TRADESTATION GROUP INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number: 0-31049

TradeStation Group, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

954-652-7000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The registrant had 41,355,346 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of November 3, 2009.

Table of Contents

TRADESTATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

TRADESTATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes.

3

Table of Contents

TRADESTATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes.

4

Table of Contents

TRADESTATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes.

5

Table of Contents

TRADESTATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(All notes and related disclosures applicable to the

three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited)

TradeStation Group, Inc. (“TradeStation Group” or the “Company”) is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “TRAD.” TradeStation Securities, Inc., TradeStation Technologies, Inc., and TradeStation Europe Limited are TradeStation Group’s operating subsidiaries. TradeStation Securities is a licensed securities broker-dealer and a registered futures commission merchant. TradeStation Technologies develops and offers strategy trading software tools and subscription services. TradeStation Europe Limited, a company organized under the laws of England and Wales, is authorized and regulated by the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority (“FSA”), and holds what is known as a “Passport” to introduce brokerage accounts for residents of countries within the European Economic Area.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group for the year ended December 31, 2008. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s consolidated financial position as of September 30, 2009 and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for each of the periods presented have been recorded. The results of operations and cash flows for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or cash flows that may be reported for the year or for any subsequent period.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 5, 2009, which is the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.

Significant Accounting Policies

The following significant accounting policy should be considered in addition to those included in the significant accounting policies section of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Investments — The Company’s investments in marketable securities are carried at fair value and are designated as available-for-sale, except for securities owned by the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary, TradeStation Securities, which are accounted for as trading investments. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments, net of deferred income taxes, are reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments are determined on the specific identification method and are reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Unrealized gains and losses on securities accounted for as trading investments are reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Declines in fair value of investments that are considered other than temporary are accounted for as realized losses.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

On June 30, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS 168”). Under SFAS 168, which became effective for the Company on July 1, 2009,

6

Table of Contents

the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became the source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards for nongovernmental entities, in addition to guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The requirements of SFAS 168 are promulgated in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Topic of the FASB ASC (the “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Topic”). Accordingly, certain references to non-SEC accounting and reporting standards in these notes to consolidated financial statements will reference the new FASB ASC. The Company’s adoption of the guidance in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Topic did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance under the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC (the “Subsequent Events Topic” and formerly SFAS No. 165). The Subsequent Events Topic applies to all entities that prepare financial statements (interim or annual) in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). When evaluating subsequent events, if an event or other transaction is within the scope of other applicable GAAP, that GAAP should be applied with respect to the recognition, measurement and disclosure of that event or transaction. The Subsequent Events Topic indicates that management should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued or available to be issued and it is effective on a prospective basis for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of the Subsequent Events Topic did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 amended FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amended APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The requirements of FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 were codified under the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB ASC and the Interim Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC and are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. The Company’s disclosures for the interim period ended September 30, 2009 reflect the adoption of these pronouncements. See Note 10 – FAIR VALUE MEASURES for a discussion of the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, which was codified under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC (the “Derivatives and Hedging Topic”) and the Guarantees Topic of the FASB ASC (the “Guarantees Topic”). The new guidance in the Derivatives and Hedging Topic and the Guarantees Topic applies to all derivative instruments and related hedged items and requires entities to provide greater transparency about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 2008. The Company’s adoption of the new guidance, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, which is a revision of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and which was codified under the Business Combinations Topic of the FASB ASC (the “Business Combinations Topic”). The new guidance in the Business Combinations Topic applies to all business entities and to transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. It revises in various areas and circumstances methods of accounting for the costs of acquisitions and other business combinations and various components thereof. The new guidance in the Business Combinations Topic is effective prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Therefore, for the Company, it became effective for any acquisition or other business combination made on or after January 1, 2009.

7

Table of Contents

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defined fair value, established a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008 the FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 was issued, which delayed the effective date of the requirements of SFAS 157 as to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. For these nonfinancial assets and liabilities, the effective date was deferred to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. SFAS 157 and FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 were codified under the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC (the “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic”). The Company’s adoption of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic on January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company’s adoption of the deferred portion of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. See Note 10 – FAIR VALUE MEASURES for a discussion of the fair value of the Company’s marketable available-for-sale securities.

Stock Compensation

The Company records stock-based compensation expense for employee services based upon the grant-date fair value of those awards in accordance with the provisions of the Compensation-Stock Compensation Topic of the FASB ASC (the “Compensation-Stock Compensation Topic”). The Company currently uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock option awards. The determination of the fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by the market price of the stock, exercise price of the award, expected term of the award, estimated volatility of the stock over the term of the award, risk-free interest rate and expected dividend yield. Separate assumptions are used for employee officer options, non-officer employee options (both of which vest over a five-year period) and non-employee director options (which vest over a three-year period).

No options to purchase shares of common stock were granted during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each option grant on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model are as follows:

In accordance with the Compensation-Stock Compensation Topic, the Company is required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures are used, and stock-based compensation expense is recorded only for those awards that are expected to vest. All stock-based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are generally the vesting periods.

8

Table of Contents

During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense, primarily related to the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards (and, to a lesser extent, common stock issued at a discount under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan), of $635,000 ($534,000 net of tax) and $609,000 ($483,000 net of tax), respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense, primarily related to the issuance of stock options (and, to a lesser extent, restricted stock awards and common stock issued at a discount under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan), of $2.1 million ($1.7 million net of tax) and $3.5 million ($2.8 million net of tax), respectively.

Vesting Acceleration of Certain Options

Certain stock options granted prior to February 2007 to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and former Chief Growth Officer and certain options granted prior to June 2007 to certain non-employee directors contained a provision resulting in 100% acceleration of vesting if the aggregate beneficial ownership of William Cruz and Ralph Cruz, the Company’s then-non-executive Co-Chairmen, fell below 25%. As a result of the aggregate beneficial ownership of William Cruz and Ralph Cruz falling below 25% in April 2008, the Company recorded compensation expense associated with the accelerated vesting of these options. The additional compensation expense from this acceleration during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $1.0 million, of which $639,000 was associated with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. This additional compensation expense of $1.0 million is included in the $3.5 million total stock-based compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

Stock-based Awards

The Company did not grant any options to purchase common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 682,540 shares of common stock with a weighted-average grant-date Black-Scholes fair value of $3.29 per share. Such options vest ratably in annual increments over a three- to five-year period and are exercisable at prices ranging from $5.49 to $8.55 per share, which were the respective closing prices of the Company’s common stock on the respective dates the options were granted. The Company did not grant any options to purchase common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 352,438 shares of common stock with a weighted-average grant-date Black-Scholes fair value of $6.24 per share. Such options vest ratably in annual increments over a three- to five-year period and are exercisable at prices ranging from $9.18 to $11.42 per share, which were the respective closing prices of the Company’s common stock on the respective dates the options were granted.

The Company did not issue any restricted shares of common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 225,048 restricted shares of common stock, which had a fair market value of $1.3 million at the grant date. The Company did not issue any restricted shares of common stock during the three months ended September 30, 2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company issued 105,574 restricted shares of common stock which had a fair market value of $1.2 million at the grant date. These restricted shares of common stock were granted to officers of the Company as awards under the Company’s incentive stock plan, vest 50% on the third anniversary of the date of grant and 100% on the sixth anniversary, and include 100% automatic vesting acceleration upon retirement, death, disability and change in control of the Company. All of these restricted shares contain a provision whereby, if employment terminates prior to full vesting, the non-vested shares will automatically be forfeited and the Company will reacquire the non-vested shares for no consideration.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, stock options for 22,511 shares and 153,621 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock were exercised under the Company’s incentive stock plan. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, stock options for 74,941 shares and 172,088 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock were exercised under the Company’s incentive stock plan.

9

Table of Contents

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company issued 29,114 and 20,985 shares of common stock under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan at prices of $7.36 and $10.04 per share, respectively.

Weighted average shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are calculated as follows (in thousands):

Stock options and non-vested restricted shares of common stock outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, which were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their weighted average effect would have been anti-dilutive, are as follows (in thousands):

Comprehensive income is defined as the change in a business enterprise’s equity during a period arising from transactions, events or circumstances relating to non-owner sources, such as unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities and foreign currency translation adjustments. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by, or distributions to, owners.

A reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands):

10

Table of Contents

Cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations, consisting of qualified deposits of $796.5 million and $626.1 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, have been segregated in special reserve bank accounts at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. or one of its banking affiliates for the exclusive benefit of customers under Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and other regulations. As of September 30, 2009, the $796.5 million of qualified deposits included $795.8 million of investments in U.S. Treasury Bills. On the first or second business day of each month, if required, this amount is adjusted based upon the previous month-end calculation. On October 1, 2009, cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations increased by $10.0 million, from $796.5 million (the balance as of September 30, 2009) to $806.5 million. Conversely, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $10.0 million on October 1, 2009. On January 2, 2009, cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations decreased by $4.1 million, from $626.1 million (the balance as of December 31, 2008) to $622.0 million. Conversely, cash and cash equivalents increased by $4.1 million on January 2, 2009.

Receivables from brokerage customers, net consist primarily of margin loans to TradeStation Securities’ brokerage customers of approximately $39.9 million and $30.3 million at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Securities owned by brokerage customers are held as collateral for margin loans. Such collateral is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, TradeStation Securities was charging a base margin debit interest rate of 7.75% per annum on debit balances in equities brokerage customer accounts.

“Margin” requirements determine the amount of equity required to be held in an account for the purchase of equities on credit. Margin lending is subject to the margin rules of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the margin requirements of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), limits imposed by clearing agent firms, and TradeStation Securities’ own internal policies. Nearly all equities accounts at TradeStation Securities are margin accounts. While not, technically speaking, an extension of credit, TradeStation Securities also provides leverage, the effect of which is similar to margin lending, to its customers’ futures and forex accounts. By permitting customers to purchase and maintain securities positions on margin or using leverage, TradeStation Securities takes the risk that a market decline will reduce the value of the collateral securing its margin loan or the leveraged amount to an amount that renders the margin loan or leverage unsecured. Under applicable securities laws and regulations, once a margin account for equities has been established, TradeStation Securities is obligated to require from the customer initial margin of no lower than 50% for purchases of securities and then is obligated to require the customer to maintain its equity in the account equal to at least 25% of the value of the securities in the account. However, TradeStation Securities’ current internal requirement is that the customer’s equity not be allowed to fall below 35% of the value of the securities in the account. If it does fall below 35%, TradeStation Securities requires the customer to increase the account’s equity to 35% of the value of the securities in the account (if not, TradeStation Securities will perform closing transactions to bring the customer account above the maintenance requirement). We also monitor our futures and forex leverage account levels on an intra-day basis and, pursuant to exchange guidelines, require customers to deposit additional collateral, or to reduce positions, when necessary. All of these requirements can be, and often are, raised as TradeStation Securities deems necessary for certain accounts, groups of accounts, securities or groups of securities. However, there is no assurance that a customer will be willing or able to satisfy a margin call or pay unsecured indebtedness owed to TradeStation Securities.

11

Table of Contents

Amounts receivable from brokers, dealers, clearing organizations and clearing agents for equities accounts consist of the following as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

Securities borrowed transactions in equities accounts require TradeStation Securities to provide the counterparty with collateral in the form of cash and are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced to the lender. TradeStation Securities monitors the market value of securities borrowed on a daily basis, and collateral is adjusted as necessary based upon market prices. See Note 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES – General Contingencies and Guarantees. As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, TradeStation Securities serviced some of its institutional equities accounts through J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., futures trades were cleared through R.J. O’Brien & Associates and forex trades were introduced to Gain Capital Group, Inc., all on a fully-disclosed basis (J.P. Morgan Clearing Corp., R.J. O’Brien & Associates, and Gain Capital Group, Inc. are collectively referred to as “clearing agents” or “clearing agent firms”). These clearing agents provide services, handle TradeStation Securities’ customers’ funds, hold securities, futures and forex positions, and remit monthly activity statements to the customers on behalf of TradeStation Securities.

As of September 30, 2009, payables to brokerage customers consisted primarily of cash balances in brokerage customer accounts. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, payables to customers totaled $865.7 million and $661.0 million, respectively. These funds are the principal source of funding for margin lending. At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, TradeStation Securities was not paying interest on cash balances in brokerage customer accounts.

TradeStation Securities is subject to the net capital requirements of the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1), which is administered by the SEC and FINRA, and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (“CFTC”) financial requirement (Regulation 1.17 under the Commodity Exchange Act), which is administered by the CFTC and the National Futures Association. Under these requirements, TradeStation Securities calculates its net capital requirements using the “alternative method,” which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital, as defined by the rules, equal to the greater of (i) $500,000 and (ii) 2.0% of aggregate customer debit balances. Customer debit items are a function of customer margin receivables and may fluctuate significantly, resulting in a significant fluctuation in the Company’s net capital requirements. At September 30, 2009, TradeStation Securities had net capital of approximately $93.6 million (115% of aggregate debit items), which was approximately $92.0 million in excess of its required net capital of approximately $1.6 million. At December 31, 2008, TradeStation Securities had net capital of approximately $94.3 million (186% of aggregate debit items), which was approximately $93.3 million in excess of its required net capital of approximately $1.0 million.

The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In accordance with guidance under the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic, three levels of inputs may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company’s Level I assets consist of U.S. Treasury Bills of which the Company purchased $924.7 million and had maturities of $28.4 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As of September 30, 2009, the Company’s investments in U.S. Treasury Bills all had maturities within one year.

12

Table of Contents

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Company’s Level II assets consist of variable rate demand note (“VRDN”) securities issued by various state agencies throughout Florida. The Company’s VRDN investments are federal tax-exempt instruments of high credit quality, secured by direct-pay letters of credit from a major financial institution. These investments have variable rates tied to short-term interest rates. Interest rates are reset weekly and these VRDN securities can be tendered for sale upon notice (generally no longer than seven days) to the remarketing agent. Although the Company’s VRDN securities are issued and rated as long-term securities (with maturities ranging from 2021 through 2023), they are priced and traded as short-term instruments. The Company classifies these short-term investments as available-for-sale in accordance with the Investments-Debt and Equity Securities Topic of the FASB ASC. The investments are carried at cost or par value, which approximates the fair market value.

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company did not hold any Level III assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

The following table summarizes the basis used to measure the fair value of securities on a recurring basis in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

The Company had unrealized gains of $120,000 and $346,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. There were no realized gains or losses, and no unrealized losses, related to the Company’s marketable securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009: the Company purchased $808.3 million and had maturities of $13.9 million related to its U.S. Treasury Bills included in cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations; purchased $90.9 million and had maturities of $14.5 million related to its U.S. Treasury Bills included in marketable securities; and purchased $25.5 million of U.S. Treasury Bills which it pledged as deposits with clearing organizations.

13

Table of Contents

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and cash equivalents, brokerage receivables and brokerage payables

For these financial instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Marketable securities

For investments in U.S. Treasury Bills, the fair value equals the quoted market price of each U.S. Treasury Bill. Investments in VRDN’s are carried at cost or par value, which approximates the fair market value.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):

Restricted Cash

As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $717,000 and $956,000 of restricted cash, respectively, supporting a ten-year lease agreement for its corporate headquarters.

Operating Leases

The Company has a ten-year lease expiring in August 2012 (with two 5-year renewal options) that commenced in the summer of 2002 for an approximately 70,000-square-foot corporate headquarters in Plantation, Florida. Rent escalations, free rent, and leasehold and other incentives are recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial ten-year term of this lease. In addition to its corporate headquarters, the Company has five non-cancelable operating leases for facilities (including two data centers) with expirations ranging from November 2009 to July 2012.

14

Table of Contents

Future minimum lease payments as of September 30, 2009 under all operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, total rent expense (which is included in occupancy and equipment and data centers and communications in the accompanying consolidated statements of income) was approximately $1.3 million and $1.2 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, total rent expense was approximately $4.1 million and $3.6 million, respectively.

Purchase Obligations

As of September 30, 2009, the Company had various purchase obligations through August 2012 totaling approximately $5.5 million as follows: approximately $1.2 million, $3.1 million, $1.1 million and $100,000 during the remainder of 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively, related primarily to back office systems and telecommunications services.

Litigation and Claims

On or about December 20, 2007, TradeStation Technologies was named as one of several defendants in a complaint filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, styled Amacker, et. al. v. Renaissance Asset Management (RAM), et. al. Other named defendants include Anthony Michael Ramunno, Man Financial Inc., MF Global, Inc., Lind-Waldock & Company, LLC, Vision, LP, Vision Financial Markets, LLC, R.J. O’Brien & Associates, Inc., and FXCM Holdings, LLC. The initial complaint alleged that over forty plaintiffs are entitled to damages because the plaintiffs were investors in a fraudulent commodity pool operated by Mr. Ramunno and RAM. The initial complaint alleged that TradeStation Technologies conducted trades on behalf of and at the request of Mr. Ramunno and RAM. The initial complaint attempted to allege the following claims: (i) violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and accompanying regulations; (ii) common law fraud under Texas law; (iii) statutory fraud under the Texas Business and Commerce Code; (iv) breach of fiduciary duties under Texas law; (v) negligent and intentional misrepresentations under Texas law; and (vi) negligence under Texas law. Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint that contained similar factual allegations and attempted to allege a single claim for aiding and abetting liability under the Commodity Exchange Act. The Second Amended Complaint asserted actual damages of at least $32.0 million. On October 10, 2008, the court dismissed the case for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. On December 2, 2008, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and, on February 2, 2009, plaintiffs filed their Appellants’ Brief with that court. On March 6, 2009, TradeStation filed its Opposition Brief. Oral arguments on the appeal were held on September 2, 2009. It is too early to predict the outcome of this appeal.

TradeStation Securities was contacted by Canadian regulatory authorities regarding its acceptance of Canadian residents as clients and trading in securities on behalf of Canadian residents without being registered in Canada (TradeStation Securities does not accept equities accounts from Canadian residents but has, historically, accepted unsolicited futures and forex accounts from certain provinces based on what it believed to be certain relevant exemptions or other applicable legal theories). TradeStation Securities is cooperating with Canadian authorities. TradeStation Securities was offered the option to have this investigation brought, discussed and resolved on a consolidated basis with all relevant Canadian provinces and accepted that proposal. If the matter is resolved with the conclusion that TradeStation Securities is required to register in the Canadian provinces that provide most of its Canadian futures business, and that Canadian clearing services must be engaged, in addition to any fines or settlement amounts required to be paid

15

Table of Contents

TradeStation Securities’ choices would be (a) to register for appropriate licenses in Canada (approximate cost of $250,000) and retain Canadian clearing services for that business (TradeStation Securities futures clearing firm is not registered in Canada and, TradeStation Securities believes, relies on what it believes to be applicable exemptions to clear such business), the cost of which is presently unknown, or (b) close all Canadian futures accounts (in 2008, revenues from Canadian futures accounts were approximately $1.2 million). TradeStation Securities’ forex business from Canadian residents is minimal. TradeStation Securities made a written offer to settle the consolidated matter. The Canadian authorities rejected that offer and settlement discussions are ongoing. It is too early to predict the outcome of this investigation.

On or about October 15, 2009, TradeStation Securities was named as the defendant in a complaint filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, styled In re: Arbco Capital Management, LLP, Richard O’Connell, Trustee v. TradeStation Securities, Inc. The complaint alleges that the debtor-in-bankruptcy, Arbco Capital Management, LLP, through its principal, Hayim Regensberg, operated a Ponzi scheme for which Mr. Regensberg has been sentenced to 100 months in jail. The complaint further alleges that in 2006, the debtor made $885,000 worth of transfers, allegedly involving TradeStation Securities, in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme and that the transfers were made with actual intent to hinder, delay and defraud some or all of the debtor’s then-existing creditors. The trustee seeks a judgment setting aside the transfers. TradeStation Securities received the complaint on October 27, 2009 and is in the beginning stages of conducting an inquiry into the allegations. Consequently, it is too early to predict the outcome of this matter.

TradeStation Securities is also engaged in routine regulatory matters and civil litigation or other dispute resolution proceedings. The pending regulatory and other matters could ultimately result in censures, sanctions, fines, damage awards, settlement payments and/or other negative consequences. While no assurances can be given, the Company does not believe that the ultimate outcome of any such routine regulatory matters or pending civil disputes will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company decided, as of June 1, 2002, to not carry errors or omissions insurance that covers third-party claims made by brokerage customers or software subscribers as a result of alleged human or system errors, failures, acts or omissions. This decision was made based upon the Company’s assessment of the potential risks and benefits, including premium rates, deductibles and coinsurance amounts, available per occurrence and aggregate coverage amounts, and the unavailability of policies that sufficiently cover the types of risks that relate to the Company’s business.

Management Continuity Agreements

In December 2005, the Company entered into a management continuity agreement with three of its executive officers, one of whom is no longer with the Company. Each management continuity agreement provides for potential severance payments during the 100-day period following a change in control, as that term is defined in the agreement, of an amount equal to up to two years of the executive’s annual compensation (in the aggregate for all three executive officers, approximately $2.3 million at December 31, 2008). The management continuity agreements do not commit the Company to retain any executive’s services for any fixed period of time, do not provide for severance payments unless the Company undergoes a change in control, and did not represent new hires or appointments. As a result of the resignation of one of those officers (which occurred on January 1, 2009), the effectiveness of his management continuity agreement terminated reducing the total amount of potential severance payments to approximately $1.5 million at September 30, 2009.

General Contingencies and Guarantees

In the ordinary course of business, there are various contingencies which are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. These include customer activities involving the execution, settlement and financing or provision of leverage for various customer securities and futures transactions. These activities may expose the Company to off-balance sheet credit risk in the event the customers are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations.

16

Table of Contents

In margin transactions, TradeStation Securities may be obligated for credit extended to its customers by TradeStation Securities or its clearing agents that is collateralized by cash and securities in the customers’ accounts. In connection with securities activities, TradeStation Securities also executes customer transactions involving the sale of securities not yet purchased (“short sales”), all of which are transacted on a margin basis subject to federal, self-regulatory organization and individual exchange regulations and TradeStation Securities’ and its clearing agents’ internal policies. New short sales rules have been imposed by regulatory authorities and more may be imposed in the near future. Additionally, TradeStation Securities may be obligated for credit extended to its customers by its clearing agents for futures transactions that are collateralized by cash and futures positions in the customers’ accounts. In all cases, such transactions may expose TradeStation Securities to significant off-balance sheet credit risk in the event customer collateral is not sufficient to fully cover losses that customers may incur. In the event customers fail to satisfy their obligations, TradeStation Securities may be required to purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the customers’ obligations.

TradeStation Securities seeks to manage the risks associated with its customers’ activities by requiring customers to maintain collateral in their margin and leveraged accounts in compliance with various regulatory requirements, internal requirements, and the requirements of clearing agents. TradeStation Securities and its clearing agents monitor required margin and leverage levels on an intra-day basis and, pursuant to such guidelines, require the customers to deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary. For further discussion, see Note 6 – RECEIVABLES FROM BROKERAGE CUSTOMERS.

TradeStation Securities borrows securities temporarily from other broker-dealers in connection with its broker-dealer business. TradeStation Securities deposits cash as collateral for the securities borrowed. Decreases in securities prices may cause the market value of the securities borrowed to fall below the level of required collateral. In the event the counterparty to these transactions does not return the cash deposited, TradeStation Securities may be exposed to the risk of selling the securities at prevailing market prices. TradeStation Securities seeks to manage this risk by requiring credit approvals for counterparties, by monitoring the collateral values on a daily basis, and by requiring additional collateral as needed.

The customers’ financing and securities settlement activities may require TradeStation Securities and its clearing agents to pledge customer securities as collateral in support of various secured financing sources, which may include bank loans. In the event the counterparty is unable to meet its contractual obligation to return customer securities pledged as collateral, TradeStation Securities may be exposed to the risk of needing to acquire the securities at prevailing market prices in order to satisfy its obligations. TradeStation Securities seeks to manage this risk by monitoring the market value of securities pledged on a daily basis.

TradeStation Securities provides guarantees to its clearing organizations and exchanges under their standard membership agreements, which require members to guarantee the performance of other members. Under the agreements, if another member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearing organization or exchange, other members would be required to meet shortfalls. TradeStation Securities’ liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable. However, management believes that the possibility of TradeStation Securities being required to make payments under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no liability has been recorded for these potential events.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $2.4 million and $8.4 million, respectively, based upon its current estimated annual effective income tax rate of approximately 39%. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $5.3 million and $14.5 million, respectively, based upon its then-estimated annual effective income tax rate of approximately 39%.

17

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2009, for financial reporting purposes, the Company estimates that it had available for federal income tax purposes total net operating loss carryforwards and income tax credit carryforwards of approximately $861,000 and $124,000, respectively. The net operating loss carryforwards expire in 2019 and the tax credits expire between 2010 and 2019. These amounts are subject to annual usage limitations of approximately $545,000. These limitations are cumulative to the extent they are not utilized in any year.

As of January 1, 2009, the Company had a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $492,000, which was decreased to $301,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. If this tax benefit is recognized in the consolidated financial statements, it would not have a material impact to the Company’s annual effective tax rate because the difference is temporary in nature. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes in uncertain tax positions over the next twelve months.

The Company is currently subject to federal income taxes in the U.S. and income taxes in three states, and in the United Kingdom. Tax regulations within each jurisdiction are subject to the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and require significant judgment to be applied. In July 2009, the Company was notified by the Internal Revenue Service that it would undergo a U.S. federal tax examination for the 2007 fiscal year. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations or state and local tax examinations for periods prior to 2005.

Any interest and penalties, if incurred in connection with an income tax examination, would be recognized as components of income tax expense.

TradeStation Group operates in two principal business segments: (i) brokerage services and (ii) software products and services. After elimination of intercompany charges, 93% of the Company’s consolidated net revenues in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2009, and 94% of the Company’s consolidated net revenues in the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008, were generated by the brokerage services segment. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on revenue and income before income taxes. The brokerage services segment represents the operations of TradeStation Securities and TradeStation Europe Limited and the software products and services segment represents the operations of TradeStation Technologies. Intercompany transactions between segments are based upon intercompany licensing and support and expense-sharing agreements, which reflect current business relationships and are designed to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

18

Table of Contents

In October 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized, and the Company announced, the use of up to $60 million of the Company’s available and unrestricted cash, over a four-year period, to repurchase shares of its common stock in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions. The stock repurchases are authorized to be made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. The four-year period commenced on November 13, 2006 and ends on November 12, 2010. Pursuant to the buy-back plan, up to $1.25 million of Company cash during each full calendar month (and a prorated amount during the first and last months) of the four-year period (i.e., up to $15 million per 12-month period and up to $60 million for the four-year period) has been authorized to be used to purchase Company shares at prevailing prices, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, rules and regulations, including Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18. The buy-back plan does not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of shares in any period, and may be modified, suspended, extended or discontinued at any time without prior notice.

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company used approximately $3.75 million to purchase 478,320 shares of its common stock at an average price of $7.84 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company used approximately $11.14 million to purchase 1,609,396 shares of its common stock at an average price of $6.92 per share. Since commencement of this buy-back plan on November 13, 2006, through September 30, 2009, the Company has used approximately $43.1 million to purchase 4,669,565 shares of its common stock at an average price of $9.24 per share. All shares purchased have been retired. See ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS – (c) Share Repurchases in PART II – OTHER INFORMATION of this report.

19

Table of Contents

This discussion should be read and evaluated in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of TradeStation Group and its subsidiaries contained in this report and with the issues, uncertainties and risk factors related to our business and industry described in “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS” of PART I of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group for the year ended December 31, 2008 and “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS” of PART II of this report. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the year, or for any subsequent period.

Overview and Recent Developments

TradeStation Securities (Member NYSE, FINRA, SIPC, NSCC, DTC, OCC & NFA) is a licensed securities broker-dealer and a registered futures commission merchant, and also a member of the Boston Options Exchange, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Chicago Stock Exchange, International Securities Exchange and NASDAQ OMX. TradeStation Securities’ business is also subject to the rules and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and state regulatory authorities (the firm is registered to conduct its brokerage business in all 50 states and the District of Columbia). TradeStation Securities self-clears most of its equities and equity and index options business, and uses an established futures clearing firm and an established forex dealer firm to clear its futures and forex business.

TradeStation Securities’ revenues consist primarily of transactional commissions and fees (including monthly platform fees), and interest derived from customer balances and margin lending to customers.

As of September 30, 2009, TradeStation Securities had 45,569 equities, futures and forex accounts (the vast majority of which were equities and futures accounts), a net increase of 647 accounts, or 1%, when compared to 44,922 accounts as of June 30, 2009, and a net increase of 4,152 accounts, or 10%, when compared to 41,417 accounts as of September 30, 2008. A brokerage account is defined as an account that either has a positive asset balance of at least $200 or has had activity within the past 180 days. In other words, an account is deemed inactive and is not included in counting total brokerage accounts if it has had less than a $200 balance and has had no activity within the past 180 days.

20

Table of Contents

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, TradeStation Securities’ brokerage customer accounts had 79,577 and 94,064 daily average revenue trades (often called “DARTs”), respectively, a decrease of 27% and 9% when compared to 108,507 and 102,834 DARTs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. The following table presents certain brokerage metrics and account information:

We compute DARTs as follows: For equities and equity and index options, a revenue trade included to calculate DARTs is a commissionable trade order placed by the customer and executed, regardless of the number of shares or contracts included in the trade order. For futures and forex, a revenue trade included to calculate DARTs is one round-turn commissionable futures contract traded, or one round-turn lot (or forex deal) traded, regardless of the number of individual orders made and executed (i.e., one futures or forex order may contain numerous contracts or deals, but each round-turn contract and deal is counted as a separate revenue trade). When viewing our DARTs, it should be taken into account that, for equities and equity and index options, we charge most of our commissions based on share volume and number of contracts traded (and not by revenue trade used to calculate DARTs). For futures and forex, we charge commissions on a per contract or per lot basis (so each futures or forex revenue trade included to calculate DARTs represents a round-turn commissionable contract or round turn-lot traded). All DARTs are not equal. The revenue and gross profit margin (brokerage commissions and fees less clearing and execution expenses as a percentage of brokerage commissions and fees) we derive from each revenue trade depends on the asset in question (equities, equity and index options, futures, forex – each has a different per unit revenue structure and cost structure) and, within each asset class, revenue and gross profit margin per equity, contract or deal varies to the extent higher volume traders receive more favorable pricing, which they often do.

TradeStation Technologies owns all of our intellectual property. TradeStation Technologies also provides subscription services for TradeStation. The subscription version of TradeStation is an institutional-quality service that offers strategy trading software tools that generate real-time buy and sell alerts based upon the subscriber’s programmed strategies or available third-party strategies, but does not include order execution or other brokerage services. Subscribers are charged a monthly subscription fee.

Our United Kingdom subsidiary, TradeStation Europe, is authorized by the United Kingdom’s FSA to act as an introducing brokerage firm in the United Kingdom. In February 2007, TradeStation Europe obtained a “passport” pursuant to which TradeStation

21

Table of Contents

Europe is considered registered, via its FSA authorization, to conduct business throughout the European Economic Area. TradeStation Europe’s operations currently consist of the solicitation and introduction of suitable European brokerage clients to its US affiliate (TradeStation Securities) for equities, options, futures and forex account services. As of September 30, 2009, and through the date of the filing of this report, TradeStation Europe’s operations and net assets are not considered to be material to our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2009, TradeStation Securities launched its new TradeStation Prime Services division. This new division will seek to fill the growing need of start-up to mid-sized hedge funds, registered investment advisers, professional traders and asset managers for quality prime brokerage services that are no longer being provided by the larger firms that traditionally served this market segment. TradeStation Prime Services intends to provide execution platforms, including TradeStation, clearance and settlement of trades, and a variety of services, including start-up assistance, outsourced/direct access trading, real-time risk management, portfolio reporting, securities lending, commission sharing agreements and capital introductions for its clients.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES. The following significant accounting policy should be considered in addition to those included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008: Investments — Our investments in marketable securities are carried at fair value and are designated as available-for-sale, except for securities owned by the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiary, TradeStation Securities, which are accounted for as trading investments. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments, net of deferred income taxes, are reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments are determined on the specific identification method and are reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Unrealized gains and losses on securities accounted for as trading investments are reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Declines in fair value of investments that are considered other than temporary are accounted for as realized losses.

The following areas are particularly subject to management’s judgments and estimates or are key components of our results of operations, and actual differences could materially affect our consolidated results of operations and financial position: Brokerage Commissions and Fees, Net Interest Income, Income Taxes, and Uninsured Loss Reserves. These areas are discussed in further detail under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in ITEM 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

22

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we operated in two principal business segments: (i) brokerage services and (ii) software products and services. The brokerage services segment represents the operations of TradeStation Securities and TradeStation Europe Limited and the software products and services segment represents the operations of TradeStation Technologies. We ceased marketing our legacy software products and subscription software services in 2000. Our primary sources of consolidated revenue are currently generated from the brokerage services segment, and the brokerage services segment should continue to produce most of our revenues for the foreseeable future. After elimination of intercompany charges, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the brokerage services segment accounted for approximately 93% of our consolidated net revenues and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the brokerage services segment accounted for approximately 94% of our consolidated net revenues. Given the size of that percentage, other than our discussion and table in Note 13 – SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION in ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS of PART I of this report, we will discuss our results of operations for the overall company instead of on a segmented basis. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, our consolidated statements of income data and presentation of that data as a percentage of change from period to period (unaudited):

Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

Net revenues were $32.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $41.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $9.4 million, or 23%. The primary reasons for this decline were decreased brokerage commissions and fees of $4.8 million, or 14%, as a result, we believe, of lower market volatility and a $4.7 million, or 74%, decrease in net interest income, due primarily to decreases in interest rates and, to a lesser extent, reduced receivables from brokerage customers (margin balances).

Net income was approximately $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $8.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $5.0 million, or 57%. The decrease resulted primarily from decreases of $4.8 million, or 14%, in brokerage commissions and fees and $4.7 million, or 74%, in net interest income, partially offset by a $3.0 million, or 30%, decrease in clearing and execution costs.

Income before income taxes was $6.1 million (19% of net revenues) for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $14.0 million (34% of net revenues) for the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $7.9 million, or 57%. Our $7.9 million decrease in income before income taxes was due primarily to decreases in brokerage commissions and fees of $4.8 million and in net interest income of $4.7 million, a $657,000 increase in employee compensation and benefits, and increased data centers and communications costs of $732,000, partially offset by decreased clearing and execution costs of $3.0 million. Our pre-tax margin (income before income taxes divided by net revenues) decreased from 34% to 19% due primarily to the decrease in brokerage commissions and fees and net interest income, increases in employee compensation and benefits, which resulted from increased employee headcount (mostly in our product development departments), and increases in data centers and communications costs, partially offset by decreased clearing and execution costs.

23

Table of Contents

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded an income tax provision of $2.4 million based upon our current estimated annual effective income tax rate of approximately 39%. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded an income tax provision of $5.3 million based upon our then-estimated annual effective income tax rate of approximately 39%. See Income Taxes below.

Revenues

Brokerage Commissions and Fees – Brokerage commissions and fees consist of commissions for equities, futures and forex transactions and, to a lesser extent, monthly platform and other fees earned from brokerage customers using the TradeStation online trading platform. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, brokerage commissions and fees were approximately $28.6 million, as compared to $33.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This $4.8 million, or 14%, decrease was due primarily to decreased brokerage commissions of $6.0 million from lower trading volume related mostly, we believe, to lower market volatility during the 2009 third quarter as compared to the 2008 third quarter (generally, as market volatility decreases our customer accounts’ trade volume decreases, and there was an upward spike in volatility during September 2008), partially offset by an increase in forex revenue of $618,000 resulting from more favorable terms achieved through the improvement of our forex contract with our clearing agent and a $392,000 increase in platform fees. We continuously review and assess our pricing, which includes commissions and platform and other fees, and we may adjust such fees from time to time in response to competitive pressures if and when they arise or as strategic pricing initiatives.

Interest Income – Interest income consists of interest earned from self-clearing operations (primarily, interest earned on brokerage customer cash balances and interest earned from brokerage customer margin lending balances), interest revenue-sharing arrangements with clearing agent firms, and interest or income from corporate cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, interest income was $1.6 million, as compared to $7.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This $5.4 million, or 77% decrease, was due primarily to decreases in interest rates and to reduced interest on receivables from brokerage customers (interest on margin balances). During the 2009 second quarter, the Company reallocated most of its investments to U.S. Treasury Bills and, to a lesser extent, money market funds that invest primarily in U.S. Treasury Bills (collectively, “US Treasury Investments”). As a result, the Company’s interest income is now affected principally by the yields obtained from such investments. The Company’s interest income has historically been dependent upon the federal funds daily effective rate and the federal funds target rate of interest, but now, since the shift to US Treasury Investments, only the federal funds target rate of interest for futures account interest-sharing is relevant. Historically, the weighted average rate of interest for equities accounts was based upon the federal funds daily effective rate of interest and, for futures accounts, was based (and continues to be based) on the federal funds target rate of interest. We estimate, based on the size and nature of our customer assets as of September 30, 2009 (and assuming for these purposes that the size and nature of our customer assets do not change), that each basis point increase or decrease in the US Treasury Investments yield (based upon the tenor of the US Treasury Investments) and, to a lesser extent, the federal funds target rate of interest will impact our annual net income by approximately $68,000. The average federal funds target rate of interest was approximately 0% and 2.0% during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest income for future periods may be materially affected by: changes in the US Treasury Investments yield and, to a lesser extent, the federal funds target rate of interest and the extent, if any, to which our customer cash account balances and/or margin lending balances increase or decrease; any decisions we may make to provide more or less favorable debit or credit interest rates to our customers; and whether we convert our futures clearing relationship to an omnibus clearing arrangement (which we are seeking to do), in which case our clearing firm will no longer receive a share of interest income from our futures customer accounts and the yield may no longer be tied to the federal funds target rate of interest.

Brokerage Interest Expense – Brokerage interest expense consists of amounts paid or payable to brokerage customers based on credit balances maintained in brokerage accounts and other brokerage-related interest expense. Brokerage interest expense does not

24

Table of Contents

include interest on company borrowings, which, if any, would be included in Expenses – Other below. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, the average annual credit interest rate paid to our equities customers was 0%, as compared to 0.50% during the three months ended September 30, 2008, and we only pay interest, if at all, for the portion of cash balances in each account over $10,000. Futures and forex customers are not paid interest on the cash balances in their accounts. As a result of the zero interest rate, we did not incur any brokerage interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2009. Brokerage interest expense was approximately $682,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2008. Factors that could affect brokerage interest expense in the future include: the growth (if any) and mix of business in our brokerage customer base among equities, futures and forex; average assets per account and the portion of account assets held in cash; and future decisions concerning credit or debit interest rates offered to our equities, futures and forex customers (as a result of changes in short-term interest rates or for other business reasons).

Subscription Fees and Other – Subscription fees and other revenues consist of, primarily, monthly fees earned for providing streaming real-time, Internet-based trading analysis software tools and market data services to non-brokerage customers and, to a lesser extent, fees for our training workshops that help customers take fuller advantage of the features and functions of the TradeStation electronic trading platform, direct sales of our legacy customer software products and royalties and similar fees received from third parties whose customers use our legacy software products. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, subscription fees and other revenues were approximately $2.1 million, as compared to $2.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The amount of subscription fees in the future will depend upon the number of subscription terminations and the number of new subscriptions each month. Subscription services and legacy customer software products have not been actively marketed in the U.S. since 2000, so it is expected that subscription terminations will exceed new subscriptions.

Expenses

Employee Compensation and Benefits – Employee compensation and benefits expenses consist primarily of employee salaries, sales commissions and bonuses, stock-based compensation and, to a lesser extent, payroll taxes, employee benefits (including group health insurance and employer contributions to benefit programs), recruitment, temporary employee services and other related employee costs. Employee compensation and benefits expenses were $10.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $9.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of approximately $657,000, or 7%. This increase was due primarily to increases in wages paid to employees of $984,000, due primarily to increased headcount (mostly in our product development departments), partially offset by decreased commissions of $263,000, due primarily to reduced trading volume. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, there was an average of 395 full-time equivalent employees, as compared to 341 full-time equivalent employees during the three months ended September 30, 2008. Employee compensation and benefits expenses are anticipated to increase during the remainder of 2009 as a result of recent and planned additions to employee headcount (primarily in our product development departments and in our new TradeStation Prime Services division).

Clearing and Execution – Clearing and execution expenses include the costs associated with executing and clearing customer trades, including fees paid to clearing agents and clearing organizations, exchanges and other market centers, fees and royalties paid for the licensing of self-clearing, back-office software systems and related services, and commissions paid to third-party broker-dealers. Clearing and execution expenses were approximately $7.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $10.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of approximately $3.0 million, or 30%. The decrease in clearing and execution expenses, which as a percentage of brokerage commissions and fees decreased to 25% during the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to 30% during the three months ended September 30, 2008, was primarily a result of a change in our mix of business among asset classes.

25

Table of Contents

Data Centers and Communications – Data centers and communications expenses consist of: (i) data communications costs necessary to connect our server farms directly to electronic marketplaces, data sources and to each other; (ii) data communications costs and rack space at our facilities where the data server farms are located; (iii) data distribution and exchange fees; and (iv) telephone, Internet and other communications costs. Data centers and communications expenses were $2.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $732,000, or 34%. This increase was due primarily to a $393,000 increase in circuit costs to connect our server farms to data providers and electronic marketplaces and a $256,000 increase in exchange fees.

Marketing – Marketing expenses consist of marketing programs, primarily: advertising in various media, including television, print media and direct mail; account opening kits and related postage; brochures; and other promotional items, including exhibit costs for industry events and seminars. Marketing expenses were $1.5 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2009 and the three months ended September 30, 2008. Our marketing expenses in future quarters may vary significantly as a result of several factors, which may include the success of current and future sales and marketing campaigns and strategies, the launch or release of new platform versions, products or services, the offering of sales seminars, and economic and market conditions.

Professional Services – Professional services expenses consist of fees for legal, accounting, tax, and other professional and consulting services. Professional services expenses were approximately $754,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $643,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $111,000, or 17%. The variance is primarily the result of increases in legal fees and consulting fees, partially offset by a decrease in accounting fees.

Occupancy and Equipment – Occupancy and equipment expenses consist of rent, utilities, property taxes, repairs, maintenance and other expenses pertaining to our office and facilities space. Occupancy and equipment expenses were $800,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $775,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $25,000, or 3%.

Depreciation and Amortization – Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of depreciation on property and equipment. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $1.1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2009 and the three months ended September 30, 2008. Depreciation expense may increase in the future based upon the level of capital expenditures we deem necessary to support our current business and the growth in our business (assuming that growth continues) and to enhance and improve the quality, reliability, speed and capacity of our brokerage services and systems. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below.

Other – Other expenses consist of insurance, regulatory fees and related costs, employee travel and entertainment, settlements for legal matters, costs related to training workshops, software maintenance, public company expenses, supplies, postage, exchange memberships, customer debits and errors, bank charges and other administrative expenses. Other expenses were $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $100,000, or 6%. The variance is primarily the result of an increase of $552,000 in various other general business expenses, partially offset by a decrease in customer debits and errors expense of $452,000.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008

Net revenues were $103.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $119.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $15.5 million, or 13%. The primary reason for this decline was a $16.6 million, or 81%, decrease in net interest income, due primarily to decreases in interest rates and to reduced receivables from brokerage customers (margin balances).

Net income was approximately $13.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $23.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $10.0 million, or 43%, due primarily to our 81% year-over-year decrease in net interest income, partially offset by decreased clearing and execution costs of $4.4 million, or 16%, which was primarily a result of a change in our mix of business among asset classes.

26

Table of Contents

Income before income taxes was $21.5 million (21% of net revenues) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $37.5 million (32% of net revenues) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $16.0 million, or 43%. Our $16.0 million decrease in income before income taxes was due primarily to our decrease in net interest income of $16.6 million, our increase in employee compensation and benefits of $1.8 million, our increase in data centers and communications of $1.6 million and our increase in marketing of $723,000, partially offset by our decreased clearing and execution costs of $4.4 million and increased brokerage commissions and fees of $1.2 million. Our pre-tax margin (income before income taxes divided by net revenues) decreased from 32% to 21% due primarily to the decrease in net interest income, the increase in employee compensation and benefits, which resulted from increased employee headcount (mostly in our product development departments), and the increase in data centers and communications costs, partially offset by decreased clearing and execution costs and increased brokerage commissions and fees.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded an income tax provision of $8.4 million based upon our current estimated annual effective income tax rate of approximately 39%. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded an income tax provision of $14.5 million based upon our then-estimated annual effective income tax rate of approximately 39%. See Income Taxes below.

Revenues

Brokerage Commissions and Fees – For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, brokerage commissions and fees were approximately $93.4 million, as compared to $92.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This $1.2 million, or 1%, increase was due primarily to increased platform fees of $1.7 million, and a $1.2 million increase in forex revenue resulting from more favorable terms achieved through the improvement of our forex contract with our clearing agent, partially offset by our decrease in brokerage commissions of $2.0 million. We continuously review and assess our pricing, which includes commissions and platform and other fees, and we may adjust such fees from time to time in response to competitive pressures, if and when they arise, or as strategic pricing initiatives.

Interest Income – For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, interest income was $3.9 million, as compared to $23.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This $19.4 million, or 83%, decrease was due primarily to a decrease in interest rates and to reduced interest on receivables from brokerage customers (interest on margin balances). During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company reallocated most of its investments to US Treasury Investments. As a result, the Company’s interest income is now affected principally by the yields obtained from such investments. The Company’s interest income has historically been dependent upon the federal funds daily effective rate and the federal funds target rate of interest, but now, since the shift to US Treasury Investments, only the federal funds target rate of interest for futures account interest-sharing is relevant. Historically, the weighted average rate of interest for equities accounts was based upon the federal funds daily effective rate of interest and, for futures accounts, was based (and continues to be based) on the federal funds target rate of interest. We estimate, based on the size and nature of our customer assets as of September 30, 2009 (and assuming for these purposes that the size and nature of our customer assets do not change), that each basis point increase or decrease in the US Treasury Investments yield (based upon the tenor of the US Treasury Investments) and, to a lesser extent, the federal funds target rate of interest will impact our annual net income by approximately $68,000. The average federal funds target rate of interest was approximately 0% and 2.43% during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Interest income for future periods may be materially affected by: changes in the US Treasury Investments yield and, to a lesser extent, the federal funds target rate of interest and the extent, if any, to which our customer cash account balances and/or margin lending balances increase or decrease; any decisions we may make to provide more or less favorable debit or credit interest rates to our customers; and whether we convert our futures clearing relationship to an omnibus clearing arrangement (which we are seeking to do), in which case our clearing firm will no longer receive a share of interest income from our futures customer accounts and the yield may no longer be tied to the federal funds target rate of interest.

27

Table of Contents

Brokerage Interest Expense – During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the average annual credit interest rate paid to our equities customers was 0%, as compared to 0.74% during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and we only pay interest, if at all, for the portion of cash balances in each account over $10,000. Futures and forex customers are not paid interest on the cash balances in their accounts. As a result of the zero interest rate, we did not incur any brokerage interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Brokerage interest expense was approximately $2.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Factors that could affect brokerage interest expense in the future include: the growth (if any) and mix of business in our brokerage customer base among equities, futures and forex; average assets per account and the portion of account assets held in cash; and future decisions concerning credit or debit interest rates offered to our equities, futures and forex customers (as a result of changes in short-term interest rates or for other business reasons).

Subscription Fees and Other – For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, subscription fees and other revenues were approximately $6.2 million, as compared to $6.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The amount of subscription fees in the future will depend upon the number of subscription terminations and the number of new subscriptions each month. Subscription services and legacy customer software products have not been actively marketed in the U.S. since 2000, so it is expected that subscription terminations will continue to exceed new subscriptions.

Expenses

Employee Compensation and Benefits – Employee compensation and benefits expenses were $31.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $29.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of approximately $1.8 million, or 6%. This increase was due primarily to increases in wages paid to employees of $2.7 million, partially offset by a decrease in stock compensation of $1.4 million. The increase in wages was due primarily to increased headcount (mostly in our product development departments). During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, there was an average of 377 full-time equivalent employees, as compared to 330 full-time equivalent employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in stock-based compensation is due primarily to $1.0 million of additional expense in 2008 relating to accelerated vesting of certain officer and non-employee director stock options that occurred as a result of the collective beneficial ownership of the company by the company’s co-founders falling below 25%. Employee compensation and benefits expenses are anticipated to increase during the remainder of 2009 due to recent and planned additions to employee headcount (primarily in our product development departments and in our new TradeStation Prime Services division).

Clearing and Execution – Clearing and execution expenses were approximately $23.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $28.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of approximately $4.4 million, or 16%. The decrease in clearing and execution expenses, which as a percentage of brokerage commissions and fees decreased to 26% during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to 31% during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, was primarily a result of a change in our mix of business among asset classes and to our flat-fee pricing plan introduced in July 2008.

Data Centers and Communications – Data centers and communications expenses were $8.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $6.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $1.6 million, or 23%. This increase was due primarily to increases of $681,000 for circuit costs to connect our server farms to data providers and electronic marketplaces, $441,000 in rack space, power and bandwidth charges at our server farms, and $408,000 for exchange fees.

Marketing – Marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $5.0 million, as compared to $4.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $723,000, or 17%, due primarily to increased advertising of $627,000.

28

Table of Contents

Our marketing expenses in future quarters may vary significantly as a result of several factors, which may include the success of current and future sales and marketing campaigns and strategies, the launch or release of new platform versions, products or services, the offering of sales seminars, and economic and market conditions.

Professional Services – Professional services expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were approximately $2.5 million, as compared to $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $83,000, or 3%. An increase in consulting expenses of $545,000 was partially offset by a decrease in legal fees of $282,000 and a decrease in accounting and tax fees of $181,000. Legal fees were higher during the 2008 period primarily as a result of $975,000 in costs associated with a trial (in which the Company prevailed), partially offset by a $625,000 recovery of previously-expensed legal fees as a result of a final settlement with our primary director and officer liability insurance carrier pertaining to that litigation in which we prevailed.

Occupancy and Equipment – Occupancy and equipment expenses were $2.3 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2008.

Depreciation and Amortization – Depreciation and amortization expenses were $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $198,000 or 6%. Depreciation expense may continue to increase based upon the level of capital expenditures we deem necessary to support our current business and the growth in our business (assuming that growth continues) and to enhance and improve the quality, reliability, speed and capacity of our brokerage services and systems. See Liquidity and Capital Resources below.

Other – Other expenses were $4.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of $507,000, or 12%, due primarily to increased fees to third parties of $345,000.

Variability of Quarterly Results

The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period or for the full year. Our quarterly revenues and operating results have varied in the past, and are likely to vary in the future. Such fluctuations may result in volatility in the price of our common stock. Our stock price has been very volatile throughout our history as a public company. For information regarding the risks related to the variability of quarterly results, see “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS” of PART I of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group for the year ended December 31, 2008 and “ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS” of PART II of this report.

Income Taxes

During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded an income tax provision of $2.4 million based upon our current estimated annual effective income tax rate of approximately 39%. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded an income tax provision of $5.3 million based upon our then-estimated annual effective income tax rate of approximately 39%.

As of September 30, 2009, for financial reporting purposes we estimate that we have available for federal income tax purposes total net operating loss carryforwards and income tax credit carryforwards of approximately $861,000 and $124,000, respectively. The net operating loss carryforwards expire in 2019 and the tax credits expire between 2010 and 2019. These amounts are subject to annual usage limitations of approximately $545,000. These limitations are cumulative to the extent they are not utilized in any year.

We are currently undergoing a routine U.S. federal tax examination by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2007 fiscal year. We are no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations or state and local tax examinations for periods prior to 2005.

29

Table of Contents

See Note 12 – INCOME TAXES in ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS of PART I of this report for additional discussion of income taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $52.0 million, of which $717,000 was restricted in support of a facility lease. On October 1, 2009, as a result of TradeStation Securities’ September 30, 2009 month-end calculation under Rule 15c3-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (see below), $10.0 million was transferred to cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations from cash and cash equivalents. We had marketable securities of approximately $84.9 million as of September 30, 2009, of which $8.5 million could be tendered for sale upon notice (generally no longer than seven days) to the remarketing agent. The remaining $76.4 million was composed of U.S. Treasury Bills with original maturities greater than three months.

As of September 30, 2009, TradeStation Securities had: $796.5 million of cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations in special reserve bank accounts for the exclusive benefit of customers under Rule 15c3-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and other regulations; receivables from brokerage customers, net of $39.9 million; and receivables from brokers, dealers, clearing organizations and clearing agents of $26.8 million. Receivables from brokerage customers, net are principally client margin loans which are demand loan obligations in customer equities accounts secured in part by cash and/or readily marketable securities. Receivables from and payables to brokers, dealers, clearing organizations and clearing agents represent primarily current open transactions which usually settle, or can be closed out, within a few business days.

Liquidity needs relating to client trading and margin borrowing activities are met primarily through cash balances in brokerage customer accounts, which were $865.7 million at September 30, 2009. Management believes that brokerage cash balances and operating earnings will continue to be the primary source of liquidity for TradeStation Securities.

TradeStation Securities is subject to the net capital requirements of the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1), which is administered by the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) financial requirement (Regulation 1.17 under the Commodity Exchange Act), which is administered by the CFTC and the National Futures Association. Under these requirements, TradeStation Securities calculates its net capital requirements using the “alternative method,” which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital, as defined by the rules, equal to the greater of (i) $500,000 and (ii) 2.0% of aggregate customer debit balances. Customer debit items are a function of customer margin receivables and may fluctuate significantly, resulting in a significant fluctuation in our net capital requirements. At September 30, 2009, TradeStation Securities had net capital of approximately $93.6 million (115% of aggregate debit items), which was approximately $92.0 million in excess of its required net capital of approximately $1.6 million. At December 31, 2008, TradeStation Securities had net capital of approximately $94.3 million (186% of aggregate debit items), which was approximately $93.3 million in excess of its required net capital of approximately $1.0 million.

In addition to net capital requirements, as a self-clearing broker-dealer TradeStation Securities is subject to DTCC, OCC, and other cash deposit requirements, which are and may continue to be large in relation to the company’s total liquid assets, and which may fluctuate significantly from time to time based upon the nature and size of TradeStation Securities’ active trader clients’ securities trading activity. As of September 30, 2009, we had security deposits and short-term U.S. Treasury Bills totaling $33.0 million with clearing organizations for the self-clearing of equities and standardized equity option trades. Our cash deposits with DTCC and OCC fluctuate significantly, and may increase or decrease significantly in future periods.

30

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2009, we had no long-term debt obligations or capital lease obligations. A summary of our operating lease obligations and minimum purchase obligations (primarily related to back-office systems and telecommunications services) is as follows (in thousands):

We have no operating lease obligations or minimum purchase obligations extending beyond 2012.

In addition to the purchase obligations set forth in the table above, we currently anticipate, in order to provide for additional growth of our brokerage business (there being no assurance additional growth will occur), capital expenditures of approximately $2.5 million for the remainder of 2009. These capital expenditures are primarily for the purchase of computer hardware and to support the growth of our data server farms and back-office systems to help support our business. These expenditures are expected to be funded through operating cash flows, capital leases, or a combination of the two.

In October 2006, our board of directors authorized, and we announced, the use of up to $60 million of our available and unrestricted cash, over a four-year period, to repurchase shares of our common stock in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions. The stock repurchases are authorized to be made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. The four-year period commenced on November 13, 2006 and ends on November 12, 2010. Pursuant to the buy-back plan, up to $1.25 million of company cash during each full calendar month (and a prorated amount during the first and last months) of the four-year period (i.e., up to $15 million per 12-month period and up to $60 million for the four-year period) has been authorized to be used to purchase company shares at prevailing prices, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, rules and regulations, including Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18. The buy-back plan does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares in any period, and may be modified, suspended, extended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we used approximately $3.75 million to purchase 478,320 shares of our common stock at an average price of $7.84 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we used approximately $11.14 million to purchase 1,609,396 shares of our common stock at an average price of $6.92 per share. Since commencement of this buy-back plan on November 13, 2006, through September 30, 2009, we used approximately $43.1 million to purchase 4,669,565 shares of our common stock at an average price of $9.24 per share. All shares purchased have been retired. See ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS – (c) Share Repurchases in PART II – OTHER INFORMATION of this report.

We anticipate that our available cash resources and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements through at least the next twelve months.

Net cash used in operating activities totaled approximately $11.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $10.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Net cash used in operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $11.8 million was due primarily to increases in cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations, purchases of trading marketable securities, receivables from brokers, dealers, clearing organizations and clearing agents, receivables from brokerage customers, net, prepaid income taxes and other assets; and decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses. This was partially offset by net income as adjusted for non-cash items; increases in payables to brokerage customers; decreases in deposits with clearing organizations; and proceeds from the maturities of trading marketable securities. Net cash provided by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $10.6 million was due primarily to net income as adjusted for non-cash items; increases in payables to brokerage customers,

31

Table of Contents

accrued expenses and accounts payable; and decreases in receivables from brokerage customers, receivables from brokers, dealers, clearing organizations and clearing agents and other assets. This was partially offset by increases in cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations and deposits with clearing organizations and decreases in payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations.

Investing activities used cash of $26.1 million and $1.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was primarily for the purchase of available-for-sale marketable securities of $27.0 million and, to a lesser extent, capital expenditures of $3.4 million consisting primarily of computer hardware to support the growth of our data server farms and computer software to support our growing infrastructure. This was partially offset by proceeds from the maturities of available-for-sale marketable securities of $4.0 million. Net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily for capital expenditures of $2.4 million consisting of computer hardware to support increased capacity of our data server farms.

Financing activities used cash of $10.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and used cash of $10.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of $10.2 million was due primarily to approximately $11.1 million used for the repurchase of company shares, partially offset by $791,000 of proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to the exercise of stock options from our incentive stock plans (and, to a lesser extent, common stock issued at a discount under the company’s employee stock purchase plan). Net cash used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $10.0 million was due primarily to approximately $11.2 million used for the repurchase of company shares, partially offset by $1.1 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to the exercise of stock options from our incentive stock plans (and, to a lesser extent, common stock issued at a discount under the company’s employee stock purchase plan) and $244,000 related to excess tax benefits from stock option exercises under our incentive stock plans.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

On June 30, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (SFAS 168). Under SFAS 168, which became effective for us on July 1, 2009, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) became the source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards for nongovernmental entities, in addition to guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The requirements of SFAS 168 are promulgated in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Topic of the FASB ASC (the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Topic). Accordingly, certain references to non-SEC accounting and reporting standards in the notes to consolidated financial statements and this management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations will reference the new FASB ASC. Our adoption of the guidance in the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Topic did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

In May 2009, the FASB issued guidance under the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC (the Subsequent Events Topic and formerly SFAS No. 165). The Subsequent Events Topic applies to all entities that prepare financial statements (interim or annual) in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). When evaluating subsequent events, if an event or other transaction is within the scope of other applicable GAAP, that GAAP should be applied with respect to the recognition, measurement and disclosure of that event or transaction. The Subsequent Events Topic indicates that management should evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued or available to be issued and it is effective on a prospective basis for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. Our adoption of the Subsequent Events Topic did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

32

Table of Contents

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 amended FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amended APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The requirements of FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 were codified under the Financial Instruments Topic of the FASB ASC and the Interim Reporting Topic of the FASB ASC and are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted. Our disclosures for the interim period ended September 30, 2009 reflect the adoption of these pronouncements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, which was codified under the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the FASB ASC (the Derivatives and Hedging Topic) and the Guarantees Topic of the FASB ASC (the Guarantees Topic). The new guidance in the Derivatives and Hedging Topic and the Guarantees Topic applies to all derivative instruments and related hedged items and requires entities to provide greater transparency about (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 2008. Our adoption of the new guidance, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R (SFAS 141R), which is a revision of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS 141), and which was codified under the Business Combinations Topic of the FASB ASC (the Business Combinations Topic). The new guidance in the Business Combinations Topic applies to all business entities and to transactions or other events in which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. It revises in various areas and circumstances methods of accounting for the costs of acquisitions and other business combinations and various components thereof. The new guidance in the Business Combinations Topic is effective prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Therefore, for us, it became effective for any acquisition or other business combination made on or after January 1, 2009.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defined fair value, established a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 was effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. However, in February 2008 the FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 was issued, which delayed the effective date of the requirements of SFAS 157 as to nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. For these nonfinancial assets and liabilities, the effective date was deferred to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. SFAS 157 and FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 were codified under the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC (the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic). Our adoption of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic on January 1, 2008 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Our adoption of the deferred portion of the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

33

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the ordinary course of business, there are various contingencies which are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. In addition to the operating leases and purchase commitments discussed above, these include customer activities involving the execution, settlement and financing or provision of leverage for various customer securities and futures transactions. These activities may expose the company to off-balance sheet credit risk in the event the customers are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations.

Nearly all TradeStation Securities equities customer accounts are margin accounts and all futures and forex accounts use leverage. In margin transactions, TradeStation Securities may be obligated for credit extended to its customers by it or its clearing agents that are collateralized by cash and securities in the customers’ accounts. In connection with securities activities, TradeStation Securities also executes customer transactions involving the sale of securities not yet purchased (short sales), all of which are transacted on a margin basis subject to federal, self-regulatory organization and individual exchange regulations and TradeStation Securities’ and its clearing agents’ internal policies. New short sales rules have been imposed by regulatory authorities and more may be imposed in the near future. Additionally, TradeStation Securities may be obligated for credit extended to its customers by its clearing agents for futures transactions that are collateralized by cash and futures positions in the customers’ accounts. In all cases, such transactions may expose TradeStation Securities to significant off-balance sheet credit risk in the event customer collateral is not sufficient to fully cover losses that customers may incur. In the event customers fail to satisfy their obligations, TradeStation Securities may be required to purchase or sell financial instruments at prevailing market prices to fulfill the customers’ obligations.

TradeStation Securities seeks to manage the risks associated with its customers’ activities by requiring customers to maintain collateral in their margin and leveraged accounts in compliance with various regulatory requirements, internal requirements, and the requirements of clearing agents. TradeStation Securities and its clearing agents monitor required margin and leverage levels on an intra-day basis and, pursuant to such guidelines, require the customers to timely deposit additional collateral or to reduce positions when necessary.

TradeStation Securities provides guarantees to its clearing organization and exchanges under their standard membership agreements, which require members to guarantee the performance of other members. Under the agreements, if another member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearing organization or exchanges other members would be required to meet shortfalls. TradeStation Securities’ liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable. However, management believes that the possibility of the company being required to make payments under these arrangements is remote. Accordingly, no liability has been recorded for these potential events.

Market risk generally represents the risk of loss that may result from the potential change in the value of a financial instrument as a result of fluctuations in interest rates or market prices. We have established policies, procedures and internal processes governing our management of market risks in the normal course of our business operations. We do not engage in proprietary trading and do not hold any market risk sensitive instruments for trading purposes.

TradeStation Securities seeks to manage the risks associated with its customers’ activities by requiring them to maintain margin and leverage collateral levels and reduce concentrated positions in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines. TradeStation Securities and its clearing agents monitor required margin and leverage levels on an intra-day basis and, pursuant to such guidelines, requires customers to deposit additional collateral, or to reduce positions, when necessary.

As a self-clearing broker-dealer, TradeStation Securities holds interest-earning assets, mainly customer funds required to be segregated in compliance with federal regulations. These funds totaled $796.5 million at September 30, 2009. Interest-earning assets are financed primarily by short-term liabilities, which totaled $865.7 million at September 30, 2009, in the form of customer cash

34

Table of Contents

balances. In addition to earning interest on the customer funds segregated in compliance with federal regulations, TradeStation Securities earns a net interest spread on the difference between amounts earned on customer margin loans and amounts paid on customer cash balances (we are currently not paying any interest to customers on their cash balances). TradeStation Securities also earns interest from interest revenue-sharing arrangements with its clearing agents. Changes in interest rates also affect the interest earned on our cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and security deposits. As of September 30, 2009: our cash and cash equivalents consisted primarily of US Treasury Investments; our marketable securities consisted primarily of US Treasury Investments and our federal tax-exempt variable rate demand note securities that are secured by a letter of credit from Bank of America (which can be tendered for sale upon notice of no longer than seven days); and our security deposits consisted primarily of U.S. Treasury Bills and cash deposits. Most of our cash and investments segregated in compliance with federal regulations are invested in U.S. Treasury Bills of various maturities.

We estimate, based on the size and nature of our customer assets as of September 30, 2009 (and assuming for these purposes that the size and nature of those assets do not change), that each basis point increase or decrease in the US Treasury Investment yield, based on current maturities, and to a lesser extent, the federal funds target rate of interest, results in an annual impact of approximately $68,000 to our net income.

TradeStation Securities seeks to manage risks associated with its securities borrowing activities by requiring credit approvals for counterparties, by monitoring the collateral values for securities borrowed on a daily basis and by obtaining additional collateral as needed. See Note 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES – General Contingencies and Guarantees in ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS of PART I of this report.

Our revenues and financial instruments are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars, and we do not invest in derivative financial instruments.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures was made under the supervision and with the participation of the company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, the company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report. A system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

There have been no changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter of 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

35

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

On or about December 20, 2007, TradeStation Technologies was named as one of several defendants in a complaint filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, styled Amacker, et. al. v. Renaissance Asset Management (RAM), et. al. Other named defendants include Anthony Michael Ramunno, Man Financial Inc., MF Global, Inc., Lind-Waldock & Company, LLC, Vision, LP, Vision Financial Markets, LLC, R.J. O’Brien & Associates, Inc., and FXCM Holdings, LLC. The initial complaint alleged that over forty plaintiffs are entitled to damages because the plaintiffs were investors in a fraudulent commodity pool operated by Mr. Ramunno and RAM. The initial complaint alleged that TradeStation Technologies conducted trades on behalf of and at the request of Mr. Ramunno and RAM. The initial complaint attempted to allege the following claims: (i) violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and accompanying regulations; (ii) common law fraud under Texas law; (iii) statutory fraud under the Texas Business and Commerce Code; (iv) breach of fiduciary duties under Texas law; (v) negligent and intentional misrepresentations under Texas law; and (vi) negligence under Texas law. Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint that contained similar factual allegations and attempted to allege a single claim for aiding and abetting liability under the Commodity Exchange Act. The Second Amended Complaint asserted actual damages of at least $32.0 million. On October 10, 2008, the court dismissed the case for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. On December 2, 2008, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and, on February 2, 2009, plaintiffs filed their Appellants’ Brief with that court. On March 6, 2009, TradeStation filed its Opposition Brief. Oral arguments on the appeal were held on September 2, 2009. It is too early to predict the outcome of this appeal.

On or about September 23, 2008, TradeStation Securities was served with a complaint filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County Georgia styled Freeman et al. v. Vision Financial, LP et. al. Other named defendants include MF Global, Inc. f/k/a Man Financial, Inc., Anthony M. Ramunno, Jr., individually and d/b/a Renaissance Asset Management, RAM I, LLC, Renaissance Asset Management, LLC and William S. Wilkinson. The complaint alleged the following claims under Georgia common law: (i) fraud and conspiracy to defraud; (ii) constructive fraud and negligent misrepresentation; (iii) breach of fiduciary duty; (iv) aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty; and (v) negligence. The plaintiffs alleged that they placed funds with Mr. Ramunno and his hedge fund companies who in turn opened brokerage accounts with TradeStation Securities and the other futures commission merchants. The complaint asserted actual damages of about $1.5 million. On April 2, 2009, the court granted defendants’ (including TradeStation’s) motions to dismiss the case with prejudice and the period during which plaintiffs could have filed an appeal has lapsed.

TradeStation Securities was contacted by Canadian regulatory authorities regarding its acceptance of Canadian residents as clients and trading in securities on behalf of Canadian residents without being registered in Canada (TradeStation Securities does not accept equities accounts from Canadian residents but has, historically, accepted unsolicited futures and forex accounts from certain provinces based on what it believed to be certain relevant exemptions or other applicable legal theories). TradeStation Securities is cooperating with Canadian authorities. TradeStation Securities was offered the option to have this investigation brought, discussed and resolved on a consolidated basis with all relevant Canadian provinces and accepted that proposal. If the matter is resolved with the conclusion that TradeStation Securities is required to register in the Canadian provinces that provide most of its Canadian futures business, and that Canadian clearing services must be engaged, in addition to any fines or settlement amounts required to be paid TradeStation Securities’ choices would be (a) to register for appropriate licenses in Canada (approximate cost of $250,000) and retain Canadian clearing services for that business (TradeStation Securities futures clearing firm is not registered in Canada and, TradeStation Securities believes, relies on what it believes to be applicable exemptions to clear such business), the cost of which is presently unknown, or (b) close all Canadian futures accounts (in 2008, revenues from Canadian futures accounts were approximately

36

Table of Contents

$1.2 million). TradeStation Securities’ forex business from Canadian residents is minimal. TradeStation Securities made a written offer to settle the consolidated matter for a payment of $25,000. The Canadian authorities rejected that offer and settlement discussions are ongoing. It is too early to predict the outcome of this investigation.

On or about October 15, 2009, TradeStation Securities was named as the defendant in a complaint filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York, styled In re: Arbco Capital Management, LLP, Richard O’Connell, Trustee v. TradeStation Securities, Inc. The complaint alleges that the debtor-in-bankruptcy, Arbco Capital Management, LLP, through its principal, Hayim Regensberg, operated a Ponzi scheme for which Mr. Regensberg has been sentenced to 100 months in jail. The complaint further alleges that in 2006, the debtor made $885,000 worth of transfers, allegedly involving TradeStation Securities, in furtherance of the Ponzi scheme and that the transfers were made with actual intent to hinder, delay and defraud some or all of the debtor’s then-existing creditors. The trustee seeks a judgment setting aside the transfers. TradeStation Securities received the complaint on October 27, 2009 and is in the beginning stages of conducting an inquiry into the allegations. Consequently, it is too early to predict the outcome of this matter.

Also see Note 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES – Litigation and Claims in ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS of PART I of this report.

Subject to the item discussed below, there have been no material changes in risk factors during 2009 through the date of this report from those previously discussed in ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS of PART I of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TradeStation Group for the year ended December 31, 2008. In reading and evaluating the information set forth in this report, in addition to considering and evaluating the item discussed below, we refer you to the issues, uncertainties and risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The following modifies, supplements and/or updates the risk factors reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 due to events or conditions during 2009 through the date of this report:

Our Recently-launched TradeStation Prime Services Division May Be Less Profitable, Unprofitable, Or More Costly Than Expected

In September 2009, we launched our new “prime services” division in order to attempt to fill the growing need of start-up to mid-sized hedge funds, registered investment advisers, professional traders and asset managers for quality prime brokerage services that are no longer being provided by the larger firms that traditionally served this market segment. There can be no assurance that our prime services offering will appeal to potential prime services clients to the extent that we believe it will. Our failure to make timely and quality enhancements to our trading platform and/or our size and balance sheet being unacceptably small to mid-size and larger funds or firms may adversely impact our ability to attract prime services clients, resulting in future revenues falling short of current expectations. In addition, we have no experience in offering prime brokerage services and the operating results of the prime services division may be less favorable than we expect as a result of unanticipated start-up costs and expenses that are not offset by expected revenues as and when planned (or at all), mistakes, the general unpredictability of operating results for a start-up business division or other factors.

(c) Share Repurchases

In October 2006, our board of directors authorized, and we announced, the use of up to $60 million of our available and unrestricted cash, over a four-year period, to repurchase shares of our common stock in the open market or through privately-negotiated transactions. The stock repurchases are authorized to be made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. The four-year period commenced on November 13, 2006 and ends on November 12, 2010. Pursuant to the buy-back plan, up to $1.25 million of company cash during each full calendar month (and a prorated amount during the first and last months) of the four-year period (i.e., up to $15

37

Table of Contents

million per 12-month period and up to $60 million for the four-year period) has been authorized to be used to purchase company shares at prevailing prices, subject to compliance with applicable securities laws, rules and regulations, including Rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18. The buy-back plan does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares in any period, and may be modified, suspended, extended or discontinued at any time without prior notice.

The following table sets forth information on our common stock buy-back program for the quarter ended September 30, 2009: