Track Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2019 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the transition period from ___________ to
____________
Commission file number: 0-23153
Track Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
87-0543981
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
200 E. 5th Avenue Suite 100, Naperville, IL 60563
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
(877) 260-2010
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area
code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes
[X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting
company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [
]
|
Non-accelerated filer [X]
|
Smaller reporting company [X]
|
|
Emerging growth company [ ]
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. [
]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [
] No [X]
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common
Stock, par value $0.0001 per share
|
TRCK
|
OTCQX
Marketplace
|
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common
stock as of August 9, 2019 was 11,401,650
Track
Group, Inc.
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2019
INDEX
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
18
|
||
25
|
||
26
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
27
|
||
28
|
||
28
|
||
28
|
||
28
|
||
28
|
||
|
|
|
29
|
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial
Statements
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
Assets
|
June 30,
2019
(unaudited)
|
September 30,
2018
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
Cash
|
$6,878,916
|
$5,446,557
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,542,103
and $3,152,966, respectively
|
5,533,258
|
5,978,896
|
Note
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $234,733 at
September 30,2018
|
-
|
-
|
Prepaid
expense and other
|
1,374,236
|
1,270,043
|
Inventory,
net of reserves of $26,934, respectively
|
253,238
|
277,119
|
Total
current assets
|
14,039,648
|
12,972,615
|
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,235,720 and
$1,999,222, respectively
|
741,641
|
745,475
|
Monitoring
equipment, net of accumulated amortization of $6,215,061 and
$5,325,654, respectively
|
2,619,670
|
3,162,542
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $13,608,444 and
$12,016,512, respectively
|
22,283,352
|
23,253,054
|
Goodwill
|
8,123,550
|
8,076,759
|
Other
assets
|
124,522
|
145,839
|
Total
assets
|
$47,932,383
|
$48,356,284
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$2,424,626
|
$2,518,030
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
12,209,866
|
10,333,103
|
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
30,437,825
|
30,437,810
|
Total
current liabilities
|
45,072,317
|
43,288,943
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
3,399,644
|
3,428,975
|
Total
liabilities
|
48,471,961
|
46,717,918
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 21)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value: 30,000,000 shares
authorized;11,401,650 shares outstanding, respectively
|
1,140
|
1,140
|
Series
A Convertible Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 1,200,000 shares
authorized; 0 shares outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
Paid
in capital
|
302,230,868
|
302,102,866
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(301,657,263)
|
(299,495,370)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,114,323)
|
(970,270)
|
Total
equity (deficit)
|
(539,578)
|
1,638,366
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
$47,932,383
|
$48,356,284
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
|
Three Months
Ended
|
Nine Months
Ended
|
||
|
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring
and other related services
|
$7,904,015
|
$7,549,779
|
$23,841,746
|
$22,062,789
|
Product
sales and other
|
1,051,449
|
129,196
|
1,416,495
|
423,056
|
Total
revenue
|
8,955,464
|
7,678,975
|
25,258,241
|
22,485,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
Monitoring,
products and other related services
|
3,661,470
|
3,039,755
|
9,827,373
|
8,409,604
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
500,704
|
432,952
|
1,512,583
|
1,377,760
|
Total cost of
revenue
|
4,162,174
|
3,472,707
|
11,339,956
|
9,787,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
4,793,290
|
4,206,268
|
13,918,285
|
12,698,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
General &
administrative
|
2,725,991
|
3,703,869
|
9,464,332
|
10,856,950
|
Selling &
marketing
|
556,122
|
466,048
|
1,637,026
|
1,394,778
|
Research &
development
|
350,532
|
254,060
|
954,276
|
600,814
|
Depreciation &
amortization
|
521,013
|
520,639
|
1,556,378
|
1,624,916
|
Total operating
expense
|
4,153,658
|
4,944,616
|
13,612,012
|
14,477,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
639,632
|
(738,348)
|
306,273
|
(1,778,977)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense,
net
|
(597,623)
|
(594,452)
|
(1,783,210)
|
(2,074,245)
|
Currency exchange
rate gain (loss)
|
201,972
|
(166,586)
|
(134,795)
|
(442,706)
|
Other income,
net
|
-
|
3,733
|
143
|
21,199
|
Total other income (expense)
|
(395,651)
|
(757,305)
|
(1,917,862)
|
(2,495,752)
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
243,981
|
(1,495,653)
|
(1,611,589)
|
(4,274,729)
|
Income
tax expense
|
313,328
|
360,807
|
457,335
|
360,807
|
Net
loss attributable to common shareholders
|
(69,347)
|
(1,856,460)
|
(2,068,924)
|
(4,635,536)
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments
|
15,255
|
(861,637)
|
(144,053)
|
(431,186)
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
$(54,092)
|
$(2,718,097)
|
$(2,212,977)
|
$(5,066,722)
|
Net
loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
$(0.01)
|
$(0.17)
|
$(0.18)
|
$(0.44)
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
11,251,650
|
10,885,444
|
11,200,551
|
10,608,127
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
TRACK GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
(Unaudited)
|
Common stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2018
|
11,401,650
|
$1,140
|
$302,102,866
|
$(299,495,370)
|
$(970,270)
|
$1,638,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASC
606 modified retrospective adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(92,969)
|
-
|
(92,969)
|
Amortization
of equity-based compensation granted to employees
|
-
|
-
|
83,218
|
-
|
-
|
83,218
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
96,673
|
96,673
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,734,918)
|
-
|
(1,734,918)
|
Balance December 31, 2018
|
11,401,650
|
1,140
|
302,186,084
|
(301,323,257)
|
(873,597)
|
(9,630)
|
Amortization
of equity-based compensation granted to employees
|
-
|
-
|
25,097
|
-
|
-
|
25,097
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(255,981)
|
(255,981)
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(264,659)
|
-
|
(264,659)
|
Balance March 31, 2019
|
11,401,650
|
1,140
|
302,211,181
|
(301,587,916)
|
(1,129,578)
|
(505,173)
|
Amortization
of equity-based compensation granted to employees
|
-
|
-
|
19,687
|
-
|
-
|
19,687
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
-
|
-
|
|
-
|
15,255
|
15,255
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
|
(69,347)
|
-
|
(69,347)
|
Balance June 30, 2019
|
11,401,650
|
$1,140
|
$302,230,868
|
$(301,657,263)
|
$(1,114,323)
|
$(539,578)
|
|
Common stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance September 30, 2017
|
10,480,984
|
$1,048
|
$300,717,861
|
$(294,067,329)
|
$(675,822)
|
$5,975,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation
of Common Stock issued to Board Member
|
(18,551)
|
(2)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2)
|
Modification
of warrants
|
|
|
149,888
|
|
|
149,888
|
Amortization
of equity-based compensation granted to employees
|
-
|
-
|
110,859
|
-
|
-
|
110,859
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
188,725
|
188,725
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,042,591)
|
-
|
(1,042,591)
|
Balance
December 31, 2017
|
10,462,433
|
1,046
|
300,978,608
|
(295,109,920)
|
(487,097)
|
5,382,637
|
Modification
of warrants
|
|
|
12,530
|
|
|
12,530
|
Amortization
of equity-based compensation granted to employees
|
-
|
-
|
47,694
|
-
|
-
|
47,694
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
241,726
|
241,726
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,736,485)
|
-
|
(1,736,485)
|
Balance March 31, 2018
|
10,462,433
|
1,046
|
301,038,832
|
(296,846,405)
|
(245,371)
|
3,948,102
|
Amortization
of equity-based compensation granted to employees
|
-
|
-
|
22,071
|
-
|
-
|
22,071
|
Issuance
of Warrants for Board of Director fees
|
-
|
-
|
75,000
|
-
|
-
|
75,000
|
Issuance
of Common Stock for Board of Director fees
|
266,358
|
27
|
364,696
|
-
|
-
|
364,723
|
Issuance
of Common Stock to employees for services
|
672,859
|
67
|
519,049
|
-
|
-
|
519,116
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(861,637)
|
(861,637)
|
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,856,460)
|
-
|
(1,856,460)
|
Balance June 30, 2018
|
11,401,650
|
$1,140
|
$302,019,648
|
$(298,702,865)
|
$(1,107,008)
|
$2,210,915
|
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these condensed consolidated
statements.
TRACK GROUP, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(2,068,924)
|
$(4,635,536)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,068,961
|
3,002,676
|
Bad
debt expense
|
445,212
|
345,215
|
Amortization
of debt discount
|
-
|
167,230
|
Stock
based compensation
|
128,002
|
1,467,521
|
Loss
on monitoring equipment included in cost of revenue
|
372,059
|
290,238
|
Foreign
currency exchange loss
|
134,795
|
442,706
|
Change
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
(49,254)
|
(19,352)
|
Prepaid
expense and other assets
|
(135,714)
|
2,388,345
|
Inventory
|
401,438
|
-
|
Accounts
payable
|
(83,201)
|
(564,889)
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,849,972
|
2,427,277
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
4,063,346
|
5,311,431
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(299,839)
|
(143,116)
|
Capitalized
software
|
(868,652)
|
(802,560)
|
Purchase
of monitoring equipment and parts
|
(1,296,621)
|
(1,128,484)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(2,465,112)
|
(2,074,160)
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
Principal
payments on long-term debt
|
(65,237)
|
(47,579)
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(65,237)
|
(47,579)
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(100,638)
|
(6,868)
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
1,432,359
|
3,182,824
|
Cash, beginning of period
|
5,446,557
|
2,027,321
|
Cash, end of period
|
$6,878,916
|
$5,210,145
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$23,685
|
$204,927
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
Non-cash
transfer of inventory to monitoring equipment
|
$424,642
|
$309,710
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated statements.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated
financial information of Track Group, Inc. and subsidiaries
(collectively, the “Company” or “Track Group”) has been prepared in accordance with the
Instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). Certain information and disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant
to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management,
the accompanying interim consolidated financial information
contains all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments necessary to present fairly the Company’s
financial position as of June 30, 2019, and results of its
operations for the three and nine months ended June 30,
2019. These financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the audited annual consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto that are included in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2018, filed with the SEC
on December 19, 2018. The results of operations for the three
and nine months ended June 30, 2019 may not be indicative of the
results for the fiscal year ending September 30,
2019.
As
of June 30, 2019, and 2018, the Company had an accumulated deficit
of $301,657,263 and $298,702,865, respectively. The Company
incurred a net loss of $2,068,924 and $4,635,536 for the nine
months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The Company may
continue to incur losses and require additional financial
resources. The Company also has debt maturing in April 2020. The
Company’s transition to profitable operations is dependent
upon generating a level of revenue adequate to support its cost
structure, which it has almost achieved and resolving the balance
sheet. Management has evaluated the significance of these
conditions and has determined that the Company can meet its
operating obligations for a reasonable period of time. The Company
expects to fund operations using cash on hand, through operational
cash flows and the potential extension of its existing debt
agreement, if necessary. Management of the Company believes that
the availability of financing from these sources is adequate to
fund operations through the upcoming twelve months.
(2) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Track
Group, Inc. and its active subsidiaries, Track Group Analytics
Limited, Track Group Americas, Inc., Track Group International
LTD., and Track Group - Chile SpA. All significant inter-company
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(3) RECENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements
are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) or other standard setting bodies, which
are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date.
During the three months ended June 30, 2019, there were no new
accounting pronouncements that had a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In
May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09 and related amendments
“Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASC 606”), which superseded all
prior revenue recognition methods and industry-specific guidance.
The principle of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue
to depict the transfer of control for promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the
entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services. On October 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 using the
modified retrospective method, whereby the adoption does not impact
any prior periods. See Note 8.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
“Compensation - Stock
Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting,” which provides guidance about which
changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award
require an entity to apply modification accounting. An entity will
account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value of
the modified award is the same as the original award, the vesting
conditions of the modified award are the same as the original award
and the classification of the modified award as an equity
instrument or liability instrument is the same as the original
award. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017. The update is to be adopted prospectively to an
award modified on or after the adoption date. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2017-09 did not have
an impact on its consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
“Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230)” requiring the
classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments to
conform the presentation in the statement of cash flows for certain
transactions, including cash distributions from equity method
investments, among others. The adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have
an effect on the Company’s consolidated statement of cash
flows.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
“Intangibles – Goodwill
and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment.” The new
guidance simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by
removing the second step of the two-step impairment test. The
amendment requires an entity to perform its annual or interim
goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting
unit with its carrying amount. An entity still has the option to
perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to
determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The new
guidance will be effective for annual periods or any interim
goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2019. The amendment should be applied on a prospective basis.
Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill
impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017.
Management does not anticipate that this adoption will have a
significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results
of operations, or cash flows.
In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,
“Leases (Topic
842).” For lessees, the
amendments in this update require that for all leases not
considered to be short term, a company recognize both a lease
liability and right-of-use asset on its balance sheet, representing
the obligation to make payments and the right to use or control the
use of a specified asset for the lease term. The amendments in this
update are effective for annual periods beginning after December
15, 2018 and interim periods within those annual periods.
Management does not anticipate that this adoption will have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
(4) IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The
Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment when events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of an asset
may not be recoverable and in the case of goodwill, at least
annually. The Company evaluates whether events and circumstances
have occurred which indicate possible impairment as of each balance
sheet date. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its fair
value, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which
the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value of the
asset. Impairment of long-lived assets is assessed at the
lowest levels for which there is an identifiable fair value that is
independent of other groups of assets.
(5) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
The
Company accounts for its business acquisitions under the
acquisition method of accounting as indicated in ASC 805, Business
Combinations, which requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to recognize the fair value of all assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the
acquiree, and establishes the acquisition date as the fair value
measurement point. Accordingly, the Company recognizes assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations,
including contingent assets and liabilities and non-controlling
interest in the acquiree, based on fair value estimates as of the
date of acquisition. In accordance with ASC 805, the Company
recognizes and measures goodwill as of the acquisition date, as the
excess of the fair value of the consideration paid over the fair
value of the identified net assets acquired.
Acquired Assets and Assumed Liabilities
Pursuant
to ASC No. 805-10-25, if the initial accounting for a business
combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in
which the combination occurs, but during the allowed measurement
period not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the
Company retrospectively adjusts the provisional amounts recognized
at the acquisition date, by means of adjusting the amount
recognized for goodwill.
Contingent Consideration
In
certain acquisitions, the Company has agreed to pay additional
amounts to sellers contingent upon achievement by the acquired
businesses of certain future goals, which may include revenue
milestones, new customer accounts, and earnings targets. The
Company records contingent consideration based on its estimated
fair value as of the date of the acquisition. The Company evaluates
and adjusts the value of contingent consideration, if necessary, at
each reporting period based on the progress toward and likely
achievement of certain targets on which issuance of the contingent
consideration is based. Any differences between the
acquisition-date fair value and the changes in fair value of the
contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date are
recognized in current period earnings until the arrangement is
settled. If there is uncertainty surrounding the value of
contingent consideration, then the Company’s policy is to
wait until the end of the measurement period before making an
adjustment.
(6) ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS)
Comprehensive
income (loss) includes net income (loss) as currently reported
under GAAP and other comprehensive income (loss). Other
comprehensive income (loss) considers the effects of additional
economic events, such as foreign currency translation adjustments,
that are not required to be recorded in determining net income
(loss), but rather are reported as a separate component of
stockholders’ equity. The Chilean Peso, New Israeli Shekel
and the Canadian Dollar are used as functional currencies of the
following operating subsidiaries: (i) Track Group Chile SpA; (ii)
Track Group International Ltd.; and (iii) Track Group Analytics
Limited, respectively. The balance sheets of all subsidiaries have
been converted into United States Dollars (USD) at the prevailing
exchange rate at June 30, 2019.
(7) NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per common share
(“Basic EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss)
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
(“Diluted EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss)
attributable to common shareholders by the sum of the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the
weighted-average dilutive common share equivalents
outstanding. The computation of Diluted EPS does not assume
exercise or conversion of securities that would have an
anti-dilutive effect.
Common
share equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of
common stock options and warrants. As of June 30, 2019 and
2018, there were 685,259 and 628,592 outstanding common share
equivalents, respectively, that were not included in the
computation of Diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended June
30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, as their effect would be
anti-dilutive. The common stock equivalents outstanding as of June
30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 consisted of the following:
|
June 30,
|
June 30,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Exercisable
common stock options and warrants
|
685,259
|
628,592
|
Total
common stock equivalents
|
685,259
|
628,592
|
At
June 30, 2019 and 2018, all stock option and warrant exercise
prices were above the market price of $0.53 and $1.00,
respectively, and thus have not been included in the basic earnings
per share calculation.
(8) REVENUE RECOGNITION
In
May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 and related amendments,
which superseded all prior revenue recognition methods and
industry-specific guidance. The principle of ASC 606 is that an
entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of control
for promised goods or services to customers in an amount that
reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In applying the
revenue principles, an entity is required to identify the
contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance
obligations, determine the transaction price, allocate the
transaction price to the performance obligations and recognize
revenue when the performance obligation is satisfied (i.e., either
over time or at a point in time). ASC 606 further requires that
companies disclose sufficient information to enable users of
financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and
uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with
customers. On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606
using the modified retrospective method, whereby the adoption does
not impact any prior periods.
Monitoring and Other Related
Services. Monitoring services
include two components: (i) lease contracts pursuant to which the
Company provides monitoring services and lease devices to
distributors or end users and the Company retains ownership of the
leased device; and (ii) monitoring services purchased by
distributors or end users who have previously purchased monitoring
devices and opt to use the Company’s monitoring services.
Sales of devices and leased GPS devices provided by the Company are
required to use the Company’s monitoring service and both the
GPS leased devices and monitoring services are accounted for as a
single performance obligation. The rates for leased devices
and monitoring services are considered to be stated at their
individual stand-alone selling prices. The Company recognizes revenue on leased devices
and monitoring services at the end of each month the services have
been provided and payment terms are 30 days from invoice date. In
those circumstances in which the Company receives payment in
advance, the Company records these payments as deferred
revenue.
Product Sales and
Other. The Company sells replacement parts to customers
under certain contracts, as well as law enforcement software
licenses and maintenance, and analytical software. The Company recognizes device and other product
sales in the period when: (a) the Company has transferred physical
possession of the products, (b) the Company has a present right to
payment, (c) the customer has legal title to the products, and (d)
the customer bears significant risks and rewards of ownership of
the products. The Company recognizes revenue from other
services as the customer receives services and the Company has the
right to payment.
Multiple Element
Arrangements. The majority of
our revenue transactions do not have multiple elements. However, on
occasion, the Company may enter into revenue transactions that have
multiple elements. These may include different combinations of
products or services that are included in a single billable
rate. These products or services are delivered over time as
the customer utilizes our services. In cases where
obligations in a contract are distinct and thus require separation
into multiple performance obligations, revenue recognition guidance
requires that contract consideration be allocated to each distinct
performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling
price. The value allocated to each performance obligation is then
recognized as revenue when the revenue recognition criteria for
each distinct promise or bundle of promises has been
met.
The
standalone selling price for each performance obligation is an
amount that depicts the amount of consideration to which the entity
expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring the good or
service. When there is only one performance obligation associated
with a contract, the entire sale value is attributed to that
obligation. When a contract contains multiple performance
obligations the transaction value is first allocated using the
observable price, which is generally a list price net of applicable
discount or the price used to sell in similar circumstances. In
circumstances when a selling price is not directly observable, the
Company will estimate the standalone selling price using
information available to us.
Effect of Adopting ASC 606. The
Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method.
Under the modified retrospective method, the Company recognized the
cumulative effect of initially applying this accounting standard as
an adjustment to the opening balance in retained earnings of
$92,969, relating to one contract for the sale of products and
associated use of software.
The
cumulative effect of the changes made to the Company’s
Consolidated October 1, 2018 Balance Sheet for the adoption of ASC
606 is as follows:
Balance
Sheet
|
As Reported
at
September
30,
2018
|
Adjustments
|
Balance as
of
October
1,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
$10,333,103
|
$92,969
|
$10,426,072
|
Total current
liabilities
|
$43,288,943
|
$92,969
|
$43,381,912
|
Total
liabilities
|
$46,717,918
|
$92,969
|
$46,810,887
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
$(299,495,370)
|
$(92,969)
|
$(299,588,339)
|
Total
equity
|
$1,638,366
|
$(92,969)
|
$1,545,397
|
Total liabilities
and stockholders’ equity
|
$48,356,284
|
$(92,969)
|
$48,263,315
|
The
following tables present the Company’s revenue disaggregated
by geography, based on management’s assessment of available
data:
|
Three Months
Ended June 30, 2019
|
Three Months
Ended June 30, 2018
|
||
|
Total
Revenue
|
% of
Total
Revenue
|
Total
Revenue
|
% of
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
$5,112,538
|
57%
|
$4,862,970
|
63%
|
Latin
America
|
3,740,858
|
42%
|
2,798,326
|
37%
|
Other
|
102,068
|
1%
|
17,679
|
-%
|
Total
|
$8,955,464
|
100%
|
$7,678,975
|
100%
|
|
Nine Months
Ended June 30, 2019
|
Nine Months
Ended June 30, 2018
|
||
|
Total
Revenue
|
% of
Total
Revenue
|
Total
Revenue
|
% of
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
$14,997,609
|
59%
|
$14,405,972
|
64%
|
Latin
America
|
10,111,825
|
40%
|
7,947,837
|
35%
|
Other
|
148,807
|
1%
|
132,036
|
1%
|
Total
|
$25,258,241
|
100%
|
$22,485,845
|
100%
|
The
above table includes total revenue for the Company, of which
monitoring and other related services is the majority
(approximately 94%) of the Company’s revenue. Latin America
includes Bahamas, Chile, Mexico, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin
Islands. Other includes Canada, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom and
Vietnam.
(9) PREPAID EXPENSE AND OTHER
As
of June 30, 2019, and September 30, 2018, the outstanding balance
of prepaid and other expense was $1,374,236 and $1,270,043,
respectively. These balances are comprised largely of a
performance bond deposit, tax deposits, vendor deposits and other
prepaid supplier expense.
(10) INVENTORY
Inventory
is valued at the lower of the cost or net realizable
value. Cost is determined using the standard costing method.
Net realizable value is determined based on the item selling
price. Inventory is periodically reviewed in order to identify
obsolete or damaged items or impaired values. The Company did
not record impairment of inventory during the quarters ended June
30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Inventory
consists of finished goods that are to be shipped to customers
and parts used for minor repairs of ReliAlert™, Shadow, and
other tracking devices. Completed and shipped ReliAlert™ and
other tracking devices are reflected in Monitoring
Equipment. As of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018,
inventory consisted of the following:
|
June 30,
2019
|
September 30,
2018
|
Finished
goods inventory
|
$280,172
|
$304,053
|
Reserve
for damaged or obsolete inventory
|
(26,934)
|
(26,934)
|
Total
inventory, net of reserves
|
$253,238
|
$277,119
|
The Company uses a third-party fulfillment service
provider. As a result of this service, the Company’s
employees do not actively assemble new product or repair damaged
inventory or monitoring equipment shipped directly from suppliers.
Purchases of monitoring equipment are
recognized directly. Management believes this process reduces
maintenance and fulfillment costs associated with inventory and
monitoring equipment.
(11) PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consisted of the following as of June 30, 2019 and
September 30, 2018, respectively:
|
June 30,
2019
|
September 30,
2018
|
Equipment,
software and tooling
|
$1,199,074
|
$1,074,471
|
Automobiles
|
5,950
|
6,153
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,460,199
|
1,358,984
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
312,138
|
305,089
|
Total
property and equipment before accumulated depreciation
|
2,977,361
|
2,744,697
|
Accumulated
depreciation
|
(2,235,720)
|
(1,999,222)
|
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
$741,641
|
$745,475
|
Property and equipment depreciation expense for
the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $88,975 and
$73,245, respectively. Property and equipment depreciation expense
for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $256,276 and
$275,127, respectively.
(12) MONITORING EQUIPMENT
The
Company leases monitoring equipment to agencies for offender
tracking under contractual service agreements. The monitoring
equipment is amortized using the straight-line method over an
estimated useful life of between one and three years. Monitoring
equipment as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018 was as
follows:
|
June 30,
2019
|
September 30,
2018
|
Monitoring
equipment
|
$8,834,731
|
$8,488,196
|
Less:
accumulated amortization
|
(6,215,061)
|
(5,325,654)
|
Monitoring
equipment, net of accumulated amortization
|
$2,619,670
|
$3,162,542
|
Amortization
of monitoring equipment for the three months ended June 30, 2019
and 2018 was $374,081 and $309,021, respectively. Amortization
of monitoring equipment for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and
2018 was $1,135,584 and $1,005,541, respectively. Amortization
expense for monitoring devices is recognized in cost of revenue.
During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, the
Company recorded charges of $137,968 and $67,124, respectively, for
devices that were lost, stolen or damaged. During the nine months
ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, the Company recorded charges
of $372,059 and $290,238, respectively, for devices that were lost,
stolen or damaged. Lost, stolen and damaged items are included in
Monitoring, products & other related services in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
(13) INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The
following table summarizes intangible assets at June 30, 2019 and
September 30, 2018, respectively:
Other
intangible assets:
|
June 30,
2019
|
September 30,
2018
|
Patent
& royalty agreements
|
$21,170,565
|
$21,170,565
|
Developed
technology
|
12,463,959
|
11,835,293
|
Customer
relationships
|
1,860,000
|
1,860,000
|
Trade
name
|
319,071
|
325,507
|
Website
|
78,201
|
78,201
|
Total
intangible assets
|
35,891,796
|
35,269,566
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
(13,608,444)
|
(12,016,512)
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
$22,283,352
|
$23,253,054
|
The
intangible assets summarized above were purchased or developed on
various dates from January 2010 through June 30, 2019. The assets
have useful lives ranging from three to twenty years. Amortization
expense for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was
$558,661 and $571,325, respectively. Amortization expense for the
nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $1,677,101 and
$1,722,008, respectively.
(14) GOODWILL
The
following table summarizes the activity of goodwill at June 30,
2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively:
|
June 30,
|
September 30,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Balance
- beginning of
period
|
$8,076,759
|
$8,226,714
|
Effect
of foreign currency translation on goodwill
|
46,791
|
(149,955)
|
Balance
- end of period
|
$8,123,550
|
$8,076,759
|
Goodwill
is recognized in connection with acquisition transactions in
accordance with ASC 805. The Company performs an impairment test
for goodwill annually or more frequently if indicators of potential
impairment exist. No impairment of goodwill was recognized through
June 30, 2019.
(15) ACCRUED LIABILITES
Accrued
liabilities consisted of the following as of June 30, 2019 and
September 30, 2018, respectively:
|
June 30,
2019
|
September 30,
2018
|
Accrued
payroll, taxes and employee benefits
|
$1,728,761
|
$1,937,021
|
Deferred
revenue
|
130,908
|
150,604
|
Deposits
payable
|
-
|
54,504
|
Accrued
taxes - foreign and domestic
|
275,789
|
351,469
|
Accrued
other expense
|
175,345
|
298,268
|
Accrued
legal costs
|
905,521
|
473,777
|
Accrued
costs of revenue
|
384,279
|
230,514
|
Accrued
bond guarantee
|
152,004
|
157,199
|
Accrued
interest
|
8,457,259
|
6,679,747
|
Total
accrued liabilities
|
$12,209,866
|
$10,333,103
|
(16) DEBT OBLIGATIONS
On February 24, 2019,
the Company and Conrent Invest S.A. (“Conrent”)
entered into a second amendment to their Facility Agreement (the
“Second Amended
Facility Agreement”), which Second
Amended Facility Agreement (i) extends the maturity date of the
Facility to the earlier of either April 1, 2020 or the date upon
which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company,
and (ii) provides that in the event of a change of control of the
Company, Conrent shall immediately cancel the Second Amended Credit
Facility and declare the outstanding principal amount, together
with unpaid interest, immediately due and
payable.
Debt
obligations as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018,
respectively, are comprised of the following:
|
June 30,
2019
|
September 30,
2018
|
|
|
|
Unsecured
facility agreement with Conrent whereby, as of June 30, 2015, the
Company had borrowed $30.4 million, bearing interest at a rate of
8% per annum, payable in arrears semi-annually, with all principal
and accrued and unpaid interest due on April 1, 2020. The Company
did not pay interest on this loan during the nine months ended June
30, 2019.
|
$30,400,000
|
$30,400,000
|
|
|
|
Loan
Agreement whereby the Company can borrow up to $5.0 million at 8%
interest per annum on borrowed funds maturing on September 30,
2020.
|
3,399,644
|
3,399,644
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing notes payable to a Canadian governmental agency assumed in
conjunction with the acquisition.
|
37,825
|
67,141
|
|
|
|
Total
debt obligations
|
33,837,469
|
33,866,785
|
Less
current portion
|
(30,437,825)
|
(30,437,810)
|
Long-term
debt, net of current portion
|
$3,399,644
|
$3,428,975
|
The
following table summarizes future maturities of debt obligations as
of June 30, 2019:
Twelve-month period ended June 30,
|
Total
|
|
|
2020
|
$30,437,825
|
2021
|
3,399,644
|
Thereafter
|
-
|
Total
|
$33,837,469
|
(17) RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related-Party Loan Agreement
On September 25, 2015, the Company entered into a
loan agreement (the “Sapinda Loan
Agreement”) with Sapinda
Asia Limited (“Sapinda”), a related party at that time, to provide
the Company with a $5.0 million line of credit that accrued
interest at a rate of 3% per annum for undrawn funds, and 8% per
annum for borrowed funds. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Sapinda Loan Agreement, available funds could be drawn down at
the Company’s request at any time prior to the maturity date
of September 30, 2017 (the “Maturity
Date”), when all borrowed
funds, plus all accrued but unpaid interest would have become due
and payable. The Company, however, was entitled to elect to satisfy
any outstanding obligations under the Sapinda Loan Agreement prior
to the Maturity Date without penalties or fees.
On March 13, 2017, the
Company and Sapinda entered into Amendment Number One to
the Sapinda Loan Agreement.
Amendment Number One extended the maturity date of all loans made
pursuant to the Sapinda Loan Agreement
to September 30, 2020. In addition, Amendment Number One eliminated
the requirement that the Company pay Sapinda the 3% interest, and forgave
the 3% interest due to Sapinda for all undrawn funds under
the Sapinda Loan Agreement
through the Execution Date. Further, Amendment Number One provided
that all Lender Penalties accrued under the Sapinda Loan Agreement
through the Execution Date were forgiven. Per Amendment Number One,
Lender Penalties began to accrue again because Sapinda failed to
fund the amount of $1.5 million on or before June 30, 2017. The
Company formally notified Sapinda of the breach by letter dated
April 4, 2017. The Company is again accruing Lender Penalties,
amounting to $730,000 at June
30, 2019, under Section 6.3 of
the Sapinda Loan Agreement,
as amended, and the Company intends to offset Lender Penalties
against future payments due. We did not draw on this line of credit, nor
did we pay any interest during the three months ended June 30,
2019. The undrawn balance of this line of credit at June 30, 2019
was $1,600,356. Further advances under
the Sapinda Loan Agreement
are not currently expected to be forthcoming, and therefore no
assurances can be given that the Company will obtain additional
funds to which it is entitled under the Sapinda Loan Agreement,
or that the penalties accruing will ever be
paid.
Additional
Related-Party Transactions and Summary of All Related-Party
Obligations
|
June 30,
2019
|
September 30,
2018
|
|
|
|
Related
party loan with an interest rate of 8% per annum for borrowed
funds. Principal and interest due September 30, 2020.
|
$3,399,644
|
$3,399,644
|
Total
related-party debt obligations
|
$3,399,644
|
$3,399,644
|
Each
of the foregoing related-party transactions was reviewed and
approved by disinterested and independent members of the
Company’s Board of Directors.
(18) PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK
The
Company is authorized to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of common
stock, $0.0001 par value per share.
The
Company is authorized to issue up to 20,000,000 shares of preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value per share. The Company’s Board of
Directors has the authority to amend the Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation, without further shareholder approval,
to designate and determine, in whole or in part, the preferences,
limitations and relative rights of the preferred stock before any
issuance of the preferred stock, and to create one or more series
of preferred stock. As of June 30, 2019, there were no shares of
preferred stock outstanding.
No
dividends were paid during the three- and nine-month periods ended
June 30, 2019 or 2018, respectively.
Series A Preferred Stock
On October 12, 2017,
the Company filed a Certificate of Designation of the Relative
Rights and Preferences (“Certificate
of Designation”) with the
Delaware Division of Corporations, designating 1,200,000 shares of
the Company’s preferred stock as Series A Preferred. Shares
of Series A Preferred rank senior to the Company’s common
stock, and all other classes and series of equity securities of the
Company that by their terms do not rank senior to the Series A
Preferred.
Except with respect to
transactions upon which holders of the Series A Preferred are
entitled to vote separately as a class under the terms of the
Certificate of Designation, the Series A Preferred has no voting
rights. The shares of
common stock into which the Series A Preferred is convertible
shall, upon issuance, have all of the same voting rights as other
issued and outstanding shares of our common
stock.
The
Series A Preferred has no separate dividend rights; however,
whenever the Board declares a dividend on the Company’s
common stock, if ever, each holder of record of a share of Series A
Preferred shall be entitled to receive an amount equal to such
dividend declared on one share of common stock multiplied by the
number of shares of common stock into which such share of Series A
Preferred could be converted on the Record Date.
Each share of Series A Preferred has a Liquidation Preference of
$35.00 per share, and is convertible, at the holder’s option,
into ten shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to
adjustments as set forth in the Certificate of Designation, at any
time beginning five hundred and forty days after the date of
issuance.
As of June 30, 2019, no shares of Series A Preferred were issued
and outstanding.
(19)
STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
Stock Incentive Plan
At the annual meeting
of shareholders on March 21, 2011, our shareholders approved the
2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2012
Plan”). The 2012
Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options and
nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights, performance shares, performance stock units, dividend
equivalents, stock payments, deferred stock, restricted stock
units, other stock-based awards and performance-based awards to
employees and certain non-employees who provide services to the
Company in lieu of cash. A total of 90,000 shares were initially
authorized for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the 2012
Plan. At the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders held on May 19,
2015, our stockholders approved a 713,262 share increase to the
total number of shares authorized under the 2012
Plan. Warrants for Board
members vest immediately and warrants issued to employees vest
annually over either a two or three-year period after the grant
date.
As
of December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors suspended further
awards under the 2012 Plan until further notice. The Company
recorded expense of $106,772 and $1,084,335 for the nine months
ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to the vesting
of common stock awarded prior to the suspension of the 2012 Plan.
There were 27,218 shares of common stock available for issuance
under the 2012 Plan as of June 30, 2019.
All Options and Warrants
On
November 30, 2017, the Board of Directors unanimously approved the
adjustment of the exercise price of 605,678 unexercised
warrants/options issued under the 2012 Plan, with original exercise
prices ranging from $1.81 to $19.46, to $1.24, resulting in
incremental stock-based compensation of $149,088, which was
expensed in the three-month period ending December 31,
2017.
The
fair value of each stock option and warrant grant is estimated on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company
granted no options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock
under the 2012 Plan. The warrants for Board members vest
immediately and expire five years from grant date and warrants or
options issued to employees vest annually over either a two to
three-year period and expire five years after the final vesting
date of the grant. The Company recorded expense of $21,231 and
$151,136 for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively, related to the issuance and vesting of outstanding
stock options and warrants.
The
option and warrant grants for three months ended June 30, 2019 and
2018 were valued using the Black-Scholes model with the following
weighted-average assumptions:
|
Nine Months Ended
June 30
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Expected
stock price volatility
|
N/A
|
102%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
N/A
|
2.09%
|
Expected
life of options/warrants
|
|
5 years
|
The
expected life of stock options (warrants) represents the period of
time that the stock options or warrants are expected to be
outstanding based on the simplified method allowed under GAAP. The
expected volatility is based on the historical price volatility of
the Company’s common stock. The risk-free interest rate
represents the U.S. Treasury bill rate for the expected life of the
related stock options (warrants). The dividend yield represents the
Company’s anticipated cash dividends over the expected life
of the stock options (warrants).
A
summary of stock option (warrant) activity for the nine months
ended June 30, 2019 is presented below:
|
Shares Under Option
|
Weighted Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding
as of September 30, 2018
|
685,259
|
$1.56
|
3.90 years
|
$-
|
Granted
|
-
|
$-
|
|
|
Expired/Cancelled
|
-
|
$-
|
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
$-
|
|
|
Outstanding
as of June 30, 2019
|
685,259
|
$1.56
|
3.15 years
|
$-
|
Exercisable
as of June 30, 2019
|
685,259
|
$1.56
|
3.15 years
|
$-
|
The
intrinsic value of options and warrants outstanding and exercisable
is based on the Company’s share price of $0.53 at June 30,
2019.
(20) INCOME TAXES
The
Company recognizes deferred income tax assets or liabilities for
the expected future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the financial statements or income tax returns.
Deferred income tax assets or liabilities are determined based upon
the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply
when the differences are expected to be settled or
realized. Deferred income tax assets are reviewed periodically
for recoverability and valuation allowances are provided as
necessary. Interest and penalties related to income tax
liabilities, when incurred, are classified in interest expense and
income tax provision, respectively.
For
the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company incurred
a net loss for income tax purposes of $2,068,924 and $4,635,536,
respectively. The amount and ultimate realization of the
benefits from the net operating losses is dependent, in part, upon
the tax laws in effect, our future earnings, and other future
events, the effects of which cannot be determined. The Company has
established a valuation allowance for all deferred income tax
assets not offset by deferred income tax liabilities due to the
uncertainty of their realization. Accordingly, there is no
benefit for income taxes in the accompanying statements of
operations.
In
computing income tax, we recognize an income tax provision in tax
jurisdictions in which we have pre-tax income for the period and
are expecting to generate pre-tax book income during the fiscal
year.
(21) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Matters
The Company is, from time to time, involved in various legal
proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business.
Lazar
Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc. On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich, Dovie
Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th Circuit
Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach of
contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption Agreements. The
plaintiffs alleged $1,587,604 in combined damages. On May 2, 2016,
the Court resolved this case in favor of the Company by granting
the Company’s motion for Summary Judgment. The plaintiffs
filed an Appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging the Court’s
ruling on the motion for Summary Judgment. The Appellate court
ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that factual issues
remain, reversing the Summary Judgment and remanding the case back
to the trial court. On February 21, 2019, the trial concluded and a
jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor; awarding the
plaintiffs $336,000 before interest. The Company filed a motion to
reverse the verdict in its entirety, which was denied on July 30,
2019. The Court entered a judgment on August 1, 2019 in the amount
of $553,115.84, inclusive of pre-judgment interest. The Company is
currently considering its options on appealing both the original
judgement and the interest methodology used by the
court.
John
Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois. On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with
a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, in District Court of the Third Judicial
District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract,
among other causes of action, related to Mr. Merrill’s
termination of employment effective September 27, 2016. Mr. Merrill
is seeking not less than $590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and
costs. At a hearing on April 25, 2018, the court dismissed the
plaintiff’s claims related to existence of an oral look-back
agreement and a separation agreement. In an order entered July 25,
2019, the court granted defendants’ motion to strike
plaintiff’s damages’ expert report and barred
plaintiff’s expert from testifying at trial, if any.
Plaintiff has moved the court to reconsider its July 25, 2019
order. The Company intends to seek summary judgment on the
remaining contested issues. We believe the allegations and claims
are without merit.
SecureAlert,
Inc. v. Federal Government of Mexico (Department of the
Interior). On March 24, 2017, SecureAlert Inc. filed a
complaint before the Federal Administrative Tribunal, asserting the
failure by defendant to pay claimant amounts agreed to, and due
under, the Pluri Annual Contract for the Rendering of Monitoring
Services of Internees, through Electric Bracelets, in the Islas
Marias Penitentiary Complex dated July 15, 2011, entered into by
and between the Organo Administrativo Desconcentrado Prevencion y
Readaptacion Social of the then Public Security Department, and
presently, an agency of the National Security Commission of the
Department of the Interior, and SecureAlert, Inc., presently Track
Group, Inc. The Company’s claim amount is upwards of $6.0
million. The Supreme Court took action to resolve previous,
conflicting decisions regarding the jurisdiction of such claims and
determined that such claims will be resolved by the Federal
Administrative Tribunal. Subsequently, plaintiff filed an Amparo
action before the Collegiate Court, seeking an appeal of the
Federal Administrative Court’s earlier decision against
plaintiff. A decision on the Amparo action is anticipated in late
2019. Based upon the fee arrangement the Company has with its
counsel, we anticipate the future liabilities attributable to legal
expense will be minimal.
Eli Sabag v. Track
Group, Inc., Sapinda Asia Limited and Lars
Windhorst. On May 4, 2018, Eli Sabag filed a
complaint before the Marion Superior Court in Marion County Indiana
for damages and declaratory Judgment against the Company. The
complaint seeks to enforce an “earn-out” clause in a
Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between the Company and
Sabag. In addition, Sabag sued the Company for breach of
fiduciary duty and tortious interference, alleging that the Company
avoided selling sufficient GPS devices so as to not trigger the
issuance of contingent stock under the “earn-out”
clause in the SPA. Finally, Sabag alleges that the Company was
unjustly enriched because it failed to pay full value for his
shares under the SPA. The Company believes the allegations are
unfounded and without merit, and it will defend the case
vigorously. Furthermore, according to the SPA, any disputes
are to be resolved through binding arbitration held in New
York. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and
Compel Arbitration on September 5, 2018. On March 29, 2019, the
Marion Superior Court ruled in favor of the Company and dismissed
all claims against the Company without prejudice. The plaintiff has
not taken any further action since March 29, 2019.
Erick Cerda v.
Track Group, Inc. On July 25, 2018, former employee Erick
Cerda, the plaintiff, filed a complaint against the Company in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Case No. 18-CV-05075, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in
an unspecific amount. To avoid the costs and uncertainties of
prolonged litigation, the parties reached a settlement, which was
finalized on June 4, 2019 and paid in June 2019. On July 22, 2019,
the case was dismissed with prejudice as a result of the
settlement.
Blaike Anderson v.
Track Group, Inc., et. al. On June 24, 2019, Blaike Anderson
filed a complaint seeking unspecified damages in the State Court of
Marion County, Indiana, alleging liability on the part of the
defendants for providing a defective ankle monitoring device and
failure to warn plaintiff regarding the condition thereof. The
defendants dispute the allegations of the complaint and intend to
vigorously defend the case.
Operating Lease Obligations
The
following table summarizes our contractual lease obligations as of
June 30, 2019:
Fiscal Year
|
Total
|
|
|
2019
(three months)
|
$79,190
|
2020
|
248,806
|
2021
|
176,291
|
2022
|
161,075
|
2023
|
3,612
|
Thereafter
|
-
|
Total
|
$668,974
|
The total operating lease obligations of $668,974
is largely related to facilities operating leases. During the nine
months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company paid $359,288 and $354,948, in lease
payment obligations, respectively.
(22) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In
accordance with the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC 855, we
have evaluated subsequent events, through the filing date and noted
that, other than as disclosed above, no additional subsequent
events have occurred that are reasonably likely to impact the
financial statements.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Report contains information that constitutes
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). Generally, the statements
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely
historical can be considered to be “forward-looking
statements.” These statements represent our
expectations, hopes, beliefs, anticipations, commitments,
intentions, and strategies regarding the future. They may be
identified by the use of words or phrases such as
“believes,” “expects,”
“intends,” “anticipates,”
“should,” “plans,” “estimates,”
“projects,” “potential,” and
“will,” among others. Forward-looking statements
include, but are not limited to, statements contained in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations regarding our financial performance,
revenue, and expense levels in the future and the sufficiency of
our existing assets to fund future operations and capital spending
needs. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. In addition,
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from our historical experience and our present expectations or
projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are
not limited to, those described in “Risk Factors” in
our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, and those described
from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
The following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto that are contained in this Report, as
well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, and Current
Reports on Form 8-K that have been filed with the SEC through the
date of this Report. Except as otherwise indicated, as used in this
Report, the terms “the Company,” “Track Group,” “we,” “our,” “us,” refer to Track Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation.
General
Our core business is
based on the leasing of patented tracking and monitoring solutions
to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, both in the
U.S and abroad, for the electronic monitoring of offenders and
offering unique data analytics services on a platform-as-a-service
(“PaaS”)
business model. Currently, we deploy offender based management
services that combine patented GPS tracking technologies, fulltime
24/7/365 global monitoring capabilities, case management, and
proprietary data analytics. We offer customizable tracking
solutions that leverage real-time tracking data, best practices
monitoring, and analytics capabilities to create complete,
end-to-end tracking solutions.
Our devices consist principally of the
ReliAlertTM
product line, which is supplemented by
the Shadow product line. These devices are generally leased on
a daily rate basis and may be combined with our monitoring center
services, proprietary software and data analytics subscription to
provide an end-to-end PaaS.
ReliAlertTM and
Shadow. Our tracking
devices utilize patented technology and are securely attached
around an offender’s ankle with a tamper resistant strap that
cannot be adjusted or removed without detection, unless by a
supervising officer, and which are activated through services
provided by our monitoring centers. The
ReliAlertTM
and Shadow units are intelligent
devices with integrated computer circuitry, utilizing both GPS and
RF, and constructed from case-hardened plastics designed to
promptly notify the intervention centers of any attempt made to
breach applicable protocols, or to remove or otherwise tamper with
the device or optical strap housing. The
ReliAlertTM
platform also incorporates voice
communication technology that provides officers with 24/7/365 voice
communication with the offenders. Both devices are FCC, CE and
PTCRB certified and protected by numerous patents and
trademarks.
Monitoring Center
Services. Our
monitoring center facilities provide live 24/7/365 monitoring of
all alarms generated from our devices, as well as customer and
technical support. Our monitoring center operators play a vital
role, and as such, we staff our centers with highly-trained,
bi-lingual individuals. These operators act as an extension of
agency resources receiving alarms, communicating and intervening
with offenders regarding violations, and interacting with
supervision staff, all pursuant to agency-established
protocols. The facilities have redundant power source, battery
back-up and triple redundancy in voice, data, and IP. The Company
has established monitoring centers in the U.S. and Chile. In
addition, the Company has assisted in the establishment of
monitoring centers for customers and local partners in other global
locations
Data Analytics
Services. Our
TrackerPALTM
software,
TrackerPALTM
Mobile, combined with our Data
Analytic analysis tools, provide an integrated platform allowing
case managers and law enforcement officers quick access views of an
offender’s travel behavior, mapping, and inference on
patterns. Our advanced data analytics service offers a highly
complex predictive reporting mechanism that combines modern
statistical methods, developed using computer science and used by
intelligence agencies that separate noteworthy events from normal
events, rank offender cases according to their need for
supervision, and relate decision-relevant metrics to benchmarks in
real-time.
Other
Services. The Company offers
smartphone applications specifically designed for the criminal
justice market, including a domestic violence app that creates a
mobile geo-zone around a survivor and an alcohol monitoring app
linked to a police-grade breathalyzer.
Business Strategy
We are committed to helping our customers improve
offender rehabilitation and re-socialization outcomes through our
innovative hardware, software, and services. We treat our
business as a service business. Although we still manufacture
patented tracking technology, we see the physical goods as only a
small part of the integrated offender monitoring solutions we
provide. Accordingly, rather than receiving a payment just for a
piece of manufactured equipment, the Company receives a recurring
stream of revenue for ongoing device agnostic subscription
contracts. As part of our strategy, we continue to expand our
device-agnostic platform to not
only collect, but also store, analyze, assess and correlate
location data for both accountability and auditing reasons, as well
as to use for predictive analytics and assessment of effective and
emerging techniques in criminal behavior and rehabilitation.
We believe a high-quality customer
experience with knowledgeable salespersons who can convey the value
of our products and services greatly enhances our ability to
attract and retain customers. Therefore, our strategy also includes
building and expanding our own direct sales force and our
third-party distribution network to effectively reach more
customers and provide them with a world-class sales and post-sales
support experience. In addition, we are developing related-service
offerings to address adjacent market opportunities in both the
public and private sectors. We believe continual investment in
research and development (“R&D”), including smartphone applications and
other monitoring services is critical to the development and sale
of innovative technologies and integrated solutions today and in
the future.
Critical Accounting Policies
From
time to time, management reviews and evaluates certain accounting
policies that are considered to be significant in determining our
results of operations and financial position.
A description of the
Company’s critical accounting policies that affect the
preparation of the Company’s financial statements is set
forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended September 30, 2018,
filed with the SEC on December 19, 2018. During the nine months
ended June 30, 2019, there have been no material changes to the
Company’s critical accounting policies other than the
adoption of ASU 2014-09, as described in Note
8.
The
preparation of financial statements requires management to make
significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense. By their
nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of
uncertainty. We assess the reasonableness of our estimates,
including those related to bad debts, inventories, estimated useful
lives, intangible assets, warranty obligations, product liability,
revenue, legal matters and income taxes. We base our estimates on
historical experience as well as available current information on a
regular basis. Management uses this information to form the
basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
Government Regulation
Our
operations are subject to various federal, state, local and
international laws and regulations.
In October 2018, through an internal review of our
export compliance, it came to our attention that some of our
products may not have been properly classified in the past, and
that our export of certain products, software and technology may be
subject to export licensing requirements of which we were not
previously aware. As a result of these findings, we hired
independent counsel to assist in, among other things, an
investigation with respect to our past export practices and
analyzing our classification of products, software and technology
and implementation of corrective measures. In addition, on October
16, 2018, we voluntarily self-disclosed the information above to
the Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”), followed by additional details that we
sent on April 1, 2019, and we have obtained licenses for the export
of our products, software and technology to all of the
Company’s international customers.
Also,
on February 7, 2019, the Company received authorization from BIS
for all of its international customers, contractors and
subsidiaries requiring approval and for its Swedish and Mexican
foreign national employees to continue using electronic monitoring
devices and the associated software and technology. On April 22,
2019, the Company received a letter from BIS indicating that it decided to close this matter
with the issuance of the Warning Letter in lieu of prosecution or
fines given the facts and circumstances.
Other
than the above disclosure related to our exports, we are not
involved in any pending or, to our knowledge, threatened
governmental proceedings, which would require curtailment of our
operations because of such laws and regulations.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018
Revenue
For
the three months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized
revenue from operations of $8,955,464 compared to $7,678,975 for
the three months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $1,276,489 or
approximately 17%. The increase in revenue was principally the
result of an increase in product sales of $914,780 and growth
driven by clients in Illinois, Bahamas, Puerto Rico and
Michigan.
Other
revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019 increased to
$1,051,449 from $129,196 in the same period in 2018, an increase of
$922,253. This increase is largely due to device sales of $914,780
to a distributor and a small increase in consumable item
sales.
Cost of Revenue
During the three months ended June 30, 2019, cost
of revenue totaled $4,162,174 compared to cost of revenue during
the three months ended June 30, 2018 of $3,472,707, an increase of
$689,467 or approximately 20%. The increase in cost of
revenue was largely the result
of higher product sales cost of $401,438, higher communication
costs of $25,181, higher device amortization of $65,059 due to
accelerated depreciation of certain devices and an increased number
of devices, higher monitoring costs of $76,699 incurred to
distribute additional devices to meet demand from growing clients,
higher lost, stolen and damaged expense of $70,844, higher freight
costs of $37,923, partially offset by lower device repair costs of
$26,370.
Depreciation and amortization included in cost of
revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 totaled
$500,704 and $432,952, respectively. These costs represent the
depreciation of ReliAlert™ and other monitoring
devices, as well as the amortization of monitoring software and
certain royalty agreements. The
increase of $67,752 represents accelerated depreciation of
certain ReliAlertTM
monitoring
devices as well as an increase in the number of
devices. We believe the
equipment lives on which the depreciation is based are appropriate
due to rapid changes in electronic monitoring technology and the
corresponding potential for obsolescence. Management
periodically assesses the useful life of the devices for
appropriateness. Amortization of a patent related to GPS and
satellite tracking is also included in cost of
sales.
Gross Profit and Margin
During
the three months ended June 30, 2019, gross profit totaled
$4,793,290, representing an increase of $587,022 or approximately
14% compared to the same period last year, and resulting in a gross
margin of approximately 53.5% compared to $4,206,268 or a gross
margin of approximately 54.8% during the three months ended June
30, 2018.
General and Administrative Expense
During
the three months ended June 30, 2019, general and administrative
expense totaled $2,725,991 compared to $3,703,869 for the three
months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease of $977,878 or
approximately 26% in general and administrative costs resulted
largely from lower legal and professional fees of $412,369,
decrease in stock based compensation of $161,325, lower wages and
taxes of $116,040, lower business taxes of $148,229, lower fees and
licenses of $113,697, lower Board of Director fees of $100,000 and
lower outside service costs of $53,352, partially offset by higher
bad debt expense of $171,105.
Selling and Marketing Expense
During
the three months ended June 30, 2019, selling and marketing expense
increased to $556,122 compared to $466,048 for the three months
ended June 30, 2018. The increase in expense of $110,074, or
approximately 25% is principally the result of higher wages and
taxes of $68,008, higher travel and entertainment expense of
$29,978 and higher outside services of $15,432.
Research and Development Expense
During the three months ended June 30, 2019,
research and development expense totaled $350,532 compared to
$254,060 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of
$96,472 or approximately 38%. The increase resulted
largely from reallocation of $46,713 of wages and $15,191 of rent
expense, higher dues and subscriptions of $11,217 and higher travel
and entertainment of $8,563. In addition, we are significantly
enhancing our technology platform to improve the efficiency of our
software, firmware, user interface and automation. As a result of
these improvements, $297,448 was capitalized as developed
technology during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $299,709
was capitalized in the three months ended June 30, 2018. A portion
of this expense would have been recognized as research and
development expense, absent the significant enhancements to the
technology.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
During
the three months ended June 30, 2019, depreciation and amortization
expense totaled $521,013 compared to $520,639 for the three months
ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $374 or less than
1%.
Total Operating Expense
During
the three months ended June 30, 2019, total operating expense
decreased to $4,153,658 compared to $4,944,616 for the three months
ended June 30, 2018, a decrease of $790,958 or approximately
16%.
Income / Loss from Operations
During
the three months ended June 30, 2019, income from operations was
$639,632 compared to a loss of $738,348 for the three months ended
June 30, 2018, an increase of $1,377,980. This improvement was due
to an improvement in gross profit of $587,022, and a decrease in
operating expense of $790,958.
Other Income and Expense
For the three months ended June 30, 2019, other
income (expense) totaled $395,651 compared to $757,305 for the
three months ended June 30, 2018, a decrease in net expense of
$361,654 or approximately 48%. The improvement in
other income (expense) is largely due to positive currency exchange
rate movements of $368,558 compared to the third fiscal quarter of
2018.
Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders
The Company had net loss attributable to common
shareholders of $69,347 for the three months ended June 30, 2019,
compared to a net loss attributable to common shareholders of
$1,856,460 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, a decrease in
net loss of $1,787,113 or approximately
96%. This decrease in net
loss is largely due to higher gross profit, lower operating expense
and positive currency exchange rate movements.
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended June
30, 2018
Revenue
For
the nine months ended June 30, 2019, the Company recognized revenue
from operations of $25,258,241, compared to $22,485,845 for the
nine months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of $2,772,396 or
approximately 12%. Of this revenue, $23,841,746 and
$22,062,789, respectively, were from monitoring and other related
services, an increase of $1,778,957 or approximately 8%. The
increase in revenue was principally the result of an increase in
monitoring operations driven by clients in Nevada, Mexico, Puerto
Rico, Michigan, Bahamas and Illinois, partially offset by lower
international monitoring revenue.
Other
revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2019 increased to
$1,416,495 from $423,056 in the same period in 2018, an increase of
$993,439 largely due to device of $1,007,749 to two distributors,
partially offset by a small decrease in consumable
items.
Cost of Revenue
During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, cost
of revenue totaled $11,339,956 compared to cost of revenue during
the nine months ended June 30, 2018 of $9,787,364, an increase of
$1,552,592 or approximately 16%. The increase in cost of
revenue was largely the result of higher product cost of goods sold
of $401,438, higher
communication costs of $318,838, higher device repair costs of
$246,852 incurred to distribute additional devices to meet demand
from growing clients, higher monitoring costs of $166,552, higher
lost, stolen and damaged unit costs of $81,821, higher server costs
of $75,486, higher freight costs of $69,501 and higher device
depreciation of $134,823.
Depreciation and amortization included in cost of
revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 totaled
$1,512,583 and $1,377,760, respectively. This $134,823 or
approximately 10% increase in costs represents accelerated
depreciation of certain ReliAlertTM
monitoring
devices as well as an increase in the number of
devices. Devices are depreciated
over a one to three-year useful life. Royalty agreements are being
amortized over a ten-year useful life. The Company believes these
lives are appropriate due to changes in electronic monitoring
technology and the corresponding potential for obsolescence.
Management periodically assesses the useful life of the devices for
appropriateness. Amortization
of a patent related to GPS and satellite tracking is also included
in cost of sales.
Gross
Profit and Margin
During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, gross
profit totaled $13,918,285, resulting in a gross margin of
approximately 55.1%, compared to $12,698,481, or a gross margin of
approximately 56.5% during the nine months ended June 30,
2018. The increase in absolute gross
profit of $1,219,804 or approximately 10% is due to an increase in
revenue offset by increases in certain cost of revenue, including
product sales costs, device repair, monitoring activity,
communication costs and depreciation of
devices.
General and Administrative Expense
During
the nine months ended June 30, 2019, general and administrative
expense totaled $9,464,332 compared to $10,856,950 for the nine
months ended June 30, 2018. The decrease of $1,392,618 or
approximately 13% in general and administrative costs resulted
largely from a decrease in stock based compensation of $1,083,386,
lower Board of Director fees of $264,722, lower wages and taxes of
$286,156, lower outside services of $152,860, lower business taxes
of $143,868 and lower travel and entertainment of $68,105,
partially offset by higher legal and professional expense of
$519,448, bad debt expense of $99,997 and higher insurance costs of
$88,246.
Selling and Marketing Expense
During
the nine months ended June 30, 2019, selling and marketing expense
totaled $1,637,026 compared to $1,394,778 for the nine months ended
June 30, 2018. The $242,248, or approximately 17% increase
resulted largely from higher wages and taxes of $125,012 and higher
travel and entertainment of $96,275 visiting existing and new
customers.
Research and Development Expense
During the nine months ended June 30, 2019,
research and development expense totaled $954,276 compared to
research and development expense for the nine months ended June 30,
2018 totaling $600,814, an increase of $353,462 or approximately
59%. The increase resulted
largely from the reallocation of $277,279 of wages and higher
travel and entertainment of $35,963. In addition, we are
significantly enhancing our technology platform to improve the
efficiency of our software, firmware, user interface, and
automation. As a result of these improvements, $868,652 was
capitalized as developed technology during the nine months ended
June 30, 2019 and $802,560 was capitalized during the nine months
ended June 30, 2018. A portion of this expense would have been
recognized as research and development expense, absent the
significant enhancements to the technology.
Depreciation
and Amortization Expense
During
the nine months ended June 30, 2019, depreciation and amortization
expense totaled $1,556,378 compared to $1,624,916 for the nine
months ended June 30, 2018. The $68,538, or approximately 4%
decrease was largely the result of certain property and equipment
assets becoming fully depreciated.
Total Operating Expense
During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, total
operating expense decreased to $13,612,012 compared to
$14,477,458 for the nine months ended
June 30, 2018, a decrease of $865,446 or approximately 6%. The
decrease was largely due to lower general and administrative
expense of $1,392,618 and lower depreciation and amortization of
$68,538. These costs were partially offset by higher selling and
marketing expense of $242,248 and higher research and development
expense of $353,462.
Income / Loss from Operations
During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, income
from operations was $306,273 compared to a loss of
$1,778,977 for the nine months
ended June 30, 2018, an improvement of $2,085,250. This improvement
was due to higher gross profit of $1,219,804 and a reduction in
operating expense of $865,446.
Other Income and Expense
For the nine months
ended June 30, 2019, other
income (expense) totaled expense of $1,917,862 compared to expense of
$2,495,752 for the nine months ended June 30, 2018. The
decrease in net other expense of $577,890 resulted primarily from
lower interest expense of $291,035, associated with supplier
financing and deferred financing fees, both in the prior fiscal
year and positive currency exchange rate movements of
$307,911.
Net Loss Attributable to Common Shareholders
The Company had a net loss from continuing
operations for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 totaling
$2,068,924 compared to a net loss of $4,635,536 for the nine months
ended June 30, 2018, representing a decrease of $2,566,612 or
approximately 55%. This decrease in net
loss is largely due to higher gross profit, lower general and
administrative costs, and lower depreciation and amortization,
partially offset by higher research and development costs and
higher selling and marketing expense.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During and prior to the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, we supplemented cash flows by
financing the business from borrowings under a credit facility, a
revolving line of credit from one of our shareholders, receipt of
certain disgorgement funds, and from the sale and issuance of
debt securities. As of June 30, 2019, excluding interest,
approximately $3.4 million was owed to Sapinda Asia Limited under a
loan agreement (the “Sapinda
Loan Agreement”) that matures
on September 30, 2020 and $30.4 million was owed to Conrent Invest
S.A. (“Conrent”)
under a loan (the
“Conrent
Loan Agreement”). No borrowings
or sales of equity securities occurred during the nine months ended
June 30, 2019 or during the year ended September 30,
2018.
On July 19, 2018, the
Company and Conrent entered into an amendment to their Facility
Agreement (the “Amended
Facility Agreement”), which Amended
Facility Agreement (i) extended the maturity date of the Facility
to the earlier of either April 1, 2019 or the date upon which the
outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company, and (ii)
provided that in the event of a change of control of the Company,
Conrent shall immediately cancel the Amended Credit Facility and
declare the outstanding principal amount, together with unpaid
interest, immediately due and payable. On February 24, 2019,
the Company and Conrent entered into a second amendment to their
Facility Agreement (the “Second Amended
Facility Agreement”), which Second
Amended Facility Agreement (i) extends the maturity date of the
Facility to the earlier of either April 1, 2020 or the date upon
which the outstanding principal amount is repaid by the Company,
and (ii) provides that in the event of a change of control of the
Company, Conrent shall immediately cancel the Second Amended Credit
Facility and declare the outstanding principal amount, together
with unpaid interest, immediately due and
payable.
Management will
continue to seek additional extensions of debt maturities, other
sources of capital, refinancing options, and potentially other
transactions to meet all of its future obligations. While
management believes it will be successful in completing one of
these alternatives prior to the maturity of the Second Amended
Facility Agreement, no assurances can be given.
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities.
During the nine months ended June
30, 2019, we had cash flows
from operating activities of $4,063,346, compared to cash flows
from operating activities of $5,311,431 for the nine months ended June
30, 2018, representing a
decrease of approximately 23%. The cash from operations was
the result of the net loss of $2,068,924, offset by aggregated
non-cash expense of $4,149,029 in the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Income. In addition, there was an increase in accrued
liabilities of $1,849,972 and a decrease in inventory of $401,438,
partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $83,201, an
increase in prepaid expense and other assets of $135,714 and an
increase in accounts receivable. In the nine month period ended
June 30, 2018 the Company had a net loss of $4,635,536, offset by
aggregated non-cash expense of $5,715,586 in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Income and received a refund of an
international performance bond of approximately $2.9 million in
prepaid expense and other assets.
Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities.
The Company used $2,465,112 of cash for investing
activities during the nine months ended June
30, 2019, compared to
$2,074,160 of cash used during the nine months ended June
30, 2018. Cash used for investing
activities was used for significant enhancements of our software
platform and purchases of monitoring and other equipment to meet
customer demand during the nine months ended June 30, 2019.
Purchases of property and equipment increased $156,723, compared to
the prior period, largely due to increases in leasehold
improvements and computer equipment.
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities.
The Company used $65,237 of cash for financing
activities during the nine months ended June
30, 2019, compared to $47,579
of cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended June
30, 2018.
Liquidity, Working Capital and Management’s Plan
As of June
30, 2019, the Company had
unrestricted cash of $6,878,916 compared to unrestricted cash of
$5,446,557 as of September 30,
2018. As of
June
30, 2019, we had a working
capital deficit of $31,032,669, compared to a working capital
deficit of $30,316,328 as of September 30, 2018. This increase
in working capital deficit of $716,341 is principally due to an
increase in accrued interest and legal costs, cash used for
additional capitalized software of $868,652, purchases of
monitoring equipment of $1,296,621 and purchases of property and
equipment of $299,839. These items were partially offset by cash
provided by operations and cash received from the sale of inventory
items.
The
Company believes that our cash on hand in addition to cash derived
from our operating activities will be sufficient to sustain
operations through the next twelve months, although no assurance
can be given. In the event that they are not sufficient, the
Company will need to obtain additional funding from outside
sources. No assurances can be given that we will be able to obtain
additional funding on terms favorable to us, if at
all.
On March 13, 2017, the Company successfully
extended the Sapinda Loan Agreement from September 30, 2017 to
September 30, 2020. On February 24, 2019, the Company successfully
extended the Conrent Loan Agreement to the earlier of either
April 1, 2020 or the date upon which the outstanding principal
amount is repaid by the Company.
Inflation
We
do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our
historical operations or profitability.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Arrangements
The
Company has not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated
entities whereby the Company has financial guarantees, derivative
instruments, or other contingent arrangements that expose the
Company to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or
any other obligation that provides financing, liquidity, market
risk, or credit risk support to the Company, except as described
below.
|
Payments
due in
fiscal year 2019
|
Payments
due in fiscal years 2020-2021
|
Payments
due in fiscal years 2022-2023
|
Total
|
Operating
leases
|
$79,190
|
$425,097
|
$164,687
|
$668,974
|
As
of June 30, 2019, the Company’s total future minimum lease
payments under noncancelable operating leases were $668,974. The
Company’s facility leases typically have original terms not
exceeding five years and generally contain multi-year renewal
options.
The
Company footprint extends to a number of countries outside the
United States, and we intend to continue to examine international
opportunities. As a result, our revenue and results of
operations are affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates,
interest rates, transfer pricing changes, taxes and other
uncertainties inherent in doing business in more than one
currency. In addition, our operations are exposed to risks
that are associated with changes in social, political, and economic
conditions in the foreign countries in which we operate, including
changes in the laws and policies that govern foreign investment, as
well as, to a lesser extent, changes in United States laws and
regulations relating to foreign trade and investment.
Foreign Currency Risks
We
had $10,220,079 and $8,080,688 in revenue from sources outside of
the United States for the nine months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively. We made and received payments in a foreign
currency during the periods indicated, which resulted in a foreign
exchange expense of $134,795 and of $442,706 in the nine months
ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Fluctuations in
the exchange loss or gain in any given period are due to the
strengthening or weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Chilean
Peso and Canadian dollar. Changes in currency exchange rates affect
the relative prices at which we sell our products and purchase
goods and services. Given the uncertainty of exchange rate
fluctuations, we cannot estimate the effect of these fluctuations
on our future business, product pricing, results of operations, or
financial condition. We do not use foreign currency exchange
contracts or derivative financial instruments for hedging or
speculative purposes. To the extent foreign sales become a more
significant part of our business in the future, we may seek to
implement strategies which make use of these or other instruments
in order to minimize the effects of foreign currency exchange on
our business.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) to ensure that material information relating to the
Company is made known to the officers who certify our financial
reports and to other members of senior management and the Board of
Directors. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms.
Under
the supervision and with the participation of management, including
the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2019 was
completed pursuant to Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the
Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed
to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be
disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms as of
June 30, 2019.
Changes in Internal Controls
We
maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting that
is designed to provide reasonable assurance that our books and
records accurately reflect our transactions and that our
established policies and procedures are followed. There was no
change in our internal control over financial reporting during our
quarter ended June 30, 2019 that materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
The Company is, from time to time, involved in various legal
proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business.
Lazar
Leybovich et al. v. SecureAlert, Inc. On March 29, 2012, Lazar Leybovich, Dovie
Leybovich and Ben Leybovich filed a complaint in the 11th Circuit
Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida alleging breach of
contract with regard to certain Stock Redemption Agreements. The
plaintiffs alleged $1,587,604 in combined damages. On May 2, 2016,
the Court resolved this case in favor of the Company by granting
the Company’s motion for Summary Judgment. The plaintiffs
filed an Appeal on June 1, 2016 challenging the Court’s
ruling on the motion for Summary Judgment. The Appellate court
ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that factual issues
remain, reversing the Summary Judgment and remanding the case back
to the trial court. On February 21, 2019, the trial concluded and a
jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor; awarding the
plaintiffs $336,000 before interest. The Company filed a motion to
reverse the verdict in its entirety, which was denied on July 30,
2019. The Court entered a judgment on August 1, 2019 in the amount
of $553,115.84, inclusive of pre-judgment interest. The Company is
currently considering its options on appealing both the original
judgement and the interest methodology used by the
court.
John
Merrill v. Track Group, Inc. and Guy Dubois. On November 30, 2016, the Company was served with
a complaint filed by John Merrill, the former Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, in District Court of the Third Judicial
District in Salt Lake County, Utah alleging breach of contract,
among other causes of action, related to Mr. Merrill’s
termination of employment effective September 27, 2016. Mr. Merrill
is seeking not less than $590,577 plus interest, attorney fees and
costs. At a hearing on April 25, 2018, the court dismissed the
plaintiff’s claims related to existence of an oral look-back
agreement and a separation agreement. In an order entered July 25,
2019, the court granted the defendants’ motion to strike
plaintiff’s damages’ expert report and barred
plaintiff’s expert from testifying at trial, if any.
Plaintiff has moved the court to reconsider its July 25, 2019
order. The Company intends to seek summary judgment on the
remaining contested issues. We believe the allegations and claims
are without merit.
SecureAlert,
Inc. v. Federal Government of Mexico (Department of the
Interior). On March 24, 2017, SecureAlert Inc. filed a
complaint before the Federal Administrative Tribunal, asserting the
failure by defendants to pay claimant amounts agreed to, and due
under, the Pluri Annual Contract for the Rendering of Monitoring
Services of Internees, through Electric Bracelets, in the Islas
Marias Penitentiary Complex dated July 15, 2011, entered into by
and between the Organo Administrativo Desconcentrado Prevencion y
Readaptacion Social of the then Public Security Department, and
presently, an agency of the National Security Commission of the
Department of the Interior, and SecureAlert, Inc., presently Track
Group, Inc. The Company’s claim amount is upwards of $6.0
million. The Supreme Court took action to resolve previous,
conflicting decisions regarding the jurisdiction of such claims and
determined that such claims will be resolved by the Federal
Administrative Tribunal. Subsequently, plaintiff filed an Amparo
action before the Collegiate Court, seeking an appeal of the
Federal Administrative Court’s earlier decision against
plaintiff. A decision on the Amparo action is anticipated in late
2019. Based upon the fee arrangement the Company has with its
counsel, we anticipate the future liabilities attributable to legal
expense will be minimal.
Eli Sabag v. Track
Group, Inc., Sapinda Asia Limited and Lars
Windhorst. On May 4, 2018, Eli Sabag filed a
complaint before the Marion Superior Court in Marion County Indiana
for damages and declaratory Judgment against the Company. The
complaint seeks to enforce an “earn-out” clause in a
Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) between the Company and
Sabag. In addition, Sabag sued the Company for breach of
fiduciary duty and tortious interference, alleging that the Company
avoided selling sufficient GPS devices so as to not trigger the
issuance of contingent stock under the “earn-out”
clause in the SPA. Finally, Sabag alleges that the Company was
unjustly enriched because it failed to pay full value for his
shares under the SPA. The Company believes the allegations are
unfounded and without merit, and it will defend the case
vigorously. Furthermore, according to the SPA, any disputes
are to be resolved through binding arbitration held in New
York. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint and
Compel Arbitration on September 5, 2018. On March 29, 2019, the
Marion Superior Court ruled in favor of the Company and dismissed
all claims against the Company without prejudice. The plaintiff has
not taken any further actions since March 29, 2019
Erick Cerda v.
Track Group, Inc. On July 25, 2018, former employee Erick
Cerda, the plaintiff, filed a complaint against the Company in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
Case No. 18-CV-05075, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages in
an unspecific amount. To avoid the costs and uncertainties of
prolonged litigation, the parties reached a settlement, which was
finalized on June 4, 2019 and paid in June 2019. On July 22, 2019,
the case was dismissed with prejudice as a result of the
settlement.
Blaike Anderson v.
Track Group, Inc., et. al. On June 24, 2019, Blaike Anderson
filed a complaint seeking unspecified damages in the State Court of
Marion County, Indiana, alleging liability on the part of
defendants for providing a defective ankle monitoring device and
failure to warn plaintiff regarding the condition thereof.
Defendants dispute the allegations of the Complaint and intend to
vigorously defend the case.
Our results of
operations and financial condition are subject to numerous risks
and uncertainties described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
our fiscal year ended September 30, 2018, filed on December 19,
2018. You should carefully consider these risk factors in
conjunction with the other information contained in this Quarterly
Report. Should any of these risks materialize, our business,
financial condition and future prospects could be negatively
impacted. As of August 9,
2019, there have been no
material changes to the disclosures made in the above-referenced
Form 10-K.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item
3. Defaults Upon
Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Mine
Safety Disclosures
Not
applicable.
Item
5. Other Information
None.
Item
6. Exhibits
(a)
|
Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
|
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Title of Document
|
|
|
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (filed herewith).
|
|
|
Certifications
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350) (filed herewith).
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL
INSTANCE DOCUMENT
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABEL LINKBASE
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL
TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Track Group, Inc.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/ Derek Cassell
|
|
|
|
Derek Cassell, Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/ Peter K. Poli
|
|
|
|
Peter K. Poli, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
-29-