Transcat 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mark one)
|
|
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the fiscal year ended:
March 25, 2006
|
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from
to
|
Commission File Number:
000-03905
TRANSCAT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
16-0874418
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, New York 14624
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)
(585) 352-7777
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the
Act:
Common Stock, $0.50 par value per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act). (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on
September 24, 2005 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
was approximately $28,463,000. The market value calculation was
determined using the closing sale price of the Registrants
Common Stock on September 24, 2005, as reported on the
NASDAQ Capital Market.
The number of shares of Common Stock of the Registrant
outstanding as of June 20, 2006 was 6,863,695.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III,
Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, of this report, to
the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference
from the Registrants definitive proxy statement relating
to the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on
August 15, 2006, which definitive proxy statement will be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) within 120 days of the end of the fiscal
year to which this report relates.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
2
PART I.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This report and, in particular, the Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations section of this report, contains forward-looking
statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These include statements concerning
expectations, estimates, and projections about the industry,
management beliefs and assumptions of Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat, we, us, or
our). Words such as anticipates,
expects, intends, plans,
believes, seeks, estimates,
and variations of such words and similar expressions are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and are
subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are
difficult to forecast. Therefore, our actual results and
outcomes may materially differ from those expressed or forecast
in any such forward-looking statements. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
INTRODUCTION
Transcat is a leading global distributor of professional grade
test, measurement, and calibration instruments and a provider of
calibration and repair services primarily throughout the
process, life science, and manufacturing industries. Our
reportable business segments offer different products and
services to the same customer base. We conduct our business
through two segments: Distribution Products and Calibration
Services.
Through our distribution products segment, we market and
distribute national and proprietary brand instruments to
approximately 11,000 global customers. Our catalog (Master
Catalog) offers access to more than 25,000 instruments,
including: calibrators, deadweight testers, temperature devices,
multimeters, oscilloscopes, pressure pumps, testers, recorders,
and related accessories, from nearly 250 of the industrys
leading manufacturers including Fluke, Hart Scientific, Agilent,
Ametek, and GE-Sensing. In addition, we are the exclusive
worldwide distributor for Transmation and Altek products. The
majority of the instrumentation we sell requires expert
calibration service to ensure that it maintains the most
exacting measurements.
Through our calibration services segment, we offer precise,
reliable, fast calibration services. In February 2006, we
acquired an additional Calibration Center of Excellence in
Fort Wayne, Indiana primarily focused on expanding our
service offerings. As of March 25, 2006, the end of our
most recently completed fiscal year (fiscal year
2006), we operated twelve Calibration Centers of
Excellence strategically located across the United States,
Puerto Rico, and Canada servicing approximately 8,000 customers.
To support our customers calibration service needs, we
deliver the industrys highest quality calibration services
and repairs. Each of our calibration laboratories is
ISO-9001:2000 and our scope of accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025 is
the widest in the industry for the market segments we serve. See
Calibration Services
Segment Quality below in Item 1 for
more information.
CalTrak®,
our proprietary documentation and asset management system, is
used to manage the workflow at our Calibration Centers of
Excellence. Additionally,
CalTrak®
provides calibration certificates, calibration data, and access
to other key documents required in the calibration process.
CalTrak®
has been validated to 21CFR 820.75, which substantiates the
validation of our process. This validation is especially
significant in the life science industry, where federal
regulations are especially stringent. See
CalTrak®
below in Item 1 for more information.
At Transcat, our attention to quality goes beyond the products
and services we deliver. Our sales teams and customer service
and support teams stand ready to provide expert advice,
application assistance and technical support wherever and
whenever our customers need it.
Among our top 200 customers, representing approximately 33% of
our consolidated sales, are Fortune
500/Global
500 companies, including Wyeth, Johnson & Johnson,
DuPont, Exxon Mobil, AK Steel Holding,
3
Dow Chemical, and Duke Energy. We believe these customers do
business with us because of our commitment to quality service,
our
CalTrak®
asset management system, and access to our product offerings.
Transcat has focused on the process and life science markets
since its founding in 1964. We are the leading seller of
calibrators into the process industry. We believe that our broad
product offering and our commitment to quality calibration
services is the foundation for deeper penetration into the
process and life science markets.
Transcats Internet website address is
www.transcat.com. The information contained on our
website is not a part of this
Form 10-K.
On our investor relations Internet web page,
http://www.transcat.com/AboutTranscat/InvestorRelations.asp,
we post the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable
after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the
SEC: annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant
to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. All such filings on our investor relations web page are
available free of charge.
An Ohio corporation founded in 1964, we are headquartered in
Rochester, New York and employ more than 200 personnel. Our
executive offices are located at 35 Vantage Point Drive,
Rochester, New York 14624. Our telephone number is 585-352-7777.
STRATEGY
We are an accredited provider of calibration services and a
distributor of test and measurement equipment. Our strategy is
to focus on gaining business and market share in markets where
companies value quality systems
and/or
operate in regulated environments. We strive to differentiate
ourselves and build barriers to competitive entry by offering
the best products and calibration services and integrating the
two to benefit our customers operations and lower their
cost.
SEGMENTS
We service our customers through two business segments:
Distribution Products and Calibration Services. Note 7 of
our Consolidated Financial Statements in this
Form 10-K
presents financial information for these segments. We serve
approximately 15,000 customers, with no customer or controlled
group of customers accounting for 5% or more of our consolidated
net sales from fiscal years 2004 to 2006. We are not dependent
on any single customer, the loss of which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet, or
results of operations.
We market and sell to our customers through multiple sales
channels consisting of direct catalog marketing, a direct field
sales organization, proactive outbound sales, and an inbound
call center. Our direct field sales team, outbound sales team,
and inbound sales team are each staffed with technically trained
personnel. Our domestic and international sales organization
covers territories in North America, Latin America, Europe,
Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. We concentrate on attracting
new customers and increasing product and calibration sales
(North America only) to existing customers. Sales efforts are
also focused on cross selling. Approximately 29% of our
customers utilize both segments of our business, which provides
us with an opportunity to increase our average revenue per
customer, adding to our value as a single source supplier. Our
sales to customers in the following geographic areas during the
periods indicated, expressed as a percentage of total sales,
were as follows (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
84%
|
|
|
|
84%
|
|
|
|
84%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other International
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We focus primarily on the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries. The process industry has been and
continues to be the foundation of our direct business
competency. The process industry, in our definition,
4
includes petroleum refining, chemical, water treatment,
industrial power, steel, petrochemical, gas and pipeline,
textile, pulp and paper, food and dairy, and utility companies.
The life science industry, in our definition, includes
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, medical device
manufacturers, and healthcare service providers. The approximate
percentage of our business in these industry segments for the
periods indicated was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
39%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
Life Science
|
|
|
21%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
Other Non-Manufacturing
|
|
|
29%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
|
|
31%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTION
PRODUCTS SEGMENT
Summary. Our customers facilities
in the process, life science, and manufacturing industries use
test, measurement, and calibration equipment to calibrate and
test their processes and ensure that their processes
and/or end
product(s) are within specification. Utilization of such
diagnostic equipment also allows for continuous improvement
processes to be in place, increasing the accuracies of their
measurements. The industrial distribution products industry for
test and measurement instrumentation, in the geographic markets
in which we predominately operate, is characterized by national
broad based distribution organizations and uniquely focused
organizations such as Transcat.
Most industrial customers find that maintaining an in-house
inventory of
back-up
test, measurement, and calibration equipment is cost prohibitive
due to the large number of stock keeping units. As a result, the
distribution of test and measurement instrumentation has
traditionally been characterized by frequent, small quantity
orders combined with a need for rapid, reliable, and
substantially complete order fulfillment. The purchasing
decision is generally made by plant engineers, quality managers,
or their purchasing function. Products are generally purchased
from more than one distributor.
The majority of our products are not consumables but are
purchased as replacement, upgrades, or for expansion of
manufacturing and research and development facilities. Our
catalog and sales activities are designed to maintain a constant
presence in front of the customer to ensure we receive the order
when they are ready to purchase. As a result, we evaluate sales
trends over at least a four quarter cycle as any individual
months sales can be impacted by numerous factors, many of
which are unpredictable and potentially non-recurring.
We believe that a distribution product customer chooses a
distributor based on a number of different criteria including
the timing and accurate delivery of orders, consistent product
quality, value added services, and price. Value added services
include providing technical support to insure our customer
receives the right product for
his/her
specific need through application knowledge and product
compatibility. We also provide calibration of product purchases,
on-line procurement, same day shipment of products for in-stock
items, a variety of custom product offerings and training
programs, and the operational efficiency of dealing with one
distributor for our customer product needs.
Our distribution products segment accounted for approximately
67% (calculated on dollars in thousands) of our revenue in our
fiscal year ended March 25, 2006, referred to as fiscal
year 2006. Within the distribution products segment, our routine
business is comprised of customers who place orders to acquire
or to replace specific instruments, which typically range from
$100 to $5,000 per order, with an average of
$1,400 per order.
Marketing and Sales. Through our
comprehensive Master Catalog, supplemental catalogs, opt-in
email newsletter, and other direct sales and marketing programs,
we offer our customers a broad selection of highly recognized
branded products at competitive prices. The instruments
typically range in price from $100 to over $5,000 for large
calibration test systems and are sold and marketed to
approximately 11,000 customers.
5
During fiscal year 2006, we distributed approximately 925,000
pieces of direct marketing materials including catalogs,
brochures, supplements and other promotional materials to
approximately 100,000 customer contacts and 550,000 potential
customer contacts. The number of catalogs and other direct
marketing materials received by each customer depends upon a
number of factors, including purchase history.
The majority of our product sales are derived from catalog
marketing. Our Master Catalog consists of approximately 700
pages of products relevant to the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries. We distribute our Master Catalog to
approximately 75,000 existing and prospective customers in the
United States and Canada approximately every 12 months. The
Master Catalog provides standard make/model and related
information and is also available in CD format upon
request and on-line at our website: www.transcat.com. Our
new customer acquisition program utilizes smaller catalog
supplements which feature new products,
promotions, or specific product categories. The catalog
supplements are launched at varying periods throughout the year;
the publications are mailed to approximately 650,000 customers
and targeted prospects.
The approximate percentage of our distribution products business
by industry segment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
41%
|
|
|
|
42%
|
|
|
|
40%
|
|
Life Science
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
8%
|
|
|
|
7%
|
|
Other Non-Manufacturing
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. The markets we serve are
highly competitive. Competition for sales in distribution
products is quite fragmented and ranges from large national
distributors and manufacturers to small local distribution
organizations and service providers. Key competitive factors
typically include customer service and support, quality, turn
around time, inventory availability, product brand name, and
price. To address our customers needs for technical
support and product application assistance, and to differentiate
ourselves from competitors, we employ a staff of highly trained
technical application specialists. To maintain our competitive
position with respect to such products and services, we must
continually demonstrate our commitment to our customers and
continue to compete effectively in the areas described above.
Suppliers and Purchasing. We believe
that effective purchasing is a key element to maintaining and
enhancing our position as a provider of high quality test and
measurement equipment. We frequently evaluate our purchase
requirements and suppliers price offerings to obtain
products at the best possible cost. We obtain our products from
about 250 suppliers of brand name and private labeled equipment.
In fiscal year 2006 our top 10 vendors accounted for
approximately 70% of our aggregate business. Approximately 30%
of our product purchases on an annual basis are from Fluke
Electronics Corporation (Fluke), which is believed
to be consistent with Flukes share of the markets we
service.
We plan our product mix, including stocked and non-stocked
inventory items, to best serve the anticipated needs of our
customers whose individual purchases vary in size. We can ship
our customers our top selling products the same day they are
ordered.
Operations. Our distribution operations
take place within an approximate 27,000 square-foot
facility located in Rochester, New York. This location is our
headquarters and also houses the customer service, sales, and
administrative functions. Approximately 29,000 product orders
are shipped from this facility annually with an average order
size in fiscal year 2006 of approximately $1,400 per order.
This average is slightly higher than recent years.
Distribution. We distribute our
products in the United States, Canada, and internationally from
our distribution center in Rochester, New York. We maintain
appropriate inventory levels in order to satisfy anticipated
customer demand for prompt delivery and complete order
fulfillment of their product needs. These inventory levels are
managed on a daily basis with the aid of our sophisticated
purchasing and stock management information system. Our
automated freight manifesting and laser bar code scanning
facilitates
6
prompt and accurate order fulfillment. We ship our United States
orders predominantly by a worldwide express carrier.
International orders are shipped by a number of different
carriers.
Distribution Agreement. In connection
with the sale of Transmation Products Group (TPG) to
Fluke in December 2001, we entered into a distribution agreement
(the Distribution Agreement) with Fluke to be the
exclusive worldwide distributor of Transmation and Altek
products until December 31, 2006. Under the Distribution
Agreement, we also agreed to purchase a pre-determined amount of
inventory from Fluke.
On October 31, 2002, with an effective date of
September 1, 2002, we entered into a new distribution
agreement (the New Agreement) with Fluke, which
replaced the Distribution Agreement. The New Agreement ends on
December 31, 2006. Under the terms of the New Agreement,
among other items, we agreed to purchase a larger,
pre-determined amount of inventory across a broader array of
products and brands during each calendar year. Our purchases for
calendar years 2005, 2004, and 2003 exceeded the commitment
under the New Agreement. We believe that this commitment to make
future purchases is consistent with our business needs and plans.
Because we expect that our purchases for calendar year 2006 will
meet our commitment, we also expect that the gain on the sale of
TPG, which has been deferred since fiscal year 2002, will be
recognized in our fiscal year 2007 third quarter. See
Note 1 and Note 8 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further disclosure.
In the normal course of business, we will be entering into
another distribution agreement (the Future
Agreement) with Fluke once our New Agreement expires on
December 31, 2006. Although we are only in the early stages
of discussion with Fluke, as part of the Future Agreement, Fluke
has agreed that we would remain exclusive worldwide distributor
of Transmation and Altek products, subject to reasonable minimum
annual purchase levels of Transmation and Altek products.
Backlog. Customer product orders
include orders for products that we routinely stock in our
inventory, customized products, and other products ordered less
frequently, which we do not stock.
Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but also
include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, and orders required to be shipped at a
future date.
At the end of fiscal year 2006, the value of our unshippable
product orders was approximately $1.4 million, compared to
approximately $1.3 million and $1.7 million at the end
of fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively. During fiscal year
2006, the month-end level of unshippable product orders varied
between a low of $1.1 million and a high of
$1.8 million. This variation is due primarily to
seasonality, the economy, supplier delivery schedules, and
variations in customer ordering patterns.
The following graph shows the quarter end trend of unshippable
product orders and backorders for fiscal years 2005 through 2006.
7
CALIBRATION
SERVICES SEGMENT
Summary. Calibration is the act of
comparing a unit or instrument of unknown value to a standard of
known value and reporting the result in some rigorously defined
form. After the act of calibration has been completed, a
decision is made, again based on rigorously defined parameters,
on what is to be done to the unit. The decision may be to
adjust, optimize, repair, limit its use, range or rating, scrap
the unit, or leave as is. The purpose of calibration is to
significantly reduce the risk of product or process failures
caused by inaccurate measurements.
Transcats calibration strategy encompasses either one of
the two ways a company manages its calibration needs:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
If a company wishes to outsource its calibration needs, an
Integrated Calibration Services Solution provides a
complete wrap-around service:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program management;
|
|
|
Calibration;
|
|
|
Logistics; and,
|
|
|
Consultation services.
|
|
|
|
|
2)
|
If a company has an in-house calibration operation, we can
provide:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration of primary standards;
|
|
|
Overflow capability either
on-site or
at one of our facilities during periods of high demand; and,
|
|
|
Consultation services.
|
In either case, we intend to have the broadest calibration
offering to our targeted markets. This includes the broadest
scope of accreditation, certification of our technicians to the
American Society for Quality standards, complete calibration
management encompassing the entire metrology function, and
access to our products offering.
The billion-dollar commercial calibration services industry in
the U.S. is extremely fragmented with an estimated
750 companies participating, ranging from nationally
accredited organizations, such as Transcat, to one-person
organizations, in addition to companies that do not currently
outsource their calibrations. Our typical customer is a
technically based individual who is employed in a quality,
engineering, or manufacturing engineering position.
The calibration services industry has its origins in the
military; approximately 60% of our calibration technicians and
laboratory managers have had calibration expertise with the
military prior to joining Transcat.
Sourcing decisions are based on quality, customer service,
turn-around time, documentation, price, and a one-source
solution.
Our calibration services segment provides periodic calibration
and repair services for our customers test, measurement,
and diagnostic instruments. We perform over 100,000 calibrations
annually. These are performed at one of our twelve Calibration
Centers of Excellence, or at the customers physical
location. Calibration services accounted for approximately 33%
(calculated on dollars in thousands) of our total fiscal year
2006 revenue.
The calibration services segment of the market is critically
aligned with our strategic focus on quality accreditations. Our
calibration services are of the highest technical and quality
levels, with broad ranges of accreditation and registration. Our
quality systems are further detailed below in
Quality.
Acquisition. In February 2006, we
acquired N.W. Calibration Inspection, Inc. (NWCI) in
Fort Wayne, Indiana, expanding our Calibration Centers of
Excellence to twelve. NWCI provides dimensional calibration,
first part inspection, and reverse engineering services to the
pharmaceutical, medical device, and automotive industries. We
paid $0.8 million in cash and $0.1 million in stock in
accordance with the purchase agreement. We allocated the initial
purchase price to the estimated fair value of the fixed assets
acquired ($0.5 million) with the excess of
$0.4 million allocated to goodwill. The goodwill is
deductible for tax purposes. The purchase agreement also
provides for performance-based payments to the sellers up to a
maximum of
8
$0.3 million. If and when such payments come due, the
amounts paid will be added to the recorded value of goodwill.
The results of the acquired business have been included in our
calibration services segment of the Consolidated Financial
Statements since the acquisition date. Pro-forma information for
this acquisition is not included as it did not have a material
impact on the consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Marketing and Sales. Calibration allows
for maximum productivity and efficiency by assuring accurate,
reliable equipment and processes. Through our calibration
services segment, we perform periodic calibrations on new and
used equipment as well as repair services for our customers. Ten
of our twelve Calibration Centers of Excellence provide
accredited calibration in commonly used measurement parameters
including electrical, physical, and dimensional. Our two newest
laboratories are expected to be accredited by the American
Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) in
the fiscal year ending March 31, 2007 (fiscal year
2007).
Our calibration services are provided to our customers with a
strategic focus in the highly regulated industries including
process, life science, and manufacturing. Our quality process
and standards are designed to meet the needs of companies that
are highly regulated (e.g., by the Food and Drug Administration,
or FDA),
and/or have
a strong commitment to quality and a comprehensive calibration
program.
The approximate percentage of our calibration services business
by industry segments for the periods indicated was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Process
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
33%
|
|
Life Science
|
|
|
38%
|
|
|
|
34%
|
|
|
|
30%
|
|
Manufacturing
|
|
|
17%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
18%
|
|
Other Non-Manufacturing
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
13%
|
|
|
|
19%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. The calibration outsource
industry is highly fragmented and is composed of companies
ranging in size from non-accredited, sole proprietorships to
internationally recognized and accredited corporations, such as
Transcat, resulting in a tremendous range of service levels and
capabilities. A large percentage of calibration companies are
small businesses that provide only basic measurements and
service markets in which quality requirements may not be as
demanding as the markets that we strategically target. Very few
of these companies are structured to compete on the same scale
and level of quality as us.
Quality. The accreditation process is
the only system currently in existence that assures measurement
competence. Each laboratory is audited and reviewed by outside
accreditation bodies proficient in the technical aspects of the
chemistry and physics that underlie metrology, ensuring that
measurements are properly made. Accreditation also requires that
all standards used for accredited measurements have a fully
documented path, known as the traceability chain, either
directly or through other accredited laboratories, back to the
national or international standard for that measurement
parameter. This ensures that our measurement process is
consistent with the global metrology network that is designed to
standardize measurements worldwide.
To ensure the quality and consistency of our calibrations to
customers, we have sought and achieved several national levels
of quality and accreditation. Our calibration laboratories are
ISO 9001:2000 registered and our scope of accreditation to
ISO/IEC 17025 is the widest in the industries we serve. Our
calibrations are also traceable to National Institute of
Standards and Technology or National Research Council of Canada
standards. Our laboratories, except San Juan and
Fort Wayne, are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 and ANSI/NCSL
Z540-1-1994 using two of the three accrediting bodies
(ABs) in the United States that are
signatories to the International Laboratory Accreditation
Cooperation (ILAC). These two ABs are A2LA and
National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program
(NVLAP). These ABs provide an objective, third
party, and internationally accepted evaluation of the quality
and consistency of our calibration process and competency. We
anticipate both San Juan and Fort Wayne will become
A2LA accredited during fiscal year 2007.
9
The importance of this international oversight, ILAC, to our
customers is the assurance that our documents will be accepted
worldwide, removing one of the barriers to trade that they may
experience if using a non-ILAC traceable calibration service
provider.
To provide the widest range of service to our customers in our
target markets, our ISO-17025 accreditations extend across a
wide range of technical disciplines. The following table
represents Transcats capabilities for each Center of
Excellence as of March 25, 2006 (A=Accredited;
N=Non-accredited):
WORKING-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electrical Metrology
Disciplines
|
|
Dimensional Metrology
Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RF/
|
|
Luminance/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inspection
|
|
|
DC/ACLF
|
|
HF/UHF
|
|
Microwave
|
|
Illuminance
|
|
Length
|
|
Optics
|
|
(GD&T)
|
|
Boston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Los Angeles
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Ottawa
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
Rochester
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
San Juan, PR(1)
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Ft. Wayne(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Metrology
Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
Particle
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
Relative
|
|
Mass
|
|
Pressure,
|
|
|
Flow
|
|
Counters
|
|
Force
|
|
Analysis
|
|
Humidity
|
|
Weight
|
|
Vacuum
|
|
Boston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Charlotte
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Dayton
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Los Angeles
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Ottawa
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Philadelphia
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Rochester
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
San Francisco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Juan, PR(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
N
|
|
N
|
St. Louis
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
Ft. Wayne(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Physical Metrology
Disciplines (Continued)
|
|
Life Sciences
Disciplines
|
|
|
|
|
Temper-
|
|
RPM,
|
|
Vibration,
|
|
Chemical/
|
|
|
Torque
|
|
ature
|
|
Speed
|
|
Acceleration
|
|
Biological
|
|
Boston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Dayton
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Houston
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Los Angeles
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Ottawa
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
N
|
Rochester
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
San Francisco
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Juan, PR(1)
|
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
St. Louis
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
N
|
Ft. Wayne(2)
|
|
A
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
|
10
REFERENCE-LEVEL CAPABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dimensional
|
|
Electrical
|
|
Humidity
|
|
Mass
|
|
Pressure
|
|
Temperature
|
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Standards
|
|
Charlotte
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
Philadelphia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
A
|
Rochester
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
Ft. Wayne(2)
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Our San Juan, Puerto Rico laboratory, which we added to our
Calibration Centers of Excellence in the first quarter of fiscal
year 2006, is expected to be accredited by A2LA in our fiscal
year 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Our Fort Wayne, Indiana laboratory, which we acquired in
the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, is currently accredited
by the Laboratory Accreditation Bureau. We are expecting this
laboratory to be accredited by A2LA in our fiscal year 2007. |
CalTrak®. CalTrak®
and CalTrak-Online is our proprietary metrology management
system that provides a comprehensive calibration quality
program. Many of our customers have unique calibration service
requirements to which we have tailored specific services.
CalTrak®
allows our customers to track calibration cycles via the
Internet and provides the customer with safe and secure off-site
archive of calibration records that can be accessed
24 hours a day. Access to records data is managed through
our secure password protected website. Calibration assets are
tracked with records that are automatically cross-referenced to
the equipment that was used to calibrate.
CalTrak®
has also been validated to meet the most stringent requirements
within the industry.
CUSTOMER
SERVICE AND SUPPORT
Our breadth of distribution products and calibration services
along with our strong commitment to customer sales, service, and
support enable us to satisfy our customer needs through
convenient selection and ordering, rapid, accurate, and complete
order fulfillment and on-time delivery.
A key element of our customer service approach is our
technically trained direct field sales team, outbound sales
team, inbound sales team, and customer service organization.
Most customer orders are placed through our customer service
organization who often provides technical assistance to our
customers to facilitate the purchasing decision. To ensure the
quality of service provided, we frequently monitor our customer
service through customer surveys, interpersonal communication,
and daily statistical reports.
Customers may place orders via:
|
|
|
Mail at Transcat, Inc., 35 Vantage Point Drive, Rochester, NY
14624;
|
|
Fax at
1-800-395-0543;
|
|
Telephone at
1-800-828-1470;
|
|
Email at sales@transcat.com; or,
|
|
Our website at www.transcat.com.
|
INFORMATION
REGARDING EXPORT SALES
Approximately 16% of our sales in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and
2004, resulted from sales to customers outside the United States
(calculated on dollars in millions). Our revenues are subject to
the customary risks of operating in an international
environment, including the potential imposition of trade or
foreign exchange restrictions, tariff and other tax increases,
fluctuations in exchange rates and unstable political
situations, any one or more of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, cash flows, balance sheet or
results of operations. See Foreign Currency below in
Item 7A for further details.
11
INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
We utilize a basic software platform, Application Plus, to
manage our business and operations segments. We also utilize a
turnkey enterprise software solution. This software includes a
suite of fully integrated modules to manage our business
functions, including customer service, warehouse management,
inventory management, financial management, customer management,
and business intelligence. This solution is a fully mature
business package with over 20 years of refinement and
currently supports over 1,200 organizations to run their mission
critical operations.
SEASONALITY
We believe that our line of business has certain historical
seasonal factors. Our fiscal second quarter is generally weaker
and the fiscal fourth quarter historically stronger due to
typical industrial operating cycles.
ENVIRONMENTAL
MATTERS
We believe that compliance with federal, state, or local
provisions relating to the protection of the environment will
not have any material effect on our capital expenditures,
earnings, or competitive position.
EMPLOYEES
At the end of fiscal year 2006, we had 238 employees, compared
to 209 and 213 employees at the end of fiscal years 2005 and
2004, respectively. The increase of 29 employees from fiscal
year 2005 to fiscal year 2006 is primarily attributed to the
acquisition of NWCI and investment in calibration technicians.
12
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
executive officers and certain key employees as of
March 25, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Carl E. Sassano
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer,
and President
|
Charles P. Hadeed
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, and Vice President of Finance
|
John A. De Voldre
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources
|
Robert C. Maddamma
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Vice President of Customer
Satisfaction
|
Jay F. Woychick
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Vice President of Marketing/Inside
Sales
|
Andrew M. Weir
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
Vice President of Field Sales
|
Joanne B. Hand
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Corporate Controller
|
In the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, Charles P. Hadeed was
named as our President, and he will continue to serve as Chief
Operating Officer. Carl E. Sassano will continue to serve as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, John J.
Zimmer was hired as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President
of Finance.
You should consider carefully the following risks and all other
information included in this annual report on
Form 10-K.
The risks and uncertainties described below and elsewhere in
this annual report on
Form 10-K
are not the only ones facing our business. If any of the
following risks were to actually occur, our business, financial
condition or results of operations would likely suffer. In that
case, the trading price of our common stock could fall and you
could lose all or part of your investment.
General Economic Conditions May Have A Material Adverse
Effect On Our Operating Results, Financial Condition, Or Our
Ability To Meet Our Commitments. The
electronic instrumentation distribution industry is affected by
changes in economic conditions, which are outside our control.
Economic slowdowns, adverse economic conditions or cyclical
trends in certain customer markets may have a material adverse
effect on our operating results, financial condition, or our
ability to meet our commitments.
We Depend On Manufacturers To Supply Our Inventory And
Rely On One Vendor Group To Supply A Significant Amount Of Our
Inventory Purchases. If They Fail To Provide Desired Products To
Us, Increase Prices, Or Fail To Timely Deliver Products, Our
Sales Could Suffer. A significant amount of
our inventory purchases are made from one vendor group. Our
reliance on this vendor group leaves us vulnerable to having an
inadequate supply of required products, price increases, late
deliveries, and poor product quality. Like other distributors in
our industry, we occasionally experience supply shortages and
are unable to purchase our desired volume of products. If we are
unable to enter into and maintain satisfactory distribution
arrangements with leading manufacturers, if we are unable to
maintain an adequate supply of products, or if manufacturers do
not regularly invest in, introduce to us,
and/or make
available to us for distribution new products, our sales could
suffer considerably. Finally, we cannot provide any assurance
that particular products, or product lines, will be available to
us, or available in quantities sufficient to meet customer
demand. This is of particular significance to our business
because the products we sell are often only available from one
source. Any limits to product access could materially and
adversely affect our business.
Indebtedness. Under our Credit
Agreement, as amended, we have two term loans, in addition to
our revolving line of credit. As of March 25, 2006, we owed
$4.3 million to our secured creditor. We are required to
meet financial tests on a quarterly basis and comply with other
covenants customary in secured financings. Although we believe
that we will continue to be in compliance with such covenants,
if we do not remain in compliance with such covenants, our
lender may demand immediate repayment of amounts outstanding.
Changes in interest rates may have a significant effect on our
monthly payment obligations and operating results. Furthermore,
we are dependent on credit from manufacturers of our products to
fund our inventory purchases. If our debt burden increases to
high levels, such manufacturers may restrict our credit. Our
cash
13
requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the rate
of growth of our sales, the timing and levels of products
purchased, payment terms, and credit limits from manufacturers,
the timing and level of our accounts receivable collections and
our ability to manage our business profitably. Our ability to
satisfy our existing obligations, whether or not under our
secured credit facility, will depend upon our future operating
performance, which may be impacted by prevailing economic
conditions and financial, business, and other factors described
in this annual report on
Form 10-K,
many of which are beyond our control.
If Existing Shareholders Sell Large Numbers Of
Shares Of Our Common Stock, Our Stock Price Could
Decline. The market price of our Common Stock
could decline as a result of sales by our existing shareholders
or holders of stock options of a large number of shares of our
Common Stock in the public market or the perception that these
sales could occur.
Our Stock Price Has Been, And May Continue To Be,
Volatile. The stock market, from time to
time, has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations
that are both related and unrelated to the operating performance
of companies. As our stock may be affected by market volatility,
and by our own performance, the following factors, among others,
may have a significant effect on the market price of our Common
Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Developments in our relationships with current or future
manufacturers of products we distribute;
|
|
|
Announcements by us or our competitors of significant
acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital
commitments;
|
|
|
Litigation or governmental proceedings or announcements
involving us or our industry;
|
|
|
Economic and other external factors, such as disasters or other
crises;
|
|
|
Sales of our Common Stock or other securities in the open market;
|
|
|
Period-to-period
fluctuations in our operating results; and
|
|
|
Our ability to satisfy our debt obligations.
|
We Expect That Our Quarterly Results Of Operations Will
Fluctuate. Such Fluctuation Could Cause Our Stock Price To
Decline. A large portion of our expenses for
calibration services, including expenses for facilities,
equipment and personnel, are relatively fixed, as is our
commitment to purchase a pre-determined amount of inventory.
Accordingly, if revenues decline or do not grow as we
anticipate, we may not be able to correspondingly reduce our
operating expenses in any particular quarter. Our quarterly
revenue and operating results have fluctuated in the past and
are likely to do so in the future. If our operating results in
some quarters fail to meet the expectations of stock market
analysts and investors, our stock price would likely decline.
Some of the factors that could cause our revenue and operating
results to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in industrial demand for products we sell
and/or
services we provide; and
|
|
|
Fluctuations in geographic conditions, including currency and
other economic conditions.
|
If We Fail To Attract And Retain Qualified Personnel, We
May Not Be Able To Achieve Our Stated Corporate
Objectives. Our ability to manage our
anticipated growth, if realized, effectively depends on our
ability to attract and retain highly qualified executive
officers and technical personnel. If we fail to attract and
retain qualified individuals, we will not be able to achieve our
stated corporate objectives.
Changes In Accounting Standards, Legal Requirements And
The NASDAQ Stock Market Listing Standards, Or Our Ability To
Comply With Any Existing Requirements Or Standards, Could
Adversely Affect Our Operating
Results. Extensive reforms relating to public
company financial reporting, corporate governance and ethics,
the NASDAQ Stock Market listing standards and oversight of the
accounting profession have been implemented over the past
several years. Compliance with the new rules, regulations and
standards that have resulted from such reforms has increased our
accounting and legal costs and has required significant
management time and attention. In the event that additional
rules, regulations or standards are implemented or any of the
existing rules, regulations or standards to which we are subject
undergo additional material modification, we could be forced to
spend significant financial and management resources to ensure
our continued compliance, which could have an adverse affect on
our results of operations. In addition, although we believe we
are in full compliance with all such existing rules, regulations
and standards, should we be or become unable to comply with any
of such rules, regulations and standards, as they presently
exist or as they may exist in the future, our results of
operations could be adversely effected and the market price of
our Common Stock could decline.
14
The Distribution Products Industry Is Highly Competitive,
And We May Not Be Able To Compete
Successfully. We compete with numerous
companies, including several major manufacturers and
distributors. Some of our competitors have greater financial and
other resources than we do, which could allow them to compete
more successfully. Most of our products are available from
several sources and our customers tend to have relationships
with several distributors. Competitors could obtain exclusive
rights to market particular products, which we would then be
unable to market. Manufacturers could also increase their
efforts to sell directly to end-users and bypass distributors
like us. Industry consolidation among healthcare products
distributors, the unavailability of products, whether due to our
inability to gain access to products or interruptions in supply
from manufacturers, or the emergence of new competitors could
also increase competition. In the future, we may be unable to
compete successfully and competitive pressures may reduce our
revenues.
Our Revenues Depend On Our Relationships With Capable
Sales Personnel As Well As Key Customers, Vendors And
Manufacturers Of The Products That We
Distribute. Our future operating results
depend on our ability to maintain satisfactory relationships
with qualified sales personnel as well as key customers, vendors
and manufacturers. If we fail to maintain our existing
relationships with such persons or fail to acquire relationships
with such key persons in the future, our business may suffer.
Our Future Success Is Substantially Dependent Upon Our
Senior Management. Our future success is
substantially dependent upon the efforts and abilities of
members of our existing senior management. Competition for
senior management is intense, and we may not be successful in
attracting and retaining key personnel.
Increases In The Cost Of Shipping Or Service Trouble With
Our Third-Party Shippers Could Harm Our
Business. Shipping is a significant expense
in the operation of our business. We ship almost all of our
U.S. orders through United Parcel Service, Inc. and other
delivery services, and typically bear the cost of shipment.
Accordingly, any significant increase in shipping rates could
have an adverse effect on our operating results. Similarly,
strikes or other service interruptions by those shippers could
cause our operating expenses to rise and adversely affect our
ability to deliver products on a timely basis.
Our Acquisitions May Not Result In The Benefits And
Revenue Growth We Expect. We are in the
process of integrating our acquisition of NWCI, and assimilating
the operations, services, products and personnel with our
management policies, procedures and strategies. We cannot be
sure that we will achieve the benefits of revenue growth that we
expect from these acquisitions or that we will not incur
unforeseen additional costs or expenses in connection with these
acquisitions. To effectively manage our expected future growth,
we must continue to successfully manage our integration of these
companies and continue to improve our operational systems,
internal procedures, accounts receivable and management,
financial and operational controls. If we fail in any of these
areas, our business could be adversely affected.
Tax Legislation Initiatives Could Adversely Affect The
Companys Net Earnings And Tax
Liabilities. We are subject to the tax laws
and regulations of the United States federal, state and local
governments, as well as foreign jurisdictions. From time to
time, various legislative initiatives may be proposed that could
adversely affect our tax positions. There can be no assurance
that our effective tax rate will not be adversely affected by
these initiatives. In addition, tax laws and regulations are
extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations.
Although we believe that our historical tax positions are sound
and consistent with applicable laws, regulations and existing
precedent, there can be no assurance that our tax positions will
not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that we would
be successful in any such challenge.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
15
We lease the following properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
Property
|
|
Location
|
|
Square Footage
|
|
|
Corporate Headquarters and
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Rochester, NY
|
|
|
27,250
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Boston, MA
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Charlotte, NC
|
|
|
4,860
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Dayton, OH
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Houston, TX
|
|
|
8,780
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Los Angeles, CA
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Ottawa, ON
|
|
|
4,160
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Philadelphia, NJ
|
|
|
8,550
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
San Francisco, CA
|
|
|
3,540
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
St. Louis, MO
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
Fort Wayne, IN
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Calibration Laboratory
|
|
San Juan, PR
|
|
|
700
|
|
We also lease office space in Shanghai, China. We believe that
our properties are generally in good condition, are well
maintained, and are generally suitable and adequate to carry on
our business.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during
the quarter ended March 25, 2006.
PART II.
ITEM 5. MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under
the symbol TRNS. As of March 25, 2006, we had
approximately 700 shareholders of record.
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
The following table sets forth, on a per share basis, for the
periods indicated, the high and low reported sales prices of our
Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market for each
quarterly period in fiscal years 2006 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
4.73
|
|
|
$
|
5.38
|
|
|
$
|
5.40
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
4.15
|
|
|
$
|
4.19
|
|
|
$
|
4.90
|
|
Fiscal Year 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$
|
3.26
|
|
|
$
|
3.05
|
|
|
$
|
3.38
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
Low
|
|
$
|
2.05
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
|
$
|
2.52
|
|
|
$
|
3.15
|
|
16
DIVIDENDS
We have not declared any cash dividends since our inception and
do not intend to pay any dividends for the foreseeable future.
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following table provides selected financial data for the
current fiscal year and the previous five fiscal years (in
thousands, except per share data). Certain reclassifications of
prior fiscal years financial information have been made to
conform with current fiscal year presentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
FY 2003(1)
|
|
|
FY 2002(2)
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
$
|
60,471
|
|
|
$
|
55,307
|
|
|
$
|
53,317
|
|
|
$
|
57,172
|
|
|
$
|
66,782
|
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
45,372
|
|
|
|
41,415
|
|
|
|
39,919
|
|
|
|
43,853
|
|
|
|
48,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
13,398
|
|
|
|
13,319
|
|
|
|
18,076
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
12,850
|
|
|
|
24,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
(6,005
|
)
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
(7,231
|
)
|
Benefit for Income Taxes, net
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(408
|
)
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) Before Cumulative
Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
(6,631
|
)
|
Cumulative Effect of a Change in
Accounting Principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
(4,715
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
(1.08
|
)
|
Basic Average
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
|
|
6,252
|
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
6,103
|
|
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Before Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
(1.08
|
)
|
Diluted Average
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
|
|
6,147
|
|
|
|
6,103
|
|
Closing Price Per Share
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the Fiscal Years
Ended March
|
|
|
|
25, 2006
|
|
|
26, 2005
|
|
|
27, 2004
|
|
|
31, 2003
|
|
|
31, 2002
|
|
|
Balance Sheets and Working Capital
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
$
|
3,952
|
|
|
$
|
5,952
|
|
|
$
|
3,736
|
|
|
$
|
2,842
|
|
|
$
|
3,869
|
|
Properties, net
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
2,556
|
|
|
|
3,911
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
8,996
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
21,488
|
|
|
|
20,207
|
|
|
|
18,385
|
|
|
|
16,758
|
|
|
|
27,624
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
5,498
|
|
|
|
6,441
|
|
|
|
5,248
|
|
|
|
6,817
|
|
Term Loan, current portion
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
Term Loan, less current portion
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
8,647
|
|
|
|
4,314
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
6,764
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In fiscal year 2003, we recorded a $6.5 million impairment
charge from the implementation of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, as a change in
accounting principle. |
|
(2) |
|
On December 26, 2001, we sold TPG, which produces
instruments used to calibrate, measure, and test physical
parameters, to Fluke for $11.0 million. On January 18,
2002, we completed the sale of our Measurement and Control unit
to Hughes Corporation for $2.9 million and reported a loss
of $4.5 million on the sale. |
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
RECLASSIFICATION
OF AMOUNTS
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal years financial
information have been made to conform with current fiscal
years presentation. In addition, certain reclassifications
of prior fiscal quarters financial information have been
made to conform with current fiscal quarter presentation.
ROUNDING
Certain percentages may vary depending on the basis used for the
calculation, such as dollars in thousands and dollars in
millions.
OVERVIEW
Operational Overview. We are a leading
distributor of professional grade test, measurement, and
calibration equipment and provider of nationally recognized and
accredited calibration services across a wide array of
measurement disciplines.
We operate our business through two reportable business segments
that offer different products and services to the same customer
base. Those two segments are Distribution Products and
Calibration Services.
In our distribution products segment, our Master Catalog is
widely recognized by both original equipment manufacturers and
customers as the ultimate source for test and measurement
equipment. Additionally, because we specialize in test and
measurement equipment, as opposed to a wide array of industrial
products, our sales and customer service personnel can provide
value added technical assistance to our customers to assist them
in determining what product best meets their particular
application requirements.
Our strength in our calibration services segment is based upon
our wide range of disciplines and our investment in the quality
systems that are required in our targeted market segments. Our
services range from the calibration of a single unit to managing
a customers entire calibration program.
18
Our revenue in our distribution products segment can be heavily
impacted by changes in the economic environment. As industrial
customers increase or curtail capital and discretionary
spending, our product sales will typically be directly impacted.
Absent significant economic volatility, we do not see this
segment of our business as having high growth potential. The
majority of our products are not consumables but are purchased
as replacements, upgrades, or for expansion of manufacturing and
research and development facilities. Year over year sales growth
in any one quarter can be impacted by a number of factors
including the addition of new product lines or channels of
distribution.
We believe our calibration services segment offers considerable
growth opportunity and the potential for continuing revenue from
established customers from what is typically an annual
calibration cycle.
We evaluate sales growth in both of our business segments
against a four quarter trend analysis, and not by analyzing any
single quarter.
Financial Overview. Our direct markets
benefited in our distribution products segment, which grew in
line with our expectation of mid single digits. Our overall
product growth rate of 10.1% (calculated on dollars in
thousands) was favorably impacted by above average growth in
sales to indirect markets who have well established customer
bases of their own. In addition, while our growth rate in
Canadian denominated sales dollars was 7.6% (calculated on
dollars in thousands), a stronger Canadian dollar resulted in a
15.8% (calculated on dollars in thousands) growth rate in
U.S. denominated sales dollars. Calibration services sales,
although resulting in an 7.9% (calculated on dollars in
thousands) growth rate in comparison to the prior year, did not
meet our overall growth expectations, especially in our fourth
quarter.
Our overall gross margin, as a percent of sales, was consistent
with the prior year. On a segment basis, our distribution
products gross margin ratio improved slightly as we continued to
focus on controlling promotional pricing, offset to a degree by
increased sales to indirect markets.
In our calibration services segment, we have continued to
balance cost control with the investment to support growth
initiatives. Those initiatives included our acquisition of the
laboratory assets in San Juan, Puerto Rico, where we
believe there is exceptional growth opportunity, doubling the
size of our Houston laboratory and increasing our staff of
qualified technicians. These investments, in combination with
our fourth quarter sales not achieving our expectations,
resulted in a 1.2 point (calculated on dollars in thousands)
gross margin decline in the segment from fiscal year 2005 to
2006.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Financial Reporting Release No. 60 requires all companies
to include a discussion of critical accounting principles or
methods used in the preparation of financial statements.
Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements includes a
complete discussion of the significant accounting policies and
methods used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements. A summary of our most critical accounting policies
follows:
Use of Estimates. The preparation of
our Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and
assumptions are used for, but not limited to, allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns, depreciable lives of fixed
assets, estimated lives of our Master Catalog, and deferred tax
asset valuation allowances. Future events and their effects
cannot be predicted with certainty; accordingly, our accounting
estimates require the exercise of judgment. The accounting
estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements will change as new events occur, as more experience
is acquired, as additional information is obtained, and as our
operating environment changes. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
19
The following table summarizes the more significant expense
(income) transactions in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations that require management estimates, which are
described below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
receivables and returns
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Depreciation of property, plant,
and equipment
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
Amortization of Master Catalog
costs
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation
allowance provisions
|
|
$
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
Changes in Estimates. In the ordinary
course of accounting for the items discussed above, we make
changes in estimates as appropriate and as we become aware of
circumstances surrounding those estimates. Such changes and
refinements in estimation methodologies are reflected in
reported results of operations in the period in which the
changes are made and, if material, their effects are disclosed
in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revenue Recognition. Sales are recorded
when products are shipped or services are rendered to customers,
as we generally have no significant post delivery obligations.
Our prices are fixed and determinable, collection of the
resulting receivable is probable, and returns are reasonably
estimated. Provisions for customer returns are provided for in
the period the related sales are recorded based upon historical
data. We recognize the majority of our service revenue based
upon when the calibration or repair activity is performed and
then shipped
and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of our service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which we recognize revenue in equal amounts at fixed intervals.
Our shipments are generally free on board shipping point and our
customers are generally invoiced for freight, shipping, and
handling charges.
Accounts Receivable. Accounts
receivable represent receivables from customers in the ordinary
course of business. These amounts are recorded net of the
allowance for doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based
upon the expected collectibility of accounts receivable. We
apply a specific formula to our accounts receivable aging, which
may be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula
may not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all
attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to sales over a specific timeframe. The returns
reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the
level of sales
and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventory. Inventory consists of
finished goods and is valued at the lower of cost or market.
Costs are determined using the average cost method of inventory
valuation. Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items not
saleable at or above cost. We reserve specifically for certain
items of our inventory and, for other items, we apply a specific
loss factor, based on historical experience, to specific
categories of our inventory. We evaluate the adequacy of the
reserve on a quarterly basis.
Properties, Depreciation, and
Amortization. Properties are stated at cost.
Depreciation and amortization is computed primarily under the
straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
2 - 6
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
3 - 10
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
4 - 10
|
Properties determined to have no value are written off at their
then remaining net book value. We account for software costs in
accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Leasehold improvements are
amortized under the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance
and repairs are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.
20
Goodwill. We estimate the fair value of
our reporting units in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, using the fair
market value measurement requirement, rather than the
undiscounted cash flows approach. We test our goodwill for
impairment on an annual basis, or immediately if conditions
indicate that such impairment could exist. The evaluation of our
reporting units on a fair value basis indicated that no
impairment existed as of March 25, 2006, March 26,
2005, and March 27, 2004.
Deferred Catalog Costs. We amortize the
cost of each Master Catalog mailed over such catalogs
estimated productive life. We review response results from
catalog mailings on a continuous basis; and if warranted, modify
the period over which costs are recognized. We amortize the cost
of each Master Catalog over an eighteen month period and
amortize the cost of each catalog supplement over a three month
period. Total deferred catalog costs in prepaid expenses and
deferred charges on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were
$0.5 million as of March 25, 2006 and
$0.4 million as of March 26, 2005.
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture. As a
result of certain post divestiture commitments, we are unable to
recognize the gain of $1.5 million on the divestiture of
TPG, which took place in fiscal year 2002, until those
commitments expire on December 31, 2006. See
Outlook below in this section and Note 8 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure.
Deferred Taxes. We account for certain
income and expense items differently for financial reporting
purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes
are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. A
valuation allowance on deferred tax assets is provided for items
for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of such
items will not be realized, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
SFAS No. 109 requires an assessment of both positive
and negative evidence when measuring the need for a deferred tax
valuation allowance. See Taxes below in this section
and Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
further details.
Stock Options. We follow the provisions
of Accounting Practice Board (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which does
not require compensation costs related to stock options to be
recorded in net income, as all options granted under the
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan had exercise prices equal to
the market value of the underlying Common Stock at grant date.
See Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
below in this section or Note 1 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for our disclosure regarding the effects of
SFAS 123R. See Note 6 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements for further disclosure regarding our stock-based
compensation.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. We do
not maintain any off-balance sheet arrangements.
21
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth, for the prior three fiscal
years, the components of our Consolidated Statements of
Operations (calculated on dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Gross Profit
Percentage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
Service Gross Profit
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
28.1
|
%
|
|
|
27.5
|
%
|
Total Gross Profit
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
As a Percentage of Net
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
|
67.5
|
%
|
|
|
67.1
|
%
|
|
|
66.4
|
%
|
Service Sales
|
|
|
32.5
|
%
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
33.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
Expenses
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Benefit for Income Taxes, net
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 25, 2006 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED
MARCH 26, 2005
(dollars
in millions):
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
40.8
|
|
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
Service
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60.5
|
|
|
$
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $5.2 million, or 9.4% (calculated on
dollars in millions) from fiscal year 2005 to 2006.
Our distribution products net sales results, which accounted for
67.5% of our sales in fiscal year 2006 and 67.1% of our sales in
fiscal year 2005 (calculated on dollars in thousands), reflect
year over year customer response to our sales and marketing
activities. Our fiscal years 2006 and 2005 product sales in
relation to prior fiscal year quarter comparisons, is as follows
(calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Sales Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We experienced distribution products net sales growth in our
direct and indirect distribution channels in fiscal year 2006
compared to fiscal year 2005. The growth in our indirect
distribution channels, primarily from high-
22
volume electrical and instrumentation wholesalers, caused a
shift in our mix by distribution channel. The following table
provides the percent of net sales and approximate gross profit
percentage for significant product distribution channels
(calculated on dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005(1)
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(2)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(2)
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
84.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
86.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
Government
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Indirect
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain prior year customer reclassifications have been made to
conform with current channel definitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs. |
Customer product orders include orders for products that we
routinely stock in our inventory, customized products, and other
products ordered less frequently, which we do not stock.
Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but also
include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, and orders required to be shipped at a
future date. Our total unshippable product orders for fiscal
year 2006 increased by approximately $0.1 million, or 7.7%
(calculated on dollars in millions) from fiscal year 2005. We
experienced an increase in the number of backorders in fiscal
year 2006 compared to fiscal year 2005 as we experienced an
increase in customer special orders, which we do not carry in
inventory. The following table reflects this increase in the
percentage of total unshippable product orders that are
backorders at the end of each fiscal quarter and our historical
trend of total unshippable product orders (calculated on dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Total Unshippable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Orders
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
% of Unshippable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Orders that are Backorders
|
|
|
92.9
|
%
|
|
|
84.6
|
%
|
|
|
72.1
|
%
|
|
|
78.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
|
|
80.0
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration services net sales increased $1.5 million, or
8.2% (calculated on dollars in millions), from fiscal year 2005
to 2006. This increase is primarily attributable to customer
acquisition in our regulated industry markets. In addition,
within any quarter, there is typically a netting of new
customers against existing customers whose calibrations may not
repeat for any number of factors. Among those factors are the
timing of customer periodic calibrations on equipment and repair
services, customer capital expenditure budgets, and customer
outsourcing decisions. Our fiscal years 2006 and 2005
calibration service sales in relation to prior fiscal year
quarter comparisons, is as follows (calculated on dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Sales Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Gross
Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15.1
|
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of net sales, slightly decreased from
25.1% in fiscal year 2005 to 25.0% in fiscal year 2006
(calculated on dollars in thousands).
Product gross profit increased $1.0 million from fiscal
year 2005 to fiscal year 2006, primarily attributable to the
10.0% (calculated on dollars in millions) increase in product
net sales. As a percent of net sales, product gross profit
increased 0.3 points (calculated on dollars in thousands) from
fiscal year 2005 to fiscal year 2006. This increase is primarily
the result of the product net sales growth we experienced in our
direct distribution channels, partially offset by product net
sales growth in our indirect distribution channels that
typically support lower margins discussed in Sales
above in this section.
Our product gross profit can be impacted by a number of factors
that can impact quarterly comparisons. Among those factors are
sales to certain channels that do not support the margins of our
direct customer base, periodic rebates on purchases discussed
above, and cooperative advertising received from suppliers,
which are reported as a reduction of cost of sales in accordance
with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 02-16
(see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). The
following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of our
product gross profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on
dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006(3)
|
|
|
|
FY 2005(3)
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Gross Profit %(1)
|
|
|
23.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
|
|
22.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
Other (Expense) Income %(2)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit %
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.3
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
|
(3) |
|
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal quarters
financial information have been made to conform with current
fiscal quarter presentation. |
Calibration services gross profit increased $0.2 million
(calculated on dollars in thousands) from the fiscal year 2005
to fiscal year 2006, primarily from an 8.2% (calculated on
dollars in millions) increase in service sales and a concerted
effort to control costs. As a percent of net sales, calibration
services gross profit decreased 1.2 points (calculated on
dollars in thousands) from fiscal year 2005 to fiscal year 2006,
primarily due to calibration service sales mix and investment in
calibration services capacity. The following table reflects the
quarterly historical trend of our calibration services gross
profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Service Gross Profit %
|
|
|
29.1
|
%
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
%
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
|
$
|
7.9
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13.6
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses increased $0.7 million, or 5.4%
(calculated on dollars in millions), from fiscal year 2005 to
fiscal year 2006. Selling, marketing, and warehouse expenses
increased $0.7 million primarily as a result of an increase
in payroll and related costs. Administrative expenses were
relatively consistent from fiscal year 2005 to fiscal year 2006
and declined as a percent of net sales from 9.1% in the fiscal
year 2005 to 8.3% in fiscal year 2006 (calculated on dollars in
thousands).
Other
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Other Expense
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense was relatively consistent from fiscal year 2005
to fiscal year 2006 resulting from higher interest rates applied
to lower average debt. Other expense decreased in the fiscal
year 2005 to fiscal year 2006 primarily attributable to a
decrease in net losses in Canadian currency transactions.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
Benefit for Income Taxes, net
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, we reversed a
significant portion, $2.7 million, of the Companys
deferred tax valuation reserve as a result of our income before
taxes over the last four years and our belief that our future
performance will result in sustained profitability and taxable
income, which is more fully described in Note 4 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements. We also provided
$0.1 million for taxes associated with our Canadian
subsidiary.
We did not recognize any provision for income taxes in fiscal
year 2005, as pretax income was offset by a reduction in our
deferred tax asset valuation reserve. When calculating income
tax expense or benefit, we recognized valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets, which were not considered realizable using
a more likely than not approach, which is more fully
described in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
25
FISCAL
YEAR ENDED MARCH 26, 2005 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED
MARCH 27, 2004
(dollars
in millions):
Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
37.1
|
|
|
$
|
35.4
|
|
Service
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
55.3
|
|
|
$
|
53.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased $2.0 million, or 3.8% from fiscal year
2004 to 2005.
Our distribution products sales results, which accounted for
67.1% of our sales in fiscal year 2005 and 66.4% of our sales in
fiscal year 2004, have positively reflected the impact of what
we believe was an improved year over year economy, and customer
response to our marketing programs. Our fiscal years 2005 and
2004 product sales trend in relation to prior fiscal year
quarter comparisons, is as follows (calculated on dollars in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
Product Sales Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(15.8
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the percent of net sales and
approximate gross profit percentage for significant product
distribution channels (calculated on dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005(1)
|
|
|
|
FY 2004(1)
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(2)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit %(2)
|
|
Direct
|
|
|
86.5
|
%
|
|
|
24.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
Government
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Indirect
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain prior years customer reclassifications have been
made to conform with current channel definitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs. |
Customer product orders include orders for products that we
routinely stock in our inventory, as well as customized products
and other products ordered less frequently, which we do not
stock. Unshippable product orders are primarily backorders, but
also include products that are requested to be calibrated in our
calibration laboratories prior to shipment, orders required to
be shipped complete, orders required to be shipped at a future
date, and orders on credit hold
and/or
awaiting letters of credit. Our total unshippable orders
decreased by approximately $0.4 million, or 23.5% from
fiscal year 2004 to 2005. We believe that the decrease is
primarily attributed to our suppliers shipping inventory to us
on a more timely basis and improvement in our inventory demand
planning. The following table reflects our historical trend of
product orders that were unshippable at the end of each fiscal
quarter and the percentage of these orders that are backorders
(calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Total Unshippable Product Orders
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
% of Unshippable Product Orders
that are Backorders
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
|
|
80.0
|
%
|
|
|
80.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
85.7
|
%
|
|
|
82.5
|
%
|
|
|
83.6
|
%
|
|
|
83.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Calibration services sales increased $0.3 million, or 1.7%,
from fiscal year 2004 to 2005. This increase, and in particular,
our year over year fourth quarter growth, was attributable to
both new customer acquisition and concerted customer service
efforts to retain existing customers. Within any quarter, there
is typically a netting of new customers against existing
customers whose calibrations may not repeat for any number of
factors. Among those factors are the timing of customer periodic
calibrations on equipment as well as repair services, customer
capital expenditure budgets, and customer outsourcing decisions.
The rate of change in our 2005 and 2004 calibration services
sales in relation to the prior fiscal year quarter is as follows
(calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
Service Sales Growth (Decline)
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.2
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13.9
|
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit, as a percent of net sales, remained constant at
25.1% in fiscal year 2005 and fiscal year 2004 (calculated on
dollars in thousands).
Product gross profit increased $0.3 million from fiscal
year 2004 to fiscal year 2005, however, the gross profit
percentage decreased by 0.3 points. As is evidenced by the chart
below, gross profit ratios were impacted mid-fiscal year 2004 as
a result of our aggressive targeting of new channels of
distribution that typically do not support the margins of our
direct customer base and an increased level of allowances to
stimulate product sales. In fiscal year 2005, as the business
climate improved, we targeted a reduction in those allowances.
In addition, our product gross profit ratio to sales can be
impacted by a number of factors that can impact quarterly and
annual comparisons. Among those factors are sales to certain
channels that do not support the margins of our direct customer
base, periodic rebates on purchases and cooperative advertising
received from suppliers, which are reported as a reduction of
cost of sales in accordance with
EITF 02-16
(see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). The
following table reflects the quarterly historical trend of our
product gross profit as a percent of net sales (calculated on
dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005(3)
|
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
|
Q3
|
|
|
Q2
|
|
|
Q1
|
|
Product Gross Profit %(1)
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
22.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
%
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
Other (Expense) Income %(2)
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Gross Profit %
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
|
|
23.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.7
|
%
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated at net sales less purchase costs. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes vendor rebates, cooperative advertising income, freight
billed to customers, freight expenses, and direct shipping costs. |
|
(3) |
|
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal quarters
financial information have been made to conform with current
fiscal quarter presentation. |
Calibration services gross profit increased $0.2 million,
or 0.6 points. This increase was a result of a modest increase
in service sales and improving laboratory efficiency. The
following table reflects the quarterly
27
historical trend of our calibration services gross profit as a
percent of net sales (calculated on dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
Service Gross Profit %
|
|
|
32.7
|
%
|
|
|
28.6
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
|
26.2
|
%
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
23.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
|
|
$
|
7.9
|
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses decreased $0.2 million, or 1.5%, from
fiscal year 2004 to 2005. In fiscal year 2005, selling,
marketing, and warehouse expenses decreased $0.6 million,
which is due to a reduction in selling payroll expenses and
related costs and more efficient product marketing initiatives.
Administrative expenses increased $0.4 primarily resulting from
the issuance of stock to certain officers and other compensation
costs.
Other
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Other Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense remained constant with the prior year as debt
levels and interest rates remained relatively unchanged. The
other expense increase in fiscal year 2005 was primarily
attributable to a net loss in Canadian currency transactions in
comparison to net gains in fiscal year 2004.
Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
We did not recognize any provision for income taxes in fiscal
year 2005, as pretax income was offset by a reduction in our
deferred tax asset valuation reserve. When calculating income
tax expense or benefit, we recognized valuation allowances for
deferred tax assets, which were not considered realizeable using
a more likely than not approach, which is more fully
described in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The benefit for income taxes in fiscal year 2004 recognizes the
benefit derived from the utilization of net operating loss and
foreign tax credit carry backs.
28
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows. The following table is a
summary of our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash Provided by (Used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$
|
4,435
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
268
|
|
Operating Activities: Cash provided by
operating activities for fiscal year 2006 was $4.4 million
and nominal for fiscal year 2005. This $4.4 million
increase was primarily the result of an increase in net income
of $0.7 million excluding the $2.7 million deferred
tax valuation allowance reversal, and an increase in cash
provided by working capital of $4.1 million, primarily
resulting from reduced inventory, offset by a decrease in
non-cash charges of $0.3 million, excluding the
$2.7 million deferred tax valuation allowance reversal.
Significant working capital fluctuations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories/Accounts Payable: Our inventory
contributed $4.2 million of working capital in fiscal year
2006. Our inventory increased $2.2 million from
March 27, 2004 to March 26, 2005 in preparation for
our historically strong product sales in the fourth quarter. Our
inventory at March 26, 2005 was higher than we anticipated
as product sales were below our expectations. Our inventory
decreased $2.0 million from March 26, 2005 to
March 25, 2006, as we made a concerted effort to lower
inventory levels while continuing to meet customer expectations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in inventory and modest decrease in accounts
payable from March 26, 2005 to March 25, 2006 resulted
in an increase in our payables to inventory ratio, as the
following table illustrates (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
Inventory, net
|
|
$
|
4.0
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
Accounts Payable/Inventory Ratio
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal years financial
information have been made to conform with current fiscal
years presentation. |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables: Our receivables contributed
$0.5 million of working capital in fiscal year 2006,
primarily due to the fluctuation in our other non-trade
receivables. Our other receivables contributed $0.4 million
of working capital which was primarily the result of a periodic
vendor rebate we earned in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2005 that we subsequently collected in fiscal year 2006. We did
not earn any vendor rebates in the fourth quarter of fiscal year
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining $0.1 million increase in receivables working
capital is attributable to the fluctuation in our trade accounts
receivables. As the following table illustrates, we have
maintained strong collection efforts as we experienced a slight
improvement in our days sales outstanding from March 26,
2005 when compared to March 25, 2006, which contributed to
a slight decrease in our trade account receivables from
March 26, 2005 when compared to March 25, 2006
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Net Sales, for the last two fiscal
months
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
8.1
|
|
Days Sales Outstanding (based on
60 days)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
29
The significant non-cash fluctuation of $2.7 million was
the result of reversing a significant portion of our deferred
tax valuation allowance. See Note 4 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for further details about the reversal.
Investing Activities. The $1.8 million of
cash used in investing activities in fiscal year 2006 resulted
from $0.9 million of capital expenditures, primarily for
our calibration laboratories and $0.9 million to purchase
NWCI. See Item 1 and Note 11 of the Consolidated
Financial Statements for further disclosure regarding the
purchase of NWCI. The $0.9 million of cash used in
investing activities in fiscal year 2005 resulted from capital
expenditures, primarily for our calibration laboratories.
Financing Activities. The $2.7 million of
cash used in financing activities in fiscal year 2006 primarily
resulted from decreasing our overall debt. As the table below
illustrates (in millions), we were able to reduce our overall
debt by $3.1 million from cash provided by operating
activities. See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information regarding our debt. This
$3.1 million use of cash was offset by $0.4 million of
cash received primarily from the exercise of employee stock
options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Term Debt
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.5
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
$
|
4.3
|
|
|
$
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinancing
of Debt.
Description. On November 13, 2002, we
entered into a Revolving Credit and Loan Agreement (the
Credit Agreement) with GMAC Business Credit, LLC
(GMAC). The Credit Agreement consisted of a term
loan, a revolving line of credit (LOC), and certain
material terms which are disclosed in Note 3 of our
Consolidated Financial Statements. The Credit Agreement was
amended on April 11, 2003 to address certain non-material
post closing conditions. The Credit Agreement was further
amended on July 22, 2004 to waive compliance with an EBITDA
(earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and
amortization) covenant for the first quarter of fiscal year
2005, permanently waive a requirement relating to an inactive
subsidiary that we had committed to dissolve by a specific date
(that has been subsequently dissolved), and increase the Credit
Agreement restriction on Master Catalog spending.
We amended the Credit Agreement again on November 1, 2004
(Third Amendment). The Third Amendment consisted of
two term notes, a LOC, a capital expenditure loan option if
certain conditions are met, and certain material terms which are
disclosed in Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements. The Third Amendment also waived compliance with the
EBITDA covenant for the second quarter of fiscal year 2005 and
extended the Credit Agreement expiration from November 13,
2005 to October 31, 2007.
The Credit Agreement was further amended on March 16, 2006
(Fourth Amendment). The Fourth Amendment provided
GMACs consent to the acquisition of NWCI, reduced the
interest rates by 0.375% in all tiers and loans, extended the
Credit Agreement expiration from October 31, 2007 to
October 31, 2008 and provided for a termination premium of
0.25% payable by us, if applicable, for the additional year,
increased the capital expenditure covenant for fiscal year 2006
from $1.5 million to $2.0 million, and permitted us to
include NWCI receivables in the borrowing base, upon
satisfaction of certain conditions.
LOC. The Credit Agreement contains both a
subjective acceleration clause and a requirement to maintain a
lock-box arrangement. These conditions result in a short-term
classification of the LOC in accordance with EITF Issue
No. 95-22,
Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding
under Revolving Credit Agreements that include both a Subjective
Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement.
30
Covenants. The table below indicates our
excess (shortage) EBITDA (earnings before interest, income
taxes, depreciation and amortization) percentage for the periods
indicated. The second and third amendments to the Credit
Agreement waived compliance with the EBITDA covenant for the
first and second quarters of fiscal year 2005, respectively. The
third amendment also reduced the EBITDA requirement for the
third and fourth quarters of fiscal year 2005. We met our EBITDA
covenant for the four quarters of fiscal year 2006 and expect to
meet the covenant on an on-going basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
|
|
Q4
|
|
Q3
|
|
Q2
|
|
Q1
|
Excess (Shortage) EBITDA
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Terms. We have pledged certain property
and fixtures in favor of GMAC, including inventory, equipment,
and accounts receivable as collateral security for the loans
made under the Credit Agreement.
See Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information on our debt. See Item 7A, Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, for a discussion of
interest rates on our debt.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial
Commitments. The table below contains
aggregated information about contractual obligations and
commercial commitments that we must make future payments under
for contracts such as debt and lease agreements, purchase
arrangements, and various operating requirements (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Capital Leases
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Unconditional Purchase
Obligations(1)
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Estimated Interest on Debt and
Capital Leases
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations
|
|
$
|
15.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.2
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to minimum inventory purchase commitment. Commitments
are an annual dollar amount based on calendar years. This table
estimates the commitment amount per fiscal year . See
Distribution Agreement above in Item 1 for
further information. |
Effect
of Recently Issued Accounting Standards.
SFAS 123R: On December 16,
2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
SFAS 123R replaces SFAS 123 and supersedes APB
No. 25. SFAS 123, as originally issued in 1995,
established as preferable a
fair-value-based
method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with
employees. However, SFAS 123 permitted entities the option
of continuing to apply the guidance in APB No. 25, as long
as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net
income would have been had the preferable
fair-value-based
method been used. SFAS 123R covers a wide range of
share-based compensation arrangements including share options,
restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share
appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.
SFAS 123R requires the cost of all share-based payment
transactions be recognized in the financial statements,
establishes fair value as the measurement objective and requires
entities to apply a
fair-value-based
measurement method in accounting for share-based payment
transactions.
The SEC amended the effective date of SFAS 123R with a new
rule issued on April 14, 2005 to amend the compliance date
for SFAS 123R that allows companies to implement
SFAS 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal year,
instead of the next reporting period, that begins after
June 15, 2005, although early adoption
31
is allowed. SFAS 123R permits companies to adopt its
requirements using either a modified prospective
method, or a modified retrospective method. Under
the modified prospective method, compensation cost
is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the
effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for
all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on
the requirements of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards
granted prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R. Under the
modified retrospective method, the requirements are
the same as under the modified prospective method,
but also permits entities to restate financial statements of
previous periods based on proforma disclosures made in
accordance with SFAS 123.
We are adopting SFAS 123R effective March 26, 2006 and
will use the aforementioned modified prospective method. Based
upon our stock option estimates and assumptions, estimates of
employee contributions to the employee stock purchase plan, and
subject to a complete management review, we expect the adoption
of SFAS 123R to reduce pre-tax income and net income by
approximately $0.4 million for the fiscal year ending
March 31, 2007. We have not changed any of our stock
compensation plans as a result of SFAS 123R, but maintain
the right to amend, suspend, or terminate any plan at any time.
SFAS 153: On December 16,
2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of
Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions
(SFAS 153). The amendments made by
SFAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of
nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of
the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the
narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive
assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance.
Previously, Opinion 29 required that the accounting for an
exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or
an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset
should be based on the recorded amount of the asset
relinquished. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset
exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. Our adoption of SFAS 153 on
July 1, 2005 did not have an effect on our consolidated
financial statements.
SFAS 154: On May 5, 2005, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and
Error Corrections (SFAS 154).
SFAS 154 is a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial
Statements. SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the
accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting
principle. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most
voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by
including the cumulative effect of changing to the new
accounting principle. SFAS 154 requires retrospective
application to prior periods financial statements of
changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to
determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative
effect of the changes. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting
changes and corrections of errors that we might make beginning
March 26, 2006. When adopted, this Statement is not
expected to have a material impact on prior year consolidated
financial statements.
EMPLOYEE
STOCK OPTIONS
We have a stock option program that is a broad based, long-term
retention program intended to attract, incent, and retain key
employees, thereby aligning shareholder and employee interests.
In granting options, we are cognizant of balancing the
plans objectives with potential incremental dilution.
Stock options are currently outstanding under two plans. Under
these plans, participants may be granted options to purchase
shares of our Common Stock at the fair market value at the time
of the grant.
The first plan, the Transcat, Inc. Amended and 1993 Restated
Stock Option Plan, had been approved by shareholders and
terminated in the first quarter of fiscal year 2004. Options
granted under that plan expired no later than five years from
the date of the grant and vest within four years, in equal
increments. For the first four years after the grant date,
options are exerciseable only if our stock price attains a
specific market value for a minimum specified number of trading
days and certain stock ownership requirements are met. After
four years, the stock price and duration requirements cease. No
options were granted in fiscal year 2004 or thereafter under
this plan as it was terminated.
32
The second plan, the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan, was
approved by shareholders in August 2003 and will terminate in
June 2013. Options granted under this plan expire no later than
ten years from the date of the grant and vest equally over a
three-year period. This plan also provides for the granting of
stock awards and performance awards.
Options granted to employees, including officers, are summarized
for the fiscal years 2002 to 2006 as follows (shares in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
FY 2003
|
|
|
FY 2002
|
|
|
Total Options Granted
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Less: Options Forfeited
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
|
(587
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Options Granted
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides additional information regarding
stock options, and options granted
and/or held
by our Corporate Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
FY 2003
|
|
|
FY 2002
|
|
|
Total Options Granted as a % of
Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
Total Options Outstanding as a %
of Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
Options Granted to Corporate
Officers as a % of Total Options Granted
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
|
34.9
|
%
|
|
|
34.0
|
%
|
|
|
63.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Options Granted to Corporate
Officers as a % of Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Cumulative Options Held by
Corporate Officers as a % of Total Options Outstanding
|
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
|
|
55.2
|
%
|
|
|
44.5
|
%
|
|
|
42.7
|
%
|
|
|
62.4
|
%
|
Cumulative Options Held by
Corporate Officers as a % of Total Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
In-the-money
and
out-of-the-money
(have an exercise price equal to or above $5.00 per share,
the market price of Transcat Common Stock at March 25,
2006) option information as of March 25, 2006 is as
follows (shares in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Exercisable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
Out-of-the-Money
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercisable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.37
|
|
Out-of-the-Money
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
2.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In-the-Money
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
Out-of-the-Money
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Options granted to our Corporate Officers as a group during
fiscal year 2006 are as follows (shares and dollars in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potential Realization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at Assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of Stock
|
Number of Securities
|
|
% of Total
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
|
Price Appreciation
|
Underlying Option
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Expiration
|
|
for Option Term(1)
|
Grants
|
|
to Employees
|
|
per Share
|
|
Date
|
|
10%
|
|
25%
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents gains that could accrue for these options, assuming
that the market price of Transcat stock appreciates over a
5 year period at annualized rates of 10% and 25%. If the
stock price does not increase above the exercise price, the
realized value of these options would be zero. |
Our Corporate Officers as a group exercised 145,000 shares
or 57.5% of total options exercised during fiscal year 2006. Our
Corporate Officers did not exercise any options during fiscal
years 2005 and 2004.
Options held by our Corporate Officers as a group, as of
March 25, 2006 are as follows (shares and dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Underlying
|
|
Values of Unexercised
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
In-the-Money
Options(2)
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
466
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
These amounts represent the difference between the exercise
price and $5.00, the market price of our Common Stock at
March 25, 2006 for all
in-the-money
options held by the Corporate Officers. |
All stock option grants are reviewed and approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. All members of
the Compensation Committee are independent directors, as defined
in the applicable rules for issuers traded on The NASDAQ Stock
Market.
For additional information regarding stock-based compensation,
see Note 6 of our Consolidated Financial Statements. See
Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards above
in this section or Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements for our disclosure regarding the effects of
SFAS 123R.
For purposes of the reporting requirements of Section 16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of
March 25, 2006, Carl E. Sassano, our chairman, chief
executive officer, and president as of such date, and Charles P.
Hadeed, our chief operating officer, chief financial officer,
and vice president of finance as of such date, were considered
our only reporting persons.
EMPLOYEE
STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan
(Plan) has up to 200,000 shares of our Common
Stock available for issuance. Under the Plan, eligible employees
may purchase stock at 85% of the fair market value of our Common
Stock on the Investment Date, which is the second to last
business day of each calendar month. Purchases are limited under
certain circumstances to maintain Plan conformance to various
regulations. Plan participation was approximately 20% of total
employees, including those ineligible, during fiscal year 2006
and 18% and 19% during fiscal years 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Shares purchased under the Plan were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
9,880
|
|
|
|
12,100
|
|
|
|
12,390
|
|
See Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
above in this section or Note 1 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for our disclosure regarding the effects of
SFAS 123R. See Note 6 of our Consolidated Financial
Statements for further disclosure regarding our stock-based
compensation.
34
OUTLOOK
We expect the business overall will experience growth in fiscal
year 2007 similar to that of fiscal year 2006. We are planning
for revenue growth in the high single digits and improved gross
margins resulting from potential leverage on increased
calibration services revenues. Distribution products revenues in
our direct distribution channel should grow in the mid single
digits, assuming a stable economy. Calibration services revenues
should grow in the low to mid teens, inclusive of the 5%
increase resulting from the acquisition of NWCI in February
2006. Revenue growth in any individual quarter is effected by a
number of factors, some beyond our control and others that we
can plan for, as detailed in Item 1A above.
Increased operating expenses are primarily targeted to support
increased revenue growth. Some of our expense increases are
necessitated by accounting requirements (i.e. expensing of stock
options), which are detailed below. Operating and net earnings
will be significantly affected in certain quarters, as discussed
below. A full understanding of these factors is needed to make
meaningful comparisons on a quarterly basis to the same period
of the previous year. Capital expenditures are planned to be in
line with last years spending.
Fiscal year 2007 will be affected by a number of factors that
should be considered and will be discussed, as appropriate, when
evaluating performance.
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Length: In April 2003, we changed our
fiscal year to a 52/53 week. See Note 1 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure. Fiscal
year 2007 will be a 53 week year and our fourth quarter
will include six weeks. We do not anticipate the impact on
revenue of this extended period to be more than 2%.
|
|
|
NWCI: In February 2006, we acquired NWCI. See
Item 1 above and Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further disclosure. We anticipate this
acquisition will increase calibration services revenue by
approximately 5% in fiscal year 2007 when compared to fiscal
year 2006.
|
|
|
SFAS 123R: In fiscal year 2007, our operating
results will reflect the adoption of SFAS 123R, the
recognition of expensing stock options. We anticipate the cost
in fiscal year 2007 to be approximately $0.4 million, with
the greatest impact in our first quarter as we record the
expense associated with unvested outstanding options. See
Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion.
|
|
|
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture: In fiscal year
2002, we divested TPG and were precluded from recognizing the
gain for accounting purposes until certain conditions were met.
See Note 8 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further disclosure. We anticipate that those conditions will be
met in our third quarter of fiscal year 2007, and therefore we
would recognize a non-cash gain to operating earnings of
$1.5 million.
|
|
|
Income Taxes: In fiscal year 2007, as a result of the
reversal of a significant portion of our deferred tax valuation
reserve in fiscal year 2006, we will provide for income taxes on
our Consolidated Statements of Operations but will not be
required to make any tax payments until we have utilized our net
operating loss carryforwards. See Note 4 of the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
|
|
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
INTEREST
RATES
Our exposure to changes in interest rates results from borrowing
activities. In the event interest rates were to move by 1%, our
yearly interest expense would increase or decrease by less than
$0.1 million assuming our average-borrowing levels remained
constant. On March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005, we had
no hedging arrangements in place to limit our exposure to upward
movements in interest rates.
35
Under our Credit Agreement, as amended, described in Note 3
of our Consolidated Financial Statements, interest on the term
loans and LOC is adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon the
applicable Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (see chart below). The
prime rate and the
30-day
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as of
March 25, 2006 were 7.50% and 4.83%, respectively. The
Companys interest rate for fiscal year 2006 ranged from
5.37% to 8.00%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier
|
|
Coverage Ratio
|
|
Term Loan A
|
|
Term Loan B
|
|
LOC
|
|
1
|
|
1.249 or less
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0.125% or
|
|
Prime Rate plus 0.375%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
|
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.875%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.375%
|
2
|
|
1.25 to 1.49
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.125% or
|
|
Prime Rate plus 0.125%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
|
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.625%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.125%
|
3
|
|
1.50 or greater
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
|
|
Prime Rate minus 0.125%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
|
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 2.375%
|
|
|
|
(b) LIBOR plus 1.875%
|
FOREIGN
CURRENCY
Approximately 91% of our sales were denominated in United States
dollars, with the remainder denominated in Canadian dollars for
fiscal years 2006 and 2005. A 10% change in the value of the
Canadian dollar to the United States dollar would impact our
revenues by less than 1%. We monitor the relationship between
the United States and Canadian currencies on a continuous basis
and adjust sales prices for products and services sold in
Canadian dollars as we believe to be appropriate. On
March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005, we had no hedging
arrangements in place to limit our exposure to foreign currency
fluctuations.
36
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
INDEX
37
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Transcat, Inc.
Rochester, New York
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of March 25, 2006
and March 26, 2005 and the related consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders
equity, and cash flows for the years then ended. We have also
audited the schedule listed in the accompanying index for the
years ended March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005. These
financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
schedule are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of
its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit
included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements and schedule, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements and schedule. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries at
March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005, and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years
in the period ended March 25, 2006, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Also, in our opinion, the schedule presents fairly, in all
material respects, the information set forth therein for each of
the two years in the period ended March 25, 2006.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York
May 5, 2006
38
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Stockholders of
Transcat, Inc.
In our opinion, the consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income, of cash flows and stockholders
equity for the year ended March 27, 2004 present fairly, in
all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows
of Transcat, Inc. and its subsidiaries for the year ended
March 27, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition,
in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the
accompanying index for the year ended March 27, 2004
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. These financial statements
and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Rochester, New York
June 17, 2004
39
TRANSCAT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Product Sales
|
|
$
|
40,814
|
|
|
$
|
37,086
|
|
|
$
|
35,423
|
|
Service Sales
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
18,221
|
|
|
|
17,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
60,471
|
|
|
|
55,307
|
|
|
|
53,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Products Sold
|
|
|
31,002
|
|
|
|
28,307
|
|
|
|
26,948
|
|
Cost of Services Sold
|
|
|
14,370
|
|
|
|
13,108
|
|
|
|
12,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cost of Products and
Services Sold
|
|
|
45,372
|
|
|
|
41,415
|
|
|
|
39,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
13,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, Marketing, and Warehouse
Expenses
|
|
|
8,553
|
|
|
|
7,948
|
|
|
|
8,540
|
|
Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
5,045
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Other Expense (Income)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Expense
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$
|
3,662
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
|
$
|
521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
|
|
6,252
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
TRANSCAT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
Accounts Receivable, less
allowance for doubtful accounts of $63 and $56 as of
March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005, respectively
|
|
|
7,989
|
|
|
|
8,089
|
|
Other Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
358
|
|
Finished Goods Inventory, net
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
5,952
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Deferred
Charges
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
13,826
|
|
|
|
15,135
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
|
|
|
2,637
|
|
|
|
1,984
|
|
Assets Under Capital Leases, net
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
Prepaid Expenses and Deferred
Charges
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Deferred Tax Asset
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
21,488
|
|
|
$
|
20,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$
|
4,219
|
|
|
$
|
4,544
|
|
Accrued Payrolls, Commissions, and
Other
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
Income Taxes Payable
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Current Portion of Term Loan
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Current Portion of Capital Lease
Obligations
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
5,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
10,826
|
|
|
|
13,092
|
|
Term Loan, less current portion
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations, less
current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
12,841
|
|
|
|
15,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value
$0.50 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
7,048,028 and 6,700,505 shares issued as of March 25,
2006 and March 26, 2005, respectively; 6,791,240 and
6,453,241 shares outstanding as of March 25, 2006 and
March 26, 2005, respectively
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
Capital in Excess of Par Value
|
|
|
4,641
|
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
Unearned Compensation
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Gain
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
Retained Earnings (Deficit)
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
(2,702
|
)
|
Less: Treasury Stock, at cost,
256,788 and 247,264 shares as of March 25, 2006 and
March 26, 2005, respectively
|
|
|
(888
|
)
|
|
|
(838
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
8,647
|
|
|
|
4,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
21,488
|
|
|
$
|
20,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
TRANSCAT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income
to Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Disposal of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Taxes
|
|
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
Provision for Doubtful Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Provision for Returns
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Provision for Slow Moving or
Obsolete Inventory
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Common Stock Expense
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Amortization of Unearned
Compensation
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Changes in Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Other
Receivables
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
(927
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
(2,229
|
)
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
Income Taxes Receivable/Payable
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
655
|
|
Prepaid Expenses, Deferred Charges,
and Other
|
|
|
(592
|
)
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
Accrued Payrolls, Commissions, and
Other
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in)
Operating Activities
|
|
|
4,435
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Property, Plant and
Equipment
|
|
|
(914
|
)
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
Purchase of N.W. Calibration
Inspection, Inc.
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing
Activities
|
|
|
(1,777
|
)
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
(459
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit, net
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
(943
|
)
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
Payments on Term Loans
|
|
|
(758
|
)
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
Proceeds from Term
Loan Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on Capital Leases
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by
Financing Activities
|
|
|
(2,654
|
)
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on
Cash
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(441
|
)
|
|
|
433
|
|
Cash at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Period
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid (Received) from
Interest and Taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$
|
372
|
|
|
$
|
316
|
|
|
$
|
293
|
|
Taxes Paid (Refunded)
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(872
|
)
|
Supplemental Disclosure of
Non-Cash Financing Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
Expiration of Warrants
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Treasury Stock Acquired in Cashless
Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Non-Cash Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Stock Issued in Connection with
Business Acquisition
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
TRANSCAT,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accum-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
In
|
|
|
|
|
|
Un-
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Excess
|
|
|
|
|
|
earned
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.50 Par Value
|
|
|
of Par
|
|
|
War-
|
|
|
Comp-
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
at Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
rants
|
|
|
ensation
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2003
|
|
|
6,177
|
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
3,031
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(235
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,311
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
(453
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,698
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Unearned
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 27, 2004
|
|
|
6,234
|
|
|
$
|
3,176
|
|
|
$
|
3,235
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
$
|
(23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,958
|
)
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
$
|
(453
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,428
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
318
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Amortization of Unearned
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Expired Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 26, 2005
|
|
|
6,453
|
|
|
$
|
3,350
|
|
|
$
|
3,995
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
$
|
(17
|
)
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
(2,702
|
)
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
(838
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,314
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
581
|
|
Restricted Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Amortization of Unearned
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Expired Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 26, 2005
|
|
|
6,791
|
|
|
$
|
3,524
|
|
|
$
|
4,641
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
(888
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
TRANSCAT,
INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
NOTE 1 NATURE
OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Description of Business: Transcat, Inc.
(Transcat or the Company) is a leading
distributor of professional grade test, measurement, and
calibration instruments and a provider of calibration and repair
services, primarily throughout the process, life science, and
manufacturing industries.
Principles of Consolidation: The Consolidated
Financial Statements of Transcat include the accounts of
Transcat, Inc. and the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries,
Transmation (Canada) Inc. and metersandinstruments.com, Inc. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of
Transcats Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States requires that the Company make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant
estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to,
allowance for doubtful accounts and returns, depreciable lives
of fixed assets, estimated lives of major catalogs (Master
Catalog), and deferred tax asset valuation allowances.
Future events and their effects cannot be predicted with
certainty; accordingly, accounting estimates require the
exercise of judgment. The accounting estimates used in the
preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements will change
as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as
additional information is obtained, and as the operating
environment changes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The following table summarizes the more significant expense
(income) transactions in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations that require management estimates, which are
described below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
receivables and returns
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Depreciation of property, plant,
and equipment
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.0
|
|
Amortization of Master Catalog
costs
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation
allowance provisions
|
|
$
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
Changes in Estimates: In the ordinary course
of accounting for the items discussed above, Transcat makes
changes in estimates as appropriate and as the Company becomes
aware of changed circumstances surrounding those estimates. Such
changes and refinements in estimation methodologies are
reflected in reported results of operations in the period in
which the changes are made and, if material, their effects are
disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Fiscal Year: We operate on a 52/53 week
fiscal year, ending the last Saturday in March. In a
52-week
fiscal year, each of our four quarters is a
13-week
period, and the final month of each quarter is a
5-week
period. In a
53-week
fiscal year, the last quarter is a
14-week
period. The fiscal years ended March 25, 2006 (fiscal
year 2006), March 26, 2005 (fiscal year
2005), and March 27, 2004 (fiscal year
2004) consisted of 52 weeks.
Revenue Recognition: Sales are recorded when
products are shipped or services are rendered to customers, as
the Company generally has no significant post delivery
obligations. The Companys prices are fixed and
determinable, collection of the resulting receivable is
probable, and returns are reasonably estimated. Provisions for
customer returns are provided for in the period the related
sales are recorded based upon historical data. The Company
recognizes the majority of service revenue based upon when the
calibration or repair activity is performed and then shipped
and/or
delivered to the customer. Some of the service revenue is
generated from managing customers calibration programs in
which the Company recognizes revenue in equal
44
amounts at fixed intervals. Shipments are generally free on
board shipping point and customers are generally invoiced for
freight, shipping, and handling charges.
Shipping and Handling Costs: Freight expense
and direct shipping costs are included in cost of sales. These
costs were approximately $1.4 million, $1.3 million,
and $1.2 million for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004,
respectively. Direct handling costs, which primarily represent
direct compensation of employees who pick, pack, and otherwise
prepare, if necessary, merchandise for shipment to customers are
reflected in selling, marketing, and warehouse expenses. These
costs were approximately $0.4 million for fiscal year 2006
and $0.3 million for fiscal years 2005 and 2004.
Vendor Rebates: Vendor rebates are based on a
specified cumulative level of purchases and are recorded as a
reduction of cost of sales as the milestone is achieved.
Cooperative Advertising Income: Transcat
follows the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) Issue
No. 02-16,
Accounting by a Reseller for Cash Consideration Received
from a Vendor which provides that cash consideration
received from a vendor by a reseller be reported as a reduction
of cost of sales as the related inventory is sold.
Comprehensive Income: Transcat reports
comprehensive income under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income. Other comprehensive income is
comprised of net income and currency translation adjustments.
Foreign Currency Translation and
Transactions: The accounts of Transcats
Canadian subsidiary are maintained in the local currency and
have been translated to United States dollars in accordance with
SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.
Accordingly, the amounts representing assets and liabilities,
except for long-term intercompany accounts and equity, have been
translated at the period-end rates of exchange and related
revenue and expense accounts have been translated at average
rates of exchange during the period. Gains and losses arising
from translation of the Companys subsidiary balance sheets
into United States dollars are recorded directly to the
accumulated other comprehensive income component of
stockholders equity.
Transcat records foreign currency gains and losses on Canadian
business transactions. The net loss for fiscal years 2006 and
2005 was less than $0.1 million. The net gain in fiscal
year 2004 was $0.2 million.
Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share
of Common Stock are computed based on the weighted average
number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share of Common Stock reflect the assumed
conversion of dilutive stock options, warrants, and unvested
restricted stock awards. In computing the per share effect of
assumed conversion, funds which would have been received from
the exercise of options, warrants, and unvested restricted stock
are considered to have been used to purchase shares of Common
Stock at the average market prices during the period, and the
resulting net additional shares of Common Stock are included in
the calculation of average shares of Common Stock outstanding.
For fiscal year 2006, the net additional Common Stock
equivalents had a $0.04 per share effect on the calculation of
dilutive earnings per share. For fiscal year 2005, the net
additional Common Stock equivalents had no effect on the
calculation of dilutive earnings per share. For fiscal year
2004, the net additional Common Stock equivalents had a
$0.01 per share effect on the calculation of dilutive
earnings per share. The
45
total number of dilutive and anti-dilutive Common Stock
equivalents resulting from stock options, warrants, and unvested
restricted stock are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
Anti-dilutive
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
1,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
$
|
0.80-$4.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.80-$2.92
|
|
|
$
|
0.80-$3.00
|
|
Warrants
|
|
$
|
0.97-$4.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$2.91
|
|
|
$
|
0.97-$3.06
|
|
Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable
represent receivables from customers in the ordinary course of
business. These amounts are recorded net of the allowance for
doubtful accounts and returns in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the
expected collectibility of accounts receivable. Transcat applies
a specific formula to its accounts receivable aging, which may
be adjusted on a specific account basis where the formula may
not appropriately reserve for loss exposure. After all attempts
to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is
written-off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The
returns reserve is calculated based upon the historical rate of
returns applied to sales over a specific timeframe. The returns
reserve will increase or decrease as a result of changes in the
level of sales
and/or the
historical rate of returns.
Inventory: Inventory consists of finished
goods and is valued at the lower of cost or market. Costs are
determined using the average cost method of inventory valuation.
Inventory is reduced by a reserve for items not saleable at or
above cost. Transcat reserves specifically for certain items of
inventory and, for other items, the Company applies a specific
loss factor, based on historical experience, to specific
categories of inventory. The Company evaluates the adequacy of
the reserve on a quarterly basis.
Properties, Depreciation, and
Amortization: Properties are stated at cost.
Depreciation and amortization is computed primarily under the
straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Years
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
2 - 6
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
3 - 10
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
4 - 10
|
Properties determined to have no value are written off at their
then remaining net book value. Transcat accounts for software
costs in accordance with Statement of Position
No. 98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Leasehold improvements are
amortized under the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life or the lease term, whichever is shorter. Maintenance
and repairs are expensed as incurred. See Note 2 of the
Consolidated Statements for further details.
Goodwill: Transcat estimates the fair value of
the Companys reporting units in accordance with
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, using the fair market value measurement
requirement, rather than the undiscounted cash flows approach.
The Company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or
immediately if conditions indicate that such impairment could
exist. The evaluation of the Companys reporting units on a
fair value basis indicated that no impairment existed as of
March 25, 2006, March 26, 2005, and March 27,
2004.
Deferred Catalog Costs: Transcat amortizes the
cost of each Master Catalog mailed over such catalogs
estimated productive life. The Company reviews response results
from catalog mailings on a continuous basis, and if warranted,
modifies the period over which costs are recognized. The Company
amortizes the cost of each Master Catalog over an eighteen month
period and amortizes the cost of each catalog supplement over a
46
three month period. Total deferred catalog costs in prepaid
expenses and deferred charges on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
were $0.5 million as of March 25, 2006 and
$0.4 million as of March 26, 2005.
Deferred Compensation: Previously, some of
Transcats directors had elected to defer receipt of their
non-discretionary awards of shares of Common Stock under the
Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan. Deferred shares
were expensed at the market value of Common Stock at the date of
award, and the associated liability is adjusted quarterly based
on the quarter end market price of Common Stock. Directors
voluntarily elected to cease deferring shares as of
April 1, 2003. The fair market value of those deferred
shares was $0.1 million as of March 25, 2006 and
March 26, 2005.
In addition, the Company provides an annual benefit to a former
presidents spouse and former executive under the terms of
a deferred compensation agreement. The deferred compensation was
less than $0.1 million as of March 25, 2006 and
March 26, 2005.
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture: As a result
of certain post divestiture commitments, Transcat is unable to
recognize the gain of $1.5 million on the divestiture of
Transmation Products Group (TPG), which took place
in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, until those
commitments expire on December 31, 2006. See Note 8 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements for further disclosure.
Deferred Taxes: Transcat accounts for certain
income and expense items differently for financial reporting
purposes than for income tax reporting purposes. Deferred taxes
are provided in recognition of these temporary differences. A
valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets is provided for
items for which it is more likely than not that the benefit of
such items will not be realized, in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires an
assessment of both positive and negative evidence when measuring
the need for a deferred tax valuation allowance. See Note 4
of our Consolidate Financial Statements for further disclosure.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments: Transcat
has determined the fair value of debt and other financial
instruments using available market information and appropriate
valuation methodologies as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, Accounts Receivables, and Accounts Payables: The carrying
amounts reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash,
accounts receivables, and accounts payables approximate fair
value, due to their short-term nature.
|
|
|
|
Debt: The carrying amount of debt under the Credit Agreement, as
such term is defined in Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, approximates fair value due to variable
interest rate pricing.
|
Stock Options: Transcat follows the provisions
of Accounting Practice Board (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which does
not require compensation costs related to stock options to be
recorded in net income, as all options granted under the
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan had exercise prices equal to
the market value of the underlying Common Stock at grant date.
To calculate the fair value of the options awarded, the Company
elected to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
(Pricing Model), which produced a weighted average
fair value of options granted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
options awarded
|
|
$
|
3.52
|
|
|
$
|
2.38
|
|
|
$
|
1.92
|
|
The following weighted average assumptions were used in the
Pricing Model:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
Expected life
|
|
10 years
|
|
10 years
|
|
10 years
|
Annualized volatility rate
|
|
76.3%
|
|
76.9%
|
|
77.2%
|
Risk-free rate of return
|
|
4.3%
|
|
4.2%
|
|
4.2%
|
Dividend Rate
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
The Company elected to account for terminations when they occur
rather than include an attrition factor into the model.
47
Pro forma amounts are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
March 27,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net Income, as reported
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation expense included in reported net income, net of
related tax effects
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
|
|
(456
|
)
|
|
|
(341
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Net Income
|
|
$
|
3,382
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic - as reported
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
Basic - pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
6,647
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
|
|
6,252
|
|
Diluted - as reported
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Diluted - pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
7,176
|
|
|
|
6,966
|
|
|
|
6,808
|
|
The effect of applying SFAS No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation pro forma disclosure
provisions in the current year is not representative of the
effect on income for future years since each subsequent year
will reflect expense for additional vesting, additional stock
option grants, and updated assumptions.
See Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
below in this Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements for disclosure regarding the effects of
SFAS 123R. See Note 6 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further disclosure regarding the Companys
stock-based compensation.
Reclassification of Amounts: Certain
reclassifications of prior fiscal years financial
information have been made to conform with current fiscal
years presentation.
Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards:
SFAS 123R: On December 16,
2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
SFAS 123R replaces SFAS 123 and supersedes APB
No. 25. SFAS 123, as originally issued in 1995,
established as preferable a
fair-value-based
method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with
employees. However, SFAS 123 permitted entities the option
of continuing to apply the guidance in APB No. 25, as long
as the footnotes to financial statements disclosed what net
income would have been had the preferable
fair-value-based
method been used. SFAS 123R covers a wide range of
share-based compensation arrangements including share options,
restricted share plans, performance-based awards, share
appreciation rights, and employee share purchase plans.
SFAS 123R requires the cost of all share-based payment
transactions be recognized in the financial statements,
establishes fair value as the measurement objective and requires
entities to apply a
fair-value-based
measurement method in accounting for share-based payment
transactions.
The Securities and Exchange Commission amended the effective
date of SFAS 123R with a new rule issued on April 14,
2005 to amend the compliance date for SFAS 123R that allows
companies to implement SFAS 123R at the beginning of their
next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that
begins after June 15, 2005, although early adoption is
allowed. SFAS 123R permits companies to adopt its
requirements using either a modified prospective
method, or a modified retrospective method. Under
the modified prospective method, compensation cost
is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the
effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for
all share-based payments granted after that date, and based on
the requirements of SFAS 123 for all unvested awards
granted prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R. Under the
modified retrospective method, the requirements are
the same as under the modified prospective
48
method, but also permits entities to restate financial
statements of previous periods based on proforma disclosures
made in accordance with SFAS 123.
The Company is adopting SFAS 123R effective March 26,
2006 and will use the aforementioned modified prospective
method. Based upon the Companys stock option estimates and
assumptions, estimates of employee contributions to the employee
stock purchase plan, and subject to a complete management
review, the Company expects the adoption of SFAS 123R to
reduce pre-tax income and net income by approximately
$0.4 million for the fiscal year ending March 31,
2007. The Company has not changed any of its stock compensation
plans as a result of SFAS 123R, but maintains the right to
amend, suspend, or terminate any plan at any time.
SFAS 153: On December 16,
2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of
Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions
(SFAS 153). The amendments made by
SFAS 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of
nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of
the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the
narrow exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive
assets and replace it with a broader exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance.
Previously, Opinion 29 required that the accounting for an
exchange of a productive asset for a similar productive asset or
an equivalent interest in the same or similar productive asset
should be based on the recorded amount of the asset
relinquished. The Statement is effective for nonmonetary asset
exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. The Companys adoption of SFAS 153
on July 1, 2005 did not have an effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
SFAS 154: On May 5, 2005, the
FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and
Error Corrections (SFAS 154).
SFAS 154 is a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes and SFAS No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial
Statements. SFAS 154 changes the requirements for the
accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting
principle. APB Opinion No. 20 previously required that most
voluntary changes in accounting principle be recognized by
including the cumulative effect of changing to the new
accounting principle. SFAS 154 requires retrospective
application to prior periods financial statements of
changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to
determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative
effect of the changes. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting
changes and corrections of errors that Transcat might make
beginning March 26, 2006. When adopted, this Statement is
not expected to have a material impact on prior year
consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2 PROPERTIES
Properties consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Machinery, Equipment, and Software
|
|
$
|
11,368
|
|
|
$
|
10,158
|
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
1,172
|
|
Leasehold Improvements
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties
|
|
$
|
13,090
|
|
|
$
|
11,656
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation and
Amortization
|
|
|
(10,453
|
)
|
|
|
(9,672
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Properties, net
|
|
$
|
2,637
|
|
|
$
|
1,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under capital leases consist of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 25,
|
|
|
March 26,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Asset Under Capital Leases
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
Less: Accumulated Amortization
|
|
|
(145
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets Under Capital Leases,
net
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Total depreciation and amortization expense amounted to
$0.8 million, $1.0 million, and $1.0 million in
fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
NOTE 3 DEBT
Description. On November 13, 2002,
Transcat entered into a Revolving Credit and Loan Agreement (the
Credit Agreement) with GMAC Business Credit, LLC
(GMAC). The Credit Agreement consisted of a term
loan, a revolving line of credit (LOC), and certain
material terms which are as set forth below.
The Credit Agreement was amended on April 11, 2003 to
address certain non-material post closing conditions.
The Credit Agreement was further amended on July 22, 2004
to waive compliance with an EBITDA (earnings before interest,
income taxes, depreciation and amortization) covenant for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2005, permanently waive a
requirement relating to an inactive subsidiary that the Company
had committed to dissolve by a specific date (that has been
subsequently dissolved), and increase the Credit Agreement
restriction on Master Catalog spending.
Transcat amended the Credit Agreement again on November 1,
2004 (Third Amendment). The Third Amendment
consisted of two term notes, a LOC, a capital expenditure loan
option if certain conditions are met, and certain material terms
which are as set forth below. The Third Amendment also waived
compliance with the Companys EBITDA covenant for the
second quarter of fiscal year 2005 and extended the Credit
Agreement expiration from November 13, 2005 to
October 31, 2007.
The Credit Agreement was further amended on March 16, 2006
(Fourth Amendment). The Fourth Amendment provided
GMACs consent to the acquisition of N.W. Calibration
Inspection, Inc. (NWCI), reduced the interest rates
by 0.375% in all tiers and loans, extended the Credit Agreement
expiration from October 31, 2007 to October 31, 2008
and provided for a termination premium of 0.25% payable by
Transcat, if applicable, for the additional year, increased the
capital expenditure covenant for fiscal year 2006 from
$1.5 million to $2.0 million, and permitted Transcat
to include NWCI receivables in the borrowing base, upon
satisfaction of certain conditions.
Term Loans. Under the terms of the
Credit Agreement, as amended, the Company has two term loans,
Term Loan A and Term Loan B, in the amounts of
$1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The notes
representing the term loans require annual payments of
$0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, payable
over three years in equal monthly installments, commencing on
December 1, 2004. The Company is further required to reduce
the term loans on an annual basis by a percentage of excess cash
flow, as defined in the Credit Agreement, as amended. Term
Loan B will be reduced by the lesser of the balance owed on
Term Loan B or 50% of the Companys excess cash flow
payable in three monthly installments. Once Term Loan B has
been repaid, the excess cash flow payment required against Term
Loan A is 20% of the Companys excess cash flow, not
to exceed $0.2 million, annually. As of March 25,
2006, the Credit Agreement, as amended, requires the Company to
make the following principal payments on combined term loans,
after giving effect to any excess cash flow payments to be made:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Payments After
Giving
|
|
|
|
Effect to Excess Cash Flow
Payments
|
|
|
|
Term Loan A
|
|
|
Term Loan B
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal Year 2007
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
Fiscal Year 2008
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOC. Under the Credit Agreement, as
amended, the maximum amount available under the LOC portion is
$9.0 million. As of March 25, 2006, the Company was
eligible to borrow up to $7.9 million based on assets and
borrowed $3.3 million. Availability under the LOC is
determined by a formula based on eligible accounts receivable
(85%) and inventory (50%).
The Credit Agreement contains both a subjective acceleration
clause and a requirement to maintain a lock-box arrangement.
These conditions result in a short-term classification of the
LOC in accordance with EITF Issue
50
No. 95-22,
Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding
under Revolving Credit Agreements that include both a Subjective
Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Arrangement.
Interest. Interest on the term loans
and LOC is adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon the
Companys calculated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, as
defined in the Credit Agreement, as amended (see chart below).
The prime rate and the
30-day
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) as of
March 25, 2006 were 7.50% and 4.83%, respectively. The
Companys interest rate for fiscal year 2006 ranged from
5.37% to 8.00%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier
|
|
Coverage Ratio
|
|
Term Loan A
|
|
Term Loan B
|
|
LOC
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1.249 or less
|
|
(a) Prime Rate plus 0.125% or
(b) LIBOR plus 2.875%
|
|
Prime Rate plus 0.375%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
(b) LIBOR plus 2.375%
|
|
2
|
|
|
1.25 to 1.49
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.125% or
(b) LIBOR plus 2.625%
|
|
Prime Rate plus 0.125%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
(b) LIBOR plus 2.125%
|
|
3
|
|
|
1.50 or greater
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
(b) LIBOR plus 2.375%
|
|
Prime Rate minus 0.125%
|
|
(a) Prime Rate minus 0.375% or
(b) LIBOR plus 1.875%
|
Covenants. The Credit Agreement, as
amended, has certain covenants with which the Company has to
comply, including a minimum EBITDA covenant, and restrictions on
capital expenditures and Master Catalog spending. The Company
was in compliance with all loan covenants and requirements
throughout fiscal year 2006.
Loan Costs. In accordance with
EITF Issue
No. 98-14,
Debtors Accounting for Changes in
Line-of-Credit
or Revolving-Debt Arrangements, any fees paid to GMAC,
third party costs associated with the LOC, and unamortized costs
remaining under the Credit Agreement, are amortized over the
term of the Credit Agreement.
Other Terms. The Credit Agreement, as
amended, requires a termination premium should an event of
default occur. A termination premium of 1% of the advance limit
in year one, 0.5% in year two, and 0.25% in year three, as
defined in the Credit Agreement, will be incurred if the Credit
Agreement is terminated prior to its expiration date of
October 31, 2008.
Additionally, the Company has pledged certain property and
fixtures in favor of GMAC, including inventory, equipment, and
accounts receivable as collateral security for the loans made
under the Credit Agreement.
The current Credit Agreement provides for a capital expenditure
loan (Cap-x Loan). The Company has achieved an
EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, of at least
$2.4 million on a trailing twelve months basis in the
required time frame specified in the Credit Agreement and
therefore may make a Cap-x Loan of up to $1.0 million for
qualifying capital expenditures. As of March 25, 2006, the
Company has not borrowed any additional monies. The Cap-x Loan
would be payable in equal monthly payments over a 36 month
period with any residual balance resulting in a balloon payment
at October 31, 2007. Interest is adjusted on a quarterly
basis based upon the Companys calculated Fixed Charge
Coverage Ratio with the same terms as Term Loan A (see
chart above).
NOTE 4 INCOME
TAXES
Transcats net income (loss) before income taxes on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
929
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
The net (benefit) provision for income taxes determined in
accordance with SFAS No. 109 for fiscal years 2006,
2005, and 2004 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Current Tax (Benefit) Provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(35
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(205
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax (Benefit) Provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(2,453
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(2,662
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table is a reconciliation of the
expected federal income tax provision computed by
applying the statutory United States federal income tax rate and
the income tax provision reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Computed Expected
Federal Income Tax
|
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
State Income Taxes
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Book Expenses Not Deductible for
Taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(2,983
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Foreign Credits, Deductions, and
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
The components of the net deferred tax assets are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
Current Deferred Tax Assets
(Liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward(1)
|
|
$
|
713
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Reserves for Inventory Obsolescence
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Catalog Costs
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
Valuation Allowance(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
(Liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Loss Carryforward(1)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
Deferred Gain on TPG Divestiture
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
Foreign Tax Credits (expires March
2008)
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
(363
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Current Deferred Tax
Assets
|
|
$
|
2,443
|
|
|
$
|
3,501
|
|
Valuation Allowance(2)
|
|
|
(819
|
)
|
|
|
(3,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Non-Current Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
1,624
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
$
|
2,662
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of March 25, 2006, Transcat has net operating loss
carryforwards of $2.1 million, which is available to offset
future federal taxable income through March 2025. |
|
(2) |
|
Deferred taxes recognize the impact of temporary differences
between the amounts of assets and liabilities recorded for
financial statement purposes and such amounts measured in
accordance with tax laws. In general, each deferred tax asset is
reviewed for expected utilization, using a more likely
than not approach, based on the character of the item
(credit, loss, etc.), the relevant history for the particular
item, the applicable expiration dates, operating projects that
would impact utilization, and identified actions under the
control of the Company in realizing the associated benefits. |
|
|
|
The Company assesses the available positive and negative
evidence surrounding the recoverability of the deferred tax
assets and applies its judgment in estimating the amount of
valuation allowance necessary under the circumstances. |
|
|
|
For fiscal year 2005, the Company determined that it is more
likely than not that the benefits associated with the net
deferred tax assets would not be realized. Accordingly, the
Company booked a full valuation allowance against its net
deferred tax assets. |
|
|
|
In fiscal year 2006, the Company reassessed all available
evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized.
As a result of the Companys income before taxes over the
last four years and the Companys belief that its future
performance will result in sustained profitability and taxable
income, the Company reversed a significant portion of the
deferred tax valuation allowance. |
53
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys utilization of U.S. foreign tax credit
carryforwards is dependent on related statutory limitations that
involve numerous factors beyond overall positive income. In
fiscal year 2006, the Company determined that it is more likely
than not that the benefits associated with the foreign tax
credits would not be realized. |
Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for basis
differences related to the investments in the Companys
foreign subsidiary. These basis differences were approximately
$2.0 million at March 25, 2006 and consisted primarily
of undistributed earnings. These earnings are considered
permanently invested in the businesses. Determination of the
deferred income tax liability on these unremitted earnings is
not practicable because such liability, if any, is dependent on
circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs.
NOTE 5 DEFINED
CONTRIBUTION PLAN
All of Transcats United States employees are eligible to
participate in a plan providing certain qualifications are met.
Effective April 1, 1981, the Deferred Profit Sharing Plan
was adopted. Effective April 1, 1987, this plan was amended
from a non-contributory to a contributory defined contribution
plan and renamed the Long-Term Savings and Deferred Profit
Sharing Plan (Plan).
In the Long-Term Savings portion of the Plan (401K),
payments of benefits accrued for plan participants are made upon
retirement or upon termination of employment prior to retirement
providing certain conditions have been met by the employee prior
to termination. The Companys matching contributions to the
401K were $0.2 million in each of the fiscal years 2006,
2005, and 2004.
In the Deferred Profit Sharing portion of the Plan, employer
contributions are made at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. The Company made no profit sharing contributions in
fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004.
NOTE 6 STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
Stock Options: In June 2003, the Company
adopted the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (2003
Plan) which replaced the Transcat, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan (1993 Plan). The
approximately 918,000 shares that were outstanding as of
the termination of the 1993 Plan were reserved under the 2003
Plan. The 2003 Plan grants options to officers and key employees
to purchase Common Stock at no less than the fair market value
at the date of grant. Options generally vest over a period up to
four years and expire up to ten years from the date of grant.
The following table summarizes the Companys options for
fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 (shares in thousands, except
per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Price
|
|
Beginning of Year
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
Add (Deduct):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Year
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
1.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, End of Year
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
Available for Grant, End of Year
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
The following table summarizes treasury stock acquired from
cashless stock option exercises for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and
2004 (shares in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Treasury Stock Acquired in
Cashless Exercise of Stock Options
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The following table presents options outstanding and exercisable
as of March 25, 2006 (shares in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
Options
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(in Years)
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.80-$2.00
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
$2.01-$3.25
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
2.37
|
|
$3.26-$4.52
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants: Under the Directors Warrant
Plan, as amended, warrants may be granted to non-employee
directors to purchase Common Stock at the fair market value at
the date of grant. Warrants generally vest over a period of four
years and expire in five years from the date of grant. The
following table summarizes warrants for fiscal years 2006, 2005,
and 2004 (shares in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2003
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
$0.97-$3.75
|
Granted
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
$2.31
|
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$3.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 27, 2004
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
$0.97-$3.06
|
Granted
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
$2.83
|
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$3.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 26, 2005
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
$0.97-$2.91
|
Granted
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
$4.26
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$2.91
|
Cancelled and Expired
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 25, 2006
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
$2.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
The Company granted warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of
Common Stock on November 13, 2002 to the Companys
previous lenders, Key Bank, N.A. and Citizens Bank, in
accordance with a Termination Agreement for refinancing the debt
with GMAC. See Note 3 above for further disclosure
regarding debt. 100,000 shares expired in each of the
fiscal years 2005 and 2006. The following table summarizes
warrants from the Termination Agreement that were originally
granted and are outstanding as of March 25, 2006 (shares
and dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of 11/13/02
|
|
|
|
As of 3/25/06
|
Number
|
|
Pricing
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Pricing
|
of Shares
|
|
Model
|
|
Expiration
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Model
|
Outstanding
|
|
Valuation
|
|
Date
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Valuation
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
11/13/2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
11/13/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
11/13/2007
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
$
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock: The 2003 Plan also allows
the Company to grant stock awards. The stock awards granted vest
over a period of one year. The following table summarizes stock
awards for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 (shares and dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
Number of Stock Awards Granted
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Expense, based on fair market value
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
Unearned compensation was less than $0.1 million at
March 25, 2006 and March 26, 2005.
56
NOTE 7 SEGMENT
AND GEOGRAPHIC DATA
Transcat has two reportable segments: Distribution Products
(Product) and Calibration Services
(Service). The accounting policies of the reportable
segments are the same as those described above in Note 1 of
the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has no
inter-segment sales. The following table presents segment and
geographic data for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
40,814
|
|
|
$
|
37,086
|
|
|
$
|
35,423
|
|
Service
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
18,221
|
|
|
|
17,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
60,471
|
|
|
|
55,307
|
|
|
|
53,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
8,779
|
|
|
|
8,475
|
|
Service
|
|
|
5,287
|
|
|
|
5,113
|
|
|
|
4,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,099
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
13,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product(1)
|
|
|
7,934
|
|
|
|
8,090
|
|
|
|
7,326
|
|
Service(1)
|
|
|
5,647
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
5,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,581
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
13,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Benefit for Income Taxes, net
|
|
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(2,059
|
)
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
3,577
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
10,703
|
|
|
$
|
12,785
|
|
|
$
|
10,441
|
|
Service
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
6,223
|
|
|
|
6,084
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
1,199
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,488
|
|
|
$
|
20,207
|
|
|
$
|
18,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
634
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
Service
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
216
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
|
$
|
1,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Service
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
914
|
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
|
$
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain reclassifications of prior fiscal years financial
information have been made to conform with current fiscal
years presentation.
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
|
Geographic Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales to Unaffiliated
Customers(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(5)
|
|
$
|
54,778
|
|
|
$
|
50,170
|
|
|
$
|
48,309
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
5,137
|
|
|
|
5,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
60,471
|
|
|
$
|
55,307
|
|
|
$
|
53,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets(4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(5)
|
|
$
|
2,422
|
|
|
$
|
1,759
|
|
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,687
|
|
|
$
|
2,099
|
|
|
$
|
2,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating expense allocations between segments were based on
actual amounts, a percentage of sales, headcount, and
managements estimates. |
|
(2) |
|
Goodwill is allocated based on the percentage of segment revenue
acquired. For fiscal year 2006, goodwill of $3.0 million
was allocated 51% product and 49% service. For fiscal years 2005
and 2004, goodwill of $2.5 million was allocated 60%
product and 40% service. |
|
(3) |
|
Net sales are attributed to the countries based on the location
of the subsidiary making the sale. |
|
(4) |
|
Long-lived assets consist of property, plant, and equipment and
capital leases and are entirely allocated to the United States
with the exception of Canadian fixed assets. |
|
(5) |
|
United States is inclusive of Puerto Rico. |
NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS
Leases: Transcat leases facilities, equipment,
and vehicles under non-cancelable operating leases. Total rental
expense for fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 was approximately
$0.9 million. The Company leases certain computer equipment
under non-cancelable capital leases. Capital lease expenses for
fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 were less than
$0.1 million in each year. The minimum future annual rental
payments under the non-cancelable leases at March 25, 2006
are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease
payments
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconditional Purchase Obligation: In
connection with the sale of TPG to Fluke Electronics Corporation
(Fluke) in December 2001, we entered into a
distribution agreement (the Distribution Agreement)
with Fluke to be the exclusive worldwide distributor of
Transmation and Altek products until December 31, 2006.
Under the Distribution Agreement, we also agreed to purchase a
pre-determined amount of inventory from Fluke.
58
On October 31, 2002, with an effective date of
September 1, 2002, we entered into a new distribution
agreement (the New Agreement) with Fluke, which
replaced the Distribution Agreement. The New Agreement ends on
December 31, 2006. Under the terms of the New Agreement,
among other items, we agreed to purchase a larger,
pre-determined amount of inventory across a broader array of
products and brands during each calendar year. Our purchases for
calendar years 2005, 2004, and 2003 exceeded the commitment
under the New Agreement. We believe that this commitment to make
future purchases is consistent with our business needs and plans.
NOTE 9 EMPLOYEE
TERMINATION COSTS
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, the following table shows the amounts expensed
and paid in fiscal years 2006, 2005, and 2004 for severance
costs that were initially incurred and accrued in these years
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
the End of
|
|
|
|
of the Year
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
the Year
|
|
|
Severance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
NOTE 10 VENDOR
CONCENTRATION
Approximately 30% of Transcats product purchases on an
annual basis are from Fluke, which is believed to be consistent
with Flukes share of the markets the Company services.
NOTE 11 ACQUISITION
In February 2006, we acquired NWCI in Fort Wayne, Indiana,
expanding our Calibration Centers of Excellence to twelve. NWCI
provides dimensional calibration, first part inspection, and
reverse engineering services to the pharmaceutical, medical
device, and automotive industries. We paid $0.8 million in
cash and $0.1 million in stock in accordance with the
purchase agreement. We allocated the initial purchase price to
the estimated fair value of the fixed assets acquired
($0.5 million) with the excess of $0.4 million
allocated to goodwill. The goodwill is deductible for tax
purposes. The purchase agreement also provides for
performance-based payments to the sellers up to a maximum of
$0.3 million. If and when such payments come due, the
amounts paid will be added to the recorded value of goodwill.
The results of the acquired business have been included in our
calibration services segment of the Consolidated Financial
Statements since the acquisition date. Pro-forma information for
this acquisition is not included as it did not have a material
impact on the consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
59
NOTE 12 QUARTERLY
DATA (Unaudited)
The following table presents certain unaudited quarterly
financial data for fiscal years 2006 and 2005 (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
FY 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
16,054
|
|
|
$
|
4,030
|
|
|
$
|
2,765
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
16,233
|
|
|
|
3,855
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
14,119
|
|
|
|
3,609
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
14,065
|
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
FY 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
15,557
|
|
|
$
|
4,339
|
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
14,040
|
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
12,488
|
|
|
|
2,909
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
13,222
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
(Reductions) to
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
(Reductions) to
|
|
|
due to
|
|
|
at the
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Statements
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
End of
|
|
|
|
of the Year
|
|
|
of Operations
|
|
|
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
the Year
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
(64
|
)
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(63
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
Reserve for Inventory Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(238
|
)
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
Deferred Tax Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FY 2006
|
|
$
|
3,802
|
|
|
$
|
(2,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(335
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
FY 2005
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,802
|
|
FY 2004
|
|
$
|
3,728
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,793
|
|
61
ITEM 9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our principal executive officer and
our principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e))
as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based
on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our
principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of such date.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting. There has been no change in our
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the last fiscal quarter covered by this annual report (our
fourth fiscal quarter) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER
INFORMATION
Not applicable.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
|
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Executive Officers in Part I of this
Form 10-K
and the information set forth under the captions Election
of Directors, Executive Officers,
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance and Corporate Governance-Code of
Ethics in our definitive 2006 Proxy Statement to be filed
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year to which this report relates.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Executive Compensation in our definitive 2006 Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report
relates.
ITEM 12. SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item, with the exception of the
information in the table below, is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information set forth under the captions
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Security Ownership of Management in our definitive
2006 Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A
within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this
report relates.
62
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans as of March 25, 2006:
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
(In
Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be issued
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
Number of securities
|
|
|
|
upon exercise of
|
|
|
exercise price of
|
|
|
remaining available for
future
|
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
outstanding options,
|
|
|
issuance under equity
|
|
|
|
warrants, and unvested
|
|
|
warrants, and unvested
|
|
|
compensation plans (excluding
|
|
|
|
restricted stock
|
|
|
restricted stock
|
|
|
securities reflected in
column(a))
|
|
Plan category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
|
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference from the information set forth under the caption
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in
our definitive 2006 Proxy Statement to be filed pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the
fiscal year to which this report relates.
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The information required by this Item is hereby incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm in our definitive 2006 Proxy
Statement to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report
relates.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) See Index to Financial Statements included as
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
(b) Exhibits.
See Index to Exhibits beginning on page 63 of this
Form 10-K.
63
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TRANSCAT, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date: June 22, 2006
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Carl
E.
Sassano Carl
E. Sassano
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Carl
E. Sassano
Carl
E. Sassano
|
|
Director, Chairman, and Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ John
J. Zimmer
John
J. Zimmer
|
|
CFO and Vice President of Finance
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Francis
R. Bradley
Francis
R. Bradley
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ E.
Lee Garelick
E.
Lee Garelick
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Richard
J. Harrison
Richard
J. Harrison
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Nancy
D. Hessler
Nancy
D. Hessler
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Robert
G. Klimasewski
Robert
G. Klimasewski
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Paul
D. Moore
Paul
D. Moore
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Cornelius
J. Murphy
Cornelius
J. Murphy
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Harvey
J. Palmer
Harvey
J. Palmer
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ Alan
H. Resnick
Alan
H. Resnick
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
/s/ John
T. Smith
John
T. Smith
|
|
Director
|
|
|
64
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation and
By-Laws
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
The Articles of Incorporation, as
amended, are incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995 and from Exhibit 3(i) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-Laws, as amended through
August 18, 1987, are incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit (3) to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1988. (SEC File
No. 000-03905)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
Material Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.1
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Directors
Stock Plan is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10(i) to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.2
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Amended and
Restated Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 99(b) to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form
S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.3
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 99(c) to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form
S-8
(Registration Statement
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.4
|
|
Transcat, Inc. Employees
Stock Purchase Plan is incorporated herein from
Exhibit 99(e) to the Companys Registration Statement
on
Form S-8
(Registration
No. 33-61665)
filed on August 8, 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.5
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(i) to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.6
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.7
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(b) to the
Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 1996.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.8
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Transcat,
Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit II to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.9
|
|
Amendments No. 1 and
No. 2 to the Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock
Option Plan are incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibits III and IV to the Companys Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.10
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit V to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1996.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.11
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) of the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.12
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(i) to
the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.13
|
|
Amendments No. 3 and 4 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan are
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(j) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.14
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(k) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.15
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.16
|
|
Amendments No. 3 and 4 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan
are incorporated herein by reference from the Companys
definitive proxy statement filed on July 7, 1998 in
connection with the 1998 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.17
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 1998 and supercedes
Exhibit 10(b) to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 1997.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.18
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1999.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.19
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the
Companys proxy statement filed on June 21, 1999 in
connection with the 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment No. 5 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Warrant Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix B to the
Companys 1999 preliminary proxy statement filed on
June 21, 1999 in connection with the 1999 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.21
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(b) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.22
|
|
Amendment No. 6 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.23
|
|
Amendment No. 8 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.24
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to the
Transcat, Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.25
|
|
Amendment No. 8 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated Directors Stock Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(b) to
the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.26
|
|
Amendment No. 7 to the
Transcat, Inc. Directors Stock Plan is incorporated herein
by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2001.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated
December 26, 2001 by and among the Company, Altek
Industries Corp. and Fluke Electronics Corp. is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys
Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 10, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.28
|
|
Distributor Agreement dated
December 26, 2001 by and between the Company and Fluke
Electronics Corporation is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 99(a) to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 10, 2002 and Exhibit 99(a) to the
Companys Current Report on Form
8-K/A dated
June 5, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated as
of January 18, 2002 by and between the Company and Hughes
Corporation is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 2(a) to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated January 22, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.30
|
|
Amendment No. 9 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+10
|
.31
|
|
Fluke Distribution Agreement, as
amended, is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10(a) to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement dated
November 12, 2002 by and among GMAC Business Credit, LLC,
Transcat, Inc. and Transmation (Canada) Inc. is incorporated
herein by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to the Companys
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
First Amendment to Loan and
Security Agreement dated April 11, 2003 by and among GMAC
Commercial Finance LLC (successor by merger to GMAC Business
Credit, LLC), Transcat, Inc. and Transmation (Canada) Inc. is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.34
|
|
Amendment No. 10 to the
Transcat, Inc. Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10(a) to the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.35
|
|
Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan
is incorporated herein by reference from Appendix A to the
Companys 2003 definitive proxy statement filed on
July 18, 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Second Amendment to Loan and
Security Agreement dated July 22, 2004 by and among GMAC
Commercial Finance LLC (successor by merger to GMAC Business
Credit, LLC), Transcat, Inc. and Transmation (Canada) Inc. is
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 26, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Third Amendment to Loan and
Security Agreement by and among Transcat, Inc., Transmation
(Canada) Inc. and GMAC Commercial Finance LLC dated
November 1, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated November 1, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.38
|
|
Form of Award Notice for Incentive
Stock Options granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.1
to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.39
|
|
Form of Award Notice for
Restricted Stock granted under the Transcat, Inc. 2003 Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.2
the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 25, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.40
|
|
Form of Warrant Certificate
representing warrants granted under the Amended and Restated
Directors Warrant Plan is incorporated herein by reference
from Exhibit 10.42 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.41
|
|
Form of Award Notice for
Non-Qualified Stock Options granted under the Transcat, Inc.
2003 Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 24, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and
among Transcat, Inc., N.W. Calibration Inspection, Inc. and the
stockholders of N.W. Calibration Inspection, Inc. dated as of
February 28, 2006 is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated February 28, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Loan and
Security Agreement by and among Transcat, Inc., Transmation
(Canada) Inc. and GMAC Commercial Finance LLC dated
March 16, 2006 is incorporated herein by reference from
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated March 16, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.44
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated
Agreement for Severance Upon Change in Control for Carl E.
Sassano and Charles P. Hadeed is incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form
8-K dated
April 19, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.45
|
|
Certain compensation information
for Carl E. Sassano, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Charles P. Hadeed, President and
Chief Operating Officer of the Company, is incorporated herein
by reference from the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 16, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
|
.46
|
|
Certain compensation information
for John J. Zimmer, Vice President of Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, is incorporated herein by
reference from the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated May 23, 2006.
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
Statement re computation of per
share earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computation can be clearly
determined from the Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income included in this
Form 10-K
as Item 8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
Subsidiaries of the registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23)
|
|
Consents of experts and counsel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32)
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Exhibits filed with this report. |
|
# |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
+ |
|
The Company has requested confidential treatment of certain
information contained in this Exhibit. Such information has been
filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Companys application for confidential
treatment under 17 C.F.R. § 200.80(b)(4) and
§ 240.24b-2. |
68