Tingo Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED: June 30, 2016

☐  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-35850

MICRONET ENERTEC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(201) 225-0190

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  ☐     No  ☒

As of August 11, 2016, there were 5,878,721 issued and outstanding shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

MICRONET ENERTEC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(USD In Thousands, Except Share and Par Value Data)

MICRONET ENERTEC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(USD In Thousands, Except Share and Par Value Data)

MICRONET ENERTEC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(USD In Thousands, Except Share and Earnings Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

MICRONET ENERTEC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(USD In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

MICRONET ENERTEC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(USD In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

MICRONET ENERTEC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(USD In Thousands)

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Overview

A. Micronet Enertec Technologies, Inc., a U.S.-based Delaware corporation, was formed on January 31, 2002. On March 14, 2013, we changed our corporate name from Lapis Technologies, Inc. to Micronet Enertec Technologies, Inc. (“we,” “Micronet Enertec” or “the Company”).

We operate through two Israel-based companies, Enertec Systems 2001 Ltd (“Enertec”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, and Micronet Ltd (“Micronet”), in which we held 62.9% as of June 30, 2016 and is controlled by us.

Micronet is a publicly traded company on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and operates in the growing commercial Mobile Resource Management (“MRM”) market. Micronet through both its Israeli and U.S. operational offices designs, develops, manufactures and sells rugged mobile computing devices that provide fleet operators and field workforces with computing solutions in challenging work environments. Micronet’s vehicle cabin installed and portable tablets increase workforce productivity and enhance corporate efficiency by offering computing power and communication capabilities that provide fleet operators with visibility into vehicle location, fuel usage, speed and mileage. Micronet’s customers consist primarily of application service providers and solution providers specializing in the MRM market.

Enertec operates in the Defense and Aerospace markets and designs, develops, manufactures and supplies various customized military computer-based systems, simulators, automatic test equipment and electronic instruments. Enertec’s solutions and systems are designed according to major aerospace integrators’ requirements and are integrated by them into critical systems such as command and control, missile fire control, maintenance of military aircraft and missiles for use by the Israeli Air Force and Navy and by foreign defense entities.

B. Standby Equity Distribution Agreement

On June 30, 2016, we entered into a Standby Equity Distribution Agreement (the “SEDA”) with YA II PV Ltd. (“YA II”), a Cayman Island exempt limited partnership and an affiliate of Yorkville Advisors Global, LLC, for the sale of up to $2.39 million of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, over a three-year commitment period.  Under the terms of the SEDA, the Company may from time to time, in its discretion, sell newly-issued shares of its common stock to YA II at a discount to market of 1.5%.  The Company expects to issue shares of common stock under the SEDA pursuant to its effective Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 196760). The Company is not obligated to utilize any of the funds available under the SEDA and there are no minimum commitments or minimum use penalties.  The total amount of funds that ultimately can be raised under the SEDA over the three-year term will depend on the market price for the Company’s common stock and the number of shares actually sold. The SEDA does not impose any restrictions on the Company’s operating activities. During the term of the SEDA, YA II is prohibited from engaging in any short selling or hedging transactions related to the Company’s common stock.

C. Note Purchase Agreement

On June 30, 2016, the Company and our wholly-owned subsidiary Enertec Electronics Ltd (collectively, the “Borrowers”) entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with YA II (the “Note Purchase Agreement”), whereby YA II will purchase $600 of notes from the Borrowers (the “Notes”). The Company received a total of $600 on July 1st, 2016. The outstanding principal balance of the Notes shall bear interest at 7% per annum. On a quarterly basis commencing on October 10, 2016, the Borrowers shall make payments of $150 of principal plus accrued interest.

All amounts payable are due on July 10, 2017. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under the Notes, all amounts payable may be due immediately.

In connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to grant to YA II a five-year warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase 66,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $4.30 per share. The Warrant is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND CONSOLIDATION

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Accordingly, they do not contain all information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all the adjustments necessary (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) to present the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2016 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the periods ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future period. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company’s accounting policies are described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and updated, as necessary, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

All the amounts included in the notes are denominated in thousand US Dollars.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the results and position of the Company and its subsidiaries. Control is the power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its operating activities. In assessing control, legal and contractual rights are taken into account. The consolidated financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control is achieved until the date that control is ceased. Intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated upon consolidation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) “FASB” issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10) (“Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU 2016-01”), which updates certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 will be effective for the Company beginning in its first quarter of 2019. We are currently assessing the potential impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, which supersedes the lease accounting guidance in ASC 840, Leases. The new guidance requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with the exception of short-term leases. For lessees, leases will continue to be classified as either operating or finance leases in the income statement. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model. The guidance is effective for reporting periods (interim and annual) beginning after December 15, 2018, for public companies, with early adoption permitted. The new guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently assessing the potential impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

NOTE 2 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND CONSOLIDATION (CONT.)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Cont.)

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, which revises the guidance in ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, and will change how companies account for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees, including the income tax impact, classification on the statement of cash flows and forfeitures. The guidance is effective for reporting periods (interim and annual) beginning after December 15, 2017, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the potential impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

NOTE 3 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The accounting guidance establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:

Level 1 – Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments and quoted prices in markets that are not active, and inputs that are directly observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 2 are typically either comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, such as

treasury securities with pricing interpolated from recent trades of similar securities, or priced with models using highly observable inputs, such as commodity options priced using observable forward prices and volatilities.

Level 3 – Significant inputs to pricing that have little or no observability as of the reporting date. The types of assets and liabilities included in Level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation, such as the complex and subjective models and forecasts used to determine the fair value of financial instruments.

Items carried at fair value as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, are summarized below:

NOTE 4 – INVENTORIES

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, computed using the first-in, first-out method. Inventories consist of the following:

NOTE 5 – SEGMENTS

Operating segments are based upon our internal organization structure, the manner in which our operations are managed and the availability of separate financial information. We have two operating segments: a defense and aerospace segment operated by Enertec and a mobile resource management segment operated by Micronet.

The following table summarizes the financial performance of our operating segments:

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other Federal securities laws, and is subject to the safe-harbor created by such Act and laws.  In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of such terms, or other variations thereon or comparable terminology.  The statements herein and their implications are merely predictions and therefore inherently subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors that may cause actual results, performance levels of activity, or our achievements, or industry results to be materially different from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements.  Such forward-looking statements appear in this Item 2 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and may appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following:

Our business and operations are subject to substantial risks, which increase the uncertainty inherent in the forward-looking statements contained or implied in this report.  Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements. Further information on potential factors that could affect our business is described under the heading “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.  Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures we have made in that report. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Overview

We operate primarily through two Israel-based companies, Enertec our wholly-owned subsidiary, and Micronet in which we have a controlling interest, which  develop, manufacture, integrate and globally market rugged computers, tablets and computer-based systems and instruments for the commercial, defense and aerospace markets. Our products, solutions and services are designed to perform in severe environments and battlefield conditions.

Micronet is a publicly-traded company on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and operates in the growing commercial MRM market and is a global developer, manufacturer and provider of mobile computing platforms, designed for integration into fleet management and mobile workforce management solutions. In June 2014, Micronet expanded its MRM business and operations in the U.S. market through the acquisition of the Vehicle Business for $7.1 million, and as a result adding to its business U.S.-based facilities which include manufacturing and technical support infrastructure, sales and marketing capabilities as well as expanding its U.S. customer base and presence with local fleets and local MRM service providers. As a result of this acquisition, Micronet currently operates via its Israeli and U.S. facilities, the first located in Azur, Israel, near Tel Aviv, and the second located in Salt Lake City, Utah.

Enertec operates in the defense and aerospace markets and designs, develops, manufactures and supplies various customized military computer-based systems, simulators, automatic test equipment and electronic instruments. Enertec’s solutions and systems are designed according to major aerospace integrators’ requirements and market technological needs and are integrated by them into critical systems such as command and control, missile fire control, maintenance of military aircraft and missiles for use by the Israeli Air Force, Israeli Navy and by foreign defense entities.

Our strategy is driven and focused on continued internal growth through diligent efforts in our traditional growing markets with new technologies and innovative systems and products as well as the development of new potential segments and markets. Concurrent with our efforts to grow organically and in line with our strategy, we will continue to seek acquisitions that will complement and expand our product offerings, support our goals and increase our competitiveness. In order to help achieve our internal growth, we have expanded our production capacity and facilities. The acquisition of Micronet, or the Acquisition, in September 2012 and the Transaction serve our strategy to grow our business, and we believe that Micronet and its research and development, proprietary know-how and manufacturing capabilities will assist us in expanding our capability to provide turnkey solutions of computer based complex systems and solutions for commercial defense and aerospace applications as well. We strongly believe that by utilizing Micronet as our commercial arm we will be able to access new market segments and new customers, thereby increase our overall customer base. Our current target markets, in which we concentrate the majority of our resources, include primarily the US market, the Israeli domestic market and the European market.

On February 18, 2016, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement, or the Asset Purchase Agreement, with Novatel Wireless, Inc., or the Seller, pursuant to which we agreed to acquire certain assets and liabilities of the Seller used in the operation of its telematics hardware business, or the Telematics Business Acquisition. The Asset Purchase Agreement provided that the Telematics Business Acquisition would close on or before March 31, 2016, subject to certain extensions and termination provisions.  On April 11, 2016, the Seller notified us that it was terminating the Asset Purchase Agreement due to the failure to meet such closing deadline and certain conditions required to extend it, and demanded a termination fee equal to $250 thousand pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. On May 3, 2016, the Seller filed a complaint in the Superior District Court of the State of Delaware naming us as the defendant. The complaint alleges, among other things, that we breached the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement and seeks, among other things, the payment of the termination fee equal to $250 thousand plus interest as well as all costs and expenses associated with the commencement of the lawsuit. On June 27, 2016 we filed our answer to the complaint in which we rejected the claims made by Novatel Wireless. The suit is currently in its early stages of discovery and exchange of interrogatories. However, we have made a $250 thousand provision in our financial statements for any claims relating to such litigation.

Results of Operations

(Dollars and NIS in thousands)

Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were $6,721 and $13,203, respectively, compared to $5,747 and $11,426 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. This represents an increase of $974 and $1,777, or an increase of 17% and 16%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, mainly due to our continuing marketing and sales penetration.

Total revenues related to the aerospace and defense segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were $2,322 and $4,853, respectively, as compared to $1,884 and $3,917, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. This represents an increase of $438 and $936, respectively, or 23% and 24% respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. The increase is mainly due to progress in various projects.

Total revenues related to the MRM segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were $4,399 and $8,350, respectively, as compared to $3,863 and $7,509, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 , respectively. This represents an increase of $536 and $ 841 or 14% and 11% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, mainly due to the continuation of our marketing and sales penetration and an increase of our backlog.

Gross profit decreased by $276 and increased by $52, to $1,558 and $3,637, and represents 23% and 28% of the revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. This is in comparison to gross profit of $1,834 and $3,585 which represented 32% and 31% of the revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

Micronet’s gross profit decreased from 35% and 35% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 to 24% and 29% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The decreases are mainly due to different product mixes and write offs of slow moving inventory.

Enertec’s gross profit decreased from 26% and 24% in the six months ended June 30, 2015 to 21% and 25% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The changes are mainly a result of changes in product mix.

Selling and Marketing

Selling and marketing costs are part of operating expenses. Selling and marketing costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were $478 and $836, respectively, as compared to $350 and $819 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. This represents an increase of $128 and $17, or 36% and 2%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The increases are mainly due to increases of sales and sales support employees.

General and Administrative

General and administrative costs are part of operating expenses. General and administrative costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were $1,518 and $2,654, respectively, compared to $1,127 and $2,238 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. This represents an increase of $391 and $416, or 34% and 19%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. The increase is mainly due to a onetime $250 provision relating to the Novatel Wireless, Inc. lawsuit.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are part of operating expenses. Research and development costs, which include mainly wages, materials and sub-contractors, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were $683 and $1,383, respectively, as compared to $723 and $1,466 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. This represents a decrease of $40 and $83, or 6% and 6%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

Loss from operations

Our loss from operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were $1,353 and $1,696, or 20% and 13% of the revenues, compared to loss from operations of $671 and $1,545, or 12% and 14% of the revenues, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 respectively. The increase in loss from operations is mainly a result of the $250 provision and a decrease in the gross profit as described above.

Financial Expenses, net

Financial expenses, net for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were $131 and $261, compared to expenses of $169 and $261 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. This represents a decrease of $38 and $0, or 23% and 0%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

Net loss attributed to Micronet Enertec Technologies, Inc.

Our net loss attributed to Micronet Enertec Technologies, Inc. was $1,219 and $1,558 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, compared to net loss of $588 and $ 1,294 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. This represents an increase in net loss of $631 and $264, or 107% and 20%, as compared to the same periods last year. The increase in net loss of the three and six months periods are attributed primarily to $250 provision and a decrease in the gross profit as described above.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to providing financial measurements based on generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., or GAAP, we provide additional financial metrics that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, or non-GAAP financial measures. Management uses non-GAAP financial measures, in addition to GAAP financial measures, to understand and compare operating results across accounting periods, for financial and operational decision making, for planning and forecasting purposes and to evaluate our financial performance.

Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures reflect our ongoing business in a manner that allows for meaningful comparisons and analysis of trends in our business, as they exclude expenses and gains that are not reflective of our ongoing operating results. Management also believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors in understanding and evaluating our operating results and future prospects in the same manner as management and in comparing financial results across accounting periods and to those of peer companies.

The non-GAAP financial measures do not replace the presentation of our GAAP financial results and should only be used as a supplement to, not as a substitute for, our financial results presented in accordance with GAAP.

The non-GAAP adjustments, and the basis for excluding them from non-GAAP financial measures, are outlined below:

The following table reconciles, for the periods presented, GAAP net loss attributable to Micronet Enertec to non-GAAP net loss attributable to Micronet Enertec and GAAP loss per share attributable to Micronet Enertec to non-GAAP net loss per share attributable to Micronet Enertec:

Liquidity and Capital Resources

(Dollars and NIS in Thousands)

The Company finances its operations through current revenues, loans and securities offerings. The loans are divided into bank loans and a loan from Meydan Family Trust No 3, or Meydan, as described below.

As of June 30, 2016, our total cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities balance was $11,463 (of which marketable securities amounted to $4,974), as compared to $12,139 (of which marketable securities amounted to $5,643) as of December 31, 2015. This reflects a decrease of $676 in cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and marketable securities. The decrease in cash and cash equivalents is primarily a result of repayments of loans to banks and others. 

On September 2, 2015, Enertec entered into a Credit Line Agreement, or the Credit Line Agreement, with a financing firm, or the Financing Firm, pursuant to which the Financing Firm agreed to grant Enertec a credit line for the financing of certain payables of Enertec. The maximum aggregate amount of the financing eligible under the Credit Line Agreement is $675 and up to 85% of each invoice. The financing pursuant to the Credit Line Agreement is at an annual rate of Prime plus 1.75%. On June 2, 2016, the Credit Line Agreement was extended and will expire on April 30, 2017. As of June 30, 2016, Enertec had financed $666 pursuant to the Credit Line Agreement.

On December 30, 2015, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement, or the Meydan Loan, with Meydan, pursuant to which Meydan agreed to loan the Company $750 on certain terms and conditions. The Meydan loan bears interest at the rate of Libor plus 8% per annum and is due and payable in 4 equal installments beginning on July 10, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, the balance on the Meydan Loan was $781.

On July 8, 2016 the Company amended the Meydan Loan Agreement such that the note shall be repaid in 4 equal installments on October 10, 2016, January 10, 2017, April 10, 2017 and July 10, 2017.

In connection with our acquisition of the Vehicle Business, Micronet entered into a loan agreement, or the FIBI Loan Agreement, with the First International Bank of Israel, or FIBI.  Under this agreement, FIBI loaned Micronet $4,850 for the financing of this acquisition.  Pursuant to the terms of the FIBI Loan Agreement, $2,425 of the loan bears interest at a quarterly adjustable rate of Prime plus 1.5 percent (3.75% percent as of the date of the loan), or the Long Term Portion. The Long Term Portion plus interest is due and payable in twelve equal consecutive quarterly installments beginning on August 29, 2014. The balance of the loan in the amount of $2,425 bears interest at a quarterly adjustable rate of Prime plus 1.2% (3.45% as of the date of the loan), or the Short Term Portion. The Short Term Portion is due and payable within one year from the date of the loan, and the interest on the Short Term Portion is due and payable every quarter beginning on August 29, 2014. The loan is secured mainly by a floating charge against Micronet’s assets and a mortgage on a building owned by Micronet. The loan is subject to customary covenants, terms, conditions, events of default and certain pre-payment provisions. As of May 28, 2015, Micronet repaid the Short Term Portion and borrowed a new loan for the same amount and on the same terms as the prior Short Term Portion for a period of six months ending on November 29, 2015.

As of November 29 2015, Micronet repaid the Short Term Portion and borrowed a new loan for the same amount and on the same terms as the prior Short Term Portion for a period of six months ending on May 29, 2016 As of May 29 2016, Micronet repaid the Short Term Portion and borrowed a new loan for the same amount and on the same terms as the prior Short Term Portion for a period of six months ending on November 29, 2016. As of June 30, 2016, the balance on this loan (the Long Term Portion and the Short Term Portion) was approximately $4,117 and the interest rates were Prime plus 1.2% and Prime plus 1.5% for the Short Term Portion and the Long Term Portion, respectively.

On June 17, 2014, Enertec Electronics entered into a loan agreement, or the Mercantile Loan Agreement, with Mercantile Discount Bank Ltd., or Mercantile Bank, pursuant to which Mercantile Bank agreed to loan the Company approximately $3,631 on certain terms and conditions, or the Mercantile Loan. The proceeds of the Mercantile Loan were used by the Company: (1) to refinance previous loans granted to the Company in the amount of approximately $1,333; (2) to complete the purchase by the Company, via Enertec, of 1.2 million shares of Micronet constituting 6.3% of the issued and outstanding shares of Micronet; and (3) for working capital and general corporate purposes.

Pursuant to the terms of the Mercantile Loan Agreement: (1) approximately $3,050 of the Mercantile Loan bears interest at a quarterly adjustable rate of Prime plus 2.45%, or the Mercantile Long Term Portion, and (2) approximately $581 of the Mercantile Loan bears interest at a quarterly adjustable rate of Prime plus 1.7%, or the Mercantile Short Term Portion. The Mercantile Long Term Portion is due and payable in five equal consecutive annual installments beginning on July 1, 2015, and the interest on the Mercantile Long Term Portion is due and payable in ten equal consecutive annual installments beginning at January 1, 2015. The Mercantile Short Term Portion in the amount of approximately $581 bears interest of Prime plus 1.7%. The Mercantile Loan is secured mainly by (1) a negative pledge on Enertec’s assets, (2) a pledge of Enertec’s financial deposits which shall be equal to 25% of Enertec’s outstanding credit balance, and (3) a fixed charge of Micronet shares at such value equal to at least 200% of the outstanding net balance of the Mercantile Loan. The Mercantile Loan is subject to customary covenants, terms, conditions, events of default and certain pre-payment provisions. As of June 30, 2016, the balance on the Mercantile Loan was $2,748 and the interest rates were Prime plus 2.45% and Prime plus 1.7% for the Mercantile Long Term Portion and the Mercantile Short Term Portion, respectively.

Pursuant to the terms of the Mercantile Loan Agreement, Enertec agreed to grant Mercantile Bank a five-year Phantom Stock Option, or the Phantom Stock Option, pursuant to which Mercantile Bank is entitled to participate in the future appreciation of the Company’s shares and receive a cash amount equal to the increase in the value of the shares underlying the Phantom Stock Option on certain terms and conditions. The Phantom Stock Option allows Mercantile Bank to theoretically exercise, on a cashless basis, options to purchase 1,144,820 shares of Micronet, or the Option Shares, and to receive a cash amount equal to the difference between approximately NIS 4,000, (representing 110 percent of the average market value of Micronet Option Shares during the 30 trading days prior to the date of the Mercantile Loan) and the actual market price of such Option Shares on the date of the exercise of the Phantom Stock Option. Pursuant to the Mercantile Loan Agreement, the parties further agreed that the potential gain to Mercantile Bank resulting from the Phantom Stock Option shall not exceed NIS 3,000. In the event the Mercantile Loan is repaid prior to the third anniversary of the Mercantile Loan, the gain to Mercantile Bank resulting from the Phantom Stock Option shall not exceed NIS 2,000. As of the date of the Mercantile Loan the exercise price of the Phantom Stock Options is higher than the market price of the Option Shares. As of June 30, 2016, the fair value of this Phantom Stock Option was $11.

In addition, on June 30, 2016, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary Enertec Electronics Ltd., or the Borrowers, entered into a Note Purchase Agreement, or the Note Purchase Agreement, with YA II PV Ltd., or YA II , whereby YA II agreed to purchase $600 of notes from the Borrowers, or the Notes. The outstanding principal balance of the Notes bear interest at 7% per annum. On a quarterly basis commencing on October 10, 2016, the Borrowers are required to make payments of $150 of principal plus accrued interest. All amounts payable are due on July 10, 2017. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under the Notes, all amounts payable may be due immediately. In conjunction with the Note Purchase Agreement we agreed to grant to YA II a 5 year warrant to purchase 66,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.30 per share.

As of June 30, 2016, our total current assets were $32,675, as compared to $33,534 at December 31, 2015. The decrease is mainly due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalent and marketable securities and a decrees in inventory.

Our trade accounts receivable at June 30, 2016 were $13,669 as compared to $12,353 at December 31, 2015. The increase is primarily due an increase in revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

As of June 30, 2016, our working capital was $11,674, as compared to $13,291 at December 31, 2015. The decrease in the working capital is primarily due to the decrease in cash and cash equivalents and due to an increase in short- term bank loans.

As of June 30, 2016, our total debt was $16,746 as compared to $14,402 at December 31, 2015.

Our bank and other debt is composed of short-term loans amounting to $14,920 as of June 30, 2016 compared to $12,049 at December 31, 2015, and long-term loans amounting to $1,826 as of June 30, 2016 compared to $2,353 at December 31, 2015. The increase in short-term loans caused an increase in the restricted cash that stands as a collateral for those loans.

Our debt includes our bank debt described above, a working capital credit facility - a loan from Meydan and the Credit Line Agreement:

Financing Needs

Although we currently do not have any material commitments for capital expenditures, we expect our capital requirements to increase over the next several years as we continue to support the organic and non-organic growth of our business. Among other activities, we plan to develop, manufacture and market larger-scale solutions, support our growing manufacturing and finance needs, continue the development and testing of our suite of products and systems, increase management, marketing and administration infrastructure, and embark on developing in-house business capabilities and facilities. Our future liquidity and capital funding requirements will depend on numerous factors, including but not limited to (1) the levels and costs of our research and development initiatives, (2) the cost of hiring, training and certifying additional highly skilled professionals (mainly engineers and technicians), and maintaining our management including sales and marketing personnel to promote our products, and (3) the cost and timing of the expansion of our development, manufacturing and marketing efforts.

The Company expects to pay off the current portion of certain bank loans in the amount $1,329 and the Meydan Loan in the amount of $562 using its cash flow from operations or possibly additional debt or equity financings.

On June 30, 2016, we entered into a SEDA, with YA II for the sale of up to $2,390 of shares of our common stock over a three-year commitment period.  Under the terms of the SEDA, we may from time to time, in our discretion, sell newly-issued shares of our common stock to YA II at a discount to market of 1.5%.  In that regard, we have filed a prospectus supplement to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-196760) and expect to issue shares of our common stock under the SEDA pursuant to such registration statement. We are not obligated to utilize any of the funds under the SEDA and there are no minimum commitments or minimum use penalties.  The total amount of funds that ultimately can be raised under the SEDA over the three-year term will depend on the market price for our common stock and the number of shares actually sold. The SEDA does not impose any restrictions on our operating activities. During the term of the SEDA, YA II is prohibited from engaging in any short selling or hedging transactions related to our common stock. As of the date hereof, we have not yet issued any shares pursuant to the SEDA.

As noted above, the Company has an effective Form S-3 registration statement, filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission using a “shelf” registration process. Under this shelf registration process, the Company may, from time to time, sell common stock, warrants or units in one or more offerings up to a total dollar amount of $30,000, of which $2,390 has been reserved for shares to be issued pursuant to the SEDA.

Based on our current business plan, we anticipate that our existing cash balances and cash generated from future sales will be sufficient to permit us to conduct our operations and to carry out our contemplated business plans for the next twelve months. However, we believe that we may need to raise additional funds if we want to materially decrease our dependence on our existing cash and other liquidity resources. Currently, the only external sources of liquidity are our banks, and we may seek additional financing from them or through securities offerings, to expand our operations, using new capital to develop new products, enhance existing products or respond to competitive pressures. However, we may also undertake additional debt or equity financings (including sales of common stock, warrants or units under our shelf registration statement) to better enable us to grow and meet our future operating and capital requirements. There is no assurance that we will be able to consummate such offerings on favorable terms or at all.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect that is material to investors on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Not applicable

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation with the participation of the Company’s management, including Mr. David Lucatz, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, and Mrs. Moran Amran, the Company’s controller (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2016. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

No change occurred in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II- OTHER INFORMATION

On February 18, 2016, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement, or the Asset Purchase Agreement, with Novatel Wireless, Inc., or the Seller, pursuant to which we agreed to acquire certain assets and liabilities of the Seller used in the operation of its telematics hardware business, or the Telematics Business Acquisition. The Asset Purchase Agreement provided that the Telematics Business Acquisition would close on or before March 31, 2016, subject to certain extensions and termination provisions.  On April 11, 2016, the Seller notified us that it was terminating the Asset Purchase Agreement due to the failure to meet such closing deadline and certain conditions required to extend it, and demanded a termination fee equal to $250 thousand pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement. On May 3, 2016, the Seller filed a complaint in the Superior District Court of the State of Delaware naming us as the defendant. The complaint alleges, among other things, that we breached the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement and seeks, among other things, the payment of the termination fee equal to $250 thousand plus interest as well as all costs and expenses associated with the commencement of the lawsuit. On June 27, 2016, we filed our answer to the complaint in which we rejected the claims made by Seller. The suit is currently in its early stages of discovery and exchange of interrogatories. We have made a $250 thousand provision in our financial statements for any claims relating to such litigation.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

EXHIBIT INDEX

22