TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period from                      to                     

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

California		95-2086631
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)
14731 Califa Street
Van Nuys, California (Address of principal executive offices)		91411 (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number: 818-787-7000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class Common Stock, no par value		Name of each exchange On which registered AMEX

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes þ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes þ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in the definitive proxy statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

     The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of Registrant, based upon the closing price of $11.25 for shares of the registrant’s common stock on December 31, 2006, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter as reported by the AMEX, was approximately $2.3 million. In calculating such aggregate market value, shares of Common Stock held by each officer, director and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock (including shares with respect to which a holder has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days) were excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

     The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of September 1, 2007 was 3,227,992

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference information from Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Commission under Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K.

 

 

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

INDEX

				Page
		Part I
Item 1		Business			3
Item 1A		Risk factors			9
Item 1B		Unresolved staff comments			12
Item 2		Properties			12
Item 3		Legal proceedings			14
Item 4		Submission of matters to a vote of security holders			14
		Part II
Item 5		Market for registrant’s common equity, related stockholder matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			15
Item 6		Selected financial data			17
Item 7		Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations			18
Item 7A		Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk			33
Item 8		Financial statements and supplementary data			34
Item 9		Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure			34
Item 9A		Controls and procedures			34
Item 9B		Other information			34
		Part III
Item 10		Directors, executive officers and corporate governance			34
Item 11		Executive compensation			34
Item 12		Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters			34
Item 13		Certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence			34
Item 14		Principal accountant fees and services			34
		Part IV
Item 15		Exhibits and financial statement schedules			34
Signatures					40
Exhibits					41
		Report of independent registered public accounting firm			45
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and 2006			46
		Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005			47
		Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005			48
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended June 30, 2007 2006 and 2005			49
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			50
EXHIBIT 10.49
EXHIBIT 10.50
EXHIBIT 10.51
EXHIBIT 10.52
EXHIBIT 10.53
EXHIBIT 10.54
EXHIBIT 10.55
EXHIBIT 10.56
EXHIBIT 10.57
EXHIBIT 10.58
EXHIBIT 10.59
EXHIBIT 10.60
EXHIBIT 10.61
EXHIBIT 10.62
EXHIBIT 10.63
EXHIBIT 10.64
EXHIBIT 10.65
EXHIBIT 10.66
EXHIBIT 10.67
EXHIBIT 10.68
EXHIBIT 10.69
EXHIBIT 23.1
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL

PART I

NOTE CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The discussions of Trio-Tech International’s (the “Company”) business and activities set forth in this Form 10-K and in other past and future reports and announcements by the Company may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and assumptions regarding future activities and results of operations of the Company. In light of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company: market acceptance of Company products and services; changing business conditions or technologies and volatility in the semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for the Company’s products and services; the impact of competition; problems with technology; product development schedules; delivery schedules; changes in military or commercial testing specifications which could affect the market for the Company’s products and services; difficulties in profitably integrating acquired businesses, if any, into the Company; risks associated with conducting business internationally and especially in Southeast Asia, including currency fluctuations and devaluation, currency restrictions, local laws and restrictions and possible social, political and economic instability; and other economic, financial and regulatory factors beyond the Company’s control. See the discussions elsewhere in this Form 10-K, including under item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for more information. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential,” “believes,” “can impact,” “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology.

We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, changed circumstances, or the occurrence of unanticipated events. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGE AND SHARE AMOUNTS)

Trio-Tech International was incorporated in 1958 under the laws of the State of California. As used herein, the term “Trio-Tech” or “Company” or “we” or “us” or “Registrant” includes Trio-Tech International and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise indicates. Our mailing address and executive offices are located at 14731 Califa Street, Van Nuys, California 91411, and our telephone number is (818) 787-7000.

With more than 49 years dedicated to the semiconductor and related industries, we have applied our expertise to our global customer base in test services, design, engineering, manufacturing, and distribution.

Recent Events

In June 2007, Trio-Tech International established a subsidiary in Chongqing, China. The new subsidiary, Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. has a registered capital of RMB20,000 (equivalent of approximately $2,600) and is wholly owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. In June 2007, Trio-Tech Pte. Ltd. infused $2,600 to Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. to fulfill its capital injection obligation. The source of the funds was from the maturity of short-term deposits held by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.

On August 27, 2007, Trio Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. entered into a Memorandum Agreement with Jia Sheng Property Development Co. Ltd. (Jiasheng thereafter) to jointly develop a piece of property with 24.91 acres owned by JiaSheng located in Chongqing, China. Pursuant to signed agreement, the investment from Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. was RMB 10,000 (equivalent of approximately $1,323 based on the exchange rate as of August 27, 2007 published by the Federal Reserve System). On August 28, 2007, Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. transferred the required amount from its bank account into a special bank account jointly monitored by both Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. and Jia Sheng. This fact was disclosed in a Form 8-K dated August 30, 2007.

General

Trio-Tech International provides third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through its laboratories in Southeast Asia. We also design, manufacture and market equipment and systems to be used in the process of testing semiconductors at our facilities in California and Southeast Asia, and distribute semiconductor processing and testing equipment manufactured by other vendors.

We operate in three business segments: Testing Services, Manufacturing and Distribution. The financial information on the measurement of profit or loss and total assets for the three segments as well as geographic areas information can be found under management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial conditions, as well as in the financial statements included in this report. Our working capital requirements are covered under management’s discussion and analysis of business outlook, liquidity and capital resources.

We currently operate five testing facilities; one in the United States and four in Southeast Asia. These facilities provide customers with a full range of testing services, such as burn-in and product life testing for finished or packaged semiconductors.

Our Ireland operation, as a component of the Testing segment, suffered continued operating losses in the three fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and the cash flows were minimal during the same three fiscal years. Thus, in August 2005, we established a restructuring plan to close the testing operation in Dublin, Ireland. In November 2005, we completed the sale of the property located in Dublin, Ireland and recorded a gain of $8,909 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. As a result, in fiscal 2006, this discontinued operation reported an income of $8,459, which consisted of the gain from the sale of property of $8,909 offset by the loss from discontinued operations of $450.

In January 2006 we completed the acquisition of a burn-in testing division in Shanghai.

Our manufacturing segment manufactures Artic Temperature Controlled Wafer Chucks, which are used for test, characterization and failure analysis of semiconductor wafers, Wet Process Stations, which wash and dry wafers at a series of 100 to 300 additional processing steps after the etching or deposition of integrated circuits, and other microelectronic substrates in what is commonly called the “front-end”, or creation of semiconductor circuits. Additionally, we also manufacture centrifuges, leak detectors, HAST (Highly Accelerated Stress Test) systems and “burn-in” systems that are used primarily in the “back-end” of the semiconductor manufacturing process to test finished semiconductor devices and electronic components.

Our distribution segment operates primarily in Southeast Asia. This segment markets and supports distribution of our own manufactured equipment in addition to distributing complementary products supplied by other manufacturers that are used by our customers and other semiconductor and electronics manufacturers. We expanded the distribution business to include a strategic business unit mainly to serve as a distributor of electronic components to customers.

Information for each segment regarding external customers, profit and loss and total assets may be found in the footnotes to the financial statements included in this Form 10-K, which information is incorporated herein by this reference.

Company History

1958		Incorporated in California.
1976		The Company formed Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. in Singapore.
1984		The Company formed the European Electronic Test Center (EETC), a Cayman Islands domiciled subsidiary, to operate a test facility in Dublin, Ireland.
1985		The Company’s Singapore subsidiary entered into a joint-venture agreement, Trio-Tech Malaysia, to operate a test facility in Penang.
1986		Trio-Tech International listed on the NASDAQ Small Cap market under the symbol TRTC.
1988		The Company acquired the Rotating Test Equipment Product Line of Genisco Technology Corporation.
1990		Trio-Tech International acquired Express Test Corporation in California.
		Trio-Tech Malaysia opened a new facility in Kuala Lumpur.
1992		Trio-Tech Singapore opened Trio-Tech Bangkok, Thailand.
		Trio-Tech Singapore achieved ISO 9002 certification.
1994		Trio-Tech Malaysia started a new components assembly operation in Batang Kali.
1995		Trio-Tech Singapore achieved ISO 9001 certification.
1997		In November 1997, the Company acquired KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems of Campbell,
		California.
1998		In September 1998, the Company listed on AMEX under the symbol TRT.
2000		Trio-Tech Singapore achieved QS 9000 certification.
		Trio-Tech Malaysia closed its facility in Batang Kali.
2001		The Company divested the Rotating Test Equipment Product Line.
		Trio-Tech Malaysia closed its facility in Kuala Lumpur.
2003		Trio-Tech Singapore opened a sales office in China known as Trio-Tech (Suzhou) Co. Ltd.
		Trio-Tech Malaysia scaled down its facility in Penang.
2004		The Company moved its Wet Process Station manufacturing from Campbell, California to Singapore.
		Trio-Tech Test Services Pte. Ltd. was renamed Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd.
		Trio-Tech Malaysia acquired a burn-in testing division in Petaling Jaya.

2005		Trio-Tech Singapore, Trio-Tech Malaysia and Trio-Tech Bangkok achieved ISO 9001, 2000 certification.
		Trio-Tech Singapore, Trio-Tech Malaysia and Trio-Tech Bangkok achieved ISO/TS16949, 2002 certification.
		Trio-Tech Ireland closed its facility in Ireland.
2006		Trio-Tech Singapore acquired a burn-in testing company in Shanghai and changed its name to
		Trio-Tech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
2007		Trio-Tech Singapore achieved ISO 14001, 2004 certification.
		Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd achieved ISO/IEC 17025, 2005 accreditation under SAN-SINGLAS.
		Trio-Tech (Suzhou) started its testing service.
		Trio-Tech Singapore established a subsidiary, Trio-Tech (ChongQing) Co. Ltd, in ChongQing, China.

Background

The worldwide unit demand for semiconductors continued to grow in calendar 2007, driven by healthy growth in major end markets, such as personal computers and consumer devices. The decline of the average selling price of semiconductors helped make possible the very attractive prices for many consumer products. According to the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), total sales growth for semiconductors was predicted to be 1.8% in calendar 2007. In terms of dollar amount, forecasted sales were $252,000,000 in calendar 2007, rising to $306,000,000 in 2010, and compound annual growth rate is predicted to be 5.4% per year from 2006 to 2010.

Recent reports show that the worldwide sales of semiconductors of $20,300,000 in May 2007 were 2.4% higher than the $19,800,000 reported for May of 2006, and 1.2% higher than the $20,000,000 reported for April 2007. The increase in sales indicates continued strength in end markets for personal computers and cell phones.

Testing Services

We own and operate facilities that provide testing services for semiconductor products to ensure that these products meet the requirements for military, aerospace, industrial and commercial applications. Testing services represented approximately 45%, 50%, and 45% of net sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

We use our own proprietary equipment for certain burn-in, centrifugal and leak tests, and commercially available equipment for various other environmental tests. We conduct the majority of our testing operations in Southeast Asia with facilities in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and China. Most of the facilities in Southeast Asia are either ISO9001 or ISO14001 certified. In March 2007, one of our testing operations was awarded ISO/ICE 17025, 2005 accreditation under SAC-SINGLAS (Singapore Accreditation Council-Singapore Laboratory Accreditation Scheme).

In August 2005, we established a restructuring plan to close our testing operation in Dublin, Ireland, as the operation did not generate adequate operating cash flow during the three prior years. The testing operations closed in November 2005. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, our China operation in Suzhou started its testing services.

Testing services are rendered to manufacturers and purchasers of semiconductors and other entities who either lack testing capabilities or whose in-house screening facilities are insufficient for testing devices in order for them to make sure that these products meet military or certain commercial specifications. Customers outsource their test services either to accommodate fluctuations in output or to benefit from economies that can be offered by third party service providers. For those customers with adequate in-house capabilities, we offer testing services for their “overflow” requirements and also provide independent testing verification services.

Our laboratories perform a variety of tests, including stabilization bake, thermal shock, temperature cycling, mechanical shock, constant acceleration, gross and fine leak tests, electrical testing, microprocessor equipment contract cleaning services, static and dynamic burn-in tests, smart burn-in tests, reliability lab services and vibration testing. Our laboratories also perform qualification testing, consisting of intense tests conducted on small samples of output from manufacturers who require qualification of their processes and devices.

Manufacturing Products

We design, develop, manufacture and market equipment for the manufacturing and testing of semiconductor wafers, devices and other electronic components. Revenue from the sale of products manufactured by the Company represented approximately 51%, 43% and 43% of net sales for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Front-End Products

Wet Process Stations

Wet Process Stations are used for cleaning, rinsing and drying semiconductor wafers, magnetic disks, flat panel displays and other microelectronic substrates. After the etching or deposition of integrated circuits, wafers are typically sent through a series of 100 to 300 additional processing steps. At many of these processing steps, the wafer is washed and dried using Wet Process Stations. This product line includes manual, semi-automated and automated Wet Process Stations, and features radial and linear robots, state-of-the-art PC touch-screen controllers and sophisticated scheduling and control software. The Wet Process Station is currently manufactured in Singapore.

Artic Temperature Controlled Wafer Chucks

The Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks are used for test, characterization and failure analysis of semiconductor wafers and other components at accurately controlled hot and cold temperatures. Several models are available with temperature ranges from -65°C to +400°C and in diameters from 4 to 12 inches. The finished wafer is put through a series of tests using the Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks in which each separate integrated device on the wafer is tested at accurately controlled temperatures for functionality. After testing, the wafer is “diced” or cut up, and each die is then placed into packaging material, usually plastic or ceramic, with lead wires to permit mounting onto printed circuit boards. These systems provide excellent performance to meet the most demanding customer applications. Several unique mechanical design features, for which patents have been granted, provide excellent mechanical stability under high probing forces and across temperature ranges.

Back-End Products

Autoclaves and HAST (Highly Accelerated Stress Test) Equipment

We manufacture a range of autoclaves and HAST systems and specialized test fixtures. Autoclaves provide pressurized, saturated vapor (100% relative humidity) test environments for fast and easy monitoring of integrated circuit manufacturing processes. HAST equipment, which provides a pressurized high temperature environment with variable humidity, are used to determine the moisture resistance of plastic encapsulated devices. HAST provides a fast and cost-effective alternative to conventional non-pressurized temperature and humidity testing.

Burn-in Equipment and Boards

We manufacture burn-in systems, burn-in boards and burn-in board test systems. Burn-in equipment is used to subject semiconductor devices to elevated temperatures while testing them electrically to identify early product failures and to assure long-term reliability. Burn-in testing approximates, in a compressed time frame, the electrical and thermal conditions to which the device would be subjected during its normal life.

We manufacture the COBIS II burn-in system which offers state-of-the-art dynamic burn-in capabilities and a Windows-based operating system with full data logging and networking features. We also offer burn-in boards for our BISIC, COBIS and COBIS II burn-in systems and other brands of burn-in systems. Burn-in boards are used to mount devices during high temperature environmental stressing tests.

We have developed several new products to complement the burn-in processes, including semi-automatic (LUBIBM) and automatic burn-in board loaders and unloaders (LUBIB). These products are designed to perform precise, high-speed transfer of IC (Integrated Circuit) packages from the semiconductor holding tray to the burn-in board, or vice versa, while maintaining the integrity of the IC’s leads. Burn-in-board cleaning systems (CUBIB) are designed to perform wet or dry cleaning for burn-in boards and other modular boards.

We build Smart Burn-In (SBI) electrical equipment and System Level Test (SLT) equipment which are used in the few final stages of testing microprocessor devices. While providing integrated burn-in solutions, we present total burn-in automation solutions to improve products’ yield, reduce processing downtime and improve efficiency. In addition, we developed a cooling solution for high power heat dissipation semiconductor devices. This solution involves the cooling or maintaining of the temperature of high power semiconductor devices.

Component Centrifuges and Leak Detection Equipment

Component centrifuges and leak detection equipment are used to test the mechanical integrity of ceramic and other hermetically sealed semiconductor devices and electronic parts for high reliability and aerospace applications. Our centrifuges spin these devices and parts at specific acceleration rates, create gravitational forces (g’s) up to 30,000g’s, and thereby indicate any

mechanical weakness in the devices. Leak detection equipment is designed to detect leaks in hermetic packaging. The first stage of the test includes pressurizing the devices in a tracer gas for fine leaks or fluid for gross leaks. The bubble tester is used for gross leak detection. A visual bubble trail will indicate when a device is defective.

Distribution Activities

The Company’s Singapore subsidiary continues to develop its international distribution activities in Southeast Asia. In addition to marketing our own proprietary products, this subsidiary distributes complementary products from other manufacturers based in the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries. The products sold include environmental chambers, shaker systems, handlers, interface systems, vibration systems, solderability testers and other manufactured products.

In recent years, many multinational companies in electronic manufacturing and semiconductor industries have set up production facilities in China, and this presented excellent opportunities for our testing equipment in China. We believe that requirements for auxiliary services such as after-sales installation, equipment services, and spare parts will be natural add-ons to our overall business.

During fiscal 2007, our Singapore distribution operation participated in the Componex India Fair and demonstrated our range of connectors, infrared and resistive touch-screen panels

Revenue from distribution activities represented approximately 4%, 7% and 12% of net sales for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Product Research and Development

The research and development costs in our U.S. operation remained consistent compared to last fiscal year. The Company incurred research and development costs of $69 in fiscal 2007, $70 in fiscal 2006, and $93 in fiscal 2005.

Research and development efforts for our U.S. operation will consist of minor product improvements. It is anticipated that the centrifuge will be converted to a Programmed Logical Controlled system and the ARTIC chiller units will be evaluated for upgrades that are in line with the latest heat removal and pump technology.

Marketing, Distribution and Services

We market our products and services worldwide, directly and through independent sales representatives. We have approximately nine independent sales representatives operating in the United States and another seventeen in various foreign countries. Of the twenty-six sales representatives, seven are representing the distribution segment and nineteen are representing the testing segment and the manufacturing segment. Trio-Tech’s United States marketing efforts are coordinated from its California location. Southeast Asia marketing efforts are assigned to the Company’s subsidiaries located in Singapore. We advertise our products in trade journals and participate in trade shows.

Independent testing laboratories, users, assemblers and manufacturers of semiconductor devices, including many large, well-known corporations, purchase our products and services. These customers depend on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing semiconductor devices. Our ability to maintain close, satisfactory relationships with our customers is essential to our stability and growth. However, because of a high concentration of customers, the loss, reduction, or delay of orders placed by our significant customers, or delays in collecting accounts receivable from our significant customers, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial positions

In fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005, sales of equipment and services to our three largest customers (Advanced Micro Devices, Freescale Semiconductor and Catalyst Semiconductor) accounted for approximately 80%, 75% and 74%, respectively, of our total net revenue. During fiscal 2007, we had sales of $27,895 (60%), $6,923 (15%) and $2,493 (5%) to Advanced Micro Devices, Freescale Semiconductor and Catalyst Semiconductor, respectively. During fiscal 2006, we had sales of $14,490 (50%), $4,787 (16%) and $2,517 (9%) to Advanced Micro Devices, Freescale Semiconductor and Catalyst Semiconductor, respectively. During fiscal 2005, we had sales of $9,054 (36%), $6,805 (27%) and $2,713 (11%) to Advanced Micro Devices, Freescale Semiconductor and Catalyst Semiconductor, respectively (see information presented in Note 14-Concentration of customers). Although the three customers mentioned above are U.S. companies, the revenue generated from them was from their facilities located outside of the U.S. The majority of our sales and services in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 were to customers outside of the United States. See information presented in Note 19 — Business Segments, of our financial statements included in this Form 10-K, which note is incorporated by reference, for further financial information about geographic areas.

Backlog

The following table sets forth the Company’s backlog at the dates indicated (amounts in thousands):

		June 30,				June 30,
		2007				2006
Manufacturing backlog		$	6,275			$	3,729
Testing service backlog			6,452				12,030
Distribution backlog			102				535
		$	12,829			$	16,294

Based upon our past experience, we do not anticipate any significant cancellations or renegotiation of sales. If there is any cancellation of a confirmed purchase order, the customer is required to reimburse us for all costs that were incurred, because the purchase orders for manufacturing, testing and distribution businesses generally require delivery within 12 months from the date of the purchase order, and certain costs would be incurred before the delivery. We do not anticipate any difficulties in meeting delivery schedules.

Materials and Supplies

Our products are designed by our engineers and are assembled and tested at our facilities in California, China and Singapore. We purchase all parts and certain components from outside vendors for assembly purposes. We have no written contracts with any of our key suppliers. As these parts and components are available from a variety of sources, we believe that the loss of any one of our suppliers would not have a material adverse effect on our result of operations taken as a whole.

Competition

There are numerous testing laboratories in the areas where we operate that perform a range of testing services similar to those offered by us. However, recent severe competition in the South Asia testing and burn-in services industry has reduced the total number of our competitors. As we have sold and will continue to sell our products to competing laboratories, and other test products are available from many other manufacturers, our competitors are able to offer the same testing capabilities. The relevant testing equipment is also available to semiconductor manufacturers and users who might otherwise use third party testing laboratories, including us, to perform testing. The existence of competing laboratories and the purchase of testing equipment by semiconductor manufacturers and users are potential threats to our future testing services revenue and earnings. Although these laboratories and new competitors may challenge us at any time, we believe that other factors, including reputation, long service history and strong customer relationships, are more important than pricing factor in determining our position on the market.

The distribution segment sells a wide range of equipment to be used for testing products. We believe that the equipment, components trading and equipment servicing markets are key growth areas in Southeast Asia and hence have focused our marketing efforts on Asia. As the semiconductor equipment industry is highly competitive, the distribution operation faces stiff price competition if the equipment is sold piecemeal. Thus, “add value” has been a key phrase in our sales mission for the past several years. We believe that “add value” will continue to dominate as the key focal point as we offer integrated solutions which draw on the strengths of our technical specialists who have undergone intensive training with our vendors. Equipment is brought into Singapore from various vendors, and depending on customers’ specific requirements, is tested and system integrated before distribution, delivery and installation.

The demand for electronic components in fiscal 2007 was relatively strong in Southeast Asia, driven by a greater demand in high-end personal computers, notebooks and server chips. Many Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) customers have been outsourcing for connectors and specialized sockets. However, as our target customers are mainly multinational contract manufacturers with a worldwide database of suppliers, the most commonly used components became extremely price competitive. The components division of our distribution segment has been in competition on the market with various distribution methods including direct online ordering systems put in place by vendors for the products they are distributing. However, we do not believe that such online competition is a major competitive factor to our business, as we offer good credit facilities and maintain excellent business relationships with our long-term customers.

The semiconductor equipment manufacturing industry is highly competitive and most of our competitors for such equipment are located in Southeast Asia. Some of our electronic device manufacturing customers in Southeast Asia increased their capital equipment in order to meet the increase in production capacity for electronic products. There is no assurance that competition will not increase or that our technological advantages may not be reduced or lost as a result of technological advances by competitors or changes in semiconductor processing technology.

We believe that the principal competitive factors in the manufacturing industry include product performance, reliability, service and technical support, product improvements, price, established relationships with customers and product familiarity. We make every effort to compete favorably with respect to each of these factors. Although we have competitors for our various products, we believe that our products compete favorably with respect to each of the above factors. We have been in business for more than 49 years and have operation facilities mostly located in Southeast Asia. We believe that those factors combined have helped us to establish long-term relationships with customers and will allow us to continue doing business with our existing customers upon their relocation to other regions where we have a local presence or are able to reach.

Patents

The manufacturing segment holds a United States patent granted in 1994 on certain aspects of our Artic temperature test systems. In 2001, we registered a new United States patent (for 20 years) for several aspects of our new range of Artic Temperature Controlled Chucks. Although we believe that these patents are an integral part of our manufacturing segment, the capitalized cost of the patents was written off in fiscal 2002 because of the impairment assessed by our management. In fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007 we did not register any patents within the U.S.

It is typical in the semiconductor industry to receive notices from time to time alleging infringement of patents or other intellectual property rights of others. We do not believe that we infringe the intellectual property rights of any others. However, should any claims be brought against us, the cost of litigating such claims and any damages could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Employees

As of June 30, 2007 we had approximately 10 employees in the United States and 648 in Southeast Asia for a total of approximately 658 employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. As of June 30, 2007, there were approximately 472 employees in the testing segment, 128 employees in the manufacturing segment, 56 employees in the distribution segment and 2 in the corporate office.

ITEM 1A — RISK FACTORS

The following are certain risk factors that could impact our business, financial results and results of operations. Investing in our common stock involves risks, including those described below. These risk factors, among others, should be considered by prospective and current investors in our common stock below before making or evaluating an investment in our securities. These risk factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected herein. If the risks we face, including those listed below, actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively impacted, and the trading price of our common stock could decline, which could cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

Our operating results are affected by a variety of factors

Our operating results are affected by a wide variety of factors that could materially affect revenue and profitability or lead to significant variability of quarterly or annual operating results. These factors include, among others, components relating to:

	•		economic and market conditions in the semiconductor industry;
	•		market acceptance of our products and services;
	•		changes in technology in the semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for our products and services;
	•		changes in testing processes;
	•		the impact of competition;
	•		the lack of long-term purchase or supply agreements with customers and vendors;
	•		changes in military or commercial testing specifications, which could affect the market for our products and services;
	•		difficulties in profitably integrating acquired businesses, if any, into the Company;
	•		the loss of key personnel or the shortage of available skilled employees;
	•		international political or economic events;
	•		currency fluctuations; and
	•		other technological, economic, financial and regulatory factors beyond our control.

Unfavorable changes in these or other factors could materially and adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. We may not be able to generate revenue growth, and any revenue growth that is achieved may not be sustained. Our business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially adversely affected if operating expenses increased and were not subsequently followed by increased revenues.

Semiconductor industry cycles affect our business

Our business depends primarily upon the capital expenditures of semiconductor manufacturers, assemblers and other testing companies worldwide. These industries in turn depend on the current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits and products utilizing semiconductor devices. The global semiconductor industry generally, and the semiconductor testing equipment industry in particular, are volatile and cyclical, with periodic capacity shortages and excess capacity. In periods of excess capacity, the industry sharply cuts its purchases of capital equipment, including our distributed products, and reduces testing volumes, including our testing services. Excess capacity also causes downward pressure on the selling prices of our products and services.

Our operating results have been adversely affected by past downturns and slowdowns. There is no assurance that there will not be downturns or slowdowns in the future that may adversely affect our financial condition or operating results. In addition, if one or more of our primary customers reduces its or their purchases or use of our products or testing services, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected. We anticipate that we will continue to be primarily dependent on the semiconductor industry for the foreseeable future.

Rapid technological changes may make our products obsolete or result in decreased prices or increased expenses

Technology changes rapidly in the semiconductor industry and may make our services or products obsolete. Advances in technology may lead to significant price erosion for products which we test with our older testing technologies. Our success will depend in part on our ability to develop and offer more advanced testing technologies and processes in the future, to anticipate both future demand and the technology to supply that demand, to enhance our current products and services, to provide those products and services at competitive prices on a timely and cost-effective basis and to achieve market acceptance of those products and services. To accomplish these goals, we may be required to incur significant engineering expenses. As new products or services are introduced, we may experience warranty claims or product returns. We may not be able to accomplish these goals correctly or timely enough. If we fail in our efforts, our products and services may become less competitive or obsolete.

Our dependence on international sales involves significant risk

Sales and services to customers outside the United States accounted for approximately 86%, 91% and 92% of our sales for fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Approximately 98% 90% and 91% of our net revenues in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, were generated from business in Southeast Asia. We expect that our non-U.S. sales and services will continue to generate the majority of our future revenues. Testing services in Southeast Asia were performed primarily for American companies, and to a lesser extent German companies, selling products and doing business in those regions. International business operations may be adversely affected by many factors, including fluctuations in exchange rates, imposition of government controls, trade restrictions, political, economic and business events and social and cultural differences.

We may incur losses due to foreign currency fluctuations

Significant portions of our revenue are denominated in Singapore and Euro dollars, Malaysian ringgit, Thai baht and other currencies. Consequently, a portion of our costs, revenue and operating margins may be affected by fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies. We are also affected by fluctuations in exchange rates because our reporting currency is the US dollar whereas the functional currencies in our Southeast Asia operations are non-U.S. dollars. Foreign currency translation adjustments resulted in an increase of $911 to shareholder’s equity for fiscal 2007, a decrease of $190 to shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2006, and an increase of $25 to shareholders’ equity for fiscal 2005.

We try to reduce our risk of foreign currency fluctuations by purchasing certain equipment and supplies in U.S. dollars and seeking payment, when possible, in U.S. dollars. However, we may not be successful in our attempts to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. Those fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results.

We do not rely on patents to protect our products or technology

We hold U.S. patents relating to our pressurization humidity testing equipment and certain aspects of our Artic temperature test systems. Additionally, in fiscal 2001, we were granted patents for certain aspects of our new range of Artic temperature controlled chucks. However, although we believe our patents are integral to the business of our manufacturing segment, generally we do not rely on patent or trade secret protection for our products or technology. Competitors may develop technologies similar to or more advanced than ours. We cannot assure that our current or future products will not be copied or will not infringe on the patents of others. Moreover, the cost of litigation of any claim or damages resulting from infringement of patents or other intellectual property could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Intense competition can adversely affect our operating results

The semiconductor equipment and testing industries are intensely competitive. Significant competitive factors include price, technical capabilities, quality, automation, reliability, product availability and customer service. We face competition from established and potential new competitors, many of whom have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than our resources. New products or testing facilities offered by our competitors could cause a decline in our revenue or a loss of market acceptance of our existing products and services. Increased competitive pressure could also lead to intensified price-based competition. Price-based competition may result in lower prices, adversely affecting our operating results.

Loss, reduction or delay of orders from significant customers could adversely affect our financial condition

The semiconductor manufacturing industry is highly concentrated, with a relatively small number of large manufacturers and assemblers accounting for a substantial portion of our revenue from product sales and testing revenue. Our experience has been that sales to particular customers may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. In fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005, sales of equipment and services to our three largest customers accounted for approximately 80%, 75% and 74%, respectively, of our total net revenue. This applies in particular to our new testing operation in Malaysia, which currently has only one major customer. In the event that the Company loses this customer, all the capital purchases to meet this customer’s requirements will be converted to support other products. Our ability to maintain close, satisfactory relationships with our customers is essential to our stability and growth. The loss of or reduction or delay in orders from our significant customers, or delays in collecting accounts receivable from our significant customers, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our testing products and services may be adversely affected by our sales of testing equipment.

If our testing equipment is purchased by semiconductor manufacturers and assemblers, it may reduce the likelihood that they will make further purchases of such equipment or use our laboratories for testing services. Although military or other specifications require certain testing to be done by independent laboratories, over time other current customers may have less need of our testing services. We believe that there is a growing trend toward outsourcing of the integrated circuit test process. As a result, we anticipate continued growth in the test laboratory business. However, there is no assurance that this trend will continue. In an attempt to diversify our sales mix, we may seek to develop and introduce new or advanced products, and to acquire other companies in the semiconductor equipment manufacturing business.

Acquisition and integration of new businesses could disrupt our ongoing business, distract management and employees, increase our expenses or adversely affect our business

A portion of any future growth may be accomplished through the acquisition of other entities. The success of those acquisitions will depend, in part, on our ability to integrate the acquired personnel, operations, products, services and technologies into our organization, to retain and motivate key personnel of the acquired entities and to retain the customers of those entities. We may not be able to identify suitable acquisition opportunities, obtain financing on acceptable terms to bring the acquisition to fruition or to integrate such personnel, operations, products or services. The process of identifying and closing acquisition opportunities and integrating acquisitions into our operations may distract our management and employees, disrupt our ongoing business, increase our expenses and materially and adversely affect our operations. We may also be subject to certain other risks if we acquire other entities, such as the assumption of additional liabilities. We may issue additional equity securities or incur debt to pay for future acquisitions.

We do not have contracts with key suppliers

We have no written contracts with any of our suppliers. Our suppliers may terminate their relationships with us at any time without notice. There can be no assurance that we will be able to find satisfactory replacement suppliers or that new suppliers will not be more expensive than the current suppliers if any of our suppliers were to terminate their relationship with us.

We are highly dependent on key personnel

Our success has depended, and to a large extent will depend, on the continued services of S.W. Yong, our Chief Executive Officer and President, Victor H. M. Ting, our Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, our other key senior executives, and engineering, marketing, sales, production and other personnel. We do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Yong or Mr. Ting, but we are the beneficiary of “key man” life insurance in the amount of $6 million on Mr. Yong and $2 million on Mr.

Ting. The loss of these key personnel, who would be difficult to replace, could harm our business and operating results. Competition for management in our industry is intense and we may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining the executive management and other key personnel that we require.

Our management has significant influence over corporate decisions

Currently our officers and directors and their affiliates beneficially own approximately 23.63% of the outstanding shares of common stock, including options held by them that are exercisable within 60 days of the date of filing of this 10-K. As a result, they may be able to significantly influence matters requiring approval of the shareholders, including the election of directors, and may be able to delay or prevent a change in control of the Company.

We may not pay cash dividends in the future

Although we declared a cash dividend of ten cents (U.S. 10¢) per share payable to the shareholders of record on December 15, 2006 and a cash dividend of fifty cents (U.S. 50¢) per share payable to the shareholders of record on January 10, 2006, we may not pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the future. We anticipate that future earnings, if any, will be retained for use in the business or for other corporate purposes. Additionally, California law prohibits the payment of dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings or cannot meet certain asset to liability ratios.

The market price for our common stock is subject to fluctuation

The trading price of our common stock has from time to time fluctuated widely. The trading price may similarly fluctuate in the future in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results, announcements of innovations or new products by us or our competitors, general conditions in the semiconductor industry and other events or factors. In addition, in recent years, broad stock market indices in general, and the securities of technology companies in particular, have experienced substantial price fluctuations on a daily basis. Fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock may adversely affect our liquidity.

Our results may be affected by interest rate fluctuations

We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. Our investment portfolio is generally comprised of cash deposits. Our policy is to place these investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and could decline in value if interest rates fluctuate, and thus subject us to market risk due to those fluctuations. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of our investment portfolio, we do not expect any material loss with respect to our investment portfolio, though no assurances can be given that material losses will not occur.

The interest rates on our loans and lines of credit range from 5.25% to 7.50% per annum. As of June 30, 2007, the outstanding aggregate principal balance on these loans and lines of credit was approximately $675. These interest rates are subject to change and we cannot predict an increase or decrease in rates, if any. However, an increase in interest rates could have an adverse effect on our financial results.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

As of the date of filing of this Form 10-K, we believe that we are utilizing approximately 90.2% of our fixed property capacity. We also believe that our existing facilities are under-utilized and are adequate and suitable to cover any sudden increase in our needs in the foreseeable future.

The following table presents the relevant information regarding the location and general character of our principal manufacturing and testing facilities:

								Owned (O)
				Approx.				or Leased (L)
				Sq. Ft.				& Expiration
Location		Principal Use/Segment		Occupied				Date
14731 Califa Street		Headquarters/			10,000			(L) Jan. 2008
Van Nuys, CA 9l411		Testing/Manufacturing
1004, Toa Payoh North, Singapore
HEX 07-01/07,		Testing			6,864			(L) Sept. 2009
HEX 07-01/07, (ancillary site)		Testing			2,339			(L) Sept. 2009
HEX 03-01/03,		Testing/Manufacturing			2,959			(L) Sept. 2009
HEX 03-16,		Testing			976			(L) Sept. 2009
HEX 01-08/15,		Testing/Manufacturing			6,864			(L) Jan. 2009
HEX 01-08/15, (ancillary site)		Testing/Manufacturing			1,629			(L) Jan. 2009
HEX 01-16/17,		Testing			1,983			(L) Jan. 2009
HEX 02-08/10,		Testing			2,959			(L) Aug. 2008
HEX 02-11/15,		Testing			3,905			(L) Apr. 2008
HEX 04-17,		Testing			1,006			(L) May. 2010
HEX 04-14/16,		Testing			2,929			(L) May. 2010
HEX 03-08/10,		Testing			2,959			(L) May. 2010
HEX 03-06/07		Testing/Manufacturing			1,953			(L) Jan. 2009
HEX 03-06/07 (ancillary site)		Testing/Manufacturing			101			(L) Jan. 2009
HEX 04-05/07		Manufacturing			2,929			(L) May. 2009
HEX 04-08/09/10		Manufacturing			2,959			(L) Dec. 2009
1008, Toa Payoh North, Singapore
HEX 03-01/06,		Testing			7,345			(L) Feb. 2009
HEX 03-09/17,		Logistics/Universal (FE)			6,099			(L) Jan. 2009
HEX 03-09/17, (ancillary site)		Logistics/Universal (FE)			70			(L) Jan. 2009
HEX 07-17/18,		Testing			4,315			(L) Nov. 2009
HEX 07-17/18, (ancillary site)		Testing			25			(L) Nov. 2009
HEX 07-01,		Testing			3,466			(L) Jan. 2010
HEX 02-17		Universal (FE)			832			(L) Jun. 2010
HEX 02-18		Testing			3,466			(L) Nov. 2009
HEX 02-15/16		Universal (FE)			1,400			(L) Jul. 2007*1
HEX 01-09/11		Universal (FE)			2,202			(L) Nov. 2009
HEX 01-15/16		Universal (FE)			1,400			(L) Oct. 2008
HEX 03-07/08		Testing			1,765			(L) Nov. 2007*1
HEX 03-07/08, (ancillary site)		Testing			144			(L) Nov. 2007*1
HEX 01-08		Transformer Room			603			(L) Jun. 2009
Hex 02-03/04/05/06		Testing			3,047			(L) Nov. 2009

Plot 1A, Phase 1

Subleased

42,013

(O) *2

Bayan Lepas Free Trade Zone 11900 Penang

Lot No. B7, Kawasan MIEL

Vacant

24,142

(O) *3

Batang Kali, Phase II, 43300 Batang Kali Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

Lot No. 11A, Jalan SS8/2,

Testing

19,334

(L) Jul. 2007*1

Sungai Way Free Industrial Zone, 47300 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

Owned (O)

Approx.

or Leased (L)

Sq. Ft.

& Expiration

Location

Principal Use/Segment

Occupied

Date

Lot No. 4, Kawasan MIEL

Testing

14,432

(L) Nov. 2007*1*2

Sungai Way Baru Free Industrial Zone, Phase III, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia

327, Chalongkrung Road,

Testing

34,432

(O

)

Lamplathew, Lat Krabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand

No. 5, Xing Han Street, Block A

Testing

9,957

(L) Oct. 2008

#04-13/16, Suzhou Industrial Park China 215021 China 215021

No. 389 Gang Ao Road Factory No. 5

Testing

6,620

(L) Sept. 2007*1

Level 5 (East) Waigaoqiao Free Trade Zone, Pudong 200131 Shanghai, China Zone, Pudong 200131 Shanghai, China

No. 5, Xing Han Street, Block A

Testing

3,606

(L) Oct. 2008

#04-11/12, Suzhou Industrial Park China 215021

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is, from time to time, the subject of litigation claims and assessments arising out of matters occurring in its normal business operations. In the opinion of management, resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

There are no material proceedings to which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any beneficial owner of more than five percent of the Company’s common stock, or any associate of such person is a party that is adverse to the Company or its properties.

There was no litigation relating to environmental action which arose from our operations.

ITEM 4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

PART II

ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock is traded on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “TRT.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low sales prices of our common stock as quoted by AMEX:

Quarter Ended		High				Low
Fiscal 2006
September 30, 2005		$	4.30			$	3.59
December 31, 2005		$	6.00			$	4.28
March 31, 2006		$	7.15			$	5.08
June 30, 2006		$	7.55			$	6.00
Fiscal 2007
September 30, 2006		$	11.96			$	5.95
December 31, 2006		$	15.40			$	10.45
March 31, 2007		$	17.15			$	10.68
June 30, 2007		$	21.93			$	14.25

Stockholders

As of September 1, 2007, there were 3,227,992 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, and the Company had approximately 169 record holders of the Common Stock.

Dividend Policy

On December 2, 2005, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of fifty cents ($0.50) per share payable to the shareholders of record on January 10, 2006. The total number of shares issued and outstanding as of January 10, 2006 was 3,215,532 and the total amount of the cash dividends paid on January 25, 2006 was approximately $1,608. The source of cash was from the proceeds from disposition of the property located in Dublin, Ireland.

On December 5, 2006, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of ten cents ($0.10) per share payable to the shareholders of record on December 15, 2006. The total number of shares issued and outstanding as of December 15, 2006 was 3,225,242 and the total amount of the cash dividends paid on January 15, 2007 was approximately $323.

The determination as to whether to pay any future cash dividends will depend upon our earnings and financial position at that time and other factors as the Board of Directors may deem appropriate. California law prohibits the payment of dividends if a corporation does not have sufficient retained earnings or cannot meet certain asset to liability ratios. It is not anticipated that dividends will be paid to holders of common stock in the foreseeable future.

Equity Compensation Plan

On December 2, 2005, the Board of Directors terminated the 1998 Stock Option Plan and Directors’ Stock Option Plan due to the cost of such compensation exceeding the benefits. There were no stock options granted during fiscal year 2007. The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2007, certain information regarding equity compensation plans of the Company:

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

Number of securities

remaining available for

Number of

future issuance under

securities to be

equity compensation

issued upon

Weighted average

plans (excluding

exercise of

exercise price of

securities reflected in

outstanding options

outstanding options

column (a))

Plan Category

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders

(1) Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan

13,050

$

3.03

—

(2) Directors’ Stock Option Plan

—

—

—

Options granted outside of the above plans

—

—

—

Total

13,050

$

$3.03

—

Stock Performance Graph

The graph below compares our cumulative total shareholder return of the Common Stock of the Company with that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the AMEX Composite Index for the five-year period ending June 30, 2007. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on June 30, 2002, in the AMEX Composite Index, and in the S&P 500 Index. The graph also assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any. The historical stock performance shown on the graph below should not be considered indicative of future shareholder returns, and we will not make or endorse any predications of future shareholder returns.

$100 invested on 06/30/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ends June 30.

		6/02				6/03				6/04				6/05				6/06				6/07
TRIO TECH INTL		$	100			$	101			$	180			$	157			$	253			$	826
S & P 500		$	100			$	108			$	126			$	132			$	141			$	167
AMEX		$	100			$	109			$	140			$	173			$	216			$	264

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(In thousands, except per share DATA)

		June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
		2007				2006				2005				2004				2003
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Net sales		$	46,750			$	29,099	(1)		$	25,061	(2)		$	18,661			$	20,922
Income (loss) from Operations			4,197				487				359				56				(101	)
Net Income from Continuing Operations			3,308				597				216				162				51
Net Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations (3)			—				8,459				5				58				(132	)
Total Net income (loss)			3,308				9,056				221				220				(81	)
Basic Earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing Operations			1.03				0.19				0.07				0.06				0.02
Discontinued Operations			0.00				2.72				0.00				0.01				(0.05	)
Total Net Income (loss)			1.03				2.91				0.07				0.07				(0.03	)
Diluted Earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing Operations			1.02				0.19				0.07				0.05				0.02
Discontinued Operations			0.00				2.71				0.00				0.02				(0.05	)
Total Net Income (loss)			1.02				2.90				0.07				0.07				(0.03	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic			3,225				3,115				2,966				2,937				2,928
Diluted			3,235				3,128				3,031				2,995				2,928
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Current assets		$	24,673			$	21,831			$	10,645			$	12,798			$	11,493
Current liabilities			8,228				8,536				5,836				5,624				5,050
Working capital			16,445				13,295				4,809				7,174				6,443
Total assets			32,788				29,384				18,345				18,000				16,711
Long-term debt and capital leases			294				874				744				793				836
Shareholders’ equity		$	21,434			$	17,392			$	9,297			$	9,024			$	8,590
Cash dividend paid per share		$	0.10			$	0.50			$	—			$	—			$	—

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES AND SHARE AMOUNTS)

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our disclaimer on “Forward-Looking Statements,” “Item 1. Business,” “Item 1A. Risk Factors,” “Item 6. Selected Financial Data” and Consolidated Financial Statements, the notes to those statements and other financial information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

Trio-Tech International operates in three distinct segments: distribution, manufacturing and testing. We provide third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through our laboratories in Southeast Asia. At or from our facilities in California and Southeast Asia, we also design, manufacture and market equipment and systems to be used in the testing and production of semiconductors, and distribute semiconductor processing and testing equipment manufactured by other vendors

Geographically, we operate in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and China. Our major operation activities are conducted in our Singapore location. Our customers are mainly concentrated in Southeast Asia and they are either semiconductor chip manufacturers or testing facilities that purchase our testing equipment.

In August 2005, we established a winding-down plan to close the testing operation in Dublin, Ireland. In November 2005, we completed the sale of property located in Dublin, Ireland and recorded a gain on the sale of property of $8,909. As a result, this discontinued operation reported income of $8,459, which consisted of the gain from the sale of property of $8,909 offset by an operating loss from the discontinued operation of $450. For basis of comparison, the financial statements related to the discontinued operation are now presented separately in this report under discontinued operations.

In the management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, for basis of comparison, the amounts used in comparison have been reclassified to exclude the amounts from discontinued operations, which have been discussed as a separate line item listed on the statements of income.

In January 2006, we completed the acquisition of a burn-in testing division in Shanghai. Beginning on January 3, 2006, the operating results of this subsidiary were included in the consolidated financial statement of the Company. In June 2007, we established a subsidiary in Chonqing, China. The formation of this entity was not considered significant to the Company. There were no operation activities in this subsidiary in fiscal year 2007.

On March 8, 2007, we hired Burnham Hill Partners, a division of Pali Capital, Inc in the United States to act as (i) our exclusive financial advisor in connection with one or more potential strategic transactions currently being explored by the Company, which may include an acquisition, joint venture, partnership, strategic alliance, merger and/or sale involving the Company and (ii) our placement agent or underwriter in connection with the raising of debt or equity capital. We believe that the agreement that we made with Burnham Hill Partners is not a material definitive agreement. One of our directors, Jason Adelman, is a partner of Burnham Hill Partners. Burnham Hill Partners proposed a fee arrangement that was consistent with industry standards for transactions of that nature, and an agreement which would expire 12 months from the date into which it was entered. The agreement was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company in good faith by a vote sufficient without counting the vote of Mr. Adelman and, in the judgment of the Board of Directors, was just and reasonable at the time the agreement was so approved.

Fiscal 2007 Highlights

	•		Total revenue increased by $17,651, or 60.7%, from $29,099 for fiscal 2006 to $46,750.
	•		Manufacturing segment revenues increased by $11,612, or 93.3%, from $12,444 for fiscal 2006 to $24,056.
	•		Testing segment revenue increased by $6,428, or 44.5%, to $20,883, compared to $14,455 for fiscal 2006.
	•		Income from continuing operations increased by $2,711 to $3,308, compared to $597 for fiscal 2006.
	•		Gross profit margins decreased slightly by 1.4% to 25.9% for fiscal 2007, compared with gross profit margins of 27.3% for fiscal year 2006.
	•		General and administrative expenses were 14.0% of revenue, representing a decrease from 21.7% of revenue for fiscal 2006.
	•		Selling expenses were 2.3% of revenue, decreased from 3.3% of revenue for fiscal year 2006.
	•		Total assets increased 11.6% to $32,788 as compared to $29,384 for fiscal 2006.
	•		Total liabilities decreased 9.2% to $8,895 as compared to $9,796 for fiscal 2006.
	•		Shareholders’ equity increased 23.2% to $21,434 as compared to $17,392 for fiscal 2006.

	•		We distributed a cash dividend of $0.10 per share on January 15, 2007, totaling $323 distributed.
	•		We expanded our China operation in Suzhou and commenced testing services in the second quarter of fiscal 2007.
	•		In June 2007, we established a subsidiary in Chonqing, China with a registered capital of $2,600.

General Financial Information

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, total assets increased by $3,404 from $29,384 at June 30, 2006 to $32,788 at June 30, 2007. The increase was in cash, property, plant and equipment and other assets, but offset with a decrease primarily in trade accounts receivables and inventories.

Cash and short-term deposits at June 30, 2007 totaled $14,950, an increase of $4,560, or 43.9%, compared to a total of $10,390 at June 30, 2006. The increase in cash and short-term deposits was mainly the result of higher revenue generated in fiscal year 2007. Revenue in fiscal 2007 increased 60.7% to $46,750 as compared to $29,099 for fiscal 2006 due to an increase in sales from the manufacturing and testing segments. The increase in cash was offset by a capital expenditure in cash of $2,812. The capital expenditure in fiscal 2007 was primarily in property, plant and equipment. During fiscal 2006, proceeds of $8,401 were received from the sale of property in Dublin, Ireland. There were no comparable proceeds from the disposal of equipment or property in fiscal 2007.

Property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2007 were $7,458, an increase of $385, or 5.4%, compared to $7,073 at June 30, 2006. Capital expenditures for fiscal 2007 were $2,864 ($2,812 in cash, and $52 in capital lease), an increase of $1,186 or 70.7%, compared to $1,678 for fiscal 2006. The increase in capital expenditure was mainly due to purchases of machinery and equipment during fiscal 2007 by each of the Singapore testing operations and China testing operations in order to meet the specifications from our customers.

Other assets at June 30, 2007 increased by $276 to $445 compared to $169 at June 30, 2006. The increase in other assets was due to an increase of $154 for a down payment of fixed assets in the Singapore and Malaysia operations and an increase of $122 in deposits for rent and utilities in the China operations.

Accounts receivables at June 30, 2007 were $7,410 a decrease of $1,108 or 13.0%, compared to $8,518 at June 30, 2006. The decrease was attributable mainly to a decrease in turn over days of accounts receivable and a decrease in sales in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the same period of fiscal 2006. The total sales from all the segments for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 were $9,194, a decrease of $306 or 3.2%, compared to total sales of $9,500 in the same period for fiscal 2006. The turnover of accounts receivables was 62 days for fiscal 2007, a decrease of 18 days or 22.5%, compared to 80 days for fiscal 2006. The decrease in turn over days of accounts receivable was primarily due to improvement in collection efforts on the part of the staff in the Singapore operations.

Inventory at June 30, 2007 was $1,946, a decrease of $501, or 20.5%, compared to $2,447 at June 30, 2006. The decrease was due mainly to the sales of finished goods from our manufacturing segment and an increase in the provision for obsolete inventory. The turnover of inventory improved by 12 days, or 34.3%, from 35 days at the end of fiscal 2006 to 23 days at the end of fiscal 2007 due to an increase in the cost of goods sold, although the average inventory throughout the year remained consistent compared to fiscal 2006.

Total liabilities at June 30, 2007 were $8,895, a decrease of $901, or 9.2%, compared to $9,796 at June 30, 2006. The decrease in liabilities was mainly due to the decrease in accounts payable, notes payable and lines of credit, but offset by the increase in accrued expenses and income tax payable.

Accounts payable decreased by $1,544 from $3,809 at June 30, 2006 to $2,265 at June 30, 2007. The decrease in accounts payable was a result of the decrease in material purchases due to a lower backlog in the Singapore distribution segment as the result of a lower demand for back-end products, such as Vibration equipment, chambers and wafer fabricators. Notes payable decreased by $825 and lines of credit decreased by $116 as a result of the repayments made by our Singapore subsidiaries in the normal course of business from cash flows from operations.

Accrued expenses increased by $1,309 from $3,045 at June 30, 2006 to $4,354 at June 30, 2007. The increase in accrued expenses was mainly due to an increase in accrued payroll expenses as the result of an increase in headcount in the China operation located in Suzhou, and an increase in bonuses payable as a result of a strong operating performance in fiscal 2007.

Critical Accounting Estimates & Policies

The discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition presented in this section are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. During the preparation of the consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and judgments that

affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to sales, returns, pricing concessions, bad debts, inventories, investments, fixed assets, intangible assets, income taxes and other contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under current conditions. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

In response to the SEC’s Release No. 33-8040, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure about Critical Accounting Policy,” we have identified the most critical accounting policies upon which our financial status depends. We determine that those critical accounting policies are related to the inventory valuation, allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition, and income tax. These accounting policies are discussed in the relevant sections in this management’s discussion and analysis, including the Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements discussed below.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

During the normal course of business, we extend unsecured credit to our customers. Typically, credit terms require payment to be made between 30 to 60 days of the sales. We do not require collateral from our customers. We maintain our cash accounts at credit worthy financial institutions.

We regularly evaluate and monitor the creditworthiness of each customer on a case-by-case basis. We include any account balances that are determined to be uncollectible, along with a general reserve, in the overall allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the information available to management, we believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts was adequate as of June 30, 2007.

Inventory Valuation

Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value. Our industry is characterized by rapid technological change, short-term customer commitments and rapid changes in demand. We make provisions for estimated excess and obsolete inventory based on our regular reviews of inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of product demand and production requirements from our customers. We write down inventories for not saleable, excess or obsolete raw materials, works-in-process and finished goods by charging such write-downs to cost of sales. In addition to write-downs based on newly introduced parts, statistics and judgments are used for assessing provision of the remaining inventory based on salability and obsolescence.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue from sales of the Company’s products is recognized upon shipment or delivery, depending upon the terms of the sales order, provided that persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, title and risk of loss have transferred to the customer, the sales amount is fixed and determinable and collection of the revenue is reasonably assured. We allocate a portion of the invoice value to products sold and the remaining portion of invoice value to installation and training work in proportion to the fair value of products sold and installation and training work to be performed. The fair value determination of products sold and the installation and training work is also based on our specific historical experience of the relative fair values of the elements if there is no easily observable market price to be considered. A significant portion of the Company’s sales is generated by testing services. Revenue derived from testing service is recognized when testing services are rendered.

The Company reduces revenue based on estimates of future credits to be granted to customers. Credits are granted for reasons such as product returns due to quality issues, volume-based incentives, and other special pricing arrangements.

Income Tax

We recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequence attributable to the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date.

During the process of determining tax liabilities, we have to deal with uncertainties involved in the application of complex tax laws. Our foreign subsidiaries are subject to income taxes in the regions or counties where they operate. Because of the different income tax jurisdictions, net losses generated in the U.S. cannot be utilized to offset the taxable income generated in foreign countries. Therefore, we may incur certain income tax expenses in any fiscal year while the Company, on a consolidated basis, may report a loss before income taxes. Although we believe that our estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different from what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals.

We assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets can be recovered. If recovery is not likely, the provision for taxes must be increased by recording a reserve in the form of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets that are estimated not to be ultimately recoverable. In this process, certain relevant criteria are evaluated including the existence of deferred tax liabilities that can be used to absorb deferred tax assets, the taxable income that can be used to absorb net operating losses and credit carry-backs, and taxable income in future years. Our judgment regarding future profitability may change due to future market conditions, changes in U.S. or international tax laws and other factors. These changes, if any, may require material adjustments to these deferred tax assets and an accompanying reduction or increase in net income in the period when such determinations are made. For U.S. income tax purposes no provision has been made for U.S. taxes on undistributed earnings of overseas subsidiaries with which the Company intends to continue to reinvest.

In addition to the risks described above, the effective tax rate is based on current enacted tax law. Significant changes during the year in enacted tax law could affect these estimates.

Comparison of Operation Results

Comparison of Fiscal 2007 and 2006

The following table presents certain data from the consolidated statements of income as a percentage of net sales for fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006:

		Year End June 30,
		2007				2006
Net Sales			100.0	%			100.0	%
Cost of Sales			74.1	%			72.7	%
Gross Margin			25.9	%			27.3	%
Operating Expenses
General and administrative			14.0	%			21.7	%
Selling			2.3	%			3.3	%
Research and development			0.2	%			0.2	%
Impairment loss			0.4	%			0.2	%
Loss on disposal of PP&E			0.0	%			0.1	%
Total Operating Expenses			16.9	%			25.5	%
Income from operations			9.0	%			1.8	%

Overall Revenue

The overall revenue is composed of the revenues from the manufacturing, testing and distribution segments. The following table presents the components of the overall revenue realized in fiscal 2007 and 2006 in percentage format, respectively.

		Years Ended June 30,
		2007				2006
Revenues:
Manufacturing			51.46	%			42.77	%
Testing			44.67				49.67
Distribution			3.87				7.56
Total			100.00	%			100.00	%

Net sales for fiscal 2007 were $46,750, an increase of $17,651, or 60.66%, compared to $29,099 for fiscal 2006. The increase in net sales can be discussed within three segments.

As a percentage of the total revenue, the revenue generated by the manufacturing segment in fiscal 2007 accounted for 51.46% of total sales, representing an increase of 8.69%, compared to 42.77% in fiscal 2006. In terms of dollar amount, the revenue for fiscal 2007 was $24,056, reflecting an increase of $11,612, or 93.31%, compared to $12,444 for fiscal 2006. We believe that the

increase in revenue generated by the manufacturing segment was due to a greater demand from the personal computer market in Asia, which in turn led to a greater demand for our products. The demand for our burn-in systems appeared to increase concurrently with the demand for more microprocessor chips in Southeast Asia. The increase primarily resulted from an increase in demand from one of our major customers, which was a result of that customer’s growing share in the market for microprocessor chips. Due to the competitive environment in the manufacturing segment, we anticipate that we will continue to implement our cost reduction plan by outsourcing a portion of our manufacturing process to outside suppliers, such as electrical and mechanical fabrication houses, and seek competitively priced materials.

The backlog in the manufacturing segment increased by 68.28%, from $3,729 in fiscal 2006 to $6,275 in fiscal 2007, correlative to the increase in demand for more highs-speed microprocessor chips in Southeast Asia.

As a percentage of the total revenue, the revenue generated by the testing segment in fiscal 2007 accounted for 44.67% of total sales, a decrease of 5.0%, compared to 49.67% in fiscal 2006. In terms of dollar amount, the revenue for fiscal 2007 was $20,883, reflecting an increase of $6,428, or 44.47%, compared to $14,455 for fiscal 2006. The testing segment continued to show improvement in revenue compared to last fiscal year due to a hike in demand for testing services in Southeast Asia, which resulted from the strong economic growth and robust development in the electronics manufacturing industries in China. The increase in revenue generated by the testing segment was the result of an improvement in performance by our testing operations in Southeast Asia. Furthermore, our China operation in Suzhou started its testing operation in the second quarter of fiscal 2007, which contributed to this increase in testing revenue. Demand for testing services varies from time to time depending on changes taking place in the market and our customers’ forecasts. We anticipate that our customers will continue to request our services to perform “burn-in” on chips to be used in wireless handsets, automotive applications and wired communications, which chips are currently in high demand in their respective markets.

Backlog in the testing segment at June 30, 2007 was $6,452, a decrease of $5,578, or 46.37%, compared to $12,030 at June 30, 2007 due to a decrease in demand for testing services from one of our major customers in Singapore.

As a percentage of the total revenue, the revenue generated by the distribution segment in fiscal 2007 accounted for 3.87%, a decrease of 3.69%, compared to 7.56% in fiscal 2006. In terms of dollar amount, revenue for fiscal 2007 was $1,811, a decrease of $389, or 17.68%, compared to $2,200 for fiscal 2006. The decrease in revenue was mainly attributable to fewer bookings from customers resulting from what we believe is a saturation of equipment and electronic components in the current market. Product volume for the distribution segment depends on sales activities such as bookings, queries on products and backlog. Equipment and electronic component sales are very competitive, as the products are readily available in the market.

We continued to focus our marketing efforts on Asia, as we believe that the recovery of equipment sales in that region is improving more rapidly than sales within the U.S. Equipment sales in the U.S. continue to decline as we believe that many companies are still conservative in capital equipment spending. The distribution operation located in Singapore will focus on selling Wet Process Stations primarily to research institutions and local universities

The backlog in the distribution segment at June 30, 2007 was $102, reflecting a decrease of $433 or 80.94%, compared to the backlog of $535 at June 30, 2006 due to a lower demand for back-end products, such as Vibration equipment, chambers and wafer fabricator.

Overall Gross Margin

Overall gross margin, as a percentage of net sales, dropped by 1.4% from 27.3% for fiscal 2006 to 25.9% for fiscal 2007. The lower margin was due primarily to the fact that sales in terms of dollar amount from the manufacturing segment increased faster than the increase in sales in terms of dollar amount from the testing segment in fiscal 2007. This led to the fact that the manufacturing segment accounted for 51.46% of total sales and the testing segment accounted for 44.67% while the gross margin in the manufacturing segment was lower than the gross margin in the testing segment. In addition, the gross margin in the manufacturing segment decreased due to an increase in sales of low margin products, which was offset by the improvement in gross margin in the testing and distribution segments. In terms of dollar amount, gross margin for fiscal 2007 was $12,093, an increase of $4,162, or 52.5%, compared to $7,931 for fiscal 2006, as a result of better sales performances by the manufacturing and testing segments.

Gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the manufacturing segment was decreased by 3.1%, from 19.2% in fiscal 2006 to 16.1% in fiscal 2007. The decrease in the gross margin was due to an increase in sales of low margin burn-in systems pass-through products in fiscal 2007 compared with fiscal 2006. Neither the increase in the absolute dollar amount of sales of burn-in boards and burn-in systems nor the increase in the quantity of burn-in systems sold in fiscal 2007 was sufficient to maintain or increase the gross margin in the manufacturing segment due to the decrease in sales prices for burn-in boards and burn-in systems as a result of strong competition in the market place. However, the Company currently intends to continue manufacturing low-margin burn-in systems and boards in order to maintain market share of these products with its current customers. In absolute amount, gross profits from the manufacturing segment in fiscal 2007 was $3,876, an increase of $1,492, or 62.6%, compared to $2,384 in fiscal 2006 as the result of an increase in revenue, as previously discussed.

Gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the testing segment was improved by 2.3%, from 35.2% in fiscal 2006 to 37.5% in fiscal 2007. In terms of dollar amount, gross margin in the testing segment in fiscal 2007 was $7,835, an increase of $2,743, or 53.9%, compared to $5,092 in fiscal 2006. The increase in the gross margin was primarily due to higher sales volume with lower overhead costs, especially in the China operation. Significant portions of our operating costs are fixed in the testing segment, thus as service demands rise and factory utilization increases, the fixed costs are spread over the increased output, which improves profit margin. However, this was offset by a drop in the average selling price of services in the Singapore testing operation. Our customers changed their demands and specifications for burn-in hours, which resulted in a lower average unit selling price for burn-in services. We expect that the effect of such trend may be offset in the future by increases in our burn-in services for the faster microprocessor chips, the demand for which chips appears to be increasing.

Gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the distribution segment was improved slightly by 0.4% from 20.7% for fiscal 2006 to 21.1% for fiscal 2007. However, in terms of dollar amount, gross margin in the distribution segment decreased by 16.0% from $455 for fiscal 2006 to $382 for fiscal 2007 due to a decrease in revenue, as previously discussed.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

		Years ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2007				2006
General and administrative		$	6,561			$	6,321
Selling		$	1,091			$	970
Research and development		$	69			$	70
Impairment loss		$	176			$	61
(Gain) Loss on disposal of PP&E			(1	)		$	22
		$	7,896			$	7,444

General and administrative expenses increased by $240, or 3.8%, from $6,321 for fiscal 2006 to $6,561 for fiscal year 2007. The increase was attributable to a hike in payroll and related expenses due to a rise in headcount in the Singapore operation and the China operation in Suzhou, and also an increase in general and administrative expenses in the Suzhou operation, which commenced its testing operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. However, such an increase was offset by a decrease in bonus expenses in fiscal year 2007. In fiscal year 2006, general and administrative expenses included directors and officers bonuses of 779 as a result of the gain related primarily to the sale of the property in Dublin, Ireland. The Company had no comparable bonus expenses for fiscal 2007.

Selling expenses increased by $121, or 12.5%, to $1,091 for fiscal year 2007, from $970 for fiscal 2006, mainly due to an increase in the provision for warranty costs, traveling expenses related with sales efforts and commission expenses attributable to the increase in commissionable sales from the Singapore manufacturing segment in fiscal 2007, as compared to fiscal 2006.

Research and development was $69 for fiscal 2007, decreased slightly by $1, or 1.4%, from $70 for fiscal 2006.

Impairment loss increased by $115, or 188.5%, from $61 for fiscal 2006 to $176 for fiscal 2007. The impairment loss consisted of machinery and equipment (pertaining to the Singapore operation) due to the decrease in demand for the slower speed microprocessor chips, as those of our existing burn-in facility assets used for testing chips became obsolete. Since there will be no future cash flows from those assets, the carrying value of these assets was written down to zero, and the impairment loss was recorded. The Company reviews the carrying amount of assets held for use and those to be disposed of whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable.

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment was $22 for fiscal 2006, which mainly resulted from the disposal of certain fixed assets at a loss. The Company had no such loss for fiscal 2007.

Income from Operations

Income from operations as a percentage of total revenue was improved by 7.3% from 1.7% for fiscal 2006 to 9.0% for fiscal 2007. In terms of dollar amount, income from operations increased by $3,710, or 762%, from $487 for fiscal 2006 to $4,197 for fiscal 2007 due to an increase in gross profit of $4,162, offset with a net increase in operating expenses of $452.

Interest Expenses

The interest expenses for fiscal years 2007 and 2006 were as follows:

(In Thousands)		Fiscal 2007				Fiscal 2006
Interest expenses		$	139			$	142

Interest expenses decreased by $3, or 2.1%, for fiscal year 2007 from $142 to $139 compared with fiscal 2006 due mainly to a lower usage of lines of credit facilities in the Singapore operation as the result of the improved cash flow from operating activities.

Other Income

Other income for fiscal years 2007 and 2006 was as follows:

(In Thousands)		Fiscal 2007				Fiscal 2006
Other income		$	178			$	598

Other income decreased by $420, or 70.2%, from $598 for fiscal 2006 to $178 for fiscal 2007 primarily due to a decrease in interest income generated from short-term deposits and a decrease in other items, but offset by an increase in rental income and currency transactional gain. Interest income in fiscal 2007 decreased by $64 due to a decrease in interest income generated from short-term deposits as the result of a decrease in short-tern deposits throughout the year. The decrease in the short-term deposits was because the short-term deposits in fiscal year 2006 were from the proceeds from the sale of property in Dublin, Irleland. whereas there was no such activity in fiscal 2007. Other items decreased by $436, which was mainly due to the reversal of a provision of $269 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006 related to the value added tax assessment incurred in our Bangkok testing operation in fiscal 1996. Also contributing to the decrease in other items was the provision for the value added tax of $115 for our China operation in Suzhou in fiscal 2007 due to a change in the local tax policy and a refund of $39 from the Ireland government in fiscal year 2006 due to redundant payments made in prior years by our Ireland testing operation prior to its closure. The Company had no similar other income in fiscal 2007. Rental income, which consisted mainly of space in our Malaysia operation rented to outside vendors, increased by $27 from $87 for fiscal year 2006 to $114 for fiscal year 2007. Currency transaction gain improved by $48, from a translation loss of $46 for fiscal 2006 to a translation gain of $2 for fiscal 2007 due to fluctuations in the exchange rates.

Income Tax

Income tax provision increased by $507, or 196.5%, from $258 in fiscal 2006 to $765 in fiscal 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to higher taxable income generated from the Singapore location. The Singapore operations generated a profit of $3,403 in fiscal 2007, up from $1,416 in fiscal 2006. The income tax provision included a utilization of deferred tax assets of $160 in Malaysia operation due to the utilization of the operating loss carried forward in fiscal 2007. The Malaysia operations generated a profit of $520 in fiscal 2007, an increase of $420, as compared to $100 for fiscal 2006. The reversal of in deferred tax assets in Malaysia was offset by a reversal of the deferred tax liability of $226 in the Singapore operations. The statutory income tax rate in Singapore was decreased to 18% in fiscal 2007 from 20% in fiscal 2006.

Minority Interest

As of June 30, 2007 we held a 55% interest in Trio-Tech Malaysia. The minority interest for fiscal 2007, in the net income of subsidiaries, was $163, an increase of $75 compared to the minority interest of $88 for fiscal 2006. The increase in the minority interest was attributable to the improvement in the net income generated from the Malaysia testing operation.

Income from Discontinued Operations

The income from discontinued operations of $8,459 for fiscal year 2006 represented gain from the sale of property located in Dublin, Ireland of $8,909, which was completed in November 2005, offset by the loss from discontinued operations of $450. The Company had no similar transactions for fiscal 2007.

Income from Continuing Operations before Minority Interest and Net Income

Income from continuing operations before minority interest increased by $2,786 as the result of an increase in income from operations and a decrease in interest expenses, but offset by a decrease in other income and an increase in tax provision, as previously discussed. Net income for fiscal 2007 was $3,308, a decrease of $5,748 compared to $9,056 in fiscal 2006. The decrease was primarily due to a drop in income from discontinued operations of $8,459, as there was no income generated from discontinued operations in fiscal 2007.

Earnings per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $1.03 and $1.02, respectively, in fiscal 2007, an increase of $0.84 and $0.83, respectively, compared with $0.19 for fiscal 2006. There was no income or loss from discontinued operations for fiscal 2007. Basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to discontinued operations for fiscal 2006 were $2.72 and $2.71, respectively.

Segment Information

The revenue, gross margin and income from each segment for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively, are presented below. As the segment revenue and gross margin for each segment have been discussed in the previous section, only the comparison of income from operations is discussed below.

Manufacturing Segment

Manufacturing Segment		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2007				2006
Revenue		$	24,056			$	12,444
Gross margin			16.1	%			19.2	%
Income (loss) from operations		$	965			$	(78	)

Income from operations in the manufacturing segment was increased by $1,043 to $965 in fiscal 2007, from an operating loss of $78 in fiscal 2006. The improvement in operating profit was attributable to the $1,492 increase in gross profit, but offset by an increase in operating expenses of $449. Operating expenses for the manufacturing segment were $2,911 and $2,462 for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in operating expenses was mainly attributable to an increase in payroll and related expenses as a result of the rise in headcount in the Singapore operations in fiscal 2007.

Testing Segment

Testing Segment		Year End June 30,
(In Thousands)		2007				2006
Revenue		$	20,883			$	14,455
Gross margin			37.5	%			35.2	%
Income from operations		$	3,330			$	1,454

Income from operations in the testing segment in fiscal 2007 was $3,330, an increase of $1,876, or 129.0%, compared to $1,454 in fiscal 2006. The increase was due primarily to an increase of $2,743 in gross profit, but offset by an increase of $867 in operating expenses. Operating expenses in the testing segment were $4,505 and $3,638 for fiscal 2007 and 2006, respectively. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to an increase in payroll and related expenses as a result of the increase in headcount in the Singapore operations and an increase in operating expenses in the newly started China operation in Suzhou, which began its testing operation in the second quarter of fiscal 2007.

Distribution Segment

Distribution Segment		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2007				2006
Revenue		$	1,811			$	2,200
Gross margin			21.1	%			20.7	%
Loss from operations		$	(66	)		$	(118	)

Loss from operations in the distribution segment decreased from $118 in fiscal 2006 to $66 in fiscal 2007. Lower operating loss in fiscal year 2007 was attributable to a decrease in operating expenses of $125, but offset by a drop in gross profit of $73. Operating expenses were $448 and $573 for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses was due to a decrease in provision for doubtful debts, as some doubtful debts from customers provided in fiscal 2006 were recovered in fiscal 2007, and lower commission expenses as a result of the decrease in commissionable sales.

Corporate

The loss from operations for Corporate for fiscal 2007 and 2006 was as follows:

		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2007				2006
Loss from operations		$	(32	)		$	(771	)

Corporate operating loss decreased by $739 from fiscal 2006 to $32 in fiscal 2007. Such a decrease in corporate income was attributable to the fee imposed on all the subsidiaries on a fixed percentage of revenue, which income increased as the result of increased revenue from subsidiaries. Another factor was operation expenses last fiscal year included accrued director and corporate officer bonuses of $859 mainly attributable to bonuses based on the gain from the sale of real property in Dublin, Ireland. The Company had no comparable bonuses for fiscal 2007. The director and corporate officer bonuses were $350 in fiscal 2007 and $859 in fiscal 2006, respectively.

Comparison of Fiscal 2006 and 2005

The following table presents certain data from the consolidated statements of income as a percentage of net sales for fiscal years 2006 and 2005 ended June 30:

		Year Ended June 30,
		2006				2005
Net Sales			100.0	%			100.0	%
Cost of Sales			72.7	%			75.9	%
Gross Margin			27.3	%			24.1	%
Operating Expenses
General and administrative			21.7	%			17.8	%
Selling			3.3	%			4.2	%
Research and development			0.2	%			0.4	%
Impairment loss			0.2	%			0.3	%
Loss (Gain) on disposal of PP&E			0.1	%			0.0	%
Total Operating Expenses			25.5	%			22.7	%
Income from operations			1.8	%			1.4	%

Overall Revenue

The overall revenue is composed of the revenues from the manufacturing, testing and distribution segments. The following table presents the components of the overall revenue realized in fiscal 2006 and 2005 in percentage format, respectively.

		Years Ended June 30,
		2006				2005
Revenues:
Manufacturing			42.77	%			42.62	%
Testing			49.67				45.12
Distribution			7.56				12.26
Total			100.00	%			100.00	%

Net sales for fiscal 2006 were $29,099, an increase of $4,038, or 16.1%, compared to $25,061 for fiscal 2005. The increase in net sales can be discussed within three segments.

As a percentage of the total revenue, the revenue generated by the manufacturing segment for fiscal 2006 was almost the same as the revenue in fiscal 2005. However, in terms of dollar amount, the revenue for fiscal 2006 was $12,444, an increase of $1,763 or 16%, compared to $10,681 for fiscal 2005. We believe that the increase in revenue generated by the manufacturing segment was due to a greater demand from the personal computer market in Asia, which in turn led to a greater demand for our products. The demand for our burn-in systems appeared to increase concurrently with the demand for more microprocessor chips in Southeast Asia. Such increase resulted from an increase in demand from one of our major customers, which was a result of that customer’s growing share in the market for chips in personal computers. Due to the competitive environment in the manufacturing segment, we anticipate that we will continue to implement our cost reduction plan by outsourcing a portion of our manufacturing process to outside suppliers, such as electrical and mechanical fabrication houses, and seek competitively priced materials.

The backlog in the manufacturing segment increased by more than 323%, from $882 in fiscal 2005 to $3,729 in fiscal 2006, due to demand for more microprocessor chips in Southeast Asia.

As a percentage of the total revenue, the revenue generated by the testing segment in fiscal 2006 accounted for 49.67% of total sales, representing an increase of 4.55%, compared to 45.12% in fiscal 2005. In terms of dollar amount, the revenue for fiscal 2006 was $14,455, reflecting an increase of $3,148, or 27%, compared to $11,307 for fiscal 2005. The increase in revenue generated by the testing segment was attributable to our testing operations in Singapore and Malaysia. These operations achieved better sales performances, compared to their performances in fiscal 2005, due to a hike in demand for testing services in Southeast Asia. We believe that the increase in demand for testing services resulted from the strong economic growth and robust development in the electronics manufacturing industries in China. In addition, an increase in demand from one of our customers with regard to its high-end personal computers, notebooks and server chips also contributed to the increase. Demand for testing services varies from time to time depending on changes taken place in the market and our customers’ forecasts. We anticipate that our customers will continue to request our services to perform “burn-in” on chips to be used in wireless handsets, automotive applications and wired communications, all of which are currently in high demand in their respective markets.

Our testing facilities provide customers with a full range of testing services, such as burn-in and product life testing for finished semiconductors or packaged components. The acquisition of the testing operation in Shanghai in January 2006 and the newly started testing operation in Suzhou in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 paved a road for us to expand our testing and burn-in services in China’s market.

Backlog in the testing segment at June 30, 2006 was $12,029, an increase of $4,645, or 63%, compared to $7,384 at June 30, 2005 due to the demand for testing services with regard to faster speed microprocessor chips in Southeast Asia.

As a percentage of the total revenue, the revenue generated by the distribution segment in fiscal 2006 accounted for 7.56%, a decrease of 4.7% compared to 12.26% in fiscal 2005. In terms of dollar amount, revenue for fiscal 2006 was $2,200, a decrease of $873, or 28%, compared to $3,073 for fiscal 2005. The contributing factors behind this drop were lower demand for back-end products such as Vibration equipment and Chambers in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2006, a saturation of equipment and electronic components in the current market, and continued conservative spending on capital equipment by many companies.

We continued to focus our marketing efforts on Asia, as we believed that the recovery of equipment sales in that region was improving more rapidly than sales within the U.S. Equipment sales in the U.S. continued to decline as many companies were still conservative in capital equipment spending. The distribution operation located in Singapore focused on selling Wet Process Stations primarily to research institutions and local universities. Equipment and electronic component sales are very competitive, as the products are prevalent in the market. Thus, “add value” has been a key phrase in the mission statement of the distribution segment.

The backlog in the distribution segment at June 30, 2006 was $535, reflecting a decrease of $564, or 51%, compared to the backlog of $1,099 at June 30, 2005, due to a lower demand for back-end products, such as Vibration equipment, chambers and wafer fabricators.

Overall Gross Margin

Overall gross margin, as a percentage of net sales was improved by 3.2% from 24.1% for fiscal 2005 to 27.3% for fiscal 2006. In terms of dollar amount, gross margin for fiscal 2006 was $7,931,an increase of $1,884, or 31%, compared to $6,047 for fiscal 2005. The increase in overall gross margin was due to the decrease of material costs in the manufacturing segment, and better utilization of testing facilities in the testing segment, offset by the decline of the gross margin in the distribution segment due to lower margin back-end products.

Gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the manufacturing segment was improved by 3.8%, from 15.3% in fiscal 2005 to 19.2% in fiscal 2006. In terms of dollar amount, gross margin in the manufacturing segment in fiscal 2006 was $2,384, an increase of $746, or 46%, compared to $1,638 in fiscal 2005. The increase in gross margin was mainly due to lower material costs incurred. The reduction in material costs was the result of our cost reduction plan, under which a portion of the manufacturing process was outsourced to cost effective, competitive vendors.

Gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the testing segment was improved by 3.2%, from 32% in fiscal 2005 to 35.2% in fiscal 2006. However, in terms of dollar amount, gross margin in the testing segment for fiscal 2006 increased by 40% to $5,092 in fiscal 2006 from $3,617 in fiscal 2005. The increase in gross margin was consistent with the increase in revenue. Our testing facilities require substantial investment to be built and significant portions of our operating costs are fixed in nature. In general, these costs do not decline along with reductions in customer demand or the utilization of our testing capacity, which in turn can adversely affect our profit margin. Conversely, as product demand rises and facility utilization increases, the fixed costs are spread over the increased output, which improve our profit margins.

Gross margin, as a percentage of revenue in the distribution segment, decreased by 5.1%, from 25.8% in fiscal 2005 to 20.7% in fiscal 2006. In terms of dollar amount, gross margin in the distribution segment in fiscal 2006 was $455, a decrease of $338, or 43%, compared to $793 in fiscal 2005. The decline in gross margin was because the revenue in the distribution segment for fiscal 2006 was primarily generated from low margin back-end products.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for fiscal years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively:

		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2006				2005
General and administrative		$	6,321			$	4,466
Selling		$	970			$	1,058
Research and development		$	70			$	93
Impairment loss		$	61			$	70
Loss on disposal of PP&E		$	22			$	1
		$	7,444			$	5,688

General and administrative expenses increased by $1,855, or 41.5%, from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 due to an increase of $546 in payroll expenses as the result of a larger headcount to handle the rise in sales volume, an increase of $78 in provision for doubtful debts, and an increase of $388 in general and administration expenses. Directors and officers’ bonuses increased by $843 as a result of the gain related primarily to the sale of the Ireland property. These bonuses were granted based primarily on a percentage of our pre-tax profits for fiscal 2006, which was consistent with our long standing compensation programs for directors and corporate officers. With regard to the gain of the property located in Dublin, Ireland, the recipients agreed to take their bonuses based on after-tax profits.

Selling expenses decreased by $88, or 8.3%, from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 due to fewer net sales in the distribution segment, which had a commission basis.

Research and development decreased by $23, or 24.7%, from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 due to less activity and fewer employee costs in the U.S. operation.

Impairment loss decreased by $9, or 12.9%, from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 due to fewer instances of obsolete machinery and burn-in equipment in Singapore. The burn-in equipment and machinery become obsolete as technology changes. The impairment loss consisted of machinery, equipment and leasehold improvements (pertaining to the Singapore operations) due to changes in demand for certain burn-in services, which in turn made certain of our existing burn-in facilities obsolete.

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment increased by $21 from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 due to the disposal of certain fixed assets at a loss.

Income from Operations

Income from operations, as a percentage of total revenue was improved marginally by 0.3% from 1.4% for fiscal 2005 to 1.7% for fiscal 2006. In terms of dollar amount, income from operations increased by $128, or 36%, from $359 for fiscal 2005 to $487 for fiscal 2006 due to an increase in gross profit of $1,884, offset with a net increase in operating expenses of $1,756.

Interest Expenses

The interest expenses for fiscal years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		Fiscal 2006				Fiscal 2005
Interest expenses		$	142			$	165

Interest expenses decreased by $23, or 14%, from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 due mainly to a lower usage of lines of credit. However, this was offset by an increase in term loans in the Singapore operation.

Other Income

Other income for fiscal years ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		Fiscal 2006				Fiscal 2005
Other income		$	598			$	182

Other income increased by $416, or 228.6%, from fiscal 2005 to fiscal 2006 primarily due to the increase in interest income generated from short-term deposits and an increase in other items, but offset by the currency transactional loss. Interest income in fiscal 2006 increased by $155 due to short-term deposits made using the proceeds from the sale of the property in Dublin, Ireland. Other items increased by $317, mainly due to the reversing of a provision of $269 in the fourth quarter related to the value added tax assessment incurred in our Bangkok testing operations in fiscal 1996. The reversal was a result of the review conducted by the tax authority in Thailand to comply with the tax regulation there. Also contributing to the increase of other items was the receipt of $39 from the Ireland government due to redundant payments incurred in our former testing operations in Ireland. These were offset by a currency translation loss, which increased by $56 from a current transactional gain of $10 for fiscal 2005.

Income Tax

Income tax provision increased by $100, or 63.3%, from $158 in fiscal 2005 to $258 in fiscal 2006. This increase was primarily attributable to higher taxable income generated from the Singapore location. The Singapore operations generated a profit of $1,416 in fiscal 2006, up from $561 in fiscal 2005. The income tax amount included a provision for deferred tax liability of $28 for the Singapore operation and net of a deferred tax liability of $10 for the Bangkok operation as the result of a reversal of deferred tax assets provision from the prior year. These were offset by net of a deferred tax assets provision of $86 for the Malaysia operation. The effective tax rate decreased from 42% in fiscal 2005 to 27% in fiscal 2006. The decrease was due to the use of foreign tax credits and general business credits, offset by the dividend income in fiscal 2006.

Income from Discontinued Operations

Income from discontinued operations for fiscal 2006 was $8,459, which included a gain of $8,909 from the sale of property located in Dublin, Ireland offset by a loss of $450 from discontinued operations.

Net Income

Net income for fiscal 2006 increased 3,997% over net income for fiscal 2005. Net income was $9,056 in fiscal 2006 compared to $221 in fiscal 2005. The main factor that contributed to the increase of $8,835 was the gain of $8,909 from the sale of property located in Dublin, Ireland. The increase of $381 in income from continuing operations was due to the increase of net sales and the increase of $416 in other income. The majority of the other income was from the reversal of a tax provision of $269 in the fourth quarter, in accordance with instruction from the tax authority in Thailand.

Earnings per Share per Common Share

Basic and diluted earnings per common share from continuing operations were $0.19 in fiscal 2006, an increase of $0.12. Basic and diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations were $2.72 and $2.70, respectively, in fiscal 2006, as compared to $0 in fiscal 2005, mainly due to income from discontinued operations derived from the sale of the Dublin, Ireland property.

Segment Information

The revenue, gross margin and income from each segment for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively, are presented below. As the segment revenue and gross margin for each segment have been discussed in the previous section, only the comparison of income from operations is discussed below.

Manufacturing Segment

Manufacturing Segment		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2006				2005
Revenue		$	12,444			$	10,681
Gross margin			19.2	%			15.3	%
Loss from operations		$	(78	)		$	(108	)

Loss from operations in the manufacturing segment decreased from $108 in fiscal 2005 to $78 in fiscal 2006. The improvement in operating loss was due to the increase of $1,764 in gross revenue in fiscal 2006. The cost of goods sold in the manufacturing segment as a percentage of sales by the segment also decreased from 85% in fiscal 2005 to 81% in fiscal 2006 due to lower material costs incurred.

Testing Segment

Testing Segment		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2006				2005
Revenue		$	14,455			$	11,307
Gross margin			35.2	%			32.0	%
Income from operations		$	1,454			$	540

Income from operations in the testing segment in fiscal 2006 was $1,454, an increase of $914, or 169%, compared to $540 in fiscal 2005. The increase was due primarily to the increase of $1,475 in gross margin, as previously discussed. In addition, an increase in demand from one of our customers with regard to its high-end personal computers, notebooks and server chips also contributed to the increase. Offsetting the positive increase was an increase of $561 in operating expenses. Operating expenses in the testing segment were $3,638 and $3,077 for fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to the increase in payroll and related expenses, as a result of the increase in headcount in Singapore in fiscal 2006.

Distribution Segment

Distribution Segment		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2006				2005
Revenue		$	2,200			$	3,073
Gross margin			20.7	%			25.8	%
Loss from operations		$	(118	)		$	(80	)

Loss from operations in the distribution segment increased from $80 in fiscal 2005 to $118 in fiscal 2006. The increase in operating loss was attributable to a decrease in gross profit of $338, offset by a decrease in operating expenses of $300. The decline in gross margin was a result of the revenue primarily from low margin back-end products in fiscal 2006. Operating expenses were $573 and $873 for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005, respectively. The decrease in operating expenses was attributable to lower selling expenses as the result of the decrease in sales.

Corporate

The (loss) income from operations for Corporate for the fiscal years 2006 and 2005 were as follows:

Corporate		Year Ended June 30,
(In Thousands)		2006				2005
Income (Loss) from operations		$	(771	)		$	7

Corporate operating income decreased by $778 from an income of $7 in fiscal 2005 to a loss of $771 in fiscal 2006. Such a decrease in corporate income was attributable to higher director and corporate officer bonuses of $859 incurred in fiscal 2006, whereas the director and corporate officer bonuses were $16 in fiscal 2005.

Liquidity Comparison

Comparison of Fiscal 2007 and 2006

Net cash provided by operating activities during fiscal 2007 was $7,938, an increase of $8,788 from net cash outflows of $850 in fiscal 2006. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2007 was primarily due to the following reasons: an increase of $2,711 in income from continuing operations, an increase of $10, 460 in non-cash items and an increase of $4,076 in cash flow from changes in operating assets and liabilities. The net income for fiscal 2007 decreased by $5,748 to $3,308 compared with $9,056 for fiscal 2006. However, a non-cash gain of $8,909 from discontinued operations on the sale of property in Dublin, Ireland was included as an adjustment to net income in fiscal 2006. Depreciation and amortization expenses as a non-cash item for fiscal 2007 also made a significant impact of $2,857 (positive cash flow). Simultaneously, changes in the accounts receivables for fiscal 2007 made a positive cash flow of $967 compared to a negative cash flow of $4,515 for fiscal 2006, which was reduced primarily by negative cash outflow of $276 from other assets.

Net cash used in investing activities increased by $5,401 to $2,668 for fiscal 2007 from a cash inflow of $2,733 for fiscal 2006. The increase in net cash used by investing activities was primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures from $1,255 in fiscal 2006 to $2,812 in fiscal 2007, and proceeds of $8,401 received from the sale of the Ireland property in fiscal 2006. The increase in capital expenditure was primarily for the purchase of machinery and equipment in fiscal 2007 in the Singapore and China operations in order to meet customers’ demands. Offsetting the increase in net cash used by investing activities was an increase of $4,562 in the net proceeds from maturing short-term deposits.

Net cash used in financing activities increased by $228 from $1,046 for fiscal 2006 to $1,274 for fiscal 2007. The increase was mainly due to a drop of $1,056 in proceeds from long-term bank loans and capital leases, and a decrease of $761 in proceeds from exercising stock options. Furthermore, dividends paid to minority interests also increased by $14. However, these were offset by (i) dividends of $323 paid to shareholders in fiscal 2007 compared to $1,608 in fiscal 2006; (ii) proceeds of $118 received in fiscal 2007 from a 10% shareholder from disgorgement of short-swing profits from prohibited transactions in our common shares pursuant to section 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; (iii) a decrease of $104 in net payment on lines of credit; and (iv) a decrease of $96 in repayment of bank loans and capital leases.

We believe we have the necessary financial resources to meet our projected cash requirement for at least the next twelve months.

Comparison of Fiscal 2006 and 2005

Net cash used in operating activities for fiscal 2006 was $850, a decrease of $1,774, or 192%, compared to net cash of $924 provided by operating activities for fiscal 2005. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities in fiscal 2006 was attributable to the following factors: (i) the increase in net income; (ii) the increase in non-cash items; (iii) the changes in operating assets and liabilities; and (iv) the cash inflow from accounts payable. The net income from operating activities in fiscal 2006 was increased by $8,835, from $221 in fiscal 2005 to $9,056. However, the increase was caused by the sale of property of a discontinued operation in the amount of $8,909. The cash inflow from accounts payable increased by $2,728 to $2,525 in fiscal 2006, compared to a cash outflow of $203 in fiscal 2005 as a result of the increase in material purchases to support the sales backlog. Also offsetting net cash was the cash outflow from accounts receivable of $4,515, which increased by $4,050, from a cash outflow of $465 in fiscal 2005.

Net cash provided by investing activities in fiscal 2006 was $2,733, an increase of $3,674, or 390%, compared to net cash of $941 used in investing activities in fiscal 2005. Compared to fiscal 2005, the increase in net cash provided by investing activities in fiscal 2006 was attributable to: (i) net proceeds from discontinued operations, which were $8,401 in fiscal 2006 whereas there were no such proceeds in fiscal 2005; (ii) a decrease in capital expenditures by $1,051 to $1,255 for fiscal 2006, compared to $2,306 for fiscal 2005; (iii) an increase in proceeds from the disposal of equipment of $154 in fiscal 2006 compared to proceeds of only $1 in fiscal 2005; (iv) a decrease in acquisition costs of $988 to $138 incurred in fiscal 2006 compared to $1,126 incurred in fiscal 2005; and (v) proceeds of $4,429 used in investing in short-term deposits in fiscal 2006 compared to net cash of $2,490 provided by net investment in short-term deposits in fiscal 2005.

Net cash used in financing activities increased by $1,163 to $1,046 in fiscal 2006 from a cash inflow of $117 in fiscal year 2005. The increase in net cash used in financing activities in fiscal 2006 as compared to fiscal 2005 was primarily due to more proceeds from long-term debt of $1,062 as compared to $862 incurred to expand the operation in Singapore, and proceeds of $784 from stock options exercised compared to $27. However, these were offset by (i) net repayments on the line of credit of $220; (ii) fewer dividends paid to minority interest of $28 as compared to $53; (iii) dividends of $1,608 paid to shareholders in fiscal 2006 compared to $0 in fiscal 2005; and (iv) repayments of $1,036 in debt and capital leases (which included repayment of Ireland’s outstanding equipment loan of $88) made in fiscal 2006, compared to repayments of $909 made in fiscal 2005.

Capital Resources

Our working capital (defined as current assets minus current liabilities) has historically been generated primarily from the following sources: operating cash flow, availability under our revolving line of credit and short term loans. The working capital was $16,445 as of June 30, 2007, representing an increase of $3,150, or 23.7%, compared to working capital of $13,295 as of June 30, 2006 mainly due to an increase in cash and a decrease in accounts payables as discussed above.
The majority of our capital expenditures are based on the demands from our customers, as we are in a capital intensive industry. In the past three years, our capital expenditures ranged from $1.7 million to $2.9 million. We financed our capital expenditures and other operating expenses through operating cash flows, our revolving line of credit and long term debts. While we had no current outstanding borrowings under our revolving lines of credit, we procured long-term loans of $675 and capitalized leases of $280 in fiscal 2007.

Our credit rating provides us with ready and adequate access to funds in global markets. At June 30, 2007, we had available unused short-term lines of credit totaling $11,587.

Entity with

Type of

Interest

Expiration

Credit

Unused

Facility

Facility

Rate

Date

Limitation

Credit

Trio-Tech Malaysia

Line of Credit

Prime rate (6.75% as of June 30, 2007) plus 2.5% per annum

May 2008

$

128

$

128

Trio-Tech Bangkok

Line of Credit

Prime rate (6.5% as of June 30, 2007) plus 1% per annum

October 2008

126

126

Trio-Tech Singapore

Line of Credit

Prime rate 5.75% as of June 30, 2007) plus 0.25% per annum

April 2008

11,333

11,333

Total

$

11,587

$

11,587

We believe that projected cash flows from operations, borrowing availability under our revolving lines of credit, cash on hand, and trade credit will provide the necessary capital to meet our projected cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. Should we find attractive capital investment, we may seek additional debt or equity financing in order to fund the transaction, in the form of bank financing, convertible debt, or the issuance of common stock.

Contractual Obligations

The following contractual obligations servicing table describes our overall future cash obligation based on various current contracts in the next five years:

		Payments Due by Period (at June 30, 2007) (In Thousands)
						Less than				1 - 3				After
		Total				1 Year				Years				3 Years
Lines of Credit		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—
Notes Payable			675				536				139				—
Interest on Notes Payable		$	20				19				1				—
Capital Leases			280				125				155				—
Operating Leases			1,600				930				670				—
Total		$	2,575			$	1,610			$	965			$	—

Corporate Guarantee Arrangement

The Company provides a corporate guarantee of approximately $1,634 to one of its subsidiaries in Southeast Asia to secure line-of-credit and term loans from a bank to finance the operations of such subsidiary. With the strong financial position of the subsidiary company, the Company believes this corporate guarantee arrangement will have no material impact on its liquidity or capital resources.

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Although the majority of our sales, cost of manufacturing and marketing are transacted in U.S. dollars, significant portions of our revenue are denominated in Singapore and Euro dollars, Malaysian ringgit, Thai baht and other currencies. Consequently, a portion of our costs, revenue and operating margins may be affected by fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily between the U.S. dollar and such foreign currencies. Our financial position and results of operations are also affected by fluctuations in exchange rates between reporting currency (which is in U.S. dollars) and functional currencies used in our operations. Foreign currency translation adjustments resulted in an increase of $911 in fiscal 2007, a decrease of $190 in fiscal 2006 and an increase of $25 in fiscal 2005 to shareholders’ equity.

We try to reduce our risk of foreign currency fluctuations by purchasing certain equipment and supplies in U.S. dollars and seeking payment, when possible, in U.S. dollars. However, we may not be successful in our attempts to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations. Those fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial results.

Interest Rate Risk

We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. Our investment portfolio is generally comprised of cash deposits. Our policy is to place these investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and could decline in value if interest rates fluctuate, and thus subject us to market risk due to those fluctuations. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of our investment portfolio, we do not expect any material loss with respect to our investment portfolio, though no assurances can be given that material losses will not occur.

The interest rates on our loans and lines of credit range from 5.25% to 7.50% per annum. As of June 30, 2007, the outstanding aggregate principal balance on these loans and lines of credit was approximately $675. These interest rates are subject to change and we cannot predict an increase or decrease in rates, if any.

																						Fair
Fiscal year ending June 30,		2008				2009				2010				Thereafter				Total				Value
Loans:
Denominated in Singapore dollars; interest is at the bank’s prime rate (4.25% at June 30, 2007 and 2006) plus 1% per annum		$	16				—				—				—			$	16			$	16
Denominated in Singapore dollars; interest is at the bank’s prime rate (4.25% at June 30, 2007 and 2006) plus 1% per annum		$	150				—				—				—			$	150			$	150
Denominated in Thailand baht; interest is at the bank’s prime rate (7.00% at June 30, 2007 and 2006)		$	39				—				—				—			$	39			$	39
Denominated in Singapore dollars; interest is at the bank’s prime rate (2.4768% at June 30, 2007 and 3.41% at June 30, 2006) plus 3.5% per annum		$	218				91				—				—			$	309			$	309
Denominated in Singapore dollars; interest is at the bank’s prime rate (4.25% at June 30, 2007 and 2006) plus 1% per annum		$	113			$	48			$	—				—			$	161			$	161
Total		$	536			$	139			$	—			$	—			$	675			$	675

ITEM 8 — FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information called for by this item is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning on page 45 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

An evaluation was carried out by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the principal executive and principal financial officers, respectively, of the Company) of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2007, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

PART III

The information required by Items 10 through 14 of Part III of this Form 10-K (information regarding our directors and executive officers, executive compensation, security ownership of certain beneficial owners, management, related stockholder matters, and certain relationships and related transactions and principal accountant fees and services, respectively) is hereby incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of fiscal 2007.

PART IV

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) (1 and 2)		FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES:
		The following financial statements, including notes thereto and the independent auditors’ report with respect thereto, are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, starting on page 45 hereof:
		1.     Report of Independent Public Registered Accounting Firm
		2.     Consolidated Balance Sheets
		3.     Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
		4.     Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
		5.     Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
		6.     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(b) EXHIBITS:

Number		Description

3.1		Articles of Incorporation, as currently in effect. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 1988.]
3.2		Bylaws, as currently in effect. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 1988.]
10.1		Credit Facility Letter dated January 4, 2001, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.2		1998 Stock Option Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company’s proxy statement filed under regulation 14A on October 27, 1997.] **
10.3		Directors Stock Option Plan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company’s proxy statement filed under regulation 14A on October 27, 1997.] **
10.4		Real Estate Lease dated February 1, 1999 between Martinvale Development Company and Universal Systems. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 1999.]
10.5		Real Estate Lease dated February 16, 2001 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #07-01/07 and #03-01/03. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.6		Real Estate Lease dated May 13, 1999 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #03-16/17. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.7		Real Estate Lease dated October 13, 1999 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #01-08/15. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.8		Real Estate Lease dated December 7, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #01-16/17. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.9		Real Estate Lease dated January 3, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #03-01/06. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.10		Real Estate Lease dated October 13, 1999 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #03-09/15 and #03-16/18. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.11		Real Estate Lease dated May 2, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #01-08. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.12		Real Estate Lease dated September 12, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #07-17/18. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.13		Real Estate Lease dated October 30, 2000 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #07-01. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2001.]
10.14		Real Estate Lease dated February 26, 2002 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #02-11/15. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
10.15		Real Estate Lease dated June 10, 2002 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #02-08/10. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]

Number		Description
10.16		Credit Facility Letter dated November 16, 2001 and June 24, 2002, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
10.17		Credit Facility Letter dated July 24, 2002, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and OCBC Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
10.18		Credit Facility Letter dated May 21, 2002, between Trio-Tech (M) Sdn Bhd and HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
10.19		Credit Facility Letter dated January 22, 2002, between Trio-Tech (KL) Sdn Bhd and Public Bank Berhad. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
10.20		Real Estate Lease dated November 8, 2001 between Elbar Investments, L.P. and Trio-Tech International for 14731 Califa Street, Van Nuys. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 23.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.]
10.21		Amendment to the Directors Stock Option Plan [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2002.] **
10.22		Credit Facility Letter dated January 28, 2003, between Trio-Tech (M) Sdn Bhd and HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2003.]
10.23		Credit Facility Letter dated September 20, 2002, between KTS Incorporated and Bank of America. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2003.]
10.24		Real Estate Lease dated January 12, 2001 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Toa Payoh North #01-S3/S4. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2003.]
10.25		Sales and Purchase Agreement, dated March 29, 2004 between TS Matrix BHD. and Trio Tech (Malaysia) SDN BHD. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 15, 2004.]
10.26		Real Estate Sublease, dated July 1, 2004 between TS Matrix BHD. and Trio Tech (Malaysia) SDN. BHD. for factory lot no. 11A Kawansan MIEL Sungai Way Baru (FTZ), Phase III Selangor Darul Ehsan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Amended Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2004.]
10.27		Real Estate Lease dated April 28, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #04-14/16 and #04-17. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2004.]
10.28		Real Estate Lease dated April 28, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #03-08/10. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2004.]
10.29		Real Estate Lease dated April 19, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #02-17. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2004.]
10.30		Real Estate Lease dated May 26, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #02-15/16. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2004.]
10.31		Credit Facility Letter dated July 7, 2003, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and Hong Leong Finance Limited. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2004.]
10.32		Credit Facility Letter dated October 2, 2003, between Trio-Tech Bangkok and Kasikornbank Public Company Limited. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2004.]

Number		Description
10.33		Credit Facility Letter dated October 7, 2003, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and DBS Bank Ltd. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2004.]
10.34		Credit Facility Letter dated August 11, 2003 between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2004.]
10.35		Letter of Offer, dated June 3, 2005 between Globetronics Technology BHD. and Trio Tech International PTE. LTD.. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2005.]
10.36		Real Estate Lease, dated December 1, 2003 between Trio Tech (Malaysia) SDN. BHD. and Amphenol Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. for factory plot no. 1A Phase 1, Bayan Lepas Free Trade Zone, 11900 Pulau Pinang. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2005.]
10.37		Real Estate Lease dated December 6, 2004 between Malaysian Industrial Estates Berhad and Trio Tech (Malaysia) SDN. BHD. for factory lot no. 4 Kawansan MIEL Sungai Way Baru (FTZ), Phase III Selangor Darul Ehsan. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2005.]
10.38		Real Estate Lease dated September 28, 2004 between Ascendas-Xinsu Development (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. and Trio Tech (SIP) Co., Ltd. for Block B #05-01/02 room 6 in Suzhou Industrial Park, China 215021. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2005.]
10.39		Real Estate Lease, dated November 8, 2004 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #03-07/08. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2005.]
10.40		Real Estate Lease, dated September 10, 2003 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #01-09/11. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2005.]
10.41		Credit Facility Letter dated May 10, 2005, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and DBS Bank Ltd. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 41 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2006.]
10.42		Real Estate Lease, dated July 5, 2005 between JTC Corporation and Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #01-15/16. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 42 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2006.]
10.43		Credit Facility Letter dated September 15, 2005 between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 43 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2006.]
10.44		Real Estate Lease, dated November 11, 2005 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #03-06/07. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 44 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2006.]
10.45		Real Estate Lease, dated March 10, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #04-05/07. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 45 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2006.]
10.46		Credit Facility Letter dated April 6, 2006, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and Standard Chartered Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 46 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2006.]
10.47		Credit Facility Letter dated April 6, 2006, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and Standard Chartered Bank. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 47 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2006.]
10.48		Credit Facility Letter dated July 26, 2006, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and DBS Bank Ltd. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10. 48 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30, 2006.]
10.49		Credit Facility Letter dated April 19, 2007, between Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd, and Standard Chartered Bank. *

Number		Description
10.50		Real Estate Lease, dated February 20, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #01-08/09/10/11/12/13/14/15 (Ancillary). *
10.51		Real Estate Lease, dated July 31, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #03-06/07 (Ancillary). *
10.52		Real Estate Lease, dated September 26, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #03-01/02/03. *
10.53		Real Estate Lease, dated September 26, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #03-16. *
10.54		Real Estate Lease, dated October 11, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #04-08/09/10. *
10.55		Real Estate Lease, dated October 26, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #07-01/02/03/04/08/06/07 and its ancillary sites. *
10.56		Real Estate Lease, dated May 2, 2007 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1004 Toa Payoh North #04-17, #04-14/15/16 and #03-08/09/10. *
10.57		Real Estate Lease, dated December 20, 2005 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #03-07/08 (Ancillary). *
10.58		Real Estate Lease, dated May 9, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #03-09/10/11/12/14/15/16/17. *
10.59		Real Estate Lease, dated July 20, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #01-08. *
10.60		Real Estate Lease, dated September 22, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #02-03/04/05/06. *
10.61		Real Estate Lease, dated September 22, 2006 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #02-18. *
10.62		Real Estate Lease, dated January 18, 2007 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #07-01. *
10.63		Real Estate Lease, dated January 29, 2007 between JTC Corporation and Trio-Tech International Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #07-17/18 and its ancillary site. *
10.64		Real Estate Lease, dated February 21, 2007 between JTC Corporation and Universal (Far East) Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #01-09/10/11. *
10.65		Real Estate Lease, dated August 2, 2007 between JTC Corporation and Universal (Far East) Pte Ltd for Block 1008 Toa Payoh North #02-17. *
10.66		Real Estate Lease, dated August 2, 2006 between Ascendas-Xinsu Development (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. and Trio Tech (SIP) Co., Ltd. for Block A #04-13/16 No. 5 Xing Han Street in Suzhou Industrial Park, China 215021.*
10.67		Real Estate Lease, dated August 16, 2006 between Ascendas-Xinsu Development (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. and Trio Tech (SIP) Co., Ltd. for Block A #04-11/12 No. 5 Xing Han Street in Suzhou Industrial Park, China 215021.*
10.68		Credit Facility Letter dated April 4, 2007, between Trio Tech (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and CIMB Bank (formerly known as Bumiputra-Commerce Bank Berhad)*
10.69		Credit Facility Letter dated May 21, 2007, between Trio Tech (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad. *
10.70		Land Development Agreement dated August 27, 2007 between Trio Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. and Jia Sheng Real Property Development Ltd. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8K dated August 30, 2007.]

Number		Description
21.1		Subsidiaries of the Registrant (100% owned by the Registrant except as otherwise stated):
		Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation
		Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation
		Trio-Tech Reliability Services, a California Corporation
		Express Test Corporation, a California Corporation
		European Electronic Test Center. Ltd. a Cayman Islands Corporation
		Trio-Tech Malaysia, a Malaysia Corporation (55% owned by the Registrant)
		Trio-Tech Kuala Lumpur, a Malaysia Corporation (100% owned by Trio-Tech Malaysia)
		Trio-Tech Bangkok, a Thailand Corporation
		Trio-Tech Thailand, a Thailand Corporation
		Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd., a Malaysia Corporation (76% owned by the Registrant)
		KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems, a California Corporation
		Trio-Tech (Suzhou) Co. Ltd., a China Corporation
		Trio-Tech (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., a China Corporation
		Trio-Tech (ChongQing) Co. Ltd (100% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation)
23.1		Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer of Registrant*
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer of Registrant*
32		Section 1350 Certification. *

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacity and on the dates indicated.

		/s/ A. Charles Wilson		September 17, 2007
		A. Charles Wilson, Director
		Chairman of the Board
		/s/ S. W. Yong		September 17, 2007
		S. W. Yong, Director
		President, Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
		/s/ Victor H.M. Ting		September 17, 2007
		Victor H.M. Ting
		Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)
		/s/ Jason T. Adelman		September 17, 2007
		Jason T. Adelman, Director
		/s/ Richard M. Horowitz		September 17, 2007
		Richard M. Horowitz, Director

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Trio-Tech International
Van Nuys, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 No. 333-38082 and Form S-8 No. 333-40102 of Trio-Tech International of our report dated September 17, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ BDO Raffles

BDO Raffles
Singapore

September 17, 2007

CERTIFICATIONS

Exhibit 31.1

I, S. W. Yong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 17, 2007

Exhibit 31.2

I, Victor H.M. Ting, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 17, 2007

Exhibit 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

		/s/ S. W. YONG
		Name: S. W. Yong
		Title:		President and Chief Executive Officer
		Date:		September 17, 2007
		/s/ VICTOR H. M. TING
		Name: Victor H.M. Ting
		Title:		Vice President and
				Chief Financial Officer
		Date:		September 17, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and shareholders
Trio-Tech International
Van Nuys, California:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trio-Tech International and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity statement and cash flows for each of the years in the period ended June 30, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits include consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trio-Tech International and subsidiaries at June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BDO Raffles

/s/ BDO Raffles

Singapore
September 17, 2007

TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES)

		June 30,				June 30,
		2007				2006
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash		$	7,135			$	2,551
Short-term deposits			7,815				7,839
Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $42 and $225			7,410				8,518
Other receivables			245				306
Inventories, less provision for obsolete inventory of $781 and $448			1,946				2,447
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			122				170
Total current assets			24,673				21,831
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, Net			7,458				7,073
OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, Net			212				311
OTHER ASSETS			445				169
TOTAL ASSETS		$	32,788			$	29,384
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Line of credit		$	—			$	116
Accounts payable			2,265				3,809
Accrued expenses			4,354				3,045
Income taxes payable			948				603
Current portion of notes payable			536				856
Current portion of capital leases			125				107
Total current liabilities			8,228				8,536
NOTES PAYABLE, net of current portion			139				644
CAPITAL LEASES, net of current portion			155				230
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES			373				386
TOTAL LIABILITIES		$	8,895			$	9,796
MINORITY INTEREST			2,459				2,196
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common stock; no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 3,227,992 and 3,219,407 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively			10,361				10,338
Paid-in capital			460				337
Accumulated retained earnings			10,135				7,150
Accumulated other comprehensive loss-translation adjustments			478				(433	)
Total shareholders’ equity			21,434				17,392
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	32,788			$	29,384