TRINITY INDUSTRIES INC - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-6903
Trinity Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 75-0225040 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
2525 Stemmons Freeway Dallas, Texas |
75207-2401 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(214) 631-4420
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one).
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x.
At July 13, 2012 the number of shares of common stock outstanding was 79,002,339.
Table of Contents
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
Caption |
Page |
|||
2 | ||||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
24 | |||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
35 | |||
35 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
36 | |||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
37 | ||||
38 | ||||
CERTIFICATIONS |
1
Table of Contents
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
$ | 836.1 | $ | 580.1 | $ | 1,619.3 | $ | 1,094.5 | ||||||||
Leasing |
192.3 | 128.2 | 334.4 | 248.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
1,028.4 | 708.3 | 1,953.7 | 1,342.5 | |||||||||||||
Operating costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
694.9 | 498.2 | 1,366.9 | 929.9 | ||||||||||||
Leasing |
112.1 | 63.3 | 185.5 | 123.8 | ||||||||||||
Other |
14.4 | 7.4 | 25.5 | 15.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
821.4 | 568.9 | 1,577.9 | 1,069.2 | |||||||||||||
Selling, engineering, and administrative expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
39.1 | 33.4 | 75.6 | 67.4 | ||||||||||||
Leasing |
7.3 | 5.6 | 13.4 | 11.3 | ||||||||||||
Other |
9.6 | 8.5 | 20.9 | 19.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
56.0 | 47.5 | 109.9 | 97.8 | |||||||||||||
Gains on disposition of property, plant, and equipment: |
||||||||||||||||
Net gains on railcar lease fleet sales |
1.6 | 0.4 | 5.3 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Other |
2.3 | 3.1 | 6.1 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating profit |
154.9 | 95.4 | 277.3 | 180.9 | ||||||||||||
Other (income) expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
(0.3 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense |
47.9 | 43.8 | 95.8 | 88.3 | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
(0.0 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (3.0 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
47.6 | 42.8 | 92.1 | 86.5 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
107.3 | 52.6 | 185.2 | 94.4 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
39.8 | 21.0 | 65.4 | 37.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
67.5 | 31.6 | 119.8 | 57.2 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(0.3 | ) | 1.6 | (0.9 | ) | 3.0 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. |
$ | 67.8 | $ | 30.0 | $ | 120.7 | $ | 54.2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.84 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.84 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
77.7 | 77.4 | 77.7 | 77.2 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
77.9 | 77.7 | 77.9 | 77.5 | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.17 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 67.5 | $ | 31.6 | $ | 119.8 | $ | 57.2 | ||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) arising during the period |
0.3 | (12.5 | ) | 3.0 | 1.8 | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustments for losses included in net income |
2.2 | 0.9 | 4.5 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment reclassification adjustment for loss included in net income |
1.1 | (0.1 | ) | 1.1 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Funded status of pension liability amortization of actuarial loss |
0.8 | | 1.7 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax |
4.4 | (11.7 | ) | 10.3 | 3.4 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) related to components of other comprehensive income (loss) |
1.6 | (4.3 | ) | 4.0 | 1.1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
2.8 | (7.4 | ) | 6.3 | 2.3 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income |
70.3 | 24.2 | 126.1 | 59.5 | ||||||||||||
Less: comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(0.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | 3.4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. |
$ | 70.4 | $ | 24.5 | $ | 126.3 | $ | 56.1 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 294.1 | $ | 351.1 | ||||
Receivables, net of allowance |
334.9 | 384.3 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
5.2 | 1.6 | ||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
385.4 | 324.8 | ||||||
Work in process |
143.0 | 125.6 | ||||||
Finished goods |
121.5 | 99.5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
649.9 | 549.9 | |||||||
Restricted cash, including TRIP Holdings of $59.5 and $74.6 |
218.9 | 240.3 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, at cost, including TRIP Holdings of $1,271.3 and $1,257.7 |
5,560.2 | 5,407.9 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation, including TRIP Holdings of $137.3 and $122.7 |
(1,309.0 | ) | (1,228.4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4,251.2 | 4,179.5 | |||||||
Goodwill |
226.6 | 225.9 | ||||||
Other assets |
216.7 | 188.4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 6,197.5 | $ | 6,121.0 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 234.6 | $ | 207.4 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
394.1 | 421.3 | ||||||
Debt: |
||||||||
Recourse, net of unamortized discount of $93.8 and $99.8 |
461.5 | 457.7 | ||||||
Non-recourse: |
||||||||
Parent and wholly-owned subsidiaries |
1,568.7 | 1,616.0 | ||||||
TRIP Holdings |
880.3 | 901.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
2,910.5 | 2,974.9 | |||||||
Deferred income |
37.9 | 38.7 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
504.5 | 434.7 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
87.7 | 95.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4,169.3 | 4,172.7 | |||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock 1.5 shares authorized and unissued |
| | ||||||
Common stock 200.0 shares authorized |
81.7 | 81.7 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
638.1 | 626.5 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
1,419.4 | 1,314.7 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(128.4 | ) | (134.0 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock |
(66.9 | ) | (25.1 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,943.9 | 1,863.8 | |||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
84.3 | 84.5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
2,028.2 | 1,948.3 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 6,197.5 | $ | 6,121.0 | |||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 119.8 | $ | 57.2 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
98.7 | 95.4 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
12.5 | 9.4 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
(1.2 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
61.9 | 16.6 | ||||||
Net gains on sales of railcars owned more than one year at the time of sale |
(5.3 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||
Gain on disposition of property, plant, equipment, and other assets |
(6.1 | ) | (3.9 | ) | ||||
Other |
5.5 | 6.6 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
(Increase) decrease in receivables |
49.4 | (99.2 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in income tax receivable |
(3.6 | ) | 3.0 | |||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
(100.0 | ) | (138.4 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(26.0 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
27.2 | 57.2 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities |
(29.4 | ) | (5.4 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
(4.9 | ) | 17.0 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
198.5 | 8.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
(Increase) decrease in short-term marketable securities |
| 116.0 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of railcars owned more than one year at the time of sale |
34.1 | 12.2 | ||||||
Proceeds from lease fleet sales sale and leaseback |
7.2 | | ||||||
Proceeds from disposition of property, plant, equipment, and other assets |
13.3 | 5.3 | ||||||
Capital expenditures leasing, net of sold railcars owned one year or less |
(172.5 | ) | (151.9 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures manufacturing and other |
(36.8 | ) | (24.6 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
| (15.3 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash required by investing activities |
(154.7 | ) | (58.3 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net |
1.4 | 1.6 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
1.2 | 0.3 | ||||||
Payments to retire debt other |
(86.7 | ) | (79.1 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt |
16.2 | 52.7 | ||||||
Deferred loan issuance costs |
| (5.9 | ) | |||||
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
21.4 | 1.8 | ||||||
Shares repurchased |
(35.2 | ) | | |||||
Dividends paid to common shareholders |
(14.5 | ) | (12.7 | ) | ||||
Other |
(4.6 | ) | (6.1 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash required by financing activities |
(100.8 | ) | (47.4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(57.0 | ) | (96.9 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
351.1 | 354.0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 294.1 | $ | 257.1 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
(unaudited)
Common Stock |
Treasury Stock |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital in Excess of Par Value |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Shares | Amount | Trinity Stockholders Equity |
Noncontrolling Interest |
Total Stockholders Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2011 |
81.7 | $ | 81.7 | $ | 626.5 | $ | 1,314.7 | $ | (134.0 | ) | (1.5 | ) | $ | (25.1 | ) | $ | 1,863.8 | $ | 84.5 | $ | 1,948.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 120.7 | | | | 120.7 | (0.9 | ) | 119.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | | | 5.6 | | | 5.6 | 0.7 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends on common stock | | | | (16.0 | ) | | | | (16.0 | ) | | (16.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted shares issued, net |
| | 10.7 | | | 0.4 | (1.3 | ) | 9.4 | | 9.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased |
| | | | | (1.7 | ) | (41.2 | ) | (41.2 | ) | | (41.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
| | 0.7 | | | 0.1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
| | 0.2 | | | | | 0.2 | | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at June 30, 2012 |
81.7 | $ | 81.7 | $ | 638.1 | $ | 1,419.4 | $ | (128.4 | ) | (2.7 | ) | $ | (66.9 | ) | $ | 1,943.9 | $ | 84.3 | $ | 2,028.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Trinity Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The foregoing consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared from the books and records of Trinity Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Trinity, Company, we, or our) including its majority-owned subsidiary, TRIP Rail Holdings LLC (TRIP Holdings). In our opinion, all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2012, and the results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, have been made in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of seasonal and other factors, the results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2012 may not be indicative of expected results of operations for the year ending December 31, 2012. These interim financial statements and notes are condensed as permitted by the instructions to Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Stockholders Equity
In December 2010, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a $200 million share repurchase program, effective January 1, 2011, which expires on December 31, 2012. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 1,692,229 shares under this program at a cost of approximately $41.2 million. Certain shares of stock repurchased during June 2012, totaling $6.0 million, were cash settled in July 2012 in accordance with normal settlement practices. No shares were repurchased under this program during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
Financial Instruments
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk are primarily cash investments, short-term marketable securities, and receivables. At June 30, 2012, one customers net receivable balance in our Energy Equipment Group, all within terms, accounted for approximately 20% of the consolidated net receivables balance outstanding.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (ASC Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income, (ASU 2011-05) which amended current comprehensive income guidance. ASU 2011-05 became effective for public companies during the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. Accordingly, the Company adopted this new standard on January 1, 2012 by including the consolidated statement of comprehensive income with its consolidated financial statements and revising Note 15 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows as it only requires a change in reporting format with regard to components of other comprehensive income.
Reclassifications
Effective December 31, 2011, the Company adopted the emerging industry policy of recognizing revenue from the sales of railcars from the lease fleet on a gross basis in leasing revenues and cost of revenues if the railcar has been owned by the lease fleet for one year or less at the time of sale. Sales of railcars from the lease fleet which have been owned by the lease fleet for more than one year are recognized as a net gain or loss from the disposal of a long-term asset. Prior year reported balances have been reclassified to conform to this policy resulting in a decrease in revenue of $2.2 million and $12.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The adoption of this policy had no effect on operating profit or net income. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to conform to the 2012 presentation.
7
Table of Contents
Note 2. Acquisitions and Divestitures
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, all of our acquisition and divestiture activity occurred in the Construction Products Group as summarized below:
Acquisitions | Divestitures | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total cost | Net cash paid |
Goodwill recorded |
Proceeds | Gain recognized |
Goodwill charged off |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
$ | 2.0 | $ | | $ | 0.8 | $ | 2.1 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
$ | 23.6 | $ | 15.3 | $ | 7.0 | $ | 8.3 | $ | 0.7 | $ | 1.0 |
Note 3. Fair Value Accounting
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurement as of June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 139.8 | $ | | $ | | $ | 139.8 | ||||||||
Restricted cash |
218.9 | | | 218.9 | ||||||||||||
Equity call agreement with TRIP Holdings equity investor1 |
| | 0.6 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||
Fuel derivative instruments1 |
| 0.0 | | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 358.7 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 359.3 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate hedges:2 |
||||||||||||||||
Wholly-owned subsidiary |
$ | | $ | 44.3 | $ | | $ | 44.3 | ||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
| 5.4 | | 5.4 | ||||||||||||
Equity put agreement with TRIP Holdings equity investor3 |
| | 2.2 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Fuel derivative instruments2 |
| 0.3 | | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | | $ | 50.0 | $ | 2.2 | $ | 52.2 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Fair Value Measurement as of December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 246.6 | $ | | $ | | $ | 246.6 | ||||||||
Restricted cash |
240.3 | | | 240.3 | ||||||||||||
Equity call agreement with TRIP Holdings equity investor1 |
| | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 486.9 | $ | | $ | 0.7 | $ | 487.6 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate hedges:2 |
||||||||||||||||
Wholly-owned subsidiary |
$ | | $ | 48.9 | $ | | $ | 48.9 | ||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
| 4.8 | | 4.8 | ||||||||||||
Equity put agreement with TRIP Holdings equity investor3 |
| | 3.1 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
Fuel derivative instruments2 |
| 0.1 | | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
$ | | $ | 53.8 | $ | 3.1 | $ | 56.9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 | Included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. |
2 | Included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. |
3 | Included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. |
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. An entity is required to establish a fair value hierarchy that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values are listed below:
8
Table of Contents
Level 1 This level is defined as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Companys cash equivalents and restricted cash are instruments of the United States Treasury or highly-rated money market mutual funds.
Level 2 This level is defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. The Companys fuel derivative instruments, which are commodity options, are valued using energy and commodity market data. Interest rate hedges are valued at exit prices obtained from each counterparty. See Note 7 Derivative Instruments and Note 11 Debt.
Level 3 This level is defined as unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The equity put and call agreements with the TRIP equity investor are valued based on cash flow projections and certain assumptions regarding the likelihood of exercising the option under the related agreement. See Note 6 Investment in TRIP Holdings.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our long-term debt are as follows:
June 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
|||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Recourse: |
||||||||||||||||
Convertible subordinated notes |
$ | 450.0 | $ | 450.2 | $ | 450.0 | $ | 439.4 | ||||||||
Less: unamortized discount |
(93.8 | ) | (99.8 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
356.2 | 350.2 | |||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
47.2 | 47.2 | 48.6 | 48.6 | ||||||||||||
Term loan |
52.4 | 55.6 | 54.7 | 55.7 | ||||||||||||
Other |
5.7 | 5.7 | 4.2 | 4.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
461.5 | 558.7 | 457.7 | 547.9 | |||||||||||||
Non-recourse: |
||||||||||||||||
2006 secured railcar equipment notes |
262.6 | 283.1 | 269.3 | 278.5 | ||||||||||||
Promissory notes |
452.6 | 433.8 | 465.5 | 448.6 | ||||||||||||
2009 secured railcar equipment notes |
213.9 | 242.1 | 218.4 | 228.6 | ||||||||||||
2010 secured railcar equipment notes |
348.2 | 354.8 | 354.3 | 333.1 | ||||||||||||
TILC warehouse facility |
291.4 | 291.4 | 308.5 | 308.5 | ||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings senior secured notes |
61.2 | 62.8 | 61.2 | 61.6 | ||||||||||||
TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes |
819.1 | 892.4 | 840.0 | 834.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
2,449.0 | 2,560.4 | 2,517.2 | 2,493.8 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,910.5 | $ | 3,119.1 | $ | 2,974.9 | $ | 3,041.7 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of our convertible subordinated notes was based on a quoted market price as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively (level 1 input). The estimated fair values of our 2006, 2009, and 2010 secured railcar equipment notes, promissory notes, TRIP Holdings senior secured notes, TRIP Rail Master Funding LLC (TRIP Master Funding) secured railcar equipment notes, and term loan are based on our estimate of their fair value as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These values were determined by discounting their future cash flows at the current market interest rate (level 3 inputs). The carrying value of our Trinity Industries Leasing Company (TILC) warehouse facility approximates fair value because the interest rate adjusts to the market interest rate and the Companys credit rating has not changed since the loan agreement was renewed in February 2011 (level 3 input). The fair values of all other financial instruments are estimated to approximate carrying value.
Note 4. Segment Information
The Company reports operating results in five principal business segments: (1) the Rail Group, which manufactures and sells railcars and related parts and components; (2) the Construction Products Group, which manufactures and sells highway products and concrete and aggregates; (3) the Inland Barge Group, which manufactures and sells barges and related products for inland waterway services; (4) the Energy Equipment Group, which manufactures and sells products for energy related businesses, including structural wind towers, tank containers and tank heads for pressure and non-pressure vessels, frac tanks, and utility, traffic, and lighting structures; and (5) the Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group (Leasing Group), which provides fleet management, maintenance, and leasing services. The segment All Other includes our captive insurance and transportation companies; legal, environmental, and maintenance costs associated with non-operating facilities; other peripheral businesses; and the change in market valuation related to ineffective commodity hedges. Gains and losses from the sale of property, plant, and equipment which are related to manufacturing and dedicated to the specific manufacturing operations of a particular segment are included in operating profit of that respective segment. Gains and losses from the sale of property, plant, and equipment that can be utilized by multiple segments are included in operating profit of the All Other segment.
9
Table of Contents
Sales and related net profits from the Rail Group to the Leasing Group are recorded in the Rail Group and eliminated in consolidation. Sales between these groups are recorded at prices comparable to those charged to external customers taking into consideration quantity, features, and production demand. Amortization of deferred profit on railcars sold to the Leasing Group is included in the operating profits of the Leasing Group. Sales of railcars from the lease fleet are included in the Leasing Group.
The financial information for these segments is shown in the tables below. We operate principally in North America.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
Revenues | Operating | |||||||||||||||
Profit | ||||||||||||||||
External | Intersegment | Total | (Loss) | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Rail Group |
$ | 380.2 | $ | 136.7 | $ | 516.9 | $ | 53.0 | ||||||||
Construction Products Group |
151.6 | 5.2 | 156.8 | 15.2 | ||||||||||||
Inland Barge Group |
173.9 | | 173.9 | 36.6 | ||||||||||||
Energy Equipment Group |
126.6 | 4.1 | 130.7 | 4.0 | ||||||||||||
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
192.3 | 1.9 | 194.2 | 76.4 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
3.8 | 17.0 | 20.8 | (6.3 | ) | |||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | (9.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
| (132.3 | ) | (132.3 | ) | (12.2 | ) | |||||||||
Eliminations Other |
| (32.6 | ) | (32.6 | ) | (2.2 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consolidated Total |
$ | 1,028.4 | $ | | $ | 1,028.4 | $ | 154.9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
Revenues | Operating | |||||||||||||||
Profit | ||||||||||||||||
External | Intersegment | Total | (Loss) | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Rail Group |
$ | 197.3 | $ | 83.4 | $ | 280.7 | $ | 15.4 | ||||||||
Construction Products Group |
148.0 | 1.3 | 149.3 | 16.1 | ||||||||||||
Inland Barge Group |
117.8 | | 117.8 | 19.1 | ||||||||||||
Energy Equipment Group |
115.1 | 2.4 | 117.5 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
128.2 | | 128.2 | 59.7 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
1.9 | 12.4 | 14.3 | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | (8.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
| (79.5 | ) | (79.5 | ) | (7.1 | ) | |||||||||
Eliminations Other |
| (20.0 | ) | (20.0 | ) | (0.4 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consolidated Total |
$ | 708.3 | $ | | $ | 708.3 | $ | 95.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
Revenues | Operating | |||||||||||||||
Profit | ||||||||||||||||
External | Intersegment | Total | (Loss) | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Rail Group |
$ | 721.4 | $ | 262.6 | $ | 984.0 | $ | 93.1 | ||||||||
Construction Products Group |
301.2 | 10.6 | 311.8 | 26.0 | ||||||||||||
Inland Barge Group |
343.3 | | 343.3 | 66.6 | ||||||||||||
Energy Equipment Group |
246.7 | 9.0 | 255.7 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
334.4 | 2.1 | 336.5 | 142.9 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
6.7 | 29.8 | 36.5 | (5.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | (21.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
| (254.9 | ) | (254.9 | ) | (23.1 | ) | |||||||||
Eliminations Other |
| (59.2 | ) | (59.2 | ) | (2.1 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consolidated Total |
$ | 1,953.7 | $ | | $ | 1,953.7 | $ | 277.3 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Table of Contents
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
Revenues | Operating | |||||||||||||||
Profit | ||||||||||||||||
External | Intersegment | Total | (Loss) | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Rail Group |
$ | 328.3 | $ | 172.2 | $ | 500.5 | $ | 24.7 | ||||||||
Construction Products Group |
278.1 | 4.8 | 282.9 | 24.4 | ||||||||||||
Inland Barge Group |
255.7 | | 255.7 | 40.8 | ||||||||||||
Energy Equipment Group |
228.3 | 7.9 | 236.2 | 11.7 | ||||||||||||
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
248.0 | | 248.0 | 114.4 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
4.1 | 23.3 | 27.4 | (0.5 | ) | |||||||||||
Corporate |
| | | (19.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
| (164.9 | ) | (164.9 | ) | (15.2 | ) | |||||||||
Eliminations Other |
| (43.3 | ) | (43.3 | ) | (0.3 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consolidated Total |
$ | 1,342.5 | $ | | $ | 1,342.5 | $ | 180.9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective December 31, 2011, the Company adopted the emerging industry policy of recognizing revenue from the sales of railcars from the lease fleet on a gross basis in leasing revenues and cost of revenues if the railcar has been owned by the lease fleet for one year or less at the time of sale. Sales of railcars from the lease fleet which have been owned by the lease fleet for more than one year are recognized as a net gain or loss from the disposal of a long-term asset. Prior year reported balances have been reclassified to conform to this policy.
11
Table of Contents
Note 5. Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
The Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group provides fleet management, maintenance, and leasing services. Selected consolidating financial information for the Leasing Group is as follows:
June 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing Group | ||||||||||||||||
Wholly- Owned Subsidiaries |
TRIP Holdings |
Manufacturing/ Corporate |
Total | |||||||||||||
(in millions, unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2.2 | $ | | $ | 291.9 | $ | 294.1 | ||||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
$ | 3,148.0 | $ | 1,134.0 | $ | 503.7 | $ | 4,785.7 | ||||||||
Net deferred profit on railcars sold to the Leasing Group |
(349.7 | ) | (184.8 | ) | | (534.5 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 2,798.3 | $ | 949.2 | $ | 503.7 | $ | 4,251.2 | |||||||||
Restricted cash |
$ | 159.4 | $ | 59.5 | $ | | $ | 218.9 | ||||||||
Debt: |
||||||||||||||||
Recourse |
$ | 99.6 | $ | | $ | 455.7 | $ | 555.3 | ||||||||
Less: unamortized discount |
| | (93.8 | ) | (93.8 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
99.6 | | 361.9 | 461.5 | |||||||||||||
Non-recourse |
1,568.7 | 989.1 | | 2,557.8 | ||||||||||||
Less: non-recourse debt owned by Trinity |
| (108.8 | ) | | (108.8 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 1,668.3 | $ | 880.3 | $ | 361.9 | $ | 2,910.5 | ||||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | 579.5 | $ | 4.4 | $ | (79.4 | ) | $ | 504.5 |
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Leasing Group | ||||||||||||||||
Wholly- Owned Subsidiaries |
TRIP Holdings |
Manufacturing/ Corporate |
Total | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3.2 | $ | | $ | 347.9 | $ | 351.1 | ||||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
$ | 3,066.0 | $ | 1,135.0 | $ | 510.0 | $ | 4,711.0 | ||||||||
Net deferred profit on railcars sold to the Leasing Group |
(344.5 | ) | (187.0 | ) | | (531.5 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 2,721.5 | $ | 948.0 | $ | 510.0 | $ | 4,179.5 | |||||||||
Restricted cash |
$ | 165.7 | $ | 74.6 | $ | | $ | 240.3 | ||||||||
Debt: |
||||||||||||||||
Recourse |
$ | 103.3 | $ | | $ | 454.2 | $ | 557.5 | ||||||||
Less: unamortized discount |
| | (99.8 | ) | (99.8 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
103.3 | | 354.4 | 457.7 | |||||||||||||
Non-recourse |
1,616.0 | 1,010.0 | | 2,626.0 | ||||||||||||
Less: non-recourse debt owned by Trinity |
| (108.8 | ) | | (108.8 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 1,719.3 | $ | 901.2 | $ | 354.4 | $ | 2,974.9 | ||||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | 582.4 | $ | 4.7 | $ | (152.4 | ) | $ | 434.7 |
See Note 6 Investment in TRIP Holdings and Note 11 Debt for a further discussion regarding the Companys investment in TRIP Holdings and TRIP Holdings debt.
12
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Percent | 2012 | 2011 | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Change | ($ in millions) | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholly owned subsidiaries: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
$ | 102.2 | $ | 92.9 | 10.0 | % | $ | 200.5 | $ | 183.2 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1) |
62.2 | 6.6 | * | 77.1 | 6.6 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
164.4 | 99.5 | 65.2 | 277.6 | 189.8 | 46.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
29.8 | 28.7 | 3.8 | 58.9 | 58.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1) |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
29.8 | 28.7 | 3.8 | 58.9 | 58.2 | 1.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 194.2 | $ | 128.2 | 51.5 | $ | 336.5 | $ | 248.0 | 35.7 | ||||||||||||||
Operating Profit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholly owned subsidiaries: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
$ | 44.0 | $ | 39.5 | $ | 87.1 | $ | 76.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Railcars owned one year or less at the time of sale |
13.5 | 3.0 | 16.4 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Railcars owned more than one year at the time of sale |
1.6 | 0.4 | 5.7 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
59.1 | 42.9 | 109.2 | 80.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
17.3 | 16.8 | 34.1 | 33.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Railcars owned one year or less at the time of sale |
| | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Railcars owned more than one year at the time of sale |
| | (0.4 | ) | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
17.3 | 16.8 | 33.7 | 34.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total operating profit |
$ | 76.4 | $ | 59.7 | $ | 142.9 | $ | 114.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating profit margin: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
46.4 | % | 46.3 | % | 46.7 | % | 45.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1) |
* | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating profit margin |
39.3 | 46.6 | 42.5 | 46.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and rent expense(2): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rent expense |
$ | 12.8 | $ | 12.2 | $ | 25.5 | $ | 24.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholly-owned subsidiaries |
$ | 24.3 | $ | 25.4 | $ | 48.9 | $ | 50.6 | ||||||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
External |
15.0 | 10.8 | 30.2 | 22.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany |
3.2 | | 6.5 | | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
18.2 | 10.8 | 36.7 | 22.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
$ | 42.5 | $ | 36.2 | $ | 85.6 | $ | 72.9 |
* | Not meaningful |
(1) | Effective December 31, 2011, the Company adopted the emerging industry policy of recognizing revenue from the sales of railcars from the lease fleet on a gross basis in leasing revenues and cost of revenues if the railcar has been owned by the lease fleet for one year or less at the time of sale. Sales of railcars from the lease fleet which have been owned by the lease fleet for more than one year are recognized as a net gain or loss from the disposal of a long-term asset. Prior year reported balances have been reclassified to conform to this policy. |
(2) | Rent expense is a component of operating profit. Interest expense is not a component of operating profit and includes the effect of hedges. Intercompany interest expense arises from Trinitys ownership of a portion of TRIP Holdings Senior Secured Notes and is eliminated in consolidation. See Note 11 Debt. |
Equipment consists primarily of railcars leased by third parties. The Leasing Group purchases equipment manufactured predominantly by the Rail Group and enters into lease contracts with third parties with terms generally ranging between one and twenty years. The Leasing Group primarily enters into operating leases. Future contractual minimum rental revenues on leases are as follows:
13
Table of Contents
Remaining six months of 2012 |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholly-owned subsidiaries |
$ | 140.8 | $ | 239.8 | $ | 187.4 | $ | 146.1 | $ | 110.5 | $ | 219.0 | $ | 1,043.6 | ||||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
47.7 | 75.6 | 54.4 | 44.4 | 37.3 | 64.8 | 324.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
$ | 188.5 | $ | 315.4 | $ | 241.8 | $ | 190.5 | $ | 147.8 | $ | 283.8 | $ | 1,367.8 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt. The Leasing Groups debt at June 30, 2012 consisted of both recourse and non-recourse debt. As of June 30, 2012, Trinitys wholly-owned subsidiaries included in the Leasing Group held equipment with a net book value of approximately $2,430.8 million that is pledged as collateral for Leasing Group debt held by those subsidiaries, including equipment with a net book value of $50.3 million securing capital lease obligations. The net book value of unpledged equipment at June 30, 2012 was $621.9 million. See Note 11 Debt regarding Leasing Group debt.
TRIP Holdings. Debt owed by TRIP Holdings and its subsidiaries is nonrecourse to Trinity and TILC and is secured solely by the consolidated assets of TRIP Holdings and the equity interests of TRIP Holdings. In July 2011, TRIP Holdings and its newly-formed subsidiary, TRIP Master Funding, issued $1,032.0 million in new debt and repaid all of the outstanding borrowings of the existing TRIP Warehouse Loan. TRIP Master Funding equipment with a net book value of $1,134.0 million, excluding deferred profit resulting from the sale of railcars to TRIP Master Funding, is pledged as collateral for the TRIP Master Funding debt. See Note 6 Investment in TRIP Holdings for a description of TRIP Holdings.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements. In prior years, the Leasing Group completed a series of financing transactions whereby railcars were sold to one or more separate independent owner trusts (Trusts). Each of the Trusts financed the purchase of the railcars with a combination of debt and equity. In each transaction, the equity participant in the Trust is considered to be the primary beneficiary of the Trust and therefore, the debt related to the Trust is not included as part of the consolidated financial statements. The Leasing Group, through newly formed, wholly-owned, qualified subsidiaries, leased railcars from the Trusts under operating leases with terms of 22 years, and subleased the railcars to independent third-party customers under shorter term operating rental agreements.
These Leasing Group subsidiaries had total assets as of June 30, 2012 of $211.2 million, including cash of $83.3 million and railcars of $95.2 million. The right, title, and interest in each sublease, cash, and railcars are pledged to collateralize the lease obligations to the Trusts and are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company. Trinity does not guarantee the performance of the subsidiaries lease obligations. Certain ratios and cash deposits must be maintained by the Leasing Groups subsidiaries in order for excess cash flow, as defined in the agreements, from the lease to third parties to be available to Trinity. Future operating lease obligations of the Leasing Groups subsidiaries as well as future contractual minimum rental revenues related to these leases due to the Leasing Group are as follows:
Remaining six months of 2012 |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future operating lease obligations of Trusts railcars |
$ | 22.7 | $ | 45.6 | $ | 44.8 | $ | 43.1 | $ | 40.1 | $ | 341.3 | $ | 537.6 | ||||||||||||||
Future contractual minimum rental revenues of Trusts railcars |
$ | 30.3 | $ | 47.2 | $ | 32.0 | $ | 23.9 | $ | 16.2 | $ | 27.1 | $ | 176.7 |
Operating Lease Obligations. Future amounts due as well as future contractual minimum rental revenues related to operating leases other than leases with the Trusts are as follows:
Remaining six months of 2012 |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future operating lease obligations |
$ | 4.5 | $ | 8.9 | $ | 8.8 | $ | 8.8 | $ | 8.6 | $ | 38.0 | $ | 77.6 | ||||||||||||||
Future contractual minimum rental revenues |
$ | 5.3 | $ | 10.2 | $ | 9.3 | $ | 6.0 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 7.6 | $ | 43.4 |
Operating lease obligations totaling $28.2 million are guaranteed by Trinity Industries, Inc. and certain subsidiaries. See Note 5 of the December 31, 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements filed on Form 10-K for a detailed explanation of these financing transactions.
14
Table of Contents
Note 6. Investment in TRIP Holdings
In 2007, the Company and other third-party equity investors formed TRIP Holdings for the purpose of providing railcar leasing and management services in North America. TRIP Holdings, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, TRIP Rail Leasing LLC (TRIP Leasing), purchased railcars from the Companys Rail and Leasing Groups funded by capital contributions from TRIP Holdings equity investors and borrowings under the TRIP Warehouse Loan. As of June 30, 2012, TRIP Holdings subsidiaries had purchased $1,325.2 million of railcars from the Company. Railcars purchased from the Company by TRIP Holdings subsidiaries were required to be purchased at prices comparable with the prices of all similar, new railcars sold contemporaneously by the Company and at prices based on third-party appraised values for used railcars.
In July 2011, as a result of refinancing TRIP Holdings previous credit facility, TRIP Holdings and its newly-formed subsidiary, TRIP Master Funding, issued $1,032.0 million in new debt. The debt was used by TRIP Master Funding to purchase all of the railcar equipment owned by TRIP Leasing which, in turn, repaid all outstanding borrowings under the then existing TRIP credit facility and settled all outstanding related interest rate hedges. See Note 11 Debt regarding TRIP Holdings and its related debt. Additionally, Trinity entered into agreements with an equity investor of TRIP Holdings potentially requiring Trinity, under certain limited circumstances, to acquire from the equity investor an additional 16.3% equity ownership in TRIP Holdings if the option is exercised to its fullest extent. Under the agreement, if exercised, Trinity would be required to pay the equity investor an amount equal to 90% of the equity investors net investment in TRIP Holdings. Similarly, at its option, Trinity, under certain limited circumstances, may acquire all of the equity investors equity ownership in TRIP Holdings at an amount equal to 100% of the equity investors net investment in TRIP Holdings. The agreements expire in July 2014. See Note 3 Fair Value Accounting.
At June 30, 2012, the Company owned 57% of TRIP Holdings with the remainder owned by three other third-party equity investors. The Company receives distributions from TRIP Holdings as an equity investor, when allowed, in proportion to its 57% equity interest, and has an interest in the net assets of TRIP Holdings upon a liquidation event in the same proportion. The terms of the Companys equity investment are identical to the terms of each of the other equity investors. Other than as described above, Trinity had no remaining equity commitment to TRIP Holdings as of June 30, 2012 and had no obligation to guarantee performance under any TRIP-related debt agreements, guarantee any railcar residual values, shield any parties from losses, or guarantee minimum yields.
The Companys carrying value of its investment in TRIP Holdings is as follows:
June 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Capital contributions |
$ | 47.3 | $ | 47.3 | ||||
Equity purchased from investors |
44.8 | 44.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
92.1 | 92.1 | |||||||
Equity in earnings |
10.8 | 12.0 | ||||||
Equity in unrealized losses on derivative financial instruments |
(0.4 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||
Distributions |
(7.0 | ) | (7.0 | ) | ||||
Deferred broker fees |
(0.5 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 95.0 | $ | 95.2 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Administrative fees paid to TILC by TRIP Holdings and subsidiaries for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 were $1.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively, and $1.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for the same periods last year.
See Note 6 of the December 31, 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements filed on Form 10-K for additional information.
Note 7. Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates and pricing for zinc, natural gas, and diesel fuel prices, as well as to convert a portion of our variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. Additionally, we use derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We also use derivatives to lock in fixed interest rates in anticipation of future debt issuances. Derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are accounted for in accordance with applicable accounting standards. See Note 3 Fair Value Accounting for discussion of how the Company valued its commodity hedges and interest rate swaps at June 30, 2012.
15
Table of Contents
Interest rate hedges
Included in accompanying balance sheet at June 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Notional Amount |
Interest Rate(1) |
Liability | AOCL loss/ (income) |
Noncontrolling Interest |
||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate locks: |
||||||||||||||||||||
2005-2006 |
$ | 200.0 | 4.87 | % | $ | | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | | |||||||||
2006-2007 |
$ | 370.0 | 5.34 | % | $ | | $ | 8.9 | $ | | ||||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
$ | 788.5 | 3.60 | % | $ | | $ | 21.7 | $ | 16.3 | ||||||||||
Interest rate swaps: |
||||||||||||||||||||
TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes |
$ | 83.8 | 2.62 | % | $ | 5.4 | $ | 3.0 | $ | 2.3 | ||||||||||
2008 debt issuance |
$ | 459.5 | 4.13 | % | $ | 44.3 | $ | 42.9 | $ | |
(1) | Weighted average fixed interest rate |
Effect on interest expense increase/(decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Expected effect during next twelve months(1) |
||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate locks: |
||||||||||||||||||||
2005-2006 |
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.3 | ) | |||||
2006-2007 |
$ | 0.8 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 1.7 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 3.3 | ||||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
$ | 1.5 | $ | | $ | 3.0 | $ | | $ | 5.9 | ||||||||||
Interest rate swaps: |
||||||||||||||||||||
TRIP warehouse |
$ | | $ | 6.8 | $ | | $ | 14.1 | $ | | ||||||||||
TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes |
$ | 0.5 | $ | | $ | 1.0 | $ | | $ | 1.7 | ||||||||||
2008 debt issuance |
$ | 4.2 | $ | 5.2 | $ | 8.4 | $ | 9.7 | $ | 16.9 |
(1) | Based on fair value as of June 30, 2012 |
During 2005 and 2006, we entered into interest rate swap transactions in anticipation of a future debt issuance. These instruments, with a notional amount of $200 million, fixed the interest rate on a portion of a future debt issuance associated with a railcar leasing transaction in 2006 and settled at maturity in the first quarter of 2006. These interest rate swaps were being accounted for as cash flow hedges with changes in the fair value of the instruments of $4.5 million in income recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) through the date the related debt issuance closed in May 2006. The balance is being amortized over the term of the related debt. The effect on interest expense is due to amortization of the AOCL balance.
In anticipation of a future debt issuance, we entered into interest rate swap transactions during the fourth quarter of 2006 and during 2007. These instruments, with a notional amount of $370 million, hedged the interest rate on a portion of a future debt issuance associated with an anticipated railcar leasing transaction, which closed in May 2008. These instruments settled during the second quarter of 2008, and were accounted for as cash flow hedges with changes in the fair value of the instruments of $24.5 million recorded as a loss in AOCL through the date the related debt issuance closed in May 2008. The balance is being amortized over the term of the related debt. The effect on interest expense is due to amortization of the AOCL balance.
In May 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction that is being used to fix the Libor component of the debt issuance which closed in May 2008. The effect on interest expense results primarily from monthly interest settlements.
Between 2007 and 2009, TRIP Holdings, as required by the TRIP Warehouse Loan, entered into interest rate swap transactions, all of which qualified as cash flow hedges, to reduce the effect of changes in variable interest rates. In July 2011, these interest rate hedges were terminated in connection with the refinancing of the TRIP Warehouse Loan. Balances included in AOCL at the date the hedges were terminated are being amortized over the expected life of the new debt with $5.9 million of additional interest expense expected to be recognized during the twelve months following June 30, 2012. Also in July 2011, TRIP Holdings wholly-owned subsidiary, TRIP Master Funding, entered into an interest rate swap transaction with a notional amount of $94.1 million to reduce the effect of changes in variable interest rates associated with the Class A-1b notes of the TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes.
See Note 11 Debt regarding the related debt instruments.
16
Table of Contents
Other Derivatives
Effect on operating income increase/(decrease) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months
Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Fuel hedges(1) |
||||||||||||||||
Effect of mark to market valuation |
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.3 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||
Settlements |
(0.1 | ) | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.3 | |||||||
Foreign exchange hedges(2) |
$ | 0.0 | $ | | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | (0.6 | ) |
(1) | Included in cost of revenues in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations |
(2) | Included in other, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations |
Natural gas and diesel fuel
We maintain a program to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in the price of natural gas and diesel fuel purchases. The intent of the program is to protect our operating profit from adverse price changes by entering into derivative instruments. For those instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, any changes in their valuation are recorded directly to the consolidated statement of operations. The amount recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 for these instruments was not significant.
Foreign exchange hedge
We enter into foreign exchange hedges to mitigate the impact on operating profit of unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These instruments are short term with quarterly maturities and no remaining balance in AOCL as of June 30, 2012.
Note 8. Property, Plant, and Equipment
The following table summarizes the components of property, plant, and equipment as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(as reported) | ||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Manufacturing/Corporate: |
||||||||
Land |
$ | 41.5 | $ | 41.6 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
434.5 | 429.7 | ||||||
Machinery and other |
753.7 | 758.7 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
23.1 | 12.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,252.8 | 1,242.8 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(749.1 | ) | (732.8 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
503.7 | 510.0 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Leasing: |
||||||||
Wholly-owned subsidiaries: |
||||||||
Machinery and other |
9.5 | 9.6 | ||||||
Equipment on lease |
3,561.1 | 3,429.3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
3,570.6 | 3,438.9 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(422.6 | ) | (372.9 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
3,148.0 | 3,066.0 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
TRIP Holdings: |
||||||||
Equipment on lease |
1,271.3 | 1,257.7 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(137.3 | ) | (122.7 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,134.0 | 1,135.0 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net deferred profit on railcars sold to the Leasing Group |
||||||||
Sold to wholly-owned subsidiaries |
(349.7 | ) | (344.5 | ) | ||||
Sold to TRIP Holdings |
(184.8 | ) | (187.0 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 4,251.2 | $ | 4,179.5 | |||||
|
|
|
|
17
Table of Contents
Note 9. Goodwill
Goodwill by segment is as follows:
June 30, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||
(as reported) | ||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Rail Group |
$ | 122.5 | $ | 122.5 | ||||
Construction Products Group |
91.4 | 90.7 | ||||||
Energy Equipment Group |
10.9 | 10.9 | ||||||
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
1.8 | 1.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 226.6 | $ | 225.9 | |||||
|
|
|
|
The net increase in the Construction Products Group goodwill as of June 30, 2012 is due to a 2012 acquisition offset partially by a divestiture.
Note 10. Warranties
The changes in the accruals for warranties for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 14.5 | $ | 12.7 | $ | 13.5 | $ | 13.2 | ||||||||
Warranty costs incurred |
(1.5 | ) | (1.4 | ) | (3.9 | ) | (2.7 | ) | ||||||||
Warranty originations and revisions |
1.4 | 0.9 | 5.2 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Warranty expirations |
(0.6 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (1.0 | ) | (1.0 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 13.8 | $ | 12.0 | $ | 13.8 | $ | 12.0 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Debt
The following table summarizes the components of debt as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(as reported) | ||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Manufacturing/Corporate Recourse: |
||||||||
Revolving credit facility |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Convertible subordinated notes |
450.0 | 450.0 | ||||||
Less: unamortized discount |
(93.8 | ) | (99.8 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
356.2 | 350.2 | |||||||
Other |
5.7 | 4.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
361.9 | 354.4 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Leasing Recourse: |
||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
47.2 | 48.6 | ||||||
Term loan |
52.4 | 54.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
99.6 | 103.3 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total recourse debt |
461.5 | 457.7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Leasing Non-recourse: |
||||||||
2006 secured railcar equipment notes |
262.6 | 269.3 | ||||||
Promissory notes |
452.6 | 465.5 | ||||||
2009 secured railcar equipment notes |
213.9 | 218.4 | ||||||
2010 secured railcar equipment notes |
348.2 | 354.3 | ||||||
TILC warehouse facility |
291.4 | 308.5 | ||||||
TRIP Holdings senior secured notes: |
||||||||
Total outstanding |
170.0 | 170.0 | ||||||
Less: owned by Trinity |
(108.8 | ) | (108.8 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
61.2 | 61.2 | |||||||
TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes |
819.1 | 840.0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total nonrecourse debt |
2,449.0 | 2,517.2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total debt |
$ | 2,910.5 | $ | 2,974.9 | ||||
|
|
|
|
18
Table of Contents
We have a $425.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility that matures on October 20, 2016. As of June 30, 2012, we had letters of credit issued under our revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $70.9 million, leaving $354.1 million available for borrowing. Other than these letters of credit, there were no borrowings under our revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2012, or for the six month period then ended. Of the outstanding letters of credit as of June 30, 2012, a total of $0.7 million is expected to expire in 2012 and the remainder in 2013. The majority of our letters of credit obligations supports the Companys various insurance programs and generally renews each year. Trinitys revolving credit facility requires the maintenance of ratios related to minimum interest coverage for the leasing and manufacturing operations and maximum leverage. Borrowings under the credit facility bear interest at Libor plus 150.0 basis points or prime plus 50.0 basis points. As of June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all such financial covenants.
The Companys 3 7/8% convertible subordinated notes are recorded net of unamortized discount to reflect their underlying economics by capturing the value of the conversion option as borrowing costs. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, capital in excess of par value included $92.8 million related to the estimated value of the Convertible Subordinated Notes conversion options, in accordance with ASC 470-20. Debt discount recorded in the consolidated balance sheet is being amortized through June 1, 2018 to yield an effective annual interest rate of 8.42% based upon the estimated market interest rate for comparable non-convertible debt as of the issuance date of the Convertible Subordinated Notes. Total interest expense recognized on the Convertible Subordinated Notes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Coupon rate interest |
$ | 4.3 | $ | 4.3 | $ | 8.7 | $ | 8.7 | ||||||||
Amortized debt discount |
3.0 | 2.8 | 6.0 | 5.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 7.3 | $ | 7.1 | $ | 14.7 | $ | 14.2 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2012, the Convertible Subordinated Notes were convertible at a price of $51.31 per share resulting in 8,770,220 issuable shares. As of June 30, 2012, if the Convertible Subordinated Notes had been converted, no shares would have been issued since the trading price of the Companys common stock was below the conversion price of the Convertible Subordinated Notes. The Company has not entered into any derivatives transactions associated with these notes.
The $475.0 million TILC warehouse loan facility, established to finance railcars owned by TILC, had $291.4 million outstanding and $183.6 million available as of June 30, 2012. The warehouse loan is a non-recourse obligation secured by a portfolio of railcars and operating leases, certain cash reserves, and other assets acquired and owned by the warehouse loan facility. The principal and interest of this indebtedness are paid from the cash flows of the underlying leases. Advances under the facility bear interest at a defined index rate plus a margin, for an all-in interest rate of 2.27% at June 30, 2012. The warehouse loan facility matures in February 2013. Amounts outstanding at maturity, absent renewal, will be payable in three installments in August 2013, February 2014, and August 2014.
Terms and conditions of other debt, including recourse and non-recourse provisions, are described in Note 11 of the December 31, 2011 Consolidated Financial Statements filed on Form 10-K.
19
Table of Contents
The remaining principal payments under existing debt agreements as of June 30, 2012 are as follows:
Remaining six months of 2012 |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recourse: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing/Corporate |
$ | 0.9 | $ | 1.7 | $ | 2.4 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 450.3 | ||||||||||||
Leasing capital lease obligations (Note 5) |
1.4 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 33.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Leasing term loan (Note 5) |
1.2 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 41.5 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-recourse leasing (Note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 secured railcar equipment notes |
6.8 | 15.1 | 16.9 | 18.6 | 21.9 | 183.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Promissory notes |
14.1 | 29.8 | 26.9 | 24.1 | 357.7 | | ||||||||||||||||||
2009 secured railcar equipment notes |
4.7 | 10.2 | 9.9 | 9.6 | 6.5 | 173.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 secured railcar equipment notes |
6.6 | 14.6 | 14.0 | 15.3 | 15.0 | 282.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
TILC warehouse facility |
4.4 | 8.2 | 4.4 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings senior secured notes: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total outstanding |
| | 170.0 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Less: owned by Trinity |
| | (108.8 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
61.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes |
20.1 | 41.1 | 40.2 | 35.9 | 29.4 | 652.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Facility termination payments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
TILC warehouse facility |
| 91.0 | 183.4 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total principal payments |
$ | 60.2 | $ | 217.6 | $ | 365.6 | $ | 110.5 | $ | 475.7 | $ | 1,774.7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Other, Net
Other, net (income) expense consists of the following items:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange transactions |
$ | 0.6 | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (1.4 | ) | $ | 0.1 | ||||||
Gain on equity investments |
(0.0 | ) | (0.0 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
(0.6 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (1.5 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other, net |
$ | (0.0 | ) | $ | (0.6 | ) | $ | (3.0 | ) | $ | (1.1 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes results in effective tax rates different from the statutory rates. The following is a reconciliation between the statutory United States Federal income tax rate and the Companys effective income tax rate:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Statutory rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||||
State taxes |
2.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Tax settlements |
0.0 | 0.0 | (1.2 | ) | 0.0 | |||||||||||
Changes in tax reserves |
(0.2 | ) | 0.8 | (0.1 | ) | 1.0 | ||||||||||
Foreign tax adjustments |
(0.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net |
0.4 | 2.1 | (0.3 | ) | 1.5 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Effective rate |
37.1 | % | 39.9 | % | 35.3 | % | 39.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we settled our audit with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 2004-2005 tax years. As a result of closing this audit, we recognized a $3.5 million tax benefit in the first quarter, primarily related to favorable claims filed and approved by the IRS in the final audit settlement.
The IRS field work for our 2006-2008 audit cycle has concluded and all issues, except for transfer pricing, have been agreed to and tentatively settled. The transfer pricing issue has been appealed and we are seeking Competent Authority review with Mexico to avoid double-taxation of income in the U.S. and in Mexico. As we do not control the timing of
20
Table of Contents
when our issues will be reviewed by Competent Authority, we cannot determine when the 2006-2008 cycle will close and all issues formally settled and thus when the statute of limitations for years after 2005 will close.
We have various subsidiaries in Mexico that file separate tax returns and thus are subject to examination by taxing authorities at different times. The 2003 tax year of one of our Mexican subsidiaries is still under review and its statute of limitations remains open through June 2014. Another Mexican subsidiarys statute of limitations for the 2005 tax year remains open through July 2013. The remaining entities are open for their 2006 tax years and forward.
Our two Swiss subsidiaries, one of which is a holding company and the other which is dormant, have been audited by the taxing authorities through 2008 and 2009. The statute of limitations in Switzerland is generally five years from the end of the tax year, but can be extended up to 15 years in certain cases if the audit has commenced during the original five year period.
We also currently have sales offices in Europe and Canada that are subject to various statutes of limitations.
Generally, states statutes of limitations in the United States are open from 2003 forward due to the use of tax loss carryforwards in certain jurisdictions.
The change in unrecognized tax benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 52.5 | $ | 36.8 | ||||
Additions for tax positions related to the current year |
2.0 | 1.8 | ||||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
| 14.5 | ||||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
(1.1 | ) | | |||||
Settlements |
(3.3 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||
Expiration of statute of limitations |
(0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending balance |
$ | 50.0 | $ | 52.3 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions related to the current year in the amounts of $2.0 million and $1.8 million recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were amounts provided for tax positions that will be taken for Federal and state income tax purposes when we file those tax returns.
Additions for tax positions of prior years for the six months ended June 30, 2011 of $14.5 million are primarily due to Federal tax positions taken on prior year returns that were proposed by the IRS but had not been previously reserved. Since these items are primarily timing differences, we will be allowed a future tax deduction. During 2011, we recorded a corresponding deferred tax asset for the future tax reduction related to these adjustments.
The reduction in tax positions of prior years of $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, was primarily related to new guidance issued by the IRS regarding the capitalization of fixed assets that was issued in March 2012 as well as state taxes.
Settlements during the six months ended June 30, 2012, primarily related to the settlement of our 2004-2005 IRS audit as well as the related impact on state tax returns. Settlements during the six months ended June 30, 2011, related to an audit of a separate tax return of a subsidiary.
The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits including interest and penalties at June 30, 2012 and 2011, that would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized was $17.5 million and $20.2 million, respectively. There is a reasonable possibility that unrecognized Federal and state tax benefits will decrease by June 30, 2013 due to a lapse in the statute of limitations for assessing tax. Amounts subject to a lapse in statute by June 30, 2013 total $2.5 million.
Trinity accounts for interest expense and penalties related to income tax issues as income tax expense. Accordingly, interest expense and penalties associated with an uncertain tax position are included in the income tax provision. The total amount of accrued interest and penalties as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $12.5 million and $13.3 million, respectively. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, included an increase in income tax expense of $0.1 million and a decrease of $0.8 million, respectively, in interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, included an increase in income tax expense of $0.9 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
21
Table of Contents
Note 14. Employee Retirement Plans
The following table summarizes the components of net retirement cost for the Company:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.5 | ||||||||
Interest |
4.9 | 4.9 | 9.7 | 9.8 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(5.8 | ) | (5.7 | ) | (11.4 | ) | (11.4 | ) | ||||||||
Actuarial loss |
0.9 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Defined benefit expense |
0.2 | (0.1 | ) | 0.5 | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Profit sharing |
3.2 | 2.2 | 5.8 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net expense |
$ | 3.4 | $ | 2.1 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 4.4 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trinity contributed $4.1 million and $10.2 million to the Companys defined benefit pension plans for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Trinity contributed $3.2 million and $8.8 million to the Companys defined benefit pension plans for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Total contributions to the Companys defined benefit pension plans in 2012 are expected to be approximately $17.3 million.
Note 15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2012 are as follows:
Currency translation adjustments |
Unrealized loss on derivative financial instruments |
Funded status of pension liability |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | (17.1 | ) | $ | (46.2 | ) | $ | (70.7 | ) | $ | (134.0 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income |
0.6 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2012, net of tax expense (benefit) of $0.2, $(32.2), $(41.0) and $(73.0) |
$ | (16.5 | ) | $ | (42.3 | ) | $ | (69.6 | ) | $ | (128.4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 7 Derivative Instruments for information on the reclassification of amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings.
Note 16. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation totaled approximately $5.6 million and $12.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Stock-based compensation totaled approximately $4.1 million and $9.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.
Note 17. Earnings Per Common Share
Basic net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. per common share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Trinity remaining after allocation to unvested restricted shares by the weighted average number of basic common shares outstanding for the period. Except when the effect would be antidilutive, the calculation of diluted net income attributable to Trinity per common share includes the net impact of unvested restricted shares and shares that could be issued under outstanding stock options. Total weighted average restricted shares and antidilutive stock options were 3.3 million shares and 3.2 million shares for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Total weighted average restricted shares and antidilutive stock options were 3.0 million shares for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011.
22
Table of Contents
The computation of basic and diluted net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. is as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) |
Average Shares |
EPS | Income (Loss) |
Average Shares |
EPS | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. |
$ | 67.8 | $ | 30.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unvested restricted share participation |
(2.3 | ) | (1.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. basic |
65.5 | 77.7 | $ | 0.84 | 29.0 | 77.4 | $ | 0.37 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
| 0.2 | | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. diluted |
$ | 65.5 | 77.9 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 29.0 | 77.7 | $ | 0.37 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) |
Average Shares |
EPS | Income (Loss) |
Average Shares |
EPS | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. |
$ | 120.7 | $ | 54.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Unvested restricted share participation |
(4.0 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. basic |
116.7 | 77.7 | $ | 1.50 | 52.3 | 77.2 | $ | 0.68 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
| 0.2 | | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. diluted |
$ | 116.7 | 77.9 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 52.3 | 77.5 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 18. Contingencies
Railworthiness Directive
As previously reported, in 2011 the Company received the approval of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) to implement a voluntary recertification of 948 tank cars owned or managed by the Companys wholly-owned, railcar leasing subsidiary and used in transporting poison inhalation hazard (PIH) materials. The recertification process is underway and being performed in conjunction with the normal three to five year, federally mandated inspection cycle for tank cars in PIH service. Maintenance costs associated with this recertification process are expensed as incurred. The additional costs estimated to be incurred for compliance with the directive are not expected to be significant.
Other Matters
As previously reported, Trinity Structural Towers, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, is in litigation with a structural wind tower customer for the customers breach of a long-term supply contract for the manufacture of towers. While the customer partially performed the contract, it ultimately defaulted on its purchase obligation and did not remedy such default following written notice. Discovery in this litigation is underway.
The Company is involved in claims and lawsuits incidental to our business arising from various matters including product warranty, personal injury, environmental issues, workplace laws, and various governmental regulations. The Company evaluates its exposure to such claims periodically and establishes accruals for these contingencies when a range of loss can be reasonably estimated. The range of loss for such matters, taking into consideration our rights in indemnity and recourse to third parties is $4.1 million to $20.6 million. Total accruals of $10.4 million, including environmental and workplace matters described below, are included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Company believes any additional liability would not be material to its financial position or results of operations.
Trinity is subject to Federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment and the workplace. The Company has reserved $7.6 million to cover our probable and estimable liabilities with respect to the investigations, assessments, and remedial responses to such matters, taking into account currently available information and our contractual rights to indemnification and recourse to third parties. However, estimates of liability arising from future proceedings, assessments, or remediation are inherently imprecise. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will not become involved in future litigation or other proceedings involving the environment and the workplace or, if we are found to be responsible or liable in any such litigation or proceeding, that such costs would not be material to the Company. We believe that we are currently in substantial compliance with environmental and workplace laws and regulations.
23
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to provide a reader of our financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of our management on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and certain other factors that may affect our future results. Our MD&A is presented in the following sections:
| Executive Summary |
| Results of Operations |
| Liquidity and Capital Resources |
| Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments |
| Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
| Forward-Looking Statements |
Our MD&A should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements of Trinity Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (Trinity, Company, we, or our) and related notes in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Executive Summary
The Companys revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 were $1,028.4 million and $1,953.7 million, respectively, representing an increase of $320.1 million and $611.2 million, respectively, or 45% and 46%, respectively, over the same periods in 2011. Operating profit for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 totaled $154.9 million and $277.3 million, respectively, compared with $95.4 million and $180.9 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2011. While all of our business segments reported increases in revenues for the six month period ended June 30, 2012 when compared to the prior year, the largest contributors to the increase were our Rail, Inland Barge, and Leasing Groups. The increase in revenues in our Rail and Inland Barge Groups was primarily due to higher shipment volumes while the increase in revenues in our Leasing Group was due to higher railcar sales from the lease fleet, higher rental revenues from lease fleet additions, and an increase in rental rates. Operating profit and margin grew for the six month period ended June 30, 2012 when compared with the prior year, primarily due to higher shipment levels in our Rail and Inland Barge Groups and from revenue growth in our Leasing Group. Our Energy Equipment and Construction Products Groups experienced declines in operating margin primarily as a result of competitive pricing pressures and, with respect to our Energy Equipment Group, additional costs related to product mix changes. Net income attributable to Trinity Industries, Inc. common stockholders for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 increased $37.8 million and $66.5 million, respectively, or 126% and 123%, respectively, over the same periods in 2011.
Our Rail and Inland Barge Groups and our structural wind towers and containers businesses operate in cyclical industries. Results in our Construction Products and Energy Equipment Groups are subject to seasonal fluctuations with the first quarter historically being the weakest quarter. Railcar sales from the lease fleet are the primary driver of fluctuations in results in the Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group. Following an extended period of weak demand for new railcars through 2010, demand for new railcars recovered sharply, primarily due to an increase in the shipment of commodities, replacement of older railcars, and federal tax benefits received from taking delivery of railcars in 2011 and 2012. While moderating from the accelerated pace in the first half of 2011, demand conditions and corresponding order levels for new railcars in the first half of 2012 continued to be favorable. Orders for structural wind towers have been slow since mid-2008 when energy development companies encountered tightened credit markets, lower demand for electricity, and heightened competition arising from declining natural gas prices and imports from foreign manufacturers. The continued slowdown in the residential and commercial construction markets negatively impacted the results of our Construction Products Group as well. We continually assess our manufacturing capacity and take steps to align our production capacity with demand for our products. Due to improvements in demand, we have increased production staff at certain facilities since late 2010.
Our backlog at June 30, 2012 compared with prior period was approximately as follows:
June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Rail Group |
||||||||
External Customers |
$ | 2,364.9 | $ | 1,948.6 | ||||
Leasing Group |
794.7 | 296.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 3,159.6 | $ | 2,245.4 | |||||
Inland Barge |
$ | 541.5 | $ | 494.2 | ||||
Structural wind towers |
$ | 817.4 | $ | 916.5 |
24
Table of Contents
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, our rail manufacturing businesses received orders for approximately 11,865 railcars. The orders in our backlog from the Leasing Group are supported by lease commitments with external customers. The final amount dedicated to the Leasing Group may vary by the time of delivery. For multi-year barge agreements, deliveries scheduled for 2012 are included in the backlog at this time; deliveries beyond 2012 are not included in the backlog if specific production quantities for future years have not been determined. Approximately $412.5 million of the structural wind towers backlog is subject to litigation with a structural wind tower customer for the customers breach of a long-term supply contract for the manufacture of towers.
Results of Operations
Overall Summary
Revenues
Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | Revenues | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External | Intersegment | Total | External | Intersegment | Total | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rail Group |
$ | 380.2 | $ | 136.7 | $ | 516.9 | $ | 197.3 | $ | 83.4 | $ | 280.7 | 84.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Construction Products Group |
151.6 | 5.2 | 156.8 | 148.0 | 1.3 | 149.3 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Barge Group |
173.9 | | 173.9 | 117.8 | | 117.8 | 47.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Energy Equipment Group |
126.6 | 4.1 | 130.7 | 115.1 | 2.4 | 117.5 | 11.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
192.3 | 1.9 | 194.2 | 128.2 | | 128.2 | 51.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
3.8 | 17.0 | 20.8 | 1.9 | 12.4 | 14.3 | 45.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
| (132.3 | ) | (132.3 | ) | | (79.5 | ) | (79.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Eliminations Other |
| (32.6 | ) | (32.6 | ) | | (20.0 | ) | (20.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Total |
$ | 1,028.4 | $ | | $ | 1,028.4 | $ | 708.3 | $ | | $ | 708.3 | 45.2 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | Revenues | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External | Intersegment | Total | External | Intersegment | Total | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rail Group |
$ | 721.4 | $ | 262.6 | $ | 984.0 | $ | 328.3 | $ | 172.2 | $ | 500.5 | 96.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Construction Products Group |
301.2 | 10.6 | 311.8 | 278.1 | 4.8 | 282.9 | 10.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Inland Barge Group |
343.3 | | 343.3 | 255.7 | | 255.7 | 34.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Energy Equipment Group |
246.7 | 9.0 | 255.7 | 228.3 | 7.9 | 236.2 | 8.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
334.4 | 2.1 | 336.5 | 248.0 | | 248.0 | 35.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
All Other |
6.7 | 29.8 | 36.5 | 4.1 | 23.3 | 27.4 | 33.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Eliminations Lease subsidiary |
| (254.9 | ) | (254.9 | ) | | (164.9 | ) | (164.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Eliminations Other |
| (59.2 | ) | (59.2 | ) | | (43.3 | ) | (43.3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Total |
$ | 1,953.7 | $ | | $ | 1,953.7 | $ | 1,342.5 | $ | | $ | 1,342.5 | 45.5 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Profit (Loss)
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months
Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Rail Group |
$ | 53.0 | $ | 15.4 | $ | 93.1 | $ | 24.7 | ||||||||
Construction Products Group |
15.2 | 16.1 | 26.0 | 24.4 | ||||||||||||
Inland Barge Group |
36.6 | 19.1 | 66.6 | 40.8 | ||||||||||||
Energy Equipment Group |
4.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 11.7 | ||||||||||||
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group |
76.4 | 59.7 | 142.9 | 114.4 | ||||||||||||
All Other |
(6.3 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (5.1 | ) | (0.5 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate |
(9.6 | ) | (8.4 | ) | (21.2 | ) | (19.1 | ) | ||||||||
Eliminations lease subsidiary |
(12.2 | ) | (7.1 | ) | (23.1 | ) | (15.2 | ) | ||||||||
Eliminations other |
(2.2 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (2.1 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consolidated Total |
$ | 154.9 | $ | 95.4 | $ | 277.3 | $ | 180.9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income and Expense. Other income and expense is summarized in the following table:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | (0.3 | ) | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | (0.7 | ) | $ | (0.7 | ) | ||||
Interest expense |
47.9 | 43.8 | 95.8 | 88.3 | ||||||||||||
Other, net |
(0.0 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (3.0 | ) | (1.1 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consolidated Total |
$ | 47.6 | $ | 42.8 | $ | 92.1 | $ | 86.5 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Table of Contents
Interest expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2012, increased $7.5 million over the prior year period due to TRIP Holdings debt refinancing completed in 2011. Interest income was substantially unchanged from the same three and six month periods last year. The increase in Other, net expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to higher foreign currency translation gains over the prior year same periods.
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes results in effective tax rates different from the statutory rates. The following is a reconciliation between the statutory United States Federal income tax rate and the Companys effective income tax rate:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Statutory rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||||
State taxes |
2.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Tax settlements |
0.0 | 0.0 | (1.2 | ) | 0.0 | |||||||||||
Changes in tax reserves |
(0.2 | ) | 0.8 | (0.1 | ) | 1.0 | ||||||||||
Foreign tax adjustments |
(0.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | (0.1 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||
Other, net |
0.4 | 2.1 | (0.3 | ) | 1.5 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Effective rate |
37.1 | % | 39.9 | % | 35.3 | % | 39.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we settled our audit with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the 2004-2005 tax years. As a result of closing this audit, we recognized a $3.5 million tax benefit in the first quarter, primarily related to favorable claims filed and approved by the IRS in the final audit settlement.
The IRS field work for our 2006-2008 audit cycle has concluded and all issues, except for transfer pricing, have been agreed to and tentatively settled. The transfer pricing issue has been appealed and we are seeking Competent Authority review with Mexico to avoid double-taxation of income in the U.S. and in Mexico. As we do not control the timing of when our issues will be reviewed by Competent Authority, we cannot determine when the 2006-2008 cycle will close and all issues formally settled and thus when the statute of limitations for years after 2005 will close.
Rail Group
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Percent | 2012 | 2011 | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Change | ($ in millions) | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rail |
$ | 473.9 | $ | 234.8 | 101.8 | % | $ | 900.3 | $ | 412.6 | 118.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Components |
43.0 | 45.9 | (6.3 | ) | 83.7 | 87.9 | (4.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 516.9 | $ | 280.7 | 84.1 | $ | 984.0 | $ | 500.5 | 96.6 | ||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
$ | 53.0 | $ | 15.4 | $ | 93.1 | $ | 24.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating profit margin |
10.3 | % | 5.5 | % | 9.5 | % | 4.9 | % |
As of June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011, our Rail Group backlog was as follows:
As of June 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
External Customers |
$ | 2,364.9 | $ | 1,948.6 | ||||
Leasing Group |
794.7 | 296.8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 3,159.6 | $ | 2,245.4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The changes in the number of railcars in the Rail Group backlog are as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months
Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
27,245 | 22,490 | 29,000 | 5,960 | ||||||||||||
Orders received |
8,610 | 7,865 | 11,865 | 26,635 | ||||||||||||
Shipments |
(5,245 | ) | (3,115 | ) | (10,255 | ) | (5,355 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Ending balance |
30,610 | 27,240 | 30,610 | 27,240 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Table of Contents
The backlog dedicated to the Leasing Group is supported by lease commitments with external customers. The final amount dedicated to the Leasing Group may vary by the time of delivery.
Operating profit for the Rail Group increased $37.6 million and $68.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. This increase was primarily due to a significantly higher volume of railcars with higher sales prices delivered during the period.
In the three months ended June 30, 2012, railcar shipments included sales to the Leasing Group of $132.3 million compared to $79.5 million in the comparable period in 2011 with a deferred profit of $12.2 million compared to $7.1 million for the same period in 2011. In the six months ended June 30, 2012, railcar shipments included sales to the Leasing Group of $254.9 million compared to $164.9 million in the comparable period in 2011 with a deferred profit of $23.1 million compared to $15.2 million for the same period in 2011. Sales to the Leasing Group and related profits are included in the operating results of the Rail Group but are eliminated in consolidation.
Construction Products Group
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Percent | 2012 | 2011 | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Change | ($ in millions) | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Concrete and Aggregates |
$ | 49.6 | $ | 46.0 | 7.8 | % | $ | 91.1 | $ | 95.6 | (4.7 | )% | ||||||||||||
Highway Products |
96.9 | 97.5 | (0.6 | ) | 199.4 | 177.2 | 12.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
10.3 | 5.8 | * | 21.3 | 10.1 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 156.8 | $ | 149.3 | 5.0 | $ | 311.8 | $ | 282.9 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
$ | 15.2 | $ | 16.1 | $ | 26.0 | $ | 24.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating profit margin |
9.7 | % | 10.8 | % | 8.3 | % | 8.6 | % |
* | not meaningful |
Revenues increased for the three month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily due to higher aggregate volumes in our Concretes and Aggregates business and higher sales in other product lines. For the six month period ended June 30, 2012, revenues increased compared to the same period last year due to higher volumes in our Highway Products business offset by slightly lower revenues in our Concrete and Aggregates business resulting from the divestiture of our Central Texas Region ready mix concrete facilities in April 2011. Operating profit decreased slightly for the three month period ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same period in 2011 primarily as a result of lower profits from our Highway Products business due to competitive pricing pressures offset by product-mix related higher profits in our Concrete and Aggregates business. For the six month period ended June 30, 2012, operating profit increased compared to the same period last year due to higher aggregate sales and improved efficiencies in our Concrete and Aggregates business offset by lower operating profit from our Highway Products business related to competitive pricing pressures and higher operating expenses.
Inland Barge Group
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Percent | 2012 | 2011 | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Change | ($ in millions) | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 173.9 | $ | 117.8 | 47.6 | % | $ | 343.3 | $ | 255.7 | 34.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating profit |
$ | 36.6 | $ | 19.1 | $ | 66.6 | $ | 40.8 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating profit margin |
21.0 | % | 16.2 | % | 19.4 | % | 16.0 | % |
Revenues and operating profit increased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same periods in the prior year due to higher volumes of hopper and tank barges and a change in the mix of barge types. Hopper barge volume primarily increased, when compared to the prior year, due to the recovery from the 2011 flood at our Missouri manufacturing facility. Operating profit for the six months ended June 30, 2012 includes a $3.4 million net gain from sales of barges previously included in property, plant, and equipment which were under lease to third-party customers. Operating profit for the three months ended June 30, 2011, included additional costs of $4.4 million, net of insurance recoveries, related to floods occurring at two of our manufacturing facilities in 2010 and 2011.
As of June 30 2012, the backlog for the Inland Barge Group was approximately $541.5 million compared to approximately $494.2 million as of June 30, 2011. For multi-year barge agreements, deliveries scheduled for 2012 are included in the backlog at this time; deliveries beyond 2012 are not included in the backlog if specific production quantities for future years have not been determined.
27
Table of Contents
Energy Equipment Group
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Percent | 2012 | 2011 | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Change | ($ in millions) | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structural wind towers |
$ | 65.9 | $ | 69.3 | (4.9 | )% | $ | 118.7 | $ | 135.8 | (12.6 | )% | ||||||||||||
Other |
64.8 | 48.2 | 34.4 | 137.0 | 100.4 | 36.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 130.7 | $ | 117.5 | 11.2 | $ | 255.7 | $ | 236.2 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
$ | 4.0 | $ | 1.2 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 11.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating profit margin |
3.1 | % | 1.0 | % | 0.1 | % | 5.0 | % |
Revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 increased compared to the same periods in 2011 as a result of higher demand for tank containers and other products offsetting lower structural wind tower shipments. Operating profit for the three month period ended June 30, 2012 increased compared to the same quarter last year as the manufacturing challenges which negatively impacted the 2011 results moderated. Operating profit for the six month period ended June 30, 2012 decreased when compared to the same period in 2011 due to transition issues arising from changes in product mix in the structural wind towers business as well as competitive pricing on structural wind towers, partially offset by increased operating profit in other product lines. As of June 30, 2012, the backlog for structural wind towers was approximately $817.4 million compared to approximately $916.5 million as of June 30, 2011. Approximately $412.5 million of this backlog is subject to litigation with a structural wind tower customer for the customers breach of a long-term supply contract for the manufacture of towers.
28
Table of Contents
Railcar Leasing and Management Services Group
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Percent | 2012 | 2011 | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Change | ($ in millions) | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholly owned subsidiaries: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
$ | 102.2 | $ | 92.9 | 10.0 | % | $ | 200.5 | $ | 183.2 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1) |
62.2 | 6.6 | * | 77.1 | 6.6 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
164.4 | 99.5 | 65.2 | 277.6 | 189.8 | 46.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
29.8 | 28.7 | 3.8 | 58.9 | 58.2 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1) |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
29.8 | 28.7 | 3.8 | 58.9 | 58.2 | 1.2 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 194.2 | $ | 128.2 | 51.5 | $ | 336.5 | $ | 248.0 | 35.7 | ||||||||||||||
Operating Profit: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholly owned subsidiaries: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
$ | 44.0 | $ | 39.5 | $ | 87.1 | $ | 76.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Railcars owned one year or less at the time of sale |
13.5 | 3.0 | 16.4 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Railcars owned more than one year at the time of sale |
1.6 | 0.4 | 5.7 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
59.1 | 42.9 | 109.2 | 80.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
17.3 | 16.8 | 34.1 | 33.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Railcars owned one year or less at the time of sale |
| | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Railcars owned more than one year at the time of sale |
| | (0.4 | ) | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
17.3 | 16.8 | 33.7 | 34.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total operating profit |
$ | 76.4 | $ | 59.7 | $ | 142.9 | $ | 114.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating profit margin: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leasing and management |
46.4 | % | 46.3 | % | 46.7 | % | 45.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Railcar sales(1) |
* | * | * | * | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating profit margin |
39.3 | 46.6 | 42.5 | 46.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fleet utilization: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholly-owned subsidiaries |
99.0 | % | 99.3 | % | 99.0 | % | 99.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
99.8 | % | 99.9 | % | 99.8 | % | 99.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total fleet |
99.1 | % | 99.4 | % | 99.1 | % | 99.4 | % |
* | Not meaningful |
(1) | Effective December 31, 2011, the Company adopted the emerging industry policy of recognizing revenue from the sales of railcars from the lease fleet on a gross basis in leasing revenues and cost of revenues if the railcar has been owned by the lease fleet for one year or less at the time of sale. Sales of railcars from the lease fleet which have been owned by the lease fleet for more than one year are recognized as a net gain or loss from the disposal of a long-term asset. Prior year reported balances have been reclassified to conform to this policy. |
Total revenues increased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same periods last year due to increased railcar sales from the lease fleet, as well as rental revenues related to additions to the lease fleet, and higher rental rates.
Operating profit increased for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same periods in 2011 due to profit from lease fleet sales, lease fleet additions, higher rental rates, and lower maintenance expenses.
To fund the continued expansion of its lease fleet to meet market demand, the Leasing Group generally uses its non-recourse $475 million warehouse facility or excess cash to provide initial financing for a portion of the purchase price of the railcars. After initial financing, the Leasing Group generally obtains long-term financing for the railcars in the lease fleet through non-recourse asset-backed securities, long-term non-recourse operating leases pursuant to sales/leaseback transactions, or long-term recourse debt such as equipment trust certificates. See Financing Activities.
Information regarding the Leasing Groups lease fleet as of June 30, 2012 follows:
Average remaining | ||||||||||||
No. of cars | Average age | lease term |
||||||||||
Wholly-owned subsidiaries |
56,220 | 6.8 | 3.4 | |||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
14,470 | 4.8 | 3.0 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total fleet |
70,690 | 6.4 | 3.3 |
29
Table of Contents
All Other
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Percent | 2012 | 2011 | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Change | ($ in millions) | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 20.8 | $ | 14.3 | 45.5 | % | $ | 36.5 | $ | 27.4 | 33.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating profit (loss) |
$ | (6.3 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (5.1 | ) | $ | (0.5 | ) |
The increase in revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 compared to the same periods last year was primarily due to an increase in sales by our transportation company. The increase in operating loss for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 was primarily due to higher claim costs related to our captive insurance company, higher environmental reserves, and higher gains in 2011 from property dispositions.
Corporate
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | Percent | 2012 | 2011 | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
($ in millions) | Change | ($ in millions) | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs |
$ | (9.6 | ) | $ | (8.4 | ) | 14.3 | % | $ | (21.2 | ) | $ | (19.1 | ) | 11.0 | % |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing, and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Total cash provided by (required by) |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 198.5 | $ | 8.8 | ||||
Investing activities |
(154.7 | ) | (58.3 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
(100.8 | ) | (47.4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (57.0 | ) | $ | (96.9 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $198.5 million compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $8.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Cash flow provided by operating activities increased due to higher operating profits in 2012, a decrease in receivables during the first half of 2012 compared with an increase in receivables during the first half of 2011, and lower increases in inventories in 2012 compared with 2011.
Receivables at June 30, 2012 decreased by $49.4 million or 13% since December 31, 2011, primarily due to lower receivables from the Energy Equipment Group. Raw materials inventory at June 30, 2012 increased by $60.6 million or 19% since December 31, 2011 primarily attributable to higher levels in our Rail Group required to meet production demands. Finished goods inventory at June 30, 2012 increased by $22.0 million or 22% since December 31, 2011 primarily attributable to higher levels of production in our Rail Group and Construction Products Group arising from seasonally higher shipping volumes in our Highway Products business since the previous year end. Accounts payable increased by $27.2 million or 13% since December 31, 2011 primarily due to higher production levels in the business groups mentioned. Accrued liabilities decreased by $29.4 million or 7% from December 31, 2011 due to the normal settlement of certain year end liabilities. We continually review reserves related to bad debt as well as the adequacy of lower of cost or market valuations related to accounts receivable and inventory.
Investing Activities. Net cash required by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $154.7 million compared to $58.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were $209.3 million, of which $172.5 million were for additions to the lease fleet. This compares to $176.5 million of capital expenditures for the same period last year, of which $151.9 million were for additions to the lease fleet. Capital expenditures for 2012 are projected to be approximately $390.0 to $440.0 million, including $260.0 to $290.0 million in net lease fleet additions. Proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment and other assets totaled $54.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 composed primarily of railcar sales from the lease fleet owned more than one year at the time of sale totaling $34.1 million. This compares to $17.5 million for the same period in 2011 composed primarily of railcar sales from the lease fleet owned more than one year at the time of sale totaling $12.2 million. Investments in short-term marketable securities decreased by $116.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Financing Activities. Net cash required by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $100.8 million compared to $47.4 million of cash required by financing activities for the same period in 2011. During the six
30
Table of Contents
months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we retired $86.7 million and $79.1 million, respectively, in debt. We borrowed $16.2 million and $52.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, primarily from our TILC warehouse loan facility. Additionally, we repurchased shares of the Companys stock under a share repurchase program as described further below. We intend to use our cash and committed credit facilities to fund the operations, expansions, and growth initiatives of the Company.
Other Financing Activities
At June 30, 2012 and for the six month period then ended, there were no borrowings under our $425.0 million revolving credit facility that matures on October 20, 2016. Interest on the revolving credit facility is calculated at Libor plus 150.0 basis points or prime plus 50.0 basis points. After subtracting $70.9 million for letters of credit outstanding, $354.1 million was available under the revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2012.
The $475.0 million TILC warehouse loan facility, established to finance railcars owned by TILC, had $291.4 million outstanding and $183.6 million available as of June 30, 2012. The warehouse loan is a non-recourse obligation secured by a portfolio of railcars and operating leases, certain cash reserves, and other assets acquired and owned by the warehouse loan facility. The principal and interest of this indebtedness are paid from the cash flows of the underlying leases. Advances under the facility bear interest at a defined index rate plus a margin, for an all-in interest rate of 2.27% at June 30, 2012. The warehouse loan facility matures in February 2013. Amounts outstanding at maturity, absent renewal, will be payable in three installments in August 2013, February 2014, and August 2014.
In December 2010, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a $200 million share repurchase program, effective January 1, 2011, which expires on December 31, 2012. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 1,692,229 shares under this program at a cost of approximately $41.2 million. Certain shares of stock repurchased during June 2012, totaling $6.0 million, were cash settled in July 2012 in accordance with normal settlement practices. No shares were repurchased under this program during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.
Following an extended period of weak demand for new railcars through 2010, demand for new railcars recovered sharply, primarily due to an increase in the shipment of commodities, replacement of older railcars, and federal tax benefits received from taking delivery of railcars in 2011 and 2012. While moderating from the accelerated pace in the first half of 2011, demand conditions and corresponding order levels for new railcars in the first half of 2012 continued to be favorable. Orders for structural wind towers have been slow since mid-2008 when energy development companies encountered tightened credit markets, lower demand for electricity, and heightened competition arising from declining natural gas prices and imports from foreign manufacturers. The continued slowdown in the residential and commercial construction markets negatively impacted the results of our Construction Products Group as well. We continually assess our manufacturing capacity and take steps to align our production capacity with demand for our products. Due to improvements in demand, we have increased production staff at certain facilities since late 2010.
Equity Investment
See Note 6 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about the investment in TRIP Holdings.
Future Operating Requirements
We expect to finance future operating requirements with cash on hand, cash flows from operations, and depending on market conditions, short-term and long-term debt, and equity. Debt instruments that the Company has utilized include its revolving credit facility, the TILC warehouse facility, senior notes, convertible subordinated notes, asset-backed securities, and sale-leaseback transactions. The Company has also issued equity at various times. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had unrestricted cash balances of $294.1 million, $354.1 million available under its revolving credit facility, and $183.6 million available under its TILC warehouse facility. The Company believes it has access to adequate capital resources to fund operating requirements and is an active participant in the credit markets.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
See Note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about off balance sheet arrangements.
Derivative Instruments
We use derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates and pricing for zinc, natural gas, and diesel fuel prices, as well as to convert a portion of our variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt. Additionally, we use derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We also use derivatives to lock in fixed interest rates in anticipation of future debt issuances. Derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are accounted for in accordance with applicable accounting standards. See Note 3 of the Consolidated
31
Table of Contents
Financial Statements for discussion of how the Company valued its commodity hedges and interest rate swaps at June 30, 2012.
Interest rate hedges
Included in accompanying balance sheet at June 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Notional Amount |
Interest Rate(1) |
Liability | AOCL loss/ (income) |
Noncontrolling Interest |
||||||||||||||||
(in millions, except %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate locks: |
||||||||||||||||||||
2005-2006 |
$ | 200.0 | 4.87 | % | $ | | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | | |||||||||
2006-2007 |
$ | 370.0 | 5.34 | % | $ | | $ | 8.9 | $ | | ||||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
$ | 788.5 | 3.60 | % | $ | | $ | 21.7 | $ | 16.3 | ||||||||||
Interest rate swaps: |
||||||||||||||||||||
TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes |
$ | 83.8 | 2.62 | % | $ | 5.4 | $ | 3.0 | $ | 2.3 | ||||||||||
2008 debt issuance |
$ | 459.5 | 4.13 | % | $ | 44.3 | $ | 42.9 | $ | |
(1) | Weighted average fixed interest rate |
Effect on interest expense increase/(decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Expected effect during next twelve months(1) |
||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate locks: |
||||||||||||||||||||
2005-2006 |
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.3 | ) | |||||
2006-2007 |
$ | 0.8 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 1.7 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 3.3 | ||||||||||
TRIP Holdings |
$ | 1.5 | $ | | $ | 3.0 | $ | | $ | 5.9 | ||||||||||
Interest rate swaps: |
||||||||||||||||||||
TRIP warehouse |
$ | | $ | 6.8 | $ | | $ | 14.1 | $ | | ||||||||||
TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes |
$ | 0.5 | $ | | $ | 1.0 | $ | | $ | 1.7 | ||||||||||
2008 debt issuance |
$ | 4.2 | $ | 5.2 | $ | 8.4 | $ | 9.7 | $ | 16.9 |
(1) | Based on fair value as of June 30, 2012 |
During 2005 and 2006, we entered into interest rate swap transactions in anticipation of a future debt issuance. These instruments, with a notional amount of $200 million, fixed the interest rate on a portion of a future debt issuance associated with a railcar leasing transaction in 2006 and settled at maturity in the first quarter of 2006. These interest rate swaps were being accounted for as cash flow hedges with changes in the fair value of the instruments of $4.5 million in income recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) through the date the related debt issuance closed in May 2006. The balance is being amortized over the term of the related debt. The effect on interest expense is due to amortization of the AOCL balance.
In anticipation of a future debt issuance, we entered into interest rate swap transactions during the fourth quarter of 2006 and during 2007. These instruments, with a notional amount of $370 million, hedged the interest rate on a portion of a future debt issuance associated with an anticipated railcar leasing transaction, which closed in May 2008. These instruments settled during the second quarter of 2008, and were accounted for as cash flow hedges with changes in the fair value of the instruments of $24.5 million recorded as a loss in AOCL through the date the related debt issuance closed in May 2008. The balance is being amortized over the term of the related debt. The effect on interest expense is due to amortization of the AOCL balance.
In May 2008, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction that is being used to fix the Libor component of the debt issuance which closed in May 2008. The effect on interest expense results primarily from monthly interest settlements.
Between 2007 and 2009, TRIP Holdings, as required by the TRIP Warehouse Loan, entered into interest rate swap transactions, all of which qualified as cash flow hedges, to reduce the effect of changes in variable interest rates. In July 2011, these interest rate hedges were terminated in connection with the refinancing of the TRIP Warehouse Loan. Balances included in AOCL at the date the hedges were terminated are being amortized over the expected life of the new debt with $5.9 million of additional interest expense expected to be recognized during the twelve months following June 30, 2012. Also in July 2011, TRIP Holdings wholly-owned subsidiary, TRIP Master Funding, entered into an interest rate swap
32
Table of Contents
transaction with a notional amount of $94.1 million to reduce the effect of changes in variable interest rates associated with the Class A-1b notes of the TRIP Master Funding secured railcar equipment notes.
See Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding the related debt instruments.
Other Derivatives
Effect on operating income increase/(decrease) | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
(in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Fuel hedges(1) |
||||||||||||||||
Effect of mark to market valuation |
$ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.3 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||
Settlements |
(0.1 | ) | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.3 | |||||||
Foreign exchange hedges(2) |
$ | 0.0 | $ | | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | (0.6 | ) |
(1) | Included in cost of revenues in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations |
(2) | Included in other, net in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations |
Natural gas and diesel fuel
We maintain a program to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in the price of natural gas and diesel fuel purchases. The intent of the program is to protect our operating profit from adverse price changes by entering into derivative instruments. For those instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, any changes in their valuation are recorded directly to the consolidated statement of operations. The amount recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 for these instruments was not significant.
Foreign exchange hedge
We enter into foreign exchange hedges to mitigate the impact on operating profit of unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. These instruments are short term with quarterly maturities and no remaining balance in AOCL as of June 30, 2012.
Contractual Obligation and Commercial Commitments
As of June 30, 2012, contractual obligations related to letters of credit decreased slightly to $71.8 million from $74.1 million as of December 31, 2011. Refer to Note 11 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for changes to our outstanding debt and maturities. Contractual obligations that relate to operating leases including sale/leaseback transactions were basically unchanged as of June 30, 2012. See Note 5 of the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding operating lease obligations. We estimate that contractual obligations related to the purchase of goods and materials have increased by approximately $64.8 million since December 31, 2011 related to increases in production levels.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about recent accounting pronouncements.
33
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q (or statements otherwise made by the Company or on the Companys behalf from time to time in other reports, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), news releases, conferences, World Wide Web postings or otherwise) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, future financial performances, estimates, projections, goals, and forecasts. Trinity uses the words anticipates, believes, estimates, expects, intends, forecasts, may, will, should, and similar expressions to identify these forward-looking statements. Potential factors, which could cause our actual results of operations to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, among others:
| market conditions and demand for our business products and services; |
| the cyclical nature of industries in which we compete; |
| variations in weather in areas where our construction products are sold, used, or installed; |
| naturally-occurring events and disasters causing disruption to our manufacturing, product deliveries, and production capacity, thereby giving rise to an increase in expenses, loss of revenue, and property losses; |
| the timing of introduction of new products; |
| the timing and delivery of customer orders or a breach of customer contracts; |
| the credit worthiness of customers and their access to capital; |
| product price changes; |
| changes in mix of products sold; |
| the extent of utilization of manufacturing capacity; |
| availability and costs of steel, component parts, supplies, and other raw materials; |
| competition and other competitive factors; |
| changing technologies; |
| surcharges and other fees added to fixed pricing agreements for steel, component parts, supplies and other raw materials; |
| interest rates and capital costs; |
| counter-party risks for financial instruments; |
| long-term funding of our operations; |
| taxes; |
| the stability of the governments and political and business conditions in certain foreign countries, particularly Mexico; |
| changes in import and export quotas and regulations; |
| business conditions in emerging economies; |
| costs and results of litigation; and |
| legal, regulatory, and environmental issues. |
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made. Trinity undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made.
34
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There has been no material change in our market risks since December 31, 2011 as set forth in Item 7A of our 2011 Form 10-K. Refer to Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for a discussion of debt-related activity and the impact of hedging activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that it is able to collect and record the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the SEC, and to process, summarize, and disclose this information within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC. The Companys Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining these procedures and, as required by the rules of the SEC, evaluating their effectiveness. Based on their evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures that took place as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers believe that these procedures are effective to 1) ensure that the Company is able to collect, process, and disclose the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files with the SEC within the required time periods and 2) accumulate and communicate this information to the Companys management, including its Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
The Company maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance that: transactions are executed in accordance with managements general or specific authorization; transactions are recorded as necessary (1) to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, and (2) to maintain accountability for assets; access to assets is permitted only in accordance with managements general or specific authorization; and the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.
During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
35
Table of Contents
The information provided in Note 18 of the Consolidated Financial Statements is hereby incorporated into this Part II, Item 1 by reference.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of our 2011 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
This table provides information with respect to purchases by the Company of shares of its Common Stock during the quarter ended June 30, 2012:
Period |
Number of Shares Purchased(1) |
Average Price Paid per Share (1) |
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2) |
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2) |
||||||||||||
April 1, 2012 through April 30, 2012 |
6,315 | $ | 29.60 | | $ | 200,000,000 | ||||||||||
May 1, 2012 through May 31, 2012 |
545,980 | $ | 25.78 | 378,392 | $ | 190,293,400 | ||||||||||
June 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 |
1,316,550 | $ | 23.94 | 1,313,837 | $ | 158,846,107 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
1,868,845 | $ | 24.49 | 1,692,229 | $ | 158,846,107 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | These columns include the following transactions during the three months ended June 30, 2012: (i) the deemed surrender to the Company of 3,117 shares of Common Stock to pay the exercise price and satisfy tax withholding in connection with the exercise of employee stock options, (ii) the surrender to the Company of 173,499 shares of common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock issued to employees, and (iii) the purchase of 1,692,229 shares of common stock on the open market as part of the stock repurchase program. |
(2) | In December 2010, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a $200 million share repurchase program, effective January 1, 2011, which expires on December 31, 2012. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 1,692,229 shares under this program at a cost of approximately $41.2 million. Certain shares of stock repurchased during June 2012, totaling $6.0 million, were cash settled in July 2012 in accordance with normal settlement practices. The approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be repurchased under such share repurchase program is shown as of the end of such month or quarter. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
The information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-Q.
None.
36
Table of Contents
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Trinity Industries, Inc., as amended April 30, 2012 (filed herewith) | |
10.1 | Trinity Industries, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012). | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith). | |
31.2 | Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith). | |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
95 | Mine Safety Disclosure Exhibit (filed herewith). | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (filed electronically herewith)* |
37
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. | By /s/ JAMES E. PERRY | |||||
Registrant | ||||||
James E. Perry | ||||||
Senior Vice President and | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
July 26, 2012 |
38
Table of Contents
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Trinity Industries, Inc., as amended April 30, 2012 (filed herewith) | |
10.1 | Trinity Industries, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Plan Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012). | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith). | |
31.2 | Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith). | |
32.1 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
32.2 | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith). | |
95 | Mine Safety Disclosure Exhibit (filed herewith). | |
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (filed electronically herewith)* | |
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (filed electronically herewith)* |
39