THUNDER MOUNTAIN GOLD INC - Quarter Report: 2019 March (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-08429
THUNDER MOUNTAIN GOLD, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada |
| 91-1031015 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
| (IRS identification No.) |
|
|
|
11770 W President Dr. STE F |
|
|
Boise, Idaho |
| 83713-8986 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
| (Zip Code) |
| ||
(208) 658-1037 | ||
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code) |
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes¨ No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is ¨ a large accelerated filer, ¨ an accelerated file, ¨ a non-accelerated filer, x a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) or ¨ an emerging growth company
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
¨ Yes x No
Number of shares of issuer’s common stock outstanding at April 27, 2019: 57,633,879
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION3
Item 1 – Financial Statements3
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation15
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk25
Item 4. Controls and Procedures25
Not required for smaller reporting companies.26
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.26
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.26
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures26
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 | |||||
|
| March 31, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 | |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Current assets: |
|
|
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents |
| $ 289 |
| $ 3,710 | |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
| 15,394 |
| 29,425 | |
Total current assets |
| 15,683 |
| 33,135 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Property and Equipment: |
|
|
|
| |
Land |
| 280,333 |
| 280,333 | |
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $132,464 and $124,384, respectively |
| 50,141 |
| 58,221 | |
Total property and equipment |
| 330,474 |
| 338,554 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Mineral interests (Note 3) |
| 379,477 |
| 479,477 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Total assets |
| $ 725,634 |
| $ 851,166 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| |
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
| |
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
| $ 162,407 |
| $ 138,092 | |
Accrued related party liability (Note 5) |
| 241,685 |
| 241,685 | |
Accrued interest payable to related parties (Note 5) |
| 57,921 |
| 52,787 | |
Deferred officer compensation (Note 6) |
| 1,041,500 |
| 1,041,500 | |
Related parties notes payable, net of discount (Note 5) |
| 146,576 |
| 126,576 | |
Total current liabilities |
| 1,650,089 |
| 1,600,640 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Accrued reclamation costs |
| 65,000 |
| 65,000 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Total liabilities |
| 1,715,089 |
| 1,665,640 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 2 and 3) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Stockholders' equity (deficit): |
|
|
|
| |
Preferred stock; $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
| - |
| - | |
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 57,645,579 shares issued and outstanding |
| 57,646 |
| 57,646 | |
Additional paid-in capital |
| 5,929,076 |
| 5,811,988 | |
Less: 11,700 shares of treasury stock, at cost |
| (24,200) |
| (24,200) | |
Accumulated deficit |
| (7,125,679) |
| (6,833,610) | |
Total Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc stockholders' equity (deficit) |
| (1,163,157) |
| (988,176) | |
Noncontrolling interest in Owyhee Gold Trust (Note 3) |
| 173,702 |
| 173,702 | |
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) |
| (989,455) |
| (814,474) | |
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit) |
| $ 725,634 |
| $ 851,166 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three Months Ended | ||
|
| March 31, | ||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Exploration |
| $ 8,617 |
| $ 57,616 |
Legal and accounting |
| 89,011 |
| 27,561 |
Management and administrative |
| 181,227 |
| 91,127 |
Depreciation |
| 8,080 |
| 12,608 |
Total operating expenses |
| 286,935 |
| 188,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, related parties |
| (5,133) |
| (15,097) |
Miscellaneous income |
| - |
| 703 |
Foreign currency exchange gain (loss) |
| (1) |
| - |
Total other income (expense) |
| (5,134) |
| (14,394) |
Net Loss |
|
(292,069) |
|
(203,306) |
Net Income – noncontrolling interest in Owyhee Gold Trust |
|
- |
|
- |
Net Loss – Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. |
| $ (292,069) |
| $ (203,306) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss per common share-basic and diluted |
| $ (0.01) |
| $ Nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding-basic and diluted |
|
57,645,579 |
|
55,932,246 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Three Months Ended |
| ||
|
| March 31, |
| ||
|
| 2019 |
| 2018 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss | $ | (292,069) | $ | (203,306) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
| 8,080 |
| 12,608 |
|
Stock based compensation |
| 117,088 |
| - |
|
Amortization of related party notes payable discount |
| - |
| 8,888 |
|
Change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
| 14,031 |
| (8,730) |
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
| 24,315 |
| 12,588 |
|
Accrued interest payable to related parties |
| 5,134 |
| 6,209 |
|
Deferred officer compensation |
| - |
| 78,000 |
|
Net cash used by operating activities |
| (123,421) |
| (93,743) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from mineral interest |
| 100,000 |
| - |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
| 100,000 |
| - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock |
| - |
| 182,988 |
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest |
| - |
| (421) |
|
Borrowing on related parties notes payable |
| 20,000 |
| - |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| 20,000 |
| 182,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| (3,421) |
| 88,824 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
| 3,710 |
| 36,454 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
| $ 289 |
| $ 125,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash financing and investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for payment of related party note payable and accrued interest payable |
| - |
| $ 104,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. |
|
|
|
| ||||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) |
|
|
|
| ||||
For the periods ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 |
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Common Stock | Additional Paid-In Capital | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Deficit | Non-Controlling Interest in OGT | Total | ||
| Shares |
| Amount | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2018 | 55,095,579 |
| $ 55,096 | $ 5,457,538 | $(24,200) | $ (6,195,923) | $ 174,111 | $ (533,378) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares and warrants issued for cash | 1,307,057 |
| 1,307 | 181,681 | - | - | - | 182,988 |
Shares and warrants issued for payment of related parties notes payable and accrued interest | 742,943 |
|
743 | 103,269 |
|
|
| 104,012 |
Distribution to noncontrolling interest | - |
| - | - | - | - | (421) | (421) |
Net income (loss) | - |
| - | - | - | (203,306) |
| (203,306) |
Balances at March 31, 2018 | 57,145,579 |
| $ 57,146 | $ 5,742,488 | $(24,200) | $ (6,399,229) | $ 173,690 | $ (450,105) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,645,579 |
| $ 57,646 | $ 5,811,988 | $(24,200) | $ (6,833,610) | $ 173,702 | $ (814,474) | |
- |
| - | 117,088 | - | - | - | 117,088 | |
Net income (loss) | - |
| - | - | - | (292,069) | - | (292,069) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at March 31, 2019 | 57,645,579 |
| $ 57,646 | $ 5,929,076 | $(24,200) | $ (7,125,679) | $ 173,702 | $ (989,455) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Business Operations
Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. (“Thunder Mountain”, “THMG”, or “the Company”) was originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Idaho on November 9, 1935, under the name of Montgomery Mines, Inc. In April 1978, the Montgomery Mines Corporation was obtained by a group of the Thunder Mountain property holders and changed its name to Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc., with the primary goal to further develop their holdings in the Thunder Mountain Mining District, located in Valley County, Idaho. Thunder Mountain Gold, Inc. takes its name from the Thunder Mountain Mining District, where its principal lode mining claims were located. For several years, the Company’s activities were restricted to maintaining its property position and exploration activities. During 2005, the Company sold its holdings in the Thunder Mountain Mining District. During 2007, the Company acquired the South Mountain Mines property in southwest Idaho and initiated exploration activities on that property, which continue today.
Basis of Presentation and Going Concern
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the management of the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim consolidated financial statements have been included.
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist as of the date the financial statements are published, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are inherent in the preparation of the Company's financial statements; accordingly, it is possible that the actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions, which could have a material effect on the reported amounts of the Company's financial position and results of operations. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2019.
For further information refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto in the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has historically incurred losses and does not have sufficient cash at March 31, 2019 to fund normal operations for the next 12 months. The Company has no recurring source of revenue and its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise capital to fund its future exploration and working capital requirements. The Company’s plans for the long-term continuation as a going concern include financing the Company’s future operations through sales of its common stock and/or debt and the eventual profitable exploitation of its mining properties. Additionally, the current capital markets and general economic conditions in the United States are significant obstacles to raising the required funds. On April 9, 2019, Eric Jones, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer loaned the Company $30,000 in the form of a note payable with a monthly interest rate of 1.5%. Management is committed to funding the Company in anticipation of the BeMetals Tranche 2 completion date funding (see below). Management is confident that Tranche 2 funding will be completed on or before May 31, 2019 and committed to supporting the Company through short-term debt financing until that funding date.
On February 27, 2019, the Company entered into an Option Agreement, (the “BeMetals Option Agreement”) with BeMetals Corp. Under the terms of the BeMetals Option Agreement, BMET USA will be entitled to purchase 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of South Mountain Mines, Inc. (“SMMI”) from Thunder Mountain Resources, Inc. (“TMRI”), both wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. The term of the agreement is for two years with BeMetals completing a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") completed by a mutually agreed
7
third-party engineering firm. This agreement requires payments to the Company of $850,000 over its term. In the event that BeMetals decides not to proceed with the South Mountain Project following, BeMetals will not be obligated to make any additional payments. See Note 3 for further information.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. If the going concern basis was not appropriate for these financial statements, adjustments would be necessary in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the reported expenses and the balance sheet classifications used.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company; its wholly owned subsidiaries, Thunder Mountain Resources, Inc. (“TMRI”) and South Mountain Mines, Inc. (“SMMI”); and a company in which the Company has majority control, Owyhee Gold Trust, LLC (“OGT”). Intercompany accounts are eliminated in consolidation.
The Company has established 75% ownership and full management of OGT. Thus, OGT’s financial information is included 100% in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016. The Company’s consolidated financial statements reflect the other investor’s 25% non-controlling, capped interest in OGT.
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions include the carrying value of properties and mineral interests, environmental remediation liabilities, deferred tax assets, and stock-based compensation. Management’s estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company recognizes deferred income tax liabilities or assets at the end of each period using the tax rate expected to be in effect when the taxes are actually paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is recognized on deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
When required to measure assets or liabilities at fair value, the Company uses a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used. The Company determines the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall. The categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Level 1 uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, Level 2 uses significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 uses significant unobservable inputs. The amount of the total gains or losses for the period are included in earnings that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date. The Company has no financial assets or liabilities that are adjusted to fair value on a recurring basis.
The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents and related party notes payable the carrying value of which approximates fair value based on the nature of those instruments.
8
The Company capitalizes costs for acquiring mineral interests and expenses costs to maintain mineral rights and leases as incurred. Exploration costs are expensed in the period in which they occur. Should a property reach the production stage, these capitalized costs would be amortized using the units-of-production method based on periodic estimates of ore reserves. Mineral properties are periodically assessed for impairment of value and any subsequent losses are charged to operations at the time of impairment. If a property is abandoned or sold, its capitalized costs are charged to operations.
Investments in Joint Venture
The Company’s accounting policy for joint ventures is as follows:
1.The Company uses the cost method when it does not have joint control or significant influence in a joint venture. Under the cost method, these investments are carried at cost. If other than temporary impairment in value is determined, it would then be charged to current net income or loss.
2.If the Company enters into a joint venture in which there is joint control between the parties or the Company has significant influence, the equity method is utilized whereby the Company’s share of the venture’s earnings and losses is included in the statement of operations as earnings in joint ventures and its investments therein are adjusted by a similar amount. If other than temporary impairment in value is determined, it would then be charged to current net income or loss.
3.In a joint venture where the Company holds more than 50% of the voting interest and has significant influence, the joint venture is typically consolidated with the presentation of non-controlling interest. In determining whether significant influences exist, the Company considers its participation in policy-making decisions and its representation on the venture’s management committee. See Note 3 regarding the Company’s investment in Owyhee Gold Trust, LLC.
The Company’s operations have been, and are subject to, standards for mine reclamation that have been established by various governmental agencies. The Company would record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which the Company incurred a legal obligation for the retirement of tangible long-lived assets. A corresponding asset would also be recorded and depreciated over the life of the asset.
After the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation, the liability is adjusted at the end of each reporting period to reflect changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation.
Determination of any amounts recognized upon adoption is based upon numerous estimates and assumptions, including future retirement costs, future inflation rates and the credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates.
For non-operating properties, the Company accrues costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when it is probable that such costs will be incurred, and they are reasonably estimable. Such costs are based on management’s estimate of amounts expected to be incurred when the remediation work is performed.
Share-based payments to employees and directors, including grants of employee stock options, are measured at fair value and expensed in the statement of operations over the vesting period.
9
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Updates Adopted
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842). The update modified the classification criteria and requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases. The update was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this update as of January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07 Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The update involves simplification of several aspects of accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of Topic 718 to include nonemployee awards. The update was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. Adoption of this update as of January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Accounting Standards Updates to Become Effective in Future Periods
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. The update removes, modifies and makes additions to the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. Management is evaluating the impact of this update on the Company’s fair value measurement disclosures.
The Company is required to have dual presentation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed as net income divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period plus the effect of potentially dilutive common stock equivalents, including options and warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock. As of March 31, 2019, and 2018, potentially dilutive common stock equivalents not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive are:
2019 | 2018 | |
Stock options | 5,035,000 | 4,700,000 |
Warrants | 250,000 | 1,025,000 |
Total possible dilution | 5,285,000 | 5,725,000 |
The Company has two lease arrangements with land owners that own land parcels adjacent to the Company’s South Mountain patented and unpatented mining claims. The leases were originally for a seven-year period, with annual payments of $20 per acre. The leases were renewed for an additional 10 years at $30 per acre paid annually; committed payments are listed in the table below. The lease payments have no work requirements.
| Annual Payment |
Acree Lease (June) | $ 3,390 |
Lowry Lease (October) | 11,280 |
Total | $14,670 |
The Company has 78 unpatented claims (1,600 acres) in the Trout Creek area and 21 unpatented claims in the South Mountain area. The claim fees are paid on these unpatented claims annually as follows:
10
Target Area | 2019 |
Trout Creek -State of Nevada | $12,090 |
Trout Creek -Lander County | 940 |
South Mountain-State of Idaho | 3,255 |
Total | $16,285 |
3. South Mountain Project
BeMetals Option Agreement:
On February 27, 2019, the Company entered into an Option Agreement, (the “BeMetals Option Agreement”) with BeMetals Corp., a British Columbia corporation (“BeMetals”), and BeMetals USA Corp., a Delaware corporation (“BMET USA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BeMetals. Under the terms of the BeMetals Option Agreement, BMET USA will be entitled to purchase 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of SMMI from TMRI, both wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. SMMI is the Company’s subsidiary that holds the Company’s investment in the South Mountain project mineral interest. The term of the agreement is for two years with BeMetals completing a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") completed by a mutually agreed third-party engineering firm.
Pursuant to the BeMetals Option Agreement, BMET USA will be entitled to purchase 100% of the outstanding shares of SMMI from TMRI if the following obligations are satisfied:
Tranche 1: cash payment of $100,000 to TMRI within 1 business day of delivery of voting support agreements from shareholders of THMG who hold or control shares carrying more than 50% of the voting rights attached to all outstanding THMG Shares. Payment was received on March 5, 2019 and is nonrefundable.
Tranche 2: within 3 business days following satisfaction of the Tranche 2 conditions (as defined and described below - the "Tranche 2 Completion Date"):
issuance of 10 million common shares in the capital of BMET USA to TMRI; and
BMET USA purchase of 2.5 million shares of THMG common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000, on a private placement basis.
Tranche 3: cash payment of $250,000 on or before the 6-month anniversary of the Tranche 2.
Tranche 4: cash payment of $250,000 on or before the 12-month anniversary of the Tranche 2.
Tranche 5: cash payment of $250,000 on or before the 18-month anniversary of the Tranche 2.
Tranche 6: cash payment of $250,000 plus an additional payment paid in in cash, BMET USA common shares or a combination of both. The calculation of the additional payment is an amount equal to the lesser of 50% of the market capitalization of BeMetals at the time, and the greater of either $10 million; or 20% the net present value of the South Mountain Project as calculated in a PEA.
The “Tranche 2 Completion Date” as defined by the Option Agreement is subject to a number of conditions precedent, including, among other things:
all requisite consents and regulatory approvals, including Exchange Approval;
approval of the shareholders of THMG which has been received from 53.24% of shareholders holding or controlling the issued and outstanding shares of the Company as of February 28, 2019;
delivery by THMG of a title opinion in respect of the South Mountain Project (including opinions relating to OGT, SMMI's ownership interest in OGT and TMRI ownership of SMMI Shares) (the "Title Opinion"), and related corporate legal opinions (met as of May 1, 2019);
delivery by THMG of an updated technical report in respect of the South Mountain Project, re-addressed to SMMI and BMET USA and with such amendments as required to satisfy Exchange requirements (met as of May 6, 2019); and
11
entry into the management contracts as defined by the Option Agreement (met as of May 13, 2019).
If the Tranche 2 Conditions Precedent are not satisfied (or waived) by May 31, 2019, either party may terminate the Option Agreement. The parties may extend the Outside Date by written agreement.
Payment(s) may be accelerated to exercise the Option Agreement, and restrictions will exist on resale of BeMetals common shares. The Company will not be granted any anti-dilution rights in respect of the shares. There is no assurance that the transactions contemplated under the BeMetals Option Agreement will be completed.
Amounts received by the Company under the agreement will be accounted for as a sale of mineral interest. The Company received $100,000 under the agreement in the three months ended March 31, 2019 which was applied against the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the South Mountain project. When and if payments received under the agreement exceed the carrying value of the Company’s investment, the excess amounts will be recognized as a gain in the statement of operations.
SMMI Joint Venture – OGT
The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary SMMI is the sole manager of the South Mountain Project in its entirety through a separate Mining Lease with Option to Purchase (“Lease Option”) with the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary OGT. The Lease Option includes a capped $5 million less net returns royalties paid through the date of exercise. The Lease Option expires in November 2026. If SMMI exercises the option, the option payment of $5 million less advance royalties will be distributed 100% by OGT to OGT’s minority member. Under the Lease Option, SMMI pays an advance $5,000 net returns royalty to OGT annually on November 4 which is distributed to OGT’s minority member.
The Company’s property and equipment are as follows:
|
| March 31, 2019 |
| December 31, 2018 | |
Vehicles | $ | 22,441 | $ | 22,441 | |
Buildings |
| 65,071 |
| 65,071 | |
Construction Equipment |
| 36,447 |
| 36,447 | |
Mining Equipment |
| 58,646 |
| 58,646 | |
|
| 182,605 |
| 182,605 | |
Accumulated Depreciation |
| (132,464) |
| (124,384) | |
|
| 50,141 |
| 58,221 | |
Land |
| 280,333 |
| 280,333 | |
Total Property and Equipment | $ | 330,474 | $ | 338,554 |
5. Related Parties Notes Payable
At December 31, 2018, the Company had notes payable balances of $56,768 and $69,808 with Eric Jones, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Jim Collard, the Company’s Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively. These notes, as amended, bear interest at 1.0% to 2.0% per month and are due December 31, 2019. On February 14, 2019, Eric Jones loaned an additional $10,000 at an interest rate of 1.5% per month and payable in full on June 30, 2019 bringing his balance at March 31, 2019 to $66,768.
On May 9, 2019, Mr. Jones loaned an additional $30,000 at an interest rate of 1.5% per month and payable in full on June 30, 2019.
On January 18, 2019, the Company executed a promissory note payable with Paul Beckman, a director of the Company. The amount of the note was $10,000 at an interest rate of 1.5% per month payable in full on June 30, 2019.
12
On October 25, 2017 the Company received $100,000 from Mr. Beckman under a convertible promissory note. On February 26, 2018, Mr. Beckman participated in the Company’s Private Placement and acquired 1,000,000 Units for $140,000. A portion of this amount was in exchange for retirement of Mr. Beckman’s convertible note payable of $100,000 and accrued interest payable of $4,012. After this transaction, the Company had no remaining obligation under the convertible note agreement with Mr. Beckman.
In addition to the related parties notes payable discussed in Note 5, the Company had the following related party transactions.
Three of the Company’s officers have been deferring compensation for services. The officers’ balances at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are as follows: Eric Jones, President and Chief Executive Officer - $420,000, Jim Collord, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer - $420,000, and Larry Thackery, Chief Financial Officer - $201,500. On July 31, 2018, the Company stopped expensing and deferring compensation for the three Company officers in the interest of marketing the SMMI project.
The Company engages Baird Hanson LLP (“Baird”), a company owned by one of the Company’s directors, to provide legal services. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company incurred $65,530 in legal expense with Mr. Baird. There was no expense for the three-month period ended in 2019. At both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the balance due to Baird was $241,685.
Since 2017, Eric Jones has advanced funds to the Company for operating expenses. The balance of Mr. Jones’ advances at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was $17,046 and $20,971, respectively; the balance is included in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company has a payable to Jim Collord of $35,016 and $33,167, respectively, attributed to reimbursement of expenses for SMMI project. The balance is included in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company’s common stock has a par value of $0.001 with 200,000,000 shares authorized. The Company also has 5,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.0001.
On February 20, 2018, the Board of Directors approved a Private Placement financing of up to $750,000 from the sale of equity units at a price of $0.14 per unit. Each unit consisted of one share of the Company’s common stock and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.20 for a period of 12 months. On April 27, 2018 the Company closed its Private Placement. The Company sold Units representing a total of 2,550,000 shares of common stock and 1,275,000 common stock purchase warrants for total proceeds of $357,000. Of this amount, $252,988 was received in cash and $104,012 was in exchange for retirement of a convertible note payable and related accrued interest payable. See Note 5.
At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company has outstanding warrants for 250,000 and 1,275,000, respectively shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.20 that expires in 2019. During the three month period ended March 31, 2019, no warrants were issued nor exercised and 1,025,000 warrants expired unexercised.
13
In March 2019, the Company granted 1,325,000 stock options to officers and directors of the Company. The options are exercisable on or before March 25, 2024 and have an exercise price of $0.09. The fair value of the options was determined to be $117,088 using the Black Scholes model. The options were fully vested upon grant and the entire fair value was recognized as compensation expense during the three ended March 31, 2019.
The fair value of each option award was estimated on the date of the grant using the assumptions noted in the following table:
Number of Options | 1,325,000 |
Stock price | $0.09 |
Exercise price | $0.09 |
Expected volatility | 209.5% |
Expected dividends | - |
Expected terms (in years) | 5.0 |
Risk-free rate | 2.21% |
The following is a summary of the Company’s options issued and outstanding under the Stock Option Incentive Plan:
| Shares |
| Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2017 | 4,700,000 |
| 0.09 |
Granted | - |
| - |
Expired | (990,000) |
| ( 0.07) |
Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2018 | 3,710,000 |
| $0.09 |
Granted | 1,325,000 |
| $0.09 |
Expired | - |
| - |
Outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2019 | 5,035,000 |
| $0.09 |
|
|
|
|
The average remaining contractual term of the options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2019 was 2.78 years. As of March 31, 2019, options outstanding and exercisable had an aggregate intrinsic value of approximately $19,200 based on the Company’s stock price of $0.09.
14
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand our financial condition. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our financial statements and the accompanying integral notes (“Notes”) thereto. The following statements may be forward-looking in nature and actual results may differ materially.
Plan of Operation:
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS: The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following: inability to locate property with mineralization, lack of financing for exploration efforts, competition to acquire mining properties; risks inherent in the mining industry, and risk factors that are listed in the Company's reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
On February 27, 2019, the Company entered into an Option Agreement, (the “BeMetals Option Agreement”) with BeMetals Corp., a British Columbia corporation (“BeMetals”), and BeMetals USA Corp., a Delaware corporation (“BMET USA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BeMetals. Under the terms of the BeMetals Option Agreement, BMET USA will be entitled to purchase 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of SMMI from TMRI, both wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. The term of the agreement is for two years, upon certain conditions extendable to three years, with BeMetals required to issue a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") completed by a mutually agreed third-party engineering firm. Upon Tranche 2, BeMetals will issue 10 million BMET common shares (Consideration Shares) to TMRI, and BeMetals will also purchase of 2.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000, on a private placement. BeMetals will make cash payments of $1,100,000 over the 24 months of the Option Agreement. The first Tranche of $100,000 has been paid to the Company. There is no assurance that the transactions under the BeMetals Option Agreement will be completed.
The Company’s plan of operation for the next twelve months will be to provide support to BeMetals Corp. during their option period and help ensure that the South Mountain PEA is completed on schedule and within budget.
While South Mountain is the Company`s main focus, work to advance the Trout Creek Project will occur in 2019 as time and available capital allows.
South Mountain Project, Owyhee County, Idaho
The South Mountain Project is considered an advanced stage, high-grade zinc-silver exploration or pre-development project. The land package at South Mountain consists of a total of 17 patented mining claims encompassing approximately 326 acres, 21 unpatented mining lode claims covering approximately 290 acres, and approximately 489 acres of leased private land. In addition, the project owns 360 acres of private land (mill site) not contiguous with the mining claims. All holdings are located in the South Mountain Mining District, Owyhee County, Idaho.
The property is located approximately 70 air miles southwest of Boise, Idaho and approximately 24 miles southeast of Jordan Valley, Oregon. It is accessible by highway 95 driving south from the Boise area to Jordan Valley Oregon, then by traveling southeast approximately 22 miles back into Idaho, via Owyhee County road that is dirt and improved to within 4 miles of historic mine site. The last 4 miles up the South Mountain Mine road are unimproved dirt road. The property is accessible year-round to within 4 miles of the property, where the property is accessible from May thru October without plowing snow. There is power distribution within 4 miles of the site as well. The climate is considered high desert. The Company has water rights on the property, and there is a potable spring on the property that once supplied water to the main camp.
On February 27, 2019, the Company entered into an Option Agreement, (the “BeMetals Option Agreement”) with BeMetals Corp., a British Columbia corporation (“BeMetals”), and BeMetals USA Corp., a Delaware corporation (“BMET USA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BeMetals. Under the terms of the BeMetals Option Agreement, BMET USA will be entitled to purchase 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of SMMI from TMRI, both wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. The term of the agreement is for two years with BeMetals completing a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA"), prepared by a mutually agreed third-party engineering firm. BeMetals will
15
issue 10 million BMET common shares (Consideration Shares) to TMRI. BeMetals will also purchase of 2.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000, on a private placement. BeMetals will make cash payments of $850,000 over the 24 months of the agreement and another $250,000 upon exercise of the Option Agreement. The exercise of the Option Agreement price can be paid in combination with cash and BeMetals common shares.
Property History
The limited historic production peaked during World War II when, based on smelter receipts, the production of direct shipped ore totaled 53,653 tons containing 3,118 ounces of gold, 566,439 ounces of silver, 13,932 pounds of copper, 2,562,318 pounds of lead and 15,593,061 pounds of zinc. In addition to the direct-ship ore, a flotation mill was constructed and operated during the late-1940s and early-1950s.
Metal | Grade | Total Metal |
Gold Silver Copper Lead Zinc | 0.058 opt 10.6 opt 1.4% 2.4% 14.5% | 3,120 ozs 566,440 ozs 1,485,200 lbs 2,562,300 lbs 15,593,100 lbs |
Anaconda Crude Ore Shipments: 1941-1953 Total Tons: 53,653
South Mountain Mines Inc. (an Idaho Corporation) owned the patented claims from 1975 to the time the Company purchased the entity in 2007. They conducted extensive exploration work including extending the Sonneman Level by approximately 1,500 feet to intercept the down-dip extension of the Texas sulfide mineralization mined on the Laxey Level approximately 400 feet up-dip from the Sonneman. High grade sulfide mineralization was intercepted and confirmed on the Sonneman Extension. In 1985 South Mountain Mines Inc. completed a feasibility study based on historic and newly developed ore zones exposed in their underground workings and drilling. This resulted in a historic resource of approximately 470,000 tons containing 23,500 ounces of gold, 3,530,000 ounces of silver, 8,339,000 pounds of copper, 13,157,000 pounds of lead and 91,817,000 pounds of zinc. Although they determined positive economics, and that the resource was still open at depth with a large upside potential, the project was shut down and placed into care and maintenance.
In 2008, the Company contracted Kleinfelder, Inc., a nationwide engineering and consulting firm, to complete a technical report “Resources Data Evaluation, South Mountain Property, South Mountain Mining District, Owyhee County, Idaho”. The technical report was commissioned by Thunder Mountain Resources, Inc. to evaluate all the existing data available on the South Mountain property. Kleinfelder utilized a panel modeling method using this data to determine potential mineralized material remaining and to make a comparison with the resource determined by South Mountain Mines in the mid-1980s.
Additional drilling and sampling will be necessary before the resource can be classified as a mineable reserve, but Kleinfelder’s calculations provided a potential resource number that is consistent with South Mountain Mines’ (Bowes 1985) reserve model.
Late in 2009, the Company contracted with Northwestern Groundwater & Geology to incorporate all the new drill and sampling data into an NI 43-101 Technical Report. This report was completed as part of the Company’s dual listing on the TSX Venture Exchange in 2010.
In January of 2018, the Company engaged Hard Rock Consulting LLC (HRC) from Denver Colorado to update the South Mountain Project 43-101. HRC concluded that significant potential exists to increase the known mineral resource with additional drilling, as well as to upgrade existing mineral resource classifications with additional infill drilling. HRC also determined that the conceptual geologic model is sound, and, in conjunction with drilling results, indicates that mineralization is essentially open in all directions, and is continuous between underground levels and extends to the surface.
16
HRC also noted that:
THMG technical staff has thorough understanding of the geology of the South Mountain Project, and that the appropriate deposit model is being applied for exploration.
Because the Project is largely located on and surrounded by private land, it greatly simplifies Project approvals compared to mining projects involving public lands.
Initial metallurgical testing demonstrates that the South Mountain massive sulfide/skarn mineralization is amenable to differential flotation and concentration.
The current mineral resource at the South Mountain Project more than sufficient to warrant continued planning and development to further advance the Project.
The Technical Report was authored by Ms. J.J. Brown, P.G., SME-RM, Mr. Jeffrey Choquette, P.E., and Mr. Randy Martin, SME-RM, all of Hard Rock Consulting, each of whom is an independent qualified person for the purposes of NI 43-101 The NI 43-101 Technical Report has an effective date of April 7, 2018 and has been filed in Canada on SEDAR in accordance with NI 43-101. The Report can be reviewed on the Company`s website at www.thundermountaingold.com.
Note to United States investors concerning estimates of measured, indicated and inferred resources.
Disclosure of the NI-43-101 has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Canadian securities laws, including Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”), which differ from the current requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) set out in Industry Guide 7. The Highlights of South Mountain NI-43-101 section refers to “mineral resources,” “measured mineral resources,” “indicated mineral resources,” and “inferred mineral resources.” While these categories of mineralization are recognized and required by Canadian securities laws, they are not recognized by Industry Guide 7 and are not normally permitted to be disclosed in SEC filings. United States investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any of measured, indicated or inferred mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves. Under Industry Guide 7, mineralization may not be classified as a “reserve” unless the mineralization can be economically or legally extracted at the time the “reserve” determination is made. "Inferred mineral resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Disclosure of "contained ounces" in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian reporting standards; however, Industry Guide 7 normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute "reserves" by Industry Guide 7 standards as in-place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information contained in this 10-k containing descriptions of South Mountain’s mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of Industry Guide 7.
Highlights of South Mountain NI-43-101 Report:
The most recent THMG drilling program was successful in defining the geometry and confirming the grades of the DMEA and Texas massive sulfide zones. Confirmed intercepts within the model include:
DMEA core hole DM2UC13-13, returned a 91.5-foot true width intercept of 13.79% Zn, 12.75 o.p.t. Ag, 0.08 o.p.t. Au, 0.45% Cu, and 7.07% Pb;
Texas core hole TX13-03 drilled from the surface across the zone, returned 11.8 feet true width, assaying 14.08% Zn, 9.01 o.p.t. Ag, 0.01 o.p.t. Au, 1.43% Cu, and 0.35% Pb
DMEA core hole DM2UC13-17, includes a 42-foot true width intercept of 17.86% Zn, 2.98 o.p.t. Ag, 0.13 o.p.t. Au, 0.18% Cu, and 0.47% Pb;
Rib channel samples across the DMEA zone on the Sonneman of 130 feet true width, assaying 16.76% Zn, 4.11 o.p.t Ag, 0.09 o.p.t. Au, 0.78% Cu, and 0.38% Pb (pg.38 of the report), including 60 feet true width intercept assaying 25.00% Zn, 3.80 o.p.t Ag, 0.130 o.p.t. Au, 0.38% Cu, and 0.41% Pb
17
Details of the Technical Report:
The Table below outlines the Mineral Resource Statement for the South Mountain Project as of April 7, 2018.
Mineral Resources at 6.04% ZnEq Cut-off | |||||||||||||
Classification | Zinc Equivalent Resource | Contained Metal | |||||||||||
Short Tons | ZnEq lbs | ZnEq % | Zn lbs | Zn% | Ag oz | Ag opt | Au oz | Au opt | Pb lbs | Pb % | Cu lbs | Cu % | |
x1000 | x1000 | x1000 | x1000 | x1000 | x1000 | x1000 | |||||||
Measured | 63.2 | 22,200 | 17.57 | 14,700 | 11.64 | 237 | 3.745 | 4.0 | 0.063 | 600 | 0.483 | 700 | 0.566 |
Indicated | 106.7 | 37,800 | 17.72 | 21,500 | 10.08 | 576 | 5.398 | 7.0 | 0.066 | 2,100 | 0.983 | 1,600 | 0.766 |
Measured + Indicated | 169.9 | 60,000 | 17.66 | 36,200 | 10.66 | 813 | 4.783 | 11.0 | 0.065 | 2,700 | 0.797 | 2,300 | 0.692 |
Inferred massive sulfide | 363.2 | 120,800 | 16.63 | 70,500 | 9.70 | 2,029 | 5.585 | 16.3 | 0.045 | 8,700 | 1.202 | 5,200 | 0.696 |
Notes:
1.The effective date of the mineral resource estimate is April 7th, 2018. The QP for the estimate is Mr. Randall K. Martin, of Hard Rock Consulting, LLC. and is independent of THMG.
2.Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources are that part of the mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geologic evidence and sampling, which is sufficient to imply but not verify grade or quality continuity. Inferred mineral resources may not be converted to mineral reserves. It is reasonably expected, though not guaranteed, that the majority of Inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to Indicated mineral resources with continued exploration.
3.The mineral resource is reported at an underground mining cutoff of 6.04% Zinc Equivalent Grade (“ZnEq”) within coherent wireframe models. The ZnEq calculation and cutoff is based on the following assumptions: an Au price of $1,231/oz, Ag price of $16.62/oz, Pb price of $0.93/lb., Zn price of $1.10/lb. and Cu price of $2.54/lb.; metallurgical recoveries of 75% for Au, 70% for Ag, 87% for Pb, 96% for Zn and 56% for Cu, assumed mining cost of $70/ton, process costs of $25/ton, general and administrative costs of $7.5/ton, smelting and refining costs of $25/ton. Based on the stated prices and recoveries the ZnEq formula is calculated as follows; ZnEq = (Au grade * 43.71) + (Ag grade * 0.55) + (Pb grade * 0.77) + (Cu grade * 1.35) + (Zn grade)
4.Rounding may result in apparent differences when summing tons, grade and contained metal content. Tonnage and grade measurements are in imperial units.
The updated resource model does not include any of the remaining polymetallic massive sulfide left in the upper part of the Laxey zone. Available historic smelter records indicate that approximately 53,642 tons of polymetallic massive sulfide were mined and direct shipped, mostly from this Zone. Historical smelter records indicate zinc values averaging 14.5%, lead 2.4%, copper 1.4%, silver at 10.6 opt, and gold at 0.058 opt (Table 6-2 of the Technical Report).
18
Long Section View of Modeled Estimation Domains. The deposit remains open along strike and down dip in the Laxey marble as shown in Figure 7-4 of the updated NI 43-101 Report.
Schematic Long Section of South Mountain Skarn Deposits
Underground Pre-Development Work Completed Since the Previous Technical Reports
The reconstruction of the Sonneman and Laxey drifts continued successfully until January 2014 when the Project went into care and maintenance. The Sonneman Level advanced 2,711 feet from the portal and is constructed to 12 feet by 12 feet for future development and mining. Approximately 350 feet of drift remains to be rehabilitated to reach the historic Texas massive sulfide zone located at the end of the old workings. This advance through this zone will allow for the drill stations and underground drilling to further define the high-grade resource encountered by William Bowes group in the 1980s.
The historic 2,200-foot long Laxey Level drift has been rehabilitated to 10 feet by 10 feet for approximately 720 feet. At that point the old tunnel had recently collapsed at an intrusive dike and preparations were being made to advance through the caved area. This old tunnel was rehabilitated and accessed along its full length in 2008, at which point it intercepted the Texas massive sulfide zone, one of many that had limited mining during and after the World War II period. Excellent high-grade massive sulfide is exposed in this area, and the core drilling during 2013 proved its continuity between the Laxey Level and the surface, an up-dip distance of nearly 400 feet.
During the development of the Sonneman Level during 2012-2013 several massive sulfide mineralized zones were mined through. Detailed rib sampling along some of these zones yielded the following results:
19
Significant THMG Channel Sample Intervals – Sonneman Drift
ID | From | To | Length | Ag (opt) | Zn % | Au (opt) | Cu % | Pb % |
OGT161671-02 | 30.0 | 160.0 | 130.00 | 4.11 | 16.76 | 0.09 | 0.78 | 0.38 |
OGT161671-02 | 209.2 | 230.2 | 21.00 | 3.14 | 14.02 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.37 |
OGT161671-02 | 270.2 | 275.0 | 4.80 | 3.21 | 13.80 | 0.24 | 0.14 | 1.10 |
OGT161714-22 | 9.0 | 32.0 | 23.00 | 7.18 | 14.69 | 0.01 | 1.17 | 0.65 |
OGT161714-22 | 76.9 | 92.0 | 15.10 | 8.24 | 14.04 | 0.01 | 2.30 | 0.59 |
OGT161735-9 | 0.0 | 40.0 | 40.00 | 13.97 | 16.44 | 0.02 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
OGT161724-30 | 0.0 | 40.0 | 40.00 | 5.80 | 5.63 | 0.00 | 0.28 | 2.83 |
Underground core drilling is planned for extending and upgrading the South Mountain resource - testing the continuity and down-dip extensions of the high-grade polymetallic massive sulfide zones. The Company plans to core drill the DMEA and Laxey zones to complete the confirmation and extensional drilling. Another core drill may be mobilized to focus primarily on the Texas zone to extend resources at depth beyond the current inferred resource area. In addition, there are plans to retrieve bulk samples for metallurgical test work. More than 15,000 feet (4,500 meters) have been drilled at South Mountain and included in the model. The South Mountain historic ore zones remain open down-dip on the zones encountered. The successful drilling and development work prove that the South Mountain resource continues to grow with potential to increase the resource substantially.
HRC also reviewed the data on the anomalous gold-bearing multilithic breccia that was identified by THMG conducting reconnaissance work at South Mountain. In 2010, five holes were drilled in the anomaly for a total footage of 3,530 feet, and 705 total samples taken every five feet of drill hole. Of the 705 samples taken, 686 samples contained anomalous gold, or 97% of the samples. The highest-grade intercept ran 0.038 ounce per ton. HRC reviewed the reports done on the breccia completed by both Kinross and Newmont; of note was Newmont’s comparison of the geology to the Battle Mountain Complex in Nevada.
Qualified Person – Edward D. Fields is the Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 responsible for the technical data reported in this news release.
This property is without known reserves and the proposed program is exploratory in nature according to Instruction 3 to paragraph (b)(5) of Industry Guide 7. There are currently no permits required for conducting exploration in accordance with the Company`s current board approved exploration plan.
Trout Creek Project, Lander County, Nevada
The Trout Creek project is a highly prospective gold exploration target located along the western flank of the Shoshone Mountain Range in the Reese River Valley in Lander County, Nevada. The claim package consists of 78 unpatented mining claims (approximately 1560 acres) that are situated along a recognizable structural zone in the Eureka-Battle Mountain mineralized gold trend. Because the project is surrounded by Newmont Mining`s land package, Thunder Mountain struck a joint venture agreement with Newmont Mining on some of their adjoining mineral rights sections and aliquot parcels from 2011 thru 2016. On October 27, 2016 the Company terminated the exploration agreement with Newmont Mining Corporation to concentrate their efforts on the South Mountain Project. The Company retained the 78-claim package by paying annual fees to BLM of $3,255 and Lander County $940 fees.
The Project is located approximately 155 air miles northeast of Reno, Nevada, or approximately 20 miles south of Battle Mountain, Nevada, in Sections 10, 11, 14, 16, 21, 22, 27; T.29N.; R.44E. Mount Diablo Baseline & Meridian, Lander County, Nevada. Latitude: 40 23’ 36” North, Longitude: 117 00’ 58” West. The property is accessible by traveling south from Battle Mountain Nevada on state highway 305, which is paved. The project is generally accessible year-round and there are no improvements on the property.
The Trout Creek target is anchored by a regional gravity anomaly on a well-defined northwest-southeast trending break in the alluvial fill thickness and underlying bedrock. Previous geophysical work in the 1980s revealed an airborne magnetic anomaly associated with the same structure, and this was further verified and outlined in 2008 by
20
Company personnel, with consultation from Jim Wright – Wright Geophysics using a ground magnetometer. The target is covered by alluvial fan deposits of generally unknown thickness, shed from the adjacent Shoshone Range, a fault block mountain range composed of Paleozoic sediments of both upper and lower plate rocks of the Roberts Mountains thrust.
An extensive data package on the area was made available to Thunder Mountain Gold by Newmont during the joint exploration agreement period (2011-2016) that significantly enhanced the target area. This, along with fieldwork consisting of mapping and sampling the altered and mineralized structures that can be followed through the Shoshone Range. Of importance is that these structures align with the Cortez-Pipeline deposits and the Phoenix deposit (part of the Eureka-Battle Mountain-Getchell Trend).
In addition to the geologic fieldwork, Wright Geophysics conducted a ground gravity survey and CSMAT over the pediment target area and this provided insight into the gravel-bedrock contact as well as defining the favorable structural setting within the buried bedrock. An untested drill target was identified under the gravel pediment along these structures, and the geophysics showed that the bedrock was within 500 feet of the surface, which is reasonable depth for exploration drilling and potential mining if a significant mineralization is encountered.
The ongoing exploration field work, including claim maintenance and assessment, is financed by the Company through sales of unregistered common stock using private placements with accredited investors. Future work will be funded in the same manner or through a strategic partnership with another mining company.
There are currently no environmental permits required for the planned exploration work on the property. In the future, a notice of intent may be required with the Bureau of Land Management. This property is without known reserves and the proposed program is exploratory in nature according to Instruction 3 to paragraph (b)(5) of Industry Guide 7.
Competition
We are an exploration stage company. We compete with other mineral resource exploration and development companies for financing and for the acquisition of new mineral properties. Many of the mineral resource exploration and development companies with whom we compete have greater financial and technical resources than us. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to spend greater amounts on acquisitions of mineral properties of merit, on exploration of their mineral properties and on development of their mineral properties. In addition, they may be able to afford greater geological expertise in the targeting and exploration of mineral properties. This competition could result in competitors having mineral properties of greater quality and interest to prospective investors who may finance additional exploration and development. This competition could adversely impact on our ability to finance further exploration and to achieve the financing necessary for us to develop our mineral properties.
Employees
Three of the Company’s officers had been deferring compensation for services. At March 31, 2019, SMMI has deferred compensation of $1,041,500. These salaries were earned in accordance with the OGT LLC operating agreement. OGT management includes SMMI`s Eric T. Jones, Jim Collord, and Larry Thackery as officers of the Company. On July 31, 2018 the Company stopped deferring compensation for the three Company officers
Results of Operations:
The Company recognized no revenues and had no production for the three months ending March 31, 2019. Total operating expenses for the three months ending March 31, 2019 of $286,935 increased from the same respective time period in 2018 by $98,023 or 52%. Exploration expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2019 decreased by $48,999 when compared to same period in 2018. This decrease can be attributed to the engagement of Hard Rock Consulting LLC to update the NI 43-101 in 2018. Legal and accounting costs increased in three-month period ended March 31, 2019 compared to 2018 by $61,450 for a total of $89,011. This increase can be associated with legal expenses surrounding the BeMetals Option Agreement signed on February 27, 2019. Management and administrative expense increased by $90,100 or 99% principally due to stock options compensation of $117,088 issued to our officers and directors in March 2019.
21
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
The consolidated financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2019 have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As shown in the consolidated financial statements for the period ended March 31, 2019, we did not have sufficient cash reserves to cover normal operating expenditures for the following 12 months.
The liquidity of the Company was enhanced on February 27, 2019, when the Company entered into an Option Agreement, (the “BeMetals Option Agreement”) with BeMetals Corp., a British Columbia corporation (“BeMetals”), and BeMetals USA Corp., a Delaware corporation (“BMET USA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BeMetals. Under the terms of the BeMetals Option Agreement, BMET USA will be entitled to purchase 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of SMMI from TMRI, both wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. The term of the agreement is for two years with BeMetals completing a preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") completed by a mutually agreed third-party engineering firm. BeMetals will issue 10 million BMET common shares (Consideration Shares) to TMRI. BeMetals will also purchase of 2.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000, on a private placement. BeMetals will make cash payments of $850,000 over the 24 months of the agreement and another $250,000 upon exercise of the Option Agreement, for total cash payments to the Company of $1,100,000, in addition to the private placement. The exercise of the Option Agreement price can be paid in combination with cash and BeMetals common shares.
The first payment of $100,000 under the BeMetals Option Agreement was received by the Company on March 1, 2019. BeMetals Corp. will purchase the 2.5 million THMG shares in a private placement upon the Companies completing certain conditions related to the option agreement. The overall consideration to THMG and its shareholders will be an amount equal to the lesser of 50% of the market capitalization of BeMetals at the time of option exercise, and the greater of either $10 million; or 20% the net present value of the South Mountain Project as calculated in a PEA
Payment may be satisfied by through the delivery of BMET common shares (Consideration Shares), a cash payment or a combination of Consideration Shares and cash. The BMET common shares will be issued at a deemed value based on the 5-day VWAP of Consideration Shares immediately prior to the date that BMET USA gives notice of its intention to exercise the option. BMET trades on the TSX-V under the ticker symbol BMET.
Potential additional sources of cash, or relief of demand for cash, include additional external debt, the sale of shares of our stock, or alternative methods such as mergers or sale of our assets. No assurances can be given, however, that we will be able to obtain any of these potential sources of cash. We currently require additional cash funding from outside sources to sustain existing operations and to meet current obligations and ongoing capital requirements.
Our plans for the long-term continuation as a going concern include financing our future operations through sales of our common stock and/or debt and the eventual profitable exploitation of our mining properties. Our plans may also, at some future point, include the formation of mining joint ventures with senior mining company partners on specific mineral properties whereby the joint venture partner would provide the necessary financing in return for equity in the property.
On April 9, 2019, Eric Jones, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer loaned the Company $30,000 in the form of a notes payable with a monthly interest rate of 1.5%. Management is committed to funding the Company in anticipation of the BeMetals Tranche 2 completion date funding. Management is confident that funding will be completed on or before May 31, 2019 and committed to supporting the Company through short-term debt financing until that funding date.
In addition to the BeMetals Corp. Option Agreement, we believe that the Company will be able to meet its financial obligations by the following:
May 8, 2019, we had $165 cash in our bank accounts.
Management and the Board are confident that BeMetals Option Agreement Tranche 2 funding will be completed on or before May 31, 2019.
22
We do not include in this consideration any additional investment funds mentioned below. Management is committed to manage expenses of all types to not exceed the on-hand cash resources of the Company at any point in time, now or in the future.
The Company will also consider other sources of funding, including potential mergers and/or additional farm-out of its other exploration property.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, net cash used for operating activities was $123,421, consisting of net loss of $292,069 reduced by non-cash expenses and changes in current assets and current liabilities. Cash provided by investing and financing activities for quarter ended March 31, 2019 totaled $120,000 from the receipt of $100,000 received from BeMetals Corp and additional borrowings of $20,000.
Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend on many factors, including timing, cost and progress of our exploration efforts, our evaluation of, and decisions with respect to, our strategic alternatives, and costs associated with the regulatory approvals. If it turns out that we do not have enough money to complete our exploration programs, we will attempt to raise additional funds from a public offering, a private placement, mergers, farm-outs or loans.
We know that additional financing will be required in the future to fund our planned operations. We do not know whether additional financing will be available when needed or on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to raise additional financing when necessary, we may have to delay our exploration efforts or any property acquisitions or be forced to cease operations. Collaborative arrangements may require us to relinquish our rights to certain of our mining claims.
Private Placement
On February 27, 2019, the Company entered into an Option Agreement, (the “BeMetals Option Agreement”) with BeMetals Corp., a British Columbia corporation (“BeMetals”), and BeMetals USA Corp., a Delaware corporation (“BMET USA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BeMetals. Under the terms of the BeMetals Option Agreement, BeMetals has agreed to purchase of 2.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000, in a private placement. Use of proceeds are for general corporate working capital. This private placement has been approved by the TSX-V.
On February 20, 2018, the Board of Directors approved a Private Placement financing of up to $750,000 from the sale of equity units at a price of $0.14 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of the Company’s common stock and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. On April 27, 2018 the Company closed its Private Placement. In total, 2,550,000 units were sold representing 2,550,000 shares of common stock and 1,275,000 warrants to purchase common stock for $0.20 over the next 12 months. Total proceeds were $357,000. Of this amount, $252,988 was received in cash and $104,012 was in exchange for retirement of a related party convertible note payable and related accrued interest payable.
The offerings are believed exempt from registration pursuant to the exemption for transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering under Section 4(6) the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The securities offered, sold, and issued in connection with the private placement have not been or are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements.
Subsequent Events
On May 8, 2019, the Company filed a Pre 14C Information Statement with the U.S. SEC, regarding shareholder action taken by written consent in lieu of a meeting. The Information Statement is to inform shareholders of the adoption of resolutions by written consent of the holders of a majority of the voting interests of the Company`s issued and outstanding common stock, approving the BeMetals Option Agreement, including its exercise, by THMG to BeMetals Corp. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, to acquire up to a 100% interest in the South Mountain Project through the common stock purchase of the Company`s wholly-owned subsidiary – South Mountain Mines Inc.
23
Contractual Obligations
During 2008 and 2009, three lease arrangements were made with land owners that own land parcels adjacent to the Company’s South Mountain patented and unpatented mining claims. The leases were for a seven-year period, with options to renew, with annual payments (based on $20 per acre) listed in the following table. The leases have no work requirements.
Payments due by period | |||||
Total* | Less than 1 year | 2-3 years | 4-5 years | More than 5 years | |
Acree Lease (yearly, June)(1) | $27,120 | $3,390 | $6,780 | $6,780 | $10,170 |
Lowry Lease (yearly, October)(1)(2) | $90,240 | $11,280 | $22,560 | $22,560 | $33,840 |
OGT LLC(3) | $50,000 | $5,000 | $10,000 | $10,000 | $25,000 |
Total | $167,360 | $19,670 | $39,340 | $39,340 | $69,010 |
(1)Amounts shown are for the lease periods years 4 through 7, a total of 1 years that remains after 2013, the second year of the lease period. Lease was extended an additional 10 years at $30/acre.
(2)The Lowry lease has an early buy-out provision for 50% of the remaining amounts owed in the event the Company desires to drop the lease prior to the end of the first seven-year period.
(3) OGT LLC, managed by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary SMMI, receives a $5,000 per year payment for up to 10 years, or until a $5 million capped NPI Royalty is paid.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have identified our critical accounting policies, the application of which may materially affect the financial statements, either because of the significance of the financials statement item to which they relate, or because they require management’s judgment in making estimates and assumptions in measuring, at a specific point in time, events which will be settled in the future. The critical accounting policies, judgments and estimates which management believes have the most significant effect on the financial statements are set forth below:
a)Estimates. Our management routinely makes judgments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the future resolution of the uncertainties increase, these judgments become even more subjective and complex. Although we believe that our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates and assumptions based upon actual results may have a material impact on our results of operation and/or financial condition.
b)Stock-based Compensation. The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.
c)Income Taxes. We have current income tax assets recorded in our financial statements that are based on our estimates relating to federal and state income tax benefits. Our judgments regarding federal and state income tax rates, items that may or may not be deductible for income tax purposes and income tax regulations themselves are critical to the Company’s financial statement income tax items.
d)Investments. In a joint venture where the Company holds more than 50% of the voting interest and has significant influence, the joint venture is consolidated with the presentation of non-controlling interest. In determining whether significant influences exist, the Company considers its participation in policy-making decisions and its representation on the venture’s management committee.
24
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of, and with the participation of, the Company’s Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a – 15(e) and Rule 15d – 15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed and effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports that it files or submits to the SEC under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in applicable rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
25
None.
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On February 27, 2019, the Company entered into an Option Agreement, (the “BeMetals Option Agreement”) with BeMetals Corp., a British Columbia corporation (“BeMetals”), and BeMetals USA Corp., a Delaware corporation (“BMET USA”), a wholly owned subsidiary of BeMetals. Under the terms of the BeMetals Option Agreement, among other conditions, BeMetals will purchase of 2.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.10 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000, in a private placement. This private placement has been approved by the TSX-V.
On February 20, 2018, the Board of Directors approved a Private Placement financing of up to $750,000 from the sale of equity units at a price of $0.14 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of the Company’s common stock and one-half of one common share purchase warrant. Each whole warrant entitles the holder to purchase one additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.20 for a period of 12 months. No finder’s fees were to be paid. Thunder Mountain Gold will utilize the net proceeds from this financing for working capital, mineral leases, and administrative expenses.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities.
During the three-month period ended March 31, 2019, the Company did not have any operating mines and therefore had no such specified health and safety violations, orders or citations, related assessments or legal actions, mining-related fatalities, or similar events in relation to the Company’s United States operations requiring disclosure pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act.
None.
26
(a) Documents which are filed as a part of this report:
Exhibits:
31.1 – Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). Jones
31.2 – Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). Thackery
101*The following financial information from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Consolidated Notes to Financial Statements
27
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf of the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
THUNDER MOUNTAIN GOLD, INC.
/s/ Eric T. Jones
By
Eric T. Jones
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 14, 2019
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934 this report signed below by the following person on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities on the date indicated.
/s/ Larry Thackery
By
Larry Thackery
Chief Financial Officer
Date; May 14, 2019
28