THOR INDUSTRIES INC - Quarter Report: 2010 October (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2010. |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
for the transition period from to . |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9235
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 93-0768752 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
419 West Pike Street, Jackson Center, OH | 45334-0629 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(937) 596-6849
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at 10/31/2010 | |
Common stock, par value $ .10 per share |
55,811,510 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
PART I Financial Information
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts presented in thousands except units, share and per share data.
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED) | ||||||||
October 31, 2010 | July 31, 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 141,747 | $ | 247,751 | ||||
Accounts receivable: |
||||||||
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $689 at 10/31/10 and $422 at 7/31/10 |
133,957 | 159,535 | ||||||
Other |
6,366 | 5,864 | ||||||
Inventories |
181,100 | 142,680 | ||||||
Note receivable |
2,463 | 2,364 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other |
45,025 | 43,576 | ||||||
Total current assets |
510,658 | 601,770 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment: |
||||||||
Land |
22,029 | 20,757 | ||||||
Buildings and improvements |
149,472 | 133,890 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
79,826 | 72,562 | ||||||
Total cost |
251,327 | 227,209 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
90,054 | 88,029 | ||||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
161,273 | 139,180 | ||||||
Investments joint ventures |
2,906 | 2,474 | ||||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Long term investments |
3,390 | 5,327 | ||||||
Goodwill |
245,766 | 150,901 | ||||||
Amortizable intangible assets |
121,973 | 5,728 | ||||||
Indefinite-lived trademarks |
12,900 | 14,936 | ||||||
Long term notes receivable |
29,308 | 28,966 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes and other |
7,944 | 14,791 | ||||||
Total other assets |
421,281 | 220,649 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 1,096,118 | $ | 964,073 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 107,234 | $ | 108,616 | ||||
Accrued liabilities: |
||||||||
Compensation and related items |
26,449 | 30,346 | ||||||
Product warranties |
62,474 | 51,467 | ||||||
Taxes |
8,306 | 28,416 | ||||||
Promotions and rebates |
10,765 | 9,419 | ||||||
Product/property liability and related liabilities |
13,860 | 15,254 | ||||||
Other |
16,761 | 13,246 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
245,849 | 256,764 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
14,791 | 14,345 | ||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits |
38,130 | 35,686 | ||||||
Deferred income tax liability |
29,662 | | ||||||
Total long term liabilities |
82,583 | 50,031 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stockauthorized 1,000,000 shares; none outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock par value of $.10 per share; authorized 250,000,000 shares; issued
61,668,849 shares @ 10/31/10 and 57,318,849 shares @ 7/31/10; |
6,167 | 5,732 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
187,501 | 95,770 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
763,314 | 745,204 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(192 | ) | (324 | ) | ||||
Less Treasury shares of 5,857,339 @ 10/31/10 & 7/31/10, at cost |
(189,104 | ) | (189,104 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
767,686 | 657,278 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 1,096,118 | $ | 964,073 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED)
STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 606,684 | $ | 502,552 | ||||
Cost of products sold |
530,106 | 432,781 | ||||||
Gross profit |
76,578 | 69,771 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
44,891 | 34,767 | ||||||
Impairment of trademarks |
2,036 | | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
2,075 | 91 | ||||||
Gain on involuntary conversion |
4,802 | | ||||||
Interest income |
1,023 | 1,670 | ||||||
Interest expense |
70 | 99 | ||||||
Other income |
455 | 769 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
33,786 | 37,253 | ||||||
Income taxes |
10,098 | 13,824 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 23,688 | $ | 23,429 | ||||
Average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
53,621,890 | 55,436,924 | ||||||
Diluted |
53,708,104 | 55,516,772 | ||||||
Earnings per common share: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | .44 | $ | .42 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | .44 | $ | .42 | ||||
Regular dividends declared and paid per common share: |
$ | .10 | $ | .07 | ||||
Special dividends declared and paid per common share: |
$ | | $ | .50 |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED)
STATEMENTS OF CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2010 AND 2009 (UNAUDITED)
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 23,688 | $ | 23,429 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
3,340 | 3,179 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
2,075 | 91 | ||||||
Trademark impairment |
2,036 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,000 | (195 | ) | |||||
Gain on disposition of property, plant & equipment |
(26 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Stock based compensation expenses |
845 | 209 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards |
(446 | ) | | |||||
Gain on involuntary conversion of assets |
(2,117 | ) | | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities (excluding acquisition): |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
43,818 | (19,090 | ) | |||||
Inventories |
(14,050 | ) | (28,751 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
(476 | ) | 3,527 | |||||
Accounts payable |
(27,512 | ) | 18,336 | |||||
Accrued liabilities |
(25,523 | ) | 17,243 | |||||
Other liabilities |
1,042 | 481 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
9,694 | 18,453 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant & equipment |
(16,642 | ) | (911 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from dispositions of property, plant & equipment |
648 | 659 | ||||||
Proceeds from disposition of investments |
2,150 | 15,000 | ||||||
Insurance proceeds from involuntary conversion of assets |
2,496 | | ||||||
Acquisition of operating subsidiary |
(99,562 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(110,910 | ) | 14,748 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Cash dividends |
(5,578 | ) | (31,602 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based awards |
446 | | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
344 | | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(4,788 | ) | (31,602 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
| (81 | ) | |||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents |
(106,004 | ) | 1,518 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
247,751 | 221,684 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 141,747 | $ | 223,202 | ||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 28,315 | $ | 4,203 | ||||
Interest paid |
$ | 70 | $ | 99 | ||||
Non-cash transactions: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures in accounts payable |
$ | 321 | $ | 24 | ||||
Common stock issued in business acquisition |
$ | 90,531 | $ | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | Nature of Operations - Thor Industries, Inc. was founded in 1980 and, together with its subsidiaries (the Company), manufactures a wide range of recreation vehicles and small and mid-size buses at various manufacturing facilities across the United States. These products are sold to independent dealers and municipalities primarily throughout the United States and Canada. |
The Companys core business activities are comprised of three distinct operations, which include the design, manufacture and sale of motorized recreation vehicles, towable recreation vehicles and buses. Accordingly, the Company has presented segmented financial information for these three segments in Note 6 to the Companys Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
The July 31, 2010 amounts are derived from the annual audited financial statements. The interim financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and change in cash flows for the interim periods presented have been made. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010. The results of operations for the three months ended October 31, 2010, including Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC (Heartland) since its acquisition on September 16, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. |
Accounting Pronouncements In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (FASB), issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). SFAS No. 167 amends ASC 810-10 (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)) by adding previously considered qualifying special purpose entities (the concept of these entities was eliminated by SFAS No. 166). In addition, companies must perform an analysis to determine whether the Companys variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. Companies must also reassess on an ongoing basis whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amendments to ASC 810-10 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted the amendments effective August 1, 2010. The adoption of the amendments did not have any impact on the financial statements. |
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2010-20 Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses. The new disclosure guidance expands the existing requirements. The enhanced disclosures provide information on the nature of credit risk in a companys financing of receivables, how that risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses, and changes to the allowance during the reporting period. The new disclosures will become effective for the Companys interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on its financial disclosures, and it will adopt its provisions when they become effective. |
2. | Acquisitions |
On September 16, 2010, the Company purchased all of the outstanding capital stock of Towable Holdings, Inc., which owns all of the outstanding equity interests of Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC, (Heartland). Heartland is engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing recreation vehicles, consisting of travel trailers and fifth wheel vehicles. Heartland will operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and will be managed as its own operating unit that is aggregated into the Companys towable recreation vehicle reportable segment. The assets acquired as a result of the acquisition include equipment and other tangible and intangible property. The assets of Heartland will be used in connection with the operation of Heartlands business of manufacturing and marketing towable recreation vehicles. |
Pursuant to the purchase agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition, the Company paid $99,562 in cash and issued 4,300,000 shares of the Companys unregistered common stock (Thor Shares) valued at an aggregate of $90,531. The value of the shares was based on an independent appraisal. The cash portion of the consideration was funded entirely from the Companys cash on hand. The cash portion of the consideration is |
5
Table of Contents
subject to adjustment following the completion of a post-closing audit of the financial statements of Heartland and its parent as described in the purchase agreement. Thus far, adjustments to increase consideration of $170 have been identified and accrued as of October 31, 2010, and the remaining adjustments are not expected to be significant. In addition, the Company expensed $1,796 of transaction costs as part of corporate selling, general and administrative expense in connection with the acquisition during the three months ended October 31, 2010. |
Members of management of Heartland who received Thor shares also entered into a stock restriction agreement with the Company, which, among other things, places restrictions on the disposition of the Companys common stock issued to such persons for a period of four years after the closing of the transaction, which restrictions lapse in pro rata amounts beginning on the first anniversary of the closing of the transaction and every six months thereafter, with an exception for certain permitted acceleration events. In addition, the Company granted to the former indirect security holders of Heartland who received Thor shares registration rights to register the resale of the Thor shares. |
The following table summarizes the preliminary approximate fair value of the net assets acquired, which are based on internal and independent external evaluations, at the date of the closing. We are in the process of finalizing the fair value of the intangible assets. Further adjustment of the allocation is not expected to be material. |
Current assets |
$ | 48,913 | ||
Property, plant and equipment |
9,993 | |||
Dealer network |
67,000 | |||
Goodwill |
94,865 | |||
Trademarks |
25,200 | |||
Technology assets |
21,300 | |||
Non-compete agreement |
4,130 | |||
Backlog |
690 | |||
Current liabilities |
(42,767 | ) | ||
Other liabilities |
(39,061 | ) | ||
Total fair value of net assets acquired |
$ | 190,263 | ||
The Company did not assume any of Heartlands outstanding debt, other than the existing capital lease obligations included in the table above. Amortized intangible assets have a weighted average useful life of 14.9 years. The dealer network was valued based on the Discounted Cash Flow Method and will be amortized on an accelerated cash flows basis over 12 years. The technology assets were valued based on the Relief from Royalty Method and will be amortized on a straight line basis over 10 to 15 years. The non-compete agreements were valued based on a form of the Discounted Cash Flow Method, the Lost Income Method, and will be amortized on a straight line basis over 5 years. The trademarks were valued based on the Relief from Royalty Method and will be amortized on a straight line basis over 25 years. The backlog was valued based on the Discounted Cash Flow Method and will be amortized over 3 weeks. Goodwill is not subject to amortization. Prior to the acquisition, Heartland had historical net tax basis in goodwill of approximately $11,600 that is deductible for tax purposes and will continue to be deductible. |
The primary reasons for the acquisition include Heartlands future earning potential, its fit with our existing operations, its market share and its cash flow. The results of operations of Heartland are included in the Companys Statement of Condensed Consolidated Operations from the date of the acquisition. Through October 31, 2010, Heartland recorded net sales of $50,119 and net income before tax of $315. Net income before tax includes onetime costs of $669 related to the step-up in finished goods inventory and $690 for amortization of backlog. The following unaudited pro forma information represents the Companys results of operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each of the respective periods. These performance results may not be indicative of the actual results that would have occurred under the ownership and management of the Company. |
6
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended October 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 668,576 | $ | 582,045 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 26,816 | $ | 25,812 | ||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | .48 | $ | .43 | ||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | .48 | $ | .43 |
On March 1, 2010, the Company acquired 100% of SJC Industries Corp. (SJC), a privately-held manufacturer of ambulances based in Elkhart, Indiana, for $19,756 in cash and $325 of future cash obligations to the seller for a total purchase price of $20,081. The Company believes that SJC is currently the second largest manufacturer of ambulances in the United States. Its brands include McCoy Miller, Marque and Premiere, each of which is sold through a nationwide network of dealers. The Company believes that the ambulance business is a natural fit with Thors bus business and has included the operations of SJC in its Buses reportable segment. Under the Companys ownership, SJC will continue as an independent operation, in the same manner as the Companys recreation vehicle and bus companies. The operations of SJC are included in the Companys operating results from the date of its acquisition. |
Based on internal and independent external valuations, the Company allocated the preliminary purchase price to the net identifiable assets of SJC as follows: |
Net working capital |
$ | 7,412 | ||
Property, plant and equipment |
2,459 | |||
Dealer network |
5,230 | |||
Goodwill |
2,490 | |||
Trademarks |
2,100 | |||
Technology |
270 | |||
Non-compete |
120 | |||
$ | 20,081 | |||
Amortized intangible assets have a weighted average useful life of 13.4 years. The dealer network will be amortized on a straight line basis over 14 years, and the technology assets and non-compete agreements will both be amortized on a straight line basis over 5 years. Goodwill and trademarks are not subject to amortization. The entire goodwill balance is tax deductible. Pro forma financial information has not been presented due to its insignificance. |
3. | Major classifications of inventories are: |
October 31, 2010 | July 31, 2010 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 88,500 | $ | 78,481 | ||||
Chassis |
43,381 | 33,335 | ||||||
Work in process |
50,155 | 46,681 | ||||||
Finished goods |
24,562 | 9,681 | ||||||
Total |
206,598 | 168,178 | ||||||
Excess of FIFO costs over LIFO costs |
(25,498 | ) | (25,498 | ) | ||||
Total inventories |
$ | 181,100 | $ | 142,680 | ||||
Of the $206,598 of inventory at October 31, 2010, all but $32,046 at certain subsidiaries are valued on a last-in, first-out basis. This $32,046 of inventory is valued on a first-in, first-out method. |
7
Table of Contents
4. | Earnings Per Share |
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | |||||||
Weighted average shares
outstanding for basic earnings
per share |
53,621,890 | 55,436,924 | ||||||
Stock options and restricted stock |
86,214 | 79,848 | ||||||
Total For diluted shares |
53,708,104 | 55,516,772 | ||||||
The Company excludes stock options that have an antidilutive effect from its calculation of weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution. At October 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had stock options outstanding of 909,000 and 239,000, respectively, which were excluded from this calculation. |
5. | Comprehensive Income |
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | |||||||
Net Income |
$ | 23,688 | $ | 23,429 | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax |
| (81 | ) | |||||
Change in temporary impairment of investments, net of tax |
132 | (28 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 23,820 | $ | 23,320 | ||||
6. | Segment Information |
The Company has three reportable segments: (1) towable recreation vehicles, (2) motorized recreation vehicles, and (3) buses. The towable recreation vehicle segment consists of product lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Airstream, Breckenridge, CrossRoads, Dutchmen, General Coach Canada, Keystone, Heartland (since its acquisition on September 16, 2010) and Komfort. The motorized recreation vehicle segment consists of product lines from the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Airstream and Thor Motor Coach (formerly Damon and Four Winds). The bus segment consists of the following operating companies that have been aggregated: Champion Bus, General Coach, ElDorado California, ElDorado Kansas, Goshen Coach and SJC (since its acquisition on March 1, 2010). |
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | |||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||
Recreation vehicles: |
||||||||
Towables |
$ | 422,449 | $ | 342,136 | ||||
Motorized |
84,114 | 47,793 | ||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
506,563 | 389,929 | ||||||
Buses |
100,121 | 112,623 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 606,684 | $ | 502,552 | ||||
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | |||||||
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes: |
||||||||
Recreation vehicles: |
||||||||
Towables |
$ | 33,100 | $ | 31,540 | ||||
Motorized |
1,004 | 102 | ||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
34,104 | 31,642 | ||||||
Buses |
9,419 | 8,380 | ||||||
Corporate |
(9,737 | ) | (2,769 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 33,786 | $ | 37,253 | ||||
October 31, 2010 | July 31, 2010 | |||||||
Identifiable Assets: |
||||||||
Recreation vehicles: |
||||||||
Towables |
$ | 664,585 | $ | 413,112 | ||||
Motorized |
96,964 | 86,726 | ||||||
Total recreation vehicles |
761,549 | 499,838 | ||||||
Buses |
125,398 | 124,374 | ||||||
Corporate |
209,171 | 339,861 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,096,118 | $ | 964,073 | ||||
8
Table of Contents
7. | Treasury Stock |
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company purchased 3,980,000 shares of the Companys common stock at $29.00 per share and held them as treasury stock at a total cost of $115,420. |
The shares were repurchased by the Company from the Estate of Wade F. B. Thompson (the Estate) in a private transaction. The late Wade F. B. Thompson was the Companys former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The repurchase transaction was evaluated and approved by the members of Thors Board who are not affiliated with the Estate. At the time of the repurchase, the shares represented 7.2% of Thors common stock outstanding. The Company used available cash to purchase the shares. |
8. | Investments and Fair Value Measurements |
ASC-820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value, which are the following: |
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. |
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
The following table represents the Companys fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash and cash equivalents and investments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010: |
9
Table of Contents
October 31, 2010 | July 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash | Auction Rate | Cash and Cash | Auction Rate | |||||||||||||
Equivalents | Securities | Equivalents | Securities | |||||||||||||
Levels of Input: |
||||||||||||||||
Level 1 |
$ | 141,747 | $ | | $ | 247,751 | $ | | ||||||||
Level 2 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Level 3 |
| 3,390 | | 5,327 | ||||||||||||
$ | 141,747 | $ | 3,390 | $ | 247,751 | $ | 5,327 | |||||||||
The Companys cash equivalents are comprised of money market funds traded in an active market with no restrictions. |
In addition to the above investments, the Company holds non-qualified retirement plan assets of $7,833 at October 31, 2010 ($7,499 at July 31, 2010). These assets, which are held for the benefit of certain employees of the Company, represent Level 1 investments primarily in mutual funds which are valued using observable market prices in active markets. They are included in other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Level 3 assets consist of bonds with an auction reset feature (auction rate securities or ARS) whose underlying assets are primarily student loans which are substantially backed by the federal government. Auction rate securities are long-term floating rate bonds tied to short-term interest rates. After the initial issuance of the securities, the interest rate on the securities is reset periodically, at intervals established at the time of issuance based on market demand for a reset period. Auction rate securities are bought and sold in the marketplace through a competitive bidding process often referred to as a Dutch auction. If there is insufficient interest in the securities at the time of an auction, the auction may not be completed and the rates may be reset to pre-determined penalty or maximum rates based on mathematical formulas in accordance with each securitys prospectus. |
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 financial assets): |
Fair Value Measurements at | ||||
Reporting Date Using | ||||
Significant Unobservable Inputs | ||||
(Level 3) | ||||
Balances at August 1, 2010 |
$ | 5,327 | ||
Net change in other comprehensive income |
213 | |||
Net loss included in earnings |
| |||
Purchases |
| |||
Sales/Maturities |
(2,150 | ) | ||
Balances at October 31, 2010 |
$ | 3,390 | ||
Auction Rate Securities |
At October 31, 2010, the Company held $3,700 (par value) of long-term investments comprised of tax-exempt ARS, which are variable-rate debt securities and have a long-term maturity with the interest being reset through Dutch auctions that are typically held every 7, 28 or 35 days. The securities have historically traded at par and are callable at par at the option of the issuer. Interest is typically paid at the end of each auction period or semi-annually. At October 31, 2010, the majority of the ARS we held were AAA rated or equivalent, and none were below AA rated or equivalent, with most collateralized by student loans substantially backed by the U.S. Federal government. |
Since February 12, 2008, most auctions have failed for these securities and there is no assurance that future auctions on the ARS in our investment portfolio will succeed and, as a result, our ability to liquidate our investment and fully recover the par value of our investment in the near term may be limited or not exist. An auction failure means that the parties wishing to sell securities could not. |
At October 31, 2010, there was insufficient observable ARS market information available to determine the fair value of our ARS investments. Therefore, management, assisted by Houlihan, Smith & Company, Inc., an independent consultant, determined an estimated fair value. In determining the estimate, consideration was given to credit quality, final stated maturities, estimates on the probability of the issue being called prior to final maturity, impact due to extended periods of maximum auction rates and broker quotes. Based on this analysis, we recognized a total |
10
Table of Contents
temporary impairment of $310 ($192 total net of tax in other comprehensive income which is in the equity section of the balance sheet) as of October 31, 2010 related to our long-term ARS investments of $3,700 (par value). |
We have no reason to believe that any of the underlying issuers of our ARS are presently at risk of default. Through October 31, 2010, we have continued to receive interest payments on the ARS in accordance with their terms. We believe we will be able to liquidate our investments without significant loss primarily due to the government guarantee of the underlying securities; however, it could take until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up to 30 years) to realize our investments par value. |
Although there is uncertainty with regard to the short-term liquidity of these securities, the Company continues to believe that the carrying amount represents the fair value of these marketable securities because of the overall quality of the underlying investments and the anticipated future market for such investments. |
In addition, the Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until the earlier of: the market for ARS stabilizes, the issuer refinances the underlying security, a buyer is found outside of the auction process at acceptable terms, or the underlying securities have matured. |
9. | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
The components of amortizable intangible assets are as follows: |
October 31, 2010 | July 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||
Cost | Amortization | Cost | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Dealer networks |
$ | 72,230 | $ | 947 | $ | 5,230 | $ | 156 | ||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
6,851 | 2,489 | 2,721 | 2,315 | ||||||||||||
Heartland trademarks |
25,200 | 126 | | | ||||||||||||
Technology and other intangibles |
22,260 | 1,006 | 270 | 22 | ||||||||||||
Total amortizable intangible assets |
$ | 126,541 | $ | 4,568 | $ | 8,221 | $ | 2,493 | ||||||||
Non-compete agreements, finite lived trademarks, technology and other intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis. Dealer networks are generally amortized on an accelerated cash flow basis. The weighted average remaining amortization period at October 31, 2010 is 14.73 years. The increase in amortizable intangibles since July 31, 2010 is related to the acquisition of Heartland, which is more fully described in Note 2. |
Estimated Amortization Expense: |
For the fiscal year ending July 2011 |
$ | 9,942 | ||
For the fiscal year ending July 2012 |
$ | 10,682 | ||
For the fiscal year ending July 2013 |
$ | 10,490 | ||
For the fiscal year ending July 2014 |
$ | 10,222 | ||
For the fiscal year ending July 2015 and thereafter |
$ | 82,712 |
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment by applying a fair-value based test on an annual basis, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential impairment. During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, management decided to combine our Damon and Four Winds motorized operations to form Thor Motor Coach to optimize operations and garner cost efficiencies. As a result, the trademarks associated with one of the former operating companies will be discontinued and was written off. |
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not subject to amortization. |
11
Table of Contents
The change in carrying value in goodwill and indefinite-lived trademarks from July 31, 2010 to October 31, 2010 is as follows: |
Goodwill | Trademarks | |||||||
Balance at July 31, 2010 |
$ | 150,901 | $ | 14,936 | ||||
Impairment of trademark in motorized reportable segment |
| (2,036 | ) | |||||
Heartland acquisition in towables reportable segment |
94,865 | | ||||||
Balance at October 31, 2010 |
$ | 245,766 | $ | 12,900 | ||||
Goodwill and trademarks by reportable segment are as follows: |
October 31, 2010 | July 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill | Trademarks | Goodwill | Trademarks | |||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 238,660 | $ | 34,811 | $ | 143,795 | $ | 9,737 | ||||||||
Motorized |
| | | 2,036 | ||||||||||||
Buses |
7,106 | 3,163 | 7,106 | 3,163 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 245,766 | $ | 37,974 | $ | 150,901 | $ | 14,936 | ||||||||
10. | Product Warranties |
The Company generally provides retail customers of its products with a one-year warranty covering defects in material or workmanship, with longer warranties of up to five years on certain structural components. The Company records a liability based on its best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Factors used in estimating the warranty liability include a history of units sold, existing dealer inventory, average cost incurred and a profile of the distribution of warranty expenditures over the warranty period. A significant increase in dealer shop rates, the cost of parts or the frequency of claims could have a material adverse impact on the Companys operating results for the period or periods in which such claims or additional costs materialize. Management believes that the warranty reserve is adequate. However, actual claims incurred could differ from estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves. Warranty reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis. |
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | |||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 51,467 | $ | 41,717 | ||||
Provision |
14,366 | 12,791 | ||||||
Payments |
(13,538 | ) | (11,998 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions |
10,179 | | ||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 62,474 | $ | 42,510 | ||||
12
Table of Contents
11. | Contingent Liabilities and Commitments |
The Company is contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with certain financial institutions providing inventory financing for certain dealers of certain of its products. These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products sold to dealers in the event of default by the dealer. The repurchase price is generally determined by the original sales price of the product and pre-defined curtailment arrangements and the Company typically resells the repurchased product at a discount from its repurchase price. The risk of loss from these agreements is spread over numerous dealers. In addition to the guarantee under these repurchase agreements, the Company also provides limited guarantees to certain of its dealers, most of which are currently in the process of being wound down. |
The Companys principal commercial commitments under repurchase agreements and guarantees at October 31, 2010 are summarized in the following chart: |
Total Amount | ||||||
Commitment | Committed | Terms of Commitments | ||||
Guarantee on dealer financing |
$ | 2,935 | Various | |||
Standby repurchase obligation on dealer financing |
$ | 708,282 | Up to eighteen months |
The repurchase agreement obligations generally extend up to eighteen months from the date of sale of the related product to the dealer. The repurchase and guarantee reserve balance as of October 31, 2010, which is included in other current liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, is $3,874 and includes the deferred estimated fair value of the implied guarantee under outstanding repurchase obligations and the estimated loss upon the eventual resale of expected repurchased product. These reserves do not include any amounts for direct guarantees as the Company does not currently expect any losses from such guarantees. The table below reflects losses incurred under repurchase agreements in the period noted. Management believes that any future losses under these agreements will not have a significant effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations. |
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | |||||||
Cost of units repurchased |
$ | 2,220 | $ | 1,377 | ||||
Realization of units resold |
1,927 | 1,041 | ||||||
Losses due to repurchase |
$ | 293 | $ | 336 | ||||
The Company obtains certain vehicle chassis from automobile manufacturers under converter pool agreements. These agreements generally provide that the manufacturer will supply chassis at the Companys various production facilities under the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement. The manufacturer does not transfer the certificate of origin to the Company and, accordingly, the Company accounts for the chassis as consigned, unrecorded inventory. Upon being put into production, the Company becomes obligated to pay the manufacturer for the chassis. Chassis are typically converted and delivered to customers within 90 days of delivery. If the chassis is not converted within 90 days of delivery to the Company, the Company generally purchases the chassis and records the inventory. At October 31, 2010, chassis on hand accounted for as consigned, unrecorded inventory was approximately $25,146. In addition to this consigned inventory, at October 31, 2010, an additional $13,303 of chassis provided by customers were located at the Companys production facilities pending further manufacturing. The Company never purchases these chassis and does not include their cost in its billings to the customer for the completed unit. |
The Company has been subject to an SEC review regarding the facts and circumstances giving rise to the restatement of its previously issued financial statements as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2006, and the financial results in each of the quarterly periods in 2006 and 2005, and its financial statements as of and for the three months ended October 31, 2006 and related matters. The Company has cooperated fully with the SEC, including from time to time responding to SEC staff requests for additional information. The investigation by the SEC staff could result in the SEC seeking various penalties and relief, including, without limitation, civil injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties or administrative relief. The Company is currently discussing the terms of a possible settlement of this matter with the SEC staff. However, there can be no assurance that a settlement will be reached. |
The Company has been named in approximately 800 complaints, some of which were originally styled as putative class actions (with respect to which class certification was ultimately denied) and some of which were filed by individual plaintiffs, filed against manufacturers of travel trailers and manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for use as emergency living accommodations in the wake of Hurricanes |
13
Table of Contents
Katrina and Rita. The complaints have been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the federal panel on multidistrict litigation for consideration in a matter captioned In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. The complaints generally assert claims for damages (for health related problems, medical expenses, emotional distress and lost earnings) and for medical monitoring costs due to the presence of formaldehyde in the units. Some of the lawsuits also seek punitive and/or exemplary damages. Thus far, however, none of the lawsuits allege a specific amount of damages sought and instead make general allegations about the nature of the plaintiffs claims without placing a dollar figure on them. The Company strongly disputes the allegations in these complaints, and intends to vigorously defend itself in all such matters. |
In addition, the Company is involved in certain litigation arising out of its operations in the normal course of its business, most of which are based upon state lemon laws, warranty claims, other claims and accidents (for which the Company carries insurance above a specified deductible amount). In this regard, the Company was a party to two companion lawsuits pending in Jefferson County, Texas which were brought against it and its affiliates, each of which arose from a March 29, 2006 crash of a bus manufactured by a subsidiary of the Company. At the mediation of the cases on June 15, 2010, a complete settlement of both cases was reached. Formal settlement agreements were executed by each of the plaintiffs in August 2010, and counsel for all plaintiffs and cross-claimants have signed Notices of Nonsuit which were filed with both courts. The Company was informed that an Order of Dismissal was signed and entered in each of the lawsuits, one on September 16, 2010 and the other on September 20, 2010, disposing of both lawsuits. |
On June 25, 2010, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were sued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Dayton Division by Teamsters Allied Benefit Funds, individually and purportedly on behalf of a class of all those who purchased or acquired Thor common stock between November 30, 2009 to June 10, 2010. The complaint alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, alleging that the Companys SEC filings and press releases were false and misleading due to, among other things, the Companys June 10, 2010 announcement that its financial statements might need to be restated. The Company has since announced that a restatement is not necessary. The Company believed the lawsuit was without merit, and the plaintiff agreed to voluntarily dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice on September 7, 2010. |
While it is impossible to estimate with certainty the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to the litigation arising out of the Companys operations in the normal course of business, including the pending litigation described above, the Company believes that while the final resolution of any such litigation may have an impact on its consolidated results for a particular reporting period, the ultimate disposition of such litigation will not have any material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity. |
12. | Provision for Income Taxes |
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes". The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current period and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could materially impact the Companys financial position or its results of operations. |
It is the Companys policy to recognize interest and penalties accrued relative to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. For the three month period ended October 31, 2010, the Company released approximately $4,500 of gross uncertain tax benefit reserve and related interest and penalties recorded at July 31, 2010 related to the effective settlement of certain uncertain tax benefits, which resulted in a net income tax benefit of approximately $3,300. The Company accrued $300 in interest and penalties related to the remaining uncertain tax benefits recorded at July 31, 2010. Additionally, the Company recorded $1,560 of uncertain tax benefit reserves and related interest and penalty reserves of Heartland upon its acquisition on September 16, 2010. |
14
Table of Contents
The Company and its corporate subsidiaries file a consolidated U. S. federal income tax return, multiple U.S. state income tax returns and multiple Canadian income tax returns. The Company has been audited for U.S. federal purposes through fiscal 2007. Periodically, various state and local jurisdictions conduct audits and therefore a variety of other years are subject to state and local review. The Company is currently being audited by the State of California for the tax years ended July 31, 2007 and July 31, 2008. The Company has reserved for this exposure in its liability for unrecognized tax benefits. |
The Company anticipates a decrease of approximately $3,400 in unrecognized tax benefits, and $700 in accrued interest and penalties related to these unrecognized tax benefits, within the next 12 months from (1) expected settlements or payments of uncertain tax positions, and (2) lapses of the applicable statutes of limitations. Actual results may differ materially from this estimate. |
13. | Retained Earnings | |
The components of changes in retained earnings are as follows: |
Balance as of July 31, 2010 |
$ | 745,204 | ||
Net Income |
23,688 | |||
Dividends Paid |
(5,578 | ) | ||
Balance as of October 31, 2010 |
$ | 763,314 | ||
14. | Loan Transactions and Related Notes Receivable |
On January 15, 2009, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the First Credit Agreement) with Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Stephen Adams Living Trust (the Trust and together with each of the foregoing persons, the Borrowers), pursuant to which the Company loaned $10,000 to the Borrowers (the First Loan). The Borrowers own, directly or indirectly, a controlling interest in FreedomRoads Holding Company, LLC (FreedomRoads Holding), the parent company of FreedomRoads, LLC (FreedomRoads), the Companys largest dealer. Pursuant to the terms of the First Credit Agreement, the Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the First Loan solely to make an equity contribution to FreedomRoads Holding to enable FreedomRoads Holding or its subsidiaries to repay its principal obligations under floor plan financing arrangements with third parties in respect of products of the Company and its subsidiaries. |
The principal amount of the First Loan is payable in full on January 15, 2014 and bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. Interest is payable in kind for the first year and is payable in cash on a monthly basis thereafter, and all interest payments due to date have been paid in full. |
On January 30, 2009, the Company entered into a Second Credit Agreement (the Second Credit Agreement) with the Borrowers pursuant to which the Company loaned an additional $10,000 to the Borrowers (the Second Loan). Pursuant to the terms of the Second Credit Agreement, the Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the Second Loan solely to make an equity contribution to FreedomRoads Holding to be used by FreedomRoads Holding or its subsidiaries to purchase the Companys products. |
The maturity date of the Second Loan is June 30, 2012. Principal is payable in semi-annual installments of $1,000 each commencing on June 30, 2010, with a final payment of $6,000 on June 30, 2012. Interest on the principal amount of the Second Loan is payable in cash on a quarterly basis at a rate of 12% per annum. All payments of principal and interest due to date have been paid in full. |
On December 22, 2009, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the Third Credit Agreement) with Marcus Lemonis, Stephen Adams, in his individual capacity, and Stephen Adams and his successors, as trustee under the Trust (each of the foregoing persons, on a joint and several basis, the Third Loan Borrowers), pursuant to which the Company loaned $10,000 to the Third Loan Borrowers (the Third Loan). The Third Loan Borrowers own, |
15
Table of Contents
directly or indirectly, a controlling interest in FreedomRoads Holding, the indirect parent company of FreedomRoads. Pursuant to the terms of the Third Credit Agreement, the Third Loan Borrowers agreed to use the proceeds of the Third Loan solely to provide a loan to one of FreedomRoads Holdings subsidiaries which would ultimately be contributed as equity to FreedomRoads to be used for working capital purposes. |
The maturity date of the Third Loan is December 22, 2014. The principal amount of the Third Loan is payable on the following dates in the following amounts: December 31, 2011 $500; December 31, 2012 $1,000; December 31, 2013 $1,100; and December 22, 2014 $7,400. The principal amount of the Third Loan bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum. Interest is payable, at the option of the Third Loan Borrowers, either in cash or in kind at each calendar quarter end from March 31, 2010 through September 30, 2011, and thereafter in cash quarterly in arrears from December 31, 2011 through the maturity date. The Third Loan Borrowers opted to pay the interest due at March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010 in kind and it was capitalized as part of the long-term note receivable. |
The First Credit Agreement, the Second Credit Agreement and the Third Credit Agreement each contain customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, events of default and acceleration provisions for loans of this type. |
In connection with the First Loan, the Borrowers caused FreedomRoads Holding and its subsidiaries (collectively, the FR Dealers), to enter into an agreement pursuant to which the FR Dealers agreed to purchase additional recreation vehicles from the Company and its subsidiaries. The term of this agreement, as subsequently amended in connection with the Second Loan and the Third Loan, continues until December 22, 2029 unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms. |
15. | Concentration of Risk |
One dealer, FreedomRoads, accounted for 17% of the Companys consolidated recreation vehicle net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 14% of its consolidated net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2010. The loss of this dealer could have a significant effect on the Companys business. |
16. | Fire at Bus Production Facility |
On February 14, 2010, a fire occurred at the northern production facility (the Facility) at the Companys manufacturing site located near Imlay City, Michigan. The Facility is one of the Companys principal manufacturing locations for its Champion and General Coach America bus lines. The fire resulted in the destruction of a significant portion of the work in process, raw materials and equipment contained in the Facility. There were no reported injuries and the origin of the fire is undetermined. The southern production plant, paint facility and other buildings at the site were not affected by the fire and remained intact. Shortly after the fire, the Company resumed limited production activities for its Champion and General Coach America buses in the southern manufacturing facility, and the Company addressed equipment and staffing reallocation. Many employees continued to work out of the southern manufacturing facility and an office building on this site on a temporary basis. |
The Company maintains a property and business interruption insurance policy that it believes will provide substantial coverage for the currently foreseeable losses arising from this incident, less up to the first $5,000 representing the Companys deductible per the policy. |
During the three months ended October 31, 2010, the Company received $5,384 of insurance proceeds which included $2,323 for business interruption. Recognized insurance recoveries for the three months ended October 31, 2010 include the $5,384 of insurance proceeds along with $70 of previously unrecognized insurance recoveries. For the three months ended October 31, 2010, a gain on involuntary conversion of $4,802 was reported in the Companys Statement of Condensed Consolidated Operations as follows: |
16
Table of Contents
Gain on Involuntary Conversion: |
Three Months Ended | Cumulative Total | |||||||||||
FY 2010 | October 31, 2010 | Since Fire | ||||||||||
Insurance recoveries recognized |
$ | 18,079 | $ | 5,454 | $ | 23,533 | ||||||
Deductible |
(5,000 | ) | | (5,000 | ) | |||||||
Work in process and raw material destroyed |
(4,305 | ) | | (4,305 | ) | |||||||
Property and equipment destroyed |
(578 | ) | (165 | ) | (743 | ) | ||||||
Clean up and other costs |
(603 | ) | (487 | ) | (1,090 | ) | ||||||
Gain on Involuntary Conversion |
$ | 7,593 | $ | 4,802 | $ | 12,395 | ||||||
The costs incurred to date of reconstructing the Facility and replacing inventory have been accounted for in the normal course of business. The costs incurred as of October 31, 2010 to reconstruct the Facility totaled $5,807. The Facility was substantially completed and operational as of September 28, 2010. The replacement cost of the property and equipment has substantially exceeded the previous carrying costs and the lost profits covered under business interruption and future clean-up and related costs are being reimbursed under the policy. However, an accurate estimate of the remaining potential gain resulting from the involuntary conversion cannot be made at this time. |
17
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts presented in thousands of dollars except unit, share
and per share data.
Executive Overview
We were founded in 1980 and have grown to be the largest manufacturer of Recreation Vehicles
(RVs) and a major manufacturer of commercial buses in North America. Our market share in the
travel trailer and fifth wheel segment of the industry (towables) is approximately 40%
including Heartland. In the motorized segment of the industry we have a market share of
approximately 18%. Our market share in small and mid-size buses is approximately 36%. We also
manufacture and sell 40-foot buses at our facility in Southern California.
On September 16, 2010, we acquired 100% of Towable Holdings, Inc., parent company of Heartland
Recreational Vehicles, LLC (Heartland), pursuant to a stock purchase agreement for $99,562 in
cash, subject to adjustment, and 4,300,000 shares of our common stock. Heartland is located in
Elkhart, Indiana and is a major manufacturer of towable recreation vehicles. Under our
ownership, Heartland will continue as an independent operation, in the same manner as our
existing recreation vehicle and bus companies, and its operations will be included in our
towable segment.
The acquisition of Heartland is expected to be accretive to our earnings, based upon
Heartlands recent and historical performances. From its founding in 2003, Heartland has become
the third largest manufacturer of fifth wheels and the sixth largest manufacturer of travel
trailers in the United States based upon Statistical Surveys retail market data as of June,
2010. Heartland has been the fastest growing RV manufacturer in recent years, and its sales
over the last 12 months exceeded $400,000. Its brands include Bighorn, Sundance, Cyclone, North
Country, and North Trail, sold through a nationwide network of dealers. See Note 2 to our
condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for additional
information on the acquisition.
Our growth has been internal and by acquisition. Our strategy has been to increase our
profitability in North America in the RV industry and in the bus business through product
innovation, service to our customers, manufacturing quality products, improving our facilities
and acquisitions. We have not entered unrelated businesses and have no plans to do so in the
future.
We rely on internally generated cash flows from operations to finance our growth although we
may borrow to make an acquisition if we believe the incremental cash flows will provide for
rapid payback. Capital expenditures of approximately $16,500 for the three months ended October
31, 2010 were made primarily for building and building improvements and to replace machinery
and equipment used in the ordinary course of business. These capital expenditures include
$4,300 for the construction of the new Champion bus plant, $4,100 for the purchase of
recreation vehicle plants which were previously leased and $4,800 for the expansion of our
recreation vehicle operations.
Our business model includes decentralized operating units and we compensate operating
management primarily with cash based upon the profitability of the business unit which they
manage. Our corporate staff provides financial management, purchasing, insurance, legal and
human resource, risk management and internal audit functions. Senior corporate management
interacts regularly with operating management to assure that corporate objectives are
understood clearly and are monitored appropriately.
Our RV products are sold to dealers who, in turn, retail those products. Our buses are sold
through dealers to municipalities and private purchasers such as rental car companies and
hotels. We generally do not finance dealers directly but do provide repurchase agreements to
assist the dealers in obtaining floor plan financing.
On February 14, 2010, a fire resulted in the total
loss of our 92,000 square foot
Champion/General Coach America (GCA) north bus production facility. We reacted immediately
and consolidated production into our 92,000 square foot south facility, which was unaffected by
the fire, and leased a 59,000 square foot facility on a monthly
18
Table of Contents
basis. We resumed production on February 25, 2010 and no significant orders were lost due to
the fire. A new Champion/GCA plant was built and it was substantially completed and operational
as of September 28, 2010.
Trends and Business Outlook
Industry conditions in the RV market have improved dramatically through 2010, with RV wholesale
shipments up 59.4% through September 2010, according to the Recreation Vehicle Industry
Association. This large increase in shipments has been attributable to two forces in the
market: RV dealers restocking of depleted lot inventories and improving retail sales to
consumers. We measure our recreation vehicle dealers inventory on a daily basis and believe
dealer restocking was largely completed as of mid-summer, 2010. As of October 31, 2010, our RV
dealers had 35,457 of our RV units in inventory, down 36% from recent peak inventory of 55,300
units in March of 2008. With our substantial increases in retail market share, this level of
dealer inventory is at appropriate levels for seasonal consumer demand. Also, wholesale RV
shipments in the month of September, 2010 were down compared with September 2009, following
thirteen consecutive monthly increases compared to the prior year.
Thors RV backlog as of October 31, 2010 was down 19% to approximately $254,000 from $315,000
as of October 31, 2009. The reduction in backlog reinforces our belief that dealers have
completed their restocking needs. Given our belief that dealer
restocking has largely been completed and inventory levels are appropriate, we believe that RV
industry wholesale shipments may be lower for a few months going forward.
Given that dealer restocking appears to be largely completed, we believe that retail demand is
the key to continued improvement in the RV industry. For the period of January through
September, 2010 RV industry retail sales in the United States were up 5.5%, according to
Statistical Surveys, Inc. Retail sales of travel trailers and fifth wheels, our most popular
products, were up 8.9% in the year-to-date period, while Class C motorhomes were up 4.3% and
higher-priced Class A motorhomes were down 4.7%. The Canadian retail RV market has performed
even better than the retail RV market in the United States, with year-to-date 2010 retail sales
up 23.1% through September 2010, according to Statistical Surveys, Inc.
If consumer confidence and retail and wholesale credit availability continue to improve,
interest rates remain low and fuel prices remain stable, we expect to see continued improvement
in sales and expect to benefit from our ability to ramp up production in an industry with fewer
manufacturing facilities than before, due to competitor failures or plant consolidations.
However, this outlook is tempered by continuing poor employment and income growth as well as
credit constraints, which could slow the pace of RV sales. A longer-term positive outlook for
the recreation vehicle segment is supported by favorable demographics as baby boomers reach the
age brackets that historically have accounted for the bulk of retail RV sales, and an increase
in interest in the RV lifestyle among both older and younger segments of the population.
Economic or industry-wide factors affecting our recreation vehicle business include raw
material costs of commodities used in the manufacture of our product. Material cost is the
primary factor determining our cost of products sold. We are starting to witness increases in
the cost of our raw materials. Steel, aluminum, and thermoplastic prices have increased and
there continues to be upward price pressure on several of our other raw materials. Future
increases in raw material costs would impact our profit margins negatively if we were unable to
raise prices for our products by corresponding amounts. Historically, we have been able to pass
along those price increases to consumers.
Government entities are the primary users of our buses. Demand in this segment is subject to
fluctuations in government spending on transit. In addition, hotel, rental car and parking lot
operators are also major users of our small and mid-sized buses and therefore travel is an
important indicator for this market. The majority of our buses have a 5-year useful life and
are being continuously replaced by operators. According to the Mid Size Bus Manufacturers
Association (MSBMA), unit sales of small and mid-sized buses increased 1.4% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared with the same period in 2009. Federal stimulus funds
helped the transit industry in the recent economic downturn, however that funding has now
expired and that is creating a negative
19
Table of Contents
effect on demand for our bus products. Municipal budgets have been reduced and transit
agencies operating costs have increased. As a result, we have experienced a softening of order
input at some of our bus operations and we have reduced staffing levels in certain locations.
As of October 31, 2010, buses reportable segment backlog is down by approximately 25% to
$212,000 from $284,000 as of October 31, 2009. Longer term, we expect positive trends in our
bus segment, which we believe will be supported by increased federal funding for transit, the
replacement cycle for buses among public and private bus customers, and the introduction of new
bus products.
We do not expect the current condition of the U.S. auto industry to have a significant impact
on our supply of chassis. Supply of chassis is adequate for now and we believe that available
inventory would compensate for changes in supply schedules if they occur. To date, we have not
noticed any unusual cost increases from our chassis suppliers. If the condition of the U.S.
auto industry significantly worsens, this could result in supply interruptions and a decrease
in our sales and earnings while we obtain replacement chassis from other sources.
20
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended October 31, 2010 vs.
Three Months Ended October 31, 2009
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
18,211 | 15,801 | 2,410 | 15.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
1,085 | 606 | 479 | 79.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
19,296 | 16,407 | 2,889 | 17.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
1,415 | 1,590 | (175 | ) | (11.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
20,711 | 17,997 | 2,714 | 15.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 422,449 | $ | 342,136 | $ | 80,313 | 23.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
84,114 | 47,793 | 36,321 | 76.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
506,563 | 389,929 | 116,634 | 29.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
100,121 | 112,623 | (12,502 | ) | (11.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 606,684 | $ | 502,552 | $ | 104,132 | 20.7 | |||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | Net Sales | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 57,869 | 13.7 | $ | 52,845 | 15.4 | $ | 5,024 | 9.5 | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
8,075 | 9.6 | 3,491 | 7.3 | 4,584 | 131.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
65,944 | 13.0 | 56,336 | 14.4 | 9,608 | 17.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
10,634 | 10.6 | 13,435 | 11.9 | (2,801 | ) | (20.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 76,578 | 12.6 | $ | 69,771 | 13.9 | $ | 6,807 | 9.8 | |||||||||||||||
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 22,986 | 5.4 | $ | 21,298 | 6.2 | $ | 1,688 | 7.9 | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
5,032 | 6.0 | 3,378 | 7.1 | 1,654 | 49.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
28,018 | 5.5 | 24,676 | 6.3 | 3,342 | 13.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
5,196 | 5.2 | 4,956 | 4.4 | 240 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
11,677 | | 5,135 | | 6,542 | 127.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 44,891 | 7.4 | $ | 34,767 | 6.9 | $ | 10,124 | 29.1 | |||||||||||||||
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE
INCOME TAXES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 33,100 | 7.8 | $ | 31,540 | 9.2 | $ | 1,560 | 4.9 | |||||||||||||||
Motorized |
1,004 | 1.2 | 102 | 0.2 | 902 | 884.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
34,104 | 6.7 | 31,642 | 8.1 | 2,462 | 7.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Buses |
9,419 | 9.4 | 8,380 | 7.4 | 1,039 | 12.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
(9,737 | ) | | (2,769 | ) | | (6,968 | ) | (251.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 33,786 | 5.6 | $ | 37,253 | 7.4 | $ | (3,467 | ) | (9.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
ORDER BACKLOG:
As of | As of | Change | ||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | Amount | % | |||||||||||||
Recreation Vehicles |
||||||||||||||||
Towables |
$ | 181,423 | $ | 266,500 | $ | (85,077 | ) | (31.9 | ) | |||||||
Motorized |
72,775 | 48,554 | 24,221 | 49.9 | ||||||||||||
Total Recreation Vehicles |
254,198 | 315,054 | (60,856 | ) | (19.3 | ) | ||||||||||
Buses |
212,602 | 283,947 | (71,345 | ) | (25.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 466,800 | $ | 599,001 | $ | (132,201 | ) | (22.1 | ) | |||||||
CONSOLIDATED
Consolidated net sales and consolidated gross profit for the three months ended October 31, 2010
increased $104,132 or 20.7% and $6,807 or 9.8%, respectively, compared to the three months ended
October 31, 2009. Recently acquired Heartland accounted for $50,119 of the $104,132 increase in
consolidated net sales. Consolidated gross profit was 12.6% of consolidated net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2010 compared to 13.9% of consolidated net sales for the three months
ended October 31, 2009. This 1.3% decrease in gross profit percentage was driven primarily by
increased discounting within the recreation vehicle segments in the current period, as dealer
inventories have been restocked to appropriate levels, and as a result dealer and competitor
pressures have necessitated greater discounting to secure sales. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended October 31, 2010 increased 29.1% compared to the
three months ended October 31, 2009. Income before income taxes for the three months ended October
31, 2010 was $33,786 as compared to the three months ended October 31, 2009 of $37,253, a decrease
of 9.3%. The specifics on changes in net sales, gross profit, selling, general and administrative
expenses and income before income taxes are addressed in the segment reporting below.
Corporate costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses increased $6,542 to
$11,677 for the three months ended October 31, 2010 compared to $5,135 for the three months ended
October 31, 2009. The increase is primarily attributable to legal and professional fees in
connection with the Heartland acquisition and the on-going SEC review totaling $3,503.
Additionally, salary and bonus costs increased $482, stock option compensation expense increased
$647, deferred compensation plan expense increased $509 and group insurance expense increased $202.
The remainder of the increase is primarily due to increased on-going professional fees.
Corporate interest income and other income was $1,940 for the three months ended October 31, 2010
compared to $2,366 for the three months ended October 31, 2009. The decrease of $426 is primarily
due to a decrease in interest income due to lower invested balances and lower interest rates.
The overall effective income tax rate was 29.9% for the three months ended October 31, 2010
compared with 37.1% for the three months ended October 31, 2009. The primary reason for the
difference in the overall effective income tax rate is the effective favorable settlement of
certain state uncertain tax benefits for the three months ended October 31, 2010 as compared to the
three months ended October 31, 2009.
22
Table of Contents
Segment Reporting
TOWABLE RECREATION VEHICLES
Analysis of change in net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2010 vs. the three months ended October 31, 2009:
Three Months | % of | Three Months | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Segment | Ended | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | Net Sales | October 31, 2009 | Net Sales | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Travel Trailers |
$ | 196,349 | 46.5 | $ | 175,633 | 51.3 | $ | 20,716 | 11.8 | |||||||||||||||
Fifth Wheels |
220,881 | 52.3 | 158,271 | 46.3 | 62,610 | 39.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
5,219 | 1.2 | 8,232 | 2.4 | (3,013 | ) | (36.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Towables |
$ | 422,449 | 100.0 | $ | 342,136 | 100.0 | $ | 80,313 | 23.5 | |||||||||||||||
Three Months | % of | Three Months | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Segment | Ended | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | Shipments | October 31, 2009 | Shipments | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Towables |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Travel Trailers |
11,106 | 61.0 | 10,305 | 65.2 | 801 | 7.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fifth Wheels |
6,924 | 38.0 | 5,258 | 33.3 | 1,666 | 31.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
181 | 1.0 | 238 | 1.5 | (57 | ) | (23.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Towables |
18,211 | 100.0 | 15,801 | 100.0 | 2,410 | 15.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impact Of Change In Price On Net Sales:
% | ||||
Increase /(Decrease) | ||||
Towables |
||||
Travel
Trailers |
4.0 | % | ||
Fifth Wheels |
7.9 | % | ||
Other |
(12.7 | )% | ||
Total Towables |
8.2 | % |
The increase in towables net sales of 23.5% resulted from a 15.3% increase in unit shipments and an
8.2% increase in the impact of the change in the net price per unit. Recently acquired Heartland
accounted for $50,119 of the $80,313 increase in total towables net
sales and for 1,789 of the
2,410 increase in total towables unit sales.
As the industry continues to stabilize, current customer preference in the fifth wheel and travel
trailer markets is trending toward higher priced units with additional features and upgrades
compared to a year ago. This trend was partially offset by increased discounting, which effectively
reduces the net sales price per unit. The other market relates primarily to the park model
industry, which has not recovered from the depressed market conditions of the past few years. As a
result, more lower priced units are being sold and at greater discounts than last year, resulting
in the 12.7% reduction in net price per unit.
The overall industry increase in wholesale unit shipments of towables for August and September 2010
compared to the same period last year was 5.6% according to statistics published by the Recreation
Vehicle Industry Association.
Cost of
products sold increased $75,289 to $364,580 or 86.3% of towables net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2010 compared to $289,291 or 84.6% of towable net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2009. The change in material, labor, freight-out and warranty comprised
$71,736 of the $75,289 increase in cost of products sold due to increased sales volume. Material,
labor, freight-out and warranty as a percentage of towable net sales was 80.5% for the three months
ended October 31, 2010 and 78.5% for the three months ended October 31, 2009. This increase as a
23
Table of Contents
percentage of towable net sales is due to an increase in discounting, which effectively
decreases net sales per unit and therefore increases the material cost percentage to net sales.
Total manufacturing overhead as a percentage of towable net sales decreased from 6.1% to 5.8% due
to the increase in production resulting in increased absorption of fixed overhead costs.
Towable gross profit increased $5,024 to $57,869 or 13.7% of towable net sales for the three months
ended October 31, 2010 compared to $52,845 or 15.4% of towable net sales for the three months ended
October 31, 2009. The increase was due to the combination of increased sales, partially offset by
increased discounts from unit list prices and increased wholesale and retail incentives provided to
customers, and changes in cost of products sold as discussed above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $22,986 or 5.4% of towable net sales for the
three months ended October 31, 2010 compared to $21,298 or 6.2% of towable net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2009. The primary reason for the $1,688 increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses was increased towable net sales which caused commissions, bonuses, and
other compensation to increase by $1,051. Sales related travel, advertising, and promotional costs
also increased $982 in correlation with the increase in sales. These cost increases were partially
offset by reductions in legal settlement costs and vehicle repurchase losses totaling $649.
Towable income before income taxes decreased to 7.8% of towable net sales for the three months
ended October 31, 2010 from 9.2% of towable net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2009.
The primary factor for this decrease in percentage was the increased discounting noted above.
MOTORIZED RECREATION VEHICLES
Analysis of change in net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2010 vs. the three months ended October 31, 2009:
Three Months | % of | Three Months | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Segment | Ended | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | Net Sales | October 31, 2009 | Net Sales | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
NET SALES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A |
$ | 58,152 | 69.1 | $ | 29,983 | 62.8 | $ | 28,169 | 93.9 | |||||||||||||||
Class C |
21,960 | 26.1 | 13,731 | 28.7 | 8,229 | 59.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B |
4,002 | 4.8 | 4,079 | 8.5 | (77 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Motorized |
$ | 84,114 | 100.0 | $ | 47,793 | 100.0 | $ | 36,321 | 76.0 | |||||||||||||||
Three Months | % of | Three Months | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Segment | Ended | Segment | Change | % | |||||||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | Shipments | October 31, 2009 | Shipments | Amount | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
# OF UNITS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Motorized |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A |
635 | 58.5 | 313 | 51.7 | 322 | 102.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class C |
405 | 37.3 | 241 | 39.8 | 164 | 68.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B |
45 | 4.2 | 52 | 8.5 | (7 | ) | (13.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total Motorized |
1,085 | 100.0 | 606 | 100.0 | 479 | 79.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impact of Change In Price On Net Sales:
% | ||||
Increase/(Decrease) | ||||
Motorized |
||||
Class A |
(9.0) | % | ||
Class C |
(8.1) | % | ||
Class B |
11.6 | % | ||
Total Motorized |
(3.0) | % |
24
Table of Contents
The increase in motorized net sales of 76.0% resulted from a 79.0% increase in unit shipments and a
3.0% decrease in the impact of the change in the net price per unit resulting primarily from mix of
product. The overall market increase in unit shipments of motorhomes was 79.2% for the two month
period of August and September 2010 compared to the same period last year according to statistics
published by the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association.
The overall impact of the change in the net price per motorized unit was a decrease of 3.0%. The
decrease in the net price per unit within the Class A product line is primarily due to increased
demand for the more moderately priced gas units as compared to the generally larger and more
expensive diesel units. Within the Class C product line, customer demand is currently trending
toward the lower to more moderately priced units. In addition, due to current competitor and dealer
pressures, discounting in both product lines has increased as well, which also effectively lowers
unit sales prices. Within the Class B product line, the increase in the net price per unit is due
to a greater concentration of higher priced models in the current year, as certain lower priced
products are no longer offered this year.
Cost of products sold increased $31,737 to $76,039 or 90.4% of motorized net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2010 compared to $44,302 or 92.7% of motorized net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2009. The change in material, labor, freight-out and warranty comprised
$31,181, of the $31,737 increase due to increased sales volume. Material, labor, freight-out and
warranty as a combined percentage of motorized net sales increased slightly to 85.3% from 84.9%
primarily due to the impact of increased discounting. Total manufacturing overhead as a percentage
of motorized net sales decreased to 5.1% from 7.8% due to the increase in unit production resulting
in higher absorption of fixed overhead costs. Total manufacturing overhead increased $555 due
primarily to wage and benefit increases to support the increase in sales.
Motorized gross profit increased $4,584 to $8,075 or 9.6% of motorized net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2010 compared to $3,491 or 7.3% of motorized net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2009. The increase in gross profit was due primarily to the 79.0% increase
in unit sales volume and cost reduction as a percentage of motorized sales noted above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $5,032 or 6.0% of motorized net sales for the
three months ended October 31, 2010 compared to $3,378 or 7.1% of motorized net sales for the three
months ended October 31, 2009. The primary reason for the $1,654 increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses was increased motorized net sales and increased income before income taxes,
which caused related commissions, bonuses and other compensation to increase by $1,536.
Motorized income before income taxes was 1.2% of motorized net sales for the three months ended
October 31, 2010 and 0.2% of motorized net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2009. The
primary factor for this increase was the improved gross profit on increased motorized net sales and
labor and production efficiency improvements. These improvements were partially offset by the
$2,036 trademark impairment charge included in the results for the three months ended October 31,
2010.
25
Table of Contents
BUSES
Analysis of change in net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2010 vs. the three months
ended October 31, 2009:
Three Months | Three Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||||||||||
October 31, 2010 | October 31, 2009 | Change | % Change | |||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 100,121 | $ | 112,623 | $ | (12,502 | ) | (11.1 | ) | |||||||
# of Units |
1,415 | 1,590 | (175 | ) | (11.0 | ) | ||||||||||
Impact of Change in Price on Net Sales |
(.1 | ) |
The decrease in buses net sales of 11.1% resulted from an 11.0% decrease in unit shipments and a
.1% decrease in the impact of the change in the net price per unit, resulting primarily from the
current reduction of the availability of federal stimulus money that was prevalent during the prior
year period.
Cost of products sold decreased $9,701 to $89,487 or 89.4% of buses net sales for the three months
ended October 31, 2010 compared to $99,188 or 88.1% of buses net sales for the three months ended
October 31, 2009. The decrease in material, labor, freight-out and warranty represents $10,762 of
the $9,701 decrease in cost of products sold. Material, labor, freight-out and warranty as a
percentage of buses net sales decreased to 81.0% from 81.6%. This decrease in percentage of cost of
products sold was due to higher margin product mix and better pricing and procurement. Total
manufacturing overhead increased $1,061, primarily due to increased employee health insurance
costs, which caused manufacturing overhead to increase to 8.4% from 6.5% as a percentage of buses
net sales.
Buses gross profit decreased $2,801 to $10,634 or 10.6% of buses net sales for the three months
ended October 31, 2010 compared to $13,435 or 11.9% of buses net sales for the three months ended
October 31, 2009. The decrease was mainly due to the reduction in unit sales.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses were $5,196 or 5.2% of buses net sales
for the three months ended October 31, 2010 compared to $4,956 or 4.4% of buses net sales for the
three months ended October 31, 2009.
Buses income before income taxes was 9.4% of buses net sales for the three months ended October 31,
2010 compared to 7.4% for the three months ended October 31, 2009. This increase is primarily due
to the favorable impact of the gain on involuntary conversion relating to the fire at our
Champion/General Coach America north bus production facility for the three months ended October 31,
2010, partially offset by the decrease in buses net sales and corresponding gross profit and the
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of net sales.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
As of October 31, 2010, we had $141,747 in cash and cash equivalents compared to $247,751 on July
31, 2010.
Long term investments net of temporary impairments totaled $3,390 as of October 31, 2010 and $5,327
as of July 31, 2010. These investments were comprised of auction rate securities, or ARS. In the
three months ended October 31, 2010, $2,150 of our ARS were redeemed at par. Reference is made to
Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this report for a
description of developments related to our investments in ARS.
Working capital at October 31, 2010 was $264,809 compared to $345,006 at July 31, 2010. We have no
long-term debt. Capital expenditures of approximately $16,500 for the three months ended October
31, 2010 were made primarily for building and building improvements and to replace machinery and
equipment used in the ordinary course of business.
The Company anticipates additional capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 of approximately $14,800.
These expenditures will be made primarily for expanding our recreation vehicle facilities and
replacing and upgrading machinery and equipment and other assets to be used in the ordinary course
of business. Anticipated capital expenditures will be funded by operations and/or cash on hand.
26
Table of Contents
Operating Activities
Net cash generated from operating activities for the three months ended October 31, 2010 was $9,694
as compared to $18,453 for the three months ended October 31, 2009. The combination of net income
and non-cash items (primarily depreciation, amortization, trademark impairment and deferred income taxes) provided $32,395 of operating cash compared to $26,707 in the prior year period.
However, this was offset by a reduction in accounts payable and accrued liabilities due to
reductions in backlog and production and by significant tax payments in the three month period
ended October 31, 2010.
Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities of $110,910 for the three months ended October 31, 2010 was
primarily due to the cash consideration paid of $99,562 for the acquisition of Heartland and its
parent company on September 16, 2010 and capital expenditures of approximately $16,500. During the three months ended October 31, 2009, net cash
provided by investing activities of $14,748 was primarily due to ARS redemptions of $15,000 at par.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities of $4,788 for the three months ended October 31, 2010
primarily represented dividend payments. The Company increased its
regular quarterly dividend of $.07 per share to $.10 per share in October 2010. During the three months ended October 31, 2009, net cash used in
financing activities of $31,602 was for dividend payments.
This included a special dividend of $.50 per share.
Critical Accounting Principles
The consolidated financial statements of Thor are prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the
use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the periods presented. We believe that of our accounting policies, the following
may involve a higher degree of judgments, estimates, and complexity:
Impairment of Goodwill, Trademarks and Long-Lived Assets
At least annually, we review the carrying amount of goodwill and trademarks with indefinite useful
lives. Long-lived assets, identifiable intangibles that are amortized, goodwill and trademarks with
indefinite useful lives are also reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from future cash
flows. This review is performed using estimates of future cash flows. If the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset is considered impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which
the carrying amount of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Management believes that the
estimates of future cash flows and fair values are reasonable; however, changes in estimates of
such cash flows and fair values could affect the evaluations.
Insurance Reserves
Generally, we are self-insured for workers compensation and group medical insurance. Under these
plans, liabilities are recognized for claims incurred, including those incurred but not reported.
The liability for workers compensation claims is determined by the Company with the assistance of
a third party administrator and actuary using various state statutes and historical claims
experience. Group medical reserves are estimated using historical claims experience. We have a
self-insured retention (SIR) for products liability and personal injury matters of $5,000 per
occurrence. We have established a reserve on our balance sheet for such occurrences based on
historical data and actuarial information. Amounts above the SIR, up to a certain dollar amount,
are covered by our excess insurance policy. We maintain excess liability insurance aggregating
$25,000 with outside insurance carriers to minimize our risks related to catastrophic claims in
excess of all our self-insured positions for product liability and personal injury matters. Any
material change in the aforementioned factors could have an adverse impact on our operating
results.
27
Table of Contents
Product Warranties
We generally provide customers of our products with a one-year warranty covering defects in
material or workmanship, with longer warranties on certain structural components. We record a
liability based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing claims
on products sold as of the balance sheet date. Factors we use in estimating the warranty liability
include a history of units sold, existing dealer inventory, average cost incurred and a profile of
the distribution of warranty expenditures over the warranty period. A significant increase in
dealer shop rates, the cost of parts or the frequency of claims could have a material adverse
impact on our operating results for the period or periods in which such claims or additional costs
materialize. Management believes that the warranty reserve is adequate; however, actual claims
incurred could differ from estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserves. Warranty reserves are
reviewed and adjusted as necessary on a quarterly basis.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes". The
objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or
refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax
consequences of events that have been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax
returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome
of these future tax consequences could materially impact the Companys financial position or its
results of operations.
We recognize liabilities for uncertain tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is
to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence
indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to
estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be
realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such
amounts, as we have to determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We re-evaluate these
uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis. This evaluation is based on factors including, but
not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues
under audit, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement would result in
the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision.
Significant judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax
assets and liabilities and valuation allowances recorded against our deferred tax assets, if any.
Valuation allowances must be considered due to the uncertainty of realizing deferred tax assets.
ASC 740 requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established against
their deferred tax assets on a tax jurisdictional basis based on the consideration of all available
evidence, using a more likely than not standard. We have evaluated the sustainability of our
deferred tax assets on our consolidated balance sheet which includes the assessment of the
cumulative income over recent prior periods. As of October 31, 2010, based on ASC guidelines, we
determined a valuation allowance was not required to be recorded against deferred income tax assets
in any of the tax jurisdictions in which we currently operate.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the sale of recreation vehicles and buses are recorded when all of the following
conditions have been met:
1) | An order for a product has been received from a dealer; | ||
2) | Written or oral approval for payment has been received from the dealers flooring institution; | ||
3) | A common carrier signs the delivery ticket accepting responsibility for the product as agent for the dealer; and | ||
4) | The product is removed from the Companys property for delivery to the dealer who placed the order. |
Certain shipments are sold to customers under cash on delivery (COD) terms. The Company
recognizes revenue on credit sales upon shipment and COD sales upon payment and delivery. Most
sales are made by dealers financing their purchases under flooring arrangements with banks or
finance companies. Products are not sold on consignment, dealers do not have the right to return
products, and dealers are typically responsible for interest costs to floorplan
lenders. On average, the Company receives payments from floorplan lenders on products sold to
dealers within 15 days of the invoice date.
28
Table of Contents
Repurchase Commitments
We are contingently liable under terms of repurchase agreements with financial institutions
providing inventory financing for certain dealers of certain of our products. These arrangements,
which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products sold to dealers in the
event of default by the dealer. The repurchase price is generally determined by the original sales
price of the product and pre-defined curtailment arrangements and we typically resell the
repurchased product at a discount from its repurchase price. We account for the guarantee under our
repurchase agreements of our dealers financing by estimating and deferring a portion of the
related product sale that represents the estimated fair value of the repurchase obligation. This
deferred amount is included in our repurchase and guarantee reserve. Additionally, the repurchase
and guarantee reserve includes our estimated loss upon resale of expected repurchases. This
estimate is based on recent historical experience supplemented by managements assessment of
current economic and other conditions affecting its dealers.
Our risk of loss under these repurchase agreements is reduced because (a) we sell our products to a
large number of dealers under these arrangements, (b) the repurchase price we are obligated to pay
declines over the period of the agreements (generally up to eighteen months) while the value of the
related product may not decline ratably and (c) we have historically been able to readily resell
any repurchased product. We believe that any future losses under these agreements will not have a
significant effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (FASB), issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments
to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) SFAS 167. SFAS No. 167 amends ASC 810-10 (formerly FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R)) by adding previously considered qualifying special purpose entities (the
concept of these entities was eliminated by SFAS No. 166). In addition, companies must perform an
analysis to determine whether the Companys variable interest or interests give it a controlling
financial interest in a variable interest entity. Companies must also reassess on an ongoing basis
whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The amendments to ASC
810-10 are effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted the
amendments effective August 1, 2010. The adoption of these amendments did not have any impact on
the financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, 2010-20 Disclosures about the
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses. The new disclosure
guidance expands the existing requirements. The enhanced disclosures provide information on the
nature of credit risk in a companys financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed in
determining the related allowance for credit losses, and changes to the allowance during the
reporting period. The new disclosures will become effective for the Companys interim and annual
reporting periods ending after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this
ASU to have a material impact on its financial disclosures, and it will adopt its provisions when
they become effective.
Forward Looking Statements
This report includes certain statements that are forward looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 as amended (the Exchange Act). These forward looking statements involve uncertainties
and risks. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from our expectations.
Factors which could cause materially different results include, among others, additional issues
that may arise in connection with the findings of the completed investigation by the Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors and the Securities and Exchange Commissions (the SEC)
requests for additional information, fuel prices, fuel availability, lower consumer confidence,
interest rate increases, tight lending practices, increased material costs, the success of new
product introductions, the pace of acquisitions, cost structure improvements, the impact of the
auction market failures on our liquidity, competition and general economic conditions and the other
risks and uncertainties discussed more fully in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended July 31, 2010
and Part II, Item 1A of this report. We disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any
updates or revisions to
29
Table of Contents
any change in expectation of the Company after the date hereof or any
change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based except as required by
law.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
None
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange
Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the rules and forms of the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure
controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control
objectives and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the
cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. We carried out an evaluation, as of
the end of the period covered by this report, under the supervision and with the participation of
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms
and accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow for timely decisions
regarding required disclosures.
During the three months ended on October 31, 2010, there were no material changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
30
Table of Contents
PART II Other Information
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We have been subject to an SEC review regarding the facts and circumstances giving rise to the
restatement of our previously issued financial statements as of July 31, 2006 and 2005, and for
each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2006, and the financial results in each
of the quarterly periods in 2006 and 2005, and our financial statements as of and for the three
months ended October 31, 2006 and related matters. We have cooperated fully with the SEC, including
from time to time responding to SEC staff requests for additional information. The investigation by
the SEC staff could result in the SEC seeking various penalties and relief, including, without
limitation, civil injunctive relief and/or civil monetary penalties or administrative relief. We
are currently discussing the terms of a possible settlement of this matter with the SEC staff.
However, there can be no assurance that a settlement will be reached.
The Company has been named in approximately 800 complaints, some of which were originally styled
as putative class actions (with respect to which class certification was ultimately denied) and
some of which were filed by individual plaintiffs, filed against manufacturers of travel trailers
and manufactured homes supplied to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for use as
emergency living accommodations in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The complaints have
been transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana by the federal panel on multidistrict
litigation for consideration in a matter captioned In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products
Liability Litigation, Case Number MDL 07-1873, United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana. The complaints generally assert claims for damages (for health related
problems, medical expenses, emotional distress and lost earnings) and for medical monitoring costs
due to the presence of formaldehyde in the units. Some of the lawsuits also seek punitive and/or
exemplary damages. Thus far, however, none of the lawsuits allege a specific amount of damages
sought and instead make general allegations about the nature of the plaintiffs claims without
placing a dollar figure on them. The Company strongly disputes the allegations in these complaints,
and intends to vigorously defend itself in all such matters.
In addition, we are involved in certain litigation arising out of our operations in the normal
course of our business, most of which are based upon state lemon laws, warranty claims, other
claims and accidents (for which we carry insurance above a specified deductible amount). In this
regard, we were a party to two companion lawsuits pending in Jefferson County, Texas which were
brought against us and our affiliates, each of which arose from a March 29, 2006 crash of a bus
manufactured by one of our subsidiaries. At the mediation of the cases on June 15, 2010, a complete
settlement of both cases was reached. Formal settlement agreements were executed by each of the
plaintiffs in August 2010, and counsel for all plaintiffs and cross-claimants have signed Notices
of Nonsuit which were filed with both courts. We have been informed that an Order of Dismissal was
signed and entered in each of the lawsuits, one on September 16, 2010 and the other on September
20, 2010, disposing of both lawsuits.
On June 25, 2010, we and certain of our officers and directors were sued in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Dayton Division by Teamsters Allied Benefit
Funds, individually and purportedly on behalf of a class of all those who purchased or acquired our
common stock between November 30, 2009 to June 10, 2010. The complaint alleged violations of
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, alleging that our SEC filings and
press releases were false and misleading due to, among other things, our June 10, 2010 announcement
that our financial statements might need to be restated. We have since announced that a restatement
is not necessary. We believe the lawsuit was without merit, and the plaintiff agreed to voluntarily
dismiss the lawsuit without prejudice on September 7, 2010.
While it is impossible to estimate with certainty the ultimate legal and financial liability with
respect to the litigation arising out of our operations in the normal course of business, including
the pending litigation described above, we believe that while the final resolution of any such
litigation may have an impact on our consolidated results for a particular reporting period, the
ultimate disposition of such litigation will not have any material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.
31
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, except as noted below.
We cannot assure you that Heartland will be successfully integrated by us.
If we cannot successfully integrate the operations of Heartland with our existing operations, we
may experience material negative consequences to our business, financial condition or results of
operations. The integration of companies that have previously been operated separately involves a
number of risks, including, but not limited to:
| demands on management related to the increase in our size after the Heartland acquisition; | ||
| the diversion of managements attention from the management of daily operations to the integration of operations; | ||
| difficulties in the assimilation and retention of employees; and | ||
| difficulties in the integration of departments, systems, including accounting systems, technologies, books and records and procedures, as well as in maintaining uniform standards, controls, including internal accounting controls, procedures and policies and expenses of any undisclosed or potential legal liabilities. |
Prior to the acquisition, Heartland and Thor operated as separate entities. We may not be able to
maintain the levels of revenue, earnings or operating efficiency that each entity had achieved or
might achieve separately. Heartlands growth could occur at the expense of our other towable
companies. Successful integration of Heartlands operations will depend on our ability to manage
those operations, realize opportunities for revenue growth presented by strengthened product
offerings and to eliminate redundant and excess costs.
We could incur asset impairment charges for goodwill, intangible
assets or other long-lived assets.
We have a significant amount of goodwill, intangible assets and other
long-lived assets. At least
annually we review goodwill and indefinite-lived trademarks for impairment. Long-lived assets, identifiable intangibles that
are amortized, goodwill and indefinite-lived trademarks are
also reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from future
cash flows. If the carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered
impaired, an impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the
carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Our determination of future cash flows, future
recoverability and fair value of our long-lived assets includes significant estimates and assumptions.
Changes in those estimates or assumptions or lower than anticipated future financial performance may result in
the identification of an impaired asset and a non-cash impairment charge, which could be material.
Any such charge will adversely affect our
operating results and financial condition.
32
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit | Description | |
10.1
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2010, by and among the Company, Heartland RV Holdings, L.P., Towable Holdings, Inc. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC and certain other persons named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 22, 2010). | |
10.2
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 16, 2010, by and among the Company and certain holders of shares of capital stock of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 22, 2010). | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document (furnished herewith) | |
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document (furnished herewith) |
Attached as Exhibits 101 to this report are the
following financial statements
from the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
October 31, 2010 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i)
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Statements of Condensed Consolidated Operations, (iii)
the Statements of Condensed Consolidated Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial
statements tagged as blocks of text.
The XBRL related information in Exhibits 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections.
The XBRL related information in Exhibits 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections.
33
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THOR INDUSTRIES, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
DATE: November 29, 2010 | /s/ Peter B. Orthwein | |||
Peter B. Orthwein | ||||
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
||||
DATE: November 29, 2010 | /s/ Christian G. Farman | |||
Christian G. Farman | ||||
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
||||
34