Timberline Resources Corp - Quarter Report: 2015 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the transition period from              to           

Commission file number: 001-34055

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION

 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(208) 664-4859

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   x   Yes  o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  xYes  o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) o  Yes  x   No

Number of shares of issuer’s common stock outstanding at August 5, 2015: 12,000,084

1

INDEX

Page

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

3

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

3

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

14

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

22

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

23

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

23

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

23

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

23

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

23

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

23

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

23

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION.

24

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

24

SIGNATURES

25

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Contents

Page

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

Consolidated balance sheets

4

Consolidated statements of operations

5

Consolidated statements of cash flows

6

Notes to consolidated financial statements

7 - 13

3

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS:

Timberline Resources Corporation (“Timberline” or “the Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”) was incorporated in August of 1968 under the laws of the State of Idaho as Silver Crystal Mines, Inc., for the purpose of exploring for precious metal deposits and advancing them to production.  In 2008, we reincorporated into the State of Delaware pursuant to a merger agreement approved by our shareholders.

In 2006, we acquired Kettle Drilling, Inc. and its Mexican subsidiary, World Wide Exploration S.A. de C.V. (“World Wide”). In 2008, Kettle Drilling, Inc. changed its name to Timberline Drilling Incorporated (“Timberline Drilling”).  In November 2011, we sold Timberline Drilling and World Wide and became solely a mineral exploration enterprise.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

a.

Basis of Presentation and Going Concern – The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, as well as the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of our management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending September 30, 2015.  All amounts presented are in U.S. dollars.  For further information refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.

The consolidated financial statements for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2015 were prepared on the basis that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of its assets and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. These financial statements do not reflect adjustments that would be necessary if the going concern assumption were not appropriate.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to receive cash flow from its operations or to successfully obtain additional financing. While the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain adequate financing in the future or that such financing will be on terms acceptable to the Company.

b.

Reclassifications – Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to current period presentation with no effect on previously reported net income (loss) and accumulated deficit.

c.

Net Income (Loss) per Share – Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed as net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants, and other convertible securities.

The dilutive effect of convertible and outstanding securities, in periods of future income as of June 30, 2015 and 2014, would be as follows:

At June 30, 2015 and 2014, the effect of the Company’s outstanding options and common stock equivalents would have been anti-dilutive.  

d.

Asset retirement obligation – We account for asset retirement obligations by following the uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs as prescribed by authoritative accounting guidance.  This guidance provides that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) will be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The ARO is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets to which it is associated, and depreciated over the useful life of the asset. Adjustments are made to the liability for changes resulting from passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate underlying the obligation. We have an ARO associated with our exploration program at the Lookout Mountain exploration project.

7

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 3 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:

The table below sets forth our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis and the fair value calculation input hierarchy level that we have determined applies to each asset and liability category.

NOTE 4 - ACQUISITION OF WOLFPACK GOLD (NEVADA) CORP.:

On August 15, 2014, we completed our acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Wolfpack Gold (Nevada) Corp. (“Wolfpack Nevada”) in accordance with the terms of an Arrangement Agreement, dated May 6, 2014, by and between the Company and the parent company of Wolfpack Nevada, Wolfpack Gold Corp. (“Wolfpack”).  The acquisition was approved by the stockholders of both Timberline and Wolfpack.   Wolfpack Nevada was a subsidiary company of Wolfpack, a publicly held Canadian corporation engaged in the exploration of precious metals properties in Nevada.  We acquired Wolfpack Nevada in order to further the exploration and development of mineral properties owned or leased by Wolfpack Nevada, as well as to increase our working capital.

This transaction was accounted for as a business combination.  We acquired all of the shares of Wolfpack Nevada in consideration for the issuance of one share of common stock of Timberline for each 0.75 common shares of Wolfpack. Pre-acquisition Timberline shareholders own approximately 64% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of the acquisition date, and former Wolfpack shareholders own approximately 36%.  

The purchase price of the transaction was $5,151,847, consisting entirely of the issuance of 3,577,672 shares of our common stock.  Of the 3,577,672 shares of common stock issued, 706,407 shares of common stock were issued to Wolfpack in exchange for the cancellation of a $1,000,000 promissory note of Timberline held by Wolfpack, as well as $17,226 of accrued and unpaid interest on the promissory note (see Note 8).  

We incurred $256,223 in expenses specifically related to the acquisition, $236,866 of which is included in professional fees expense, $1,918 is included in mineral exploration expenses, and $17,439 is included in other general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2014.

The acquisition of Wolfpack Nevada closed at 9:00 a.m. pacific time on August 15, 2014.  The closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE MKT on the day prior to this date was $1.44 per share (adjusted for the reverse stock split – See Note 9).  

The purchase price allocation of the acquisition is summarized as follows:

During the quarter ended June 30, 2015, we received $150,000 as an option payment related to one of the properties we acquired in the Wolfpack acquisition that is subject to an option agreement with a third party.

8

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 5 – ENTRY INTO PROPERTY OPTION AGREEMENT:

On March 12, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), we entered into a property option agreement (“Agreement”) with Gunpoint Exploration Ltd. (“Gunpoint”), which closed on March 31, 2015.  Gunpoint granted us an exclusive and irrevocable option (“Option”) to purchase a 100% interest in Gunpoint’s Talapoosa project (the “Project”) in western Nevada.  Pursuant to the Agreement, we have the right to exercise the Option at any time beginning on March 31, 2015 and ending within thirty (30) months of March 12, 2015, unless sooner terminated (“Option Period”).    

As consideration for the Option, we agreed to issue two million (2,000,000) shares of common stock and pay $300,000 in cash.  A $100,000 cash payment was made on March 31, 2015.  The common stock was valued at fair value on the Effective Date and capitalized with the cash payment of $100,000 for a total of $1,300,000.  The remaining $200,000 cash payment is due the earlier of (a) two business days following the completion of a financing for at least $2 million in gross aggregate proceeds or (b) 180 days from March 31, 2015.  The common stock was issued on March 31, 2015 and is being held in escrow.  The shares are irrevocable and will be released to Gunpoint as follows:  25% on September 12, 2015; 25% on March 12, 2016; 25% on September 12, 2016; and 25% on March 12, 2017.  Gunpoint will receive the total of 2,000,000 shares even if the Company does not exercise the Option.  

At any time during the Option Period, we may purchase 100% of Talapoosa by providing written notification thereof and paying to Gunpoint $10 million in cash (the “Option Payment”) within ninety (90) days of the notification date.  Upon the date that Gunpoint receives the Option Payment (the “Closing Date”), we will have earned a 100% interest in the Project.

For a period of five years following the Closing Date (“Contingent Payment Period”), should the daily price of gold (as determined by the London PM Fix) be fixed at or above $1,600, on any single day during the Contingent Payment Period (the “Initial Threshold Event”) and at any time after the Initial Threshold Event during the Contingent Payment Period the daily price of gold (as determined by the London PM Fix) averages U.S.$1,600 per ounce or greater for a period of ninety (90) consecutive trading days (the “Trigger Event”), we shall be required to pay or cause to be paid to Gunpoint an additional payment of $10 million (the “Contingent Payment”) within ninety (90) days of the date that the Trigger Event is deemed to have occurred.  The Contingent Payment shall consist of $5 million in cash, and the remainder shall be paid either in cash or in shares of our common stock or a combination thereof at our sole discretion.

Following our exercise of the Option, effective as of the Closing Date, Gunpoint reserves a net smelter returns royalty in all minerals mined and removed from the Project, in the amount of one percent (1%).  We may purchase the royalty from Gunpoint at any time for a cash payment of $3 million.

NOTE 6 – INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE:

In July 2009, we entered into a joint venture operating agreement (the “Agreement”) with Highland Mining, LLC (“Highland”).  The joint venture entity, Butte Highlands JV, LLC (“BHJV”) was created for the purpose of developing and mining the Butte Highlands Gold Project.  As a result of our contribution of our 100% interest in the Butte Highlands Gold Project, carried on our balance sheet at cost, we hold a 50% interest in BHJV.  Under terms of the Agreement, our interest in BHJV will be carried to production by Highland, which will fund all future project exploration and mine development costs.  

Under the Agreement, Highland contributed property and agreed to fund all future mine development costs at Butte Highlands.  Both the Company’s and Highland’s share of development costs will be paid from proceeds of future mine production.  The Operating Agreement stipulates that Highland shall appoint a manager of BHJV and that Highland will manage BHJV until such time as all mine development costs, less $2 million (the deemed value of our contribution of property to BHJV), are distributed to Highland out of the proceeds from future mine production.

At June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, we have a receivable from BHJV for expenses incurred on behalf of BHJV in the amount of $5,753 and $11,576, respectively.  

9

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 7 – PREPAID DRILLING SERVICES:

During the year ended September 30, 2012, we obtained $1,100,000 in prepaid drilling services as a portion of the consideration received from the sale of Timberline Drilling.  The prepayment amount represents discounts on future drilling services, or cash if we do not use the prepaid drilling services, to be provided by Timberline Drilling to us between November 2011 and November 2016.  During the year ended September 30, 2014, we accepted $150,000 as settlement of the portion of the prepaid drilling services that was due to be paid to the Company in November 2014 ($220,000).  During the nine months ended June 30, 2015, we used $75,685 in prepaid drilling services.  

The following table summarizes activity in the Company’s prepaid drilling services:

NOTE 8 – ABANDONMENT OF MINERAL RIGHTS:

During the nine months ended June 30, 2015, we elected to terminate the lease on the Iron Butte property, resulting in a write off of $426,000.  We expect to focus our resources on advancing the Talapoosa project and therefore decided to return the Iron Butte property to the underlying owner before any further property payments were due.  

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

Director fees

The Company has accrued nil and $91,000 in director fees as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively.

NOTE 10 – NOTE PAYABLE:

On March 14, 2014, the Company entered into a promissory note (the “Note”) and deed of trust, security agreement, assignment of leases and rents and fixture filing to secure promissory note (the “Deed of Trust”) with Wolfpack.  The Company and Wolfpack entered into the Note and the Deed of Trust in connection with a proposed business combination (the “Proposed Transaction”) that was the subject of a letter of intent between the parties dated effective March 11, 2014 and was completed on August 15, 2014 (see Note 4).  

Pursuant to the Note, the Company agreed to repay Wolfpack the unpaid principal amount of advances made under the Note up to a maximum principal amount of $1,000,000, together with accrued interest thereon.   The amount drawn on the Note bore interest at 5% during the first six months of the loan and 10% thereafter until repaid.  Interest was payable in arrears on the date that the Note was prepaid, in proportion to the principal amount being prepaid, or on the date that the Note was due and payable. The Note became payable five business days after the Proposed Transaction closed.  The outstanding principal amount of $1,000,000, together with accrued interest of $17,226, was paid to Wolfpack with the issuance of 706,407 shares of our common stock on August 15, 2014.

10

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 11 – COMMON STOCK, WARRANTS AND PREFERRED STOCK:

One-for-twelve Reverse Stock Split

In September 2014, our board of directors and stockholders approved a one-for-twelve reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock. After the reverse stock split, effective October 31, 2014, each holder of record held one share of common stock for every 12 shares held immediately prior to the effective date. As a result of the reverse stock split, the number of shares underlying outstanding stock options and warrants and the related exercise prices were adjusted to reflect the change in the share price and outstanding shares on the date of the reverse stock split. The effect of fractional shares was not material.

Following the effective date of the reverse stock split, the par value of the common stock remained at $0.001 per share. As a result, we have reduced the common stock in the consolidated balance sheets and statement of changes in stockholders’ equity included herein on a retroactive basis for all periods presented, with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital. All share and per-share amounts and related disclosures have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the one-for-twelve reverse stock split.

Increase in Authorized Shares

During the year ended September 30, 2014, our board of directors and stockholders approved an increase in the number of  authorized shares of common stock from 100,000,000 shares, par value $0.001, to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001.

Stock Issued for Mineral Rights, Property and Equipment

In October, 2013, pursuant to an amended mineral property lease and option agreement for mineral claims, we issued 16,667 restricted common shares with a value of $40,000 based upon the closing price of our shares of common stock on the date of issuance as quoted on the NYSE MKT.

In January, 2014, pursuant to a vendor agreement related to the provision of metallurgical testing services, we issued 53,922 restricted common shares with a value of $110,000 based upon the closing price of our shares of common stock on the date of issuance as quoted on the NYSE MKT.

In October, 2014, pursuant to a mineral property lease and option agreement for mineral claims, we issued 83,334 restricted common shares with a value of $80,000 based upon the closing price of our shares of common stock on the date of issuance as quoted on the NYSE MKT.  The value of these shares was listed as common stock payable on September 30, 2014.

Stock Issued for Property Option Agreement

On March 31, 2015, pursuant to a property option agreement (Note 5), we issued 2,000,000 restricted common shares with a value of $1,200,000 based upon the closing price of our shares of common stock as quoted on the NYSE MKT on March 12, 2015, the effective date of the property option agreement.

Stock Issued for Compensation

On January 27, 2015, we issued 100,000 restricted common shares for employee compensation.  The shares were valued at $69,000 based upon the closing price of our shares of common stock on the date of issuance as quoted on the NYSE MKT.  

Stock Issued for Repayment of Note Payable

On March 14, 2014, we entered into a promissory note (the “Note”) and deed of trust, security agreement, assignment of leases and rents and fixture filing to secure promissory note (the “Deed of Trust”) with Wolfpack (see Notes 4 and 8). The outstanding principal amount of $1,000,000, together with accrued interest of $17,226, was paid to Wolfpack with the issuance of 706,407 shares of our common stock on August 15, 2014.

11

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

Warrants

We issued 25,000 warrants during the year ended September 30, 2013 in connection with our public offerings.  12,500 of the warrants are exercisable on a cashless basis, at the holders’ option, for a two-year term commencing December 26, 2013.  The remaining 12,500 warrants are exercisable on a cashless basis, at the holders’ option, for a two-year term commencing September 10, 2014.  No warrants were issued during the nine months ended June 30, 2015 or the year ended September 30, 2014, and no warrants were exercised or expired during the nine months ended June 30, 2015 or the year ended September 30, 2014.

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Our board of directors is authorized to issue the preferred stock from time to time in series, and is further authorized to establish such series, to fix and determine the variations in the relative rights and preferences as between series, to fix voting rights, if any, for each series, and to allow for the conversion of preferred stock into common stock.

NOTE 12 – STOCK OPTIONS:

We have established the Amended 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended by our shareholders on May 28, 2010) to authorize the granting of up to 833,334 stock options to employees, directors and consultants. Upon exercise of options, shares are issued from the available authorized shares of the Company.  Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our stock at the date of grant.  

On December 17, 2014, 365,000 options were granted, with a vesting date of January 1, 2015.  Total compensation cost of options is generally recognized from the grant date through the vesting date.  Total compensation cost of options for employees was $55,500.  These costs are classified under salaries and benefits expense. Total compensation cost of options for directors was $54,000.  These costs are classified as other general and administrative expenses.  The fair value of the option awards was estimated to be $109,500 on the date of grant with a Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the assumptions noted in the following table.  

On January 14, 2015, 34,189 options were granted, with a vesting date of January 14, 2015.  Total compensation cost of options for employees was $16,411.  These costs are classified under salaries and benefits expense.  The fair value of the option awards was estimated to be $16,411 on the date of grant with a Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the assumptions noted in the following table.

12

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

No option awards were granted during the three or nine months ended June 30, 2014, and no option awards vested under the plan during those periods.

The following is a summary of our options issued under the Amended 2005 Equity Incentive Plan:

The aggregate of options exercisable as of June 30, 2015 had an intrinsic value or $25,550 based on the closing price of $0.55 per share of our common stock on June 30, 2015.

NOTE 13 – COMMITMENTS:

Real Estate Lease Commitments

The Company has real estate lease commitments related to its main office in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho and facilities in Eureka, Nevada and Sparks, Nevada.

Total office lease expense from continuing operations is included in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:

13

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Such forward-looking statements concern our anticipated results and developments in our operations in future periods, planned exploration and development of our properties, plans related to our business and other matters that may occur in the future.  These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.  These statements include, but are not limited to, comments regarding:

· the establishment and estimates of mineralization and reserves;

· the grade of mineralization and reserves;

· anticipated expenditures and costs in our operations;

· planned exploration activities and the anticipated outcome of such exploration activities;

·

planned production of technical reports and economic assessments on our properties;

· plans and anticipated timing for obtaining permits and licenses for our properties;

· expected future financing and its anticipated outcome;

· plans and anticipated timing regarding production dates;

· anticipated gold prices;

· expected future financing and its anticipated outcome;

· anticipated liquidity to meet expected operating costs and capital requirements;

· our ability to obtain financing to fund our estimated expenditure and capital requirements; and

· factors expected to impact our results of operations

Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:

· risks related to our limited operating history;

· risks related to our ability to continue as a going concern;

· risks related to our history of losses and our expectation of continued losses;

· risks related to our properties being in the exploration or, if warranted, development stage;

· risks related to our bringing our projects into production;

· risks related to our mineral operations being subject to government regulation;

· risks related to future legislation and administrative changes to mining laws;

· risks related to future legislation regarding climate change

· risks related to our ability to obtain additional capital to develop our reserves, if any;

· risks related to land reclamation requirements and costs;

· risks related to mineral exploration and development activities being inherently dangerous;

· risks related to our insurance coverage for operating risks;

· risks related to cost increases for our exploration and development projects;

· risks related to a shortage of equipment and supplies adversely affecting our ability to operate;

· risks related to mineral estimates;

· risks related to the fluctuation of prices for precious and base metals, such as gold, silver and copper;

· risks related to the competitive industry of mineral exploration;

· risks related to our title and rights in our mineral properties;

· risks related to integration issues with acquisitions;

· risks related to joint ventures and partnerships;

14

· risks related to potential conflicts of interest with our management;

· risks related to our dependence on key management;

· risks related to our Talapoosa Project, Lookout Mountain and other acquired growth projects;

· risks related to our business model;

· risks related to our acquisition of Wolfpack Gold Corp.;

· risks related to our acquisition of the Talapoosa option;

· risks related to our Canadian regulatory requirements; and

· risks related to our shares of common stock.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the sections titled “Risk Factors”, “Description of Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 23, 2014.  Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.  We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.  We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as otherwise required by law.

We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by the foregoing cautionary statements.

Corporate Background and History

We became an exploration-stage company in January 2004 with the change in the management of the Company.  From January 2004 until March 2006, we were strictly a mineral exploration company.  With our acquisition of a drilling services company and the acquisition of the Butte Highlands Gold Project, we diversified our business plan to include drilling services and an exploration property with the potential to develop an underground mine with possible future gold production.  Prior to the purchase of Timberline Drilling (formerly known as Kettle Drilling), we had no reported revenues and only had accumulated losses. In June 2010, we acquired Staccato Gold Resources Ltd. (“Staccato”), a Canadian-based resource company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange that was in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing mineral properties with a focus on gold exploration in the dominant gold producing trends in Nevada.  As a result of this acquisition, we obtained Staccato’s Eureka Property, which included their flagship gold exploration project, the Lookout Mountain Project (“Lookout Mountain”) and the Windfall project, along with several other projects at various stages of exploration in the Battle Mountain/Eureka gold trend in Nevada, along with Staccato’s wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, BH Minerals USA, Inc.  In September 2011, we announced that we had entered into a non-binding letter of intent to sell Timberline Drilling to a private company formed by a group of investors, including certain members of the senior management team of Timberline Drilling.  The sale of Timberline Drilling was completed in November 2011 for a total value of approximately $15 million and enabled the Company to focus exclusively on its core business of gold exploration and development.

Corporate Overview

Our business is mineral exploration, with a focus on district-scale gold projects such as the advanced Talapoosa project and our Eureka project in Nevada, as well as our 50% carried-to-production interest in the Butte Highlands joint venture, which is currently progressing under the terms of our 50/50 joint venture agreement with Highland.

Recent Events

On August 15, 2014, we completed our acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding common shares of Wolfpack Gold (Nevada) Corp. (“Wolfpack Nevada”) in accordance with the terms of an Arrangement Agreement, dated May 6, 2014, by and between the Company and the parent company of Wolfpack Nevada, Wolfpack Gold Corp. (“Wolfpack”).  The acquisition was approved by the stockholders of both Timberline and Wolfpack.   Wolfpack Nevada was a subsidiary company of Wolfpack, a publicly held Canadian corporation engaged in the exploration of precious metals properties in Nevada.  We acquired Wolfpack Nevada in order to further the exploration and development of mineral properties owned or leased by Wolfpack Nevada, as well as to increase our working capital. (See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details of the transaction.)

15

In September, 2014, our board of directors and stockholders approved a one-for-twelve reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock. After the reverse stock split, effective October 31, 2014, each holder of record held one share of common stock for every 12 shares held immediately prior to the effective date. As a result of the reverse stock split, the number of shares underlying outstanding stock options and warrants and the related exercise prices were adjusted to reflect the change in the share price and outstanding shares on the date of the reverse stock split. The effect of fractional shares was not material.

On March 12, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), we entered into a property option agreement (“Agreement”) with Gunpoint Exploration Ltd. (“Gunpoint”), which closed on March 31, 2015.  Gunpoint granted us an exclusive and irrevocable option (“Option”) to purchase a 100% interest in Gunpoint’s Talapoosa project (the “Project”) in western Nevada.  Pursuant to the Agreement, we have the right to exercise the Option at any time beginning on March 31, 2015 and ending within thirty (30) months of March 12, 2015, unless sooner terminated (“Option Period”).  (See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further details of the transaction.)  

Mineral Exploration

Talapoosa, Nevada

Talapoosa is a 14,870 acre district-scale property comprising US Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) claims, fee lands, and water rights.  Mineralized material at Talapoosa consists of 42.5 million tons of in place bulk tonnage with an average grade of 0.03 ounces of gold per ton and 0.37 ounces of silver per ton.  The project was fully permitted by Miramar Mining Corporation with the BLM and the State of Nevada in 1996, but remained undeveloped due to low prevailing metals prices.  The deposit is open on strike, and we believe potential exists to expand the quantity of mineralized material with additional exploration.  The acquisition includes the 4 mile-long Appaloosa zone located one mile to the north of and parallel to the Talapoosa mineralized area.  The Appaloosa zone outcrops as epithermal-type sinter and breccia with vein fragments and is untested but for six historic, shallow drill holes.  

In March, 2015, we completed a National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) compliant Technical Report entitled “Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the Talapoosa Project, Nevada,” dated March 24, 2015 (the “Talapoosa Technical Report”) substantiating the mineralization for the Talapoosa project.  Upon completion of the Talapoosa Technical Report, we initiated an NI 43-101 Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) on the property.  Results of the PEA were released on April 27, 2015 and reported positive results on a potential open pit mine with heap leach processing and Merrill Crowe recovery of gold and silver.  To support the PEA, we completed due diligence reviews on the gold and silver mineralization; historic studies including metallurgy, geotechnical pit wall stability, hydrology, geochemistry, mining methods, and facility siting for the previously proposed operation.  

Follow-up work is planned to include additional metallurgical studies, drilling for additional samples and to increase our level of confidence for certain parts of the mineralized zone, and initiation of studies to update historic permits to current standards.  These activities are expected to be incorporated into a NI 43-101 compliant Preliminary Feasibility Study during the first half of 2016.  

There are no proven and probable reserves as defined under United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s Industry Guide 7 (“Guide 7”) at Talapoosa and our activities there remain exploratory in nature.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors: The Talapoosa Technical Report and the PEA use the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resource,” “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource”. We advise investors that these terms are defined in and required to be disclosed by Canadian regulations (NI 43-101); however, these terms are not defined terms under Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. As a reporting issuer in Canada, we are required to prepare reports on our mineral properties in accordance with NI 43-101. We reference the Talapoosa Technical Report and the PEA in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for informational purposes only and the Technical Report and PEA are not incorporated herein by reference.  Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of a mineral deposit in the above categories will ever be converted into Guide 7 compliant reserves.  “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category.  Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases.  Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable.  

16

Eureka Project, Nevada

The Eureka Project, which includes Lookout Mountain, comprises an area of approximately 15,000 acres, or more than 23 square miles.  The Eureka Project is located within the southern portion of Nevada’s Battle Mountain-Eureka gold trend and includes three structurally controlled zones of gold mineralization, each approximately 3- 4 miles in strike length, all zones of which are open and will require additional in-fill and step-out drilling. The project has an extensive exploration, drilling, and gold production history by a number of companies since 1975, including Idaho Mining Corp., Norse-Windfall Mining, Amselco, Echo Bay Mines, Newmont and Barrick Gold. A total of 533 holes, totaling 267,000 feet, were drilled on the property prior to its acquisition by Timberline in 2010. Gold mineralization tested to date is typical sediment-hosted “Carlin-type” gold mineralization, most of which may be amenable to low cost, heap leach processing.

In 2010-2011 we completed an exploration program that culminated in the release of an NI 43-101 compliant technical report, entitled, Technical Report on the Lookout Mountain Project, Eureka County, Nevada, USA, dated May 2, 2011 (the “Lookout Mountain Technical Report”).  The Lookout Mountain Technical Report was prepared by Mine Development Associates (“MDA”) of Reno, Nevada under the supervision of Michael M. Gustin, Senior Geologist, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101.  The Lookout Mountain Technical Report details mineralization at Lookout Mountain.

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors: The Lookout Mountain Technical Report uses the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resource,” “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource”. We advise investors that these terms are defined in and required to be disclosed by Canadian regulations (NI 43-101); however, these terms are not defined terms under Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. As a reporting issuer in Canada, we are required to prepare reports on our mineral properties in accordance with NI 43-101. We reference the Lookout Mountain Technical Report in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for informational purposes only and the Lookout Mountain Technical Report is not incorporated herein by reference.  Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of a mineral deposit in the above categories will ever be converted into Guide 7 compliant reserves.  “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category.  Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases.  Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable.  

The Lookout Mountain Technical Report was modeled and estimated by MDA by evaluating available drill data statistically, utilizing geologic interpretations provided by Timberline to interpret gold mineral domains on cross sections spaced at 50- to 100-foot intervals across the extent of the Lookout Mountain mineralization, rectifying the mineral-domain interpretations on level plans spaced at 10-foot intervals, analyzing the modeled mineralization using geostatistics to aid in the establishment of estimation parameters, and interpolating grades into a three-dimensional block model.

In 2012, we released updated exploration data for Lookout Mountain and filed an updated Lookout Mountain Technical Report.   As a result of the most recently completed exploration program, we have successfully extended the mineralized zone at Lookout Mountain 600 feet to the south of the mineralized zone boundary defined in the 2011 Lookout Mountain Technical Report, and have expanded mineralization along the west margin of the deposit. Results from Lookout Mountain, and from the South Adit area, significantly increased the currently reported mineralization at Lookout Mountain.  In early 2013, we completed our 2012 exploration program at Lookout Mountain, including 26,140 feet total of infill-drilling.  This program focused on expansion of mineralization, metallurgical, geotechnical, and permitting studies.

Assay results from drilling were incorporated into an updated Lookout Mountain Technical Report which was completed in early 2013.  Drilling also provided data for on-going metallurgical studies directed at characterization of gold mineralization recovery, and for initial assessment of pit-slope stabilities.  Permitting-related activities were advanced through completion of quarterly monitoring, and installation of three monitoring wells. Initial site facilities (heap leach pads, mine rock storage, access roads) have also been prepared.  

In 2013, we continued geochemical waste rock environmental characterization, completed independent metallurgical leach testing, continued water quality monitoring and defined hydrologic work plans.  We also continued the baseline environmental data collection and analysis at Lookout Mountain.  In addition, we reduced costs by consolidating our Elko field office into our Eureka facility.  

17

During most of 2014, the Company limited exploration related activities to low cost field surveys including soil and rock sampling, drill site reclamation, site archeological surveys, and geologic mapping.  The mapping led to identification of new targets on each of the three structural zones of gold mineralization.  In December, 2014 drilling resumed at Eureka with an initial test of one new target completed before year-end.  Reverse circulation (RC) drill hole BHSE-171 identified a new zone of gold mineralization and intersected 25 feet of 0.144 ounces of gold per ton (opt) (7.62 meters (m) of 4.93 grams of gold per tonne (g/t)) within a longer 65 foot interval assaying 0.094 opt (19.82 m of 3.22 g/t) in the Lookout Mountain area.  This hole was offset 140 feet from BHSE-152 (drilled in 2012) which first encountered the new zone in 2012 but was not completed due to drilling difficulties.  

In follow-up to the successful results in RC drill hole BHSE-171, two diamond drill core holes were completed in January, 2015.  BHSE-172 intersected 25.2 feet of 0.15 opt (7.7 m of 5.02 g/t) within an interval of 46.6 feet of 0.10 opt (14.2 m of 5.02 g/t).  BHSE-173 intercepted 57.4 feet of 0.06 opt (17.5 m @ 1.92 g/t).  The two core hole intercepts of the mineralized zone were offset approximately 140 feet from BHSE-171.  The intercepts are well-correlated, as the gold occurs in mineralized collapse breccia within the pyritic Dunderberg Shale-Hamburg Dolomite contact zone.  The intercepts are thought by Timberline geologists to be related to a higher grade feeder system as recognized in many Carlin-type systems.

Two additional RC holes were completed as infill drilling within the existing resource area at Lookout Mountain.  Results were highlighted by hole BHSE-174 which intercepted 75.0 feet of 0.02 opt (22.9 m of 0.57 g/t) which is very consistent with surrounding intercepts.  

We also completed a six-hole RC drill program on the Windfall target within the Eureka project.  The drilling successfully tested on-strike, offset, and down-dip extensions of gold mineralization that was previously mined at Windfall.  Six drill holes completed over a strike length of approximately 3,000 feet intersected gold mineralization consistent with results from over 600 historic drill holes, highlighted by BHWF-40 which intersected 80 feet at 0.09 opt of gold (6.1 m @ 8.79 g/t).    

Further work at Eureka is planned for 2015 to include updating of geologic models at Lookout Mountain and Windfall based on the recent drilling results.  The data for Windfall will be evaluated to support potential development of a resource estimate of the gold mineralization at the project.  

Of our previously announced budget of approximately $2 million for 2015 exploration on the Eureka Project, including Lookout Mountain and Windfall, we have spent approximately $0.5 million to date, and we have reduced our anticipated expenditures at Eureka in order to prioritize resources toward the development of Talapoosa.

There are no proven and probable reserves as defined under Guide 7 at the Eureka Project and our activities there remain exploratory in nature.

Butte Highlands Project, Montana

In conjunction with our joint venture partner, Highland, we continue to advance the Butte Highlands project toward an expected commencement of mineral extraction.  With the receipt of final assays from the 50,000-foot underground exploration drill program that was completed in the year ended September 30, 2011, Highland completed an initial mine plan and obtained necessary data for the submission of the Hard Rock Operating Permit (“HRO Permit”) application.  The mine plan anticipates mineral extraction of approximately 400 tons per day during the first four years of operation, with mineralized material to be direct shipped to a nearby mill.  

We submitted the application for our HRO Permit to the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”) in May 2010. As a result of hydrological studies, it had become evident that there would be a need to pump and discharge more water from the mineralized area than was initially expected.  As a result, the project requires an additional water discharge permit (“MPDES Permit”) issued by the State of Montana and the construction of additional water treatment facilities.  An application for the MPDES Permit was submitted to the MDEQ on March 30, 2012, and during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 we received the MPDES Permit, to take effect on August 1, 2013.

In May 2013, we released an NI 43-101 compliant technical report, entitled, Technical Report on the Butte Highlands Gold Project, Silver Bow County, Montana, USA, dated May 10, 2013 (the “Butte Technical Report”).  The Butte Technical Report was prepared by MDA, of Reno, Nevada under the supervision of Michael M. Gustin, Senior Geologist, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101.

18

Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors: The Butte Technical Report uses the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resource,” “indicated mineral resource”, “inferred mineral resource” and “historic mineral resource”. We advise investors that these terms are defined in and required to be disclosed by Canadian regulations (NI 43-101); however, these terms are not defined terms under Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. As a reporting issuer in Canada, we are required to prepare reports on our mineral properties in accordance with NI 43-101. We reference the Butte Technical Report in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for informational purposes only and the Butte Technical Report is not incorporated herein by reference.  Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of a mineral deposit in the above categories will ever be converted into Guide 7 compliant reserves.  “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category.  Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases.  Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable.  

A significant project milestone was achieved with the receipt of a notice of completeness and draft HRO Permit from the MDEQ on December 7, 2012.   In January, 2013, with environmental baseline studies substantially complete, the MDEQ initiated completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) for the project upon which the final HRO Permit was scheduled to be issued late in the third quarter of 2013.  A draft EIS was issued on October 11, 2013 and, after receipt of public comments thereupon, the MDEQ spent most of 2014 preparing the final EIS document which was published on December 18, 2014.  The MDEQ has subsequently published, on January 26, 2015, a Record of Decision (“ROD”) authorizing Butte Highlands Joint Venture (“BHJV”) to construct and operate the proposed underground gold mine.  

During 2014, the United States Forest Service (“USFS”) completed specialist studies in support of a proposed Plan of Operations to allow the usage of USFS roads for haulage of mineralized material from the mine site.  The USFS initiated preparation of an Environmental Assessment (“EA”) in the second quarter of 2013.  The draft EA was released and followed with a public comment period in the first quarter of 2014.  During the fourth quarter of 2014, the USFS continued preparing a Final EA which considers the public comments and is coordinating plans with Butte-Silver Bow County and BHJV for long-term road maintenance plans.  

In the first quarter of 2014, a “Nationwide 404” Permit was granted by the US Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE), as was a Conservation District 310 Permit (pending final engineering design submittals), to BHJV to allow needed road improvements across stream crossings and associated minor wetlands.  

In March, 2015, the USFS released a Draft Decision Notice on an EA which, when finalized, will authorize material haulage by BHJV and provides a route for mine support vehicles.  The USFS concluded that the effects of using either of two alternative routes would be mitigated thereby allowing a Finding of No Significant Impacts.  The Draft Decision Notice was subject to a final objection period of 45 days as mandated by federal law.   

The USFS received and reviewed four substantive objections to the Draft Decision Notice.  On June 10, 2015, the Forest Supervisor for the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest officially responded by letter that after review, the road use as proposed by BHJV and approved in the Draft Decision Notice was found to be in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, policies, and the Forest Plan.  This review by the USFS was noted to be the final administrative determination of the Department of Agriculture and that no further agency review of the written response to objections is available.  The USFS is now preparing the Final EA and the Decision Notice which is anticipated to be released in the third quarter of 2015.  

With receipt of the ROD for the project and the anticipated near-term release of the Final EA and Decision Notice from the USFS, subject to prevailing gold prices, we anticipate that BHJV will post the required bond and re-initiate final pre-development planning and work in the third quarter of 2015.  BHJV has already initiated planning for implementation of mitigation measures identified by the MDEQ in the ROD.  Designs for necessary upgrades to the road have been completed and submitted to the USFS for approval.  Construction can begin shortly after approval of the final designs by the USFS.  When road construction is completed, and all agreed-upon mitigation measures have been implemented, the final permit by the USFS for road use is expected to be granted.  Once approved, and subject to a positive extraction decision by BHJV and seasonal weather conditions, road improvements and final mine construction are expected to be initiated in the second half of 2015.

19

Timberline's joint venture operating agreement at the Butte Highlands Project calls for Timberline to retain a 50-percent project interest while being carried to production (as defined in the joint venture agreement) by Highland.  Once in production, as defined in the joint venture agreement, Timberline is to receive 20-percent of project cash flow until Highland recovers its initial capital expenditures, at which time Timberline will receive 50-percent of cash flow.  

A feasibility study has not been completed on the Butte Highlands project, and there are no proven and probable reserves at the property under Guide 7.  Our activities there remain exploratory in nature and there is no certainty the proposed operations will be economically viable.

Summary

We believe the global economic environment and monetary climate continue to favor a solid and relatively steady gold price for the foreseeable future.  While volatility is to be expected, our expectation is that we can continue to advance our business model in spite of the current gold price and market volatility.  

As a company, we are focused on advancing our Talapoosa project.  In May 2015, we finalized a positive PEA, the results of which we announced on April 27, 2015, and we are advancing toward the preparation of a pre-feasibility study for an anticipated open pit mining operation.  Subject to available capital, we also expect to continue exploration programs at the Lookout Mountain and Windfall areas within our Eureka project and at Seven Troughs. The Butte Highlands project in Montana is being advanced by our joint venture operating partner through the final stages of permitting, after which a production decision will be made by our partner.  We believe that management and our board of directors have the knowledge and experience to appropriately advance Talapoosa toward a production decision, and to evaluate other strategic opportunities.       

Results of Operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Consolidated Results

Our consolidated net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was $681,923 compared to a consolidated net loss of $656,466 for the three months ended June 30, 2014.  The year over year difference is primarily attributed to increased exploration expenditures at Talapoosa in the three months ended June 30, 2015 and decreased other general and administrative fees in the three months ended June 30, 2014 due to a credit for unpaid director fees.  During the three months ended June 30, 2015 we also incurred an increase in Delaware franchise tax expense due to the method of calculation which was significantly impacted by the increase in our authorized number of common shares in order to complete the acquisition of Wolfpack Nevada and our subsequent reverse stock split.  These increases were partially offset by a reduction in legal fees during the three months ended June 30, 2015.  Legal fees were higher in the three months ended June 30, 2014 due to the acquisition of Wolfpack Nevada.  Exploration expenditures during the three months ended June 30, 2015 increased due to the work at Talapoosa, which was primarily related to the completion of the PEA.  Expenses for the advancement of Talapoosa are expected to continue in 2015, subject to adequate funding.  

20

Our consolidated net loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 was $2,983,313 compared to a consolidated net loss of $1,842,778 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014.  The year over year difference is primarily attributed to increased exploration expenditures at Eureka and Talapoosa, impairment of mineral rights, non-cash stock option expense related to stock options granted during the 2015 period, and non-cash stock issuance expense, which were partially offset by a reduction in salaries, benefits and legal fees.  Exploration expenditures increased due to drilling and permitting activities at Eureka, including a required archeological survey, and the commencement of work at Talapoosa in the nine months ended June 30, 2015.  Expenses for the advancement of Talapoosa and exploration at Eureka are expected to continue in 2015, subject to exploration results and adequate funding.  In the nine months ended June 30, 2015, we terminated the property lease on the Iron Butte property, resulting in a $426,000 charge to abandonment of mineral rights.  Stock listing fees increased in the nine months ended June 30, 2015 due to additional listing fees incurred for shares issued in conjunction with the Talapoosa property option agreement.  We also incurred an increase in Delaware franchise tax expense due to the method of calculation which was significantly impacted by the increase in our authorized number of common shares in order to complete the acquisition of Wolfpack Nevada and our subsequent reverse stock split.

Financial Condition and Liquidity

At June 30, 2015, we had assets of $17,626,340, consisting of cash in the amount of $352,944; property, mineral rights and equipment, net of depreciation of $15,221,599, and other assets in the amount of $2,051,797.  

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of our assets and the settlement of our liabilities in the normal course of our operations. Disruptions in the credit and financial markets over the past several years have had a material adverse impact on a number of financial institutions and investors and have limited access to capital and credit for many companies.  In addition, commodity prices and mining equities have seen significant volatility which increases the risk to precious metal investors.     Credit and market disruptions, among other things, make it more difficult for us to obtain, or increase our cost of obtaining, capital and financing for our operations.  Our access to additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all.  If we are unable to obtain financing through equity investments, we will seek multiple solutions including, but not limited to, asset sales, credit facilities or debenture issuances in order to continue as a going concern.  

At June 30, 2015, we had working capital of $392,761.  As of the date of this report, we have no outstanding debt and a cash balance of approximately $200,000.  As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we do not anticipate that we will be able to continue as a going concern for the next 12 months without receiving significant additional financing.  Therefore, we expect to engage in financial transactions to increase our cash balance or decrease our cash obligations in the near term, which may include equity financings, joint venture agreements, sales of non-core assets, credit facilities or debenture issuances, or other strategic transactions.  

We are working to increase our working capital by decreasing our expenditures.  We have implemented significant across-the-board salary reductions; curtailed discretionary exploration expenditures; and reduced professional fees and other general and administrative expenditures.  We are also working to increase our working capital by exploring multiple financing alternatives.    

We recognize that we will not be able to execute our operating plans with our current cash balances.  However, with our current cash balance, our expected ability to acquire additional capital and complete necessary financing transactions, and our ability to curtail discretionary exploration expenditures as needed, we believe that we will have sufficient working capital to meet our ongoing, non-discretionary operating expenses for the next 12 months and maintain our primary mineral properties.  Additional capital may be obtained through financing transactions such as asset sales, equity investments, joint ventures, debt facilities, or other types of strategic arrangements.

We plan, as funding allows, to follow up on our completed PEA of Talapoosa with a pre-feasibility study, which is expected to include trade-off studies, further metallurgical tests, and analysis of milling and other processing scenarios.  Also subject to available capital, we may continue prudent exploration programs on our material exploration properties and/or fund some exploratory activities on early-stage properties.  We are currently revising our corporate and exploration budgets with a focus on the advancement of the Talapoosa pre-feasibility study.  Our current working capital is not sufficient to meet our currently planned exploration costs and general corporate and administrative expenses through the end of fiscal 2015, and we will require additional funding and reductions in exploration and administrative expenditures.

21

As a potential future source of cash flow our Butte Highlands project continues to be carried to production (as defined in the joint venture agreement). Regulatory delays in permitting have resulted in deferred receipts of anticipated cash flow.  If and when extraction of mineralized material begins, we expect to realize income from our 20% share of project cash flows, with potential increased income after initial capital expenditures are repaid and our share of project cash flows increases to 50%.  While this prospective income is expected to fund some of our future exploration expenditures, we do not anticipate that it will be sufficient to fund all such activities and that additional financing will still be necessary to fund our other exploration activities, or those activities will have to be curtailed.  

Given current market conditions, we cannot provide assurance that necessary financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.  Without additional financing, we would have to significantly curtail our exploration and other expenditures while we seek alternative funding arrangements to provide sufficient capital to meet our ongoing, non-discretionary expenditures for the next 12 months and maintain our primary mineral properties. If we cannot obtain sufficient additional financing, we may be unable to make required property payments on a timely basis and be forced to return some or all of our leased or optioned properties to the underlying owners.   

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

See Note 2 to the financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report for a summary of the significant accounting policies used in the presentation of our financial statements. We are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses.  We believe that our most critical accounting estimates are related to asset impairments and asset retirement obligations.

Our critical accounting policies and estimates are as follows:

Asset Impairments

Significant property acquisition payments for active exploration properties are capitalized.  The evaluation of our mineral properties for impairment is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineralized material associated with the properties, and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale.  If no mineable ore body is discovered, or market conditions for minerals deteriorate, there is the potential for a material decline in the value assigned to such mineral properties.

We review the carrying value of equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from our use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the equipment is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors.

Asset Retirement Obligations

We have an obligation to reclaim our properties after the surface has been disturbed by exploration methods at the site. As a result, we have recorded a liability for the fair value of the reclamation costs we expect to incur at our Lookout Mountain Project.  We estimate applicable inflation and credit-adjusted risk-free rates as well as expected reclamation time frames. To the extent that the estimated reclamation costs change, such changes will impact future reclamation expense recorded. A liability is recognized for the present value of estimated environmental remediation (asset retirement obligation) in the period in which the liability is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The offsetting balance is charged to the related long-lived asset. Adjustments are made to the liability for changes resulting from passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate underlying the obligation.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

22

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusions of Management Regarding Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

At the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, Kiran Patankar (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer, Randal Hardy, (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a – 15(e) and Rule 15d – 15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation, or of any proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities which are, or would be, likely to have a material adverse effect upon us or our operations, taken as a whole.  No director, officer or affiliate of Timberline and no owner of record or beneficial owner of more than 5% of our securities or any associate of any such director, officer or security holder is a party adverse to Timberline or has a material interest adverse to Timberline in reference to pending litigation.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014 which was filed with the SEC on December 23, 2014.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

All unregistered sales of equity securities have previously been disclosed on Form 8-K.

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

We consider health, safety and environmental stewardship to be a core value for the Company.

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities with respect to mining operations and properties in the United States that are subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). During the quarter ended December 31, 2014, our U.S. exploration properties were not subject to regulation by the MSHA under the Mine Act.  

23

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.  

* - Filed herewith

24

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

25