Track Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2016 December (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2016
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the transition period from ___________ to
____________
Commission file number: 0-23153
Track Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
87-0543981
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization )
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
1215 W. Lakeview Court, Romeoville, Il. 60446
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
(877) 260-2010
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area
code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated
filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [
]
|
Non-accelerated filer [
]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company [X]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ]
No [X]
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common
stock as of February 6, 2017 was 10,344,118.
Track Group, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2016
INDEX
|
|
Page
|
|
||
|
|
|
1
|
||
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
14
|
||
18
|
||
19
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
19
|
||
20
|
||
20
|
||
20
|
||
20
|
||
21
|
||
|
|
|
22
|
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
Assets
|
2016
|
2016
|
Current assets:
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Cash
|
$2,486,390
|
$1,769,921
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,695,060
and $2,335,508, respectively
|
5,920,597
|
6,894,095
|
Note
receivable, current
|
334,733
|
334,733
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
515,000
|
816,708
|
Inventory,
net of reserves of $98,150 and $98,150, respectively
|
464,151
|
521,851
|
Total current assets
|
9,720,871
|
10,337,308
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$1,503,512 and $1,421,389, respectively
|
1,075,212
|
1,226,461
|
Monitoring equipment, net of accumulated amortization of $3,535,297
and $3,438,074, respectively
|
4,583,890
|
4,358,117
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $8,821,745
and $8,233,659, respectively
|
25,286,897
|
25,540,650
|
Goodwill
|
7,841,220
|
7,955,876
|
Other assets
|
3,016,318
|
2,900,911
|
Total
assets
|
$51,524,408
|
$52,319,323
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
3,263,481
|
2,771,101
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
5,637,673
|
3,976,192
|
Current
portion of long-term debt, net of discount of $222,973 and
$222,973, respectively
|
3,245,732
|
3,245,732
|
Total
current liabilities
|
12,146,886
|
9,993,025
|
Stock payable - related party
|
3,289,879
|
3,289,879
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion and discount of $130,068 and
$185,811, respectively
|
30,379,358
|
30,345,803
|
Total
Liabilities
|
45,816,123
|
43,628,707
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value: 30,000,000 shares authorized;
10,333,516 outstanding at December 31 and September 30,
2016
|
1,034
|
1,034
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
299,001,399
|
298,876,399
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(291,955,262)
|
(289,341,503)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
(1,338,886)
|
(845,314)
|
Total
equity
|
5,708,285
|
8,690,616
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$51,524,408
|
$52,319,323
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months
Ended
December 31, |
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Monitoring
services
|
$7,265,013
|
$5,957,426
|
Other
|
406,477
|
360,178
|
Total
revenues
|
7,671,490
|
6,317,604
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
Monitoring,
products and other related services
|
2,933,622
|
1,880,212
|
Depreciation
& amortization included in cost of revenues
|
445,493
|
488,967
|
Impairment
of monitoring equipment and parts
|
74,787
|
60,000
|
Total
cost of revenues
|
3,453,902
|
2,429,179
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
4,217,588
|
3,888,425
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
General
& administrative
|
3,768,099
|
3,411,643
|
Restructuring
costs
|
566,330
|
-
|
Selling
& marketing
|
627,749
|
620,029
|
Research
& development
|
530,806
|
547,159
|
Depreciation
& amortization
|
575,111
|
700,035
|
Total
operating expenses
|
6,068,095
|
5,278,866
|
Loss from operations
|
(1,850,507)
|
(1,390,441)
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
Loss
on disposal of equipment
|
-
|
(33,805)
|
Interest
expense, net
|
(647,103)
|
(694,508)
|
Currency
exchange rate loss
|
(116,442)
|
(18,149)
|
Other
income, net
|
293
|
9,665
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
|
(2,613,759)
|
(2,127,238)
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
(493,572)
|
215,095
|
Comprehensive loss
|
$(3,107,331)
|
$(1,912,143)
|
Net
loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
$(0.25)
|
$(0.21)
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
10,333,516
|
10,261,288
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months Ended
December 31, |
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(2,613,759)
|
$(2,127,238)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,020,604
|
1,189,003
|
Impairment
of monitoring equipment and parts
|
74,787
|
60,000
|
Bad
debt expense
|
359,551
|
199,854
|
Amortization
of debt discount
|
55,743
|
55,743
|
Stock
based compensation
|
225,374
|
159,469
|
Vesting
and re-pricing of stock options
|
-
|
196,114
|
Loss
on disposal of property and equipment
|
-
|
33,805
|
Change
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
660,834
|
(836,330)
|
Notes
receivable
|
-
|
(9,099)
|
Inventories
|
57,700
|
131,348
|
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
149,428
|
(76,313)
|
Accounts
payable
|
684,987
|
146,921
|
Accrued
expenses
|
1,461,547
|
418,593
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
2,136,796
|
(458,130)
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(12,762)
|
(46,970)
|
Capitalized
software
|
(570,093)
|
(442,578)
|
Purchase
of monitoring equipment and parts
|
(818,600)
|
(898,500)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(1,401,455)
|
(1,388,048)
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
Principal
payments on notes payable
|
(17,266)
|
(587,608)
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(17,266)
|
(587,608)
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(1,606)
|
3,766
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
716,469
|
(2,430,020)
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
1,769,921
|
4,903,045
|
Cash, end of period
|
$2,486,390
|
$2,473,025
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial information
of Track Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively, the
“Company” or “Track Group”) has been prepared in accordance with the
Instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). Certain information and disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant
to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management,
the accompanying interim consolidated financial information
contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s
financial position as of December 31, 2016, and results of its
operations for the three months ended December 31, 2016. These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that are
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2016. The results of operations for
the three months ended December 31, 2016 may not be indicative of
the results for the fiscal year ending September 30,
2017.
Certain
prior year amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements have been reclassified to conform with the current year
presentation.
(2) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Track Group and its subsidiaries. All significant
inter-company transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. Certain prior year
amounts on the consolidated statement of operations have
been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation. These reclassifications have no impact on the
previously reported results.
(3) RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies, which
are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date.
Unless otherwise discussed, the Company believes that the impact of
recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have
a material impact on its financial position or results of
operations upon adoption.
In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12. The amendments in this
update affect the guidance in Accounting Standards Update 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet
effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the
amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and
transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended
by Update 2014-09). Accounting Standards Update 2015-14, Revenue
from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the
Effective Date, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one
year. Management is currently evaluating the impact that this
amendment will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and
Licensing, (“ASU 2016-10”). This update was intended to clarify two
aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the
licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related
principles for those areas. The effective date for ASU 2016-10 is
the same as Topic 606, which begins for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. Management is currently
evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2016-10 on the
Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations
(Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net). This update was intended
to improve the operability and understandability of the
implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations.
The amendments in this update have the same effective date as ASC
606 as discussed above. Management is currently evaluating the
impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2016-08 on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock
Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting. The amendments in this update change the
accounting for certain stock-based compensation transactions,
including the income tax consequences and cash flow classification
for applicable transactions. The amendments in this update are
effective for annual periods beginning after December 31, 2016 and
interim periods within those annual periods. Management is
currently evaluating the impact that this amendment will have on
its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 841).
For lessees, the amendments in this update require that for all
leases not considered to be short term, a company recognize both a
lease liability and right-of-use asset on its balance sheet,
representing the obligation to make payments and the right to use
or control the use of a specified asset for the lease term. The
amendments in this update are effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those
annual periods. Management is currently evaluating the impact that
this amendment will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
August 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial
Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of
Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a
Going Concern. The new guidance requires management to assess a
company’s ability to continue as a going concern and to
provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances.
Disclosures are required when conditions give rise to substantial
doubt. Substantial doubt is deemed to exist when it is probable
that the company will be unable to meet its obligations within one
year from the financial statement issuance date. The new guidance
is effective for our annual period beginning September 30, 2017,
and all annual and interim periods thereafter. We are currently
evaluating what impact the adoption of this guidance will have on
our financial statements or disclosures in our financial
statements.
(4) IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of
an asset may not be recoverable and in the case of goodwill, at
least annually. The Company evaluates whether events and
circumstances have occurred which indicate possible impairment as
of each balance sheet date. If the carrying amount of an asset
exceeds its fair value, an impairment charge is recognized for the
amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair
value of the asset. Impairment of long-lived assets is
assessed at the lowest levels for which there is an identifiable
fair value that is independent of other groups of assets. The
Company recorded $74,787 and $60,000 of impairment expenses related
to monitoring equipment for the three months ended December 31,
2016 and 2015, respectively.
(5) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The Company accounts for its business acquisitions under the
acquisition method of accounting as indicated in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, which requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to recognize the fair value of all assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree; and establishes the acquisition date as the fair value
measurement point. Accordingly, the Company recognizes assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations,
including contingent assets and liabilities and non-controlling
interest in the acquiree, based on fair value estimates as of the
date of acquisition. In accordance with ASC 805, the Company
recognizes and measures goodwill as of the acquisition date, as the
excess of the fair value of the consideration paid over the fair
value of the identified net assets acquired.
Acquired Assets and Assumed Liabilities
Pursuant to ASC No. 805-10-25, if the initial accounting for a
business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting
period in which the combination occurs, but during the allowed
measurement period not to exceed one year from the acquisition
date, the Company retrospectively adjusts the provisional amounts
recognized at the acquisition date, by means of adjusting the
amount recognized for goodwill.
Contingent Consideration
In certain acquisitions, the Company has agreed to pay additional
amounts to sellers contingent upon achievement by the acquired
businesses of certain future goals which may include revenue
milestones, new customer accounts, and earnings targets. The
Company records contingent consideration based on its estimated
fair value as of the date of the acquisition. The Company evaluates
and adjusts the value of contingent consideration, if necessary, at
each reporting period based on the progress toward and likely
achievement of certain targets on which issuance of the contingent
consideration is based. Any differences between the
acquisition-date fair value and the changes in fair value of the
contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date are
recognized in current period earnings until the arrangement is
settled. If there is too much uncertainty surrounding the value of
contingent consideration, then the Company’s policy is to
wait until the end of the measurement period before making an
adjustment.
(6) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Comprehensive loss includes net loss as currently reported under
U.S. GAAP and other comprehensive loss. Other comprehensive loss
considers the effects of additional economic events, such as
foreign currency translation adjustments, that are not required to
be recorded in determining net loss, but rather are reported as a
separate component of stockholders’ equity. The Chilean Peso,
New Israeli Shekel and the Canadian Dollar are used as functional
currencies of the following operating subsidiaries: (i) Track Group
Chile SpA; (ii) Track Group International Ltd.; and (iii) Track
Group Analytics Limited, respectively. The balance sheets of all
subsidiaries have been converted into United States Dollars (USD)
at the prevailing exchange rate at December 31, 2016.
(7) NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net loss per common share (“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net loss per common share (“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss
attributable to common shareholders by the sum of the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the
weighted-average dilutive common share equivalents
outstanding. The computation of Diluted EPS does not assume
exercise or conversion of securities that would have an
anti-dilutive effect.
Common share equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the
exercise of common stock options and warrants. As of December
31, 2016 and 2015, there were 526,901 and 411,390 outstanding
common share equivalents, respectively, that were not included in
the computation of Diluted EPS for the three months ended December
31, 2016 and 2015, respectively as their effect would be
anti-dilutive. The common stock equivalents outstanding as of
December 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:
|
December 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Exercise
of outstanding common stock options and warrants
|
526,901
|
411,390
|
Total
common stock equivalents
|
526,901
|
411,390
|
(8) ACQUISITION
Track Group Analytics Limited
On November 26, 2014, the Company entered into a Share Purchase
Agreement to purchase from the shareholders of Track Group
Analytics Limited, formerly G2 Research Limited
(“TGA”), all issued and outstanding shares of TGA
for an aggregate purchase price of up to CAD$4,600,000 (the
“TGA Acquisition”),
of which CAD$2,000,000 was paid in cash to the TGA shareholders on
the Closing Date with the remainder of the purchase price to be
paid as follows: (i) CAD$600,000 to the former TGA shareholders in
shares of common stock of which one-half of the shares were issued
on the one-year anniversary of the closing and the balance was
issued on the two-year anniversary of the closing; and (ii) up to
CAD$2,000,000 to the former TGA shareholders in shares of common
stock over a two-year period beginning as of the closing,
subject to the achievement of certain milestones set forth in the
purchase agreement. The Company has paid approximately USD$880,000
of milestone payments through stock issuances through December 31,
2016 and the final milestone payment of 10,602 shares of common
stock was paid on January 31, 2017.
The fair value of patents, developed technology, customer
contracts/relationship, tradename and trademarks were capitalized
as of the acquisition date and will be subsequently amortized using
a straight-line method to depreciation and amortization expense
over their estimated useful lives.
(9) PREPAID AND OTHER EXPENSES
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for prepaid
expenses and other current assets approximate their fair market
value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. As of
December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the outstanding balance
of prepaid and other expenses was $515,000 and $816,708,
respectively. The $515,000 as of December 31, 2016 is
comprised largely of prepayments toward inventory purchases, vendor
deposits and other prepaid supplier expenses.
(10) INVENTORY
Inventory is valued at the lower of the cost or market. Cost
is determined using the first-in, first-out
(“FIFO”) method. Market is determined based
on the estimated net realizable value, which generally is the
item’s selling price. Inventory is periodically reviewed
in order to identify obsolete, damaged or impaired
items.
Inventory consists of finished goods that are to be shipped to
customers and parts used for minor repairs of
ReliAlertTM,
Shadow, and other tracking devices. Completed and shipped
ReliAlertTM,
and other tracking devices are reflected in Monitoring
Equipment. As of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016,
respectively, inventory consisted of the
following:
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
2016
|
Finished
goods inventory
|
$562,301
|
$620,001
|
Reserve
for damaged or obsolete inventory
|
(98,150)
|
(98,150)
|
Total
inventory, net of reserves
|
$464,151
|
$521,851
|
(11) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The following table summarizes property and equipment at December
31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, respectively:
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
2016
|
Equipment,
software and tooling
|
$1,003,659
|
$1,028,173
|
Automobiles
|
79,814
|
87,313
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,245,329
|
1,279,500
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
249,921
|
252,864
|
Total
property and equipment before accumulated depreciation
|
2,578,723
|
2,647,850
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(1,503,512)
|
(1,421,389)
|
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
$1,075,211
|
$1,226,461
|
Property and equipment depreciation expense for the three months
ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $50,291 and $176,088,
respectively.
(12) MONITORING EQUIPMENT
The following table summarizes monitoring equipment at December 31,
2016 and September 30, 2016, respectively:
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
2016
|
Monitoring
equipment
|
$8,119,187
|
$7,796,191
|
Less:
accumulated amortization
|
(3,535,297)
|
(3,438,074)
|
Monitoring
equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
$4,583,890
|
$4,358,117
|
The Company began leasing monitoring equipment to agencies for
offender tracking in April 2006 under contractual service
agreements. The monitoring equipment is amortized using the
straight-line method over an estimated useful life of three to five
years.
Amortization of monitoring equipment for the three months ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $332,993 and $376,467, respectively.
These expenses were recognized in cost of revenues.
(13) INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table summarizes intangible assets at December 31,
2016 and September 30, 2016, respectively:
|
December 31,
2016
|
September 30,
2016
|
Other
intangible assets:
|
|
|
Patent
& royalty agreements
|
21,170,565
|
21,170,565
|
Technology
|
10,009,880
|
9,651,074
|
Customer
relationships
|
2,535,721
|
2,555,086
|
Trade
name
|
314,275
|
319,383
|
Website
|
78,201
|
78,201
|
Total
intangible assets
|
34,108,642
|
33,774,309
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
(8,821,745)
|
(8,233,659)
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization
|
$25,286,897
|
$25,540,650
|
The intangible assets summarized above were purchased on various
dates from January 2010 through December 2016. The assets have
useful lives ranging from three to ten years. Amortization expense
of intangible assets for the three months ended December 31, 2016
and 2015 was $524,820 and $523,948,
respectively.
(14) GOODWILL
The following table summarizes the activity of goodwill at December
31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, respectively:
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
2016
|
Balance
- beginning of period
|
$7,955,876
|
$7,782,903
|
Effect
of foreign currency translation on goodwill
|
(114,656)
|
172,973
|
Balance
- end of period
|
$7,841,220
|
$7,955,876
|
Goodwill is recognized in connection with acquisition transactions
in accordance with ASC 805. The Company performs an impairment test
for goodwill annually or more frequently if indicators of potential
impairment exist. No impairment of goodwill had been recognized
through December 31, 2016.
(15) OTHER ASSETS
As of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016, the outstanding
balance of other assets was $3,016,318 and $2,900,911,
respectively. Other assets are comprised largely of a cash
collateralized performance bond for an international
customer. The Company anticipates this restricted cash will be
unrestricted and available to the Company upon completion of its
relationship with the customers, unless mutually agreed
otherwise.
(16) ACCRUED LIABILITES
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31,
2016 and September 30, 2016:
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
2016
|
Accrued
royalties
|
$11,070
|
$16,977
|
Accrued
payroll, taxes and employee benefits
|
1,772,606
|
1,424,812
|
Accrued
consulting
|
96,708
|
123,114
|
Accrued
taxes - foreign and domestic
|
115,824
|
311,614
|
Accrued
board of directors fees
|
119,468
|
96,000
|
Accrued
other expenses
|
156,880
|
143,101
|
Accrued
cellular costs
|
77,280
|
84
|
Accrued
outside services
|
216,413
|
13,768
|
Accrued
restructuring costs
|
566,330
|
-
|
Accrued
warranty and manufacturing costs
|
156,025
|
103,441
|
Accrued
interest
|
2,349,069
|
1,743,281
|
Total
accrued liabilities
|
$5,637,673
|
$3,976,192
|
(17) RESTRUCTURING
In the
first quarter of fiscal year 2017, the Company approved a plan to
restructure its business (the “Restructuring Plan”) to
streamline operations by consolidating its headquarters from Salt
Lake City, Utah into its existing Chicagoland office. The
Restructuring Plan, which is expected to be completed in fiscal
2017, also included outsourcing its monitoring center that allowed
the Company to reduce its headcount significantly, lower future
expenses and improve its ability to align workforce costs with
customer demands. The Company recognized expenses for the
Restructuring Plan of $566,330, including $448,330 of severance
expense and $118,000 of lease and moving costs, all of which will
be paid in fiscal 2017.
Total
fiscal year 2017 restructuring
charges and their utilization are summarized as
follows:
|
Employee
-related
|
Other
costs
|
Total
|
Liability at
September 30, 2016
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
Accrued
|
448,330
|
118,000
|
566,330
|
Payments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Liability at
December 31, 2016
|
$448,330
|
$118,000
|
$566,330
|
(18) DEBT OBLIGATIONS
On September 25, 2015, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement
(the “Loan
Agreement”) with one of
the Company’s related parties, Sapinda Asia Limited
(“Sapinda”) to provide the Company with a $5.0
million line of credit that accrues interest at a rate of 3% per
annum for undrawn funds, and 8% per annum for borrowed funds.
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement,
available funds may be drawn down at the Company’s request at
any time until the Loan Agreement matures on September 30, 2017
(the “Maturity
Date”), when all borrowed
funds, plus all accrued but unpaid interest will become due and
payable. The Company, however, may elect to satisfy any outstanding
obligations under the Loan Agreement prior to the Maturity Date
without penalties or fees. The Company did not draw on this line of
credit nor did it pay any interest during the three months ended
December 31, 2016. The undrawn balance of this line of credit at
December 31, 2016 was $1,600,356.
On May 1, 2016, the Company entered into an unsecured Loan
Agreement with Conrent Invest S.A., acting with respect to its
Compartment Safety III (the “Conrent Loan
Agreement”). Under
the Conrent Loan Agreement, the Company can borrow $5.0
million for working capital, repayment of debt, and operating
purposes. When funded, the unsecured loan will bear interest
at a rate of 8% per annum, payable in arrears semi-annually, with
all principal and accrued unpaid interest due on July 31,
2018. In addition, the Company anticipates paying the lender
an arrangement fee of $112,500 when it receives proceeds from this
loan. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had not received the
funds under the Conrent Loan Agreement.
Debt obligations as of December 31, 2016 and September 30, 2016,
respectively, are comprised of the following:
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
September 30,
2016
|
Unsecured
facility agreement with an entity whereby, as of June 30, 2015, the
Company may borrow up to $30.4 million bearing interest at a rate
of 8% per annum, payable in arrears semi-annually, with all
principal and accrued and unpaid interest due on July 31, 2018. A
$1.2 million origination fee was paid and recorded as a debt
discount and will be amortized as interest expense over the term of
the loan. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining debt discount was
$353,041. The Company did not pay interest on this loan during the
three months ended December 31, 2016.
|
|
$30,046,959
|
$29,991,216
|
|
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement whereby the Company can borrow up to $5.0 million at 8%
interest per annum on borrowed funds maturing on September 30,
2017.
|
|
3,399,644
|
3,399,644
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing notes payable to a Canadian governmental agency assumed in
conjunction with the G2 acquisition.
|
|
161,227
|
182,002
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
lease with effective interest rate of 12%. Lease matures
August 15, 2019.
|
|
17,260
|
18,673
|
|
|
|
|
Total
debt obligations
|
|
33,625,090
|
33,591,535
|
Less
current portion
|
|
(3,245,732)
|
(3,245,732)
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
|
$30,379,358
|
$30,345,803
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s future
maturities of debt obligations, net of the amortization of debt
discounts as of December 31, 2016:
Fiscal Year
|
Total
|
2017
|
$3,468,705
|
2018
|
30,448,018
|
2019
|
42,250
|
2020
|
19,158
|
2021
& thereafter
|
-
|
Debt
discount
|
(353,041)
|
Total
|
$33,625,090
|
(19) RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related-Party Loan Agreement
On September 25, 2015, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement
(the “Loan
Agreement”) with one of
the Company’s related parties, Sapinda Asia Limited
(“Sapinda”) to provide the Company with a $5.0
million line of credit that accrues interest at a rate of 3% per
annum for undrawn funds, and 8% per annum for borrowed funds.
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement,
available funds may be drawn down at the Company’s request at
any time until the Loan Agreement matures on September 30, 2017
(the “Maturity
Date”), when all borrowed
funds, plus all accrued but unpaid interest will become due and
payable. The Company, however, may elect to satisfy any outstanding
obligations under the Loan Agreement prior to the Maturity Date
without penalties or fees. The Company did not draw on this line of
credit nor did it pay any interest during the three months ended
December 31, 2016. The undrawn balance of this line of credit at
December 31, 2016 was $1,600,356.
Stock Payable – Related Party
Changes in the stock payable liability are shown
below:
|
December 31,
|
September 30,
|
|
2016
|
2016
|
Beginning
balance
|
$3,289,879
|
$3,501,410
|
Payment
of shares for achieving performance milestones
|
-
|
(211,531)
|
Ending
balance
|
$3,289,879
|
$3,289,879
|
Shares of common stock valued at up to $3,000,000, included in the
beginning balance shown above, can be earned by the former owner of
GPS Global Tracking and Surveillance System, Ltd., now
a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, subject to
achieving certain milestones. The measurement period of the
milestones ends April 1, 2017.
In connection with the acquisition of TGA (See Note 8), the Company
recognized a liability for stock payable to the former owners of
the entity acquired. In conjunction with the respective purchase
agreements, shares of the Company’s common stock are payable
based on the achievement of certain milestones on or before
November 26, 2016. The final milestone payment of 10,602 shares of
common stock related to the TGA acquisition was paid in the second
fiscal quarter of 2017.
Each of the foregoing related-party transactions was reviewed and
approved by disinterested and independent members of the Company's
Board of Directors.
(20) PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK
The Company is authorized to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of
common stock, $0.0001 par value per share. During the three months
ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued no additional shares of
common stock. The Company accrued fees for payment to an individual
for their services as a member of the Board of Directors in the
fourth quarter 2016 that is expected to be issued as stock in
2017.
The Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share. The Company's Board
of Directors has the authority to amend the Company's Articles of
Incorporation, without further shareholder approval, to designate
and determine, in whole or in part, the preferences, limitations
and relative rights of the preferred stock before any issuance of
the preferred stock, and to create one or more series of preferred
stock. As of December 31, 2016, there were no shares of preferred
stock outstanding.
(21) STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
Stock Incentive Plan
At the annual meeting of shareholders on March 21, 2011, the
shareholders approved the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the
“2012
Plan”). The 2012
Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and
nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend
equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, restricted stock
units, other stock-based awards and performance-based awards to
employees and certain non-employees who provide services to the
Company in lieu of cash. A total of 90,000 shares were initially
authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2012
Plan. At the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders held on May 19,
2015, our stockholders approved a 713,262 share increase to the
total number of shares authorized under the 2012
Plan. As of December 31,
2016, 108,784 shares of common stock were available for future
grants under the 2012 Plan.
All Options
and Warrants
The fair value of each stock option and warrant grant is estimated
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
During the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the
Company granted 154,410 and 40,261 warrants to purchase shares of
common stock. The warrants for Board members vest immediately and
expire two years from grant date and warrants issued to employees
vest annually over either a two to three year period and expire two
years after the final vesting date of the grant. During the
three months ended December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015 no
options were issued under the 2012 Plan. The Company recorded
expense of $200,374 and $95,968 for the three months ended December
31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to the issuance and
vesting of outstanding stock options and warrants.
The option and warrant grants for three months ended December 31,
2016 were valued using the Black-Scholes model with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
Three Months Ended
December 31
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Expected
stock price volatility
|
119%
|
51%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
0.60%
|
0.64%
|
Expected
life of options/warrants
|
2
years
|
2
years
|
The expected life of stock options (warrants) represents the period
of time that the stock options or warrants are expected to be
outstanding based on the simplified method allowed under GAAP. The
expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of
the Company’s common stock. The risk-free interest rate
represents the U.S. Treasury bill rate for the expected life of the
related stock options (warrants). The dividend yield represents the
Company’s anticipated cash dividends over the expected life
of the stock options (warrants).
A summary of stock option activity for the three months ended
December 31, 2016 is presented below:
|
|
Shares Under Option
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|
|||
Outstanding as of September 30, 2016
|
|
|
504,991
|
|
|
$
|
10.78
|
|
1.15 years
|
|
$ |
182,095
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
154,410
|
|
|
$
|
4.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
|
|
(32,500)
|
|
|
$
|
(19.58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
626,901
|
|
|
$
|
8.90
|
|
1.34 years
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Exercisable as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
526,901
|
|
|
$
|
9.87
|
|
0.89 years
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable is based
on the Company’s share price of $4.50 at December 31,
2016.
(22) INCOME
TAXES
The
Company recognizes deferred income tax assets or liabilities for
the expected future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the financial statements or income tax returns.
Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are determined based upon
the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply
when the differences are expected to be settled or
realized. Deferred income tax assets are reviewed periodically
for recoverability and valuation allowances are provided as
necessary. Interest and penalties related to income tax
liabilities, when incurred, are classified in interest expense and
income tax provision, respectively.
For the
three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred
net losses for income tax purposes of $2,613,759 and $2,127,238,
respectively. The amount and ultimate realization of the
benefits from the net operating losses is dependent, in part, upon
the tax laws in effect, the Company's future earnings, and other
future events, the effects of which cannot be determined. The
Company has established a valuation allowance for all deferred
income tax assets not offset by deferred income tax liabilities due
to the uncertainty of their realization. Accordingly, there is
no benefit for income taxes in the accompanying statements of
operations.
(23) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Matters
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings
incidental to the conduct of our business. Historically, the
outcome of all such legal proceedings has not, in the aggregate,
had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity. Other than as set forth below,
there are no additional pending or threatened legal proceedings at
this time.
Lazar Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc. On March 29, 2012,
Lazar Leybovich, Dovie Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a
complaint in the 11th Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County,
Florida alleging breach of contract with regard to certain Stock
Redemption Agreements. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew the
complaint. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on November
15, 2012. On May 2, 2016, the Court resolved this case in favor of
the Company by granting the Company's motion for summary judgment.
The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging
the court’s ruling on the motion for summary
judgment.
Boggs et al. v. Judicial Electronic Monitoring, SecureAlert, Inc.
et al. On December 3, 2015,
Candace Boggs et al. filed a complaint in the State Court of
Dougherty County, Georgia, alleging breach of contract breach of
contract and negligence in monitoring of certain offenders in
Dougherty County, Georgia, as well as a request for punitive
damages. Plaintiffs withdrew their complaint in February 2016, but
refiled the complaint on October 12, 2016. We believe the
allegations are inaccurate and are defending the case vigorously.
We believe the probability of incurring a material loss to be
remote.
Track Group, Inc. v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd.
On May 18, 2016, the Company filed a
complaint in District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt
Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, under the terms of a
loan agreement and promissory note between the Company and I.C.S.
of the Bahamas Co. Ltd (“ICS”). We believe we will be
successful in this action to for amounts owed under the loan
agreement and promissory note; however, the Company may encounter
challenges enforcing a favorable judgment in the foreign
jurisdiction where ICS resides.
Track Group Inc. v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd.
On September 26, 2016 the Company
filed a Notice of Arbitration with the International Centre for
Dispute Resolution, alleging breach of contract by I.C.S. of the
Bahamas Co. Ltd. (“ICS”). Under the terms of the
Commercial and Monitoring Representative Agreement dated November
30, 2010 (the “C&M Agreement”) between the Company
and ICS any dispute must be resolved by binding arbitration. The
Company asserts that ICS had failed to pay the Company fees owed to
it under the C&M Agreement. The Company is confident it will be
successful in the arbitration; however, the Company may encounter
challenges enforcing a successful arbitration award in the foreign
jurisdiction where ICS resides.
John Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois.
On November 30, 2016, the Company was
served with a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief
Financial Officer of the Company filed in District Court of the
Third Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach
of contract, among other causes of action, related to Mr.
Merrill’s termination of employment. Mr. Merrill is seeking
not less than $590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and costs. Mr.
Merrill’s employment with the Company was terminated
effective September 27, 2016. We believe the allegations and claims
are unfounded, are without merit, and we have submitted
counterclaims against Mr. Merrill. We intend to defend the case
vigorously and believe the probability of incurring a material loss
to be remote.
(24) SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
In accordance with the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC 855,
we have evaluated subsequent events, through the filing date
and noted that no subsequent events have occurred that are
reasonably likely to impact the financial statements.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Item 2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains information that constitutes
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange
Act”). Generally, the statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical can be
considered to be “forward-looking
statements.” These statements represent our
expectations, hopes, beliefs, anticipations, commitments,
intentions, and strategies regarding the future. They may be
identified by the use of words or phrases such as
“believes,” “expects,”
“intends,” “anticipates,”
“should,” “plans,” “estimates,”
“projects,” “potential,” and
“will,” among others. Forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, statements contained in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations regarding our financial performance,
revenue, and expense levels in the future and the sufficiency of
our existing assets to fund future operations and capital spending
needs. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. In addition,
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from our historical experience and our present expectations or
projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are
not limited to, those described in “Risk Factors” in
our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, and those described
from time to time in our reports filed with the SEC.
The following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that are contained in this Report, as
well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form
10-K, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, and Current
Reports on Form 8-K that have been filed with the SEC through the
date of this Report. Except as otherwise indicated, as used in this
Report, the terms “the Company,” “Track Group,” “we,” “our,” “us,” refer to Track Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation.
General
Our
core business is based on the manufacture and leasing of patented
tracking and monitoring solutions to federal, state and local law
enforcement agencies, both in the U.S and abroad, for the
electronic monitoring of offenders and offering unique data
analytics services on a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) business
model. Currently, the Company deploys offender based
management services that combine patented GPS tracking
technologies, fulltime 24/7/365 global monitoring capabilities,
case management, and proprietary data analytics. We offer
customizable tracking solutions that leverage real-time tracking
data, best-practices monitoring, and analytics capabilities to
create complete, end-to-end tracking solutions.
Our
devices consist principally of the ReliAlert product line, which is
supplemented by the ancillary Shadow and R.A.D.A.R product
lines. These devices are generally leased on a daily rate
basis and may be combined with our monitoring center services,
proprietary software and data analytics subscription to provide an
end-to-end PaaS.
ReliAlert and
Shadow. Our tracking
devices utilize patented technology and are securely attached
around an offender’s ankle with a tamper resistant strap that
cannot be adjusted or removed without detection, unless by a
supervising officer, and which is activated through services
provided by our monitoring centers. The ReliAlert and Shadow units
are intelligent devices with integrated computer circuitry,
utilizing both GPS and RF, and constructed from case-hardened
plastics designed to promptly notify the intervention centers of
any attempt made to breach applicable protocols, or to remove or
otherwise tamper with the device or optical strap housing. The
ReliAlert platform also incorporates voice communication technology
that provides officers with 24/7/365 voice communication with the
offenders. Both devices are FCC, CE and PTCRB certified and
protected by numerous patents and trademarks.
R.A.D.A.R. Our
Real-Time Alcohol Detection and Recognition (R.A.D.A.R.) device is
a comprehensive proprietary alcohol offender supervision and
monitoring system with a fuel-cell based, breath-alcohol testing
system that incorporates a number of safeguards to prevent
tampering, including biometric user identification to provide
accurate, actionable alcohol alerts. All breath-alcohol tests are
time stamped and include a GPS fix. The web-enabled reporting
center assures testing compliance with notifications via text or
email.
Monitoring Center
Services. Our
monitoring center facilities provide live 24/7/365 monitoring of
all alarms generated from our devices, as well as customer and
technical support. Our monitoring center operators play a vital
role, and as such, we staff our centers with highly-trained,
bi-lingual individuals. These operators act as an extension of
agency resources receiving alarms, communicating and intervening
with offenders regarding violations, and interacting with
supervision staff, all pursuant to agency-established
protocols. The facilities have redundant power source, battery
back-up and triple redundancy in voice, data, and IP. The Company
has established monitoring centers in the U.S. and Chile. In
addition the Company has assisted in the establishment of
monitoring centers for customers and local partners in other global
locations. During the first and second fiscal quarters of 2017, the
company has transitioned one of its monitoring centers to an
independent vendor, whom we monitor closely. See Note 17 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Data Analytics
Services. Our
TrackerPAL software, TrackerPAL Mobile, combined with our Data
Analytic analysis tools, provide an integrated platform allowing
case managers and law enforcement officers’ quick access
views of a targets travel behavior, mapping, and provide inference
on patterns. Our advanced data analytics service offers a
highly complex predictive reporting mechanism that combines modern
statistical methods, developed using computer science and used by
intelligence agencies that separate noteworthy events from normal
events, rank offender cases according to their need for
supervision, and relate decision-relevant metrics to benchmarks in
real-time.
Strategy
Our
global growth strategy is to continue to expand service offerings
on a subscription basis that empowers professionals in security,
law enforcement, corrections and rehabilitation organizations
worldwide with a single-sourced, real-time, end-to-end offender
management solution that integrates reliable intervention
technologies to support re-socialization, monitoring, and
predictive analytics for offenders. To accomplish this objective,
we have and will continue to innovate and grow our portfolio of
proprietary and non-proprietary real-time monitoring and
intervention products and services. These include GPS, RF, drug and
alcohol testing for offenders, and predictive analytics. Given
the flexibility of our platform, our device technology, tracking,
monitoring, and analytical capabilities, we believe that our
solutions may apply to other industry verticals that require
tracking, monitoring and predictive analytics such as those
entities responsible for individuals on parole or
bail.
Critical Accounting Policies
From
time to time, management reviews and evaluates certain accounting
policies that are considered to be significant in determining our
results of operations and financial position.
A description of the Company’s critical accounting policies
that affect the preparation of the Company’s financial
statements is set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2016. Such policies were
unchanged during the three months ended December 31,
2016.
The
preparation of financial statements requires management to make
significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. By their
nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty. We assess the reasonableness of our estimates,
including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible
assets, warranty obligations, product liability, revenue, legal
matters and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical
experience as well as available current information on a regular
basis. Management uses this information to form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended December 31, 2016, Compared to Three Months
Ended December 31, 2015
Revenue
For
the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized
revenue from operations of $7,671,490 compared to $6,317,604 for
the three months ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $1,353,886
or 21%. The increase in revenue was principally the result of
(i) expansion and growth of offender monitoring in Chile, and (ii)
increases in total growth of our North American
monitoring operations driven by clients in Indiana and
Virginia.
Other
revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2016 increased to
$406,477 from $360,178 in the same period in 2015 largely due to
higher sales of consumable items. Notwithstanding, we will continue
to focus on recurring subscription based opportunities and not
equipment sales.
Cost of Revenue
During the three months ended December 31, 2016,
cost of revenue totaled $3,453,902 compared to cost of revenue
during the three months ended December 31, 2015 of $2,429,179, an
increase of $1,024,723 or approximately
42%. The increase in cost of
revenue was largely the result of increases in total monitoring and
analytics activity, which drove up monitoring center personnel costs by $116,821,
communication costs by $411,222, repairs and maintenance by
$157,338, outside monitoring costs by $321,704 and other
incremental revenue related costs.
The
Company is examining ways to lower device manufacturing costs and
increase automation of our software system to offset other
increases in cost of revenue. During the second fiscal quarter of
2017, the Company will complete the outsourcing of our monitoring
centers to an independent vendor to lower monitoring
costs.
Depreciation and amortization included in cost of
revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
totaled $445,493 and $488,967, respectively. Certain devices became
fully depreciated in the first quarter of 2017. These costs
represents depreciation of monitoring devices as well as the
amortization of certain royalty agreements. Devices are depreciated
over a three to five year useful life. Royalty agreements are being
amortized over a ten year useful life. The Company believes these
lives are appropriate due to rapid changes in electronic monitoring
technology and the corresponding potential for obsolescence.
Management periodically assesses estimates for useful lives of
assets for appropriateness.
Impairment cost for equipment and parts for the three months ended
December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $74,787 and $60,000,
respectively. These costs relate to disposal of obsolete
inventory, monitoring equipment and parts as we continue to make
significant enhancements to our various devices and monitoring
platform.
Gross Profit and Margin
During the three months ended December 31, 2016,
gross profit totaled $4,217,588, resulting in a gross margin of 55%
compared to $3,888,425 or a gross margin of 62% during the three
months ended December 31, 2015. The increase in
absolute gross profit is due to higher overall revenues. The
decrease in gross margin is due to the increase in certain aspects
of cost of revenue, including communication costs, internal and
external monitoring costs and repairs and
maintenance.
General and Administrative Expense
During
the three months ended December 31, 2016, general and
administrative expense totaled $3,768,099 compared to $3,411,643
for the three months ended December 31, 2015. The increase of
$356,456 or approximately 10% in general and administrative costs
resulted largely from increases in bad debt expense, outside
service fees, training and recruiting costs and board of director
fees, partially offset by lower legal and professional fees and
lower travel related expenses.
Restructuring Costs
During
the three months ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $566,330 of
costs related to the relocation of our headquarters from Salt Lake
City, Utah to our existing Chicagoland office. These costs include
the transfer of our own monitoring center activities to a
highly-specialized third party, severance pay related to a
reduction of approximately 65 monitoring center employees, as well
as other support employees and moving costs. (See Note 17 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).
Selling and Marketing Expense
During
the three months ended December 31, 2016, selling and marketing
expense increased to $627,749 compared to $620,029 for the three
months ended December 31, 2015. The $7,720, or approximately 1%
increase resulted from additional consulting and outside services,
largely offset by lower wages and travel related
expenses.
Research and Development Expense
During
the three months ended December 31, 2016, research and development
expense totaled $530,806 compared to $547,159 for the three months
ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $16,353 or approximately
3%. The Company is significantly enhancing its technology
platform to improve the efficiency of its software, firmware, user
interface, and automation. As a result of these improvements,
$570,093 was capitalized as developed technology during the three
months ended December 31, 2016 and $442,578 was capitalized in the
three months ended December 31, 2015. A portion of these expenses
would have been recognized as research and development expense,
absent the significant enhancements to the technology.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
During
the three months ended December 31, 2016, depreciation and
amortization expense totaled $575,111 compared to $700,035 for the
three months ended December 31, 2015. The $124,924, or
approximately 18% decrease was largely the result of certain
property and equipment assets becoming fully
depreciated.
Other Income and Expense
For the three months ended December 31, 2016, net
interest expense was $647,103 compared to $694,508 for the three
months ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $47,405 or
approximately 7%. The decrease in net
interest expense resulted primarily from a penalty due from the
lender under the agreement, partially offset interest payable on
the undrawn funds of the agreement and interest expense on drawn
funds for the three months ended December 31,
2016.
Net Loss
The Company had a net loss of $2,613,759 for the
three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of
$2,127,238 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, an
increase of $486,521. This increase in net
loss is largely due to an increase in cost of revenues,
restructuring costs and general and administrative
costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During prior fiscal
years, the Company has supplemented cash flows to finance the
business from borrowings under a credit facility, a revolving line
of credit from one of its shareholders, receipt of certain
disgorgement funds, and from the sale and issuance of debt
securities. No such borrowings or sales of equity securities
occurred during the three months ended December 31,
2016.
As
of December 31, 2016, the Company had unrestricted cash of
$2,486,390 and a working capital deficit of $2,426,015, compared to
unrestricted cash of $1,769,921 and a working capital surplus of
$344,283 as of September 30, 2016.
The
Company provided $2,136,796 from operating activities during the
three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to a use of funds of
$458,130 in the three months ended December 31, 2015. The Company
had a net loss of $2,613,759 for the three months ended December
31, 2016, which included certain non-cash items, such as
depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, and bad
debt expense. In addition accounts receivable was $660,834 lower
and accounts payable and accrued expenses increased $2,144,520 for
the three months ended December 31, 2016.
The Company used cash of $1,401,455 for investing
activities during the three months ended December 31, 2016,
compared to $1,388,048 of cash used in investing activities in the
three months ended December 31, 2015. Cash used for investing
activities was spent on significant enhancements of the
Company’s next generation software platform and for purchases
of monitoring and other equipment to meet demand during the three
months ended December 31, 2016.
The
Company used $17,266 of cash for financing activities during the
three months ended December 31, 2016, compared to $587,608 in cash
used in the three months ended December 31, 2015.
The
Company's Restructuring Plan approved in the quarter ended December
31, 2016 is intended to reduce certain expenses, and reduce the
Company's dependence on external sources of financing. While the
Restructuring Plan is intended to result in a reduction in
operating losses and cash used in operations, the Company currently
remains dependent on external sources of financing to continue
operations. As a result, management intends to pursue certain
options to reduce its dependence on external sources of capital,
which may include refinancing certain debt, extending debt
maturities, converting certain debt to equity, selling certain
non-core assets, and/or raising additional capital, although no
assurances can be given that management will be successful in
consummating any of the foregoing. In addition to the
foregoing, the Company intends to meet its working capital
requirements by (i) requesting advances under the Loan Agreement
with Sapinda Asia Limited (“Sapinda”) (“Sapinda Loan Agreement”) and Loan
Agreement with Conrent Invest S.A. (“Conrent”) (“Conrent Loan Agreement”), and
(ii) further reducing operating and other costs under the
Restructuring Plan; provided,
however, advances under the Sapinda Loan Agreement and
Conrent Loan Agreement may not be available to the Company. As
of December 31, 2016, $3.4 million and $30.4 million were owed to
Sapinda and Conrent under the Sapinda Loan Agreement and Conrent
Loan Agreement (together, the “Loan Agreements”),
respectively. Together with available cash and cash flow from
operations, and assuming the Company is able to obtain further
advances under the Loan Agreements, management believes that the
Company may have adequate working capital to provide for its
working capital requirements through the remainder of its fiscal
year ending September 30, 2017, although no assurances can be
given.
Item 3. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The
Company footprint extends to several countries outside the United
States, and we intend to continue to expand our foreign
operations. As a result, our revenues and results of
operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates,
interest rates, and other uncertainties inherent in doing business
in more than one currency. In addition, our operations are
exposed to risks that are associated with changes in social,
political, and economic conditions in the foreign countries in
which we operate, including changes in the laws and policies that
govern foreign investment, as well as, to a lesser extent, changes
in United States laws and regulations relating to foreign trade and
investment.
Foreign Currency Risks
We
had $2,795,781 and $2,554,808 in revenue from sources outside the
United States for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and
2015, respectively. Although we typically transact the sale of
monitoring equipment and services in U.S. Dollars, we do receive
payments in an equivalent value of foreign currencies which
resulted in foreign exchange losses of $116,442 and $18,149 during
the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,
respectively. Changes in currency exchange rates affect the
relative prices at which we sell our products and purchase goods
and services. Given the uncertainty of exchange rate
fluctuations, we cannot estimate the effect of these fluctuations
on our future business, product pricing, results of operations, or
financial condition.
We
did not use foreign currency exchange contracts or derivative
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. To
the extent foreign sales become a more significant part of our
business in the future, we may seek to implement strategies which
make use of these or other hedging instruments in order to minimize
the effects of foreign currency exchange on our
business.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that
we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange
Act”), (i) is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules
and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer (our principal financial and accounting officer),
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our
management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange
Act. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of December 31,
2016.
Changes in Internal Controls
We
maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting that
is designed to provide reasonable assurance that our books and
records accurately reflect our transactions and that our
established policies and procedures are followed. There
was no change in our internal control over financial reporting
during our quarter ended December 31, 2016 that materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
We are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings
incidental to the conduct of our business. Historically, the
outcome of all such legal proceedings has not, in the aggregate,
had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations or liquidity. Other than as set forth below,
there are no additional pending or threatened legal proceedings at
this time.
Lazar Leybovich et al v. SecureAlert, Inc. On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich,
Dovie Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th
Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach
of contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption
Agreements. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew the
complaint. The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on
November 15, 2012. On May 2, 2016, the Court resolved this case in
favor of the Company by granting the Company's motion for summary
judgment. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on June 1,
2016 challenging the court’s ruling on the motion for summary
judgment.
Boggs et al. v. Judicial Electronic Monitoring, SecureAlert, Inc.
et al. On December 3,
2015, Candace Boggs et al. filed a complaint in the State Court of
Dougherty County, Georgia, alleging breach of contract and
negligence in monitoring of certain offenders in Dougherty County,
Georgia, as well as a request for punitive damages. Plaintiffs
withdrew their complaint in February 2016, but refiled the
complaint on October 12, 2016. We believe the allegations are
inaccurate and are defending the case vigorously. We believe the
probability of incurring a material loss to be
remote.
Track Group, Inc. v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd.
On May 18, 2016, the Company filed a
complaint in District Court of the Third Judicial District in Salt
Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract, under the terms of a
loan agreement and promissory note between the Company and I.C.S.
of the Bahamas Co. Ltd (“ICS”). We believe we will be
successful in this action to for amounts owed under the loan
agreement and promissory note; however, the Company may encounter
problems enforcing a favorable judgment in the foreign jurisdiction
where ICS resides.
Track Group Inc. v. I.C.S. of the Bahamas Co. Ltd.
On September 26, 2016 the Company
filed a Notice of Arbitration with the International Centre for
Dispute Resolution, alleging breach of contract by I.C.S. of the
Bahamas Co. Ltd. (“ICS”). Under the terms of the
Commercial and Monitoring Representative Agreement dated November
30, 2010 (the “C&M Agreement”) between the Company
and ICS any dispute must be resolved by binding arbitration. The
Company asserts that ICS had failed to pay the Company fees owed to
it under the C&M Agreement. The Company is confident it will be
successful in the arbitration; however, the Company may encounter
problems enforcing a successful arbitration award in the foreign
jurisdiction where ICS resides.
John Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois. On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with
a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial
Officer of the Company filed in District Court of the Third
Judicial District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of
contract, among other causes of action, related to Mr.
Merrill’s termination of employment. Mr. Merrill is
seeking not less than $590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and
costs. Mr. Merrill’s employment with the Company was
terminated effective September 27, 2016. We believe the
allegations and claims are unfounded, are without merit, and we
have submitted counterclaims against Mr. Merrill. We
intend to defend the case vigorously and believe the probability of
incurring a material loss to be remote.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
We
have identified the following risk factor in addition to the risk
factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2016:
We rely on significant suppliers and other third parties for key
products, cellular access and monitoring services. If
we do not renew these agreements when they expire, or if these
suppliers or other third parties otherwise fail to comply with
their contractual obligations, our results of operations or
financial condition could be adversely affected.
We have entered into an agreement with three national providers for
cellular services. We also rely currently on a single source for
the large majority of the manufacturing of our products, as well as
for our offender monitoring services provided to all of our U.S.
and certain of our international customers. If any of these
significant suppliers were to cease providing products or services
to us, or if the service levels fall below levels required by our
customers, we would be required to seek alternative sources. No
assurances can be provided that alternate sources could be located
or that the delay or additional expense associated with locating
alternative sources for these products or services or otherwise
addressing the deficiency in service levels would not materially
and adversely affect our business and financial
condition.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon
Senior Securities.
None.
Not
applicable.
None.
(a)
|
Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
|
Exhibit Number
|
|
Title of Document
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31(i)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
31(ii)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement by and between Track Group, Inc. and Derek
Cassell dated, December 1, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 +
|
|
Services Agreement, dated December 7, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement by and between Track Group Inc.
and Derek Cassell, dated February 13, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE
|
+ Confidential
treatment has been requested for certain confidential portions of
this exhibit pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. In accordance with Rule 24b-2, these confidential
portions have been omitted from this exhibit and filed separately
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission."
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Track Group, Inc.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Date: February 14, 2017
|
By:
|
/s/ Guy Dubois
|
|
|
|
Guy Dubois
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: February 14, 2017
|
By:
|
/s/ Peter K. Poli
|
|
|
|
Peter K. Poli, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
-22-