statements of Thor are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the
use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the periods presented. We believe that of our accounting policies, the following
may involve a higher degree of judgments, estimates, and complexity.
Impairment of Goodwill, Trademarks and Long-Lived Assets
At least annually we review the carrying value of goodwill and trademarks with indefinite useful
lives. Long-lived assets, identifiable intangibles that are amortized, goodwill and trademarks with
indefinite useful lives are also reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from future cash
flows. This review is performed using estimates of future cash flows. If the carrying value of a
long-lived asset is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which
the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Management believes that the
estimates of future cash flows and fair values are reasonable; however, changes in estimates of
such cash flows and fair values could affect the evaluations.
Insurance Reserves
Generally, we are self-insured for workers compensation and group medical insurance. Under these
plans, liabilities are recognized for claims incurred, including those incurred but not reported,
and changes in the reserves. The liability for workers compensation claims is determined by the
Company with the assistance of a third party administrator and actuary using various state statutes
and reserve requirements and historical claims experience. Group medical reserves are estimated
using historical claims experience. We have a self-insured retention for products liability and
personal injury matters of $5,000 per occurrence. We have established a reserve on our balance
sheet for such occurrences based on historical data and actuarial information. We maintain excess
liability insurance aggregating $25,000 with outside insurance carriers to minimize our risks
related to catastrophic claims in excess of all our self-insured positions. Any material change in
the aforementioned factors could have an adverse impact on our operating results.
Warranty
We provide customers of our products with a warranty covering defects in material or workmanship
for primarily one year with longer warranties of up to five years on certain structural components.
We record a liability based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and
existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Factors we use in estimating the
warranty liability include a history of units sold, existing dealer inventory, average cost
incurred and a profile of the distribution of warranty expenditures over the warranty period. A
significant increase in dealer shop rates, the cost of parts or the frequency of claims could have
a material adverse impact on our operating results for the period or periods in which such claims
or additional costs materialize. Management believes that the warranty reserve is adequate;
however, actual claims incurred could differ from estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves.
Warranty reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable
or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax
consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax
returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the Companys
22
Table of Contents
financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these tax consequences
could materially impact the Companys financial position or its results of operations.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recorded when all of the following
conditions have been met:
1) | An order for a product has been received from a dealer; | ||
2) | Written or oral approval for payment has been received from the dealers flooring institution; | ||
3) | A common carrier signs the delivery ticket accepting responsibility for the product as agent for the dealer; and | ||
4) | The product is removed from the Companys property for delivery to the dealer who placed the order. |
Certain shipments are sold to customers under cash on delivery (COD) terms. The Company
recognizes revenue on COD sales upon payment and delivery. Most sales are made by dealers financing
their purchases under flooring arrangements with banks or finance companies. Products are not sold
on consignment, dealers do not have the right to return products, and dealers are typically
responsible for interest costs to floorplan lenders. On average, the Company receives payments from
floorplan lenders on products sold to dealers within 15 days of the invoice date.
Repurchase Commitments
It is customary practice for companies in the recreation vehicle industry to enter into repurchase
agreements with financing institutions to provide financing to their dealers. Generally, these
agreements provide for the repurchase of products from the financing institution in the event of a
dealers default. The risk of loss under these agreements is spread over numerous dealers and
further reduced by the resale value of the units which the Company would be required to repurchase.
Although losses under these agreements have increased in the past six months, they have not been
significant in the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements, and management
believes that any future losses under these agreements will not have a significant effect on the
Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. The Company records repurchase
reserves based on prior experience and known current events.
Investments
We have an investment portfolio comprised of taxable and tax-exempt auction rate securities. The
value of these securities is subject to market volatility for the period we hold these investments
and until their sale or maturity. We recognize realized losses when declines in the fair value of
our investments, below their cost basis, are judged to be other-than-temporary. In determining
whether a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, we consider various factors including
market price (when available), investment ratings, the length of time and the extent to which the
fair value has been less than our cost basis, auction success and failure rates, and our intent and
ability to hold the investment until maturity or for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in market value. We make significant judgments in considering these factors.
If it is judged that a decline in fair value is other-than-temporary, the investment is valued at
the current fair value and a realized loss equal to the decline is reflected in net income which
could materially adversely affect our operating results.
23
Table of Contents
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS 141R) which is effective
as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. This
standard will significantly change the accounting for business acquisitions both during the period
of the acquisition and in subsequent periods. Among the more significant changes in the accounting
for acquisitions are the following:
| Transaction costs, many of which are currently treated as costs of the acquisition, will generally be expensed. | ||
| In-process research and development will be accounted for as an asset, with the cost recognized as the research and development is realized or abandoned. These costs are currently expensed at the time of the acquisition. | ||
| Contingencies, including contingent consideration, will generally be recorded at fair value with subsequent adjustments recognized in operations. Contingent consideration is currently accounted for as an adjustment of the purchase price. | ||
| Decreases in valuation allowances on acquired deferred tax assets will be recognized in operations. Previously such changes were considered to be subsequent changes in consideration and were recorded as decreases in goodwill. |
The effects of implementing SFAS 141R on the Companys financial position, results of operations,
and cash flows will depend on future acquisitions.
Forward Looking Statements
This report includes certain statements that are forward looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 as amended. These forward looking statements involve uncertainties and risks. There can
be no assurance that actual results will not differ from the Companys expectations. Factors which
could cause materially different results include, among others, additional issues that may arise in
connection with the findings of the completed investigation of the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors and the SECs requests for additional information, fuel prices, fuel availability, lower
consumer confidence, interest rate increases, tight lending practices, increased material costs,
the success of new product introductions, the pace of acquisitions, cost structure improvements,
the impact of the auction market failures on our liquidity, competition and general economic
conditions and the other risks and uncertainties discussed more fully in Item 1A of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2008 and Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q. The Company disclaims any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or
revisions to any change in expectation of the Company after the date hereof or any change in
events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based except as required by law.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency related to its operations in
Canada. However, because of the size of the Canadian operations, a hypothetical 10% change in the
Canadian dollar as compared to the U.S. dollar would not have a significant impact on the Companys
financial position or results of operations. The Company is also exposed to market risks related to
interest rates because of its investments in debt securities. A hypothetical 10% change in interest
rates would not have a significant impact on the Companys financial position or results of
operations.
Reference is made to Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere
in this Report for a description of developments related to our investments in ARS.
In January 2009 we entered into two credit agreements with Stephen Adams, in his individual
capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust
(the Trust
24
Table of Contents
and together with each of the foregoing persons, the Borrowers), pursuant to which we made two
$10 million loans to the Borrowers. The first loan is payable in full on January 15, 2014 and the
second loan is payable in full on January 29, 2010. The Borrowers own approximately 90% of
FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC (FreedomRoads) the parent company of one of our dealers. The
loans are guaranteed by FreedomRoads and are secured by a first priority security interest in all
of the direct and indirect legal, equitable and beneficial interests of the Borrowers in
FreedomRoads. While we believe that the notes receivable from the Borrowers are collectible, a
deterioration in the liquidity or credit worthiness of the Borrowers or FreedomRoads could impact
the collectibility of the notes receivable.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under
Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and
evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Companys management recognized that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and the Companys management necessarily was
required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. The Company has carried out an evaluation, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including its
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in
the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms.
During the three months ended on January 31, 2009, there were no material changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
25
Table of Contents
PART II Other Information
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The SEC is reviewing the facts and circumstances giving rise to the restatement of our previously
issued financial statements as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the years in the
three-year period ended July 31, 2006, and the financial results in each of the quarterly periods
in 2006 and 2005, and our financial statements as of and for the three months ended October 31,
2006 and related matters. We are cooperating fully with the SEC. The investigation by the SEC staff
could result in the SEC seeking various penalties and relief, including, without limitation, civil
injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties or administrative relief. The nature of the
relief or remedies the SEC may seek, if any, cannot be predicted at this time. Thor has been named
in several complaints, some of which were originally styled as putative class actions, filed
against manufacturers of travel trailers and manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) for use as emergency living accommodations in the wake of Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita. The complaints along with other complaints filed by numerous individual
plaintiffs, have been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the federal panel on
multidistrict litigation for consideration in a matter captioned In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde
Products Liability Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaints generally allege injury due to the presence of
formaldehyde in the units for which the plaintiffs are seeking monetary and other damages. Thor
strongly disputes the allegations in these complaints, and intends to vigorously defend itself in
all such matters.
In addition, we are involved in certain litigation arising out of our operations in the normal
course of our business most of which are based upon state lemon laws, warranty claims, other
claims and accidents (for which we carry insurance above a specified deductible amount). We do not
believe that any one of these claims is material.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 except as provided below:
Our repurchase agreements with floor plan lenders could result in increased costs.
In accordance with customary practice in the recreation vehicle industry, upon the request of a
lending institution financing a dealers purchase of our products we will execute a repurchase
agreement with the lending institution. Repurchase agreements provide that, for up to 18 months
after a recreation vehicle is financed and in the event of default by the dealer, we will
repurchase the recreation vehicle repossessed by the lending institution for the amount then due,
which is usually less than 100% of the dealers cost. The difference between the gross repurchase
price and the price at which the repurchased product can then be resold, which is typically at a
discount to the original sale price, is an expense to us. Thus, if we were obligated to repurchase
a substantially greater number of recreation vehicles in the future, this would increase our costs.
In difficult economic times this amount could become material.
Certain of our notes receivable may have collectibility risk.
In January 2009 we entered into two credit agreements with Stephen Adams, in his individual
capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust
(the Trust and together with each of the foregoing persons, the Borrowers), pursuant to which
we made two $10 million loans to the Borrowers. The first loan is payable in full on January 15,
2014 and the second loan is payable in full on January 29, 2010. The Borrowers own approximately
90% of FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC (FreedomRoads) the parent company of one of our dealers.
The loans are guaranteed by FreedomRoads and are secured by a first priority security interest in
all of the direct and
26
Table of Contents
indirect legal, equitable and beneficial interests of the Borrowers in FreedomRoads. While we
believe that the notes receivable from the Borrowers are collectible, a deterioration in the
liquidity or credit worthiness of the Borrowers or FreedomRoads could impact the collectibility of
the notes receivable.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on December 9, 2008. For more information on
the above matters submitted to a vote of security holders, see the Companys proxy statement dated
October 30, 2008.
(1) At the meeting, the stockholders elected two Class A directors of the Company to serve until
the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders in 2011. The names of the directors elected and the
number of votes cast for or withheld, as well as the number of broker non-votes, with respect to
each director are as follows:
Director | For | Withheld | Broker Non-Votes | |||||||||
Wade F. B. Thompson |
51,836,733 | 485,489 | | |||||||||
Jan H. Suwinski |
48,872,751 | 3,449,471 | |
The terms of directors H. Coleman Davis, III, Peter B. Orthwein, William C. Tomson, Neil D.
Chrisman, Alan Siegel and Geoffrey A. Thompson continued after the meeting. Mr. Davis subsequently
retired as a director of the Company as of December 31, 2008.
(2) At the meeting, the stockholders voted to adopt the Thor Industries, Inc. 2008 Annual Incentive
Plan. The number of votes cast for or against, as well as the number of abstentions and broker
non-votes with respect to the 2008 Annual Incentive Plan are as follows:
For | Against | Abstain | Broker Non-Votes | |||||||||||
47,846,041 | 413,462 | 694,382 | 3,368,337 |
27
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit | Description | |
10.1
|
Thor Industries, Inc. 2008 Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys 8-K dated December 15, 2008). | |
10.2
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys 8-K dated December 15, 2008). | |
10.3
|
Thor Industries, Inc. Select Executive Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys 8-K dated December 15, 2008). | |
10.4
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated January 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys 8-K dated January 22, 2009). | |
10.5
|
Credit Agreement between the Company and Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust, dated January 30, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys 8-K dated February 3, 2009). | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
DATE: March 9, 2009 | /s/ Wade F. B. Thompson | |||
Wade F. B. Thompson | ||||
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
DATE: March 9, 2009 | /s/ Christian G. Farman | |||
Christian G. Farman | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
28