TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
☑
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2019
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
Transition Period from ___ to ___
Commission
File Number 1-14523
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
California
|
95-2086631
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
Number)
|
|
|
Block
1008 Toa Payoh North
|
|
Unit
03-09 Singapore
|
318996
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant's
Telephone Number: (65) 6265
3300
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
Name of
each exchange
|
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol
|
On which registered
|
Common
Stock, no par value
|
TRT
|
The
NYSE MKT
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a
well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in rule 405 of the
Securities Act. ⬜Yes ☑No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
⬜Yes ☑ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. ☑Yes ⬜ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). ☑Yes ⬜ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definition of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer”, “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. Large Accelerated Filer ☐ Accelerated Filer ☐
Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
☐ Smaller Reporting Company ☑ Emerging Growth
Company ☐
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
⬜
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ⬜Yes
☑No
The
aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
Registrant, based upon the closing price of $2.46 for shares of the
registrant’s Common Stock on December 31, 2018, the last
business day of the registrants most recently completed second
fiscal quarter as reported by the NYSE MKT, was approximately
$4,332,000. In calculating such aggregate market value, shares of
Common Stock held by each officer, director and holder of 5% or
more of the outstanding Common Stock (including shares with respect
to which a holder has the right to acquire beneficial ownership
within 60 days) were excluded because such persons may be deemed to
be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not
necessarily a conclusive determination for other
purposes.
The
number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of September 1,
2019 was 3,673,055.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
Part
III of this Form 10-K incorporates by reference information from
Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2019 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be filed with the Commission under Regulation 14A
within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form
10-K.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
INDEX
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
||
6
|
||
6
|
||
6
|
||
7
|
||
7
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
||
7
|
||
8
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
25
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
||
26
|
||
26
|
||
26
|
||
26
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
||
26
|
||
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
F-8
|
TRIO-TECH
INTERNATIONAL
PART I
ITEM 1 – BUSINESS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES AND SHARE
AMOUNTS)
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
The
discussions of Trio-Tech International’s (the
“Company”) business and activities set forth in this
Form 10-K and in other past and future reports and announcements by
the Company may contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and assumptions regarding future activities and results of
operations of the Company. In light of the “safe
harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, the following factors, among others, could
cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in
any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company:
market acceptance of Company products and services; changing
business conditions or technologies and volatility in the
semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for the
Company’s products and services; the impact of competition;
problems with technology; product development schedules; delivery
schedules; changes in military or commercial testing specifications
which could affect the market for the Company’s products and
services; difficulties in profitably integrating acquired
businesses, if any, into the Company; risks associated with
conducting business internationally and especially in Asia,
including currency fluctuations and devaluation, currency
restrictions, local laws and restrictions and possible social,
political and economic instability; credit risks in the Chinese
real estate industry; changes in macroeconomic conditions and
credit market conditions; and other economic, financial and
regulatory factors beyond the Company’s control. In some
cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of
terminology such as “may,” “will,”
“expects,” “plans,”
“anticipates,” “estimates,”
“potential,” “believes,” “can
impact,” “continue,” or the negative thereof or
other comparable terminology.
Unless
otherwise required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation to
update forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events,
changed circumstances, or the occurrence of unanticipated events.
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such
forward-looking statements.
General
Trio-Tech
International was incorporated in 1958 under the laws of the State
of California. As used herein, the term "Trio-Tech" or
"Company” or “we” or “us” or
“Registrant” includes Trio-Tech International and its
subsidiaries unless the context otherwise indicates. The mailing
address and executive offices are located at Block 1008 Toa Payoh
North, Unit 03-09 Singapore 318996, Singapore, and the telephone
number is (65) 6265 3300.
We make
available through our website, free of charge, our Annual Reports
on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on
Form 8-K, proxy statements and any amendments to those reports or
statements filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably
practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished
to the SEC. The SEC also maintains an internet site at www.sec.gov
that contains such reports and statements filed electronically with
the SEC by the Company. Additional information about Trio-Tech is
available on our website at www. triotech.com.
During
fiscal year 2019, the Company operated its business in four
segments: manufacturing, testing services, distribution and real
estate. Geographically, the Company operates in the United States
(“U.S.”), Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and China. It
operates six testing service facilities; one in the U.S. and five
in Asia. It operates two manufacturing facilities: one in the
U.S. and the other in Asia. Its distribution segment and real
estate segment operate primarily in Asia. Its major customers are
concentrated in Asia and they are either semiconductor chip
manufacturers or testing facilities that purchase testing
equipment. For information relating to revenues, profit and loss
and total assets for each of the segments, see Note 19 - Business
Segments contained in the consolidated financial statements
included in this Form 10-K.
Company History – Certain Highlights For the Five Fiscal
Years ended June 30, 2019
2015
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd., re-certified to ISO 9001:2008
standards.
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., Singapore, Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
and Trio-Tech (Bangkok) Co., Ltd. re-certified to ISO 9001:2008
standards. (Aug 2015)
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., Singapore, re-certified to ISO 14001:2004
standards. (Aug 2015)
|
2016
|
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.,
re-certified to ISO 14001:2004 standards. (July
2016)
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.,
re-certified to OHSAS 18001:2007 standards. (July
2016)
|
2017
|
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.,
Singapore, re-certified to biz SAFE Level 3 Workplace Safety and
Health standards.
|
2018
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co. Ltd. re-certified to ISO 9001:2015 standards. (Apr
2018).
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) re-certified to ISO 9001:2015
standards. (Jun 2018)
Trio-Tech
(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. re-certified to ISO 9001:2015 standards. (Jun
2018)
Trio-Tech
(Bangkok) Co. Ltd. re-certified to ISO 9001:2015 standards. (Jun
2018)
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) re-certified to ISO 14001:2015
standards. (Jun 2018)
|
2019
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co. Ltd. recertified to ISO 14001:2015 standard. (July
2019)
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co. Ltd. recertified to OHSAS 18001:2007 standard. (July
2019)
|
Overall Business Strategies
Our core business is and historically has been in the semiconductor
industry (testing services, manufacturing-assembly) manufacturing
and distribution. Revenue from the semiconductor industry accounted
for 99.8% and 99.7% of our total revenue for fiscal years 2019 and
2018 respectively. The semiconductor industry has experienced
periods of rapid growth, but has also experienced downturns, often
in connection with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles
of both semiconductor companies’ and their customers’
products and declines in general economic conditions. To
reduce our risks associated with sole industry focus and customer
concentration, the Company continues to put effort into expanding
for new businesses in different industry. Real Estate segment contributed only 0.2% to the
total revenue for fiscal 2019 and has been an insignificant
business operation since the property market in China has slowed
down due to control measures in China. We are continuing the
process of winding-down our oil & gas equipment fabrication
operations, which discontinued its operations in December
2012.
To
achieve our strategic plan for our semiconductor business, we
believe that we must pursue and win new business in the following
areas:
●
Primary markets –
Capturing additional market share within our primary markets by
offering superior products and services to address the needs of our
major customers.
●
Growing markets –
Expanding our geographic reach in areas of the world with
significant growth potential.
●
New markets –
Developing new products and technologies that serve wholly new
markets.
●
Complementary strategic
relationships – Through complementary acquisitions or
similar arrangements, we believe we can expand our markets and
strengthen our competitive position. As part of our growth
strategy, the Company continues to selectively assess opportunities
to develop strategic relationships, including acquisitions,
investments and joint development projects with key partners and
other businesses.
Business Segments
Testing Services
Our
testing services are rendered to manufacturers and purchasers of
semiconductors and other entities who either lack testing
capabilities or whose in-house screening facilities are
insufficient for testing devices in order for them to make sure
that these products meet certain commercial specifications.
Customers outsource their test services either to accommodate
fluctuations in output or to benefit from economies that can be
offered by third party service providers.
Our
laboratories perform a variety of tests, including stabilization
bake, thermal shock, temperature cycling, mechanical shock,
constant acceleration, gross and fine leak tests, electrical
testing, microprocessor equipment contract cleaning services,
static and dynamic burn-in tests, reliability lab services and
vibration testing. We also perform qualification testing,
consisting of intense tests conducted on small samples of output
from manufacturers who require qualification of their processes and
devices.
We use
our own proprietary equipment for certain burn-in, centrifugal and
leak tests, and commercially available equipment for various other
environmental tests. We conduct the majority of our testing
operations in Asia with facilities in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand
and China, which have been certified to the relevant ISO quality
management standards.
Manufacturing
We
manufacture both front-end and back-end semiconductor test
equipment and related peripherals at our facilities in Singapore
and the U.S.
Front-End Products
Artic Temperature Controlled Wafer Chucks
Artic
Temperature Controlled Wafer Chucks are used for test,
characterization and failure analysis of semiconductor wafers and
such other components at accurately controlled cold and hot
temperatures. These systems provide excellent performance to meet
the most demanding customer applications. Several unique mechanical
design features provide excellent mechanical stability under high
probing forces and across temperature ranges.
Wet Process Stations
Wet
Process Stations are used for cleaning, rinsing and drying
semiconductor wafers, flat panel display magnetic disks, and other
microelectronic substrates. After the etching or deposition of
integrated circuits, wafers are typically sent through a series of
100 to 300 additional processing steps. At many of these processing
steps, the wafer is washed and dried using Wet Process
Stations.
Back-End Products
Autoclaves and HAST (Highly Accelerated Stress Test)
Equipment
We
manufacture autoclaves, HAST systems and specialized test fixtures.
Autoclaves provide pressurized, saturated vapor (100% relative
humidity) test environments for fast and easy monitoring of
integrated circuit manufacturing processes. HAST systems provide a
fast and cost-effective alternative to conventional non-pressurized
temperature and humidity testing.
Burn-in Equipment and Boards
We
manufacture burn-in systems, burn-in boards and burn-in board test
systems. Burn-in equipment is used to subject semiconductor devices
to elevated temperatures while testing them electrically to
identify early product failures and to assure long-term
reliability. Burn-in boards are used to mount devices during high
temperature environmental stressing tests.
We
provide integrated burn-in automation solutions to improve
products’ yield, reduce processing downtime and improve
efficiency. In addition, we develop a cooling solution, which is
used to cool or maintain the temperature of high power heat
dissipation semiconductor devices.
Component Centrifuges and Leak Detection Equipment
We
manufacture centrifuges that perform high speed constant
acceleration to test the mechanical integrity of ceramic and other
hermetically sealed semiconductor devices and electronic parts for
high reliability and aerospace applications. Leak detection
equipment is designed to detect leaks in hermetic packaging. The
bubble tester is used for gross leak detection. A visual bubble
trail will indicate when a device is defective.
Distribution
In
addition to marketing our proprietary products, we distribute
complementary products made by manufacturers mainly from the U.S.,
Europe, Taiwan and Japan. The products include environmental
chambers, handlers, interface systems, vibration systems, shaker
systems, solderability testers and other, semiconductor equipment.
Besides equipment, we also distribute a wide range of components
such as connectors, sockets, LCD display panels and touch-screen
panels. Furthermore, our range of products are mainly targeted for
industrial products, the life cycle of which can last from 3 years
to 7 years, rather than consumer products which have a shorter life
cycle.
Real Estate
Beginning in 2007, TTI invested in real estate property in
Chongqing, China, which has generated investment income from the
rental revenue and investment returns from deemed loan receivables,
which are classified as other income. The rental income is
generated from the rental properties in MaoYe and FuLi in
Chongqing, China. In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, the
investment in JiaSheng, which was deemed as loans receivable, was
transferred to down payment for purchase of investment property in
China.
Product Research and Development
We
focus our research and development activities on improving and
enhancing both product design and process technology. We conduct
product and system research and development activities for our
products in Singapore and the U.S. Research and development
expenses were $345 and $451 in fiscal years 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
Marketing, Distribution and Services
We
market our products and services worldwide, directly and through
independent sales representatives and our own marketing sales team.
We have approximately five independent sales representatives
operating in the U.S. and another twenty in various foreign
countries. All sales representatives represented the testing
services segment and the manufacturing segment for various products
and services produced and provided from our facilities in different
locations.
Dependence on Limited Number of Customers
In
fiscal years 2019 and 2018, combined sales of equipment and
services to our three largest customers accounted for approximately
58.3% and 64.0%, respectively, of our total net revenue. Of those
sales, $16,421 (41.9%) and $21,648 (51.4%), of our total net
revenue were from one major customer. Although the major customer
is a U.S. company, the revenue generated from it was from
facilities located outside of the U.S. The majority of our sales
and services in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were to customers
outside of the U.S.
Backlog
The
following table sets forth the Company's backlog at the dates
indicated:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Manufacturing
backlog
|
$4,210
|
$4,324
|
Testing services
backlog
|
4,292
|
4,927
|
Distribution
backlog
|
1,494
|
2,781
|
Real estate
backlog*
|
153
|
293
|
|
$10,149
|
$12,325
|
*Real
estate backlog is based on the rental income from a non-cancellable
lease.
Based
on our past experience, we do not anticipate any significant
cancellations or re-negotiation of sales. The purchase orders for
the manufacturing, testing services and distribution businesses
generally require delivery within 12 months from the date of the
purchase order and certain costs are incurred before delivery. In
the event of a cancellation of a confirmed purchase order, we
require our customers to reimburse us for all costs
incurred. We do not
anticipate any difficulties in meeting delivery schedules. For
testing services, the backlog is based on estimates provided by our
customers and is not based on a customer’s purchase order as
it is a practice that the purchase orders are provided only during
the process of delivery. During the fiscal year 2019, management
has revised the basis of estimation to be more reflective of
realizable revenue, and thus the prior year amount has been
restated for comparison purpose.
Materials and Supplies
Our
products are designed by our engineers and are assembled and tested
at our facilities in the U.S., China and Singapore. We purchase all
parts and certain components from outside vendors for assembly
purposes. We have no written contracts with any of our key
suppliers. As these parts and components are available from a
variety of sources, we believe that the loss of any one of our
suppliers would not have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations taken as a whole.
Competition
Our
ability to compete depends on our ability to develop, introduce and
sell new products or enhanced versions of existing products on a
timely basis and at competitive prices, while reducing our
costs.
There
are numerous testing laboratories in the areas where we operate
that perform a range of testing services similar to those
offered. However, due to severe competition in the Asia
testing and burn-in services industry there has been a reduction in
the total number of competitors. The existence of competing
laboratories and the purchase of testing equipment by semiconductor
manufacturers and users are potential threats to our future testing
services revenue and earnings. Although these laboratories and
new competitors may challenge us at any time, we believe that other
factors, including reputation, long service history and strong
customer relationships, are instrumental in determining our
position in the market.
The
distribution segment sells a wide range of equipment to be used for
testing products. As the semiconductor equipment industry is highly
competitive, we offer a one-stop service alternative to customers
by complementing our products with design consultancy and other
value-added services.
The
principal competitive factors in the manufacturing industry include
product performance, reliability, service and technical support,
product improvements, price, established relationships with
customers and product familiarity. We make every effort to compete
favorably with respect to each of these factors. Although we
have competitors for our various products, we believe that our
products compete favorably with respect to each of the above
factors. We have been in business for more than 60 years and have
operation facilities mostly located in Asia. Those factors
combined have helped us to establish and nurture long-term
relationships with customers and will allow us to continue doing
business with our existing customers upon their relocation to other
regions where we have a local presence or are able to
reach.
Patents
In
fiscal years 2019 and 2018, we did not register any patents within
the U.S.
It is
typical in the semiconductor industry to receive notices from time
to time alleging infringement of patents or other intellectual
property rights of others. We do not believe that we infringe on
the intellectual property rights of any others. However, should any
claims be brought against us, the cost of litigating such claims
and any damages could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
Employees
As of
June 30, 2019, we had approximately 574 full time employees and no
part time employees. Geographically, approximately 9 full time
employees were located in the U.S. and approximately 565 full time
employees in Asia. None of our employees are represented by a labor
union.
There
were approximately 59 employees in the manufacturing segment, 479
employees in the testing services segment, 3 employees in the
distribution segment, 3 employees in the real estate segment and 30
employees in general administration, logistics and
others.
ITEM 1A – RISK
FACTORS
As a
smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are not required to provide the
information required by this item.
Not
applicable.
ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES
As of
the date of filing of this Form 10-K, we believe that we are
utilizing approximately 80% of our fixed property capacity. We also
believe that our existing facilities are adequate and suitable to
cover any sudden increase in our needs in the foreseeable
future.
The
following table presents the relevant information regarding the
location and general character of our principal manufacturing and
testing facilities:
Location
|
Segment
|
Approx. Sq. Ft.
Occupied
|
Owned (O) or Leased (L)
& Expiration Date
|
|
16139 Wyandotte Street, Van Nuys,
CA 91406,
United States of America
|
Corporate,
Testing Services / Manufacturing
|
5,200
|
(L) March 2020
|
|
1004, Toa Payoh North, Singapore
Unit No. HEX 07-01/07
|
Testing Services
|
6,864
|
(L) Sept 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 07-01/07, (ancillary site)
|
Testing Services
|
2,532
|
(L) Sept 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 03-01/02/03
|
Testing Services / Manufacturing
|
2,959
|
(L) Sept 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 01-08/15
|
Testing Services / Manufacturing / Logistics Store
|
6,864
|
(L) Jan 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 01-08/15, (ancillary site)
|
Testing Services / Manufacturing
|
449
|
(L) Jan 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 07-10/11
|
Testing Services / Manufacturing
|
1,953
|
(L) Dec 2021
|
|
1008, Toa Payoh North, Singapore
Unit No. HEX 03-09/17
|
Manufacturing
|
6,099
|
(L) Jan 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 03-09/17, (ancillary site)
|
Manufacturing
|
70
|
(L) Jan 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 01-09/10/11
|
Manufacturing
|
2,202
|
(L) Sept 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 01-15/16
|
Manufacturing
|
1,400
|
(L) Sept 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 01-08
|
Manufacturing
|
603
|
(L) June 2020
|
|
Unit No. HEX 01-12/14
|
Manufacturing
|
1,664
|
(L) July 2022
|
|
Lot No. 11A, Jalan SS8/2,
Sungai Way Free Industrial Zone,
47300 Petaling Jaya,
Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
|
Testing Services
|
78,706
|
(O)
|
|
4809-3-35,CBD Perdana 2
Persiaran Flora Cyber 12
63000 Cyberjaya
|
Manufacturing
|
2000
|
(L) May 2020
|
|
327, Chalongkrung Road,
Lamplathew, Lat Krabang,
Bangkok 10520, Thailand
|
Testing Services
|
34,433
|
(O)
|
|
No. 5, Xing Han Street, Block A
#04-15/16, Suzhou Industrial Park
China 215021
|
Testing Services
|
6,200
|
(L) Jan 2020
|
|
B7-2, Xiqing Economic Development Area International Industrial
Park
Tianjin City, China 300385
|
Testing Services
|
45,940
|
(L) April 2021
|
ITEM 3 – LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
The
Company is, from time to time, the subject of litigation claims and
assessments arising out of matters occurring in its normal business
operations. In the opinion of management, resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial
statements.
There
are no material proceedings to which any director, officer or
affiliate of the Company, any beneficial owner of more than five
percent of the Company’s Common Stock, or any associate of
such person is a party that is adverse, to the Company or its
properties.
ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not
applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY,
RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our
Common Stock is traded on the NYSE MKT under the symbol
“TRT.”
As of
September 1, 2019, there were 3,673,055 shares of our Common Stock
issued and outstanding, and the Company had approximately 57 record
holders of Common Stock. The number of holders of record does not
include the number of persons whose stock is in nominee or
“street name” accounts through brokers.
Dividend Policy
We did
not declare any cash dividends in either fiscal year 2019 or fiscal
year 2018.
The
determination as to whether to pay any future cash dividends will
depend upon our earnings and financial position at that time and
other factors as the Board of Directors may deem appropriate. In
general, California law prohibits the payment of unless the
corporation’s retained earnings prior to the dividend equals
or exceeds the dividend or, immediately after payment of the
dividends, the corporation’s assets would equal or exceed its
total liabilities. There is no assurance that dividends will be
paid to holders of Common Stock in the foreseeable
future.
ITEM 6 - SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
As a
smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are not required to provide the
information required by this item.
ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PERCENTAGES AND SHARE
AMOUNTS)
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction
with our disclaimer on “Forward-Looking Statements,”
“Item 1. Business,” and our Consolidated Financial
Statements, the notes to those statements and other financial
information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
During
fiscal years 2019 and 2018, Trio-Tech International operated in
four segments: manufacturing, testing services, distribution and
real estate. In fiscal year 2019, revenue from the manufacturing,
testing services, distribution and real estate segments represented
38.0%, 42.8%, 19.0% and 0.2% of our revenue, respectively, as
compared to 37.7%, 45.8%, 16.2% and 0.3%, respectively, in fiscal
year 2018.
Semi-conductor
testing and manufacturing (assembly) of test equipment is our core
business. We provide third-party semiconductor testing and burn-in
services primarily through our laboratories in Asia. At or from our
facilities in the U.S. and Asia, we also design, manufacture and
market equipment and systems to be used in the testing and
production of semiconductors, and distribute semiconductor
processing and testing equipment manufactured by other
vendors.
Our
distribution segment operates primarily in Asia. This segment
markets and supports distributing complementary products supplied
by other manufacturers that are used by its customers and other
semiconductor and electronics manufacturers. We believe this will
help us to reduce our exposure to multiple risks arising from being
a mere distributor of manufactured products from
others.
The main revenue component for the real estate segment was rental
income.
No other investment income was recorded as “revenue” by
the real estate segment in either of fiscal years 2019 or
2018.
The rental income is generated from the rental properties acquired
from MaoYe Property Ltd. (“MaoYe”) and Chongqing FuLi
Real Estate Development Co. Ltd (“FuLi”) in Chongqing,
China. In the second quarter of fiscal 2015, the investment made
with JiaSheng Property Development Co. Ltd
(“JiaSheng”), which was deemed as loans receivable, was
transferred to down payment for purchase of investment property in
China.
Trio-Tech
Chongqing Co., Ltd. (“TTCQ”) invested RMB 5,554 in
rental properties in MaoYe during fiscal year 2008, RMB 3,600 in
rental properties from JiangHuai
Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiangHuai”)
during fiscal year 2010 and RMB 4,025 in rental properties in FuLi
during fiscal year 2010. During fiscal year 2019, TTCQ has
completed the sale of thirteen of the fifteen units constituting
the MaoYe property which contributed a capital gain of $685. The
total investment in properties in China was RMB 9,649 and RMB
13,179, or approximately $1,405 and $1,991 in fiscal years 2019 and
2018, respectively. The carrying value of these investment
properties in China was RMB 5,367 and RMB 7,583, or approximately
$782 and $1,146, in fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. These
properties generated a total rental income of $98 and $139 for
fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. TTCQ’s investment
in properties that generated rental income is discussed further in
this Form 10-K.
TTCQ
has yet to receive the title deed for properties purchased from
JiangHuai. TTCQ is in the legal process of obtaining the title
deed, which is dependent on JiangHuai completing the entire
project. The JiangHuai property did not generate any income during
fiscal 2019 and 2018.
On October 14, 2014, TTCQ and Jun Zhou Zhi Ye entered into a
memorandum of understanding. Based on the memorandum of
understanding, both parties agreed to register a sales and purchase
agreement upon Jun Zhou Zhi Ye obtaining a license to sell the
commercial property (the Singapore Themed Resort Project) located
in Chongqing, China. The proposed agreement is for the sale of shop
lots with a total area of 1,484.55 square meters as consideration
for the outstanding amounts owed to TTCQ by Jun Zhou Zhi Ye as
follows:
a) Long term loan receivable RMB 5,000, or approximately $814, as
disclosed in Note 5, plus the interest receivable on long term loan
receivable of RMB 1,250;
b) Commercial units measuring 668 square meters, as mentioned
above; and
c) RMB 5,900 as part of the unrecognized cash consideration of RMB
8,000 relating to the disposal of the joint venture.
The consideration does not include the remaining outstanding amount
of RMB 2,000, or approximately $326, which will be paid to TTCQ in
cash.
The shop lots are to be delivered to TTCQ upon completion of the
construction of the shop lots in the Singapore Themed Resort
Project. The initial targeted date of completion was December 31,
2016. Based on discussions with the developers, the completion date
is estimated to be December 31, 2021. The delay was primarily due to
the time needed by the developers to work with various parties to
inject sufficient funds into this project. Based on the available
information, management believes that the developer is capable of
working with new investors to complete certain phases of this
project.
Fiscal Year 2019
Highlights (in Thousands)
●
Total revenue
decreased by $3,163, or 7.5%, to $39,198 in fiscal year 2019
compared to $42,361 in fiscal year 2018.
●
Manufacturing
segment revenue decreased by $1,089, or 6.8%, to $14,889 in fiscal
year 2019 compared to $15,978 in fiscal year 2018.
●
Testing services
segment revenue was $16,760 in fiscal year 2019, a decrease of
$2,631, or 13.6%, compared to $19,391 in fiscal year
2018.
●
Distribution
segment revenue was $7,451 in fiscal year 2019, an increase of $598
or 8.7%, compared to $6,853 in fiscal year 2018.
●
Real estate segment
revenue decreased by $41, to $98 in fiscal year 2019 compared to
$139 in fiscal year 2018.
●
Overall gross
profit margin decreased by 2.1% to 23.0% in fiscal year 2019
compared to 25.1% in fiscal year 2018.
●
General and
administrative expenses decreased by $201, or 2.8%, to $7,049 in
fiscal year 2019 compared to $7,250 in fiscal year
2018.
●
Research and
development expenses decreased by $106, from $451 in fiscal year
2018 to $345 in fiscal year 2019.
●
Gain on disposal of
property, plant and equipment was $13 in fiscal year 2019, a
decrease of $64 as compared to $77 in fiscal year
2018.
●
Income from
operations was $794 in fiscal year 2019, a decrease of $1,394, as
compared to $2,188 in fiscal year 2018.
●
Income from
continuing operations before income taxes was $1,409 in fiscal year
2019, a decrease of $881, as compared to $2,290 in fiscal year
2018.
●
Other income
decreased by $86 to $249 in fiscal year 2019 compared to $335 in
fiscal year 2018.
●
Gain on sale of
properties was $685 in fiscal year 2019.
●
Income tax benefit
for fiscal year 2019 was $42 compared to income tax expense of $987
in fiscal year 2018.
●
Working capital
increased by $2,379, or 25.8 %, to $11,607 as of June 30, 2019
compared to $9,228 as of June 30, 2018.
●
Net income
attributable to Trio-Tech International for fiscal year 2019 was
$1,545 compared to $1,184 in fiscal year 2018.
●
Net loss
attributable to non-controlling interest for fiscal year 2019 was
$97 compared to net income of $106 in fiscal year
2018.
The
highlights above are intended to identify some of our most
significant events and transactions during our fiscal year 2019.
However, these highlights are not intended to be a full discussion
of our results for the year. These highlights should be read in
conjunction with the discussion on these items in Item 7 and with
our consolidated financial statements and footnotes accompanying
this Annual Report.
General Financial Information
During
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, total assets increased by $53
from $36,474 in fiscal year 2018 to $36,527 in fiscal year 2019.
The increase was primarily due to an increase in short term
deposits, prepaid expenses and other current assets, property,
plant and equipment, and restricted term deposits. The increase was
partially offset by the decrease in cash and cash equivalents,
trade receivables, other receivables, inventories, asset held for
sale, deferred tax assets, investment properties and other
assets.
Cash
and cash equivalents at June 30, 2019 were $4,863, a decrease of
$1,676, or 25.6%, compared to $6,539 at June 30, 2018. The decrease
was mainly due to deposits placed to acquire
equipment.
Trade
accounts receivable at June 30, 2019 was $7,113, representing a
decrease of $634, or 8.2%, compared to $7,747 at June 30, 2018. The
decrease was attributable to improvement in collection and decrease
in sales, especially in the Malaysia and China operations.
The number of days’ sales
outstanding in accounts receivables was 69 days and 72 days for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
As at
June 30, 2019, other receivables were $817, a decrease of $64, or
7.3%, compared to $881 at June 30, 2018. The decrease was primarily
due to a decrease in advance payment made by the Company in the
Singapore operation. The decrease was partially offset by an
increase in contract assets arising from the effect of new
accounting standard, ASC 606
Revenue from contracts with customers which became
effective in the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 in China operation.
Inventories
at June 30, 2019 were $2,427, a decrease of $503, or 17.2%,
compared to $2,930 at June 30, 2018. The decrease in inventories
was mainly due to the timing of customers’ orders. The number
of days’ inventory held was 85 days at the end of fiscal
2019, compared to 70 days at the end of fiscal year 2018. The
slower turnover of inventory on hand was mainly due to some delayed
shipment as per customers’ requirement in the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2019.
Assets
held for sale in Penang, Malaysia as at June 30, 2019 was $89,
compared to $91 at June 30, 2018. Management received an expression
of interest from a potential buyer in acquiring the property during
second quarter of fiscal year 2019 and the sale was under
negotiation with the potential buyer during third quarter of fiscal
year 2019. Sales and Purchase Agreement was finalized with the
potential buyer during fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019. The
completion of the sale is subject to the approval by Penang
Development Corporation.
Investment
properties in China as of June 30, 2019 were $782, a decrease of
$364 from $1,146 at June 30, 2018. The decrease was primarily
due to the sale of MaoYe investment properties in the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2019 for a gain of $685.
Property,
plant and equipment at June 30, 2019 were $12,159, an increase of
$224, compared to $11,935 at June 30, 2018. The increase in
property, plant and equipment was mainly due to acquisition of
plant and equipment for replacement and new businesses in fiscal
year 2019 compared to fiscal year of 2018, and the foreign currency exchange difference between
functional currency and U.S. dollars from June 30, 2018 to
June 30, 2019. Capital expenditures in fiscal year 2019 increased
by $532, to $2,841, as compared to $2,309 for fiscal year 2018. The
increase in capital expenditure in the China and Thailand
operations was partially offset by the decrease in capital
expenditure in the Singapore operation in fiscal year
2019.
Other
assets at June 30, 2019 were $1,750, a decrease of $499, or 22.2%,
compared to $2,249 at June 30, 2018. The decrease in other assets
was primarily due to the reclassification of down payments made for
the purchase of equipment to property, plant and equipment in the
Malaysia and China operations.
Restricted
term deposits at June 30, 2019 increased by $11, to $1,706 compared
to $1,695 at June 30, 2018. The increase was mainly due to fixed
deposit interest earned and currency
translation difference between functional currency and U.S.
dollar from June 30, 2018 to
June 30, 2019.
Total
liabilities at June 30, 2019 were $11,666, a decrease of $1,307, or
10.1%, compared to $12,973 at June 30, 2018. The decrease in
liabilities was primarily due to the decrease in lines of credit,
accounts payable, income taxes payable and capital leases, but
partially offset by the increase in accrued expenses and bank loans
payable.
Utilized
lines of credit as of June 30, 2019 decreased by $1,856 to $187,
from to $2,043 as of June 30, 2018. The decrease in lines of credit
was mainly due to the repayment made for lines of credit in fiscal
year ended June 30, 2019.
Accounts
payable as of June 30, 2019 decreased by $432 to $3,272 from $3,704
as of June 30, 2018. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in
purchases and more payments released in fiscal year 2019 as
compared to fiscal year 2018.
Accrued
expenses as at June 30, 2019 increased by $314 to $3,486 from
$3,172 as at June 30, 2018. The increase was mainly due to an
increase in customer deposits received in the China
operation.
Income
Tax Payable as at June 30, 2019 decreased by $257 to $856 from
$1,113 as at June 30, 2018. The decrease was mainly due to the
repayment made for Income and Repatriation Tax that arose from
introduction of Tax Cuts & Jobs Act 2017 in first quarter of
fiscal year 2019 and also the reversal made for Repatriation Tax in
second and fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019.
Critical Accounting Estimates & Policies
The
discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition
presented in this section are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the U.S. During the preparation
of the consolidated financial statements we are required to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate
our estimates and judgments, including those related to sales,
returns, pricing concessions, bad debts, inventories, investments,
fixed assets, intangible assets, income taxes and other
contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and
on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under
current conditions. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions.
In response to the SEC’s Release No. 33-8040,
Cautionary Advice
Regarding Disclosure about Critical Accounting Policy,
we have identified the most critical
accounting policies upon which our financial status depends. We
determined that those critical accounting policies are related to
the inventory valuation, allowance for doubtful accounts, revenue
recognition, impairment of property, plant and equipment,
investment property and income tax. These accounting policies are
discussed in the relevant sections in this management’s
discussion and analysis, including the Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements discussed below.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts
During
the normal course of business, we extend unsecured credit to our
customers in all segments. Typically, credit terms require payment
to be made between 30 to 90 days from the date of the sale. We
generally do not require collateral from customers. We maintain our
cash accounts at credit-worthy financial institutions.
The
Company’s management considers the following factors when
determining the collectability of specific customer accounts:
customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the
customer, current economic industry trends, and changes in customer
payment terms. The Company includes any account balances that are
determined to be uncollectible, along with a general reserve, in
the overall allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to
collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off
against the allowance. Based on the information available to
management, the Company believed that its allowance for doubtful
accounts was adequate as of June 30, 2019.
Inventory Valuation
Inventories of our manufacturing and distribution segments
consisting principally of raw materials, works in progress, and
finished goods are stated at the lower of cost, using the first-in,
first-out (“FIFO”) method, or market value. The
semiconductor industry is characterized by rapid technological
change, short-term customer commitments and swiftly changing
demand. Provisions for estimated excess and obsolete inventory are
based on regular reviews of inventory quantities on hand and the
latest forecasts of product demand and production requirements from
our customers. Inventories are written down for not saleable,
excess or obsolete raw materials, works-in-process and finished
goods by charging such write-downs to cost of sales. In addition to
write-downs based on newly introduced parts, statistics and
judgments are used for assessing provisions of the remaining
inventory based on salability and obsolescence.
Property, Plant and Equipment & Investment
Property
Property, plant and equipment and investment properties are stated
at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the
assets using the straight-line method. Amortization of leasehold
improvements is provided for over the lease terms or the estimated
useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter, using the
straight-line method.
Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are charged directly to
expense as incurred. Additions and improvements to property and
equipment are capitalized. When assets are disposed of, the related
cost and accumulated depreciation thereon are removed from the
accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income or
loss.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions
The United States dollar (“U.S. dollar”) is the
functional currency of the U.S. parent company. The Singapore
dollar, the national currency of Singapore, is the primary currency
of the economic environment in which the operations in Singapore
are conducted. We also have business entities in Malaysia,
Thailand, China and Indonesia, of which the Malaysian ringgit
(“RM”), Thai baht, Chinese renminbi (“RMB”)
and Indonesian rupiah, are the national currencies. The Company
uses the U.S. dollar for financial reporting purposes.
The Company translates assets and liabilities of its subsidiaries
outside the U.S. into U.S. dollars using the rate of exchange
prevailing at the balance sheet date, and the statement of
operations is measured using average rates in effect for the
reporting period. Adjustments resulting from the translation of the
subsidiaries’ financial statements from foreign currencies
into U.S. dollars are recorded in shareholders' equity as part of
accumulated comprehensive income or loss - translation adjustment.
Gains or losses resulting from transactions denominated in
currencies other than functional currencies of the Company’s
subsidiaries are reflected in income for the reporting
period.
Revenue Recognition
On July 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2014-09, ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (“ASC Topic
606”). This standard update outlines a single comprehensive
model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from
contracts with customers. We adopted using the modified
retrospective method applied to all contracts that were not
completed contracts at the date of initial application (i.e. July
1, 2018). Results for reporting periods after July 1, 2018 are
presented under ASC Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not
adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the
Company’s historic accounting under ASC Topic
605.
We apply a five-step approach as defined in ASC Topic 606 in
determining the amount and timing of revenue to be recognized: (1)
identifying the contract with customer; (2) identifying the
performance obligations in the contracts; (3) determining the
transaction price; (4) allocating the transaction price to the
performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognizing
revenue when the corresponding performance obligation is
satisfied.
Revenue
derived from testing services is recognized when testing services
are rendered. Revenue generated from sale of products in the
manufacturing and distribution segments are recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the
products has occurred, customer acceptance has been obtained (which
means the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been
transferred to the customer), the price is fixedor determinable and
collectability is reasonably assured. Certain customers can request
for installation and training services to be performed for certain
products sold in the manufacturing segment. These services are
mainly on helping customers with the test runs of the machines sold
and are considered a separate performance obligation. Such services
can be provided by other entities as well and these do not
significantly modify the product. The Company recognizes the
revenue at point in time when the Company has satisfied its
performance obligation.
In the real estate segment: (1) revenue from property development
is earned and recognized on the earlier of the dates when the
underlying property is sold or upon the maturity of the agreement;
if this amount is uncollectible, the agreement empowers the
repossession of the property, and (2) rental revenue is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases.
This means that, with respect to a particular lease, actual amounts
billed in accordance with the lease during any given period may be
higher or lower than the amount of rental revenue recognized for
the period. Straight-line rental revenue is commenced when the
tenant assumes possession of the leased premises. Accrued
straight-line rents receivable represents the amount by which
straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in
accordance with lease agreements.
Joint Venture
The Company analyzes its investments in joint ventures to determine
if the joint venture is a variable interest entity (a
“VIE”) and would require consolidation. The Company (a)
evaluates the sufficiency of the total equity at risk, (b) reviews
the voting rights and decision-making authority of the equity
investment holders as a group, and whether there are any guaranteed
returns, protection against losses, or capping of residual returns
within the group and (c) establishes whether activities within the
venture are on behalf of an investor with disproportionately few
voting rights in making this VIE determination. The Company would
consolidate a venture that is determined to be a VIE if it was the
primary beneficiary. Beginning January 1, 2010, a new accounting
standard became effective and changed the method by which the
primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined. Through a primarily
qualitative approach, the variable interest holder, if any, who has
the power to direct the VIE’s most significant activities is
the primary beneficiary. To the extent that the joint venture does
not qualify as VIE, the Company further assesses the existence of a
controlling financial interest under a voting interest model to
determine whether the venture should be consolidated.
Equity Method
The Company analyzes its investments in joint ventures to determine
if the joint venture should be accounted for using the equity
method. Management evaluates both Common Stock and in-substance
Common Stock as to whether they give the Company the ability to
exercise significant influence over operating and financial
policies of the joint venture even though the Company holds less
than 50% of the Common Stock and in-substance Common Stock. If so,
the net income of the joint venture will be reported as
“Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures, net of
tax” in the Company’s consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income or loss.
Cost Method
Investee
companies not accounted for under the consolidation or the equity
method of accounting are accounted for under the cost method of
accounting. Under this method, the Company’s share of the
earnings or losses of such investee companies is not included in
the consolidated balance sheet or consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income or loss. However, impairment
charges are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations
and comprehensive income or loss. If circumstances suggest that the
value of the investee company has subsequently recovered, such
recovery is not recorded.
Long-Lived Assets & Impairment
Our business requires heavy investment in manufacturing facilities
and equipment that are technologically advanced but can quickly
become significantly under-utilized or rendered obsolete by rapid
changes in demand. We have recorded intangible assets with finite
lives related to our acquisitions.
We evaluate our long-lived assets with finite lives for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Factors
considered important that could result in an impairment review
include significant underperformance relative to expected
historical or projected future operating results, significant
changes in the manner of use of the assets or the strategy for our
business, significant negative industry or economic trends, and a
significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period of
time. Impairment is recognized based on the difference between the
fair value of the asset and its carrying value, and fair value is
generally measured based on discounted cash flow analysis, if there
is significant adverse change.
In our business in the future, we may be required to record
impairment charges on our long-lived assets. There was no
impairment in fiscal years 2019 and 2018.
Fair Value Measurements
Under the standard ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures
(“ASC Topic
820”), fair value refers to the price that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between participants in the market in which the
reporting entity transacts its business. ASC Topic 820 clarifies
the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions
market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
In support of this principle, ASC Topic 820 establishes a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop
those assumptions. Under the standard, fair value measurements
would be separately disclosed by level within the fair value
hierarchy.
Income Tax
We account for income taxes using the liability method in
accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income
Taxes (“ASC Topic 740”), which requires an entity to
recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequence
attributable to the difference between the tax bases of assets and
liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements,
which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years.
Further, the effects of enacted tax laws or rate changes are
included as part of deferred tax expenses or benefits in the period
that covers the enactment date. Management believed that it was
more likely than not that the future benefits from these timing
differences would not be realized. Accordingly, a full allowance
was provided as of June 30, 2019 and 2018.
The calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex global tax regulations.
We recognize potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues
in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of
whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If
the estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate
assessment, a further charge to expense would result.
Stock Based Compensation
Under ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock
Compensation (“ASC Topic
718”), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant
date, based on the estimated fair value of the award using an
option pricing model for stock options (Black-Scholes) and market
price for restricted stock units, and is recognized as expense over
the employee’s requisite service period.
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements
We adopted ASC Topic 810, Consolidation
(“ASC Topic 810”). This
guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This guidance requires that
non-controlling interests in subsidiaries be reported in the equity
section of the controlling company’s balance sheet. It also
changes the manner in which the net income of the subsidiary is
reported and disclosed in the controlling company’s income
statement.
Loan Receivables
The loan receivables are classified as current assets carried at
face value and are individually evaluated for impairment. The
allowance for loan losses reflects management’s best estimate
of probable losses determined principally on the basis of
historical experience and specific allowances for known loan
accounts. All loans or portions thereof deemed to be uncollectible
or to require an excessive collection cost are written off to the
allowance for losses.
Interest Income
Interest income on loans is recognized on an accrual basis.
Discounts and premiums on loans are amortized to income using the
interest method over the remaining period to contractual maturity.
The amortization of discounts into income is discontinued on loans
that are contractually 90 days past due or when collection of
interest appears doubtful.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The
amendments in ASU 2018-18 ASC Topic 808: Collaborative Arrangements: Clarifying the
Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606 provide more
comparability in the presentation of revenue for certain
transactions between collaborative arrangement participants. The
amendments allow organizations to only present units of account in
collaborative arrangements that are within the scope of the revenue
recognition standard together with revenue accounted for under the
revenue recognition standard. The parts of the collaborative
arrangement that are not in the scope of the revenue recognition
standard should be presented separately from revenue accounted for
under the revenue recognition standard. The amendments are
effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
While early application is permitted, including adoption in an
interim period, the Company has not elected to early adopt. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this
accounting standard update on its consolidated financial
statements.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-13 ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement: Disclosure
Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair
Value Measurement modify the disclosure requirements on fair
value measurements based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement,
including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments
on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted
average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3
fair value measurements, and the narrative description of
measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only
the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial
fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied
retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date.
The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
The amendments in ASU 2018-09 Codification
Improvements represent changes
to clarify, correct errors in, or make minor improvements to the
Codification, eliminating inconsistencies and providing
clarifications in current guidance. The amendments in this ASU
include those made to: Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive
Income-Overall; Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments;
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity-Overall; Compensation-Stock
Compensation-Income Taxes; Business Combinations-Income Taxes;
Derivatives and Hedging-Overall; Fair Value Measurement-Overall;
Financial Services-Brokers and Dealers-Liabilities; and Plan
Accounting-Defined Contribution Pension Plans-Investments-Other.
The amendments are effective for all entities for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, and thus will be effective for
the Company for the fiscal year that commenced July 1, 2019 and
will end June 30, 2020. The Company has completed the assessment
for this update, apart from subtopic 718-740 Compensation-Stock
Compensation, other subtopics
in this update are not applicable to the Company. The Company has
completed the assessment for this update and concluded that the
subtopic 718-740 has no significant impact to the
Company’s consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-02 ASC Topic 220: Income Statement – Reporting
Comprehensive Income provide financial statement preparers
with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to retained earnings in each
period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal
corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (or portion
thereof) is recorded. The amendments
in ASC Topic 220 are effective for public business entities for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and thus will be
effective for the Company for the fiscal year that commenced July
1, 2019 and will end June 30, 2020. The Company has
completed the assessment and concluded that this update has no
significant impact to the Company’s consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income.
The amendments in ASU 2017-11: Earnings Per Share
(Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities
from Equity (Topic
480);
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic
815) are effective for public companies for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, and thus will be effective for
the Company for the fiscal year that commenced July 1, 2019 and
will end June 30, 2020. The Company has completed the assessment
and concluded that this update has no impact to the Company’s
EPS calculation.
The amendments in ASU 2017-04 ASC Topic 350: Intangibles - Goodwill and
Other (“ASC Topic
350”) simplify the test for goodwill impairment. For public
companies, these amendments are effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within
those periods. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s presentation of
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in ASU 2019-05 ASC Topic 326: Financial Instruments —
Credit Losses (“ASC Topic
326”): Targeted Transition
Relief is issued to provide
option to measure certain types of assets at fair value which
allows companies to irrevocably elect, upon adoption of ASU
2016-13, the fair value option on financial instruments that (1)
were previously recorded at amortized cost and (2) are within the
scope of ASC 326-20 if the instruments are eligible for the fair
value option under ASC 825-10. The amendments in ASU 2018-19 ASC
Topic 326: Codification Improvements to
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses clarify that receivables arising from operating
leases are not within the scope of the credit losses standard, but
rather, should be accounted for in accordance with the
lease’s standard. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 ASC Topic
326: Financial Instruments —
Credit losses (“ASC Topic
326”) are issued for the measurement of all expected credit
losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on
historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and
supportable forecasts. For public companies that are SEC filers,
ASC Topic 326 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. While early application will be permitted for all
organizations for fiscal years and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, the Company has
not yet determined if it will early adopt. The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact of this accounting standard update
on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU 2016-12 ASC Topic
842: Leases, which amends a number of aspects of the existing
accounting standards for leases which require lessees to recognize
operating leased assets and corresponding liabilities on the
balance sheet for all leases with lease terms of more than 12
months. In July 2018, ASU 2018-10: Codification Improvements to Leases
addressed stakeholders’ questions about how to apply certain
aspects of the new guidance in Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 842: Leases. The
clarifications address the rate implicit in the lease, impairment
of the net investment in the lease, lessee reassessment of lease
classification, lessor reassessment of lease term and purchase
options, variable payments that depend on an index or rate and
certain transition adjustments. Besides, the amendments in ASU
2018-11 ASC Topic 842: Leases:
Targeted Improvements related to transition relief on
comparative reporting at adoption affect all entities with lease
contracts that choose the additional transition method and
separating components of a contract affect only lessors whose lease
contracts qualify for the practical expedient. In July 2018, the
amendments in ASU 2018-20 ASC Topic 842: Leases: Narrow-Scope Improvements
for Lessors addressed the
following issues facing lessors when applying this lease standard:
(1) sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from lessees, (2)
certain lessor costs and (3) recognition of variable payments for
contracts with lease and non-lease components. On March 5, 2019,
ASU 2019-01 issued to exempt both lessees and lessors from having
to provide certain interim disclosures in the fiscal year in which
a company adopts the new leases standard. The amendments are effective for all entities for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and thus will be
effective for the Company for the fiscal year that commenced July
1, 2019 and will end June 30, 2020. The Company will adopt these
standards starting in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020 on a
modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the
period through a cumulative-effect adjustment. The Company has completed its preliminary impact
evaluation of the new lease accounting standard on its consolidated
financial statement and expects to recognize new right-of-use
assets and lease liabilities of approximately $790 to $840 on the
consolidated balance sheet. The Company does not expect the change
to have a material impact on the consolidated statements of income
and the consolidated statements of cash flows. Further, upon
adoption, the Company will expand its financial statement
disclosures to present additional details of its leasing
arrangements.
Other new pronouncements issued but not yet effective until after
June 30, 2019 are not expected to have a significant effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Comparison of Operating Results
The
following table presents certain data from the consolidated
statements of operating income as a percentage of net sales for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenue
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Cost
of sales
|
77.0
|
74.9
|
Gross Margin
|
23.0%
|
25.1%
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
18.0%
|
17.1%
|
Selling
|
2.1
|
1.9
|
Research
and development
|
0.9
|
1.1
|
Gain
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
(0.2)
|
Total
operating expenses
|
21.0%
|
19.9%
|
Income from Operations
|
2.0%
|
5.2%
|
Overall Revenue
The
overall revenue is composed of the revenues from the manufacturing,
testing services, distribution and real estate segments. The
following table presents the components of the overall revenue
realized in fiscal years 2019 and 2018 in percentage format,
respectively.
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Manufacturing
|
38.0%
|
37.7%
|
Testing
|
42.8
|
45.8
|
Distribution
|
19.0
|
16.2
|
Real
estate
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
Total
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
Revenue
in fiscal year 2019 was $39,198, a decrease of $3,163 or 7.5%,
compared to $42,361 in fiscal year 2018. The decrease in revenue
was due to a decrease in sales across all segments except the
distribution segment.
As a
percentage of total revenue, the revenue generated by the
manufacturing segment in fiscal year 2019 accounted for 38.0%, an
increase of 0.3%, as compared to 37.7% in fiscal year 2018. In
terms of dollar amount, the revenue generated by the manufacturing
segment in fiscal year 2019 was $14,889, reflecting a decrease of
$1,089, or 6.8%, compared to $15,978 in fiscal year 2018. The
decrease in revenue generated by the manufacturing segment was due
to a decrease in the manufacturing segment in the China operation
and the U.S. operation as a result of lower demand for capital
expenditure by our customers in these two operations. The decreases
were partially offset by an increase in the manufacturing segment
in the Singapore operation as a result of higher demand for capital
expenditure by our customers in that operation.
Backlog
in the manufacturing segment was $4,210 as of June 30, 2019,
representing a decrease of $114 from $4,324 as of June 30, 2018. We
expect the demand for our products to increase at a slower pace in
fiscal year 2020 as compared to fiscal year 2019, depending on the
global market for testing equipment and systems amid the trade
tension between United State and China, the two largest economies
in the world.
As a
percentage of total revenue, the revenue generated by the testing
services segment in fiscal year 2019 accounted for 42.8% of total
sales, a decrease of 3.0% compared to 45.8% in fiscal year 2018. In
terms of dollar amounts, the revenue generated by the testing
services segment for fiscal year 2019 was $16,760, reflecting a
decrease of $2,631, compared to $19,391 for fiscal year 2018. The
decrease in revenue generated by the testing segment was
primarily attributable to a decrease in Malaysia and China
operations. The decrease in the Malaysia and China operations were
due to a decrease in volume of testing services requested by our
customers. These decreases were partially offset by the increase in
revenue as a result of higher volume in the Singapore, and Thailand
operations during fiscal year 2019. Demand for testing services
varies from country to country depending on changes taking place in
the market and our customers’ forecasts. Because it is
difficult to accurately forecast fluctuations in the market, we
believe that it is necessary to maintain testing facilities in
close proximity to our customers in order to make it convenient for
them to send us their newly manufactured parts for testing and to
enable us to maintain a share of the market.
Backlog
in the testing services segment as of June 30, 2019 was $4,292, a
decrease of $635 as compared to $4,927 at June 30, 2018. The
decrease in backlog was mainly from the Malaysia and China
operations. The backlog depends on the estimates volume provided by
customers, which are in turn dependent upon the customers’
inventory levels and demand.
As a
percentage of total revenue, the revenue generated by the
distribution segment in fiscal year 2019 accounted for 19.0% of
total sales, an increase of 2.8% compared to 16.2% in fiscal year
2018. In terms of dollar amounts, revenue for fiscal year 2019 was
$7,451, an increase of $598, or 8.7%, compared to $6,853 for fiscal
year 2018. The increase of revenue in our distribution segment was
due to the increase in orders for certain products from customers
in our Singapore and China operations. This increase was partially
offset by a decrease in orders in the Malaysia
operation.
Backlog
in the distribution segment as of June 30, 2019 was $1,494,
reflecting a decrease of $1,287 compared to the backlog of $2,781
at June 30, 2018. The decrease in backlog was mainly due to a
decrease in demands from customers as a result of the slowing
economic environment. We believe that our competitive advantage in
the distribution segment is our design and engineering capabilities
in components and touch screen products, which allow customization
to meet the specific requirement of our customers. Product volume
for the distribution segment depends on sales activities such as
placing orders and queries for products and backlog. Equipment and
electronic component sales are very competitive, as the products
are readily available in the market.
As a
percentage of total revenue, the revenue generated by the real
estate segment was 0.2% of total sales in fiscal year 2019 and 0.3%
of total sales in fiscal year 2018. In terms of dollar value,
revenue for fiscal year 2019 was $98, a decrease of $41, or 29.5%,
compared to $139 for fiscal year 2018. Our real estate segment saw
a decrease in rental income due to the sale of a majority of the
MaoYe properties in fiscal year 2019.
Backlog
in the real estate segment as of June 30, 2019 was $153, a decrease
of $140 as compared to $293 at June 30, 2018.
Overall Gross Margin
Overall
gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 23.0% in fiscal year
2019, a decrease of 2.1% compared to 25.1% in fiscal year 2018. The
decrease in gross margin as a percentage of revenue was mainly
attributable to the manufacturing and testing segments. In terms of
dollar value, the overall gross profit for fiscal year 2019 was
$9,001, a decrease of $1,637, or 2.1%, compared to $10,638 for
fiscal year 2018. The decrease in the dollar value of overall gross
margin was mainly due to the decrease of sales in the manufacturing
and testing segments, which was partially offset by an increase of
sales in the distribution segment.
The
gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the manufacturing
segment was 23.5% in fiscal year 2019, remained comparable with
23.6% in fiscal year 2018. In terms of dollar amounts, the gross
profit for the manufacturing segment in fiscal year 2019 was
$3,496, a decrease of $269, or 7.1%, compared to $3,765 in fiscal
year 2018. The decrease in absolute dollar amount of gross margin
was mainly due to a decrease in revenue in our Singapore, U.S. and
China operations.
The
gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the testing services
segment was 27.2% in fiscal year 2019, a decrease of 4.1% compared
to 31.3% in fiscal year 2018. In terms of dollar amounts, gross
profit in the testing services segment in fiscal year 2019 was
$4,558, a decrease of $1,510, or 24.9%, compared to $6,068 in
fiscal year 2018. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily
due to the decrease in revenue brought about by a decrease in
orders in the China and Malaysia operations. A significant portion
of our cost of goods sold is fixed in the testing segment. Thus, as
the demand for services and factory utilization decreases, the
fixed costs are spread over the decrease output, which will
decrease the gross profit margin. The negative impact on gross
profit margin was partially offset by the effort of cost saving in
the China and Malaysia operations.
The
gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the distribution segment
was 12.7% in fiscal year 2019, an increase of 1.2% compared to
11.5% in fiscal year 2018. The increase in gross margin percentage
was due to the increase of sales and a change in the product mix.
The distribution segment had more sales of products with a higher
profit margin compared to the same period of last fiscal year. In
terms of dollar amounts, gross profit in the distribution segment
was $946, an increase of $161, or 20.5%, compared to $785 in fiscal
year 2018. The gross margin of the distribution segment was not
only affected by the market price of our products, but also our
product mix, which changed frequently as a result of the changes in
market demand.
The
gross margin as a percentage of revenue in the real estate segment
was 1% in fiscal year 2019, a deterioration of 13.4% compared to a
gross margin of 14.4% in fiscal year 2018. In absolute dollar
amount, gross margin in the real estate segment was $1 in fiscal
year 2019, a decrease of $19, as compared to a gross margin of $20
in fiscal year 2018. The decrease was due to a decrease in revenue
from MaoYe properties due to sales of a majority of the properties
in fiscal year 2019 as discussed earlier.
Operating Expenses
Operating
expenses for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 were as
follows:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
General
and administrative
|
$7,049
|
$7,250
|
Selling
|
826
|
826
|
Research
and development
|
345
|
451
|
Gain
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
(13)
|
(77)
|
Total
|
$8,207
|
$8,450
|
General
and administrative expenses decreased by $201, or 2.8%, from $7,250
in fiscal year 2018 to $7,049 in fiscal year 2019. The decrease was mainly attributable to a decrease
in payroll related and bonus expenses in the Malaysia, China and
U.S. operations, and a decrease in professional expenses in the
Malaysia operations. These decreases were partially offset by an
increase in medical expenses in the Singapore
operations.
Research
and development expenses were $345 and $451 in fiscal year 2019 and
2018, respectively, reflecting a decrease of $106 or 23.5%. The
decrease was mainly due to a decrease of expenses in the China
operation. The China operation did not incur any research and
development expenses in fiscal year 2019 whereas there was a
one-off research and development project in fiscal year
2018.
During
fiscal year 2019, there was a gain in disposal of property, plant
and equipment amounting to $13, as compared to a gain on disposal
of $77 in fiscal year 2018. The disposal of property, plant and
equipment is a part of routine operational review of assets during
the fiscal year 2019, resulting in a gain.
Income from Operations
Income
from operations was $794 in fiscal year 2019, a decrease of $1,394,
as compared to $2,188 in fiscal year 2018. The decrease was mainly
due to a decrease in revenue resulting in a decrease in gross
margin which was partially offset by the decrease in operating
expenses, as discussed earlier.
Interest Expenses
The
interest expenses for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were as
follows:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Interest expenses
|
$319
|
$233
|
Interest
expenses increased by $86, or 36.9%, to $319 in fiscal year 2019
from $233 in fiscal year 2018. The increase in interest expenses was mainly
due to Malaysia operation has taken up new bank loan in funding for
operation and potential investment purposes in fiscal year
2019.
Other
Income, Net
Other
income, net for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 was as
follows:
|
For the Year
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Interest
income
|
$100
|
$50
|
Other
rental income
|
113
|
110
|
Exchange
loss
|
(135)
|
(160)
|
Government
Grants
|
77
|
126
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
2
|
-
|
Other
miscellaneous income
|
92
|
209
|
Total
|
$249
|
$335
|
Other
income decreased by $86 to $249 for fiscal year 2019 as compared to
$335 for fiscal year 2018. The decrease in other income in fiscal
year 2019 was mainly due to decrease in receipt of government
grants and other miscellaneous income. These decreases were
partially offset by an increase in interest income and decrease in
foreign exchange loss.
Gain on sale of properties
During
the first quarter of 2019, management decided to sell MaoYe
Property, which is one of our earlier investment properties, In
order to monetize the capital gain on property, TTCQ appointed a
sole agent for 6 months as of September 1, 2018 to search for
suitable buyers for this property. TTCQ has completed the sale of
thirteen of the fifteen units constituting the MaoYe property which
sale resulted in a gain of $685. During third quarter 2019,
considering the current market condition in China, management has
decided not to sell the remaining two units of MaoYe properties and
the properties were reclassified to investment property from assets
held for sale.
Income Tax Benefits/Expenses
Income tax benefits for fiscal year 2019 were $42, as compared to
income tax expense of $987 for fiscal year 2018. A change of $1,029
was mainly due to the provision for repatriation tax of $900 made
in fiscal year 2018. The provision for income taxes for the year
ended June 30, 2019 includes a $145 decrease from the completion of
our provisional accounting for the effects of the Tax Act under SAB
118 and a $192 decrease from utilization of the Company’s Net
Operating Loss and allowable tax credit. The decrease is associated
with the one-time mandatory repatriation tax of certain post-1986
earnings and profits that were deferred from U.S. taxation by the
Company’s foreign subsidiaries.
At June
30, 2019, the Company had no federal net operating loss
carry-forwards and state net operating loss carry forward of $867,
which expire through 2038. These carryovers may be subject to
limitations under I.R.C. Section 382. The Company also had tax
credit carry-forward of approximately $49 for U.S. federal income
tax purposes expiring through 2020. Management of the Company is
uncertain whether it is more likely than not that these future
benefits will be realized. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance
was established.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
Loss
from discontinued operations was $3 in fiscal year 2019, as
compared to $13 in fiscal year 2018. The loss was attributable to
currency translation effect in the discontinued operations. We
discontinued our fabrication segment in fiscal year
2013.
Non-controlling Interest
As of
June 30, 2019, we held an indirect 55% interest each in Trio-Tech
(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. (“TTM”), Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur)
Sdn. Bhd. (“TTKL”), SHI and PT SHI, and a 76% interest
in Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. (“Prestal”).
The non-controlling interest for
fiscal year 2019, in the net loss of subsidiaries, was $97, a
change of $203 compared to the non-controlling interest in the net
income of $106 for the previous fiscal year. The change in the
non-controlling interest was primarily attributable to the net loss
generated by the Malaysia operations in fiscal year 2019, as
compared to net profit generated by the Malaysia operation in the
previous fiscal year.
Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders
Net
income for fiscal year 2019 was $1,545, an increase of $361, as
compared to $1,184 for fiscal year 2018. The increase in net income
during fiscal year 2019 was mainly due to the gain on the sale of
MaoYe properties and a decrease in tax expenses. These were
partially offset by the decrease in gross profit as discussed
earlier.
Earnings per Share
Basic
earnings per share from continuing operations was $0.42 in fiscal
year 2019, as compared to $0.34 in fiscal year 2018. Basic loss per
share from discontinued operations was $nil for fiscal year 2019
and 0.01 for fiscal year 2018.
Diluted
earnings per share from continuing operations was $0.41 in fiscal
year 2019, as compared to $0.32 in fiscal year 2018. Diluted loss
per share from discontinued operations was $nil for fiscal year
2019 and 0.01 for fiscal year 2018.
Segment Information
The
revenue, gross margin and income or loss from each segment for
fiscal years 2019 and 2018 are presented below. As the segment
revenue and gross margin have been discussed in the previous
section, only the comparison of income or loss from operations is
discussed below.
Manufacturing Segment
The
revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
manufacturing segment for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were as
follows:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenue
|
$14,889
|
$15,978
|
Gross
margin
|
23.5%
|
23.6%
|
Income
from operations
|
$575
|
$548
|
Income
from operations in the manufacturing segment was $575 in fiscal
year 2019, an increase of $27, as compared to $548 in fiscal year
2018. The increase was attributable to a decrease in operating
expenses. Operating expenses were $2,921 and $3,217 for fiscal
years 2019 and 2018, respectively. The
decrease in operating expenses was mainly due to a decrease in
research & development expenses and corporate overhead
allocation, which are allocated on a predetermined fixed
charge basis.
Testing Services Segment
The
revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the testing
services segment for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were as
follows:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenue
|
$16,760
|
$19,391
|
Gross
margin
|
27.2%
|
31.3%
|
(Loss)/Income
from operations
|
$(164)
|
$1,522
|
Loss
from operations in the testing services segment in fiscal year 2019
was $164, a change of $1,686 compared to operation income of $1,522
in fiscal year 2018. The decrease in operating income was
attributable to a decrease in revenue by $2,631, a decrease in
gross margin of $1,510 and an increase in operating expense of
$176. Operating expenses were $4,722 and $4,546 for fiscal years
2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in operating expenses was
mainly attributable to an increase in
selling expenses, research and development expenses and corporate
overheads.
Selling expenses increased due to higher travelling expenses
incurred in the Singapore operations. The increase in corporate
overhead expenses was due to an increase in the corporate overhead
allocation, which are allocated on a predetermined fixed charge
basis. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in
general and administrative expenses. Decrease in general and
administrative expenses was mainly due to decrease of manpower
expenses in the China operation.
Distribution Segment
The
revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
distribution segment for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were as
follows:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenue
|
$7,451
|
$6,853
|
Gross
margin
|
12.7%
|
11.5%
|
Income
from operations
|
$598
|
$475
|
Income
from operations in the distribution segment was $598 in fiscal year
2019 as compared to $475 in fiscal year 2018. The increase was
mainly due to the increase in revenue by $598 and an increase in
gross margin of $161, as discussed earlier. These increases were
partly offset by increase in operating expenses. Operating expenses
were $348 and $310 for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The increase in selling expenses and
general and administrative expenses contributed to the increase in
operating expenses. Increased selling expenses were due to increase
in commissionable sales.
Real Estate
The
revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the real estate
segment for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were as
follows:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenue
|
$98
|
$139
|
Gross
margin
|
1%
|
14.4%
|
Loss
from operations
|
$(92)
|
$(56)
|
Gain
on sale of properties
|
685
|
-
|
Loss
from operations in the real estate segment increased by $36 to $92
in fiscal year 2019 as compared to $56 in fiscal year 2018. The
increase in operating loss was primarily due to the decrease in
revenue of $41 and the decrease in gross margin of $19, as
discussed earlier. The increase in operating expenses of $16
generated further operation loss. Operating expenses were $92 and
$76 for fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively. There was other
income arising from gain on sale of properties amounting to $685 in
fiscal year 2019.
Corporate
The
following table presents the loss from operations for Corporate for
fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Loss
from operations
|
$(123)
|
$(301)
|
In
fiscal year 2019, corporate operating loss was $123, a change of
$178 compared to an operating loss of $301 in fiscal year 2018. The
decrease was mainly due to a decrease in staff related
expenses.
Liquidity
The
Company’s core businesses testing services, manufacturing and
distribution, operate in a volatile industry, in which its average
selling prices and product costs are influenced by competitive
factors. These factors create pressures on sales, costs, earnings
and cash flows, which impact liquidity.
Net
cash provided by operating activities increased by $53 to $4,454
for the twelve months ended June 30, 2019 from $4,401 in the same
period of the last fiscal year.
Net
cash used in investing activities increased by $3,361 to an outflow
of $5,340 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2019, from an
outflow of $1,979 for the same period of last fiscal year. The
increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due
to an increase of $3,164 from investments in restricted and
unrestricted deposits due to uplift of deposits and an increase of
$532 for acquisition of plant and equipment. This increase was
partially offset by an increase in cash inflow of $943 from
non-recurring sales proceed received from the sale of
properties.
Net
cash used in financing activities for the twelve months ended June
30, 2019 was $590, representing a decrease of $417 compared to
$1,007 net cash used in financing activities during the twelve
months ended June 30, 2018. Cash inflow increased mainly due to an
increase in proceeds from bank loans and capital lease by $1,211
and exercising stock options of $350 and a decrease in repayment of
bank loans and capital leases by $46. The decrease in cash outflow
was partially offset by an increase in cash outflow of $1,254 from
repayment of lines of credit.
We
believe that our projected cash flows from operations, borrowing
availability under our revolving lines of credit, cash on hand,
trade credit and the secured bank loans will provide the necessary
financial resources to meet our projected cash requirements for at
least the next 12 months. Should we find an attractive capital
investment, we may seek additional debt or equity financing in
order to fund the transaction, in the form of bank financing,
convertible debt, or the issuance of Common Stock.
Capital Resources
Our working capital (defined as current assets minus current
liabilities) has historically been generated primarily from the
following sources: operating cash flow, availability under our
revolving line of credit, and short-term loans. The working capital
was $11,607 as of June 30, 2019, representing an increase of
$2,379, or 25.8%, compared to working capital of $9,228 as of June
30, 2018. The increase in working capital was mainly due to
increases in current assets such as short-term deposits and prepaid
expenses and other current assets and decreases in current
liabilities such as, lines of credit and accounts payable. Such
fluctuations were partially offset by decreases in current assets
such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventories
and assets held for sale and increases in current liabilities such
as accrued expenses as discussed above.
The majority of our capital expenditures are based on demands from
our customers, as we are operating in a capital-intensive
industry. Our capital expenditures were $2,841 and $2,309 for
fiscal year 2019 and fiscal year 2018, respectively. The capital
expenditures in fiscal year 2019 were mainly in the China and
Thailand operations, which provide testing services to our
customers. We financed our capital expenditures and other operating
expenses through operating cash flows and long-term
debts.
Our
credit rating provides us with ready and adequate access to funds
in the global market. At June 30, 2019, we had available unused
lines of credit totaling $5,888.
Entity
with
|
Type
of
|
Interest
|
Expiration
|
Credit
|
Unused
|
Facility
|
Facility
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Limitation
|
Credit
|
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., Singapore
|
Lines of
Credit
|
Ranging from 1.85%
to 5.5%
|
-
|
$4,213
|
$4,213
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
|
Lines of
Credit
|
5.22% to
6.3%
|
-
|
$1,492
|
$1,492
|
Universal (Far
East) Pte. Ltd.
|
Lines of
Credit
|
Ranging from 1.85%
to 5.5%
|
-
|
$370
|
$183
|
As of June 30, 2018, the Company had certain lines of credit that
are collateralized by restricted deposits.
Entity
with
|
Type
of
|
Interest
|
Expiration
|
Credit
|
Unused
|
Facility
|
Facility
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Limitation
|
Credit
|
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., Singapore
|
Lines of
Credit
|
Ranging from 1.6% to
5.5%
|
-
|
$4,183
|
$3,325
|
Trio-Tech (Tianjin)
Co., Ltd.
|
Lines of
Credit
|
5.22%
|
-
|
$1,511
|
$1,437
|
Universal (Far
East) Pte. Ltd.
|
Lines of
Credit
|
Ranging from 1.6% to
5.5%
|
-
|
$367
|
$256
|
On January 4, 2018, Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. signed an
agreement with a bank to sub-allocate a portion of the facility
thereafter to its subsidiary - Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. for
an Accounts Payable Financing facility with the bank for SGD 500,
or approximately $367 based on the market exchange rate. Interest
is charged at 1.85% to 5.5%. The financing facility was set up to
facilitate the working capital in our operations in Singapore. The
Company started to use this facility in fiscal year
2018.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do
not consider the Company to have any off-balance sheet arrangements
that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future
effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources.
ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a
smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are not required to provide the
information required by this item.
ITEM
8 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The
information called for by this item is included in the Company's
consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-2 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
An
evaluation was carried out by the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the principal executive and
principal financial officers, respectively, of the Company) of the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June
30, 2019, the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K. Based
upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 30,
2019.
Additionally,
management has the responsibility for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company
and thus also assessed the effectiveness of our internal controls
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019. Management used the
framework set forth in the report entitled “Internal Control
– Integrated Framework” published by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013 to
evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
Internal
control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by,
or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, and effected by our Board of Directors,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purpose in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and
includes those policies and procedures that:
1.
Pertain to the
maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the Company;
2.
Provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with
authorization of management and directors of the Company;
and
3.
Provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, and use or disposition of the Company’s assets
that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Internal
control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance
of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent
limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process
that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to
lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures.
Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented
by collusion or improper management override. Because of such
limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over
financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known
features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is
possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though
not eliminate, the risk.
Based
on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the Company’s internal controls over
financial reporting were effective as of June 30,
2019.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except as discussed below, there has been no change in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting
during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019, which were identified in
connection with management’s evaluation required by paragraph
(d) of rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation
We are in the process of implementing an ERP System, as part of a
multi-year plan to integrate and upgrade our systems and processes.
The implementation of this ERP system is scheduled to occur in
phases over a few years, and began with the migration of certain of
our operational and financial systems in our Singapore operations
to the new ERP system during the second quarter of fiscal 2017.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, the operational and
financial systems in Singapore were substantially transitioned to
the new system.
This implementation effort continued in fiscal 2019. The
operational and financial systems in our Malaysia operation were
substantially transitioned to the new system during the first
quarter of fiscal 2019.
As a phased implementation of this system occurs, we are
experiencing certain changes to our processes and procedures which,
in turn, result in changes to our internal control over financial
reporting. While we expect the new ERP system to strengthen our
internal financial controls by automating certain manual processes
and standardizing business processes and reporting across our
organization, management will continue to evaluate and
monitor our internal controls as processes and procedures in each
of the affected areas evolve.
Adoption of New Revenue
Recognition Accounting Standard
In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, we implemented controls
relating to adoption of the new revenue recognition accounting
standards that were adopted in fiscal 2019 to ensure that the
revenue contracts, and related policies and process flows were
sufficiently reviewed to identify adoption impacts.
ITEM 9B – OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
PART III
The
information required by Items 10 through 14 of Part III of this
Form 10-K (information regarding our directors and executive
officers, executive compensation, security ownership of certain
beneficial owners, management, related stockholder matters, and
certain relationships and related transactions and principal
accountant fees and services, respectively) is hereby incorporated
by reference from the Company's Proxy Statement to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the
end of fiscal year 2019.
PART IV
ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT
SCHEDULES
(a) (1 and
2) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
SCHEDULES:
The
following financial statements, including notes thereto and the
independent auditors' report with respect thereto, are filed as
part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, starting on page 34
hereof:
1.
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
2.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
3.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
4.
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Equity
5.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
6.
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) The
exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10K are set
forth on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits, and
are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 16 – FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not
applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
TRIO-TECH
INTERNATIONAL
By:
/s/ Victor H.M.
Ting
VICTOR
H.M. TING
Vice
President and
Chief
Financial Officer
September
23, 2019
|
Pursuant
to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the Registrant and in the capacity and on the dates
indicated.
|
/s/ A. Charles
Wilson
A.
Charles Wilson, Director
Chairman
of the Board
September 23,
2019
/s/
S.W.Yong
S. W.
Yong, Director
President,
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
September 23,
2019
/s/ Victor H. M.
Ting
Victor
H.M. Ting, Director
Vice
President,
and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
September 23,
2019
/s/ Jason T.
Adelman
Jason
T. Adelman, Director
September 23,
2019
/s/ Richard M.
Horowitz
Richard
M. Horowitz, Director
September 23,
2019
|
EXHIBITS:
Number
|
Description
|
|
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation, as currently in effect. [Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for June 30, 1988.]
|
3.2
|
Bylaws,
as currently in effect. [Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for June 30,
1988.]
|
Amendment
to 2007 Employee Stock Option Plan [Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its Annual
Meeting held December 14, 2010.]**
|
|
Amendment
to 2007 Directors Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit B to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its
Annual Meeting held December 14, 2010.]**
|
|
Amendment
to 2007 Directors Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference
to Appendix A to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its
Annual Meeting held December 9, 2013.]**
|
|
2017
Employee Stock Option Plan [Incorporated by reference to Appendix 1
to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting
held December 4, 2017.]**
|
|
2017
Directors Equity Incentive Plan [Incorporated by reference to
Appendix 2 to the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for its Annual
Meeting held December 4, 2017.]**
|
|
21.1
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant (100% owned by the Registrant except as otherwise
stated)
Express
Test Corporation (Dormant), a California Corporation
Trio-Tech
Reliability Services (Dormant), a California
Corporation
KTS
Incorporated, dba Universal Systems (Dormant), a California
Corporation
European Electronic
Test Center. Ltd., a Cayman Islands Corporation (Operation ceased
on November 1, 2005)
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation
Universal (Far
East) Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation
Trio-Tech
International (Thailand) Co., Ltd., a Thailand
Corporation
Trio-Tech (Bangkok)
Co., Ltd., a Thailand Corporation
Trio-Tech
(Malaysia) Sdn Bhd., a Malaysia Corporation (55% owned by the
subsidiary of Registrant)
Trio-Tech (Kuala
Lumpur) Sdn Bhd., a Malaysia Corporation (100% owned by Trio-Tech
Malaysia)
Prestal
Enterprise Sdn. Bhd., a Malaysia Corporation (76% owned by the
Registrant)
Trio-Tech (SIP)
Co., Ltd., a China Corporation
Trio-Tech
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a China Corporation (Windup in March 30,
2017)
Trio-Tech
(Chongqing) Co. Ltd., (100% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte.
Ltd., a Singapore Corporation)
SHI
International Pte. Ltd, a Singapore Corporation (55% owned
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore
Corporation)
PT SHI
Indonesia, an Indonesia Corporation (100% owned by SHI
International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation)
Trio-Tech (Tianjin)
Co., Ltd., a China Corporation (100% owned by Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., a Singapore Corporation)
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm*
|
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer of
Registrant*
|
|
Rule
13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer of
Registrant*
|
|
Section
1350 Certification. *
|
|
101.INS*
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
101.DEF*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
101.LAB*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
101.PRE*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
* Filed
electronically herewith.
**
Indicates management contracts or compensatory plans or
arrangements required to be filed as an exhibit to this
report
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Trio-Tech International
Van Nuys, California
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Trio-Tech International and Subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of June 30, 2019 and 2018, and the
related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive
income (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2019, and the related
notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated
financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2019
and 2018, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended June 30,
2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
Basis of Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements
based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered
with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we
engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Mazars LLP
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
We have served as the company’s auditors since
2009
/s/ Mazars
LLP
Singapore
September
23, 2019
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES)
|
June
30,
2019
|
June
30,
2018
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$4,863
|
$6,539
|
Short-term
deposits
|
4,144
|
653
|
Trade
accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $263
and $259
|
7,113
|
7,747
|
Other
receivables
|
817
|
881
|
Inventories,
less provision for obsolete inventory of $673 and $695
|
2,427
|
2,930
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
287
|
208
|
Assets
held for sale
|
89
|
91
|
Total current assets
|
19,740
|
19,049
|
NON-CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
Deferred
tax assets
|
390
|
400
|
Investment
properties, net
|
782
|
1,146
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
12,159
|
11,935
|
Other
assets
|
1,750
|
2,249
|
Restricted
term deposits
|
1,706
|
1,695
|
Total
non-current assets
|
16,787
|
17,425
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$36,527
|
$36,474
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Lines
of credit
|
$187
|
$2,043
|
Accounts
payable
|
3,272
|
3,704
|
Accrued
expenses
|
3,486
|
3,172
|
Income
taxes payable
|
417
|
285
|
Current
portion of bank loans payable
|
488
|
367
|
Current
portion of capital leases
|
283
|
250
|
Total current liabilities
|
8,133
|
9,821
|
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Bank
loans payable, net of current portion
|
2,292
|
1,437
|
Capital
leases, net of current portion
|
442
|
524
|
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
327
|
327
|
Income
taxes payable
|
439
|
828
|
Other
non-current liabilities
|
33
|
36
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
3,533
|
3,152
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
$11,666
|
$12,973
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
TRIO-TECH
INTERNATIONAL’S SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|
|
Common
stock, no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 3,673,055 shares
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2019 and 3,553,055 shares
issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2018
|
$11,424
|
$11,023
|
Paid-in
capital
|
3,305
|
3,249
|
Accumulated
retained earnings
|
7,070
|
5,525
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive gain-translation adjustments
|
1,867
|
2,182
|
Total Trio-Tech International shareholders'
equity
|
23,666
|
21,979
|
Non-controlling
interests
|
1,195
|
1,522
|
TOTAL EQUITY
|
$24,861
|
$23,501
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$36,527
|
$36,474
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND
SUBSIDIARIES
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
|
For the
Year Ended
|
|
|
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
$14,889
|
$15,978
|
Testing
services
|
16,760
|
19,391
|
Distribution
|
7,451
|
6,853
|
Real
estate
|
98
|
139
|
|
39,198
|
42,361
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
Cost
of manufactured products sold
|
11,393
|
12,213
|
Cost
of testing services rendered
|
12,202
|
13,323
|
Cost
of distribution
|
6,505
|
6,068
|
Cost
of real estate
|
97
|
119
|
|
30,197
|
31,723
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
9,001
|
10,638
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
7,049
|
7,250
|
Selling
|
826
|
826
|
Research
and development
|
345
|
451
|
Gain
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
(13)
|
(77)
|
Total
operating expenses
|
8,207
|
8,450
|
|
|
|
Income from Operations
|
794
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
Other Income / (Expenses)
|
|
|
Interest
expenses
|
(319)
|
(233)
|
Other income,
net
|
249
|
335
|
Gain
on sale of properties
|
685
|
-
|
Total
other income
|
615
|
102
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations before Income
Taxes
|
1,409
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Benefits / (Expenses)
|
42
|
(987)
|
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations before non-controlling interests, net of
tax
|
1,451
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(3)
|
(13)
|
NET INCOME
|
1,448
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
Less:
net (loss)/income attributable to non-controlling
interests
|
(97)
|
106
|
Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders
|
$1,545
|
$1,184
|
|
|
|
Amounts Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders:
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations, net of tax
|
1,548
|
1,197
|
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(3)
|
(13)
|
Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders
|
$1,545
|
$1,184
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0.42
|
$0.34
|
Basic
loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$-
|
$(0.01)
|
Basic Earnings per Share from Net Income
|
|
|
Attributable to Trio-Tech International
|
$0.42
|
$0.33
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International nal
|
$0.41
|
$0.32
|
Diluted
loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
-
|
(0.01)
|
Diluted Earnings per Share from Net Income
|
|
|
Attributable to Trio-Tech International
|
$0.41
|
$0.31
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
Basic
|
3,673
|
3,553
|
Dilutive
effect of stock options
|
89
|
218
|
Number
of shares used to compute earnings per share diluted
|
3,762
|
3,771
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
For the
Year Ended
|
|
|
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Trio-Tech
International Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
1,448
|
1,290
|
Foreign
currency translation, net of tax
|
(420)
|
728
|
Comprehensive Income
|
1,028
|
2,018
|
Less:
comprehensive (loss) / income attributable to the non-controlling
interests
|
(202)
|
285
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders
|
$1,230
|
$1,733
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
|
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
Retained
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
|
Non- Controlling
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Interests
|
Total
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2017
|
3,523
|
10,921
|
3,206
|
4,341
|
1,633
|
1,426
|
21,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
option expenses
|
-
|
-
|
43
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
43
|
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,184
|
-
|
106
|
1,290
|
Dividend
declared by subsidiary
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(189)
|
(189)
|
Exercise
of options
|
20
|
51
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
51
|
Issue
of restricted shares to consultant
|
10
|
51
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
51
|
Translation
adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
549
|
179
|
728
|
Balance
at June 30, 2018
|
3,553
|
11,023
|
3,249
|
5,525
|
2,182
|
1,522
|
23,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
option expenses
|
-
|
-
|
56
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
56
|
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,545
|
-
|
(97)
|
1,448
|
Dividend
declared by subsidiary
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(125)
|
(125)
|
Exercise
of options
|
120
|
401
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
401
|
Translation
adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(315)
|
(105)
|
(420)
|
Balance
at June 30, 2019
|
3,673
|
11,424
|
3,305
|
7,070
|
1,867
|
1,195
|
24,861
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN
THOUSANDS)
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
|
Jun
30,
|
Jun
30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$1,448
|
$1,290
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
|
Gain
on disposal of properties
|
(685)
|
-
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,450
|
2,214
|
|
Stock
compensation
|
56
|
43
|
|
Usage
of provision for obsolete inventory
|
(25)
|
4
|
|
Reversal
of income tax provision
|
(299)
|
-
|
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
10
|
7
|
|
Accrued
interest expense, net accrued interest income
|
(9)
|
201
|
*
|
Gain
on sale of property, plant and equipment – continued
operations
|
1
|
15
|
|
Issuance
of shares to service provider
|
-
|
51
|
|
Warranty
recovery, net
|
(43)
|
34
|
|
Gain
on proceeds from insurance claim
|
-
|
(85)
|
*
|
Fixed
assets written off
|
(33)
|
-
|
|
Deferred
tax benefit
|
5
|
5
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition
effects
|
|
|
|
Trade
accounts receivable
|
630
|
995
|
|
Other receivables
|
64
|
(220)
|
|
Other assets
|
432
|
(377)
|
|
Inventories
|
539
|
(1,162)
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(79)
|
18
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(68)
|
488
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
60
|
880
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
4,454
|
4,401
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of properties
|
943
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from maturing of unrestricted term deposits and short-term
deposits, net
|
-
|
484
|
|
Proceeds
from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
3
|
42
|
|
Insurance
proceeds received
|
-
|
85
|
*
|
Investments
in restricted and unrestricted deposits
|
(3,445)
|
(281)
|
|
Addition
to property, plant and equipment
|
(2,841)
|
(2,309)
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(5,340)
|
(1,979)
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
Repayment
on lines of credit
|
(10,137)
|
(8,883)
|
|
Repayment
of bank loans and capital leases
|
(687)
|
(733)
|
|
Dividends
paid on non-controlling interest
|
(125)
|
(189)
|
|
Proceeds
from exercising stock options
|
401
|
51
|
|
Proceeds
from bank loans and capital leases
|
9,958
|
8,747
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
(590)
|
(1,007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Changes in Exchange Rate
|
(189)
|
390
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Decrease) / Increase in Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted
Cash
|
(1,665)
|
1,805
|
*
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at Beginning of
Period
|
8,234
|
6,429
|
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash at End of
Period
|
$6,569
|
$8,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Information of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
$284
|
$181
|
|
Income
taxes
|
$106
|
$245
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Transactions
|
|
|
|
Capital
lease of property, plant and equipment
|
$214
|
$228
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
Reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted
Cash
|
|
|
Cash
|
4,863
|
6,539
|
Restricted Term-Deposits in Non-Current Assets
|
1,706
|
1,695
|
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash Shown in
Statement of Cash Flows
|
$6,569
|
$8,234
|
|
|
|
*Amounts
restated to exclude changes of restricted deposit for fiscal year
2018 for comparative purpose after adoption of ASU 2016-18 in
fiscal year 2019.
The Statement of Cash flow reflecting adoption of ASU 2016-18,
Statement of Cash Flows, Restricted Cash (Topic 230) beginning in
the first quarter of 2019. Amounts included in restricted deposits
represent the amount of cash pledged to secure loans payable or
trade financing granted by financial institutions and serve as
collateral for public utility agreements such as electricity and
water. Restricted deposits are classified as non-current assets, as
they relate to long-term obligations and will become unrestricted
only upon discharge of the obligations.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 AND 2018
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
1.
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES.
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation -
Trio-Tech International (the
“Company” or “TTI” hereafter) was
incorporated in fiscal 1958 under the laws of the State of
California. TTI provides third-party semiconductor testing and
burn-in services primarily through its laboratories in Asia. In
addition, TTI operates testing facilities in the U.S. The
Company also designs, develops, manufactures and markets a broad
range of equipment and systems used in the manufacturing and
testing of semiconductor devices and electronic components. In
fiscal 2019, TTI conducted business in the foregoing four segments:
Manufacturing (assembly), Testing Services, Distribution and Real
Estate. TTI has subsidiaries in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia,
Thailand, Indonesia and China as follows:
|
Ownership
|
Location
|
|
|
|
Express Test Corporation (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van Nuys, California
|
Trio-Tech Reliability Services (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van Nuys, California
|
KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van Nuys, California
|
European Electronic Test Centre (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Dublin, Ireland
|
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.
|
100%
|
Singapore
|
Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Singapore
|
Trio-Tech International (Thailand) Co. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Bangkok, Thailand
|
Trio-Tech (Bangkok) Co. Ltd.
|
100%
|
Bangkok, Thailand
|
(49% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and 51% owned by
Trio-Tech International (Thailand) Co. Ltd.)
|
|
|
Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
(55% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.)
|
55%
|
Penang and Selangor, Malaysia
|
Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd.
|
55%
|
Selangor, Malaysia
|
(100% owned by Trio-Tech Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.)
|
|
|
Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.
|
76%
|
Selangor, Malaysia
|
(76% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.)
|
|
|
Trio-Tech (SIP) Co., Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Suzhou, China
|
Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Chongqing, China
|
SHI International Pte. Ltd. (Dormant)
(55% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd)
|
55%
|
Singapore
|
PT SHI Indonesia (Dormant)
(100% owned by SHI International Pte. Ltd.)
|
55%
|
Batam, Indonesia
|
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Tianjin, China
|
* 100%
owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.
The
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“U.S. GAAP’’). The basis of accounting
differs from that used in the statutory financial statements of the
Company’s subsidiaries and equity investee companies, which
are prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally
accepted in their respective countries of incorporation. In the
opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements have
reflected all costs incurred by the Company and its subsidiaries in
operating the business.
All
dollar amounts in the financial statements and in the notes herein
are presented in thousands of United States dollars (US$’000)
unless otherwise designated.
Liquidity –
The Company earned net income attributable to common shareholders
of $1,545 and $1,184 for fiscal years 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
The
Company’s core businesses - testing services, manufacturing
(assembly) and distribution - operate in a volatile industry,
whereby its average selling prices and product costs are influenced
by competitive factors. These factors create pressures on sales,
costs, earnings and cash flows, which will impact liquidity.
Foreign Currency Translation and Transactions —
The U.S. dollar is the functional
currency of the U.S. parent company. The Singapore dollar, the
national currency of Singapore, is the primary currency of the
economic environment in which the operations in Singapore are
conducted. The Company also has business entities in Malaysia,
Thailand and China, of which the Malaysian ringgit
(“RM”), Thai baht, Chinese renminbi (“RMB”)
and Indonesian rupiah, are the national currencies. The Company
uses the U.S. dollar for financial reporting
purposes.
The Company translates assets and liabilities of its subsidiaries
outside the U.S. into U.S. dollars using the rate of exchange
prevailing at the fiscal year end, and the consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income or loss is translated at
average rates during the reporting period. Adjustments resulting
from the translation of the subsidiaries’ financial
statements from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars are recorded
in shareholders' equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive
gain - translation adjustments. Gains or losses resulting from
transactions denominated in currencies other than functional
currencies of the Company’s subsidiaries are reflected in
income for the reporting period.
Use of Estimates — The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. Among the more significant estimates included
in these financial statements are the estimated allowance for
doubtful accounts receivable, reserve for obsolete inventory,
reserve for warranty, impairments and the deferred income tax asset
allowance. Actual results could materially differ from those
estimates.
Revenue Recognition — On
July 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09, ASC Topic
606, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (“ASC Topic
606”). This standard update outlines a single comprehensive
model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from
contracts with customers. We adopted using the modified
retrospective method applied to all contracts that were not
completed contracts at the date of initial application (i.e. July
1, 2019). Results for reporting periods after July 1, 2019 are
presented under ASC Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not
adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the
Company’s historic accounting under ASC Topic
605.
We apply a five-step approach as defined in ASC Topic 606 in
determining the amount and timing of revenue to be recognized: (1)
identifying the contract with customer; (2) identifying the
performance obligations in the contracts; (3) determining the
transaction price; (4) allocating the transaction price to the
performance obligations in the contract; and (5) recognizing
revenue when the corresponding performance obligation is
satisfied.
Revenue derived from testing services is recognized when testing
services are rendered. Revenue generated from sale of products in
the manufacturing and distribution segments are recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of the
products has occurred, customer acceptance has been obtained (which
means the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been
transferred to the customer), the price is fixed or determinable
and collectability is reasonably assured. Certain customers can request for installation and
training services to be performed for certain products sold in the
manufacturing segment. These services are mainly on helping
customers with the test runs of the machines sold and are
considered a separate performance obligation. Such services can be
provided by other entities as well and these do not significantly
modify the product. The Company recognizes the revenue at point in
time when the Company has satisfied its performance
obligation.
In the real estate segment: (1) revenue from property development
is earned and recognized on the earlier of the dates when the
underlying property is sold or upon the maturity of the agreement;
if this amount is uncollectible, the agreement empowers the
repossession of the property, and (2) rental revenue is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases.
This means that, with respect to a particular lease, actual amounts
billed in accordance with the lease during any given period may be
higher or lower than the amount of rental revenue recognized for
the period. Straight-line rental revenue is commenced when the
tenant assumes possession of the leased premises. Accrued
straight-line rents receivable represents the amount by which
straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in
accordance with lease agreements.
GST / Indirect Taxes — The Company’s policy is to
present taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental
authorities on a net basis. The Company records the amounts
collected as a current liability and relieves such liability upon
remittance to the taxing authority without impacting revenues or
expenses.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
— During the normal course of business, the Company
extends unsecured credit to its customers in all segments.
Typically, credit terms require payment to be made between 30 to 90
days from the date of the sale. The Company generally does not
require collateral from our customers.
The
Company’s management considers the following factors when
determining the collectability of specific customer accounts:
customer credit-worthiness, past transaction history with the
customer, current economic industry trends, and changes in customer
payment terms. The Company includes any account balances that are
determined to be uncollectible, along with a general reserve, in
the overall allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to
collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off
against the allowance. Based on the information available to
management, the Company believed that its allowance for doubtful
accounts was adequate as of June 30, 2019 and 2018.
Warranty Costs — The Company provides for the
estimated costs that may be incurred under its warranty program at
the time the sale is recorded in its manufacturing segment. The
Company estimates warranty costs based on the historical rates of
warranty returns. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of
its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as
necessary.
Cash and Cash Equivalents — The Company considers all
highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months
or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Term Deposits — Term deposits consist of bank
balances and interest-bearing deposits having maturities of 3 to 6
months. As of June 30, 2019,
the Company held approximately $1,426 of
unrestricted term deposits in the Company’s Malaysia
subsidiary and $113 of unrestricted term deposits in the
Company’s 100% owned Thailand subsidiary, which were
denominated in RM and Thai baht, as compared to $548 and $105 as of
June 30, 2018. As of June 30, 2019, the Company held approximately
$1,876 of unrestricted term deposits in the Company’s 100%
owned Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., which were denominated in
Singapore currency, and $728 of unrestricted term deposits in the
Company’s 100% owned China subsidiary, which were denominated
in RMB.
Restricted Term Deposits — The Company held certain term
deposits in the Singapore and Malaysia operations which were
considered restricted as they were held as security against certain
facilities granted by the financial institutions. As of June 30,
2019 the Company held
approximately $1,478 of restricted term deposits in the
Company’s 100% owned Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd., which
were denominated in Singapore currency, and $228 of restricted term
deposits in the Company’s 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary,
which were denominated in RM, as compared to June 30, 2018 when the
Company held approximately $1,468 of restricted term deposits in
the Company’s 100% owned Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.,
which were denominated in Singapore currency, and $227 of
restricted term deposits in the Company’s 55% owned Malaysian
subsidiary, which were denominated in the currency of
Malaysia.
Inventories — Inventories in the Company’s
manufacturing and distribution segments consisting principally of
raw materials, works in progress, and finished goods are stated at
the lower of cost, using the first-in, first-out
(“FIFO”) method, or market value. The semiconductor
industry is characterized by rapid technological change, short-term
customer commitments and rapid changes in demand. Provisions for
estimated excess and obsolete inventory are based on our regular
reviews of inventory quantities on hand and the latest forecasts of
product demand and production requirements from our customers.
Inventories are written down for not saleable, excess or obsolete
raw materials, works-in-process and finished goods by charging such
write-downs to cost of sales. In addition to write-downs based on
newly introduced parts, statistics and judgments are used for
assessing provisions of the remaining inventory based on salability
and obsolescence.
Property, Plant and Equipment & Investment Property
— Property, plant and equipment, and investment property are
stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.
Depreciation is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the
assets using the straight-line method. Amortization of leasehold
improvements is provided for over the lease terms or the estimated
useful lives of the assets, whichever is shorter, using the
straight-line method.
Maintenance,
repairs and minor renewals are charged directly to expense as
incurred. Additions and improvements to the assets are capitalized.
When assets are disposed of, the related cost and accumulated
depreciation thereon are removed from the accounts and any
resulting gain or loss is included in the consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income or loss.
Long-Lived Assets and Impairment – The Company’s
business requires heavy investment in manufacturing facilities and
equipment that are technologically advanced but can quickly become
significantly under-utilized or rendered obsolete by rapid changes
in demand.
The
Company evaluates the long-lived assets, including property, plant
and equipment and investment property, for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
of such assets may not be recoverable. Factors considered important
that could result in an impairment review include significant
underperformance relative to expected historical or projected
future operating results, significant changes in the manner of use
of the assets or the strategy for our business, significant
negative industry or economic trends, and a significant decline in
the stock price for a sustained period of time. Impairment is
recognized based on the difference between the fair value of the
asset and its carrying value, and fair value is generally measured
based on discounted cash flow analysis, if there is significant
adverse change.
The
Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 360, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets (“ASC Topic 360”), to
property, plant and equipment. ASC Topic 360 requires that
long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable through the estimated undiscounted
cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition
of the assets. Whenever any such impairment exists, an impairment
loss will be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value
exceeds the fair value.
Leases — The Company leases certain property,
plant and equipment in the ordinary course of business. The leases
have varying terms. Some may have included renewal and/or purchase
options, escalation clauses, restrictions, penalties or other
obligations that the Company considered in determining minimum
lease payments. The leases were classified as either capital leases
or operating leases, in accordance with ASC Topic 840, Accounting for Leases (“ASC Topic
840”). The Company records monthly rental expense equal to
the total amount of the payments due in the reporting period over
the lease term in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The difference between
rental expense recorded and the amount paid is credited or charged
to deferred rent, which is included in accrued expenses in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company’s management expects that in the normal course of
business, operating leases will be renewed or replaced by other
leases. The future minimum operating lease payments, for which the
Company is contractually obligated as of June 30, 2019, are
disclosed in these notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Assets under capital leases are capitalized using interest rates
appropriate at the inception of each lease and are depreciated over
either the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term on
a straight-line basis. The present value of the related lease
payments is recorded as a contractual obligation. The future
minimum annual capital lease payments are included in the total
future contractual obligations as disclosed in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
Comprehensive Income or Loss — ASC Topic 220, Reporting Comprehensive
Income, (“ASC Topic
220”), establishes standards for reporting and
presentation of comprehensive income or loss and its components in
a full set of general-purpose financial statements. The Company has
chosen to report comprehensive income or loss in the statements of
operations. Comprehensive income or loss is comprised of net income
or loss and all changes to shareholders’ equity except those
due to investments by owners and distributions to
owners.
Income Taxes — The
Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method in
accordance with ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income
Taxes (“ASC Topic
740”). ASC Topic 740 requires an entity to recognize
deferred tax liabilities and assets. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequence
attributable to the difference between the tax bases of assets and
liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements,
which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years.
Further, the effects of enacted tax laws or rate changes are
included as part of deferred tax expenses or benefits in the period
that covers the enactment date.
The
calculation of tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties
in the application of complex global tax regulations. The Company
recognizes potential liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues
in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on its estimate of
whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If
payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be unnecessary, the
reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being
recognized in the period when the Company determines the
liabilities are no longer necessary. If the estimate of tax
liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, a
further charge to expense would result.
Retained Earnings — It is
the intention of the Company to reinvest earnings of its foreign
subsidiaries in the operations of those subsidiaries. These taxes
are undeterminable at this time. The amount of earnings retained in
subsidiaries was $14,019 and $12,393 at June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
Research and Development Costs — The Company incurred research and development
costs of $345 and $451 in fiscal year 2019 and in fiscal year 2018,
respectively, which were charged to operating expenses as
incurred.
Stock Based Compensation — Under ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock
Compensation (“ASC Topic
718”), stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant
date, based on the estimated fair value of the award using an
option pricing model for stock options (Black-Scholes) and market
price for restricted stock units, and is recognized as expense over
the employee’s requisite service period.
Earnings per Share — Computation of basic earnings per share is
conducted by dividing net income available to common shares
(numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding (denominator) during a reporting period. Computation of
diluted earnings per share gives effect to all dilutive potential
common shares outstanding during a reporting period. In computing
diluted earnings per share, the average market price of common
shares for a reporting period is used in determining the number of
shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock
options.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments — Carrying values of trade accounts
receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and term deposits
approximate their fair value due to their short-term maturities.
Carrying values of the Company’s lines of credit and
long-term debt are considered to approximate their fair value
because the interest rates associated with the lines of credit and
long-term debt are adjustable in accordance with market situations
when the Company tries to borrow funds with similar terms and
remaining maturities. See Note 17 for detailed discussion of the
fair value measurement of financial
instruments.
ASC
Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The financial assets and financial liabilities that require
recognition under the guidance include available-for-sale
investments, employee deferred compensation plan and foreign
currency derivatives. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for
inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of
observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by
requiring that the observable inputs be used when available.
Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data
obtained from sources independent of us. Unobservable inputs are
inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed
based on the best information available under the circumstances. As
such, fair value is a market-based measure considered from the
perspective of a market participant who holds the asset or owes the
liability rather than an entity-specific measure. The hierarchy is
broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as
follows:
●
Level
1—Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.
Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and
regularly available in an active market, valuation of these
products does not entail a significant degree of judgment.
Financial assets utilizing Level 1 inputs include U.S. treasuries,
most money market funds, marketable equity securities and our
employee deferred compensation plan;
●
Level
2—Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not
active or for which all significant inputs are observable, directly
or indirectly. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2
inputs include foreign currency forward exchange contracts, most
commercial paper and corporate notes and bonds; and
●
Level
3—Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and
significant to the overall fair value measurement. Financial assets
utilizing Level 3 inputs primarily include auction rate securities.
We use an income approach valuation model to estimate the exit
price of the auction rate securities, which is derived as the
weighted-average present value of expected cash flows over various
periods of illiquidity, using a risk adjusted discount rate that is
based on the credit risk and liquidity risk of the
securities.
Concentration of Credit Risk — Financial instruments that subject the
Company to credit risk compose of trade accounts receivable. The
Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers for
potential credit losses. The Company generally does not require
collateral. The Company believes that its credit policies do not
result in significant adverse risk and historically it has not
experienced significant credit related losses.
Investments — The
Company analyzes its investments to determine if it is a variable
interest entity (a “VIE”) and would require
consolidation. The Company (a) evaluates the sufficiency of the
total equity at risk, (b) reviews the voting rights and
decision-making authority of the equity investment holders as a
group, and whether there are any guaranteed returns, protection
against losses, or capping of residual returns within the group,
and (c) establishes whether activities within the venture are on
behalf of an investor with disproportionately few voting rights in
making this VIE determination. The Company would consolidate an
investment that is determined to be a VIE if it was the primary
beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined by a
primarily qualitative approach, whereby the variable interest
holder, if any, has the power to direct the VIE’s most
significant activities and is the primary beneficiary. A new
accounting standard became effective and changed the method by
which the primary beneficiary of a VIE is determined. Through a
primarily qualitative approach, whereby the variable interest
holder, if any, who has the power to direct the VIE’s most
significant activities and is the primary beneficiary. To the
extent that the investment does not qualify as VIE, the Company
further assesses the existence of a controlling financial interest
under a voting interest model to determine whether the investment
should be consolidated.
Equity Method —
The Company analyzes its investments to determine if they should be
accounted for using the equity method. Management evaluates both
Common Stock and in-substance Common Stock to determine whether
they give the Company the ability to exercise significant influence
over operating and financial policies of the investment even though
the Company holds less than 50% of the Common Stock and
in-substance Common Stock. The net income of the investment, if
any, will be reported as “Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated joint ventures, net of tax” in the
Company’s consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income.
Cost Method — Investee companies not accounted
for under the consolidation or the equity method of accounting are
accounted for under the cost method of accounting. Under this
method, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of such
Investee companies is not included in the consolidated balance
sheet or statements of operations and comprehensive income or loss.
However, impairment charges are recognized in the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income or loss. If
circumstances suggest that the value of the investee Company has
subsequently recovered, such recovery is not recorded.
Loan Receivables from Property Development Projects
— The loan receivables
from property development projects are classified as current asset,
carried at face value and are individually evaluated for
impairment. The allowance for loan losses reflects
management’s best estimate of probable losses determined
principally on the basis of historical experience and specific
allowances for known loan accounts. All loans or portions thereof
deemed to be uncollectible or to require an excessive collection
cost are written off to the allowance for losses.
Interest
income on the loan receivables from property development projects
are recognized on an accrual basis. Discounts and premiums on loans
are amortized to income using the interest method over the
remaining period to contractual maturity. The amortization of
discounts into income is discontinued on loans that are
contractually 90 days past due or when collection of interest
appears doubtful.
Contingent Liabilities — Certain conditions may exist as of
the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a
loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or
more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company’s
management and its legal counsel assess such contingent
liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of
judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal
proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted
claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company’s
legal counsel evaluates the perceived merits of any legal
proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits
of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought
therein.
If the
assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a
material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can
be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the
Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates
that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but
is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated,
then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an
estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and
material, would be disclosed.
Loss
contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless
they involve guarantees, in which case the nature of the guarantee
would be disclosed.
2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The
amendments in ASU 2018-18 ASC Topic 808: Collaborative Arrangements: Clarifying the
Interaction between Topic 808 and Topic 606 provide more
comparability in the presentation of revenue for certain
transactions between collaborative arrangement participants. The
amendments allow organizations to only present units of account in
collaborative arrangements that are within the scope of the revenue
recognition standard together with revenue accounted for under the
revenue recognition standard. The parts of the collaborative
arrangement that are not in the scope of the revenue recognition
standard should be presented separately from revenue accounted for
under the revenue recognition standard. The amendments are
effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
While early application is permitted, including adoption in an
interim period, the Company has not elected to early adopt. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this
accounting standard update on its consolidated financial
statements.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-13 ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement: Disclosure
Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair
Value Measurement modify the disclosure requirements on fair
value measurements based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement,
including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments
on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted
average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3
fair value measurements, and the narrative description of
measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only
the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial
fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied
retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date.
The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
The amendments in ASU 2018-09 Codification
Improvements represent changes
to clarify, correct errors in, or make minor improvements to the
Codification, eliminating inconsistencies and providing
clarifications in current guidance. The amendments in this ASU
include those made to: Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive
Income-Overall; Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments;
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity-Overall; Compensation-Stock
Compensation-Income Taxes; Business Combinations-Income Taxes;
Derivatives and Hedging-Overall; Fair Value Measurement-Overall;
Financial Services-Brokers and Dealers-Liabilities; and Plan
Accounting-Defined Contribution Pension Plans-Investments-Other.
The amendments are effective for all entities for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, and thus will be effective for
the company for the fiscal year that commenced July 1, 2019 and
will end June 30, 2020. The Company has completed the assessment
for this update, apart from subtopic 718-740 Compensation-Stock
Compensation, other subtopics
in this update are not applicable to the Company. The Company has
concluded that the subtopic 718-740 has no significant impact to
the Company’s consolidated statements of operations
and comprehensive income.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-02 ASC Topic 220: Income Statement – Reporting
Comprehensive Income provide financial statement preparers
with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to retained earnings in each
period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal
corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (or portion
thereof) is recorded. The amendments
in ASC Topic 220 are effective for public business entities for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and thus will be
effective for the company for the fiscal year that commenced July
1, 2019 and will end June 30, 2020. . The Company has
completed the assessment and concluded that this update has no
significant impact to the Company’s consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income.
The amendments in ASU2017-11: Earnings Per Share
(Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities
from Equity (Topic
480);
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic
815) are effective for public companies for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, and thus will be effective for
the company for the fiscal year that commenced July 1, 2019 and
will end June 30, 2020. The Company has completed the assessment
and concluded that this update has no impact to the Company’s
EPS calculation.
The amendments in ASU 2017-04 ASC Topic 350 —
'Intangibles - Goodwill and
Other (“ASC Topic
350”) simplify the test for goodwill impairment. For public
companies, these amendments are effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within
those periods. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s presentation of
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in ASU 2019-05 ASC Topic 326: Financial Instruments —
Credit Losses (“ASC Topic
326”): Targeted Transition
Relief is issued to provide
option to measure certain types of assets at fair value which
allows companies to irrevocably elect, upon adoption of ASU
2016-13, the fair value option on financial instruments that (1)
were previously recorded at amortized cost and (2) are within the
scope of ASC 326-20 if the instruments are eligible for the fair
value option under ASC 825-10. The amendments in ASU 2018-19 ASC
Topic 326: Codification Improvements to
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses clarify that receivables arising from operating
leases are not within the scope of the credit losses standard, but
rather, should be accounted for in accordance with the
lease’s standard. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 ASC Topic
326: Financial Instruments —
Credit losses (“ASC Topic
326”) are issued for the measurement of all expected credit
losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on
historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and
supportable forecasts. For public companies that are SEC filers,
ASC Topic 326 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal
years. While early application will be permitted for all
organizations for fiscal years and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, the Company has
not yet determined if it will early adopt. The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact of this accounting standard update
on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued an ASU 2016-12 ASC Topic
842: Leases, which amends a number of aspects of the existing
accounting standards for leases which require lessees to recognize
operating leased assets and corresponding liabilities on the
balance sheet for all leases with lease terms of more than 12
months. In July 2018, ASU 2018-10: Codification Improvements to Leases
addressed stakeholders’ questions about how to apply certain
aspects of the new guidance in Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 842: Leases. The
clarifications address the rate implicit in the lease, impairment
of the net investment in the lease, lessee reassessment of lease
classification, lessor reassessment of lease term and purchase
options, variable payments that depend on an index or rate and
certain transition adjustments. Besides, the amendments in ASU
2018-11 ASC Topic 842: Leases:
Targeted Improvements related to transition relief on
comparative reporting at adoption affect all entities with lease
contracts that choose the additional transition method and
separating components of a contract affect only lessors whose lease
contracts qualify for the practical expedient. In July 2018, the
amendments in ASU 2018-20 ASC Topic 842: Leases: Narrow-Scope Improvements
for Lessors addressed the
following issues facing lessors when applying this lease standard:
(1) sales taxes and other similar taxes collected from lessees, (2)
certain lessor costs and (3) recognition of variable payments for
contracts with lease and non-lease components. On March 5, 2019,
ASU 2019-01 issued to exempt both lessees and lessors from having
to provide certain interim disclosures in the fiscal year in which
a company adopts the new leases standard. The amendments are effective for all entities for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and thus will be
effective for the company for the fiscal year that commenced July
1, 2019 and will end June 30, 2020. . The Company will adopt these
standards starting in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020 on a
modified retrospective approach at the beginning of the
period through a cumulative-effect adjustment. The Company has completed its preliminary impact
evaluation of the new lease accounting standard on its consolidated
financial statement and expects to recognize new right-of-use
assets and lease liabilities of approximately $790 to $840 on the
consolidated balance sheet. The Company does not expect the change
to have a material impact on the consolidated statements of income
and the consolidated statements of cash flows. Further, upon
adoption, the Company will expand its financial statement
disclosures to present additional details of its leasing
arrangements.
Other new pronouncements issued but not yet effective until after
June 30, 2019 are not expected to have a significant effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
3. TERM DEPOSITS
|
June
30,
2019
|
June
30,
2018
|
|
|
|
Short-term
deposits
|
$4,143
|
$606
|
Currency
translation effect on short-term deposits
|
1
|
47
|
Total short-term deposits
|
4,144
|
653
|
Restricted
term deposits
|
1,701
|
1,664
|
Currency
translation effect on restricted term deposits
|
5
|
31
|
Total restricted term deposits
|
1,706
|
1,695
|
Total Term deposits
|
$5,850
|
$2,348
|
Restricted deposits represent the amount of cash pledged to secure
loans payable granted by financial institutions and serve as
collateral for public utility agreements such as electricity and
water and performance bonds related to customs duty payable.
Restricted deposits are classified as non-current assets, as they
relate to long-term obligations and will become unrestricted only
upon discharge of the obligations. Short-term deposits represent
bank deposits, which do not qualify as cash
equivalents.
4. TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS
Accounts
receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms.
The Company performs continuing credit evaluations of its
customers’ financial conditions, and although management
generally does not require collateral, letters of credit may be
required from its customers in certain circumstances.
Senior
management reviews trade accounts receivable on a periodic basis to
determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible.
Management includes any trade accounts receivable balances that are
determined to be uncollectible in the allowance for doubtful
accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed,
the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on
the information available to us, management believed the allowance
for doubtful accounts as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018 was
adequate.
The
following table represents the changes in the allowance for
doubtful accounts:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Beginning
|
$259
|
$247
|
Additions charged
to expenses
|
94
|
8
|
Recovered
|
(84)
|
(1)
|
Write-off
|
-
|
-
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(6)
|
5
|
Ending
|
$263
|
$259
|
5. LOANS RECEIVABLE FROM PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
The
following table presents TTCQ’s loans receivable from
property development projects in China as of June 30, 2019 and as
of June 30, 2018. The exchange rate is based on the historical
rate published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as on
March 31, 2015, since the net loan receivable was “nil”
as at June 30, 2019 and as at June 30, 2018.
|
Loan Expiry
|
Loan Amount
|
Loan Amount
|
|
Date
|
(RMB)
|
(U.S. Dollars)
|
Short-term loan receivables
|
|
|
|
JiangHuai
(Project - Yu Jin Jiang An)
|
May
31, 2013
|
2,000
|
325
|
Less:
allowance for doubtful receivables
|
|
(2,000)
|
(325)
|
Net loan receivable from property development projects
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loan receivables
|
|
|
|
Jun
Zhou Zhi Ye
|
Oct
31, 2016
|
5,000
|
814
|
Less:
transfer – down-payment for purchase of investment
property
|
|
(5,000)
|
(814)
|
Net loan receivable from property development projects
|
|
-
|
-
|
On November 1, 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
JiangHuai Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiangHuai”)
to invest in their property development projects (Project - Yu Jin
Jiang An) located in Chongqing City, China. Due to the short-term
nature of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan based
on ASC Topic 310-10-25 Receivables, amounting to RMB 2,000, or approximately $325.
The loan was renewed and it, expired on May 31, 2013. TTCQ did not
generate other income from JiangHuai for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018. Based on TTI’s financial
policy, a provision for doubtful receivables of $325 on the
investment in JiangHuai was recorded during the second quarter of
fiscal 2014. TTCQ is in the legal process of recovering the
outstanding amount of $325.
On November 1, 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
JiaSheng Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiaSheng”) to
invest in their property development projects (Project B-48 Phase
2) located in Chongqing City, China. Due to the short-term nature
of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan based on ASC
Topic 310, amounting to RMB 5,000, or approximately $814 based on
the exchange rate as of March 31, 2015 published by the Monetary
Authority of Singapore. The amount was unsecured and repayable at
the end of the term. The loan was renewed in November 2011 for a
period of one year, which expired on October 31, 2012 and was again
renewed in November 2012 and expired in November 2013. On November
1, 2013, the loan was transferred by JiaSheng to, and is now
payable by, Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd. (“Jun Zhou
Zhi Ye”), and the transferred agreement expired on October
31, 2016. Prior to the second quarter of fiscal year 2015, the loan
receivable was classified as a long-term receivable. The book value
of the loan receivable approximates its fair value. In the second
quarter of fiscal year 2015, the loan receivable was transferred to
down payment for purchase of investment property that is being
developed in the Singapore Themed Resort Project (see Note
8).
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories
consisted of the following:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
$1,190
|
$1,153
|
Work in
progress
|
1,306
|
1,947
|
Finished
goods
|
591
|
505
|
Less: provision for
obsolete inventory
|
(673)
|
(695)
|
Currency
translation effect
|
13
|
20
|
|
$2,427
|
$2,930
|
The
following table represents the changes in provision for obsolete
inventory:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
$695
|
$686
|
Additions charged
to expenses
|
17
|
9
|
Usage -
disposition
|
(42)
|
(5)
|
Currency
translation effect
|
3
|
5
|
Ending
|
$673
|
$695
|
7. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE
Penang Property
During the fourth quarter of 2015, the operations in Malaysia
planned to sell its factory building in Penang, Malaysia. In
accordance with ASC Topic 360, during fiscal year 2015 the property
was reclassified from investment property, which had a net book
value of RM 371, or approximately $98, to assets held for sale,
since there was an intention to sell the factory building. In May
2015, Trio-Tech Malaysia was approached by a potential buyer to
purchase the factory building. On September 14, 2015, application
to sell the property was rejected by Penang Development Corporation
(PDC). The rejection was because the business activity of the
purchaser was not suitable to the industry that is being promoted
on said property. PDC made an offer to purchase the property, which
was not at the expected value and the offer expired on March 28,
2016 and no further conversations with PDC have occurred
since. Management received an expression of interest from a
potential buyer in acquiring the property during second quarter of
fiscal year 2019 and the sale was under negotiation with the
potential buyer during third quarter of fiscal year 2019. Sales and
Purchase Agreement was finalized with the potential buyer during
fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019. The completion of the sale is
subject to the approval by Penang Development Corporation.
The net book value of the building was
RM371, or $89, as at June 30, 2019 and RM371, or $91, as at June
30, 2018.
The following table presents the Company’s assets held for
sale in Malaysia as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018. The
exchange rate is based on the exchange rate as of June 30, 2015
published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
|
|
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
Investment
Date / Reclassification Date
|
Investment
Amount
|
Investment
Amount
|
Investment
Amount
|
|
|
(RM)
|
(U.S.
Dollars)
|
(U.S.
Dollars)
|
Penang Property
Reclassification
from investment property
|
June
30, 2015
|
681
|
181
|
181
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(15)
|
(13)
|
|
681
|
166
|
168
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
June
30, 2015
|
(310)
|
(83)
|
(83)
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
6
|
6
|
|
(310)
|
(77)
|
(77)
|
|
Net
investment in rental property - Malaysia
|
|
371
|
89
|
91
|
8. INVESTMENTS
During
the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company entered into a
joint venture agreement with JiaSheng to develop real estate
projects in China. The Company invested RMB 10,000, or
approximately $1,606 for a 10% interest in the newly formed joint
venture, which was incorporated as a limited liability company,
Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd. (the “joint
venture”), in China. The Company would receive a fee of RMB
10,000, or approximately $1,606 for the services rendered in
connection with bidding in certain real estate projects from the
local government. Upon signing of the agreement, JiaSheng paid the
Company RMB 5,000 in cash, or approximately $803. The remaining RMB
5,000, which was not recorded as a receivable as the Company
considered the collectability uncertain, would be paid over 72
months commencing in 36 months from the date of the agreement when
the joint venture secured a property development project stated
inside the joint venture agreement. The Company considered the RMB
5,000, or approximately $803 received in cash from JiaSheng, the
controlling venturer in the joint venture, as a partial return of
the Company’s initial investment, resulting in a net
investment of RMB 5,000 as of March 31, 2014. The
Company further reduced its investments by RMB 137, or
approximately $20, towards the losses from operations incurred by
the joint venture, resulting in a net investment of RMB 4,863, or
approximately $708 based on exchange rate as of June 30, 2019.
Except as otherwise noted, transaction amounts in this note are
translated into US dollars at the historical exchange
rate.
During
the second quarter of fiscal year 2014, TTCQ decided to dispose of
its 10% interest in the joint venture after TTCQ revalued certain
monetary risks relating to the development of the project. On
October 2, 2013, TTCQ entered into a share transfer agreement (the
“Share Transfer Agreement”) with Zhu Shu. Based on the
agreement, the purchase price was to be paid by (1) RMB 10,000
worth of commercial property in Chongqing China, or approximately
$1,634 consisting of commercial units measuring 668 square meters
to be delivered in June 2016, and (2) the remaining RMB 8,000, or
approximately $1,307 by cash consideration to be paid in sixteen
quarterly equal instalments of RMB 500 per quarter commencing from
January 2014. Based on ASC Topic 845 Non-monetary Consideration, the Company
deferred the recognition of the gain on disposal of the 10%
interest in joint venture investment until such time that the
consideration is paid, so that the gain can be ascertained.
The
recorded value of the disposed investment amounting to $708 based
on exchange rate as of June 30, 2019, is classified as “other
assets” under non-current assets, because it is considered a
down payment for the purchase of the commercial property in
Chongqing. The first three instalments, amounting to RMB 500 each
due in January 2014, April 2014 and July 2014, were all outstanding
until the date of disposal of the investment in the joint venture.
Out of the outstanding RMB 8,000, TTCQ received RMB 100 during May
2014. Except as otherwise noted, transaction amounts in this note
are translated into US dollars at the historical exchange
rate.
On
October 14, 2014, TTCQ and Jun Zhou Zhi Ye entered into a
memorandum of understanding. Based on the memorandum of
understanding, both parties agreed to register a sales and purchase
agreement upon Jun Zhou Zhi Ye obtaining the license to sell the
commercial property (the Singapore Themed Resort Project) located
in Chongqing, China. The proposed agreement is for the sale of shop
lots with a total area of 1,484.55 square meters as consideration
for the outstanding amounts owed to TTCQ by Jun Zhou Zhi Ye as
follows:
a) Long
term loan receivable RMB 5,000, or approximately $814, as disclosed
in Note 5, plus the interest receivable on long term loan
receivable of RMB 1,250;
b)
Commercial units measuring 668 square meters, as mentioned above;
and
c) RMB
5,900 as part of the unrecognized cash consideration of RMB 8,000
relating to the disposal of the joint venture.
The
consideration does not include the remaining outstanding amount of
RMB 2,000, or approximately $326, which will be paid to TTCQ in
cash.
The shop lots are to be delivered to
TTCQ upon completion of the construction of the shop lots in the
Singapore Themed Resort Project. The initial targeted date of
completion was December 31, 2016. Based on discussions with the
developers, the completion date is currently estimated to be
December 31, 2021. The delay was primarily due to
the time needed by the developers to work with various parties to
inject sufficient funds into this project. Based on the available
information, management believes that the developer is capable of
working with new investors to complete certain phases of this
project.
The
Share Transfer Agreement (10% interest in the joint venture) was
registered with the relevant authorities in China during October
2016.
9. INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES
The following table presents the Company’s investment in
properties in China as of June 30, 2019. The exchange rate is based
on the market rate as of June 30, 2019.
|
Investment
Date / Reclassification Date
|
Investment
Amount (RMB)
|
Investment Amount
(U.S. Dollars)
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property I – MaoYe
Property
|
Jan
04, 2008
|
5,554
|
894
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(87)
|
Reclassification
as “Assets held for sale”
|
July
01, 2018
|
(5,554)
|
(807)
|
Reclassification
from “Assets held for sale”
|
Mar
31, 2019
|
2,024
|
301
|
|
2,024
|
301
|
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property II -
JiangHuai
|
Jan
06, 2010
|
3,600
|
580
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property III - Fu Li
|
Apr
08, 2010
|
4,025
|
648
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(124)
|
Gross
investment in rental property
|
|
9,649
|
1,405
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
June
30, 2019
|
(6,075)
|
(890)
|
Reclassified
as “Assets held for sale”
|
July
01, 2018
|
2,822
|
410
|
Reclassification
from “Assets held for sale”
|
Mar
31, 2019
|
(1,029)
|
(143)
|
|
(4,282)
|
(623)
|
|
Net investment in property – China
|
|
5,367
|
782
|
The following table presents the Company’s investment in
properties in China as of June 30, 2018. The exchange rate is based
on the market rate as of June 30, 2018.
|
Investment Date
|
Investment
Amount (RMB)
|
Investment Amount
(U.S. Dollars)
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property I - MaoYe Property
|
Jan
04, 2008
|
5,554
|
894
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property II -
JiangHuai
|
Jan
06, 2010
|
3,600
|
580
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property III - Fu Li
|
Apr
08, 2010
|
4,025
|
648
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(131)
|
Gross
investment in rental property
|
|
13,179
|
1,991
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
June
30,2018
|
(5,596)
|
(845)
|
Net investment in property – China
|
|
7,583
|
1,146
|
The following table presents the Company’s investment in
properties in Malaysia as of June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018. The
exchange rate is based on the exchange rate as of June 30, 2015
published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
|
Investment
Date
|
Investment
Amount
|
Investment
Amount
|
|
|
(RM)
|
(U.S.
Dollars)
|
Purchase
of Penang Property
|
Dec
31, 2012
|
681
|
181
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(15)
|
Reclassification
as “Assets held for sale”
|
June
30, 2015
|
(681)
|
(166)
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
June
30, 2015
|
(310)
|
(83)
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
6
|
Reclassified
as “Assets held for sale”
|
June
30, 2015
|
(310)
|
(77)
|
Net
investment in rental property - Malaysia
|
|
-
|
-
|
Rental Property I - MaoYe Property
In fiscal 2008, TTCQ purchased an office in Chongqing, China from
MaoYe Property Ltd. (“MaoYe”), for a total cash
purchase price of RMB 5,554, or approximately $894. TTCQ identified
a new tenant and signed a new rental agreement (653 square meters
at a monthly rent of RMB 39, or approximately $6) on August 1, 2015
which expires on July 31, 2020. TTCQ signed a new rental agreement
(451 square meters at a monthly rent of RMB 24, or approximately
$4) on February 1, 2018 which expires on January 31,
2021.
During the first quarter of 2019, management decided to sell MaoYe
Property, which is one of our earlier investment properties. In
order to monetize the capital gain on property, TTCQ appointed a
sole agent for 6 months as of September 1, 2018 to search for
suitable buyers for this property. The Company has completed the
sale of thirteen of the fifteen units constituting the MaoYe
Property as of the end of third quarter 2019 which contributed the
gain of $685. During the third quarter 2019, considering the
current market conditions in China, management has decided not to
sell the remaining two units of MaoYe properties and as of third
quarter 2019, the properties were reclassified to investment
property from assets held for sale.
Property purchased from MaoYe generated a rental income of
$66 and $99 for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
Rental Property II - JiangHuai
In fiscal year 2010, TTCQ purchased eight units of commercial
property in Chongqing, China from Chongqing JiangHuai Real Estate
Development Co. Ltd. (“JiangHuai”) for a total purchase
price of RMB 3,600, or approximately $580. Although these units
were rented in the past, all eight units are currently vacant and
TTCQ is working with the developer to find a suitable buyer to
purchase all the commercial units. TTCQ has yet to receive the
title deed for these properties; however, TTCQ has the vacancies in
possession with the exception of two units, which are in the
process of clarification. TTCQ is in the legal process to obtain
the title deed, which is dependent on JiangHuai completing the
entire project.
Property purchased from JiangHuai generated a rental income of nil
for both the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.
Rental Property III – FuLi
In fiscal 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
Chongqing FuLi Real Estate Development Co. Ltd.
(“FuLi”) to purchase two commercial properties totaling
311.99 square meters (“office space”) located in Jiang
Bei District Chongqing. Although TTCQ currently rents its office
premises from a third party, it intends to use the office space as
its office premises. The total purchase price committed and paid
was RMB 4,025, or approximately $648. The development was
completed and the property was handed over in April 2013 and the
title deed was received during the third quarter of fiscal
2014.
The two commercial properties were leased to third parties under
two separate rental agreements. One of such leases provides for a
rent increase of 5% every year on May 1, commencing in 2017 until
the rental agreement expired on April 30, 2019. The rental
agreement of this lease has been extended for 3 years, commencing
from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2021 with a term of rent increase of
6% every year.
For the other lease expired on March 31, 2018, TTCQ identified a
new tenant and signed a new rental agreement (161 square meters at
a monthly rent of RMB 62, or approximately $9) on November 1, 2018
which expires on October 31, 2019.
Property purchased from FuLi generated a rental income of $32 and
$40 for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
Summary
Total
rental income for all investment properties (Property I, II and
III) in China was $98 for the year ended June 30, 2019, and $139
for the same period in the prior fiscal year.
Depreciation
expenses for all investment properties in China were $86 and $102
for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and
equipment consisted of the following:
|
Estimated
Useful
|
June
30,
|
|
|
Life in
Years
|
2019
|
2018
|
Building and
improvements
|
3-20
|
$5,082
|
$5,070
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
3-27
|
6,150
|
6,093
|
Machinery and
equipment
|
3-7
|
26,140
|
24,138
|
Furniture and
fixtures
|
3-5
|
1,111
|
1,029
|
Equipment
under capital leases
|
3-5
|
928
|
928
|
Property, plant and equipment,
gross
|
|
$39,411
|
$37,258
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
|
(25,083)
|
(23,440)
|
Accumulated
amortization on equipment under capital leases
|
|
(808)
|
(795)
|
Total
accumulated depreciation
|
|
$(25,891)
|
$(24,235)
|
Property,
plant and equipment before currency translation effect,
net
|
|
13,520
|
13,023
|
Currency
translation effect
|
|
(1,361)
|
(1,088)
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$12,159
|
$11,935
|
Depreciation
and amortization expenses for property, plant and equipment during
fiscal years 2019 and 2018 were $2,364 and $2,112,
respectively.
11. OTHER ASSETS
Other assets
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Down
payment for purchase of investment properties
|
$1,645
|
$1,645
|
Down
payment for purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
100
|
561
|
Deposits
for rental and utilities
|
169
|
140
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(164)
|
(97)
|
Total
|
$1,750
|
$2,249
|
12. LINES OF CREDIT
The carrying value of the Company’s lines of credit
approximates its fair value, because the interest rates associated
with the lines of credit are adjustable in accordance with market
situations when the Company borrowed funds with similar terms and
remaining maturities.
The Company’s credit rating provides it with readily and
adequate access to funds in global markets.
As of June 30, 2019, the Company had certain lines of credit that
are collateralized by restricted deposits.
Entity
with
|
Type
of
|
Interest
|
Expiration
|
Credit
|
Unused
|
Facility
|
Facility
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Limitation
|
Credit
|
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.,
Singapore
|
Lines of Credit
|
Ranging from 1.85% to
5.5%
|
-
|
$4,213
|
$4,213
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
|
Lines of Credit
|
5.22% to 6.3%
|
-
|
$1,492
|
$1,492
|
Universal (Far East) Pte.
Ltd.
|
Lines of Credit
|
Ranging from 1.85% to
5.5%
|
-
|
$370
|
$183
|
As of June 30, 2018, the Company had certain lines of credit that
are collateralized by restricted deposits.
Entity
with
|
Type
of
|
Interest
|
Expiration
|
Credit
|
Unused
|
Facility
|
Facility
|
Rate
|
Date
|
Limitation
|
Credit
|
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.,
Singapore
|
Lines of Credit
|
Ranging from
1.6% to 5.5
%
|
-
|
$4,183
|
$3,325
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
|
Lines of Credit
|
5.22%
|
-
|
$1,511
|
$437
|
Universal (Far East) Pte.
Ltd.
|
Lines of Credit
|
Ranging from 1.6%
to 5.5%
|
-
|
$367
|
$256
|
On 4 January 2018, Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. signed an
agreement with a bank to sub-allocate a portion of the facility
thereunder to its subsidiary - Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. for
an Accounts Payable Financing facility with the bank for SGD 500,
or approximately $367 based on the market exchange rate. Interest
is charged at 1.85% to 5.5%. The financing facility was set up to
facilitate the working capital in our operations in Singapore. The
Company started to use this facility in fiscal year
2018.
13. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses
consisted of the following:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Payroll
and related costs
|
1,354
|
1,545
|
Commissions
|
107
|
89
|
Customer
deposits
|
46
|
17
|
Legal
and audit
|
299
|
265
|
Sales
tax
|
9
|
17
|
Utilities
|
120
|
130
|
Warranty
|
39
|
82
|
Accrued
purchase of materials and property, plant and
equipment
|
362
|
454
|
Provision
for re-instatement
|
302
|
289
|
Deferred
income
|
61
|
-
|
Contract
Liabilities
|
501
|
31
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
293
|
172
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(7)
|
81
|
Total
|
$3,486
|
$3,172
|
14. WARRANTY ACCRUAL
The Company provides for the estimated costs that may be incurred
under its warranty program at the time the sale is recorded. The
warranty period for products manufactured by the Company is
generally one year or the warranty period agreed with the
customer. The Company estimates the warranty costs based on
the historical rates of warranty returns. The Company
periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty
liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary.
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Beginning
|
$82
|
$48
|
Additions
charged to cost and expenses
|
15
|
64
|
Utilization
/ reversal
|
(58)
|
(30)
|
Currency
translation effect
|
-
|
-
|
Ending
|
$39
|
$82
|
15. BANK LOANS PAYABLE
Bank
loans payable consisted of the following:
|
June
30, 2019
|
June
30, 2018
|
Note payable denominated in RM for expansion plans
in Malaysia, maturing in August 2024, bearing interest rate at
bank’s lending rate minus 2% and 5.00% at June 30, 2019 and
June 30, 2018 per annum, with monthly payments of principal plus
interest through August 2024, collateralized by the acquired
building with a carrying value of $2,683 and $2,809, as
at June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018,
respectively.
|
$2 ,696
|
$1,615
|
|
|
|
Note
payable denominated in U.S. dollars for expansion plans in
Singapore and its subsidiaries, maturing in April 2020, bearing
interest at the bank’s lending rate (3.96% for June 30, 2019
and June 30, 2018, respectively) with monthly payments of principal
plus interest through April 2017. This note payable is secured by
plant and equipment with a carrying value of $148 and $187 as of
June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018, respectively.
|
142
|
293
|
|
|
|
Total bank loans payable
|
2,838
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of bank loan payable
|
494
|
380
|
Currency
translation effect on current portion of bank loan
|
(6)
|
(13)
|
Current
portion of bank loan payable
|
488
|
367
|
Long
term portion of bank loan payable
|
2,344
|
1,528
|
Currency
translation effect on long-term portion of bank loan
|
(52)
|
(91)
|
Long
term portion of bank loans payable
|
$2,292
|
$1,437
|
Future
minimum payments (excluding interest) as of June 30, 2019 were as
follows:
2020
|
$488
|
2021
|
362
|
2022
|
380
|
2023
|
399
|
2024
|
407
|
Thereafter
|
744
|
Total
obligations and commitments
|
$2,780
|
Future minimum payments (excluding interest) as of June 30, 2018
were as follows:
2019
|
$367
|
2020
|
372
|
2021
|
242
|
2022
|
254
|
2023
|
267
|
Thereafter
|
302
|
Total
obligations and commitments
|
$1,804
|
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The
Company leases certain facilities and equipment under long-term
agreements expiring at various dates through fiscal year 2019 and
thereafter. Certain leases require the Company to pay real estate
income tax and insurance and provide for escalation of lease costs
based on certain indices.
Future
minimum payments under capital leases and non-cancelable operating
leases and net rental income under non-cancelable sub-leased
properties as of June 30, 2019 were as follows:
|
|
|
Sub-lease
|
Net
|
For the Year Ending
June 30,
|
Capital
Leases
|
Operating
Leases
|
Rental
(Income)
|
Operating
Leases
|
2020
|
$283
|
$646
|
$(26)
|
$620
|
2021
|
187
|
216
|
-
|
216
|
2022
|
143
|
47
|
-
|
47
|
2023
|
68
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
2024
|
44
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total future
minimum lease payments
|
$725
|
$910
|
$(26)
|
$884
|
Less: amount
representing interest
|
-
|
|
|
|
Present value of
net minimum lease payments
|
725
|
|
|
|
Less: current
portion of capital lease obligations
|
283
|
|
|
|
Long-term
obligations under capital leases
|
$442
|
|
|
|
Future
minimum payments under capital leases and non-cancelable operating
leases and net rental income under non-cancelable sub-leased
properties as of June 30, 2018 were as follows:
|
|
|
Sub-lease
|
Net
|
For the Year Ending
June 30,
|
Capital
Leases
|
Operating
Leases
|
Rental
(Income)
|
Operating
Leases
|
2019
|
$250
|
$717
|
$(26)
|
$691
|
2020
|
249
|
531
|
(26)
|
505
|
2021
|
150
|
44
|
-
|
44
|
2022
|
102
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2023
|
23
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total future
minimum lease payments
|
$774
|
$1,292
|
$(52)
|
$1,240
|
Less: amount
representing interest
|
-
|
|
|
|
Present value of
net minimum lease payments
|
774
|
|
|
|
Less: current
portion of capital lease obligations
|
250
|
|
|
|
Long-term
obligations under capital leases
|
$524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company purchased equipment under the capital lease agreements with
rates ranging from 1.88% to 7.50% for fiscal years 2019 and 2018.
These agreements mature ranging from July 2019 to Jan
2024.
Total
rental expense on all operating leases, cancelable and
non-cancelable, amounted to $708 and $703 in fiscal years 2019 and
2018, respectively.
Trio-Tech
(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. has a capital commitment for the purchase of
equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to RM
18, or approximately $4 based on the exchange rate on June 30, 2019
as compared to RM 62, or approximately $16 for the last fiscal
year.
Trio-Tech
Tianjin Co. Ltd has capital commitments for the purchase of
equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to RMB
397, or approximately $58 based on the exchange rate on June 30,
2019 as compared to RMB 3,927, or approximately $593 based on the
exchange rate on June 30, 2018.
Deposits with banks in China are not insured by the local
government or agency, and are consequently exposed to risk of loss.
The Company believes the probability of a bank failure, causing
loss to the Company, is remote.
The
Company is, from time to time, the subject of litigation claims and
assessments arising out of matters occurring in its normal business
operations. In the opinion of management, resolution of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial statements.
17. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS APPROXIMATE CARRYING
VALUE
In accordance with ASC Topic 825 and 820, the following presents
assets and liabilities measured and carried at fair value and
classified by level of fair value measurement
hierarchy:
There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2019 or for the same period in the prior fiscal
year.
Term deposits (Level 2) – The carrying amount approximates
fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments.
Restricted term deposits (Level 2) – The carrying amount
approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments.
Lines of credit (Level 3) – The carrying value of the lines
of credit approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of
the obligations.
Bank loans payable (Level 3) – The carrying value of the
Company’s bank loan payables approximates its fair value as
the interest rates associated with long-term debt is adjustable in
accordance with market situations when the Company borrowed funds
with similar terms and remaining maturities.
18. CONCENTRATION OF CUSTOMERS
The
Company had one major customer that accounted for the following
revenue and trade accounts receivable:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Revenue
|
|
|
-
Customer
A
|
41.9%
|
51.4%
|
-
Customer
B
|
11.4%
|
9.3%
|
|
|
|
Trade
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
- Customer
A
|
41.3%
|
57.9%
|
- Customer
B
|
3.3%
|
1.3%
|
19. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
In fiscal year 2019, the Company operated in four segments; the
testing service industry (which performs structural and electronic
tests of semiconductor devices), the designing and manufacturing of
equipment (assembly of equipment tests the structural integrity of
integrated circuits and other products), distribution of various
products from other manufacturers in Singapore and Asia and the
real estate segment in China.
The revenue allocated to individual countries was based on where
the customers were located. The allocation of the cost of
equipment, the current year investment in new equipment and
depreciation expense have been made on the basis of the primary
purpose for which the equipment was acquired.
All
inter-segment sales were sales from the manufacturing segment to
the testing and distribution segment. Total inter-segment sales
were $484 in fiscal year 2019 and $879 in fiscal year 2018.
Corporate assets mainly consisted of
cash and prepaid expenses. Corporate expenses mainly consisted of
stock option expenses, salaries, insurance, professional expenses
and directors' fees. Corporate expenses are allocated to the four
segments on a pre-determined fixed amount calculated based on the
annual budgeted sales, except the Malaysia operation, which is
calculated based on actual sales. The following segment information
table includes segment operating income or loss after including
corporate expenses allocated to the segments, which gets eliminated
in the consolidation.
Business Segment Information:
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Year
|
|
Operating
|
|
Depr.
|
|
|
Ended
|
Net
|
Income
|
Total
|
and
|
Capital
|
|
June
30,
|
Revenue
|
(Loss)
|
Assets
|
Amort.
|
Expenditures
|
Manufacturing
|
2019
|
$14,889
|
$575
|
$9,576
|
$120
|
$52
|
2018
|
$15,978
|
$548
|
$8,549
|
$115
|
$143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing
Services
|
2019
|
16,760
|
(164)
|
22,182
|
2,244
|
2,789
|
|
2018
|
19,391
|
1,522
|
23,480
|
1,997
|
2,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
2019
|
7,451
|
598
|
785
|
-
|
-
|
2018
|
6,853
|
475
|
789
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate
|
2019
|
98
|
(92)
|
3,826
|
86
|
-
|
|
2018
|
139
|
(56)
|
3,521
|
102
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication
|
2019
|
-
|
-
|
27
|
-
|
-
|
Services*
|
2018
|
-
|
-
|
27
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
&
|
2019
|
-
|
(123)
|
131
|
-
|
-
|
Unallocated
|
2018
|
-
|
(301)
|
108
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Company
|
2019
|
$39,198
|
$794
|
$36,527
|
$2,450
|
$2,841
|
2018
|
$42,361
|
$2,188
|
$36,474
|
$2,214
|
$2,309
|
*
Fabrication services is a discontinued
operation.
20. OPERATING LEASES
Operating leases arise from the leasing of the Company’s
commercial and residential real estate investment property. Initial
lease terms generally range from 12 to 60 months. Depreciation
expense for assets subject to operating leases is taken into
account primarily on the straight-line method over a period of
twenty years in amounts necessary to reduce the carrying amount of
the asset to its estimated residual value. Depreciation expenses
relating to the property held as investments in operating leases
was $86 and $102 for fiscal years 2019 and 2018,
respectively.
Future minimum rental income in China to be received from fiscal
year 2020 to fiscal year 2021 on non-cancellable operating leases
is contractually due as follows as of June 30, 2019:
2020
|
$121
|
2021
|
35
|
|
$156
|
Future minimum rental income in China to be received from fiscal
year 2019 to fiscal year 2021 on non-cancellable operating leases
is contractually due as follows as of June 30, 2018:
2019
|
$137
|
2020
|
121
|
2021
|
35
|
|
$293
|
21. OTHER INCOME, NET
Other
income, net consisted of the following:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Interest
income
|
100
|
50
|
Other
rental income
|
113
|
110
|
Exchange
gain / (loss)
|
(135)
|
(160)
|
Government
grant
|
77
|
126
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
2
|
-
|
Other
miscellaneous income
|
92
|
209
|
Total
|
$249
|
$335
|
22. INCOME TAXES
Income
before provision for income taxes consists of the
following:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
United
States
|
(308)
|
(180)
|
International
|
1,717
|
2,470
|
Total
|
$1,409
|
$2,290
|
The
components of the provision for income taxes are as
follows:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Current:
|
|
|
Federal
|
$(337)
|
$900
|
State
|
2
|
2
|
Foreign
|
289
|
79
|
|
$(46)
|
$981
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
Federal
|
$-
|
$-
|
State
|
-
|
-
|
Foreign
|
4
|
6
|
|
4
|
6
|
Total
provisions
|
$(42)
|
$987
|
A
reconciliation of income tax expense compared to the amount of
income tax expense that would result by applying the U.S. federal
statutory income tax rate to pre-tax income is as
follows:
|
For
the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Statutory federal
tax rate
|
21.00%
|
(27.55)%
|
State taxes, net of
federal benefit
|
(0.22)
|
(6.00)
|
Permanent items and
credits
|
11.23
|
-
|
Foreign rate
differential
|
(4.76)
|
32.98
|
Other
|
4.71
|
(1.45)
|
Changes in
valuation allowance
|
(11.11)
|
4.01
|
Tax reform related
to one-time repatriation tax
|
(23.83)
|
(45.0)
|
Effective
rate
|
(2.98)%
|
(43.10)%
|
The
provision for income taxes has been determined based upon the tax
laws and rates in the countries in which we operate. The Company is
subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the
provision for income taxes and income tax assets and liabilities,
including evaluating uncertainties in the application of accounting
principles and complex tax laws.
The Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on
December 22, 2017, and permanently reduces the U.S. federal
corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated corporate
Alternative Minimum Tax, modified rules for expensing capital
investment, and limits the deduction of interest expense for
certain companies. The Act is a fundamental change to the taxation
of multinational companies, including a shift from a system of
worldwide taxation with some deferral elements to a territorial
system, current taxation of certain foreign income, a minimum tax
on low tax foreign earnings, and new measures to curtail base
erosion and promote U.S. production.
As the
Company has a June 30 fiscal year end, the lower corporate income
tax rate was phased in as of January 1, 2018, resulting in a lower
US statutory federal rate. In accordance with Section 15 of the
Internal Revenue Code, the Company applied a blended U.S. statutory
federal income tax rate of 27.55% in computing the tax provision
for the year ended June 30, 2018. Accounting Standard Codification
(“ASC”) 740 requires filers to record the effect of tax
law changes in the period enacted. The Company recognized income
tax expenses of $900 related to the one-time deemed repatriation as
of June 30, 2018. No expenses were recognized related to the
deferred tax re-measurement and minimum tax on low tax foreign
earnings. The SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118
(“SAB 118”) that permits filers to record provisional
amounts during a measurement period ending no later than one year
from the date of enactment. As
of Dec 31, 2018, the Company’s accounting for the Tax Act is
complete. The provision for income taxes for the year ended
June 30, 2019 includes a $145 decrease from the completion of our
provisional accounting for the effects of the Tax Act under SAB
118. The decrease is associated with the one-time mandatory
repatriation tax of certain post-1986 earnings and profits that
were deferred from U.S. taxation by the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries. The Company filed its US federal income tax return
during Q4, which included the $755 one-time repatriation tax as
well as utilization of net operating losses and tax credits
amounting to $192 which was not finalized until the filing of the
return.
Due to
the enactment of Tax Act, the Company is subject to a tax on global
intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”). GILTI
is a tax on foreign income in excess of a deemed return on tangible
assets of foreign corporations. Companies subject to GILTI have the
option to account for the GILTI tax as a period cost if and when
incurred, or to recognize deferred taxes for temporary differences
including outside basis differences expected to reverse as GILTI.
The Company has elected to account for GILTI as a period cost, and
therefore has included GILTI expense in its effective tax rate
calculation for the year ended June 30, 2019.
The
Company accrues penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax
benefits when necessary as a component of penalties and interest
expenses, respectively. The Company had no unrecognized tax
benefits or related accrued penalties or interest expenses at June
30, 2019.
The
Company has maintained an indefinite reinvestment assertion as of
June 30, 2019. Accordingly, no deferred taxes related to
withholding taxes or unrealized foreign currency gains or losses
have been recorded.
In
assessing the ability to realize the deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the
generation of future taxable income during the periods in which
those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers
the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected
future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. Based on these criteria, management believes it is more
likely than not the Company will not realize the benefits of the
federal, state, and foreign deductible differences. Accordingly, a
full valuation allowance has been established.
Temporary
differences that give rise to a significant portion of deferred tax
assets and deferred tax liabilities is as follows for the year
ended June 30:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
Net operating
losses and credits
|
$363
|
$633
|
Inventory
valuation
|
64
|
69
|
Provision for bad
debts
|
296
|
112
|
Accrued
vacation
|
94
|
3
|
Accrued
expenses
|
325
|
629
|
Fixed asset
basis
|
23
|
-
|
Investment in
subsidiaries
|
-
|
61
|
Unrealized
gain
|
55
|
4
|
Other
|
73
|
3
|
Total deferred tax
assets
|
$1,293
|
$1,514
|
Deferred tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
(390)
|
(324)
|
Others
|
(78)
|
-
|
Total deferred
income tax liabilities
|
$(468)
|
$(324)
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
825
|
1,190
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(762)
|
(1,117)
|
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$63
|
$73
|
|
|
|
Presented
as follows in the balance sheets:
|
|
|
Deferred tax
assets
|
390
|
400
|
Deferred tax
liabilities
|
(327)
|
(327)
|
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$63
|
$73
|
The valuation allowance decreased by $355 and $293
in fiscal year 2019 and 2018, respectively.
At June
30, 2019, the Company had no federal net operating loss
carry-forwards and state net operating loss carryforward of $867,
which expire through 2038. These carryovers may be subject to
limitations under I.R.C. Section 382. The Company also had tax
credit carry-forward of approximately $49 for U.S. federal income
tax purposes expiring through 2020. Management of the Company is
uncertain whether it is more likely than not that these future
benefits will be realized. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance
was established.
Generally,
U.S. federal, state, and foreign authorities may examine the
Company’s tax returns for three years, four years, and five
years, respectively, from the date an income tax return is filed.
However, the taxing authorities may continue to adjust the
Company’s net operating loss carryforwards until the statute
of limitations closes on the tax years in which the net operating
losses are utilized.
23. UNRECOGNIZED TAX
BENEFITS
The Company adopted ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income
Taxes - Interpretation of Topic
740.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized
tax benefits is as follows:
Balance at June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018
|
$ (250)
|
The Company accrues penalties and interest on unrecognized tax
benefits as a component of penalties and interest expenses,
respectively. The Company has not accrued any penalties or interest
expense relating to the unrecognized benefits at June 30, 2019 and
June 30, 2018.
The major tax jurisdictions in which the Company files income tax
returns are the U.S., Singapore, China and Malaysia. The statute of
limitations, in general, is open for years 2011 to 2018 for tax
authorities in those jurisdictions to audit or examine income tax
returns. The Company is under annual review by the governments of
Singapore, Malaysia, China, and Thailand. However, the Company is
not currently under tax examination in any other jurisdiction
including the United States.
24. REVENUE
The
Company generates revenue primarily from 3 different segments:
Manufacturing, Testing and Distribution. The Company accounts for a
contract with a customer when there is approval and commitment from
both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment
terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and
collectability of consideration is probable. The Company’s
revenues are measured based on consideration stipulated in the
arrangement with each customer, net of any sales incentives and
amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales taxes.
The revenues are recognized as separate performance obligations
that are satisfied by transferring control of the product or
service to the customer.
Significant Judgments
The
Company’s arrangements with its customers include various
combinations of products and services, which are generally capable
of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance
obligations. A product or service is considered distinct if it is
separately identifiable from other deliverables in the arrangement
and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other
resources that are readily available to the customer.
The
Company allocates the transaction price to each performance
obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis
(“SSP”). Determining the SSP for each distinct
performance obligation and allocation of consideration from an
arrangement to the individual performance obligations and the
appropriate timing of revenue recognition are significant judgments
with respect to these arrangements. The Company typically
establishes the SSP based on observable prices of products or
services sold separately in comparable circumstances to similar
clients. The Company may estimate SSP by considering internal
costs, profit objectives and pricing practices in certain
circumstances.
Warranties,
discounts and allowances are estimated using historical and recent
data trends. The Company includes estimates in the transaction
price only to the extent that a significant reversal of revenue is
not probable in subsequent periods. The Company’s products
and services are generally not sold with a right of return, nor has
the Company experienced significant returns from or refunds to its
customers.
Manufacturing
The
Company primarily derives revenue from the sale of both front-end
and back-end semiconductor test equipment and related peripherals,
maintenance and support of all these products, installation and
training services and the sale of spare parts. The Company’s
revenues are measured based on consideration stipulated in the
arrangement with each customer, net of any sales incentives and
amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales
taxes.
The
Company recognizes revenue at a point in time when the Company has
satisfied its performance obligation by transferring control of the
product to the customer. The Company uses judgment to evaluate
whether the control has transferred by considering several
indicators, including:
●
whether
the
Company has a present right to payment;
●
the
customer has legal
title;
●
the
customer has
physical possession;
●
the
Customer has
significant risk and rewards of ownership; and
●
the
customer has
accepted the product, or whether customer acceptance is considered
a formality based on history of acceptance of similar products (for
example, when the customer has previously accepted the same
equipment, with the same specifications, and when we can
objectively demonstrate that the tool meets all of the required
acceptance criteria, and when the installation of the system is
deemed perfunctory).
Not all
of the indicators need to be met for the Company to conclude that
control has transferred to the customer. In circumstances in which
revenue is recognized prior to the product acceptance, the portion
of revenue associated with its performance obligations of product
installation and training services are deferred and recognized upon
acceptance.
The
majority of sales under the Manufacturing segment include a
standard 12-month warranty. The Company has concluded that the
warranty provided for standard products are assurance type
warranties and are not separate performance obligations. Warranty
provided for customized products are service warranties and are
separate performance obligations. Transaction prices are allocated
to this performance obligation using cost plus method. The portion
of revenue associated with warranty service is deferred and
recognized as revenue over the warranty period, as the customer
simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of warranty
services provided by the Company.
Testing
The
Company rendered testing services to manufacturers and purchasers
of semiconductors and other entities who either lack testing
capabilities or whose in-house screening facilities are
insufficient. The Company primarily derives testing revenue from
burn-in services, manpower supply and other associated services.
SSP is directly observable from the sales orders. Revenue is
allocated to performance obligations satisfied at a point in time
depending upon terms of the sales order. Generally, there is no
other performance obligation other than what has been stated inside
the sales order for each of these sales.
Terms
of contract that may indicate potential variable consideration
included warranty, late delivery penalty and reimbursement to solve
non-conformance issues for rejected products. Based on historical
and recent data trends, it is concluded that these terms of the
contract do not represent potential variable consideration. The
transaction price is not contingent on the occurrence of any future
event.
Distribution
The
Company distributes complementary products particularly equipment,
industrial products and components by manufacturers mainly from the
U.S., Europe, Taiwan and Japan. The Company recognizes revenue from
product sales at a point in time when the Company has satisfied its
performance obligation by transferring control of the product to
the customer. The Company uses judgment to evaluate whether the
control has transferred by considering several indicators discussed
above. The Company recognizes the revenue at a point in time,
generally upon shipment or delivery of the products to the customer
or distributors, depending upon terms of the sales
order.
Method and Impact of Adoption
Effective
as of July 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606), and its related amendments using the modified
retrospective transition method. This method was applied to
contracts that were not complete as of the date of adoption. Under
the modified retrospective transition approach, periods prior to
the adoption date were not adjusted and continue to be reported in
accordance with ASC 605.
An
assessment was made on the impact of all existing arrangements as
at the date of adoption, under ASC 606, to identify the cumulative
effect of applying ASC 606 on the beginning retained earnings. The
Company quantified the impact of the adoption on its financial
position, results of operations and cash flow. The impact
amounted to 0.06% of fiscal 2018 revenue or $28, which is
immaterial to the Company. Hence, based on materiality
principle, the Company concluded that the cumulative adjustment is
not required to be made to the Company’s Beginning Retained
Earnings.
The
impact is primarily driven by the changes related to the accounting
of standard warranty. Prior to adoption of ASC 606, the Company
accounted for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to costs of
sales when revenue was recognized. Upon adoption of ASC 606, the
standard warranty for customized products is recognized as a
separate performance obligation.
The
Company has completed its adoption and implemented policies,
processes and controls to support the standard’s measurement
and disclosure requirements. The Company recognizes net product
revenue when it satisfies the obligations as evidenced by the
transfer of control of its products and services to customers. The
guidance did not have material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial results.
Contract Balances
The
timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections may
result in accounts receivable, contract assets, and contract
liabilities (deferred revenue) on the Company’s condensed
consolidated balance sheet. A receivable is recorded in the period
the Company delivers products or provides services when the Company
has an unconditional right to payment.
Contract
assets primarily relate to the value of products and services
transferred to the customer for which the right to payment is not
just dependent on the passage of time. Contract assets are
transferred to receivable when rights to payment become
unconditional.
A
contract liability is recognized when the Company receives payment
or has an unconditional right to payment in advance of the
satisfaction of performance. The contract liabilities represent (1)
Deferred product revenue related to the value of products that have
been shipped and billed to customers and for which the control has
not been transferred to the customers, and (2) Deferred service
revenue, which is recorded when the Company receives consideration,
or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior
to transferring services to the customer under the terms of a sales
contract. Deferred service revenue typically results from warranty
services, and maintenance and other service contracts.
As of
July 1, 2018, deferred income amounting to $260 was reclassified
from other receivables to contract assets and customer deposits
amounting to $31 was reclassified from accrued expenses to contract
liabilities in order to establish the new opening balance for
contract assets and liabilities.
The
Company’s payment terms and conditions vary by contract type,
although terms generally include a requirement of payment of 70% to
90% of total contract consideration within 30 to 60 days of
shipment, with the remainder payable within 30 days of acceptance.
In instances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from
the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that its
contracts generally do not include a significant financing
component.
Contract assets were recorded under other receivable while
contract liabilities were recorded under accrued expenses in the
balance sheet.
The
following table summarizes the effects of adopting ASU 2014-09 as
an adjustment to the opening balance.
|
Balance as of
June 30, 2018
|
Adjustment for (ASC 606)
|
Opening as of
July 1, 2018
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Trade
Accounts Receivable
|
8,007
|
(260)
|
7,747
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Receivables
|
|
|
|
Others
|
621
|
-
|
621
|
Contract
Assets
|
-
|
260
|
260
|
Total
|
621
|
260
|
881
|
|
Balance as of
June 30, 2018
|
Adjustment for (ASC 606)
|
Opening as of
July 1, 2018
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
3,704
|
-
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Expenses
|
|
|
|
Others
|
3,172
|
(31)
|
3,141
|
Contract
Liabilities
|
-
|
31
|
31
|
Total
|
3,172
|
-
|
3,172
|
The
following table is the reconciliation of contract
balances.
|
June 30, 2019
(Audited)
$
|
July 1, 2018 (Audited)
$
|
Trade
Accounts Receivable
|
7,113
|
7,747
|
Trade
Accounts Payable
|
3,272
|
3,704
|
Contract
Assets
|
419
|
260
|
Contract
Liabilities
|
501
|
31
|
Remaining Performance Obligation
The remaining performance obligation (RPO) disclosure provides the
aggregate amount of the transaction price yet to be recognized as
of the end of the reporting period and an explanation as to when
the company expects to recognize these amounts in revenue. It is
intended to be a statement of overall work under contract that has
not yet been performed and does not include contracts in which the
customer is not committed. The customer is not considered committed
when they are able to terminate for convenience without payment of
a substantive penalty. The disclosure includes estimates of
variable consideration, except when the variable consideration is a sale
based or usage-based royalty promised in exchange for a license of
intellectual property. Additionally, as a practical expedient, the
Company does not include contracts that have an original duration
of one year or less. Remaining performance obligation estimates are
subject to change and are affected by several factors, including
terminations, changes in the scope of contracts, periodic
revalidations, and adjustment for revenue that has not materialized
and adjustments for currency.
As at June 30, 2019, the aggregate amount of the transaction price
allocated to RPO related to customer contracts that are unsatisfied
or partially unsatisfied was $1,038. Given the profile of contract
terms, approximately 23.5% percent of this amount is expected to be
recognized as revenue over the next two years, approximately 76.5%
percent between three and five years.
Practical
Expedients
The Company applies the following practical
expedients:
●
The
Company accounts for shipping and handling costs as activities to
fulfil the promise to transfer the goods, instead of a promised
service to its customer.
●
The
Company has not elected to adjust the promised amount of
consideration for the effects of a significant financing component
as the Company expects, at contract inception, that the period
between when the entity transfers a promised good or service to a
customer and when the customer pays for that good or service will
generally be one year or less.
●
The
Company has elected to adopt the practical expedient for contract
costs, specifically in relation to incremental costs of obtaining a
contract.
Costs to obtain a contract are not material, and the Company
generally expenses such costs as incurred because the amortization
period is one year or less.
25. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company adopted ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share.
Basic earnings per share
(“EPS”) are computed by dividing net income available
to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period.
Diluted EPS give effect to all dilutive potential common shares
outstanding during a period. In computing diluted EPS, the average
price for the period is used in determining the number of shares
assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options and
warrants.
Options
to purchase 673,500 shares of Common Stock at exercise prices
ranging from $2.69 to $5.98 per share were outstanding as of June
30, 2019. No outstanding options were excluded in the computation
of diluted EPS for fiscal year 2019 since all options were
dilutive.
Options
to purchase 657,500 shares of Common Stock at exercise prices
ranging from $3.41 to $5.98 per share were outstanding as of June
30, 2018. No outstanding options were excluded in the computation
of diluted EPS for fiscal year 2018 since all options were
dilutive.
The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted average
shares used in the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the
years presented herein:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Income
attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from
continuing operations, net of tax
|
$1,548
|
$1,197
|
Loss
attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from
discontinued operations, net of tax
|
$(3)
|
$(13)
|
|
|
|
Net Income attributable to Trio-tech International common
shareholders
|
1,545
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding - basic
|
3,673
|
3,553
|
Dilutive
effect of stock options
|
89
|
218
|
Number of shares used to compute earnings per share -
diluted
|
3,762
|
3,771
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0.42
|
$0.34
|
Basic
loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$-
|
$(0.01)
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Share from Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech
International
|
$0.42
|
$0.33
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0.41
|
$0.32
|
Diluted
loss per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
-
|
(0.01)
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Share from Net Income Attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0.41
|
$0.31
|
26. STOCK OPTIONS
On September 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors
unanimously adopted the 2007 Employee Stock Option Plan (the
“2007 Employee Plan”) and the 2007 Directors Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2007 Directors Plan”) each of
which was approved by the shareholders on December 3, 2007. Each of
those plans was amended during the term of such plan to increase
the number of shares covered thereby. As of the last amendment
thereof, the 2007 Employee Plan covered an aggregate of 600,000
shares of the Company’s Common Stock and the 2007 Directors
Plan covered an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock. Each of those plans terminated by its respective
terms on September 24, 2017. These two plans were administered by
the Board, which also established the terms of the
awards.
On September 14, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors
unanimously adopted the 2017 Employee Stock Option Plan (the
“2017 Employee Plan”) and the 2017 Directors Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2017 Directors Plan”) each of
which was approved by the shareholders on December 4, 2017. Each of
these plans is administered by the Board of Directors of the
Company.
Assumptions
The
fair value for the options granted were estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions, assuming no expected dividends:
|
For
the Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Expected
volatility
|
45.38% to
97.48%
|
47.29% to
104.94%
|
Risk-free interest
rate
|
0.30% to
2.35%
|
0.30% to
0.78%
|
Expected life
(years)
|
2.5 -3.25
|
2.50
|
The
expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the
Company’s stock. Due to higher volatility, the observation is
made on a daily basis for the twelve months ended June 30, 2019.
The observation period covered is consistent with the expected life
of options. The expected life of the options granted to employees
has been determined utilizing the “simplified” method
as prescribed by ASC Topic 718 Stock Based Compensation, which,
among other provisions, allows companies without access to adequate
historical data about employee exercise behavior to use a
simplified approach for estimating the expected life of a
"plain vanilla" option grant. The simplified rule for estimating
the expected life of such an option is the average of the time to
vesting and the full term of the option. The risk-free rate is
consistent with the expected life of the stock options and is based
on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant.
2017 Employee Stock Option Plan
The
Company’s 2017 Employee Plan permits the grant of stock
options to its employees covering up to an aggregate of 300,000
shares of Common Stock. Under the 2017 Employee Plan, all options
must be granted with an exercise price of not less than fair value
as of the grant date and the options granted must be exercisable
within a maximum of ten years after the date of grant, or such
lesser period of time as is set forth in the stock option
agreements. The options may be exercisable (a) immediately as of
the effective date of the stock option agreement granting the
option, or (b) in accordance with a schedule related to the date of
the grant of the option, the date of first employment, or such
other date as may be set by the Compensation Committee. Generally,
options granted under the 2017 Employee Plan are exercisable within
five years after the date of grant, and vest over the period as
follows: 25% vesting on the grant date and the remaining balance
vesting in equal installments on the next three succeeding
anniversaries of the grant date. The share-based compensation will
be recognized in terms of the grade method on a straight-line basis
for each separately vesting portion of the award. Certain option
awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in
control (as defined in the 2017 Employee Plan).
The
Company granted options to purchase 76,000 shares of its Common
Stock to employees pursuant to the 2017 Employee Plan during the
twelve months ended June 30, 2019.
There
were no stock options exercised during the twelve months ended June
30, 2019. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses
of $18 and $29 in the three and twelve months ended June 30, 2019
under the 2017 Employee Plan. The balance of unamortized
stock-based compensation of $14 based on fair value on the grant
date related to options granted under the 2017 Employee Plan is to
be recognized over a period of three years. The weighted-average
remaining contractual term for non-vested options was 2.37
years.
As of June 30, 2019, there were vested employee stock options
granted under the 2017 Employee Plan covering a total of 49,000
shares of Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was
$4.97, and the weighted average contractual term was 4.11
years. The total fair value of vested employee stock options
as of June 30, 2019 was $244.
The
Company granted options to purchase 60,000 shares of its Common
Stock to employee directors pursuant to the 2017 Employee Plan
during the twelve months ended June 30, 2018. The Company
recognized stock-based compensation expenses of $6 in the twelve
months ended June 30, 2018 under the 2017 Employee Plan. The
balance of unamortized stock-based compensation of $9 based on fair
value on the grant date related to options granted under the 2017
Employee Plan is to be recognized over a period of three years. No
stock options were exercised during the twelve months ended June
30, 2018. The weighted-average remaining contractual term for
non-vested options was 5.98 years.
As of
June 30, 2018 there were vested employee stock options that were
exercisable covering a total of 15,000 shares of Common Stock. The
weighted-average exercise price was $5.98 and the weighted average
contractual term was 4.73 years. The total fair value of vested
employee stock options was $90.
A
summary of option activities under the 2017 Employee Plan during
the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2019 is presented as
follows:
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2018
|
60,000
|
$5.98
|
4.73
|
$-
|
Granted
|
76,000
|
3.38
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2019
|
136,000
|
4.53
|
4.28
|
-
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2019
|
49,000
|
4.97
|
4.11
|
-
|
A
summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the twelve months ended June 30, 2019 is
presented below:
|
Options
|
Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
at July 1, 2018
|
45,000
|
$5.98
|
Granted
|
76,000
|
3.38
|
Vested
|
(34,000)
|
(4.53)
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested
at June 30, 2019
|
87,000
|
$4.28
|
A
summary of option activities under the 2017 Employee Plan during
the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2017
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
Granted
|
60,000
|
5.98
|
4.98
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2018
|
60,000
|
5.98
|
4.73
|
-
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2018
|
15,000
|
5.98
|
4.73
|
-
|
A
summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 is
presented below:
|
Options
|
Weighted Average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
at July 1, 2017
|
-
|
$-
|
Granted
|
60,000
|
5.98
|
Vested
|
(15,000)
|
5.98
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested
at June 30, 2018
|
45,000
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
2007 Employee Stock Option Plan
The
2007 Directors Plan terminated by its terms on September 24, 2017
and no further options may be granted thereunder. However, the
options outstanding thereunder continue to remain outstanding and
in effect in accordance with their terms. The 2007 Employee Plan
permitted the issuance of options to employees.
As the
2007 Plan has terminated, the Company did not grant any options
pursuant to the 2007 Employee Plan during the twelve months ended
June 30, 2019. There were 50,000 options exercised during the
twelve months ended June 30, 2019. The Company recognized
stock-based compensation expenses of $1 in the twelve months ended
June 30, 2019 under the 2007 Employee Plan.
The
Company did not grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Employee
Plan during the twelve months ended June 30, 2018. There were no
options exercised during the twelve months ended June 30, 2018. The
Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of $4 in the
twelve months ended June 30, 2018 under the 2007 Employee Plan. The
balance of unamortized stock-based compensation of $1 based on fair
value on the grant date related to options granted under the 2007
Employee Plan is to be recognized over a period of three
years.
As of
June 30, 2019, there were vested employee stock options that were
exercisable covering a total of 68,125 shares of Common Stock. The
weighted-average exercise price was $3.62 and the weighted average
contractual term was 2.15 years. The total fair value of vested
employee stock options as of June 30, 2019 was $247.
A
summary of option activities under the 2007 Employee Plan during
the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2019 is presented as
follows:
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding at July
1, 2018
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
2.10
|
$121
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
(50,000)
|
3.26
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited or
expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at June
30, 2019
|
77,500
|
$3.69
|
2.22
|
$-
|
Exercisable at June
30, 2019
|
68,125
|
$3.62
|
2.15
|
$-
|
A
summary of option activities under the 2007 Employee Plan during
the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding at July
1, 2017
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
3.10
|
$187
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited or
expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at June
30, 2018
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
2.10
|
$121
|
Exercisable at June
30, 2018
|
98,750
|
$3.43
|
1.73
|
$103
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value of the 127,500 shares of common stock
upon exercise of options was $121.
A
summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the twelve months ended June 30, 2019 is
presented below:
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant-Date
|
|
Options
|
Fair
Value
|
Non-vested at July
1, 2018
|
28,750
|
$3.83
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
(19,375)
|
(3.69)
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested at June
30, 2019
|
9,375
|
$4.14
|
A
summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 is
presented below:
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant-Date
|
|
Options
|
Fair
Value
|
Non-vested at July
1, 2017
|
48,125
|
$3.77
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
(19,375)
|
(3.43)
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested at June
30, 2018
|
28,750
|
$3.83
|
|
|
|
2017 Directors Equity Incentive Plan
The
2017 Directors Plan permits the grant of options covering up to an
aggregate of 300,000 shares of Common Stock to its directors in the
form of non-qualified options and restricted stock. The exercise
price of the non-qualified options is 100% of the fair value of the
underlying shares on the grant date. The options have five-year
contractual terms and are generally exercisable immediately as of
the grant date.
In the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 the Company granted options to
purchase 80,000 shares of its Common Stock to directors pursuant to
the 2017 Directors Plan with an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of Common Stock (as defined under the 2017 Directors
Plan in conformity with Regulation 409A or the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended) at the date of grant. The fair value of
the options granted to purchase 80,000 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock was approximately $262 based on the
fair value of $3.28 per share determined by the Black Scholes
option pricing model. As all of the stock options granted under the
2017 Directors Plan vest immediately at the date of grant, there
were no unvested stock options granted under the 2017 Directors
Plan as of June 30, 2019. There were no options exercised during
the twelve months ended June 30,
2019. The Company recognized stock-based compensation
expenses of $26 in the twelve months ended June 30, 2019 under the
2017 Directors Plan.
In the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the Company granted options to
purchase 80,000 shares of its Common Stock to directors pursuant to
the 2017 Directors Plan with an exercise price equal to the fair
market value of Common Stock (as defined under the 2017 Directors
Plan in conformity with Regulation 409A or the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended) at the date of grant. The fair value of
the options granted to purchase 80,000 shares of the
Company’s Common Stock was approximately $478 based on the
fair value of $5.98 per share determined by the Black Scholes
option pricing model. As all of the stock options granted under the
2017 Directors Plan vest immediately at the date of grant, there
were no unvested stock options granted under the 2017 Directors
Plan as of June 30, 2018. The Company recognized stock-based
compensation expenses of $33 in the twelve months ended June 30,
2018 under the 2017 Directors Plan.
A
summary of option activities under the 2017 Directors Plan during
the twelve months ended June 30, 2019 is presented as
follows:
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2018
|
80,000
|
$5.98
|
4.73
|
$-
|
Granted
|
80,000
|
3.28
|
4.78
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2019
|
160,000
|
4.63
|
4.25
|
-
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2019
|
160,000
|
4.63
|
4.25
|
-
|
2007 Directors Equity Incentive Plan
The
2007 Directors Plan terminated by its terms on September 24, 2017
and no further options may be granted thereunder. However, the
options outstanding thereunder continue to remain outstanding and
in effect in accordance with their terms. The 2007 Directors Plan
permitted the grant of options covering up to an aggregate of
500,000 shares of Common Stock to its directors in the form of
non-qualified options and restricted stock. The exercise price of
the non-qualified options is 100% of the fair value of the
underlying shares on the grant date. The options have five-year
contractual terms and are generally exercisable immediately as of
the grant date.
As the
2007 Directors plan terminated in fiscal 2018, the Company did not
grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Director Plan during the
twelve months ended June 30, 2019. There were 70,000 worth of stock
options exercised during the twelve months period ended June 30,
2019. The Company did not recognize any stock based compensation
expenses during the twelve months ended June 30, 2019.
As of
June 30, 2019, there were vested director stock options covering a
total of 300,000 shares of Common Stock. The weighted-average
exercise price was $3.40 and the weighted average remaining
contractual term was 1.58 years. The total fair value of vested
directors' stock options as of June 30, 2019 was $1,021. All of our
director stock options vest immediately at the date of grant. There
were no unvested director stock options as of June 30,
2019.
As of
June 30, 2018, there were vested director stock options covering a
total of 390,000 shares of Common Stock. The weighted-average
exercise price was $3.41 and the weighted average remaining
contractual term was 2.05 years. The total fair value of vested
directors' stock options as of June 30, 2018 was $1,331. All of our
director stock options vest immediately at the date of grant. There
were no unvested director stock options as of June 30,
2018.
A
summary of option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan during
the twelve months ended June 30, 2019 is presented as
follows:
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July
1, 2018
|
390,000
|
3.41
|
2.05
|
412
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
(70,000)
|
3.40
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited or
expired
|
(20,000)
|
3.62
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at June
30, 2019
|
300,000
|
3.40
|
1.58
|
9
|
Exercisable at June
30, 2019
|
300,000
|
3.40
|
1.58
|
9
|
A
summary of option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan during
the twelve months ended June 30, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July
1, 2017
|
415,000
|
3.36
|
2.93
|
673
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
(20,000)
|
2.59
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited or
expired
|
(5,000)
|
2.07
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at June
30, 2018
|
390,000
|
3.41
|
2.05
|
412
|
Exercisable at June
30, 2018
|
390,000
|
3.41
|
2.05
|
412
|
27. NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 810, the Company has
classified the non-controlling interest as a component of
stockholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets. Additionally, the Company has presented the net income
attributable to the Company and the non-controlling ownership
interests separately in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
Non-controlling interest represents the minority
stockholders’ share of 45% of the equity of Trio-Tech
Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., 45% interest in SHI International Pte.
Ltd., and 24% interest in Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd., which are
subsidiaries of the Company.
The table below reflects a reconciliation of the equity
attributable to non-controlling interest:
|
For the
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
Non-controlling
interest
|
2019
|
2018
|
Beginning
balance
|
$1,522
|
$1,426
|
Net
income
|
(97)
|
106
|
Dividend declared
by a subsidiary
|
(125)
|
(189)
|
Translation
adjustment
|
(105)
|
179
|
Ending
balance
|
$1,195
|
$1,522
|
F-44