Annual Statements Open main menu

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL - Annual Report: 2004 (Form 10-K)

e10vk
Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

     
þ   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004

OR

     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-14523

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
     
California
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  95-2086631
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
     
14731 Califa Street
Van Nuys, California

(Address of principal executive offices)
  91411
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number: 818-787-7000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
Title of each class
Common Stock, no par value
  Name of each exchange
On which registered

AMEX

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in the definitive proxy statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ

     The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of Registrant, as of December 26, 2003 was approximately $10.8 million (based upon the last sales price for shares of Registrant’s Common Stock as reported by the AMEX on December 26, 2003, the last business day of the Company’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter). Shares of Common Stock held by each officer, director and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock (including shares with respect to which a holder has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days) have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

     The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of September 10, 2004 was 2,964,542.



 


TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

INDEX

         
    Page
       
    3  
    9  
    11  
    11  
       
    12  
    13  
    14  
    32  
    33  
    33  
    34  
    34  
       
Item 10   Directors and executive officers of the registrant
    34  
Item 11   Executive compensation
    34  
Item 12  Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters
    34  
Item 13   Certain relationships and related transactions
    34  
Item 14   Principal Accountant Fees and Services
    34  
       
    34  
Signatures
    38  
Exhibits
    39  
    42  
    43  
    44  
    45  
    46  
    47  
 Exhibit 10.27
 Exhibit 10.28
 Exhibit 10.29
 Exhibit 10.30
 Exhibit 10.31
 Exhibit 10.32
 Exhibit 10.33
 Exhibit 10.34
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32

2


Table of Contents

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

PART I

NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The discussions of Trio-Tech International’s (the “Company”) business and activities set forth in this Form 10-K and in other past and future reports and announcements by the Company may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and assumptions regarding future activities and results of operations of the Company. In light of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company: market acceptance of Company products and services; changing business conditions or technologies and volatility in the semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for the Company’s products and services; the impact of competition; problems with technology; product development schedules; delivery schedules; changes in military or commercial testing specifications which could affect the market for the Company’s products and services; difficulties in profitably integrating acquired businesses, if any, into the Company; risks associated with conducting business internationally and especially in Southeast Asia, including currency fluctuations and devaluation, currency restrictions, local laws and restrictions and possible social, political and economic instability; and other economic, financial and regulatory factors beyond the Company’s control. See the discussions elsewhere in this Form 10-K, including under the heading “Certain Risks That May Affect Our Future Results”, for more information. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential,” “believes,” “can impact,” “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology.

We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, changed circumstances, or the occurrence of unanticipated events.

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

Trio-Tech International was incorporated in 1958 under the laws of the State of California. As used herein, the term “Trio-Tech” or “Company” or “we” or “us” or “Registrant” includes Trio-Tech International and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise indicates. Our mailing address and executive offices are located at 14731 Califa Street, Van Nuys, California 91411, and our telephone number is (818) 787-7000.

With more than 46 years dedicated to the semiconductor and related industries, we have applied our expertise to our global customer base in test services, design, engineering, manufacturing, and distribution.

General

Founded in 1958, Trio-Tech International provides third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through its laboratories in Southeast Asia. The Company also designs, manufactures and markets equipment and systems used in the testing and production of semiconductors at its facilities in California and Southeast Asia, and distributes semiconductor processing and testing equipment manufactured by others.

The Company operates in three business segments: Testing Services, Manufacturing and Distribution.

We currently operate five testing facilities, one in the United States, one in Europe and three in Southeast Asia. These facilities provide customers with a full range of testing services, such as burn-in and product life testing for finished or packaged components. In fiscal 2004, Ireland operation received certification from one of its customers as an approved programming house. The Ireland operation now focuses on providing programming services, and continues to focus on service and tape and reel. Subsequent to the year end we acquired a division in Malaysia which provides burn-in services for a large electronic product manufacturer.

We manufacture “Artic Temperature Controlled Wafer Chucks”, which are used for test, characterization and failure analysis of semiconductor wafers and other microelectronic substrates in what is commonly called the “front-end”, or creation of semiconductor circuits. Additionally, we also manufacture centrifuges, leak detectors, HAST (Highly Accelerated Stress Test) systems and “burn-in” systems that are used primarily in the “back-end” of the semiconductor manufacturing process to test finished semiconductor devices and electronic components. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, the manufacturing of Wet Process Stations by one of the operations in the United States, Universal Systems of San Jose, CA, was moved to Singapore, and this transition was completed by end of fiscal 2004.

3


Table of Contents

Our operation in Southeast Asia has an active distribution business. Additionally, the Southeast Asia operation markets and supports distribution of their own manufactured equipment in addition to distributing complementary products from other manufacturers that are used by the Company’s customers and other semiconductor and electronics manufacturers. Trio-Tech Services Pte. Ltd., a dormant wholly owned subsidiary of Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., was renamed to Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. Subsequent to the fiscal year end, one of the operations in Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., the Singapore Distribution operation, transferred its assets to Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. for the purpose of expanding this operation through this entity.

On July 1, 2004, subsequent to fiscal year end, Trio-Tech Malaysia completed its acquisition of a burn-in testing division for an aggregate cash purchase price of 3,500,000 Ringgit Malaysia, representing approximately $921,053 on March 29, 2004 based on the spot exchange rate published in Federal Reserve as of that date and acquired additional related assets for a purchase price of 1,126,995 Ringgit Malaysia (or approximately $296,578 based on the spot exchange rate published in Federal Reserve as of July 1, 2004). This division was previously owned by a competitor.

Company History

     
1958
  Incorporated in California
 
   
1976
  The Company formed Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. in Singapore.
 
   
1984
  The Company formed the European Electronic Test Center (EETC), a Cayman Islands domiciled subsidiary, to operate a test facility in Dublin, Ireland.
 
   
1985
  The Company’s Singapore subsidiary entered into a joint-venture agreement, Trio-Tech Malaysia, to operate a test facility in Penang.
 
   
1986
  Trio-Tech International listed on the NASDAQ Small Cap market under the symbol TRTC.
 
   
1988
  The Company acquired the Rotating Test Equipment Product Line of Genisco Technology Corporation.
 
   
1990
  Trio-Tech International acquired Express Test Corporation in California.
Trio-Tech Malaysia opened a new facility in Kuala Lumpur.
 
   
1992
  Trio-Tech Singapore opened Trio-Tech Bangkok, Thailand.
Trio-Tech Singapore achieved ISO 9002 certification.
 
   
1994
  Trio-Tech Malaysia started a new components assembly operation in Batang Kali.
 
   
1995
  Trio-Tech Singapore achieved ISO 9001 certification.
 
   
1997
  In November 1997, the Company acquired KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems of Campbell, California.
 
   
1998
  In September 1998, the Company listed on AMEX under the symbol TRT.
 
   
2000
  Trio-Tech Singapore achieved QS 9000 certification.
Trio-Tech Malaysia closed its facility in Batang Kali.
 
   
2001
  The Company divested the Rotating Test Equipment Product Line.
Trio-Tech Malaysia closed its facility in Kuala Lumpur.
 
   
2003
  Trio-Tech Singapore opened a sales office in China known as Trio-Tech (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
Trio-Tech Malaysia scaled down its facility in Penang.
 
   
2004
  The Company moved its Wet Process Station manufacturing from Campbell, California to Singapore.
Trio-Tech Test Services Pte. Ltd. was renamed Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd.
Trio-Tech Malaysia acquired a burn-in testing division in Malaysia.

4


Table of Contents

Background

The semiconductor industry entered calendar 2004 in the midst of an up cycle, after experiencing the worst downturn ever seen in 2001 and flat sales in 2002. The worldwide market for the semiconductor industry was estimated at $166.4 billion in 2003, with a forecast growth of 19.4% to $194.6 billion in 2004 and 5.8% to $206.0 billion in 2005. According to the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), the industry growth is being driven by strong demand for microchips for a broad range of applications, including personal computers, cellular telephones, consumer electronics, wired and wireless telecommunications infrastructure, and automotive. Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International (SEMI) reported recently that semiconductor capital equipment totaled $18.7 billion, or 86% higher than the first half of 2003. SEMI has observed strong double-digit billings growth is observed in all regions with the exception of North America. SEMI projected that Taiwan and China will be the two regions experiencing the strongest year over year growth. SEMI announced that the industry is anticipated to sell $36.2 billion of new chip manufacturing, testing and assembly equipment in 2004. Its forecast indicates that the equipment market will grow 24% in 2005 and the cyclic market growth will contract slightly in 2006 before resuming low double digit growth in 2007.

“Back-End”

Trio-Tech’s test services are concentrated on the back-end screening and testing of semiconductor devices. With the high concentration of semiconductor assembly and packaging facilities in Southeast Asia, a large demand exists for third party test services in this region. Customers use third party test services to accommodate fluctuations in output or to benefit from economies that can be offered by third party service providers.

Finished devices are put through a series of tests, such as burn-in and electrical testing, to ensure that they meet the necessary performance and quality standards, before shipment to the customer. Our component centrifuges, leak detectors, HAST equipment and COBIS burn-in systems are all used to test and screen finished semiconductor devices to ensure that they meet the specifications required by the manufacturers and customers.

“Front-End”

Semiconductor devices are fundamental building blocks used in electronic equipment and systems. Each semiconductor device consists of an integrated circuit designed to perform a specific electronic function. Integrated circuits are manufactured through a series of complex steps on a wafer substrate, etching or depositing the circuit pattern on a surface, typically a circular silicon wafer, measuring three to twelve inches in diameter. Multiple integrated circuit patterns are transferred to the wafer, and each completed integrated circuit is called a device or die. The number of devices or dies depends on the size of the circuit and the size of the wafer. Manufacturers can significantly increase the number of devices or dies per wafer by shrinking the circuit size or by expanding the wafer size. The transition to increased wafer size, from 200mm (8 inch) to 300mm (12 inch) wafers, is currently underway throughout the industry.

After etching or deposition of integrated circuits, wafers are typically sent through a series of 100 to 300 additional processing steps. At many of these process steps, the wafer is washed and dried using Wet Process Stations, which we manufacture.

The finished wafer is then put through a series of tests in which each separate integrated device on the wafer is tested for functionality. Our Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks are used with a wafer prober to test semiconductor wafers at accurately controlled temperatures. After testing, the wafer is “diced” or cut up, and each die is then placed into a packaging material, usually plastic or ceramic, with lead wires to permit mounting onto printed circuit boards.

Testing Services

We own and operate facilities that provide testing services for semiconductor devices and other electronic components to meet the requirements of military, aerospace, industrial and commercial applications. Testing services represented approximately 47%, 45% and 46% of sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The Company uses its own proprietary equipment for certain burn-in, centrifugal and leak tests, and commercially available equipment for various other environmental tests. The Company conducts the majority of its testing operations in Southeast Asia with facilities in Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand. All of the facilities in Southeast Asia are ISO 9002 as well as QS 9000 certified. The Company also operates test facilities in Ireland. We are also in the process to obtain certification under TS16949 for all the Southeast Asia facilities.

The testing services are used by manufacturers and purchasers of semiconductors and other components who either lack testing capabilities or whose in-house screening facilities are insufficient for testing devices to military or certain commercial

5


Table of Contents

specifications. For those customers with adequate in-house capabilities, we offer testing services for their “overflow” requirements and also provide independent testing verification services.

Trio-Tech’s laboratories perform a variety of tests, including stabilization bake, thermal shock, temperature cycling, mechanical shock, constant acceleration, gross and fine leak tests, electrical testing, static and dynamic burn-in tests, and vibration testing. The laboratories also perform qualification testing, consisting of intense tests conducted on small samples of output from manufacturers who require qualification of their processes and devices.

Manufacturing Products

The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets equipment for the manufacturing and testing of semiconductor wafers, devices and other electronic components. Revenue from the sale of products manufactured by the Company represented approximately 37%, 22% and 26% of sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Front-End Products

Wet Process Stations

Wet Process Stations are used for cleaning, rinsing and drying semiconductor wafers, magnetic disks, flat panel displays and other microelectronic substrates. This product line includes manual, semi-automated and automated wet process stations, and features radial and linear robots, state-of-the-art PC touch-screen controllers and sophisticated scheduling and control software. The Wet Process Station was manufactured by the Company’s subsidiary, Universal Systems, through the first nine months of fiscal 2004. Thereafter, the Company moved its Wet Process Station manufacturing, along with all its equipment, from Universal Systems to Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. in Singapore.

Artic Temperature Controlled Wafer Chucks

The Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks are used for test, characterization and failure analysis of semiconductor wafers and other components at accurately controlled hot and cold temperatures. Several models are available with temperature ranges from -65°C to +400°C and in diameters from 4 to 12 inch. These systems provide excellent performance to meet the most demanding customer applications. Several unique mechanical design features, for which patents are pending, provide excellent mechanical stability under high probing forces and across the temperature ranges.

Back-End Products

Autoclaves and HAST (Highly Accelerated Stress Test) Equipment

We manufacture a range of autoclaves and HAST systems and specialized test fixtures. Autoclaves provide pressurized, saturated vapor (100% relative humidity) test environments for fast and easy monitoring of integrated circuit manufacturing processes. HAST equipment, which provides a pressurized high temperature environment with variable humidity, is used to determine the moisture resistance of plastic encapsulated devices. HAST provides a fast and cost-effective alternative to conventional non-pressurized temperature and humidity testing.

Burn-in Equipment and Boards

We manufacture burn-in systems, burn-in boards and burn-in board test systems. Burn-in equipment is used to subject semiconductor devices to elevated temperatures while testing them electrically to identify early product failures and to assure long-term reliability. Burn-in testing approximates, in a compressed time frame, the electrical and thermal conditions to which the device would be subjected during its normal life.

The Company manufactures the COBIS II burn-in system which offers state-of-the-art dynamic burn-in capabilities and a Windows-based operating system with full data logging and networking features. The Company developed, and now offers, a new Power Line Conditioner for the COBIS II, which decreases the type and frequency of electrical interruptions. The Company also offers burn-in boards for its BISIC, COBIS and COBIS II burn-in systems and other brands of burn-in systems. Burn-in boards are used to mount devices during high temperature environmental stressing. The Burn-in Board Tester is an extremely accurate software programmable burn-in board tester, which can be programmed to check up to 1024 sockets’ pins.

In 2000 through 2002, the Company developed several new products to complement the burn-in processes, including semi-automatic (LUBIBM) and automatic burn-in board loaders & unloaders (LUBIB). These products were designed to perform precise, high-speed transfer of IC packages from the semiconductor holding tray to the burn-in board, or vice-versa, while maintaining the integrity of the IC’s leads. Additional features have been further integrated into the LUBIB to improve

6


Table of Contents

productivity and minimize human handling including the integration of automatic burn-in board handling systems and the automatic electrical board check station. We have improved the LUBIBM with built-in test functions for a major microprocessor company to study device characteristics and to weed out device failures. Burn-in-board cleaning systems (CUBIB) are designed to perform wet or dry cleaning for burn-in boards and other modular boards. Recently, we jointly developed a fully automatic CUBIB with one of our major customers. We also recently developed and introduced a new innovation, the burn-in Socket Contact Conditioner (SCC), which removes fragments of solder residue from the contact pins of an IC Socket, improving the productivity of the test process and reducing contact failure on socket pins.

In 2002 through 2003, the Company was the major supplier to build Smart Burn-In (SBI) electrical equipment to test microprocessors for one customer. This equipment is regarded as a high-end method of testing microprocessor devices. While providing integrated burn-in solutions, our sales team presented the total burn-in automation solutions (in the BITS conference in Phoenix, Arizona in March 2003) to improve products’ yield, reduce process downtime and improve efficiency. In addition, the Company developed a cooling solution for high power heat dissipation semiconductor devices. This solution involves the cooling or maintaining of the temperature of high power semiconductor devices.

In 2003 through 2004, the Company was the major supplier to build System Level Test (SLT) equipment to test the microprocessors of one customer. This equipment is used at the final stage of testing these microprocessor devices.

Component Centrifuges and Leak Detection Equipment

Component centrifuges and leak detection equipment are used to test the mechanical integrity of ceramic and other hermetically sealed semiconductor devices and electronic parts for high reliability and aerospace applications. The company’s centrifuges spin these devices and parts at specific acceleration rates, creating gravitational forces (g’s) up to 30,000g’s, thereby indicating any mechanical weakness in the devices. Leak detection equipment is designed to detect leaks in hermetic packaging. The first stage of the test includes pressurizing the devices in a tracer gas for fine leaks or fluid for gross leaks. The bubble tester is used for gross leak detection. A visual bubble trail will indicate when a device is defective.

Distribution Activities

The Company’s Singapore subsidiary continues to develop its international distribution division. The distribution operation markets, sells and supports our products in Southeast Asia. In addition to our own products, this operation also distributes complementary products from other manufacturers based in the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries. These products are widely used by high quality and volume production manufacturers in the semiconductor and electronic industries. The products include environmental chambers, shaker systems, handlers, interface systems, vibration systems, solderability testers and other manufacturing products.

Subsequent to the fiscal year end, one of the operations in Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., the Singapore Distribution operation, transferred its assets to its subsidiary Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd., for the purpose of expanding this operation through this entity.

Revenue from distribution activities represented approximately 16%, 33% and 29% of sales for the years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Product Research and Development

We continue to invest in research and development to improve our products and services. The Company incurred research and development costs of $117,000 in fiscal 2004, $121,000 in fiscal 2003 and $331,000 in fiscal 2002.

We will continue to develop new testing technology that allows us to offer more advanced processes. During 2000 through 2002, the Company developed new equipment and facilities to participate in a new generation of burn-in technology known as HBI and SBI. This technology was developed to meet the unique test requirements of the latest microprocessor products. The HBI and SBI test systems are multiple positions, independently programmable systems that can economically run long test times at unique burn-in conditions. We developed significant facilities, including a power sub-station and improved environmental controls, to house the HBI and SBI technology.

While the semiconductor industry in the United States continues to adjust to implementing the 12 inch wafer, the test equipment market for chucks continued to remain slow for the remaining 4, 6 and 8 inch wafer markets. With this coming trend, we anticipate that our U.S operation will shift their focus from research and development on “Front End” products to concentrate on the refurbished equipment market, which is anticipated to be strong in the recovering semiconductor market.

7


Table of Contents

Marketing, Distribution and Services

The Company markets its products and services worldwide, directly and through independent sales representatives. We have approximately 11 independent sales representatives operating in the United States and another 13 in various foreign countries. Of the 24 sales representatives, 3 represent the Distribution Segment and the others represent the Manufacturing and Testing Segment. Trio-Tech’s United States marketing efforts are coordinated from its California location. Southeast Asia marketing efforts are assigned to its subsidiary in Singapore. The Company advertises its products in trade journals and participates in trade shows.

Independent testing laboratories, users, assemblers and manufacturers of semiconductor devices, including many, large well-known corporations, purchase the Company’s products and services. These customers depend on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing semiconductor devices. In fiscal 2004, 2003, and 2002, sales of equipment and services to our two largest customers (Catalyst Semiconductor and Advanced Micro Devices) accounted for approximately 51.8%, 49.3%, and 55%, respectively, of our net revenues. Our ability to maintain close, satisfactory relationships with our customers is essential to our stability and growth. The loss of or reduction or delay in orders from our significant customers, or delays in collecting accounts receivable from our significant customers, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, the Company had sales of $2,853,000 (15%) and $7,074,000 (37%) to Catalyst Semiconductor and AMD, respectively.

Backlog

The following table sets forth the Company’s backlog at the dates indicated (amounts in thousands):

                 
    June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
Manufacturing backlog
  $ 3,440     $ 582  
Testing service backlog
    4,058       5,138  
Distribution backlog
    852       206  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 8,350     $ 5,926  
 
   
 
     
 
 

Based upon past experience, the Company does not anticipate any significant cancellations or renegotiation of sales, and if there is any cancellation of confirmed purchase order, the customer will need to reimburse the Company on all costs that were incurred. The purchase orders for manufacturing, testing and distribution require delivery within the next 12 months. The Company does not anticipate any difficulties in meeting delivery schedules.

Manufacturing and Supply

The Company’s products are designed by its engineers and are assembled and tested at its facilities in California, Singapore and Ireland. We purchase all parts, and certain components, from outside sources for assembly by the Company. We have no written contracts with any of our key suppliers. As these parts and components are available from a variety of sources, the Company believes that the loss of any one of our suppliers would not have a material adverse effect on its business taken as a whole.

Competition

There are numerous competing testing laboratories in Southeast Asia that perform a range of testing services similar to those offered by the Company. However, recent severe competition and attrition in the Asian test and burn-in services industry has reduced the total number of the Company’s competitors to approximately three. Product performance and reliability in the Testing Segment, although fundamentally equivalent, are provided by using our own proprietary equipment for certain burn-in, centrifugal and leak tests. As the Company has sold and will continue to sell its products to competing laboratories, and as other test products are available from many other manufacturers, the Company’s competitors can offer the same testing capabilities. Testing equipment is also available to semiconductor manufacturers and users who might otherwise use outside testing laboratories, including the Company, to perform environmental testing. The existence of competing laboratories and the availability of testing equipment to semiconductor manufacturers and users pose competitive threats to the Company’s future testing services revenues and earnings. Although the aforementioned laboratories and new competitors may challenge the

8


Table of Contents

Company at any time, the Company believes that other factors, including its reputation, long service history and strong customer relationships, are important factors in determining the Company’s position in the market.

The Southeast Asia Distribution Segment sells a range of more than 27 different testing products, of which 3% are front-end products, the sales volumes of which are highly dependent on customer capital expenditure plans. The market for this segment is very competitive as a few competitors are already established. Through 46 years dedicated to the semiconductor and related industries, we have formed lasting relationships with key suppliers in our Distribution Segment which allows us to competitively price our distributed products.

The semiconductor equipment manufacturing industry is highly competitive. There are approximately three competitors in our Manufacturing Segment for Burn-in Boards and Burn-in Ovens and at least twelve competitors for Wet Process Stations in Asia. In the United States, we have one competitor for HAST Systems, one for Artic Thermal Chucks, and one for Gross Leak Test Equipment. There can be no assurance that competition will not increase or that the Company’s technological advantages may not be reduced or lost as a result of technological advances by competitors or changes in semiconductor processing technology. We continue to invest in research and development to improve our products and services.

We believe that the principal competitive factors in the manufacturing industry include product performance, reliability, service and technical support, product improvements, price, established relationships with customers and product familiarity. The Company makes every effort to compete favorably with respect to each of these factors. For example, we believe that the products manufactured by the Company meet or exceed customer applications through unique design features, which applications demand systems that work year after year in a production setting. Our manufactured systems have a track record of reliability. The Company has been in business for more than 46 years and has facilities in several regions of the world. The Company believes those factors have combined not only to help establish long-term relationships with customers but also to allow it to continue to do business with customers upon their relocation to other regions in which the Company conducts business. The Company believes that its pricing of manufactured and distributed systems is competitive in the market. Our competitive position in the markets we are serving is not readily determinable, because there is no information publicly available regarding our competitors who are privately held companies.

Patents

Trio-Tech’s Manufacturing Segment holds a United States Patent granted in 1987 in relation to its pressurization humidity testing equipment. The Company also holds a United States Patent granted in 1994 on certain aspects of its Artic temperature test systems. In 2000, the Company filed, and was granted in 2001, a new United States patent (20 years) for several aspects of its new range of Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks. Although the Company believes these patents are an integral part of our Manufacturing Segment, the capitalized cost of the patents was written off in fiscal 2002 because of the impairment assessed by our management. This assessment was based on an examination of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows which were generated by the subsidiaries where certain long-lived assets (goodwill and certain fixed assets) are used.

In fiscal 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company did not register any patent within U.S.

It is typical in the semiconductor industry to receive notices from time to time alleging infringement of patents or other intellectual property rights of others. The Company does not believe that it infringes on the intellectual property rights of others. However, should any claims therefor be brought against the Company, the cost of litigating such claims, and any damages that may result therefrom, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Employees

As of June 30, 2004 the Company had approximately 14 employees in the United States, 347 in Southeast Asia and 10 in Ireland for a total of approximately 371 employees. None of the Company’s employees are represented by a labor union. As of June 30, 2004, there were approximately 274 employees in the testing segment, 77 employees in the manufacturing segment, 18 in the distribution segment and 2 in Corporate.

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

At this time, the Company believes that it uses about 62.8% of its fixed property capacity. The Company also believes that its existing facilities are under-utilized and are adequate and suitable to cover any sudden increase in the Company’s needs in the foreseeable future.

The following table sets forth information as to the location and general character of the principal manufacturing and testing facilities of the Registrant:

9


Table of Contents

                 
                Owned (O)
        Approx.   or Leased (L)
        Sq. Ft.   Expiration
Location
  Principal Use/Segment
  Occupied
  Date
14731 Califa Street
  Headquarters/     10,000     (L) Jan. 2005 *1
Van Nuys, CA 9l411
  Testing/Manufacturing            
 
               
Abbey Road
  Testing     18,400     (O)
Deansgrange Co.
               
Dublin, Ireland
               
 
               
1004, Toa Payoh North, Singapore
               
HEX 07-01/07,
  Testing     6,864     (L) Sept. 2006
HEX 03-01/03,
  Testing/Manufacturing     2,959     (L) Sept. 2006
HEX 03-16,
  Testing     976     (L) Sept. 2006
HEX 01-08/15
  Testing/Manufacturing     6,864     (L) Jan. 2006
HEX 01-16/17
  Testing     1,983     (L) Jan. 2006
HEX 02-08/10,
  Testing     2,959     (L) Aug. 2005
HEX 02-11/15
  Testing     3,905     (L) Apr. 2005 *1
HEX 04-17
  Testing     1,006     (L) May. 2007
HEX 04-14/16
  Testing     2,929     (L) May. 2007
HEX 03-08/10
  Testing     2,959     (L) May. 2007
 
               
1008, Toa Payoh North, Singapore
               
HEX 03-01/06,
  Testing     7,345     (L) Feb. 2006
HEX 03-09/17,
  Logistics/Universal(FE)     6,099     (L) Jan. 2006
HEX 01-08,
  Transformer Room     603     (L) Jun. 2006
HEX 07-17/18,
  Testing     4,315     (L) Nov. 2006
HEX 07-01,
  Testing     3,466     (L) Jan. 2007
HEX 02-17
  Universal (FE)     832     (L) May. 2007
HEX 02-15/16
  Universal (FE)     1,400     (L) Jul. 2007
 
               
HEX 01-S3/S4
  Power Substation     1,628     (L) Sept. 2006
 
               
Plot 1A, Phase 1
  Subleased     49,924     (O) *2
Bayan Lepas Free Trade Zone
               
11900 Penang
               
 
               
327, Chalongkrung Road,
  Testing     11,300     (O)
Lamplathew, Lat Krabang,
               
Bangkok 10520, Thailand
               
 
               
Lot No. B7, Kawasan MIEL
  Subleased     24,142     (O) *2
Batang Kali, Phase II,
               
43300 Batang Kali
               
Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
               

*  
1 With respect to the various leases that expire during fiscal 2005, the Company anticipates that the landlord will offer similar terms on each such lease at renewal and does not believe that material expenses will be incurred.
 
*   2 The premises are subleased to a third party.

10


Table of Contents

ITEM 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is, from time to time, the subject of litigation claims and assessments arising out of matters occurring in its normal business operations. In the opinion of management, resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

There are no material proceedings to which any director, officer or affiliate of the Registrant, any beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Registrant’s common stock, or any associate of such person is a party that is adverse to the Registrant or its properties.

There was no litigation relating to environmental action which arose from operations.

ITEM 4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

11


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5 MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Registrant’s common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “TRT”. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low sales prices of our common stock as quoted by AMEX:

                 
Quarter Ended
  High
  Low
Fiscal 2003
               
September 30, 2002
    2.65       1.87  
December 31, 2002
    2.30       1.51  
March 31, 2003
    2.30       1.86  
June 30, 2003
    2.45       1.86  
Fiscal 2004
               
September 30, 2003
    3.60       2.40  
December 31, 2003
    4.25       3.24  
March 31, 2004
    4.65       3.59  
June 30, 2004
    5.00       4.25  

The Company has never declared any cash dividends on its common stock. Any future determination as to cash dividends will depend upon the earnings and financial position of the Company at that time and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem appropriate. California law prohibits the payment of dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings or cannot meet certain asset to liability ratios. It is anticipated that no dividends will be paid to holders of common stock in the foreseeable future.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding equity compensation plans of the Company:

                         
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
                    Number of
                    securities
                    remaining available
                    for future issuance
                    under equity
    Number of           compensation plans
    securities to be           (excluding
    issued upon   Weighted-average   securities
    exercise of   exercise price of   reflected in column
    outstanding options   outstanding options   (a))
Plan Category
  (a)
  (b)
  (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
                       
(1) Company’s 1988 Stock Option Plan
    213,500     $ 3.95       86,500  
(2) Directors Stock Option Plan
    132,000     $ 3.24       168,000  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:
    0     $ 0.00       0  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
    345,500     $ 3.68       254,500  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

12


Table of Contents

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(In thousands, except Earnings (Loss) per share)

                                         
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
  2001
  2000
Consolidated Statements of Operations
                                       
Net sales
  $ 19,154     $ 21,246     $ 19,617     $ 36,133     $ 26,943  
Income (loss) from operations
    36       (287 )     (3,579 )     1,383       1,180  
Net Income (Loss)
    220       (81 )     (3,547 )     1,163       1,034  
Earnings (Loss) per share :
                                       
Basic
    0.07       (0.03 )     (1.21 )     0.40       0.37  
Diluted
    0.07       (0.03 )     (1.21 )     0.39       0.36  
Weighted average common shares outstanding
                                       
Basic
    2,939       2,928       2,928       2,884       2,759  
Diluted
    3,000       2,928       2,928       3,006       2,895  
Consolidated Balance Sheets
                                       
Current assets
  $ 12,798     $ 11,493     $ 13,405     $ 15,501     $ 17,279  
Current liabilities
    5,429       4,466       6,486       7,599       8,349  
Working capital
    7,369       7,027       6,919       7,902       8,930  
Total assets
    18,000       16,711       19,075       24,150       22,712  
Long-term debt and capitalized leases
    793       836       986       1,745       586  
Shareholders’ equity
  $ 9,024     $ 8,590     $ 8,618     $ 11,609     $ 10,448  

13


Table of Contents

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)

The discussions of Trio-Tech International’s (the “Company”) business and activities set forth in this Form 10-K and in other past and future reports and announcements by the Company may contain forward-looking statements within meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and assumptions regarding future activities and results of operations of the Company. In light of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company: market acceptance of Company products and services; changing business conditions or technologies and volatility in the semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for the Company’s products and services; market demand for higher-end semiconductor equipment; the impact of competition on products and pricing; losses or curtailments of purchases from key customers; problems with technology; product development schedules; delivery schedules; changes in military or commercial testing specifications which could affect the market for the Company’s products and services; difficulties in profitably integrating acquired businesses, if any, into the Company; risks associated with conducting business internationally and especially in Southeast Asia, including currency fluctuations and devaluation, currency restrictions, local laws and restrictions, and possible social, political and economic instability; and other economic, financial and regulatory factors beyond the Company’s control. See the discussions elsewhere in this Form 10-K for more information. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may”, “will”, “opinion”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “estimates”, “potential”, “believes”, “can impact”, “continue”, or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology.

We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, changed circumstances, or the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview

Founded in 1958, Trio-Tech International provides third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through its laboratories in Southeast Asia. The Company operates in three distinct segments: Sales, Manufacturing, and Testing. At or from its facilities in California and Southeast Asia, the Company also designs, manufactures and markets equipment and systems used in the testing and production of semiconductors, and distributes semiconductor processing and testing equipment manufactured by others.

     (i) Results of operations and business outlook

The following table sets forth our revenue components for the past three years:

Revenue Components

                         
    Year Ended
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Net Sales:
                       
Testing
    46.50 %     44.74 %     45.58 %
Manufacturing
    37.18       22.00       25.60  
Distribution
    16.32       33.26       28.82  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
    100.00 %     100.00 %     100.00 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Geographically, we operate in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and Ireland. Our customers are mainly concentrated in Southeast Asia and they are either semiconductor chip manufacturers or testing facilities that purchase our testing equipment.

Our core business, Testing Services, experienced a decline in sales in the last fiscal year, especially in Singapore, due to a fall in demand for certain products. Nevertheless, we are expecting an increasing trend for burn-in services in Southeast Asia in fiscal 2005 with increased demand for a certain new type of burn-in device. However, we have yet to receive the confirmed backlog. In fiscal 2004, Ireland operation received certification from one of its customers as an approved programming house. The operation in Ireland plans to continue to service existing customers and search for new business opportunities. In addition, with the newly acquired burn-in division in Malaysia from a competitor, we managed to service a large electronic product manufacturer with whom we had been pursuing a business relationship for some time. This acquisition benefited not only our Testing segment, but also our Manufacturing segment where we have higher sales for burn-in boards.

14


Table of Contents

We saw higher backlog from the Singapore Manufacturing operation towards the end of the year. This increased backlog was derived mainly from burn-in boards and Smart Burn-In (SBI) electrical testers to test microprocessors, which were in high demand by our major customers in Asia. In fiscal 2005, we anticipate that the business volume will come in mainly from Southeast Asia. The U.S. operation will continue to purchase refurbished equipment so that the operation can remain competitive in the used equipment market.

We anticipate that there will be a change in product mix for Singapore Distribution operation from low margin front-end products to equipment sales according to the market trend. The backlog for Equipment sales increased by threefold, to $852 in fiscal 2004, mainly from Vibration products and two new products, Camera Modules and Film Deposition Systems. Camera Modules and components, which are in the imaging technology industry, are in demand across the Asian region, and Film Deposition Systems are important for manufacturing process in Semiconductor industries and research institutions.

The key performance indicators for the Company are based on market demand. Sales activities such as bookings, backlog, and queries on products also formed part of our performance indicators, as well as customers’ forecasts and the financial results of customers and competitors. Statistics obtained from the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) give reasonable inference of the upward trend of electronic materials until 2006, after which time no forecast has been given. The SIA report indicated that strong double-digit billings growth is observed in all regions with the exception of North America. The report also shows that Asia makes up 63% of the semiconductor market region. Taiwan and China are two regions experiencing the strongest year over year growth.

The Company believes the current market trend indicates that the overall semiconductor market is responding to the increase in demand for computer and consumer electronics. The activity level increased specifically in the information technology, medical and military markets. Increasing demand for equipment, including burn-in systems and boards, can be seen in the Asian region, China and India. However, the Semiconductor equipment capital spending budgets in the U.S were reduced due to lower growth expectation in the next two quarters because of the slow economy in the U.S. This resulted from, among other things, higher oil prices, an unstable Mideast region and lower consumer confidence.

There are several influencing factors which create uncertainties when forecasting performance, such as the ever-changing nature of technology, i.e. specific requirements from the customer, decline in demand for certain types of burn-in devices or equipment, and other similar factors. One of these factors is the highly competitive nature of the Semiconductor industry. Another is that some customers are unable to provide a forecast of the products required for the next few weeks, hence it is difficult for our Singapore Manufacturing operation to plan out the resources needed to meet these customers’ requirements. This will normally result in a lower margin for these products as it is more expensive to purchase materials in a short time frame. However, the Company has taken action to protect itself and formulated plans for dealing with these unpredictable factors. For example, in order to meet customers’ demands on short notice, the operation has already begun to stockpile materials. The drawback is that if customers cancel orders, the Company is responsible for finding other buyers for these materials. We will be instituting further cost cutting measures such as combining certain plants together, finding solutions to cut utilities rates, remaining economic in scale and maintaining a lean headcount, among others. Furthermore, we have begun subcontracting certain areas of manufacturing functions to ease supervisory and administrative work. Finally, the Company is exploring new business opportunities such as selling new products.

     (ii) Financial information

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, total assets increased by $1,289 from $16,711 at June 30, 2003 to $18,000 at June 30, 2004. The majority of the increase was in short-term deposits, other receivables and inventories, but offset with a decrease in investments in marketable securities of $485.

The increase in short-term deposits of $1,341 from $4,308 at June 30, 2003 to $5,649 at June 30, 2004 mainly derived from cash proceeds from the disposal of marketable securities and the withdrawal of previously invested funds. All of the $485 of the investments in marketable securities at June 30, 2003 were sold in the first quarter of 2004 in order to take advantage of the increase in market value, utilize the profit and exit the market. The Company also withdrew previously invested funds of $210, which were held in trust by an independent investing firm, for further investment in the newly acquired burn-in testing operation in Malaysia.

Cash decreased by $138 from $1,495 at June 30, 2003 to $1,357 at June 30, 2004 as the Company reinvested additional cash balances into short-term deposits. Furthermore, the early repayment of a loan in Singapore and the payment of 2003 bonuses contributed to the decrease in cash.

Inventories increased by $360 from June 30, 2003 to $1,409 at June 30, 2004 attributable to the Singapore Manufacturing and Distribution operations. The Singapore Manufacturing operation began work on new orders and turned the finished goods into revenue towards the end of fourth quarter. On the other hand, the Singapore Distribution operation purchased inventories, which

15


Table of Contents

happened to be in transit, to cater to the higher backlog as of June 30, 2004. As a result, the work in progress increased by $534, which was offset with a decrease in finished goods of $242.

The increase in other receivables also contributed to the increase in total assets. The increase in other receivables mainly derived from the down payment for the renovation of SBI (Smart Burn-in) facilities of $377 in Singapore as well as the deposit of $92 paid for the acquisition of the testing operation in Malaysia. These offset the withdrawal of previously invested funds of $210 from the independent investing firm, which withdrawal is described above.

Total liabilities at June 30, 2004 were $6,866, reflecting an $853 increase from $6,013 at June 30, 2003. Accounts payable at June 30, 2004 increased by $1,236 since June 30, 2003 due mainly to a rise in quantity of materials purchased before payment for a few of the operations in Southeast Asia at the end of the fourth quarter. This was offset by a decrease in lines of credit, notes payable and capitalized leases as a result of net payments of $154, $35 and $190 respectively. During the year fiscal 2004, Universal Systems negotiated with the bank to terminate the capitalized lease assets with an early redemption of $74 before relocating its operation and assets from San Jose, California to another subsidiary in Singapore. As of June 30, 2004, total liabilities (excluding minority interest) were 76.1% of total capital, compared with 70% at June 30, 2003. Total liabilities as a percentage of total capital was higher in fiscal 2004 mainly due to higher accounts payable, as mentioned earlier. The Company believes its strong cash position provides ready and ample access to funds in the global capital market.

Critical Accounting Policies

We prepare the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions.

In response to the SEC’s Release No. 33-8040, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policy,” We identified the most critical accounting principles upon which its financial statements depend. The following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

During the normal course of business, we extend unsecured credit to its customers. Typically credit terms require payment to be made between 30 to 60 days of the sale. We do not require collateral from its customers. We maintain our cash accounts at credit worthy financial institutions.

We regularly evaluate and monitor the creditworthiness of each customer on a case-by-case basis. We include any account balances that are determined to be uncollectible, along with a general reserve, in the overall allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the information available to management, we believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts was adequate as of June 30, 2004.

Inventory Valuation

Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value. Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, shore-term customer commitments and rapid changes in demand. We make provisions for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based on our regular reviews of inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of product demand and production requirements from our customers. We write down inventories for not saleable, excess or obsolete raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods by charging such write-downs to cost of sales. In addition to write-downs based on newly introduced parts, statistics and judgments are used for assessing provision of the remaining inventory based on salability and obsolescence. In fiscal 2004, certain inventories with provision were sold in connection with products sales generating zero or little margin, which led to the reduction of inventory provision and contributed partially a flat margin in the product sales generated in Manufacturing segment.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues generated from sales of products in Manufacturing and Distribution segments are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the products has occurred, customer acceptance has been obtained, which means the significant risks and rewards of the ownership have been transferred to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable and

16


Table of Contents

collectibility is reasonably assured. Certain products sold (in Manufacturing segment) may require installation and training to be performed.

Revenue from product sales is also recorded in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Statement 00-21 “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” and Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” which generally requires revenue earned on product sales involving multiple-elements to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of those elements. Accordingly, we allocate revenue to each element in a multiple-element arrangement based on the element’s respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold and specifically defined in a quotation or contract. We allocate a portion of the invoice value to products sold and the remaining portion of invoice value to installation work in proportion of the fair value of products sold and installation work to be performed. Training elements are valued based on hourly rates, which we charge for these services when sold apart from product sales. The fair value determination of products sold and the installation and training work is also based on our specific historical experience of the relative fair values of the elements if there is no easily determinable market price to be considered. In fiscal 2004 and 2003, the installation revenues generated in connection with product sales were immaterial and included in the product sales revenue line on the consolidated statement of income. We estimate an allowance for sales returns based on historical experience with product returns.

Revenue derived from testing service is recognized when testing services are rendered.

Income Tax

We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”). SFAS No. 109 requires an entity to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequence attributable to the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date.

Our foreign subsidiaries are subject to income taxes in the regions where they operate. Because of the different income tax jurisdictions, net losses generated in the U.S. cannot be utilized to offset the taxable income generated in foreign countries. Therefore, we may incur certain income tax expenses in any fiscal year.

For US income tax purposes, no provision has been made for US taxes on undistributed earnings of overseas subsidiaries, with which the Company intends to continue to reinvest. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of additional tax that might be payable on the foreign earnings if they were remitted as dividends, were lent to the Company, or if the Company should sell its stock in the subsidiary. However, the Company believes that US foreign tax credits and net operating losses available would substantially eliminate any additional tax effects.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Effective July 1, 2002, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”). SFAS No. 144 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. Whenever any such impairment exists, an impairment loss will be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value.

17


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Comparison of Year Ended June 30, 2004 (“2004”) and June 30, 2003 (“2003”)

                 
    2004
  2003
Net Sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of Sales
    75.5 %     76.5 %
 
   
 
     
 
 
Gross Margin
    24.5 %     23.5 %
Operating Expenses
               
General and administrative
    19.7 %     18.8 %
Selling
    4.6 %     3.3 %
Research and development
    0.6 %     0.6 %
Impairment Loss
    0.0 %     1.7 %
(Gain) Loss on disposal of PP&E
    -0.5 %     0.5 %
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total Operating Expenses
    24.4 %     24.9 %
 
   
 
     
 
 
Income from operations
    0.1 %     -1.4 %
 
   
 
     
 
 

Overall Net Sales and Gross Margin

Overall sales for fiscal 2004 were $19,154, down $2,092 from fiscal 2003 by a difference of 9.85%. This decrease in sales was primarily due to the significant drop in sales in the Distribution segment, as well as decreased activity in the Testing segment, both of which offset the surge in sales in the Manufacturing segment, especially in the fourth quarter. Overall gross margin increased marginally by less than 1% from 23.5% in fiscal 2003 to 24.5% in fiscal 2004, primarily attributable to the Distribution segment even though sales in that segment decreased significantly.

Distribution Segment

The revenue and gross margin for the Distribution segment for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2004
  2003
Revenue
  $ 3,124     $ 7,067  
Gross margin
    13.5 %     5.3 %

Net sales in the Distribution segment decreased 55.8%, a decrease of $3,943 from $7,067 in fiscal 2003 to $3,124 in fiscal 2004. The bulk of the sales decline was attributable to the decrease in unit volume of low-margin products, which experienced a reduction in sales revenue of $3,926 from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004, along with a 34.7% drop in quantity sold and a 49.6% reduction in selling price. Sales of Vibration products and Reflow ovens fell by $115, with a drop of 33.3% in quantity sold. The demand for Vibration products diminished as this equipment had an average unit selling price greater than $100. Customers in the United States remained conservative in making large investments, hence demand was low. Customers showed a preference to purchase substitute equipment at an average selling price below $30. As for Reflow ovens, customers developed more stringent requirements in technology, and our existing vendor was unable to satisfy the change. We will continue to search for other vendors who can meet our customers’ requirements. However, the unit selling price of Vibration products and Reflows ovens increased by 30.5% over fiscal 2003 due to our ability to meet customers’ specialized demands, hence their willingness to pay more for this benefit. Additionally, spare parts and services increased sales by $117.

Despite the decline in sales in the Distribution segment overall, the margin showed an improvement of 8.2% from 5.3% in fiscal 2003 to 13.5% in fiscal 2004 due to the decreased sales of low-margin products combined with the improvement in average unit selling price of Vibration products and Reflow ovens. This contributed mainly to the slight improvement in the overall gross margin compared to fiscal 2003.

18


Table of Contents

Testing Segment

The revenue and gross margin for the Testing segment for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2004
  2003
Revenue
  $ 8,908     $ 9,505  
Gross margin
    29.2 %     38.4 %

The Testing segment also experienced some deterioration in sales. Sales dropped by 6.3% from $9,505 in fiscal 2003 to $8,908 in fiscal 2004. Burn-in volume for this segment decreased due to a change in customers’ burn-in requirements. We adjusted to meet these specifications, but still suffered a lower margin of 9.2% from fiscal 2003 because of operating with fixed costs. Also contributing was the fall in product life cycle for one particular type of burn-in, and one new type of burn-in has yet to ramp up as expected. Additionally, we adopted a reduction in service fees of approximately 13.3% in an effort to maintain existing customers and attract new ones in an increasingly competitive market.

Gross margin dropped by 9.3%, from 38.5% in fiscal 2003 to 29.2% in fiscal 2004 due to several factors. First, the Company reduced service fees in an effort to retain existing customers and capture new ones in an increasingly competitive market. Second, material costs, such as utilities, increased due to higher usage of certain products and some new administrative charges from the vendor of utilities were imposed. In order to counter the above, the Singapore Testing operation is working diligently to obtain more business for the latest type of burn-in, and will be closely monitoring costs to maintain them at the minimum level.

Although the Thailand operation saw boosted sales in fiscal 2004, it generated a lower margin due to a change in product mix, as more services at a lower margin were provided to one particular customer with whom Trio-Tech has a long standing relationship.

Manufacturing Segment

The revenue and gross margin for the Manufacturing segment for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2004
  2003
Revenue
  $ 7,122     $ 4,674  
Gross margin
    19.3 %     19.1 %

The setbacks in sales in the Testing and Distribution Segments were partially offset by an improvement in sales in the Manufacturing segment, resulting an overall increase in sales of 52.4% from $4,674 in fiscal 2003 to $7,122 in fiscal 2004. The market conditions for the microelectronics market remained positive as indicated by the improved backlog, which increased from $582 in fiscal 2003 to $3,440 in fiscal 2004. Sales of burn-in systems and burn-in boards increased, as did sales derived from fabrication and upgrading customers’ equipment. The Singapore Manufacturing operation was chosen by a customer to be its major supplier to build systems for the testing of microprocessor, and anticipates that it will continue to provide this service. This same operation also procured the business of burn-in boards sales to its new customer.

Sales of burn-in boards were $851 in fiscal 2004, an increase in the quantity sold of 175.6% with a drop in unit selling price of 7.2%. Sales of burn-in systems were $1,758, a 585% increase in quantity sold and a 44.1% decrease in unit selling price over fiscal 2003. Even though the unit selling price decreased for all these products, the dollar volume resulting from the substantial increase in the quantity sold of burn-in boards and burn-in systems exceeded the dollar volume resulting from the drop in selling price. The sales of Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks contributed the decrease of $160 due to the decrease in both quantity and the unit selling price.

Gross margin as a percentage of sales remained relatively flat at 19%, but the dollar volume increased by $475 from $892 in fiscal 2003 to $1,367 in fiscal 2004, which was consistent with the increase in sales. Another factor which contributed to a flat margin was due to the sale of certain inventories with provision generating zero or little margin.

Geographically, net sales into and within the United States region decreased by 47.9%, from $9,038 in fiscal 2003 to $4,706 in fiscal 2004. The drop in demand in the U.S. for front-end products from the Singapore Distribution segment contributed to 90.4% of the decline. It was also due in part to the decline in demand for Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks as Semiconductor equipment capital spending budgets in the U.S. appear to have been reduced based on lower growth expectations for the second half of 2004. In addition, the U.S. Manufacturing operation was moved from San Jose, California to Singapore at the very end of the third quarter, hence we predict a temporary lack of bookings for Wet Process Stations while we prepare for the manufacturing process and determine the needs of the customers in this new region. Net sales into and within Ireland increased 33.1%, from $943 in fiscal 2003 from $1,255 in fiscal 2004. Responsible for the increase was a boost in programming

19


Table of Contents

services in the Ireland operation. Net sales into and within the Southeast Asia region increased by 18.0% from $11,306 in fiscal 2003 to $13,344 in fiscal 2004, as there was higher demand for Burn-in Boards and Systems in Malaysia and Singapore.

Operating Expenses

The operating expenses for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2004
  2003
General and administrative
  $ 3,769     $ 3,992  
Selling
  $ 875     $ 702  
Research and development
  $ 117     $ 121  
Impairment Loss
  $ 4     $ 358  
(Gain) loss on disposal of PP&E
  $ (101 )   $ 115  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 4,664     $ 5,288  
 
   
 
     
 
 

As a percentage of sales, operating expenses dropped by 0.6% from 24.9% in fiscal 2003 to 24.4% in fiscal 2004. This was a result of the slight movements in all the operating expense items as a percentage of sales. As a percentage of sales, general and administrative expenses increased slightly by 0.9% from 18.8% in fiscal 2003 to 19.7% in fiscal 2004.

General and administrative expenses decreased by $223 from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004. Several factors contributed to this reduction, including diminished bonus provisions of $127 in the Singapore operation as a few of the operations did not meet their bonus payment criteria. Salaries were cut back by $117 in Southeast Asia and $101 in the United States operation as part of cost cutting measures. Insurance and rental diminished by $33 in Universal Systems after the operation along with its assets were moved from San Jose, California to Singapore. In fiscal 2003, the Company granted certain stock options which had an exercise price less than that of the fair market value resulting in a $14 compensation cost. In fiscal 2004, as all options were granted at fair market value, no similar compensation costs were incurred. Finally, miscellaneous costs fell by $6. This was all offset by higher depreciation of $25 due to renovations and additional purchases of equipment in Southeast Asia; addition withholding tax of $10 from Malaysia operation; additional provision for doubtful debts of $9; and incremental tele-communication expenses of $9 due to overseas travel. Additionally, a reversal in provision for contingent liabilities of $51 occurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2003, as the court case was settled in favor of Trio-Tech and we were not liable for the compensation. No such reversal of provision occurred in 2004. Likewise, in fiscal 2004 Corporate officers’ bonuses in the amount of $17 were paid, whereas in fiscal 2003, $54 in bonuses were reversed out as the group did not meet its bonus payment criteria

As a percentage of sales, selling expenses increased marginally by 1.3% from 3.3% in fiscal 2003 to 4.6% in 2004. Selling expenses as a whole increased by $173. One reason for this was the increase in commission of $43 in the U.S. operation due to a higher number of commissionable sales, and a $60 increase in commissions in Singapore Manufacturing and Distribution for the same reason. Another reason was the higher warranty cost of $165 due to more numerous equipment sales for the Singapore Manufacturing and Distribution segments. Higher travel costs of $16 were incurred in Singapore mainly for the purpose of transferring the manufacturing of Wet Process Stations from San Jose to Singapore. Greater participation in semiconductor shows and conferences resulted in higher trade show costs of $13 for fiscal 2004. Finally, there was an increase in miscellaneous costs of $2. This was offset with a reduction in salaries of $50 in the Southeast Asia operation through a reduction in headcount. Also, there was a savings of $49 in salaries in the U.S. as the sales staff at Universal Systems was laid off in the third quarter of 2003, and a savings in rent and utilities of $27 as this same facility was closed down.

Research and development remained relatively flat from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004.

(Gain)/Loss on Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment

The loss on disposal of fixed assets of $115 in fiscal 2003, was related to the write off of obsolete burn-in facilities in Southeast Asia in fiscal 2003. On the other hand, the gain on disposal of $101 in fiscal 2004 was derived from the Ireland and Thailand operations. Ireland operation sold equipment which had been written off several years ago, hence enabling us to recognize $62 of the sales proceeds as a total gain for the operation. Also, the Thailand operation made a substantial sale of boards to one of its customers, realizing a gain of $39.

20


Table of Contents

Income (loss) from operations

The income (loss) from operations for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2004
  2003
Manufacturing Segment
  $ (205 )   $ (802 )
Testing Segment
  $ 241     $ 803  
Distribution Segment
  $ (27 )   $ (212 )
Corporate
  $ 27     $ (76 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 36     $ (287 )
 
   
 
     
 
 

The Company turned the operating loss of $287 in fiscal 2003 to an operating income of $36 in fiscal 2004. The improvement was mainly attributed to the Manufacturing and Distribution Segments, which have more than offset the decline in operating income for the Testing Segment.

The operating loss in the Manufacturing Segment declined by $597, from $802 in fiscal 2003 to $205 in fiscal 2004. The reduction in operating loss resulted in part from the transfer of the Universal Systems manufacturing operation from San Jose to Singapore in the third quarter of 2004. Hence, certain fixed costs which were incurred in fiscal 2003 were not repeated in fiscal 2004. General & administrative costs as a percentage of sales decreased from 21.8% in fiscal 2003 to 12.4% in fiscal 2004, while selling expenses as a percentage of sales dropped from 8% to 5.4%, mainly due to the significant rise in sales of 52.4%. The decline in general & administrative costs of 9.4% and selling expenses of 2.6% as a percentage of sales was mainly attributed to Universal System. After Universal System moved its manufacturing operation, along with all its equipment, to Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. in Singapore, this resulted in a savings in high fixed costs, such as salaries of $148, rental of $60, commissions of $15, and research and development costs of $12 when compared to fiscal 2003.

The Distribution Segment also contributed to the improvement in operating income. Its operating loss decreased by $185 from $212 in fiscal 2003 to $27 in fiscal 2004. This improvement was mainly due to the change in product mix, which improved gross margin as mentioned earlier. Operating expenses for Vibration products and Reflow ovens remained similar to those in fiscal 2003 which, along with the increase in price, contributed to the decrease in operating loss for the Distribution Segment.

Corporate also contributed to the improvement in the overall operating income. The corporate office attempts to reimburse its operating expenses by imposing a fee to all subsidiaries on a fixed percentage of total revenue. Due to the increase in Singapore Manufacturing sales in the fourth quarter, while the rate remained unchanged, the fees collected in fiscal 2004 were more than corporate operating expenses. This is unlikely to recur in fiscal 2005. Hence, Corporate went from an operating loss of $76 in fiscal 2003 to an operating income of $27 in fiscal 2004, an increase of $103.

The above were more than enough to offset the decrease in operating income for the Testing Segment, which declined from $803 in fiscal 2003 to $241 in fiscal 2004. The cost of goods sold and operating expenses in the Testing segment, comprised of fixed and semi-fixed costs such as rental, depreciation, and administrative salaries, remained fixed despite the overall decrease in sales. With the increase in cost of goods sold as mentioned earlier due to higher utilities costs, the operating income declined by $562.

Interest Expense

The interest expenses for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2004
  2003
Interest expense
  $ (120 )   $ (185 )

Interest expense decreased by $65 in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003. One reason for this was the lower interest incurred on lines of credit as the Singapore and U.S. operations repaid their lines of credit during the end of 2003 and the beginning of 2004. Also, lower interest was incurred on a term loan in the Singapore operation as most of its loan was repaid. Offsetting this was the interest from additional borrowings obtained for the building of extensions, burn-in systems and other equipment during the year by the Singapore operation.

Other Income

Other income for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2004
  2003
Other income
  $ 372     $ 347  

21


Table of Contents

Other income increased $25 from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004. One contributing factor to this was increased rental income due to the leasing out of factories in Ireland and Malaysia, which contributed $80. Another cause was increased net gain on disposal of marketable securities of $66. Offsetting these increases was a loss on currency exchange of $12 in 2004 versus an exchange gain of $9 in 2003 for a total difference of $21. Also, we experienced a decrease of $19 in dividends and interest income, a decline in royalty income of $20, a drop of $52 in sundry income, and a decrease of $9 in miscellaneous income.

Income Tax

The total income tax provision decreased by $81 or 74.5%, from $94 in fiscal 2003 to $13 in fiscal 2004. Of the change of $81, there was an increase of $28 related to the current portion of income tax due to the increase of $29 in foreign income tax provision and a decrease of $1 in state income tax provision compared to those in fiscal 2003. The rest was related to the deferred portion of income taxes benefit. An increase of $29 in current portion of foreign income tax expense was a result of tax provision of approximately $19 incurred in Ireland operation due to the gain of $62 on disposal of equipment and the remaining $10 of current portion of income tax provision incurred in Malaysia operation due to the increase in its operating income.

The deferred income tax portion was changed from provision of $42 in fiscal 2003 to benefit of $67 in fiscal 2004. The swing was approximately $$109, which was attributed to a decrease of deferred tax liability incurred mainly in Singapore. The decrease in deferred income tax expense was the result of the timing differences related to the recording of depreciation expenses for book and tax purposes and net operating loss carried forward in Singapore and Malaysia. We did not recognize any income tax benefits related to the net operating losses generated in the U.S. We believe that when the future taxable income exceeds the cumulative losses, it is likely that such benefits will be realized.

The Company’s effective income tax rate decreased from 75% in fiscal 2003 to 5% in fiscal 2004. The decrease in the effective income tax rate in fiscal 2004 was due to a change from net loss of $125 before income tax to net income of $288 before income tax and due to a change in the income tax provision of $94 in fiscal 2003 to income tax provision of $13 in fiscal 2004. As discussed above, the decrease of deferred tax liability in Singapore contributed to the decrease of total income tax provision which in turn contributed to the decrease of effective income tax rate. In addition, the net loss in the U.S. was decrease from $231 in fiscal 2003 to $87 in fiscal 2004 and net income in foreign countries increased from $106 in fiscal 2003 to $375 in fiscal 2004, both of which contributed to the decrease of effective income tax rate.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S., Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Ireland, respectively. Income taxes are provided in those countries where taxable income is earned. Income in one country is not offset by losses in another country. Accordingly, no benefit is provided for losses in the countries except where the loss can be carried back against income recognized in previous years. In essence, the effect of providing tax against taxable income while not providing benefit for losses results in an effective tax rate that differs from the federal statutory rate. The nature and terms of income tax holidays, abatements, rate reductions and similar arrangements granted by foreign taxing authorities and their impact on the provision for income taxes are as follows:

1.   Capital allowances are available in the Southeast Asia operation to offset taxable income, which is the same as accelerated allowance on fixed assets. This reduces the income tax payable and creates deferred tax liabilities for the next few years.
 
2.   Reinvestment allowances can only offset the tax payable if the expansion, modernization or diversification is carried out in a promoted area.

Net (Loss) Income

As a result of all of the factors analyzed above, the net income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 was approximately $220, which represented an increase of $301 from a net loss of $81 for fiscal 2003, or a 371.6% change. Basic earnings per share for fiscal 2004 increased to $0.07 per share from a basic loss per share of $0.03 in fiscal 2003, which represented an increase of $0.10, a 333.3% change. Diluted earnings per share for fiscal 2004 was $0.07 per share, an increase of $0.10 per share from a diluted loss per share of $0.03 for fiscal 2003.

22


Table of Contents

Year Ended June 30, 2003 (“2003”) Compared to Year Ended June 30, 2002 (“2002”)

                 
    2003
  2002
Net Sales
    100.0 %     100.0 %
Cost of Sales
    76.5 %     81.2 %
 
   
 
     
 
 
Gross Margin
    23.5 %     18.8 %
Operating Expenses
               
General and administrative
    18.8 %     21.1 %
Selling
    3.3 %     6.1 %
Research and development
    0.6 %     1.7 %
Impairment Loss
    1.7 %     8.3 %
(Gain) Loss on disposal of PP&E
    0.5 %     -0.2 %
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total Operating Expenses
    24.9 %     37.0 %
 
   
 
     
 
 
Income from operations
    -1.4 %     -18.2 %
 
   
 
     
 
 

Overall Net Sales and Gross margin

Net sales for the Company increased overall by 8.3% from $19,617 in fiscal 2002 to $21,246 in fiscal 2003, a difference of $1,629. The increase in sales was primarily derived from the Distribution and Testing segments, which offset the decrease in sales in the Manufacturing segment. Overall gross margin increased by 4.7% from 18.8% in fiscal 2002 to 23.5% in fiscal 2003. The greater portion of this increase was attributable to the Manufacturing segment, which recovered from a loss to a positive gross margin in spite of a drop in sales.

Distribution Segment

The revenue and gross margin for the Distribution segment for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2003
  2002
Revenue
  $ 7,067     $ 5,653  
Gross margin
    5.3 %     9.1 %

The Distribution segment sales increased from $5,653 in fiscal 2002 to $7,067 in fiscal 2003, due to a surge in sales of low margin front-end products. An additional low margin front-end product of a similar nature to that of our existing products was responsible for this surge. Sales of low-margin products were $1,213, a 24.9% decline in quantity sold but a 50% increase in the selling price, whereas the sales of Test chambers and Reflow ovens were $201 in fiscal 2003 with a 46.7% rise in quantity sold and a drop in selling price of 58.1%. Test chambers and Reflow ovens were also in higher demand as we were able to keep the cost of these machines reasonably priced with a selling price ranging from $11 to $46, which fell within customers’ capital budgets.

Gross margin dropped by 3.8%, from 9.1% in fiscal 2002 to 5.3% in fiscal 2003, due to fierce competition in the capital equipment market and the decrease in customers’ capital spending budgets. Conversely, some customers took advantage of price reductions to obtain necessary equipment, which also impacted our gross margin. The increase in sales volume for Test Chambers and Reflow ovens was not sufficient to offset the effects of the price reduction.

Testing Segment

The revenue and gross margin for the Testing segment for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2003
  2002
Revenue
  $ 9,505     $ 8,942  
Gross margin
    38.4 %     38.4 %

The Testing segment also experienced an increase in sales in the Thailand and Singapore operations, where sales increased from $8,942 in fiscal 2002 to $9,505 in fiscal 2003. The Thailand operation secured new contracts from existing customers, as well as

23


Table of Contents

secured new customers, and one particular type of burn-in device was in high demand from the Testing operation in Singapore. However, one particular customer in Malaysia shifted their production to Thailand, and revenue from this customer decreased in anticipation of this relocation. As a result, sales were not as high as they otherwise may have been.

Gross margin as a percentage of sales remained relatively flat at 38.4%, but the margin in dollars increased by $218 to $3,655 in fiscal 2003, which was consistent with the increase in sales.

Manufacturing Segment

The revenue and gross margin for the Manufacturing segment for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2003
  2002
Revenue
  $ 4,674     $ 5,022  
Gross margin
    19.1 %     -6.7 %

The increase in the Distribution and Testing sales was offset by a decrease in sales in the Manufacturing segment, which was mainly attributable to the United States operation. The net sales in the Manufacturing segment experienced a general decline of $348, from $5,022 in fiscal 2002 to $4,674 in fiscal 2003. The continued pessimistic outlook of the electronics industry and the threat of war in the Middle East for most of fiscal 2003 forced manufacturers to delay capital spending. Customers remained conservative in spending due to the overall pessimistic outlook of the electronics industry. Sales of Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks dropped $356, a 16.1% decrease in quantity sold and a 24.7% decrease in the selling price. Rate Turn Tables sales fell $315, a 100% reduction in quantity sold with no change in selling price, and were completely fazed-out in fiscal 2003. Sales of Environmental Test equipment dropped $257, a 33.3% decline in quantity sold with a 39.3% drop in selling price. Fortunately, the decline in Manufacturing segment sales was offset by an increase in sales of burn-in systems as a result of our ability to meet customers’ specialized demands, and therefore the ability to charge more for these products. The sales of Burn-in Boards fell $47, a 36% drop in quantity sold and a 50% reduction in the selling price. This overall decline was offset by a climb in sales of Burn-in Systems of $258, with a 14.3% decrease in quantity sold but a 75.1% increase in selling price. Wet Process Stations sales increased by $114 in spite of a 47.4% decrease in quantity sold, due to a 102.1% hike in selling price. HAST Equipment sales rose $210 due to a 300% growth in quantity sold and a 13.9% decrease in selling price.

Despite the decrease in Manufacturing Segment sales, the gross margin increased from a negative 6.7% in fiscal 2002 to a positive 19.1% in fiscal 2003 mainly due lower cost of goods sold incurred in fiscal 2003. This increase in fact contributed to the bulk of the improvement in the overall gross margin for the Company. The cost of goods sold included an inventory obsolescence of $511 in the United States operation in 2002, which did not recur in 2003. Likewise, lower depreciation expenses of $234 incurred as no depreciation was charged on fixed assets that were impaired in fiscal 2002 and did not recur in fiscal 2003. Finally, the United States operations reduced headcount as part of cost cutting measures thereby reducing payroll related costs by $484.

Geographically, net sales into and within the United States increased by 11.8%, from $8,083 in fiscal 2002 to $9,038 in fiscal 2003. This was a result of an increasing demand in the U.S. for front-end products from the Distribution segment in Singapore and HAST equipment from one of the local operations. Net sales into and within the Southeast Asia region increased 12% from $10,093 in fiscal 2002 to $11,306 in fiscal 2003, primarily attributable to a new burn-in testing service in the Thailand operation and an increase in demand for burn-in equipment in Singapore as a result of the ability to meet customers’ specifications. Net sales into and within Ireland and other countries decreased by 36.2% from $1,479 in fiscal 2002 to $943 in fiscal 2003 due to a decline in demand for testing services, which occurred when several large customers moved out of Europe, and lower Manufacturing sales from Singapore and the Unites States into Europe and other countries as well.

Operating Expenses

The operating expenses for fiscal 2003 and 2002 were as follows:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2003
  2002
General and administrative
  $ 3,992     $ 4,141  
Selling
  $ 702     $ 1,200  
Research and development
  $ 121     $ 331  
Impairment Loss
  $ 358     $ 1,631  
(Gain) on disposal of PP&E
  $ 115     $ (33 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 5,288     $ 7,270  
 
   
 
     
 
 

24


Table of Contents

Operating expenses decreased by $1,982 or 27.3% from $7,270 in fiscal 2002 to $5,288 in fiscal 2003. As a percentage of total revenue, our operating expenses in fiscal 2003 decreased from 37% to 24.9% in fiscal 2002.

General and Administrative (“G&A”) expenses decreased by $149 or 3.6% from $4,141 in fiscal 2002 to $3,992 in fiscal 2003. As a percentage of sales, G&A decreased by 2.3% from 21.1% in 2002 to 18.8% in fiscal 2003. Although we experienced a $333 decrease in G&A during fiscal 2003 as a result of a decrease in payroll related expenses, primarily in the U.S. operations, such decrease was offset by a $264 increase in payroll expenses in Southeast Asia as operations there increased based on increased sales. In addition, we had a $40 decrease in rental, relocation, and insurance expenses due to relocation to smaller facilities in Van Nuys, California in 2002, and a $40 decrease in depreciation expense as no depreciation was charged on fixed assets that were impaired in fiscal 2002 and did not recur in fiscal 2003.

Selling expenses decreased by $498 or 41.5% from $1,200 in fiscal 2002 to $702 in fiscal 2003. As a percentage of sales, selling expenses decreased 2.8% from 6.1% in fiscal 2002 to 3.3% in fiscal 2003. Of the $498, (1) $195 was related to a decrease in commission expense as a result of a decrease in commission-related sales in the Distribution and Manufacturing segments, (2) $127 was related to a decrease in warranty expenses incurred in Southeast Asia, reflecting the fact that the amount of products sold requiring warranty was reduced in fiscal 2003, (3) a $60 decrease was due to an impairment loss recorded in fiscal 2002 which did not recur in fiscal 2003, (4) an approximate $50 decrease in travel and related costs was due to fewer sales trips made in the second half of fiscal 2003 as a result of the Iraq war and the SARS outbreak in Asia, and (5) a $66 decrease in other expense items was a result of cost-cutting measures implemented during fiscal 2003.

Research and development expense decreased by $210 or 63.4% from $331 in fiscal 2002 to $121 in fiscal 2003. This decrease was due primarily to management’s decision to reduce research and development activities on its Wet Process Stations and Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks, based on reduced demand for these customized products in the Manufacturing Segment.

Impairment loss

Impairment loss decreased by $1,273 or 78.1%, from $1,631 in fiscal 2002 to $358 in fiscal 2003. The decrease of $1,273 was primarily due to the remaining fixed and intangible assets written to their fair value in fiscal 2003, which were not written down previously. The Company recorded an impairment loss based on its examination of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows generated by the subsidiaries where certain long-lived assets (certain fixed assets) were used.

The impairment loss of $358 in fiscal 2003 consisted of machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements (pertaining to the Malaysia and Singapore Testing operations) due to changes in demand for certain burn-in services which in turn made certain of our existing burn-in facilities obsolete.

(Gain) Loss on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment

The disposal of property, plant and equipment resulted in a decrease of $148 from a gain of $33 in fiscal 2002 to a loss of $115 in fiscal 2003. The disposal loss was related to the disposal of the obsolete burn-in facilities in Southeast Asia due to new developments and advancement in technology.

Income (loss) from operations

The income (loss) from operations for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 were as follow:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2003
  2002
Manufacturing Segment
  $ (802 )   $ (4,013 )
Testing Segment
  $ 803     $ 680  
Distribution Segment
  $ (212 )   $ (69 )
Corporate
  $ (76 )   $ (177 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ (287 )   $ (3,579 )
 
   
 
     
 
 

The substantial reduction in the operating loss from $3,579 in fiscal 2002, to $287 in fiscal 2003 was mainly attributed to the Manufacturing and Testing Segment and Corporate, which have more than to offset the increase in operating loss for Distribution Segment.

The operating loss in Manufacturing Segment decreased by $3,211 from $4,013 in fiscal 2003 to $802 in fiscal 2002, mainly due to lower cost of goods sold as mentioned earlier. In addition, the operating expenses further decreased such as the reduction of $1,045 in impairment loss of machinery and equipment was recorded in fiscal 2002 but was not repeated in fiscal 2003. No depreciation was charged on the machinery and equipment that were impaired in fiscal 2002, hence there was a reduction of $98

25


Table of Contents

in depreciation expense in fiscal 2003. Payroll related expenses were reduced by $343 as a part of cost cutting measures implemented in fiscal 2003. Concurrently, rental, insurance, travel, legal and auditing fees and commission were cut by $202 for the same reason. Finally, a reduction in research and development costs resulted in a savings of $210 due to a change in demand for products sold by our Manufacturing segment.

Testing Segment and Corporate also contributed to the reduction in operating loss. The operating loss for Testing Segment increased by $123 from $680 in fiscal 2002 to $803 in fiscal 2003. Its operating expenses decreased mainly due to the impairment loss of $130 which consisted of machinery and equipment, furniture, and leasehold improvements pertaining to the Malaysia and Singapore operations recorded in fiscal 2002 but was not repeated in fiscal 2003.

The operating loss in Corporate reduced from $177 in fiscal 2002 to $76 in fiscal 2003 due to an increase in allocated charges on the subsidiaries, which was contributed from a significant reduction in sales for one particular product with a lower allocated charge. This was offset by the increase in tax fees of $53 for the appointment of a new firm to assist in the tax computation rather than computing internally. Additionally, compensation costs of $14 were charged because of the grant of certain stock options with an exercise price at less than the fair market value of the underlying Common Stock.

The above were more than to offset the increase in operating loss for Distribution Segment, which increased from $69 in fiscal 2002 to $212 in fiscal 2003, mainly attributed to the decrease in gross margin mentioned earlier. Despite there was a significant increase in Distribution Segment sales, the operating loss did not reduce as the bulk of the sales increase derived from low margin front-end products. Hence, the margin that derived from such products was minimal.

Interest Expenses

The interest expenses for fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 were as follows:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2003
  2002
Interest expense
  $ (185 )   $ (207 )

Interest expense decreased by $22 or 10.6%, from $207 in fiscal 2002 to $185 in fiscal 2003. This decrease was primarily due to net repayments of $932 on the line of credit and payments of $1,284 on long-term debt and capitalized leases.

Other Income

The other income for fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 were as follows:

                 
(In Thousands, unaudited)
  2003
  2002
Other income
  $ 347     $ 306  

Other income increased by $41 or 13.4% from $306 in fiscal 2002 to $347 in fiscal 2003. Changes in other income in fiscal 2003 compared to those in fiscal 2002 consisted mainly of (1) an increase in gain on disposal of marketable securities of $50, (2) an increase in exchange gain of $116 in fiscal 2003 and, (3) a decrease in interest income of $99 in fiscal 2003.

Income Tax

The total income tax provision increased by $41 or 77% from $53 in fiscal 2002 to $94 in fiscal 2003. Of the change of $41, $19 was related to the current portion of income tax due to the increase of $18 in foreign income tax expense and $1 in state income tax expense compared to those in fiscal 2002. The remaining $22 related to the deferred portion of income taxes expense. The increase of $18 in current foreign income tax expense was a result of an increase in income in Thailand from a loss of $36 in fiscal 2002 to an income of $288 in fiscal 2003, which was offset by the decrease in income in Singapore of $466 in fiscal 2002 to $182 in fiscal 2003. Though Singapore had a higher income in fiscal 2002, the allowance on depreciation for tax purposes reduced the taxable income and thus resulted in a lower tax provision in fiscal 2002.

The deferred portion of income tax provision increased by $22 from $20 in fiscal 2002 to $42 in fiscal 2003, which was attributed to the increase in the deferred tax liability incurred mainly in Singapore. The increase in deferred income tax expense was the result of the timing differences related to the recording of depreciation expense for book and tax purposes. We did not recognize any income tax benefits related to the losses generated in the U.S. We believe that when the future taxable income exceeds the cumulative losses, it is likely that such benefits will be realized.

The Company’s effective income tax rate increased from 2% in fiscal 2002 to 75% in fiscal 2003. The increase in the effective income tax rate in fiscal 2003 was due to the decrease in net loss generated in the U.S. and the increase in the net income before taxes generated by the operations conducted in foreign countries. In addition, the net loss incurred in the U.S. cannot offset the

26


Table of Contents

taxable income in Singapore and Thailand. Therefore, the main portion of income tax expense of $94 was incurred in Singapore and Thailand.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S., Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Ireland, respectively. Income taxes are provided in those countries where taxable income is earned. Income in one country is not offset by losses in another country. Accordingly, no benefit is provided for losses in the countries except where the loss can be carried back against income recognized in previous years. This has the effect of providing tax against taxable income while not providing benefit for losses, which results in an effective tax rate that differs from the federal statutory rate. The nature and terms of income tax holidays, abatements, rate reductions and similar arrangements granted by foreign taxing authorities and their impact on the provision for income taxes are as follows:

1.   Capital allowances are available in the Southeast Asia operations to offset taxable income, which is the same as accelerated allowance on fixed assets. This reduces the income tax payable and creates deferred tax liabilities for the next few years.
 
2.   Reinvestment allowances can only offset the tax payable if the expansion, modernization or diversification is carried out in a promoted area.

Net (Loss) Income

As a result of all of the factors analyzed above, the net loss for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 was approximately $81, which represented a decrease in losses of $3,466 from a net loss of $3,547 for fiscal 2002, or a 97.7% change. Basic loss per share for fiscal 2003 decreased to $0.03 per share, from a basic loss per share of $1.21 in fiscal 2002, which represented a decrease of $1.18, a 97.7% change. Diluted loss per share for fiscal 2003 was $0.03 per share, a decrease of $1.18 per share from diluted loss per share of $1.21 for fiscal 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe our financial condition is strong. The working capital (defined as current assets minus current liabilities) of $7,370 as of June 30, 2004 increased by $343, or 4.88%, compared to working capital of $7,027 as of June 30, 2003. The current ratio (defined as current assets divided by current liabilities) was 2.36 times as of June 30, 2004 compared to 2.57 as of June 30, 2003. The Company had positive working capital for the ten fiscal years prior to the year ended June 30, 2004. We believe that the Company has the ability to maintain positive working capital and strong liquidity in the near future.

Management believes the Company has the economic wherewithal to satisfy any short-term funding for several reasons. We have cash provided by operating activities of $1,854 after adjusting for non-cash items and movements in working capital and our collection of accounts receivable is approximately 70 days which is consistent with last year and is adequate for our purposes. Furthermore, the manufacturing operation in San Jose, California, which consistently showed a loss, was moved to Singapore without additional work force. We anticipate that it will ease the working capital used to finance that operation.

The Burn-in testing operation in Malaysia acquired on July 1, 2004 will need significant capital expenditure of $578 to renovate the office, plant and facilities for new products, replace existing equipments and purchase new equipments. Currently, internal funding is used for the first two payment of $576 for the total acquisition cost of approximately $921 (2,000 Ringgit Malaysian) The balance of the purchase price for this burn-in operation of approximately $395 (1,500 Ringgit Malaysian) was paid in the form of a bank guaranteed which will mature in six months at December 31, 2004.

In addition, the backlog from Singapore Manufacturing ramped up beginning in the last quarter of fiscal 2004. Accordingly, we anticipate that there will be more purchases of raw materials to meet the orders in the next few quarters, and the unused credit facilities will be utilized to fund this area.

At June 30, 2004, the Company had available short-term lines of credit totaling $3,699, of which $3,553 was unused. However, of this $3,553, the line of credit of Trio-Tech Singapore of $2,925 expired in July 2004. The Company anticipates that it will renew this line of credit at a later date.

                             
Entity with Facility
  Type of
  Interest
  Credit
  Unused
Trio-Tech Malaysia
  Line of Credit     7.00 %   $ 91     $ 91  
Trio-Tech Bangkok
  Line of Credit     6.75 %     98       98  
Trio-Tech Singapore
  Line of Credit     5.5 to 6.0 %     3,510       3,364  
 
               
 
     
 
 
 
              $ 3,699     $ 3,553  
 
               
 
     
 
 

27


Table of Contents

The Company procured long-term loans of $773 and capitalized leases of $111 in fiscal 2004 to finance capital purchases, and another loan of approximately $1,000 has yet to be drawn down.

The following contractual obligations servicing table describes our overall future cash obligations based on various current contracts in the next five years:

                                         
    Payments Due by Period (at June 30, 2004)
            Less than   1 - 3   4 - 5   After
    Total
  1 Year
  Years
  Years
  5 Years
Lines of Credit
  $ 146     $ 146     $     $     $  
Notes Payable
    1,089       506       583              
Capital Leases
    456       246       202       8        
Operating Leases
    1,373       654       719              
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 3,064     $ 1,552     $ 1,504     $ 8     $  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Other requirements will be for the expansion of the new Distribution operation in Singapore, where we anticipate the purchase of raw materials for Wet Process Stations and for new products. There were no other capital commitments except those that were disclosed as of June 30, 2004..

Fiscal 2004

Net cash provided by operating activities during the year ended June 30, 2004 doubled from net cash of $927 provided by operating activities during the year ended June 30, 2003 to a net cash of $1,856. Movements in working capital included increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses, and decreases in accounts receivable and inventories.

The increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $2,161 over June 30, 2003 was mainly due to larger orders for purchase of materials, especially in the Singapore operation, to meet orders in the first quarter of 2005. There was a sudden increase in our Manufacturing backlog in 2004, which went from $582 in June 2003 to $3,440 in June 2004.

However, accounts receivable decreased by $588 at June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003. This was mainly attributable to the lower sales generated from the Singapore Testing and Distribution operation. As a result, sales in Southeast Asia decreased by $605 to $4,100 in the last quarter of fiscal 2004 as compared to the same quarter in fiscal 2003. Nevertheless, the accounts receivable turnover index (defined as net sales divided by average ending accounts receivable less bad debt allowance) remains consistent at 5 times at June 30, 2003 and 2004, indicating that the Company remains efficient in its collection.

Inventories decreased by $324 at June 30, 2004 as compared to June 30, 2003, which was mainly attributed to the decline in inventories of $310 in Universal System. These inventories were either turned into finished goods and sold off or transferred to Singapore in the third quarter of fiscal 2004; none was in the operation thereafter. The provision for stock obsolescence in Universal Systems of $250 was written off after the transfer and the carry value of the inventories was taken up in the Singapore subsidiary. On the other hand, the Singapore Manufacturing operation and Distribution operation started to stock up inventories during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, to work on new orders and to cater for the higher backlog as of June 30, 2004. Hence, the inventory turnover index (defined as cost of sales divided by average ending inventory) was 11.77 times at June 30, 2004, down from 15.75 times at June 30, 2004.

The bulk of the cash provided from investing activities during the year 2004 was invested in short-term deposits, because of our view that cash will be required in the short term for new investments in Malaysia. The investments in short-term deposits increased $1,341 from $4,308 in June 30, 2003 to $5,649 in June 30, 2004. This contributed mainly to the net cash used in investing activities during the year ended June 30, 2004 of $1,581, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $1,346 during the year ended June 30, 2003. In addition, capital expenditures increased by $470 in 2004 mainly due to the acquisition of burn-in systems and the extension of a building. These were offset with the higher proceeds of $241 mainly from sales of equipment and lower purchase of marketable securities of $533 in 2004.

Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended June 30, 2004 was $464, reflecting a decrease of $1,287 compared to the $1,751 used in financing activities during 2003. Out of the decrease of $1,287, $1,166 was due to lower net repayment on lines of credit, debt and capitalized leases during the year ended June 30, 2004 compared to net repayments of $1,681 for the year ended June 30, 2003. In addition, cash of $104 was received from stock options exercised during the year ended June 30, 2004.

Approximately $2,011 of short-term deposits as of June 30, 2004 is held in the Company’s 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary. Of such amount, $1,742 is denominated in the currency of Malaysia, of which $147 is currently available for movement

28


Table of Contents

overseas, as authorized by the Central Bank of Malaysia. There are additional amounts available as dividends (after making deductions for income tax) pursuant to Malaysian regulations.

Fiscal 2003

Net cash provided by operating activities during the year ended June 30, 2003 was $927, reflecting a significant increase of $2,644, compared to a net cash of $1,717 used in operating activities during the year ended June 30, 2002. Movements in working capital included increases in accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and a decrease in inventories.

The increase in accounts receivable of $222 was mainly attributable to the higher net sales of 8.3% for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 compared to June 30, 2002. The increased sales were the primary factor in the improvement in the accounts receivable turnover. The accounts receivable turnover index (defined as net sales divided by average ending accounts receivable less bad debt allowance) totaled 5.45 times as at June 30, 2003, compared with 4.21 times at June 30, 2002 also indicating that the company believes that the foregoing reflects its consistent emphasis on the collection of accounts receivable.

Accounts payables and accrued expense increased by $1,540 over June 30, 2002 mainly due to an increase in purchases of finished goods in one of the U.S operations to cater for the sudden increase in their backlog from $111 as at June 30, 2002 to $1,001 as at June 30, 2003. In addition, a potential sales rebate of $163 was accrued in the Singapore operation after finalization of pricing with a customer.

However, inventory decreased by $445 at June 30, 2003 as compared to June 30, 2002, which was due to the improvement in the inventory turnover index. The inventory turnover index (defined as cost of sales divided by average ending inventory) was 15.75 times at June 30, 2003, up from 10.86 times at June 30, 2002.

Net cash provided from investing activities increased $105 from $1,241 at June 30, 2002 to $1,346 at June 30, 2003. The change was contributed mainly from higher proceeds from disposal of marketable securities of $109, an increase in short term deposits of $53 and a reduction in purchases on marketable securities of $139. This was offset with an increase in capital expenditures of $122 in the Testing segment for business expansion in Southeast Asia and lower proceeds from sales of equipment by $63.

Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended June 30, 2003 was $1,751, reflecting a decrease of $1,843 compared to $92 provided by financing activities during the year ended June 30, 2002. Out of the decrease of $1,843, $1,681 was due to lower net repayment on lines of credit, debt and capitalized leases during the year ended June 30, 2003 compared to net borrowings of $96 for the year ended June 30, 2002. In addition, higher dividends of $66 were paid out to the minority interest during the year ended June 30, 2002.

Approximately $806 of cash deposits as of June 30, 2003 is held in the Company’s 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary. Of such amounts, $535 was denominated in the currency of Malaysia, of which $168 is currently available for movement overseas, as authorized by the Central Bank of Malaysia. There are additional amounts available as dividends (after making deductions for income tax) pursuant to Malaysian regulations.

Corporate Guarantee Arrangement

The Company provides a corporate guarantee to one of its subsidiaries in Southeast Asia of approximately $1,462 to secure line-of-credit and term loans from a bank to finance the operations of such subsidiary. With the strong financial position of the subsidiary company, the Company believes this corporate guarantee arrangement will have no material impact on its liquidity or capital resources.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. FIN 46, as amended by FIN 46(R), issued in January 2003, requires an investor with a majority of the variable interests in a variable interest entity to consolidate the entity and also requires majority and significant variable interest investors to provide certain disclosures. A variable interest entity is an entity in which the equity investors do not have a controlling financial interest or the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The provisions of FIN 46(R) are applicable for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2004. The Company does not have any variable interest entities that must be consolidated.

CERTAIN RISKS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR FUTURE RESULTS

We hereby caution stockholders, prospective investors in Trio-Tech International and other readers that the following important factors, among others, in some cases have affected, and in the future could affect, our stock price or cause our actual results for

29


Table of Contents

the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004 and future fiscal years and quarters to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements, oral or written, made by or on behalf of us.

Our operating results are affected by a variety of factors

Our operating results are affected by a wide variety of factors that could materially affect revenues and profitability or lead to significant variability of quarterly or annual operating results. These factors include, among others, components relating to:

  economic and market conditions in the semiconductor industry;

  market acceptance of our products and services;

  changes in technologies in the semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for our products and services;

  changes in testing processes;

  the impact of competition;

  the lack of long-term purchase or supply agreements with customers and vendors;

  changes in military or commercial testing specifications, which could affect the market for our products and services;

  difficulties in profitably integrating acquired businesses, if any, into the Company;

  the loss of key personnel or the shortage of available skilled employees;

  international political or economic events;

  currency fluctuations; and

  other technological, economic, financial and regulatory factors beyond our control.

Unfavorable changes in these or other factors could materially and adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. We may not be able to generate revenue growth and any revenue growth that is achieved may not be sustained. Our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected if operating expenses increase and are not subsequently followed by increased revenues.

The semiconductor industry cycles affect our business

Our business depends primarily upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers, assemblers and other testing companies worldwide. These industries in turn depend on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing semiconductor devices. The global semiconductor industry generally, and the semiconductor testing equipment industry in particular, are volatile and cyclical, with periodic capacity shortages and excess capacity. In periods of excess capacity, the industry sharply cuts its purchases of capital equipment, including our distributed products, and reduces testing volumes, including our testing services. Excess capacity also causes downward pressure on the selling prices of our products and services.

Our operating results have been adversely affected by past downturns and slowdowns. There is no assurance that there will not be downturns or slowdowns in the future that may adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. In addition, if one or more of our primary customers reduces its or their purchases or use of our products or testing services, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected. We anticipate that we will continue to be primarily dependent on the semiconductor industry for the foreseeable future.

Rapid technological changes may make our products obsolete or result in decreased prices or increased expenses

Technology changes rapidly in the semiconductor industry and may make our services or products obsolete. Advances in technology may lead to significant price erosion for products which we test with our older testing technologies. Our success will depend in part on our ability to develop and offer more advanced testing technologies and processes in the future, to anticipate both future demand and the technology to supply that demand, to enhance our current products and services, to provide those products and services at competitive prices on a timely and cost-effective basis and to achieve market acceptance of those products and services. To accomplish these goals, we may be required to incur significant engineering expenses. As new products or services are introduced, we may experience warranty claims or product returns. We may not be able to accomplish these goals correctly or timely enough. If we fail in our efforts, our products and services may become obsolete or less competitive.

Our dependence on international sales involves significant risk

Sales and services to customers outside the United States accounted for approximately 70%, 58% and 59% of our net revenues for fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Approximately 69%, 53% and 51% of our net revenues in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, were generated from business in Southeast Asia. We expect that our non-U.S. sales and services will continue to generate the major part of our future revenues. Testing services in Southeast Asia were performed primarily for American companies, and to a lesser extent German companies, selling products and doing business in those regions.

30


Table of Contents

International business operations may be adversely affected by many factors including fluctuations in exchange rates, imposition of government controls, trade restrictions, political, economic and business events and social and cultural differences.

We may incur losses due to foreign currency fluctuations

Significant portions of our revenues are denominated in Singapore and Euro dollars, Malaysian ringgit, Thai baht and other currencies. Consequently, a portion of our costs, revenues and operating margins may be affected by fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies. We are also affected by fluctuations in exchange rates if there is a mismatch between our foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Foreign currency translation adjustments resulted in an increase of $155 to shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2004, an increase of $18 to shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2003 and an increase of $262 to shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2002.

We try to reduce our risk of foreign currency fluctuations by purchasing certain equipment and supplies in U.S. dollars and seeking payment, when possible, in U.S. dollars. However, we may not be successful in our attempts to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. Those fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results.

We do not rely on patents to protect our products or technology

We hold U.S. patents relating to our pressurization humidity testing equipment and certain aspects of our Artic temperature test systems. Additionally, in fiscal 2001, we were granted patents for certain aspects of our new ranges of Artic temperature controlled chucks. However, although we believe our patents are integral to our business, generally we do not rely on patent or trade secret protection for our products or technology. Competitors may develop technologies similar to or more advanced than ours. We cannot assure you that our current or future products will not be copied or will not infringe on the patents of others. Moreover, the cost of litigation of any claim or damages resulting from infringement of patents or other intellectual property could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Intense competition can adversely affect our operating results

The semiconductor equipment and testing industries are intensely competitive. Significant competitive factors include price, technical capabilities, quality, automation, reliability, product availability and customer service. We face competition from established and potential new competitors, many of whom have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than our resources. New products or testing facilities offered by our competitors could cause a decline in our revenues or a loss of market acceptance of our existing products and services. Increased competitive pressure could also lead to intensified price-based competition. Price-based competition may result in lower prices, adversely affecting our operating results.

Loss, reduction or delay of orders from significant customers could adversely affect our financial condition

The semiconductor manufacturing industry is highly concentrated, with a relatively small number of large manufacturers and assemblers accounting for a substantial portion of our revenues from product sales and testing revenues. Our experience has been that sales to particular customers may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. In fiscal 2004, 2003, and 2002, sales of equipment and services to our two largest customers accounted for approximately 52%, 49%, and 55%, respectively, of our net revenues. Our ability to maintain close, satisfactory relationships with our customers is essential to our stability and growth. The loss of or reduction or delay in orders from our significant customers, or delays in collecting accounts receivable from our significant customers, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

There is a limited market for our testing products and services

If testing equipment is purchased by semiconductor manufacturers and assemblers, it may reduce the likelihood that they will make further purchases of such equipment, or use our laboratories for testing services. Although military or other specifications require certain testing to be done by independent laboratories, over time other current customers may have less need for our testing services. We believe that there is a growing trend toward outsourcing of the integrated circuit test process. As a result, we anticipate continued growth in the test laboratory business. However, there is no assurance that this trend will continue. In an attempt to diversify our sales mix, we may seek to develop and introduce new or advanced products, and to acquire other companies in the semiconductor equipment manufacturing business.

Acquisition and integration of new businesses could disrupt our ongoing business, distract management and employees, increase our expenses and adversely affect our business

A portion of any future growth may be accomplished through the acquisition of other entities. The success of those acquisitions will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate the acquired personnel, operations, products, services and technologies into our

31


Table of Contents

organization, to retain and motivate key personnel of the acquired entities and to retain the customers of those entities. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition opportunities, obtain financing on acceptable terms to bring the acquisition to fruition or to integrate such personnel, operations, products or services. The process of identifying and closing acquisition opportunities and integrating acquisitions into our operations may distract our management and employees, disrupt our ongoing business, increase our expenses and materially and adversely affect our operations. We may also be subject to certain other risks if we acquire other entities, such as the assumption of additional liabilities. We may issue additional equity securities or incur debt to pay for future acquisitions.

We do not have contracts with key suppliers

We have no written contracts with any of our suppliers. Our suppliers may terminate their relationships with us at any time without notice. There can be no assurance that we will be able to find satisfactory replacement suppliers or that new suppliers would not be more expensive than the current suppliers if any of our suppliers were to terminate their relationship with us.

We are highly dependent on key personnel

Our success has depended, and, to a large extent will depend, on the continued services of S.W. Yong, our Chief Executive Officer and President, Victor H. M. Ting, our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, our other key senior executives and engineering, marketing, sales, productions and other personnel. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Yong or Mr. Ting, but we are the beneficiary of “key man” life insurance in the amount of $6 million on Mr. Yong and $2 million on Mr. Ting. The loss of these key personnel, who would be difficult to replace, could harm our business and operating results. Competition for management in our industry is intense and we may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining the executive management and other key personnel that we require.

Our management has significant influence over corporate decisions

Currently our officers and directors and their affiliates beneficially own approximately 32.8% of the outstanding shares of common stock, including options held by them that are exercisable within 60 days of the date of filing of this 10-K. As a result, they may be able to significantly influence matters requiring approval of the shareholders, including the election of directors, and may be able to delay or prevent a change in control of the Company.

We have not paid cash dividends

We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We anticipate that the future earnings, if any, will be retained for use in the business or for other corporate purposes. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the future. Additionally, California law prohibits the payment of dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings or cannot meet certain asset to liability ratios. Thus, there is no assurance that the Company would be permitted to pay dividends in the future.

Possible dilutive effect of outstanding options

As of June 30, 2004, there were 345,500 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding stock options. The outstanding options are currently exercisable at exercise prices ranging from $2.25 to $6.00 per share. We anticipate that the trading price of our common stock at the time of exercise of any such outstanding options will exceed the exercise price under those options. Thus such exercise will have a dilutive effect on our shareholders.

The market price for our common stock is subject to fluctuation

The trading price of our common stock has from time to time fluctuated widely. The trading price may similarly fluctuate in the future in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results, announcements of innovations or new products by us or our competitors, general conditions in the semiconductor industry and other events or factors. In addition, in recent years, broad stock market indices in general, and the securities of technology companies in particular, have experienced substantial price fluctuations on a daily basis. Fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock may adversely affect our liquidity.

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. Our investment portfolio is generally comprised of cash deposits. Our policy is to place these investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards. These securities are subject to interest rate risk, and could decline in value if interest rates fluctuate and thus subject us to market risk due to those fluctuations. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of our investment portfolio, we do not

32


Table of Contents

expect any material loss with respect to our investment portfolio, though no assurances can be given that material losses will not occur.

The outstanding aggregate principal balance on loans to us and on our lines of credit range from 4.50% to 7.25% per annum. As of June 30, 2004, the outstanding principal balance on these loans was approximately $1,235. These interest rates are subject to change and we cannot predict an increase or decrease in rates, if any.

                                                                 
                                            There-           Fair
Period ending June 30,
  2005
  2006
  2007
  2008
  2009
  after
  Total
  Value
Loans:
                                                               
denominated by Singapore Dollars
  $ 145                                             $ 145     $ 145  
Interest rate (varaible)
    7.25 %                                                        
denominated by Singapore Dollars
  $ 195     $ 195     $ 65                             $ 455     $ 455  
Interest rate (fixed)
    6.25 %     6.25 %     6.25 %                                        
denominated by Singapore Dollars
  $ 58     $ 61     $ 21                             $ 140     $ 140  
Interest rate (fixed)
    5.59 %     5.59 %     5.59 %                                        
denominated by Thailand Baht
  $ 59     $ 59     $ 59     $ 30                     $ 207     $ 207  
Interest rate (variable)
    4.50 %     4.50 %     4.50 %     4.50 %                                
denominated Irish Pound
  $ 32     $ 28     $ 28                             $ 88     $ 88  
Interest rate (variable)
    5.59 %     5.59 %     5.59 %                                        
denominated Irish Pound
  $ 17     $ 16     $ 17     $ 4                     $ 54     $ 54  
Interest rate (variable)
    5.11 %     5.11 %     5.11 %     5.11 %                                
Line of credit:
                                                               
denominated by Singapore Dollars
  $ 146                                             $ 146     $ 146  
Interest rate (variable)
                                                               
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 652     $ 359     $ 190     $ 34     $     $     $ 1,235     $ 1,235  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk. Although the majority of our sales, cost of manufacturing and marketing are transacted in U.S. dollars, significant portions of our revenues are denominated in Singapore and Euro dollars, Malaysian ringgit, Thai Baht and other currencies. Consequently, a portion of our costs, revenues and operating margins may be affected by fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies. We are also affected by fluctuations in exchange rates if there is a mismatch between our foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Foreign currency translation adjustments resulted in an increase of $155 to shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2004, an increase of $18 to shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2003 and an increase of $262 to shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2002.

We try to reduce our risk of foreign currency fluctuations by purchasing certain equipment and supplies in U.S. dollars and seeking payment, when possible, in U.S. dollars. However, we may not be successful in our attempts to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. Those fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results.

ITEM 8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information called for by this item is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning on page 42 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None

33


Table of Contents

ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

An evaluation was carried out by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2004, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable

PART III

The information required by Items 10 through 14 of Part III of this Form 10-K (information regarding our directors and executive officers, executive compensation, security ownership of certain beneficial owners, management, related stockholder matters, and certain relationships and related transactions and principal accountant fees and services, respectively) is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of fiscal 2004.

PART IV

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

     
(a) (1 and 2)
  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES:
 
   
  The following financial statements, including notes thereto and the independent auditors’ report with respect thereto, are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, starting on page 42 hereof:
 
   
  1.    Report of Independent Public Registered Accounting Firm
 
   
  2.    Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
   
  3.    Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive (Loss) Income
 
   
  4.    Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
 
   
  5.    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
   
  6.    Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
   
(b)
  REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:
 
   
  The Registrant filed the following reports on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004:
 
   
  Form 8-K, filed April 7, 2004 (with a date of earliest event reported of March 29, 2004) reporting under Item 5.
 
   
(c)
  EXHIBITS:
     
Number
  Description
3.1
  Articles of Incorporation, as currently in effect. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 1988.]
 
   
3.2
  Bylaws, as currently in effect. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 1988.]
 
   
10.1
  Credit Facility Letter dated January 4, 2001, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.2
  1998 Stock Option Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company’s proxy statement filed under regulation 14A on October 27, 1997]. **

34


Table of Contents

     
Number
  Description
10.3
  Directors Stock Option Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company’s proxy statement filed under regulation 14A on October 27, 1997]. **
 
   
10.4
  Real Estate Lease dated February 1, 1999 between Martinvale Development Company and Universal Systems. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 1999.]
 
   
10.5
  Real Estate Lease dated February 16, 2001 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #07-01/07 and #03-01/03. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.6
  Real Estate Lease dated May 13, 1999 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #03-16/17. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.7
  Real Estate Lease dated October 13, 1999 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #01-08/15. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.8
  Real Estate Lease dated December 7, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #01-16/7. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.9
  Real Estate Lease dated January 3, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #03-01/06. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.10
  Real Estate Lease dated October 13, 1999 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #03-09/15 and #03-16/18. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.11
  Real Estate Lease dated May 2, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #01-08. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.12
  Real Estate Lease dated September 12, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #07-17/18. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.13
  Real Estate Lease dated October 30, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #07-01. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
 
   
10.14
  Real Estate Lease dated February 26, 2002 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #02-11/15. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
 
   
10.15
  Real Estate Lease dated June 10, 2002 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #02-08/10. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
 
   
10.16
  Credit Facility Letter dated November 16, 2001 and June 24, 2002, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
 
   
10.17
  Credit Facility Letter dated July 24, 2002, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and OCBC Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
 
   
10.18
  Credit Facility Letter dated May 21, 2002, between Trio-Tech (M) Sdn Bhd and HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]

35


Table of Contents

     
Number
  Description
10.19
  Credit Facility Letter dated January 22, 2002, between Trio-Tech (KL) Sdn Bhd and Public Bank Berhad. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
 
   
10.20
  Real Estate Lease dated November 8, 2001 between Elbar Investments, L.P. and Trio-Tech International for 14731 Califa Street, Van Nuys. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 23.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
 
   
10.21
  Amendment to the Directors Stock Option Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.] **
 
   
10.22
  Credit Facility Letter dated January 28, 2003, between Trio-Tech (M) Sdn Bhd and HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2003.]
 
   
10.23
  Credit Facility Letter dated September 20, 2002, between KTS Incorporated and Bank of America. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2003.]
 
   
10.24
  Real Estate Lease dated January 12, 2001 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Toa Payoh North #01-S3/S4. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2003.]
 
   
10.25
  Sales and Purchase Agreement, dated March 29, 2004 between TS Matrix BHD and Trio Tech (Malaysia) SDN BHD. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2004.]
 
   
10.26
  Sub-tenancy Agreement, dated July 1, 2004 between TS Matrix BHD and Trio Tech (Malaysia) SDN. BHD. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Amended Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2004.]
 
   
10.27
  Real Estate Lease dated April 28, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #04-14/16 and #04-17. *
 
   
10.28
  Real Estate Lease dated April 28, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #03-08/10. *
 
   
10.29
  Real Estate Lease dated April 19, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #02-17. *
 
   
10.30
  Real Estate Lease dated May 26, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #02-15/16. *
 
   
10.31
  Credit Facility Letter dated July 7, 2003, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and Hong Leong Finance Limited.*
 
   
10.32
  Credit Facility Letter dated October 2, 2003, between Trio-Tech Bangkok and Kasikornbank Public Company Limited.*
 
   
10.33
  Credit Facility Letter dated October 7, 2003, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and DBS Bank Ltd.*
 
   
10.34
  Credit Facility Letter dated August 11, 2003 between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank.*
 
   
21.1
  Subsidiaries of the Registrant (100% owned by the Registrant except as otherwise stated):
 
   
  Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation
 
   
  Trio-Tech Test Services Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation, was renamed Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd.
 
   
  Trio-Tech Reliability Services, a California Corporation
 
   
  Express Test Corporation, A California Corporation
 
   
  European Electronic Test Center. Ltd. A Cayman Islands Corporation

36


Table of Contents

     
Number
  Description
  Trio-Tech Malaysia, a Malaysia Corporation (55% owned by the Registrant)
 
   
  Trio-Tech Kuala Lumpur, a Malaysia Corporation (100% owned by Trio-Tech Malaysia)
 
   
  Trio-Tech Bangkok, a Thailand Corporation
 
   
  Trio-Tech Thailand, a Thailand Corporation
 
   
  Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd., a Malaysia Corporation (76% owned by the Registrant)
 
   
  KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems, a California Corporation
 
   
  Trio-Tech (Suzhou) Co. Ltd., a China Corporation
 
   
23.1
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
   
31.1
  Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Registrant*
 
   
31.2
  Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Registrant*
 
   
32
  Section 1350 Certification. *

* Filed electronically herewith

** Indicates management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit to this report.

37


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

         
  By:   /s/ Victor H.M. Ting
     
 
      VICTOR H.M. TING
      Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
      Date: September 22, 2004

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and as of the dates indicated have signed this report below.

     
/s/ A. Charles Wilson
  September 22, 2004

 
   
A. Charles Wilson, Director
   
Chairman of the Board
   
 
   
/s/ S. W. Yong
  September 22 2004

 
   
S. W. Yong, Director
   
President, Chief Executive Officer
   
(Principal Executive Officer)
   
 
   
/s/ Victor H.M. Ting
  September 22, 2004

 
   
Victor H.M. Ting
   
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
   
(Principal Financial Officer)
   
 
   
/s/ Jason T. Adelman
  September 22, 2004

 
   
Jason T. Adelman, Director
   
 
   
/s/ Richard M. Horowitz
  September 22, 2004

 
   
Richard M. Horowitz, Director
   

38


Table of Contents

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, S. W. Yong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 22, 2004

     
  /s/ S. W. YONG
 
 
  S. W. Yong, Chief Executive
  Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)

39


Table of Contents

Exhibit 31.2

I, Victor H.M. Ting, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 22, 2004

     
  /s/ VICTOR H.M. TING
 
 
  Victor H.M. Ting, Chief Financial Officer
  and Vice President (Principal Financial Officer)

40


Table of Contents

Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     
  /s/ S. W. YONG
 
 
  Name: S. W. Yong
  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
  Date: September 22, 2004
 
   
  /s/ VICTOR H. M. TING
 
 
  Name: Victor H.M. Ting
  Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  Date: September 22, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

41


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
Trio-Tech International
Van Nuys, California:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trio-Tech International and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three years ended June 30, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trio-Tech International and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2004 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BDO International

     
/s/ BDO International
   
 
   
Singapore
   
September 14, 2004
   

42


Table of Contents

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES)

                         
            June 30,   June 30,
    Note
  2004
  2003
ASSETS
                       
CURRENT ASSETS:
                       
Cash
    2     $ 1,357     $ 1,495  
Short-term deposits
    2       5,649       4,308  
Investments in marketable securities
    2             485  
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $165 and $157
    2       3,695       3,643  
Other receivables
            583       373  
Inventories, less provision for obsolete inventory of $445 and $735
    3       1,409       1,049  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
            105       140  
 
           
 
     
 
 
Total current assets
            12,798       11,493  
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, Net
    4       5,202       5,210  
OTHER ASSETS, Net
                  8  
 
           
 
     
 
 
TOTAL ASSETS
          $ 18,000     $ 16,711  
 
           
 
     
 
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                       
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
                       
Lines of credit
    5     $ 146     $ 300  
Accounts payable
            2,316       1,080  
Accrued expenses
    6       2,166       2,096  
Income taxes payable
    9       49       56  
Current portion of notes payable
    8       506       632  
Current portion of capitalized leases
    10       246       302  
 
           
 
     
 
 
Total current liabilities
            5,429       4,466  
 
           
 
     
 
 
NOTES PAYABLE, net of current portion
    8       583       492  
CAPITALIZED LEASES, net of current portion
    10       210       344  
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
    9       644       711  
 
           
 
     
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES
            6,866       6,013  
 
           
 
     
 
 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
    10              
MINORITY INTEREST
            2,110       2,108  
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
                       
Common stock; no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 2,964,562 and 2,927,542 shares issued and outstanding
    11       9,527       9,423  
Paid-in capital
    11       284       284  
Accumulated deficit
    11       (519 )     (739 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income-unrealized gain
    11             45  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss-translation adjustments
    11       (268 )     (423 )
 
           
 
     
 
 
Total shareholders’ equity
            9,024       8,590  
 
           
 
     
 
 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
          $ 18,000     $ 16,711  
 
           
 
     
 
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

43


Table of Contents

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE)

                                 
            Years Ended
            June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    Note
  2004
  2003
  2002
NET SALES
                               
- PRODUCT SALES
          $ 10,246     $ 11,741     $ 10,675  
- SERVICES
            8,908       9,505       8,942  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
            19,154       21,246       19,617  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
COST OF SALES
                               
- COST OF GOODS SOLD
            8,145       10,395       10,421  
- COSTS OF SERVICE RENDERED
            6,309       5,850       5,505  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
            14,454       16,245       15,926  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
GROSS PROFIT
            4,700       5,001       3,691  
OPERATING EXPENSES:
                               
General and administrative
            3,769       3,992       4,141  
Selling
            875       702       1,200  
Research and development
            117       121       331  
Impairment Loss
            4       358       1,631  
(Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant & equipment
            (101 )     115       (33 )
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
            4,664       5,288       7,270  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
            36       (287 )     (3,579 )
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
                               
Interest expense
            (120 )     (185 )     (207 )
Other income
    14       372       347       306  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
            252       162       99  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND MINORITY INTEREST
            288       (125 )     (3,480 )
INCOME TAXES
    9       13       94       53  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST
            275       (219 )     (3,533 )
MINORITY INTEREST
            (55 )     138       (14 )
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON SHARES
            220       (81 )     (3,547 )
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME :
                               
Unrealized (gain) loss on investment
            (45 )     21       24  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
            155       18       262  
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
          $ 330     $ (42 )   $ (3,261 )
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
                               
Basic
          $ 0.07     $ (0.03 )   $ (1.21 )
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
Diluted
          $ 0.07     $ (0.03 )   $ (1.21 )
 
           
 
     
 
     
 
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND POTENTIAL COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
                               
Basic
            2,939       2,928       2,928  
Diluted
            3,000       2,928       2,928  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

44


Table of Contents

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (IN THOUSANDS)

                                                 
                                         
                                         
                                Accum-
ulated
   
    Common Stock
  Additional   Retained
Earnings/
  Other
Compre-
   
    Number of           Paid-in   Accumulated   hensive    
    Shares
  Amount
  Capital
  Deficit
  (Loss)
  Total
Balance, June 30, 2001
    2,927     $ 9,423     $ 0     $ 2,889     $ (703 )   $ 11,609  
Stock compensation due to issuance of options
                    24                       24  
Other
                    246                       246  
Net loss
                            (3,547 )             (3,547 )
Unrealized gain in marketable securities (net of tax)
                                    24       24  
Translation adjustment
                                    262       262  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance, June 30, 2002
    2,927       9,423       270       (658 )     (417 )     8,618  
Stock compensation due to issuance of options
                    14                       14  
Net loss
                            (81 )             (81 )
Unrealized gain in marketable securities (net of tax)
                                    21       21  
Translation adjustment
                                    18       18  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance, June 30, 2003
    2,927       9,423       284       (739 )     (378 )     8,590  
Cash received from stock options exercised
    37       104                               104  
Net Income
                            220               220  
Unrealized loss in marketable securities (net of tax)
                                    (45 )     (45 )
Translation adjustment
                                    155       155  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Balance, June 30, 2004
    2,964     $ 9,527     $ 284     $ (519 )   $ (268 )     9,024  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

45


Table of Contents

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW (IN THOUSANDS)

INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

                         
    Years Ended
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 220     $ (81 )   $ (3,547 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    1,145       1,271       1,705  
Bad debt expense (recovery), net
    14       (17 )     41  
Inventory provision
          19       511  
Impairment loss
    4       358       1,631  
Stock Compensation
          14       24  
(Gain) Loss on sale of property and equipment
    (101 )     115       (33 )
(Gain) Loss on disposal of marketable securities
    (115 )     (49 )     1  
Deferred income taxes
    (67 )     42       20  
Minority interest, net
    55       (138 )     14  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
Accounts receivable, net
    (66 )     522       300  
Other receivables
    (206 )     (175 )     (310 )
Inventories
    (360 )     (36 )     409  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    35       (12 )     (25 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    1,305       (856 )     (2,396 )
Income taxes payable
    (7 )     (50 )     (62 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    1,856       927       (1,717 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
                       
Short term deposits
    (1,341 )     1,719       1,666  
Capital expenditures
    (1,040 )     (570 )     (448 )
Purchase of marketable securities
    (4 )     (537 )     (676 )
Other assets
    8       69       80  
Proceeds from disposal of marketable securites
    555       665       556  
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
    241             63  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    (1,581 )     1,346       1,241  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
                       
Net payments and borrowings on lines of credit
    (155 )     (932 )     1,205  
Principal payments of debt and capitalized leases
    (1,359 )     (1,284 )     (1,181 )
Proceeds from long-term debt
    999       535       72  
Dividends paid to minority interest
    (53 )     (70 )     (4 )
Cash received from stock options exercised
    104              
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (464 )     (1,751 )     92  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
    51       (34 )     242  
NET (DECREASE)/INCREASE IN CASH
    (138 )     488       (142 )
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
    1,495       1,007       1,149  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR
  $ 1,357     $ 1,495     $ 1,007  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
                       
Cash paid during the year for:
                       
Interest
  $ 120     $ 182     $ 200  
Income taxes
  $ 91     $ 102     $ 95  
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
                       
- Acquisition of property, plant and equipment under capital finance lease
  $ 135     $ 363     $ 276  
- Capitalization of property, plant and equipment paid in advance
  $     $ 329     $  

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

46


Table of Contents

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004, 2003 AND 2002 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND
NUMBER OF SHARES)

1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Trio-Tech International (“the Company” or “TTI” thereafter) was incorporated in fiscal 1958 under the laws of the State of California. TTI provides third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through its laboratories in Southeast Asia. In addition, TTI operates test facilities in the United States and Europe. The Company also designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of equipment and systems used in the manufacture and testing of semiconductor devices and electronic components. TTI conducts business in three business segments: Testing Services, Manufacturing and Distribution. TTI has subsidiaries in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Ireland as follows:

             
    Ownership
  Location
Express Test Corporation
    100 %   Van Nuys, California
Trio-Tech Reliability Services
    100 %   Van Nuys, California
KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems
    100 %   San Jose, California
European Electronic Test Centre.
    100 %   Dublin, Ireland
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.
    100 %   Singapore
Trio-Tech Test Services Pte. Ltd.
    100 %   Singapore
(renamed as Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd.)
           
Trio-Tech Thailand
    100 %   Bangkok, Thailand
Trio-Tech Bangkok
    100 %   Bangkok, Thailand
Trio-Tech Malaysia
    55 %   Penang, Malaysia
Trio-Tech Kuala Lumpur – 100% owned by Trio-Tech Malaysia
    55 %   Selangor, Malaysia
Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.
    76 %   Selangor, Malaysia
Trio-Tech (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
    100 %   Suzhou, China

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Among the more significant estimates included in these financial statements are the estimated accounts receivable allowance for doubtful accounts, reserve for obsolete inventory, and the deferred income tax asset allowance. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Accounting Period — The Company’s fiscal reporting period coincides with the 52-53 week period ending on the last Friday in June. Fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002 are 52-week reporting periods, respectively. For simplicity purposes the Company refers to its fiscal year end as June 30.

Revenue Recognition — Revenues generated from sales of products in the Manufacturing and Distribution segments are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the products has occurred, customer acceptance has been obtained, which means the significant risks and rewards of the ownership have been transferred to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Certain products sold (in the Manufacturing segment) require installation and training to be performed.

Revenue from product sales is also recorded in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Statement 00-21 “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” and Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” which generally requires revenue earned on product sales involving multiple-elements to be allocated to

47


Table of Contents

each element based on the relative fair values of those elements. Accordingly, the Company allocates revenue to each element in a multiple-element arrangement based on the element’s respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold and specifically defined in a quotation or contract. The Company allocates a portion of the invoice value to products sold and the remaining portion of invoice value to installation work in proportion of the fair value of products sold and installation work to be performed. Training elements are valued based on hourly rates, which the Company charges for these services when sold apart from product sales. The fair value determination of products sold and the installation and training work is also based on our specific historical experience of the relative fair values of the elements if there is no easily determinable market price to be considered. In fiscal 2004 and 2003, the installation revenues generated in connection with product sales were immaterial and included in the product sales revenue line on the consolidated statement of income. The Company estimates an allowance for sales returns based on historical experience with product returns. Revenue derived from testing service is recognized when testing services are rendered.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts — During the normal course of business, the Company extends unsecured credit to its customers. Typically credit terms require payment to be made between 30 to 60 days of the sale. We do not require collateral from its customers. The Company maintains its cash accounts at credit worthy financial institutions.

The Company regularly evaluates and monitors the creditworthiness of each customer on a case-by-case basis. The Company includes any account balances that are determined to be uncollectible, along with a general reserve, in the overall allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the information available to management, the Company believed that its allowance for doubtful accounts was adequate as of June 30, 2004.

Warranty Costs — The Company provides for the estimated costs that may be incurred under its warranty program at the time the sale is recorded. The Company estimates the warranty costs based on the historical rates of warranty returns. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary. See Note 7 for the change in the accrued warranty costs.

Short Term Deposits — Short Term deposits consist of bank balances and interest bearing deposits having maturity of 1 to 12 months. As of June 30, 2004, approximately $2,011 of short-term deposits are held in the Company’s 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary. $1,742 of this amount is denominated in the currency of Malaysia. Out of the $1,742, $147 is currently available for movement to overseas, as authorized by the Central Bank of Malaysia. There are additional amounts available as dividends (after making deductions for income tax) pursuant to Malaysian regulations.

As of June 30, 2003, approximately $806 of short-term deposits were held in the Company’s 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary. Five hundred and thirty five dollars of this amount was denominated in the currency of Malaysia. Out of the $535, $168 was then available for movement to overseas, as authorized by the Central Bank of Malaysia. There are additional amounts available as dividends (after making deductions for income tax) pursuant to Malaysian regulations in force from July 1, 2000.

Investments in Marketable Securities — Investments in marketable securities are accounted for under the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115. Marketable equity securities are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in a separate component of shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in investment income. The Company recognized comprehensive loss (net of tax) of $45 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 and comprehensive income (net of tax) of $21 and $24, during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively, based on its proportionate interest in the subsidiary where the marketable securities are recorded.

Inventories — Inventories consist principally of raw materials, work in progress, and finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost, using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method, or market value.

Property, Plant and Equipment — Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the assets, using the straight-line method. Amortization of leasehold improvements is provided for over the term of the leases or the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichever is the shorter, using the straight-line method. Capital grants from the Industrial Development Authority in Ireland are accounted for when claimed by reducing the cost of the related assets. The grants are amortized over the depreciable lives of those assets. The Company reviews the carrying value of its fixed assets for possible impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Impairment losses are charged to operations when recognized. During fiscal 2003 and 2004, the Company recorded an impairment loss against the carrying value of fixed assets in the amount of $358 and $4 respectively.

48


Table of Contents

Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are charged directly to expense as incurred. Additions and betterments to property and equipment are capitalized. When assets are disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation thereon are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statement of operations.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — Effective July 1, 2002, the Company applies the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”) to property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets such as patents. SFAS No. 144 requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the assets. Whenever any such impairment exists, an impairment loss will be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value will be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value.

In the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, the Company recorded an impairment loss of approximately $358 based on its examination of future undiscounted cash flows, which are generated by the subsidiaries where certain long-lived assets (goodwill, patent, and certain fixed assets) were used. The impairment of $358 consisted of machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements (pertaining to the Malaysia and Singapore Testing operations) due to changes in demand for certain burn-in services which in turn made certain of our existing burn-in facilities obsolete. There was an impairment loss of Long-Lived Assets of approximately $4 pertaining to the Thailand operation in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004.

Comprehensive Income (Loss) — The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” (“SFAS No. 130”) issued by the FASB. SFAS No. 130 establishes standards for reporting and presentation of comprehensive income (loss) and its components in a full set of general-purpose financial statements. The Company has chosen to report comprehensive income (loss) in the statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) and all changes to shareholders’ equity except those due to investments by owners and distributions to owners.

Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions — The financial position and results of operations of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries are measured using currencies, namely, Singapore Dollar, Malaysia Ringgit, Thai Baht and Euro Dollar, other than the U.S. Dollar as their functional currency. They represent an increase or decrease in (a) the actual functional current cash flows realized upon settlement of foreign currency transactions and (b) the expected functional currency cash flows on unsettled foreign currency transactions. All transaction gains and losses are included in other income or expense. Accordingly, for these subsidiaries all assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rates as of the respective balance sheet date. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Cumulative gains and losses from the translation of these subsidiaries’ financial statements are reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.

Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”). SFAS No. 109 requires an entity to recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets. Deferred taxes assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequence attributable to the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Further, the effects of enacted tax laws or rate changes are included as part of deferred tax expenses or benefits in the period that covers the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

For US income tax purposes, no provision has been made for US taxes on undistributed earnings of oversea subsidiaries, with which the Company intends to continue to reinvest. It is not practicable to estimate the amount of additional tax that might be payable on the foreign earnings if they were remitted as dividends, or lent to the Company, or if the Company should sell its stock in the subsidiary. However, the Company believes that US foreign tax credits and net operating losses available would substantially eliminate any additional tax effects.

Retained earnings — It is the intention of the Company to reinvest earnings of its foreign subsidiaries in the operations of those subsidiaries. Accordingly, no provision has been made for U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes that would result if such earnings were repatriated. These taxes are undeterminable at this time. The amount of earnings retained in subsidiaries was $7,518 at June 30, 2004.

Research and Development Costs — The Company incurred research and development costs of $117 in fiscal 2004, $121 in fiscal 2003 and $331 in fiscal 2002 that were charged to operating expenses as incurred.

Stock Based Compensation — Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123), establishes a fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation plans and for

49


Table of Contents

transactions in which a company acquires goods or services from employees and non-employees in exchange for equity instruments. SFAS No. 123 also gives the option, with respect to employees only, to account for stock-based compensation, utilizing the intrinsic method, in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB No. 25), “Accounting for Stock issued to Employees”. The Company adopts APB No. 25 and FIN 44 for measurement and recognition of employee stock-based compensation.

The Company has adopted the intrinsic value method of accounting for employee stock options as permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123) and discloses the pro forma effect on net loss and loss per share as if the fair value based method had been applied. For equity instruments, including stock options, issued to non-employees, the fair value of the equity instruments or the fair value of the consideration received, whichever is more readily determinable is used to determine the value of services or goods received and the corresponding charge to operations.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

                         
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Net income (loss) : as reported
  $ 220     $ (81 )   $ (3,547 )
Add: stock based employee compensation included in reported income
          14       24  
Deduct: total stock based employee compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards
    (42 )     (18 )     (186 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pro forma net income (loss)
  $ 178     $ (85 )   $ (3,709 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income (loss) per share - basic
                       
As reported
  $ 0.07     $ (0.03 )   $ (1.21 )
Pro forma
  $ 0.06     $ (0.03 )   $ (1.27 )
Income (loss) per share - diluted
                       
As reported
  $ 0.07     $ (0.03 )   $ (1.21 )
Pro forma
  $ 0.06     $ (0.03 )   $ (1.27 )

As required by SFAS No. 123, the Company provides the following disclosure of estimated values for these awards. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during fiscal 2004, 2003, and 2002 was $2.66, $2.25, and $3.20 per share, respectively, and aggregate $42, $18, and $186, respectively, for total options granted by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the assumptions listed below:

                         
    Years Ended
    June 30, 2004
  June 30, 2003
  June 30, 2002
Volatility
    41.9 %     37.2 %     45.9 %
Risk free interest rate
    2.76 %     2.27 - 2.93 %     2.37 - 3.16 %
Expected life (years)
    2.00       2.00       2.17  

Earnings per Share — The Company adopted SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share (“EPS”). Basic Earnings Per Share is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during a period. In computing diluted EPS, the average price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from exercise of stock options and warrants.

50


Table of Contents

Stock options to purchase 345,500 shares at prices ranging from $2.25 to $6.00 per share were outstanding during fiscal 2004. The following options were excluded in the computation of diluted EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares and therefore were anti-dilutive:

                     
Type
  Shares
  Price
  Expiration
Options
    20,000     $ 5.63     September 18, 2005
Options
    32,000     $ 5.37     July 10, 2005
Options
    48,000     $ 6.00     March 27, 2005

Stock options to purchase 349,500 shares at prices ranging from $2.25 to $6.69 per share were outstanding during fiscal 2003 and were excluded in the computation of diluted EPS because their effect would have been antidilutive.

The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted-average shares used in the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the periods presented herein:

                         
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Net income (loss) used to compute basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ 220     $ (81 )   $ (3,547 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic
    2,939       2,928       2,928  
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants
    61              
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share - diluted
    3,000       2,928       2,928  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Fair Values of Financial Instruments — The carrying value of trade accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair value due to their short-term maturities. The carrying values of the Company’s lines of credit and long-term debt are considered to approximate their fair value because the interest rates are based on the interest rates that are currently available to the Company for issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.

Concentration of credit risk — Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk consists primarily of accounts receivable. Concentration of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is generally diversified due to the number of entities composing the Company’s customer base and their geographic dispersion. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers for potential credit losses. The Company generally does not require collateral. The Company believes that its credit policies do not result in significant adverse risk and historically it has not experienced significant credit related losses.

The following table represents the changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts:

                         
    Years Ended
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Beginning
  $ 157     $ 174     $ 174  
Additions charged to cost and expenses
    18             66  
Recovered
    (4 )     (17 )     (25 )
Actual write-offs
    (6 )           (41 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Ending
  $ 165     $ 157     $ 174  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements — In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”. FIN 46, as amended by FIN 46(R), issued in January 2003, requires an investor with a majority of the variable interests in a variable interest entity to consolidate the entity and also requires majority and significant variable interest investors to provide certain disclosures. A variable interest entity is an entity in which the equity

51


Table of Contents

    investors do not have a controlling financial interest or the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance the entity’s activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The provisions of FIN 46(R) are applicable for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2004. The Company does not have any variable interest entities that must be consolidated as of June 30, 2004.

    Reclassification — Certain reclassifications have been made to the previous year’s financial statements to conform to current year presentation, with no effect on previously reported net income.

3.   INVENTORIES
 
    Inventories consist of the following:
                 
    June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
Raw materials
  $ 652     $ 873  
Work in progress
    700       166  
Finished goods
    502       745  
Less: provision for obsolete inventory
    (445 )     (735 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 1,409     $ 1,049  
 
   
 
     
 
 

4.   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
 
    Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
                         
    Useful   June 30,   June 30,
    Life in years
  2004
  2003
Building and improvements
    3-20     $ 817     $ 843  
Leasehold improvements
    3-27       2,347       1,895  
Machinery and equipment
    3-7       4,655       3,461  
Furniture and fixtures
    3-5       363       350  
Equipment under capital leases
    3-5       1,279       1,896  
 
           
 
     
 
 
 
            9,461       8,445  
Less:
                       
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
            3,417       2,453  
Accumulated amortization on equipment under capital leases
            842       782  
 
           
 
     
 
 
 
          $ 5,202     $ 5,210  
 
           
 
     
 
 

     Depreciation and amortization expense during fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $1,145, $1,271 and $1,705, respectively.

52


Table of Contents

5.   LINES OF CREDIT
                 
    June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
Revolving line of credit denominated by Singapore dollars payable to a commercial bank for working capital purposes, to borrow up to $2,925 with an interest rate at the bank’s prime rate (5.75% at June 30, 2004) plus 0.25%. The line of credit is renewable in July 2004 and is collateralized by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. accounts receivable
  $ 146     $  
Revolving line of credit denominated by United States dollars, payable to a commercial bank for working capital purposes, to borrow up to $300 with an interest rate at bank’s prime rate (4.00% at June 30, 2003) plus 1.75%. The line was cancelled during the year. This line of credit was previously collateralized by Trio-Tech International accounts receivable and inventories.
          300  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Lines of credit
  $ 146     $ 300  
 
   
 
     
 
 

     The lines of credit have various financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with all such debt covenants at June 30, 2004.

6.   ACCRUED EXPENSES
 
    Accrued expenses consist of the following:
                 
    June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
Payroll and related
  $ 954     $ 967  
Commissions
    64       46  
Customer Deposits
    39       24  
Legal and audit
    113       109  
Sales tax
    271       288  
Utilities
    201       134  
Warranty
    162       165  
Provision for sales volume rebate
    3       164  
Provision for building sinking fund
    34       17  
Accrual for construction work performed
          28  
Rental provisions
    27       25  
Other accrued expenses
    298       129  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 2,166     $ 2,096  
 
   
 
     
 
 

53


Table of Contents

7.   WARRANTY ACCRUAL
                 
    June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
Beginning
  $ 165     $ 305  
Additions charged to cost and expenses
    41       1  
Recovered
          (126 )
Actual write-offs
    (44 )     (15 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Ending
  $ 162     $ 165  
 
   
 
     
 
 

54


Table of Contents

8.   NOTES PAYABLE
 
    Notes payable consists of the following:
                 
    June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
Note payable denominated by Singapore Dollars to a commercial bank for purchasing certain equipment, maturing in September 2003, bearing interest at 6.5% per annum, payable in monthly installments of $48 through September 2003. This note payable was previously collateralized by the relevant equipment.
  $       210  
Note payable denominated by Singapore Dollars to a commercial bank for purchasing certain equipment, maturing in February 2005, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate (5.75% at June 30, 2004) plus 1.5% per annum, payable in monthly installments of $17 through February 2005, collateralized by the relevant equipment, with a fixed deposit and a corporate guarantee.
    145       330  
Note payable denominated by Singapore Dollars to a commercial bank for purchasing certain equipment, maturing in October 2005, bearing interest at a fixed rate (5.50% at June 30, 2003) per annum payable in monthly installments of $16 through October 2005. This note payable was cancelled before its maturity and was previously collateralized by majority of the accounts receivable.
          413  
Note payable denominated by Singapore Dollars to a commercial bank for purchasing certain equipment, maturing in October 2006, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate (5.75% at June 30, 2004) plus 0.5% per annum, payable in monthly installments of $16 thorugh October 2006 with no collateral.
    455        
Note payable denominated by Singapore Dollars to a commercial bank for purchasing certain equipment, maturing in October 2006, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate (2.95% at June 30, 2004) plus 2.64% per annum, payable in monthly installments of $5 thorugh October 2006, with no collateral.
    140        
Note payable denominated by Thailand Baht to a commercial bank for extension of a building, maturing in September 2005, bearing interest at a fixed rate (4.5% at June 30, 2004), payable in monthly installments of $31 through September 2006, with no collateral.
    207        
Mortgage note payable denominated in Irish Pounds to the Industrial Credit Corporation for purchasing a building, maturing in July 2007, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate (2.09% and 2.73% at June 30, 2004 and 2003) plus 3.5% per annum, payable in monthly installments of $2 through July 2007, collateralized by the relevant building.
    88       107  
Mortgage note payable denominated by Irish Pounds to the Industrial Credit Corporation for purchasing a building, maturing in May 2008, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate (2.11% and 2.54% at June 30, 2004 and 2003) plus 3% per annum, payable in monthly installments. of $1 through May 2008, collateralized by the relevant building.
    54       64  
 
   
 
     
 
 
 
    1,089       1,124  
Less current portion
    (506 )     (632 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Notes payable
  $ 583     $ 492  
 
   
 
     
 
 

55


Table of Contents

    Maturities of notes payable as of June 30, 2004 are as follows:
         
Year        
Ending        
June 30,
       
2005
  $ 506  
2006
    359  
2007
    190  
2008
    34  
2009
     
Thereafter
     
 
   
 
 
 
  $ 1,089  
 
   
 
 

9.   INCOME TAXES
 
    The Company generates taxable income and loss in the U.S., Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Ireland, respectively, and files income tax returns in these countries. The summarized income or loss before income taxes in the U.S. and foreign countries for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
                         
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
U.S.
  $ (87 )   $ (231 )   $ (3,611 )
Foreign
    375       106       131  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 288     $ (125 )   $ (3,480 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

    On a consolidated basis, the Company’s net income tax provision (benefits) are as follows:
                         
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Current:
                       
Federal
  $     $     $  
State
    3       4       3  
Foreign
    77       48       30  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
    80       52       33  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Deferred:
                       
Foreign
    (67 )     42       20  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
 
  $ 13     $ 94     $ 53  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

    The reconciliation between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the effective income tax rate is as follows:
                         
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Statutory federal tax rate
    34 %     (34 )%     (34 )%
State taxes, net of federal benefit
    6       (6 )     (6 )
Foreign tax rate reduction
    (37 )     28       13  
Other
          4       2  
Changes in valuation allowance
    2       83       27  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Effective rate
    5 %     75 %     2 %
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

    At June 30, 2004, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $5.1 million for federal income tax purposes (which will expire through fiscal 2024) and $0.2 million for state income tax purposes (which will expire through fiscal 2009). Management of the Company is uncertain whether it is more likely than not these future benefits will be realized. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance has been established.

56


Table of Contents

    The components of deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
                 
    June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
Deferred tax assets:
               
Net operating loss carry forward
  $ 1,721     $ 1,632  
Fixed asset impairment
           
Inventory valuation
    141       254  
Depreciation
    99       51  
Provision for bad debts
    8       5  
Accrued vacation
    10       17  
Accrued expenses
    40       44  
Other
          1  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total deferred tax assets
    2,019       2,004  
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
Depreciation
    449       584  
Other
    195       127  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total deferred income tax liabilities
    644       711  
 
   
 
     
 
 
Subtotal
    1,375       1,293  
Valuation allowance
    (2,019 )     (2,004 )
 
   
 
     
 
 
Net deferred tax liability
  $ (644 )   $ (711 )
 
   
 
     
 
 

    The valuation allowance increased by $15, $104 and $935 in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

10.   COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
    The Company leases certain of its facilities and equipment under long-term agreements expiring at various dates through fiscal 2009. Certain of these leases require the Company to pay real estate taxes and insurance and provide for escalation of lease costs based on certain indices. Future minimum payments under capital leases and non-cancelable operating leases as of June 30, 2004 are as follows:
                 
    Capital   Rental
Year ending June 30,
  Leases
  Commitments
2005
  $ 266     $ 654  
2006
    125       488  
2007
    64       230  
2008
    32       1  
2009
    8        
Thereafter
           
 
   
 
     
 
 
Total future minimum lease payments
    495     $ 1,373  
 
           
 
 
Less amount representing interest
    (39 )        
 
   
 
         
Present value of net minimum lease payments
    456          
Less current portion of capitalized lease obligations
    (246 )        
 
   
 
         
Long-term obligations under capital leases
  $ 210          
 
   
 
         

    Total rental expense on all operating leases, both cancelable and non-cancelable, amounted to $658 in fiscal 2004, $733 in fiscal 2003 and $705 in fiscal 2002.

    The Company is, from time to time, the subject of litigation claims and assessments arising out of matters occurring in its normal business operations. In the opinion of management, resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

57


Table of Contents

11. TRANSACTIONS IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Fiscal 2004

On July 14, 2003, the Board of Directors granted options under the 1998 Plan, covering 61,000 shares of Common Stock to 30 employees and 35,000 shares of Common Stock to 4 directors with an exercise price of $2.66 per share equal to the market price at the grant date. The options granted to directors vested in full on the grant date. The options granted to the employees have a five-year contractual life and vested 25% on the grant date and will vest as to an additional 25% on each anniversary date. According to APB No. 25, no stock compensation was recognized for these 96,000 options. On the measurement date, there was no intrinsic value on these options. Therefore, no stock compensation expense was recognized for this transaction during fiscal 2004.

Option holders under the Directors Plan exercised options covering 5,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an exercise price of $2.72 per share. Consequently, the Company issued 5,000 shares of Common Stock in exchange for aggregate proceeds of $14.

Option holders under the Directors Plan exercised options covering 25,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an exercise price of $2.82 per share. Consequently, the Company issued 25,000 shares of Common Stock in exchange for aggregate proceeds of $70.

Option holders under the 1998 Plan exercised options covering 2,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock with an exercise price of $3.20 per share and options covering 5,000 shares at exercise price of $2.66 per share. Consequently, the Company issued 7,000 shares of Common Stock in exchange for aggregate proceeds of $20.

Fiscal 2003

On July 16, 2002, the Board of Directors granted options under the 1998 Plan covering 35,000 shares of Common Stock to 5 directors with an exercise price lower than the market price at the grant date. These options granted have a five-year contractual life and vested immediately. The Company recognized the stock compensation expense of $14 according to APB No. 25 on June 30, 2003.

No options were exercised in fiscal 2003.

Based on variable accounting method, the Company determined that no additional stock compensation expense was recognized in fiscal 2003 for the repricing transactions related to 45,000 options, which occurred in fiscal 2000.

Fiscal 2002

On October 16, 2001, the Board of Directors granted options under the 1998 Plan, covering 116,000 shares of Common Stock to 55 employees and 50,000 shares of Common Stock to 5 directors with an exercise price of $2.72 per share equal to the market price at the grant date. The options granted to directors vested in full on the grant date. The options granted to the employees have a five-year contractual life and vested 25% on the grant date and then 25% on each anniversary date. Consequently, the Company recognized the stock compensation expense of $24 according to APB No. 25 in fiscal 2002.

Based on variable accounting method, the Company determined that no additional stock compensation expense was recognized in fiscal 2002 for the repricing transactions related to 45,000 options, which occurred in fiscal 2000.

On December 8, 1997, the Company’s shareholders approved the Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”) under which employees, officers, directors and consultants receive options to purchase the Company’s Common Stock at a price that is not less than 100 percent of the fair market value at the date of grant. Options under the 1998 Plan have a five-year contractual life and vest at the rate of 25% at the grant date and 25% at each anniversary after the granting date. There are 300,000 shares authorized for grant under the 1998 Plan, and options to acquire 213,500 shares were outstanding as of June 30, 2004.

On December 8, 1997, the Company’s shareholders approved the Directors Stock Option Plan (the “Directors Plan” under which duly elected non-employee Directors and the President (if he or she is a director of the Company) of the Company (currently four individuals) receive options to purchase the Company’s Common Stock at a price of 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. Each option granted under Plan shall have a five-year contractual life and be exercisable immediately commencing as of the date of grant. There are 300,000 shares authorized for grant under the Directors Plan and options to acquire 132,000 shares were outstanding as of June 30, 2004.

58


Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the stock option and warrant activities for the three years ended June 30, 2002, 2003, 2004:

                                 
                    Number   Weighted
    Number   Weighted   of   Average
    of   Average   Options   Exercise
Outstanding Options   Options
  Price
  Exercisable
  Price
Beginning outstanding options at June 30, 2001
    408,000     $ 4.92                  
Granted
    166,000       3.05                  
Exercised
                             
Canceled
    (99,500 )     4.93                  
 
   
 
             
 
         
Total outstanding options at June 30, 2002
    474,500       4.27       347,750     $ 4.36  
 
   
 
             
 
         
Granted
    35,000       2.25                  
Exercised
                               
Canceled
    (160,000 )     4.49                  
 
   
 
             
 
         
Total outstanding options at June 30, 2003
    349,500       3.96       296,000       4.05  
 
   
 
             
 
         
Granted
    96,000       2.74                  
Exercised
    (37,000 )     2.81                  
Canceled
    (63,000 )     3.99                  
 
   
 
             
 
         
Total outstanding options at June 30, 2004
    345,500     $ 3.68       278,875     $ 3.85  
 
   
 
             
 
         
                                         
Year Ended June 30, 2004
Options Outstanding
  Options Exercisable
    Weighted Average            
Grant   Number   Remaining   Weighted Average   Number    
Price Range
  Outstanding
  Contractual Life
  Exercise Price
  Exercisable
  Exercise Price
$2.50 - $3.69
    240,500       2.70       2.85       178,875       2.82  
$3.70 - $4.69
    5,000       4.76       4.25       1,250       4.25  
$4.70 - $5.69
    52,000       1.10       5.47       50,750       5.46  
$5.70 - $6.69
    48,000       0.75       6.00       48,000       6.00  
 
   
 
                     
 
         
 
    345,500       2.03       3.68       278,875       3.85  
 
   
 
                     
 
         

12. CONCENTRATION OF CUSTOMERS

The Company had two major customers that accounted for the following accounts receivable and sales during the periods ended:

                         
Years ended June 30,
  2004
  2003
  2002
Sales
                       
- Customer A
    15 %     17 %     24 %
- Customer B
    37 %     33 %     31 %
Accounts Receivable
                       
- Customer A
    15 %     10 %     24 %
- Customer B
    32 %     28 %     24 %

59


Table of Contents

13. UNUSED FINANCING FACILITIES

The Company has various credit facilities available to it. The following table summarizes the credit facilities available to the Company and the unutilized portion of the facilities at June 30, 2004:

                                 
Entity with Facility
  Type of
  Interest
  Credit
  Unused
Trio-Tech Malaysia
  Line of Credit     7.00 %   $ 91     $ 91  
Trio-Tech Bangkok
  Line of Credit     6.75 %     98       98  
Trio-Tech Singapore
  Line of Credit     5.5 to 6.0 %     3,510       3,364  
 
                   
 
     
 
 
 
                  $ 3,699     $ 3,553  
 
                   
 
     
 
 

14. OTHER INCOME

     Other income consists of the following:

                         
    June 30,   June 30,   June 30,
    2004
  2003
  2002
Interest Income
  $ 78     $ 83     $ 182  
Rental Income
    169       89       90  
Royalty Income
          20       25  
Dividend Income
    11       25       20  
Exchange (loss) gain
    (12 )     9       (107 )
Sales of other products
          52       77  
Gain (loss) on disposal on marketable securities
    115       49       (1 )
Other miscellaneous income
    11       20       20  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 
Total
  $ 372     $ 347     $ 306  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
 

15. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company operates principally in three industry segments, the testing service industry (that performs structural and electronic tests of semiconductor devices), the designing and manufacturing of equipment (that tests the structural integrity of integrated circuits and other products), and the distribution of various products from other manufacturers in Singapore and Southeast Asia. The following net sales were based on customer location rather than subsidiary location.

The allocation of the cost of equipment, the current year investment in new equipment and depreciation expense have been made on the basis of the primary purpose for which the equipment was acquired.

All inter-segment sales are sales from the manufacturing segment to the testing and distribution segment. Total inter-segment sales were $151 in fiscal 2004, $41 in fiscal 2003, and $38 in fiscal 2002. Corporate assets mainly consist of cash and prepaid expenses. Corporate expenses mainly consist of salaries, insurance, professional expenses and directors’ fees.

60


Table of Contents

Business Segment Information:

                                                 
    Year           Operating           Depr.    
    Ended   Net   Income           and   Capital
    Jun. 30,
  Sales
  (loss)
  Assets
  Amort.
  Expenditures
Manufacturing
  FY 2004   $ 7,122     $ (205 )   $ 2,423     $ 99     $ 165  
 
  FY 2003     4,674       (802 )     2,494       88       5  
 
  FY 2002     5,022       (4,013 )     2,939       410       217  
Testing Services
  FY 2004     8,908       241       14,893       910       783  
 
  FY 2003     9,505       803       13,431       1,068       1,212  
 
  FY 2002     8,942       680       15,646       1,187       474  
Distribution
  FY 2004     3,124       (27 )     588       129       227  
 
  FY 2003     7,067       (212 )     415       109       45  
 
  FY 2002     5,653       (69 )     399       104       18  
Corporate and
  FY 2004           27       96       7        
unallocated
  FY 2003           (76 )     371       6        
 
  FY 2002           (177 )     91       4       15  
Total Company
  FY 2004   $ 19,154     $ 36     $ 18,000     $ 1,145     $ 1,175  
 
  FY 2003   $ 21,246     $ (287 )   $ 16,711     $ 1,271     $ 1,262  
 
  FY 2002   $ 19,617     $ (3,579 )   $ 19,075     $ 1,705     $ 724  

Geographic Area Information:

                                                                 
                                                    Elimin-    
    Year                                           ations    
    Ended   United                                   and   Total
    Jun. 30,
  States
  Europe
  Singapore
  Thailand
  Malaysia
  Other
  Company
Net sales to
  FY 2004   $ 4,706       1,255       9,944       2,534       866       (151 )     19,154  
customers
  FY 2003   $ 9,038       943       8,682       1,992       632       (41 )     21,246  
 
  FY 2002   $ 8,083       1,479       8,177       1,377       539       (38 )     19,617  
Operating
  FY 2004   $ (216 )     (23 )     184       48       16       27       36  
Income (loss)
  FY 2003   $ (167 )     (140 )     73       17       6       (76 )     (287 )
 
  FY 2002   $ (3,050 )     (480 )     104       18       7       (178 )     (3,579 )
Property, plant
  FY 2004   $ 8       380       3,557       886       411       (40 )     5,202  
and equipment - net
  FY 2003   $ 104       446       3,514       844       342       (40 )     5,210  
  FY 2002   $ 160       463       3,528       807       675       (40 )     5,593  

61


Table of Contents

16. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

     The Company’s summarized quarterly financial data are as follows:

                                 
Year ended June 30, 2003   Sep. 30,
  Dec. 31,
  Mar. 31,
  Jun. 30,
Revenues
  $ 5,915     $ 5,051     $ 5,561     $ 4,719  
Expenses
    5,789 (a)     4,996       5,545 (b)     5,041 (c)
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest
    126       55       16       (322 )
Income taxes
    68       (18 )     21       23  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Income before minority interest
    58       73       (5 )     (345 )
Minority interest
    (2 )     18       33       89  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income (loss)
  $ 56     $ 91     $ 28     $ (256 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net income (loss) per share:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.02     $ 0.03     $ 0.01     $ (0.09 )
Fully diluted
  $ 0.02     $ 0.03     $ 0.01     $ (0.09 )
                                 
Year ended June 30, 2004   Sep. 30,
  Dec. 31,
  Mar. 31,
  Jun. 30,
Revenues
  $ 3,850 (d)   $ 5,056     $ 5,042     $ 5,206  
Expenses
    4,046       4,816 (e)     4,869 (f)     5,135 (g)
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest
    (196 )     240       173       71  
Income taxes
    15       18       7       (27 )
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
(Loss) income before minority interest
    (211 )     222       166       98  
Minority interest
    (54 )     (4 )     2       1  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net (loss) income
  $ (265 )   $ 218     $ 168     $ 99  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Net (loss) income per share:
                               
Basic
  $ (0.09 )   $ 0.07     $ 0.06     $ 0.03  
Fully diluted
  $ (0.09 )   $ 0.07     $ 0.06     $ 0.03  

(a)   The expenses include a loss on disposal of property, plant and machinery of $112 derived from Singapore.

(b)   Cost of sales increased with the exceptionally high sales for the distribution of low margin front-end products of $1,600.

(c)   This includes an impairment of $358 consisting of machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements (pertaining to the Malaysia and Singapore Testing Segments).

(d)   Sales dropped sharply from Q4 FY2003 mainly due to the decline in Distribution sales from low-margin front-end products of $1,154, which offset by an increase in the sales of burn-in boards.

(e)   Gross margin at 28.1% in Q3 FY2004 was comparatively higher than the other quarters. This was attributed from Manufacturing and Distribution segment.

(f)   This includes a gain on disposal of equipment of $62 derived from Ireland.

(g)   Selling expenses increased to 6.2% of sales in Q4 FY2004 from an average of 4.6% due to commission payment towards end of the fiscal year. The expenses also include a gain on disposal of boards of $39 derived from Thailand.

62


Table of Contents

17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Trio-Tech Malaysia (“Buyer”), one of the Malaysia subsidiaries, entered into an agreement with TS Matrix Bhd, a Malaysian company (“Seller”), on March 29, 2004 under which Buyer agreed to acquire certain assets of Seller utilized by the burn-in testing division of Seller for an aggregate cash purchase price of 3,500 Ringgit Malaysia. A portion of the purchase price (350 Ringgit Malaysia, representing approximately $92 on March 29, 2004 based on the spot exchange rate published in Federal Reserve as of that date) was paid on March 29, 2004 by way of a deposit and was credited towards the aggregate purchase price at the closing of the transaction. The acquisition was completed on July 1, 2004. At the closing, the balance of the purchase price was paid, of which approximately $434 (or 1,650 Ringgit Malaysia was paid in cash) and approximately $395 (or 1,500 Ringgit Malaysia) was paid in the form of a bank-guaranteed note. The note payable will mature in six months from the closing date of the acquisition on July 1, 2004. Buyer also acquired on July 1, 2004 additional assets which Seller had been leasing for a purchase price of approximately $297 (or 1,127 Ringgit Malaysia ). Except as otherwise noted, the foregoing United States Dollar amounts were calculated based on the spot exchange rate published in Federal Reserve as of July 1, 2004. The source of the funds for this acquisition was the general working capital of Buyer.

The above newly acquired division will be accounted for under the purchase method and addresses the initial recognition and measurement of goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in a business combination. The Company will recognize $493 as the valuation of customer listing will be amortized over 5 years.

The current fiscal reporting period of the Company coincides with the 52-53 week period ending the last Friday in June. Subsequent to the year-end, the Board of Directors approved the change of the fiscal report period to end on the last day of June, effective July 1, 2004.

63