TTM TECHNOLOGIES INC - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 28, 2011
Commission File Number: 0-31285
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE | 91-1033443 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2630 South Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana, California 92704
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Address of principal executive offices)
(714) 327-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, of registrant outstanding at May 3, 2011:
81,318,061
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets
March 28, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 202,340 | $ | 216,078 | ||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance for bad debts of $1,265 in 2011 and $1,827 in 2010 |
292,033 | 287,703 | ||||||
Inventories |
144,600 | 135,385 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
33,324 | 30,125 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
7,208 | 7,208 | ||||||
Total current assets |
679,505 | 676,499 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
760,370 | 740,630 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
21,228 | 23,733 | ||||||
Goodwill |
197,319 | 197,808 | ||||||
Definite-lived intangibles, net |
93,425 | 97,873 | ||||||
Deposits and other non-current assets |
37,087 | 25,409 | ||||||
$ | 1,788,934 | $ | 1,761,952 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 87,504 | $ | 67,123 | ||||
Accounts payable |
161,787 | 154,600 | ||||||
Accounts payable due to related parties |
42,238 | 50,374 | ||||||
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits |
43,349 | 51,107 | ||||||
Equipment payable |
77,309 | 59,802 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
37,552 | 35,194 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
449,739 | 418,200 | ||||||
Convertible senior notes, net of discount |
146,705 | 145,283 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of discount |
260,572 | 312,995 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
14,472 | 12,608 | ||||||
Related party financing obligation |
21,829 | 20,399 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
20,445 | 19,609 | ||||||
Total long-term liabilities |
464,023 | 510,894 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) |
||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders equity |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000 shares authorized, 81,186 and 80,262 shares issued and
outstanding in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
81 | 80 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
528,846 | 519,051 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
220,937 | 193,814 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
18,397 | 15,310 | ||||||
Total TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders equity |
768,261 | 728,255 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
106,911 | 104,603 | ||||||
Total equity |
875,172 | 832,858 | ||||||
$ | 1,788,934 | $ | 1,761,952 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations
For the Quarters Ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
For the Quarters Ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 342,801 | $ | 138,219 | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
260,875 | 111,246 | ||||||
Gross profit |
81,926 | 26,973 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Selling and marketing |
9,033 | 6,727 | ||||||
General and administrative |
23,051 | 9,037 | ||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangibles |
4,158 | 791 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 50 | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets |
| 500 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
36,242 | 17,105 | ||||||
Operating income |
45,684 | 9,868 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(6,291 | ) | (2,781 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
977 | (8 | ) | |||||
Total other expense, net |
(5,314 | ) | (2,789 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes |
40,370 | 7,079 | ||||||
Income tax provision |
(11,282 | ) | (2,594 | ) | ||||
Net income |
29,088 | 4,485 | ||||||
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
(1,965 | ) | | |||||
Net income attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders |
$ | 27,123 | $ | 4,485 | ||||
Earnings per share attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders: |
||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the Quarters Ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010
For the Quarters Ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 29,088 | $ | 4,485 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
15,695 | 3,883 | ||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets |
4,188 | 820 | ||||||
Amortization of convertible notes, debt discount and debt issuance costs |
1,846 | 1,440 | ||||||
Non-cash interest imputed on other long-term liabilities and related party financing obligation |
371 | 30 | ||||||
Income tax benefit from restricted stock units released and common stock options exercised |
(1,916 | ) | (391 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
6,713 | 2,334 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,754 | 1,412 | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets |
| 500 | ||||||
Net loss (gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment and other |
418 | (163 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized loss on derivative assets and liabilities |
283 | | ||||||
Net unrealized foreign currency exchange gain |
20 | | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition: |
||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
(4,208 | ) | (8,839 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(9,171 | ) | (1,825 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(4,309 | ) | 415 | |||||
Accounts payable |
1,097 | 2,150 | ||||||
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits and other accrued expenses |
(4,784 | ) | 71 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
37,085 | 6,322 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and equipment deposits |
(26,480 | ) | (3,011 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and assets held for sale |
11 | 3,442 | ||||||
Proceeds from the redemption of short-term investments |
| 1,351 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(26,469 | ) | 1,782 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Repayment of revolving loan |
(14,620 | ) | | |||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(17,500 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
5,713 | 44 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock awards exercised or released |
1,916 | 391 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(24,491 | ) | 435 | |||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
137 | | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(13,738 | ) | 8,539 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
216,078 | 94,347 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 202,340 | $ | 102,886 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of noncash investing and financing activities:
At March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010 accrued purchases of equipment totaled $92,155 and $1,180,
respectively.
See accompanying notes to consolidated condensed financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
TTM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share data)
(1) Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
TTM Technologies, Inc. (the Company or TTM) is a leading global provider of time-critical and
technologically complex printed circuit board (PCB) products and backplane assemblies (PCBs
populated with electronic components), which serve as the foundation of sophisticated electronic
products. The Company provides advanced technology products and offers a
one-stop manufacturing solution to customers from engineering support to prototype development
through final volume production. The Company serves a diversified customer base in various markets
throughout the world, including manufacturers of networking/communications infrastructure products,
personal computers, touch screen tablets and mobile media devices (cellular phones and smart
phones). The Company also serves high-end computing, commercial aerospace/defense, and
industrial/medical industries. The Companys customers include both original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) providers.
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared by the
Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated
condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial
position, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented. It is
suggested that these consolidated condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The preparation of financial statements
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the Companys consolidated condensed
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates. The Company uses a 13-week fiscal quarter accounting period with the first quarter
ending on the last Monday in March and the fourth quarter always ending on December 31. The
first quarters ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010 each contained 87 and 88 days, respectively.
(2) Acquisition of PCB Subsidiaries
On the evening of April 8, 2010 (in the morning of April 9, 2010, Hong Kong time), the Company
acquired from Meadville Holdings Limited (Meadville), an exempted company incorporated under the
laws of the Cayman Islands, and MTG Investment (BVI) Limited (MTG), a company incorporated under
the laws of the British Virgin Islands and a wholly owned subsidiary of Meadville, all of the
issued and outstanding capital stock of four wholly owned subsidiaries of MTG. These four
companies, through their respective subsidiaries, engage in the business of manufacturing and
distributing printed circuit boards, including circuit design, quick-turn-around services, and
drilling and routing services. Subsequent to the acquisition, these four companies and their
subsidiaries (together, the PCB Subsidiaries) are subsidiaries of the Company and represent the
Asia Pacific operating segment of the Company.
The Company purchased the PCB Subsidiaries for a total consideration of $114,034 in cash and
36,334 shares of TTM common stock, of which approximately 26,225 are subject to restrictions. After
taking into account the 36,334 shares of TTM common stock issued in the acquisition and based on
the number of shares outstanding on April 8, 2010, the date the Company acquired the PCB
Subsidiaries, approximately 45% of TTM common stock outstanding was held by Meadville, its
shareholders, or their transferees.
The purchase price of the PCB Subsidiaries was allocated to tangible and intangible assets
acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interests based on their estimated fair value at
the date of the acquisition (April 8, 2010). Noncontrolling interests consist of a 29.8% equity
interest in one PCB manufacturing subsidiary and a 20.0% equity interest in one other PCB
manufacturing subsidiary held by third parties. The fair value was determined by utilizing a
combination of income and market comparable approaches. The income approach was used to estimate
the total enterprise value of each noncontrolling interest by estimating discounted future cash
flows. The market comparable approach indicates the fair value of the noncontrolling interest based
on a comparison to comparable enterprises in similar lines of business that are publicly traded or
are part of a public or private transaction.
6
Table of Contents
Bank fees and legal and accounting costs associated with the acquisition of the PCB
Subsidiaries of $1,798 for the quarter ended March 29, 2010 have
been expensed and recorded as
general and administrative expense in the consolidated condensed statement of operations in
accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. There were no bank fees or legal and
accounting costs associated with the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries for the quarter ended
March 28, 2011.
Unaudited pro forma operating results for the Company, assuming the acquisition of the PCB
Subsidiaries occurred on January 1, 2010 are as follows:
For the Quarter | ||||
Ended | ||||
March 29, 2010 | ||||
(In thousands, except | ||||
per share data) | ||||
Net sales |
$ | 296,535 | ||
Net income |
$ | 6,171 | ||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.08 | ||
Dilutive earnings per share |
$ | 0.08 | ||
The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have been
achieved had the PCB Subsidiaries acquisition occurred as of January 1, 2010, or the results that
may be achieved in future periods.
(3) Accounts and Notes Receivable Factoring and Sales Arrangements
In the normal course of business, the Companys foreign subsidiaries utilize accounts
receivable factoring arrangements. Under these arrangements, the Company may sell certain of its
accounts receivable to financial institutions, which are accounted for as a sale, at a discount
ranging from 1% to 2% of the accounts receivable. In all arrangements there is no recourse against
the Company for its customers failure to pay. The Company sold $14,261 of accounts receivable for
the quarter ended March 28, 2011.
Additionally,
the Companys foreign subsidiaries may also sell certain of their notes receivable
at a discount ranging from 1% to 2% of the notes receivable. The Company sold $26,289 of notes
receivable for the quarter ended March 28, 2011.
The Company did not sell any accounts or notes receivable for the quarter ended March 29,
2010.
(4) Inventories
Inventories as of March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consist of the following:
March 28, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 52,043 | $ | 50,465 | ||||
Work-in-process |
53,233 | 47,178 | ||||||
Finished goods |
39,324 | 37,742 | ||||||
$ | 144,600 | $ | 135,385 | |||||
7
Table of Contents
(5) Goodwill and Definite-lived Intangibles
As of March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010 goodwill by operating segment and the components of
definite-lived intangibles were as follows:
Goodwill
North | Asia | |||||||||||
America | Pacific | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 131,650 | $ | 183,176 | $ | 314,826 | ||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
(117,018 | ) | | (117,018 | ) | |||||||
14,632 | 183,176 | 197,808 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment during the quarter |
77 | (566 | ) | (489 | ) | |||||||
Balance as of March 28, 2011 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
131,727 | $ | 182,610 | 314,337 | ||||||||
Accumulated impairment losses |
(117,018 | ) | | (117,018 | ) | |||||||
$ | 14,709 | $ | 182,610 | $ | 197,319 | |||||||
The December 31, 2010 goodwill balance includes foreign currency translation adjustments
related to foreign subsidiaries which operate in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar.
Definite-lived Intangibles
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign | Net | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Accumulated | Currency | Carrying | Amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Rate Change | Amount | Period | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (years) | |||||||||||||||||||
March 28, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Strategic customer relationships |
$ | 120,427 | $ | (35,663 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 84,762 | 9.2 | |||||||||
Trade name |
10,302 | (1,741 | ) | (33 | ) | 8,528 | 6.0 | |||||||||||||
Licensing agreements |
350 | (215 | ) | | 135 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||
Order backlog |
1,288 | (1,286 | ) | (2 | ) | | 0.2 | |||||||||||||
$ | 132,367 | $ | (38,905 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 93,425 | |||||||||||
All of the definite-lived intangibles are amortized using the straight line method of
amortization over the useful life, with the exception of the strategic customer relationship
intangibles, which are amortized using an accelerated method of amortization based on estimated
cash flows. Amortization expense was $4,188 and $820 for the quarters ended March 28, 2011 and
March 29, 2010, respectively. Amortization expense related to acquired licensing agreements is
classified as cost of goods sold.
Estimated aggregate amortization for definite-lived intangible assets for the next five years
is as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Remaining 2011 |
$ | 13,300 | ||
2012 |
16,516 | |||
2013 |
15,521 | |||
2014 |
13,945 | |||
2015 |
12,470 | |||
$ | 71,752 | |||
8
Table of Contents
(6) Long-term Debt and Letters of Credit
The following table summarizes the long-term debt of the Company as of March 28, 2011 and
December 31, 2010.
Average Effective | Average Effective | |||||||||||||||
Interest Rate | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||||
as of | as of | |||||||||||||||
March 28, | March 28, | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2011 | 2011 | 2010 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Bank loans, due various dates through May 2012 |
2.12 | % | $ | 15,813 | 3.39 | % | $ | 30,412 | ||||||||
Term loan due November 2013 |
2.25 | % | 332,500 | 2.26 | % | 350,000 | ||||||||||
Other |
6.00 | % | 19 | 6.00 | % | 20 | ||||||||||
348,332 | 380,432 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Unamortized discount |
(256 | ) | (314 | ) | ||||||||||||
348,076 | 380,118 | |||||||||||||||
Less: Current maturities |
(87,504 | ) | (67,123 | ) | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
$ | 260,572 | $ | 312,995 | ||||||||||||
The maturities of long-term debt through 2013 and thereafter are as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Remaining 2011 |
$ | 35,003 | ||
2012 |
120,561 | |||
2013 |
192,504 | |||
Thereafter |
8 | |||
$ | 348,076 | |||
Bank loans are made up of bank lines of credit in mainland China and are used for working
capital and capital investment for the Companys mainland China facilities acquired in conjunction
with the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries. These facilities are denominated in either U.S.
Dollars or Chinese Renminbi (RMB), with interest rates tied to either LIBOR or Peoples Bank of
China rates. These bank loans expire in May 2012.
On April 9, 2010, in conjunction with the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, the Company
became a party to a credit agreement (Credit Agreement) entered into on November 16, 2009 by
certain PCB Subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement consists of a $350,000 senior secured term loan
(Term Loan), a $87,500 senior secured revolving loan (Revolving Loan), a $65,000 factoring facility
(Factoring Facility), and a $80,000 letters of credit facility (Letters of Credit Facility), all of
which mature on November 16, 2013. The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of the
assets of the PCB Subsidiaries and is senior to all other Company debt including the Convertible
Senior Notes, (Note 7). The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the full and punctual
payment of all obligations of the PCB Subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate of LIBOR (term election
by Company) plus an applicable interest margin. Borrowings under the Term Loan will bear interest
at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.0%, LIBOR plus 2.25% under the Revolving Loan, and LIBOR plus 1.25% under
the Factoring Facility. There is no provision, other than an event of default, for these interest
margins to increase. At March 28, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding
borrowings under the Credit Agreement was 2.25%.
The Company is required to make scheduled payments of the outstanding Term Loan balance
beginning in 2011. All and any other outstanding balances under the Credit Agreement are due at the
maturity date of November 16, 2013. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are subject to certain
financial and operating covenants that include, among other provisions, limitations on dividends or
other distributions, maintaining maximum total leverage ratios and minimum net worth, current
assets, and interest coverage ratios at both the Company and PCB Subsidiaries level. The Company is
in compliance with the covenants.
9
Table of Contents
The Company is also required to pay a commitment fee of 0.20% per annum on the unused portion
of any loan or facility under the Credit Agreement. For the quarter ended March 28, 2011, the
Company incurred $75 in commitment fees related to unused borrowing availability under the Credit
Agreement. As of March 28, 2011, all of the remaining Term Loan was outstanding, none of the
Revolving Loan or Factoring Facility was outstanding, and $75,905 of the Letters of Credit Facility
was outstanding. Available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Loan and Factoring Facility was
$87,500 and $65,000, respectively, at March 28, 2011.
On April 9, 2010, the Company entered into an interest rate swap arrangement with an initial
notional amount of $146,500 for the period beginning April 18, 2011 and ending on April 16, 2013.
See Note 11.
Other Letters of Credit
In addition to the letters of credit obtained by the PCB Subsidiaries pursuant to the Credit
Agreement, the Company maintains several unused letters of credit: a $1,994 standby letter of
credit expiring December 31, 2011 associated with its insured workers compensation program; a
$1,000 standby letter of credit expiring February 29, 2012 related to the lease of one of its
production facilities; and various other letters of credit aggregating to approximately $692
related to purchases of machinery and equipment with various expiration dates through June 2011.
(7) Convertible Senior Notes
In 2008, the Company issued 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes (Convertible Notes) due May 15,
2015, in a public offering for an aggregate principal amount of $175,000. The Convertible Notes
bear interest at a rate of 3.25% per annum. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on May 15
and November 15 of each year. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank
equally to the Companys future unsecured senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any
of the Companys future subordinated indebtedness. The liability and equity components of the
Convertible Notes are separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the Companys
non-convertible debt borrowing rate when interest costs are recognized.
The Company has allocated the Convertible Notes offering costs to the liability and equity
components in proportion to the allocation of proceeds and accounted for them as debt issuance
costs and equity issuance costs, respectively. At March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the
following summarizes the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes:
March 28, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Liability components: |
||||||||
Convertible Notes |
$ | 175,000 | $ | 175,000 | ||||
Less: Convertible Notes unamortized discount |
(28,295 | ) | (29,717 | ) | ||||
Convertible Notes, net of discount |
$ | 146,705 | $ | 145,283 | ||||
Equity components: |
||||||||
Additional paid-in capital: |
||||||||
Embedded conversion option Convertible Notes |
$ | 43,000 | $ | 43,000 | ||||
Embedded conversion option Convertible Notes issuance costs |
(1,413 | ) | (1,413 | ) | ||||
$ | 41,587 | $ | 41,587 | |||||
At March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010 remaining unamortized debt issuance costs included in
other non-current assets were $2,855 and $2,998, respectively. The debt issuance costs and debt
discount are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the Convertible Notes using the
effective interest rate method. At March 28, 2011, the remaining amortization period for the
unamortized Convertible Note discount and debt issuance costs was 4.1 years.
The components of interest expense resulting from the Convertible Notes for the quarters ended
March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010 are as follows:
For the Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Contractual coupon interest |
$ | 1,422 | $ | 1,422 | ||||
Amortization of Convertible Notes debt discount |
1,422 | 1,309 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
143 | 131 | ||||||
$ | 2,987 | $ | 2,862 | |||||
10
Table of Contents
For the quarters ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010, the amortization of the Convertible
Notes debt discount and debt issuance costs is based on an effective interest rate of 8.37%.
Conversion
At any time prior to November 15, 2014, holders may convert their Convertible Notes into cash
and, if applicable, into shares of the Companys common stock based on a conversion rate of 62.6449
shares of the Companys common stock per $1 principal amount of Convertible Notes, subject to
adjustment, under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter beginning after June
30, 2008 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of our common
stock for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last
trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the
applicable conversion price on each applicable trading day of such preceding calendar quarter; (2)
during the five business day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period in which the
trading price per note for each day of that 10 consecutive trading day period was less than 98% of
the product of the last reported sale price of the Companys common stock and the conversion rate
on such day; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions described in the
prospectus supplement. As of March 28, 2011, none of the conversion criteria had been met.
On or after November 15, 2014 until the close of business on the third scheduled trading day
preceding the maturity date, holders may convert their notes at any time, regardless of the
foregoing circumstances. Upon conversion, for each $1 principal amount of notes, the Company will
pay cash for the lesser of the conversion value or $1 and shares of our common stock, if any, based
on a daily conversion value calculated on a proportionate basis for each day of the 60 trading day
observation period. Additionally, in the event of a fundamental change as defined in the prospectus
supplement, or other conversion rate adjustments such as share splits or combinations, other
distributions of shares, cash or other assets to stockholders, including self-tender transactions
(Other Conversion Rate Adjustments), the conversion rate may be modified to adjust the number of
shares per $1 principal amount of the notes. As of March 28, 2011, none of the criteria for a
fundamental change or a conversion rate adjustment had been met.
The maximum number of shares issuable upon conversion, including the effect of a fundamental
change and subject to Other Conversion Rate Adjustments, would be 13,978.
Note Repurchase
The Company is not permitted to redeem the Convertible Notes at any time prior to maturity. In
the event of a fundamental change or certain default events, as defined in the prospectus
supplement, holders may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or a portion of their
Convertible Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid
interest.
Convertible Note Hedge and Warrant Transaction
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into a
convertible note hedge and warrant transaction (Call Spread Transaction), with respect to the
Companys common stock. The convertible note hedge, which cost an aggregate of $38,257 and was
recorded, net of tax, as a reduction of additional paid-in capital, consists of the Companys
option to purchase up to 10,963 shares of common stock at a price of $15.96 per share. This option
expires on May 15, 2015 and can only be executed upon the conversion of the above mentioned
Convertible Notes. Additionally, the Company sold warrants to purchase 10,963 shares of its common
stock at a price of $18.15 per share. The warrants expire ratably beginning August 2015 through
February 2016. Proceeds from the sale of warrants of $26,197 were recorded as an addition to
additional paid-in capital. The Call Spread Transaction has no effect on the terms of the
Convertible Notes and reduces potential dilution by effectively increasing the conversion price of
the Convertible Notes to $18.15 per share of the Companys common stock.
11
Table of Contents
(8) Comprehensive Income
The following table summarizes the components of comprehensive income for the quarters ended
March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 29,088 | $ | 4,485 | ||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax expense of $64
for the quarter ended March 28, 2011 |
2,813 | | ||||||
Net unrealized gains on effective cash flow hedges, net of tax
benefit of $38 for the quarter ended March 28, 2011 |
617 | | ||||||
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax |
3,430 | | ||||||
Comprehensive income |
32,518 | 4,485 | ||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(2,308 | ) | | |||||
Comprehensive income attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders |
$ | 30,210 | $ | 4,485 | ||||
The following provides a summary of the activity associated with the designated cash flow
hedges reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income for the quarter ended March 28, 2011:
March 28, 2011 | ||||
(in thousands) | ||||
Beginning balance, net of tax |
$ | (3,121 | ) | |
Changes in fair value gain, net of tax |
617 | |||
Reclassification to earnings, net of tax |
| |||
Ending balance, net of tax |
$ | (2,504 | ) | |
The amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income for the cash flow hedge related
to the interest rate swap are reclassified into interest expense during the operative period of the
swap, beginning April 18, 2011 and ending on April 16, 2013, and in the same period in which the
related interest on the floating-rate debt obligation affects earnings. The Company expects that
approximately $2,075 will be reclassified into the statement of operations, net of tax, in the next
12 months.
(9) Impairment of Long-lived Assets and Goodwill
The Company reduced the carrying value of the Dallas, Oregon facility, which was classified as
an asset held for sale, to record the estimated fair value less costs
to sell, resulting in an
impairment of $500 for the quarter ended March 29, 2010 due to a depressed real estate market in
the surrounding Dallas, Oregon region. The Company sold the Dallas, Oregon facility in July 2010.
(10) Income Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate was 27.9% and 36.6% for the quarters ended March 28, 2011 and
March 29, 2010, respectively. The Companys effective tax rate decreased primarily due to the
impact of an increase in total earnings earned in lower-tax jurisdictions resulting from the
acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries. The Companys effective tax rate will generally differ from
the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to favorable tax rates associated with certain earnings
from the Companys operations in lower-tax jurisdictions in China. Certain foreign losses generated
are not more than likely to be realizable, and thus, no income tax benefit has been recognized on
these losses. The Companys foreign earnings attributable to the Asia Pacific operating segment
will be permanently reinvested in such foreign jurisdictions and, therefore, no deferred tax
liabilities for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings are recorded.
12
Table of Contents
(11) Financial Instruments
Derivatives
Interest Rate Swaps
The Companys business is exposed to interest rate risk resulting from fluctuations in
interest rates on certain variable rate LIBOR debt. Increases in interest rates would increase
interest expenses relating to the outstanding variable rate borrowings of certain foreign
subsidiaries and increase the cost of debt. Fluctuations in interest rates can also lead to
significant fluctuations in the fair value of the debt obligations.
On April 9, 2010, the Company entered into a two-year pay-fixed, receive floating (1-month
LIBOR), amortizing interest rate swap arrangement with an initial notional amount of $146,500, for
the period beginning April 18, 2011 and ending on April 16, 2013. The interest rate swap will apply
a fixed interest rate against the first interest payments of a portion of the $350,000 Term Loan
over the term of the interest rate swap. As part of the Companys risk management strategy, the
Company chose not to hedge its initial year interest payment cash flows of its Term Loan because of
low LIBOR rates at inception which would have initially resulted in locking in a fixed rate higher
than LIBOR spot rate at the onset.
The notional amount of the interest rate swap decreases to zero over its term, consistent with
the Companys risk management objectives. The notional value underlying the hedge at March 28, 2011
was $146,500. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company will pay a fixed rate of 2.50%
and will receive floating 1-month LIBOR during the swap period. The Company has designated this
interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge.
At inception, the fair value of the interest rate swap was zero. As of March 28, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the fair value of the swap was recorded as a liability of $3,657 and $3,421,
respectively, in other long-term liabilities. The change in the fair value of the interest rate
swap is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, in the
Companys consolidated condensed balance sheet. No ineffectiveness was recognized for the quarter
ended March 28, 2011 as the interest rate swap does not hedge interest rate cash flows until the
period beginning April 18, 2011.
Additionally, the Company, through its acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, assumed a long
term pay-fixed, receive floating (1-month LIBOR), amortizing interest rate swap arrangement with an
initial notional amount of $40,000, for the period beginning October 8, 2008 and ending on July 30,
2012. This interest rate swap applied to the PCB Subsidiaries pre-acquisition, long-term
borrowings, which were paid-off on the acquisition date. The notional amount of the interest rate
swap decreases to zero over its term. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company will
pay a fixed rate of 3.43% and will receive floating 1-month LIBOR during the swap period. As the
borrowings attributable to this interest rate swap were paid off upon acquisition, the Company did
not designate this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge. As of March 28, 2011 and December 31,
2010, the fair value of the swap was recorded as a liability of $1,037 and $1,206, respectively, in
other long-term liabilities. The change in the fair value of this interest rate swap is recorded as
Other, net in the consolidated condensed statement of operations.
Foreign Exchange Contracts
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the impact of changes
in foreign currency exchange rates and to reduce the volatility of purchases and other obligations
generated in currencies other than the functional currencies. Our foreign subsidiaries may at times
purchase forward exchange contracts to manage their foreign currency risks in relation to
particular purchases or obligations, such as the related party financing obligation arising from
the put call option to purchase the remaining 20% of a majority owned subsidiary in 2013 and
certain purchases of machinery denominated in foreign currencies other than the Companys foreign
functional currency. The notional amount of the foreign exchange contracts at March 28, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 was approximately $62,833 and $36,266, respectively. The Company has designated
certain of these foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges, with the exception of the foreign
exchange contracts in relation to the related party financing obligation. In this instance, the
hedged item is a recognized liability subject to foreign currency transaction gains and losses and,
therefore, changes in the hedged item due to foreign currency exchange rates are recorded in
earnings. Therefore, hedge accounting has not been applied.
13
Table of Contents
The fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated condensed balance sheet are
as follows:
Asset / (Liability) Fair Value | ||||||||||
March 28, | December 31, | |||||||||
Balance Sheet Location | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
Cash flow derivative instruments designated as hedges: |
||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | $ | 5 | $ | | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Deposits and other non-current assets | 566 | 9 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Other accrued expenses | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Other long-term liabilities | (18 | ) | (272 | ) | |||||
Interest rate swap |
Other long-term liabilities | (3,657 | ) | (3,421 | ) | |||||
Cash flow derivative instruments not designated as hedges: |
||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 252 | 482 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Other accrued expenses | | (4 | ) | ||||||
Foreign exchange contracts |
Deposits and other non-current assets | 1,575 | 728 | |||||||
Interest rate swap |
Other long-term liabilities | (1,037 | ) | (1,206 | ) | |||||
$ | (2,316 | ) | $ | (3,685 | ) | |||||
The following tables provide information about the amounts recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income related to derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, as well as the amounts
recorded in each caption in the consolidated condensed statement of operations when derivative
amounts are reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income:
For the Quarter Ended March 28, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
Effective Portion | Ineffective Portion | |||||||||||||
Gain/(Loss) | Gain/(Loss) | Gain/(Loss) | ||||||||||||
Recognized in Other | Reclassified into | Recognized into | ||||||||||||
Financial Statement Caption | Comprehensive Income | Income | Income | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge: |
||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
Interest expense | $ | (235 | ) | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Foreign currency forward |
Other, net | 814 | | | ||||||||||
$ | 579 | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
The gain recognized in other, net in the consolidated condensed statement of operations on
derivative instruments not designated as hedges is as follows:
Quarter Ended | ||||
March 28, | ||||
2011 | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Derivative instruments not designated as hedges: |
||||
Interest rate swap |
$ | 166 | ||
Foreign exchange contracts |
921 | |||
$ | 1,087 | |||
14
Table of Contents
Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments at March
28, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
March 28, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term derivative assets |
$ | 257 | $ | 257 | $ | 482 | $ | 482 | ||||||||
Short-term derivative liabilities |
2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Noncurrent derivative assets |
2,141 | 2,141 | 737 | 737 | ||||||||||||
Long-term derivative liabilities |
4,711 | 4,711 | 4,899 | 4,899 | ||||||||||||
Long-term equity investment |
2,706 | 2,273 | 2,714 | 2,280 | ||||||||||||
Related party financing obligation |
21,829 | 22,412 | 20,399 | 20,791 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
348,076 | 346,701 | 380,118 | 370,812 | ||||||||||||
Convertible senior notes |
146,705 | 234,570 | 145,283 | 207,508 |
The fair value of the derivative instruments was determined using pricing models developed
based on the LIBOR swap rate, foreign currency exchange rates, and other observable market data,
including quoted market prices, as appropriate. The values were adjusted to reflect nonperformance
risk of both the counterparty and the Company.
The fair value of equity securities accounted for under the cost method (nonmarketable equity
securities) was determined using market multiples derived from comparable companies. Under that
approach, the identification of comparable companies requires significant judgment. Additionally,
multiples might lie in ranges with a different multiple for each comparable company. The selection
of where the appropriate multiple falls within that range also requires significant judgment,
considering both qualitative and quantitative factors.
The related party financing obligation fair value was estimated based on the minimum price of
the obligation plus 2.5% interest discounted at the liabilitys discount rate based on the
Companys adjusted cost of borrowing.
The fair value of the long-term debt was estimated based on discounting the par value of the
debt over its life for the difference between the debt stated interest rate and current market
rates for similar debt at March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The fair value of the convertible senior notes was estimated based on quoted market prices.
At March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys financial instruments included cash and
cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes receivable, accounts payable and equipment payables.
Due to short-term maturities, the carrying amount of these instruments approximates fair value.
(12) Significant Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk
The Companys customers include both OEMs and EMS companies. The Companys OEM customers often
direct a significant portion of their purchases through EMS companies. While the Companys
customers include both OEM and EMS providers, the Company measures customer concentration based on
OEM companies, as they are the ultimate end customers.
For the quarter ended March 28, 2011 one customer accounted for approximately 13% of the
Companys net sales. For the quarter ended March 29, 2010, no one customer accounted for 10% or
greater of the Companys net sales. The loss of one or more major customers or a decline in sales
to the Companys major customers would have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition and results of operation.
The Company also extends credit to its customers, which are concentrated primarily in the
computer and networking and communication and aerospace/defense industries, and most of which are
located outside the United States. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of customers,
does not require collateral and considers the credit risk profile of the entity from which the
receivable is due in further evaluating collection risk.
15
Table of Contents
As of March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys 10 largest customers in the
aggregate accounted for 50% and 53%, respectively, of total accounts receivable. If one or more of
the Companys significant customers were to become insolvent or were otherwise unable to pay for
the manufacturing services provided, it would have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition and results of operations.
(13) Fair Value Measures
The Company measures at fair value its financial and non-financial assets by using a fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, essentially an exit
price, based on the highest and best use of the asset or liability.
At March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the following financial assets and liabilities were
measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the type of inputs shown:
March 28, | Fair Value Measurements Using: | |||||||||||||||
2011 | Level 1 Inputs | Level 2 Inputs | Level 3 Inputs | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 85,611 | $ | 85,611 | | | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivative assets |
2,398 | | $ | 2,398 | | |||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities |
4,694 | | 4,694 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities |
20 | | 20 | |
December 31, | Fair Value Measurements Using: | |||||||||||||||
2010 | Level 1 Inputs | Level 2 Inputs | Level 3 Inputs | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 66,742 | $ | 66,742 | | | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivative assets |
1,219 | | $ | 1,219 | | |||||||||||
Interest rate swap derivative liabilities |
4,627 | | 4,627 | | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities |
277 | | 277 | |
There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 inputs
for the quarter ended March 28, 2011.
The following is a summary of activity for fair value measurements using Level 3 inputs for
the quarter ended March 29, 2010:
For the Quarter | ||||
Ended | ||||
Fair Value Measurement using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | March 29, 2010 | |||
(In thousands) | ||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 1,351 | ||
Transfers to level 3 |
| |||
Settlement |
(1,351 | ) | ||
Changes in fair value included in earnings |
| |||
Ending balance |
$ | | ||
There was no activity for fair value measurement using Level 3 inputs for the quarter ended
March 28, 2011.
The
changes in fair value included in earnings for the quarter ended
March 29, 2010 have been
included in other, net in the consolidated condensed statement of operations.
The majority of the Companys non-financial instruments, which include goodwill, intangible
assets, inventories, and property, plant and equipment, are not required to be carried at fair
value on a recurring basis. However, if certain triggering events occur (or tested at least
annually for goodwill) such that a non-financial instrument is required to be evaluated for
impairment, based upon a comparison of the non-financial instruments fair value to its carrying
value, an impairment is recorded to reduce the carrying value to the fair value, if the carrying
value exceeds the fair value.
16
Table of Contents
For the quarter ended March 29, 2010, the following non-financial instruments were measured at
fair value on a nonrecurring basis using the type of inputs shown:
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Losses for | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 29, | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | the Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | Inputs | Inputs | Inputs | March 29, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asset held for sale |
$ | 500 | | $ | 500 | | $ | 500 | ||||||||||||
The fair values of long-lived assets held and used and the asset held for sale were primarily
determined using appraisals and comparable prices of similar assets, which are considered to be
Level 2 inputs.
(14) Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Matters
The Company is subject to various legal matters, which it considers normal for its business
activities. While the Company currently believes that the amount of any ultimate potential loss for
known matters would not be material to the Companys financial condition, the outcome of these
actions is inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate
potential loss could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition or results
of operations in a particular period. The Company has accrued amounts for its loss contingencies
which are probable and estimable at March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010. However, these amounts
are not material to the consolidated condensed financial statements.
Environmental Matters
The process to manufacture PCBs requires adherence to city, county, state, federal and foreign
jurisdiction environmental regulations regarding the storage, use, handling and disposal of
chemicals, solid wastes and other hazardous materials as well as air quality standards. Management
believes that its facilities comply in all material respects with environmental laws and
regulations. The Company has in the past received certain notices of violations and has implemented
certain required minor corrective activities. There can be no assurance that violations will not
occur in the future.
The Company is involved in various stages of investigation and cleanup in Connecticut related
to environmental remediation matters for two sites and has investigated a third site. The ultimate
cost of site cleanup is difficult to predict given the uncertainties regarding the extent of the
required cleanup, the interpretation of applicable laws and regulations, and alternative cleanup
methods. The third Connecticut site was investigated under Connecticuts Land Transfer Act and no
contamination above applicable standards was found. The Company concluded that it was probable that
it would incur remediation and monitoring costs for these sites of approximately $389 and $558 as
of March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, the liability for which is included in other
long-term liabilities. The Company estimates that it will incur the remediation costs over the next
12 to 84 months. This accrual was discounted at 8% per annum to determine the Companys best
estimate of the liability, which the Company estimated as ranging from $839 to $1,274 on an
undiscounted basis.
The liabilities recorded do not take into account any claims for recoveries from insurance or
third parties and none are anticipated. These costs are mostly comprised of estimated consulting
costs to evaluate potential remediation requirements, completion of the remediation, and monitoring
of results achieved. Subject to the imprecision in estimating future environmental remediation
costs, the Company does not expect the outcome of the environmental remediation matters, either
individually or in the aggregate, to have a material adverse effect on its financial position,
results of operations, or cash flows.
17
Table of Contents
(15) Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used to calculate basic
earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the quarters ended March 28, 2011 and March
29, 2010:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share | ||||||||
amounts) | ||||||||
Net income attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders |
$ | 27,123 | $ | 4,485 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
80,696 | 43,310 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of performance-based stock units, restricted stock units and stock options |
1,090 | 669 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of assumed conversion of convertible notes outstanding |
518 | | ||||||
Diluted shares |
82,304 | 43,979 | ||||||
Earnings per share attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders: |
||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.10 | ||||
For the quarters ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010, performance-based stock units,
restricted stock units and stock options to purchase 648 and 2,326 shares of common stock,
respectively, were not considered in calculating diluted earnings per share because the options
exercise prices or the total expected proceeds under the treasury stock method for
performance-based stock units, restricted stock units or stock options was greater than the average
market price of common shares during the period and, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive.
(16) Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized in the accompanying consolidated condensed
statements of operations as follows:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 216 | $ | 328 | ||||
Selling and marketing |
111 | 108 | ||||||
General and administrative |
1,427 | 976 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense recognized |
1,754 | 1,412 | ||||||
Income tax benefit recognized |
(534 | ) | (478 | ) | ||||
Total stock-based compensation expense after income taxes |
$ | 1,220 | $ | 934 | ||||
Performance-based Restricted Stock Units
In 2010 the Company implemented a long-term incentive program for executives that provides for
the issuance of performance-based restricted stock units (PRUs), representing hypothetical shares
of the Companys common stock that may be issued. Under the PRU program, a target number of PRUs is
awarded at the beginning of each three-year performance period. The number of shares of common
stock released at the end of the performance period will range from zero to 2.4 times the target
number depending on performance during the period. The performance metrics of the PRU program are
based on (a) annual financial targets, which for the first one-third of the grant are based on
revenue and EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization expense), each
equally weighted, and (b) an overall modifier based on the Companys total stockholder return (TSR)
relative to the S&P SmallCap 600 over the three-year performance period.
18
Table of Contents
The Company records stock-based
compensation expense for PRU awards granted based on
managements periodic assessment
of the probability of the PRU awards vesting. For the quarter ended March 28, 2011, management determined
that vesting of the PRU awards was probable.
PRUs activity for the quarter ended March 28, 2011 was as follows:
Shares | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||
Outstanding target shares at December 31, 2010 |
55 | |||
Granted: |
||||
Second tranche of 2010 grant |
45 | |||
First tranche of 2011 grant |
63 | |||
Outstanding target shares at March 28, 2011 |
163 | |||
The fair value for PRUs granted is calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation model, as the
TSR modifier contains a market condition. For the quarters ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010,
the following assumptions were used in determining the fair value:
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
20111 | 20102 | |||||||
Weighted-average fair value |
$ | 22.74 | $ | 10.11 | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.0 | % | 1.3 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
| | ||||||
Expected volatility |
59 | % | 65 | % | ||||
Expected term in months |
33 | 33 |
(1) | Reflects the weighted-averages for the second year of the three-year performance period applicable to PRUs granted in 2010 and for the first year of the three-year performance period applicable to PRUs granted in 2011 | |
(2) | Reflects the first year of the three-year performance period applicable to PRUs granted in 2010. |
Restricted Stock Units
The Company granted 335 and 377 restricted stock units during the quarters ended March 28,
2011 and March 29, 2010, respectively. The units granted have a weighted-average fair value per
unit of $17.30 for the quarter ended March 28, 2011 and $9.14 for the quarter ended March 29, 2010.
The fair value for restricted stock units granted is based on the closing share price of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant.
Stock Options
The Company did not grant any stock option awards during the quarters ended March 28, 2011 and
March 29, 2010.
Foreign Employee Share Awards
Prior to the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries by the Company, there existed an employee
share award scheme originally set up by the controlling shareholder of the PCB Subsidiaries to
incentivize and reward the PCB Subsidiaries employees. In 2008, administration of this scheme was
transferred to a small group of employees in order to carry on the objectives of the program. After
the close of the acquisition, the unvested Meadville Holdings shares remaining for vesting and/or
granting purposes under that scheme were exchanged for the right to earn fractional shares of TTM
common stock plus cash equal to the dividend distributed by Meadville Holdings to the holders of
Meadville Holdings shares after the acquisition. These remaining grants vest over five tranches.
Two tranches vested in the first quarter of 2011 and the remaining three tranches will vest
annually thereafter, through 2014. As per ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, the fair value of
the common stock plus cash consideration to be received by the employee, after adjustment for
estimated forfeitures, that is attributed to pre-combination service is recognized as purchase
consideration. The fair value, after adjustment for estimated forfeitures, that is attributed to
post-combination service is recognized as an expense over the remaining vesting period and is
included as a component of total stock-based compensation expense. At March 28, 2011 and December
31, 2010, there were approximately 50 and 193 shares in the employee share award grants,
respectively.
19
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of total unrecognized compensation costs as of March 28, 2011:
Unrecognized | Remaining Weighted | |||||||
Stock-Based | Average Recognition | |||||||
Compensation Cost | Period | |||||||
(In thousands) | (In years) | |||||||
PRU awards |
$ | 2,751 | 2.3 | |||||
RSU awards |
10,172 | 1.7 | ||||||
Stock option awards |
722 | 1.8 | ||||||
Foreign employee share awards |
474 | 1.8 | ||||||
$ | 14,119 | |||||||
(17) Segment Information
The operating segments reported below are the Companys segments for which separate financial
information is available and upon which operating results are evaluated by the chief operating
decision maker to assess performance and to allocate resources. The Company manages its worldwide
operations based on two geographic operating segments: 1) North America, which consists of seven
domestic PCB fabrication plants, including a facility that provides follow-on value-added services
primarily for one of the PCB fabrication plants, and one backplane assembly plant in Shanghai,
China, which is managed in conjunction with the Companys U.S. operations and its related European
sales support infrastructure; and 2) Asia Pacific, which consists of the PCB Subsidiaries and their
seven PCB fabrication plants, which include a substrate facility. Each segment operates
predominantly in the same industry with production facilities that produce similar customized
products for its customers and use similar means of product distribution in their respective
geographic regions.
The Company evaluates segment performance based on operating segment income, which is
operating income before amortization of intangibles. Interest expense and interest income are not
presented by segment since they are not included in the measure of segment profitability reviewed
by the chief operating decision maker. All inter-segment transactions have been eliminated.
Reportable segment assets exclude short-term investments, which are managed centrally.
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2011 | March 29, 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||
North America |
$ | 142,250 | $ | 138,219 | ||||
Asia Pacific |
202,465 | | ||||||
Total sales |
344,715 | 138,219 | ||||||
Inter-segment sales |
(1,914 | ) | | |||||
Total net sales |
$ | 342,801 | $ | 138,219 | ||||
Operating Segment Income: |
||||||||
North America |
$ | 16,765 | $ | 10,659 | ||||
Asia Pacific |
33,077 | | ||||||
Total operating segment income |
49,842 | 10,659 | ||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangibles |
(4,158 | ) | (791 | ) | ||||
Total operating income |
45,684 | 9,868 | ||||||
Total other expense |
(5,314 | ) | (2,789 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 40,370 | $ | 7,079 | ||||
The Company accounts for inter-segment sales and transfers as if the sale or transfer were to
third parties: at arms length and in conjunction with the Companys revenue recognition policy. The
inter-segment sales for the quarter ended March 28, 2011 are sales from the Asia Pacific operating
segment to the North America operating segment.
20
Table of Contents
(18) Related Party Transactions
Long-term Equity Investment
The Company, through its acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, acquired a 10% equity interest
in a private company, Aspocomp Oulu Oy (Oulu), which is located in Finland. The majority owner of
this private company is Aspocomp Group Oyj (Aspocomp), a Helsinki Stock Exchange traded Finnish
company, which is therefore a related party. Aspocomp is also the 20% minority shareholder in
Meadville Aspocomp (BVI) Holdings Limited, a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company
consolidates the financial results of this majority-owned company.
The Company accounts for this 10% nonmarketable investment in Oulu using the cost method of
accounting. Under the cost method of accounting, the investment is measured at cost subsequent to
initial measurement, which for the Company was April 8, 2010, the acquisition date of the PCB
Subsidiaries. The fair value assigned to this investment at the acquisition date was $2,718, which
was based on a market approach to estimate the enterprise value and recorded as a component of
non-current assets.
The equity investment is tested for impairment if there are impairment triggers. There was no
impairment of the equity investment for the quarter ended March 28, 2011.
Long-term Related Party Financing Obligation
The related party financing obligation consists of a put and call option agreement which
grants the noncontrolling interest a put option to sell, and to one of the PCB Subsidiaries a call
option to purchase, the remaining 20% equity interest in one of its majority owned subsidiaries.
The exercise price of the put option is the greater of (i) an enterprise value calculation, which
uses earnings before interest and taxes, depreciation and amortization projections on the
extrapolation of the latest unaudited combined financial results of the majority owned subsidiary
to a four-year period and an enterprise value multiplier of 5.5 times, or (ii) the net asset value
based on the extrapolation of the latest unaudited combined financial results of the majority owned
subsidiary as at end of the fiscal year 2012; or (iii) the minimum price of approximately 15,384
EUR plus interest which will accrue at a rate of 2.5% compounded annually until the option is
exercised. Fair value as of the acquisition date of the financial liability was based upon the
minimum price as the other two scenarios were determined to be nonsubstantive due to the
challenging current and expected future operations of the subsidiary. As the minimum price
represents a fixed obligation, the noncontrolling interest was accounted for as a financing
obligation rather than a noncontrolling interest and 100% of the subsidiary is consolidated. The
fair value of the related party financial liability was estimated based on the minimum price of the
obligation plus 2.5% interest discounted at the liabilitys discount rate based on the Companys
adjusted cost of borrowing as of the acquisition date.
Supply and Lease Arrangements
The Companys foreign subsidiaries enter into long-term supply arrangements to purchase
laminate and prepreg from a related party in which a significant shareholder of the Company holds
an approximate 17% shareholding. These supply arrangements expire on December 31, 2012. The Companys
foreign subsidiaries also purchased laminate and prepreg from the laminate companies of the said
significant shareholder of the Company. For the quarter ended March 28, 2011, the Company purchased
$24,133 of laminate and prepreg from these related parties. There were no such related party
purchases for the quarter ended March 29, 2010.
Additionally, a foreign subsidiary of the Company also leases warehouse space from a related
party controlled by a significant shareholder of the Company. Likewise, a related party leases
employee housing space from a foreign subsidiary of the Company. For the quarter ended March 28,
2011, the net income for these activities was $64. There was no such related party activity for the
quarter ended March 29, 2010.
At March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys consolidated condensed balance sheet
included $42,238 and $50,374, respectively, in accounts payable due to and $113 and $86,
respectively, in accounts receivable due from a related party for the supply and lease
arrangements.
21
Table of Contents
(19) Subsequent Event
On May 4, 2011, the Company announced that it had entered into a letter of intent to acquire the
remaining 20 percent interest in Meadville Aspocomp (BVI) Holdings
Ltd. from Aspocomp, which is accounted for as a
related party financing obligation (Note 18), for EUR 14,500 or
approximately $21,100. Additionally, under this letter of intent, the Company has also agreed to exchange its 10
percent stake in Oulu for approximately 12,300 shares of Aspocomp. Both the
proposed transactions are subject to the signing and completion of definitive agreements.
22
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read
in conjunction with our consolidated condensed financial statements and the related notes and the
other financial information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion and
analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a
result of specified factors, including those set forth in Item 1A Risk Factors of Part II below
and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations set forth in our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
OVERVIEW
We are a leading global provider of time-critical and technologically complex printed circuit
board (PCB) products and backplane assemblies (PCBs populated with electronic components), which
serve as the foundation of sophisticated electronic products. We provide our customers advanced technology products and offer a one-stop manufacturing solution to
customers from engineering support to prototype development through final volume production. We
serve a diversified customer base in various markets throughout the world, including manufacturers
of networking/communications infrastructure products, personal computers, touch screen tablets and
mobile media devices (cellular phones and smart phones). We also serve high-end computing,
commercial aerospace/defense, and industrial/medical industries. Our customers include both
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and electronic manufacturing services (EMS) providers.
In April 2010, we acquired from Meadville all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of
four of its subsidiaries. These four companies and their respective subsidiaries, collectively
referred to as the PCB Subsidiaries, comprised Meadvilles PCB manufacturing and distributing
business. See Note 2 in our consolidated condensed financial statements.
While our customers include both OEM and EMS providers, we measure customers based on OEM
companies as they are the ultimate end customers. We measure customers as those companies that have
placed orders of $2,000 or more in the preceding 12-month period. As of March 28, 2011, we had
approximately 1,175 customers and as of March 29, 2010 we had approximately 820 customers. Sales to
our 10 largest customers accounted for 46% and 52% of our net sales in the first quarter ended
March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010, respectively. We sell to OEMs both directly and indirectly
through EMS companies.
The following table shows the percentage of our net sales attributable to each of the
principal end markets we served for the periods indicated.
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, | March 29, | |||||||
End Markets(1) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Aerospace/Defense |
16 | % | 42 | % | ||||
Cellular Phone |
9 | | ||||||
Computing/Storage/Peripherals |
27 | 12 | ||||||
Medical/Industrial/Instrumentation/Other |
8 | 11 | ||||||
Networking/Communications |
34 | 33 | ||||||
Other |
6 | 2 | ||||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
(1) | Sales to EMS companies are classified by the end markets of their OEM customers. |
For PCBs, we measure the time sensitivity of our products by tracking the quick-turn
percentage of our work. We define quick-turn orders as those with delivery times of 10 days or
less, which typically captures research and development, prototype, and new product introduction
work, in addition to unexpected short-term demand among our customers. Generally, we quote prices
after we receive the design specifications and the time and volume requirements from our customers.
Our quick-turn services command a premium price as compared to standard lead-time products.
23
Table of Contents
We also deliver a significant percentage of compressed lead-time work with lead times of 11 to
20 days. We typically receive a premium price for this work as well. Purchase orders may be
cancelled prior to shipment. We charge customers a fee, based on percentage completed, if an order
is cancelled once it has entered production. We derive revenues primarily from the sale of PCBs and
backplane assemblies using customer-supplied engineering and design plans. We recognize revenues
when persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, the sales terms are fixed or determinable,
title and risk of loss have transferred, and collectibility is reasonably assured generally when
products are shipped to the customer. Net sales consist of gross sales less an allowance for
returns, which typically has been less than 2% of gross sales. We provide our customers a limited
right of return for defective PCBs and backplane assemblies. We record an estimated amount for
sales returns and allowances at the time of sale based on historical information.
Cost of goods sold consists of materials, labor, outside services, and overhead expenses
incurred in the manufacture and testing of our products as well as stock-based compensation
expense. Many factors affect our gross margin, including capacity utilization, product mix,
production volume, and yield. We generally do not participate in any significant long-term
contracts with suppliers, with the exception of the supply arrangement to purchase laminate and
prepregs from a related party controlled by a significant shareholder, and we believe there are a
number of potential suppliers for the raw materials we use.
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and commissions paid to our
internal sales force and independent sales representatives, salaries paid to our sales support
staff, stock-based compensation expense as well as costs associated with marketing materials and
trade shows. We generally pay higher commissions to our independent sales representatives for
quick-turn work, which generally has a higher gross profit component than standard lead-time work.
General and administrative costs primarily include the salaries for executive, finance,
accounting, information technology, facilities and human resources personnel, as well as insurance
expenses, expenses for accounting and legal assistance, incentive compensation expense, stock-based
compensation expense, bad debt expense, gains or losses on the sale or disposal of property, plant
and equipment, and acquisition related expenses.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our consolidated condensed financial statements included in this report have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
A critical accounting policy is defined as one that is both material to the presentation of
our consolidated condensed financial statements and requires management to make judgments that
could have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations. These policies
require us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate.
Different estimates we could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimates that are reasonably
likely to occur, could have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that
are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these
estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Our critical accounting policies include asset valuation related to bad debts and inventory;
sales returns and allowances; impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill and intangible
assets; derivative instruments and hedging activities; realizability of deferred tax assets;
establishing the fair value of individual assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling
interest when we acquire other businesses; and determining self-insured reserves.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We provide customary credit terms to our customers and generally do not require collateral. We
perform ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of our customers and maintain an
allowance for doubtful accounts based upon historical collections experience and judgments as to
expected collectibility of accounts. Our actual bad debts may differ from our estimates.
24
Table of Contents
Inventories
In assessing the realizability of inventories, we are required to make judgments as to future
demand requirements and compare these with current and committed inventory levels. When the market
value of inventory is less than the carrying value, the inventory cost is written down to the
estimated net realizable value thereby establishing a new cost basis. Our inventory requirements
may change based on our projected customer demand, market conditions, technological and product
life cycle changes, longer or shorter than expected usage periods, and other factors that could
affect the valuation of our inventories. We maintain certain finished goods inventories near
certain key customer locations in accordance with agreements with those customers. Although this
inventory is typically supported by valid purchase orders, should these customers ultimately not
purchase these inventories, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely
affected.
Sales Returns and Allowances
We derive revenues primarily from the sale of printed circuit boards and backplane assemblies
using customer-supplied engineering and design plans and generally recognize revenue upon delivery.
We provide our customers a limited right of return for defective printed circuit boards and
backplane assemblies. We accrue an estimated amount for sales returns and allowances at the time of
sale using our judgment based on historical information and anticipated returns as a result of
current period sales. To the extent actual experience varies from our historical experience,
revisions to these allowances may be required.
Long-lived Assets
We have significant long-lived tangible and intangible assets consisting of property, plant
and equipment, definite-lived intangibles, and goodwill. We review these assets for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may
not be recoverable. In addition, we perform an impairment test related to goodwill at least
annually. Our goodwill and intangibles are largely attributable to our acquisitions of other
businesses. We have two operating segments, North America and Asia Pacific.
During the fourth quarter of each year, and when events and circumstances warrant an
evaluation, we perform an impairment assessment of goodwill, which requires the use of a fair value
based analysis. We determine the fair value of our reporting units based on discounted cash flows
and market approach analyses as considered necessary and consider factors such as a weakened
economy, reduced expectations for future cash flows coupled with a decline in the market price of
our stock and market capitalization for a sustained period as indicators for potential goodwill
impairment. If the reporting units carrying amount exceeds its estimated fair value, a second step
must be performed to measure the amount of the goodwill impairment loss, if any. The second step
compares the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill, determined in the same manner as
the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, with the carrying amount of such
goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of
that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
We also assess other long-lived assets, specifically definite-lived intangibles and property,
plant and equipment, for potential impairment given similar impairment indicators. When indicators
of impairment exist related to our long-lived tangible assets and definite-lived intangible assets,
we use an estimate of the undiscounted net cash flows in measuring whether the carrying amount of
the assets is recoverable. Measurement of the amount of impairment, if any, is based upon the
difference between the assets carrying value and estimated fair value. Fair value is determined
through various valuation techniques, including market and income approaches as considered
necessary.
If forecasts and assumptions used to support the realizability of our goodwill and other
long-lived assets change in the future, significant impairment charges could result that would
adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
As a matter of policy, we use derivatives for risk management purposes, and we do not use
derivatives for speculative purposes. Derivatives are typically entered into as hedges of changes
in interest rates, currency exchange rates, and other risks.
When we determine to designate a derivative instrument as a cash flow hedge, we formally
document the hedging relationship and its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking
the hedge, the hedging instrument, the hedged item, the nature of the risk being hedged, how the
hedging instruments effectiveness in offsetting the hedged risk will be assessed, and a
description of the
25
Table of Contents
method of measuring ineffectiveness. We also formally assess, both at the hedges inception
and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivative that is used in hedging transactions is highly
effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged items.
Derivative financial instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the
consolidated condensed balance sheet with measurement at fair value. Fair value of the derivative
instruments is determined using pricing models developed based on the underlying swap interest
rate, foreign currency exchange rates, and other observable market data as appropriate. The values
are also adjusted to reflect nonperformance risk of both the counterparty and the Company. For
derivatives that are designated as a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative
are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, to the extent the derivative is effective
at offsetting the changes in cash flow being hedged until the hedged item affects earnings. To the
extent there is any hedge ineffectiveness, changes in fair value relating to the ineffective
portion are immediately recognized in earnings. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are
not designated as hedges are recorded in earnings each period.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets are reviewed for recoverability, and valuation allowances are
provided, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amounts that are more likely
than not to be realized based on our estimate of future taxable income. Should our expectations of
taxable income change in future periods, it may be necessary to establish a valuation allowance,
which could affect our results of operations in the period such a determination is made. We record
an income tax provision or benefit during interim periods at a rate that is based on expected
results for the full year. If future changes in market conditions cause actual results for the year
to be more or less favorable than those expected, adjustments to the effective income tax rate
could be required.
In addition, we are subject to income taxes in the United States and foreign jurisdictions.
Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the
ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions where the ultimate tax determination
is uncertain. Additionally, our calculations of income taxes are based on our interpretations of
applicable tax laws in the jurisdictions in which we file.
Business Combinations
We allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets
acquired, liabilities assumed and noncontrolling interest, based on their estimated fair values.
The excess of the purchase price over these fair values is recorded as goodwill. We engage
independent third-party appraisal firms to assist us in determining the fair values of assets
acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interest. Such valuations require management to
make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets.
The fair value of the real property was estimated primarily via the cost approach, and where
applicable, the sales comparison approach and income approach. The procedures employed included
site inspections, analysis of the subject properties, review of the highest and best use of the
subject properties, discussions with onsite property management, determinations regarding future
use of the facilities, review of real property market data available in the local market,
estimation of replacement cost, new and typical expected useful lives, and the calculation of all
factors of obsolescence.
For the fair value of the personal property we utilized the cost approach as the primary
approach for valuing the majority of the personal property. The market approach was used to
estimate the value of certain equipment commonly traded in the second hand marketplace, as well as
computers and computer-related assets. The income approach was used to quantify any economic
obsolescence that may be present in the subject assets. Our analysis also entailed an estimation of
useful lives, which were researched and discussed with property management and market sources. The
fair value measurement assumes the highest and best use of personal property assets by market
participants.
The significant purchased intangible assets recorded by us include customer relationships,
trade name, and order backlog. The fair values assigned to the identified intangible assets are
discussed in Note 5 of the notes to the consolidated condensed financial statements.
Critical estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include but are not limited to: future
expected cash flows from customer relationships, estimating cash flows from existing backlog,
market position of the trade name, as well as assumptions about cash flow savings from the trade
name, and discount rates. Managements estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed
to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual
results may differ from estimates.
26
Table of Contents
Estimates associated with the accounting for acquisitions may change during the measurement
period as additional information becomes available regarding the assets acquired, liabilities
assumed, and noncontrolling interest as discussed in Note 3 of the notes to consolidated condensed
financial statements.
Self Insurance
We are primarily self-insured in North America for group health insurance and workers
compensation benefits provided to our U.S. employees, and we purchase insurance to protect against
annual claims at the individual and aggregate level. We estimate our exposure for claims incurred
but not reported at the end of each reporting period. We use our judgment using our historical
claim data and information and analysis provided by actuarial and claim advisors, our insurance
carriers and brokers on an annual basis to estimate our liability for these claims. This liability
is subject to individual insured stop-loss coverage for both programs which is $250,000 per
individual. Our actual claims experience may differ from our estimates.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The quarter ended March 29, 2010 does not include the results of operations from our acquired
PCB Subsidiaries, as the acquisition occurred on April 8, 2010. The acquisition has had and will
continue to have a significant effect on our operations as discussed in the various comparisons
noted below.
There were 87 and 88 days for the quarters ended March 28, 2011 and March 29, 2010, respectively.
The following table sets forth the relationship of various items to net sales in our
consolidated condensed statement of operations:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2011 | March 29, 2010 | |||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
76.1 | 80.5 | ||||||
Gross profit |
23.9 | 19.5 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Selling and marketing |
2.6 | 4.9 | ||||||
General and administrative |
6.7 | 6.5 | ||||||
Amortization of definite-lived intangibles |
1.3 | 0.6 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets |
| 0.4 | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
10.6 | 12.4 | ||||||
Operating income |
13.3 | 7.1 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(1.8 | ) | (2.0 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
0.3 | | ||||||
Total other expense, net |
(1.5 | ) | (2.0 | ) | ||||
Income before income taxes |
11.8 | 5.1 | ||||||
Income tax provision |
(3.3 | ) | (1.9 | ) | ||||
Net income |
8.5 | 3.2 | ||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(0.6 | ) | | |||||
Net income attributable to TTM Technologies, Inc. stockholders |
7.9 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||
We manage our worldwide operations based on two geographic operating segments: (1) North
America, which consists of seven domestic PCB fabrication plants, including a facility that
provides follow-on value-added services primarily for one of the PCB fabrication plants, and one
backplane assembly plant in Shanghai, China, which is managed in conjunction with our U.S.
operations and its related European sales support infrastructure; and (2) Asia Pacific, which
consists of the PCB Subsidiaries and their seven PCB fabrication plants, which include a substrate
facility. Each segment operates predominantly in the same industry with production facilities that
produce similar customized products for our customers and use similar means of product distribution
in their respective geographic regions.
27
Table of Contents
The following table compares net sales by reportable segment for the quarters ended March 28,
2011 and March 29, 2010:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||
March 28, 2011 | March 29, 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||
North America |
$ | 142,250 | $ | 138,219 | ||||
Asia Pacific |
202,465 | | ||||||
Total sales |
344,715 | 138,219 | ||||||
Inter-segment sales |
(1,914 | ) | | |||||
Total net sales |
$ | 342,801 | $ | 138,219 | ||||
Net Sales
Net sales increased $204.6 million, from $138.2 million
for the quarter ended March 29, 2010 to $342.8
million for the
quarter ended March 28, 2011 primarily due to our acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries,
which comprise our Asia Pacific reporting segment.
Revenue for the North America segment increased $4.1 million, or 3.0%,
from $138.2 million in
the first quarter 2010 to $142.3 million in the first quarter of 2011. This increase was primarily due to improved
performance at a number of our production facilities as well as increased average PCB selling price
from the first quarter 2010, partially offset by the closure of our Hayward, California backplane
assembly facility.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold increased $149.7 million from $111.2 million for the quarter ended March
29, 2010 to $260.9 million for the quarter ended March 28, 2011
primarily due to our acquisition of
the PCB Subsidiaries in April 2010, which comprise our Asia Pacific segment.
Cost of goods sold for the North America segment remained consistent with $111.2 million for
the first quarter ended March 29, 2010 and $111.1 million for the quarter ended March 28, 2011.
As a percentage of net sales, cost of goods sold
decreased from 80.5% for the first quarter ended March 29, 2010 to 78.1% for the first quarter
ended March 28, 2011, primarily due to the closure of our Hayward and
Los Angeles, California production facilities in 2010.
Gross Profit
As a result of the foregoing,
gross profit increased $54.9 million from $27.0 million for the quarter ended March 29, 2010
to $81.9 million for the first quarter ended March 28, 2011, primarily
due to our acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries. Overall gross margin increased from 19.5% for the
quarter ended March 29, 2010 to 23.9% for the first quarter ended March 28, 2011 due
primarily to higher overall profit margins for the Asia Pacific segment, which in turn are
primarily attributable to that segments sale of HDI PCBs and other product mix variations.
Additionally, gross margin increased in our North America segment due to the facility closures as discussed above.
Selling and Marketing Expenses
Selling and marketing expenses increased $2.3 million, or 34.3%, from $6.7 million for the
quarter ended March 29, 2010 to $9.0 million for the first quarter ended March 28, 2011 due
to our acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries. As a percentage of net sales, selling and marketing
expenses were 4.9% for the quarter ended March 29, 2010 as compared to 2.6% for the first
quarter ended March 28, 2011. The decline in selling and marketing expense as a percentage of net
sales is due to our acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, which have lower selling labor and
commission expense than our North America segment.
28
Table of Contents
General and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expenses increased $14.1 million from $9.0 million, or 6.5% of net
sales, for the quarter ended March 29, 2010 to $23.1 million, or 6.7% of net sales, for the
quarter ended March 28, 2011. The increase in expense primarily relates to our acquisition of
the PCB Subsidiaries in April 2010, partially offset by a decrease in transaction-related costs of $1.8
million from the quarter ended March 29, 2010 to the comparable quarter in 2011.
Amortization of Definite-Lived Intangibles
Intangible amortization expense increased $3.4 million from $0.8 million, or 0.6% of net
sales, for the quarter ended March 29, 2010 to $4.2 million, or 1.3% of net sales, for the
first quarter ended March 28, 2011. The increase was due to our acquisition of the PCB
Subsidiaries. Identifiable intangible assets include customer relationships, trade name and order
backlog.
Other Income (Expense)
Other expense, net increased $2.5 million from $2.8 million for the first quarter ended March
29, 2010 to $5.3 million for the first quarter ended March 28, 2011. The increase in other expense,
net was primarily due to interest expense related to the debt assumed at the date of acquisition of
the PCB Subsidiaries, as well as increased amortization of costs related to the issuance of this
debt, partially
offset by foreign currency transaction gains in the first quarter of 2011.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes increased $8.7 million from $2.6 million for the first quarter ended
March 29, 2010 to $11.3 million for the first quarter ended March 28, 2011 primarily due to higher
pre-tax income. Our effective tax rate was 27.9% for the first
quarter ended March 28, 2011 and
36.6% for the first quarter ended March 29, 2010. Our effective tax rate decreased in 2011
primarily due to the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, which have a lower effective tax rate
than our North America operations. Our effective tax rate is primarily impacted by the U.S. federal
income tax rate, apportioned state income tax rates, tax rates in China and Hong Kong, generation
of other credits and deductions available to us, and certain non-deductible items. Certain foreign
losses generated are not more than likely to be realizable, and thus no income tax benefit has been
recognized on these losses. Additionally, as of March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had net
deferred income tax assets of approximately $14.0 million and $18.3 million, respectively. Based on
our forecast for future taxable earnings, we believe it is more likely than not that we will
utilize the deferred income tax asset in future periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operations, the issuance of
Convertible Notes and, more recently, the issuance of term and revolving debt. Our principal uses
of cash have been to meet debt service requirements, finance capital expenditures, fund working
capital requirements and finance acquisitions. We anticipate that servicing debt, funding working
capital requirements, financing capital expenditures, and acquisitions will continue to be the
principal demands on our cash in the future.
As of March 28, 2011, we had net working capital of approximately $229.8 million compared to
$258.3 million as of December 31, 2010.
Our 2011 capital expenditure plan is expected to total approximately $136.0 million (of which
approximately $115.0 million relates to our Asia Pacific segment), and will fund capital equipment
purchases to increase production capacity, expand our technological capabilities and replace aging
equipment.
Based on our current level of operations, we believe that cash generated from operations, cash
on hand and available borrowings under our existing credit arrangements will be adequate to meet
our currently anticipated debt service, capital expenditures, acquisition, and working capital
needs for the next 12 months and beyond. The semiannual repayments on our existing term loan
increase as the debt nears maturity in 2013. Should we choose to maintain a significant level of
annual capital expenditures or to pursue an acquisition in the next few years, refinancing of our
existing debt may be necessary. In the event we determine to engage in significant acquisition or
debt refinancing transactions, the adequacy of our liquidity will depend on our ability to achieve
an appropriate combination of financing from third parties and access to capital markets. We cannot
give any assurances that we will be able to obtain additional financing or otherwise access the
capital markets in the future on acceptable terms or at all.
29
Table of Contents
Credit Agreement
On April 9, 2010, in conjunction with the acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, the Company
became a party to a credit agreement (Credit Agreement), entered into on November 16, 2009 by
certain PCB Subsidiaries, which are now our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement
was put in place in contemplation of the acquisition in order to refinance the then-existing credit
facilities of the PCB Subsidiaries.
The Credit Agreement consists of a $350.0 million senior secured Term Loan, a $87.5 million
senior secured Revolving Loan, a $65.0 million Factoring Facility, and a $80.0 million Letters of
Credit Facility, all of which mature on November 16, 2013. The Credit Agreement is secured by
substantially all of the assets of the PCB Subsidiaries and is senior to all other of our debt
including the Convertible Senior Notes. The Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the
full and punctual payment of all obligations of the PCB Subsidiaries under the Credit Agreement.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate of LIBOR (term election
by Company) plus an applicable interest margin. Borrowings bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus
2.0% under the Term Loan, LIBOR plus 2.25% under the Revolving Loan, and LIBOR plus 1.25% under the
Factoring Facility. At March 28, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the outstanding
borrowings was 2.25%.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are subject to certain financial and operating covenants
that include maintaining maximum total leverage ratios and minimum net worth, current assets, and
interest coverage ratios at both the Company and PCB Subsidiaries level. At March 28, 2011, we were
in compliance with the covenants.
We are required to pay a commitment fee of 0.20% per annum on any unused portion of loan or
facility under the Credit Agreement. For the first quarter ended March 28, 2011, we incurred $0.1
million in commitment fees related to the unused portion of any loan or facility under the Credit Agreement.
As of March 28, 2011, all of the remaining Term Loan and $75.9 million of Letters of Credit were outstanding,
and available borrowing capacity under the Revolving Loan and Factoring Facility was $87.5 million
and $65.0 million, respectively.
Bank Loans
Bank loans are made up of bank lines of credit in mainland China and are used for working
capital and capital investment for our mainland China facilities. These facilities are denominated
in either U.S. Dollars or Chinese Renminbi (RMB), with interest rates tied to either LIBOR or the
Peoples Bank of China rates with a small margin adjustment. These bank loans expire in May 2012.
Convertible Notes
In 2008 we issued $175.0 million of Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes bear interest at
a rate of 3.25% per annum. Interest is payable semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of
each year. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally to our future
unsecured senior indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any of our future subordinated
indebtedness.
At any time prior to November 15, 2014, holders may convert their Convertible Notes into cash
and, if applicable, into shares of our common stock based on a conversion rate of 62.6449 shares of
our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, subject to adjustment, under the
following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter beginning after June 30, 2008 (and only
during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20
trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the
immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the applicable
conversion price on each applicable trading day of such preceding calendar quarter; (2) during the
five business day period after any 10 consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per
note for each day of that 10 consecutive trading day period is less than 98% of the product of the
last reported sale price of our common stock and the conversion rate on such day; or (3) upon the
occurrence of specified corporate transactions described in the prospectus supplement related to
the Convertible Notes, which can be found on the SECs website at www.sec.gov. As of March 28,
2011, none of the conversion criteria had been met.
30
Table of Contents
On or after November 15, 2014 until the close of business on the third scheduled trading day
preceding the May 15, 2015 maturity of the Convertible Notes, holders may convert their notes at
any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. Upon conversion, for each $1,000 principal
amount of notes, we will pay cash for the lesser of the conversion value or $1,000 and shares of
our common stock, if any, based on a daily conversion value calculated on a proportionate basis for
each day of the applicable 60 trading day observation period.
The maximum number of shares issuable upon conversion, subject to certain conversion rate
adjustments, would be approximately 14 million shares.
We are not permitted to redeem the notes at any time prior to maturity. In the event of a
fundamental change or certain default events, as defined in the prospectus supplement, holders may
require us to repurchase for cash all or a portion of their notes at a price equal to 100% of the
principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
In 2008, in connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we entered into a
convertible note hedge and warrant transaction (Call Spread Transaction), with respect to our
common stock. The convertible note hedge consists of our option to purchase up to 11.0 million
shares of common stock at a price of $15.96 per share. This option expires on May 15, 2015 and can
only be executed upon the conversion of the Convertible Notes. Additionally, we sold warrants for
the option to purchase 11.0 million shares of our common stock at a price of $18.15 per share. The
warrants expire ratably beginning August 2015 through February 2016. The Call Spread Transaction
has no effect on the terms of the Convertible Notes and reduces potential dilution by effectively
increasing the conversion price of the Convertible Notes to $18.15 per share of our common stock.
Other Letters of Credit
In addition to the letters of credit obtained by the PCB Subsidiaries pursuant to the Credit
Agreement, we maintain several letters of credit: a $2.0 million standby letter of credit expiring
December 31, 2011 associated with insured workers compensation program; a $1.0 million standby
letter of credit expiring February 29, 2012 related to the lease for one of our production
facilities; and various other letters of credits aggregating to approximately $0.7 million related
to purchases of machinery and equipment with various expiration dates through June 2011.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table provides information on our contractual obligations as of March 28, 2011:
Less Than | After | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations(1)(2) | Total | 1 Year | 1 - 3 Years | 4 - 5 Years | 5 Years | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations |
$ | 348,332 | $ | 87,504 | $ | 260,820 | $ | 8 | $ | | ||||||||||
Convertible debt obligations |
175,000 | | | 175,000 | | |||||||||||||||
Interest on debt obligations |
39,424 | 13,029 | 17,864 | 8,531 | | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap liabilities |
6,232 | 3,585 | 2,647 | | | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency forward contract liabilities |
20 | 2 | 18 | | | |||||||||||||||
Equipment payables |
91,536 | 77,309 | 14,227 | | | |||||||||||||||
Related party financing obligation(3) |
21,829 | | 21,829 | | | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations |
78,764 | 34,994 | 43,770 | | | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease commitments |
5,089 | 2,222 | 1,474 | 452 | 941 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 766,226 | $ | 218,645 | $ | 362,649 | $ | 183,991 | $ | 941 | ||||||||||
(1) | Unrecognized uncertain tax benefits of $0.1 million are not included in the table above as we have not determined when the amount will be paid. | |
(2) | Estimated environmental liabilities of $0.4 million, not included in the table above, are accrued and recorded as liabilities in our consolidated condensed balance sheet as of March 28, 2011. | |
(3) | Related party financing obligation consists of a put and call option agreement in which we granted a put option to a related party to sell and they granted us a call option to purchase the remaining 20% equity interest in a recently acquired PCB subsidiary beginning in 2013. |
31
Table of Contents
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have, nor have we ever had, any relationships with unconsolidated entities
or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special
purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance
sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not engage
in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. As a result, we are not materially
exposed to any financing, liquidity, market, or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in
these relationships.
Seasonality
As a result of the product and customer mix of our Asia Pacific operating segment, a portion
of our revenue will be subject to seasonal fluctuations going forward. These fluctuations include
seasonal patterns in the computer and cellular phone industry, which together have become a
significant portion of the end markets that we serve. This seasonality typically results in higher
net sales in the third quarter due to end customer demand for fourth quarter sales of consumer
electronics products. Seasonal fluctuations also include the Chinese New Year holiday in the first
quarter, which typically results in lower net sales.
Impact of Inflation
We believe that our results of operations are not materially impacted by moderate changes in
the inflation rate as we expect that we generally will be able to continue to pass along component
price increases to our customers. Severe increases in inflation, however, could affect the global
and U.S. economies and have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard related to revenue recognition in
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This standard eliminates the residual method of revenue
allocation by requiring entities to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling
prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price hierarchy. Our adoption of this
standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
In the normal course of business operations we are exposed to risks associated with
fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We address these risks through
controlled risk management that includes the use of derivative financial instruments to
economically hedge or reduce these exposures. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments
for trading or speculative purposes.
We have not experienced any losses to date on any derivative financial instruments due to
counterparty credit risk.
To ensure the adequacy and effectiveness of our interest rate and foreign exchange hedge
positions, we continually monitor our interest rate swap positions and foreign exchange forward
positions, both on a stand-alone basis and in conjunction with their underlying interest rate and
foreign currency exposures, from an accounting and economic perspective. However, given the
inherent limitations of forecasting and the anticipatory nature of the exposures intended to be
hedged, we cannot assure that such programs will offset more than a portion of the adverse
financial impact resulting from unfavorable movements in either interest or foreign exchange rates.
In addition, the timing of the accounting for recognition of gains and losses related to
mark-to-market instruments for any given period may not coincide with the timing of gains and
losses related to the underlying economic exposures and, therefore, may adversely affect our
consolidated condensed operating results and financial position.
Interest rate risk
Our business is exposed to interest rate risk resulting from fluctuations in interest rates.
Our interest expense is more sensitive to fluctuations in the general level of LIBOR and the
Peoples Bank of China interest rates than to changes in rates in other markets. Increases in
interest rates would increase interest expenses relating to the outstanding variable rate
borrowings of certain foreign subsidiaries and increase the cost of debt. Fluctuations in interest
rates can also lead to significant fluctuations in the fair value of the debt obligations.
32
Table of Contents
On April 9, 2010, we entered into a two-year pay-fixed, receive floating (1-month LIBOR),
amortizing interest rate swap arrangement with an initial notional amount of $146.5 million, for
the period beginning April 18, 2011 and ending on April 16, 2013. The interest rate swap will apply
a fixed interest rate against the first interest payments of a portion of the $350.0 million Term
Loan for this period. The notional amount of the interest rate swap decreases to zero over its
term, consistent with our risk management objectives. The notional value underlying the hedge at
March 28, 2011 was $146.5 million. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company will pay
a fixed rate of 2.50% and will receive floating 1-month LIBOR during the swap period.
To the extent the instruments are considered to be effective, changes in fair value are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. To the extent there is any hedge
ineffectiveness, changes in fair value relating to the ineffective portion are immediately
recognized in earnings as interest expense. No ineffectiveness was recognized for the quarter ended
March 28, 2011. At inception, the fair value of the interest rate swap was zero. As of March 28,
2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the swap was recorded as a liability of $3.7 million
and $3.4 million, respectively, in other long-term liabilities. The change in the fair value of the interest rate
swap is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, in our
consolidated condensed balance sheet. There was no impact to interest expense for the quarter ended
March 28, 2011 as the interest rate swap does not hedge interest rate cash flows until the period
beginning April 18, 2011. We have designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge.
We also, through our acquisition of the PCB Subsidiaries, assumed a long term pay-fixed,
receive floating (1-month LIBOR), amortizing interest rate swap arrangement with an initial
notional amount of $40.0 million, for the period beginning October 8, 2008 and ending on July 30,
2012. The notional amount of the interest rate swap amortizes to zero over its term, consistent
with our risk management objectives. The notional value underlying the hedge at March 28, 2011 was
$40.0 million. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, we will pay a fixed rate of 3.43% and
will receive floating 1-month LIBOR during the swap period. As the borrowings attributable to this
interest rate swap were paid off upon acquisition, we did not designate this interest rate swap as
a cash flow hedge. As of March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the swap was
recorded as a liability of $1.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in other long-term liabilities. The change
in fair value of this interest rate swap is recorded as other, net in the consolidated condensed
statement of operations.
As of March 28, 2011, approximately 41% of
our total debt was based on fixed rates,
including notional amounts related to interest rate swaps. Based on our borrowings as of March 28,
2011 an assumed 1% change in variable rates would cause our annual interest cost to change by $3.1
million.
Foreign currency risks
We are subject to risks associated with transactions that are denominated in currencies other
than our functional currencies, as well as the effects of translating amounts denominated in a
foreign currency to the U.S. Dollar as a normal part of the reporting process. Our Asia Pacific
operations utilize the Chinese Renminbi, or RMB, and the Hong Kong
Dollar, or HKD, as the functional
currency, which results in the Company recording a translation adjustment that is included as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company does not generally engage in
hedging to manage foreign currency risk related to its revenue and expenses denominated in RMB and
HKD.
We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the impact of changes in
foreign currency exchange rates and to reduce the volatility of purchases and other obligations
generated in currencies other than the functional currencies. Our foreign subsidiaries may at times
purchase forward exchange contracts to manage their foreign currency risk in relation to particular
purchases or obligations, such as the related party financing obligation arising from the put call
option to purchase the remaining 20% of a majority owned subsidiary, and certain purchases of
machinery denominated in foreign currencies other than our foreign functional currency. The
notional amount of the foreign exchange contracts at March 28, 2011 was approximately $62.8
million. We have designated certain of these foreign exchange contracts as cash flow hedges, with
the exception of the foreign exchange contracts in relation to the related party financing
obligation. In this instance, the hedged item is a recognized liability subject to foreign currency
transaction gains and losses and therefore, changes in the hedged item due to foreign currency
exchange rates are already recorded in earnings. Therefore, hedge accounting has not been applied.
33
Table of Contents
The table below presents information about certain of the foreign currency forward
contracts at March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
As of March 28, 2011 | As of December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Average Contract | Average Contract | |||||||||||||||
Notional | Rate or Strike | Notional | Rate or Strike | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amount | Amount | Amount | |||||||||||||
(In thousands in | (In thousands in | |||||||||||||||
USD) | USD) | |||||||||||||||
Receive foreign currency/pay USD |
||||||||||||||||
Euro |
$ | 59,896 | 1.34 | $ | 31,685 | 1.32 | ||||||||||
Japanese Yen |
2,937 | 0.01 | 4,581 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
$ | 62,833 | $ | 36,266 | |||||||||||||
Estimated fair value, net asset |
$ | 2,378 | $ | 942 | ||||||||||||
Debt Instruments
The table below presents information about certain of our debt instruments (bank borrowings)
as of March 28, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
As of March 28, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Fair Market | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | Value | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable Rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ |
$ | 35,000 | $ | 117,000 | $ | 192,500 | $ | | $ | | $ | 344,500 | $ | 342,869 | 2.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
RMB |
| 3,813 | | | | 3,813 | 3,813 | 4.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Variable Rate |
35,000 | 120,813 | 192,500 | | | 348,313 | 346,682 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ |
3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 175,004 | 175,019 | 234,589 | 3.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Fixed Rate |
3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 175,004 | 175,019 | 234,589 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 35,003 | $ | 120,817 | $ | 192,504 | $ | 4 | $ | 175,004 | $ | 523,332 | $ | 581,271 | ||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Market | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | Total | Value | Interest Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable Rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ |
$ | 56,500 | $ | 117,000 | $ | 192,500 | $ | | $ | | $ | 366,000 | $ | 356,380 | 2.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
RMB |
10,619 | 3,792 | | | | 14,411 | 14,411 | 5.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Variable Rate |
67,119 | 120,792 | 192,500 | | | 380,411 | 370,791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed Rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ |
4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 175,004 | 175,021 | 207,529 | 3.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Fixed Rate |
4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 175,004 | 175,021 | 207,529 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 67,123 | $ | 120,797 | $ | 192,504 | $ | 4 | $ | 175,004 | $ | 555,432 | $ | 578,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
The table below presents information regarding our interest rate swaps as of March 28, 2011.
Remaining | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Fair Market Value | |||||||||||||
Average interest payout rate |
2.37 | % | 2.59 | % | 2.50 | % | ||||||||||
Interest payout amount |
(3,053 | ) | (3,155 | ) | (676 | ) | ||||||||||
Average interest received rate |
0.25 | % | 0.25 | % | 0.25 | % | ||||||||||
Interest received amount |
282 | 303 | 67 | |||||||||||||
Fair value
loss at March 28, 2011 |
(4,694 | ) |
34
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures for financial reporting to give
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports submitted under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. These controls and procedures also give
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and
communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), together with management,
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March
28, 2011, pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and
CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the
Exchange Act) were effective such that information relating to the Company, including our
consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our SEC reports, (i) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time frames specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is
accumulated and communicated to company management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to
allow timely discussion regarding disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter
ended March 28, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our principal executive officer and chief financial officer, does
not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will
prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control systems objectives
will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further,
because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls also can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about
the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of
controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with
policies or procedures.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we may become a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary
course of our business. There can be no assurance that we will prevail in any such litigation. We
believe that the amount of any ultimate potential loss for known matters would not be material to
our financial condition; however, the outcome of these actions is inherently difficult to predict.
In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate potential loss could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operations and cash flows in a particular period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully
consider the factors described in Part I Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010, in analyzing an investment in our common stock. If any of the
risks in our Annual Report on Form 10-K occurs, our business, financial condition, and results of
operations would likely suffer, the trading price of our common stock could fall, and you could
lose all or part of the money you paid for our common stock.
35
Table of Contents
In addition, the risk factors and uncertainties could cause our actual results to differ
materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements, whether made in this report or
the other documents we file with the SEC, or our annual or quarterly reports to stockholders,
future press releases, or orally, whether in presentations, responses to questions, or otherwise.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibits | |
31.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
36
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
TTM Technologies, Inc. |
||||
/s/ Kenton K. Alder | ||||
Kenton K. Alder | ||||
Dated: May 9, 2011 | President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
/s/ Steven W. Richards | ||||
Steven W. Richards | ||||
Dated: May 9, 2011 | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
37
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Exhibits | |
31.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. |
38