TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
transition period from
to
Commission
File Number 000-09908
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
FLORIDA
|
59-1947988
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
9454 Wilshire Blvd., R-1,
Beverly Hills, California
|
90212
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800)
525-1698
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
None
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $0.01 par
value per share
|
(Title of class)
|
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check
mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No
☒
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted
on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File
required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No
☐
Indicate by check
mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act:
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of
June 30, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most
recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market
value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant
was approximately $7,626,132, based upon the closing price of the
registrant’s common stock as reported on the OTCQX
Marketplace on such date.
As of March 29, 2018, the registrant had 122,349,958
shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item
|
|
Page
|
PART I
|
||
1.
|
Business
|
1
|
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
10
|
1B.
|
Unresolved Staff
Comments
|
15
|
2.
|
Properties
|
15
|
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
15
|
4.
|
Mine
Safety Disclosures
|
15
|
PART II
|
||
5.
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
16
|
6.
|
Selected Financial
Data
|
16
|
7.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
7A.
|
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
26
|
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
27
|
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
27
|
9A.
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
27
|
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
27
|
PART III
|
||
10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
28
|
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
32
|
12.
|
Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder
Matters
|
36
|
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
38
|
14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
38
|
PART IV
|
||
15.
|
Exhibits, Financial
Statement Schedules
|
39
|
|
||
|
Signatures
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Statements
|
F-1
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), and we intend that such
forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors created
thereby. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, except for historical information, may be
deemed to be forward-looking statements. You can generally identify
forward-looking statements as statements containing the words
“will,” “would,” “believe,”
“expect,” “estimate,”
“anticipate,” “intend,”
“estimate,” “assume,” “can,”
“could,” “plan,” “predict,”
“should” or the negative or other variations thereof or
comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. In addition, any statements that refer to projections
of our future financial performance, trends in our businesses, or
other characterizations of future events or circumstances are
forward-looking statements.
The
forward-looking statements included herein are based on current
expectations of our management based on available information and
involve a number of risks and uncertainties, all of which are
difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are
beyond our control. As such, our actual results could differ
materially and adversely from those expressed in any
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, some of
which are listed under the section “Risk Factors,”
Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers should
carefully review these risks, as well as the additional risks
described in other documents we file from time to time with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. In light of the significant
risks and uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information
included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be
regarded as a representation by us or any other person that such
results will be achieved, and readers are cautioned not to place
undue reliance on such forward-looking information. Except as
required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise the
forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events or
circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
PART I
Item 1.
BUSINESS
Overview
TOMI
Environmental Solutions, Inc. (“TOMI”, the
“Company”, “we”, “our” and
“us”) is a global provider of infection prevention and
decontamination products, services and research. Our operating
structure consists of four divisions: Healthcare, Life Sciences,
TOMI Service Network and Food Safety. We provide environmental
solutions for indoor and outdoor surface decontamination through
the sale of equipment, services and licensing of our
SteraMist™ Binary
Ionization Technology® (“BIT™”), which
is a hydrogen peroxide-based mist and fog registered with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Our mission is
to help our customers create a healthier world through our product
line and our motto is innovating for a safer world™ for healthcare
and life.
We
introduced our SteraMist™
BIT™
technology platform to the commercial market in in June 2013, which currently
consists of a suite of products that incorporate our
BIT™
Solution and applicators, including the SteraMist™ Surface
Unit and the SteraMist™ Environment
System. We have expanded our SteraMist™
BIT™
Technology beyond chemical and biological warfare applications to
the killing of problem microorganisms (including spores) in a wide
variety of commercial settings. SteraMist™
BIT™
provides fast-acting biological six-log kill, which is a 99.9999%
kill, and works in hard-to-reach areas, while leaving no residue or
noxious fumes.
We
currently target domestic and international markets for the control
of microorganisms and the decontamination of large and small indoor
space for biological pathogens and chemical agents including
infectious diseases in hospital, bio-secure labs, pharmaceutical,
biodefense, biosafety including isolation and transfer chambers,
tissue banks, food safety and many other commercial and residential
settings.
Our Technology
BIT™ was developed
in response to Amerithrax, the weaponized anthrax spore attacks
that occurred in Washington, D.C. shortly after the September 11,
2001 U.S. terrorist attacks. BIT™ is a patented
process that aerosolizes and activates a low concentration hydrogen
peroxide solution, producing a fine aqueous mist that contains a
high concentration of Reactive Oxidative Species
(“ROS”), mostly hydroxyl radicals. ROS cause damage to
pathogenic organisms, such as bacteria, bacteria spores, molds
spores, other fungi and yeast, via mechanisms such as oxidation of
unsaturated fatty acids such as carbohydrates, lipids and amino
acids, leading to cellular disruption and/or dysfunction. As such,
our BIT™ is able to
quickly and effectively kill pathogenic organisms in the air and on
surfaces without damaging delicate
equipment or computers, and the only by-product is oxygen and water
(in the form of humidity).
1
Testing
detailed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
of the U.S. Department of Defense demonstrates these ROS, which
include the hydroxyl ion and hydroxyl radicals, aggressively break
the double bonds in bacterial spores, biological and chemical
warfare agents and neutralize their threat while producing nontoxic
by-products. The unique alteration of the chemistry of our solution
occurs after passing our EPA-registered solution through our high
energy atmospheric cold plasma arc, which causes the breaking of
the double bond of a hydrogen peroxide molecule, the net result of
which is our .OH
hydroxyl radical. This hydroxyl radical is known as Ionized
Hydrogen Peroxide (“iHP™”). This
patented process allows these reactive oxygen species
(“ROS’s”) such as hydroxyl radicals to exist in
high concentrations without rapidly recombining and losing their
reactivity.
BIT™ uses a
low percentage Hydrogen Peroxide as its only active ingredient to
produce a hydroxyl radical (.OH
ion) and is represented by the TOMI™ SteraMist™ brand
of products, which produce a germ-killing aerosol that behaves like
a gas.
SteraMist™
has been used throughout the world and has been demonstrated to
reduce certain problem organisms, such as bacterial spores,
Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (“VRE”), Clostridium
difficile (“C. diff”) spores, Middle East Respiratory
Syndrome (“MERS”) and Ebola Virus Disease
(“Ebola”). In U.S. hospitals where
SteraMist™
is being used in terminal cleans, evidence has demonstrated a
reduction of C. diff spore rates. SteraMist™ has reduced
outbreaks of nosocomial MDRO’s (Klebsiella pneumoniae, AB,
pseudomonas aeruginosa) at the largest hospital in Panama,
contributed to the control of MERS in South Korea and, in the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, our technology passed a sanctioned test
showing six-log reduction against Geobacillus stearothermophilus.
In May 2015, the United States Agency for International Development
(USAID) awarded us a grant in the amount of $559,000 for the
development of SteraMist™ Mobile
Decontamination Chambers to fight Ebola. In May 2016, upon the
decontamination and decommissioning of an Ebola treatment center in
West Africa, we fully achieved the milestones upon which the grant
was conditioned. Additionally, BIT™ has also been
shown to effectively decontaminate weaponized biological agents,
including anthrax, chemical agents such as VX (an extremely toxic
organophosphate) and sulfur mustard (otherwise known as mustard
gas) when applied using properly developed international
protocols.
Independent lab
testing, study data from international pharmaceutical companies and
field clinical data have shown six-log efficacy in both C. diff
spores and against Geobacillus stearothermophilus. Geobacillus
stearothermophilus is a laboratory
testing gold standard and is commonly used as a challenge organism
for sterilization
validation studies and periodic check
of sterilization cycles.
Under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(“FIFRA”), we are required
to register with the EPA and certain state regulatory authorities
as a seller of pesticides. In June 2015, SteraMist™
BIT™ was registered with the EPA as a hospital-healthcare
disinfectant for use as a misting/fogging agent.
SteraMist™
BIT™ holds
EPA registrations both as a hospital-healthcare and general
disinfectant (EPA Registration 90150-2) and for mold control and
air and surface remediation (EPA Registration 90150-1). In February
2016, we expanded our label with the EPA to include the bacterias
C. diff and MRSA, as well as the influenza virus h1n1, which we believe has better positioned us to penetrate
the hospital-healthcare and other industries. In August
2017, our EPA label was further expanded to include efficacy
against Salmonella and Norovirus. In December 2017,
SteraMist™ was included in the EPA’s list K, G, L and
M. Currently, we have our EPA-registered label in all
50 states, with the addition of
California and New York in July and October 2016,
respectively.
SteraMist™
is designed to be easily incorporated into current cleaning
procedures; is economical, non-corrosive and easy to apply; leaves
no residues; and requires no wiping. All our SteraMist™ products are fully validated to
comply with good manufacturing practice standard, have received
Conformité Européene (“CE”) marks in the
European Economic Area (“EEA”) and are approved by Underwriters Laboratory. Our
solution is manufactured at an EPA-registered solution blender and
our product performance is supported by good laboratory practice
efficacy data for Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
mold spores, MRSA, h1n1, Geobacillus stearothermophilus and C.
diff spores. As of January
27, 2017, our BIT™
solution and BIT™
technology is one of 53 of the EPA’s “Registered
Antimicrobial Products Effective against Clostridium difficile Spores”, as published
on the EPA’s K List.
We
continue to pursue additional opportunities to further expand the
use of BIT™ in other
applications. In July 2015, we entered into a materials transfer
agreement with the US Agriculture Research Service
(“ARS”) to conduct food safety research using
iHP™
or SteraMist™
BIT™.
In 2016, we registered and listed SteraMist™ as a
disinfectant, medical device with the U.S. Food & Drug
Administration (“FDA”) and are seeking registration
with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) as a
product to be utilized in the medical device sterilization field,
food packaging, preservation and food safety industries.
Additionally, in 2016, we also successfully passed EPA protocols
testing for Salmonella, which we believe will further support our
application for use of SteraMist™
BIT™
in food safety applications.
2
During
2017, we continued to build brand awareness through marketing and
advertising initiatives, as well as the overall performance of our
product. We also increased efforts in our research and development
of various testing and studies with a concentration in the
hospital-healthcare market. We currently have placed significant
resources into a study that focuses on quicker hospital room
terminal cleans.
In
February 2017, we established a Scientific Advisory Board comprised
currently of two experts in biosafety and infection prevention. The
Scientific Advisory Board will assist management in developing
strategies, scientific research and development and monitoring
technological and regulatory trends.
In
August 2017, we announced the hiring of a new sales director to
assist in the development of our business in the life science
markets and added 26 additional sales representatives to our Life
Sciences division. We currently provide our technology to five of
the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world and anticipate
continued growth in the life science market, as well as expansion
into more of our existing clients’ facilities in 2018 due, in
part, to the expansion of our sales force.
In
October 2017, we entered into a distribution agreement with Protak
Scientific Ltd (“Protak”), a United Kingdom-based
company that manufacturers enzyme indicators for hydrogen peroxide
decontamination performance validation. Pursuant to the agreement,
we will distribute Protak’s enzyme indicators as well as use
the product in our service engagements. This enzyme indicator is
designed to assist end users in obtaining a quicker validation
time. We believe that our new relationship with Protak will further
develop our opportunities in the life science market and increase
customer satisfaction on service engagements.
In
November 2017, we were awarded a group purchasing agreement by
Premier, Inc. (“Premier”), which operates a leading
group purchasing organization (“GPO”), and in February
2018, we were onboarded and added to the list of approved suppliers
with Premier. We believe
this award will provide us with another opportunity to further
penetrate the hospital-healthcare market. We are actively
seeking to enter into additional GPO agreements to facilitate
further growth in the domestic hospital-healthcare markets. During
2017, we continued to expand our customer base in the
hospital-healthcare market and added independent sales
representatives to further bolster our sales presence.
In
November 2017, we also received notice that our product
registration of SteraMist™ in Canada was finalized. We
anticipate this will facilitate additional growth in international
revenue in the hospital-healthcare, life science and remediation
markets. We also expect the Canadian registration will help expand
our TSN or service network in the Canadian remediation
market.
Intellectual Property
Our
success depends in part upon our ability to obtain and maintain
proprietary protection for our products and technologies. We
protect our technology and products by, among other means,
obtaining United States and foreign patents. There can be no
assurance, however, that any patent will provide adequate
protection for the technology, system, product, service or process
it covers. In addition, the process of obtaining and protecting
patents can be long and expensive. We also rely upon trade secrets,
technical know-how, and continuing technological innovation to
develop and maintain our competitive position.
As part of our intellectual property protection
strategy, we have registered our BIT™
solution with the EPA and successfully
obtained a CE mark in the EEA.
We
currently hold 7 United States patents in both the utilization of
and designs of our products and have submitted an additional
utility patent to the USPTO and a PCT with the International
Authorities. Further, we have 25 foreign patents in countries
included but not limited to Canada, China, Korea, Singapore,
Taiwan, Belgium, Italy, and Spain. Patents for individual products
extend for varying periods according to the date of filing or grant
and legal term of patents in various countries where a patent is
obtained. The actual protection a patent provides, which can vary
from country to country, depends upon the type of patent, the scope
of its coverage, and the availability of legal remedies in each
country.
Our
products are sold around the world under various brand names and
trademarks. We consider our brand names and trademarks to be
valuable in the marketing of our products. As of December 31,
2017, we had a total of 8 trademark registrations in the
United States across as many of 5 separate classes, many of which
are registered in multiple classes, and we have 6 additional
trademark submissions in review with the USPTO.
In addition, we held 16 trademark registrations in various foreign
countries in as many as 5 separate classes, many of which are
registered in multiple classes.
We
also maintain internal non-disclosure safeguards, including the
execution of non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with our
employees, consultants and others.
3
Our Products and Services
Our SteraMist™ Surface Unit is a fully
portable, fast-acting, handheld, point and spray
disinfection/decontamination system intended to disinfect and
decontaminate facilities, homes and assets to the maximum extent
possible and provide for quick turnover of the affected space. The
single applicator surface unit enables disinfection of all
surfaces, including high touch, sensitive medical equipment and
electronics. With a 5-second application time and 7-minute contact
time, within minutes after the iHP™
mist has been applied, the space is
safe to re-enter.
Our
SteraMist™ Surface Unit is lightweight, easy to transport and
capable of achieving reliable disinfection/decontamination results,
as it is easily incorporated into existing cleaning procedures and
protocols. It can be used as a standalone hospital terminal clean
product or as an adjunct to ultraviolet disinfection. The
SteraMist™ Surface Unit
produces hydroxyl radicals through its plasma science and does not
require heating, ventilation or air conditioning systems to be shut
down. Additionally, it requires no wiping, leaves no residue and is
free of bleach, chlorine, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, titanium
dioxide, peracetic acid and silver ions.
SteraMist™
Surface Unit
|
SteraMist™
Surface Unit
|
Our
SteraMist™ Environment System is a transportable,
remotely-controlled (robotic) system that provides complete room
disinfection/decontamination of a sealed space up to 103.8
m3 (3,663
ft3).
Individually, each remote applicator can be used to treat a space
of approximately 34.6 m3 (1,221
ft3).
Multiple SteraMist™ Environment
Systems can be used simultaneously to accommodate larger or
multiple spaces with fast application and minimal down time. Our
hybrid technology applicators can be used in manual and/or fogging
modes.
SteraMist™
Environment System
|
SteraMist™
Environment System
|
4
We also
offer customized disinfection and decontamination applications in
healthcare, pharmaceutical, vivarium, clean room and bio-safety
facilities throughout the world using our SteraMist™
technology. In these customized, built-in applications, our
SteraMist™ technology is integrated into full rooms,
pass-boxes, chambers, bag in/bag out and other
enclosures.
Customized
Built In Unit
|
Customized
Built In Unit
|
We
offer complete decontamination and disinfection services in
residential and commercial industries through the use of our
SteraMist™ BIT™ platform of
products, in-house technicians and the TOMI Service Network
(described below). We specialize in providing these customized
services in medical facilities, bio-safety labs, tissue labs, clean
rooms, office buildings, hospitality, schools, pharmaceutical
companies, remediation, companies, military, transportation,
airports, first responders, single-family homes and multi-unit
residences.
Domestically, we
are focused on the health care and hospital, bio-safety and
pharmaceutical markets, along with other verticals that are covered
through our professional service division. Internationally, we seek
strategic partners, manufacturer representatives or licensed
distribution partners and are currently focused on Asia, the
European Union, the Middle East, Central America, Mexico and
Canada. In such international markets, our technologies are used
for the control of microorganisms and the decontamination of large
and small indoor spaces for biological pathogens and chemical
agents, including infectious diseases in hospitals, bio-secure labs
and pharmaceutical manufacturers, biodefense and biosafety
facilities (including isolation and transfer chambers), tissue
banks, food safety and many other commercial and residential
settings. Our marketing and strategic partnership agreements have
focused on Singapore, the Philippines, Taiwan, Hong Kong, South
Korea and Japan, particularly in light of past MERS and severe
acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemics.
Manufacturing
We
outsource the manufacturing of our SteraMist™ line of
equipment. In October 2014, we entered into a manufacturing and
development agreement with RG Group, Inc. (“RG Group”),
which we amended and restated in November 2016. Our
agreement does not provide for any minimum purchase commitments and
has a two-year term, subject to extensions thereof. Our
agreement provides for a warranty against product defects for one
year from the date we ship the product manufactured
thereunder. RG Group is an ISO9001 registered company with
facilities in Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey.
Industries
We
believe that our technology, services and products offer a
significant opportunity to help reduce the spread to patients and
others of Community Associated and Healthcare-Associated Infections
(“HAI”). HAIs are one of the top ten leading causes of
death in the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (“CDC”) has noted that HAIs are a major, yet
often preventable, threat to patient safety. As of March 2009, HAIs
had a direct cost to the U.S. healthcare system of approximately
$35 to $45 billion dollars annually and approximately 10% of
inpatients contract infections from hospitals, resulting in more
than 2,000,000 illnesses and over 100,000 deaths per year (or
1 in every 25 admissions). Further, it has been estimated that
approximately 15% of all discharged hospital patients are
readmitted with infections. Traditional cleaning has been known to
leave 30% to 60% of pathogens behind. Additionally, a well-known
study from 55 New England hospitals concluded that 25% of operating
room surfaces are left unclean. The rapid turnover rate of hospital
rooms, treatment rooms, hotel rooms and mass transportation,
combined with the ability of bacteria to mutate and form drug
resistant bacteria, present a substantial challenge to manual
cleaning of such spaces, such as the use of surface chlorine
wipes.
5
Our
BIT™
has safely and effectively produced a six-log efficacy, which is a
99.9999% reduction. In comparison to most of its competitors, we
believe that SteraMist™ technology has
a quicker and higher kill level in a shorter time and leaves no
residue, is not affected by humidity, is not caustic, does not
blister painted surfaces, contains no silver ions, requires no
humidity alteration prior to or after use, has a shorter exposure
time, and is quicker to exhaust due to the production of our
reactive oxygen species (iHP™),
“.OH”, verses
nebulization of higher concentrates of hydrogen peroxide, such as
vaporized hydrogen peroxide (“VHP”) and hydrogen
peroxide vapor (HPV) type products. Our “.OH” is a small
0.5 to 3 micron particle that contains no bleach, and rooms require
little or no preparation prior to treatment. When our
“.OH” is finished
killing, inactivating and neutralizing bacteria, bacteria spores,
fungi, viruses and certain chemical agents, it converts to oxygen
and water.
Our
SteraMist™ and
BIT™
Technology and TOMI’s related service platform are currently
being used in a broad spectrum of industries,
including:
●
medical
facilities
●
bio-safety
labs
●
tissue
labs
●
clean
rooms
●
office
buildings
●
hospitality
●
schools
●
pharmaceutical
companies
●
remediation
companies
●
military
●
transportation
●
airports
●
first
responders
●
single-family homes
and multi-unit residences
We also
believe, based on our marketing efforts to date, that other
potential vertical industry applications for our technology,
service and products include:
●
blood
banks
●
food safety
industry
●
athletic
facilities
●
airlines
●
entertainment
●
homeland defense
and border protection
●
control and
containment of pandemic breakouts
We
intend to generate and support research on improving, extending and
applying our patents. We have received interest, both domestically
and internationally, in forming business alliances with major
healthcare companies, biosafety labs, tissue and blood labs,
pharmaceutical companies and food safety companies, as well as
companies in the border protection industry, including homeland
defense companies, construction companies and remediation
companies.
Marketing and Distribution
Through
our sales and services, our business growth objective is to be a
global leader in disinfection and decontamination, including
domestic and international infectious disease control. We hope to
achieve this through our premier platform of hydrogen peroxide
mists and fogs, as well as other infectious control products and
technologies. We intend to continue to expand and support research
and development on other decontamination and remediation solutions,
including hydroxyl radicals and other ROS, and to form more
business alliances. Our strategy involves licensing of our
technology and/or performing decontamination services within
cleanrooms, bio-safety labs, tissue and blood labs, pharmaceutical
labs, kidney dialysis centers, major remediation companies,
construction companies and corporations specializing in disaster
relief.
We sell
our products domestically through our internal sales force, as well
as independent sales and manufacturing representatives.
Internationally, our products are sold through exclusive and
non-exclusive sales representatives and distributors. We have
shipped our BIT™ Technology
into 20 countries worldwide.
6
Market Segments
Hospitals.
We are seeking to expand our penetration of the hospital market segment. Under the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (also known as
the Affordable Care Act or ACA) Hospital Readmissions Reduction
Program, hospitals that have high rates of infections and HAIs now
face significant penalties. We believe that our
SteraMist™
BIT™
technology reduces the spread of infections and HAIs in patient
rooms, infectious disease rooms and operatory suites, with a
corresponding return on investment to the hospital of up to 20-to-1
in the first year. At this time, we cannot predict the effect of
any potential healthcare reform legislation, including the
potential repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
on such penalties or our business and prospects in the hospital
market segment.
Bio-safety Labs, Tissue and
Blood Labs and Cleanrooms. Bio-safety labs, tissue and blood labs and
cleanrooms are subject to transfer risks and constantly seek to
reduce the risk of exposure to infectious or potentially infectious
agents or materials. We believe that the use of
SteraMist™ as a routine decontamination product in all
biosafety levels and microbiological practices may reduce the
risk of such contamination, while also reducing potential negative
effects that can result from other decontamination products, such
as VHP, formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and titanium dioxide,
including blistering of paints,
corrosion of metals, lengthy exposure times and potential
carcinogenic exposure.
There
are many requirements and restrictions on the type of
decontamination agents such labs may use to prevent these risks and
remediate adverse incidents. In light of these regulations, we
believe our rapid deployment of effective aerosolized reactive
oxygen species could become the solution to lower risks and perform
decontamination clean-up in these labs. Our product works within
minutes and leaves no noxious chemical
smell behind.
We also believe that our products and
technology can aid in all biosafety levels and microbiological
practices, on all safety equipment, transfer hoods, isolation
chambers, animal cages and other equipment, as well as help prevent
the risks associated with handling infectious microorganisms.
Our BIT™ technology has recently been successfully
tested to biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) and level 4 (BSL-4)
standards, including animal research cages. Biosafety level 3
(BSL-3) is appropriate for agents with a known potential for
aerosol transmission, for agents that may cause serious and
potentially lethal infections and that are indigenous or exotic in
origin. Exotic agents that pose a high individual risk of
life-threatening disease by infectious aerosols and for which no
treatment is available are restricted to high containment
laboratories that meet biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) standards.
SteraMist™ not only decontaminates spaces in minutes but also
decontaminates the animal cages in minutes which helps in the
prevention of the spread of diseases that are typically found
within these research animal cages.
Food Safety
Industry. We believe that SteraMist™ can also serve
as an effective decontaminant in the food safety industry.
According to the CDC, 80 million people per year in the United
States contract, and 5,000 people die from, food poisoning or other
food-related illnesses. Current food safety cleaning techniques
involve time intensive processes, which can reduce food
manufacturers’ profit. Our iHP™ degrades into
only harmless water and oxygen. If we are able to successfully
obtain approval by the FDA and USDA, we anticipate that our
solution can be applied to all foods and all food packing and
storage equipment as SteraMist is safe for use on electronics and
kitchenware, along with high touch surfaces where most pathogens
are found (such as phones, computers and kitchen
appliances). We believe that SteraMist™ could be
useful for decontamination at all phases of food production, from
the farm, slaughterhouse, packaging and canning
facilities, to the transportation of food and to the restaurants
and grocery stores.
Remediation
Industry. Generally, a professional, certified remediation
company waits until an emergency or disaster occurs before they can
earn fees. We have implemented and plan to expand our
certification, license and equipment program throughout the United
States, which allows such disaster professionals to earn fees by
performing surface remediation and infectious disease control in
addition to their emergency response-related work. As there are
over 20,000 certified professional remediators in the United
States, we are aggressively targeting this market. Our service
division, the TOMI Service Network
(“TSN”), resulted from the demand for our
product nationally. Currently, over 65 national companies are
licensed to use our products and solutions. We recently approved
the design of a TOMI van which has become available to those of our
national service team companies who are licensed TSN
members.
7
Biodefense Industry.
Countries around the world, including the United States, need to
protect their borders and cities against a potential terrorist
attack. We believe that our SteraMist™ line of
products may give governmental bodies an added tool in their
arsenal to mitigate the risk of a weaponized biological attack. In
addition, SteraMist™ could assist
in mitigating the spread of emerging pandemic viruses, including
strains of Ebola, MERS, h1n1, h5n1, h7n9 and h10n8. In addition, we
believe our SteraMist™ line of
products may assist border patrol agents in controlling the spread
of infectious disease introduced by foreign individuals by
decontaminating interview rooms, containment rooms and holding
cells after a potential infected carrier’s condition either
improves or the carrier dies.
Hospitality.
Our products are designed to be used for air remediation and
surface cleaning, including remote controls, chairs, telephones,
toilet seats and hard-to-reach areas, which would allow hospitality
professionals (such as hotels and motels) to offer cleaner rooms
and common areas to guests and others.
TOMI Service Network (TSN)
In 2015, we launched TOMI Service Network
(TSN), which has allowed us to enhance our service
division by creating a national service network composed of
existing, full service restoration industry specialists. Since the
launch of TSN, we have recruited and entered into licensing
agreements with 69 geographically and strategically-placed
companies that will become network hubs to take advantage of our
SteraMist™ platform of products, assist as service
providers for our domestic and international client base and
provide regional, national and international large event
mobilization response.
Competition
The
decontamination and environmental infectious disease control
industry is extremely competitive. Our competitors include
companies that market other hydrogen peroxide-based products, such
as Steris Corporation (“Steris”), Bioquell, Inc.
(“Bioquell”) and The Clorox Company
(“Clorox”), various ultraviolet companies and quad
ammonia-chemical companies. We believe
our SteraMist suite of products have a competitive advantage in
that they have a quicker and less caustic kill time, provide a six
log kill to a wide variety of pathogens and leave no residue or unpleasant odor.
However, these competitors may have longer operating
histories, greater name recognition, larger installed customer
bases and substantially greater financial and marketing resources
than us. We believe that the principal factors affecting
competition in our markets include name recognition and the ability
to receive referrals based on client confidence in the service.
There are no significant barriers of entry that could keep
potential competitors from opening similar facilities. Our ability
to compete successfully in the industry will depend, in large part,
upon our ability to market and sell our indoor decontamination and
infectious disease control products and services. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the
remediation industry, or that future competition will not have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results and
financial condition.
Competitive Advantages
SteraMist™
offers the following competitive advantages:
●
Provides a 99.9999%
or six-log kill (i.e. the statistical destruction of all
microorganisms and their spores) on all challenged pathogens,
including Geobacillus stearothermophilus, the spore that is
considered a gold standard for validation of sterilization versus
household/industrial cleaners that offer a 99.9% or three-log, kill
to 99.99%, or four-log, kill.
8
●
Kills pathogens
within seconds of application, whereas household/industrial
cleaners often take anywhere from 5 to 30 minutes.
●
Easy to
use.
●
Does not require a
user to mix any chemicals.
●
Does not include
silver ions or peracetic acid.
●
Leaves no
residue.
●
Not affected by
humidity or temperature.
●
Non-corrosive.
●
Does not damage
medical or electronic equipment.
●
By-products
converts to oxygen and water (humidity).
●
When you enter the
room you can “smell the clean”.
Research & Development
We are
generating and supporting research on improving, extending and
applying our patents in the field of mechanical cleaning and
decontamination. Research and development expenses for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, were approximately $454,000 and
$184,000, respectively.
Employees
As of
March 20, 2018, we have 18 full time principally operational and
administrative employees working within the United States. Most of
our sales are conducted by independent sales
representatives.
Government Regulation
Our business is subject to various degrees of
governmental regulation in the countries in which we operate. In
the United States, the EPA, the FDA and other governmental
authorities regulate the development, manufacture, sale, and
distribution of our products and services. Our international
operations also are subject to a significant amount of government
regulation, including country-specific rules and regulations and
U.S. regulations applicable to our international operations.
Government regulations include detailed inspection of, and controls
over, research and development, product approvals and
manufacturing, marketing and promotion, sampling, distribution,
record-keeping, storage, and disposal practices.
Corporate Information
TOMI
was incorporated in the State of Florida in 1979 as “Dauphin,
Inc.” (“Dauphin”). On June 27, 1994, Dauphin,
through an exchange agreement, acquired 100% of the outstanding
common stock of RPS Executive Limousines, Ltd., a privately held
New York Corporation (“RPS Limo”), which transaction
was treated, for accounting purposes, as a reverse acquisition. On
July 19, 1994, Dauphin changed its name to RPS Enterprises, Ltd.
and effected a one-for-three reverse split of its common
stock.
In
August 2002, certain investors purchased the majority of prior
management’s stock and changed the name from RPS Enterprises
Ltd. to RPS Group, Inc. (“RPS Group”). In October 2002,
RPS Group sold back the operating subsidiary, RPS Limo, to prior
management, at which time, RPS Group became a shell company with no
significant assets or operations.
On September 5, 2007, The Ozone Man,
Inc. was incorporated in the State of Nevada
(“Ozone-NV”). On October 15, 2007, RPS Group changed
its name to The Ozone Man, Inc. (“Ozone-FL”) and
effected a one-for-twenty reverse split of its common
stock.
On October 17,
2007, Ozone-FL acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of
common stock of Ozone-NV in a recapitalization transaction pursuant
to which Ozone-NV was treated as the continuing entity. On May 14,
2009, Ozone-FL changed its name to TOMI Environmental Services,
Inc.
9
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Our business routinely encounters and attempts
to address risks, some of which will cause our future results to
differ, sometimes materially, from those originally anticipated.
Below, we have described our present view of certain important
risks. The risk factors set forth below are not the only risks that
we may face or that could adversely affect us. If any of the risks
discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K actually occur, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. If this were to occur, the trading
price of our securities could decline significantly.
In assessing these risks,
investors should also refer to the other information contained or
incorporated by reference in our other filings with the
SEC.
Risk Related to Our Company and Business
We have experienced losses historically, may be required to obtain
additional financing and may never achieve and sustain
profitability.
As of
December 31, 2017, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately
$38.0 million and we incurred net losses of approximately $3.6
million and $3.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016, respectively. We may continue to incur net losses for the
foreseeable future as we continue to develop our products and seek
customers and distribution for our products. Even if we achieve
profitability, we may be unable to sustain or increase
profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Further, to finance our product
development and grow our business, we may seek funds through
borrowings or through additional rounds of financing, including
private or public equity or debt offerings. We may be unable to
raise funds on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In
addition, the sale of additional equity or convertible debt
securities could result in additional dilution to our shareholders.
If we borrow additional funds or issue debt securities, these
securities could have rights superior to holders of our common
stock and could contain covenants that will restrict our
operations. If we do not obtain additional resources or achieve and
sustain profitability, our ability to capitalize on business
opportunities will be limited, the growth of our business will be
harmed, our business may fail, and investors may lose all of their
investment.
Our operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations
that may increase costs of operations and impact or limit our
business plans.
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations affecting
many aspects of our present and potential future operations,
including a wide variety of EPA labeling and other state regulatory
agency requirements. Compliance with these laws and regulations may
result in increased costs and delays as a result of administrative
proceedings and certain reporting obligations. Public officials and
entities may seek injunctive relief or other remedies to enforce
applicable environmental laws and regulations. We cannot predict
the outcome of any administrative proceedings that may
arise.
We are subject to risks related to our international operations and
failure to manage these risks may adversely affect our operating
results and financial condition.
A
substantial portion of our sales are made to customers outside the
United States. As such, we may be denied access to our customers as
a result of a closing of the borders of the countries in which we
sell our products due to economic, legislative, political and
military conditions in such countries. International operations are
subject to a number of other inherent risks, and our future results
could be adversely affected by a number of factors,
including:
●
unfavorable
political or economic environments;
●
requirements or
preferences for domestic products or solutions, which could reduce
demand for our products;
●
differing existing
or future regulatory and certification requirements;
●
unexpected legal or
regulatory changes;
●
greater difficulty
in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection
periods;
●
difficulties in
enforcing contracts;
●
an inability to
effectively protect intellectual property;
●
tariffs
and trade barriers, export regulations and other regulatory and
contractual limitations on our ability to sell our products;
and
●
potentially adverse
tax consequences, including multiple and possibly overlapping tax
structures.
If we
are unable to manage the risks inherent in our international
activities, our ability to obtain future revenues may suffer and,
consequently, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
10
Our success depends upon third party contractors, suppliers and
manufacturers, the disruption of which could negatively impact our
business.
We rely
upon third parties to supply us with components for our products.
We outsource the manufacturing of our SteraMist™ line of
equipment to RG Group pursuant to a manufacturing and development
agreement and use contract manufacturers to build our
BIT™-based systems,
as we do not maintain our own manufacturing facilities. If we fail
to maintain relationships with our current suppliers, we may not be
able to effectively commercialize and market our products, which
would have a material and adverse effect on our business. Further,
any disruption in the manufacturing process could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. We cannot ensure that alternative production capacity
would be available in the event of a disruption, or if it would be
available, it could be obtained on favorable terms.
The introduction of new products is often accompanied by design and
production delays, as well as significant cost, which could prevent
us from introducing new products to the market in a timely and
cost-effective manner.
The
development and initial production and enhancement of the
decontamination systems we produce is often accompanied by design
and production delays and related costs. Often, we cannot predict
the time and expense required to overcome such problems. If we are
unable to introduce new products on our anticipated timeframe, our
business, financial condition and results of operations may
suffer.
Our success depends on our ability to adequately protect our
intellectual property.
In
April 2013, we acquired certain assets from L-3 Applied
Technologies, Inc. (“L-3”), including patents,
trademarks and trade secrets related to BIT™. Our
commercial success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain,
maintain, defend, file new or enforce our existing patents,
trademarks, trade secrets and other intellectual property rights
covering our technologies and products, including, in particular,
the intellectual property rights we acquired from L-3. We may,
however, be unable to adequately preserve such rights due to a
number of reasons, including the following:
●
our rights could be
invalidated, circumvented, challenged, breached or infringed
upon;
●
we may not have
sufficient resources to adequately prosecute or protect our
intellectual property rights;
●
upon expiration of
our patents, certain of our key technology may become widely
available; or
●
third parties may
be able to develop or obtain patents for similar or competing
technology.
Although we devote
resources to the establishment and protection of our patents and
trademarks, we cannot assure you that the actions we have taken or
will take in the future will be adequate to prevent violation of
our patents, trademarks and proprietary rights by others or prevent
others from seeking to block sales of our products as an alleged
violation of their patents, trademarks and proprietary rights. In
the future, litigation may be necessary to enforce our trademarks
or proprietary rights and we may be forced to defend ourselves
against claimed infringement or the rights of others. Any such
litigation could result in adverse determinations that could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
We may be unable to enforce our intellectual property rights
throughout the world.
The
laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property
rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.
Companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and
defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign
jurisdictions. To the extent that we have obtained or are able to
obtain patents or other intellectual property rights in any foreign
jurisdictions, it may be difficult to stop the infringement of our
patents or the misappropriation of other intellectual property
rights. For example, some foreign countries have compulsory
licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to
third parties. In addition, some countries limit the availability
of certain types of patent rights and enforceability of patents
against third parties, including government agencies or government
contractors. In these countries, patents may provide only limited
benefit or no benefit.
Proceedings to
enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in
substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other
aspects of our business. Accordingly, efforts to protect our
intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate.
In addition, future changes in the law and legal decisions by
courts in the United States and foreign countries may affect our
ability to obtain adequate protection for our technology and
products and the enforcement of intellectual property.
11
We may not be able to manage our growth effectively, create
operating efficiencies or achieve or sustain
profitability.
The
ability to manage and operate our business as we execute our growth
strategy will require effective planning. Rapid growth could strain
our internal resources, which could lead to a lower quality of
customer service, reporting problems and delays in meeting
important deadlines, resulting in loss of market share and other
problems that could adversely affect our reputation and financial
performance. Our ability to manage future growth effectively will
also require us to continue to update and improve our operational,
financial and management controls and procedures. If we do not
manage our growth effectively, we could be faced with slower growth
and a failure to achieve or sustain profitability.
We face significant competition in our industry, which could
significantly limit our growth and materially and adversely affect
our financial results.
The
decontamination and environmental infectious disease control
industry is extremely competitive. The competition includes
remediators and disinfection/decontamination companies such as
Steris, Bioquell and Clorox, various ultraviolet companies and quad
ammonia-chemical companies. These competitors may have longer
operating histories, greater name recognition, larger installed
customer bases and substantially greater financial and marketing
resources than us. We believe that the principal factors affecting
competition in our markets include name recognition and the ability
to receive referrals based on client confidence in the service.
There are no significant barriers of entry that could keep
potential competitors from opening similar facilities. Our ability
to compete successfully in the industry will depend, in large part,
upon our ability to market and sell our indoor decontamination and
infectious disease control products and services. There can be no
assurance that we will be able to compete successfully in the
remediation industry, or that future competition will not have a
material adverse effect on our business, operating results and
financial condition.
We are dependent on our key personnel, the loss of whom could
adversely affect our operations, and if we fail to attract and
retain the talent required for our business, we could be materially
harmed.
Our
success is substantially dependent on the performance of our
executive officers, including our Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Dr. Halden S. Shane, the loss of whom would have a
material adverse effect on our business. Given our relatively
recent entry into the decontamination industry, we depend to a
significant degree on our ability to attract, retain and motivate
quality personnel. We have experienced attrition among our
executive officers in the past and do not carry key man life
insurance on any key personnel. Any future loss of key members of
our organization may delay or prevent us from marketing and
performing our services.
Competition for
highly-skilled personnel is often intense, especially in Southern
California, where we have a substantial presence and need for
highly-skilled personnel. We may not be successful in attracting,
integrating or retaining qualified personnel to fulfill our current
or future needs. Also, to the extent we hire personnel from
competitors, we may be subject to allegations that we have
improperly solicited, or that they have divulged proprietary or
other confidential information, or that their former employers own
their inventions or work product.
Our operations, and those of our suppliers, are subject to a
variety of business continuity hazards and risks, any of which
could interrupt production or operations or otherwise adversely
affect our performance and results.
We
are subject to business continuity hazards and other risks,
including natural disasters, utility and other mechanical failures,
labor difficulties, inability to obtain necessary licenses, permits
or registrations, disruption of communications, data security and
preservation, disruption of supply or distribution, safety
regulation and labor difficulties. The
occurrence of any of these or other events might disrupt or shut
down operations, or otherwise adversely impact the production or
profitability of a particular facility, or our operations as a
whole. We may also be subject to certain liability claims in the
event of an injury or loss of life, or damage to property and
equipment, resulting from such events. Although we maintain
property and casualty insurance, as well as other forms of
insurance that we believe are customary for our industries, our
insurance policies include limits and, as such, our coverage may be
insufficient to protect against all potential hazards and risks
incident to our business. Should any such hazards or risks occur,
or should our insurance coverage be inadequate or unavailable, our
business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations
might be adversely affected.
12
Our products are subject to potential product liability claims
which, if successful, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Certain
of our products may be hazardous if
not deployed properly or if defective. We are exposed to
significant risks for product liability claims if death, personal
injury or property damage results from the use of our products.
While we currently maintain insurance against product liability
claims, we may experience material product liability losses in the
future. Our insurance coverage may not continue to be available on
terms that we accept, if at all, and our insurance coverage also
may not adequately cover liabilities that we incur. A successful
claim against us that exceeds our insurance coverage level or that
is not covered by insurance, or any product recall, could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, product liability and other
claims can divert the attention of management and other personnel
for significant periods of time, regardless of the ultimate
outcome. Further, claims of this nature may cause our customers to
lose confidence in our products and us. As a result, an
unsuccessful defense of a product liability or other claim could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
The requirements of being a public company may strain our
resources, divert management’s attention and affect our
ability to attract and retain executive management and qualified
board members.
We have
and likely will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and
other expenses as a public company subject to the reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(“SOX”), the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act and other applicable rules and regulations.
Our management and other personnel devote a substantial amount of
time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and
regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance costs
and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For
example, applicable rules and regulations could make it more
difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve
on our Board or as executive officers.
In
addition, SOX requires, among other things, that we maintain
effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure
controls and procedures. Our testing, or the potential subsequent
testing by our independent registered public accounting firm in
future periods, may reveal deficiencies in our internal control
over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses.
Our compliance with Section 404 of SOX may require that we incur
substantial expense and expend significant management time on
compliance-related issues. Moreover, if our independent registered
public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our internal
control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material
weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline, and we
could be subject to sanctions or investigations by regulatory
authorities, which would require additional financial and
management resources.
As a
result of disclosure of information in this Annual Report on Form
10-K and in filings required of a public company, our business and
financial condition are more visible, which we believe may result
in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and
other third parties. If such claims are successful, our business
and operating results could be adversely affected. Even if the
claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor,
these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them,
could divert the resources of our management and adversely affect
our business and operating results.
Risk Related to Our Securities
Our stock price is volatile and there is a limited market for our
shares.
The
stock markets generally have experienced, and will probably
continue to experience, extreme price and volume fluctuations that
have affected the market price of the shares of many small-cap
companies. These fluctuations have often been unrelated to the
operating results of such companies. Factors that may affect the
volatility of our stock price include the following:
●
our success, or
lack of success, in developing and marketing our products and
services;
●
our ability to
raise the required capital to fund our business;
●
the announcement of
new products, services, or technological innovations by us or our
competitors;
●
changes in our
executive leadership;
●
quarterly
fluctuations of our operating results;
●
changes in revenue
or earnings; and
●
competition.
13
Moreover, the OTCQX
Marketplace (“OTCQX”) is a trading platform, and
trading of securities quoted on the OTCQX is often more sporadic
than the trading of securities listed on a national securities
exchange like The NASDAQ Stock Market or the New York Stock
Exchange. Even if we were to seek to list our securities on a
national securities exchange, there is no assurance we will be able
to do so, and if we do so, many of these same forces and
limitations may still impact our trading volumes and market price
in the near term. Additionally, the sale or attempted sale of a
large amount of common stock into the market may also have a
significant impact on the trading price of our common
stock.
We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable
future.
We have not paid dividends on our common stock
since inception. The continued operation and expansion of
our business will require substantial funding. Accordingly, we
currently intend to retain earnings, if any, for use in the
business and we do not
anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends on shares of our common
stock for the foreseeable future. Any determination to pay
dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board and
will depend upon results of operations, financial condition,
contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable law
and other factors our Board deems relevant. Investors seeking cash
dividends should not purchase our common stock. Accordingly,
realization of a gain on your investment will depend on the
appreciation of the price of our common stock, which may never
occur.
Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules
of the SEC, and trading in our securities is very limited, which
makes transactions in our common stock cumbersome and may reduce
the value of an investment in our securities.
The SEC has adopted regulations which generally
define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that
is not listed on a qualified national securities exchange and that
has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, or with an
exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain
exceptions. Historically, shares of our common stock have traded on
the OTCQX at a price of less
than $5.00 per share and, as a result, our common stock is
considered a “penny stock” by the SEC and subject to
rules adopted by the SEC regulating broker-dealer practices in
connection with transactions in “penny stocks.” Our
securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose
additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell
to persons other than established customers and accredited
investors. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless
exempt, Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act requires that a
broker-dealer must:
●
approve
a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks;
and
●
receive
from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting
forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be
purchased.
In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in
penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:
●
obtain
financial information and investment experience objectives of the
person; and
●
make
a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks
are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient
knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of
evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.
The
broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a
penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating
to the penny stock market that:
●
sets
forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability
determination; and
●
provides
that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from
the investor prior to the transaction.
Additionally, the investor must receive disclosure
about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public
offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions
payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered
representative, current quotations for the securities and the
rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in
penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements must be sent
disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the
account and information on the limited market in penny
stocks. Generally, brokers may be less willing to
execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny
stock” rules. This may discourage investor interest in and limit the
marketability of our securities.
14
While we intend to apply to list our common stock on a national
securities exchange, the exchange may not approve our listing and,
if approved, our common stock may not continue to trade on such
exchange.
We
intend to apply to list our common stock on a national securities
exchange. As such, we will need to satisfy certain qualitative and
quantitative requirements in order to successfully list our common
stock on such an exchange. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to meet the applicable requirements for such initial listing
or that our application will be approved.
If our
listing application is approved, we will be required to comply with
certain listing requirements of such exchange, which may include
compliance with certain requirements with respect to our corporate
governance, finances, stock trading volume and stock price. If we
fail to meet any of these requirements, such exchange may take
steps to delist our common stock. Such a delisting would likely
have a negative effect on the price of our common stock and would
adversely affect the ability to sell or purchase our common stock.
Further, even if we successfully apply to list our common stock on
a national exchange, we cannot assure you that an orderly and
active trading market in our common stock will ever develop or be
sustained.
We have a substantial number of options and warrants outstanding,
which could give rise to additional issuances of our common stock
and potential dilution of ownership to existing
shareholders.
As
of December 31, 2017, we had outstanding options and warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 35.7 million shares of our common stock at
exercise prices ranging from $0.05 to $2.10 per share. Of these,
200,000 represent shares underlying options with exercise prices
ranging from $0.05 to $2.10 per share and 35.5 million represent
shares underlying warrants at exercise prices ranging from $0.10 to
$1.00 per share. To the extent any holders of options or warrants
exercise same, the issuance of shares of our common stock upon such
exercise will result in dilution of ownership to existing
shareholders. Additionally, as a result of our 2017 financing, in
which we raised $6,000,000 (See Note 6—Convertible Debt), the
promissory notes issued are convertible at $0.54 per share into an
aggregate of 11,111,111 shares of common stock, if fully converted.
As part of this transaction, we also issued warrants to purchase up
to an additional 999,998 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $0.69 per share.
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not
applicable.
Item 2.
PROPERTIES
Our
corporate headquarters, a 300 square foot office space, is located
at 9454 Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse, Beverly Hills, CA 90212. We
lease this space for $22,500 annually on a month-to-month tenancy
in a professional office building.
Our operations headquarters of 6,000
square feet is located in Frederick MD and is comprised of space
for offices, warehousing, laboratory, training and mock hospital
facilities at $50,400 annually on a three-year term that
expired on January 31, 2018. We have contracted with our current
landlord for a 9,000 square foot space at a new facility in
Frederick MD, to accommodate our expanding operations. The new
space will have additional office and warehouse space, a dedicated
laboratory, larger R&D space and a customized drive-in space
for the decontamination of ambulances and other first responder
vehicles. The new proposed lease will
be for either a five or seven-year term with the rent to be
determined when the term of the lease is finalized. Our old
lease has been extended until the landlord has completed the build
out of the new space and it is ready for occupancy.
Item 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We
currently are not a party to any legal proceedings, the adverse
outcome of which, in management’s opinion, individually or in
the aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 4.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not
applicable.
15
PART II
Item 5.
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our
common stock is quoted on the OTCQX under the symbol
“TOMZ.” Trading in stocks quoted on the OTCQX is often
thin and characterized by wide fluctuations in trading prices due
to many factors that may have little to do with a company’s
operations or business prospects.
OTCQX
securities are not listed or traded on the floor of an organized
national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTCQX securities
transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network
connecting dealers in stocks. OTCQX issuers are traditionally
smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing
requirements of a regional or national stock exchange.
Set
forth below are the range of high and low bid quotations for our
common stock from the OTCQX for the periods indicated. The market
quotations were obtained from the OTCQX and reflect inter-dealer
prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may
not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Period
|
High
($)
|
Low
($)
|
Year
ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
0.60
|
0.46
|
Second
Quarter
|
0.55
|
0.34
|
Third
Quarter
|
0.47
|
0.25
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
0.40
|
0.22
|
Year
ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
First
Quarter
|
0.27
|
0.10
|
Second
Quarter
|
0.17
|
0.05
|
Third
Quarter
|
0.22
|
0.07
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
0.21
|
0.10
|
Shareholders
As of
March 20, 2018, there were approximately 890 record holders of our common
stock. On March 20, 2018, the last reported sale price of our
common stock on the OTCQX was $0.11 per share.
Dividends
We have
not paid and do not currently intend to pay cash dividends on our
common stock in the foreseeable future. Our policy is to retain all
earnings, if any, to provide funds for operation and expansion of
our business. The declaration of dividends, if any, will be subject
to the discretion of our Board, which may consider such factors as
our results of operations, financial condition, capital needs and
acquisition strategy, among others.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Item 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
Required.
16
Item 7.
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations relates to the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016. This discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those
financial statements that are included elsewhere in this report. As
disclosed elsewhere in this report, we commenced our current
operations in the fourth quarter of 2007 and continue to focus on
obtaining high-tech decontamination technology and developing
health and infectious disease protocols.
Overview
We are
a global provider of infection prevention and
decontamination products, services and research. Our operating structure consists of four
divisions: Healthcare, Life
Sciences, TOMI Service Network and Food Safety. We provide
environmental solutions for indoor and
outdoor surface decontamination through the sale of equipment,
services and licensing of our SteraMist™
BIT™,
which is a hydrogen peroxide-based mist and fog registered with the
EPA. Our mission is to help our customers create a healthier world
through our product line and our motto is “innovating for a
safer world™” for
healthcare and life.
We introduced our SteraMist™
BIT™
technology platform to the commercial market in June 2013, which currently consists of a suite of
products that
incorporate our BIT™
Solution and applicators, including the SteraMist™ Surface Unit and
the SteraMist™ Environment System. We have expanded
our SteraMist™ BIT™
Technology beyond chemical and biological warfare applications
to the killing of problem
microorganisms (including spores) in a wide variety of commercial
settings. SteraMist™ BIT™ provides
fast-acting biological
six-log kill, which is a 99.9999% kill, and works in
hard-to-reach areas, while
leaving no residue or noxious fumes.
We
currently target domestic and international markets for the control
of microorganisms and the decontamination of large and small indoor
space for biological pathogens and chemical agents including
infectious diseases in hospital, bio-secure labs, pharmaceutical,
biodefense, biosafety including isolation and transfer chambers,
tissue banks, food safety and many other commercial and residential
settings.
Under FIFRA, we are required to register with the
EPA and certain state regulatory authorities as a seller of
pesticides. In June 2015, SteraMist™ BIT™ was
registered with the EPA as a hospital-healthcare disinfectant for
use as a misting/fogging agent. SteraMist™ BIT™ holds EPA registrations both as a
hospital-healthcare and general disinfectant (EPA Registration
90150-2) and for mold control and air and surface remediation (EPA
Registration 90150-1). In February 2016, we expanded our label with
the EPA to include the bacterias C. diff and MRSA, as well as the
influenza virus h1n1, which we
believe has better positioned us to penetrate the
hospital-healthcare and other industries. In August 2017, our EPA
label was further expanded to include efficacy against Salmonella
and Norovirus. In December 2017, SteraMist™ was included in
the EPA’s list K, G, L
and M. Currently, we have our
EPA-registered label in all 50 states, with the addition of California and New York in
July and October 2016, respectively.
SteraMist™
is designed to be easily incorporated into current cleaning
procedures; is economical, non-corrosive and easy to apply; leaves
no residues; and requires no wiping. All our SteraMist™ products are
fully validated to comply with good manufacturing practice
standard, have received CE marks in the EEA and are approved by Underwriters Laboratory. Our
solution is manufactured at an EPA-registered solution blender and
our product performance is supported by good laboratory practice
efficacy data for Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Mold spores, MRSA, h1n1, Geobacillus stearothermophilus and C.
diff spores. As of January
27, 2017, our BIT™ solution and
BIT™
technology is one of 53 of the EPA’s “Registered
Antimicrobial Products Effective against Clostridium difficile Spores”, as published
on the EPA’s K List.
During
2017, we continued to build brand awareness through marketing and
advertising initiatives, as well as the overall performance of our
product. We also increased efforts in our research and development
of various testing and studies with a concentration in the
hospital-healthcare market. We currently have placed significant
resources into a study that focuses on quicker hospital room
terminal cleans.
In
February 2017, we established a Scientific Advisory Board comprised
currently of two experts in biosafety and infection prevention. The
Scientific Advisory Board will assist management in developing
strategies, scientific research and development and monitoring
technological and regulatory trends.
17
We have
recently been featured in many publications including some that are
listed below. One of the articles was a peer review paper that
provided the review of TOMI’s efficacy data and the first for
showing efficacy by combining equipment and solution in the
treatment for control of multidrug resistant organisms
(MDRO’s).
–
In April 2017, we were featured in a
article published in the International Journal of Food Microbiology
by the USDA and Public Health Dept. of Harvard University which
stated Cold plasma activated hydrogen peroxide aerosol (SteraMist
product) rendered samples of Escherichia Coli 0157: H7, Salmonella
Typhimurium, and Listeria innocua inactive, while also maintaining
the quality of the produce tested.
–
In July 2017, one
of our custom built in systems that was designed and installed into
a vivarium facility at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute was
featured in a publication, ALNmag
(Animal Laboratory Magazine).
–
In January of 2018,
we were included in the article “Review of Necessary
Practices for EPA Submission of a Hospital Disinfectant Using Good
Laboratory Practice (GLP) Disinfectant Study Summaries of
TOMI’s SteraMist™ BIT™ Disinfection System”
in the Journal of The Association for Biosafety and Biosecurity
(ABSA) International 2017, Vol. 22 (4) 172-180
–
In February of
2018, we were featured in an article that discusses how a hospital
in Delaware is managing to control the spread of the flu virus.
Delaware Online, part of the USA Today Network, shared news of
record high flu cases in the state and how St. Francis Healthcare,
located in Wilmington, DE, is managing to address the need to
control this highly infectious and aggressive flu strain through
the use of our SteraMist™ BIT™ technology.
In
March and May 2017, we raised through a private placement
transaction gross proceeds of $6,000,000. We issued senior callable
convertible promissory notes (“the Notes”) in two
tranches of $5,300,000 and $700,000, respectively, which originally
were scheduled to mature on August 31, 2018 and November 8, 2018,
respectively, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or converted.
In February and March 2018,
we and the holders of the Notes
extended the maturity date of the $5,300,000 principal
amount of Notes to April 1, 2019 and
the $700,000 principal amount
of Notes to June 8, 2019.
The Notes are
convertible at any time by the holder into common stock at a
conversion price of $0.54 per share. We may redeem the Notes at any
time prior to maturity at a price equal to 100% of the outstanding
principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and
unpaid interest as of the redemption date. Interest on the
Notes is payable semi-annually in cash on February 28 and August 31
of each year at a rate of 4 percent per annum. In addition, we
issued three-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of
999,998 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.69 per
share. Currently, we are using the proceeds from the private
placement for research and development, international product
registration, expansion of our internal sales force, marketing,
public relations, expansions of our EPA label and for working
capital and general corporate purposes.
In 2016, we filed a lawsuit against Astro
Pak Corporation (“Astro
Pak”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, SixLog Corporation
(“SixLog”), in
California federal court for infringing our United States Patent
Nos. 6,969,487 and 7,008,592 and violating our intellectual
property rights by, among other things, indicating that our
technology and patents were proprietary to SixLog and marketing our
patented equipment with SixLog labels. In July 2017, we
settled the above-mentioned litigation, pursuant to which
Astro Pak and SixLog acknowledged that
we are the sole owner of ionized hydrogen peroxide decontamination
and sterilization technology, patents, and products, which we
market under the brands Binary Ionization Technology®
(BIT™) and SteraMist™. Astro Pak and SixLog agreed to
cease their prior conduct and
pay us a cash settlement. Astro Pak also agreed to assign its
iHP™ mark to us, complementing our existing trademark
and trade name protection. Finally, Astro Pak and SixLog agreed to
remove from their website(s) or
take steps to remove any assertions or suggestions that they own or
developed ionized hydrogen peroxide technology or patents, or that
they provide any ionized hydrogen peroxide products or
services.
In
August 2017, we announced the hiring of a new sales director to
assist in the development of our business in the life science
markets and added 26 additional sales representatives to our Life
Sciences division. We currently provide our technology to five of
the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world and anticipate
continued growth in the life science market, as well as expansion
into more of our existing clients’ facilities in 2018 due, in
part, to the expansion of our sales force.
In
October 2017, we entered into a distribution agreement with Protak,
a United Kingdom-based company that manufacturers enzyme indicators
for hydrogen peroxide decontamination performance validation.
Pursuant to the agreement, we will distribute Protak’s enzyme
indicators as well as use the product in our service engagements.
This enzyme indicator is designed to assist end users in obtaining
a quicker validation time. We believe that our new relationship
with Protak will further develop our opportunities in the life
science market and increase customer satisfaction on service
engagements.
18
In
November 2017, we were awarded a group purchasing agreement by
Premier, which operates a leading GPO, and in February 2018, we
were onboarded and added to the list of approved suppliers with
Premier. We believe this
award will provide us with another opportunity to further penetrate
the hospital-healthcare market. We
are actively seeking to enter into additional GPO agreements to
facilitate further growth in the domestic hospital-healthcare
markets. During 2017, we continued to expand our customer base in
the hospital-healthcare market and added independent sales
representatives to further bolster our sales presence.
In
November 2017, we also received notice that our product
registration of SteraMist™ in Canada was finalized. We
anticipate this will facilitate additional growth in international
revenue in the hospital-healthcare, life science and remediation
markets. We also expect the Canadian registration will help expand
our TSN or service network in the Canadian remediation
market.
In
December 2017, we entered into an equipment purchase agreement with
Pfizer Manufacturing Belgium. The equipment purchase agreement
governs the terms and conditions of the sale of equipment and any
services provided between TOMI and Pfizer Manufacturing
Belgium.
Domestically, our
revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was
$3,495,000 and $4,012,000, respectively. The decrease for the year
ended December 31, 2017 was due primarily to product mix in our TSN
sales and restructuring of our internal
infrastructure.
Internationally,
our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was
$1,499,000 and $2,331,000, respectively. While regulatory and
product registrations have slowed our anticipated growth in Asia
and Europe, we continue to make strides in the registration
process, which we anticipate will position us to generate
additional revenue in those regions. For the year ended December
31, 2017, we registered our SteraMist™ BIT™ technology in 10 key countries
throughout Europe. In March 2018, SteraMist™ BIT™ technology was registered with the
Taiwan Environmental Protection Agency. In addition, during 2017,
we continued our growth in international markets by entering into
multiple distribution and sales representation agreements in the
United Kingdom, Chile, Brazil and Portugal. In November 2017, we
entered into a distribution agreement with Westbury Decontamination
Ltd., a United Kingdom-based company that operates in the
decontamination and sterilization markets. We have also made
substantial progress with our patent and trademark applications in
various countries in Asia in order to protect our trademark and
intellectual property rights in such markets.
During
2017, we continued to add new customers in the life science
markets, who have engaged us to perform service work. Our service
revenue increased by 45% in 2017 and we expect continued growth in
2018. In order to meet the growing demand for our services, we
transferred approximately $324,000 in machinery from our inventory
into fixed assets. The additional machinery carried in our fixed
assets will allow us to provide our TSN members with more rental
equipment and should allow us to take on more high-level
decontamination service engagements in the near
future.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. The estimation process requires assumptions to be made
about future events and conditions, and as such, is inherently
subjective and uncertain. Actual results could differ materially
from our estimates.
The SEC
defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in
management’s view, most important to the portrayal of our
financial condition and results of operations and most demanding of
our judgment. We consider the following policies to be critical to
an understanding of our consolidated financial statements and the
uncertainties associated with the complex judgments made by us that
could impact our results of operations, financial position and cash
flows.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize
revenue when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2)
service has been rendered or delivery has occurred; (3) the selling
price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is
reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) is based
on management’s judgment regarding the fixed nature of the
selling prices of the services rendered or products delivered and
the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts to
customers, and allowance, and other adjustments will be provided
for in the same period the related sales are recorded.
19
Fair Value Measurement
The
authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair
value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal
market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to
transact and (iv) willing to transact. The guidance describes a
fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that
may be used to measure fair value, which are the
following:
Level
1:
Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level
2:
Inputs
other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or corroborated by observable market
data or substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
Level
3:
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the value of the assets or
liabilities.
Our financial
instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued expenses and convertible debt. All these
items were determined to be Level 1 fair value
measurements.
The
carrying amounts of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value
because of the short maturity of these instruments. The recorded
value of convertible debt approximates its fair value as the terms
and rates approximate market rates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash
and cash equivalents includes cash on hand held at financial
institutions and other liquid investments with original maturities
of three months or less. At times, these deposits may be in excess
of insured limits.
Accounts Receivable
Our
accounts receivable are typically from credit worthy customers or,
for certain international customers, are supported by pre-payments.
For those customers to whom we extend credit, we perform periodic
evaluations of them and maintain allowances for potential credit
losses as deemed necessary. We have a policy of reserving for
doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of
potential credit losses in existing accounts receivable. We
periodically review our accounts receivable to determine whether an
allowance is necessary based on an analysis of past due accounts
and other factors that may indicate that the realization of an
account may be in doubt. Account balances deemed to be
uncollectible are charged to the allowance after all means of
collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is
considered remote.
Inventories
Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out
method. Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and raw
materials. At December
31, 2017 and 2016, we did not have a
reserve for slow-moving or obsolete inventory.
Property and Equipment
We
account for property and equipment at cost less accumulated
depreciation. We compute depreciation using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally
three to five years. Depreciation for equipment, furniture and
fixtures and vehicles commences once placed in service for its
intended use. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases or
service lives of the improvements, whichever is
shorter.
Accrued Warranties
Accrued
warranties represent the estimated costs, if any, that will be
incurred during the warranty period of our products. We make an
estimate of expected costs that will be incurred by us during the
warranty period and charge that expense to the consolidated
statement of operations at the date of sale. Our manufacturer
assumes warranty against product defects for one year from date of
sales, which we extend to our customers. We assume responsibility
for product reliability and results.
20
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between
the financial statement reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws
in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The
measurement of deferred income tax assets is reduced, if necessary,
by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits, which are, on a more
likely than not basis, not expected to be realized, in accordance
with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) guidance
for income taxes. The effect on deferred income tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period
that such tax rate changes are enacted.
Loss Per Share
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing our net loss by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the
period presented. Diluted loss per share is based on the treasury
stock method and includes the effect from potential issuance of
shares of common stock, such as shares issuable pursuant to the
exercise of options and warrants and conversions of preferred stock
or debentures.
Stock-Based Compensation
We
account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), ASC 718,
“Compensation—Stock Compensation.” Under the
provisions of FASB ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is
estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value
and is recognized as expense over the requisite service
period.
On July
7, 2017, our shareholders approved the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan
(the “2016 Plan”), which our board of directors had
previously approved. The 2016 Plan authorizes the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted
stock units and performance units/shares. Up to 5,000,000 shares of
common stock are authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan.
Shares issued under the 2016 Plan may be either authorized but
unissued shares, treasury shares, or any combination thereof.
Provisions in the 2016 Plan permit the reuse or reissuance by the
2016 Plan of shares of common stock for numerous reasons,
including, but not limited to, shares of common stock underlying
canceled, expired, or forfeited awards of stock-based compensation
and stock appreciation rights paid out in the form of cash.
Stock-based compensation will typically be awarded in consideration
for the future performance of services to us. All recipients of
awards under the 2016 Plan are required to enter into award
agreements with the Company at the time of the award; awards under
the 2016 Plan are expressly conditioned upon such agreements. For
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued
200,000 shares of common stock and 100,000 options to purchase
shares of common stock from the 2016 Plan,
respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject us to significant
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents. We maintain cash balances at financial institutions
which exceed the current Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
limit of $250,000 at times during the year.
Long-Lived Assets Including Acquired Intangible Assets
We
assess long-lived assets for potential impairments at the end of
each year, or during the year if an event or other circumstance
indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of
the asset. In evaluating long-lived assets for impairment, we
measure recoverability of these assets by comparing the carrying
amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are
expected to generate. If our long-lived assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market
value. We base the calculations of the estimated fair value of our
long-lived assets on the income approach. For the income approach,
we use an internally developed discounted cash flow model that
includes, among others, the following assumptions: projections of
revenues and expenses and related cash flows based on assumed
long-term growth rates and demand trends; expected future
investments to grow new units; and estimated discount rates. We
base these assumptions on our historical data and experience,
industry projections, micro and macro general economic condition
projections, and our expectations. We had no long-lived asset
impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016.
21
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May
2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2014-09, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers, to replace the existing revenue
recognition criteria for contracts with customers. In August 2015,
the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Deferral of the Effective Date, to
defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 to interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We will
adopt the ASUs on January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective
basis. Upon adoption of the ASUs, we currently estimate there will
not be a material impact to our beginning balance
sheet.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, to require lessees to recognize
all leases, with certain exceptions, on the balance sheet, while
recognition on the statement of operations will remain similar to
current lease accounting. The ASU also eliminates real
estate-specific provisions and modifies certain aspects of lessor
accounting. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption
permitted. We currently expect to adopt the ASU on January 1,
2019. We will be required to recognize and measure leases existing
at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest
comparative period presented using a modified retrospective
approach, with certain practical expedients available. We intend to
elect the available practical expedients upon adoption. Upon
adoption, we expect the consolidated balance sheet to include a
right of use asset and liability related to substantially all of
our lease arrangements. We are continuing to assess the impact of
adopting the ASU on our financial position, results of operations
and related disclosures and have not yet concluded whether the
effect on the consolidated financial statements will be
material.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment
Accounting, to simplify the accounting for the income tax
effects from share-based compensation, the accounting for
forfeitures and the accounting for statutory income tax
withholding, among others. In particular, the ASU requires all
income tax effects from share-based compensation to be recognized
in the consolidated statement of operations when the awards vest or
are settled, the ASU permits accounting for forfeitures as they
occur, and the ASU permits a higher level of statutory income tax
withholding without triggering liability accounting. Adoption of
the ASU is modified retrospective, retrospective and prospective,
depending on the specific provision being adopted. We adopted the
ASU on January 1, 2017, which did not impact our beginning
accumulated deficit and additional paid-in capital.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.
2017-04, Simplifying the Test for
Goodwill Impairment, to
simplify the test for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2. An entity will, therefore,
perform the goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of
a reporting unit with its carrying amount, recognizing an impairment charge for the amount
by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, not to exceed
the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity still has the option to
perform a qualitative assessment to determine if the quantitative
impairment test is necessary. The ASU is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or
annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after
January 1, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is prospective. We have not
yet selected an adoption date, and the ASU will have a currently
undetermined impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In May
2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Scope Of Modification Accounting, to
provide guidance on which changes to the terms or conditions of
a share-based payment
award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The ASU
is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
with early adoption permitted. Adoption of the ASU is prospective.
We will adopt the ASU on January 1, 2018, which will have no
impact on the consolidated financial statements upon
adoption.
Financial Operations Overview
Our
financial position as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively,
was as follows:
|
As of December
31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
$5,394,000
|
$8,250,000
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$4,550,000
|
$948,000
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
$1,836,000
|
$1,521,000
|
Inventories
|
$3,519,000
|
$4,047,000
|
Deposits on
merchandise
|
$-
|
$147,000
|
Current
liabilities
|
$1,103,000
|
$1,053,000
|
Convertible notes
payable, net
|
$5,944,000
|
$-
|
Working
capital
|
$9,073,000
|
$5,716,000
|
22
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, our debt and liquidity positions
were affected by the following:
●
Gross proceeds from
the issuance of the Notes of $6,000,000; and
●
Net cash used in
operations of approximately $2,432,000.
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared
to the Year Ended December 31, 2016
|
Year
Ended
|
Year
Ended
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
December
31,
2016
|
Revenue,
Net
|
$4,994,000
|
$6,343,000
|
Gross
Profit
|
$3,066,000
|
$3,733,000
|
Total Operating
Expenses(1)
|
$6,510,000
|
$7,102,000
|
Loss from
Operations
|
$(3,444,000)
|
$(3,369,000)
|
Total Other Income
(Expense)
|
$(196,000)
|
$212,000
|
Net
Loss
|
$(3,640,000)
|
$(3,157,000)
|
Basic (loss) per
share
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.03)
|
Diluted (loss) per
share
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.03)
|
(1)
Includes
approximately $649,000 and $615,000 in non-cash equity compensation
expense for the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Sales
During
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we had net revenue
of approximately $4,994,000 and $6,343,000, respectively,
representing a decrease in revenue of approximately 1,349,000 or
21%. The decrease in revenue during the year ended December 31,
2017 is
attributable primarily to the fact that a distributor placed a
large order in the first quarter of 2016, with no such
corresponding transaction during the same period in
2017.
Net Revenue
Product and Service Revenue
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
SteraMist™ Product
|
$4,101,000
|
$5,727,000
|
Service and
Training
|
893,000
|
616,000
|
Total
|
$4,994,000
|
$6,343,000
|
Revenue by Geographic Region
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
United
States
|
$3,495,000
|
$4,012,000
|
International
|
1,499,000
|
2,331,000
|
Total
|
$4,994,000
|
$6,343,000
|
Cost of Sales
During
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, our cost of sales were
approximately $1,928,000 and $2,611,000, respectively, representing
a decrease of approximately $683,000 or 26%. The primary reason for
the decrease in cost of sales is lower sales during the year ended
December 31, 2017 as compared to the prior year. Our gross profit
margins as a percentage of sales for the year ended December 31,
2017 increased as compared to the prior period as a result of the
customer and product mix in sales.
23
Professional Fees
Professional fees
for the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately $877,000,
as compared to $517,000 for the prior year, representing an
increase of approximately $360,000, or 70%. The increase is
attributable to increased efforts to protect and strengthen our
intellectual property and the lawsuit with Astro Pak, which we
settled in July 2017. Professional fees are comprised primarily of
legal, accounting and financial consulting fees.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and
amortization was approximately $607,000 and $586,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, representing an
increase of $21,000, or 4%. The increase in depreciation expense is
attributable to additional fixed assets acquired in 2017 and
2016.
Selling Expenses
Selling
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately
$1,256,000, as compared to $1,513,000 for the year ended December
31, 2016, representing a decrease of approximately $257,000 or 17%.
The decrease in selling expenses is attributable to lower sales
volume for the year ended December 31, 2017 and a reduced number of
employees as compared to the prior year. Selling expenses represent
selling salaries and wages, trade show fees, commissions and
marketing expenses.
Research and Development
Research and
development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 were
approximately $454,000, as compared to $184,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2016, representing an increase of approximately
$270,000, or 147%. The primary reason for the increase was
attributable to current and ongoing studies and testing in
connection with our product related to quicker hospital terminal
cleans. Research and development expenses mainly include costs
incurred in generating and supporting research on improving,
extending and applying our patents in the field of mechanical
cleaning and decontamination.
Consulting Fees
Consulting fees for
the year ended December 31, 2017 were approximately $211,000, as
compared to $307,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016,
representing a decrease of approximately $96,000, or 31%. The
decrease in consulting fees is primarily due to significant charge
incurred during the year ended December 31, 2016 with no such
charge in 2017.
Equity Compensation Expense
Equity
compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was
approximately $649,000, as compared to $615,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2016, representing an increase of approximately
$34,000 or 6%. Equity compensation expense is incurred upon the
issuance of warrants and stock options. On the date of a grant, we
determine the fair value of the award and recognize compensation
expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the
vesting period of the award. The fair value of the award is
calculated using the Black-Scholes Method option-pricing
model.
General and Administrative Expense
General
and administrative expense includes salaries and payroll taxes,
rent, insurance expense, utilities, office expense and product
registration costs. General and administrative expense was
approximately $2,775,000 and $3,380,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, representing a decrease
of approximately $605,000 or 18%. The primary reason for the
decrease in general and administrative expense is attributable to
lower salaries and wages due to a reduced number of employees for
the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to the prior
year.
Other Income and Expense
Amortization of
debt discount was $6,000 and $0 during the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of debt discount for the
year ended December 31, 2017 consists of the amortization of debt
discount on the $6,000,000 principal amount of Notes issued in
March and May 2017. The debt discount was amortized over the life
of the Notes utilizing the effective interest method.
24
Income
recognized from grant for the year ended December 31, 2016 was
$200,000. This represents the amounts advanced to us in excess of
the costs incurred. The grant was finalized in 2016.
Gain on
disposition of equipment for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016 was $0 and $12,000, respectively.
Interest income for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $1,800
and $0, respectively.
Interest expense
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately
$191,000 and $0, respectively. Interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2017 consisted of the interest incurred on the
$6,000,000 principal amount of Notes issued in March and May
2017.
Net Loss
Net
loss for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was
approximately ($3,640,000) and ($3,157,000), respectively. Net loss
per common share, basic and diluted, for the year ended December
31, 2017 was ($0.03). Net loss per common share, basic and diluted,
for the year ended December 31, 2016 was ($0.03). The primary
reasons for the increased net loss can be attributed
to:
●
Lower revenue and
gross profit of approximately $1,349,000 and $667,000,
respectively;
●
Reduced other
income of $212,000.
●
Interest expense of
approximately $191,000, offset by;
●
Lower operating
expenses of approximately $592,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $4,550,000 and working capital of
$9,073,000. Our principal capital requirements are to
fund operations, invest in research and development and capital
equipment, and the continued costs of public company filing
requirements. We have historically funded our operations through
debt and equity financings.
In
September 2016, our common stock was uplisted to the OTCQX Best
Market. We intend to apply to further uplist our common stock to a
national securities exchange in the future. Due to the
applicable qualitative and quantitative standards required to
successfully list on a national securities exchange, we may need to
raise additional capital in order to meet such benchmarks. If we
fail to satisfy the applicable listing standards of a national
securities exchange, we may be unable to successfully list our
common stock on such an exchange.
In
March and May 2017, we raised gross proceeds of $6,000,000 through
a private placement of the Notes. We issued the Notes in two
tranches of $5,300,000 and $700,000, respectively, which originally
were scheduled to mature on August 31, 2018 and November 8, 2018,
respectively, unless earlier redeemed, repurchased or converted.
The Notes are convertible at any time by the holder into common
stock at a conversion price of $0.54 per share. We may redeem the
Notes at any time prior to maturity at a price equal to 100% of the
outstanding principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus
accrued and unpaid interest as of the redemption
date. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in cash
on February 28 and August 31 of each year at a rate of 4 percent
per annum. In addition, we issued three-year warrants to purchase
up to an aggregate of 999,998 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $0.69 per share. Currently, we are using the proceeds from
the private placement for research and development, international
product registration, expansion of our internal sales force,
marketing, public relations, expansions of our EPA label and for
working capital and general corporate purposes. In February and March 2018, we and the holders of the Notes extended the
maturity date of the $5,300,000 principal amount of Notes to April 1, 2019 and the $700,000
principal amount of Notes to
June 8, 2019.
For the
years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we incurred losses from
operations of approximately $3,444,000 and $3,369,000,
respectively. The cash used in operations was approximately
$2,432,000 and $4,505,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016, respectively. We experienced a decline in revenue for
the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year period,
which contributed to our loss from operations in 2017. The decline
in revenue was attributable primarily to the fact
that a distributor placed a large order in the first quarter of
2016, with no such corresponding transaction during the same period
in 2017.
25
Our revenues can fluctuate due to the following factors, among
others:
●
Ramp up and
expansion of our internal sales force and manufacturers’
representatives;
●
Length of our sales
cycle;
●
Expansion into new
territories and markets; and
●
Timing of orders
from distributors.
We
could incur additional operating losses and an increase of costs
related to the continuation of product and technology development
and administrative activities.
Management has
taken and will endeavor to continue to take a number of actions in
order to improve our results of operations and the related cash
flows generated from operations in order to strengthen our
financial position, including the following items:
●
Expanding our label
with the EPA to further our product registration
internationally;
●
Continued expansion
of our internal sales force and manufacturer representatives in an
effort to drive domestic revenue in all hospital-healthcare
verticals;
●
Continued expansion
of our internal sales force and manufacturer representatives in an
effort to drive global revenue in the life science
verticals;
●
Expansion of
international distributors; and
●
Continued growth of
TSN and new growth in the food safety market including pre- and
post-harvest.
We
believe that our existing balance of cash and cash equivalents and
amounts expected to be provided by operations will provide us with
sufficient financial resources to meet our cash requirements for
operations, working capital and capital expenditures over the next
twelve months. However, in the
event of unforeseen circumstances, unfavorable market developments
or unfavorable results from operations, there can be no assurance
that the above actions will be successfully implemented, and our
cash flows may be adversely affected. While we have reduced
the length of our sales cycle, it may still exceed 4–6 months
and it is possible we may not be able to generate sufficient
revenue in the next twelve months to cover our operating and
compliance costs. We may also need to raise additional debt or
equity financing to execute on the commercialization of our planned
products. We cannot make any assurances that management’s
strategies will be effective or that any additional financing will
be completed on a timely basis, on acceptable terms or at all. Our
inability to successfully implement our strategies or to complete
any other financing may mean that we would have to significantly
reduce costs and/or delay projects, which would adversely affect
our business, customers and program development, and would
adversely impact us.
Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately
$2,432,000 and $4,505,000, respectively. Cash used in operating
activities decreased in 2017 approximately $2,073,000 as compared
to the prior year period primarily due to the increase in inventory
that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2016.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately
$15,000 and $463,000, respectively. Cash used in investing
activities decreased $448,000 compared to the prior year period
primarily due to service equipment purchased in 2016.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2017 consisted of the $6,000,000 in
aggregate gross proceeds received from the issuance of the Notes
and proceeds from the exercise of warrants of $48,750.
Cash provided by financing activities
during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $0.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
Not
applicable.
26
Item
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial
statements required by this item are included in Part IV, Item 15
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, beginning on page F-1, and are
incorporated by reference herein.
Item
9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
as is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are intended to ensure
that the information we are required to disclose in the reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated
and communicated to our management, including the Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures.
Based
on that evaluation, of our Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer we concluded that, as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective. Our management has concluded that the
financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in
conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Management does not
expect their disclosure controls and procedures to prevent all
errors and all fraud and no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and fraud will be
prevented. Additionally, over time, a control may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, therefore fraud may occur or
misstatements may not be detected.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over our financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States.
Our
internal control over financial reporting includes those policies
and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of our assets, (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors,
and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or
timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of
our assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our
management, with the participation of our Principal Chief Executive
Officer and our Principal Chief Financial Officer, conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our Principal
Chief Executive Officer along with our Principal Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
Annual Report on Form 10-K, our internal control over financial
reporting was effective. Our internal control over financial
reporting was not subject to attestation by our independent
registered public accounting as we are a smaller reporting
company.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During
our most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our
internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
27
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Our
directors and executive officers and their ages and positions as of
March 20, 2018 are presented below.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Halden S. Shane
|
|
73
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board
|
Elissa J. Shane
|
|
38
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer
|
Nick Jennings
|
|
40
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Harold W. Paul
|
|
69
|
|
Director, Secretary
|
Walter C. Johnsen
|
|
67
|
|
Director
|
Kelly J. Anderson
|
|
50
|
|
Director
|
Ronald E. Ainsworth
|
|
65
|
|
Director
|
Lim Boh Soon
|
|
62
|
|
Director
|
Halden S.
Shane: Dr. Shane has
been our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board since
October 15, 2007, when we commenced our current operations.
Dr. Shane also served as
President and CEO of Tiger Management International, a private
management company that deals in business management of private and
public companies. Dr. Shane resigned all positions and closed Tiger
Management International in 2009. Dr. Shane was founder and CEO of
Integrated Healthcare Alliance, Inc. and also founder and General
Partner of Doctors Hospital West Covina, California. Prior thereto,
Dr. Shane practiced Podiatric Surgery specializing in ankle
arthroscopy. Dr. Shane received his Bachelor of Science degree
from the University of Miami in 1969, his Bachelor of Medical
Science degree from California College of Podiatric Medicine in
1971, and his Doctor of Podiatric Medicine Degree from the
California College of Podiatric Medicine in 1973. He is Board
Certified by the American Board of Podiatric Surgery, American
Board of Orthopedics, and the American Board of Quality Assurance
and Review. Dr. Shane brings to our Board experience in in the
medical and finance industries.
Elissa J.
Shane:
Ms.
Shane has been our Chief
Operating Officer since January
2018. Previously, she served
as our Chief Regulatory
and Compliance Officer from September 2015 to December 2017
and as our Corporate
Secretary since January 2016. From January 2014 to September 2015,
Ms. Shane served as a paralegal with Levi Lubarsky Feigenbaum &
Weiss LLP, where she worked with the firm’s managing
partners and staff attorneys and directed all operational aspects
of the litigation cycle from inception through appeal. From
September 2009 to January 2014, she served as a paralegal with
Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP, where she managed all regulatory and
compliance issues, litigation procedures and advertising and
promotional matters. Ms. Shane received a B.A. in Psychology and
Communications with a minor in Economics from the University of
Southern California in 2001.
Nick Jennings: Mr. Jennings has been
our Chief Financial Officer since October 2014. From July 2014
until his employment by the Company, Mr. Jennings was self-employed
and provided consulting, accounting and tax compliance services to
private-owned companies. From November 2006 until June 2014, Mr.
Jennings was a senior manager at Richardson Kontogouris Emerson
LLP, where he worked with various public and private companies
providing services in a variety of business areas including tax
compliance, tax consulting, general accounting, and business
assurance. He is a graduate of Loyola Marymount College with a
degree in accounting and is a member of the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants.
Harold W.
Paul: Mr. Paul has
been one of our directors since June 2009 and currently acts as
our Corporate Secretary. He has been engaged in the private
practice of law for more than thirty-five years, primarily as a
securities specialist. Mr. Paul has been company counsel to public
companies listed on the AMEX, NASDAQ and OTC exchanges. He has
served as a director for six public companies in a variety of
industries, including technology and financial services. He holds a
BA degree from SUNY at Stony Brook and a JD from Brooklyn Law
School and is admitted to practice in New York and Connecticut. Mr.
Paul brings to our Board experience as a director of public
companies and with the United States securities
laws.
Walter
C. Johnsen:
Mr. Johnsen has been one of
our directors since January 2016. Since January 1, 2007, Mr.
Johnsen has served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Acme United Corporation, a leading worldwide supplier of
innovative branded cutting, measuring and safety products in the
school, home, office, hardware & industrial markets. From
November 30, 1995 to December 31, 2006, he held the titles of
President and Chief Executive Officer at Acme United. Mr. Johnsen
previously served as Vice Chairman and a principal of Marshall
Products, Inc., a medical supply distributor. Mr. Johnsen holds a
Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering and a Master of Science
in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University, and a Master of
Business Administration from Columbia University. Mr. Johnsen
brings to our Board experience with business and
operations.
28
Kelly
J. Anderson:
Ms. Anderson has been one
of our directors since January 2016. Ms. Anderson is a partner in C
Suite Financial Partners, a financial consulting services company
dedicated to serving private, public, private equity,
entrepreneurial, family office and government-owned firms in all
industries. Between July 2014 and March 2015, Ms. Anderson was CFO
of Mavenlink, a SaaS company, between October 2012 and January
2014, Ms. Anderson was Chief Accounting Officer of Fisker
Automotive, between April 2010 and February 2012, Ms. Anderson was
the President and Chief Financial Officer of T3 Motion, Inc.,
(“T3”), an electric vehicle technology company. Between
March 2008 and April 2010, she served as T3’s Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, and as a director from
January 2009 until January 2010. From 2006 until 2008, Ms. Anderson
was Vice President at Experian, a leading credit reporting agency.
From 2004 until 2006, Ms. Anderson was Chief Accounting Officer for
TripleNet Properties, G REIT, Inc., T REIT, Inc., NNN 2002 Value
Fund, LLC, and Chief Financial Officer of NNN 2003 Value Fund, LLC
and A REIT, Inc., all of which were real estate investment funds
managed by TripleNet Properties. From 1996 to 2004, Ms. Anderson
held senior financial positions with The First American Corp., a
Fortune 500 title insurance company. Ms. Anderson is an inactive
California CPA and a 1989 graduate of the College of Business and
Economics at California State University, Fullerton. Ms. Anderson
brings to our Board experience in finance.
Ronald E. Ainsworth: Mr. Ainsworth has
been one of our directors since July 2017. Mr. Ainsworth has more
than 35 years of experience as an investment banker. Since January
2016, he has been a managing partner at 41 North Partners, LLC, a
privately held, middle market investment banking firm that focuses
primarily on environmental- and healthcare-related companies. In
December 2013, he co-managed the acquisition of Informationlogix,
LLC, a technology company that provides services to major financial
institutions and on whose board of directors Mr. Ainsworth
currently serves. In November 2010, Mr. Ainsworth co-founded NuView
Financial Services LLC, which was sold in July 2015. In February
2010, Mr. Ainsworth was part of a group that acquired a minority
interest in 3 Pam LLC, which was sold to PIMCO in July 2015. In
1981, he co-founded Trenwith Group LLC, an investment banking firm
with which he served in various capacities, including as its Chief
Executive Officer, prior to selling the company in December 2009.
Mr. Ainsworth holds a Bachelor’s degree from California State
University, Northridge.
Dr. Lim Boh Soon: Dr. Lim has been one
of our directors since January 2018. Dr. Lim has more than 25 years of experience in
the banking and finance industry. For more than the past five
years, he is a fellow of the Singapore Institute of Directors, and
is currently an independent non-executive director on the board of
two publicly-listed companies on the Singapore Stock Exchange
– since October 2015, he has been a director of Jumbo Group
Limited and since June 2017, he has been a director of OUE
Commercial REIT Management Pte. Ltd. In addition, Dr. Lim has
worked in various senior management positions for several regional
and multi-national organizations, including UBS Capital Asia
Pacific Limited, The NatSteel Group, Rothschild Ventures Asia
Limited and The Singapore Technologies Group. Dr. Lim was also a
member of the Regional Investment Committee for UBS AG in Asia. Dr.
Lim graduated with a First-Class Honors in Mechanical Engineering
from The University of Strathclyde in the United Kingdom (formerly
The Royal College of Science & Technology) in 1981 and obtained
his Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering from The
University of Strathclyde in the United Kingdom in
1985.
Family Relationships
Ms.
Elissa J. Shane, our Chief Operating Officer, is the daughter of
Dr. Halden Shane, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board.
Board Composition
Our Board currently consists of six members. Our bylaws provide
that our directors will hold office until their successors have
been duly elected and qualified. Our Board is responsible for the
business and affairs of our Company and considers various matters
that require its approval. Our executive officers are appointed by
our Board and serve at its discretion.
Scientific Advisory Board
In
February 2017, we approved and announced the formation of the TOMI
Scientific Advisory Board. The Scientific Advisory Board operates
under the terms of a written Advisory Board Charter. The role of TOMI’s scientific advisory board will be
to:
(1)
constructively
challenge and help develop proposals on
strategy;
(2)
attend Scientific Advisory Board
meetings;
(3)
accept
responsibility, publicly and, where necessary, in writing when
required to do so under any act, regulation or code of
conduct;
(4)
scrutinize
the performance of management in meetings, prepare agreed goals and
objectives, and monitor the reporting of performance on
technological and regulatory trends that will impact our
business;
29
(5)
set
forth our strategic goals with respect to scientific research and
development and liaise with us to ensure we obtain the necessary
resources to meet our objectives, in scientific research and
development;
(6)
devote time to developing and refreshing the
knowledge of our Company’s technology, products and mission
in “Innovating for a Safer World”
and
(7)
uphold
the highest standards of integrity and probity, and support us in
maintaining the appropriate culture, values and
behaviors.
The Scientific Advisory Board consists of the following
members:
Miguel A. Grimaldo, MEng: Miguel A. Grimaldo, MEng is an
Assistant Professor in the Department of Pathology, Director of
Institutional Biocontainment Resources at the University of Texas
Medical Branch (“UTMB”) and the Director of the
Biocontainment Engineering Division for the Galveston National
Laboratory. His responsibilities include the review of all design,
construction, commissioning and operation of High and Maximum
containment laboratories as well as to ensure regulatory compliance
and to conduct ongoing evaluation and recertification on all
critical containment features, equipment and operations for
Biosafety Level 3 (BSL‐3), Animal Biosafety
Level 3 (ABSL-3) and Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) laboratory
facilities at UTMB. He is also a member of the UTMB Institutional
Biosafety Committee. He has served as Committee Member for
development of the ANSI Z9.14‐2014
Standard‐
Testing and Performance‐Verification
Methodologies for Ventilation Systems for Biosafety Level 3
(BSL‐3) and
Animal Biosafety Level 3 (ABSL3) facilities as well as for the 2016
Edition of the National Institute of Health (NIH) ‐ Design Requirements
Manual (DRM) for Biomedical Laboratories and Animal Research
Facilities. Mr. Grimaldo routinely serves as Biocontainment Advisor
for containment laboratories nationally and internationally on
design, construction and operations and also routinely contributes
to a technical column in the American Biological Safety Association
(ABSA) journal, Applied Biosafety, entitled, “Containment
Talk”. Mr. Grimaldo obtained his Masters of Engineering from
the University of Louisville and Bachelor of Science degrees in
Agricultural Engineering and Agricultural Economics from Texas
A&M University.
Dr. Helene Paxton, MS, MT(ASCP), PhD,
CIC: Dr. Helene Paxton, MS, MT(ASCP), PhD, CIC, is an
Infection Preventionist, owner of Bio Guidance, LLC, adjunct
biology professor at Rowan University and Director of Infection
Prevention at Saint Francis Healthcare. She is Infection Control
Certified (CIC), board certified as an International Medical
Laboratory Scientist and holds a PhD in Epidemiology. Dr. Paxton
has over 40 years of experience in medical devices and infectious
disease consulting. Dr. Paxton obtained her PhD from Kennedy
Western University and her MS from Bowling Green State
University.
Audit Committee
Our
Audit Committee was established in June 2009 and currently is
comprised of Ms. Anderson, Mr. Paul and Dr. Lim. Ms. Anderson serves as chairperson of the Audit
Committee. The Company relies on the exemption related to Mr.
Paul’s lack of standing as a financial expert, since a
majority of the Audit Committee was comprised of financial experts
and does not believe the committee composition materially affects
its ability to act independently. The Audit Committee
operates under a written charter, which is available at
http://investor.tomimist.com/corporate-governance/audit-committee-charter.
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in
monitoring the integrity of the annual, quarterly and other
financial statements of the Company, the independent
auditor’s qualifications and independence, the performance of
the Company’s independent auditors and the compliance by the
Company with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee
also reviews and approves all related-party transactions. Our Board
has determined that Ms. Anderson is an “audit committee
financial expert” as defined by the regulations promulgated
by the SEC.
Code of Ethics
The
Board adopted a Code of Ethics in 2008 that applies to, among other
persons, Board members, officers (including our Chief Executive
Officer), contractors, consultants and advisors. Our Code of
Ethics, which is available at
http://investor.tomimist.com/corporate-governance/code-of-ethics,
sets forth written standards designed to deter wrongdoing and to
promote:
1.
honest and ethical
conduct including the ethical handling of actual or apparent
conflicts of interest between personal and professional
relationships;
2.
full, fair,
accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and
documents that we file with or submit to the SEC and in other
public communications made by us;
3.
compliance with
applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
30
4.
the prompt internal
reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics to an appropriate
person or persons identified in the Code of Ethics;
and
5.
accountability for
adherence to the Code of Ethics.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive
officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common
stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and
reports of changes in ownership of our common stock. Officers,
directors and greater than ten percent shareholders are required by
SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a)
forms they file.
To our
knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of Section 16(a)
reports furnished to us and a review of the shareholders register,
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, our officers,
directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners complied
with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.
31
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Summary Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth the total compensation paid to or earned
by our named executive officers for the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016, respectively:
Name and
Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
|
Option/
Warrant
Awards
($)(1)
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Halden S.
Shane
|
2017
|
360,000
|
—
|
—
|
434,847(2)
|
—
|
794,847
|
Chairman and
CEO
|
2016
|
360,000
|
—
|
—
|
355,307(3)
|
—
|
715,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Jennings
(4)
|
2017
|
144,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
144,000
|
CFO
|
2016
|
135,000
|
—
|
—
|
73,636
|
—
|
208,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Wotzcak
(5)
|
2017
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
President
|
2016
|
202,205
|
—
|
76,500
|
—
|
80,000
|
358,705
|
(1)
|
The amounts shown
in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of
stock, option and/or warrant award, as applicable, granted during
the year computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 2
of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements
contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of
valuation assumptions made in determining the grant date fair value
of the awards.
|
|
|
(2)
|
On January 15,
2016, we entered into a new employment agreement with Dr. Shane,
effective January 1, 2016. The
agreement provides for a base annual salary of $360,000. The
agreement also provides for the quarterly issuance of an option to
purchase 250,000 shares of common stock in 2016 with an exercise
price equal to the three-day trailing volume weighted average price
of our common stock. Dr. Shane is also entitled to performance
bonuses, subject to the achievement of certain objectives,
including: (i) a minimum semi-annual grant of an option to purchase
up to 250,000 shares of common stock and (ii) a cash bonus,
determined in the sole discretion of the Board. Pursuant to his
employment agreement, during the year ended December 31, 2017, we
issued Dr. Shane five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of
3,750,000 shares of common stock as executive compensation. The
exercise prices of the warrants range from $0.10 to $0.12 per
share, based on the closing price of our common stock on the date
of issuance. Utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model, we
determined the fair value of the warrants issued to Dr. Shane was
approximately $435,000, with the following assumptions: volatility,
145%–153%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest
rate, 1.90%–2.23%; and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair
value of each share of common stock underlying the warrants ranged
from $0.09–$0.12. We recognized equity-based compensation to
Dr. Shane of approximately $435,000 on the warrants during the year
ended December 31, 2017.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Pursuant to his
employment agreement, during the year ended December 31, 2016, we
issued Dr. Shane five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of
1,000,000 shares of common stock as executive compensation. The
exercise prices of the warrants range from $0.27 to $0.50 per
share, based on the closing price of our common stock on the date
of issuance. Utilizing the Black-Scholes pricing model, we
determined the fair value of the warrants issued to Dr. Shane was
approximately $355,000, with the following assumptions: volatility,
146%–162%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest
rate, 1.17%–1.95%; and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair
value of each share of common stock underlying the warrants ranged
from $0.24–$0.51. We recognized equity-based compensation to
Dr. Shane of approximately $355,000 on the warrants during the year
ended December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Jennings’
employment agreement provides for a base annual salary of $132,000,
which was increased to $144,000 in October 2016.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Mr. Wotczak
resigned from his position as President effective December 2,
2016.
|
32
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End
The
following table sets forth certain information with respect to
outstanding warrants to purchase common stock previously awarded to
the Company’s named executive officers as of December 31,
2017.
|
Option
Awards
|
||||
Name
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Warrants/
Options
Exercisable
(#)
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Warrants/
Options
Unexercisable
(#)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Warrants
(#)
|
Warrant
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Warrant
Expiration
Date
|
Halden S.
Shane
|
3,000,000(1)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.30
|
2/11/2019-2/11/2021
|
|
250,000(2)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.50
|
3/31/2021
|
|
250,000(3)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.42
|
6/30/2021
|
|
250,000(4)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.32
|
9/30/2021
|
|
250,000(5)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.27
|
12/30/2021
|
|
250,000(8)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.10
|
7/17/2022
|
|
3,500,000(9)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.12
|
12/22/2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Jennings
|
300,000(6)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.30
|
10/1/2019-10/1/2021
|
|
100,000(7)
|
—
|
—
|
$0.55
|
1/26/2021
|
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
|
Warrants
vested in increments of 1,000,000 on 2/11/2014, 2/11/2015 and
2/11/2016 and have a term of 5 years
Warrants
vested on 3/31/2016 and have a term of 5 years
Warrants
vested on 6/30/2016 and have a term of 5 years
Warrants
vested on 9/30/2016 and have a term of 5 years
Warrants
vested on 12/30/2016 and have a term of 5 years
Warrants
vested in increments of 100,000 on 10/1/2014, 10/1/2015 and
10/1/2016 and have a term of 5 years
Warrants
vested on 1/26/2016 and have a term of 5 years
Warrants
vested on 7/17/2017 and have a term of 5 years
Warrants
vested on 12/22/2017 and have a term of 5 years
|
Employment Agreements, Termination of Employment and
Change-in-Control Arrangements
Except
as described below, we currently have no employment agreements with
any of our executive officers, nor any compensatory plans or
arrangements resulting from the resignation, retirement or any
other termination of any of our executive officers, from a
change-in-control, or from a change in any executive
officer’s responsibilities following a
change-in-control.
Employment Agreements
We have
entered into employment agreements with each of the named executive
officers and generally include the named executive officer’s
initial base salary and an indication of equity compensation
opportunities.
Halden S. Shane
On January 15, 2016, we
entered into an employment agreement
with Dr. Shane, effective January 1, 2016. The agreement
provides for a base annual salary of $360,000. The agreement
also provides for the quarterly issuance of an option to purchase
250,000 shares of common stock in 2016 with an
exercise price equal to the three day trailing volume weighted
average price of our common stock. In the event Dr.
Shane is terminated for any reason or becomes disabled or dies, any
options he holds at such time will become cashless and will be
entitled to piggyback registration and exercise immediately. Dr.
Shane is also entitled to performance bonuses, subject to the
achievement of certain objectives, including (i) a minimum
semi-annual grant of stock options to purchase up to 250,000 shares
of common
stock and (ii) a cash bonus,
determined in the sole discretion of the Board. The agreement also
provides that we will reimburse Dr. Shane for certain business and
entertainment expenses, including the use of an
automobile.
33
In the event Dr. Shane
is terminated as CEO as a result of a change in control, Dr. Shane
will be entitled to a lump sum payment of two year’s salary
at the time of such termination and will be granted an option to
purchase 3,000,000 shares of common stock that are cashless and,
when exercised, will have piggyback registration or demand
registration rights, and if applicable, any and all outstanding
stock grants will be accelerated and be fully
vested.
The Board may terminate Dr. Shane for cause by written notification
to Dr. Shane; provided, however, that no termination for cause will
be effective unless Dr. Shane has been provided with prior written
notice and opportunity for remedial action and fails to remedy
within 30 days thereof, in the event of a termination by the
Company (i) by reason of willful dishonesty towards, fraud upon, or
deliberate injury or attempted injury to, the Company, (ii) by
reason of material breach of his employment agreement and (iii) by
reason of gross negligence or intentional misconduct with respect
to the performance of duties under the agreement. Upon termination
for cause, Dr. Shane will be immediately paid an amount equal to
his gross salary. The Board may terminate Dr. Shane other than for
cause at any time upon giving notice to Dr. Shane. Upon such
termination, Dr. Shane will be immediately paid an amount equal to
his gross salary.
Elissa J. Shane
On January 5, 2018, in connection with her
appointment as our Chief
Operating Officer, we entered into an employment agreement with Elissa J.
Shane, effective January 1,
2018. Pursuant to her
employment agreement, Ms. Shane will receive an annual base salary
of at least $200,000, subject to annual review and discretionary
increase by the Compensation Committee of the Board. Ms. Shane is
eligible to receive an annual cash bonus and other annual incentive
compensation, and the agreement
provides that we will issue Ms.
Shane annually an option to purchase at least 250,000 shares of
common stock pursuant to the 2016 Plan. Additionally, in connection
with the execution of her
employment agreement, on January 5, 2018, we issued Ms. Shane an option under the 2016 Plan
to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.12 per
share. Her employment agreement
also provides that we will
reimburse Ms. Shane for reasonable and necessary business and
entertainment expenses that she incurs in performing her duties.
During the term of her employment, Ms. Shane will also be entitled
to up to four weeks of paid vacation time annually, which will
accrue up to six weeks, and to participate in our benefit plans and programs, including but not
limited to all group health, life, disability and retirement plans.
Ms. Shane is also entitled to the sum of $750 per month as a
vehicle allowance. The initial term of her employment agreement is three years, which may
be automatically extended for successive one-year terms, unless
either party provides the other with 120 days’ prior written notice of its intent to
terminate the agreement.
Nick Jennings
On
September 30, 2014, we entered into an employment agreement with
Nick Jennings, our Chief Financial Officer, to provide part-time
services. The term of the employment agreement expired in December
31, 2014. Mr. Jennings’ salary was $5,000 per month payable
in cash, paid bi-weekly, and $2,000 per month payable in common
stock, paid quarterly. Mr. Jennings also received a five-year
warrant to purchase up to 300,000 shares of common stock at a price
of $0.30 per share, which represented the volume weighted-average
price per share of our common stock on October 1, 2014 and vested
as follows: 100,000 shares vested upon issuance, 100,000 shares
vested on October 1, 2015, and 100,000 shares vested on October 1,
2016. In connection with the employment agreement, Mr. Jennings
entered into agreements that included restrictive covenants of
non-solicitation and confidentiality of proprietary
information.
On
September 2, 2015, we entered into a new employment agreement with
Mr. Jennings, which superseded his prior agreement, pursuant to
which he continues to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr.
Jennings’ annual salary is $132,000, which is reviewed
annually. On January 26, 2016, we issued Mr. Jennings a five year
warrant to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $0.55 per share. The agreement also provided for
the issuance of an additional five year warrant to purchase 100,000
shares of common stock in 2016, however, this provision was
modified to grant a salary increase in lieu of the options. In
October 2016, Mr. Jennings’ annual salary was increased to
$144,000 per year. Mr. Jennings is also entitled to additional
equity compensation based upon superior performance of his
responsibilities, as determined by the Board in its sole
discretion. The agreement also
provides that we will reimburse Mr. Jennings for certain business
and entertainment expenses. In the event of a change in
control of the Company that results in his termination, Mr.
Jennings will be entitled to a lump sum payment of one year’s
salary and all equity awards will be accelerated and fully vested.
In the event his employment is terminated other than for cause, Mr.
Jennings will receive an amount equal to his annual salary as of
such termination date after the second employment
anniversary.
34
Director Compensation
Each of our
non-employee directors receives cash fees and stock as compensation
for their service on the Board and the committees of the Board on
which they are a member. The tables below set forth
cash and
stock compensation earned by each non-employee director during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
Name
|
Fees earned or
paid in cash
($)
|
Stock awards
($)
|
Option awards
($)
|
Other Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Harold W. Paul (1)
|
30,000
|
8,000
|
—
|
60,000
|
98,000
|
Walter
Johnsen (2)
|
30,000
|
8,000
|
—
|
—
|
38,000
|
Kelly
Anderson (3)
|
35,000
|
8,000
|
—
|
—
|
43,000
|
Edward
Fred (4)
|
7,500
|
8,000
|
—
|
—
|
15,500
|
Ronald E. Ainsworth (5)
|
15,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
15,000
|
(1)
Mr. Paul also
received $60,000 in cash compensation in exchange for legal
services rendered during 2017.
(2)
Mr. Johnsen was
elected to the Board on January 29, 2016. The term of his
agreement as director commenced on February 1, 2016 for up to two
years and until a successor is elected, or resignation or
removal. Our agreement with Mr. Johnsen provides for an annual
fee in the amount of $30,000 paid on a quarterly basis and an
annual grant of 50,000 shares of common stock. In April 2017,
we issued Mr. Johnsen 50,000 shares of common stock that were
valued at $8,000.
(3)
Ms. Anderson was
elected to the Board on January 29, 2016 and serves as the
chairperson of our Audit Committee. The term of her agreement
as director commenced on February 1, 2016 for up to two years and
until a successor is elected, or resignation or removal. Our
agreement with Ms. Anderson provides for an annual fee in the
amount of $35,000 paid on a quarterly basis and an annual grant of
50,000 shares of common stock. In April 2017, we issued Ms.
Anderson 50,000 shares of common stock that were valued at
$8,000.
(4)
Mr. Fred resigned in March 2017. In
April 2017, we paid
Mr. Fred fees in the amount of $7,500 and issued
him 50,000 shares of stock
valued at $8,000.
(5)
Mr. Ainsworth was elected to the Board on July 7, 2017. The term of
his agreement as director commenced on July 7, 2017 for up to one
year and until a successor is elected, or resignation or
removal. Our agreement with Mr. Ainsworth provides for an
annual fee in the amount of $30,000 paid on a quarterly basis and
an annual grant of 50,000 shares of common stock.
35
Item 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
ANDRELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Equity
Compensation Plan
Information
We
currently maintain one compensation plan: the 2016 Plan. The 2016
Plan was approved by the Board on January 29, 2016 and received
shareholder approval on July 7, 2017. The 2016 Plan authorizes the
issuance of 5,000,000 shares of common stock. On August 25, 2015,
the Board terminated the 2008 Plan, which we had maintained
previously and which our shareholders had approved. Accordingly, we
will issue future awards under the 2016 Plan.
The following table
provides information as of December 31, 2017 with respect to
compensation plans under which our equity securities
are authorized for issuance.
Plan Category
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants
and rights
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under
equity compensation plans(3)
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
200,000
|
(1)
|
$0.96
|
—
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security
holders
|
16,050,000
|
(2)
|
$0.35
|
—
|
Total
|
16,250,000
|
|
$0.35
|
—
|
(1)
|
Prior
to August 25, 2015, we granted awards under the 2008
Plan.
|
(2)
|
Represents
shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants
issued to executive officers, employees and consultants in exchange
for services rendered.
|
(3)
|
On July
7, 2017, the 2016 Plan received shareholder approval, which permits
the grant of awards for up to 5,000,000 shares of common
stock.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to
the beneficial ownership of our common stock and Series A preferred
stock (together, “Voting Stock”) as of March 20, 2018
for:
●
each person (or group of affiliated persons) known by us to be the
beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of
common stock or Series A preferred stock;
●
each of our directors and nominees for election to the
Board;
●
each of the executive officers named in the summary compensation
table; and
●
all of our directors and executive officers as a
group.
We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the
rules of the SEC. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we
believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons
and entities named in the following table have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of Voting Stock that
they beneficially own, subject to applicable community property
laws.
Applicable percentage ownership is based on
122,349,958 shares of common stock and 510,000 shares of Series A
preferred stock outstanding at March 20, 2018. In computing the number of shares of
Voting Stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage
ownership of that person, we deemed to be outstanding all shares of
Voting Stock subject to options, warrants or other convertible
securities held by that person or entity that are currently
exercisable or releasable or that will become exercisable or
releasable within 60 days of March 20, 2018. We did not deem
these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person. Except as otherwise
noted, the address of each person or entity in the following table
is c/o TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc., 9454 Wilshire Blvd.,
Penthouse, Beverly Hills, CA 90212.
36
|
Shares
Beneficially Owned
|
|
||||
|
Common
Stock
|
Series A
Preferred Stock
|
|
|||
|
Shares
|
|
% of
Class
|
Shares
|
% of
Class
|
% of Total
Voting Power(1)
|
Named
Executive Officers and Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Halden S. Shane,
CEO and Chairman of the Board
|
28,095,048
|
(2)
|
21.6%
|
510,000
|
100%
|
21.9%
|
Elissa J. Shane,
Chief Operating Officer
|
1,991,310
|
(3)
|
1.1%
|
|
|
1.1%
|
Nick Jennings,
Chief Financial Officer
|
512,145
|
(4)
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
Harold W. Paul,
Secretary, Director
|
1,379,774
|
(5)
|
1.0%
|
—
|
—
|
1.0%
|
Walter Johnsen,
Director
|
150,000
|
(6)
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
Kelly Anderson,
Director
|
150,000
|
(7)
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
Ronald E.
Ainsworth, Director
|
—
|
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
Lim Boh Soon,
Director
|
590,190
|
(8)
|
*
|
—
|
—
|
*
|
All current
directors and executive officers as a group (8
persons)
|
32,868,467
|
(9)
|
25.2%
|
510,000
|
100%
|
24.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5%
Beneficial Owners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lau Sok
Huy
|
17,361,111
|
(10)
|
14.4%
|
—
|
—
|
14.4%
|
Ah Kee
Wee
|
11,666,669
|
(11)
|
9.7%
|
—
|
—
|
9.7%
|
*
Denotes ownership of less than 1%
(1)
|
Percentage of total voting power represents voting power with
respect to all shares of our common stock and Series A preferred
stock, as a single class. The holders of common stock
and Series A preferred
stock are each entitled to one vote per share.
|
(2)
|
Consists
of (i) 18,845,048 shares of common stock held of record by Dr.
Shane, (ii) 1,500,000 shares of common stock held of record by the
Shane Family Trust, (iii) 1,000,000 shares of common stock held of
record by Belinha Shane and (iv) 7,750,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants to purchase common stock held by Dr. Shane
that are exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2018. Dr.
Shane is a co-trustee of the Shane Family Trust and may be
deemed to share voting and investment power over the securities
held by the trust. Belinha Shane is Dr. Shane’s wife. Dr.
Shane disclaims ownership of such shares held by his wife, except
to the extent of his pecuniary interest.
|
(3)
|
Consists
of (i) 1,891,310 shares of common stock held of record by Ms. Shane
and (ii) 100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants to purchase common stock held by Ms. Shane
that are exercisable within 60 days of March 20, 2018.
|
(4)
|
Consists
of (i) 112,145 shares of common stock held of record by Mr.
Jennings and (ii) 400,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of warrants to purchase common stock held by Mr.
Jennings that are exercisable within 60 days of March 20,
2018.
|
(5)
|
Consists of (i) 1,314,774 shares of common stock
held of record by Mr. Paul
and (ii) 65,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of March
20, 2018.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Consists of (i) 125,000 shares of common stock held of record by Mr. Johnsen and (ii)
25,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock
options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 20,
2018.
|
(7)
|
Consists of (i) 125,000 shares of common stock held of record by Ms. Anderson and (ii)
25,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock
options that are exercisable within 60 days of March 20,
2018.
|
(8)
|
Consists of 590,190 shares of common stock held of record by Dr.
Lim.
|
(9)
|
Consists
of (i) 24,503,467 shares of common stock, (ii) 8,150,000 shares of
common stock
issuable upon the exercise of warrants to purchase common stock and
(iii) 215,000 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 20, 2018.
|
(10)
|
Based on Form 3 filed with the SEC by Lau Sok Huy on January 24,
2018.
|
(11)
|
Based
on information reported by Mr. Wee to the Company. Consists of
(i) 8,666,669 shares of common stock and (ii) 3,000,000 shares of
common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants to purchase
common stock held by Mr. Wee that are exercisable within 60 days of
March 20, 2018.
|
37
Changes in Control
We are
unaware of any contract or other arrangement the operation of which
may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our
Company.
Item
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
Transactions with Related Persons
In May
2017, we entered into an agreement with 41 North International LLC
to provide consulting services in the areas of sales management and
business development. The term of the agreement is for six
months and provides for automatic monthly renewals. Either party
can terminate the agreement after 6 months with 30 days written
notice. The agreement provides for a $20,000 monthly fee as
an advance against commissions. No sales or commissions
were made under the consulting agreement in 2017. Mr.
Ainsworth is a principal of 41 North International, LLC and
director of the Company. The agreement was terminated on October
31, 2017.
Independence of the Board
Based
upon information submitted by Mr. Johnsen, Ms. Anderson, Dr. Lim,
Mr. Paul and Mr. Ainsworth the Board has determined that each of
them is “independent” for purposes of OTC Governance
Guidelines for directors. Mr. Shane is not an independent director.
No director will be considered “independent” unless the
Board affirmatively determines that the director has no direct or
indirect material relationship with the Company.
Our
board of directors has three separate standing committees: the
Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee.
We have
made each of our committee charters available on our website at
http://investor.tomimist.com/.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Accountant Fees
The
following table presents the aggregate fees billed for audit and
other services provided by our independent registered public
accounting firm, Wolinetz, Lafazan & Company, P.C, during the
2017 and 2016 fiscal years:
|
For the Fiscal
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Audit
Fees(1)
|
$99,000
|
$94,000
|
Audit-Related
Fees(2)
|
—
|
—
|
Tax
Fees(3)
|
—
|
—
|
All Other
Fees(4)
|
—
|
—
|
Total
|
$99,000
|
$94,000
|
(1)
|
Audit Fees—Audit fees represent the professional
services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements
and the review of our financial statements included in quarterly
reports, along with services normally provided by the accounting
firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Audit-Related Fees—Audit-related fees represent
professional services rendered for assurance and related services
by Wolinetz, Lafazan & Company, P.C. that were reasonably
related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial
statements that are not reported under audit fees.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Tax Fees— Tax fees represent professional services
rendered by the accounting firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and
tax planning.
|
|
|
(4)
|
All Other Fees—All other fees represent fees billed
for products and services provided by Wolinetz, Lafazan &
Company, P.C other than the services reported for the other
categories.
|
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures of the
Audit Committee
Consistent with the
rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Audit Committee approves the engagement of our
independent registered public accounting firm and is also required
to pre-approve all audit and non-audit expenses. All of the
services described above were approved by the Audit Committee in
accordance with its procedure. We do not otherwise rely on
pre-approval policies and procedures.
38
PART IV
Item 15.
EXHIBITS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
Documents filed as part of this report:
(1)
Financial Statements. See Index to Financial Statements and
Schedule on page F-1.
(2)
Schedules to Financial Statements. All financial statement
schedules have been omitted because they are either inapplicable or
the information required is provided in our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes thereto, included in Part II,
Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(3) The
exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed (or
incorporated by reference herein) as part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
DATED:
March 29, 2018
|
|
TOMI
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ HALDEN
S. SHANE
|
|
|
Halden S Shane
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
The
undersigned directors and officers of TOMI Environmental Solutions,
Inc. constitute and appoint Halden S. Shane and Nick Jennings, or
either of them, as their true and lawful attorney and agent with
power of substitution, to do any and all acts and things in our
name and behalf in our capacities as directors and officers and to
execute any and all instruments for us and in our names in the
capacities indicated below, which said attorney and agent may deem
necessary or advisable to enable said corporation to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules,
regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K,
including specifically but without limitation, power and authority
to sign for us or any of us in our names in the capacities
indicated below, any and all amendments hereto; and we do hereby
ratify and confirm all that said attorney and agent shall do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in
the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
|
/s/ HALDEN
S.
SHANE
Halden S. Shane
|
Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
March
29, 2018
|
|
|
|
/s/ NICK
JENNINGS
Nick Jennings
|
Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
March
29, 2018
|
|
|
|
/s/ HAROLD
W.
PAUL
Harold W. Paul
|
Director
|
March
29, 2018
|
/s/ WALTER
C.
JOHNSEN
Walter C. Johnsen
|
Director
|
March
29, 2018
|
/s/ KELLY
J.
ANDERSON
Kelly J. Anderson
|
Director
|
March
29, 2018
|
/s/ RONALD
E. AINSWORTH
Ronald E. Ainsworth
|
Director
|
March
29, 2018
|
/s/ LIM
BOH SOON
Lim Boh Soon
|
Director
|
March
29, 2018
|
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
Description of
Exhibit
|
Form
|
File
No.
|
Date
|
Exhibit
|
Filed
Herewith
|
Articles of
Restatement of the Registrant, effective October 6,
2009
|
S-1
|
333-162356
|
10/6/09
|
3.1
|
|
|
Articles of
Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, effective
October 24, 2011
|
8-K
|
000-09908
|
10/24/11
|
3.1(a)
|
|
|
Amended Bylaws
of the Registrant, adopted effective November 2, 2007
|
10-Q
|
000-09908
|
5/16/16
|
3.2
|
|
|
Amendment to
Amended Bylaws of the Registrant, adopted effective January 29,
2016
|
8-K
|
000-09908
|
2/1/16
|
3.2
|
|
|
2016
Equity Incentive Plan, as adopted by the Registrant’s board
of directors on January 29, 2016
|
10-Q
|
000-09908
|
5/16/16
|
10.6
|
|
|
Offer Letter,
dated January 15, 2016, by and between the Registrant and Dr.
Halden Shane
|
10-Q
|
000-09908
|
5/16/16
|
10.1
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement, dated February 8, 2016, by and between the Registrant
and Robert Wotczak
|
10-Q
|
000-09908
|
5/16/16
|
10.2
|
|
|
Offer Letter,
dated September 2, 2015, by and between the Registrant and Nick
Jennings
|
10-Q
|
000-09908
|
5/16/16
|
10.3
|
|
|
Offer Letter,
dated September 2, 2015, by and between the Registrant and Norris
Gearhart
|
10-Q
|
000-09908
|
5/16/16
|
10.4
|
|
|
Form
of Appointment to the Board of Directors as Independent Director of
the Registrant
|
10-Q
|
000-09908
|
5/16/16
|
10.5
|
|
|
Restated
Manufacturing and Development Agreement, dated November 10, 2016,
by and between the Registrant and RG Group
|
10-Q
|
000-09908
|
9/30/16
|
10.1
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement, entered into as of January 5, 2018, by and between the
Registrant and Elissa J. Shane, effective as of January 1,
2018
|
8-K
|
000-09908
|
1/8/18
|
10.1
|
|
|
Code
of Ethics
|
10-K
|
000-09908
|
3/31/09
|
14
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of
the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Power of
Attorney (included in signature page)
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Certification of
Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Certification of
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Certification of
Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Certification of
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
101.INS
|
XBRL
Instance Document
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
+
|
Indicates
a management contract or compensatory plan.
|
|
|
#
|
The
information in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 shall not be deemed
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall they be
deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (including this
report), unless the Registrant specifically incorporates the
foregoing information into those documents by
reference.
|
41
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
Page
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
|
F-2
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and
2016
|
F-3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2017
and 2016
|
F-4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016
|
F-5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017
and 2016
|
F-6
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-8
|
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
To the
shareholders and the board of directors of
TOMI
Environmental Solutions, Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of TOMI
Environmental Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’
equity, and cash flows, for each of the two years in the period
ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively
referred to as the “consolidated financial
statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis for Opinion
These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we
engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
WOLINETZ, LAFAZAN
& COMPANY, P.C.
We have
served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.
Rockville
Centre, NY
March
29, 2018
F-2
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
December 31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
$4,550,003
|
$948,324
|
Accounts Receivable
- net
|
1,835,949
|
1,521,378
|
Inventories (Note
3)
|
3,518,884
|
4,047,310
|
Deposits on
Merchandise (Note 10)
|
-
|
147,010
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
270,419
|
104,448
|
Total
Current Assets
|
10,175,255
|
6,768,469
|
|
|
|
Property and
Equipment – net (Note 4)
|
712,822
|
611,807
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets:
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
– net (Note 5)
|
1,548,532
|
1,918,040
|
Security
Deposits
|
4,700
|
4,700
|
Total
Other Assets
|
1,553,232
|
1,922,740
|
Total
Assets
|
$12,441,310
|
$9,303,016
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
$751,730
|
$735,879
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities (Note 12)
|
267,136
|
278,413
|
Accrued
Interest (Note 6)
|
80,000
|
-
|
Customer
Deposits
|
3,062
|
30,120
|
Deferred
Rent
|
781
|
8,541
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
1,102,709
|
1,052,953
|
|
|
|
Convertible
Notes Payable, net of discount of $55,625
|
||
at
December 31, 2017 (Note 6)
|
5,944,375
|
-
|
Total
Long-Term Liabilities
|
5,944,375
|
-
|
Total
Liabilities
|
7,047,084
|
1,052,953
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity:
|
|
|
Cumulative
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock;
|
||
par value
$0.01, 1,000,000 shares authorized; 510,000 shares
issued
|
||
and
outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
Cumulative
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock; $1,000 stated
value;
|
||
7.5% Cumulative
dividend; 4,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
||
and
outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
-
|
-
|
Common stock;
par value $0.01, 200,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||
122,049,958 and
120,825,134 shares issued and outstanding
|
||
at
December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
|
1,220,499
|
1,208,251
|
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
42,139,675
|
41,367,946
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
(37,971,049)
|
(34,331,234)
|
Total
Shareholders’ Equity
|
5,394,225
|
8,250,063
|
Total Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$12,441,310
|
$9,303,016
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
F-3
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
|
|
For The Year
Ended
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Sales,
net
|
$4,993,668
|
$6,343,432
|
Cost
of Sales
|
1,927,773
|
2,610,500
|
Gross
Profit
|
3,065,895
|
3,732,931
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
Professional
Fees
|
876,880
|
516,926
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
607,127
|
586,384
|
Selling
Expenses
|
1,256,465
|
1,512,752
|
Research
and Development
|
454,089
|
184,259
|
Equity
Compensation Expense (Note 7)
|
649,348
|
614,696
|
Consulting
Fees
|
210,538
|
307,040
|
General
and Administrative
|
2,774,916
|
3,380,025
|
Other
|
(319,388)
|
-
|
Total Operating
Expenses
|
6,509,975
|
7,102,082
|
Loss from
Operations
|
(3,444,080)
|
(3,369,150)
|
|
|
|
Other Income
(Expense):
|
|
|
Amortization
of Debt Discounts
|
(6,279)
|
-
|
Gain
on Disposition of Property and Equipment
|
-
|
12,000
|
Grant
|
-
|
199,891
|
Interest
Income
|
1,800
|
-
|
Interest
Expense
|
(191,256)
|
-
|
Total Other Income
(Expense)
|
(195,735)
|
211,891
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
$(3,639,814)
|
$(3,157,259)
|
|
|
|
Loss Per Common
Share
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.03)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
|
121,372,605
|
120,557,102
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
|
|
|
Series A
Preferred
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Total
Shareholders'
|
||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Equity
|
Balance at December 31,
2015
|
510,000
|
$5,100
|
120,063,180
|
$1,200,632
|
$40,391,215
|
$(31,173,974)
|
$10,422,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
614,696
|
|
614,696
|
Common stock
issued for services provided
|
|
|
761,954
|
7,620
|
362,035
|
|
369,654
|
Net Loss for
the year ended December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,157,259)
|
(3,157,259)
|
Balance at
December 31, 2016
|
510,000
|
5,100
|
120,825,134
|
1,208,252
|
41,367,946
|
(34,331,234)
|
8,250,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
635,223
|
|
635,223
|
Common stock
issued for services provided
|
|
|
249,824
|
2,498
|
35,602
|
|
38,100
|
Warrants
exercised
|
|
|
975,000
|
9,750
|
39,000
|
|
48,750
|
Warrants
issued as part of debt private placement
|
|
|
|
|
61,904
|
|
61,904
|
Net Loss for
the year ended December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,639,814)
|
(3,639,814)
|
Balance at
December 31, 2017
|
510,000
|
$5,100
|
122,049,958
|
$1,220,500
|
$42,139,675
|
$(37,971,049)
|
$5,394,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
|
F-5
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS
|
|
For The
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Cash
Flow From Operating Activities:
|
||
Net
Loss
|
$(3,639,814)
|
$(3,157,259)
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Loss to
|
||
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities:
|
||
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
607,127
|
586,384
|
Amortization
of Debt Discount
|
6,279
|
-
|
Equity
Based Compensation
|
635,223
|
614,696
|
Value
of Equity Issued for Services
|
38,100
|
369,653
|
Reserve
for Bad Debts
|
200,000
|
255,000
|
Gain
on Disposition of Property and Equipment
|
-
|
(12,000)
|
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
|
||
Decrease (Increase) in:
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
(514,572)
|
(361,802)
|
Inventory
|
204,622
|
(2,755,688)
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
(165,971)
|
(27,718)
|
Deposits
on Merchandise
|
147,010
|
295,348
|
Other Assets
|
36,613
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in:
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
15,851
|
(286,004)
|
Accrued
Expenses
|
(11,277)
|
159,598
|
Accrued
Interest
|
80,000
|
-
|
Deferred
Rent
|
(7,760)
|
(6,203)
|
Advances
on Grant
|
-
|
(210,503)
|
Customer
Deposits
|
(27,058)
|
(4,991)
|
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
|
(2,432,241)
|
(4,504,876)
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow From Investing Activities:
|
||
Purchase
of Property and Equipment
|
(14,829)
|
(474,866)
|
Proceeds
on Disposition of Property and Equipment
|
-
|
12,000
|
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(14,829)
|
(462,866)
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
|
F-6
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS –
CONTINUED
|
|
For The
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Cash
Flow From Financing Activities:
|
||
Proceeds
from Exercise of Warrants
|
48,750
|
-
|
Proceeds
from Convertible Notes
|
6,000,000
|
-
|
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
6,048,750
|
-
|
Increase
(Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
3,601,679
|
(4,967,742)
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents - Beginning
|
948,326
|
5,916,068
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents – Ending
|
$4,550,003
|
$948,326
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information:
|
||
Cash
Paid For Interest
|
$111,256
|
$-
|
Cash
Paid for Income Taxes
|
$800
|
$800
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash
Investing and Financing Activities :
|
||
Establishment
of discount on convertible debt
|
$61,904
|
$-
|
Transfer
of equipment from
|
||
inventory
to property and equipment
|
$323,805
|
$103,553
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
F-7
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
TOMI
Environmental Solutions, Inc. (“TOMI”, the
“Company”, “we”, “our” and
“us”) is a global provider of infection prevention and
decontamination products and services, focused primarily on life
sciences including healthcare, bio-safety, pharmaceutical,
clean-room and research.
TOMI
provides environmental solutions for indoor and outdoor surface
decontamination through the sale of equipment, services and
licensing of its SteraMist™ Binary
Ionization Technology® (“BIT™”), which
is a hydrogen peroxide-based mist and fog registered with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). TOMI’s
mission is to help its customers create a healthier world through
its product line and its motto is “innovating for a safer
world” for healthcare and life.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of TOMI and its wholly-owned subsidiary, TOMI Environmental
Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Reclassification of Accounts
Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior-year comparative
financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported
results of operations or financial position.
Use of Estimates
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported and disclosed in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ materially from these estimates. On an ongoing basis,
we evaluate our estimates, including those related to accounts
receivable, inventory, fair values of financial instruments,
intangible assets, useful lives of intangible assets and property
and equipment, fair values of stock-based awards, income taxes, and
contingent liabilities, among others. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of our assets and
liabilities.
Fair Value Measurements
The
authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair
value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal
market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to
transact, and (iv) willing to transact. The guidance describes a
fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that
may be used to measure fair value, which are the
following:
Level
1:
Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level
2:
Inputs
other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or corroborated by observable market
data or substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
Level
3:
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the value of the assets or
liabilities.
Our
financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and convertible
debt. All these items were determined to be Level 1 fair value
measurements.
F-8
The
carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value
because of the short maturity of these instruments. The recorded
value of convertible debt approximates its fair value as the terms
and rates approximate market rates (See Note 6).
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash
and cash equivalents includes cash on hand held at financial
institutions and other liquid investments with original maturities
of three months or less. At times, these deposits may be in excess
of insured limits.
Accounts Receivable
Our
accounts receivable are typically from credit worthy customers or,
for certain international customers, are supported by pre-payments.
For those customers to whom we extend credit, we perform periodic
evaluations of them and maintain allowances for potential credit
losses as deemed necessary. We have a policy of reserving for
doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of
potential credit losses in existing accounts receivable. We
periodically review our accounts receivable to determine whether an
allowance is necessary based on an analysis of past due accounts
and other factors that may indicate that the realization of an
account may be in doubt. Account balances deemed to be
uncollectible are charged to the allowance after all means of
collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is
considered remote. Bad debt expense for the years ended December
31, 2017 and 2016 was $263,882 and $285,030,
respectively.
At
December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the allowance for doubtful
accounts was $500,000 and $300,000,
respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, two customers accounted for 24% of
accounts receivable. Two customers accounted for 22% of net
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2016, one customer accounted for 10% of accounts
receivable. One customer accounted for 10% of net revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2016.
Inventories
Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method. Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and
raw materials. At December 31, 2017
and December 31, 2016, we did not have a reserve for slow-moving or
obsolete inventory.
Deposits on Merchandise
Deposits
on merchandise primarily consist of amounts paid in advance of the
receipt of inventory (see Note 10).
Property and Equipment
We
account for property and equipment at cost less accumulated
depreciation. We compute depreciation using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally
three to five years. Depreciation for equipment, furniture and
fixtures and vehicles commences once placed in service for its
intended use. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases or
service lives of the improvements, whichever is
shorter.
Accounts
Payable
As of December 31, 2017, one vendor accounted for approximately 45%
of total accounts payable. As of December 31, 2016, two vendors
accounted for approximately 49% of total accounts
payable.
One vendor accounted for 73% and 78% of cost of goods sold for the
years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
F-9
Accrued Warranties
Accrued
warranties represent the estimated costs, if any, that will be
incurred during the warranty period of our products. We make an
estimate of expected costs that will be incurred by us during the
warranty period and charge that expense to the consolidated
statement of operations at the date of sale. Our manufacturer
assumes warranty against product defects for one year from date of
sales, which we extend to our customers upon sale of the product.
We assume responsibility for product reliability and results. As of
December 31, 2017 and 2016, the warranty reserve was $5,000 and $0,
respectively.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between
the financial statement reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws
in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The
measurement of deferred income tax assets is reduced, if necessary,
by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits, which are, on a more
likely than not basis, not expected to be realized in accordance
with ASC guidance for income taxes. Net deferred tax benefits have
been fully reserved at December 31, 2017 and 2016. The effect on
deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in the period that such tax rate changes are
enacted.
Loss Per Share
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing the Company’s net loss
by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period presented. Diluted loss per share is
based on the treasury stock method and includes the effect from
potential issuance of shares of common stock, such as shares
issuable pursuant to the exercise of options and warrants and
conversions of preferred stock or debentures.
Potentially
dilutive securities as of December 31, 2017 consisted of 11,111,100
shares of common stock from convertible debentures, 35,501,411
shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding
warrants, 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon outstanding
options and 510,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion
of outstanding shares of Preferred A stock (“Convertible
Series A Preferred Stock”). Diluted and basic weighted
average shares are the same, as potentially dilutive shares are
anti-dilutive.
Potentially
dilutive securities as of December 31, 2016, consisted of
37,076,413 shares of common stock from outstanding warrants,
200,000 shares of common stock from options and 510,000 shares of
common stock from convertible Series A preferred stock. Diluted and
basic weighted average shares are the same, as potentially dilutive
shares are anti-dilutive.
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares
assumed to be outstanding during the period of computation. Diluted
loss per share is computed similarly to basic loss per share except
that the denominator is increased to include the number of
additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the
potential shares had been issued and if the additional common
shares were dilutive. Options, warrants, preferred stock and shares
associated with the conversion of debt to purchase an aggregate of
approximately 47.3 million and 37.8 million shares of common stock
were outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, but
were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share due to
the anti-dilutive effect on net loss per share.
F-10
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Net
loss
|
$(3,639,814)
|
$(3,157,259)
|
Adjustments
for convertible debt - as converted
|
|
|
Interest
on convertible debt
|
191,256
|
-
|
Amortization
of debt discount on convertible debt
|
6,279
|
-
|
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders
|
$(3,442,279)
|
$(3,157,259)
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
121,372,605
|
120,557,102
|
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders per share:
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
$(0.03)
|
$(0.03)
|
Revenue Recognition
Revenue
is recognized when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; (2) service has been rendered or delivery has occurred; (3)
the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability
is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are
based on management’s judgment regarding the fixed nature of
the selling prices of the services rendered or products delivered
and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts
to customers, and allowance, and other adjustments will be provided
for in the same period the related sales are recorded.
Stock-Based Compensation
We
account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), ASC 718,
“Compensation—Stock Compensation.” Under the
provisions of FASB ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is
estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value
and is recognized as expense over the requisite service
period.
On July
7, 2017, our shareholders approved the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan
(the “2016 Plan”). The 2016 Plan authorizes the grant
of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units and performance units/shares. Up to
5,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized for issuance under
the 2016 Plan. Shares issued under the 2016 Plan may be either
authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, or any combination
thereof. Provisions in the 2016 Plan permit the reuse or reissuance
by the 2016 Plan of shares of common stock for numerous reasons,
including, but not limited to, shares of common stock underlying
canceled, expired, or forfeited awards of stock-based compensation
and stock appreciation rights paid out in the form of cash.
Stock-based compensation will typically be awarded in consideration
for the future performance of services to us. All recipients of
awards under the 2016 Plan are required to enter into award
agreements with the Company at the time of the award; awards under
the 2016 Plan are expressly conditioned upon such agreements. For
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued options to
purchase 100,000 shares of common stock out of the 2016 Plan. In
addition, for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued
200,000 shares of common stock out of the 2016 Plan.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject us to significant
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents. We maintain cash balances at financial institutions
which exceed the current Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
limit of $250,000 at times during the year.
F-11
Long-Lived Assets Including Acquired Intangible Assets
We
assess long-lived assets for potential impairments at the end of
each year, or during the year if an event or other circumstance
indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of
the asset. In evaluating long-lived assets for impairment, we
measure recoverability of these assets by comparing the carrying
amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are
expected to generate. If our long-lived assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market
value. We base the calculations of the estimated fair value of our
long-lived assets on the income approach. For the income approach,
we use an internally developed discounted cash flow model that
includes, among others, the following assumptions: projections of
revenues and expenses and related cash flows based on assumed
long-term growth rates and demand trends; expected future
investments to grow new units; and estimated discount rates. We
base these assumptions on our historical data and experience,
industry projections, micro and macro general economic condition
projections, and our expectations. We had no long-lived asset
impairment charges for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016.
Advertising and Promotional Expenses
We
expense advertising costs in the period in which they are incurred.
Advertising and promotional expenses for the years ended December
31, 2017 and 2016, were approximately $66,000 and $130,000,
respectively.
Research and Development Expenses
We expense research and development expenses in the period in which
they are incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,
research and development expenses were approximately $454,000 and
$184,000, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs
We include shipping and handling costs relating to the delivery of
products directly from vendors to the Company in cost of sales.
Shipping and handling costs, which include third-party delivery
costs relating to the delivery of products to customers, are
classified as a general and administrative expense. Shipping and
handling costs included in general and administrative expense were
approximately $119,000 and $143,000 for the years ended December
31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Business Segments
We
currently have one reportable business segment due to the fact that
we derive our revenue primarily from one product. A breakdown of
revenue is shown below:
F-12
Net Revenue
Product and Service Revenue
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
SteraMist
Product
|
$4,101,000
|
$5,727,000
|
Service
and Training
|
893,000
|
616,000
|
Total
|
$4,994,000
|
$6,343,000
|
Revenue by Geographic Region
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
United
States
|
$3,495,000
|
$4,012,000
|
International
|
1,499,000
|
2,331,000
|
Total
|
$4,994,000
|
$6,343,000
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May
2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No. 2014-09, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers , to replace the existing revenue
recognition criteria for contracts with customers. In August 2015,
the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Deferral of the Effective Date , to
defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 to interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We will
adopt the ASUs on January 1, 2018 on a modified retrospective
basis. Upon adoption of the ASUs, we currently estimate there will
not be a material impact to our beginning balance
sheet.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases , to require lessees to
recognize all leases, with certain exceptions, on the balance
sheet, while recognition on the statement of operations will remain
similar to current lease accounting. The ASU also eliminates real
estate-specific provisions and modifies certain aspects of lessor
accounting. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption
permitted. We currently expect to adopt the ASU on January 1,
2019. We will be required to recognize and measure leases existing
at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest
comparative period presented using a modified retrospective
approach, with certain practical expedients available. We intend to
elect the available practical expedients upon adoption. Upon
adoption, we expect the consolidated balance sheet to include a
right of use asset and liability related to substantially all of
our lease arrangements. We are continuing to assess the impact of
adopting the ASU on our financial position, results of operations
and related disclosures and have not yet concluded whether the
effect on the consolidated financial statements will be
material.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment
Accounting , to simplify the accounting for the income tax
effects from share-based compensation, the accounting for
forfeitures and the accounting for statutory income tax
withholding, among others. In particular, the ASU requires all
income tax effects from share-based compensation to be recognized
in the consolidated statement of operations when the awards vest or
are settled, the ASU permits accounting for forfeitures as they
occur, and the ASU permits a higher level of statutory income tax
withholding without triggering liability accounting. Adoption of
the ASU is modified retrospective, retrospective and prospective,
depending on the specific provision being adopted. We adopted the
ASU on January 1, 2017, which did not impact our beginning
accumulated deficit and additional paid-in capital.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.
2017-04, Simplifying the Test for
Goodwill Impairment, to
simplify the test for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2. An entity will, therefore,
perform the goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of
a reporting unit with its carrying amount, recognizing an impairment charge for the amount
by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, not to exceed
the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity still has the option to
perform a qualitative assessment to determine if the quantitative
impairment test is necessary. The ASU is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or
annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after
January 1, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is prospective. We have not
yet selected an adoption date, and the ASU will have a currently
undetermined impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
F-13
In May
2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Scope Of Modification Accounting, to
provide guidance on which changes to the terms or conditions of
a share-based payment
award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The ASU
is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
with early adoption permitted. Adoption of the ASU is prospective.
We will adopt the ASU on January 1, 2018, which will have no
impact on the consolidated financial statements upon
adoption.
NOTE 3. INVENTORIES
Inventories
consist of the following at:
|
|
|
|
December
31,
2017
|
December
31,
2016
|
Raw
materials
|
$-
|
$13,031
|
Finished
goods
|
3,518,884
|
4,034,279
|
|
$3,518,884
|
$4,047,310
|
NOTE 4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and
equipment consists of the following at:
|
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Furniture and
fixtures
|
$91,216
|
$91,216
|
Equipment
|
1,192,293
|
866,803
|
Vehicles
|
56,410
|
56,410
|
Computer and
Software
|
113,319
|
100,175
|
Leasehold
Improvements
|
15,554
|
15,554
|
|
1,468,792
|
1,130,158
|
Less: Accumulated
depreciation
|
755,969
|
518,350
|
|
$712,822
|
$611,808
|
For the
years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, depreciation was $237,619
and $216,876, respectively.
NOTE 5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets
consist of Patents and Trademarks related to our Binary Ionization
Technology. All of these assets were pledged as collateral for the
convertible notes as described below in Note 6. The patents are
being amortized over the estimated remaining lives of the related
patents. The trademarks have an indefinite life. Amortization
expense was $369,508 and $369,508 for the years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016, respectively.
Definite life
intangible assets consist of the following:
|
December
31,
2017
|
December
31,
2016
|
Intellectual
Property and Patents
|
$2,848,300
|
$2,848,300
|
Less: Accumulated
Amortization
|
1,739,768
|
1,370,260
|
Intangible Assets,
net
|
$1,108,532
|
$1,478,040
|
F-14
Indefinite life
intangible assets consist of the following:
Trademarks
|
$440,000
|
$440,000
|
Total Intangible
Assets, net
|
$1,548,532
|
$1,918,040
|
Approximate
amortization over the next five years is as follows:
Twelve Month
Period Ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
2018
|
$370,000
|
2019
|
370,000
|
2020
|
368,000
|
2021
|
-
|
2022
|
-
|
|
$1,108,000
|
F-15
NOTE 6. CONVERTIBLE DEBT
In
March and May 2017, the Company closed a private placement
transaction in which it issued to certain accredited investors
unregistered senior callable convertible promissory notes (the
“Notes”) and three-year warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 999,998 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$0.69 per share in exchange for aggregate gross proceeds of
$6,000,000. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 4% per annum.
$5,300,000 in principal matures on August 31, 2018 and $700,000 in
principal matures on November 8, 2018, unless earlier redeemed,
repurchased or converted. The maturity dates of these notes were
extended in February and March of 2018 (See note 16). The Notes are
convertible at the option of the holder into common stock at a
conversion price of $0.54 per share. Subsequent to September 1,
2017, we may redeem the Notes that are scheduled to mature on
August 31, 2018 at any time prior to maturity at a price equal to
100% of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes to be
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the redemption
date. Prior to November 8, 2018, we may redeem the Notes that
are scheduled to mature on such date at any time prior to maturity
at a price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the
Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the
redemption date. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in
cash on February 28 and August 31 of each year, beginning on August
31, 2017. Interest expense related to the Notes for the year ended
December 31, 2017 was $191,256.
The
warrants were valued at $62,559 using the Black-Scholes pricing
model with the following assumptions: expected volatility: 104.06%
-111.54%; expected dividend: $0; expected term: 3 years; and
risk-free rate: 1.49% - 1.59%. The Company recorded the
warrants’ relative fair value of $61,904 as an increase to
additional paid-in capital and a discount against the related
debt.
The
debt discount is being amortized over the life of the Notes using
the effective interest method. Amortization expense for the year
ended December 31, 2017 was $6,279.
Convertible notes
consist of the following at December 31, 2017:
|
December
31,
2017
|
Convertible
notes
|
$6,000,000
|
Initial
discount
|
(61,904)
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
6,279
|
Convertible notes,
net
|
$5,944,375
|
F-16
NOTE 7. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Our
board of directors may, without further action by our shareholders,
from time to time, direct the issuance of any authorized but
unissued or unreserved shares of preferred stock in series and at
the time of issuance, determine the rights, preferences and
limitations of each series. The holders of such preferred stock may
be entitled to receive a preference payment in the event of any
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company before any
payment is made to the holders of our common stock. Furthermore,
the board of directors could issue preferred stock with voting and
other rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the
holders of our common stock.
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock
Our
authorized Convertible Series A Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value,
consists of 1,000,000 shares. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, there
were 510,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively. The
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock is convertible at the rate of
one share of common stock for one share of Convertible Series A
Preferred Stock.
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock
Our
authorized Convertible Series B Preferred Stock, $1,000 stated
value, 7.5% Cumulative dividend, consists of 4,000 shares. At
December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no shares issued and
outstanding, respectively. Each share of Convertible Series B
Preferred Stock may be converted (at the holder’s election)
into two hundred shares of our common stock.
Common Stock
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, we issued 761,954 shares of
common stock valued at $369,654 for professional services
rendered.
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 249,824 shares
of common stock valued at $38,100 for professional services
rendered, of which the Company issued 200,000 shares that were
valued at $32,000 and issued to our board of directors (See Note
10).
In
August 2017, warrants to purchase 375,000 and 600,000 shares of
common stock were exercised, which resulted in gross proceeds to
the Company of $18,750 and $30,000, respectively.
Stock Options
In
February 2016, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of
100,000 shares of common stock to four directors, valued at $54,980
in total. The options have an exercise price of $0.55 per share and
expire in February 2026. The options were valued using the
Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: volatility:
224%; dividend yield: 0%; zero coupon rate: 1.47%; and a life of 10
years.
The
following table summarizes stock options outstanding as of December
31, 2017 and 2016:
|
December 31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
||
|
Number of Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Number of Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
200,000
|
$0.76
|
100,000
|
$0.96
|
Granted
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
|
0.55
|
Exercised
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Outstanding,
end of period
|
200,000
|
$0.76
|
200,000
|
$0.76
|
F-17
Options
outstanding and exercisable by price range as of December 31, 2017
were as follows:
Outstanding
Options
|
Average
Weighted
|
Exercisable
Options
|
||
Range
|
Number
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
$2.10
|
40,000
|
2.01
|
40,000
|
$2.10
|
$0.05
|
20,000
|
3.03
|
20,000
|
$0.05
|
$0.27
|
40,000
|
7.01
|
40,000
|
$0.27
|
$0.55
|
100,000
|
8.10
|
100,000
|
$0.55
|
|
200,000
|
6.16
|
200,000
|
$0.76
|
Stock Warrants
For the
year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized total equity-based
compensation of approximately $394,000 on warrants issued to the
CEO in connection with his current and previous employment
agreements (Note 9). For the year ended December 31, 2016, we
recognized $39,000 in stock compensation expense for the warrants
issued to the CEO in February 2014 that vested in February 2016. In
addition, on March 31, 2016, we issued warrants to purchase up to
250,000 shares of common stock to the CEO with a term of five years
that vest upon issuance and have an exercise price of $0.50 per
share. We utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value the
warrants to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock received
by the CEO totaling approximately $129,000 with the following
assumptions: volatility, 162%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk
free interest rate, 1.47%; and a life of 5 years. The grant date
fair value of each warrant was $0.51. On June 30, 2016, we issued
warrants to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock to the
CEO with a term of five years that vest upon issuance and have an
exercise price of $0.42 per share. The Company utilized the
Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrants to purchase up to
250,000 shares of common stock received by the CEO totaling
approximately $99,000 with the following assumptions: volatility,
157%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest rate, 1.17%;
and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair value of each warrant
was $0.40. On September 30, 2016, the Company issued warrants to
purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock to the CEO with a
term of five years that vest upon issuance and have an exercise
price of $0.32 per share. We utilized the Black-Scholes method to
fair value the warrants to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common
stock received by the CEO totaling approximately $66,000 with the
following assumptions: volatility, 155%; expected dividend yield,
0%; risk free interest rate, 1.27%; and a life of 5 years. The
grant date fair value of each warrant was $0.27. On December 31,
2016, we issued warrants to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common
stock to the CEO with a term of five years that vest upon issuance
and have an exercise price of $0.27 per share. We utilized the
Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrants to purchase up to
250,000 shares of common stock received by the CEO totaling
approximately $61,000 with the following assumptions: volatility,
146%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest rate, 1.95%;
and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair value of each warrant
was $0.24.
For the
year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized total equity-based
compensation of approximately $73,000 on warrants issued to the CFO
in connection with his current and previous employment agreements
(Note 11). For the year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized
$22,000 in stock compensation expense for the warrants issued to
the CFO under his previous agreement with the Company. In addition,
on January 26, 2016, we issued warrants to purchase up to 100,000
shares of common stock to the CFO with a term of five years that
vest upon issuance and have an exercise price of $0.55 per share.
We utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrants to
purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock received by the CFO
totaling approximately $51,000 with the following assumptions:
volatility, 164%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest
rate, 1.47%; and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair value of
each warrant was $0.51.
For the
year ended December 31, 2016, we recognized equity compensation
expense of approximately $92,000 related to the vested and accrual
of unvested warrants contracted to an employee pursuant to his
employment agreement with the Company that were issued in April
2016. We utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value the
300,000 warrants received by the employee totaling approximately
$139,000 with the following assumptions: volatility, 159%; expected
dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest rate, 1.47%; and a life of 5
years. The grant date fair value of each warrant was
$0.46.
In
March and May of 2017, in connection with the issuance of the
Notes, we issued three-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate
of 999,998 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.69 per
share (see Note 6).
F-18
On June
30, 2017, we issued warrants to purchase up to 15,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share to the members
of the Scientific Advisory Board with a term of five years, which
vested upon issuance. The Company utilized the Black-Scholes method
to fair value the warrants received by the members of the
Scientific Advisory Board at $1,400 with the following assumptions:
volatility, 150%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest
rate, 1.83%; and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair value of
each share underlying the warrant was $0.09.
During
the first and second quarter of 2017, we recognized approximately
$23,000 in equity compensation expense for the vested and unvested
portion of a warrant issued to a former employee pursuant to his
agreement with the Company. In September 2017, the employee
resigned from his position with the Company. Accordingly, the
unvested portion of his warrant was terminated and the $22,000 in
equity compensation expense was reversed.
In June
2017, we modified the terms of outstanding warrants to purchase
4,000,000 shares of common stock. Pursuant to a settlement
agreement, the term of the warrants was increased by 2 years and
the exercise price was modified to $0.12 per share (decrease of
$0.03 per share). Pursuant to ASC 718, the modified terms of
the warrants resulted in approximately $196,000 in incremental
equity compensation expense for the year ended December 31,
2017. We utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value the
warrants under the original and modified terms with the following
range of assumptions: volatility, 81%-97%; expected dividend yield,
0%; risk free interest rate, 1.28%; and a life of 0.33 - 2.33
years, respectively. The grant date fair value of each share of
common stock underlying the warrant was $0.01 and $0.06,
respectively.
In July
2017 we issued a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock
to the CEO at an exercise price of $0.10 per share pursuant to his
employment agreement with the Company. The warrant was valued at
approximately $23,000 and has a term of 5 years. We utilized the
Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrant received by the CEO
with the following assumptions: volatility, 153%; expected dividend
yield, 0%; risk free interest rate, 1.90%; and a life of 5 years.
The grant date fair value of each share of common stock underlying
the warrant was $0.09.
In
October 2017, we issued warrants to purchase up to 10,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $0.17 per share to the members
of the Scientific Advisory Board with a term of five years, which
vested upon issuance. The Company utilized the Black-Scholes method
to fair value the warrants received by the members of the
Scientific Advisory Board at approximately $1,500 with the
following assumptions: volatility, 147%; expected dividend yield,
0%; risk free interest rate, 1.98%; and a life of 5 years. The
grant date fair value of each share underlying the warrant was
$0.15.
In
December 2017 we issued a warrant to purchase 3,500,000 shares of
common stock to the CEO at an exercise price of $0.12 per share
pursuant to his employment agreement with the Company. The warrant
was valued at approximately $412,000 and has a term of 5 years. We
utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrant
received by the CEO with the following assumptions: volatility,
145%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest rate, 2.23%;
and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair value of each share of
common stock underlying the warrant was $0.12.
The
following table summarizes the outstanding common stock warrants as
of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
December 31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
||
|
Number of Warrants
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Number of Warrants
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
37,076,413
|
$0.31
|
35,676,413
|
$0.30
|
Granted
|
4,774,998
|
0.24
|
1,400,000
|
0.42
|
Exercised
|
(975,000)
|
0.05
|
—
|
—
|
Expired
|
(5,375,000)
|
0.13
|
—
|
—
|
Outstanding,
end of period
|
35,501,411
|
$0.33
|
37,076,413
|
$0.31
|
F-19
Warrants
outstanding and exercisable by price range as of December 31, 2017
were as follows:
Outstanding Warrants
|
|
Exercisable Warrants
|
||
Range
|
Number
|
Average
Weighted
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
$0.10
|
265,000
|
4.54
|
265,000
|
$0.10
|
$0.12
|
7,500,000
|
3.28
|
7,500,000
|
$0.12
|
$0.15
|
250,000
|
0.01
|
250,000
|
$0.15
|
$0.17
|
10,000
|
4.82
|
10,000
|
$0.17
|
$0.26
|
100,000
|
0.49
|
100,000
|
$0.26
|
$0.27
|
250,000
|
4.00
|
250,000
|
$0.27
|
$0.29
|
10,125,613
|
2.80
|
10,125,613
|
$0.29
|
$0.30
|
11,925,800
|
0.75
|
11,925,800
|
$0.30
|
$0.32
|
250,000
|
3.75
|
250,000
|
$0.32
|
$0.33
|
75,000
|
0.75
|
75,000
|
$0.33
|
$0.42
|
250,000
|
3.50
|
250,000
|
$0.42
|
$0.50
|
325,000
|
2.57
|
325,000
|
$0.50
|
$0.55
|
100,000
|
3.08
|
100,000
|
$0.55
|
$0.62
|
75,000
|
0.55
|
75,000
|
$0.62
|
$0.69
|
999,998
|
2.21
|
999,998
|
$0.69
|
$1.00
|
3,000,000
|
2.34
|
3,000,000
|
$1.00
|
|
35,501,411
|
2.15
|
35,501,411
|
$0.33
|
NOTE 8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In May
2017, we entered into an agreement with 41 North International LLC
to provide consulting services in the areas of sales management and
business development. The term of the agreement is for six
months and provides for automatic monthly renewals. Either party
can terminate the agreement after 6 months with 30 days written
notice. The agreement provides for a $20,000 monthly fee as
an advance against commissions. No sales or commissions
were made under the consulting agreement in 2017. Mr.
Ainsworth is a principal of 41 North International, LLC and
director of the Company. The agreement was terminated on October
31, 2017.
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments
In
September 2014, we entered into a lease agreement for office and
warehouse space in Frederick, Maryland. As part of the lease
agreement, we received a rent holiday in the first 5 months of the
lease. The lease also provides for an escalation clause pursuant to
which the Company will be subject to an annual rent increase of 3%,
year over year. The lease expired on January 31, 2018 and is
currently on a month to month basis. The Company accounts for the
lease using the straight-line method and recorded $45,709 in rent
expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Approximate
minimum annual rents under the lease are as follows:
Period Ending
January 31,
|
Amount
|
2018
|
$4,000
|
|
$4,000
|
Legal Contingencies
We may become a party to litigation in the normal
course of business. In the opinion of management, there
are no legal matters involving us that would have a material
adverse effect upon our financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows. In addition, from time to time, we may have
to file claims against parties that infringe on our intellectual
property.
F-20
Product Liability
As
of December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there were no claims
against us for product liability.
NOTE 10. CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS
Manufacturing Agreement
In November 2016, we entered into a new manufacturing and
development agreement with RG Group Inc. The agreement does not
provide for any minimum purchase commitments and is for a term of
two years with provisions to extend. The agreement also provides
for a warranty against product defects for one year from the sale
to the end user.
As of December 31, 2017
and 2016, balances due to RG Group, Inc. accounted for
approximately 45% and 31% of total accounts payable,
respectively. At December 31, 2017
and 2016, we maintained required deposits with RG Group, Inc. in
the amounts of $0 and $147,010,
respectively. For the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, RG
Group, Inc. accounted for 73% and 78% of cost of goods sold,
respectively.
Agreements with Directors
In
March 2017, we increased the annual board fee to directors to
$30,000, to be paid on a quarterly basis, with the exception of the
audit committee chairperson, whose annual fee we increased to
$35,000, also to be paid on a quarterly basis. In addition, we
issued to each of our four board members 50,000 shares of common
stock in April 2017. The 200,000 shares of common stock were valued
at $32,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017.
In
December 2017, we increased the annual board fee to directors to
$40,000 in cash, to be paid on a quarterly basis, with the
exception of the audit committee chairperson, whose annual fee we
increased to $45,000, also to be paid on a quarterly basis. The
board fee also includes the issuance of 75,000 shares of common
stock on an annual basis.
At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our
shareholders elected Mr. Ronald E. Ainsworth to our board of
directors, to serve as a Class I director. The term of his
service as director commenced on July 7, 2017 and will expire at
our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, unless Mr. Ainsworth
sooner resigns or is removed. In his capacity as a director, Mr.
Ainsworth is entitled to an annual fee in the amount of $30,000
paid on a quarterly basis and the grant of 50,000 shares of our
common stock. Mr. Ainsworth is a principal in 41 North
International, LLC (see Note 8). The agreement with 41 North was
terminated on October 31, 2017.
Other Agreements
In June
2015, we launched the TOMI Service Network (“TSN”). The
TSN is a national service network composed of existing full service
restoration industry specialists that have entered into licensing
agreements with us to become Primary Service Providers
(“PSP’s”). The licensing agreements grant
protected territories to PSP’s to perform services using our
SteraMist™ platform of
products and also provide for potential job referrals to
PSP’s whereby we are entitled to referral fees. Additionally,
the agreement provides for commissions due to PSP’s for
equipment and solution sales they facilitate to other service
providers in their respective territories. As part of these
agreements, we are obligated to provide to the PSP’s various
training, ongoing support and facilitate a referral network call
center. As of December 31, 2017, we had entered into 69 licensing
agreements in connection with the launch of the TSN. The licensing
agreements contain fixed price minimum equipment and solution
orders based on the population of the territories granted pursuant
to the licensing agreements. The nature and
terms of our TSN agreements may represent multiple deliverable
arrangements. Each of the deliverables in these arrangements
typically represent a separate unit of
accounting.
In May
2015, we were awarded a grant by the United States Agency for
International Development (“USAID”) in the amount of
$559,000 for the development of SteraMist™ Mobile Decontamination Chambers to
fight the Ebola epidemic. The grant is based on milestones set
forth in the agreement between the Company and USAID. In May 2016,
we completed the USAID grant by completing the sixth and final
milestone and received gross proceeds in the amount of $559,003
during the period of the agreement. The Company incurred costs in
connection with the grant through December 31, 2016 in the amount
of $359,112. The proceeds received as part of the grant in excess
of the costs incurred has been presented on our statement of
operations in the amount of $199,891 for the year ended December
31, 2016.
F-21
NOTE 11. INCOME TAXES
The Company’s income tax expense consisted of:
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Current:
|
|
|
United
States
|
$-
|
$-
|
Foreign
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
-
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
United
States
|
-
|
-
|
Foreign
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$-
|
$-
|
The Company’s net income (loss) before income tax consisted
of:
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
United
States
|
$(3,639,814)
|
$(3,157,259)
|
Foreign
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$(3,639,814)
|
$(3,157,259)
|
Our
income tax expense differed from the amounts computed by applying
the United States statutory corporate income tax rate for the
following reasons:
On
December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax
Act”) was enacted into law making significant changes to the
Internal Revenue Code. Changes include, but are not limited to, a
federal corporate tax rate decrease from 35% to 21% for tax years
beginning after December 31, 2017, the transition of U.S.
international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a territorial
system and a one-time transition tax on the mandatory deemed
repatriation of foreign earnings. We are required to recognize the
effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment, such as
re-measuring our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities as well
as reassessing the net realizability of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities. The Tax Act did not give rise to any material impact
on the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of
operations due to our historical worldwide loss position and the
full valuation allowance on our net U.S. deferred tax
assets.
In
December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (“SAB 118”), which allows
us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to
extend beyond one year from the enactment date. Since the Tax Act
was enacted late in the fourth quarter of 2017 (and ongoing
guidance and accounting interpretations are expected over the next
12 months), we consider the accounting of deferred tax
re-measurements and other items, such as state tax considerations,
to be incomplete due to the forthcoming guidance and our ongoing
analysis of final year-end data and tax positions. We expect to
complete our analysis within the measurement period in accordance
with SAB 118. We do not expect any subsequent adjustments to
have any material impact on the consolidated balance sheets or
statements of operations due to our historical worldwide loss
position and the full valuation allowance on our net U.S. deferred
tax assets.
F-22
The
reconciliation of taxes at the federal and state statutory rate to
our provision for income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Loss
before income tax
|
$(3,639,814)
|
$(3,157,259)
|
US
statutory corporate income tax rate (federal and
state)
|
39.45%
|
39.45%
|
Income
tax expense computed at US statutory corporate income tax
rate
|
|
|
Income
tax expense computed at US statutory corporate income tax
rate
|
(1,435,907)
|
(1,245,539)
|
Reconciling
items:
|
|
|
Effect
of U.S. tax law change (1)
|
1,793,212
|
|
Change
in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
|
(675,889)
|
1,258,389
|
Provision to prior
year tax return
|
69,767
|
(250,994)
|
Incentive stock
options and warrants
|
256,168
|
242,498
|
Amortized
debt discount
|
2,477
|
-
|
Meals
and Entertainment
|
5,825
|
8,595
|
Other
|
(15,653)
|
(12,949)
|
Income
tax expense
|
$-
|
$-
|
(1)
Due to the Tax Act,
our U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31,
2017 were re-measured from 35% to 21%. The change in tax rate
resulted in a decrease to our gross U.S. deferred tax assets which
is offset by a corresponding decrease to our valuation
allowance.
Components of our
deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are as
follows:
|
December 31,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
Reserve
for Bad Debt
|
$140,000
|
$118,000
|
Inventory
Capitalization
|
94,000
|
152,000
|
Accrued
Vacation
|
31,000
|
8,700
|
Deferred
Rent
|
-
|
3,400
|
Property
and Equipment
|
21,000
|
-
|
Intangible
Assets
|
208,000
|
237,000
|
Net
operating losses
|
3,724,000
|
4,380,000
|
Valuation
Allowance
|
(4,218,000)
|
(4,893,700)
|
Deferred
Tax Assets
|
-
|
5,400
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
|
$-
|
$(5,400)
|
|
|
|
Net
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
|
$-
|
$-
|
Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between
the financial statement reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws
in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The
measurement of deferred income tax assets is reduced, if necessary,
by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits, which are, on a more
likely than not basis, not expected to be realized; in accordance
with ASC guidance for income taxes. As of December 31, 2017, we recorded a
valuation allowance of $4,218,000 for the portion of the deferred
tax assets that we do not expect to be realized. The valuation
allowance on our net deferred taxes decreased by $676,000 during
the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to the
effect of the U.S. tax law changes offset by additional U.S.
deferred tax assets incurred in the current year that cannot be
realized. Management believes that based on the available
information, it is more likely than not that the U.S. deferred tax
assets will not be realized, such that a valuation allowance is
required against U.S. deferred tax assets. The effect on deferred
income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in the period that such tax rate changes are
enacted.
F-23
For
income tax purposes in the United States, we had available federal
net operating loss carryforwards ("NOL") as of December 31, 2017
and 2016 of approximately $13,898,000 and $11,148,000 respectively
to reduce future federal taxable income. For income tax purposes
in the United States, we had available state NOL carryforwards as
of December 31, 2017 and 2016 of approximately $11,506,000 and
$8,756,000 respectively to reduce future state taxable
income. If any of the NOL's are not utilized, they will
expire at various dates through 2037. There may be certain
limitations as to the future annual use of the NOLs due to certain
changes in our ownership.
We
record uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740 on the
basis of a two-step process whereby (1) we determine whether it is
more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on
the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those
tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition
threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is
more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement
with the related tax authority. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,
the management of the Company determined there were no reportable
uncertain tax positions.
NOTE 12. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following
at:
|
||
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Commissions
|
$115,506
|
$172,735
|
Payroll
and related costs
|
43,484
|
40,264
|
Director
fees
|
27,750
|
19,000
|
Accrued
Warranty
|
5,000
|
-
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
75,396
|
46,414
|
Total
|
$267,136
|
$278,413
|
NOTE 13. ACCRUED WARRANTY
Our
manufacturer assumes warranty against product defects for one year
from the sale to customers, which we extend to our customers upon
sale of the product. We assume responsibility for product
reliability and results. The warranty is generally limited to a
refund of the original purchase price of the product or a
replacement part. We estimate warranty costs based on historical
warranty claim experience.
The
following table presents warranty reserve activities
at:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Beginning
accrued warranty costs
|
$-
|
$-
|
Cost of warranty
claims
|
5,731
|
-
|
Settlement of
warranty claims
|
(5,731)
|
-
|
Provision for
product warranty costs
|
5,000
|
-
|
Ending
accrued warranty costs
|
$5,000
|
$-
|
NOTE 14. CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
The
Company had certain customers whose revenue individually
represented 10% of more of the Company’s total revenue, or
whose accounts receivable balances individually represented 10% of
more of the Company’s accounts receivable.
As of December 31, 2017, two customers accounted for 24% of
accounts receivable. Two customers accounted for 22% of net
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017
As of December 31, 2016, one customer accounted for 10% of accounts
receivable. One customer accounted for 10% of net revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2016
F-24
NOTE 15. LITIGATION SETTLEMENT
In July
2017, we settled our litigation with Astro Pak Corporation
(“Astro Pak”) relating to our patents and intellectual
property rights. Astro Pak has agreed
that we are the sole owner of ionized hydrogen peroxide
decontamination and sterilization technology, patents, and
products, which we market under the brands Binary Ionization
Technology® (BIT™) and SteraMist™. We sued Astro
Pak and its wholly owned subsidiary SixLog Corporation
(“SixLog”) in California federal court for infringing
our United States Patent Nos. 6,969,487 and 7,008,592 and violating
our intellectual property rights by, among other things, indicating
that our technology and patents were proprietary to SixLog and
marketing our patented equipment with SixLog labels. Astro Pak and
SixLog agreed to cease this conduct and pay us a cash settlement.
Astro Pak also agreed to assign its iHP mark to us, complementing
our existing trademark and trade name protection. Finally, Astro
Pak and SixLog agreed to remove from the web or take steps to
remove any assertions or suggestions that they own or developed
ionized hydrogen peroxide technology or patents, or that they
provide any ionized hydrogen peroxide products or
services.
NOTE 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We have
evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial
statements were issued and up to the time of filing of the
financial statements with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Effective
January 1, 2018, we appointed Elissa J. Shane as Chief Operating
Officer. . Pursuant to her employment agreement, Ms. Shane will
receive an annual base salary of at least $200,000, subject to
annual review and discretionary increase by the Compensation
Committee of the Board. Ms. Shane is eligible to receive an annual
cash bonus and other annual incentive compensation, and the
agreement provides that we will issue Ms. Shane annually an option
to purchase at least 250,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the
2016 Plan. Additionally, in connection with the execution of her
employment agreement, on January 5, 2018, we issued Ms. Shane an
option under the 2016 Plan to purchase 100,000 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $0.12 per share. Her employment
agreement also provides that we will reimburse Ms. Shane for
reasonable and necessary business and entertainment expenses that
she incurs in performing her duties. During the term of her
employment, Ms. Shane will also be entitled to up to four weeks of
paid vacation time annually, which will accrue up to six weeks, and
to participate in our benefit plans and programs, including but not
limited to all group health, life, disability and retirement plans.
Ms. Shane is also entitled to the sum of $750 per month as a
vehicle allowance. The initial term of her employment agreement is
three years, which may be automatically extended for successive
one-year terms, unless either party provides the other with 120
days’ prior written notice of its intent to terminate the
agreement.
On
January 29, 2018 Dr. Boh Soon Lim was elected to our Board of
Directors. His term is up to three years depending upon the
assigned class of directors and thereafter for three years upon
reelection, unless prematurely concluded by mutual consent, or
otherwise as provided.
In February and March 2018, the maturity date of
the convertible promissory notes was extended. The maturity date
for $5,300,000 of principal on the convertible promissory notes was extended to April 1, 2019 and
the maturity date on $700,000 in principal of the convertible
promissory notes was extended to June 8, 2019. (See Note
6)
F-25