TRUIST FINANCIAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2018 March (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________

FORM 10-Q

_____________________________

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2018

Commission File Number: 1-10853

_____________________________

BB&T CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_____________________________



North Carolina	56-0939887
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



200 West Second Street Winston-Salem, North Carolina	27101
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(336) 733-2000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

______________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company" and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	ý		Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨
			Emerging growth company	¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

At March 31, 2018, 779,751,860 shares of the registrant's common stock, $5 par value, were outstanding.



TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2018

		Page No.
PART I - Financial Information
	Glossary of Defined Terms	1
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)	5
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity (Unaudited)	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Note 1. Basis of Presentation	8
	Note 2. Securities	9
	Note 3. Loans and ACL	11
	Note 4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets	14
	Note 5. Loan Servicing	15
	Note 6. Deposits	16
	Note 7. Long-Term Debt	16
	Note 8. Shareholders' Equity	17
	Note 9. AOCI	17
	Note 10. Income Taxes	17
	Note 11. Benefit Plans	17
	Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies	18
	Note 13. Fair Value Disclosures	19
	Note 14. Derivative Financial Instruments	23
	Note 15. Computation of EPS	27
	Note 16. Operating Segments	28
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	29
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	49
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	49
PART II - Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	49
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	49
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	49
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities - (none.)
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures - (not applicable.)
Item 5.	Other Information - (none to be reported.)
Item 6.	Exhibits	50

Table of Contents

Glossary of Defined Terms

The following terms may be used throughout this Report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes.



Term		Definition
2017 Repurchase Plan		Plan for the repurchase of up to $1.93 billion of BB&T's common stock
ACL		Allowance for credit losses
AFS		Available-for-sale
Agency MBS		Mortgage-backed securities issued by a U.S. government agency or GSE
ALLL		Allowance for loan and lease losses
AOCI		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Basel III		Global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity published by the BCBS
BB&T		BB&T Corporation and subsidiaries
BCBS		Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
BHC		Bank holding company
BHCA		Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended
Branch Bank		Branch Banking and Trust Company
BSA/AML		Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering
BU		Business Unit
CB-Commercial		Community Banking Commercial, an operating segment
CB-Retail		Community Banking Retail and Consumer Finance, an operating segment
CCAR		Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review
CD		Certificate of deposit
CDI		Core deposit intangible assets
CEO		Chief Executive Officer
CET1		Common equity Tier 1
CFPB		Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
CMO		Collateralized mortgage obligation
Colonial		Collectively, certain assets and liabilities of Colonial Bank acquired by BB&T in 2009
Company		BB&T Corporation and subsidiaries (interchangeable with "BB&T" above)
CRA		Community Reinvestment Act of 1977
CRE		Commercial real estate
CRMC		Credit Risk Management Committee
CROC		Compliance Risk Oversight Committee
DIF		Deposit Insurance Fund administered by the FDIC
Dodd-Frank Act		Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
DOL		United States Department of Labor
EPS		Earnings per common share
EVE		Economic value of equity
Exchange Act		Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB		Financial Accounting Standards Board
FATCA		Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act
FDIC		Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHA		Federal Housing Administration
FHC		Financial Holding Company
FHLB		Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLMC		Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
FINRA		Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
FNMA		Federal National Mortgage Association
FRB		Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
FS&CF		Financial Services and Commercial Finance, an operating segment
FTP		Funds transfer pricing
GAAP		Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
GNMA		Government National Mortgage Association
Grandbridge		Grandbridge Real Estate Capital, LLC
GSE		U.S. government-sponsored enterprise
HFI		Held for investment
HMDA		Home Mortgage Disclosure Act

Table of Contents



Term		Definition
HTM		Held-to-maturity
IDI		Insured depository institution
IH&PF		Insurance Holdings and Premium Finance, an operating segment
IPV		Independent price verification
IRC		Internal Revenue Code
IRS		Internal Revenue Service
ISDA		International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
LCR		Liquidity Coverage Ratio
LHFS		Loans held for sale
LIBOR		London Interbank Offered Rate
MBS		Mortgage-backed securities
MRLCC		Market Risk, Liquidity and Capital Committee
MSR		Mortgage servicing right
MSRB		Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
N/A		Not applicable
National Penn		National Penn Bancshares, Inc., acquired by BB&T effective April 1, 2016
NIM		Net interest margin, computed on a TE basis
NM		Not meaningful
NPA		Nonperforming asset
NPL		Nonperforming loan
NSFR		Net stable funding ratio
NYSE		NYSE Euronext, Inc.
OAS		Option adjusted spread
OCI		Other comprehensive income (loss)
OREO		Other real estate owned
ORMC		Operational Risk Management Committee
OT&C		Other, Treasury and Corporate
OTTI		Other-than-temporary impairment
Parent Company		BB&T Corporation, the parent company of Branch Bank and other subsidiaries
Patriot Act		Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001
PCI		Purchased credit impaired loans as well as assets of Colonial Bank acquired from the FDIC during 2009, which were formerly covered under loss sharing agreements
PSU		Performance share units
Re-REMICs		Re-securitizations of Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits
RMC		Risk Management Committee
RMO		Risk Management Organization
RSU		Restricted stock unit
RUFC		Reserve for unfunded lending commitments
SBIC		Small Business Investment Company
SEC		Securities and Exchange Commission
Short-Term Borrowings		Federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements and other short-term borrowed funds with original maturities of less than one year
Simulation		Interest sensitivity simulation analysis
Swett & Crawford		CGSC North America Holdings Corporation, acquired by BB&T effective April 1, 2016
TBA		To be announced
TDR		Troubled debt restructuring
TE		Taxable-equivalent
U.S.		United States of America
U.S. Treasury		United States Department of the Treasury
UPB		Unpaid principal balance
VaR		Value-at-risk
VIE		Variable interest entity

Table of Contents

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



Unaudited (Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)	March 31, 2018			December 31, 2017
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	1,869		$	2,243
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	912			343
Cash equivalents	132			127
Restricted cash	198			370
AFS securities at fair value	25,017			24,547
HTM securities (fair value of $21,829 and $22,837 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively)	22,390			23,027
LHFS at fair value	1,189			1,099
Loans and leases	143,017			143,701
ALLL	(1,498		)	(1,490		)
Loans and leases, net of ALLL	141,519			142,211
Premises and equipment	2,078			2,055
Goodwill	9,617			9,618
CDI and other intangible assets	679			711
MSRs at fair value	1,119			1,056
Other assets	14,010			14,235
Total assets	$	220,729		$	221,642
Liabilities
Deposits	$	158,196		$	157,371
Short-term borrowings	4,321			4,938
Long-term debt	23,410			23,648
Accounts payable and other liabilities	5,140			5,990
Total liabilities	191,067			191,947
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $5 par, liquidation preference of $25,000 per share	3,053			3,053
Common stock, $5 par	3,899			3,910
Additional paid-in capital	7,593			7,893
Retained earnings	16,712			16,259
AOCI, net of deferred income taxes	(1,645		)	(1,467		)
Noncontrolling interests	50			47
Total shareholders' equity	29,662			29,695
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	220,729		$	221,642

Common shares outstanding	779,752			782,006
Common shares authorized	2,000,000			2,000,000
Preferred shares outstanding	126			126
Preferred shares authorized	5,000			5,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



	Three Months Ended
Unaudited	March 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)	2018		2017
Interest Income
Interest and fees on loans and leases	$	1,605	$	1,501
Interest and dividends on securities	291		258
Interest on other earning assets	25		16
Total interest income	1,921		1,775
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits	118		69
Interest on short-term borrowings	20		2
Interest on long-term debt	150		95
Total interest expense	288		166
Net Interest Income	1,633		1,609
Provision for credit losses	150		148
Net Interest Income After Provision for Credit Losses	1,483		1,461
Noninterest Income
Insurance income	436		458
Service charges on deposits	165		168
Mortgage banking income	99		103
Investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions	113		91
Trust and investment advisory revenues	72		68
Bankcard fees and merchant discounts	69		59
Checkcard fees	52		51
Operating lease income	37		36
Income from bank-owned life insurance	31		29
Other income	106		108
Securities gains (losses), net
Gross realized gains	—		—
Gross realized losses	—		—
OTTI charges	—		—
Non-credit portion recognized in OCI	—		—
Total securities gains (losses), net	—		—
Total noninterest income	1,180		1,171
Noninterest Expense
Personnel expense	1,039		1,035
Occupancy and equipment expense	194		193
Software expense	65		58
Outside IT services	32		49
Regulatory charges	40		39
Amortization of intangibles	33		38
Loan-related expense	29		30
Professional services	30		22
Merger-related and restructuring charges, net	28		36
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt	—		392
Other expense	196		210
Total noninterest expense	1,686		2,102
Earnings
Income before income taxes	977		530
Provision for income taxes	186		104
Net income	791		426
Noncontrolling interests	3		5
Dividends on preferred stock	43		43
Net income available to common shareholders	$	745	$	378
Basic EPS	$	0.96	$	0.47
Diluted EPS	$	0.94	$	0.46
Cash dividends declared per share	$	0.375	$	0.300
Basic weighted average shares outstanding	779,617		809,903
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	791,005		822,719

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



	Three Months Ended
Unaudited	March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017
Net income	$	791		$	426
OCI, net of tax:
Change in unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs	14			9
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges	78			(2		)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities	(268		)	(2		)
Other, net	(2		)	2
Total OCI	(178		)	7
Total comprehensive income	$	613		$	433

Income Tax Effect of Items Included in OCI:
Change in unrecognized net pension and postretirement costs	$	4		$	7
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges	26			(1		)
Change in unrealized net gains (losses) on AFS securities	(84		)	(1		)
Other, net	1			—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



Unaudited (Dollars in millions, shares in thousands)	Shares of Common Stock		Preferred Stock		Common Stock			Additional Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings			AOCI			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Shareholders' Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017	809,475		$	3,053	$	4,047		$	9,104		$	14,809		$	(1,132	)	$	45		$	29,926
Add (Deduct):
Net income	—		—		—			—			421			—			5			426
OCI	—		—		—			—			—			7			—			7
Stock transactions:
Issued in connection with equity awards, net	6,256		—		32			54			—			—			—			86
Repurchase of common stock	(4,361	)	—		(22		)	(138		)	—			—			—			(160		)
Cash dividends declared on common stock	—		—		—			—			(243		)	—			—			(243		)
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock	—		—		—			—			(43		)	—			—			(43		)
Equity-based compensation expense	—		—		—			30			—			—			—			30
Other, net	—		—		—			13			(11		)	—			(6		)	(4		)
Balance, March 31, 2017	811,370		$	3,053	$	4,057		$	9,063		$	14,933		$	(1,125	)	$	44		$	30,025

Balance, January 1, 2018	782,006		$	3,053	$	3,910		$	7,893		$	16,259		$	(1,467	)	$	47		$	29,695
Add (Deduct):
Net income	—		—		—			—			788			—			3			791
OCI	—		—		—			—			—			(178		)	—			(178		)
Stock transactions:
Issued in connection with equity awards, net	3,599		—		18			(31		)	—			—			—			(13		)
Repurchase of common stock	(5,853	)	—		(29		)	(291		)	—			—			—			(320		)
Cash dividends declared on common stock	—		—		—			—			(292		)	—			—			(292		)
Cash dividends declared on preferred stock	—		—		—			—			(43		)	—			—			(43		)
Equity-based compensation expense	—		—		—			31			—			—			—			31
Other, net	—		—		—			(9		)	—			—			—			(9		)
Balance, March 31, 2018	779,752		$	3,053	$	3,899		$	7,593		$	16,712		$	(1,645	)	$	50		$	29,662

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

BB&T CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



Unaudited	Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income	$	791		$	426
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
Provision for credit losses	150			148
Depreciation	105			99
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt	—			392
Amortization of intangibles	33			38
Equity-based compensation expense	31			30
(Gain) loss on securities, net	—			—
Net change in operating assets and liabilities:
LHFS	(90		)	499
Trading and equity securities	10			(644		)
Other assets, accounts payable and other liabilities	(583		)	(886		)
Other, net	(139		)	56
Net cash from operating activities	308			158
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Proceeds from sales of AFS securities	95			107
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of AFS securities	959			1,355
Purchases of AFS securities	(1,863		)	(1,205		)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of HTM securities	626			588
Purchases of HTM securities	(39		)	(2,126		)
Originations and purchases of loans and leases, net of principal collected	385			333
Other, net	40			201
Net cash from investing activities	203			(747		)
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net change in deposits	830			1,104
Net change in short-term borrowings	(617		)	613
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt	7			3,947
Repayment of long-term debt	(41		)	(4,645		)
Net cash from common stock transactions	(344		)	(74		)
Cash dividends paid on common stock	(292		)	(243		)
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock	(43		)	(43		)
Other, net	17			(14		)
Net cash from financing activities	(483		)	645
Net Change in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash	28			56
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, January 1	3,083			4,424
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, March 31	$	3,111		$	4,480

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	256		$	151
Income taxes	15			21
Noncash investing activities:
Transfers of loans to foreclosed assets	67			138

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTE 1. Basis of Presentation

General

See the Glossary of Defined Terms at the beginning of this Report for terms used herein. These consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flow activity required in accordance with GAAP. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations have been made. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The information contained in the financial statements and notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 should be referred to in connection with these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

Reclassifications

Cash and cash equivalents includes restricted cash for the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Certain other amounts reported in prior periods' consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the ACL, determination of fair value for financial instruments, valuation of MSRs, goodwill, intangible assets and other purchase accounting related adjustments, benefit plan obligations and expenses, and tax assets, liabilities and expense.

Derivative Financial Instruments

BB&T historically assessed the effectiveness of accounting hedges using the long-haul method. In conjunction with the adoption of new hedge accounting guidance, the shortcut method was added to the methods BB&T uses to assess effectiveness. The selection of methods depends on the facts and circumstances specific to each hedge. The shortcut method is applied to hedges that achieve perfect offset. For hedges that are not eligible for the shortcut method, an initial quantitative analysis is performed to demonstrate that the hedges are expected to be highly effective in off-setting corresponding changes in either the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. At least quarterly thereafter, analyses are performed to ensure that each hedge remains highly effective. Quantitative analyses referred to as a long-haul methodology include techniques such as regression analysis and hypothetical derivatives.

Revenue Recognition

In addition to lending and related activities, BB&T offers various services to customers that generate revenue. Contract performance typically occurs in one year or less. Incremental costs of obtaining a contract are expensed when incurred when the amortization period is one year or less. As of March 31, 2018, remaining performance obligations consisted primarily of insurance and investment banking services for contracts with an original expected length of one year or less.

Insurance income

Insurance commissions are received on the sale of insurance products, and revenue is recognized upon the placement date of the insurance policies. Payment is normally received within the policy period. In addition to placement, BB&T also provides insurance policy related risk management services. Revenue is recognized as these services are provided. Performance-based commissions are recognized when received or earlier when, upon consideration of past results and current conditions, the revenue is deemed not probable of reversal.

Transaction and service based revenues

Transaction and service based revenues include service charges on deposits, investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions, trust and investment advisory revenues, bankcard fees and merchant discounts, and checkcard fees. Revenue is recognized when the transactions occur or as services are performed over primarily monthly or quarterly periods. Payment is typically received in the period the transactions occur or, in some cases, within 90 days of the service period. Fees may be fixed or, where applicable, based on a percentage of transaction size or managed assets.

Table of Contents

Changes in Accounting Principles and Effects of New Accounting Pronouncements



Standard/ Adoption Date	Description	Effects on the Financial Statements
Standards Adopted During the Current Period
Revenue from Contracts with Customers Jan 1, 2018	Requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.	BB&T adopted this guidance using the modified retrospective approach for in-scope contracts at the date of adoption. The impact was not material.
Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost Jan 1, 2018	Requires that the service cost component of net benefit costs of pension and postretirement benefit plans be reported in the same line item as other compensation costs in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in a separate line item.	The service cost component is included in personnel expense and the other components of net benefit costs are included in other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The prior period was reclassified to conform to the current presentation. See Note 11. Benefit Plans.
Derivatives and Hedging Jan 1, 2018	Expands the risk management activities that qualify for hedge accounting, and simplifies certain hedge documentation and assessment requirements. Eliminates the concept of separately recording hedge ineffectiveness, and expands disclosure requirements.	BB&T early adopted this guidance using the modified retrospective approach. The impact was not material. New required disclosures have been included in Note 14. Derivative Financial Instruments.
Standards Not Yet Adopted
Leases Jan 1, 2019	Requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities related to certain operating leases on the balance sheet, requires additional disclosures by lessees, and contains targeted changes to accounting by lessors.	BB&T expects assets and liabilities will likely be significantly higher. Implementation efforts are ongoing, including implementation of software solutions.
Credit Losses Jan 1, 2020	Replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology with an expected credit loss methodology and requires consideration of a broader range of information to determine credit loss estimates. Financial assets measured at amortized cost will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by using an allowance for credit losses. Purchased credit deteriorated loans will receive an allowance for expected credit losses. Any credit impairment on AFS debt securities for which the fair value is less than cost will be recorded through an allowance for expected credit losses.	BB&T expects that the ACL could be materially higher; however, the magnitude of the increase and its impact has not yet been quantified and depends on economic conditions at the time of adoption. The standard also requires expanded disclosures related to credit losses and asset quality.

NOTE 2. Securities

In conjunction with the adoption of new accounting standards, an immaterial amount of HTM securities was transferred to AFS securities and an immaterial amount of equity securities was transferred from AFS securities to other assets in the first quarter of 2018. The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair values of AFS and HTM securities:



March 31, 2018	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized				Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
AFS securities:
U.S. Treasury	$	2,441	$	—	$	106	$	2,335
GSE	187		—		11		176
Agency MBS	21,605		3		921		20,687
States and political subdivisions	1,194		28		23		1,199
Non-agency MBS	363		215		—		578
Other	41		1		—		42
Total AFS securities	$	25,831	$	247	$	1,061	$	25,017

HTM securities:
U.S. Treasury	$	1,098	$	—	$	4	$	1,094
GSE	2,198		5		50		2,153
Agency MBS	19,069		30		542		18,557
States and political subdivisions	24		—		—		24
Other	1		—		—		1
Total HTM securities	$	22,390	$	35	$	596	$	21,829

Table of Contents



December 31, 2017	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized				Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
AFS securities:
U.S. Treasury	$	2,368	$	—	$	77	$	2,291
GSE	187		—		8		179
Agency MBS	20,683		8		590		20,101
States and political subdivisions	1,379		37		24		1,392
Non-agency MBS	384		192		—		576
Other	8		—		—		8
Total AFS securities	$	25,009	$	237	$	699	$	24,547

HTM securities:
U.S. Treasury	$	1,098	$	8	$	—	$	1,106
GSE	2,198		11		22		2,187
Agency MBS	19,660		33		222		19,471
States and political subdivisions	28		—		—		28
Other	43		2		—		45
Total HTM securities	$	23,027	$	54	$	244	$	22,837

Certain investments in marketable debt securities and MBS issued by FNMA and FHLMC exceeded 10% of shareholders' equity at March 31, 2018. The FNMA investments had total amortized cost and fair value of $14.6 billion and $14.0 billion, respectively. The FHLMC investments had total amortized cost and fair value of $10.5 billion and $10.1 billion, respectively.

Changes in credit losses on securities with OTTI where a portion of the unrealized loss was recognized in OCI were immaterial for all periods presented.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the securities portfolio by contractual maturity are shown in the following table. The expected life of MBS may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to prepay the underlying mortgage loans with or without prepayment penalties.



March 31, 2018	AFS				HTM
(Dollars in millions)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	462	$	460	$	—	$	—
Due after one year through five years	544		534		2,699		2,665
Due after five years through ten years	2,266		2,161		863		840
Due after ten years	22,559		21,862		18,828		18,324
Total debt securities	$	25,831	$	25,017	$	22,390	$	21,829

The following tables present the fair values and gross unrealized losses of investments based on the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:



March 31, 2018	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
AFS securities:
U.S. Treasury	$	697	$	9	$	1,637	$	97	$	2,334	$	106
GSE	9		—		167		11		176		11
Agency MBS	7,304		198		13,273		723		20,577		921
States and political subdivisions	203		1		343		22		546		23
Total	$	8,213	$	208	$	15,420	$	853	$	23,633	$	1,061

HTM securities:
U.S. Treasury	$	1,094	$	4	$	—	$	—	$	1,094	$	4
GSE	1,455		37		287		13		1,742		50
Agency MBS	12,396		313		4,339		229		16,735		542
Total	$	14,945	$	354	$	4,626	$	242	$	19,571	$	596

Table of Contents



December 31, 2017	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
AFS securities:
U.S. Treasury	$	634	$	4	$	1,655	$	73	$	2,289	$	77
GSE	9		—		170		8		179		8
Agency MBS	5,077		64		13,920		526		18,997		590
States and political subdivisions	201		1		355		23		556		24
Total	$	5,921	$	69	$	16,100	$	630	$	22,021	$	699

HTM securities:
GSE	$	1,470	$	12	$	290	$	10	$	1,760	$	22
Agency MBS	10,880		77		4,631		145		15,511		222
Total	$	12,350	$	89	$	4,921	$	155	$	17,271	$	244

The unrealized losses on U.S. Treasury securities, GSE securities and Agency MBS were the result of increases in market interest rates compared to the date the securities were acquired rather than the credit quality of the issuers or underlying loans.

At March 31, 2018, the majority of the unrealized loss on states and political subdivisions securities was the result of fair value hedge basis adjustments that are a component of amortized cost. These securities are evaluated for credit impairment through a qualitative analysis of issuer performance and the primary source of repayment. At March 31, 2018, none of these securities had credit impairment.

NOTE 3. Loans and ACL

The following tables present loans and leases HFI by aging category:



March 31, 2018	Accruing
(Dollars in millions)	Current		30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days Or More Past Due		Nonaccrual		Total
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	58,844	$	31	$	—	$	257	$	59,132
CRE	21,420		10		—		67		21,497
Lease financing	1,872		1		—		13		1,886
Retail:
Residential mortgage	27,845		400		420		127		28,792
Direct	11,550		55		6		64		11,675
Indirect	16,329		272		5		74		16,680
Revolving credit	2,734		21		11		—		2,766
PCI	517		24		48		—		589
Total	$	141,111	$	814	$	490	$	602	$	143,017



December 31, 2017	Accruing
(Dollars in millions)	Current		30-89 Days Past Due		90 Days Or More Past Due		Nonaccrual		Total
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	58,852	$	41	$	1	$	259	$	59,153
CRE	21,209		8		1		45		21,263
Lease financing	1,906		4		—		1		1,911
Retail:
Residential mortgage	27,659		472		465		129		28,725
Direct	11,756		65		6		64		11,891
Indirect	16,745		412		6		72		17,235
Revolving credit	2,837		23		12		—		2,872
PCI	567		27		57		—		651
Total	$	141,531	$	1,052	$	548	$	570	$	143,701

Table of Contents

The following table presents the carrying amount of loans by risk rating. PCI loans are excluded because their related ALLL is determined by loan pool performance and revolving credit loans are excluded as the loans are charged-off rather than reclassifying to nonperforming:



	March 31, 2018						December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Commercial & Industrial		CRE		Lease Financing		Commercial & Industrial		CRE		Lease Financing
Commercial:
Pass	$	57,844	$	21,127	$	1,867	$	57,700	$	20,862	$	1,881
Special mention	155		29		2		268		48		6
Substandard-performing	876		274		4		926		308		23
Nonperforming	257		67		13		259		45		1
Total	$	59,132	$	21,497	$	1,886	$	59,153	$	21,263	$	1,911

	Residential Mortgage		Direct		Indirect		Residential Mortgage		Direct		Indirect
Retail:
Performing	$	28,665	$	11,611	$	16,606	$	28,596	$	11,827	$	17,163
Nonperforming	127		64		74		129		64		72
Total	$	28,792	$	11,675	$	16,680	$	28,725	$	11,891	$	17,235

The following tables present activity in the ACL:



Three Months Ended March 31, 2018	Balance at Jan 1, 2018		Charge-Offs			Recoveries		Provision (Benefit)			Balance at Mar 31, 2018
(Dollars in millions)	Balance at Jan 1, 2018		Charge-Offs			Recoveries		Provision (Benefit)			Balance at Mar 31, 2018
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	522	$	(23	)	$	8	$	15		$	522
CRE	160		(6		)	2		19			175
Lease financing	9		(1		)	—		2			10
Retail:
Residential mortgage	209		(4		)	—		11			216
Direct	106		(19		)	6		6			99
Indirect	348		(107		)	15		91			347
Revolving credit	108		(21		)	5		12			104
PCI	28		—			—		(3		)	25
ALLL	1,490		(181		)	36		153			1,498
RUFC	119		—			—		(3		)	116
ACL	$	1,609	$	(181	)	$	36	$	150		$	1,614



Three Months Ended March 31, 2017	Balance at Jan 1, 2017		Charge-Offs			Recoveries		Provision (Benefit)			Balance at Mar 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Balance at Jan 1, 2017		Charge-Offs			Recoveries		Provision (Benefit)			Balance at Mar 31, 2017
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	530	$	(33	)	$	7	$	20		$	524
CRE	145		(1		)	6		(9		)	141
Lease financing	7		(1		)	—		4			10
Retail:
Residential mortgage	227		(12		)	—		8			223
Direct	103		(14		)	6		7			102
Indirect	327		(107		)	17		101			338
Revolving credit	106		(21		)	5		13			103
PCI	44		—			—		2			46
ALLL	1,489		(189		)	41		146			1,487
RUFC	110		—			—		2			112
ACL	$	1,599	$	(189	)	$	41	$	148		$	1,599

Table of Contents

The following table provides a summary of loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment:



	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Recorded Investment		Related ALLL		Recorded Investment		Related ALLL
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	58,793	$	497	$	58,804	$	494
CRE	21,391		164		21,173		154
Lease financing	1,873		9		1,910		9
Retail:
Residential mortgage	27,953		149		27,914		143
Direct	11,601		92		11,815		98
Indirect	16,383		293		16,935		296
Revolving credit	2,737		93		2,842		97
PCI	589		25		651		28
Total	$	141,320	$	1,322	$	142,044	$	1,319

The following tables set forth certain information regarding impaired loans, excluding PCI and LHFS, that were individually evaluated for impairment:



As of / For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2018	UPB		Recorded Investment				Related ALLL		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
(Dollars in millions)	UPB		Without an ALLL		With an ALLL		Related ALLL		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	376	$	140	199		$	25	$	348	$	1
CRE	109		21		85		11		109		—
Lease financing	14		1		12		1		3		—
Retail:
Residential mortgage	886		133		706		67		825		8
Direct	97		25		49		7		75		1
Indirect	306		5		292		54		298		11
Revolving credit	29		—		29		11		29		—
Total	$	1,817	$	325	$	1,372	$	176	$	1,687	$	21



As of / For The Year Ended December 31, 2017	UPB		Recorded Investment				Related ALLL		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
(Dollars in millions)	UPB		Without an ALLL		With an ALLL		Related ALLL		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	381	$	136	213		$	28	$	424	$	6
CRE	91		26		64		6		109		3
Lease financing	1		—		1		—		3		—
Retail:
Residential mortgage	860		132		679		67		895		37
Direct	99		22		54		8		78		4
Indirect	308		6		294		52		269		41
Revolving credit	30		—		30		10		29		1
Total	$	1,770	$	322	$	1,335	$	171	$	1,807	$	92

Table of Contents

The following table presents a summary of TDRs, all of which are considered impaired:



(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017
Performing TDRs:
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	38	$	50
CRE	12		16
Lease financing	—		—
Retail:
Residential mortgage	627		605
Direct	59		62
Indirect	277		281
Revolving credit	29		29
Total performing TDRs	1,042		1,043
Nonperforming TDRs (also included in NPL disclosures)	196		189
Total TDRs	$	1,238	$	1,232
ALLL attributable to TDRs	$	145	$	142

The following table summarizes the primary reason loan modifications were classified as TDRs and includes newly designated TDRs as well as modifications made to existing TDRs. Balances represent the recorded investment at the end of the quarter in which the modification was made. Rate modifications include TDRs made with below market interest rates that also include modifications of loan structures.



Three Months Ended March 31,	2018						2017
	Types of Modifications				Impact To ALLL		Types of Modifications				Impact To ALLL
(Dollars in millions)	Rate		Structure		Impact To ALLL		Rate		Structure		Impact To ALLL
Newly Designated TDRs:
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	10	$	10	$	—	$	22	$	31	$	1
CRE	19		1		—		6		2		—
Lease financing	—		—		—		—		—		—
Retail:
Residential mortgage	82		10		5		128		6		6
Direct	2		—		—		3		1		—
Indirect	42		1		5		41		2		4
Revolving credit	5		—		1		5		—		1
Re-modification of Previously Designated TDRs	21		5		—		45		9		—

Charge-offs and forgiveness of principal and interest for TDRs were immaterial for all periods presented.

The pre-default balance for modifications that had been classified as TDRs during the previous 12 months that experienced a payment default was $23 million and $28 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Payment default is defined as movement of the TDR to nonaccrual status, foreclosure or charge-off, whichever occurs first.

Unearned income, discounts and net deferred loan fees and costs were immaterial. Residential mortgage loans in process of foreclosure were $298 million at March 31, 2018 and $288 million at December 31, 2017.

NOTE 4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table, which excludes fully amortized intangibles, presents information for identifiable intangible assets:



	March 31, 2018							December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
CDI	$	605	$	(423	)	$	182	$	605	$	(409	)	$	196
Other, primarily customer relationship intangibles	1,171		(674		)	497		1,211		(696		)	515
Total	$	1,776	$	(1,097	)	$	679	$	1,816	$	(1,105	)	$	711

Table of Contents

NOTE 5. Loan Servicing

Residential Mortgage Banking Activities

The following tables summarize residential mortgage banking activities:



(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017
UPB of residential mortgage and home equity loan servicing portfolio	$	117,827	$	118,424
UPB of residential mortgage loans serviced for others, primarily agency conforming fixed rate	88,746		89,124
Mortgage loans sold with recourse	473		490
Maximum recourse exposure from mortgage loans sold with recourse liability	245		251
Indemnification, recourse and repurchase reserves	36		37



As of / For The Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018			Mar 31, 2017
UPB of residential mortgage loans sold from LHFS	$	2,553		$	3,579
Pre-tax gains recognized on mortgage loans sold and held for sale	39			31
Servicing fees recognized from mortgage loans serviced for others	65			68
Approximate weighted average servicing fee on the outstanding balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for others	0.28		%	0.28		%
Weighted average interest rate on mortgage loans serviced for others	4.00			4.01

The following table presents a roll forward of the carrying value of residential MSRs recorded at fair value:



Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017
Residential MSRs, carrying value, January 1	$	914		$	915
Additions	28			38
Change in fair value due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions:
Prepayment speeds	61			17
OAS	2			—
Servicing costs	—			9
Realization of expected net servicing cash flows, passage of time and other	(32		)	(33		)
Residential MSRs, carrying value, March 31	$	973		$	946

Gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments used to mitigate the income statement effect of changes in residential MSR fair value	$	(63	)	$	(20	)

The sensitivity of the fair value of the residential MSRs to changes in key assumptions is included in the accompanying table:



	March 31, 2018							December 31, 2017
	Range				Weighted Average			Range				Weighted Average
(Dollars in millions)	Min		Max		Weighted Average			Min		Max		Weighted Average
Prepayment speed	6.0	%	8.7	%	7.9		%	7.1	%	10.1	%	9.1		%
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase					$	(28	)					$	(31	)
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase					(55		)					(60		)

OAS	8.3	%	8.9	%	8.5		%	8.4	%	8.9	%	8.5		%
Effect on fair value of a 10% increase					$	(30	)					$	(28	)
Effect on fair value of a 20% increase					(58		)					(54		)

Composition of loans serviced for others:
Fixed-rate residential mortgage loans					99.2		%					99.1		%
Adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans					0.8							0.9
Total					100.0		%					100.0		%

Weighted average life					6.9 years							6.4 years

Table of Contents

The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. As indicated, changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the above table, the effect of an adverse variation in one assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated without changing any other assumption; while in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which may magnify or counteract the effect of the change.

Commercial Mortgage Banking Activities

The following table summarizes commercial mortgage banking activities for the periods presented:



(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017
UPB of CRE mortgages serviced for others	$	27,472	$	28,441
CRE mortgages serviced for others covered by recourse provisions	4,175		4,153
Maximum recourse exposure from CRE mortgages sold with recourse liability	1,225		1,218
Recorded reserves related to recourse exposure	5		5
CRE mortgages originated during the year-to-date period	1,383		6,753
Commercial MSRs at fair value	146		142

NOTE 6. Deposits

The composition of deposits is presented in the following table:



(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	55,085	$	53,767
Interest checking	27,217		27,677
Money market and savings	62,169		62,757
Time deposits	13,725		13,170
Total deposits	$	158,196	$	157,371

Time deposits greater than $250,000	$	3,194	$	2,622

NOTE 7. Long-Term Debt

The following table presents a summary of long-term debt:



	Mar 31, 2018											Dec 31, 2017
				Stated Rate				Effective Rate		Carrying		Carrying
(Dollars in millions)	Maturity			Min		Max		Effective Rate		Amount		Amount
BB&T Corporation:
Fixed rate senior notes	2018	to	2024	2.05	%	6.85	%	3.20	%	$	8,490	$	8,562
Floating rate senior notes	2018		2022	1.99		2.99		2.60		2,547		2,547
Fixed rate subordinated notes	2019		2022	3.95		5.25		2.33		919		933
Branch Bank:
Fixed rate senior notes	2018		2022	1.45		2.85		2.89		5,617		5,653
Floating rate senior notes	2019		2020	2.17		2.30		2.32		1,149		1,149
Fixed rate subordinated notes	2025		2026	3.63		3.80		3.96		2,064		2,119
FHLB advances (1)	2018		2034	—		5.50		1.85		2,451		2,480
Other long-term debt										173		205
Total long-term debt										$	23,410	$	23,648


(1)	FHLB advances had a weighted average maturity of 3.6 years at March 31, 2018.

The effective rates above reflect the impact of fair value hedges and debt issuance costs. Subordinated notes with a remaining maturity of one year or greater qualify under the risk-based capital guidelines as Tier 2 supplementary capital, subject to certain limitations.

During 2017, Branch Bank terminated FHLB advances totaling $2.9 billion of par value, which resulted in a pre-tax loss on early extinguishment of debt totaling $392 million.

Table of Contents

NOTE 8. Shareholders' Equity

The following table presents the activity related to awards of RSUs, PSUs and restricted shares:



(Shares in thousands)	Units/Shares		Wtd. Avg. Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2018	12,948		$	33.90
Granted	3,414		49.11
Vested	(3,413	)	33.54
Forfeited	(75	)	34.65
Nonvested at March 31, 2018	12,874		38.03
Expected to vest at March 31, 2018	11,862		38.03

NOTE 9. AOCI

The following table summarizes activity in AOCI:



(Dollars in millions)	Unrecognized Net Pension and Postretirement Costs			Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges			Unrealized Net Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities			Other, net			Total
AOCI balance, January 1, 2017	$	(764	)	$	(92	)	$	(259	)	$	(17	)	$	(1,132	)
OCI before reclassifications, net of tax	(2		)	3			(1		)	1			1
Amounts reclassified from AOCI:
Before tax	17			(8		)	(1		)	1			9
Tax effect	6			(3		)	—			—			3
Amounts reclassified, net of tax	11			(5		)	(1		)	1			6
Total OCI, net of tax	9			(2		)	(2		)	2			7
AOCI balance, March 31, 2017	$	(755	)	$	(94	)	$	(261	)	$	(15	)	$	(1,125	)

AOCI balance, January 1, 2018	$	(1,004	)	$	(92	)	$	(356	)	$	(15	)	$	(1,467	)
OCI before reclassifications, net of tax	—			70			(282		)	(2		)	(214		)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI:
Before tax	18			11			19			—			48
Tax effect	4			3			5			—			12
Amounts reclassified, net of tax	14			8			14			—			36
Total OCI, net of tax	14			78			(268		)	(2		)	(178		)
AOCI balance, March 31, 2018	$	(990	)	$	(14	)	$	(624	)	$	(17	)	$	(1,645	)
Primary income statement location of amounts reclassified from AOCI	Other expense			Net interest income			Net interest income			Net interest income

NOTE 10. Income Taxes

The effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 were 19.0% and 19.6%, respectively. The current quarter tax provision reflects the lower federal income tax rate enacted with tax reform in December of 2017. The earlier quarter includes the tax benefits associated with using the marginal income tax rate for the loss on the early extinguishment of debt.

NOTE 11. Benefit Plans

The components of net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit pension plans are summarized in the following table:



Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	Location	2018			2017
Service cost	Personnel expense	$	60		$	52
Interest cost	Other expense	50			49
Estimated return on plan assets	Other expense	(112		)	(93		)
Amortization and other	Other expense	20			20
Net periodic benefit cost		$	18		$	28

Table of Contents

BB&T makes contributions to the qualified pension plans in amounts between the minimum required for funding and the maximum deductible for federal income tax purposes. Discretionary contributions totaling $144 million were made during the three months ended March 31, 2018. There are no required contributions for the remainder of 2018, though BB&T may elect to make additional discretionary contributions.

NOTE 12. Commitments and Contingencies

The following table summarizes certain commitments and contingencies. Refer to Note 13. Fair Value Disclosures for amounts related to off-balance sheet financial instruments.



(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017
Investments in affordable housing projects:
Carrying amount	$	2,018	$	1,948
Amount of future funding commitments included in carrying amount	935		928
Lending exposure	526		561
Tax credits subject to recapture	455		471
Private equity investments	469		471
Future funding commitments to private equity investments	134		143

Legal Proceedings

The nature of BB&T's business ordinarily results in a certain amount of claims, litigation, investigations and legal and administrative cases and proceedings, all of which are considered incidental to the normal conduct of business. BB&T believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding legal proceedings and, with respect to such legal proceedings, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously, litigating or settling cases according to management's judgment as to what is in the best interests of BB&T and its shareholders.

On at least a quarterly basis, liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings are assessed utilizing the latest information available. For those matters where it is probable that BB&T will incur a loss and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, and is more than nominal, a liability is recorded in the consolidated financial statements. These legal reserves may be increased or decreased to reflect any relevant developments on at least a quarterly basis. For other matters, where a loss is not probable or the amount of the loss is not estimable, legal reserves are not accrued. While the outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel and available insurance coverage, management believes that the established legal reserves are adequate and the liabilities arising from legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations or consolidated cash flows of BB&T.

Pledged Assets

Certain assets were pledged to secure municipal deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, borrowings and borrowing capacity, subject to any applicable asset discount, at the FHLB and FRB as well as for other purposes as required or permitted by law. The following table provides the total carrying amount of pledged assets by asset type, of which the majority are pursuant to agreements that do not permit the other party to sell or repledge the collateral. Assets related to employee benefit plans are excluded from the following table.



(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017
Pledged securities	$	13,257	$	14,636
Pledged loans	73,998		74,718

Table of Contents

NOTE 13. Fair Value Disclosures

The following tables present fair value information for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:



March 31, 2018
(Dollars in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Trading and equity securities	$	623	$	368	$	255	$	—
AFS securities:
U.S. Treasury	2,335		—		2,335		—
GSE	176		—		176		—
Agency MBS	20,687		—		20,687		—
States and political subdivisions	1,199		—		1,199		—
Non-agency MBS	578		—		137		441
Other	42		—		42		—
Total AFS securities	25,017		—		24,576		441
LHFS	1,189		—		1,189		—
MSRs	1,119		—		—		1,119
Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts	196		1		184		11
Foreign exchange contracts	3		—		3		—
Total derivative assets	199		1		187		11
Private equity investments	400		—		—		400
Total assets	$	28,547	$	369	$	26,207	$	1,971
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts	$	409	$	—	$	405	$	4
Foreign exchange contracts	3		—		3		—
Total derivative liabilities	412		—		408		4
Securities sold short	113		—		113		—
Total liabilities	$	525	$	—	$	521	$	4



December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Trading and equity securities	$	633	$	363	$	270	$	—
AFS securities:
U.S. Treasury	2,291		—		2,291		—
GSE	179		—		179		—
Agency MBS	20,101		—		20,101		—
States and political subdivisions	1,392		—		1,392		—
Non-agency MBS	576		—		144		432
Other	8		6		2		—
Total AFS securities	24,547		6		24,109		432
LHFS	1,099		—		1,099		—
MSRs	1,056		—		—		1,056
Derivative assets:
Interest rate contracts	440		—		434		6
Foreign exchange contracts	3		—		3		—
Total derivative assets	443		—		437		6
Private equity investments	404		—		—		404
Total assets	$	28,182	$	369	$	25,915	$	1,898
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities:
Interest rate contracts	$	708	$	—	$	705	$	3
Foreign exchange contracts	6		—		6		—
Total derivative liabilities	714		—		711		3
Securities sold short	120		—		120		—
Total liabilities	$	834	$	—	$	831	$	3

Table of Contents

Accounting standards define fair value as the exchange price that would be received on the measurement date to sell an asset or the price paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market available to the entity in an orderly transaction between market participants, with a three level valuation input hierarchy. The following discussion focuses on the valuation techniques and significant inputs for Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities.

A third-party pricing service is generally utilized in determining the fair value of the securities portfolio. Management independently evaluates the fair values provided by the pricing service through comparisons to other external pricing sources, review of additional information provided by the pricing service and other third party sources for selected securities and back-testing to compare the price realized on any security sales to the daily pricing information received from the pricing service. Fair value measurements are derived from market-based pricing matrices that were developed using observable inputs that include benchmark yields, benchmark securities, reported trades, offers, bids, issuer spreads and broker quotes. As described by security type below, additional inputs may be used, or some inputs may not be applicable. In the event that market observable data was not available, which would generally occur due to the lack of an active market for a given security, the valuation of the security would be subjective and may involve substantial judgment by management.

Trading and equity securities: Trading and equity securities primarily consist of exchange traded equity securities, and debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury, GSEs, or states and political subdivisions. The valuation techniques for debt securities are more fully discussed below.

U.S. Treasury securities: Treasury securities are valued using quoted prices in active over-the-counter markets.

GSE securities and agency MBS: GSE pass-through securities are valued using market-based pricing matrices that reference observable inputs including benchmark TBA security pricing and yield curves that were estimated based on U.S. Treasury yields and certain floating rate indices. The pricing matrices for these securities may also give consideration to pool-specific data supplied directly by the GSE. GSE CMOs are valued using market-based pricing matrices that are based on observable inputs including offers, bids, reported trades, dealer quotes and market research reports, the characteristics of a specific tranche, market convention prepayment speeds and benchmark yield curves as described above.

States and political subdivisions: These securities are valued using market-based pricing matrices that reference observable inputs including MSRB reported trades, issuer spreads, material event notices and benchmark yield curves.

Non-agency MBS: Pricing matrices for these securities are based on observable inputs including offers, bids, reported trades, dealer quotes and market research reports, the characteristics of a specific tranche, market convention prepayment speeds and benchmark yield curves as described above. Non-agency MBS also include investments in Re-REMIC trusts that primarily hold non-agency MBS, which are valued based on broker pricing models that use baseline securities yields and tranche-level yield adjustments to discount cash flows modeled using market convention prepayment speed and default assumptions.

Other securities: These securities consist primarily of corporate bonds. These securities are valued based on a review of quoted market prices for assets as well as through the various other inputs discussed previously.

LHFS: Certain mortgage loans are originated to be sold to investors, which are carried at fair value. The fair value is primarily based on quoted market prices for securities backed by similar types of loans. The changes in fair value of these assets are largely driven by changes in interest rates subsequent to loan funding and changes in the fair value of servicing associated with the mortgage LHFS.

MSRs: Residential MSRs are valued using an OAS valuation model to project cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios, which are discounted at risk-adjusted rates. The model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenue, costs to service and other economic factors. Fair value estimates and assumptions are compared to industry surveys, recent market activity, actual portfolio experience and, when available, other observable market data. Commercial MSRs are valued using a cash flow valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows. BB&T considers actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs and other economic factors that are determined based on current market conditions.

Derivative assets and liabilities: The fair values of derivatives are determined based on quoted market prices and internal pricing models that use market observable data. The fair values of interest rate lock commitments, which are related to mortgage loan commitments and are categorized as Level 3, are based on quoted market prices adjusted for commitments that are not expected to fund and include the value attributable to the net servicing fees.

Private equity investments: In many cases there are no observable market values for these investments and therefore management must estimate the fair value based on a comparison of the operating performance of the company to multiples in the marketplace for similar entities. This analysis requires significant judgment, and actual values in a sale could differ materially from those estimated.

Table of Contents

Securities sold short: Securities sold short represent debt securities sold short that are entered into as a hedging strategy for the purposes of supporting institutional and retail client trading activities.

Activity for Level 3 assets and liabilities is summarized below:



(Dollars in millions)	Non-agency MBS			MSRs			Net Derivatives			Private Equity Investments
Balance at January 1, 2017	$	507		$	1,052		$	(13	)	$	362
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in earnings	9			37			(4		)	5
Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI	(18		)	—			—			—
Purchases	—			—			—			68
Issuances	—			38			15			—
Sales	—			—			—			(18		)
Settlements	(18		)	(39		)	12			(4		)
Transfers out of Level 3	—			—			—			(13		)
Balance at March 31, 2017	$	480		$	1,088		$	10		$	400

Balance at January 1, 2018	$	432		$	1,056		$	3		$	404
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Included in earnings	(1		)	68			—			6
Included in unrealized net holding gains (losses) in OCI	23			—			—			—
Purchases	—			—			—			24
Issuances	—			37			(5		)	—
Sales	—			—			—			(24		)
Settlements	(13		)	(42		)	9			(10		)
Balance at March 31, 2018	$	441		$	1,119		$	7		$	400

Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings for the period, attributable to assets and liabilities still held at March 31, 2018	$	(1	)	$	68		$	5		$	12
Primary income statement location of realized gains (losses) included in earnings	Net interest income			Mortgage banking income			Mortgage banking income			Other income

BB&T’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels as of the end of a reporting period. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for 2018 and 2017.

The non-agency MBS categorized as Level 3 represent ownership interest in various tranches of Re-REMIC trusts. These securities are valued at a discount, which is unobservable in the market, to the fair value of the underlying securities owned by the trusts. The Re-REMIC tranches do not have an active market and therefore are categorized as Level 3. At March 31, 2018, the fair value of Re-REMIC non-agency MBS represented a discount of 16.3% to the fair value of the underlying securities owned by the Re-REMIC trusts.

The majority of private equity investments are in SBIC qualified funds, which primarily focus on equity and subordinated debt investments in privately-held middle market companies. The majority of these VIE investments are not redeemable and distributions are received as the underlying assets of the funds liquidate. The timing of distributions, which are expected to occur on various dates on an approximately ratable basis through 2026, is uncertain and dependent on various events such as recapitalizations, refinance transactions and ownership changes among others. As of March 31, 2018, restrictions on the ability to sell the investments include, but are not limited to, consent of a majority member or general partner approval for transfer of ownership. These investments are spread over numerous privately-held middle market companies, and thus the sensitivity to a change in fair value for any single investment is limited. The significant unobservable inputs for these investments are EBITDA multiples that ranged from 5x to 15x, with a weighted average of 9x, at March 31, 2018.

The following table details the fair value and UPB of LHFS that were elected to be carried at fair value:



	March 31, 2018						December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value		Aggregate UPB		Difference		Fair Value		Aggregate UPB		Difference
LHFS reported at fair value	$	1,189	$	1,180	$	9	$	1,099	$	1,084	$	15

Excluding government guaranteed, LHFS that were in nonaccrual status or 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest were not material at March 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

The following table provides information about certain assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, which are primarily collateral dependent and may be subject to liquidity adjustments. The carrying values represent end of period values, which approximate the fair value measurements that occurred on the various measurement dates throughout the period. The valuation adjustments represent the amounts recorded during the period regardless of whether the asset is still held at period end. These assets are considered to be Level 3 assets (excludes PCI).



As of / For The Three Months Ended March 31,	2018					2017
(Dollars in millions)	Carrying Value		Valuation Adjustments			Carrying Value		Valuation Adjustments
Impaired loans	$	185	$	(12	)	$	255	$	(8	)
Foreclosed real estate	40		(66		)	49		(66		)

For financial instruments not recorded at fair value, estimates of fair value are based on relevant market data and information about the instrument. Values obtained relate to one trading unit without regard to any premium or discount that may result from concentrations of ownership, possible tax ramifications, estimated transaction costs that may result from bulk sales or the relationship between various instruments.

An active market does not exist for certain financial instruments. Fair value estimates for these instruments are based on current economic conditions, currency and interest rate risk characteristics, loss experience and other factors. Many of these estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and cannot be determined with precision. Therefore, the fair value estimates in many instances cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realizable in a current sale of the instrument. In addition, changes in assumptions could significantly affect these fair value estimates. The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of these financial instruments.

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash: For these short-term instruments, the carrying amounts are a reasonable estimate of fair values.

HTM securities: The fair values of HTM securities are based on a market approach using observable inputs such as benchmark yields and securities, TBA prices, reported trades, issuer spreads, current bids and offers, monthly payment information and collateral performance.

Loans receivable: The fair values for loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, applying interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms and credit quality, which are deemed to be indicative of orderly transactions in the current market. For commercial loans and leases, discount rates may be adjusted to address additional credit risk on lower risk grade instruments. For residential mortgage and other consumer loans, internal prepayment risk models are used to adjust contractual cash flows. Loans are aggregated into pools of similar terms and credit quality and discounted using a LIBOR based rate. The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair values.

Deposit liabilities: The fair values for demand deposits are equal to the amount payable on demand. Fair values for CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to aggregate expected maturities. BB&T has developed long-term relationships with its deposit customers, commonly referred to as CDIs, that have not been considered in the determination of the deposit liabilities' fair value.

Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings, excluding securities sold short, approximate their fair values.

Long-term debt: The fair values of long-term debt instruments are estimated based on quoted market prices for the instrument if available, or for similar instruments if not available, or by using discounted cash flow analyses, based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments.

Contractual commitments: The fair values of commitments are estimated using the fees charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. The fair values of guarantees and letters of credit are estimated based on the counterparties' creditworthiness and average default rates for loan products with similar risks. These respective fair value measurements are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Retail lending commitments are assigned no fair value as BB&T typically has the ability to cancel such commitments by providing notice to the borrower.

Table of Contents

Financial assets and liabilities not recorded at fair value are summarized below:



		March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Fair Value Hierarchy	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Financial assets:
HTM securities	Level 2	$	22,390	$	21,829	$	23,027	$	22,837
Loans and leases HFI, net of ALLL	Level 3	141,519		140,461		142,211		141,664
Financial liabilities:
Time deposits	Level 2	13,725		13,775		13,170		13,266
Long-term debt	Level 2	23,410		23,495		23,648		23,885

The following is a summary of selected information pertaining to off-balance sheet financial instruments:



	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Notional/Contract Amount		Fair Value		Notional/Contract Amount		Fair Value
Commitments to extend, originate or purchase credit	$	69,814	$	324	$	67,860	$	259
Residential mortgage loans sold with recourse	473		5		490		5
Other loans sold with recourse	4,175		5		4,153		5
Letters of credit	2,460		22		2,466		21

NOTE 14. Derivative Financial Instruments

The following table provides a summary of derivative strategies and the related accounting treatment:



	Cash Flow Hedges	Fair Value Hedges	Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges
Risk exposure	Variability in cash flows of interest payments on floating rate business loans, overnight funding and various LIBOR funding instruments.	Changes in value on fixed rate long-term debt, CDs, FHLB advances, loans and state and political subdivision securities due to changes in interest rates.	Risk associated with an asset or liability, including mortgage banking operations and MSRs, or for client needs. Includes exposure to changes in market rates and conditions subsequent to the interest rate lock and funding date for mortgage loans originated for sale.
Risk management objective	Hedge the variability in the interest payments and receipts on future cash flows for forecasted transactions related to the first unhedged payments and receipts of variable interest.	Convert the fixed rate paid or received to a floating rate, primarily through the use of swaps.	For interest rate lock commitment derivatives and LHFS, use mortgage-based derivatives such as forward commitments and options to mitigate market risk. For MSRs, mitigate the income statement effect of changes in the fair value of the MSRs.
Treatment during the hedge period	Changes in value of the hedging instruments are recognized in AOCI until the related cash flows from the hedged item are recognized in earnings.	Changes in value of both the hedging instruments and the assets or liabilities being hedged are recognized in the income statement line item associated with the instrument being hedged.	Entire change in fair value recognized in current period income.
Treatment if hedge ceases to be highly effective or is terminated	Hedge is dedesignated. Changes in value recorded in AOCI before dedesignation are amortized to yield over the period the forecasted hedged transactions impact earnings.	If hedged item remains outstanding, the basis adjustment that resulted from hedging is amortized into earnings over the lesser of the designated hedged period or the maturity date of the instrument, and cash flows from terminations are reported in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged item.	Not applicable
Treatment if transaction is no longer probable of occurring during forecast period or within a short period thereafter	Hedge accounting ceases and any gain or loss in AOCI is reported in earnings immediately.	Not applicable	Not applicable

Table of Contents

Impact of Derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets

The fair values of derivative instruments are presented on a gross basis in other assets or other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Master netting arrangements allows counterparties to offset certain net derivative assets and liabilities with a defaulting party in determining the net termination amount. Collateral practices mitigate the potential loss impact to affected parties by requiring liquid collateral to be posted on a daily basis to secure the aggregate net exposure. Cash collateral is recorded in restricted cash and interest-bearing deposits in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. BB&T utilizes the London Clearinghouse to clear swaps that are required to be cleared under the Dodd-Frank Act. Effective January 16, 2018, the London Clearinghouse rules were modified to treat variation margin payments as settlements of exposure instead of collateral. At March 31, 2018, settlements are applied against the fair value of the related derivative contracts in the table below.

The following table presents the notional amount and estimated fair value of derivative instruments:



		March 31, 2018								December 31, 2017
	Hedged Item or Transaction	Notional Amount		Fair Value						Notional Amount		Fair Value
(Dollars in millions)	Hedged Item or Transaction	Notional Amount		Gain			Loss			Notional Amount		Gain			Loss
Cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts:
Pay fixed swaps	3 mo. LIBOR funding	$	6,500	$	—		$	—		$	6,500	$	—		$	(126	)
Fair value hedges:
Interest rate contracts:
Receive fixed swaps	Long-term debt	15,571		1			(130		)	15,538		118			(166		)
Options	Long-term debt	6,087		—			(1		)	6,087		—			(1		)
Pay fixed swaps	Commercial loans	392		2			—			416		5			(1		)
Pay fixed swaps	Municipal securities	231		—			(55		)	231		—			(76		)
Total		22,281		3			(186		)	22,272		123			(244		)
Not designated as hedges:
Client-related and other risk management:
Interest rate contracts:
Receive fixed swaps		10,800		61			(150		)	10,880		141			(61		)
Pay fixed swaps		11,033		27			(40		)	10,962		59			(155		)
Other		1,722		3			(4		)	1,658		4			(4		)
Forward commitments		4,116		8			(6		)	3,549		3			(2		)
Foreign exchange contracts		506		3			(3		)	470		3			(6		)
Total		28,177		102			(203		)	27,519		210			(228		)
Mortgage banking:
Interest rate contracts:
Interest rate lock commitments		1,641		11			(4		)	1,308		7			(3		)
When issued securities, forward rate agreements and forward commitments		3,502		9			(8		)	3,124		4			(3		)
Other		336		2			—			182		1			—
Total		5,479		22			(12		)	4,614		12			(6		)
MSRs:
Interest rate contracts:
Receive fixed swaps		5,599		—			—			4,498		15			(86		)
Pay fixed swaps		5,226		—			—			3,418		32			(13		)
Options		4,275		67			(11		)	4,535		50			(11		)
When issued securities, forward rate agreements and forward commitments		1,077		5			—			1,813		1			—
Other		35		—			—			3		—			—
Total		16,212		72			(11		)	14,267		98			(110		)
Total derivatives not designated as hedges		49,868		196			(226		)	46,400		320			(344		)
Total derivatives		$	78,649	199			(412		)	$	75,172	443			(714		)
Gross amounts not offset in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Amounts subject to master netting arrangements not offset due to policy election				(81		)	81					(297		)	297
Cash collateral (received) posted				(39		)	162					(20		)	344
Net amount				$	79		$	(169	)			$	126		$	(73	)

Table of Contents

The following table presents additional information for fair value hedging relationships:



	March 31, 2018									December 31, 2017
	Hedged Items Currently Designated					Hedged Items No Longer Designated				Hedged Items Currently Designated					Hedged Items No Longer Designated
(Dollars in millions)	Carrying Amount		Hedge Basis Adjustment			Carrying Amount		Hedge Basis Adjustment		Carrying Amount		Hedge Basis Adjustment			Carrying Amount		Hedge Basis Adjustment
AFS securities	$	350	$	58		$	138	$	5	$	391	$	69		$	142	$	5
Loans and leases	392		(7		)	112		—		500		(5		)	11		—
Long-term debt	15,960		(117		)	752		3		16,163		87			754		4

Impact of Derivatives on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

No portion of the change in fair value of derivatives designated as hedges has been excluded from effectiveness testing.

The following table summarizes amounts related to cash flow hedges, which consist of interest rate contracts. Prior amounts and presentation were not conformed to new hedge accounting guidance that was adopted in 2018.



Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017
Pre-tax gain (loss) recognized in OCI:
Deposits	$	21		$	—
Long-term debt	72			—
Total	$	93		$	4
Pre-tax gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into interest expense:
Deposits	$	(2	)	$	—
Long-term debt	(9		)	—
Total	$	(11	)	$	8

The following table summarizes the impact on net interest income related to fair value hedges, which consist of interest rate contracts. Prior period amounts and presentation were not conformed to new hedge accounting guidance that was adopted in 2018.



Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017
AFS securities:
Amounts related to interest settlements	$	(2	)	$	(3	)
Recognized on derivatives	11			—
Recognized on hedged items	(11		)	—
Net income (expense) recognized	(2		)	(3		)
Loans and leases:
Amounts related to interest settlements	—			(1		)
Recognized on derivatives	3			—
Recognized on hedged items	(3		)	—
Net income (expense) recognized	—			(1		)
Long-term debt:
Amounts related to interest settlements	8			46
Recognized on derivatives	(181		)	—
Recognized on hedged items	192			—
Net income (expense) recognized	19			46
Net income (expense) recognized, total	$	17		$	42

Table of Contents

The following table presents pre-tax gain (loss) recognized in income for derivative instruments not designated as hedges:



Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	Location	2018			2017
Client-related and other risk management:
Interest rate contracts	Other noninterest income	$	15		$	11
Foreign exchange contracts	Other noninterest income	7			(2		)
Mortgage banking:
Interest rate contracts	Mortgage banking income	4			(15		)
MSRs:
Interest rate contracts	Mortgage banking income	(67		)	(20		)
Total		$	(41	)	$	(26	)

The following table presents information about BB&T's cash flow and fair value hedges:



(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018			Dec 31, 2017
Cash flow hedges:
Net unrecognized after-tax gain (loss) on active hedges recorded in AOCI	$	(13	)	$	(96	)
Net unrecognized after-tax gain (loss) on terminated hedges recorded in AOCI (to be recognized in earnings through 2022)	(1		)	3
Estimated portion of net after-tax gain (loss) on active and terminated hedges to be reclassified from AOCI into earnings during the next 12 months	—			(25		)
Maximum time period over which BB&T has hedged a portion of the variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions excluding those transactions relating to the payment of variable interest on existing instruments	4 years			5 years
Fair value hedges:
Unrecognized pre-tax net gain on terminated hedges (to be recognized as interest primarily through 2019)	$	88		$	129
Portion of pre-tax net gain on terminated hedges to be recognized as a change in interest during the next 12 months	44			49

Derivatives Credit Risk – Dealer Counterparties

Credit risk related to derivatives arises when amounts receivable from a counterparty exceed those payable to the same counterparty. The risk of loss is addressed by subjecting dealer counterparties to credit reviews and approvals similar to those used in making loans or other extensions of credit and by requiring collateral. Dealer counterparties operate under agreements to provide cash and/or liquid collateral when unsecured loss positions exceed minimal limits.

Derivative contracts with dealer counterparties settle on a monthly, quarterly or semiannual basis, with daily movement of collateral between counterparties required within established netting agreements. BB&T only transacts with dealer counterparties with strong credit standings.

Table of Contents

Derivatives Credit Risk – Central Clearing Parties

With the exception of the central clearing party used for TBA transactions that does not post variation margin to the bank, central clearing parties exchange cash on a daily basis to settle changes in exposure. Certain derivatives are cleared through central clearing parties that require initial margin collateral. Initial margin collateral requirements are established on varying bases, with such amounts generally designed to offset the risk of non-payment. Initial margin is generally calculated by applying the maximum loss experienced in value over a specified time horizon to the portfolio of existing trades. The following table summarizes collateral positions with central clearing counterparties:



(Dollars in millions)	Mar 31, 2018		Dec 31, 2017
Dealer Counterparties:
Cash collateral received from dealer counterparties	$	40	$	21
Derivatives in a net gain position secured by collateral received	41		22
Unsecured positions in a net gain with dealer counterparties after collateral postings	2		2
Cash collateral posted to dealer counterparties	163		172
Derivatives in a net loss position secured by collateral received	166		171
Additional collateral that would have been posted had BB&T's credit ratings dropped below investment grade	4		—
Central Clearing Parties:
Cash collateral, including initial margin, posted to central clearing parties	14		177
Derivatives in a net loss position	2		176
Securities pledged to central clearing parties	75		91

NOTE 15. Computation of EPS

Basic and diluted EPS calculations are presented in the following table:



Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)	2018		2017
Net income available to common shareholders	$	745	$	378

Weighted average number of common shares	779,617		809,903
Effect of dilutive outstanding equity-based awards	11,388		12,816
Weighted average number of diluted common shares	791,005		822,719

Basic EPS	$	0.96	$	0.47
Diluted EPS	$	0.94	$	0.46

Anti-dilutive awards	90		295

Table of Contents

NOTE 16. Operating Segments

BB&T's business segment structure aligns with how management reviews performance and makes decisions by client, segment and business unit. There are four major reportable business segments: CB-Retail, CB-Commercial, IH&PF and FS&CF. In addition, there is an OT&C segment. For additional information, see Note 19 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.



Three Months Ended March 31,	CB-Retail						CB-Commercial						FS&CF
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net interest income (expense)	$	837		$	842		$	464		$	406		$	159		$	130
Net intersegment interest income (expense)	49			34			70			101			18			40
Segment net interest income	886			876			534			507			177			170
Allocated provision for credit losses	122			129			37			4			(5		)	6
Segment net interest income after provision	764			747			497			503			182			164
Noninterest income	339			331			105			102			301			280
Noninterest expense	673			673			254			307			301			287
Income (loss) before income taxes	430			405			348			298			182			157
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	106			151			78			103			38			48
Segment net income (loss)	$	324		$	254		$	270		$	195		$	144		$	109

Identifiable assets (period end)	$	69,998		$	72,226		$	56,435		$	55,328		$	29,766		$	28,227

	IH&PF						OT&C (1)						Total
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net interest income (expense)	$	26		$	23		$	147		$	208		$	1,633		$	1,609
Net intersegment interest income (expense)	(6		)	(4		)	(131		)	(171		)	—			—
Segment net interest income	20			19			16			37			1,633			1,609
Allocated provision for credit losses	1			2			(5		)	7			150			148
Segment net interest income after provision	19			17			21			30			1,483			1,461
Noninterest income	439			463			(4		)	(5		)	1,180			1,171
Noninterest expense	375			400			83			435			1,686			2,102
Income (loss) before income taxes	83			80			(66		)	(410		)	977			530
Provision (benefit) for income taxes	21			30			(57		)	(228		)	186			104
Segment net income (loss)	$	62		$	50		$	(9	)	$	(182	)	$	791		$	426

Identifiable assets (period end)	$	5,789		$	5,768		$	58,741		$	58,952		$	220,729		$	220,501


(1)	Includes financial data from business units below the quantitative and qualitative thresholds requiring disclosure.

Table of Contents


ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, regarding the financial condition, results of operations, business plans and the future performance of BB&T that are based on the beliefs and assumptions of the management of BB&T and the information available to management at the time that these disclosures were prepared. Words such as "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "forecasts," "intends," "plans," "projects," "may," "will," "should," "could," and other similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following:



l	general economic or business conditions, either nationally or regionally, may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, slower deposit and/or asset growth, and a deterioration in credit quality and/or a reduced demand for credit, insurance or other services;
l	disruptions to the national or global financial markets, including the impact of a downgrade of U.S. government obligations by one of the credit ratings agencies, the economic instability and recessionary conditions in Europe, the eventual exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union;
l	changes in the interest rate environment, including interest rate changes made by the Federal Reserve, as well as cash flow reassessments may reduce net interest margin and/or the volumes and values of loans and deposits as well as the value of other financial assets and liabilities;
l	competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions may increase significantly;
l	legislative, regulatory or accounting changes, including changes resulting from the adoption and implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act may adversely affect the businesses in which BB&T is engaged;
l	local, state or federal taxing authorities may take tax positions that are adverse to BB&T;
l	a reduction may occur in BB&T's credit ratings;
l	adverse changes may occur in the securities markets;
l	competitors of BB&T may have greater financial resources or develop products that enable them to compete more successfully than BB&T and may be subject to different regulatory standards than BB&T;
l	cybersecurity risks could adversely affect BB&T's business and financial performance or reputation, and BB&T could be liable for financial losses incurred by third parties due to breaches of data shared between financial institutions;
l	higher-than-expected costs related to information technology infrastructure or a failure to successfully implement future system enhancements could adversely impact BB&T's financial condition and results of operations and could result in significant additional costs to BB&T;
l	natural or other disasters, including acts of terrorism, could have an adverse effect on BB&T, materially disrupting BB&T's operations or the ability or willingness of customers to access BB&T's products and services;
l	costs related to the integration of the businesses of BB&T and its merger partners may be greater than expected;
l	failure to execute on strategic or operational plans, including the ability to successfully complete and/or integrate mergers and acquisitions or fully achieve expected cost savings or revenue growth associated with mergers and acquisitions within the expected time frames could adversely impact financial condition and results of operations;
l	significant litigation and regulatory proceedings could have a material adverse effect on BB&T;
l	unfavorable resolution of legal proceedings or other claims and regulatory and other governmental investigations or other inquiries could result in negative publicity, protests, fines, penalties, restrictions on BB&T's operations or ability to expand its business and other negative consequences, all of which could cause reputational damage and adversely impact BB&T's financial conditions and results of operations;
l	risks resulting from the extensive use of models;
l	risk management measures may not be fully effective;
l	deposit attrition, customer loss and/or revenue loss following completed mergers/acquisitions may exceed expectations; and
l	widespread system outages, caused by the failure of critical internal systems or critical services provided by third parties, could adversely impact BB&T's financial condition and results of operations.

These and other risk factors are more fully described in this report and in BB&T's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 under the sections entitled "Item 1A. Risk Factors" and from time to time, in other filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, BB&T undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason. Readers should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature BB&T may make in any subsequent Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K.

Table of Contents

BB&T is a financial holding company organized under the laws of North Carolina. BB&T conducts operations through its principal bank subsidiary, Branch Bank, and its nonbank subsidiaries.

Regulatory Considerations

The extensive regulatory framework applicable to financial institutions is intended primarily for the protection of depositors, the DIF and the stability of the financial system, rather than for the protection of shareholders and creditors. In addition to banking laws, regulations and regulatory agencies, BB&T is subject to various other laws, regulations, supervision and examination by other regulatory agencies, all of which affect the operations and management of BB&T and its ability to make distributions to shareholders. Refer to BB&T's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for additional disclosures with respect to significant laws and regulations affecting BB&T.

On April 10, 2018, the banking regulators issued a proposal to simplify capital rules for large banks. The proposal introduces a “stress capital buffer," which would in part integrate the forward-looking stress test results with the non-stress capital requirements. The result would produce capital requirements for large banking organization that are firm-specific and risk-sensitive and reduce the overall number of capital ratios that must be met. The stress capital buffer would equal the decrease in a firm’s CET1 capital ratio in CCAR plus four quarters of planned common stock dividends. A banks stress capital buffer requirement would be subject to a floor of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets.

Executive Summary

Consolidated net income available to common shareholders for the first quarter of 2018 was $745 million. On a diluted per common share basis, earnings for the first quarter of 2018 were $0.94, an increase of $0.48 compared to the first quarter of 2017. First quarter 2018 results were negatively impacted by fee waivers and other costs associated with our system outage in February, which resulted in lost revenue of approximately $15 million and incremental noninterest expenses of approximately $5 million. Results for the first quarter of 2017 included a $392 million loss on the early extinguishment of debt.

BB&T's results of operations for the first quarter of 2018 produced an annualized return on average assets of 1.45%, an annualized return on average risk-weighted assets of 1.81% and an annualized return on average common shareholders' equity of 11.43%, compared to ratios for the same quarter of the prior year of 0.79%, 0.98% and 5.72%, respectively.

Total revenues on a TE basis were $2.8 billion for the first quarter of 2018, an increase of $16 million compared to the same period in 2017. This reflects an increase of $7 million in taxable-equivalent net interest income. Net interest margin was 3.44%, compared to 3.46% for the first quarter of 2017.

The provision for credit losses was $150 million compared to $148 million in the first quarter of 2017. Net charge-offs for the first quarter of 2018 totaled $145 million compared to $148 million for the earlier quarter. Asset quality remains strong despite a $42 million increase to NPAs compared to the fourth quarter of 2017 related to CRE lending and leasing, as well as an increase in foreclosed properties.

Noninterest income was up $9 million compared to the first quarter of 2017. Noninterest expense was $1.7 billion for the first quarter of 2018, down $416 million compared to the earlier quarter. This decrease was primarily driven by a loss of $392 million on the early extinguishment of debt in the earlier period. Excluding this item and merger-related and restructuring charges, noninterest expense was down $16 million as a result of tight expense control.

The provision for income taxes was $186 million for the first quarter of 2018, compared to $104 million for the earlier quarter. This produced an effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2018 of 19.0%, compared to 19.6% for the first quarter of 2017. The provision for income taxes for the current quarter reflects the new lower federal tax rate, whereas the earlier period includes the tax benefits associated with using the marginal income tax rate for the loss on the early extinguishment of debt. The current quarter also reflects $18 million in excess tax benefits from equity-based compensation plans compared to $35 million in the earlier quarter.

BB&T's CET1 capital ratio was 10.2% at March 31, 2018. BB&T declared common dividends of $0.375 per share during the first quarter of 2018, a 13.6% increase compared to the fourth quarter of 2017. This resulted in a dividend payout ratio of 39.2%. The total payout ratio for the first quarter of 2018 was 82.1%.

In April, BB&T announced plans to acquire Regions Insurance, which will increase the retail insurance network in BB&T's core markets across the Southeast and newer markets in Texas, Louisiana and Indiana. The acquisition is expected to close in the third quarter of 2018.

Table of Contents

Analysis of Results of Operations

Net Interest Income and NIM

First Quarter 2018 compared to First Quarter 2017

Net interest income on a TE basis was $1.7 billion for the first quarter of 2018, an increase of $7 million compared to the same period in 2017. Interest income increased $129 million, which primarily reflects higher rates. Interest expense increased $122 million due to higher funding costs reflecting the impact of rate increases.

Net interest margin was 3.44%, compared to 3.46% for the first quarter of 2017. Average earning assets increased $2.0 billion, or 1.0%. The increase in average earnings assets reflects a $3.8 billion increase in average securities, partially offset by a $2.0 billion decrease in other earning assets. The decrease in other earning assets was primarily due to lower balances held at the Federal Reserve. Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $254 million compared to the earlier quarter, as the growth in earning assets was funded by noninterest-bearing deposits, which increased $2.3 billion compared to the earlier quarter. Average interest-bearing deposits decreased $6.5 billion, which was partially offset by increases of $2.9 billion in average long-term debt and $3.4 billion in average short-term borrowings. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased due to organic growth. The annualized TE yield on the total loan portfolio for the first quarter was 4.57%, up 27 basis points compared to the earlier quarter. The annualized TE yield on the average securities portfolio for the first quarter was 2.44%, up two basis points compared to the earlier quarter.

The average annualized cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.46%, up 20 basis points compared to the first quarter of 2017. The average annualized rate on short-term borrowings was 1.43%, up 100 basis points. The average annualized rate on long-term debt was 2.54%, up 71 basis points. The higher rates on funding liabilities primarily reflect the impact of rate increases.

The following table sets forth the major components of net interest income and the related annualized yields and rates as well as the variances between the periods caused by changes in interest rates versus changes in volumes. Changes attributable to the mix of assets and liabilities have been allocated proportionally between the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

Table of Contents



Table 1
TE Net Interest Income and Rate / Volume Analysis (1)

Three Months Ended March 31,	Average Balances (6)				Annualized Yield/Rate				Income/Expense				Increase			Change due to
(Dollars in millions)	2018		2017		2018		2017		2018		2017		(Decrease)			Rate			Volume
Assets
Total securities, at amortized cost: (2)
U.S. Treasury	$	3,538	$	4,730	1.77	%	1.72	%	$	15	$	20	$	(5	)	$	1		$	(6	)
GSE	2,385		2,386		2.23		2.22		13		13		—			—			—
Agency MBS	40,813		34,909		2.42		2.16		248		189		59			24			35
States and political subdivisions	1,215		2,091		3.78		5.13		11		27		(16		)	(6		)	(10		)
Non-agency MBS	375		432		7.73		18.85		7		20		(13		)	(11		)	(2		)
Other	48		59		2.28		1.89		—		—		—			—			—
Total securities	48,374		44,607		2.44		2.42		294		269		25			8			17
Other earning assets (3)	2,250		4,259		4.54		1.49		25		16		9			19			(10		)
Loans and leases, net of unearned income: (4)(5)
Commercial and industrial	58,627		57,125		3.72		3.49		537		492		45			32			13
CRE	21,398		19,892		4.47		3.74		234		183		51			37			14
Lease financing	1,872		1,653		3.00		2.84		14		12		2			1			1
Residential mortgage	28,824		29,701		4.00		4.01		289		297		(8		)	—			(8		)
Direct	11,791		12,014		4.90		4.33		141		129		12			14			(2		)
Indirect	16,914		18,137		7.31		6.76		304		302		2			23			(21		)
Revolving credit	2,798		2,607		8.94		8.79		67		57		10			2			8
PCI	631		883		19.21		19.72		30		43		(13		)	(1		)	(12		)
Total loans and leases HFI	142,855		142,012		4.57		4.31		1,616		1,515		101			108			(7		)
LHFS	1,051		1,686		3.66		3.49		9		15		(6		)	1			(7		)
Total loans and leases	143,906		143,698		4.57		4.30		1,625		1,530		95			109			(14		)
Total earning assets	194,530		192,564		4.04		3.80		1,944		1,815		129			136			(7		)
Nonearning assets	26,889		27,397
Total assets	$	221,419	$	219,961
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest-checking	$	27,270	$	29,578	0.37		0.18		25		13		12			13			(1		)
Money market and savings	61,690		64,857		0.44		0.23		67		37		30			32			(2		)
Time deposits	13,847		14,924		0.68		0.48		23		17		6			7			(1		)
Foreign deposits - interest-bearing	935		929		1.42		0.67		3		2		1			1			—
Total interest-bearing deposits	103,742		110,288		0.46		0.26		118		69		49			53			(4		)
Short-term borrowings	5,477		2,105		1.43		0.43		20		2		18			11			7
Long-term debt	23,677		20,757		2.54		1.83		150		95		55			40			15
Total interest-bearing liabilities	132,896		133,150		0.87		0.50		288		166		122			104			18
Noninterest-bearing deposits	53,396		51,095
Other liabilities	5,599		5,813
Shareholders' equity	29,528		29,903
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	221,419	$	219,961
Average interest-rate spread					3.16	%	3.30	%
NIM/net interest income					3.44	%	3.46	%	$	1,656	$	1,649	$	7		$	32		$	(25	)
Taxable-equivalent adjustment									$	23	$	40


(1)	Yields are stated on a TE basis utilizing the marginal income tax rates. The change in interest not solely due to changes in yield/rate or volume has been allocated on a pro-rata basis based on the absolute dollar amount of each.


(2)	Total securities include AFS and HTM securities.


(3)	Includes cash equivalents, interest-bearing deposits with banks, trading securities, FHLB stock and other earning assets.


(4)	Loan fees, which are not material for any of the periods shown, are included for rate calculation purposes.


(5)	NPLs are included in the average balances.


(6)	Excludes basis adjustments for fair value hedges.

Table of Contents

Provision for Credit Losses

First Quarter 2018 compared to First Quarter 2017

The provision for credit losses totaled $150 million for the first quarter of 2018, compared to $148 million for the same period of the prior year.

Net charge-offs were $145 million for the first quarter of 2018 and $148 million for the first quarter of 2017. Net charge-offs were 0.41% of average loans and leases on an annualized basis for the first quarter of 2018, compared to 0.42% of average loans and leases for the same period in 2017.

Noninterest Income

First Quarter 2018 compared to First Quarter 2017

Noninterest income for the first quarter of 2018 was up $9 million compared to the earlier quarter.

Investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions increased $22 million due to higher managed account fees and higher investment banking income. Insurance income decreased $22 million compared to the earlier quarter primarily due to lower performance-based commissions. Service charges on deposits was essentially flat, but was negatively impacted due to fee waivers associated with the system outage as previously mentioned. Other income was essentially flat, as increases from various sundry items were more than offset by a $22 million decrease in income related to assets for certain post-employment benefits, which is primarily offset in other income/expense categories.

Noninterest Expense

First Quarter 2018 compared to First Quarter 2017

Noninterest expense for the first quarter of 2018 was down $416 million compared to the earlier quarter primarily driven by a loss of $392 million on the early extinguishment of debt in the earlier period. Excluding this item and merger-related and restructuring charges, noninterest expense was down $16 million due to tight expense control.

Personnel expense was essentially flat compared to the earlier quarter as lower salaries expense driven by approximately 1,500 fewer FTEs was largely offset by higher pension service cost. Outside IT services decreased $17 million compared to the earlier quarter due to lower project-related expenses. Other expense decreased $14 million compared to the earlier quarter, primarily due to an increase in the expected return on pension plan assets due to higher plan assets.

Segment Results

See Note 16. Operating Segments herein and Note 19. Operating Segments in BB&T's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, for additional disclosures related to BB&T's reportable business segments. Fluctuations in noninterest income and noninterest expense incurred directly by the segments are more fully discussed in the "Noninterest Income" and "Noninterest Expense" sections above.



Table 2
Net Income by Reportable Segment

Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017
Community Banking Retail and Consumer Finance	$	324		$	254
Community Banking Commercial	270			195
Financial Services and Commercial Finance	144			109
Insurance Holdings and Premium Finance	62			50
Other, Treasury & Corporate	(9		)	(182		)
BB&T Corporation	$	791		$	426

Table of Contents

First Quarter 2018 compared to First Quarter 2017

Community Banking Retail and Consumer Finance

CB-Retail serves retail clients by offering a variety of loan and deposit products, payment services, bankcard products and other financial services by connecting clients to a wide range of financial products and services. CB-Retail includes Dealer Retail Services which originates loans on an indirect basis to consumers for the purchase of automobiles, boats and recreational vehicles. Additionally, CB-Retail includes specialty finance lending, small equipment leasing and other products for consumers. CB-Retail also includes Residential Mortgage Banking which originates and purchases mortgage loans to either hold for investment or sell to third-parties. BB&T generally retains the servicing rights to loans sold. Mortgage products include fixed and adjustable-rate government guaranteed and conventional loans used for the purpose of constructing, purchasing or refinancing residential properties. Substantially all of the properties are owner-occupied. Residential Mortgage Banking also includes Mortgage Warehouse Lending, which provides short-term lending solutions to finance first-lien residential mortgages held-for-sale by independent mortgage companies.

CB-Retail net income was $324 million for the first quarter of 2018, an increase of $70 million compared to the earlier quarter. Segment net interest income increased due to higher funding spreads on deposits and a change in mix to higher yielding loans, partially offset by lower credit spreads on loans. Noninterest income increased primarily due to higher bankcard fees and merchant discounts. The provision for income taxes declined $45 million due to a lower tax rate compared to the earlier quarter.

CB-Retail average loans and leases held for investment decreased $2.3 billion, or 3.5%, compared to the earlier quarter, primarily driven by a decline in sales finance loans due to the strategic decision to optimize the size of the portfolio and direct investments towards higher-yielding assets.

CB-Retail average total deposits decreased $392 million, or 0.5%, compared to the earlier quarter. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased $1.5 billion while average time deposits and interest checking fell $1.3 billion and $467 million, respectively.

Community Banking Commercial

CB-Commercial serves large, medium and small business clients by offering a variety of loan and deposit products and by connecting clients to the combined organization’s broad array of financial services. CB-Commercial includes CRE lending, commercial and industrial lending, corporate banking, asset-based lending, dealer inventory financing, tax exempt financing, cash management and treasury services, and commercial deposit products.

CB-Commercial net income was $270 million for the first quarter of 2018, an increase of $75 million compared to the earlier quarter. Segment net interest income increased $27 million driven primarily by higher funding spreads on deposits, average noninterest-bearing deposit growth and average loan growth, partially offset by lower credit spreads on loans. The allocated provision for credit losses increased $33 million primarily due to a normalization in loss estimates and higher net charge-offs. Noninterest expense decreased $53 million driven primarily by a decline in personnel expense due to a third quarter of 2017 change in approach for allocating capitalized loan origination costs, as well as lower allocated corporate expenses. The provision for income taxes declined $25 million compared to the earlier quarter due to a lower tax rate.

CB-Commercial average loans and leases held for investment increased $1.2 billion, or 2.3%, compared to the earlier quarter, driven primarily by an increase in average commercial real estate loans.

CB-Commercial average total deposits decreased $167 million, or 0.3%, compared to the earlier quarter. Noninterest bearing deposits increased $1.0 billion while average interest checking and money market and savings declined $791 million and $223 million, respectively.

Financial Services and Commercial Finance

FS&CF provides personal trust administration, estate planning, investment counseling, wealth management, asset management, corporate retirement services, capital markets and corporate banking services, specialty finance and corporate trust services to individuals, corporations, institutions, foundations and government entities. In addition, the segment includes BB&T Securities, a full-service brokerage and investment banking firm, which offers clients a variety of investment services, including discount brokerage services, equities, annuities, mutual funds and government bonds. The Corporate Banking Division originates and services large corporate relationships, syndicated lending relationships and client derivatives while the specialty finance products offered by FS&CF include equipment finance, tax-exempt financing for local governments and special-purpose entities, and full-service commercial mortgage banking lending.

Table of Contents

FS&CF net income was $144 million for the first quarter of 2018, an increase of $35 million compared to the earlier quarter. Noninterest income increased $21 million due to higher investment banking and brokerage fees and commissions, primarily driven by higher managed account fees and higher investment banking income. The allocated provision for credit losses decreased due to a decline in net charge-offs. Noninterest expense increased due to higher personnel expense primarily resulting from increased incentive expense. The provision for income taxes declined primarily due to a lower tax rate.

FS&CF average loans and leases held for investment increased $2.3 billion, or 9.5%, compared to the earlier quarter. Corporate Banking's average loans and leases held for investment increased $890 million, or 6.2%, compared to the earlier quarter, while BB&T Wealth's average loans and leases held for investment increased $271 million, or 17.1%. Average loans and leases held for investment at Governmental Finance increased $598 million, or 13.0%, compared to the earlier quarter and increased 14.5% and 14.0%, respectively, for Equipment Finance and Grandbridge.

FS&CF average total deposits decreased $3.7 million, or 11.5%, compared to the earlier quarter, primarily driven by an initiative to reduce non-core deposits that were indexed to LIBOR.

Insurance Holdings and Premium Finance

BB&T's insurance agency / brokerage network is the fifth largest in the world. IH&PF provides property and casualty, employee benefits and life insurance to businesses and individuals. It also provides small business and corporate services, such as workers compensation and professional liability, as well as surety coverage and title insurance. Additionally, IH&PF includes commercial and retail insurance premium finance.

IH&PF net income was $62 million for the first quarter of 2018, an increase of $12 million compared to the earlier quarter. Noninterest income decreased $24 million primarily due to lower performance-based commissions.

Noninterest expense decreased $25 million primarily due to declines in business referral expense, merger-related and restructuring charges and personnel expense. The provision for income taxes decreased compared to the earlier quarter due to a lower tax rate.

Other, Treasury & Corporate

Net income in OT&C can vary due to the changing needs of the Corporation, including the size of the investment portfolio, the need for wholesale funding and income received from derivatives used to hedge the balance sheet.

OT&C generated a net loss of $9 million in the first quarter of 2018, compared to a net loss of $182 million in the earlier quarter. Segment net interest income decreased $21 million primarily due to an increase in the rate and average balances for long-term debt. The allocated provision for credit losses decreased due to a decline in the provision for PCI loans and a decrease in the provision for unfunded lending commitments. Noninterest expense decreased $352 million due to a $392 million loss on the early extinguishment of debt in the earlier period, partially offset by an increase in personnel expense due to a third quarter of 2017 change in approach for allocating capitalized loan origination costs. The benefit for income taxes fell $171 million primarily due to a decline in pre-tax loss and lower excess tax benefits from equity-based compensation plans.

Analysis of Financial Condition

Investment Activities

The total securities portfolio was $47.4 billion at March 31, 2018, compared to $47.6 billion at December 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2018, the securities portfolio included $25.0 billion of AFS securities (at fair value) and $22.4 billion of HTM securities (at amortized cost).

The effective duration of the securities portfolio was 5.1 years at March 31, 2018, compared to 4.7 years at December 31, 2017. The duration of the securities portfolio excludes certain non-agency MBS.

See Note 2. Securities herein for additional disclosures related to BB&T's evaluation of securities for OTTI.

Table of Contents

Lending Activities

Loans HFI totaled $143.0 billion at March 31, 2018, compared to $143.7 billion at December 31, 2017. This decrease was primarily related to indirect loans and revolving credit loans. Management continuously evaluates the composition of the loan portfolio taking into consideration the current and expected market conditions, interest rate environment and risk profiles to optimize profitability. Based upon this evaluation, management may decide to focus efforts on growing or decreasing exposures in certain portfolios through both organic changes and portfolio acquisitions or sales.

The following table presents the composition of average loans and leases:



Table 3
Quarterly Average Balances of Loans and Leases

For the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	3/31/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2017		6/30/2017		3/31/2017
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	58,627	$	58,478	$	58,211	$	58,150	$	57,125
CRE	21,398		20,998		20,776		20,304		19,892
Lease financing	1,872		1,851		1,732		1,664		1,653
Retail:
Residential mortgage	28,824		28,559		28,924		29,392		29,701
Direct	11,791		11,901		11,960		12,000		12,014
Indirect	16,914		17,426		17,678		18,127		18,137
Revolving credit	2,798		2,759		2,668		2,612		2,607
PCI	631		689		742		825		883
Total average loans and leases HFI	$	142,855	$	142,661	$	142,691	$	143,074	$	142,012

Average loans held for investment for the first quarter of 2018 were $142.9 billion, up $194 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2017.

Average commercial and industrial loans increased $149 million, as production late in the prior quarter led to higher average balances. This was partially offset by a seasonal decline in average mortgage warehouse loans. Average CRE increased $400 million due to growth in loans for income producing properties. In addition, average residential mortgage loans increased $265 million due to a change to retain a portion of the conforming mortgage production rather than selling substantially all such production.

Average indirect retail loans decreased $512 million, primarily due to seasonality, strategic optimization and directing investments toward higher-yielding assets.

Table of Contents

Asset Quality

The following tables summarize asset quality information for the past five quarters:



Table 4
Asset Quality

(Dollars in millions)	3/31/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2017		6/30/2017		3/31/2017
NPAs (1)
NPLs:
Commercial and industrial	$	257	$	259	$	288	$	300	$	355
CRE	67		45		41		50		60
Lease financing	13		1		2		3		4
Residential mortgage	127		129		141		131		172
Direct	64		64		64		65		66
Indirect	74		72		70		63		66
Total nonaccrual loans and leases HFI (1)(2)	602		570		606		612		723
Foreclosed real estate	40		32		46		48		49
Other foreclosed property	27		25		28		30		29
Total nonperforming assets (1)(2)	$	669	$	627	$	680	$	690	$	801

Performing TDRs (3):
Commercial and industrial	$	38	$	50	$	62	$	50	$	51
CRE	12		16		22		24		25
Residential mortgage	627		605		609		603		771
Direct	59		62		63		63		65
Indirect	277		281		267		244		244
Revolving credit	29		29		29		29		29
Total performing TDRs (3)(4)	$	1,042	$	1,043	$	1,052	$	1,013	$	1,185

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing:
Commercial and industrial	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	—
CRE	—		1		—		—		—
Residential mortgage (5)	420		465		409		401		438
Direct	6		6		9		7		7
Indirect	5		6		6		4		5
Revolving credit	11		12		11		10		10
PCI	48		57		70		71		82
Total loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing (5)	$	490	$	548	$	505	$	493	$	542

Loans 30-89 days past due:
Commercial and industrial	$	31	$	41	$	47	$	32	$	36
CRE	10		8		8		3		12
Lease financing	1		4		1		2		1
Residential mortgage (6)	400		472		455		393		401
Direct	55		65		55		54		55
Indirect	272		412		358		341		251
Revolving credit	21		23		22		20		20
PCI	24		27		41		29		29
Total loans 30-89 days past due (6)	$	814	$	1,052	$	987	$	874	$	805

Excludes loans held for sale.


(1)	PCI loans are accounted for using the accretion method.


(2)	Sales of nonperforming loans totaled $33 million, $44 million, $19 million, $75 million and $74 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, September 30, 2017, June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, respectively.


(3)	Excludes TDRs that are nonperforming totaling $196 million, $189 million, $203 million, $214 million and $218 million at March 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, September 30, 2017, June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, respectively. These amounts are included in total nonperforming assets.


(4)	Sales of performing TDRs, which were primarily residential mortgage loans, totaled $29 million, $44 million, $49 million, $203 million and $48 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, September 30, 2017, June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, respectively.


(5)	Includes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that BB&T has the right but not the obligation to repurchase that are past due 90 days or more totaling $23 million, $66 million, $45 million, $32 million and $29 million at March 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, September 30, 2017, June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, respectively.


(6)	Includes government guaranteed GNMA mortgage loans that BB&T has the right but not the obligation to repurchase that are past due 30-89 days totaling $1 million, $2 million, $2 million, $2 million and $2 million at March 31, 2018, December 31, 2017, September 30, 2017, June 30, 2017 and March 31, 2017, respectively.

Table of Contents



Table 5
Asset Quality Ratios

As of / For the Three Months Ended	3/31/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2017		6/30/2017		3/31/2017
Asset Quality Ratios:
NPLs as a percentage of loans and leases HFI	0.42	%	0.40	%	0.42	%	0.43	%	0.51	%
NPAs as a percentage of:
Total assets	0.30		0.28		0.31		0.31		0.36
Loans and leases HFI plus foreclosed property	0.47		0.44		0.48		0.48		0.56
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of loans and leases HFI	0.34		0.38		0.35		0.34		0.38
Loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing as a percentage of loans and leases HFI	0.57		0.73		0.69		0.61		0.56
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans and leases HFI	0.41		0.36		0.35		0.37		0.42
ALLL as a percentage of loans and leases HFI	1.05		1.04		1.04		1.03		1.04
Ratio of ALLL to:
Net charge-offs	2.55x		2.89x		2.93x		2.80x		2.49x
NPLs	2.49x		2.62x		2.44x		2.43x		2.05x

Asset Quality Ratios (Excluding Government Guaranteed and PCI): (1)
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of loans and leases HFI	0.04	%	0.05	%	0.05	%	0.05	%	0.06	%

Applicable ratios are annualized.

(1)

This asset quality ratio has been adjusted to remove the impact of government guaranteed mortgage loans and PCI. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected in the calculation of these ratios. Management believes the inclusion of such assets in this asset quality ratio results in distortion of this ratio such that it might not be reflective of asset collectibility or might not be comparable to other periods presented or to other portfolios that do not have government guarantees or were not impacted by purchase accounting.

Nonperforming assets totaled $669 million at March 31, 2018, up $42 million compared to December 31, 2017. Nonperforming loans and leases represented 0.42% of loans and leases held for investment, a slight increase compared to December 31, 2017. The increase in nonperforming assets was primarily related to CRE lending and leasing, as well as an increase in foreclosed properties.

The following table presents activity related to NPAs:



Table 6
Rollforward of NPAs

Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017
Balance, January 1	$	627		$	813
New NPAs	363			387
Advances and principal increases	89			65
Disposals of foreclosed assets (1)	(119		)	(128		)
Disposals of NPLs (2)	(33		)	(74		)
Charge-offs and losses	(64		)	(71		)
Payments	(152		)	(147		)
Transfers to performing status	(41		)	(43		)
Other, net	(1		)	(1		)
Ending balance, March 31	$	669		$	801


(1)	Includes charge-offs and losses recorded upon sale of $23 million and $61 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.


(2)	Includes charge-offs and losses recorded upon sale of $10 million and $11 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Loans 30-89 days past due and still accruing totaled $814 million at March 31, 2018, down $238 million compared to the prior quarter. The decrease was primarily due to expected seasonality in indirect lending and residential mortgage.

Table of Contents

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing totaled $490 million at March 31, 2018, down $58 million compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to a decrease in residential mortgage loans. The ratio of loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of loans and leases was 0.34% at March 31, 2018, compared to 0.38% for the prior quarter. Excluding government guaranteed and PCI loans, the ratio of loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing as a percentage of loans and leases was 0.04% at March 31, 2018, an improvement of one basis point from the prior quarter.

Problem loans include loans on nonaccrual status or loans that are 90 days or more past due and still accruing as disclosed in Table 4. In addition, for the commercial portfolio segment, loans that are rated special mention or substandard performing are closely monitored by management as potential problem loans. Refer to Note 3. Loans and ACL herein for additional disclosures related to these potential problem loans.

Certain residential mortgage loans have an initial period where the borrower is only required to pay the periodic interest. After the interest-only period, the loan will require the payment of both interest and principal over the remaining term. At March 31, 2018, approximately $633 million of the outstanding balances of residential mortgage loans were in the interest-only phase. Approximately 96.1% of the interest-only balances will begin amortizing within the next three years.

Home equity lines, which are a component of the direct retail portfolio, generally require interest-only payments during the first 15 years after origination. After this initial period, the outstanding balance begins amortizing and requires the payment of both interest and principal. At March 31, 2018, the direct retail lending portfolio includes $8.3 billion of variable rate home equity lines and $1.0 billion of variable rate other lines of credit. Approximately $6.4 billion of the variable rate home equity lines is currently in the interest-only phase and approximately 8.5% of these balances will begin amortizing within the next three years. Approximately $913 million of the outstanding balance of variable rate other lines of credit is in the interest-only phase and 15.2% of these balances will begin amortizing within the next three years. Variable rate home equity lines and other lines of credit typically reset on a monthly basis.

TDRs occur when a borrower is experiencing, or is expected to experience, financial difficulties in the near-term and a concession has been granted to the borrower. As a result, BB&T will work with the borrower to prevent further difficulties and ultimately improve the likelihood of recovery on the loan. To facilitate this process, a concessionary modification that would not otherwise be considered may be granted, resulting in classification of the loan as a TDR. Refer to Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for additional policy information regarding TDRs.

Performing TDRs were essentially flat during the first quarter, as the commercial and industrial and CRE portfolios were down while government guaranteed residential mortgage loans increased.

The following table provides a summary of performing TDR activity:



Table 7
Rollforward of Performing TDRs

(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017
Balance, January 1	$	1,043		$	1,187
Inflows	133			180
Payments and payoffs	(42		)	(62		)
Charge-offs	(17		)	(15		)
Transfers to nonperforming TDRs, net	(27		)	(24		)
Removal due to the passage of time	(14		)	(33		)
Non-concessionary re-modifications	(5		)	—
Sold and transferred to LHFS	(29		)	(48		)
Balance, March 31	$	1,042		$	1,185

Table of Contents

The following table provides further details regarding the payment status of TDRs outstanding at March 31, 2018:



Table 8
Payment Status of TDRs

March 31, 2018					Past Due				Past Due
(Dollars in millions)	Current Status				30-89 Days				90 Days Or More				Total
Performing TDRs (1):
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial	$	38	100.0	%	$	—	—	%	$	—	—	%	$	38
CRE	12		100.0		—		—		—		—		12
Retail:
Residential mortgage	346		55.2		102		16.3		179		28.5		627
Direct	57		96.6		2		3.4		—		—		59
Indirect	239		86.3		38		13.7		—		—		277
Revolving credit	24		82.8		4		13.8		1		3.4		29
Total performing TDRs	716		68.7		146		14.0		180		17.3		1,042
Nonperforming TDRs (2)	98		50.0		28		14.3		70		35.7		196
Total TDRs	$	814	65.7		$	174	14.1		$	250	20.2		$	1,238


(1)	Past due performing TDRs are included in past due disclosures.


(2)	Nonperforming TDRs are included in NPL disclosures.

ACL

Activity related to the ACL is presented in the following tables:



Table 9
Activity in ACL

	For The Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	3/31/2018			12/31/2017			9/30/2017			6/30/2017			3/31/2017
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,609		$	1,601		$	1,602		$	1,599		$	1,599
Provision for credit losses (excluding PCI loans)	153			137			128			151			146
Provision (benefit) for PCI loans	(3		)	1			(2		)	(16		)	2
Charge-offs:
Commercial and industrial	(23		)	(23		)	(13		)	(26		)	(33		)
CRE	(6		)	(2		)	(4		)	(3		)	(1		)
Lease financing	(1		)	(1		)	(2		)	(1		)	(1		)
Residential mortgage	(4		)	(8		)	(7		)	(20		)	(12		)
Direct	(19		)	(15		)	(16		)	(16		)	(14		)
Indirect	(107		)	(104		)	(103		)	(88		)	(107		)
Revolving credit	(21		)	(19		)	(17		)	(19		)	(21		)
PCI	—			—			(1		)	—			—
Total charge-offs	(181		)	(172		)	(163		)	(173		)	(189		)
Recoveries:
Commercial and industrial	8			12			8			9			7
CRE	2			4			3			3			6
Lease financing	—			1			1			—			—
Residential mortgage	—			1			—			1			—
Direct	6			6			6			7			6
Indirect	15			13			14			16			17
Revolving credit	5			5			4			5			5
Total recoveries	36			42			36			41			41
Net charge-offs	(145		)	(130		)	(127		)	(132		)	(148		)
Balance, end of period	$	1,614		$	1,609		$	1,601		$	1,602		$	1,599

ALLL (excluding PCI loans)	$	1,473		$	1,462		$	1,451		$	1,455		$	1,441
ALLL for PCI loans	25			28			27			30			46
RUFC	116			119			123			117			112
Total ACL	$	1,614		$	1,609		$	1,601		$	1,602		$	1,599

Table of Contents

The ACL, which consists of the ALLL and the RUFC, totaled $1.6 billion at March 31, 2018, essentially flat compared to December 31, 2017.

The ALLL, excluding PCI, was $1.5 billion, up $11 million compared to December 31, 2017. The allowance for PCI loans was $25 million, down $3 million compared to December 31, 2017. As of March 31, 2018, the total allowance for loan and lease losses was 1.05% of loans and leases held for investment, compared to 1.04% at December 31, 2017. These amounts include acquired loans, which were marked to fair value and did not receive an ALLL at the acquisition date.

The ALLL was 2.49 times NPLs held for investment, compared to 2.62 times at December 31, 2017. At March 31, 2018, the ALLL was 2.55 times annualized quarterly net charge-offs, compared to 2.89 times at December 31, 2017.

Net charge-offs during the first quarter of 2018 totaled $145 million, or 0.41% of average loans and leases, compared to $148 million, or 0.42% of average loans and leases for the first quarter of 2017.

Refer to Note 3. Loans and ACL for additional disclosures.

The following table presents an allocation of the ALLL at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017. This allocation of the ALLL is calculated on an approximate basis and is not necessarily indicative of future losses or allocations. The entire amount of the allowance is available to absorb losses occurring in any category of loans and leases.



Table 10
Allocation of ALLL by Category

	March 31, 2018				December 31, 2017
(Dollars in millions)	Amount		% Loans in each category		Amount		% Loans in each category
Commercial and industrial	$	522	41.4	%	$	522	41.1	%
CRE	175		15.0		160		14.8
Lease financing	10		1.3		9		1.3
Residential mortgage	216		20.1		209		20.0
Direct	99		8.2		106		8.3
Indirect	347		11.7		348		12.0
Revolving credit	104		1.9		108		2.0
PCI	25		0.4		28		0.5
Total ALLL	1,498		100.0	%	1,490		100.0	%
RUFC	116				119
Total ACL	$	1,614			$	1,609

Deposits

Deposits totaled $158.2 billion at March 31, 2018, an increase of $825 million from December 31, 2017. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $1.3 billion and time deposits increased $555 million. These increases were partially offset by a $588 million decrease in money market and savings and a $460 million decrease in interest checking.

The following table presents the composition of average deposits for the last five quarters:



Table 11
Composition of Average Deposits

Three Months Ended
(Dollars in millions)	3/31/2018		12/31/2017		9/30/2017		6/30/2017		3/31/2017
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	53,396	$	54,288	$	53,489	$	52,573	$	51,095
Interest checking	27,270		26,746		27,000		28,849		29,578
Money market and savings	61,690		61,693		61,450		64,294		64,857
Time deposits	13,847		13,744		13,794		14,088		14,924
Foreign office deposits - interest-bearing	935		1,488		1,681		459		929
Total average deposits	$	157,138	$	157,959	$	157,414	$	160,263	$	161,383

Average deposits for the first quarter were $157.1 billion, down $821 million compared to the prior quarter. Average noninterest-bearing deposits decreased $892 million, primarily due to decreases in commercial balances, partially offset by increases in personal and public funds balances.

Table of Contents

Interest checking increased $524 million, primarily due to increases in commercial and public funds balances. Average time deposits increased $103 million primarily due to increases in commercial balances. Average foreign office deposits decreased $553 million due to changes in the overall funding mix.

Noninterest-bearing deposits represented 34.0% of total average deposits for the first quarter, compared to 34.4% for the prior quarter and 31.7% a year ago. The cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.46% for the first quarter, up six basis points compared to the prior quarter.

Borrowings

At March 31, 2018, short-term borrowings totaled $4.3 billion, a decrease of $617 million compared to December 31, 2017. Short-term borrowings fluctuate based on the Company's funding needs. Long-term debt totaled $23.4 billion at March 31, 2018, a decrease of $238 million compared to December 31, 2017.

Shareholders' Equity

Total shareholders' equity was $29.7 billion at March 31, 2018, down $33 million from December 31, 2017. Significant additions include net income of $791 million. Significant decreases include common and preferred dividends totaling $335 million, $320 million of share repurchases and the OCI net loss of $178 million, primarily due to declines in AFS securities valuations. BB&T's book value per common share at March 31, 2018 was $34.06, compared to $34.01 at December 31, 2017.

Merger-Related and Restructuring Activities

In conjunction with the consummation of an acquisition or the implementation of a restructuring initiative, BB&T typically accrues certain merger-related and restructuring expenses, which may include estimated severance and other personnel-related costs, costs to terminate lease contracts, costs related to the disposal of duplicate facilities and equipment, costs to terminate data processing contracts and other costs associated with the acquisition or restructuring activity. Merger-related and restructuring accruals are re-evaluated periodically and adjusted as necessary. The remaining accruals at March 31, 2018 are expected to be utilized within one year, unless they relate to specific contracts that expire later. The following table presents a summary of merger-related and restructuring charges and the related accruals:



Table 12
Merger-Related and Restructuring Charges and Related Accruals

(Dollars in millions)	Accrual at Jan 1, 2018		Expense		Utilized			Accrual at Mar 31, 2018
Severance and personnel-related	$	14	$	3	$	(9	)	$	8
Occupancy and equipment (1)	20		18		(19		)	19
Professional services	—		1		—			1
Systems conversion and related costs (1)	—		5		(5		)	—
Other adjustments	—		1		(1		)	—
Total	$	34	$	28	$	(34	)	$	28


(1)	Includes asset impairment charges.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting and reporting policies of BB&T are in accordance with GAAP and conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. BB&T's financial position and results of operations are affected by management's application of accounting policies, including estimates, assumptions and judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues and expenses. Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in the consolidated financial position and/or consolidated results of operations and related disclosures. The more critical accounting and reporting policies include accounting for the ACL, determining fair value of financial instruments, intangible assets, costs and benefit obligations associated with pension and postretirement benefit plans, and income taxes. Understanding BB&T's accounting policies is fundamental to understanding the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations. Accordingly, the critical accounting policies are discussed in detail in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in BB&T's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Significant accounting policies and changes in accounting principles and effects of new accounting pronouncements are discussed in detail in Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in BB&T's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Additional disclosures regarding the effects of new accounting pronouncements are included in the "Basis of Presentation" Note included herein. There have been no other changes to the significant accounting policies during 2018.

Table of Contents

Risk Management

BB&T has a strong and consistent risk culture, based on established risk values, which promotes predictable and consistent performance within an environment of open communication and effective challenge. The strong culture influences all associates in the organization daily and helps them evaluate whether risks are acceptable or unacceptable while making decisions that balance quality, profitability and growth appropriately. BB&T’s effective risk management framework establishes an environment which enables it to achieve superior performance relative to peers, ensures that BB&T is viewed among the safest of banks and assures the operational freedom to act on opportunities.

BB&T ensures that there is an appropriate return for the amount of risk taken, and that the expected return is in line with its strategic objectives and business plan. Risk-taking activities are evaluated and prioritized to identify those that present attractive risk-adjusted returns while preserving asset value. BB&T only undertakes risks that are understood and can be managed effectively. By managing risk well, BB&T ensures sufficient capital is available to maintain and grow core business operations in a safe and sound manner.

Regardless of financial gain or loss to the Company, associates are held accountable if they do not follow the established risk management policies and procedures. Compensation decisions take into account an associate’s adherence to, and successful implementation of, BB&T’s risk values. The compensation structure supports the Company’s core values and sound risk management practices in an effort to promote judicious risk-taking behavior.

BB&T’s risk culture encourages transparency and open dialogue between all levels in the performance of organizational functions, such as the development, marketing and implementation of a product or service.

The principal types of inherent risk include compliance, credit, liquidity, market, operational, reputation and strategic risks. Refer to BB&T's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for disclosures related to each of these risks under the section titled "Risk Management."

Market Risk Management

The effective management of market risk is essential to achieving BB&T’s strategic financial objectives. As a financial institution, BB&T’s most significant market risk exposure is interest rate risk in its balance sheet; however, market risk also includes product liquidity risk, price risk and volatility risk in BB&T’s BUs. The primary objectives of market risk management are to minimize any adverse effect that changes in market risk factors may have on net interest income, net income and capital and to offset the risk of price changes for certain assets recorded at fair value. At BB&T, market risk management also includes the enterprise-wide IPV function.

Interest Rate Market Risk (Other than Trading)

BB&T actively manages market risk associated with asset and liability portfolios with a focus on the strategic pricing of asset and liability accounts and management of appropriate maturity mixes of assets and liabilities. The goal of these activities is the development of appropriate maturity and repricing opportunities in BB&T’s portfolios of assets and liabilities that will produce reasonably consistent net interest income during periods of changing interest rates. These portfolios are analyzed for proper fixed-rate and variable-rate mixes under various interest rate scenarios.

The asset/liability management process is designed to achieve relatively stable NIM and assure liquidity by coordinating the volumes, maturities or repricing opportunities of earning assets, deposits and borrowed funds. Among other things, this process gives consideration to prepayment trends related to securities, loans and leases and certain deposits that have no stated maturity. Prepayment assumptions are developed using a combination of market data and internal historical prepayment experience for residential mortgage-related loans and securities, and internal historical prepayment experience for client deposits with no stated maturity and loans that are not residential mortgage related. These assumptions are subject to monthly review and adjustment, and are modified as deemed necessary to reflect changes in interest rates relative to the reference rate of the underlying assets or liabilities. On a monthly basis, BB&T evaluates the accuracy of its Simulation model, which includes an evaluation of its prepayment assumptions, to ensure that all significant assumptions inherent in the model appropriately reflect changes in the interest rate environment and related trends in prepayment activity. It is the responsibility of the MRLCC to determine and achieve the most appropriate volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as to ensure an adequate level of liquidity and capital, within the context of corporate performance goals. The MRLCC also sets policy guidelines and establishes long-term strategies with respect to interest rate risk exposure and liquidity. The MRLCC meets regularly to review BB&T’s interest rate risk and liquidity positions in relation to present and prospective market and business conditions, and adopts funding and balance sheet management strategies that are intended to ensure that the potential impacts on earnings and liquidity as a result of fluctuations in interest rates are within acceptable tolerance guidelines.

Table of Contents

BB&T uses derivatives primarily to manage economic risk related to securities, commercial loans, MSRs and mortgage banking operations, long-term debt and other funding sources. BB&T also uses derivatives to facilitate transactions on behalf of its clients. As of March 31, 2018, BB&T had derivative financial instruments outstanding with notional amounts totaling $78.6 billion, with a net fair value loss of $213 million. See Note 14. Derivative Financial Instruments for additional disclosures.

The majority of BB&T’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature and, therefore, differ greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets or inventories. Fluctuations in interest rates and actions of the FRB to regulate the availability and cost of credit have a greater effect on a financial institution’s profitability than do the effects of higher costs for goods and services. Through its balance sheet management function, which is monitored by the MRLCC, management believes that BB&T is positioned to respond to changing needs for liquidity, changes in interest rates and inflationary trends.

Management uses the Simulation to measure the sensitivity of projected earnings to changes in interest rates. The Simulation projects net interest income and interest rate risk for a rolling two-year period of time. The Simulation takes into account the current contractual agreements that BB&T has made with its customers on deposits, borrowings, loans, investments and commitments to enter into those transactions. Furthermore, the Simulation considers the impact of expected customer behavior. Management monitors BB&T’s interest sensitivity by means of a model that incorporates the current volumes, average rates earned and paid, and scheduled maturities and payments of asset and liability portfolios, together with multiple scenarios that include projected prepayments, repricing opportunities and anticipated volume growth. Using this information, the model projects earnings based on projected portfolio balances under multiple interest rate scenarios. This level of detail is needed to simulate the effect that changes in interest rates and portfolio balances may have on the earnings of BB&T. This method is subject to the accuracy of the assumptions that underlie the process, but management believes that it provides a better illustration of the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates than other analyses such as static or dynamic gap. In addition to the Simulation, BB&T uses EVE analysis to focus on projected changes in assets and liabilities given potential changes in interest rates. This measure also allows BB&T to analyze interest rate risk that falls outside the analysis window contained in the Simulation. The EVE model is a discounted cash flow of the portfolio of assets, liabilities, and derivative instruments. The difference in the present value of assets minus the present value of liabilities is defined as the economic value of equity.

The asset/liability management process requires a number of key assumptions. Management determines the most likely outlook for the economy and interest rates by analyzing external factors, including published economic projections and data, the effects of likely monetary and fiscal policies, as well as any enacted or prospective regulatory changes. BB&T’s current and prospective liquidity position, current balance sheet volumes and projected growth, accessibility of funds for short-term needs and capital maintenance are also considered. This data is combined with various interest rate scenarios to provide management with the information necessary to analyze interest sensitivity and to aid in the development of strategies to reach performance goals.

The following table shows the effect that the indicated changes in interest rates would have on net interest income as projected for the next twelve months assuming a gradual change in interest rates as described below. Key assumptions in the preparation of the table include prepayment speeds of mortgage-related and other assets, cash flows and maturities of derivative financial instruments, loan volumes and pricing, deposit sensitivity, customer preferences and capital plans. The resulting change in net interest income reflects the level of interest rate sensitivity that income has in relation to the investment, loan and deposit portfolios.



Table 13
Interest Sensitivity Simulation Analysis

Interest Rate Scenario					Annualized Hypothetical Percentage Change in Net Interest Income
Linear Change in Prime Rate	Prime Rate
Linear Change in Prime Rate	Mar 31, 2018		Mar 31, 2017		Mar 31, 2018		Mar 31, 2017
Up 200 bps	6.75	%	6.00	%	3.96	%	3.85	%
Up 100	5.75		5.00		2.53		2.61
No Change	4.75		4.00		—		—
Down 25	4.50		3.75		(1.02	)	(1.26	)
Down 100	3.75		3.00		(5.77	)	N/A

The MRLCC has established parameters related to interest sensitivity that prescribe a maximum negative impact on net interest income under different interest rate scenarios. In the event the results of the Simulation model fall outside the established parameters, management will make recommendations to the MRLCC on the most appropriate response given the current economic forecast. The following parameters and interest rate scenarios are considered BB&T’s primary measures of interest rate risk:


•	Maximum negative impact on net interest income of 2% for the next 12 months assuming a 25 basis point change in interest rates each month for four months followed by a flat interest rate scenario for the remaining eight month period.

Table of Contents


•	Maximum negative impact on net interest income of 4% for the next 12 months assuming a 25 basis point change in interest rates each month for eight months followed by a flat interest rate scenario for the remaining four month period.

If a parallel rate change of 200 basis points cannot be modeled due to a low level of rates, a proportional limit applies, and the maximum negative impact on net interest income is adjusted on a proportional basis. Regardless of the proportional limit, the negative risk exposure limit will be the greater of the 4% or the proportional limit.

Management has also established a maximum negative impact on net interest income of 4% for an immediate 100 basis points parallel change in rates and 8% for an immediate 200 basis points parallel change in rates. Management currently only models up to a negative 100 basis point decline, and the maximum negative impact on net interest income is adjusted on a proportional basis. Regardless of the proportional limit, the negative risk exposure limit will be the greater of 4% or the proportional limit. These "interest rate shock" limits are designed to create an outer band of acceptable risk based upon a significant and immediate change in rates.

Management has temporarily suspended its interest rate exposure limits to declining interest rates. As the Federal Reserve has started to raise rates, competitive pressure on deposit rates has not materialized. As a result, asset repricing in excess of liability repricing is causing the measured exposure to declining rates to increase. Management evaluates its interest rate risk position each month.

Management must also consider how the balance sheet and interest rate risk position could be impacted by changes in balance sheet mix. Liquidity in the banking industry has been very strong during the current economic cycle. Much of this liquidity increase has been due to a significant increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits. Consistent with the industry, Branch Bank has seen a significant increase in this funding source. The behavior of these deposits is one of the most important assumptions used in determining the interest rate risk position of BB&T. A loss of these deposits in the future would reduce the asset sensitivity of BB&T’s balance sheet as the Company increases interest-bearing funds to offset the loss of this advantageous funding source.

Beta represents the correlation between overall market interest rates and the rates paid by BB&T on interest-bearing deposits. BB&T applies an average beta of approximately 50% to its non-maturity interest bearing deposit accounts for determining its interest rate sensitivity. Non-maturity interest bearing deposit accounts include interest checking accounts, savings accounts, and money market accounts that do not have a contractual maturity. Due to current market conditions the actual deposit beta on non-maturity interest bearing deposits has been less than 20%; however, BB&T expects the beta to increase as rates continue to rise. BB&T regularly conducts sensitivity on other key variables to determine the impact they could have on the interest rate risk position. This allows BB&T to evaluate the likely impact on its balance sheet management strategies due to a more extreme variation in a key assumption than expected.

The following table shows the effect that the loss of demand deposits and an associated increase in managed rate deposits would have on BB&T’s interest-rate sensitivity position. For purposes of this analysis, BB&T modeled the incremental beta for the replacement of the lost demand deposits at 100%.



Table 14
Deposit Mix Sensitivity Analysis

Linear Change in Rates	Base Scenario at March 31, 2018 (1)		Results Assuming a Decrease in Noninterest Bearing Demand Deposits

			$1 Billion		$5 Billion
Up 200 bps	3.96	%	3.75	%	2.92	%
Up 100	2.53		2.40		1.89

(1) The base scenario is equal to the annualized hypothetical percentage change in net interest income at March 31, 2018 as presented in the preceding table.

If rates increased 200 basis points, BB&T could absorb the loss of $19.1billion, or 34.6%, of noninterest bearing deposits and replace them with managed rate deposits with a beta of 100% before becoming neutral to interest rate changes.

Table of Contents

The following table shows the effect that the indicated changes in interest rates would have on EVE. Key assumptions in the preparation of the table include prepayment speeds of mortgage-related and other assets, cash flows and maturities of derivative financial instruments, loan volumes and pricing and deposit sensitivity.



Table 15
EVE Simulation Analysis

Change in Interest Rates	EVE/Assets				Hypothetical Percentage Change in EVE
Change in Interest Rates	Mar 31, 2018		Mar 31, 2017		Mar 31, 2018		Mar 31, 2017
Up 200 bps	11.9	%	12.2	%	(6.7	)%	1.3	%
Up 100	12.4		12.3		(2.2	)	1.8
No Change	12.7		12.1		—		—
Down 25	12.7		11.9		(0.1	)	(1.1	)
Down 100	12.3		N/A		(3.5	)	N/A

Market Risk from Trading Activities

BB&T also manages market risk from trading activities which consists of acting as a financial intermediary to provide its customers access to derivatives, foreign exchange and securities markets. Trading market risk is managed through the use of statistical and non-statistical risk measures and limits. BB&T utilizes a historical VaR methodology to measure and aggregate risks across its covered trading BUs. This methodology uses two years of historical data to estimate economic outcomes for a one-day time horizon at a 99% confidence level. The average 99% one-day VaR and the maximum daily VaR for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, were each less than $1 million. Market risk disclosures under Basel II.5 are available in the Additional Disclosures section of the Investor Relations site on BBT.com.

Liquidity

Liquidity represents the continuing ability to meet funding needs, including deposit withdrawals, timely repayment of borrowings and other liabilities, and funding of loan commitments. In addition to the level of liquid assets, such as cash, cash equivalents and AFS securities, many other factors affect the ability to meet liquidity needs, including access to a variety of funding sources, maintaining borrowing capacity in national money markets, growing core deposits, the repayment of loans and the ability to securitize or package loans for sale.

BB&T monitors the ability to meet customer demand for funds under both normal and stressed market conditions. In considering its liquidity position, management evaluates BB&T’s funding mix based on client core funding, client rate-sensitive funding and national markets funding. In addition, management also evaluates exposure to rate-sensitive funding sources that mature in one year or less. Management also measures liquidity needs against 30 days of stressed cash outflows for Branch Bank and BB&T. To ensure a strong liquidity position, management maintains a liquid asset buffer of cash on hand and highly liquid unpledged securities. BB&T follows the FRB's enhanced prudential standards for purposes of determining the liquid asset buffer. BB&T’s policy is to use the greater of either 5% of total assets or a range of projected net cash outflows over a 30 day period. As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, BB&T's liquid asset buffer was 15.1% and 14.3%, respectively, of total assets.

BB&T is considered to be a "modified LCR" holding company. BB&T would be subject to full LCR requirements if its assets were to increase above $250 billion or if it were to be considered internationally active. BB&T produces LCR calculations to effectively manage the position of High-Quality Liquid Assets and the balance sheet deposit mix to optimize BB&T's liquidity position. BB&T's LCR was approximately 144% at March 31, 2018, compared to the regulatory minimum for such entities of 100%, which puts BB&T in full compliance with the rule. The LCR can experience volatility due to issues like maturing debt rolling into the 30 day measurement period, or client inflows and outflows. The daily change in BB&T’s LCR averaged less than 2% during 2018 with a maximum change of approximately 12%.

On April 27, 2016, the OCC, the FRB and the FDIC released a notice of proposed rulemaking for the US version of the net stable funding ratio. Under the proposal, BB&T will be a "modified NSFR" holding company. BB&T would be subject to full NSFR requirements if it has $250 billion or more in assets or $10 billion or more in total on-balance sheet foreign exposure. BB&T is evaluating the information in the proposal but does not currently expect a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

Table of Contents

Parent Company

The purpose of the Parent Company is to serve as the primary source of capital for the operating subsidiaries, with assets primarily consisting of cash on deposit with Branch Bank, equity investments in subsidiaries, advances to subsidiaries, accounts receivable from subsidiaries, and other miscellaneous assets. The principal obligations of the Parent Company are payments on long-term debt. The main sources of funds for the Parent Company are dividends and management fees from subsidiary, repayments of advances to subsidiaries, and proceeds from the issuance of equity and long-term debt. The primary uses of funds by the Parent Company are for investments in subsidiaries, advances to subsidiaries, dividend payments to common and preferred shareholders, retirement of common stock and payments on long-term debt.

Liquidity at the Parent Company is more susceptible to market disruptions. BB&T prudently manages cash levels at the Parent Company to cover a minimum of one year of projected cash outflows which includes unfunded external commitments, debt service, common and preferred dividends and scheduled debt maturities without the benefit of any new cash infusions. Generally, BB&T maintains a significant buffer above the projected one year of cash outflows. In determining the buffer, BB&T considers cash requirements for common and preferred dividends, unfunded commitments to affiliates, being a source of strength to its banking subsidiary and being able to withstand sustained market disruptions that could limit access to the capital markets. At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Parent Company had 26 months and 29 months, respectively, of cash on hand to satisfy projected contractual cash outflows, and 21 months and 23 months, respectively, taking into account common stock dividends.

Branch Bank

BB&T carefully manages liquidity risk at Branch Bank. Branch Bank’s primary source of funding is customer deposits. Continued access to customer deposits is highly dependent on the confidence the public has in the stability of the bank and its ability to return funds to the client when requested. BB&T maintains a strong focus on its reputation in the market to ensure continued access to client deposits. BB&T integrates its risk appetite into its overall risk management framework to ensure the bank does not exceed its risk tolerance through its lending and other risk taking functions and thus risk becoming undercapitalized. BB&T believes that sufficient capital is paramount to maintaining the confidence of its depositors and other funds providers. BB&T has extensive capital management processes in place to ensure it maintains sufficient capital to absorb losses and maintain a highly capitalized position that will instill confidence in the bank and allow continued access to deposits and other funding sources. Branch Bank monitors many liquidity metrics including funding concentrations, diversification, maturity distribution, contingent funding needs and ability to meet liquidity requirements under times of stress.

Branch Bank has several major sources of funding to meet its liquidity requirements, including access to capital markets through issuance of senior or subordinated bank notes and institutional CDs, access to the FHLB system, dealer repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements with commercial clients, access to the overnight and term Federal funds markets, use of a Cayman branch facility, access to retail brokered CDs and a borrower in custody program with the FRB for the discount window. At March 31, 2018, Branch Bank has approximately $80.0 billion of secured borrowing capacity, which represents approximately 7.8 times the amount of one year wholesale funding maturities.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities, Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Related Party Transactions

Refer to BB&T's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for discussion with respect to BB&T's quantitative and qualitative disclosures about its fixed and determinable contractual obligations. Additional disclosures about BB&T's contractual obligations, commitments and derivative financial instruments are included in Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies, Note 13. Fair Value Disclosures and Note 14. Derivative Financial Instruments.

Capital

The maintenance of appropriate levels of capital is a management priority and is monitored on a regular basis. BB&T’s principal goals related to the maintenance of capital are to provide adequate capital to support BB&T’s risk profile consistent with the Board-approved risk appetite, provide financial flexibility to support future growth and client needs, comply with relevant laws, regulations, and supervisory guidance, achieve optimal credit ratings for BB&T and its subsidiaries and provide a competitive return to shareholders. Risk-based capital ratios, which include CET1 capital, Tier 1 capital and Total capital are calculated based on regulatory guidance related to the measurement of capital and risk-weighted assets.

Management regularly monitors the capital position of BB&T on both a consolidated and bank level basis. In this regard, management’s overriding policy is to maintain capital at levels that are in excess of the capital targets, which are above the regulatory "well capitalized" levels. Management has implemented stressed capital ratio minimum targets to evaluate whether capital ratios calculated with planned capital actions are likely to remain above minimums specified by the FRB for the annual CCAR. Breaches of stressed minimum targets prompt a review of the planned capital actions included in BB&T’s capital plan.

Table of Contents



Table 16
Capital Under Basel III

	Minimum Capital		Well-Capitalized		Minimum Capital Plus Capital Conservation Buffer				BB&T Targets
	Minimum Capital		Well-Capitalized		2018		2019 (1)		Operating		Stressed
CET1 capital to risk-weighted assets	4.5	%	6.5	%	6.375	%	7.000	%	8.5	%	6.0	%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	6.0		8.0		7.875		8.500		10.0		7.5
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	8.0		10.0		9.875		10.500		12.0		9.5
Leverage ratio	4.0		5.0		N/A		N/A		8.0		5.5


(1)	BB&T's goal is to maintain capital levels above the 2019 requirements.

While nonrecurring events or management decisions may result in the Company temporarily falling below its operating minimum guidelines for one or more of these ratios, it is management’s intent through capital planning to return to these targeted operating minimums within a reasonable period of time. Such temporary decreases below the operating minimums shown above are not considered an infringement of BB&T’s overall capital policy, provided a return above the minimums is forecast to occur within a reasonable time period.



Table 17
Capital Ratios (1)

(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)	Mar 31, 2018			Dec 31, 2017
Risk-based:
CET1 capital to risk-weighted assets	10.2		%	10.2		%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	12.0			11.9
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	14.0			13.9
Leverage ratio	9.9			9.9

Non-GAAP capital measure (2):
Tangible common equity per common share	$	20.86		$	20.80

Calculation of tangible common equity (2):
Total shareholders' equity	$	29,662		$	29,695
Less:
Preferred stock	3,053			3,053
Noncontrolling interests	50			47
Intangible assets	10,296			10,329
Tangible common equity	$	16,263		$	16,266

Risk-weighted assets	$	176,948		$	177,217
Common shares outstanding at end of period	779,752			782,006


(1)	Current quarter regulatory capital information is preliminary.

(2)

Tangible common equity and related measures are non-GAAP measures that exclude the impact of intangible assets and their related amortization. These measures are useful for evaluating the performance of a business consistently, whether acquired or developed internally. BB&T's management uses these measures to assess the quality of capital and returns relative to balance sheet risk and believes investors may find them useful in their analysis of the Corporation. These capital measures are not necessarily comparable to similar capital measures that may be presented by other companies.

Capital levels remained strong at March 31, 2018. BB&T declared total common dividends of $0.375 per share (up 13.6% from the fourth quarter) during the first quarter of 2018, which resulted in a dividend payout ratio of 39.2%. The Company also completed $320 million of share repurchases during the first quarter of 2018, which resulted in a total payout ratio of 82.1%.

Table of Contents

Share Repurchase Activity



Table 18
Share Repurchase Activity

(Dollars in millions, except per share data, shares in thousands)	Total Shares Repurchased	Average Price Paid Per Share (1)		Total Shares Repurchased Pursuant to Publicly-Announced Plan (2)	Maximum Remaining Dollar Value of Shares Available for Repurchase Pursuant to Publicly-Announced Plan
January 2018	4,759	$	54.67	4,757	$	380
February 2018	1,129	54.67		1,096	320
March 2018	25	54.62		—	320
Total	5,913	54.67		5,853


(1)	Excludes commissions.


(2)	Pursuant to the 2017 Repurchase Plan, announced on June 28, 2017, authorizing up to $1.88 billion of share repurchases over a one-year period ending June 30, 2018. In November 2017, the amount authorized was increased $53 million to $1.93 billion for the same one-year period.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Refer to "Market Risk Management" in the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" section herein.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the management of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Refer to the "Commitments and Contingencies" note in the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements."

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in BB&T's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to BB&T or that management has deemed to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect BB&T's business, financial condition, and/or operating results.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(c) Refer to "Share Repurchase Activity" in the "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" section herein.

Table of Contents



ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.	Description	Location
10.1*	Form of LTIP Award Agreement for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan (effective 2018).	Filed herewith.
10.2*	Form of Performance Unit Award Agreement for the BB&T Corporation 2012 Incentive Plan (effective 2018).	Filed herewith.
12†	Statement re: Computation of Ratios.	Filed herewith.
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith.
32	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.	Filed herewith.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.	Filed herewith.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.	Filed herewith.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.	Filed herewith.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.	Filed herewith.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase.	Filed herewith.

* Management compensatory plan or arrangement.

† Exhibit filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available upon request.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		BB&T CORPORATION (Registrant)

Date:	April 30, 2018	By:	/s/ Daryl N. Bible
			Daryl N. Bible
			Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer)

Date:	April 30, 2018	By:	/s/ Cynthia B. Powell
			Cynthia B. Powell
			Executive Vice President and Corporate Controller
			(Principal Accounting Officer)