TOMI Environmental Solutions, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 September (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark
One)
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017
or
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from _____ to _____
Commission
File Number 000-09908
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
Florida
|
59-1947988
|
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
|
|
9454
Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse, Beverly Hills, CA 90212
|
|
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
|
|
|
|
(800)
525-1698
|
|
|
|
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
|
|
|
Not
Applicable
|
|
|
|
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer
[ ]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company [X]
|
|
Emerging
growth company [ ]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of
November 9, 2017, the registrant had 122,049,958 shares of common
stock outstanding.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2017
|
||
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
4
|
|
|
|
Item
1
|
Financial
Statements.
|
4
|
|
|
|
Item
2
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item
3
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
34
|
|
|
|
Item
4
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
34
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
35
|
|
|
|
Item
1
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
35
|
|
|
|
Item
1A
|
Risk
Factors.
|
35
|
|
|
|
Item
2
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
35
|
|
|
|
Item
3
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
35
|
|
|
|
Item
4
|
Mine
Safety Disclosures.
|
35
|
|
|
|
Item
5
|
Other
Information.
|
35
|
|
|
|
Item
6
|
Exhibits.
|
35
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
37
|
2
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this
“Form 10-Q”) contains forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), and we intend that such forward looking statements be
subject to the safe harbors created thereby. For this purpose, any
statements contained in this Form 10-Q, except for historical information, may be deemed
forward-looking statements. You can
generally identify forward-looking statements as statements
containing the words “will,” “would,”
“believe,” “expect,” “estimate,”
“anticipate,” “intend,”
“estimate,”
“assume,” “can,” “could,”
“plan,” “predict,” “should” or
the negative or other variations thereof or comparable terminology
are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
In addition, any statements that refer
to projections of our future financial performance, trends in our
businesses, or other characterizations of future events or
circumstances are forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations
of our management based on available information and involve a
number of risks and uncertainties, all of which are difficult or impossible to
predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. As
such, our actual results could
differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a
result of various factors, some of which are listed under the
section “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report
on Form 10-K. Readers should carefully review these risks, as well
as the additional risks described in other documents we file from
time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In light
of the significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the
forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such
information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any
other person that such results will be achieved, and readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking information.
Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise
the forward-looking statements
contained herein to reflect events or
circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events.
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
September
30,
2017
(Unaudited)
|
December
31,
2016
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
$5,270,313
|
$948,324
|
Accounts Receivable
- net
|
1,603,481
|
1,521,378
|
Inventories (Note
3)
|
4,420,448
|
4,047,310
|
Deposits on
Merchandise (Note 10)
|
-
|
147,010
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
278,701
|
104,448
|
Total
Current Assets
|
11,572,942
|
6,768,469
|
|
|
|
Property and
Equipment - net (Note 4)
|
653,656
|
611,807
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets:
|
|
|
Intangible Assets -
net (Note 5)
|
1,640,909
|
1,918,040
|
Security
Deposits
|
4,700
|
4,700
|
Total
Other Assets
|
1,645,609
|
1,922,740
|
Total
Assets
|
$13,872,207
|
$9,303,016
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
$1,349,648
|
$735,879
|
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities (Note 11)
|
227,058
|
278,413
|
Accrued
Interest (Note 6)
|
20,000
|
-
|
Customer
Deposits
|
7,487
|
30,120
|
Deferred
Rent
|
2,721
|
8,541
|
Convertible
Notes Payable, net of discount of $54,730
|
||
at
September 30, 2017 (Note 6)
|
5,245,270
|
-
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
6,852,185
|
1,052,953
|
|
|
|
Convertible
Notes Payable, net of discount of $4,592 at September 30, 2017
(Note 6)
|
695,408
|
-
|
Total
Long-term Liabilities
|
695,408
|
-
|
Total
Liabilities
|
7,547,593
|
1,052,953
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity:
|
|
|
Cumulative
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock;
|
||
par value
$0.01, 1,000,000 shares authorized; 510,000 shares
issued
|
||
and outstanding at
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
5,100
|
5,100
|
Cumulative
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock; $1,000 stated
value;
|
||
7.5% Cumulative
dividend; 4,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
||
and outstanding at
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
|
-
|
-
|
Common stock;
par value $0.01, 200,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||
122,049,958 and
120,825,134 shares issued and outstanding
|
||
at September 30,
2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
|
1,220,499
|
1,208,251
|
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
41,726,260
|
41,367,946
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
(36,627,244)
|
(34,331,234)
|
Total
Shareholders’ Equity
|
6,324,615
|
8,250,063
|
Total Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$13,872,207
|
$9,303,016
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
|
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Three Months
Ended
|
Nine Months
Ended
|
||
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales,
net
|
$1,030,095
|
$1,092,332
|
$3,508,748
|
$4,527,840
|
Cost
of Sales
|
389,170
|
431,621
|
1,318,021
|
1,886,193
|
Gross
Profit
|
640,925
|
660,711
|
2,190,727
|
2,641,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Professional
Fees
|
72,197
|
101,428
|
738,918
|
374,609
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
145,760
|
148,347
|
453,834
|
427,377
|
Selling
Expenses
|
319,807
|
283,515
|
870,287
|
1,153,178
|
Research
and Development
|
79,747
|
92,847
|
128,512
|
120,345
|
Equity
Compensation Expense (Note 7)
|
(20,597)
|
85,322
|
223,300
|
542,291
|
Consulting
Fees
|
63,293
|
49,734
|
180,405
|
280,795
|
General
and Administrative
|
696,028
|
834,872
|
2,078,252
|
2,506,456
|
Other
|
(319,388)
|
-
|
(319,388)
|
-
|
Total Operating
Expenses
|
1,036,848
|
1,596,064
|
4,354,121
|
5,405,051
|
Loss from
Operations
|
(395,923)
|
(935,353)
|
(2,163,394)
|
(2,763,404)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
(Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of Debt Discounts
|
(1,688)
|
-
|
(2,582)
|
-
|
Gain
on Disposition of Property and Equipment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12,000
|
Grant
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
202,451
|
InterestIncome
|
585
|
-
|
1,221
|
-
|
Interest
Expense
|
(60,000)
|
-
|
(131,256)
|
-
|
Total Other Income
(Expense)
|
(61,103)
|
-
|
(132,617)
|
214,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
$(457,025)
|
$(935,353)
|
$(2,296,010)
|
$(2,548,953)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Per Common
Share
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and Diluted
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.01)
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.02)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
|
121,567,328
|
120,763,449
|
121,144,339
|
120,467,106
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
5
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
|
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Series A
Preferred
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
Paid
in
Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
|
Balance at
December 31, 2016
|
510,000
|
$5,100
|
120,825,134
|
$1,208,251
|
$41,367,946
|
$(34,331,234)
|
$8,250,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity based
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
221,808
|
|
221,808
|
Common stock
issued for services provided
|
|
|
249,824
|
2,498
|
35,602
|
|
38,100
|
Warrants
exercised
|
|
|
975,000
|
9,750
|
39,000
|
|
48,750
|
Warrants
issued as part of debt private placement
|
|
|
|
|
61,904
|
|
61,904
|
Net Loss for
the nine months ended September 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,296,010)
|
(2,296,010)
|
Balance at
September 30, 2017
|
510,000
|
$5,100
|
122,049,958
|
$1,220,499
|
$41,726,260
|
$(36,627,244)
|
$6,324,615
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
6
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Cash
Flow From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
$(2,296,010)
|
$(2,548,952)
|
Adjustments
to Reconcile Net Loss to
|
|
|
Net
Cash Used In Operating Activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
453,834
|
427,377
|
Amortization
of Debt Discount
|
2,582
|
-
|
Equity
Based Compensation
|
221,808
|
542,291
|
Value
of Equity Issued for Services
|
38,100
|
369,653
|
Reserve
for Bad Debts
|
100,000
|
155,000
|
Gain
on Disposition of Property and Equipment
|
-
|
(12,000)
|
Changes
in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
Decrease
(Increase) in:
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
(182,103)
|
(27,323)
|
Inventory
|
(583,291)
|
(3,162,771)
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
(174,253)
|
(55,421)
|
Deposits
on Merchandise
|
147,010
|
273,628
|
Increase
(Decrease) in:
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
613,769
|
82,952
|
Accrued
Expenses
|
(51,355)
|
(7,484)
|
Accrued
Interest
|
20,000
|
-
|
Deferred
Rent
|
(5,820)
|
(4,653)
|
Advances
on Grant
|
-
|
(210,503)
|
Customer
Deposits
|
(22,632)
|
(1,339)
|
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
|
(1,718,362)
|
(4,179,544)
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flow From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
Purchase
of Property and Equipment
|
(8,398)
|
(460,540)
|
Proceeds
on Disposition of Property and Equipment
|
-
|
12,000
|
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(8,398)
|
(448,540)
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
7
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS –
CONTINUED
|
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Cash
Flow From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
Proceeds
from Exercise of Warrants
|
48,750
|
-
|
Proceeds
from Convertible Notes
|
6,000,000
|
-
|
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
6,048,750
|
-
|
Increase
(Decrease) In Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
4,321,989
|
(4,628,084)
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents - Beginning
|
948,324
|
5,916,068
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents – Ending
|
$5,270,313
|
$1,287,984
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
Cash
Paid For Interest
|
$111,256
|
$-
|
Cash
Paid for Income Taxes
|
$800
|
$800
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash
Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
Establishment
of discount on convertible debt
|
$61,904
|
$-
|
Reclassification
of demo equipment from
|
|
|
inventory
to property and equipment
|
$210,154
|
$-
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
8
TOMI ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
TOMI
Environmental Solutions, Inc. (“TOMI”, the
“Company”, “we”, “our” and
“us”) is a global provider of infection prevention and
decontamination products and services, focused primarily on life
sciences including healthcare, bio-safety, pharmaceutical,
clean-room and research.
TOMI
provides environmental solutions for indoor and outdoor surface
decontamination through the sale of equipment, services and
licensing of its SteraMist™ Binary
Ionization Technology® (“BIT™”), which
is a hydrogen peroxide-based mist and fog registered with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). TOMI’s
mission is to help its customers create a healthier world through
its product line and its motto is “innovating for a safer
world” for healthcare and life.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The
interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
included herein, presented in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles utilized in the United States of America
(“GAAP”), and stated in U.S. dollars, have been
prepared by the Company, without an audit, pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not
misleading.
These
financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are
necessary for fair presentation of the information contained
therein. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial
statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2016 and
notes thereto which are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
previously filed with the SEC on March 29, 2017. The Company
follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim
reports. The results of operations for the interim periods covered
by this Form 10-Q may not necessarily be indicative of results of
operations for the full fiscal year or any other interim
period.
Principles of Consolidation
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of TOMI and its wholly-owned subsidiary, TOMI
Environmental Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassification of Accounts
Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior-year comparative
financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported
results of operations or financial position.
Use of Estimates
The
preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from
these estimates. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates,
including those related to accounts receivable, inventory, fair
values of financial instruments, intangible assets, useful lives of
intangible assets and property and equipment, fair values of
stock-based awards, income taxes, and contingent liabilities, among
others. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of our assets and liabilities.
9
Fair Value Measurements
The
authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair
value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal
market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to
transact, and (iv) willing to transact. The guidance describes a
fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that
may be used to measure fair value, which are the
following:
Level
1:
|
Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
|
Level
2:
|
Inputs
other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or corroborated by observable market
data or substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
|
Level
3:
|
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the value of the assets or
liabilities.
|
Our
financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and convertible
debt. All these items were determined to be Level 1 fair value
measurements.
The
carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value
because of the short maturity of these instruments. The recorded
value of convertible debt approximates its fair value as the terms
and rates approximate market rates (See Note 6).
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash
and cash equivalents includes cash on hand held at financial
institutions and other liquid investments with original maturities
of three months or less. At times, these deposits may be in excess
of insured limits.
Accounts Receivable
Our
accounts receivable are typically from credit worthy customers or,
for certain international customers, are supported by pre-payments.
For those customers to whom we extend credit, we perform periodic
evaluations of them and maintain allowances for potential credit
losses as deemed necessary. We have a policy of reserving for
doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of
potential credit losses in existing accounts receivable. We
periodically review our accounts receivable to determine whether an
allowance is necessary based on an analysis of past due accounts
and other factors that may indicate that the realization of an
account may be in doubt. Account balances deemed to be
uncollectible are charged to the allowance after all means of
collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is
considered remote. Bad debt expense for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $103,000 and $164,000,
respectively. Bad debt expense for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2016 was approximately $50,000 and $155,000,
respectively.
At
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the allowance for
doubtful accounts was $400,000 and $300,000,
respectively.
As of September 30, 2017, one customer accounted for 13% of
accounts receivable. Three customers accounted for 39% of net
revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and two
customers accounted for 24% of net revenue for the nine months
ended September 30, 2017.
As of December 31, 2016, one customer accounted
for 10% of accounts receivable. Three customers accounted for 32%
of net revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and
two customers accounted for 26% of net revenue for the nine months
ended September 30, 2016.
Inventories
Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method. Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and
raw materials. At September 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, we did not have a reserve for slow-moving or
obsolete inventory.
10
Deposits on Merchandise
Deposits on merchandise primarily consist of
amounts paid in advance of the receipt of inventory
(see Note
10).
Property and Equipment
We
account for property and equipment at cost less accumulated
depreciation. We compute depreciation using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally
three to five years. Depreciation for equipment, furniture and
fixtures and vehicles commences once placed in service for its
intended use. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases or
service lives of the improvements, whichever is
shorter.
Accounts Payable
As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, two vendors
accounted for approximately 74% and 49% of total accounts payable,
respectively.
For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2017, one vendor accounted for 72% and
69% of cost of goods sold, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2016, one vendor accounted for 63% and 76% of cost of goods sold,
respectively.
Accrued Warranties
Accrued warranties represent the estimated costs,
if any, that will be incurred during the warranty period of our
products. We make an estimate of expected costs that will be
incurred by us during the warranty period and charge that expense
to the consolidated statement of operations at the date of sale.
Our manufacturer assumes warranty against product defects for one
year, which we extend to our
customers upon sale of the product. We assume responsibility for
product reliability and results. As of September 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2016, the Company did not establish a warranty
reserve.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between
the financial statement reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws
in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The
measurement of deferred income tax assets is reduced, if necessary,
by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits that are, on a more
likely than not basis, not expected to be realized in accordance
with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) guidance
for income taxes. Net deferred tax benefits have been fully
reserved at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The effect on
deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in the period that such tax rate changes are
enacted.
Loss Per Share
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing the Company’s net loss
by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period presented. Diluted loss per share is
based on the treasury stock method and includes the effect from
potential issuance of shares of common stock, such as shares
issuable pursuant to the exercise of options and warrants and
conversions of preferred stock or debentures.
Potentially
dilutive securities as of September 30, 2017 consisted of
11,111,100 shares of common stock from convertible debentures,
35,691,411 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding warrants, 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon
outstanding options and 510,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon conversion of outstanding shares of Preferred A stock
(“Convertible Series A Preferred Stock”). Diluted and
basic weighted average shares are the same, as potentially dilutive
shares are anti-dilutive.
Potentially
dilutive securities as of September 30, 2016, consisted of
36,826,413 shares of common stock from outstanding warrants,
200,000 shares of common stock from options and 510,000 shares of
common stock from Convertible Series A Preferred Stock. Diluted and
basic weighted average shares are the same, as potentially dilutive
shares are anti-dilutive.
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares
assumed to be outstanding during the period of computation. Diluted
loss per share is computed similarly to basic loss per share except
that the denominator is increased to include the number of
additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the
potential shares had been issued and if the additional common
shares were dilutive. Options, warrants, preferred stock and shares
associated with the conversion of debt to purchase approximately
47.5 million and 37.5 shares of common stock were outstanding at
September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, but were excluded from
the computation of diluted loss per share due to the anti-dilutive
effect on net loss per share.
11
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(457,025)
|
$(935,353)
|
Adjustments
for convertible debt - as converted
|
|
|
Interest
on convertible debt
|
60,000
|
-
|
Amortization
of debt discount on convertible debt
|
1,688
|
-
|
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders
|
$(395,337)
|
$(935,353)
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
121,567,328
|
120,763,449
|
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders per share:
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.01)
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(2,296,010)
|
$(2,548,953)
|
Adjustments
for convertible debt - as converted
|
|
|
Interest
on convertible debt
|
131,256
|
-
|
Amortization
of debt discount on convertible debt
|
2,582
|
-
|
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders
|
$(2,162,172)
|
$(2,548,953)
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
121,144,339
|
120,467,106
|
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders per share:
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.02)
|
Revenue Recognition
Revenue
is recognized when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists; (2) service has been rendered or delivery has occurred; (3)
the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability
is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are
based on management’s judgment regarding the fixed nature of
the selling prices of the services rendered or products delivered
and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts
to customers, and allowance, and other adjustments will be provided
for in the same period the related sales are recorded.
Stock-Based Compensation
We
account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), ASC 718,
“Compensation—Stock Compensation.” Under the
provisions of FASB ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is
estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value
and is recognized as expense over the requisite service
period.
On July
7, 2017, our shareholders approved the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan
(the “2016 Plan”). The 2016 Plan authorizes the grant
of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units and performance units/shares. Up to
5,000,000 shares of common stock are authorized for issuance under
the 2016 Plan. Shares issued under the 2016 Plan may be either
authorized but unissued shares, treasury shares, or any combination
thereof. Provisions in the 2016 Plan permit the reuse or reissuance
by the 2016 Plan of shares of common stock for numerous reasons,
including, but not limited to, shares of common stock underlying
canceled, expired, or forfeited awards of stock-based compensation
and stock appreciation rights paid out in the form of cash.
Stock-based compensation will typically be awarded in consideration
for the future performance of services to us. All recipients of
awards under the 2016 Plan are required to enter into award
agreements with the Company at the time of the award; awards under
the 2016 Plan are expressly conditioned upon such agreements. For
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued options to
purchase 100,000 shares of common stock out of the 2016 Plan. In
addition, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company
issued 200,000 shares of common stock out of the 2016
Plan.
12
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject us to significant
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents. We maintain cash balances at financial institutions
which exceed the current Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
limit of $250,000 at times during the year.
Long-Lived Assets Including Acquired Intangible Assets
We
assess long-lived assets for potential impairments at the end of
each year, or during the year if an event or other circumstance
indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of
the asset. In evaluating long-lived assets for impairment, we
measure recoverability of these assets by comparing the carrying
amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are
expected to generate. If our long-lived assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market
value. We base the calculations of the estimated fair value of our
long-lived assets on the income approach. For the income approach,
we use an internally developed discounted cash flow model that
includes, among others, the following assumptions: projections of
revenues and expenses and related cash flows based on assumed
long-term growth rates and demand trends; expected future
investments to grow new units; and estimated discount rates. We
base these assumptions on our historical data and experience,
industry projections, micro and macro general economic condition
projections, and our expectations. We had no long-lived asset
impairment charges for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2017 and 2016.
Advertising and Promotional Expenses
We
expense advertising costs in the period in which they are incurred.
Advertising and promotional expenses for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2017, were approximately $11,000 and $39,000,
respectively. Advertising and promotional expenses for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2016, were approximately
$22,000 and $109,000, respectively
Research and Development Expenses
We expense research and
development expenses in the period in which they are
incurred. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2017, research and development expenses were approximately $80,000
and $129,000, respectively. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2016, research and development expenses were
approximately $93,000 and $120,000, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Costs
We include shipping and
handling costs relating to the delivery of products directly from
vendors to the Company in cost of sales. Other shipping and
handling costs, including third-party
delivery costs relating to the delivery of products to customers,
are classified as a general and administrative expense.
Shipping and handling costs included
in general and administrative expense were approximately $32,000
and $84,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,
respectively. Shipping and handling costs included in general and
administrative expense were approximately $33,000 and $105,000 for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016,
respectively.
Business Segments
We
currently have one reportable business segment due to the fact that
we derive our revenue primarily from one product. A breakdown of
revenue is shown below:
13
Net Revenue
Product and Service Revenue
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
SteraMist
Product
|
$792,000
|
$850,000
|
Service
& Training
|
238,000
|
242,000
|
Total
|
$1,030,000
|
$1,092,000
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
SteraMist
Product
|
$2,713,000
|
$3,984,000
|
Service
& Training
|
796,000
|
544,000
|
Total
|
$3,509,000
|
$4,528,000
|
Revenue by Geographic Region
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
United
States
|
$755,000
|
$747,000
|
International
|
275,000
|
345,000
|
Total
|
$1,030,000
|
$1,092,000
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
United
States
|
$2,497,000
|
$3,010,000
|
International
|
1,012,000
|
1,518,000
|
Total
|
$3,509,000
|
$4,528,000
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May
2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU
2014-09) “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606).” ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition
requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)”, and
requires entities to recognize revenue when it transfers promised
goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017,
including interim periods within that reporting period.
We are
currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption
of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2016, the
FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 (ASU 2016-02)
“Leases (Topic
842).” ASU 2016-02 provides new lease accounting
guidance. ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim
periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is
permitted. We are currently in the process of evaluating the
impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-09 (ASU 2016-09) “Compensation – Stock
Compensation (Topic 718).” ASU 2016-09 provides
improvements to employee share-based payment accounting. ASU
2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that
reporting period.
14
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.
2017-04, Simplifying the Test for
Goodwill Impairment, to
simplify the test for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2. An entity will, therefore,
perform the goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of
a reporting unit with its carrying amount, recognizing an impairment charge for the amount
by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, not to exceed
the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity still has the option to
perform a qualitative assessment to determine if the quantitative
impairment test is necessary. The ASU is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or
annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after
January 1, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is prospective. We have not
yet selected an adoption date, and the ASU will have a currently
undetermined impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In May
2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Scope Of Modification Accounting, to
provide guidance on which changes to the terms or conditions of
a share-based payment
award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The ASU
is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
with early adoption permitted. Adoption of the ASU is prospective.
We are currently obtaining an understanding of the ASU and plan to
adopt the ASU on January 1, 2018.
NOTE 3. INVENTORIES
Inventories
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
September
30,
2017
(Unaudited)
|
December
31,
2016
|
Raw
materials
|
$573
|
$13,031
|
Finished
goods
|
4,419,875
|
4,034,279
|
|
$4,420,448
|
$4,047,310
|
NOTE 4. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consists of the following:
|
September
30,
2017
(Unaudited)
|
December
31,
2016
|
Furniture and
fixtures
|
$91,216
|
|
Equipment
|
1,145,531
|
926,979
|
Vehicles
|
56,410
|
56,410
|
Software
|
39,999
|
39,999
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
15,554
|
15,554
|
|
1,348,710
|
1,130,158
|
Less: Accumulated
depreciation
|
695,054
|
518,350
|
|
$653,656
|
$611,808
|
For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, depreciation was
$53,383 and $176,703, respectively. For the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2016, depreciation was $55,970 and $150,246,
respectively.
NOTE 5. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets
consist of patents and trademarks related to our Binary Ionization
Technology. We amortize the patents over the estimated remaining
lives of the related patents. The trademarks have an indefinite
life. Amortization expense was $92,377 and $277,131 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
15
Definite life
intangible assets consist of the following:
|
September
30,
2017
(Unaudited)
|
December
31,
2016
|
|
|
|
Intellectual
Property and Patents
|
$2,848,300
|
$2,848,300
|
Less: Accumulated
Amortization
|
1,647,391
|
1,370,260
|
Intangible Assets,
net
|
$1,200,909
|
$1,478,040
|
Indefinite life
intangible assets consist of the following:
Trademarks
|
$440,000
|
$440,000
|
Total Intangible
Assets, net
|
$1,640,909
|
$1,918,040
|
Approximate
amortization over the next five years is as follows:
Twelve Month
Period Ending September 30,
|
Amount
|
|
|
2018
|
$370,000
|
2019
|
370,000
|
2020
|
370,000
|
2021
|
91,000
|
2022
|
$-
|
|
1,201,000
|
NOTE 6. CONVERTIBLE DEBT
In
March and May 2017, the Company closed a private placement
transaction in which it issued to certain accredited investors
unregistered senior callable convertible promissory notes (the
“Notes”) and three-year warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 999,998 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$0.69 per share in exchange for aggregate gross proceeds of
$6,000,000. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 4% per annum.
$5,300,000 in principal matures on August 31, 2018 and $700,000 in
principal matures on November 8, 2018, unless earlier redeemed,
repurchased or converted. The Notes are convertible at the option
of the holder into common stock at a conversion price of $0.54 per
share. Subsequent to September 1, 2017, we may redeem the Notes
that are scheduled to mature on August 31, 2018 at any time prior
to maturity at a price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal
amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest as of the redemption date. Prior to November 8,
2018, we may redeem the Notes that are scheduled to mature on such
date at any time prior to maturity at a price equal to 100% of the
outstanding principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus
accrued and unpaid interest as of the redemption date. Interest on
the Notes is payable semi-annually in cash on February 28 and
August 31 of each year, beginning on August 31, 2017. Interest
expense related to the Notes for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017 was $60,000 and $131,256,
respectively.
The
warrants were valued at $62,559 using the Black-Scholes pricing
model with the following assumptions: expected volatility: 104.06%
-111.54%; expected dividend: $0; expected term: 3 years; and risk
free rate: 1.49% - 1.59%. The estimated fair value of the warrants
was calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Company
recorded the warrants’ relative fair value of $61,904 as an
increase to additional paid-in capital and a discount against the
related debt.
The
debt discount is being amortized over the life of the Notes using
the effective interest method. Amortization expense for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $1,688 and $2,582,
respectively.
16
Convertible notes
consist of the following at September 30, 2017:
Current:
|
September
30,
2017
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Convertible
notes
|
$5,300,000
|
Initial
discount
|
(57,106)
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
2,376
|
Convertible notes,
net
|
$5,245,270
|
Long-term:
|
September
30,
2017
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Convertible
notes
|
$700,000
|
Initial
discount
|
(4,798)
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
206
|
Convertible notes,
net
|
$695,408
|
NOTE 7. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Our
board of directors may, without further action by our shareholders,
from time to time, direct the issuance of any authorized but
unissued or unreserved shares of preferred stock in series and at
the time of issuance, determine the rights, preferences and
limitations of each series. The holders of such preferred stock may
be entitled to receive a preference payment in the event of any
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of the Company before any
payment is made to the holders of our common stock. Furthermore,
the board of directors could issue preferred stock with voting and
other rights that could adversely affect the voting power of the
holders of our common stock.
Convertible Series A Preferred Stock
Our
authorized Convertible Series A Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value,
consists of 1,000,000 shares. At September 30, 2017 and December
31, 2016, there were 510,000 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively. The Convertible Series A Preferred Stock is
convertible at the rate of one share of common stock for one share
of Convertible Series A Preferred Stock.
Convertible Series B Preferred Stock
Our
authorized Convertible Series B Preferred Stock, $1,000 stated
value, 7.5% Cumulative dividend, consists of 4,000 shares. At
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no shares
issued and outstanding, respectively. Each share of Convertible
Series B Preferred Stock may be converted (at the holder’s
election) into two hundred shares of our common stock.
Common Stock
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company issued
761,954 shares of common stock valued at $369,654 for professional
services rendered.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company issued
249,824 shares of common stock valued at $38,100 for professional
services rendered, of which the Company issued 200,000 shares that
were valued at $32,000 and issued to our board of directors (See
Note 10).
In
August 2017, warrants to purchase 375,000 and 600,000 shares of
common stock were exercised, which resulted in gross proceeds to
the Company of $18,750 and $30,000, respectively.
17
Stock Options
In
February 2016, we issued options to purchase an aggregate of
100,000 shares of common stock to four directors, valued at $54,980
in total. The options have an exercise price of $0.55 per share and
expire in February 2026. The options were valued using the
Black-Scholes model using the following assumptions: volatility:
224%; dividend yield: 0%; zero coupon rate: 1.47%; and a life of 10
years.
The
following table summarizes stock options outstanding as of
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
September 30,
2017
(Unaudited)
|
December 31,
2016
|
||
|
Number of Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Number of Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
200,000
|
$0.76
|
100,000
|
$0.96
|
Granted
|
—
|
—
|
100,000
|
0.55
|
Exercised
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Outstanding,
end of period
|
200,000
|
$0.76
|
200,000
|
$0.76
|
Options
outstanding and exercisable by price range as of September 30, 2017
were as follows:
Outstanding
Options
|
Average
Weighted
|
Exercisable
Options
|
||
Range
|
Number
|
Remaining
Contractual
Life in
Years
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.10
|
40,000
|
2.26
|
40,000
|
$2.10
|
$0.05
|
20,000
|
3.27
|
20,000
|
$0.05
|
$0.27
|
40,000
|
7.26
|
40,000
|
$0.27
|
$0.55
|
100,000
|
8.35
|
100,000
|
$0.55
|
|
200,000
|
6.41
|
200,000
|
$0.76
|
Stock Warrants
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized total
equity based compensation of approximately $333,000 on warrants
issued to the CEO in connection with his current and previous
employment agreements. For the nine months ended September 30,
2016, the Company recognized $39,000 in stock compensation expense
for the warrants issued to the CEO in February 2014 that vested in
February 2016. In addition, on March 31, 2016, the Company issued a
warrant to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock to the CEO
with a term of five years that vested upon issuance and has an
exercise price of $0.50 per share. The Company utilized the
Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrant to purchase up to
250,000 shares of common stock received by the CEO as approximately
$129,000 with the following assumptions: volatility, 162%; expected
dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest rate, 1.47%; and a life of 5
years. The grant date fair value of each share of common stock
underlying the warrant was $0.51. On June 30, 2016, the Company
issued a warrant to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock
to the CEO with a term of five years that vested upon issuance and
has an exercise price of $0.42 per share. The Company utilized the
Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrants to purchase up to
250,000 shares of common stock received by the CEO as approximately
$99,000 with the following assumptions: volatility, 157%; expected
dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest rate, 1.17%; and a life of 5
years. The grant date fair value of each share of common stock
underlying the warrant was $0.40. On September 30, 2016, , the
Company issued a warrant to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common
stock to the CEO with a term of five years that vested upon
issuance and has an exercise price of $0.32 per share. The Company
utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrant to
purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock received by the CEO
as approximately $66,000 with the following assumptions:
volatility, 155%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest
rate, 1.27%; and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair value of
each share of common stock underlying the warrant was
$0.27.
18
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized total
equity based compensation of approximately $73,000 on warrants
issued to the CFO in connection with his current and previous
employment agreements. For the nine months ended September 30,
2016, the Company recognized $22,000 in stock compensation expense
for the accrued but unvested portion of the warrants issued to the
CFO under his previous agreement with the Company. In addition, on
January 26, 2016, the Company issued a warrant to purchase up to
100,000 shares of common stock to the CFO with a term of five years
that vested upon issuance and has an exercise price of $0.55 per
share. The Company utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value
the warrants to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock
received by the CFO as approximately $51,000 with the following
assumptions: volatility, 164%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk
free interest rate, 1.47%; and a life of 5 years. The grant date
fair value of each share of common stock underlying the warrant was
$0.51.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recognized equity
compensation expense of approximately $81,000 related to the vested
and accrual of the unvested portion of a warrant issued in April
2016 to a former employee pursuant to his employment agreement with
the Company. The Company utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair
value the warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of common stock
received by the employee as approximately $139,000 with the
following assumptions: volatility, 159%; expected dividend yield,
0%; risk free interest rate, 1.47%; and a life of 5 years. The
grant date fair value of each share of common stock underlying the
warrant was $0.46.
In
March and May of 2017, in connection with the issuance of the
Notes, we issued three-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate
of 999,998 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.69 per
share (see Note 6).
On June
30, 2017, we issued warrants to purchase up to 15,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share to the members
of the Scientific Advisory Board with a term of five years, which
vested upon issuance. The Company utilized the Black-Scholes method
to fair value the warrants received by the members of the
Scientific Advisory Board at $1,400 with the following assumptions:
volatility, 150%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest
rate, 1.83%; and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair value of
each share underlying the warrant was $0.09.
During
the first and second quarter of 2017, we recognized approximately
$23,000 in equity compensation expense for the vested and unvested
portion of a warrant issued to a former employee pursuant to his
agreement with the Company. In September 2017, the employee
resigned from his position with the Company and the unvested
portion of his warrant was terminated. For the three months ended
September 30, 2017, we reversed the equity compensation expense for
the accrued but unvested portion of his warrant of
$22,000.
In June
2017, we modified the terms of outstanding warrants to purchase
4,000,000 shares of common stock. Pursuant to a settlement
agreement, the term of the warrants was increased by 2 years and
the exercise price was modified to $0.12 per share (decrease of
$0.03 per share). Pursuant to ASC 718, the modified terms of
the warrants resulted in approximately $196,000 in incremental
equity compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30,
2017. We utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value the
warrants under the original and modified terms with the following
range of assumptions: volatility, 81%-97%; expected dividend yield,
0%; risk free interest rate, 1.28%; and a life of 0.33 - 2.33
years, respectively. The grant date fair value of each share of
common stock underlying the warrant was $0.01 and $0.06,
respectively.
In
July 2017 we issued a warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of common
stock to the CEO at an exercise price of $0.10 per share pursuant
to his employment agreement with the Company. The warrant was
valued at approximately $23,000 and has a term of 5 years. We
utilized the Black-Scholes method to fair value the warrant
received by the CEO with the following assumptions: volatility,
153%; expected dividend yield, 0%; risk free interest rate, 1.90%;
and a life of 5 years. The grant date fair value of each share of
common stock underlying the warrant was $0.09.
The
following table summarizes the outstanding common stock warrants as
of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
|
September 30,
2017 (Unaudited)
|
December 31,
2016
|
||
|
Number of Warrants
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Number of Warrants
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
37,076,413
|
$0.31
|
35,676,413
|
$0.30
|
Granted
|
1,264,998
|
0.57
|
1,400,000
|
0.42
|
Exercised
|
(975,000)
|
0.05
|
—
|
—
|
Expired
|
(1,675,000)
|
0.04
|
—
|
—
|
Outstanding,
end of period
|
35,691,411
|
$0.33
|
37,076,413
|
$0.31
|
19
Warrants
outstanding and exercisable by price range as of September 30, 2017
were as follows:
Outstanding Warrants
|
|
Exercisable Warrants
|
||
Range
|
Number
|
Average
Weighted
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
|
Number
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
$0.10
|
265,000
|
4.79
|
265,000
|
$0.10
|
$0.12
|
4,000,000
|
2.04
|
4,000,000
|
$0.12
|
$0.15
|
3,750,000
|
0.05
|
3,750,000
|
$0.15
|
$0.26
|
100,000
|
0.74
|
100,000
|
$0.26
|
$0.27
|
250,000
|
4.25
|
250,000
|
$0.27
|
$0.29
|
10,125,613
|
3.06
|
10,125,613
|
$0.29
|
$0.30
|
11,925,800
|
1.00
|
11,925,800
|
$0.30
|
$0.32
|
250,000
|
4.00
|
250,000
|
$0.32
|
$0.33
|
75,000
|
1.00
|
75,000
|
$0.33
|
$0.42
|
250,000
|
3.75
|
250,000
|
$0.42
|
$0.50
|
525,000
|
1.83
|
525,000
|
$0.50
|
$0.55
|
100,000
|
3.33
|
100,000
|
$0.55
|
$0.62
|
75,000
|
0.80
|
75,000
|
$0.62
|
$0.69
|
999,998
|
2.46
|
999,998
|
$0.69
|
$1.00
|
3,000,000
|
2.59
|
3,000,000
|
$1.00
|
|
35,691,411
|
1.88
|
35,691,411
|
$0.33
|
There
were no unvested warrants outstanding as of September 30,
2017.
NOTE 8. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
For
each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and
2016, we incurred fees for legal services rendered by Harold Paul
in the amount of $15,000 and $45,000, respectively. Mr. Paul is
also a director of the Company.
In January 2016, we
entered into a distributor agreement with TOMI Asia to facilitate
growth in Asia. Wee Ah Kee, one of our significant
shareholders, is the Chief Executive Officer of TOMI Asia. We
amended the distributor agreement
in August 2016, at which time TOMI Asia changed its name to
SteraMist Asia. The initial term of our new agreement is three
years and the agreement sets revenue targets of $5.5 million, $8.5
million and $12 million of our products during 2016, 2017 and 2018,
respectively. Our new agreement includes mainland China and
Indochina and excludes South Korea, Japan, Australia and New
Zealand. Approximately $49,000 and $56,000 in sales were made under
the distributor agreement
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,
respectively. No sales were made under the distributor agreement
for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2016.
In May
2017, we entered into an agreement with 41 North International LLC
to provide consulting services in the areas of sales management and
business development. The term of the agreement is for six
months and provides for automatic monthly renewals. Either party
can terminate the agreement after 6 months with 30 days written
notice. The agreement provides for a $20,000 monthly fee as
an advance against commissions. Mr. Ainsworth is a principal of 41
North International, LLC and director of the Company. The agreement
was terminated on October 31, 2017. (see Note 10).
20
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments
In
September 2014, we entered into a lease agreement for office and
warehouse space in Frederick, Maryland. As part of the lease
agreement, we received a rent holiday in the first 5 months of the
lease. The lease also provides for an escalation clause pursuant to
which the Company will be subject to an annual rent increase of 3%,
year over year. The lease expires on January 31, 2018. The Company
accounts for the lease using the straight line method and recorded
$11,427 and $34,281 in rent expense for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Approximate
minimum annual rents under the lease are as follows:
Period Ending
January 31,
|
Amount
|
|
|
2018
|
$18,000
|
|
$18,000
|
Legal Contingencies
We may become a party to litigation in the normal
course of business. In the opinion of management, there
are no legal matters involving us that would have a material
adverse effect upon our financial condition, results of operations
or cash flows. In addition, from time to time, we may have
to file claims against parties that infringe on our intellectual
property.
Product Liability
As
of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, there were no claims
against us for product liability.
NOTE 10. CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS
Manufacturing Agreement
In November
2016, we entered into a new
manufacturing and development agreement with RG Group Inc. The
agreement does not provide for any minimum purchase commitments and
is for a term of two years with provisions to extend. The agreement
also provides for a warranty against product defects for one
year.
As of September 30,
2017, and December 31, 2016, balances due to RG Group, Inc.
accounted for approximately 61% and 31% of total accounts payable,
respectively. At September 30, 2017
and December 31, 2016, we maintained required deposits with RG
Group, Inc. in the amounts of $0 and $147,010,
respectively. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2017, RG Group,
Inc. accounted for 72% and 69% of cost of goods sold, respectively.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, RG Group,
Inc. accounted for 63% and 76% of cost of goods sold,
respectively.
Agreements with Directors
In
March 2017, we increased the annual board fee to directors to
$30,000, to be paid on a quarterly basis, with the exception of the
audit committee chairperson, whose annual fee we increased to
$35,000, also to be paid on a quarterly basis. In addition, we
issued to each of our four board members 50,000 shares of common
stock in April 2017. The 200,000 shares of common stock were valued
at $32,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2017.
At our 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, our
shareholders elected Mr. Ronald E. Ainsworth to our board of
directors, to serve as a Class I director. The term of his
service as director commenced on July 7, 2017 and will expire at
our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, unless Mr. Ainsworth
sooner resigns or is removed. In his capacity as a director, Mr.
Ainsworth is entitled to an annual fee in the amount of $30,000
paid on a quarterly basis and the grant of 50,000 shares of our
common stock. Mr. Ainsworth is a principal in 41 North
International, LLC (see Note 8).
Other Agreements
In June
2015, we launched the TOMI Service Network (“TSN”). The
TSN is a national service network composed of existing full service
restoration industry specialists that have entered into licensing
agreements with us to become Primary Service Providers
(“PSP’s”). The licensing agreements grant
protected territories to PSP’s to perform services using our
SteraMist™ platform of
products and also provide for potential job referrals to
PSP’s whereby we are entitled to referral fees. Additionally,
the agreement provides for commissions due to PSP’s for
equipment and solution sales they facilitate to other service
providers in their respective territories. As part of these
agreements, we are obligated to provide to the PSP’s various
training, ongoing support and facilitate a referral network call
center. As of September 30, 2017, we had entered into 64 licensing
agreements in connection with the launch of the TSN. The licensing
agreements contain fixed price minimum equipment and solution
orders based on the population of the territories granted pursuant
to the licensing agreements.
21
NOTE 11. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT
LIABILITIES
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following
at:
|
||
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2017
(unaudited)
|
December 31,
2016
|
Commissions
|
$79,445
|
$172,735
|
Payroll
and related costs
|
41,264
|
40,264
|
Director
fees
|
35,250
|
19,000
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
71,099
|
46,414
|
Total
|
$227,058
|
$278,413
|
NOTE 12. CUSTOMER CONCENTRATION
The
Company had certain customers whose revenue individually
represented 10% of more of the Company’s total revenue, or
whose accounts receivable balances individually represented 10% of
more of the Company’s accounts receivable.
Three
customers accounted for 39% of net revenues for the three months
ended September 30, 2017 and two
customers accounted for 24% of net revenues for the
nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Three customers accounted for 32% of net revenues for the three
months ended September 30, 2016 and two customers accounted for 26%
of net revenues for the nine months ended September 30,
2016.
At
September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, one customer accounted
for 13% and 10% of accounts receivable, respectively.
NOTE 13. LITIGATION SETTLEMENT
In July
2017, we settled our litigation with Astro Pak Corporation
(“Astro Pak”) relating to our patents and intellectual
property rights. Astro Pak has agreed
that we are the sole owner of ionized hydrogen peroxide
decontamination and sterilization technology, patents, and
products, which we market under the brands Binary Ionization
Technology® (BIT™) and SteraMist™. We sued Astro
Pak and its wholly owned subsidiary SixLog Corporation
(“SixLog”) in California federal court for infringing
our United States Patent Nos. 6,969,487 and 7,008,592 and violating
our intellectual property rights by, among other things, indicating
that our technology and patents were proprietary to SixLog and
marketing our patented equipment with SixLog labels. Astro Pak and
SixLog agreed to cease this conduct and pay us a cash settlement.
Astro Pak also agreed to assign its iHP mark to us, complementing
our existing trademark and trade name protection. Finally, Astro
Pak and SixLog agreed to remove from the web or take steps to
remove any assertions or suggestions that they own or developed
ionized hydrogen peroxide technology or patents, or that they
provide any ionized hydrogen peroxide products or
services.
NOTE 14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the
financial statements were issued and up to the time of filing of
the financial statements with the SEC.
22
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition
and results of operations in conjunction with the condensed
consolidated financial statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and with our audited consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC.
In addition to our historical condensed consolidated financial
information, the following discussion contains forward-looking
statements that reflect our plans, estimates, and beliefs. Our
actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the
forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute
to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in
this Form 10-Q, particularly in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk
Factors.”
Overview
We are
a global provider of infection prevention and
decontamination products and services, focused primarily on life
sciences, including healthcare,
bio-safety, pharmaceutical, clean-room and research. We
provide environmental solutions for
indoor and outdoor surface decontamination through the sale of
equipment, services and licensing of our
SteraMist™
BIT™,
which is a hydrogen peroxide-based mist and fog registered with the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). Our
mission is to help our customers create a healthier world through
our product line and our motto is “innovating for a safer
world” for healthcare and life. Introduced commercially in June 2013, our current suite of products incorporates our
BIT™ Solution and
applicators, including the
SteraMist™ Surface Unit and the SteraMist™ Environment
System. We have expanded our SteraMist™ BIT™ Technology beyond
chemical and biological warfare applications to the
deactivation of problem microorganisms
(including spores) in a wide variety of commercial settings.
SteraMist™ BIT™ provides fast-acting biological deactivation and works in
hard-to-reach areas, while
leaving no residue or noxious fumes.
We currently target domestic and international markets for the control
of microorganisms and the decontamination of large and small indoor
space for biological pathogens and chemical agents including
infectious diseases in hospitals, bio-secure labs, pharmaceutical,
biodefense, biosafety including isolation and transfer chambers,
tissue banks, food safety and many other commercial and residential
settings.
Under the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, we are
required to register with the EPA and certain state regulatory
authorities as a seller of pesticides. In June 2015,
SteraMist™ BIT™ was registered with the EPA as a
hospital-healthcare disinfectant for use as a misting/fogging
agent. SteraMist™ BIT™ holds EPA registrations both as a
hospital-healthcare and general disinfectant (EPA Registration
90150-2) and for mold control and air and surface remediation (EPA
Registration 90150-1). In February 2016, we expanded our label with
the EPA to include the bacterias C. diff and MRSA, as well as the
virus h1n1, which has better positioned us to penetrate the
hospital-healthcare and other industries. In August 2017, our EPA
label was further expanded to include efficacy against Salmonella
and Norovirus. We currently have our EPA-registered label in all 50
states with the addition of California and New York in July and
October 2016, respectively.
SteraMist™
is easily incorporated into current cleaning procedures; is
economical, non-corrosive and easy to apply; leaves no residues;
and requires no wiping. All our SteraMist™ products are
fully validated to comply with good manufacturing practice
standard, have received Conformité Européene (CE) marks
in the European Economic Area and are approved by Underwriters Laboratory. Our
solution is manufactured at an EPA-registered solution blender and
our product performance is supported by good laboratory practice
efficacy data for Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
mold spores, MRSA, h1n1, Geobacillus stearothermophilus and C.
diff spores. As of January
27, 2017, our BIT™ solution and
BIT™
technology is one of 33 of the EPA’s “Registered
Antimicrobial Products Effective against Clostridium difficile Spores”, as published
on the EPA’s K List.
In
March and May 2017, we raised through a private placement
transaction gross proceeds of $6,000,000. We issued senior callable
convertible promissory notes (“the Notes”) in two
tranches of $5,300,000 and $700,000, respectively, which mature on
August 31, 2018 and November 8, 2018, respectively, unless earlier
redeemed, repurchased or converted. The Notes are convertible at
any time by the holder into common stock at a conversion price of
$0.54 per share. Subsequent to September 1, 2017, we may redeem the
Notes that are scheduled to mature on August 31, 2018 at any time
prior to maturity at a price equal to 100% of the outstanding
principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and
unpaid interest as of the redemption date. Prior to November
8, 2018, we may redeem the Notes that are scheduled to mature on
such date at any time prior to maturity at a price equal to 100% of
the outstanding principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus
accrued and unpaid interest as of the redemption date. Interest on
the Notes is payable semi-annually in cash on February 28 and
August 31 of each year, beginning on August 31, 2017, at a rate of
4 percent per annum. In addition, we issued three-year warrants to
purchase up to an aggregate of 999,998 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $0.69 per share. The proceeds from the private
placement will be used for research and development, international
product registration, expansion of our internal sales force,
marketing, public relations, expansions of our EPA label and for
working capital and general corporate purposes.
23
In
February 2017, we established a Scientific Advisory Board comprised
currently of two experts in intellectual property, biosafety and
infection prevention. The Scientific Advisory Board will assist
management in developing strategies, scientific research and
development and monitoring technological and regulatory
trends.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 we have continued to build
brand awareness through marketing and advertising initiatives as
well as the overall performance of our product. In July 2017, one
of our custom built in systems that was designed and installed into
a vivarium facility was featured in a publication, ALNmag.
Domestically, our
revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was
$755,000 and $2,497,000, respectively, compared to $747,000 and
$3,010,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.
The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, was due
primarily to the slower pace of growth in our TSN network resulting
in lower equipment sales to TSN members. We have refocused our
resources in TSN to assist members with training and marketing in
their territories and believe we have positioned TSN well moving
forward. We anticipate expansion of the TSN network in the fourth
quarter of 2017 and in 2018. Internationally, our revenue for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $275,000 and
$1,012,000, respectively, compared to $345,000 and $1,518,000 for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. The primary
reason for the decrease in revenue is attributable to a $650,000
order placed by a distributor in 2016, with no corresponding order
placed in 2017, notwithstanding the minimum purchase requirements
under its agreement.
In
August 2017, we announced the hiring of a new sales director to
assist in the development of our business in the life science
markets and added twenty-six additional sales representatives to
our life science division. We currently provide our technology to
five of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world and
anticipate continued growth in the life science market, as well as
expansion into more of our existing clients’ facilities, in
2018 due, in part, to the expansion of our sales
force.
During
2017, we have continued to add new customers in the life science
markets, who have engaged us to perform service work, and we
anticipate continued growth in service revenue in 2018. In order to
meet the growing demand for our services, we reclassified
approximately $210,000 in machinery from our inventory into fixed
assets. The additional machinery carried in our fixed assets will
allow us to have more rental equipment for our TSN members to rent
and will allow TOMI to take on more high level decontamination
service engagements in the near future.
In
October 2017, we entered into a distribution agreement with Protak
Scientific Ltd (“Protak”), a United Kingdom-based
company that manufacturers enzyme indicators for hydrogen peroxide
decontamination performance validation. Pursuant to the agreement,
we will distribute Protak’s enzyme indicators as well as use
the product in our service engagements. This enzyme indicator is
designed to assist end users in obtaining a quicker validation
time. We believe that our new relationship with Protak will further
develop our opportunities in the life science market and increase
customer satisfaction on service engagements.
In
November 2017, we were awarded a group purchasing agreement and
added to the list of approved suppliers with Premier, Inc.,
which
operates a leading group purchasing organization
(“GPO”). We believe this award will provide us with
another opportunity to further penetrate the hospital healthcare
market. We are actively seeking to enter into additional GPO
agreements to facilitate further growth in the domestic
hospital-healthcare markets. During 2017, we have continued to
expand our customer base in the hospital-healthcare market and
added independent sales representatives to further bolster our
sales presence.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2017, we continued to sell
SteraMist™ equipment and
solution and add customers in Europe and registered our
SteraMist™ BIT™ technology in
10 key countries throughout the European region. In addition,
during 2017, we have continued our growth in international markets
by entering into multiple distribution and sales representation
agreements in the United Kingdom, Chile, Brazil and Portugal. In
November 2017, we entered into a distribution agreement with
Westbury Decontamination Ltd., a United Kingdom-based company that
operates in the decontamination and sterilization
markets.
In
November 2017, we received notice that our product registration of
SteraMist™ in Canada was
finalized. We anticipate this will facilitate additional growth in
international revenue in the hospital-healthcare, life science and
remediation markets. We also expect the Canadian registration will
help expand our TSN or service network in the Canadian remediation
market.
While
regulatory and product registrations have slowed our anticipated
growth in Asia, we continue to make strides in the registration
process, which we anticipate will position us to generate
additional revenue in the region. We have also made substantial
progress with our patent and trademark applications in various
countries in Asia in order to protect our trademark and
intellectual property rights in such markets.
24
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation
of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities. The estimation process requires assumptions to be
made about future events and conditions, and as such, is inherently
subjective and uncertain. Actual results could differ materially
from our estimates.
The SEC
defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in
management’s view, most important to the portrayal of our
financial condition and results of operations and most demanding of
our judgment. We consider the following policies to be critical to
an understanding of our condensed consolidated financial statements
and the uncertainties associated with the complex judgments made by
us that could impact our results of operations, financial position
and cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is
recognized when: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
(2) service has been rendered or delivery has occurred; (3) the
selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is
reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) is based
on management’s judgment regarding the fixed nature of the
selling prices of the services rendered or products delivered and
the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts to
customers, and allowance, and other adjustments will be provided
for in the same period the related sales are recorded.
Fair Value Measurement
The
authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair
value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or
paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal
market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to
transact and (iv) willing to transact. The guidance describes a
fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that
may be used to measure fair value, which are the
following:
Level
1:
Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level
2:
Inputs
other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or
indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or corroborated by observable market
data or substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
Level
3:
Unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that
are significant to the value of the assets or
liabilities.
Our financial
instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued expenses and convertible debt. All these
items were determined to be Level 1 fair value
measurements.
The
carrying amounts of cash and equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value
because of the short maturity of these instruments. The recorded
value of convertible debt approximates its fair value as the terms
and rates approximate market rates
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash
and cash equivalents includes cash on hand held at financial
institutions and other liquid investments with original maturities
of three months or less. At times, these deposits may be in excess
of insured limits.
Accounts Receivable
Our
accounts receivable are typically from credit worthy customers or,
for certain international customers, are supported by pre-payments.
For those customers to whom we extend credit, we perform periodic
evaluations of them and maintain allowances for potential credit
losses as deemed necessary. We have a policy of reserving for
doubtful accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of
potential credit losses in existing accounts receivable. We
periodically review our accounts receivable to determine whether an
allowance is necessary based on an analysis of past due accounts
and other factors that may indicate that the realization of an
account may be in doubt. Account balances deemed to be
uncollectible are charged to the allowance after all means of
collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is
considered remote.
25
Inventories
Inventories are
valued at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out
method. Inventories consist primarily of finished goods and raw
materials. At September
30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we did
not have a reserve for slow-moving or obsolete
inventory.
Property and Equipment
We
account for property and equipment at cost less accumulated
depreciation. We compute depreciation using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally
three to five years. Depreciation for equipment, furniture and
fixtures and vehicles commences once placed in service for its
intended use. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases or
service lives of the improvements, whichever is
shorter.
Accrued Warranties
Accrued
warranties represent the estimated costs, if any, that will be
incurred during the warranty period of our products. We make an
estimate of expected costs that will be incurred by us during the
warranty period and charge that expense to the consolidated
statement of operations at the date of sale. Our manufacturer
assumes warranty against product defects for one year, which we
extend to our customers. We assume responsibility for product
reliability and results.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between
the financial statement reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws
in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The
measurement of deferred income tax assets is reduced, if necessary,
by a valuation allowance for any tax benefits, which are, on a more
likely than not basis, not expected to be realized, in accordance
with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) guidance
for income taxes. The effect on deferred income tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the period
that such tax rate changes are enacted.
Loss Per Share
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing the Company’s net loss
by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period presented. Diluted loss per share is
based on the treasury stock method and includes the effect from
potential issuance of shares of common stock, such as shares
issuable pursuant to the exercise of options and warrants and
conversions of preferred stock or debentures.
Stock-Based Compensation
We
account for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial
Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), ASC 718,
“Compensation—Stock Compensation.” Under the
provisions of FASB ASC 718, stock-based compensation cost is
estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value
and is recognized as expense over the requisite service
period.
On July
7, 2017, our shareholders approved the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan
(the “2016 Plan”), which our board of directors had
previously approved. The 2016 Plan authorizes the grant of stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted
stock units and performance units/shares. Up to 5,000,000 shares of
common stock are authorized for issuance under the 2016 Plan.
Shares issued under the 2016 Plan may be either authorized but
unissued shares, treasury shares, or any combination thereof.
Provisions in the 2016 Plan permit the reuse or reissuance by the
2016 Plan of shares of common stock for numerous reasons,
including, but not limited to, shares of common stock underlying
canceled, expired, or forfeited awards of stock-based compensation
and stock appreciation rights paid out in the form of cash.
Stock-based compensation will typically be awarded in consideration
for the future performance of services to us. All recipients of
awards under the 2016 Plan are required to enter into award
agreements with the Company at the time of the award; awards under
the 2016 Plan are expressly conditioned upon such agreements. For
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued options to
purchase 100,000 shares of common stock out of the 2016 Plan. In
addition, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company
issued 200,000 shares of common stock out of the 2016
Plan.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject us to significant
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash
equivalents. We maintain cash balances at financial institutions
which exceed the current Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
limit of $250,000 at times during the year.
26
Long-Lived Assets Including Acquired Intangible Assets
We
assess long-lived assets for potential impairments at the end of
each year, or during the year if an event or other circumstance
indicates that we may not be able to recover the carrying amount of
the asset. In evaluating long-lived assets for impairment, we
measure recoverability of these assets by comparing the carrying
amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are
expected to generate. If our long-lived assets are considered to be
impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by
which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market
value. We base the calculations of the estimated fair value of our
long-lived assets on the income approach. For the income approach,
we use an internally developed discounted cash flow model that
includes, among others, the following assumptions: projections of
revenues and expenses and related cash flows based on assumed
long-term growth rates and demand trends; expected future
investments to grow new units; and estimated discount rates. We
base these assumptions on our historical data and experience,
industry projections, micro and macro general economic condition
projections, and our expectations. We had no long-lived asset
impairment charges for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2017 and 2016.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May
2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU
2014-09) “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606).” ASU 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition
requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605)”, and
requires entities to recognize revenue when it transfers promised
goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in
exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017,
including interim periods within that reporting period.
We are
currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption
of ASU 2014-09 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-02 (ASU 2016-02) “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU
2016-02 provides new lease accounting guidance. ASU 2016-02
is effective for annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that
reporting period. Early adoption is permitted. We are
currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption
of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No.
2016-09 (ASU 2016-09) “Compensation – Stock
Compensation (Topic 718).” ASU 2016-09 provides
improvements to employee share-based payment accounting. ASU
2016-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that
reporting period.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No.
2017-04, Simplifying the Test for
Goodwill Impairment, to
simplify the test for goodwill impairment by removing Step 2. An entity will, therefore,
perform the goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of
a reporting unit with its carrying amount, recognizing an impairment charge for the amount
by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, not to exceed
the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. An entity still has the option to
perform a qualitative assessment to determine if the quantitative
impairment test is necessary. The ASU is
effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for interim or
annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after
January 1, 2017. Adoption of the ASU is prospective. We have not
yet selected an adoption date, and the ASU will have a currently
undetermined impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
In May
2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Scope Of Modification Accounting, to
provide guidance on which changes to the terms or conditions of
a share-based payment
award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The ASU
is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
with early adoption permitted. Adoption of the ASU is prospective.
We are currently obtaining an understanding of the ASU and plan to
adopt the ASU on January 1, 2018.
Financial Operations Overview
Our
financial position as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016,
was as follows:
|
September
30,
2017
(Unaudited)
|
December
31,
2016
|
|
|
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
$6,324,615
|
$8,250,063
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$5,270,313
|
$948,324
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
$1,603,481
|
$1,521,378
|
Inventories
|
$4,420,448
|
$4,047,310
|
Deposits on
merchandise
|
$-
|
$147,010
|
Current
liabilities
|
$6,852,185
|
$1,052,953
|
Long-term
liabilities
|
$695,408
|
$-
|
Working
capital
|
$4,720,757
|
$5,715,516
|
27
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2017, our liquidity positions
were affected by the following:
●
Gross proceeds from
the issuance of the Notes of $6,000,000; and
●
Net cash used in
operations of approximately $1,718,000.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
|
For the Three
Months
|
|
|
Ended September
30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues,
net
|
$1,030,000
|
$1,092,000
|
Gross
Profit
|
$641,000
|
$661,000
|
Total Operating
Expenses(1)
|
$1,037,000
|
$1,596,000
|
Loss from
Operations
|
$(396,000)
|
$(935,000)
|
Total Other Income
(Expense)
|
$(61,000)
|
$-
|
Net
Loss
|
$(457,000)
|
$(935,000)
|
Basic loss per
share
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.01)
|
Diluted loss per
share
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.01)
|
(1)
Includes
approximately ($21,000) and $85,000 in non-cash equity compensation
expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Sales
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we had net
revenue of approximately $1,030,000 and $1,092,000, respectively,
representing a decrease in revenue of $62,000 or 6%.
Net Revenue
Product and Service Revenue
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
SteraMist
Product
|
$792,000
|
$850,000
|
Service
& Training
|
238,000
|
242,000
|
Total
|
$1,030,000
|
$1,092,000
|
Revenue by Geographic Region
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
United
States
|
$755,000
|
$747,000
|
International
|
275,000
|
345,000
|
Total
|
$1,030,000
|
$1,092,000
|
Cost of Sales
During
the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, our cost of
sales was approximately $389,000 and $432,000, respectively,
representing a decrease of 42,000 or 10%. The primary reason for
the decrease in cost of sales is lower sales during the three
months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year. Our
gross profit margins as a percentage of sales for the three months
ended September 30, 2017 were consistent with the same period in
2016.
28
Professional Fees
Professional fees
for the three months ended September 30, 2017 were approximately
$72,000, as compared to $101,000 during the prior year,
representing a decrease of approximately $29,000, or 29%.
Professional fees are mainly comprised of legal, accounting and
financial consulting fees.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and
amortization was approximately $146,000 and $148,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively,
representing a decrease of $2,000, or 2%.
Selling Expenses
Selling
expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 were
approximately $320,000, as compared to $284,000 in the same period
in 2016, representing an increase of $36,000 or 13%. The increase
in selling expenses is attributable to our agreement with 41 North
International, LLC. Selling expenses represent selling salaries and
wages, trade show fees, commissions and marketing
expenses.
Research and Development
Research and
development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017
were approximately $80,000, as compared to $93,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2016. Research and development expenses
mainly include costs incurred in generating and supporting research
on improving, extending and applying our patents in the field of
mechanical cleaning and decontamination.
Equity Compensation Expense
Equity
compensation expense, which represents non-cash charges, for the
three months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $(21,000),
as compared to $85,000 during the three months ended September 30,
2016, representing a decrease of $106,000, or 124%. The primary
reason for the decrease is attributable to the issuance of fewer
options and warrants issued in the three months ended September 30,
2017 compared to the same period in 2016 and the reversal of equity
compensation charges for the unvested portion of a former
employee’s warrant that terminated in September 2017 in
connection with his resignation from the Company.
Consulting Fees
Consulting fees for
the three months ended September 30, 2017 were approximately
$63,000, as compared to $50,000 during the three months ended
September 30, 2016, representing an increase of approximately
$13,000, or 26%.
General and Administrative Expense
General
and administrative expense includes salaries and payroll taxes,
rent, insurance expense, utilities, office expense and product
registration costs. General and administrative expense was
approximately $696,000 and $835,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, representing a decrease
of $139,000 or 17%. The primary reason for the decrease in general
and administrative expense is attributable to lower salaries and
wages due to a reduced number of employees in the three months
ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in
2016.
Other Income and Expense
Amortization of
debt discount was $1,688 and $0 during the three months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of debt
discount in the three months ended September 30, 2017 consisted of
the amortization of debt discount on the $6,000,000 principal
amount of Notes issued in March and May 2017. The debt discount was
amortized over the life of the Notes utilizing the effective
interest method.
Interest income for
the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was
approximately $600 and $0, respectively.
Interest expense
for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was
approximately $60,000 and $0, respectively. Interest expense for
the three months ended September 30, 2017 consisted of the interest
incurred on the $6,000,000 principal amount of Notes issued in
March and May 2017.
29
Net Loss
Net
loss for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was
approximately $457,000 and $935,000, respectively, representing a
decrease in the net loss of $478,000 or 51%. The primary reasons
for the decrease in the net loss can be attributed to:
●
Decreased operating
expenses of approximately $559,000, offset by;
●
Lower revenue and
gross profit of approximately $62,000 and $20,000, respectively;
and
●
Interest expense of
approximately $60,000.
Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
|
For the Nine
Months
|
|
|
Ended September
30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues,
net
|
$3,509,000
|
$4,528,000
|
Gross
Profit
|
$2,191,000
|
$2,642,000
|
Total Operating
Expenses(1)
|
$4,354,000
|
$5,405,000
|
Loss from
Operations
|
$(2,163,000)
|
$(2,763,000)
|
Total Other Income
(Expense)
|
$(133,000)
|
$214,000
|
Net
Loss
|
$(2,296,000)
|
$(2,549,000)
|
Basic loss per
share
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.02)
|
Diluted loss per
share
|
$(0.02)
|
$(0.02)
|
(1)
Includes
approximately $223,000 and $542,000 in non-cash equity compensation
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Sales
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we had net
revenue of approximately $3,509,000 and $4,528,000, respectively,
representing a decrease in revenue of $1,019,000 or 23%. The
decrease in revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2017
is
attributable primarily to the fact
that a distributor placed a large order in the first quarter of
2016, with no such
corresponding
transaction during the same
period in
2017.
Net Revenue
Product and Service Revenue
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
SteraMist
Product
|
$2,713,000
|
$3,984,000
|
Service
& Training
|
796,000
|
544,000
|
Total
|
$3,509,000
|
$4,528,000
|
Revenue by Geographic Region
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
United
States
|
$2,497,000
|
$3,010,000
|
International
|
1,012,000
|
1,518,000
|
Total
|
$3,509,000
|
$4,528,000
|
30
Cost of Sales
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, our cost of
sales was approximately $1,318,000 and $1,886,000, respectively,
representing a decrease of 568,000 or 30%. The primary reason for
the decrease in cost of sales is lower sales during the nine months
ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year. Our gross
profit margins as a percentage of sales for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 increased as compared to the prior period as a
result of the customer and product mix in sales.
Professional Fees
Professional fees
for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were approximately
$739,000, as compared to $375,000 during the prior year,
representing an increase of approximately $364,000, or 97%. The
increase is attributable to increased efforts to protect and
strengthen our intellectual property with additional trademark and
patent filings. Professional fees are mainly comprised of legal,
accounting and financial consulting fees.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and
amortization was approximately $454,000 and $427,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively,
representing an increase of $27,000, or 6%. The increase in
depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017
is attributable to additional fixed assets acquired in the current
and prior year.
Selling Expenses
Selling
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were
approximately $870,000, as compared to $1,153,000 in the same
period in 2016, representing a decrease of $283,000 or 25%. The
decrease in selling expenses is attributable to lower sales volume
in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and a reduced number of
employees as compared to the prior year. Selling expenses represent
selling salaries and wages, trade show fees, commissions and
marketing expenses.
Research and Development
Research and
development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2017
were approximately $129,000, as compared to $120,000 in the nine
months ended September 30, 2016, representing an increase of $9,000
or 7%. Research and development expenses mainly include costs
incurred in generating and supporting research on improving,
extending and applying our patents in the field of mechanical
cleaning and decontamination.
Equity Compensation Expense
Equity
compensation expense, which represents non-cash charges, for the
nine months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $223,000, as
compared to $542,000 during the nine months ended September 30,
2016, representing a decrease of $319,000, or 59%. The primary
reason for the decrease is attributable to differences in the
timing of the issuances of options and warrants during the nine
months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Consulting Fees
Consulting fees for
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were approximately
$180,000, as compared to $281,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2016, representing a decrease of approximately
$101,000, or 36%. The decrease in consulting fees is primarily due
to significant charge incurred during the nine months ended
September 30, 2016 with no such charge in the current year
period.
General and Administrative Expense
General
and administrative expense includes salaries and payroll taxes,
rent, insurance expense, utilities, office expense and product
registration costs. General and administrative expense was
approximately $2,078,000 and $2,506,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, representing a decrease
of $428,000 or 17%. The primary reason for the decrease in general
and administrative expense is attributable to lower salaries and
wages due to a reduced number of employees in the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in
2016.
31
Other Income and Expense
Amortization of
debt discount was $2,582 and $0 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization of debt
discount in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 consists of
the amortization of debt discount on the $6,000,000 principal
amount of Notes issued in March and May 2017. The debt discount was
amortized over the life of the Notes utilizing the effective
interest method.
Income
recognized from grant for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
was $202,000. This represents the amounts advanced to the Company
in excess of the costs incurred. The grant was finalized in
2016.
Gain on
disposition of equipment for the nine months ended September 30,
2017 and 2016 was $0 and $12,000, respectively.
Interest income for
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was approximately
$1,200 and $0, respectively.
Interest expense
for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was
approximately $131,000 and $0, respectively. Interest expense for
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 consisted of the interest
incurred on the $6,000,000 principal amount of Notes issued in
March and May 2017.
Net Loss
Net
loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was
approximately $2,296,000 and $2,549,000, respectively, representing
a decrease in net loss of $253,000 or 10%. The primary reasons for
the decrease in the net loss are :
●
Lower operating
expenses of approximately $1,051,000, offset by;
●
Lower revenue and
gross profit of approximately $1,019,000 and $451,000,
respectively;
●
Interest expense of
approximately $131,000; and
●
Reduced other
income of $214,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $5,270,000 and working capital of
$4,721,000. Our principal capital requirements are to
fund operations, invest in research and development and capital
equipment, and the continued costs of public company filing
requirements. We have historically funded our operations through
debt and equity financings.
In
September 2016, our common stock was uplisted to the OTCQX Best
Market. We intend to apply to further uplist our common stock to a
national securities exchange in the future. Due to the
applicable qualitative and quantitative standards required to
successfully list on a national securities exchange, we may need to
raise additional capital in order to meet such benchmarks. If we
fail to satisfy the applicable listing standards of a national
securities exchange, we may be unable to successfully list our
common stock on such an exchange.
In
March and May 2017, we raised through a private placement
transaction gross proceeds of $6,000,000. We issued the Notes in
two tranches of $5,300,000 and $700,000, respectively, which mature
on August 31, 2018 and November 8, 2018, respectively, unless
earlier redeemed, repurchased or converted. The Notes are
convertible at any time by the holder into common stock at a
conversion price of $0.54 per share. Subsequent to September 1,
2017, we may redeem the Notes that are scheduled to mature on
August 31, 2018 at any time prior to maturity at a price equal to
100% of the outstanding principal amount of the Notes to be
redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the redemption
date. Prior to November 8, 2018, we may redeem the Notes that
are scheduled to mature on such date at any time prior to maturity
at a price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal amount of the
Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the
redemption date. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in
cash on February 28 and August 31 of each year, beginning on August
31, 2017, at a rate of 4 percent per annum. In addition, we issued
three-year warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 999,998
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.69 per share. The
proceeds from the private placement will be used for research and
development, international product registration, expansion of our
internal sales force, marketing, public relations, expansions of
our EPA label and for working capital and general corporate
purposes.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, we incurred losses
from operations of approximately $2,163,000 and $2,763,000,
respectively. The cash used in operations was approximately
$1,718,000 and $4,179,000 for the nine months ended September 30,
2017 and 2016, respectively. We experienced a decline in
revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to
the same period in the prior year period, which contributed to our
loss from operations in the first nine months of 2017. The decline
in revenue was attributable primarily to the fact
that a distributor placed a large order in the first quarter of
2016, with no such corresponding transaction during the same period
in 2017.
32
Our revenues can fluctuate due to the following factors, among
others:
●
Ramp up and
expansion of our internal sales force and manufacturers’
representatives;
●
length of our sales
cycle;
●
Expansion into new
territories and markets; and
●
Timing of orders
from distributors.
We
could incur additional operating losses and an increase of costs
related to the continuation of product and technology development
and administrative activities.
Management has
taken and will endeavor to continue to take a number of actions in
order to improve our results of operations and the related cash
flows generated from operations in order to strengthen our
financial position, including the following items:
●
Expanding our label
with the EPA to further our product registration
internationally;
●
Continued expansion
of our internal salesforce and manufacturer representatives in an
effort to drive domestic revenue in all hospital-healthcare
verticals;
●
Continued expansion
of our internal sales force and manufacturer representatives in an
effort to drive global revenue in the life science
verticals;
●
Expansion of
international distributors; and
●
Continued growth of
the TSN and new growth in the food safety market including pre- and
post-harvest.
We
believe that our existing balance of cash and cash equivalents and
amounts expected to be provided by operations will provide us with
sufficient financial resources to meet our cash requirements for
operations, working capital and capital expenditures over the next
twelve months. However, in the
event of unforeseen circumstances, unfavorable market developments
or unfavorable results from operations, there can be no assurance
that the above actions will be successfully implemented, and our
cash flows may be adversely affected. While we have reduced
the length of our sales cycle, it may still exceed 4–6 months
and it is possible we may not be able to generate sufficient
revenue in the next twelve months to cover our operating and
compliance costs. We may also need to raise additional debt or
equity financing to execute on the commercialization of our planned
products. We cannot make any assurances that management’s
strategies will be effective or that any additional financing will
be completed on a timely basis, on acceptable terms or at all. Our
inability to successfully implement our strategies or to complete
any other financing may mean that we would have to significantly
reduce costs and/or delay projects, which would adversely affect
our business, customers and program development, and would
adversely impact us.
Operating Activities
Cash used in operating activities
during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was
approximately $1,718,000 and 4,179,000, respectively. Cash used in
operating activities decreased $2,461,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 primarily due to the increase in inventory which
occurred during the nine months ended September 30,
2016.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities
during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was
approximately $8,000 and $448,000. Cash used in investing
activities decreased $440,000 as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2016 primarily due to service equipment purchased in
the nine months ended September 30, 2016 with no corresponding
purchase for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Financing Activities
Cash provided by financing activities
during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 consisted of the
$6,000,000 in aggregate gross proceeds received from the issuance
of the Notes and proceeds from the exercise of warrants of
$48,750.
Cash provided by financing activities
during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was
$0.
33
Contractual Obligations
Our
contractual obligations as of September 30, 2017 are summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
Payments Due by
Period
|
||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
Year
|
1–3
Years
|
3–5
Years
|
More
than
5
Years
|
Operating
Leases(1)
|
$18
|
$18
|
$-
|
$—
|
$—
|
Convertible
Debt(2)
|
6,000
|
$5,300
|
$700
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
$6,018
|
$5,318
|
$700
|
$—
|
$—
|
(1)
Amounts represent a
non-cancelable operating lease for office space in Frederick,
Maryland that terminates on January 31, 2018. In addition to base
rent, the lease calls for payment of common area maintenance
operating expenses.
(2)
Amount represents
convertible notes maturing on August 31, 2018 and November 8,
2018.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See
Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in Item 1 above.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do
not have any transactions, agreements or other contractual
arrangements that constitute off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies
See
Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained
in Item 1. Financial Statements above.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
The
Company is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 405 under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 12b-2 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), and is not required to disclose the information
required by this Item 3 pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation
S-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has
evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Form
10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that
as of September 30, 2017, our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed at a reasonable assurance level and are
effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are
required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control
over Financial
Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules
13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) under
the Exchange Act during the period covered by this Form 10-Q
that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and
Procedures
In
designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures and
internal control over financial reporting, management recognizes
that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the
desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints
and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the
benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their
costs.
34
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are
not a party to any material proceedings or threatened proceedings
as of the date of this filing.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
While,
as a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the
information required by this Item 1A, you should carefully review
and consider the risk factors contained in our other reports and
periodic filings with the SEC, including without limitation the
risk factors contained under the caption
“Item 1A—Risk Factors” in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The risk
factors discussed in that Form 10-K do not identify all risks
that we face because our business operations could also be affected
by additional factors that are not presently known to us or that we
currently consider to be immaterial to our operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds.
On July
17, 2017, we issued 31,000 shares of common stock valued at $3,100
to a consultant.
No
underwriters were involved in the foregoing sales of securities.
The securities described in this Item 2 were issued pursuant to the
exemption set forth in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act and
Regulation D promulgated thereunder relative to transactions by an
issuer not involving any public offering. All recipients either
received adequate information about us or had access, through
employment or other relationships, to such
information.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not
applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The
documents listed in the Exhibit Index of this Form 10-Q are
incorporated herein by reference.
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
TOMI
ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14,
2017
|
By:
|
/s/
Halden
S. Shane
|
|
|
|
Halden S.
Shane
|
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 14,
2017
|
By:
|
/s/
Nick
Jennings
|
|
|
|
Nick
Jennings
|
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer) |
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
Filed
Herewith
|
||||||
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
|
|
Certification
of Halden S. Shane, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Certification
of Nick Jennings, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
32.1#
|
|
Certification
of Halden S. Shane, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
32.2#
|
|
Certification
of Nick Jennings, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
Instance Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
# This certification is deemed not filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities
Act), or the Exchange Act.
37