TSS, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
or
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ___________to ____________
Commission
file number: 000-51426
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
20-2027651
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
7226
Lee DeForest Drive, Suite 203
Columbia,
MD 21046
|
|
21046
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(410)
423-7438
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months
(or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicated
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common
Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, as of October 31,
2008 12,557,669
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
Table
of Contents
|
Page
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 (unaudited) and as of December
31,
2007
|
1
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and nine months
ended
September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 (successor) and for the
period
from January 1, 2007 to January 19, 2007 (predecessor)
|
2
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and September 30, 2007 (successor) and for the period from
January 1, 2007 to January 19, 2007 (predecessor)
|
3
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
4
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
Item
1A. Risk Factors
|
22
|
|
|
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds
|
22
|
|
|
Item
3. Defaults upon Senior
Securities
|
23
|
|
|
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of
Security Holders
|
23
|
|
|
Item
5. Other
Information
|
23
|
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
23
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
24
|
Item
1. Financial Statements
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
(audited)
|
||||||
Current
Assets
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
6,856,253
|
$
|
13,172,210
|
|||
Contract
and other receivables, net
|
20,932,470
|
18,349,140
|
|||||
Costs
and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted
contracts
|
4,721,578
|
1,322,254
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
499,497
|
301,487
|
|||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
893,322
|
893,322
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
33,903,120
|
34,038,413
|
|||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
903,669
|
1,044,545
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
18,813,509
|
20,714,967
|
|||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
19,838,552
|
21,089,136
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
150,973
|
512,000
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
73,609,823
|
$
|
77,399,061
|
|||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Notes
payable, current portion
|
$
|
182,384
|
$
|
1,650,306
|
|||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
16,266,264
|
16,121,492
|
|||||
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts
|
11,145,410
|
3,880,279
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
27,594,058
|
21,652,077
|
|||||
Notes
payable, less current portion
|
4,230,013
|
7,848,661
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
59,960
|
44,648
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
31,884,031
|
29,545,386
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock- $.0001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
or
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock—$.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 12,730,629 and
12,150,400 issued; 12,557,669 and 11,992,325 outstanding at September
30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
|
1,273
|
1,214
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
60,699,980
|
55,268,012
|
|||||
Treasury
stock, 172,960 and 158,075 shares at cost at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively
|
(861,663
|
)
|
(814,198
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(18,113,798
|
)
|
(6,601,353
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
41,725,792
|
47,853,675
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
73,609,823
|
$
|
77,399,061
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
1
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Predecessor
|
||||||||||||||||
Successor (Fortress International Group, Inc.)
|
(TSS/Vortech)
|
|||||||||||||||
For the period
|
||||||||||||||||
|
January 1,
|
|||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
through
|
||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008
|
September 30,2007
|
September 30, 2008
|
September 30,2007
|
January 19, 2007
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(unaudited)
|
(audited)
|
||||||||||||
Results
of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
25,781,523
|
$
|
12,692,772
|
$
|
65,363,481
|
$
|
32,232,016
|
$
|
1,412,137
|
||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
20,660,103
|
10,749,331
|
54,719,170
|
27,378,926
|
1,108,276
|
|||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
5,121,420
|
1,943,441
|
10,644,311
|
4,853,090
|
303,861
|
|||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
4,838,291
|
3,964,468
|
15,275,116
|
10,026,448
|
555,103
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
|
125,716
|
137,032
|
355,810
|
289,708
|
33,660
|
|||||||||||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
702,569
|
567,109
|
2,104,067
|
1,574,671
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Impairment
loss on goodwill
|
2,973,000
|
-
|
4,190,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating costs
|
8,639,576
|
4,668,609
|
21,924,993
|
11,890,827
|
588,763
|
|||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(3,518,156
|
)
|
(2,725,168
|
)
|
(11,280,682
|
)
|
(7,037,737
|
)
|
(284,902
|
)
|
||||||
Interest
income (expense), net
|
(49,653
|
)
|
104,116
|
(194,661
|
)
|
476,388
|
3,749
|
|||||||||
Loss
from operations before income taxes
|
(3,567,809
|
)
|
(2,621,052
|
)
|
(11,475,343
|
)
|
(6,561,349
|
)
|
(281,153
|
)
|
||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(349,898
|
)
|
-
|
37,102
|
(349,325
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(3,217,911
|
)
|
$
|
(2,621,052
|
)
|
$
|
(11,512,445
|
)
|
$
|
(6,212,024
|
)
|
$
|
(281,153
|
)
|
|
Per
Common Share (Basic and Diluted):
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
and diluted net loss
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding-basic and diluted
|
12,326,397
|
11,715,512
|
12,164,454
|
11,743,186
|
-
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
2
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Successor (Fortress International Group, Inc.)
|
Predecessor
|
|||||||||
|
(TSS/Vortech)
|
|||||||||
For the period
|
||||||||||
January 1,
|
||||||||||
Nine Months Ended
|
through
|
|||||||||
September 30, 2008
|
September 30, 2007
|
January 19, 2007
|
||||||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(11,512,445
|
)
|
$
|
(6,212,024
|
)
|
$
|
(281,153
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
|
||||||||||
(used
in) operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
355,810
|
289,708
|
33,660
|
|||||||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
2,491,477
|
1,891,419
|
-
|
|||||||
Impairment
loss on goodwill
|
4,190,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
119,728
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Stock
and warrant-based compensation
|
1,469,252
|
999,196
|
-
|
|||||||
Benefit
from income taxes
|
-
|
490,675
|
-
|
|||||||
Other
non-cash income, net
|
15,312
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effects from acquisitions:
|
||||||||||
Contracts
and other receivables
|
(2,315,446
|
)
|
(2,293,228
|
)
|
3,698,863
|
|||||
Costs
and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
|
(3,399,324
|
)
|
(2,443,158
|
)
|
(1,078,505
|
)
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(197,902
|
)
|
(294,911
|
)
|
(108,618
|
)
|
||||
Due
from affiliates
|
-
|
-
|
519,923
|
|||||||
Other
assets
|
256,571
|
(1,076,125
|
)
|
(42,968
|
)
|
|||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(124,199
|
)
|
3,464,210
|
(1,861,306
|
)
|
|||||
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
|
||||||||||
uncompleted
contracts
|
6,755,014
|
151,894
|
419,676
|
|||||||
Other
liabilities
|
-
|
(586,283
|
)
|
(643,571
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(1,896,152
|
)
|
(5,618,627
|
)
|
656,001
|
|||||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(214,935
|
)
|
(338,547
|
)
|
(127,602
|
)
|
||||
Sale
of investments held in trust
|
-
|
44,673,994
|
-
|
|||||||
Purchase
of TSS/Vortech, net of cash acquired
|
-
|
(9,677,683
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Purchase
of SMLB, net of cash acquired
|
(2,094,561
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Purchase
of Comm Site of South Florida, Inc, net of cash acquired
|
-
|
(135,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Purchase
of Innovative Power Solutions
|
-
|
(1,502,032
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Deferred
acquistion costs
|
(21,785
|
)
|
(1,031,472
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(2,331,281
|
)
|
31,989,260
|
(127,602
|
)
|
|||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||
Payments
on notes payable
|
(84,065
|
)
|
(51,494
|
)
|
(6,281
|
)
|
||||
Payments
on Rubicon seller notes
|
(1,956,994
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Payment
on promissory note payable to officer
|
-
|
(2,000,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Payment
on shareholder advance
|
-
|
(20,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Payment
to shareholders electing to redeem their shares in
|
||||||||||
connection
with the TSS/Vortech acquisition
|
-
|
(4,340,013
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Repurchase
of treasury stock
|
(47,465
|
)
|
(2,036,015
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Members'
distributions
|
-
|
-
|
(1,561,639
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(2,088,524
|
)
|
(8,447,522
|
)
|
(1,567,920
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
(6,315,957
|
)
|
17,923,111
|
(1,039,521
|
)
|
|||||
Cash,
beginning of period
|
13,172,210
|
7,347
|
2,361,838
|
|||||||
Cash,
end of period
|
$
|
6,856,253
|
$
|
17,930,458
|
$
|
1,322,317
|
||||
|
||||||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$
|
377,196
|
$
|
416,417
|
$
|
368
|
||||
Cash
paid for taxes
|
24,602
|
593,166
|
-
|
|||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
|
||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with the acquisition of SMLB
|
500,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with the acquistion of TSS/Vortech
|
-
|
14,211,359
|
-
|
|||||||
Issuance
of common stock in connection with the acquistion of
Innovative
|
-
|
150,000
|
||||||||
Promissory
notes payable issued in connection with the acquistion of SMLB
|
15,248
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Promissory
notes payable issued in connection with the acquistion of Rubicon
|
439,241
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Promissory
notes payable issued in connection with the acquistion of TSS/Vortech
|
-
|
10,000,000
|
-
|
|||||||
Prommissory
notes payable issued in connection with the acquistion of
Innovative
|
-
|
300,000
|
-
|
|||||||
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
|
||||||||||
Promissory
notes payable issued to officers converted to common stock
|
3,500,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Discount
received on note repayment from officer
|
-
|
500,000
|
-
|
|||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Except
for the balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and the
results of operations of our Predecessor Company for the period from January
1,
2007 through January 19, 2007, which are derived from audited financial
statements, the accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited.
In
the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of
such financial position and results of operations have been included. All such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Interim results are not
necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
The
consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities
and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and do not contain certain information included in
the Company’s annual financial statements and notes. These financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements
and the notes thereto filed with the SEC in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as amended.
Nature
of Business and Organization
The
Company provides a single source solution for highly technical mission-critical
facilities such as data centers, operations centers, network facilities, server
rooms, security operations centers, communications facilities and the
infrastructure systems that are critical to their function. The Company’s
services consist of technology consulting, design and engineering, construction
management, systems installation and facilities management.
The
Company was incorporated in Delaware on December 20, 2004 under the name
“Fortress America Acquisition Corporation” as a special purpose acquisition
company for the purpose of acquiring an operating business that performs
services in the homeland security industry.
On
July
20, 2005, we closed our initial public offering (“IPO”) of 7,800,000 units,
including an over-allotment option of 800,000 units, with each unit consisting
of one share of our common stock and two warrants (each to purchase one share
of
common stock at $5.00). Of the total IPO proceeds of $43,183,521, net of
issuance costs, $41,964,000 were placed into a trust fund (“Trust”)
and the remaining $1,219,521 were available to fund operations in the pursuit
of
acquiring a company.
On
January 19, 2007, the Company acquired all of the outstanding interest in
TSS/Vortech in exchange for a combination of cash, the Company’s common stock,
and issuance of two convertible notes (See Note 10). The acquisition
fundamentally transformed the Company from a firm primarily investing capital
to
an operating business. Concurrent with the acquisition, the Company changed
its
name to Fortress International Group, Inc.
After
acquiring TSS/Vortech during 2007, the Company continued its expansion through
the acquisitions of Comm Site of South Florida, Inc. (“Comm Site”),
Innovative Power Systems, Inc. and Quality Power Systems, Inc. (“Innovative”)
and Rubicon Integration, LLC. (“Rubicon”). On January 2, 2008, the Company
acquired SMLB, Ltd. to continue its footprint expansion with complementary
service offerings. As applicable, the Company also acquired these companies’
operating subsidiaries. The results of operations, cash flows and financial
position attributable to these acquisitions are included in the consolidated
financial statements from the respective dates of their acquisition (See
Note 4). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3, “Determining the Fair
Value of a Financial Asset When the Market of that Asset is not Active” (“FSP
157-3”). FSP 157-3 provides an example that clarifies and reiterates certain
provisions of the existing fair value standard, including basing fair value
on
orderly transactions and usage of management and broker inputs. FSP 157-3 is
effective immediately but is not expected to have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
In
May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No.
163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts” (“SFAS 163”). SFAS
163 requires recognition of a claim liability prior to an event of default
when
there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial
obligation. SFAS 163 clarifies how FAS 60 applies to financial guarantee
insurance contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to
account for premium revenue and claim liabilities and requires expanded
disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. SFAS 163 is
effective January 1, 2009. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS
163 to have a material effect on its consolidated results of operations and
financial condition.
4
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In
May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the
sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles
used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities
that
are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (the
GAAP hierarchy). SFAS No. 162 will become effective 60 days
following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material effect on its
consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In April
2008, FASB issued a Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets,” (“FSP 142-3”) which amends the factors a
company should consider when developing renewal assumptions used to determine
the useful life of an intangible asset under SFAS 142. FSP 142-3 replaces the
previous useful life criteria with a new requirement-that an entity consider
its
own historical experience in renewing similar arrangements. In issuing FSP
142-3, the FASB hopes to improve the consistency between the useful life of
a
recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value of the asset. FAS 142-3 is effective January 1, 2009.
The
Company is currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of FAS 142-3
may have on its financial statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS
No. 161, “ Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” (“SFAS No. 161”) which requires
additional disclosures about the objectives of the derivative instruments and
hedging activities, the method of accounting for such instruments under SFAS
No. 133 and its related interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of the
effects of such instruments and related hedged items on our financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective beginning
January 1, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact
that adoption of SFAS No. 161 may have on its financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “ Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51,” (“SFAS No.
160”) which changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests.
Minority interests will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and
will
be reported as a component of equity separate from the parent’s equity, and
purchases or sales of equity interests that do not result in a change in control
will be accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, net income
attributable to the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated
net
income on the face of the income statement and, upon a loss of control, the
interest sold, as well as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value
with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective for
us beginning January 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively, except for the
presentation and disclosure requirements, which will apply retrospectively.
The
Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material effect
on its consolidated results of operation of financial condition.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations,”
(“SFAS No. 141R”) which replaces SFAS No. 141. The statement retains the
purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but requires a number of
changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are recognized
in
the purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization
of
in-process research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing
of
acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R is effective for the
Company beginning January 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively to business
combinations completed on or after that date.
5
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(2)
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
During
the second quarter 2008 and included in the nine months ended September 30,
2008, the Company recognized a $0.7 million loss on customer contract due to
concerns as to whether the amounts were collectible. As such, the Company has
not recorded any revenue related to this contract and we will recognize revenue
for this customer based on cash collections. The Company is owed $1.3 million
from this customer of which $0.8 million will be recognized upon cash collection
and the remaining $0.5 million reduced the unsecured, promissory notes payable
to the sellers of SMLB (seller note). The seller note reduction was pursuant
to
the working capital adjustment pursuant to terms of the SMLB purchase agreement.
Contract costs totaling $0.7 million were fully recognized in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. In the event the $1.3 million is collected, the
Company will recognize revenue of $0.8 million and the seller note will be
increased by $0.5 million.
As
of
September 30, 2008, accounts receivable of $1.4 million is due from a customer
to whom the Company has offered extended payment terms. The customer has
executed a promissory note in the same amount bearing interest at 8% per annum
with payments of interest only due monthly and the balance in full is due on
December 15, 2008. This amount was recognized as revenue during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. The Company has a history of conducting business
with
this customer and therefore believes collectibility is reasonably assured.
(3)
|
Customer
Concentration
|
The
Company earned approximately 39% of its revenue from two customers for the
nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Accounts receivable from these customers at
September 30, 2008 was $7.9 million. For the nine months ended September 30,
2007, the Company earned approximately 30% of its revenue from two customers.
(4)
|
Acquisitions
|
In
2007,
the Company transitioned from a special purpose acquisition company to an
operating entity with its purchase of TSS/Vortech. The Company has continued
its
strategy to build on to the TSS/Vortech operations through acquisitions that
expand geographical reach, add complementary services and access new key
customers for additional selling opportunities. All of the acquisitions have
been accounted for using purchase accounting. The results of operations
attributable to each acquisition are included in the consolidated financial
statements from the date of acquisition. The value of the Company’s common stock
issued in connection with the acquisitions was determined based on the five
day
average closing price of the Company’s common stock beginning two days before
through two days after the announcement date multiplied by the number of shares
issued.
2008
Acquisition
SMLB,
Ltd.
On
January 2, 2008, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of SMLB,
Ltd., which provides consulting and construction management services for the
mission-critical facilities in the Chicago area. The closing consideration
consisted of (i) $2,094,561 in cash, including acquisition costs of $151,133
and
net of acquired cash of $56,573, subject to certain adjustment to be determined
subsequent to the closing of the acquisition, as provided in the purchase
agreement, (ii) 96,896 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at
approximately $500,000, (iii) $500,000 in unsecured promissory notes
bearing interest at 6% per annum, and (iv) additional earn-out amounts up to
a
maximum of $600,000, contingent upon the achievement of certain earnings targets
by SMLB for each of the calendar years 2008-2009.
All
of
the shares issued to the selling members were placed into escrow to secure
the
rights of Fortress under the acquisition. These shares will be released subject
to certain conditions under the agreements twelve months from the acquisition
date. During the second quarter 2008, the unsecured promissory note of $500,000
was reduced to $15,248 based on a working capital adjustment per the purchase
agreement.
The
Company paid a premium (i.e., goodwill) over the fair value of the net tangible
and preliminarily identified intangible assets acquired for a number of reasons,
including SMLB’s complementary experience, key customer relationships in an
expanded market, and service offerings in the mission-critical facility
industry. The Company recorded goodwill totaling $2.7 million associated with
the SMLB acquisition, which is not expected to be deductible for income tax
purposes.
6
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The
adjusted fair values of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed for
SMLB
is as follows:
SMLB
|
||||
Cash
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
||
Common
stock
|
462,775
|
|||
Promissory
notes to sellers
|
15,248
|
|||
Acquistion
costs
|
151,133
|
|||
Total
purchase price
|
$
|
2,629,156
|
||
Cash
and equivalents
|
$
|
56,573
|
||
Contracts
and other receivables
|
387,612
|
|||
Goodwill
|
2,693,060
|
|||
Identifiable
intangibles, net
|
271,000
|
|||
Total
assets acquired
|
$
|
3,408,245
|
||
Liabilities
|
||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
137,309
|
||
Income
taxes payable
|
131,662
|
|||
Billings
in excess of costs
|
510,117
|
|||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
779,089
|
|||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
2,629,156
|
2007
Acquisitions
Rubicon
Integration, LLC
During
the first quarter of 2008, the Company finalized its purchase price allocation
associated with Rubicon, resulting in an increase in the value of customer
relationship intangibles of $1.0 million and a corresponding decrease in
goodwill.
During
the second quarter of 2008, Rubicon achieved certain 2008 revenue bookings
targets through June 30, 2008, which entitled the sellers under the purchase
agreement to an unsecured promissory note of $0.4 million and resulted in a
corresponding increase in goodwill (see Note 10). The Company recorded
indefinite lived intangibles totaling $3.9 million associated with Rubicon
transaction, of which $2.3 million is expected to be deductible for
income tax purposes.
TSS/Vortech
During
the third quarter of 2008, shares issued to the selling members of TSS/Vortech
were released from escrow. As of September 30, 2008, TSS/Vortech recorded
indefinite lived intangibles were $16.5 million, of which $12.7 million is
expected to be deductible for income taxes.
Purchase
Price Allocation
Under
business combination accounting, the purchase price for each of the acquired
companies, Rubicon and SMLB, was allocated to the net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition
dates. The allocation of the purchase price was based upon valuations performed
for each of the acquired companies. Subject to adjustment associated with
working capital requirements and contingent consideration issuable upon
achievement of certain financial targets, we finalized
the Rubicon valuation in the first quarter of 2008 and SMLB
during the second quarter 2008.
The
valuations indicated that the estimated fair value of the assets acquired was
less than the total of the purchase price paid and the liabilities assumed
in
the transactions. As a result, the excess purchase price was assigned to
goodwill for each acquisition. The Company recorded goodwill associated with
its
acquisitions of SMLB and Rubicon totaling $6.1 million of which $2.3 million
is
expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
7
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Tangible
and Other Intangible Long-Lived Assets
In
performing the purchase price allocation for each acquired company, the Company
considered, among other factors, the intention for future use of acquired
assets, analysis of historical financial performance and estimates of future
performance of each acquired company’s products. The fair value of assets was
based, in part, on a valuation using either a cost, income, or in some cases,
market valuation approach and estimates and assumptions provided by management.
The tangible assets primarily include personal property such as computers,
software and service vehicles. Intangible assets consist primarily of customer
relationships, order backlog and trade name.
SMLB
|
Rubicon
|
Innovative
|
TSS/Vortech
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Intangible
asset:
|
||||||||||||||||
Trade
name
|
$
|
36,000
|
$
|
460,000
|
$
|
60,000
|
$
|
4,930,000
|
$
|
5,486,000
|
||||||
In-place
contracts
|
230,000
|
50,000
|
350,000
|
406,201
|
1,036,201
|
|||||||||||
Customer
relationships
|
-
|
2,970,000
|
560,000
|
14,100,000
|
17,630,000
|
|||||||||||
Non
competition agreement
|
5,000
|
685,000
|
50,600
|
-
|
740,600
|
|||||||||||
Total
intangible
|
271,000
|
4,165,000
|
1,020,600
|
19,436,201
|
24,892,801
|
|||||||||||
Accumulated
amortization
|
(152,122
|
)
|
(822,131
|
)
|
(382,483
|
)
|
(3,697,513
|
)
|
(5,054,249
|
)
|
||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
$
|
118,878
|
$
|
3,342,869
|
$
|
638,117
|
$
|
15,738,688
|
$
|
19,838,552
|
Impairment
The
Company has not realized the anticipated revenue from customers acquired in
its
acquisitions and had experienced continued operating losses during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008. Based on the recurring operating losses and
a
revision to the Company’s forecast during the second quarter of 2008, the
Company conducted analyses of the operations in order to identify any impairment
in the carrying value of the goodwill related to the business. During the third
quarter 2008, the Company’s market value declined further and we conducted
additional analysis, which contemplated the market condition occurring through
the third quarter. The analyses of the business using both an income approach
and a market approach determined that the carrying value exceeded the current
fair value of the business, resulting in goodwill impairment of $3.0 million
for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and $4.2 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2008, the adjusted carrying value
of
goodwill was $18.8 million.
For
the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, amortization
expense totaling $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively, has been included
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related to the above
intangibles of which $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, is included
in
cost of revenue.
For
the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, amortization
expense totaling $2.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively, has been
included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related
to
the above intangibles of which $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively,
is included in cost of revenue.
Proforma
Results
Unaudited pro
forma results of operations are as follows. The amounts are shown as if the
acquisitions had occurred at the beginning of the periods
presented:
Three Months
|
Nine Months
|
||||||
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
|||||
September 30, 2007
|
September 30, 2007
|
||||||
Proforma
revenue
|
$
|
15,894,628
|
$
|
44,642,765
|
|||
Proforma
operating loss
|
(2,052,390
|
)
|
(5,707,428
|
)
|
|||
Proforma
pretax loss
|
(2,068,684
|
)
|
(5,681,989
|
)
|
|||
Proforma
net loss
|
(2,515,304
|
)
|
(5,596,968
|
)
|
|||
Pro
forma basic and diluted net loss per share
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
$
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average common shares
|
12,039,904
|
12,520,861
|
This
information is not necessarily indicative of the operational results that would
have occurred if the acquisition had been consummated on the dates indicated
nor
is it necessarily indicative of future operating results of the combined
enterprise.
8
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(5)
|
Basic
and Diluted Net Loss per
Share
|
Basic
and
diluted net loss per common share is computed as follows:
Successor
|
|||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(3,217,911
|
)
|
$
|
(2,621,052
|
)
|
$
|
(11,512,445
|
)
|
$
|
(6,212,024
|
)
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares
|
12,326,397
|
11,715,512
|
12,164,454
|
11,743,186
|
|||||||||
Net
loss per share
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
$
|
(0.22
|
)
|
$
|
(0.95
|
)
|
$
|
(0.53
|
)
|
As
of September 30, 2008, there were unvested restricted stock, options to purchase
units and warrants outstanding to purchase a total of 18,165,634 shares of
common stock and convertible unsecured promissory notes convertible into 533,333
shares of common stock. These were excluded in the computation of diluted
net loss per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
No
weighted average common shares or income (loss) per share amounts are shown
for
the Predecessor since the Predecessor was limited liability company whose
capital structure consisted of membership interests.
(6)
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Restricted
Stock
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company
granted 132,000 and 770,832 restricted common shares,
respectively, under the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (“Plan”).
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the weighted average fair
value
of these grants was $4.53 per share.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, non-cash
compensation expense totaling $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively,
has
been included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related
to vesting of awards, of which $0.1 million and zero, respectively, is in
cost of revenue.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30, 2007, non-cash
compensation expense totaling $1.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively,
has
been included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations related
to vesting of awards, of which $0.3 million and zero, respectively, is in cost
of revenue. There was no other restricted stock activity.
(7)
|
Common
Stock Repurchases
|
During
the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company repurchased 8,895
treasury shares with an aggregate value of $20,322 associated with vesting
restricted stock of an employee. During the nine months ended September 30,
2008, the Company repurchased 14,885 treasury shares with an aggregate value
of
$47,465 associated with vesting restricted stock of an employee. The
Company paid the employee’s related taxes associated with the employee’s
vested stock and decreased the shares issued to the employee by a corresponding
value, resulting in a share issuance net of taxes to employee. The value of
the
shares netted for employee taxes represents treasury stock repurchased. There
were no similar repurchases during 2007.
Prior
to
the consummation of the acquisition of TSS/Vortech, the Company announced and
implemented a common stock repurchase program under which it may purchase up
to
3,000,000 shares of common stock. Currently the Board of Directors has
authorized the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares under this program.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company repurchased 354,775
of the Company’s common shares valued in aggregate at $1.9 million. The plan was
suspended in the third quarter of 2007; accordingly, there has been no activity
under the plan in 2008.
In
January 2007, the Company repurchased 756,100 shares at an aggregate value
of $4.3 million from those shareholders that voted against the acquisition
of TSS/Vortech and requested that their shares be redeemed at the then per
share
trust value of $5.74 per share.
9
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(8)
|
Options
to Purchase Units and
Warrants
|
At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were outstanding options to
purchase units and warrants to purchase 17,810,300 of common shares. Both the
option to purchase units and warrants have a cashless exercise feature, whereby
the holder may elect to receive a net amount of shares and forego the payment
of
the strike price.
In
February 2007, the Company entered into a one year agreement with an advisor
in
which we were obligated to issue a warrant for the purchase of 125,000 shares
of
our common stock, in exchange for consulting services. The fair value of these
warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model and is recognized over
the
term of the agreement. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
the computed Black-Scholes value of the warrant remained unchanged and decreased
by $141,422, respectively, resulting in a corresponding decrease in selling,
general and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recognized
$213,000 in selling, general and administrative expense associated with the
warrant.
(9)
|
Income
Taxes
|
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting
for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”),. APB
No.
28, Interim
Financial Reporting,
and
FASB Interpretation No. 18, “Accounting
for Income Taxes in Interim Periods.”
Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the
financial reporting and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected
to reverse.
The
Company’s provision for income taxes reflects the establishment of a full
valuation allowance against deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2008. SFAS
No. 109 requires management to evaluate its deferred tax assets on a regular
basis to reduce them to an amount that is realizable on a more likely than
not
basis.
The
Company is in a net operating loss carryover position. The net operating losses
not utilized can be carried forward for 20 years to offset future taxable
income. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded a
partial valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, as the
Company concluded that under relevant accounting standards, it is more
likely than not that a portion of deferred tax assets will be not be
realizable.
Under
SFAS No. 109, the Company evaluated available evidence to determine whether
a
full or partial valuation allowance of deferred tax assets should be recorded.
As of September 30, 2008, cumulative losses in recent periods is evidence to
support the need for a valuation allowance. Such evidence outweighs projections
of future taxable income that may support the realization of deferred tax
assets.
The
Company is expected to record future deferred tax expense, primarily as the
result of tax amortization resulting from the purchases of TSS/Vortech and
Rubicon. Under SFAS No. 109, tax amortization on indefinite lived assets
(goodwill and other intangibles) may not be offset by deferred tax assets that
are not currently realizable, primarily deferred tax assets relating to net
operating loss carryovers, because of valuation allowances.
The
Company has recorded an income tax benefit of $349,898 for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 which consists of income taxes currently payable of
$37,102 net of a reduction in deferred tax liabilities of $387,000. For the
nine
months ended September 30, 2008, income expense of $37,102 has been recorded
to
reflect state income taxes.
The
Company’s effective tax rate is based upon the rate expected to be applicable to
the full fiscal year. The rate differs from that used in the three months ended
September 30, 2007 primarily due to changes in the valuation allowance
subsequent to that date.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company was required to adopt FASB Interpretation No.
48,
“Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN
48”). The Company evaluates its uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis and
has not identified any changes in uncertain tax positions during the reporting
period.
Management
is in the process of evaluating the various tax positions associated with the
acquisition of SMLB and is of the opinion that any deferred tax liabilities
that
would ultimately result from uncertain tax positions related to this acquisition
is not anticipated to be material.
The
Company files a consolidated federal tax return in states that allow it, and
in
other states it files separate company returns.
All
of
the Company's prior federal and state income tax filings since inception remain
open under statutes of limitation. Innovative Power System Inc.'s statutes
of limitation are open from the 2002 tax year forward for both federal and
Virginia purposes. Quality Power Systems Inc.'s statutes of
limitation are open from the 2003 tax year forward for both federal and Virginia
purposes. SMLB’s statutes of limitation are open from the 2006 tax year forward
for both federal and Illinois purposes.
10
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(10)
|
Notes
Payable
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Convertible,
unsecured promissory note, due 2012 (6.0%)
|
$
|
4,022,356
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
|||
Unsecured
promissory note, due 2011 (6.0%)
|
331,688
|
394,611
|
|||||
Unsecured
promissory note, due 2008 (6.0%)
|
-
|
1,517,753
|
|||||
Unsecured
promissory note, due 2011 (6.0%)
|
15,248
|
-
|
|||||
Vehicle
notes
|
43,105
|
86,603
|
|||||
Total
debt
|
4,412,397
|
9,498,967
|
|||||
Less
current portion
|
182,384
|
1,650,306
|
|||||
Total
debt, less current portion
|
$
|
4,230,013
|
$
|
7,848,661
|
In
connection with the acquisition of TSS/Vortech, on January 19, 2007, the Company
issued two convertible, unsecured promissory notes, with an aggregate value
of
$10,000,000 to the sellers. During the third quarter of 2007, the Company
entered into an agreement with its Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”), one
of the selling members, to retire $2,500,000 of the note due to him by paying
$2,000,000 and the CEO used the proceeds to repurchase the Company’s common
stock and warrants. The prepayment discount realized of $500,000 has been
recorded as additional paid-in capital. The notes bear interest at six percent
per year and have a term of five years. Interest only is payable during the
first two years of each note with principal payments commencing on the second
anniversary (January 19, 2009) and continuing throughout the balance of the
term
of the notes in equal quarterly principal installments totaling $625,000, as
adjusted for the early repayment of the CEO notes.
During
the third quarter 2008, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer,
both of the selling members, entered into an agreement with the Company to
convert $2,500,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, of their respective notes
into
equity at a conversion price of $7.50 per share, resulting in the aggregate
issuance of 466,667 common shares. The conversion has been recorded as
additional paid-in capital. In addition, the Chief Operating Officer agreed
to
postpone any principal and interest payments payable to him under his remaining
$4,000,000 promissory note until March, 2010, with such interest to be accrued
to the outstanding principal. The notes are convertible at any time by the
selling members at a conversion price of $7.50 per share and are automatically
convertible if the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for 20
consecutive trading days equals or exceeds $7.50 per share.
In
connection with the acquisition of Innovative, on September 24, 2007, the
Company issued an unsecured promissory note to the sellers in the amount of
$300,000. The note bears interest at six percent per year and has a three year
term. Quarterly principal installments of $15,000 plus interest are due
commencing December 31, 2007, with a final balloon payment of $120,000 due
on
December 31, 2010. Based on achieving certain earnings targets through December
31, 2007 and net of a purchase price adjustment associated with working capital,
the Innovative sellers received an additional promissory note of $64,611 at
December 31, 2007. The additional unsecured promissory note is in a similar
form of the unsecured promissory note issued at closing, bearing interest
at six percent per year and has a three-year term. Quarterly principal
installments of $3,231 plus interest are due commencing March 31, 2008 with
a
final balloon payment of $25,844 due on March 31, 2011.
In
connection with the Rubicon acquisition, the Company was obligated to issue
unsecured promissory notes totaling $1.5 million and $2.0 million contingent
on
Rubicon achieving certain earnings targets for the month ended December 31,
2007
and certain revenue bookings targets for 2008, respectively. Rubicon exceeded
earnings targets for the month ended December, 31 2007, resulting in the
issuance of a promissory note totaling $1.5 million which was paid in the first
quarter of 2008.
Of
the
$2.0 million contingent note, approximately $0.4 million was issued at June
30,
2008 based on Rubicon’s achievement of revenue bookings targets through that
date. The issued note bears interest at six percent per annum from the
acquisition date and was paid on July 31, 2008. At December 31, 2008, the
Company may be required to issue and pay up to $1.6 million or the balance
of
the note contingent on Rubicon’s achievement of certain revenue booking targets
in the second half of 2008. Any contingent note issuance will have earned
interest at six percent per annum from the purchase date through
payment. At September 30, 2008, revenue bookings were not determinable beyond
a
reasonable doubt and the remaining $1.6 million contingent note has not been
issued.
In
connection with the acquisition of SMLB, on January 2, 2008, the Company issued
unsecured promissory notes with an aggregate value of $500,000 to the sellers.
The notes bear interest at six percent per year and has a three-year term.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company reduced the seller
notes to $15,248 based on a $484,752 working capital adjustment in
accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement. Principal installments
net of the adjustment of $3,050, $3,050 and $9,148, plus accrued
interest, are due on January 2, 2009, January 2, 2010 and January 2,
2011, respectively. The Company may prepay the notes any time at its election
without penalty.
11
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(11)
Related
Party Transactions
Our
Audit
Committee in accordance with its written charter reviews and approves in advance
all related party transactions greater than $25,000 and follows a pre-approved
process for contracts with related parties for less than $25,000.
The
Company participates in transactions with the following entities affiliated
through common ownership and management.
S3
Integration, LLC.
S3
Integration LLC (S3 Integration) is owned 15% by each of the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and President. S3 Integration provides commercial security
systems design and installation services as a subcontractor to the
Company.
Chesapeake
Systems, LLC.
(Chesapeake Systems) is 9% owned by, and significantly indebted to, the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer. Chesapeake Systems is a manufacturers’
representative and distributor of mechanical and electrical equipment and
purchased certain assets of Chesapeake Tower Systems, Inc. in February
2007.
Chesapeake
Mission Critical, LLC.
(Chesapeake MC) is 9% owned by each of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
its President. Additionally, it is significantly indebted to the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer. Chesapeake MC is a manufacturers’ representative and
distributor of electrical equipment and purchased certain assets of Chesapeake
Tower Systems, Inc. in February 2007.
Chesapeake
Tower Systems, Inc
.
Chesapeake Tower Systems, Inc. (Chesapeake) is 100% owned by the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer. On February 28, 2007, Chesapeake sold substantially all
of
its assets to Chesapeake Systems and Chesapeake MC. Except for an office space
sublease agreement, Chesapeake does not engage in any business with the Company.
Chesapeake was a manufacturer's representative and distributor of mechanical
and
electrical equipment, which Chesapeake sold to the Company.
CS
Technology, Inc.
CS
Technology, Inc. (CST) is majority owned by a nephew of the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer. CST is in the Technology Consulting business and is a
customer of the Company.
CTS
Services, LLC
(CTS) is
55% owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. CTS is a mechanical
contractor that acts as a subcontractor to the Company for certain projects.
In
addition, CTS utilizes the Company as a subcontractor on projects as
needed.
L.H.
Cranston Acquisition Group, Inc
. L.H.
Cranston Acquisition Group, Inc. is 25% owned by the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer. L.H. Cranston Acquisition Group is a mechanical, electrical and
plumbing contractor that acts, directly or through its subsidiary L.H. Cranston
and Sons, Inc., as subcontractor to the Company on a project-by-project
basis.
Telco
P&C, LLC.
Telco
P&C, LLC (Telco) is 55% owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.
Telco is a specialty electrical installation company that acts as a
subcontractor to the Company. The Company has also acted as a subcontractor
to
Telco as needed. CTS purchased 100% of Telco’s membership interests in the first
quarter of 2008.
Automotive
Technologies, Inc.
Automotive Technologies, Inc., is 60% owned by the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and provides vehicle maintenance and repair services to the
Company.
TPR
Group Re Three LLC.
TPR
Group Re Three, LLC (TPR Group Re Three) is 50% owned by each of the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its President. TPR Group Re
Three leases office space to the Company under the terms of a real property
lease to TSS/Vortech.
The
following table sets forth transactions the Company has entered into with the
above related parties for the Successor for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 and for the Predecessor for the period from January
1, 2007 through January 19, 2007.
12
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Successor
|
Predecessor
|
|||||||||||||||
Period from
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months
|
Nine Months
|
January 1, 2007
|
||||||||||||||
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
through
|
||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2008
|
September 30, 2007
|
September 30, 2008
|
September 30, 2007
|
January 19, 2007
|
|||||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||||||||||
CTS
Services, LLC
|
$
|
51,298
|
$
|
78,885
|
$
|
163,576
|
$
|
147,711
|
$
|
1,800
|
||||||
Chesapeake
Systems, LLC
|
2,410
|
-
|
2,410
|
52,716
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Chesapeake
Mission Critical, LLC
|
12,562
|
67,818
|
65,565
|
95,034
|
-
|
|||||||||||
CS
Technology, Inc.
|
40,752
|
-
|
116,673
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
S3
Integration
|
7,667
|
-
|
7,667
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
114,689
|
$
|
146,703
|
$
|
355,891
|
$
|
295,461
|
$
|
1,800
|
||||||
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
CTS
Services, LLC
|
$
|
1,309,845
|
$
|
2,292,792
|
$
|
2,102,864
|
$
|
2,763,184
|
$
|
82,032
|
||||||
Chesapeake
Systems, LLC
|
-
|
-
|
147,931
|
160,304
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Chesapeake
Mission Critical, LLC
|
65,082
|
41,125
|
118,399
|
78,750
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Chesapeake
Tower Systems, Inc.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
56,501
|
8,225
|
|||||||||||
S3
Integration, LLC
|
111,630
|
-
|
149,145
|
218,922
|
-
|
|||||||||||
LH
Cranston & Sons, Inc.
|
-
|
90,800
|
7,500
|
222,677
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Telco
P&C, LLC
|
325,089
|
18,222
|
335,158
|
29,174
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
1,811,646
|
$
|
2,442,939
|
$
|
2,860,997
|
$
|
3,529,512
|
$
|
90,257
|
||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
||||||||||||||||
Office
rent paid to Chesapeake Tower Systems, Inc.
|
$
|
58,072
|
$
|
46,841
|
$
|
176,406
|
$
|
131,782
|
$
|
16,016
|
||||||
Office
rent paid to TPR Group Re Three, LLC
|
98,131
|
94,976
|
293,513
|
286,454
|
26,472
|
|||||||||||
Vehicle
repairs to Automotive Technologies, Inc.
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4,442
|
656
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
156,203
|
$
|
141,817
|
$
|
469,919
|
$
|
422,678
|
$
|
43,144
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable/(payable):
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
CTS
Services, LLC
|
$
|
58,746
|
$
|
44,821
|
|||
CTS
Services, LLC
|
(861,263
|
)
|
(2,969,671
|
)
|
|||
Chesapeake
Systems, LLC
|
2,410
|
611
|
|||||
Chesapeake
Systems, LLC
|
-
|
(873
|
)
|
||||
Chesapeake
Mission Critical, LLC
|
12,562
|
104,397
|
|||||
Chesapeake
Mission Critical, LLC
|
(47,576
|
)
|
(18,950
|
)
|
|||
CS
Technology, Inc.
|
40,712
|
-
|
|||||
Telco
P&C,
LLC
|
(122,274
|
)
|
(8,000
|
)
|
|||
LH
Cranston&Sons,
Inc.
|
-
|
(11,575
|
)
|
||||
S3
Integration, LLC
|
7,667
|
-
|
|||||
S3
Integration, LLC
|
(31,425
|
)
|
(60,556
|
)
|
|||
Total
accounts receivable
|
$
|
122,097
|
$
|
149,829
|
|||
Total
accounts (payable)
|
$
|
(1,062,538
|
)
|
$
|
(3,069,625
|
)
|
13
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements
and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
contains ‘‘forward-looking statements’’ within the meaning of Section 27A
of the Securities Act, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We intend the
forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor for forward-looking
statements in such sections of the Exchange Act. The forward-looking information
is based on various factors and was derived using numerous assumptions. All
statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities,
events or developments that we intend, expect, project, believe or anticipate
will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Such statements
are based upon certain assumptions and assessments made by our management in
light of their experience and their perception of historical trends, current
conditions, expected future developments and other factors they believe to
be
appropriate. These forward-looking statements are usually accompanied by words
such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “seek,” “expect,” “intend” and similar
expressions.
Forward-looking
statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties, and our actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward looking statements
due to a number of factors, including those set forth in Part I,
Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as amended, and as updated and supplemented by
Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
and elsewhere in this report. These factors, as well as other cautionary
statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, should be read and
understood as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements
wherever they appear herein. The forward-looking statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q represent our judgment as of the date hereof.
We
encourage you to read those descriptions carefully. We caution you not to place
undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report.
These
statements, like all statements in this report, speak only as of the date of
this report (unless an earlier date is indicated) and we undertake no obligation
to update or revise the statements except as required by law.
Business
Formation and Overview
We
were incorporated in Delaware on December 20, 2004 as a special
purpose acquisition company under the name “Fortress America Acquisition
Corporation” for the purpose of acquiring an operating business that performs
services in the homeland security industry. On July 20, 2005, we
closed our initial public offering of 7,800,000 units (including underwriters
exercise of an over-allotment option), resulting in net proceeds to us of
approximately $43.2 million.
On
January 19, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding membership interests
of each of VTC, L.L.C., doing business as “Total Site Solutions” (“TSS”), and
Vortech, L.L.C. (“Vortech” and, together with TSS, “TSS/Vortech”) and
simultaneously changed our name to “Fortress International Group, Inc.”
The acquisition fundamentally transformed us from a firm primarily seeking
to invest capital to an operating business.
Building
on the TSS/Vortech business, management continued an acquisition strategy to
expand our geographical footprint, add complementary services, and diversify
and
expand our customer base. During 2007, we acquired substantially all of the
assets of Comm Site of South Florida, Inc., 100% of the outstanding stock of
Innovative Power Solutions, Inc. and Quality Power Solutions, Inc. and 100%
of
the membership interests of Rubicon Integration, L.L.C.
On
January 2, 2008, we continued our acquisition strategy with the purchase of
100% of the outstanding stock of SMLB, Ltd., which provides consulting and
construction management services for the mission-critical facilities in the
Chicago area. The closing consideration consisted of (i) $2,000,000 in cash,
subject to certain adjustment to be determined subsequent to the closing of
the acquisition, as provided in the purchase agreement, (ii) 96,896 shares
of our common stock valued at approximately $500,000, (iii) $500,000
in unsecured promissory notes bearing interest at 6% per annum (this note
was adjusted to $15,248 as SMLB has not met the working capital requirement
established in the purchase agreement), and (iv) additional earn-out amounts
up
to a maximum of $600,000, contingent upon the achievement of certain earnings
targets by SMLB for each of the calendar years 2008-2009.
With
the
acquired assets, we provide comprehensive services for the planning, design,
and
development of mission-critical facilities and infrastructure. We also
provide a single source solution for highly technical mission-critical
facilities such as data centers, operation centers, network facilities, server
rooms, security operations centers, communications facilities and the
infrastructure systems that are critical to their function. Our services include
technology consulting, engineering and design management, construction
management, system installations, operations management and facilities
management and maintenance.
Contract
Backlog
We
believe an indicator of our future performance is our backlog of uncompleted
projects in process or recently awarded. Our backlog represents our estimate
of
anticipated revenue from executed and awarded contracts that have not been
completed and that we expect will be recognized as revenues over the life of
the
contracts. We have broken out our backlog into the following three categories:
(i) technology consulting consisting of services related to consulting and/or
engineering design contracts; (ii) construction management, and (iii) facility
management.
14
Backlog
is not a measure defined in generally accepted accounting principles, and our
methodology for determining backlog may not be comparable to the methodology
of
other companies in determining their backlog. Our backlog is generally
recognized under two categories: (1) contracts for which work authorizations
have been or are expected to be received on a fixed-price basis, guaranteed
maximum price basis and time and materials basis and (2) contracts awarded
to us
where some, but not all, of the work have not yet been authorized.
At
September 30, 2008, we have authorizations to proceed with work for
approximately $54.3 million or 25% of our total backlog of $217.7 million.
At
December 31, 2007, we had authorizations to proceed with work for approximately
$32.4 million or 19% of our total backlog of $172.9 million. Additionally,
approximately $144.9 million and $118.0 million or 67% and 68% of our backlog
relates to a single customer at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
As
of
September 30, 2008, our backlog was approximately $217.7 million, compared
to
approximately $172.9 million at December 31, 2007. The following table reflects
the value (in millions) of our backlog in the above three categories as of
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Technology
consulting
|
$
|
6.8
|
$
|
3.9
|
|||
Construction
management
|
195.9
|
154.1
|
|||||
Facilities
management
|
15.0
|
14.9
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
217.7
|
$
|
172.9
|
The
backlog amounts are estimates, subject to changes or cancellations. The actual
customer purchase orders to perform work may vary in scope and amount from
the
backlog amounts presented herein. Additionally, some of our customers may be
dependent on additional funding resources, which in the current economic
environment may be difficult for them to obtain. Accordingly, we can provide
no
assurance that we will in fact be awarded the maximum amount of such contracts
or be awarded any amount at all.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation
of these financial statements requires that management make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
the
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly from those
estimates.
We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant
estimates and judgments used in the preparation of our financial
statements.
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize revenue when pervasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the contract
price is fixed or determinable, services have been rendered or goods delivered
and collectability is reasonably assured. Our revenue is derived from the
following types of contractual arrangements: fixed-price contracts, time and
material contracts and cost-plus-fee contracts (including guaranteed maximum
price contracts). Our primary source of revenue is from fixed price contracts
and we apply Statement of Position (SOP) 81-1, “Accounting
for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type
Contracts,”
recognizing revenue on the percentage-of-completion method using costs incurred
in relation to total estimated project costs.
Revenue
from fixed price contracts is recognized on the percentage of completion method,
measured by the percentage of total costs incurred to date to estimated total
costs for each contract. This method is used because management considers costs
incurred and costs to complete to be the best available measure of progress
in
the contracts. Contract costs include all direct materials, subcontract and
labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such
as
indirect labor, payroll taxes, employee benefits and supplies.
Revenue
on time-and-material contracts is recognized based on the actual labor hours
performed at the contracted billable rates and costs incurred on behalf of
the
customer. Revenue on cost-plus-fee contracts is recognized to the extent of
costs incurred, plus an estimate of the applicable fees earned. Fixed fees
under
cost-plus-fee contracts are recorded as earned in proportion to the allowable
costs incurred in performance of the contract.
Contract
revenue recognition inherently involves estimation. Examples of estimates
include the contemplated level of effort to accomplish the tasks under the
contract, the costs of the effort and an ongoing assessment of the Company’s
progress toward completing the contract. From time to time, as part of its
standard management process, facts develop that require us to revise its
estimated total costs on revenue. To the extent that a revised estimate affects
contract profit or revenue previously recognized, we record the cumulative
effect of the revision in the period in which the revisions becomes known.
The
full amount of an anticipated loss on any type of contract is recognized in
the
period in which it becomes probable and can reasonably be
estimated.
15
Under
certain circumstances, we may elect to work at risk prior to receiving an
executed contract document. We have a formal procedure for authorizing any
such
at risk work to be incurred. Revenue, however, is deferred until a contract
modification or vehicle is provided by the customer.
Additionally,
in the event the collection of revenue is not reasonably assured, we recognize
revenue when we are paid for the service. We expense any related contracted
costs as they are incurred.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The
allowance for doubtful accounts is our best estimate of the amount of probable
credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We determine the
allowance based on an analysis of our historical experience with bad debt
write-offs and an aging of the accounts receivable balance. Account balances
are
charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been
exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.
As
of
September 30, 2008, accounts receivable of $1.4 million is due from a
customer to whom we have offered extended payment terms. The customer has
executed a promissory note in the same amount bearing interest at 8% per annum
with payments of interest only due monthly and the balance in full is due on
December 15, 2008. This amount was recognized as revenue in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008. We have a history of conducting business with this
customer and therefore believe collectibility is reasonably
assured.
Non-cash
Compensation
We
apply
the expense recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123(R)”),
therefore, the recognition of the value of the instruments results in
compensation expense in our financial statements. The expense differs from
other
compensation and professional expenses in that these charges, though generally
permitted to be settled in cash, are typically settled through the issuance
of
common stock, which would have a dilutive effect upon earnings per share, if
and
when such warrants are exercised or restricted stock vests. The determination
of
the estimated fair value used to record the compensation or professional
expenses associated with the equity or liability instruments issued requires
management to make a number of assumptions and estimates that can change or
fluctuate over time.
Goodwill
and Other Purchased Intangible Assets
Goodwill
represents the excess of costs over fair value of net assets of businesses
acquired. Other purchased intangible assets include the fair value of items
such
as customer contracts, backlog and customer relationships. SFAS No. 142,
“Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets”(“SFAS
No. 142”), establishes financial accounting and reporting for acquired
goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired
in
a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful
life
are not amortized, but rather tested for impairment on an annual basis or
purchased intangible assets with a definite useful life are amortized on a
straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We have a process
pursuant to which we typically retain third-party valuation experts to assist
us
in determining the fair market values and useful lives of identified intangible
assets. Certain techniques require us to make estimates and assumptions about
the future financial performance of the acquired businesses that may change
in
the future.
Our
intangible assets consist of trade name, in-place contracts, customer
relationships, and non-competition agreements with amortizable lives of 1-8
years for the finite lived intangibles. The Company annually tests for the
impairment of goodwill pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No. 142 and of
the
other purchased intangible assets pursuant to the requirements of SFAS No.
144,
“Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”
If
events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset value might be
impaired, we will test during the interim period in which those changes occur.
Through the third quarter 2008, we
continued to incur operating losses, revised our forecasted revenues as certain
of our acquisitions have not delivered originally anticipated revenues, and
experienced a market decline in our equity value.
As a
result of these potential impairment indicators, we evaluated the carrying
value
of goodwill and other long-lived intangible assets for impairment. Utilizing
a
third party firm we determined the carrying value of goodwill was in excess
of
the fair value, resulting in an aggregate impairment on goodwill of
approximately $4.2 million.
16
Income
Taxes
Deferred
income taxes are provided for the differences between the basis of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets
and liabilities are measured using tax rates in effect for the year in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount expected to be realized.
We
make
certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial
statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation
of
certain tax assets and liabilities, which principally arise from differences
in
the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement
purposes. We also must analyze income tax reserves, as well as determine the
likelihood of recoverability of deferred tax assets and adjust any valuation
allowances accordingly. Considerations with respect to the recoverability of
deferred tax assets include the period of expiration of the tax asset, planned
use of the tax asset and historical and projected taxable income, as well as
tax
liabilities for the tax jurisdiction to which the tax asset relates. Valuation
allowances are evaluated periodically and will be subject to change in each
future reporting period as a result of changes in one or more of these
factors.
Effective
January 1, 2007, we were required to adopt FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”).
FIN 48 prescribes a more-likely-than-not threshold of financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a
tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition of
income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred tax
assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with
tax positions, accounting for income taxes in interim periods and income tax
disclosures. Since inception and through January 1, 2007, the adoption date
of this standard, we were in essence a “special purpose acquistion”
company with no substantive operations. Management concluded that the adoption
of FIN 48 had no material effect on our financial position or results
of operations. As of September 30, 2008, we do not have any material
gross unrecognized tax benefit liabilities. However, management is still in
the
process of evaluating the various tax positions associated with the acquisition
of SMLB and is of the opinion that any deferred tax liabilities that would
ultimately result from uncertain tax positions related to these entities may
be
covered by indemnification provisions provided in the acquisition agreement
or
may result in an adjustment to goodwill.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The
most critical estimates and assumptions are made in determining the allowance
for doubtful accounts, revenue recognition, recovery of long-lived assets,
useful lives of long-lived assets, accruals for estimated tax and stock
compensation expense. Actual results could differ from those estimates and
assumptions.
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3, “Determining the Fair
Value of a Financial Asset When the Market of that Asset is not Active” (“FSP
157-3”). FSP 157-3 provides an example that clarifies and reiterates certain
provisions of the existing fair value standard, including basing fair value
on
orderly transactions and usage of management and broker inputs. FSP 157-3 is
effective immediately but is not expected to have a material impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee
Insurance Contracts” (“SFAS 163”), SFAS 163 requires recognition of a claim
liability prior to an event of default when there is evidence that credit
deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. SFAS 163
clarifies how FAS 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance contracts,
including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium
revenue and claim liabilities and requires expanded disclosures about financial
guarantee insurance contracts. SFAS 163 is effective for us January 1, 2009.
The
Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 163 to have a material effect
on
our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the
sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles
used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities
that
are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (the
GAAP hierarchy). SFAS No. 162 will become effective 60 days
following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” We do not expect the
adoption of SFAS 162 to have a material effect on our consolidated results
of operations and financial condition.
In
April
2008, FASB issued a Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets,” (“FSP 142-3”) which amends the factors a
Company should consider when developing renewal assumptions used to determine
the useful life of an intangible asset under SFAS 142. FSP 142-3 replaces the
previous useful life criteria with a new requirement-that an entity consider
its
own historical experience in renewing similar arrangements. In issuing FSP
142-3, the FASB hopes to improve the consistency between the useful life of
a
recognized intangible asset and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value of the asset. FAS 142-3 is effective January 1, 2009.
We
are currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of FAS 142-3 may
have
on our financial statements.
17
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “ Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133,” (“SFAS No. 161”) which requires additional disclosures about the
objectives of the derivative instruments and hedging activities, the method
of
accounting for such instruments under SFAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of the effects of such instruments
and
related hedged items on our financial position, financial performance, and
cash
flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective beginning January 1, 2009. We are
currently assessing the potential impact that adoption of SFAS No. 161 may
have on our financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No.
160”),
which
changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests. Minority interests
will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and will be reported as
a
component of equity separate from the parent’s equity, and purchases or sales of
equity interests that do not result in a change in control will be accounted
for
as equity transactions. In addition, net income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the
face
of the income statement and, upon a loss of control, the interest sold, as
well
as any interest retained, will be recorded at fair value with any gain or loss
recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 160 is effective beginning July 1,
2009 and will apply prospectively, except for the presentation and disclosure
requirements, which will apply retrospectively. We do not expect the adoption
of
SFAS No. 160 to have a material effect on our consolidated results of operation
of financial.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, “Business Combinations,”
(“SFAS No. 141(R)”) which replaces SFAS No. 141. The statement retains the
purchase method of accounting for acquisitions, but requires a number of
changes, including changes in the way assets and liabilities are recognized
in
the purchase accounting. It also changes the recognition of assets acquired
and
liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, requires the capitalization
of
in-process research and development at fair value, and requires the expensing
of
acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R is effective beginning
January 1, 2009 and will apply prospectively to business combinations
completed on or after that date.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
Predecessor
|
||||||||||||||||
Successor (Fortress International Group, Inc.)
|
(TSS/Vortech)
|
|||||||||||||||
For the period
|
||||||||||||||||
|
January 1,
|
|||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
through
|
||||||||||||||
September 30, 2008
|
September 30,2007
|
September 30, 2008
|
September 30,2007
|
January 19, 2007
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(audited)
|
||||||||
Results
of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
25,781,523
|
$
|
12,692,772
|
$
|
65,363,481
|
$
|
32,232,016
|
$
|
1,412,137
|
||||||
Cost
of revenue
|
20,660,103
|
10,749,331
|
54,719,170
|
27,378,926
|
1,108,276
|
|||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
5,121,420
|
1,943,441
|
10,644,311
|
4,853,090
|
303,861
|
|||||||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
4,838,291
|
3,964,468
|
15,275,116
|
10,026,448
|
555,103
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation
|
125,716
|
137,032
|
355,810
|
289,708
|
33,660
|
|||||||||||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
702,569
|
567,109
|
2,104,067
|
1,574,671
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Impairment
loss on goodwill
|
2,973,000
|
-
|
4,190,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
operating costs
|
8,639,576
|
4,668,609
|
21,924,993
|
11,890,827
|
588,763
|
|||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(3,518,156
|
)
|
(2,725,168
|
)
|
(11,280,682
|
)
|
(7,037,737
|
)
|
(284,902
|
)
|
||||||
Interest
income (expense), net
|
(49,653
|
)
|
104,116
|
(194,661
|
)
|
476,388
|
3,749
|
|||||||||
Loss
from operations before income taxes
|
(3,567,809
|
)
|
(2,621,052
|
)
|
(11,475,343
|
)
|
(6,561,349
|
)
|
(281,153
|
)
|
||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(349,898
|
)
|
-
|
37,102
|
(349,325
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(3,217,911
|
)
|
$
|
(2,621,052
|
)
|
$
|
(11,512,445
|
)
|
$
|
(6,212,024
|
)
|
$
|
(281,153
|
)
|
Results
of operations for the Successor company for the three months ended September
30,
2008 compared with the three months ended September 30,
2007.
Revenue.
Revenue
increased $13.1 million to $25.8 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008 from $12.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
The
increase was primarily driven by a $12.3 million increase in our
construction management services and the inclusion of $1.9 million of revenue
associated with the acquisitions of Innovative, Rubicon and
SMLB.
Cost
of Revenue.
Cost of
revenue increased $10.0 million to $20.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from $10.7 million for the three months ended September
30,
2007. The increase was primarily driven by a volume increase in our
construction management services and the inclusion of $1.2 million of cost
of
revenue associated with the acquisitions of Innovative, Rubicon, and
SMLB.
Gross
Margin Percentage.
Gross
margin percentage increased by 4.6% to 19.9% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to 15.3 % for the three months ended September
30,
2007. Excluding the effect of gross margin contribution associated with the
acquisitions of Innovative, Rubicon and SMLB, gross margin percentage
increased to 18.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from 15.3%
for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The overall increase in gross
profit was primarily attributable improved profitability on our
construction management contracts; however, we expect our total gross margin
percentage to approximate 16.0%.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.8 million to $4.8
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $4.0 million for
the
three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily driven by
professional fees of approximately $0.5 million that we expensed associated
with abandoned acquisitions and the inclusion of $0.6 million of selling,
general and administrative expenses associated with the acquisitions of
Innovative, Rubicon, and SMLB.
18
As
we
have experienced delays in the timing of revenues associated with certain
customers, we began implementing a plan to restructure expenses to align with
current operating revenues. The plan seeks to reduce operating costs associated
with personnel and related costs, professional fees, and sales and marketing,
which we anticipate will result in lower total selling, general and
administrative costs.
Depreciation.
Depreciation remained consistent at $0.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to $0.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007.
Amortization
of intangible assets.
Amortization expense increased $0.1 million to $0.7 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to $0.6 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase is attributable to an increase in amortizable
intangible assets as a result of our acquisitions of Innovative, Rubicon and
SMLB.
Impairment
loss on intangibles. We
have
experienced continued operating losses and had a decline in our equity market
value during the three months ended September 30, 2008. Based on these potential
impairment indicators, we conducted analyses of the operations in order to
identify any impairment in the carrying value of the goodwill and other
intangibles related to our business. Analyzing our business using both an income
approach and a market approach, we determined that the carrying value
exceeded the current fair value of our business, resulting in goodwill
impairment of $3.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. At
September 30, 2008, the adjusted carrying value of goodwill was $18.8
million.
Interest
income (expense), net.
Our
interest income (expense), net, decreased $0.2 million to ($0.1) million for
the
three months ended September 30, 2008 from $0.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in interest income was due primarily
to a
lower average invested balance in the three months ended September 30, 2008
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Income
tax expense (benefit).
Income
tax (benefit) increased $0.4 million to ($0.4) million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 from zero for the three months ended September 30,
2007. The tax benefit was associated with the decrease in our deferred tax
liability associated with a decrease in our tax deductible
goodwill.
Results
of operations for the Successor company for the nine months ended September
30,
2008 compared with the nine months ended September 30,
2007.
Revenue.
Revenue
increased $33.2 million to $65.4 million for the nine months ended September
30,
2008 from $32.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The
increase was primarily driven by a $24.1 million increase in our
construction management services and the inclusion of $10.5 million of revenue
associated with the acquisitions of Innovative, Rubicon, and
SMLB.
Cost
of Revenue.
Cost of
revenue increased $27.3 million to $54.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 from $27.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The increase was driven by the increase in revenue primarily from our
construction management services and the inclusion of $8.3 million of cost
of
revenue associated with the acquisitions of Innovative, Rubicon, and
SMLB.
Gross
Margin Percentage.
Gross
margin percentage increased 1.2% to 16.3% for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to 15.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The
increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to improved
profitability on our construction management contracts.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $5.3 million to $15.3
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $10.0 million for
the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily driven
by $2.2 million of selling, general and administrative expenses associated
with the acquisitions of Innovative, Rubicon and SMLB, and $1.2 million that
we
expensed associated with abandoned acquisitions.
As
we
have experienced delays in the timing of revenues associated with certain
customers and margins have contracted, we began implementing a plan to
restructure expenses to align with current operating revenues. The plan seeks
to
reduce operating costs associated with personnel and related costs, professional
fees, and sales and marketing, which we anticipate will result in lower total
selling, general and administrative costs.
Depreciation.
Depreciation remained consistent at $0.4 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to $0.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007.
Amortization
of intangible assets.
Amortization expense increased $0.5 million to $2.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 from $1.6 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007. The increase is attributable to an increase in the amortizable
intangible assets as a result of our acquisitions of Innovative, Rubicon and
SMLB.
19
Impairment
loss on intangibles.
Through
the third quarter 2008, we continued to incur operating losses, revised our
forecasted revenues as certain of our acquisitions have not delivered originally
anticipated revenues, and experienced a market decline in our equity value.
Based on these potential impairment indicators, we conducted an analyses of
the
operations in order to identify any impairment in the carrying value of the
goodwill and other intangibles related to our business. Analyzing our business
using both an income approach and a market approach, we determined that the
carrying value exceeded the current fair value of our business, resulting in
goodwill impairment of $4.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. At September 30, 2008, the adjusted carrying value of goodwill was $18.8
million.
Interest
income (expense), net.
Our
interest income (expense), net, decreased $0.7 million to ($0.2) million for
the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $0.5 million for the nine months
ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease in interest income was due primarily to a
lower
average invested balance in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared
to
nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Income
tax expense (benefit).
Income
tax expense (benefit) decreased $0.3 million to zero for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 from ($0.3) million for the nine months ended September
30,
2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, income tax benefit was
$0.3
million reflecting the value of a NOL carryback to prior periods at an effective
federal rate of 34%, net of a valuation allowance on deferred tax
assets.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
We
have
historically incurred net losses and have used our cash and investments to
fund
our operating and investing activities. We believe that operational
improvements, strategic investments and complementary acquisitions will improve
the cash flows of our business. Our efforts are continuing and may include
further acquisitions and realignment of our sales, general and administrative
expenses. We cannot be sure, however, as to the amount and timing of the
associated financial impact. Summary cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 and for the period January 1, through January 19,
2007 (Predecessor) are as follows:
Predecessor
|
||||||||||
Successor (Fortress International Group, Inc.)
|
(TSS/Vortech)
|
|||||||||
For
the period
|
||||||||||
For
the nine
|
For
the nine
|
January
1,
|
||||||||
months
ended
|
months
ended
|
through
|
||||||||
September 30, 2008
|
September 30, 2007
|
Janaury 19, 2007
|
||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$
|
(1,896,152
|
)
|
$
|
(5,618,627
|
)
|
$
|
656,001
|
||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(2,331,281
|
)
|
31,989,260
|
(127,602
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(2,088,524
|
)
|
(8,447,522
|
)
|
(1,567,920
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
$
|
(6,315,957
|
)
|
$
|
17,923,111
|
$
|
(1,039,521
|
)
|
Cash
and
cash equivalents decreased $6.3 million to $6.9 million at September 30, 2008
from $13.2 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease was primarily attributable
to $1.9 million from operating activities, $2.1 million for the purchase of
SMLB
and $2.0 million for the repayment of promissory notes issued in connection
with
the Rubicon acquisition.
Operating
Activity
Net
cash
used in operations decreased $3.7 million to $1.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 from $5.6 million used in operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. The decline in cash used in operating cash
flows is primarily attributable to working capital as follows:
Increase
in net loss.
Net loss
increased $5.3 million to $11.5 million for the nine months ended September
30,
2008 from $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The
increase in net loss was primarily attributable to a $5.0 million increase
in non-cash items consisting of the impairment loss on goodwill, amortization
of
intangibles and equity-based compensation expense.
Increase
in working capital.
Net
changes in operating assets and liabilities decreased approximately $4.1
million primarily due to trade receivables and payables, which accounts for
the improvement or decline in cash used by operating activities. The
decrease is primarily attributable to managing our trade accounts receivable
and
corresponding payables.
Investing
Activity
Net
cash
used in investing increased $34.3 million to $2.3 million used in investing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $32.0 million
provided by investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The increase was primarily attributable to our transition to an operating
Company in the first quarter of 2007 and the release of investments held in
trust for general operating purposes.
Sale
of investments held in Trust.
Upon
the approval of the TSS/Vortech acquisition, we had a cash inflow from the
sale of approximately $44.7 million in trust investments, which funded the
cash
portion of the acquisition and repurchase of common stock from dissenting
shareholders electing to receive their IPO proceeds back and provided cash
for
future ongoing operations.
20
Acquisitions.
Net cash
used to acquire businesses decreased $10.2 million to $2.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $12.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. In the first quarter of 2008, we acquired SMLB, Ltd.
which had a significantly lower enterprise value and in turn lower cash purchase
price component as compared to TSS/Vortech acquisition, which occurred in the
first quarter of 2007.
Financing
Activity
Net
cash
used in financing decreased $6.3 million to $2.1 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 from $8.4 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2007. The decrease in cash used in financing activities was attributable
fundamentally to different activity as described in the following:
·
|
Repayment
of seller notes.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we repaid $2.0
million of unsecured promissory notes that were issued to the Rubicon
sellers upon achievement of certain financial targets at December
31, 2007
and June 30, 2008.
|
Repurchase
of common stock.
During the first quarter of 2007, we used $6.2 million to repurchase
our
common stock associated with the election of conversion rights
by our dissenting shareholders in connection with our acquisition of
TSS/Vortech and $1.3 million in a share buyback program. The share
buyback
program was suspended in the third quarter of 2007; however,
during 2008 we repurchased 14,885 shares at an average price of $3.19
per share for employee taxes associated with net issuance of vesting
restricted stock.
|
Non-Cash
Activities
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we issued total unsecured
promissory notes totaling $0.5 million as purchase consideration. In connection
with the acquisitions of SMLB, we initially issued $0.5 million of unsecured
promissory notes that were reduced in the second quarter 2008 to $15,248
pursuant to the working capital requirements per the original purchase
agreement. Consistent with the Rubicon purchase agreement in exchange for
achieving specified financial targets through June 30, 2008, we issued an
additional $0.4 million of unsecured promissory notes.
During
the third quarter 2008, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer,
both of the selling members of TSS/Vortech, entered into an agreement with
the
Company to convert $2,500,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, of their respective
notes into common stock at a conversion price of $7.50 per share, resulting
in the aggregate issuance of 466,667 common shares. The conversion has been
recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. In addition, the Chief
Operating Officer agreed to postpone any principal and interest payments payable
to him under his remaining $4,000,000 promissory note until March, 2010, with
such interest to be accrued to the outstanding principal. At September 30,
2008,
$4,000,000 of the seller notes remains outstanding, which are convertible at
$7.50 per shares to 533,333 shares of the Company’s common stock.
For
a
discussion of our acquisitions, see Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements-Acquisitions.
Liquidity
In
the
third quarter of 2008, we initiated a plan to restructure expenses to realign
them with the current operating revenues and gross margins as certain customers
have delayed their spending. Our plan seeks to reduce operating costs associated
with professional fees, sales and marketing, and personnel and related
costs.
We
believe that our current cash and cash equivalents and expected future cash
generated from operations will satisfy our expected working capital, capital
expenditure and investment requirements through the next twelve months. We
may elect to secure additional capital in the future, if available and at
acceptable terms, to improve our liquidity or fund acquisitions. The
amounts involved in any such transaction, individually or in the aggregate,
may
be material and differ in structure relative to past acquisitions. To the extent
that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities, the
issuance of such securities could result in dilution to our existing
shareholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of debt
securities, the terms of such debt could impose additional restrictions on
our
operations. Additional capital, if required, may not be available on acceptable
terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be
required to reduce the scope of acquisition plans, which could impact our
business, financial condition and earnings.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
At
September 30, 2008, we do not have any off balance sheet
arrangements.
21
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk.
Refer
to
our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as amended,
for a complete discussion of our market risk. There have been no material
changes to the market risk information included in our Annual Report on
form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Our
management performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in
Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
as of September 30, 2008. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of September 30,
2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
for the third quarter of 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Exchange
Act.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings.
We
are
not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge,
is any material legal proceeding threatened against us.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
In
addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should
carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
subsequent quarterly reports, which could materially affect our business,
financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K are not the only risks that we face. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results as well as adversely affect the value of
an
investment in our common stock.
There
have been no material updates to the risk factors previously disclosed in our
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds.
The
table
set forth below shows all repurchases of securities by us during the quarter
ended September 30, 2008:
Total Shares
|
Approximate Dollar
|
||||||||||||
Average
|
Purchased as Part of
|
Amount of Shares Yet
|
|||||||||||
Monthly
Period During the Quarter
|
Total Shares
|
Price Paid
|
Publically Announced
|
To Be Purchase Under
|
|||||||||
Ended
September 30, 2008
|
Purchased
|
per
Share
|
Plans
|
Plans
|
|||||||||
July
1, 2008-July 31, 2008
|
8,028
|
$
|
2.27
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
August,
1 2008-August 31, 2008
|
-
|
$ | |||||||||||
September
1, 2008- September 30, 2008
|
867
|
$
|
1.31
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
Total
|
8,895
|
$
|
2.18
|
The
Company repurchased 8,895 shares for employee taxes associated with net issuance
of vesting restricted stock.
22
Item
3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
Not
applicable.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not
applicable.
Item
5. Other Information.
Item
6. Exhibits.
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
10.1
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement between Fortress International Group, Inc.
and
Thomas P. Rosato, dated August 26, 2008.
|
|
10.2
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement between Fortress International
Group, Inc. and Gerard G. Gallagher, dated August 26,
2008.
|
|
10.3
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement between Fortress International Group, Inc.
and
Harvey L. Weiss, dated August 26, 2008.
|
|
10.4
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement between Fortress International Group, Inc.
and
Timothy C. Dec, dated August 26, 2008.
|
|
10.5
|
Amendment
to Consulting Agreement between Fortress International Group, Inc.
and
Washington Capital Advisors, Inc. , dated August 26,
2008.
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certificate
of Fortress International Group, Inc. Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
|
Certificate
of Fortress International Group, Inc. Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1‡
|
|
Certificate
of Fortress International Group, Inc. Chief Executive Officer and
Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of
2002.
|
‡
Furnished herewith.
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
FORTRESS
INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 14, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas P. Rosato
|
|
|
Thomas P. Rosato
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer (Authorized Officer and Principal Executive
Office)
|
Date:
November 14, 2008
|
By:
|
/s/
Timothy C. Dec
|
|
|
Timothy
C. Dec
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
24