TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL - Quarter Report: 2005 December (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2005
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number 1-14523
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
California | 95-2086631 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification Number) | |
14731 Califa Street | ||
Van Nuys, California | 91411 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: 818-787-7000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
with the Commission by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Yes o No þ
Number
of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 10, 2006 is 3,219,157.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION, OTHER INFORMATION AND SIGNATURES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION, OTHER INFORMATION AND SIGNATURES
Page | ||||||||
Part I. Financial Information | ||||||||
Item 1. | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
Item 2. | 19 | |||||||
Item 3. | 34 | |||||||
Item 4. | 35 | |||||||
Part II. Other Information | ||||||||
Item 1. | 36 | |||||||
Item 1A. | 36 | |||||||
Item 2. | 36 | |||||||
Item 3. | 36 | |||||||
Item 4. | 36 | |||||||
Item 5. | 37 | |||||||
Item 6. | 37 | |||||||
Signatures | 38 | |||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32 |
Table of Contents
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES)
Dec 31, | June 30, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 7,034 | $ | 1,439 | ||||
Short-term deposits |
6,627 | 3,211 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of $190 and $147, respectively |
3,853 | 4,178 | ||||||
Other receivables |
327 | 142 | ||||||
Inventories, less provision for obsolete inventory
of $429 and $428, respectively |
1,253 | 1,584 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
258 | 76 | ||||||
Total current assets |
19,352 | 10,630 | ||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, Net |
6,912 | 7,176 | ||||||
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, Net |
339 | 386 | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
139 | 138 | ||||||
ADVANCES TO SELLER |
153 | 15 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 26,895 | $ | 18,345 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
||||||||
Lines of credit |
$ | 259 | $ | 336 | ||||
Accounts payable |
1,343 | 1,681 | ||||||
Dividends payable |
1,608 | | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
3,286 | 2,598 | ||||||
Income tax payable |
239 | 168 | ||||||
Current portion of notes payable |
882 | 655 | ||||||
Current portion of capital leases |
110 | 123 | ||||||
Current portion of deferred tax liabilities |
278 | 275 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
8,005 | 5,836 | ||||||
NOTES PAYABLE, net of current portion |
899 | 634 | ||||||
CAPITAL LEASES, net of current portion |
155 | 110 | ||||||
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES |
413 | 407 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
9,472 | 6,987 | ||||||
MINORITY INTEREST |
2,027 | 2,061 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Common stock; no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized;
3,051,242 shares issued and outstanding as at Dec.
31, 2005, and 2,976,042 shares issued and outstanding as at Jun.
30, 2005, and |
9,786 | 9,554 | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
328 | 284 | ||||||
Accumulated retained earnings (deficit) |
6,271 | (298 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss-translation adjustments |
(989 | ) | (243 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
15,396 | 9,297 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 26,895 | $ | 18,345 | ||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE)
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
NET SALES |
||||||||||||||||
- PRODUCT SALES |
$ | 5,870 | $ | 7,836 | $ | 3,710 | $ | 2,879 | ||||||||
- SERVICES |
7,260 | 5,440 | 3,715 | 2,654 | ||||||||||||
13,130 | 13,276 | 7,425 | 5,533 | |||||||||||||
COST OF SALES |
||||||||||||||||
- COST OF GOODS SOLD |
4,915 | 6,428 | 3,220 | 2,362 | ||||||||||||
- COSTS OF SERVICES RENDERED |
4,525 | 3,655 | 2,339 | 1,885 | ||||||||||||
9,440 | 10,083 | 5,559 | 4,247 | |||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
3,690 | 3,193 | 1,866 | 1,286 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
2,577 | 2,368 | 1,288 | 1,130 | ||||||||||||
Director and officer bonuses |
705 | 9 | 705 | (10 | ) | |||||||||||
Selling |
515 | 550 | 230 | 281 | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
33 | 56 | 16 | 23 | ||||||||||||
Impairment Loss |
15 | 1 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
3,845 | 2,984 | 2,239 | 1,424 | ||||||||||||
(LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS |
(155 | ) | 209 | (373 | ) | (138 | ) | |||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(74 | ) | (86 | ) | (38 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
112 | 42 | 82 | (12 | ) | |||||||||||
Total |
38 | (44 | ) | 44 | (67 | ) | ||||||||||
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
(117 | ) | 165 | (329 | ) | (205 | ) | |||||||||
INCOME TAXES |
184 | 51 | 112 | (60 | ) | |||||||||||
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST |
(301 | ) | 114 | (441 | ) | (145 | ) | |||||||||
MINORITY INTEREST |
19 | 21 | (5 | ) | 34 | |||||||||||
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
(282 | ) | 135 | (446 | ) | (111 | ) | |||||||||
DISCONTINUED OPERATION (NOTE 9) |
||||||||||||||||
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATION |
8,459 | 2 | 8,837 | 11 | ||||||||||||
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
$ | 8,177 | $ | 137 | $ | 8,391 | $ | (100 | ) | |||||||
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
||||||||||||||||
Basic (loss) earnings per share from Continuing operations |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||
Basic earnings per share from Discontinued operation |
2.80 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share from Net income (loss) |
$ | 2.71 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 2.76 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||||
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from Continuing operations |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings per share from Discontinued operation |
2.80 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from Net income (loss) |
$ | 2.71 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 2.76 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON AND
POTENTIAL COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
3,016 | 2,965 | 3,038 | 2,966 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
3,016 | 3,065 | 3,038 | 2,966 | ||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 8,177 | $ | 137 | $ | 8,391 | $ | (100 | ) | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(746 | ) | 278 | (766 | ) | 240 | ||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
$ | 7,431 | $ | 415 | $ | 7,625 | $ | 140 | ||||||||
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
Dec 31, | Dec 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 8,177 | $ | 137 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
792 | 707 | ||||||
Bad debt expense, net |
48 | 34 | ||||||
Inventory provision |
1 | | ||||||
Interest income on short-term deposits |
(79 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
Impairment loss |
15 | 1 | ||||||
Stock compensation |
44 | | ||||||
Gain from sales of property discontinued operation |
(8,909 | ) | | |||||
Deferred tax provision |
8 | 45 | ||||||
Minority interest |
(19 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
277 | 183 | ||||||
Other receivables |
(185 | ) | (269 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
| (81 | ) | |||||
Inventories |
330 | (410 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(182 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
350 | (554 | ) | |||||
Income tax payable |
71 | 9 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
739 | (291 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Proceeds from maturing short-term deposits |
6,576 | 3,354 | ||||||
Investments in short-term deposits |
(9,913 | ) | (1,408 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures |
(704 | ) | (1,197 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of business in Malaysia |
| (1,126 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of property discontinued operation |
8,401 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of equipment |
| 201 | ||||||
Advances to seller |
(138 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
4,222 | (176 | ) | |||||
5
Table of Contents
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
Dec 31, | Dec 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net payments and borrowings on lines of credit |
(77 | ) | 178 | |||||
Principal payments of debt and capital leases |
(501 | ) | (385 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
1,025 | 430 | ||||||
Dividends paid to minority interest |
(27 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||
Cash received from stock options exercised |
232 | 5 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
652 | 175 | ||||||
EFFECT OF CHANGES IN EXCHANGE RATES |
(18 | ) | 61 | |||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH |
5,595 | (231 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
1,439 | 1,357 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
$ | 7,034 | $ | 1,126 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest |
$ | 77 | $ | 93 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 2,071 | $ | 97 | ||||
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Capitalization of property, plant and equipment paid in advance |
$ | | $ | 368 | ||||
Deposit for the acquisition of business in Malaysia paid in advance |
$ | | $ | 92 | ||||
Declaration of cash dividends to be paid |
$ | 1,608 | $ | |
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AND NUMBER OF
SHARES)
1. | ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
Trio-Tech International (the Company or TTI hereafter) was incorporated in 1958 under the laws of the State of California. TTI provides third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through its laboratories in Southeast Asia; in addition, TTI operates test facilities in the United States. The Company also designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of equipment and systems used in the manufacturing and testing of semiconductor devices and electronic components. TTI conducts business in three industry segments: Testing Services, Manufacturing and Distribution. TTI has subsidiaries located in the U.S., Ireland, Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and China as follows: |
Ownership | Location | |||
Express Test Corporation (Dormant) |
100% | Van Nuys, California | ||
Trio-Tech Reliability Services (Dormant) |
100% | Van Nuys, California | ||
KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems (Dormant) |
100% | Van Nuys, California | ||
European Electronic Test Centre |
100% | Dublin, Ireland | ||
(Operation ceased on November 1, 2005) |
||||
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. |
100% | Singapore | ||
Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. |
100% | Singapore | ||
Trio-Tech Thailand |
100% | Bangkok, Thailand | ||
Trio-Tech Bangkok |
100% | Bangkok, Thailand | ||
Trio-Tech Malaysia |
55% | Penang and Selangor,Malaysia | ||
Trio-Tech Kuala Lumpur 100% owned by |
55% | Selangor, Malaysia | ||
Trio-Tech Malaysia |
||||
Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. |
76% | Selangor, Malaysia | ||
Trio-Tech (Suzhou) Co. Ltd. |
100% | Suzhou, China |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. The accompanying financial statements do not include all the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended December 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Companys annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. |
2. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories consist of the following: |
Dec. 31, | June 30, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 837 | $ | 842 | ||||
Work in progress |
636 | 608 | ||||||
Finished goods |
209 | 562 | ||||||
Less: provision for obsolete inventory |
(429 | ) | (428 | ) | ||||
$ | 1,253 | $ | 1,584 | |||||
7
Table of Contents
3. | STOCK OPTIONS |
As of December 31, 2005, the Company has two share-based compensation plans, which are described below. The Company historically adopted the APB No. 25 approach intrinsic value method and presented the pro forma information in line with the requirements of SFAS No. 123. Historically, the stock based compensation cost has been charged against income, which was $0, $0, and $14 (related to directors option plan) for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. There was no income tax benefit related to share-based compensation for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively, as the Company did not claim a deduction for corporate income tax purpose. |
Effective July 1, 2005, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payments, using the modified prospective application method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized during the six months ended December 31, 2005 includes the applicable amounts of: (a) compensation cost of all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, July 1, 2005 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123) and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to July 1, 2005 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the new provisions of SFAS No. 123R). Amortization of unrecognized fair value of the non-vested options as of July 1, 2005 was $7 and $3 for the six months and three months ended December 31, 2005, respectively. Options to purchase 30,000 shares of the Companys common stock were issued on July 7, 2005 under the Directors Plan. The fair value of 30,000 shares of the Companys common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted under the Directors Plan was $34 disclosed in Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. No shares were issued under 1998 Stock Option Plan for the six months ended December 31, 2005. On November 14, 2005, an option to purchase 750 shares of the Companys common stock was issued to a consultant in connection with his services rendered to the Company and the stock options were not issued pursuant to the 1998 Stock Option Plan of the Company or the Directors Stock Option Plan. The exercise price under the option was $2.66, which was lower than the fair market value of the stock on the grant date of the option. The option was exercisable immediately upon grant. The fair value of the 750 shares of the Companys common stock issuable upon exercise of such option was approximately $2 based on the value at $2.92 per share determined by the Black Scholes option pricing model. |
Assumptions |
The disclosure of the above fair value for these awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the assumptions listed below: |
Six months | ||||||||||||||||
Ended | Years Ended | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Expected Volatility |
49.50 51.12 | % | 33.5 - 36.8 | % | 41.9 | % | 37.2 | % | ||||||||
Weighted average volatility |
49.54 | % | 33.9 | % | 41.9 | % | 37.2 | % | ||||||||
Risk free interest rate |
3.71 4.50 | % | 2.89 3.27 | % | 2.76 | % | 2.27 - 2.93 | % | ||||||||
Expected terms (years) |
2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
The expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Companys stock. The observation is made on a weekly basis. The observation period covered is consistent with the expected terms of options. The expected terms of stock options are based on the average vesting period on a basis consistent with the historical experience of the similar option grants. The risk-free rate is consistent with the expected terms of stock option and based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. |
1998 Stock Option Plan |
The Companys 1998 Stock Option Plan (the 1998 Plan), which is shareholder-approved, permits the grant of stock options to its employees of up to 300,000 shares of common stock. The Company believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys stock at the date of grant. These options have a five-year contractual life term. Awards vest over four years; with 25% generally vesting on the grant date, and the balance vesting in equal installments on the next three succeeding anniversaries of the grant date. The share-based compensation will be |
8
Table of Contents
amortized based on accelerated method over the four periods. Certain option awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the Plan). |
A summary of option activities under the 1998 Plan during the six months of fiscal 2006 ended December 31, 2005 is presented as follows: |
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Stock Options | Shares | Price | Term | Value | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at July 1, 2005 |
165,000 | $ | 3.44 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
| | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(59,450 | ) | 3.07 | |||||||||||||
Expired |
(22,000 | ) | 5.40 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
83,550 | $ | 2.95 | 2.00 | $ | 199,536 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2005 |
63,925 | $ | 2.99 | 2.00 | $ | 158,456 | ||||||||||
Cash received from options exercised by employees during the six months ended December 31, 2005 was approximately $183. |
A summary of the status of the Companys non-vested stock options during the six months ended December 31, 2005 is presented below: |
Weighted-Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Non-vested Options | Shares | Fair Value | ||||||
Non-vested at July 1, 2005 |
34,750 | $ | 0.86 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
(14,875 | ) | 0.80 | |||||
Forfeited or expired |
| | ||||||
Non-vested at December 31, 2005 |
19,875 | $ | 0.91 | |||||
As of December 31, 2005, there was approximately $15 of accumulated unrecognized stock compensation based on fair value on the grant date related to non-vested options granted under the 1998 Plan. Such amount is expected to be recognized during the weighted average period of 2.5 years. |
Directors Stock Option Plan |
The Directors Stock Option Plan (the Directors Plan), which is shareholder-approved, permits the grant of stock options to its duly elected non-employee Directors and one of the corporate officers of the Company (if he or she is also a director of the Company) and covers 300,000 shares of common stock. The Company believes that such awards better align the interests of its directors with those of its shareholders. Prior to July 1, 2003, option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to 85% of the fair market price of the Companys stock at the grant date. Subsequent to July 1, 2003, the Board approved an amendment to the Directors Plan requiring options to purchase the Companys common stock to be exercisable at a price equal to 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the grant date. These options have five-year contractual terms. Options awards are exercisable immediately as of the grant date. |
9
Table of Contents
A summary of the activities under the Directors Plan during the six months ended December 31,
2005 is presented below:
Weighted - | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | ||||||||||||||
Stock Options | Shares | Price | Term | Value | ||||||||||||
Outstanding at July 1, 2005 |
137,000 | $ | 3.63 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
30,000 | 3.75 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(15,000 | ) | 3.10 | |||||||||||||
Expired |
(32,000 | ) | 5.37 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
120,000 | $ | 2.80 | 2.00 | $ | 245,009 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2005 |
120,000 | $ | 3.26 | 2.00 | $ | 245,009 | ||||||||||
Cash received from options exercised by directors during the six months ended December 31, 2005 was
approximately $47.
Stock Option issued not pursuant to the 1998 Stock Option Plan or the Directors Stock Option
Plan
On November 14, 2005, an option to purchase 750 shares of the Companys common stock was issued to
a consultant in connection with his services rendered to the Company. The stock option was not
issued pursuant to the 1998 Stock Option Plan of the Company or the Directors Stock Option Plan.
The exercise price under the option was $2.66, which was lower than the fair market value of the
stock on the grant date of the option and was exercisable immediately upon grant. The fair value of
750 shares of the Companys common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options granted was
approximately $2 based on the value at $2.92 per share determined by the Black Scholes option
pricing model.
A summary of option granted not under an existing stock option plan during the six months of fiscal
2006 ended December 31, 2005 is presented as follows:
Weighted- | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Exercise | ||||||||
Stock Options | Shares | Price | ||||||
Outstanding at July 1, 2005 |
| $ | | |||||
Granted |
750 | 2.66 | ||||||
Exercised |
(750 | ) | 2.66 | |||||
Expired |
| | ||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
| $ | | |||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2005 |
| $ | | |||||
Cash received from the option exercised by the consultant during the six months ended December 31,
2005 was approximately $2.
10
Table of Contents
The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per
share for the six months and three months ended December 31, 2004 as if the Company had applied the
fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation for each
period presented:
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | |||||||
2004 | 2004 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 137 | $ | (100 | ) | |||
Add: stock based employee compensation
included in reported income |
| | ||||||
Deduct: total stock based employee compensation
expense determined under fair value method for all
awards |
(18 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ | 119 | $ | (109 | ) | |||
Earnings (loss) per share -basic |
||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.05 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||
Earnings (loss) per share -diluted |
||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.05 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.04 | ) |
11
Table of Contents
4. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings per
Share (EPS). Basic EPS are computed by dividing net income available to common
shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
(denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common
shares outstanding during a period. In computing diluted EPS, the average price for the
period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise
of stock options and warrants.
Stock options to purchase 203,550 shares at exercise prices ranging from $2.25 to $4.50 per
share were outstanding as of December 31, 2005. No options were excluded in the
determination of common shares equivalents because the average market price of common shares
was greater than the exercise price of the stock options. The resulted common shares
equivalents were approximately 76,000 shares. However, since there was a loss from continued
operations, the common share equivalents were not presented in the following table for
earning per share calculation purposes.
Stock options to purchase 381,000 shares at prices ranging from $2.25 to $6.00 per share were
outstanding as of December 31, 2004. 99,000 options were excluded in the computation of
diluted EPS because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the
common shares and therefore were anti-dilutive.
The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares used in the
computation of basic and diluted EPS for the years presented herein:
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (282 | ) | $ | 135 | $ | (446 | ) | $ | (111 | ) | |||||
Income from discontinued operation |
$ | 8,459 | $ | 2 | $ | 8,837 | $ | 11 | ||||||||
Income (loss) attribute to common shares |
$ | 8,177 | $ | 137 | $ | 8,391 | $ | (100 | ) | |||||||
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic (loss) earnings per share from Continuing operations |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||
Basic earnings per share from Discontinued operation |
2.80 | | 2.91 | | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share from Net Income |
$ | 2.71 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 2.76 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||||
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from Continuing operations |
$ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings per share from Discontinued operation |
2.80 | | 2.91 | | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from Net Income |
$ | 2.71 | $ | 0.04 | $ | 2.76 | $ | (0.03 | ) | |||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding basic |
3,016 | 2,965 | 3,038 | 2,966 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock options |
| 100 | | | ||||||||||||
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share diluted |
3,016 | 3,065 | 3,038 | 2,966 | ||||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
5. | ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS |
Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. We sell our
products and services to manufacturers in the semiconductor industry. We perform continuing
credit evaluations of our customers financial condition, and although we generally do not
require collateral, letters of credit may be required from our customers in certain
circumstances.
Senior management reviews accounts receivable on a monthly basis to determine if any
receivables will potentially be uncollectible. We include any accounts receivable balances
that are determined to be uncollectible in our allowance for doubtful accounts. After all
attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the
allowance. Based on the information available to us, we believe our allowance for doubtful
accounts for the six months ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30, 2005
was adequate. However, actual write-offs might be more or less than the recorded allowance.
Dec. 31, | June 30, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Beginning |
$ | 147 | $ | 165 | ||||
Additions charged to expenses |
72 | 44 | ||||||
Recovered |
(24 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||
Actual write-offs |
(5 | ) | | |||||
Ending |
$ | 190 | $ | 147 | ||||
6. | DIVIDENDS PAYABLE |
On December 2, 2005, the Board of Directors of Registrant declared a cash dividend of fifty
cents (US 50¢) per share based on the shareholders of records on January 10, 2006. The total
number of shares issued and outstanding as of January 10, 2006 was 3,215,532 and the total
cash dividends paid on January 25, 2006 were $1,608. The source of cash was from the
proceeds of disposing the property located in Dublin, Ireland.
7. | ADVANCES TO SELLER |
On November 18, 2005, the Company entered into a Definitive Agreement for Sale and Transfer of
Shares (the Agreement) with Globetronics International Inc. (the Seller), a British Virgin
Islands company. The Agreement provided that the Company would buy 100% of the equity
interests of Globetronics (Shanghai) Inc. (thereafter GSI, which is a China-based wholly
owned foreign investment enterprise (WOFIE) conducting business in burn-in testing service)
for $153 (which covers certain fixed assets and the current customers of the testing service).
The purchase price under the Agreement did not include any other assets or liabilities in
GSI. The Agreement further provided that the cash of GSI would be swapped on a
dollar-to-dollar basis. In addition, the Company would not be responsible for any disclosed
or undisclosed liabilities incurred prior to the acquisition completion date. This Agreement
also included a management service agreement, in which the Company appointed the Seller to
provide accounting services to the acquired entity for $37 during a three-month transitional
period commencing on the acquisition completion date. This transaction was not and is not
considered material to the Company.
On December 26, 2005, the application for the share transfer was approved by the relevant
governmental authorities in China. On December 30, 2005, the Company and the Seller agreed
that the final purchase price would be $153 (of which $138 was the remaining balance due) and
a cash swap in the amount of $351 to be wired to the Seller on December 30, 2005 and that the
closing date would be deemed to have occurred when the funds arrived at the Sellers bank,
which occurred on January 3, 2006. Before the completion date, the Company did not have any
access to the fixed assets owned by the Seller. The completion date of this acquisition was
deemed to be January 3, 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the signed agreement, the acquired
entity is in the process of changing its name from GSI to Trio-Tech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
13
Table of Contents
8. | WARRANTY ACCRUAL |
Dec. 31, | June 30, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Beginning |
$ | 155 | $ | 162 | ||||
Additions charged to cost and expenses |
29 | 43 | ||||||
Recovered |
| | ||||||
Actual write-offs |
| (50 | ) | |||||
Ending |
$ | 184 | $ | 155 | ||||
9 | DISCONTINUED OPERATION AND CORRESPONDING RESTRUCTURING PLAN |
The Companys Ireland operation, as a component of the Testing segment, suffered continued
operating losses in the past three fiscal years and the cash flow was minimal for the past
three years. In August 2005, the Company established a restructuring plan to close the
Testing operation in Dublin, Ireland. This fact was initially disclosed in the Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005. Based on the restructuring plan and in accordance with
EITF 03-13, the Company presented the operation results from Ireland as a discontinued
operation as the Company believed that no continued cash flow would be generated by the
disposed component (Ireland subsidiary) and that the Company would have no significant
continuing involvement in the operation of the discontinued component. Management of the
Company initiated a plan to sell the property located in Dublin, Ireland in August 2005 and
ceased the depreciation of the property in accordance with SFAS No. 144. In accordance with
the restructuring plan, the Company would transfer the relevant machinery and equipment to
Singapore and paid off the outstanding balance on the equipment loans, collect accounts
receivable and pay off accounts payable as much as it could before moving out Ireland. If the
accounts receivable and accounts payable were not wound down before moving out of Ireland, the
Company planned to have the Singapore office take over the responsibility for the collection
and repayment matters. As a result, the machinery and equipment located in Dublin, Ireland
was not included in the assets held for sale on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2005.
In late September 2005, the Company entered into a Definite Sale and Purchase Agreement with a
buyer through an auction process with a selling price of
8.85 million (equivalent to
$10,574) and received a deposit of
885 (equivalent to $1,057). The sale was consummated
on November 1, 2005. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the asset held for sale was recorded at
historical carrying value of the property of $261, as of September 30, 2005, which was lower
than its fair value, less the cost to sell.
During the process of winding down the Companys operation in Dublin, Ireland, the Company
incurred general and administrative expense of approximately $120 and one-time employment
termination benefits of approximately $330 (of which $107 were paid in the quarter ended
September 30, 2005) for the six months ended December 31, 2005. In connection with the sale
of the property located in Dublin, Ireland, the Company also incurred the following direct
expenses including professional fees of approximately $92, commissions and other selling
related expenses of approximately $40 and incurred a liability estimated at $86 to refund the
industrial development agency grant by the Irish government agency. The estimated amount of
$86 is subject to the clearance of the Irish government agency. These expenses were directly
offset against the proceeds from selling property as these expenses were deemed as cost to
sell. The tax on capital gain in Ireland from the sale of property was approximately $1,955,
which was deducted from the gross proceeds from selling the property after the taxable gain
was determined. The Company considered the inter-period tax allocation noting the impact of
allocation was minimal as there was a loss of $450 in the Ireland entity before considering
the gain from selling property and there were significant net operating losses carry-forward
which cannot be used to offset the taxable capital gain. The gain realized through disposing
the property in November 2005 was presented as part of income from discontinued operations in
the statement of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2005. The Company
anticipates that it may incur additional costs and expenses in winding up the business of the
subsidiary through which the Ireland facility was operated.
Under the provision of SFAS No. 52, translation adjustments that result when a foreign
entitys financial statements are translated into a parent companys or an investors
reporting currency are separately reported in the parent companys other comprehensive income.
Foreign currency translation adjustments that are accumulated in other comprehensive income
are reclassified to income only when they are realized, if the investment in the foreign
entity is sold or is
14
Table of Contents
substantially or completely liquidated. Accordingly, the foreign
currency translation adjustments on the balance sheet of the Dublin, Ireland subsidiary as of
November 1, 2005 in the amount of approximately $769 were reclassified into the process of
disposing of the property presented below.
Income from discontinued operations for the six and three months ended December 31, 2005 was
as follows:
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||
NET SALES |
$ | 78 | 257 | | 149 | |||||||||||
COST OF SALES |
63 | 227 | | 121 | ||||||||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
15 | 30 | | 28 | ||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
120 | 87 | 38 | 48 | ||||||||||||
Employment termination benefits |
330 | | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
450 | 87 | 38 | 48 | ||||||||||||
(435 | ) | (57 | ) | (38 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||||
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(3 | ) | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Other (expense) income |
(12 | ) | 65 | (33 | ) | 33 | ||||||||||
Total |
(15 | ) | 59 | (34 | ) | 31 | ||||||||||
(Loss) Income from discontinued operation |
(450 | ) | 2 | (72 | ) | 11 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of property |
8,909 | | 8,909 | | ||||||||||||
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATION |
$ | 8,459 | $ | 2 | $ | 8,837 | $ | 11 | ||||||||
Breakdown of gain on sale of property |
||||||||||||||||
Gross proceeds |
$ | 10,574 | | $ | 10,574 | | ||||||||||
Net book value of the property |
(261 | ) | | (261 | ) | | ||||||||||
Grant payable to Ireland government |
(86 | ) | | (86 | ) | | ||||||||||
Professional fees |
(92 | ) | | (92 | ) | | ||||||||||
Commissions and related selling expenses |
(40 | ) | | (40 | ) | | ||||||||||
10,095 | | 10,095 | | |||||||||||||
Capital gain tax |
(1,955 | ) | | (1,955 | ) | | ||||||||||
8,140 | | 8,140 | | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
769 | | 769 | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of property |
$ | 8,909 | $ | | $ | 8,909 | $ | | ||||||||
15
Table of Contents
As the Company does not provide a separate cash flow statement for the discontinued
operation, the details of cash flow from the discontinued operation in Ireland is summarized as
follows: the gross proceeds were approximately $10,574, cost to sell was $218, disbursement for
capital gain tax was $1,955, resulting in net proceeds of $8,401. The loss from discontinued
operations of $450 was deemed as cash outflow from operating activities of the discontinued
operation; the net proceeds provided by investing activities was $8,401 from the sale of the
property; the cash used in financing activities was the disbursement to pay off the outstanding
equipment loan of $88. The impact of this discontinued operation was immaterial because the
total revenues for fiscal years June 30, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $600 and $500,
respectively. The Company believes there will not be any future significant cash flows from the
discontinued operation as the outstanding accounts receivable and accounts payable are
immaterial to the Company financial position and liquidity.
Before moving out of Ireland, the Company wired the remaining cash of approximately $7,800 to
its Singapore subsidiary where the main operations are located. Subsequently, approximately
$1,608 out of the $7,800 was wired to the U.S. corporate office for distribution of dividends to
shareholders, which were paid on January 25, 2006. In addition, $705 of the $7,800 was used for
bonuses to the directors and corporate officers paid in December 2005 and January 2006,
respectively.
10. | BUSINESS SEGMENTS |
The Company operates principally in three industry segments, the testing service industry
(which performs structural and electronic tests of semiconductor devices), the designing and
manufacturing of equipment (which equipment tests the structural integrity of integrated
circuits and other products), and the distribution of various products from other
manufacturers in Singapore and Southeast Asia. The following net sales were based on
customer location rather than subsidiary location.
The allocation of the cost of equipment, the current year investment in new equipment and
depreciation expense have been made on the basis of the primary purpose for which the
equipment was acquired.
All inter-segment sales were sales from the Manufacturing segment to the Testing and
Distribution segments. Total inter-segment sales were $30 and $37 for the six months ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and $8 for the three months ended 2004. There were
no inter-segment sales for the three months ended December 31, 2005. Corporate assets mainly
consisted of cash and prepaid expenses. Corporate expenses mainly consisted of salaries,
insurance, professional expenses and directors fees.
The following segment information is unaudited:
Business Segment Information:
Quarter | Operating | Depr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Net | Income | Total | and | Capital | |||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Sales | (loss) | Assets | Amort. | Expenditures | |||||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
2005 | $ | 3,111 | $ | (117 | ) | $ | 2,842 | $ | 27 | $ | 187 | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2,425 | 5 | 2,138 | 17 | 32 | |||||||||||||||||||
Testing Services |
2005 | 3,715 | 561 | 21,160 | 369 | 385 | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2,654 | (58 | ) | 14,427 | 315 | 241 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distribution |
2005 | 599 | (1 | ) | 748 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 454 | (94 | ) | 1,293 | 38 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and |
2005 | | (817 | ) | 2,145 | | | |||||||||||||||||
unallocated |
2004 | | 8 | 228 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Company |
2005 | $ | 7,425 | $ | (373 | ) | $ | 26,895 | $ | 400 | $ | 573 | ||||||||||||
2004 | $ | 5,533 | $ | (138 | ) | $ | 18,086 | $ | 370 | $ | 294 |
16
Table of Contents
Business Segment Information:
Six | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Months | Operating | Depr | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | Net | Income | Total | and | Capital | |||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Sales | (loss) | Assets | Amort. | Expenditures | |||||||||||||||||||
Manufacturing |
2005 | $ | 4,466 | $ | (292 | ) | $ | 2,842 | $ | 50 | $ | 198 | ||||||||||||
2004 | 6,403 | 152 | 2,138 | 35 | 53 | |||||||||||||||||||
Testing Services |
2005 | 7,260 | 1,020 | 21,160 | 735 | 505 | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 5,440 | 124 | 14,427 | 596 | 956 | |||||||||||||||||||
Distribution |
2005 | 1,404 | (2 | ) | 748 | 7 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 1,433 | (82 | ) | 1,293 | 75 | 188 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate and |
2005 | | (881 | ) | 2,145 | | | |||||||||||||||||
unallocated |
2004 | | 15 | 228 | 1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Company |
2005 | $ | 13,130 | $ | (155 | ) | $ | 26,895 | $ | 792 | $ | 704 | ||||||||||||
2004 | $ | 13,276 | $ | 209 | $ | 18,086 | $ | 707 | $ | 1,197 |
Geographic Area Information:
China | Elimin- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter | and | ations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | United | other | and | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | States | countries | Singapore | Thailand | Malaysia | Other | Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales to |
2005 | $ | 1,093 | 363 | 4,589 | 488 | 892 | | 7,425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
customers |
2004 | $ | 538 | 351 | 3,001 | 492 | 1,159 | (8 | ) | 5,533 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating |
2005 | $ | 12 | (2 | ) | 343 | 37 | 67 | (830 | ) | (373 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) |
2004 | $ | (58 | ) | (32 | ) | (36 | ) | (6 | ) | (14 | ) | 8 | (138 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Long-lived |
2005 | $ | 23 | 20 | 3,683 | 822 | 2,743 | (40 | ) | 7,251 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
2004 | $ | 7 | 394 | 3,538 | 886 | 2,065 | (40 | ) | 6,850 |
17
Table of Contents
Geographic Area Information:
Six | China | Elimin- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Months | and | ations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended | United | other | and | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | States | countries | Singapore | Thailand | Malaysia | Other | Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales to |
2005 | $ | 1,527 | 691 | 8,380 | 949 | 1,613 | (30 | ) | 13,130 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
customers |
2004 | $ | 1,207 | 697 | 6,083 | 1,145 | 4,181 | (37 | ) | 13,276 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating |
2005 | $ | (8 | ) | (2 | ) | 584 | 66 | 113 | (908 | ) | (155 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) |
2004 | $ | (86 | ) | (20 | ) | 126 | 28 | 146 | 15 | 209 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-lived |
2005 | $ | 23 | 20 | 3,683 | 822 | 2,743 | (40 | ) | 7,251 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
2004 | $ | 7 | 394 | 3,538 | 886 | 2,065 | (40 | ) | 6,850 |
11. IMPAIRMENT LOSS
During the six months ended December 31, 2005, an impairment loss of approximately $15 was
incurred in the Testing segment located in Singapore. The relevant machinery and equipment
was not suitable to perform testing services for the high speed microprocessor chips.
Consequently, this machinery and equipment was deemed obsolete.
18
Table of Contents
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) |
The discussions of Trio-Tech Internationals (the Company) business and activities set forth
in this Form 10-Q and in other past and future reports and announcements by the Company may contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and assumptions
regarding future activities and results of operations of the Company. In light of the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the following factors,
among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any
forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company: market acceptance of Company
products and services; changing business conditions or technologies and volatility in the
semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for the Companys products and services; the
impact of competition; problems with technology; product development schedules; delivery schedules;
changes in military or commercial testing specifications which could affect the market for the
Companys products and services; difficulties in profitably integrating acquired businesses, if
any, into the Company; risks associated with conducting business internationally and especially in
Southeast Asia, including currency fluctuations and devaluation, currency restrictions, local laws
and restrictions and possible social, political and economic instability; and other economic,
financial and regulatory factors beyond the Companys control. The occurrence of a tsunami in Asia
and hurricanes in the southern part of North America had an indirect impact on the Company.
World-wide oil prices increased after several hurricanes in the first quarter of fiscal 2006, which
caused companies to incur higher costs. We believe customers have tightened and will continue to
tighten their spending resulting in a decline in the demand for electronic products and
semiconductor equipment. We anticipate that this chain effect will hit the Companys business
gradually in the future. See the discussions elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, including under the
heading Certain Risks That May Affect Our Future Results, for more information. In some cases,
you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as may, will,
expects, plans, anticipates, estimates, potential, believes, can impact, continue,
or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology.
We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events,
changed circumstances, or the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
Founded in 1958, Trio-Tech International provides third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in
services primarily through its laboratories in Southeast Asia. The Company also designs,
manufactures and markets equipment and systems and distributes semiconductor processing and testing
equipment manufactured by others. The Company operates in three business segments: Testing
Services, Manufacturing and Distribution. The Testing segment is the largest of these business
segments thus far this fiscal year. It accounted for over 55.3% of our revenue for the six months
ended December 31, 2005, and it averages a higher growth rate than the other two business segments,
although the semiconductor market is characterized by wide swings in growth rates from year to
year.
We own and operate facilities that provide testing services for semiconductor devices and other
electronic components to meet the requirements of military, aerospace, industrial and commercial
applications. The Company uses its own proprietary equipment for certain burn-in, centrifugal and
leak tests, and commercially available equipment for various other environmental tests. The
Company conducts the majority of its testing operations in Southeast Asia with facilities in
Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand.
The Companys Ireland operation, as a component of the Testing segment, suffered continued
operating losses in the past three fiscal years and the cash flow was minimal for the past three
years. In August 2005, the Company established a restructuring plan to close the Testing operation
in Dublin, Ireland. This fact was initially disclosed in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2005. Based on the restructuring plan and in accordance with EITF 03-13, the Company
presented the operation results from Ireland as a discontinued operation as the Company believed
that no continued cash flow would be generated by the disposed component (Ireland subsidiary) and
that the Company would have no significant continuing involvement in the operation of the
discontinued component. Management of the Company initiated a plan to sell the property located in
Dublin, Ireland in August 2005 and ceased the depreciation of the property in accordance with SFAS
No. 144. The Company transferred the relevant machinery and equipment to Singapore and was going
to pay the outstanding balance on the equipment loans. As a result, the machinery and equipment
located in Dublin, Ireland was not included in the assets held for sale. Management of the Company
presented the property as assets held for sale for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as
this property was available for immediate sale in its then present condition subject only to terms
that are usual and customary for sales of such property; the sale of the property was probable; and
transfer of the property was expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one
year. In November 2005, the Company completed the sale of property located in Dublin, Ireland and
recorded a gain of sale of property of $8,909. As a result, this discontinued operation reported an
income of $8,459, which consisted of the gain from the sale of property of $8,909 offset by the
loss from discontinued operation of $450. The Company still has accounts receivable and
19
Table of Contents
accounts payables relating to the Ireland location. The Company expects some expenses to incur for
collecting accounts receivables and disbursing payables, for statutory expenses and for expenses
incurred in winding up the subsidiary.
On November 18, 2005, the Company entered into a Definitive Agreement for Sale and Transfer of
Shares (the Agreement) with Globetronics International Inc. (the Seller), a British Virgin
Islands company. The Agreement provided that the Company would buy 100% of the equity interests of
Globetronics (Shanghai) Inc. (thereafter GSI, which is a China-based wholly owned foreign
investment enterprise (WOFIE) conducting business in burn-in testing service) for $153 (which
covers certain fixed assets and the current customers of the testing service). The purchase price
under the Agreement did not include any other assets or liabilities in GSI. The Agreement further
provided that the cash of GSI would be swapped on a dollar-to-dollar basis. In addition, the
Company would not be responsible for any disclosed or undisclosed liabilities incurred prior to the
acquisition completion date. This Agreement also included a management service agreement, in which
the Company appointed the Seller to provide accounting services to the acquired entity for $37
during a three-month transitional period commencing on the acquisition completion date. This
transaction was not and is not considered material to the Company.
On December 26, 2005, the application for the share transfer was approved by the relevant
governmental authorities in China. On December 30, 2005, the Company and the Seller agreed that
the final purchase price would be $153 (of which $138 is the remaining balance due) and a cash swap
in the amount of $351 would be wired to the Seller on December 30 and the closing date would be
when the funds arrived at the Sellers bank, which occurred on January 3, 2006. Before the
completion date, the Company did not have any access to the fixed assets owned by the Seller. The
completion date of this acquisition was January 3, 2006. Pursuant to the terms of the signed
agreement, the acquired entity is in the process of changing its name from GSI to Trio-Tech
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
Our Manufacturing segment manufactures Artic Temperature Controlled Wafer Chucks, which are used
for test, characterization and failure analysis of semiconductor wafers, Wet Process Stations,
which wash and dry wafers at a series of 100 to 300 additional processing steps after the etching
or deposition of integrated circuits, and other microelectronic substrates in what is commonly
called the front-end, or creation of semiconductor circuits. Additionally, we also manufacture
centrifuges, leak detectors, HAST (Highly Accelerated Stress Test) systems and burn-in systems
that are used primarily in the back-end of the semiconductor manufacturing process to test
finished semiconductor devices and electronic components. The Manufacturing segment operates
primarily in Singapore and the United States.
Our Distribution segment operates primarily in Southeast Asia. This segment markets and supports
distribution of the Companys own manufactured equipment in addition to distributing complementary
products from other manufacturers that are used by the Companys customers and other semiconductor
and electronics manufacturers. Our Distribution segment also serves as a distributor of electronic
components to customers.
Results of operations and business outlook
The following table sets forth our revenue components for the six and three months ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Revenue Components
Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | Dec. 31, | |||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||||||||||
Testing |
55.29 | % | 40.96 | % | 50.03 | % | 47.94 | % | ||||||||
Manufacturing |
34.02 | 48.24 | 41.90 | 43.85 | ||||||||||||
Distribution |
10.69 | 10.80 | 8.07 | 8.21 | ||||||||||||
Total |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Testing Segment
Net sales in the Testing segment expanded by 14.33% to 55.29% and 2.09% to 50.03% of total net
sales for the six months and three months ended December 31, 2005, respectively, when compared for
the same periods of the last fiscal year. The Testing segment outperformed the other two business
segments during this period due to an increase in testing services to one major customer because of
an increased demand for that customers personal computers, notebooks and server chips. Volume in
the Testing segment varies depending on market demand and customer forecasts. We anticipate that
our customers will require our testing services to perform burn-in on chips, as wireless
handsets, automotive applications and wired communications are currently in demand in the market.
20
Table of Contents
We currently operate four Testing facilities, one in the United States and three in Southeast Asia.
These facilities provide customers with a full range of testing services, such as burn-in and
product life testing for finished or packaged components. On January 3, 2006, the acquisition of
the operation in Shanghai was completed. It is anticipated that such acquisition will enable the
Company to expand its testing and burn-in services into China.
Our Testing facilities require substantial investment to construct and are largely fixed-costs
assets once in operation. Because we own most of the testing facilities, a significant portion of
our operating costs are fixed. In general, these costs do not decline with reductions in customer
demand or our utilization of our testing capacity, and can adversely affect profit margin as a
result. Conversely, as product demand rises and factory utilization increases, the fixed costs are
spread over the increased output, which should improve profit margins.
Manufacturing Segment
Net sales in the Manufacturing segment as a percentage of total net sales were 34.02% and 41.90%for
the six months and three months ended December 31, 2005, respectively, a drop of 14.22% and 1.95%
for the six months and three months ended December 31, 2005,, respectively, compared with those in
the same periods of the last fiscal year. The decrease in percentage of Manufacturing sales to
total net sales was due to a decrease in sales of burn-in boards. The absolute amount of net sales
actually increased by $686 in the three months ended December 31, 2005 from $2,425 to $3,111.
However, the Testing service outperformed the Manufacturing segment resulting in a decrease in
terms of a percentage of revenue for the Manufacturing segment. For the six months ended December
31, 2005, the Manufacturing segment reported a decrease in sales of $1,937 (or 30.30%) to $4,466
from $6,403 compared to the same period of the last fiscal year.
As Manufacturing costs such as labor and rental expenses in the U.S. are more expensive than those
in Singapore, the Company shifted the Wet Process Station Manufacturing operation from San Jose to
Singapore in fiscal 2004, and has utilized existing personnel located in Singapore. In the U.S., we
are focusing on marketing used and refurbished equipment, which some of our U.S. customers are more
willing to purchase since it is less expensive than new equipment.
Due to the competitive environment in the Manufacturing segment, we anticipate that we will
continue to implement our cost reduction plan by outsourcing a portion of our manufacturing process
to outside suppliers (electrical and mechanical fabrication houses) and seeking competitive
material costs.
Distribution Segment
Net sales in the Distribution segment accounted for 10.69% and 8.07%of total net sales for the six
months and three months ended December 31, 2005, respectively, dropped by 0.11% and 0.14% for the
six months and three months ended December 31, 2005, respectively, compared with those in the same
periods of the last fiscal year. However, the absolute amount of net sales actually increased by
$145 in the three months ended December 31, 2005 from $454 to $599. The increase was due to an
increase in demand of low margin front-end products, such as Vibration equipment, chambers and
wafer fabricators. For the six months ended December 31, 2005, sales decreased by $29 from $1,433
to $1,404 compared to the same period of the last fiscal year. Product volume for the Distribution
segment depends on sales activities such as bookings, queries on products and backlog. Equipment
and electronic component sales are very competitive, as the products are prevalent in the market.
Thus, add value has been a key phrase in the Companys sales mission for the past 12 months.
Our marketing is mainly focused on Asia as we believe that the recovery of equipment sales in that
region is improving more rapidly than sales within the U.S. The equipment sales for the U.S.
continue to be gradual as many companies are still conservative in capital equipment spending.
With Singapore as the manufacturing base for Wet Process Stations, the Singapore Distribution
operations market Wet Process Stations mainly to local research institutions and universities, as
well as work closely with customers on their specific requirements. Volume for servicing also
increased where there was a need for equipment to be tested and integrated before delivery and
installation.
The financial information on the measurement of profit or loss and total assets for the three
segments as well as geographic areas information can also be found under financial conditions and
notes to consolidated financial statements. The working capital requirements of the Company are
covered under liquidity and capital resources.
Uncertainties and Remedies
There are several influencing factors which create uncertainties when forecasting performance, such
as the ever-changing nature of technology, including specific requirements from the customer,
decline in demand for certain types of burn-in devices or equipment, and other similar factors.
One of these factors is the highly competitive nature of the semiconductor industry. Another is
that some customers are unable to provide a forecast of the products required in the upcoming
weeks; hence it is difficult to plan for the resources needed to meet these customers requirements
due to short lead time and last minute order
21
Table of Contents
confirmation. This will normally result in a lower margin for these products, as it is more
expensive to purchase materials in a short time frame. However, the Company has taken action to
protect itself and has formulated plans for dealing with these unpredictable factors. For example,
in order to meet customers demands upon short notice the Company maintains higher inventories, but
continues to work closely with its customers to avoid stock piling. We continue to cut costs by
upgrading some of our existing facilities to cater to the changing requirements of customers and
maintaining a lean headcount, while still keeping quality high so as to sell new products at a
competitive price. We have also been improving customer service from staff by keeping them up to
date on the newest technology and stressing the importance of understanding and meeting the
stringent requirements of our customers. Finally, the Company is exploring new markets and
products, looking for new customers, and upgrading and improving burn-in technology while at the
same time searching for improved testing methods of higher technology chips.
Comparison of Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2005 (Q2 2006) and December 31, 2004 (Q2 2005)
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of income data as a percentage of
net sales for the three months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (the second quarters),
respectively:
Q2 2006 | Q2 2005 | |||||||
Net Sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of Sales |
74.9 | % | 76.8 | % | ||||
Gross Margin |
25.1 | % | 23.2 | % | ||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||
General and administrative |
17.3 | % | 20.4 | % | ||||
Director and officer bonuses |
9.5 | % | (0.2 | %) | ||||
Selling |
3.1 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||
Research and development |
0.2 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||
Total Operating Expenses |
30.1 | % | 25.7 | % | ||||
(Loss) from operations |
-5.0 | % | -2.5 | % | ||||
Overall Net Sales
Overall sales increased by $1,892 (or 34.19%) to $7,425 for the three months ended December 31,
2005 from $5,533 in the same period last fiscal year. The sales increase was mainly due to the
sales performance of the Singapore burn-in division in the Testing segment. That division
experienced higher testing service sales because of increased demand by one customer due to an
increased demand for its personal computers, notebooks and server chips. Additionally, the
Manufacturing segment experienced better sales performance due to an increase in demand of burn-in
systems and burn-boards in Asia. In the Distribution segment, revenue increased due to an increase
in demand for low margin front-end products.
Geographically, we operate in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and China. We have
discontinued our operations in Ireland as of August 2005. Net sales into and within China and the
Southeast Asia regions increased by $1,337 (or 26.8%) to $6,332 for the three months ended December
31, 2005 from $4,996 in the same period last fiscal year, primarily caused by the increase in sales
in the Testing segment. Net sales into and within the United States increased by $555 (or 103.2%)
to $1,093 for the three months ended December 31, 2005 from $538 in the same period last fiscal
year, primarily due to a sales improvement in the Manufacturing segment which included the sale of
a Wet Process Station.
Overall Gross Margin
Overall gross margin increased by 1.9% to 25.1% for the three months ended December 31, 2005 from
23.2% for the same period last fiscal year. The increase was due to higher gross margin of our
unique operating cost structure in our Testing segment, offset by the lower profit margin in our
Manufacturing segment.
In our Testing segment, a significant portion of the operating expenses is fixed, which means the
operating expenses do not decline proportionally to the revenue volume or the utilization of our
testing capacity. Thus, as the service demand and the utilization of our testing capacity increase,
those fixed portions of operating expenses are spread over the total revenues generated, which then
lead to a higher gross profit margin. Revenue in the Testing segment increased by $1,061 (or
40.0%) to $3,715 for the three months ended December 31, 2005 from $2,654 in the same period last
fiscal year, while the gross profit margin increased by approximately 8.1%. The average selling
price of burn-in systems and burn-in boards in our Manufacturing segment dropped due to price
competition and increased cost of materials for the three months ended December 31, 2005, resulting
in a 5.5% decrease in gross profit margin. In the Distribution segment, gross margin dropped 1%
for the three months ended December 31, 2005 due to an increase in demand for low margin front-end
products.
22
Table of Contents
Loss from operations
Loss from operations increased by $235 (or 170.3%) to $373 for the three months ended December 31,
2005 from a loss of $138 as compared to the same period last fiscal year, due to an increase in
gross profit of $580, and net of an increase in (i) the director and officer bonuses of
approximately $715; and (ii) the operating expenses of $119 due to an increase in legal and
professional fees related to the acquisition of the operation in China, the legal procedures for
the declaration of dividends in the U.S., the implementation of new accounting principles generally
accepted in the U.S. and an increase in payroll and related expenses.
Operating Expenses
The operating expenses for the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 were as follow:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | Q2 2006 | Q2 2005 | ||||||
General and administrative |
$ | 1,288 | $ | 1,130 | ||||
Director and officer bonuses |
$ | 705 | $ | (10 | ) | |||
Selling |
$ | 230 | $ | 281 | ||||
Research and development |
$ | 16 | $ | 23 | ||||
Total |
$ | 2,239 | $ | 1,424 | ||||
General and administrative expenses increased by $158 (or 14.0%) to $1,288 for the three
months ended December 31, 2005 from $1,130 in the same period last fiscal year. The increase was
due to an increase in the operating expenses in legal and professional fees related to the
acquisition of the operation in China, the legal procedures for the declaration of dividends in the
U.S., the implementation of new accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and an
increase in payroll and related expenses.
Director and officer bonuses were approximately $705 and a negative of $10 for the three months
ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The negative bonuses of $10 for the three months
ended December 31, 2004 were due to a reversal of bonus overprovided in the prior year. These
bonuses were paid and are payable primarily based on the Companys long standing compensation
programs for the Officers and Chairman of the Company, which is based on percentages of the
Companys pre-tax profits for the year. In the case of the profits from the sale of the property in
Dublin, Ireland, the recipients agreed to take their percentages from after tax profits. During
the second quarter of fiscal 2006, a decision was made to pay that part of the bonuses attributable
to the sale of property in Dublin, Ireland.
Selling expenses decreased by $51 (or 18.2%) to $230 for the three months ended December 31, 2005
from $281 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to a
decrease in commissions due to over provision of commissions in the prior year and warranty costs
due to less provision for warranty cost required for lower sales in the six months ended December
31, 2005 of approximately $61, offset by an increase in travel expense of approximately $10.
Research and development costs decreased by $7 (or 30.4%) to $16 for the three months ended
December 31, 2005 from $23 in the same period last fiscal year. This decrease was primarily due to
a decrease in the headcount which had yet to be replaced as of December 31, 2005.
Interest Expense
The interest expenses for the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 were as follow:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | Q2 2006 | Q2 2005 | ||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 38 | $ | 55 |
Interest expenses decreased by $17 from $55 in Q2 2005 to $38 in Q2 2006, primarily due to lower
usage of credit line facilities in the Singapore operation for the three months ended December 31,
2005 when compared to the same period last year.
Other Income (Loss)
Other income (loss) for the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 were as follow:
23
Table of Contents
(In Thousands, unaudited) | Q2 2006 | Q2 2005 | ||||||
Other income (loss) |
$ | 82 | $ | (12 | ) |
Other income increased by $94 (or 783.3%) to $82 for the three months ended December 31, 2005
from a loss of $12 for the same period last fiscal year, primarily due to the interest income
generated from short-term deposits and a decrease in the currency transaction loss. Interest
income was $63 for the three months ended December 31, 2005 and was $53 higher than the interest
income generated in the same period last fiscal year due to short-term deposits made using the
proceeds from the sale of the Ireland property in Dublin, Ireland. Currency transaction loss
improved by $50 from $51 for the three months ended December 31, 2004 to $1 for this quarter.
Income Tax
Income tax provision increased by $172 (or 286.7%) to $112 for the three months ended December 31,
2005 as compared to a benefit of $60 in the same period last fiscal year. Income tax provision of
$112 for this quarter was primarily attributable to the income generated from Singapore and
Malaysia. Income tax benefit of $60 for the same period last fiscal year was mainly due to the tax
recovery for the tax period between 1999 and 2001 in Singapore.
Income from Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations increased by $8,826 to $8,837 for the three months ended
December 31, 2005 from $11 for the same period last fiscal year. The significant increase in the
income from discontinued operations was due to the gain from the sale of property of $8,909
completed in November 2005, offset by the loss from discontinued operations of $72. The loss from
discontinued operations was $11 for the same period last year.
Net Income (loss)
Net income increased by $8,491 to $8,391 for three months ended December 31, 2005 as compared to a
loss of $100 in the same period last fiscal year. Such an increase was primarily due to an
increase in income from discontinued operations of $8,826 offset by an increase in loss from
continuing operations of $335. Consequently, basic loss per share from continuing operations for
the three months ended December 31, 2005 increased by $0.12 from a loss per share of $0.03 in the
second quarter 2005 to a loss per share of $0.15 in the second quarter 2006. Diluted loss per share
from continuing operations for the three months ended December 31, 2005 were $0.15, which
represents an increase of $0.12 from diluted loss per share of $0.03 for the three months ended
December 31, 2004. Consequently, there was an increase in both basic and diluted earnings per
share attributable to discontinued operations of $2.91 for the three months ended December 31, 2005
due to the closing of the Ireland facility during the period.
Testing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income (loss) from operations for the Testing segment for the second
quarter of 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | Q2 2006 | Q2 2005 | ||||||
Revenue |
$ | 3,715 | $ | 2,654 | ||||
Gross margin |
37.0 | % | 28.9 | % | ||||
Income (loss) from operations |
$ | 561 | $ | (58 | ) |
Revenue in the Testing segment increased by $1,061 (or 40.0%) to $3,715 for the three months
ended December 31, 2005 from $2,654 in the same period last fiscal year. This was due to an
increase in testing services to one major customer due to an increased demand for that customers
personal computers, notebooks and server chips.
In our Testing operation, a significant portion of the operating expenses is fixed, which means the
operating expenses do not decline proportional to the revenue volume or the utilization of our
testing capacity. Thus, as the service demand and the utilization of our testing capacity increase,
those fixed portions of operating expenses are spread over the total revenues generated, which then
lead to a higher gross profit margin. Since revenue in the Testing segment increased by $1,061 and
the utilization of our testing capacity increased in this quarter, as compared to the same period
last fiscal year, gross profit margin increased by 8.1% to 37.0% for the three months ended
December 31, 2005 from 28.9% as compared to the same quarter last fiscal year. Gross profits were
$1,375 and $769 for the three months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
24
Table of Contents
Operating income increased by $619 to an income of $561 for the three months ended December 31,
2005 as compared to a loss of $58 for the same period last fiscal year. Such an increase in
operating income was attributable to an increase in gross profit of $606 and offset by a decrease
in operating expenses of $11. Operating expenses were $814 and $825 for the three months ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Such a decrease in operating expenses was mainly
attributable to a slight decrease in the general and administrative expenses.
Manufacturing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and (loss) income from operations for the Manufacturing segment for the
second quarter of 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | Q2 2006 | Q2 2005 | ||||||
Revenue |
$ | 3,111 | $ | 2,425 | ||||
Gross margin |
12.8 | % | 18.3 | % | ||||
(Loss) income from operations |
$ | (117 | ) | $ | 5 |
Revenue in the Manufacturing segment increased by $686 (or 28.3%) to $3,111 for the three
months ended December 31, 2005 from $2,425 for the same period last fiscal year, due to an increase
in demand of burn-in systems and burn-in boards in Asia. However, the average selling price for
burn-in systems and burn-in boards dropped due to price competition while the cost of material
increased for the three months ended December 31, 2005. The result was a decrease of 5.5% in gross
profit margin to 12.8% for this quarter from 18.3% for the same period last fiscal year. Gross
profits were $398 and $443 for the three months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Operating income decreased by $122 to a loss of $117 for the three months ended December 31, 2005
as compared to an income of $5 for the same period last fiscal year. The decrease in operating
income was attributed by a decrease in gross profit of $45 and an increase in operating expenses of
$77. Operating expenses were $515 and $438 for the three months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. The increase in operating expenses was mainly attributable to higher selling, payroll
and related expenses.
Distribution Segment
The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the Distribution segment for the second
quarter of 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | Q2 2006 | Q2 2005 | ||||||
Revenue |
$ | 599 | $ | 454 | ||||
Gross margin |
15.4 | % | 16.5 | % | ||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | (94 | ) |
Revenue in the Distribution segment increased by $145 (or 31.9%) to $599 for the three months
ended December 31, 2005 from $454 in the same period last fiscal year, due to an increase in demand
of low margin front-end products, such as Vibration equipment, chambers and wafer fabricators.
Since revenues were generated primarily from low margin front-end products in the three months
ended December 31, 2005, gross profit margin dropped by 1.1% to 15.4% for this quarter from 16.5%
in the same period last fiscal year. Gross profits were $92 and $75 for the three months ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Operating loss improved by $93 to a loss of $1 for the three months ended December 31, 2005 from a
loss of $94 for the same period last fiscal year. Such an improvement in operating loss was
attributable to an increase in gross profit of $17 and a decrease in operating expenses of $76.
Operating expenses were $93 and $169 for the three months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Such a reduction in operating expenses was mainly attributable to a decrease in
commissions of approximately $36 and other selling related expenses of approximately $40.
Corporate
The (loss) income from operations for Corporate for the second quarter of 2006 and 2005 were as
follow:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | Q2 2006 | Q2 2005 | ||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
$ | (817 | ) | $ | 8 |
25
Table of Contents
Corporate operating income decreased by $825 to a loss of $817 for the three months ended
December 31, 2005 from an income of $8 in the same period last fiscal year. Such a decrease in
corporate income was attributable to (i) director and officer bonuses of approximately $705; and
(ii) higher operating expenses due to an increase in legal and professional fees related to the
acquisition of the operation in China, the legal procedures for the declaration of dividends in the
U.S., the implementation of new accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. and an
increase in payroll and related expenses.
Year to Date Comparison of the Six Months Ended December 31, 2005 (2006) and to the Six Months
Ended December 31, 2004 (2005)
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of (loss) income data as a
percentage of net sales for the six months ended December 31, 2005 (the first half) and 2004,
respectively:
YTD 2006 | YTD 2005 | |||||||
Net Sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of Sales |
71.9 | % | 75.9 | % | ||||
Gross Margin |
28.1 | % | 24.1 | % | ||||
Operating Expenses |
||||||||
General and administrative |
19.6 | % | 17.9 | % | ||||
Director and officer bonuses |
5.4 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||
Selling |
3.9 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||
Research and development |
0.3 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||
Impairment Loss |
0.1 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
Total Operating Expenses |
29.3 | % | 22.5 | % | ||||
(Loss) Income from operations |
-1.2 | % | 1.6 | % | ||||
Overall Net Sales
Overall sales decreased slightly by $146 (or 1.1%) to $13,130 for the six months ended December 31,
2005 from $13,276 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. Although sales in the Testing
segment increased by $1,820 (or 33.5%) to $7,260 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from
$5,440 as compared to the same period last fiscal year, overall sales were still affected by slow
sales performance in the Manufacturing segment, which reported a decrease in sales of $1,937 (or
30.3%) to $4,466 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from $6,403 as compared to the same
period last fiscal year. Revenue in the Distribution segment decreased by $29 (or 2%) to $1,404 for
the six months ended December 31, 2005 from $1,433 in the same period last fiscal year, due to a
decline in the sales of low margin front-end products.
Geographically, we continue to operate in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and China. We
have discontinued our operations in Ireland as of August 2005. On January 3, 2006, the Company
completed its acquisition of GSI and is in the process of changing its name to Trio-Tech
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Such acquisition empowers the Company to expand its testing and burn-in
services into China. Net sales into and within China and the Southeast Asia regions decreased by
$466 (or 3.9%) to $11,603 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from $12,069 as compared to
the same period last fiscal year, attributed mainly attributable to the slow sales performance in
the Manufacturing segment in the Southeast Asia and Europe regions. Net sales into and within the
United States increased by $320 (or 26.5%) to $1,527 for the six months ended December 31, 2005
from $1,207 as compared to the same period last fiscal year, primarily due to a slight sales
improvement in the Manufacturing segment in the United States, which included the sale of a Wet
Process Station.
Overall Gross Margin
Overall gross margin increased by 4.0% to 28.1% for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from
24.1% as compared to the same period last fiscal year, due to higher gross margin of our unique
operating cost structure in our Testing segment, offset by low profit margin in our Manufacturing
segment.
In our Testing segment, a significant portion of the operating expenses is fixed, which means the
operating expenses do not decline proportional to the revenue volume or the utilization of our
testing capacity. Thus, as the service demand and the utilization of our testing capacity increase,
those fixed portions of operating expenses are spread over the total revenues generated, which then
lead to a higher gross profit margin. Since revenue in the Testing segment increased by $1,820 (or
33.5%) to $7,260 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from $5,440 as compared to the same
period last fiscal year, gross profit margin increased by approximately 4.9%. However, the average
selling price of burn-in systems and burn-in boards in our Manufacturing segment dropped
significantly and cost of materials increased adversely for the six months ended December 31,
26
Table of Contents
2005, which resulted in the gross profit margin dropping by 2.3% accordingly. In the Distribution
segment, gross margin dropped by 1% for the six months ended December 31, 2005 due to an increase
in demand for low margin front-end products. Overall, the gross profit margin still remained at an
increase of 4.0%.
Loss from operations
Loss from operations of $155 increased by $364 (or 174.2%) from an income of $209 for the six
months ended December 31, 2005 mainly due to better sales performance, which resulted in higher
gross profit of $497, offset with an increase in (i) the director and officer bonuses of
approximately $696; and (ii) the operating expenses due to an increase in legal and professional
fees related to the acquisition of the operation in China, the legal procedures for the declaration
of dividends in the U.S., the implementation of new accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. and an increase in payroll and related expenses.
Operating Expenses
The operating expenses for the first half of 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
Operating Expenses
(In Thousands, unaudited) | YTD 2006 | YTD 2005 | ||||||
General and administrative |
$ | 2,577 | $ | 2,368 | ||||
Director and officer bonuses |
$ | 705 | $ | 9 | ||||
Selling |
$ | 515 | $ | 550 | ||||
Research and development |
$ | 33 | $ | 56 | ||||
Impairment loss |
$ | 15 | $ | 1 | ||||
Total |
$ | 3,845 | $ | 2,984 | ||||
General and administrative expenses increased by $209 (or 8.8%) to $2,577 for the six months
ended December 31, 2005 from $2,368 as compared to the same period last fiscal year, due to an
increase in legal and professional fees related to the implementation of new accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States and an increase in payroll and related expenses.
Director and officer bonuses were approximately $705 and $9 for the six months ended December 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively. These bonuses were paid and are payable primarily based on the
Companys long standing compensation programs for the Officers and Chairman of the Company, which
is based on percentages of the Companys pre-tax profits for the year. In the case of the profits
on the sale of the property in Dublin, Ireland, the recipients agreed to take their percentages on
the after tax profits. During the period ended in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, a decision was
made to pay that part of the bonuses attributable to the sale of property in Dublin, Ireland.
Selling expenses decreased by $35 (or 6.4%) to $515 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from
$550 as compared to the same period last fiscal year, primarily due to a decrease in warranty costs
of approximately $35, resulting from lower sales in the Manufacturing segment.
Research and development costs decreased by $23 (or 41.1%) to $33 for the six months ended December
31, 2005 from $56 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. This decrease was primarily due
to a decrease in the headcount which had yet to be replaced as of December 31, 2005.
Impairment loss increased by $14 to $15 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from $1 as
compared to the same period last fiscal year, which was attributed by the obsolescence of certain
machinery and equipment not suitable for performing testing services for the high speed
microprocessor chips for one of our major customers.
Interest Expense
The interest expenses for the first half of 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
27
Table of Contents
(In Thousands, unaudited) | YTD 2006 | YTD 2005 | ||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 74 | $ | 86 |
Interest expenses decreased by $12 during the first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to the same
period last year, primarily due to lower usage of credit line facilities by the Singapore operation
for the six months ended December 31, 2005 when compared to the same period last year.
Other Income
Other income for the first half of 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | YTD 2006 | YTD 2005 | ||||||
Other income |
$ | 112 | $ | 42 |
Other income increased by $70 (or 166.7%) to $112 for the six months ended December 31, 2005
from a loss of $42 as compared to the same period last fiscal year, primarily due to the interest
income generated from short-term deposits and the currency transaction loss. Interest income was
$79 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 and was $55 higher than the interest income
generated in the same period last fiscal year due to deposits entered into with the funds from the
sale of the Ireland property. Currency transaction loss improved by $20 to $3 for the six months
ended December 31, 2005 from $23 as compared to the same period last fiscal year.
Income Tax
Income tax provision increased by $133 (or 260.8%) to $184 for the six months ended December 31,
2005 from $51 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. Income tax provision of $184 for
the six months ended December 31, 2005 was primarily attributed by the income generated from
Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia. Income tax provision of $51 for the same period last fiscal year
mainly resulted from the tax provision provided for taxable income generated during the period, net
of the tax recovery of $68 for the tax period between 1999 and 2001 in Singapore. Because of the
different income tax jurisdictions, the loss generated in the United States is not applicable
against the taxable income generated in foreign countries. Therefore, the Company generally incurs
certain income tax expenses in every fiscal year.
Income from Discontinued Operations
Income from discontinued operations increased by $8,457 to $8,459 for the six months ended December
31, 2005 from $2 for the same period last fiscal year. The significant increase in the income from
discontinued operations was contributed by the gain from sale of property of $8,909 completed in
November 2005, offsetting the loss from discontinued operation of $450. The loss from discontinued
operations was $2 for the same period last year.
Net Income
Net income increased by $8,040 to $8,177 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from $137 in
the same period last fiscal year. Such an increase was primarily due to an increase in income from
discontinued operations of $8,457 offset by an increase in loss from continuing operations of $417.
Consequently, basic loss per share contributed from continuing operations for the six months ended
December 31, 2005 decreased by $0.14 from earnings per share of $0.05 in the first half of fiscal
2005 to a loss of $0.09 per share in the first half of fiscal 2006. Diluted loss per share
contributed from continuing operations for the six months ended December 31, 2005 was $0.09, which
represented a decrease of $0.13 from diluted earnings per share of $0.04 for the six months ended
December 31, 2004. Consequently, there was an increase in both basic and diluted earnings per
share attributed to discontinued operations of $2.80 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 due
to the closing of the Ireland facility during the period.
Testing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the Testing segment for the first half of
2006 and 2005 were as follows:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | YTD 2006 | YTD 2005 | ||||||
Revenue |
$ | 7,260 | $ | 5,440 | ||||
Gross margin |
37.7 | % | 32.8 | % | ||||
Income from operations |
$ | 1,020 | $ | 124 |
28
Table of Contents
Revenue in the Testing segment increased by $1,820 (or 33.5%) to $7,260 for the six months
ended December 31, 2005 from $5,440 in the same period last fiscal year, due to an increase in
testing services to one major customer due to an increase in demand for that customers personal
computers, notebooks and server chips.
In our Testing operation, a significant portion of the operating expenses is fixed, which means the
operating expenses do not decline proportional to the revenue volume or the utilization of our
testing capacity. Thus, as the service demand and the utilization of our testing capacity increase,
those fixed portions of operating expenses are spread over the total revenues generated, which then
lead to a higher gross profit margin. Since revenue in the Testing segment increased by $1,820 and
the utilization of our testing capacity increased in this quarter, as compared to the same period
last fiscal year, gross profit margin increased by 4.9% to 37.7% for the six months ended December
31, 2005 from 32.8% as compared to the same quarter last fiscal year. Gross profits were $2,735
and $1,785 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Operating income increased by $896 to $1,020 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 as compared
to $124 for the same period last fiscal year. Such an increase in operating income was attributed
by an increase in gross profit of $950 and an increase in operating expenses of $57. Operating
expenses were $1,717 and $1,660 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Such an increase in operating expenses was mainly attributed by an increase in the variable portion
of payroll and related expenses in our Testing operation.
Manufacturing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and (loss) income from operations for the Manufacturing segment for the
first half of 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | YTD 2006 | YTD 2005 | ||||||
Revenue |
$ | 4,466 | $ | 6,403 | ||||
Gross margin |
14.5 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||
(Loss) income from operations |
$ | (292 | ) | $ | 152 |
Revenue in the Manufacturing segment, which reported a decrease in sales of $1,937 (or 30.3%)
to $4,466 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from $6,403 in the same period last fiscal
year, was due to a decrease in sales of burn-in boards by $2,288, offset by an increase in sales of
burn-in systems and Wet Process Stations of approximately $351.
Since the average selling price of burn-in systems and burn-in boards dropped due to price
competition and cost of materials increased adversely for the six months ended December 31, 2005,
the gross profit margin dropped by 2.3% to 14.5% for the first half from 16.8% in the same period
last fiscal year. Gross profits were $647 and $1,076 for the six months ended December 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
Operating income decreased by $444 to a loss of $292 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 as
compared to an income of $152 for the same period last fiscal year. Such a decrease in operating
income was attributed by a decrease in gross profit of $429 and an increase in operating expenses
of $15. Operating expenses were $939 and $924 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Such an increase in operating expenses was mainly attributed by slightly higher
general and administrative expenses.
Distribution Segment
The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the Distribution segment for the first half
of 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | YTD 2006 | YTD 2005 | ||||||
Revenue |
$ | 1,404 | $ | 1,433 | ||||
Gross margin |
22.0 | % | 23.4 | % | ||||
Loss from operations |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (82 | ) |
Revenue in the Distribution segment decreased by $29 (or 2.0%) to $1,404 for the six months
ended December 31, 2005 from $1,433 in the same period last fiscal year, which was attributable to
a decline in the sales of low margin front-end products.
29
Table of Contents
Since revenues are generated primarily from low margin front-end products, gross profit margin
dropped by 1.4% to 22.0% for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from 23.4% as compared to the
same period last fiscal year. Gross profits were $309 and $335 for the six months ended December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Operating loss improved by $80 to a loss of 2 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 from a
loss of $82 in the same period last fiscal year. Such an improvement in operating loss was
attributable to a decrease in operating expenses of $105, offset by a drop in gross profit of $26.
Operating expenses were $311 and $416 for the six months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. Such a reduction in operating expenses was mainly attributable to a decrease in
commissions of approximately $61 and other selling related expenses of approximately $44.
Corporate
The (loss) income from operations for Corporate for the first half of 2006 and 2005 were as follow:
(In Thousands, unaudited) | YTD 2006 | YTD 2005 | ||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
$ | (881 | ) | $ | 15 |
Corporate operating loss increased by $896 to a loss of $881 for the six months ended December
31, 2005 from an income of $15 as compared to the same period last fiscal year. Such a decrease in
corporate income was attributable to (i) an increase in director and officer bonuses of
approximately $696; and (ii) higher operating expenses due to an increase in legal and professional
fees related to the acquisition of the operation in China, the legal procedures for the declaration
of dividends in the U.S., the implementation of new accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. and an increase in payroll and related expenses.
Financial Condition
During the six months ended December 31, 2005, total assets increased $8,550 from $18,345 at June
30, 2005 to $26,895 at December 31, 2005. The majority of the increase was in cash, short term
deposits, other receivables, prepaid expenses, advances to seller and other assets of $9,517, but
offset by a decrease in accounts receivables of $325, inventories of $331 and property, plant and
equipment and other intangibles of $311.
At the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006, total cash and short term deposits totaled
$13,661, up $9,011 from fiscal year-end 2005. During the first six months of fiscal 2006, cash
increased primarily due to net proceeds received from the sale of property in Dublin, Ireland of
$8,401, offset by advances for the newly acquired subsidiary in China, capital expenditures of
$704, principal repayments of debt and capital leases of $501 (which includes the repayment of
Irelands outstanding equipment loan of $88) and payments on the lines of credit of $77.
Inventories of $1,253 at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006 decreased $331 from fiscal
year-end 2005 mainly due to the sales of finished goods from our Distribution segment. The turnover
of inventory of 27 days at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006 improved marginally
compared with 28 days at fiscal year-end 2005.
Accounts receivable at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006 decreased $325 from fiscal
year-end 2005 primarily due to more efficient collections in the Southeast Asia operations but
offset with higher sales in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, compared with the first quarter of
fiscal 2006. Accounts receivables turnover remained unchanged at 56 days at the end of the second
quarter of fiscal 2006 and at fiscal year-end 2005.
Advances to seller increased by $138 to $153 as of December 31, 2005 from $15 at June 30, 2005 due
to the final payment of $153 to Seller to acquire GSI in China. This acquisition was completed on
January 3, 2006.
Property, plant and equipment decreased by $264 from $7,176 at June 30, 2005 to $6,912 at December
31, 2005 due to the disposal of assets held for sale in the Ireland Testing operation with a
carrying value of $261. Capital expenditures of $704 for the first six months ended December 31,
2005 were offset by the depreciation of $743 for the same period last fiscal year.
Capital expenditures were $704 for the first six months of fiscal 2006, compared with $1,841 the first six months of fiscal 2005. The decrease in capital expenditures was mainly due to higher purchases of machinery and equipment during the first six months ended fiscal 2005 for the acquired Malaysia Testing operation to meet customers requirements.
Capital expenditures were $704 for the first six months of fiscal 2006, compared with $1,841 the first six months of fiscal 2005. The decrease in capital expenditures was mainly due to higher purchases of machinery and equipment during the first six months ended fiscal 2005 for the acquired Malaysia Testing operation to meet customers requirements.
Depreciation and amortization was $792 for the first six months of fiscal 2006, compared with $707
for the first six months of fiscal 2005, as more fixed assets were acquired in the first half of
fiscal 2006 than in the same period last fiscal year.
30
Table of Contents
Accrued expenses of $3,286 at the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2006 increased $688 from June
30, 2005 primarily due to accrued bonuses, higher sales tax, commission and utilities in one of the
Singapore operations but offset with the lower accrued purchases and fixed assets purchases.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $1,030 to $739 for the six months ended
December 31, 2005 from net cash used of $291 in the same period last fiscal year. The increase in
the net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to (1) the swing in net income from
$137 to $8,177 during the six months of fiscal 2006 as compared to same period last fiscal year;
and (2) the net impact of adjusting non-cash items during the first six months of fiscal 2006 was
$8,099 which has decreased the net income as compared to $742 which had increased the net income
during the first six months of fiscal 2005, which was mainly due to a gain on sale of property in
Dublin, Ireland of $8,909. In addition, the increase was attributable to a positive cash flow of
$957 from accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable and accrued expenses and offset by
a negative cash flow of $367 from other receivables and prepaid expenses and other current assets
for six months ended December 31, 2005.
Net cash provided by investing activities increased by $4,398 to $4,222 for the six months ended
December 31, 2005 from a negative cash flow of $176 for the same period last fiscal year. The
improvement in net cash provided by investing activities was primarily due an increase in the net
investment in short-term deposits of $5,283 to $3,337 during the six months of fiscal 2006 as
compared to net proceeds of $1,946 during the six months of fiscal 2005. The increase in the
investment in short-term deposits in fiscal 2006 was due to placement of the proceeds received from
the sale of property in Dublin, Ireland in the short-term deposits. Capital expenditures decreased
by $493 to $704 during the six months of fiscal 2006 from $1,197 during the first six months of
fiscal 2005. The net proceeds from discontinued operations increased by $8,401 during the first
six months of fiscal 2006 as compared to nil during the first six months of fiscal 2005, which was
mainly due to the sale of property in Dublin, Ireland. There were no proceeds from sale of
equipment during the six months of fiscal year 2006 as compared to $201 during the six months of
fiscal 2005. Acquisition of business decreased by $637 to $138 during the six months of fiscal
2006 from $1,126 during the six months of fiscal 2005, which was attributable to the advance
payments in business acquisition in China of $138 during the six months of fiscal 2006 as compared
to the business acquisition in Malaysia of $1,126 during the six months of fiscal 2005.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $477 to $652 for the six months ended
December 31, 2005 from $175 in the same period last fiscal year. The improvement in net cash
provided by financing activities was primarily due to: (1) more proceeds from long-term debt of
$1,025 during the six months of fiscal 2006 compared to $430 during the six months of fiscal 2005;
(2) repayments of $501, which includes repayment of Irelands outstanding equipment loan of $88
made during the first six months of fiscal 2006 compared to repayments of $385 made during the
first six months of fiscal 2005; (3) proceeds from stock options exercised of $232 during the first
six months of fiscal 2006 compared to $5 during the first six months of fiscal 2005; (4) net
repayments on the line of credit of $77 during the six months of fiscal 2006 whereas there were net
borrowings of $178 during the six months of fiscal 2005; and (5) less dividends paid to minority
interest of $27 during the six months of fiscal 2006 compared to $53 during the six months of
fiscal 2005.
The details of cash flow from the discontinued operation in Ireland are summarized as follows: the
gross proceeds was approximately $10,574, cost to sell was $218, disbursement for capital gain tax
was $1,955, resulting in net proceeds of $8,401. The loss from discontinued operation of $450 was
deemed as cash outflow from operating activities of the discontinued operation; the net proceeds
provided by investing activities was $8,401 from the sale of the property; the cash used in
financing activities was the disbursement to pay off the outstanding equipment loan of $88. The
impact of this discontinued operation was immaterial because the total revenues for fiscal years
June 30, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $600 and $500, respectively. The Company believes there
will not be any future significant cash flows from the discontinued operation as the outstanding
accounts receivable and accounts payable are immaterial to the Company financial position and
liquidity.
Before moving out of Ireland, the Company wired the remaining cash of approximately $7,800 to its
Singapore subsidiary where the main operations are located. On December 2, 2005, the Board of
Directors of Registrant declared a cash dividend of fifty cents (US 50¢) per share based on the
shareholders of records on January 10, 2006. The total number of shares issued and outstanding as
of January 10, 2006 was 3,215,532 and the total cash dividends paid on January 25, 2006 were
$1,608, which was paid out of the above $7,800. In addition, $705 of the $7,800 was used for
bonuses to the directors and corporate officers paid in December 2005 and January 2006,
respectively.
In addition, as of December 31, 2005, approximately $838 of cash deposits were held in the
Companys 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary. Of such amount, $833 were denominated in the currency of
Malaysia, but $139 is currently available for movement to overseas, as authorized by the Central
Bank of Malaysia. There are additional amounts available for distribution as dividends (after
making deductions for income tax) pursuant to Malaysian regulations.
31
Table of Contents
The current ratio (defined as current assets divided by current liabilities) improved to 2.42 as of
December 31, 2005 compared to 1.82 as of June 30, 2005. We believe the Company has sufficient
financial resources for its ordinary operations, capital expenditures, dividend payments and other
business requirements for the next twelve months.
Corporate Guarantee Arrangement
The Company provides a corporate guarantee of approximately $1,504 to one of its subsidiaries in
Southeast Asia to secure line-of-credit and term loans from a bank to finance the operations of
such subsidiary. With the strong financial position of the subsidiary company, the Company believes
this corporate guarantee arrangement will have no material impact on its liquidity or capital
resources.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting
Changes in Interim Financial Statements. (SFAS No. 154). SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements
for the accounting for, and reporting of, a change in accounting principle. Previously, most
voluntary changes in accounting principles were required to be recognized by way of a cumulative
effect adjustment within net income during the period of the change. SFAS No. 154 generally
requires retrospective application to the prior period financial statements of voluntary changes in
accounting principles. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005. However, SFAS No. 154 does not change the transition provisions
of any existing accounting pronouncements. The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No.
154 will have a material effect on its results of operations or financial condition.
Critical Accounting Estimates & Policies
We prepare the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements require
the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management periodically
evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on
historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions
or conditions.
In response to the SECs Release No. 33-8040, Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About
Critical Accounting Policy, the Company identified the most critical accounting principles upon
which its financial status depends. The Company determined that those critical accounting
principles are related to the use of estimates, inventory valuation, revenue recognition, income
tax and impairment of long-lived assets. The Company states these accounting policies in the
relevant sections in this managements discussion and analysis, including the Recently Issued
Accounting Pronouncements discussed below.
Use of Estimates
The Companys financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, which require us to make estimates and judgments that
significantly affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. The Company regularly evaluates these estimates,
including those related to inventory valuation, revenue recognition and income taxes. These
estimates are based on historical experience and on assumptions that are believed by management to
be reasonable under the circumstances. The most important estimates included in the financial
statements are the allowance for doubtful accounts, provision for inventory obsolescence, the
estimated useful life of long-lived assets, and valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
Actual results may differ materially from these estimates, which may impact the carrying values of
assets and liabilities.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
During the normal course of business, we extend unsecured credit to our customers. Typically,
credit terms require payment to be made between 30 to 60 days of the sale. We do not require
collateral from our customers. We maintain our cash accounts at credit worthy financial
institutions.
We regularly evaluate and monitor the creditworthiness of each customer on a case-by-case basis.
We include any account balances that are determined to be uncollectible, along with a general
reserve, in the overall allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a
receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the
information available to management, we believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts was
adequate as of December 31, 2005.
32
Table of Contents
Inventory Valuation
Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value.
Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, short-term customer commitments and
rapid changes in demand. We make provisions for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based on
our regular reviews of inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of product demand and
production requirements from our customers. We write-down inventories for not saleable, excess or
obsolete raw materials, works-in-process and finished goods by charging such write-downs to cost of
sales. In addition to write-downs based on newly introduced parts, statistics and judgments are
used for assessing provision of the remaining inventory based on salability and obsolescence.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from sales of the Companys products is recognized upon shipment or delivery, depending
upon the terms of the sales order, provided that persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists,
title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer, the sales amount is fixed and
determinable, and collection of the revenue is reasonably assured. We allocate a portion of the
invoice value to products sold and the remaining portion of invoice value to installation work in
proportion to the fair value of products sold and installation work to be performed. The fair
value determination of products sold and the installation and training work is also based on our
specific historical experience of the relative fair values of the elements if there is no easily
determinable market price to be considered. A portion of the Companys sales is
contributed from testing services. Revenue derived from testing service is recognized when testing
services are rendered.
The Company reduces revenue based on estimates of future credits to be granted to customers.
Credits are granted for reasons such as product returns due to quality issues, volume-based
incentives, and other special pricing arrangements.
Income Tax
In determining income for financial statement purposes, the Company must make certain estimates and
judgments in the calculation of tax expense and the resultant tax liabilities and in the
recoverability of deferred tax assets that arise from temporary differences between the tax and
financial statement recognition of revenue and expense.
In the ordinary course of global business there may be many transactions and calculations where the
ultimate tax outcome is uncertain. The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws. Our foreign subsidiaries are subject to
income taxes in the regions where they operate. Because of the different income tax jurisdictions,
net losses generated in the U.S. cannot be utilized to offset the taxable income generated in
foreign countries. Therefore, we may incur certain income tax expenses in any fiscal year though
the Company may generate lower income before income taxes. Although the Company believes the
estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will
not be different than what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals.
As part of its financial process, the Company must assess the likelihood that its deferred tax
assets can be recovered. If recovery is not likely, the provision for taxes must be increased by
recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are
estimated not to be ultimately recoverable. In this process, certain relevant criteria are
evaluated including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred
tax assets, the taxable income that can be used to absorb net operating losses and credit
carrybacks, and taxable income in future years. The Companys judgment regarding future
profitability may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or international tax laws
and other factors. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to these deferred tax
assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in net income in the period when such
determinations are made.
In addition to the risks described above, the effective tax rate is based on current enacted tax
law. Significant changes during the year in enacted tax law could affect these estimates.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review long-lived assets for impairment when certain indicators are present that suggest the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. This review process primarily focuses on other intangible
assets from business acquisitions and property, plant and equipment. Factors considered include
the under-performance of a business compared to expectations and shortened useful lives due to
planned changes in the use of the assets. Recoverability is determined by comparing the carrying
amount of long-lived assets to estimate future undiscounted cash flows. If future undiscounted
cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the long-lived assets, an impairment charge would
be recognized for the excess of the carrying amount over fair value determined by either a quoted
market price, if any, or a value determined by utilizing a discounted cash flow technique.
Additionally, in the case of assets that will continue to be used by the Company in future periods,
a shortened life may be utilized if appropriate, resulting in accelerated amortization or
depreciation based upon the expected net realizable value of the asset at the date the asset will
no
33
Table of Contents
longer be utilized by the Company. Actual results may vary from estimates due to, among other
things, differences in operating results, shorter asset useful lives and lower market values for
excess assets.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. Our
investment portfolio is generally comprised of cash deposits. Our policy is to place these
investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards. These securities are subject to
interest rate risk, and could decline in value if interest rates fluctuate and thus subject us to
market risk due to those fluctuations. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of our
investment portfolio, we do not expect any material loss with respect to our investment portfolio,
though no assurances can be given that material losses will not occur.
As of December 31, 2005, the outstanding aggregate principal balance on these loans, capital leases
and lines of credit was approximately $2,305. The interest on our loans, capital leases and lines
of credit range from 4.19% to 7.50% per annum. A majority of these interest rates are variable and
are subject to change in line with market rates.
Dec. 30, | June 30, | |||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||
denominated by Singapore dollars
with variable interest rate at prime rates
ranging from 2.95% to
5.75% plus 1% to 6.25% per annum |
$ | 1,665 | $ | 1,045 | ||||
denominated by Irish pound
with variable interest rate at prime rates
ranging from 2.09% to
2.11% plus 5.11% to 5.59% per annum |
| 98 | ||||||
denominated by Thailand baht
with fixed interest rate at 4.50% per annum |
116 | 146 | ||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 1,781 | $ | 1,289 | ||||
Capital leases: |
||||||||
denominated by Singapore dollars
with fixed interest rate ranging from
4.19% to 6.60% per annum |
$ | 247 | $ | 199 | ||||
denominated by Malaysia ringgit
with fixed interest rate at 4.30% per annum |
18 | 22 | ||||||
denominated by US dollars
with fixed interest rate at 0.81% per annum |
8 | | ||||||
denominated by Irish pound
with variable interest rate at a prime
rate of 2.09% plus 7.10% |
| 12 | ||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 265 | $ | 233 | ||||
Line of credit: |
||||||||
denominated by Singapore dollars
with variable interest rate at 5.75% plus
6.00% per annum |
$ | 259 | $ | 336 | ||||
Total |
$ | 2,305 | $ | 1,858 | ||||
34
Table of Contents
The outstanding aggregate principal balance on these loans, capital leases and lines of credit were
mainly utilized by the Testing segment for investments in facilities and equipment to meet
customers requirement. One of the Singapore operations used 48% of the banking facilities as of
December 31, 2005. Nevertheless, the Singapore operation was able to meet repayment of loans and
capital obligations as the majority of the overall net sales were contributed from the operation.
The Thailand operation utilized term loans to finance the extension of a building in Bangkok and it
will be able to meet the repayment of loan obligations as the operation has been generating cash
for the past few years. With the cessation of Ireland operation and sale of property, the term loan
was fully redeemed at the end of second quarter of Fiscal 2006.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk. Although the majority of our sales, cost of manufacturing and
marketing are transacted in U.S. dollars, significant portions of our revenues are denominated in
Singapore and Euro dollars, Malaysian ringgit, Thai Baht and other currencies. Consequently, a
portion of our costs, revenues and operating margins may be affected by fluctuations in exchange
rates, primarily between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies. We are also affected by
fluctuations in exchange rates if there is a mismatch between our foreign currency denominated
assets and liabilities. Foreign currency translation adjustments resulted in an decrease of $989
and $243 to shareholders equity for the six months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
We try to reduce our risk of foreign currency fluctuations by purchasing certain equipment and
supplies in U.S. dollars and seeking payment, when possible, in U.S. dollars. However, we may not
be successful in our attempts to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. Those
fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial results.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
An evaluation was carried out by the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31,
2005, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and
procedures were effective. During the period covered by this report, there were no changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting that materially affected or are reasonably
likely to materially affect the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
35
Table of Contents
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Not applicable |
Item 1A. Risk Factors
CERTAIN RISKS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR FUTURE RESULTS | |||
We hereby caution stockholders, prospective investors in Trio-Tech International and other readers that there is no change to the risk factors disclosed in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005 except for the material change in the following important factors. Such factors in some cases have affected, and in the future could affect, our stock price or cause our actual results for the six months ending December 31, 2005 and future quarters and fiscal years to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements, oral or written, made by or on behalf of us. | |||
We have paid cash dividends. On December 2, 2005, the Board of Directors of Registrant declared a cash dividend of fifty cents (US 50¢) per share based on the shareholders of records on January 10, 2006. The total number of shares issued and outstanding as of January 10, 2006 was 3,215,532 and the total cash dividends paid on January 25, 2006 were approximately $1,608,000. The dividend was declared from the Companys retained earnings and the cash for payment of the dividends was from the net proceeds of disposing the property located in Dublin, Ireland. | |||
Possible dilutive effect of outstanding options | |||
As of December 31, 2005, there were 203,550 shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding stock options. The outstanding options are currently exercisable at exercise prices ranging from $2.25 to $4.50 per share. We anticipate that the trading price of our common stock at the time of exercise of any such outstanding options will exceed the exercise price under those options. Thus such exercise will have a dilutive effect on our shareholders. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Malaysian and Singapore regulations prohibit the payment of dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings and tax credit. In addition, the payment of dividends can only be made after making deductions for income tax pursuant to the regulations. Furthermore, the cash movements from the Companys 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary to overseas are restricted and must be authorized by the Central Bank of Malaysia. California law also prohibits the payment of dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings or cannot meet certain asset to liability ratios. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to Vote of Security Holders
An annual meeting of shareholders was held December 2, 2005. The only matter voted on at the annual meeting was the election of Directors. Proxies for the annual meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. There was no solicitation in opposition to managements nominees for Directors as listed in the Proxy Statement. All of such nominees were elected. The number of votes for each of such nominees was as follows (there being no abstentions or votes withheld): |
Director | For | Against | Abstain | No Vote | Total | |||||||||||||||
Jason Adelman |
2,129,874 | 3,840 | 916,028 | 3,049,742 | ||||||||||||||||
Richard Horowitz |
2,127,474 | 6,240 | 916,028 | 3,049,742 | ||||||||||||||||
Yong Siew Wai |
2,130,949 | 2,765 | 916,028 | 3,049,742 | ||||||||||||||||
A. Charles Wilson |
2,130,964 | 2,750 | 916,028 | 3,049,742 |
36
Table of Contents
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable |
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1 | Memorandum of Agreement, dated September 30, 2005 between European Electronic Test Centre Ltd. and Dorville Homes Ltd. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for September 30, 2005] | ||
10.2 | Deed of Assignment, dated October 27, 2005 between European Electronic Test Centre Ltd. and Dorville Homes Ltd. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for September 30, 2005] | ||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Registrant | ||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Registrant | ||
32 | Section 1350 Certification. |
37
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL | ||||||
By: | /s/ Victor H.M. Ting | |||||
VICTOR H.M. TING | ||||||
Vice President and | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Principal Financial Officer) | ||||||
Dated: February 17, 2006 |
38