TUESDAY MORNING CORP/DE - Annual Report: 2020 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10‑K

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020

or

Commission File Number 0‑19658

Tuesday Morning Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

* As previously disclosed, on May 27, 2020, Tuesday Morning Corporation (the “Company”) was notified by the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) that the Company’s common stock would be delisted from Nasdaq as a result of the Company’s filing of a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.  On June 8, 2020, trading in the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq was suspended, and the Company’s common stock began trading on the OTC Pink Market under the symbol “TUESQ”.  On July 1, 2020, Nasdaq filed a Form 25 with the SEC to delist the Company’s common stock.  The deregistration of the common stock under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) will be effective 90 days, or such shorter period as the SEC may determine, after filing of the Form 25. Upon deregistration of the common stock under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act, the common stock will remain registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well‑known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ☒  No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 Regulation S‑T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes  ☒  No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b‑2 of the Act).  Yes  ☐  No  ☒

The aggregate market value of shares of the registrant’s common stock held by non‑affiliates of the registrant at December 31, 2019 was approximately $66,809,834 based upon the closing sale price on the Nasdaq Global Select Market reported for such date.

As of the close of business on September 10, 2020, there were 46,957,928 outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock.

Documents Incorporated By Reference:

None.

Table of Contents

2

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward‑Looking Statements

This Form 10‑K contains forward‑looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections. These statements may be found throughout this Form 10‑K, particularly under the headings “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” among others. Forward‑looking statements typically are identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend” and similar words, although some forward‑looking statements are expressed differently. You should consider statements that contain these words or words that state other “forward‑looking” information carefully because they describe our current expectations, plans, strategies and goals and our beliefs concerning future business conditions, future results of operations, future financial positions, and our current business outlook.  Forward looking statements also include statements regarding the Company’s plans with respect to the Chapter 11 Cases, the Company’s plan to continue its operations while it works to complete the Chapter 11 process, the Company’s debtor-in-possession financings, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, the Company’s plans for store closures and lease renegotiations, financial projections and other statements regarding the Company’s proposed reorganization, strategy, future operations, performance and prospects, sales and growth expectations, our liquidity, capital expenditure plans, our inventory management plans and merchandising and marketing strategies.

The terms “Tuesday Morning,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” as used in this Form 10‑K refer to Tuesday Morning Corporation and its subsidiaries.

The factors listed below in Item 1A. under the heading “Risk Factors” and in other sections of this Form 10‑K provide examples of risks, uncertainties and events that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations expressed in our forward‑looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and events also include, but are not limited to, the following:

3

The forward‑looking statements made in this Form 10‑K relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. Except as may be required by law, we disclaim obligations to update any forward‑looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statements were made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward‑looking statements.

4

PART I

Item 1.  Business

Business Overview

One of the original off-price retailers, Tuesday Morning is a leading destination for unique home and lifestyle goods. We were established in 1974 and specialize in name-brand, better/best products for the home. We are known for irresistible finds at an incredible value and we search the world for amazing deals to bring to our customers.

We are an off-price retailer, selling high-quality products at prices generally below those found in boutique, specialty and department stores, catalogs and on-line retailers. Our customers come to us for an ever-changing, exceptional assortment of brand names at great prices. Our primary merchandise categories are upscale home textiles, home furnishings, housewares, gourmet food, pet supplies, bath and body products, toys and seasonal décor. We buy our inventory opportunistically from a variety of sources including direct from manufacturer, through closeout sellers and occasionally other retailers. We have strong supplier relationships and we strive to make it easy for our vendors to do business with us, so that they will come to us first. Our goods are deeply-discounted, but never seconds or irregulars.

Our customer is a savvy shopper with a discerning taste for quality at a value. Our strong value proposition has established a loyal customer base, who we engage regularly with social media, email, direct mail, digital media and newspaper circulars.

With 685 stores across the country as of June 30, 2020, we are in the neighborhood in convenient, accessible locations. Our store layout is clean and simple, and the low-frills environment means we can pass even deeper savings on to our dedicated customer base. Our stores operate in both primary and secondary locations of major suburban markets, near our middle and upper‑income customers. We are generally able to obtain favorable lease terms due to our flexibility regarding site selection and our straightforward format, allowing us to use a wide variety of space configurations.

We operate our business as a single operating segment.

COVID-19 Pandemic, Bankruptcy Filing and Going Concern

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our business operations, store traffic, employee availability, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and cash flow.  As of March 25, 2020, we temporarily closed all of our stores nationwide, severely reducing revenues and resulting in significant operating losses and the elimination of substantially all operating cash flow. Stores have gradually reopened as allowed by state and local jurisdictions, and all but two of our stores had re-opened by the end of the fiscal year.  The scope and duration of this pandemic and the related disruption to our business and financial impacts cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

Bankruptcy Filing and Going Concern

5

Business Strategy  

In fiscal 2020, we focused on resetting our merchandise strategy to our heritage of being an off-price retailer. We edited our assortment and drove our merchandising efforts to deliver our customers a treasure hunt and strong values that are representative of the off price marketplace. Additionally, we worked to improve our supply chain efficiency, working capital management and inventory turns, and continued to optimize our marketing effectiveness, cost controls and infrastructure.

We adjusted our strategy in the spring of fiscal 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and significant disruption to our business, which led to the filing of our Chapter 11 Cases.  For the duration of fiscal 2020, our focus was on safeguarding our assets, preserving liquidity, managing through bankruptcy proceedings, and planning for our anticipated emergence.

Competition & Seasonality

We believe the principal factors by which we compete are value, brand names, breadth and quality of our product offerings. Our prices are generally below those of department and specialty stores, catalog and on‑line retailers and we offer a broad assortment of high‑end, first quality, brand-name merchandise. We currently compete against a diverse group of retailers, including department, discount and specialty stores, e‑commerce and catalog retailers and mass merchants, which sell, among other products, home furnishings, housewares and related products. We also compete in particular markets with a substantial number of retailers that specialize in one or more types of home furnishing and houseware products that we sell. Some of these competitors have substantially greater financial resources that may, among other things, increase their ability to purchase inventory at lower costs or to initiate and sustain aggressive price competition.

Our business is subject to seasonality, with a higher level of our net sales and operating income generated during the quarter ending December 31, which includes the holiday shopping season. Net sales in the quarters ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 accounted for approximately 37%, 34% and 33% of our annual net sales for fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  The rate for fiscal 2020 is impacted by the reduced annual sales achieved due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in reduced sales in the second half of our fiscal year.

6

Working Capital Items

Because of the seasonal nature of our business, our working capital needs are greater in the months leading up to our peak sales period from Thanksgiving to the end of December. Historically, the increase in working capital needs during this time was financed with cash flow provided by operations and our revolving credit facility. See Liquidity and Capital Resources section in Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information, including information regarding our debtor-in-possession financing agreements, which are (1) the Senior Secured Super Priority Debtor-in-Possession Credit Agreement (the “DIP ABL Credit Agreement”) among the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, for itself and other lenders, which provides for a super priority secured debtor-in-possession revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $100 million (the “DIP ABL Facility”), and (2) the Senior Secured Super Priority Debtor-In-Possession Delayed Draw Term Loan Agreement (the “DIP DDTL Agreement”) with the Franchise Group, Inc., which provides for delayed draw term loans up to an aggregate principal amount of $25 million (the “DIP Term Facility”).

Inventory is one of the largest assets on our balance sheet. Efficient inventory management is a key component of our business success and profitability. To be successful, we must maintain sufficient inventory levels to meet our customers’ demands while keeping the inventory fresh and turning the inventory appropriately to optimize profitability.

Purchasing

We provide an outlet for manufacturers and other sources looking for effective ways to reduce excess inventory resulting from order cancellations by retailers, manufacturing overruns, bankruptcies and excess capacity. Since our inception, we have not experienced significant difficulty in obtaining first quality, brand-name off‑price merchandise in adequate volumes and at competitive prices. We utilize a mix of both domestic and international suppliers. We generally pay our suppliers timely and generally do not request special consideration for markdowns, advertising or returns. During fiscal 2020, our top ten vendors accounted for approximately 10.7% of total purchases, with no single vendor accounting for more than 1.6% of total purchases.

Low Cost Operations

It is our goal to operate with a low cost structure in comparison to many other retailers. We place great emphasis on expense management throughout the Company. Our stores have a “no frills” format and we are flexible in our site selection in order to maintain favorable lease terms.

Customer Shopping Experience

While we offer a “no frills” format in our stores, we have made progress in reorganizing and refreshing our stores to enhance our customers’ shopping experience. We offer a flexible return policy and we accept all major payment methods including cash, checks, all major credit cards, gift cards and digital wallets. We continue to work on initiatives we believe will enhance our customers’ shopping experience.

Distribution Network

In fiscal 2020, we utilized 1.2 million square feet of distribution center facilities in Dallas, Texas and a 0.6 million square foot distribution center in Phoenix, Arizona, along with bypass facilities and a network of pool point facilities throughout the country which service all of our stores throughout the United States. The Phoenix distribution center commenced operations during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. We shipped approximately 98 million units to our stores during fiscal 2020, a significant reduction from the prior year, impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.  In fiscal 2020, as the next step in our supply chain strategy, we began the retrofit of our existing Dallas-based distribution facility to accommodate our distribution requirements for our existing store base as well as for planned future growth.  Due to the impacts of COVID-19, the retrofit of the Dallas distribution center was ceased in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.  We also reached the decision in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 to close our Phoenix distribution center and consolidate operations in our Dallas-based facility, which we expect to be completed in early fiscal 2021.

Pricing

Our pricing policy is to sell merchandise generally below retail prices charged by department and specialty stores, catalog and on‑line retailers. Prices are determined centrally and are initially uniform at all of our stores. Once a price is determined for a particular item, labels displaying two‑tiered pricing are affixed to the product. A typical price tag displays a “Compare At” or “Compare Estimated Value” price, and “Our Price”. Our buyers determine and verify retail “Compare At” or “Compare Estimated Value” prices by reviewing prices published in advertisements, catalogs, on‑line and manufacturers’ suggested retail price lists and by visiting department or specialty stores selling similar merchandise. Our information systems provide daily sales and inventory information, which enables us to evaluate our prices and inventory levels and to adjust prices on unsold merchandise in a timely manner and on a periodic basis as dictated by sales volumes and incoming purchases, thereby effectively managing our inventory levels and offering competitive pricing.

7

Employees

As of June 30, 2020, we employed 1,555 persons on a full‑time basis and 5,878 persons on a part‑time basis, which is a significant reduction from the prior year due to the impacts of COVID-19 and a resulting reduction in force we implemented in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020. Our employees are not represented by any labor unions. We have not experienced any work stoppage due to labor disagreements, and we believe that our employee relations are strong.

Intellectual Property

The trade name “Tuesday Morning” is material to our business. We have registered the name “Tuesday Morning” as a service mark with the United States Patent and Trademark office. We have also registered other trademarks including but not limited to “Tuesday Morning Perks^®”.  Solely for convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to in this Form 10‑K may appear without the ^® or ^tm symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights, or the rights of the applicable licensor, to these trademarks and trade names.

Corporate Information

Tuesday Morning Corporation is a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1991. Our principal executive offices are located at 6250 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75240, and our telephone number is (972) 387‑3562.

We maintain a website at www.tuesdaymorning.com. Copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10‑K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, Current Reports on Form 8‑K and any amendments to such reports filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) are available free of charge on our website under the Investor Relations section as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports and amendments with, or furnish them to, the SEC.  In addition, the SEC maintains a website, www.sec.gov, which contains the reports, proxy and information statements and other information which we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.

In addition, the SEC maintains a website, www.sec.gov, which contains the reports, proxy and information statements and other information which we file with, or furnish to, the SEC.

Stores and Store Operations

Store Locations.  As of June 30, 2020, we operated 685 stores in the following 39 states:

8

Site Selection. We continue to evaluate our current store base for potential enhancement or relocation of our store locations. As a result of this ongoing evaluation, we intend to pursue attractive relocation opportunities in our existing store base, close certain stores by allowing leases to expire for underperforming stores or where alternative locations in similar trade areas are not available at acceptable lease rates, and, when appropriate, open new stores. For both new stores and relocations, we negotiate for upgraded sites. As a result of the disruption to our business from the pandemic, and as part of our reorganization, we have accelerated the closure of a significant number of stores, as described above.  Additionally, we have reviewed all of our leases and renegotiated the terms, with favorable outcomes for many of our leases.  We believe that this strategy will better position us for long‑term profitable growth.

Store Leases.  We lease substantially all store locations under operating leases. Our existing store leases generally are for an initial term of five to ten years with two five-year renewal options and, in limited circumstances, our store leases involve a tenant allowance for leasehold improvements. We record rent expense ratably over the life of the lease beginning with the date we take possession of or have the right to use the premises, and if our leases provide for a tenant allowance, we record the landlord reimbursement as a liability and ratably amortize the liability as a reduction to rent expense over the lease term beginning with the date we take possession of or control the physical access to the premises. Leases for new stores also typically allow us the ability to terminate a lease after approximately 60 months if store sales do not reach a stipulated amount stated in the lease. As a result, we generally do not operate locations with continued store‑level operating losses for an extended period of time. As a result of the disruption to our business from the COVID-19 pandemic, we have reviewed all of our leases and renegotiated the terms of many of our leases, obtaining more favorable terms.  New leases and amendments to existing leases are often for shorter terms than historically.  

Store Layout. Our site selection process and “no frills” approach to presenting merchandise allow us to use a wide variety of space configurations. The size of our stores ranges from approximately 6,000 to 30,000 square feet, averaging on a per store basis approximately 12,400 square feet as of June 30, 2020.  Historically, we have designed our stores to be functional, with less emphasis placed upon fixtures and leasehold aesthetics. With our current real estate strategy, we continue to be focused on designing a very functional, easy to shop environment that also highlights the quality of the merchandise. We display all merchandise on counters, shelves, or racks while maintaining minimum inventory in our stockrooms.

Store Operations.  Our stores are generally open seven days a week, excluding certain holidays. As noted above, we temporarily closed all stores as of March 25, 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and began the process to re-open in late April, and continued re-opening stores on a rolling basis with modified operating hours as appropriate.  By June 15, 2020, we had reopened all but two of our 687 store locations, and those stores have since been permanently closed.  The timing and frequency of shipments of merchandise to our stores results in efficiency of receiving and restocking activities at our stores. The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant disruption to the inventory flow to our stores.  We attempt to align our part‑time employees’ labor hours with anticipated workload and with current sales. We generally conduct annual physical counts of our store merchandise staggered throughout the second half of our fiscal year. In the second half of fiscal 2020, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic including our temporary store closures, we conducted physical inventories at a portion of our stores sufficient to validate the existence of inventory in our stores and the accuracy of our estimated shrink reserve rate.  

Store Management.  Each store has a manager who is responsible for recruiting, training and supervising store personnel and assuring that the store is managed in accordance with our established guidelines and procedures. Store managers are full‑time employees. Our store managers are supported by district and regional level support. Store managers are responsible for centrally-directed store disciplines and routines. The store manager is assisted primarily by part‑time employees who generally serve as assistant managers and cashiers, and help with merchandise stocking efforts. Members of our management visit selected stores routinely to review inventory levels and merchandise presentation, personnel performance, expense controls, security and adherence to our policies and procedures. In addition, district and regional field managers periodically meet with senior management to review store policies and discuss purchasing, merchandising, advertising and other operational issues.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Our business is subject to significant risks, including the risks and uncertainties described below. These risks and uncertainties and the other information in this Form 10‑K, including our consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements, should be carefully considered. If any of the events described below actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected in a material way.

9

Risks Related to Our Business

As a result of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, we are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with bankruptcy proceedings, and operating under Chapter 11 may restrict our ability to pursue strategic and operational initiatives.

For the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases, our operations and our ability to execute our business strategy will be subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with bankruptcy.  These risks include:

Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with the Chapter 11 Cases, we cannot predict or quantify the ultimate impact that events occurring during the Chapter 11 process may have on our business, financial condition and results of operations, and there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.  We believe that our plans, already implemented and continuing to be implemented, will mitigate the conditions and events that have raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.  However, due to the uncertainty around the scope and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related disruption to our business and financial impacts, and because our plans, including those in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, are not yet finalized, fully executed, or approved by the Bankruptcy Court, they cannot be deemed probable of mitigating this substantial doubt.

Our common stock has been delisted from trading on Nasdaq, and is traded only in the over-the-counter market, which could negatively affect our stock price and liquidity. Additionally, trading in our securities during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases is highly speculative and poses substantial risks.  Trading prices for the Company’s common stock may bear little or no relationship to the actual recovery, if any, by holders of the Company’s common stock in the Chapter 11 Cases.

On May 27, 2020, the Company received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Department staff of The Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) notifying it that, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases and in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rules 5101, 5110(b) and IM-5101-1, Nasdaq determined that the Company’s common stock would be delisted from Nasdaq.  On June 8, 2020, trading in the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq was suspended. On July 1, 2020, Nasdaq filed a Form 25 with the SEC to delist the Company’s common stock and the delisting was effective 10 days thereafter.  

10

On June 8, 2020, the Company’s common stock began trading on the OTC Pink marketplace under the symbol “TUESQ”. The Company can provide no assurance that the Company’s common stock will continue to trade on this market, whether broker-dealers will continue to provide public quotes of the Company’s common stock on this market, whether the trading volume of the Company’s common stock will be sufficient to provide for an efficient trading market or whether quotes for the Company’s common stock will continue on this market in the future. The Company cautions that trading in the Company’s common stock during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases is highly speculative and poses substantial risks. Trading prices for the Company’s common stock may bear little or no relationship to the actual recovery, if any, by holders of the Company’s common stock in the Chapter 11 Cases.

The pursuit of the Chapter 11 Cases has consumed and will continue to consume a substantial portion of the time and attention of our management, which may have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations, and we may face increased levels of employee attrition.

While the Chapter 11 Cases continue, our management will be required to spend a significant amount of time and effort focusing on the cases.  This diversion of attention may materially adversely affect the conduct of our business, and, as a result, our financial condition and results of operations, particularly if the Chapter 11 Cases are protracted.

During the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, our employees will face considerable distraction and uncertainty and we may experience increased levels of employee attrition.  A loss of key personnel or material erosion of employee morale could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to meet customer expectations, thereby adversely affecting our business and results of operations.  The failure to retain or attract members of our management team and other key personnel could impair our ability to execute our strategy and implement operational initiatives, thereby having a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

If we are not able to confirm a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization or liquidation or are not able to consummate a sale of the Company or certain of its material assets pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, we could be required to liquidate under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Company intends to pursue, among other things, a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization or the consummation of a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all assets of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries pursuant to Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code.  If we are not able to confirm a plan of reorganization or liquidation or consummate a Section 363 sale, we could be forced to liquidate under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Upon a showing of cause, the Bankruptcy Court may convert the Chapter 11 Cases to a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.  In such event, a Chapter 7 trustee would be appointed or elected to liquidate our assets for distribution in accordance with the priorities established by the Bankruptcy Code.  We believe that liquidation under Chapter 7 would result in significantly smaller distributions being made to our creditors than those provided for in a Chapter 11 sale because of (i) the likelihood that the assets would have to be sold or otherwise disposed of in a distressed fashion over a short period of time rather than in a controlled manner and as a going concern, (ii) additional administrative expenses involved in the appointment of a Chapter 7 trustee, and (iii) additional expenses and claims, some of which would be entitled to priority, that would be generated during the liquidation and from the rejection of leases and other executory contracts in connection with a cessation of operations.

There can be no assurance that our current cash position and amounts of cash from future operations will be sufficient to fund operations. In the event that we do not have sufficient cash to meet our liquidity requirements, and our current financing is insufficient or exit financing is not available, we may be required to seek additional financing. There can be no assurance that such additional financing would be available, or, if available, would be available on acceptable terms.  Failure to secure any necessary exit financing or additional financing would have a material adverse effect on our operations and ability to continue as a going concern.

If we pursue a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, our post-bankruptcy capital structure is yet to be determined, and any changes to our capital structure may have a material adverse effect on existing debt and security holders.

If we pursue a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization, our post-bankruptcy capital structure will be set pursuant to a plan that requires Bankruptcy Court approval.  Any reorganization of our capital structure may include exchanges of new debt or equity securities for our existing securities, and such new debt or equity securities may be issued at different interest rates, payment schedules and maturities than our existing creditors.  The success of a reorganization through any such exchanges or modifications will depend on approval by the Bankruptcy Court and the willingness of existing security holders to agree to the exchange or modification, and there can be no guarantee of success.  If such exchanges or modifications are successful, holders of our debt may find their holdings no longer have any value or are materially reduced in value, or they may be converted to equity and be diluted or may be modified or replaced by debt with a principal amount that is less than the outstanding principal amount, longer maturities and reduced interest rates.  There can be no assurance that any new debt or equity securities will maintain their value at the time of issuance.  If existing debt or equity holders are adversely affected by a reorganization, it may adversely affect our ability to issue new debt or equity in the future.

11

Any plan of reorganization that we may implement will be based in large part upon assumptions and analyses developed by us. If these assumptions and analyses prove to be incorrect, our plan may be unsuccessful in its execution.

Any plan of reorganization that we may implement could affect both our capital structure and the ownership, structure and operation of our businesses and will reflect assumptions and analyses based on our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that we consider appropriate under the circumstances.  Whether actual future results and developments will be consistent with our expectations and assumptions depends on a number of factors, including but not limited to (i) our ability to change substantially our capital structure; (ii) our ability to obtain adequate liquidity and financing sources; (iii) our ability to maintain customers’ confidence in our viability as a continuing entity and to attract and retain sufficient business from them; (iv) our ability to obtain merchandise; (v) our ability to retain key employees, and (vi) the overall strength and stability of general economic conditions. The failure of any of these factors could materially adversely affect the successful reorganization of our businesses.

In addition, any plan of reorganization will rely upon financial projections, including with respect to revenues, EBITDA, capital expenditures, debt service and cash flow.  Financial forecasts are necessarily speculative, and it is likely that one or more of the assumptions and estimates that are the basis of these financial forecasts will not be accurate.  In our case, the forecasts will be even more speculative than normal, because they may involve fundamental changes in the nature of our capital structure.  Accordingly, we expect that our actual financial condition and results of operations will differ, perhaps materially, from what we have anticipated.  Consequently, there can be no assurance that the results or developments contemplated by any plan of reorganization we may implement will occur or, even if they do occur, that they will have the anticipated effects on us and our subsidiaries or our businesses or operations.  The failure of any such results or developments to materialize as anticipated could materially adversely affect the successful execution of any plan of reorganization.

We may be unable to comply with restrictions imposed by our DIP ABL Facility and DIP Term Facility.

The DIP ABL Facility and the DIP Term Facility contain customary affirmative and negative covenants for debtor-in-possession financings, which include, among other things, restrictions on (i) indebtedness, (ii) liens, (iii) mergers, consolidations and dispositions, (iv) affiliate transactions, (v) changes in the nature of our businesses, (vi) dividends, distributions, and other restricted payments, (vii) the use of loan proceeds and cash on hand, (viii) entering into agreements that restrict our subsidiaries from paying dividends or distributions or that restrict us or our subsidiaries from granting security interests and other liens, (ix) advances, loans and investments, and (x) transactions with respect to our subsidiaries.  In addition, the DIP ABL Facility requires us to, among other things, maintain certain minimum liquidity requirements, and receive approval of a plan of reorganization or sale of substantially all of our assets through the Chapter 11 process pursuant to certain agreed upon deadlines. Our ability to comply with these provisions may be affected by events beyond our control and our failure to comply could result in an event of default under the DIP ABL Facility and DIP Term Facility.  On September 8, 2020, the lenders under the DIP ABL Facility agreed to extend the deadline contained in the court order approving the DIP ABL Credit Agreement for filing a plan of reorganization or motion to sell substantially all of our assets to September 17, 2020.  On September 9, 2020, the committee for the unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases filed an objection with the Bankruptcy Court asserting the extension was not valid.  The Company believes the objection is without merit and intends to vigorously oppose the objection.

We have substantial liquidity needs and may not be able to obtain sufficient liquidity during the pendency of the Chapter 11 proceedings or to confirm a plan of reorganization or liquidation.

In addition to the cash requirements necessary to fund ongoing operations, we have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, significant professional fees and other costs in connection with our Chapter 11 proceedings.  While we believe the DIP ABL Facility and the DIP Term Facility will provide sufficient liquidity to fund anticipated cash requirements through the Chapter 11 proceedings, there can be no assurance that our liquidity will be sufficient to allow us to satisfy our obligations related to the Chapter 11 Cases or to pursue confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization or plan of liquidation.  We can provide no assurance that we will be able to secure additional interim financing or exit financing sufficient to meet our liquidity needs or, if sufficient funds are available, offered to us on acceptable terms.

12

We may be subject to claims that will not be discharged in our Chapter 11 proceedings, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

The Bankruptcy Code provides that the confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization discharges a debtor from substantially all debts arising prior to confirmation.  With few exceptions, all claims that arose prior to confirmation of the plan of reorganization (i) would be subject to compromise and/or treatment under the plan of reorganization and (ii) would be discharged in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and the terms of the plan of reorganization.  Any claims not ultimately discharged through a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization could be asserted against the reorganized entities and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations on a post-reorganization basis.

Our financial results may be volatile and may not reflect historical trends.

During the Chapter 11 Cases, we expect our financial results to continue to be volatile as asset impairments, restructuring activities and expenses, contract terminations and rejections, and claims assessments may significantly impact our consolidated financial performance.  As a result, our historical financial performance is likely not indicative of our financial performance after the Petition Date.

In addition, if we emerge from Chapter 11, the amounts reported in subsequent consolidated financial statements may materially change relative to historical consolidated financial statements, including as a result of revisions to our operating plans pursuant to a plan of reorganization.  We also may be required to adopt fresh start accounting, in which case our assets and liabilities will be recorded at fair value as of the fresh start reporting date, which may differ materially from the recorded values of assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. Our financial results after the application of fresh start accounting also may be different from historical trends.

Operating in bankruptcy for a long period of time may harm our business.

A long period of operations under Bankruptcy Court protection could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.  So long as the proceedings related to the Chapter 11 Cases continue, senior management will be required to spend a significant amount of time and effort dealing with the reorganization instead of focusing exclusively on business operations.  A prolonged period of operating under Bankruptcy Court protection also may make it more difficult to retain management and other key personnel necessary to the success of our business.  In addition, the longer the proceedings related to the Chapter 11 Cases continue, the more likely it is that customers will lose confidence in our ability to reorganize our business successfully and will seek to establish alternative commercial relationships.

So long as the proceedings related to these cases continue, we will be required to incur substantial costs for professional fees and other expenses associated with the administration of the Chapter 11 Cases, including the cost of litigation.  In general, litigation can be expensive and time consuming to bring or defend against.  Such litigation could result in settlements or damages that could significantly affect our financial results.  It is also possible that certain parties will commence litigation with respect to the treatment of their claims under a plan of reorganization.  It is not possible to predict the potential litigation that we may become party to, nor the final resolution of such litigation.  The impact of any such litigation on our business and financial stability, however, could be material.

Should the Chapter 11 proceedings be protracted, we may also need to seek new financing to fund operations.  If we are unable to obtain such financing on favorable terms or at all, the chances of successfully reorganizing our business may be seriously jeopardized and the likelihood that we will instead be required to liquidate our assets may increase.

Outbreaks of communicable disease, or other public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, could substantially harm our business.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our business operations, store traffic, employee availability, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and cash flow.

As of March 25, 2020, we had temporarily closed all of our stores nationwide, severely reducing revenues and resulting in significant operating losses and the elimination of substantially all operating cash flow. Although stores have gradually reopened as allowed by state and local jurisdictions, and all but two of our stores had re-opened by the end of the fiscal year, the scope and duration of this pandemic and the related disruption to our business and financial impacts cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.  Further impacts may include, but are not limited to, both internal and external impacts to our supply chain, transportation capabilities, staffing ability, and self-insurance costs

13

Our customers may also be negatively affected by the consequences of COVID-19, which could negatively impact demand for our products as customers delay, reduce or eliminate discretionary purchases at our stores that have reopened or may reopen. Any significant reduction in customer visits to, and spending at, our stores caused directly or indirectly by COVID-19 would result in a further loss of revenue and cash flows and negatively impact profitability and could result in other material adverse effects.

The extent to which the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic will impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity is highly uncertain and difficult to predict considering the rapidly evolving environment and will depend on future developments, including the potential further geographic spread and duration of the ongoing pandemic, the severity, containment, and management of the virus and the actions that may be taken by various governmental authorities and other third parties in response to the pandemic.

Changes in economic and political conditions may adversely affect consumer spending, which could significantly harm our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

The success of our business depends, to a significant extent, upon the level of consumer spending. A number of factors beyond our control affect the level of consumer spending on merchandise that we offer, including, among other things:

The merchandise we sell generally consists of discretionary items. Reduced consumer confidence and spending cut backs may result in reduced demand for our merchandise, including discretionary items, and may force us to take significant inventory markdowns. Reduced demand also may require increased selling and promotional expenses. Adverse economic conditions and any related decrease in consumer demand for our merchandise could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Failure to identify and respond to changes in consumer trends and preferences could significantly harm our business.

The retail home furnishings and housewares industry is subject to sudden shifts in consumer trends and consumer spending. Our sales and results of operations depend in part on our ability to predict or respond to changes in trends and consumer preferences in a timely manner. Although our business model allows us greater flexibility than many traditional retailers to meet consumer preferences and trends, we may not successfully do so. Any sustained failure to anticipate, identify and respond to emerging trends in consumer preferences could negatively affect our business and results of operations.

14

Our sales depend on a volume of traffic to our stores, and a reduction in traffic to, or the closing of, anchor tenants and other destination retailers in the shopping centers in which our stores are located could significantly reduce our sales and leave us with excess inventory.

Most of our stores are located in shopping centers that benefit from varied and complementary tenants, whether specialty or mass retailers, and other destination retailers and attractions to generate sufficient levels of consumer traffic near our stores. Any decline in the volume of consumer traffic at shopping centers, whether because of consumer preferences to shop on the internet or at large warehouse stores, an economic slowdown, a decline in the popularity of shopping centers, the closing of anchor stores or other destination retailers or otherwise, could result in reduced sales at our stores and leave us with excess inventory, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results or business.

We must continuously attract buying opportunities for off‑price merchandise and anticipate consumer demand as off‑price merchandise becomes available, and our failure to do so could adversely affect our performance.

By their nature, specific off‑price merchandise items are available from manufacturers or vendors generally on a non‑recurring basis. As a result, we do not have long‑term contracts with our vendors for supply, pricing or access to products, but make individual purchase decisions, which may be for large quantities. Due to economic uncertainties, some of our manufacturers and suppliers may cease operations or may otherwise become unable to continue supplying off‑price merchandise on terms acceptable to us. We cannot assure that manufacturers or vendors will continue to make off‑price merchandise available to us in quantities acceptable to us or that our buyers will continue to identify and take advantage of appropriate buying opportunities. In addition, if we misjudge consumer demand for products, we may significantly overstock unpopular products and be forced to take significant markdowns and miss opportunities to sell more popular products. An inability to acquire suitable off‑price merchandise in the future or to accurately anticipate consumer demand for such merchandise would have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Our results of operations will be negatively affected if we are not successful in managing our inventory profitably.

Inventory is one of the largest assets on our balance sheet and represented approximately 23% of our total assets at June 30, 2020 and 64% at June 30, 2019. Our inventory balance at June 30, 2020 is significantly lower than the prior year due to the COVID-19 disruption to our supply chain operations.  Also impacting the lower percentage for fiscal 2020 is the adoption of ASC 842 at the beginning of the fiscal year, which resulted in recognizing operating lease right-of-use assets on our balance sheet in the current year.  Inventory at June 30, 2020 represented 47% of total assets excluding our operating lease right-of use assets at that same date.  Efficient inventory management is a key component of our business success and profitability. To be successful, we must maintain sufficient inventory levels to meet our customers’ demands without allowing those levels to increase to such an extent that the costs to store and hold the goods unduly impact our financial results. If our buying decisions do not accurately predict customer trends or purchasing actions, we may have to take unanticipated markdowns to dispose of the excess inventory, which also can adversely impact our financial results. We continue to focus on ways to reduce these risks, but we cannot assure that we will be successful in our inventory management. If we are not successful in managing our inventory balances, our results of operations may be negatively affected. We have recorded significant inventory write‑downs from time to time in the past and there can be no assurances that we will not record additional inventory charges in the future.

Our results of operations will be negatively affected if we are unsuccessful in effectively managing our supply chain operations.

With few exceptions, all inventory is shipped directly from suppliers to our distribution network, including our Dallas distribution center along with bypass and pool point facilities, where the inventory is then processed, sorted and shipped to our stores. We depend in large part on the orderly operation of this receiving and distribution process, which depends, in turn, on adherence to shipping schedules and effective management of our distribution centers. We may not anticipate all of the changing demands which our operations will impose on our receiving and distribution system.

The loss of, disruption in operations of, or increased costs in the operation of our distribution center facilities would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Events beyond our control, such as disruptions in operations due to fire or other catastrophic events, labor disagreements or shipping problems, may result in delays in the delivery of merchandise to our stores. We also cannot assure that our insurance will be sufficient, or that insurance proceeds will be paid to us in a timely manner, in the event a distribution center is shut down for any reason.  As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and impact to our business, we have announced that we will be closing our Phoenix distribution center.  We expect the closure to be completed in early fiscal 2021 and there can be no assurance there will be no delays in the delivery of merchandise to our stores.

15

The unplanned loss or departure of one or more members of our senior management or other key management could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our future performance will depend in large part upon the efforts and abilities of our senior management and other key employees. The loss of service of these persons could have a material adverse effect on our business and future prospects. We do not maintain key person life insurance for our senior management. We cannot provide any assurance that we will not experience future turnover related to our senior management team.

Our business is intensely competitive, and a number of different competitive factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

The retail home furnishings and housewares industry is intensely competitive. As an off‑price retailer of home furnishings and housewares, we currently compete against a diverse group of retailers, including department stores and discount stores, specialty, on‑line, and catalog retailers and mass merchants, which sell, among other products, home furnishing, houseware and related products similar and often identical to those we sell. We also compete in particular markets with a substantial number of retailers that specialize in one or more types of home furnishing and houseware products that we sell. Many of these competitors have substantially greater financial resources that may, among other things, increase their ability to purchase inventory at lower costs or to initiate and sustain aggressive price competition.

A number of different competitive factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, including:

We cannot assure that we will be able to continue to compete successfully with our existing or new competitors, or that prolonged periods of deep discount pricing by our competitors will not materially harm our business. We compete for customers, employees, locations, merchandise, services and other important aspects of our business with many other local, regional, national and international retailers. We also face competition from alternative retail distribution channels such as catalogs and, increasingly, e‑commerce websites and mobile device applications. Changes in the merchandising, pricing and promotional activities of those competitors, and in the retail industry, in general, may adversely affect our performance.

If we are unable to maintain and protect our information technology systems and technologies, we could suffer disruptions in our business, damage to our reputation, increased costs and liability, and obstacles to our growth.

The operation of our business is heavily dependent upon the implementation, integrity, security, and successful functioning of our computer networks and information systems, including the point‑of‑sale systems in our stores, data centers that process transactions, and various software applications used in our operations.  Our systems are subject to damage or interruption from weather events, power outages, telecommunications or computer failures, computer viruses, security breaches, employee errors and similar occurrences. A failure of our systems to operate effectively as a result of damage to, interruption, or failure of any of these systems could result in data loss, a failure to meet our reporting obligations, or material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements, or cause losses due to disruption of our business operations and loss of customer confidence. These adverse situations could also lead to loss of sales or profits or cause us to incur additional repair, replacement and development costs.  Our inability to improve our information technology systems and technologies may fail to support our growth and may limit opportunities.

16

Increases in fuel prices and changes in transportation industry regulations or conditions may increase our freight costs and thus our cost of sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Our freight costs are impacted by changes in fuel prices through surcharges. Fuel prices and surcharges affect freight costs both on inbound shipments from vendors and outbound shipments to our stores. In addition, the U.S. government requires drivers of over‑the‑road trucks to take certain rest periods which reduces the available amount of time they can drive during a 24‑hour period. Changes in trucking industry conditions, such as truck driver shortages and highway congestion, could increase freight costs. High fuel prices or surcharges, as well as stringent driver regulations and changes in transportation industry conditions, may increase freight costs and thereby increase our cost of sales.

An increase in the cost or a disruption in the flow of our imported products may significantly decrease our sales and profits.

Merchandise manufactured and imported from overseas represents the majority of our total product purchases acquired both domestically and internationally. A disruption in the shipping of imported merchandise or an increase in the cost of those products may significantly decrease our sales and profits. In addition, if imported merchandise becomes more expensive or unavailable, the transition to alternative sources may not occur in time to meet our demands. Products from alternative sources may also be of lesser quality and more expensive than those we currently import.

Risks associated with our reliance on imported products include disruptions in the shipping and importation or increases in the costs of imported products because of factors such as:

The products we buy abroad are sometimes priced in foreign currencies and, therefore, we are affected by fluctuating exchange rates. We might not be able to successfully protect ourselves in the future against currency rate fluctuations, and our financial performance could suffer as a result.

Changes to federal tax policy may adversely impact our operations and financial performance.

Changes in U.S. tax or trade policy regarding merchandise produced in other countries could adversely affect our business. Changes in U.S. tariffs, quotas, trade relationships or tax provisions that reduce the supply or increase the relative cost of goods produced in other countries could increase our cost of goods and/or increase our effective tax rate. Although such changes would have implications across the entire industry, we may fail to effectively adapt and to manage the adjustments in strategy that would be necessary in response to those changes. In addition to the general uncertainty and overall risk from potential changes in U.S. laws and policies, as we make business decisions in the face of uncertainty as to potential changes, we may incorrectly anticipate the outcomes, miss out on business opportunities, or fail to effectively adapt our business strategies and manage the adjustments that are necessary in response to those changes. These risks could adversely affect our revenues, increase our effective tax rates, and reduce our profitability.

17

Our success depends upon our marketing, advertising and promotional efforts. If our marketing spend is inadequate, if we fail to implement programs successfully, or if our competitors are more effective than we are, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Historically, we have used marketing and promotional programs to attract customers to our stores and to encourage purchases by our customers. We use various media for our promotional efforts, including email, direct mail, newspaper inserts, digital video, digital display, search and social networks. In fiscal 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we reduced our marketing spend, and anticipate spending at a reduced level for an unknown period of time.  If we are unable to increase our marketing spend appropriately, our business may suffer.  If we fail to choose the appropriate medium for our efforts, or fail to implement and execute new marketing opportunities, our competitors may be able to attract some of our customers and cause them to decrease purchases from us and increase purchases elsewhere, which would negatively impact our net sales. Changes in the amount and degree of promotional intensity or merchandising strategy by our competitors could cause us to have some difficulties in retaining existing customers and attracting new customers.

If we do not attract, train and retain quality employees in appropriate numbers, including key employees and management, our performance could be adversely affected.

Our performance is dependent on recruiting, developing, training and retaining quality sales, distribution center and other employees in large numbers, as well as, experienced buying and management personnel. Many of our store employees are in entry level or part‑time positions with historically high rates of turnover. Our ability to meet our labor needs while controlling costs is subject to external factors, such as unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, minimum wage legislation, and changes in rules governing eligibility for overtime and changing demographics. In the event of increasing wage rates, if we do not increase our wages competitively, our staffing levels and customer service could suffer because of a declining quality of our workforce, or our earnings would decrease if we increase our wage rates, whether in response to market demands or new minimum wage legislation. Changes that adversely impact our ability to attract and retain quality employees and management personnel could adversely affect our performance.

Our results of operations are subject to seasonal and quarterly fluctuations, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results or the market price of our common stock.

Our business is subject to seasonality with a higher level of net sales and operating income generated during the quarter ended December 31, which includes the holiday shopping season. Net sales in the quarters ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 accounted for approximately 37%, 34% and 33% of our annual net sales for fiscal years 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  For more information about our seasonality, please read Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Quarterly Results and Seasonality.”

Because a significant percentage of our net sales and operating income are generated in the quarter ending December 31, we have limited ability to compensate for shortfalls in December quarter sales or earnings by changes in our operations or strategies in other quarters. A significant shortfall in results for the quarter ending December 31 of any year could have a material adverse effect on our annual results of operations and on the market price of our common stock. In addition, in anticipation of higher sales during this period, we purchase substantial amounts of seasonal inventory and hire many temporary employees. An excess of seasonal merchandise inventory could result if our net sales during this principal selling season were to fall below either seasonal norms or expectations. If our December quarter sales results are substantially below expectations, our financial performance and operating results could be adversely affected by unanticipated markdowns, particularly in seasonal merchandise. Lower than anticipated sales in the principal selling season would also negatively affect our ability to absorb the increased seasonal labor costs.

Our quarterly results of operations may also fluctuate significantly based on additional factors, such as:

18

These factors could also have a material adverse effect on our annual results of operations and on the market price of our common stock.

If we fail to protect the security of information about our business and our customers, suppliers, business partners and employees, we could damage our reputation and our business, incur substantial additional costs and become subject to litigation and government investigations and enforcement actions.

In the ordinary course of our business, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, our proprietary business information and that of our customers, suppliers and business partners, and personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, on our computer networks and information systems.  The secure processing, maintenance and transmission of this information is critical to our operations.  Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure and that of our service providers may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions.  Cyber threats are rapidly evolving and are becoming increasingly sophisticated. Any such attack or breach could compromise our security and remain undetected for a period of time, and confidential information could be misappropriated, resulting in a loss of customers’, suppliers’, business partners’ or employees’ personal information, negative publicity, harm to our business and reputation, and potentially causing us to incur costs to reimburse third parties for damages and potentially subjecting us to government investigations and enforcement actions. In addition, the regulatory environment surrounding data and information security and privacy is increasingly demanding, as new and revised requirements are frequently imposed across our business. Compliance with more demanding privacy and information security laws and standards may result in significant expense due to increased investment in technology and the development of new operational processes, and implementing new initiatives could result in system disruptions. We maintain cyber risk insurance, but this insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our losses from any future breaches of our systems.

We are subject to various government regulations, changes in the existing laws and regulations and new laws and regulations which may adversely affect our operations and financial performance.

The development and operation of our stores are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in many areas of our business, including, but not limited to, those that impose restrictions, levy a fee or tax, or require a permit or license, or other regulatory approval, and building and zoning requirements. Difficulties or failures in obtaining required permits, licenses or other regulatory approvals could delay or prevent the opening of a new store, and the suspension of, or inability to renew, a license or permit could interrupt operations at an existing store. We are also subject to laws governing our relationship with employees, including minimum wage requirements, overtime, and other state and federal wage and hour regulations, regulations governing leaves of absence, health insurance mandates, working and safety conditions, and immigration status requirements. Additionally, changes in federal labor laws could result in portions of our workforce being subjected to greater organized labor influence. This could result in an increase to our labor costs. A significant portion of our store personnel are paid at rates related to the minimum wage established by federal, state and municipal law. Additionally, we are subject to certain laws and regulations that govern our handling of customers’ personal information. A failure to protect the integrity and security of our customers’ personal information could expose us to private litigation and government investigations and enforcement actions, as well as materially damage our reputation with our customers. While we endeavor to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, governmental and regulatory bodies may change such laws and regulations in the future which may require us to incur substantial cost increases. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to various sanctions, penalties or fines and may be required to cease operations until we achieve compliance which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial results and operations.

We face risks to our corporate reputation from our customers, employees and other third parties.

Damage to our corporate reputation could adversely affect our sales results and profitability. Our reputation is partially based on perception. Any incident that erodes the trust or confidence of our customers or the general public could adversely affect our reputation and operating performance, particularly if the incident results in significant adverse publicity or governmental inquiry. An incident could include alleged acts, or omissions by, or situations involving our vendors, our landlords, or our employees outside of work, and may pertain to social or political issues or protests largely unrelated to our business. The use of social media platforms, including blogs, social media websites, and other forms of internet-based communications, which allow individuals access to a broad audience, continues to increase. The opportunity for dissemination of information, including inaccurate information, is seemingly limitless and readily available. Information concerning our Company may be posted on such platforms at any time. Information posted may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, which could negatively affect our sales and profitability, diminish customer trust, reduce employee morale and productivity, and lead to difficulties in recruiting and retaining qualified employees. The harm may be immediate, without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction.

19

We face litigation risks from customers, employees, and other third parties in the ordinary course of business.

Our business is subject to the risk of litigation by customers, current and former employees, suppliers, stockholders and others through private actions, class actions, administrative proceedings, regulatory actions, or other litigation. The outcome of litigation, particularly class action lawsuits and regulatory actions, is difficult to assess or quantify. Plaintiffs in these types of lawsuits may seek recovery of very large or indeterminate amounts, and the magnitude of the potential loss relating to such lawsuits may remain unknown for substantial periods of time. The cost to defend future litigation may be significant. There may also be adverse publicity associated with litigation that could decrease customer acceptance of merchandise offerings, regardless of whether the allegations are valid or whether we are ultimately found liable.

We face risks with respect to product liability claims and product recalls, which could adversely affect our reputation, our business, and our consolidated results of operations.

We purchase merchandise from third parties and offer this merchandise to customers for sale. Merchandise could be subject to recalls and other actions by regulatory authorities. Changes in laws and regulations could also impact the type of merchandise we offer to customers. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, issues that result in recalls of merchandise. In addition, in the past, individuals have asserted claims, and may in the future assert claims, that they have sustained injuries from third‑party merchandise offered by us, and we may be subject to future lawsuits relating to these claims. There is a risk that these claims or liabilities may exceed, or fall outside the scope of, our insurance coverage. Any of the issues mentioned above could result in damage to our reputation, diversion of development and management resources, or reduced sales and increased costs, any of which could harm our business.

Our stores may be adversely affected by local conditions, natural disasters, and other events.

Certain regions in which our stores are located may be subject to adverse local conditions, natural disasters, and other events. If severe weather, such as heavy snowfall or extreme temperatures, discourages or restricts customers in a particular region from traveling to our stores, our sales could be adversely affected. If severe weather conditions occur during the second quarter of our fiscal year, the adverse impact to our sales and profitability could be even greater than at other times during the year because we generate a significant portion of our sales and profits during this period. Natural disasters including tornados, hurricanes, floods, and earthquakes may damage our stores, corporate office, and distribution facilities or other operations, which may adversely affect our financial results. Additionally, demographic shifts in the areas where our stores are located could adversely impact our financial results and operations.

Our results of operations may be negatively affected by inventory shrinkage.

We are subject to the risk of inventory loss and theft. Although our inventory shrinkage rates have not fluctuated significantly in recent years, we cannot assure that actual rates of inventory loss and theft in the future will be within our estimates or that the measures we are taking will effectively reduce the problem of inventory shrinkage. Although some level of inventory shrinkage is an unavoidable cost of doing business, if we were to experience higher rates of inventory shrinkage or incur increased security costs to combat inventory theft, our results of operations could be affected adversely.

Our results of operations may be negatively impacted by exposure to unexpected costs related to our insurance programs.

Our insurance coverage is subject to deductibles, self-insured retentions, limits of liability and similar provisions that we believe are prudent based on our overall operations. We may incur certain types of losses that we cannot insure or which we believe are not economically reasonable to insure, such as losses due to acts of war and terrorism, employee and certain other crime, and some natural disasters. If we incur these losses and they are material, our business could suffer. Certain material events may result in sizable losses for the insurance industry and adversely impact the availability of adequate insurance coverage or result in excessive premium increases. To offset negative cost trends in the insurance market, we may elect to self-insure, accept higher deductibles or reduce the amount of coverage in response to these market changes. In addition, we self-insure a significant portion of expected losses under our workers’ compensation, general liability, and group health insurance programs. Unanticipated changes in any applicable actuarial assumptions and management estimates underlying our recorded liabilities for these self-insured losses, including potential increases in medical and indemnity costs, could result in significantly different expenses than expected under these programs, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Although we continue to maintain property insurance for catastrophic events, we are self-insured for losses up to the amount of our deductibles. If we experience a greater number of self-insured losses than we anticipate, our financial performance could be adversely affected.

20

We are subject to customer payment-related risks that could increase operating costs or exposure to fraud or theft, subject us to potential liability and potentially disrupt our business.

We accept payments using a variety of methods, including cash, credit and debit cards, gift cards, gift certificates, store credits, and digital wallets. Acceptance of these payment options subjects us to rules, regulations, contractual obligations and compliance requirements, including payment network rules and operating guidelines, data security standards and certification requirements, and rules governing electronic funds transfers. In October 2015, the payment card industry shifted liability for certain debit and credit card transactions to retailers who are not able to accept EMV chip technology transactions. Any disruption to our ability to accept EMV chip technology transactions may subject us to increased risk of liability for fraudulent transactions and may adversely affect our business and operating results.

For certain payment methods, including credit and debit cards, we pay interchange and other fees, which may increase over time and raise our operating costs. We rely on third parties to provide payment processing services, including the processing of credit cards, debit cards, and other forms of electronic payment. If these companies become unable to provide these services to us, or if their systems are compromised, it could potentially disrupt our business. The payment methods that we offer also subject us to potential fraud and theft by criminals, who are becoming increasingly more sophisticated, seeking to obtain unauthorized access to or exploit weaknesses that may exist in the payment systems.  If we fail to comply with applicable rules or requirements for the payment methods we accept, or if payment-related data is compromised due to a breach or misuse of data, we may be liable for costs incurred by payment card issuing banks and other third parties or subject to fines and higher transaction fees, or our ability to accept or facilitate certain types of payments may be impaired. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in certain payment types, which may result in a shift to other payment types or potential changes to our payment systems that may result in higher costs. As a result, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls over financial reporting there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis, which could result in a loss of investor confidence and negatively impact our business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable and accurate financial statements and to effectively prevent fraud.  As further described in Part II Item 9A “Controls and Procedures” of this Annual Report, management has concluded that, because of a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to ineffective assessment of impairment of long-lived assets, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2020.  Specifically, management’s estimation of fair value did not appropriately utilize market participant assumptions, which was identified and corrected prior to filing.  The material weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.  We cannot be certain that these measures will be successful or that we will be able to prevent future significant deficiencies or material weaknesses.  Any remediation efforts additionally may require us to incur unanticipated costs for various professional fees and services.  Material inaccuracies in our financial statements would damage their value to management and our Board of Directors in making decisions as to the operation of our business, could harm our reputation and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.  Properties

Stores.  

We lease all of our stores from unaffiliated third parties, except one Company‑owned store located adjacent to our existing distribution facility in Dallas, Texas. A description of the location of our stores is provided in Item 1, “Business—Stores and Store Operations.” At June 30, 2020, the remaining terms of the majority of our store leases range from one month to five years. The average initial term of store leases executed under our real estate strategy is approximately ten years, typically with options available for renewal. We intend to continue to lease all of our new stores from unaffiliated third parties. Our store leases typically include “kick clauses,” which allow us, at our option, to exit the lease with no penalty approximately 60 months after entering into the lease if store sales do not reach a stipulated amount stated in the lease.

21

Distribution Facilities and Corporate Headquarters.  

We own a 104,675 square foot building which houses our corporate office in Dallas, Texas. Our Dallas distribution center utilizes approximately 1.2 million square feet, all of which is owned. During fiscal 2015, we executed a lease for approximately 0.6 million square feet related to our additional distribution center in Phoenix, Arizona which started operations in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.

We lease from unaffiliated third parties four parcels of land of approximately 538,250 square feet, for trailer parking and storage.

In fiscal 2020, as the next step in our supply chain strategy, we began the retrofit of our existing Dallas-based distribution facility to accommodate our distribution requirements for our existing store base as well as for planned future growth.  Due to the impacts of COVID-19, the retrofit of the Dallas distribution center was ceased in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.  We also reached the decision in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020 to close our Phoenix distribution center and consolidate operations in our Dallas-based facility, which we expect to be completed in early fiscal 2021.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Information related to the Chapter 11 Cases that were filed on May 27, 2020 is included in Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In addition, we are involved in legal and governmental proceedings as part of the normal course of our business. Reserves have been established when a loss is considered probable and are based on management’s best estimates of our potential liability in these matters. These estimates have been developed in consultation with internal and external counsel and are based on a combination of litigation and settlement strategies.  Management believes that such litigation and claims will be resolved without material effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

22

PART II

Item 5.  Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

As a result of the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, on June 8, 2020, trading in the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq was suspended.  On July 1, 2020, Nasdaq filed a Form 25 with the SEC to delist the Company’s common stock.

On June 8, 2020, the Company’s common stock began trading on the OTC Pink marketplace under the symbol “TUESQ”.  Securities traded in the over-the-counter market generally have significantly less liquidity than securities traded on a national securities exchange.  Over-the-counter market quotations may reflect inter-dealer prices, without any retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.  The Company cautions that trading in the Company’s common stock during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases is highly speculative and poses substantial risks. Trading prices for the Company’s common stock may bear little or no relationship to the actual recovery, if any, by holders of the Company’s common stock in the Chapter 11 Cases. 

As of September 10, 2020, there were approximately 155 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock. We do not presently have plans to pay dividends on our common stock. The DIP ABL Facility and DIP Term Facility do not permit us to pay dividends or repurchase our common stock.  Additional details are provided in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

Not Required

23

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Selected Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10‑K.

Overview

Bankruptcy Filing and Going Concern

24

Results for the Year ended June 30, 2020

25

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, selected statement of operations data, expressed as a percentage of net sales, as well as the number of stores open at the end of each period. There can be no assurance that the trends in sales or operating results will continue in the future.

See Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements herein for a discussion of restructuring, impairment, and abandonment charges, as well as reorganization items.

26

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We define EBITDA as net income or net loss before interest, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA reflects further adjustments to EBITDA to eliminate the impact of certain items, including certain non-cash items and other items that we believe are not representative of our core operating performance. These measures are not presentations made in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as alternatives to net income or loss as a measure of operating performance. In addition, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not presented as, and should not be considered as, alternatives to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation, or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP and Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by such adjustments. We believe it is useful for investors to see these EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA measures that management uses to evaluate our operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are included to supplement our financial information presented in accordance with GAAP and because we use these measures to monitor and evaluate the performance of our business as a supplement to GAAP measures and we believe the presentation of these non-GAAP measures enhances investors’ ability to analyze trends in our business and evaluate our performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are also frequently used by analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry. The non-GAAP measures presented may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

The following table reconciles net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure (in thousands):

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019

Our net sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2020 were significantly negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Net sales were $874.9 million in fiscal 2020 compared to $1,007 million in fiscal 2019. On March 25, 2020, we temporarily closed all of our stores nationwide, severely reducing revenues and resulting in significant operating losses and the elimination of substantially all operating cash flow. Comparable store sales decreased 11.8%.  New stores are included in the same store sales calculation starting with the sixteenth month following the date of the store opening.  A store that relocates within the same geographic market or modifies its available retail space is generally considered the same store for purposes of this computation.  All stores that were temporarily closed due to the pandemic continued to be included in the computation of comparable store sales for fiscal 2020, thereby negatively impacting comparable store sales.  The decrease in comparable store sales was comprised of a decrease in customer transactions of 11.5% along with a decrease in average ticket of 0.4%.  Non-comparable store sales decreased by a total of $16.9 million and resulted in a 130 basis point negative impact on net sales.  Non-comparable store sales include the net effect of sales from

27

new stores and sales from stores that have closed.  The non-comparable store sales decrease was driven by 30 store closings, partially offset by one store opening, which have occurred since the end of fiscal 2019.  To provide a further assessment of our performance and a more comparable performance indicator, we calculated comparable store sales excluding the period of time stores were closed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and estimate that comparable store sales, as adjusted for only the period of time stores were open in both fiscal 2020 and fiscal 2019, were approximately flat for fiscal 2020.  Additionally, to provide a comparable measure for our continuing stores, we calculated comparable store sales excluding the period of time stores were closed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as excluding sales for the stores we plan to permanently close, and estimate that comparable store sales, as further adjusted, declined approximately 1.3% for fiscal 2020.

Gross profit for fiscal 2020 was $284.9 million, a decrease of 19.1% compared to $352.3 million for fiscal 2019. As a percentage of net sales, gross margin decreased to 32.6% in fiscal 2020 compared with 35.0% in fiscal 2019. The decrease in gross margin was primarily a result of higher markdowns, primarily driven by liquidation markdowns at closing stores, along with higher recognized supply chain and transportation costs.

SG&A decreased to $330.6 million in fiscal 2020, compared to $362.8 million in the same period last year.  The decrease was due to lower labor costs, incentive compensation and retention costs, as well as reduced advertising, driven in part by the temporary store closures and cost management initiatives in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.  As a percentage of net sales, SG&A increased to 37.8% for fiscal 2020, versus 36.0% in the prior year, deleveraging significantly, as impacted by the negative impact on sales in the current year quarter due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Restructuring, impairment and abandonment charges, were $113.5 million during fiscal 2020 and were primarily related to our permanent store closing plan along with our decision to close our Phoenix distribution center, as well as compensation costs related to a reorganization reduction in force completed prior to the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases and pre-filing incremental professional fees.

Our operating loss was $159.2 million during fiscal 2020 as compared to an operating loss of $10.5 million for fiscal 2019, an increase of $148.7 million. The operating loss in the current year was primarily the result of the significant impairment and abandonment charges recognized for the approved permanent store and Phoenix distribution center closures, and lower net sales which were significantly driven by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, along with restructuring costs as well as reorganization costs resulting from the filing of our Chapter 11 Cases.

Interest expense increased $1.3 million to $3.8 million in fiscal 2020 compared to $2.5 million in the prior year, as a result of higher interest rates on our revolving credit facility and increased borrowings during fiscal 2020, as well as the acceleration of financing costs as a result of reduced borrowing capacity driven by both a lower commitment and a reduced term.  Other income was $0.6 million in fiscal 2020 compared to $0.8 million in fiscal 2019.

Income tax expense for fiscal 2020 was $221,000 compared to income tax expense of $246,000 in fiscal 2019.  The effective tax rates for fiscal 2020 and 2019 were (0.1%) and (2.0%), respectively. We currently believe the expected effects on future year effective tax rates to continue to be nominal until the cumulative losses and valuation allowance are fully utilized.  A full valuation allowance is currently recorded against substantially all of our net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2020.  The total valuation allowance at the end of fiscal years 2020, 2019, and 2018 was $67.6 million, $27.5 million and $23.7 million, respectively. A deviation from the customary relationship between income tax benefit and pretax income results from utilization of the valuation allowance.

Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2019 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018

For a discussion of fiscal 2019 results of operations as compared to fiscal 2018 results of operations, please refer to Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, filed with the SEC on August 22, 2019.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

In fiscal 2020, cash provided by operating activities was $93.9 million, compared to $19.6 million in the prior fiscal year. The increase in cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2020 was primarily the result of a $126.4 million larger decrease in inventory.  This increase was partially offset by our higher net loss of $153.9 million in fiscal 2020, adjusted for the non-cash impacts of asset impairment and abandonment charges, totaling $105.2 million, as well as a $9.6 million cash outlay for July rents, which were paid at the end of June, and a $4.5 million higher cash usage in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

28

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal 2020 and 2019 related primarily to capital expenditures.  Our capital expenditures are generally associated with store relocations, expansions and new store openings, capital improvements to existing stores, as well as enhancements to our distribution center facilities, equipment, and systems along with improvements related to technology and equipment.  Cash used in investing activities totaled $13.9 million and $16.3 million for fiscal 2020 and 2019, respectively.  Prior year spending primarily related to our store real estate strategy, while current year spending reflects reduced real estate project activity and increased investment in our distribution center facilities as well as in technology.

We currently expect to incur capital expenditures, net of construction allowances received from landlords, of approximately $6 million to $8 million in fiscal year 2021, which reflects reduced capital spending as one of the liquidity preservation measures we have taken due to the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities of $44.7 million in fiscal 2020 was related to $34.6 in net repayments on our revolving credit facility, a $5.0 million lower cash overdraft provision, and the payment of $4.9 million in financing costs related to obtaining debtor-in-possession financing. Net cash used in financing activities of $1.4 million in fiscal 2019 related to $3.8 million of net repayments on our revolving credit facility, $0.6 million of financing costs related to the January 2019 amendment and extension of our revolving credit facility, and $0.2 million of capital lease principal payments, partially offset by a $3.2 cash overdraft provision.  

Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement

We are party to a credit agreement providing for an asset-based, five year senior secured revolving credit facility in the original amount of up to $180.0 million that was scheduled to mature on January 29, 2024 (the “Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement”). The availability of funds under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement was limited to the lesser of a calculated borrowing base and the lenders’ aggregate commitments under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement. Our indebtedness under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement is secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets.

As of June 30, 2020, we had $0.1 million remaining outstanding under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement, as required by the DIP ABL Credit Agreement.  See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements herein and “Liquidity” below for additional information.

Liquidity

Historically, we have financed our operations with funds generated from operating activities, available cash and cash equivalents, and borrowings under our Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and will continue to have, an adverse effect on our business operations, store traffic, employee availability, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and cash flow.  As of March 25, 2020, we temporarily closed all of our stores nationwide, severely reducing revenues and resulting in significant operating losses and the elimination of substantially all operating cash flow.

The filing of the Chapter 11 Cases was an event of default under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement, making all amounts outstanding under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement immediately due and payable and no additional borrowings are available under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement.  As of June 30, 2020, the remaining outstanding amounts under the existing agreement are reflected as a current liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

To provide for liquidity during the Chapter 11 Cases, we have entered into agreements for debtor-in-possession financing.  On May 29, 2020, in accordance with an order of the Bankruptcy Court, Debtors entered into the DIP ABL Credit Agreement, which provides for a super priority secured debtor-in-possession revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount of up to $100 million.  Under the terms of the DIP ABL Credit Agreement, amounts available for advances are subject to a borrowing base generally consistent with the borrowing base under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement, subject to certain agreed upon exceptions. The DIP ABL Credit Agreement requires that all proceeds of advances under the DIP ABL Facility be used only for ordinary course general corporate and working capital purposes, costs of administration of the Chapter 11 Cases, certain professional fees and fees and expenses relating to the DIP ABL Facility, in each case, in accordance with a cash flow budget that will be updated periodically, subject to certain permitted variances. The DIP ABL Credit Agreement requires that all cash received by us (other than proceeds of the DIP ABL Facility) be applied to repay outstanding amounts under the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement.

29

The DIP ABL Facility contains customary affirmative and negative covenants for debtor-in-possession financings.  In addition, the DIP ABL Facility requires us to, among other things, maintain certain minimum liquidity requirements, and receive approval of a plan of reorganization or sale of substantially all of our assets through the Chapter 11 process by agreed upon deadlines.

The commitments of the lenders under the DIP ABL Facility terminate and outstanding borrowings under the DIP ABL Facility mature at the earliest of the date which is one hundred eighty (180) days after the Petition Date; the date of consummation of the sale of all or substantially all of our assets; the effective date of a plan of reorganization; or upon the occurrence of an event of default under the DIP ABL Credit Agreement or such other date as the outstanding borrowings under the DIP Facility are accelerated.

As of June 30, 2020, cash and cash equivalents were $46.7 million and total liquidity, defined as cash and cash equivalents plus borrowing availability, was $79.7 million as of June 30, 2020, which includes $33.0 million available for borrowing under the DIP ABL Facility.  In early July 2020, an additional $25 million of additional borrowing capacity became available upon our execution of the DIP DDTL Agreement.

As discussed above, in mid-June 2020, we commenced the process to close 132 store locations in a first wave of store closings.  By the end of July, all of these stores were permanently closed.  In mid-July 2020, we began the process to close an additional 65 stores following negotiations with our landlords. We also began the process to close our Phoenix, Arizona distribution center and expect the closure to be completed early in fiscal 2021. These store closures will have an impact on our operating cash flows.

Please refer to Note 1, Note 3 and Note 12 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Chapter 11 Cases as well as for a discussion of the DIP ABL Facility and the DIP Term Facility.

Although we are seeking to address our liquidity concerns through the Chapter 11 Cases, the approval of a plan of reorganization or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets is not within our control and uncertainty remains as to whether the Bankruptcy Court will approve a plan of reorganization or a sale of all or substantially all of our assets.

We have concluded that our financial condition and our projected operating results, our need to satisfy certain financial and other covenants in our debtor-in-possession financing, our need to implement a restructuring plan and receive new financing, and the risks and uncertainties surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the Chapter 11 Cases raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.  We believe that our plans, already implemented and continuing to be implemented, will mitigate the conditions and events that have raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.  However, due to the uncertainty around the scope and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related disruption to our business and financial impacts, and because our plans, including those in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, are not yet finalized, fully executed, or approved by the Bankruptcy Court, they cannot be deemed probable of mitigating this substantial doubt.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of certain assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On a recurring basis, we evaluate our significant estimates which are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—We evaluate long-lived assets, principally property and equipment, as well as lease right-of-use assets subsequent to the adoption of ASC 842, for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying values may not be recoverable.  Management's judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on market conditions and financial performance.  Indicators of impairment may also include the planned closure of a store or facility, among others.  The results of our fourth quarter fiscal 2020 impairment analysis indicated an impairment of our property and equipment as well as operating lease right-of-use assets at approximately 200 of our stores along with property and equipment of our Phoenix distribution center facility totaling $80.1 million, which is included in restructuring costs in the statement of operations.  The impairments were the result of closing plans for these stores and the Phoenix distribution center.

30

Impairment is indicated when the sum of the estimated future cash flows, on an undiscounted basis, is less than the asset’s (asset group’s) carrying amount.  Then, when the fair value of the estimated future cash flows, on a discounted basis, is less than carrying amount, an impairment charge is recorded.  The testing of an asset group for recoverability involves assumptions regarding the future cash flows of the asset group, the growth rate of those cash flows, and the remaining useful life over which an asset group is expected to generate cash flows.  In the event we determine an asset group is not recoverable, the measurement of an estimated impairment loss involves a number of management judgments, including the selection of an appropriate discount rate, as well as various unobservable inputs incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value.  These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions.  Fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions and factors.  Key market participant assumptions used for purposes of determining the fair value of our long-lived assets, including lease right-of-use assets, in connection with the fiscal 2020 impairment discussed above included market rent assumptions and the discount rate.

If actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used to calculate estimated future cash flows, we may be exposed to impairment losses that could be material.  Additionally, we can provide no assurance that we will not have additional impairment charges in future periods as a result of changes in our operating results or assumptions.

Our property and equipment, combined with our operating lease right-of-use assets totaled $327.1 million as of June 30, 2020, or approximately 65% of total assets, which reflects the impact of the $80.1 million impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2020.  Impairment charges recorded in fiscal 2019 were not material.

Inventory—Our inventories consist of finished goods and are stated at the lower of cost or market using the retail inventory method for store inventory and the specific identification method for warehouse inventory. We have a perpetual inventory system that tracks on-hand inventory and inventory sold at a SKU level. Inventory is relieved and cost of goods sold is recorded based on the current cost of the item sold. Buying, distribution, freight and certain other costs are capitalized as part of inventory and are charged to cost of sales as the related inventory is sold. The retail inventory method, which is used by a number of our competitors, involves management estimates with regard to items such as markdowns. Such estimates may significantly impact the ending inventory valuation at cost as well as the amount of gross margin recognized.

Our stores conduct annual physical inventories, staggered during the second half of the fiscal year. During periods in which physical inventory observations do not occur, we utilize an estimate for recording inventory shrink based on the historical results of our previous physical inventories. In the second half of fiscal 2020, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic including our temporary store closures, we conducted physical inventories at a portion of our stores sufficient to validate the existence of inventory in our stores and the accuracy of our estimated shrink reserve rate.  We have loss prevention and inventory controls programs that we believe minimize shrink. The estimated shrink rate may require a favorable or unfavorable adjustment to actual results to the extent that our subsequent actual physical inventory results yield a different result. Although inventory shrink rates have not fluctuated significantly in recent years, if the actual rate were to differ from our estimates, then an adjustment to inventory shrink would be required.

Inventory is one of the largest assets on our balance sheet and represented approximately 23%, 64%, and 62% of total assets at June 30, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Total inventory decreased $123.0 million or 51.7% from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruption to our retail and supply chain operations, including the liquidation of inventory at our closing stores. Total inventory increased 5.6%, or $12.5 million, from June 30, 2018 to June 30, 2019. On a per store basis, store inventory decreased 50.8% from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020 and increased 3.2% from June 30, 2018 to June 30, 2019.

Markdowns—We utilize markdowns to promote the effective and timely sale of merchandise which allows us to consistently provide new merchandise to our customers. We also utilize markdowns coupled with promotional events to drive traffic and stimulate sales. Markdowns may be temporary or permanent. Temporary markdowns are for a designated period of time with markdowns recorded to cost of sales based on quantities sold during the period. Permanent markdowns are charged to cost of sales immediately based on the total quantities on hand at the time of the markdown. Markdowns and damages were 5.9% in fiscal 2020 and were 4.5% in fiscal 2019.  The increase in fiscal year 2020 was primarily related to the markdowns taken in conjunction with our store closure going out of business sales.  Markdowns may vary throughout the quarter or year in timing.

The effect of a 1.0% markdown in the value of our inventory at June 30, 2020 would result in a decline in gross profit and a reduction in our earnings per share for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 of $1.1 million and $0.02, respectively.

31

Insurance and Self‑Insurance Reserves—We use a combination of insurance and self‑insurance plans to provide for the potential liabilities associated with workers’ compensation, general liability, property insurance, director and officers’ liability insurance, vehicle liability and employee health care benefits. Our stop loss limits per claim are $500,000 for workers’ compensation, $250,000 for general liability, and $150,000 for medical. Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by us are estimated, in part, by historical claims experience, severity factors and the use of loss development factors by third-party actuaries.

The insurance liabilities we record are primarily influenced by the frequency and severity of claims and include a reserve for claims incurred but not yet reported. Our estimated reserves may be materially different from our future actual claim costs, and, when required adjustments to our estimated reserves are identified, the liability will be adjusted accordingly in that period. Our self‑insurance reserves for workers’ compensation, general liability and medical were $8.4 million, $1.3 million, and $0.9 million, respectively, at June 30, 2020 and $8.2 million, $1.1 million, and $0.9 million, respectively, at June 30, 2019.

We recognize insurance expenses based on the date of an occurrence of a loss including the actual and estimated ultimate costs of our claims. Claims paid reduce our reserves and our current period insurance expense is adjusted for the difference in prior period recorded reserves and actual payments. Current period insurance expenses also include the amortization of our premiums paid to our insurance carriers. Expenses for workers’ compensation, general liability and medical insurance were $2.7 million, $3.3 million and $8.7 million, respectively, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020; $2.1 million, $2.3 million and $7.9 million, respectively, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019; and $5.3 million, $2.9 million and $6.4 million, respectively, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.

Income taxes—We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is more likely than not that such assets will be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, all available evidence is considered including past operating results, future reversals of taxable temporary differences, estimates of future income and tax planning strategies. We have elected to utilize the “with and without” method for purposes of determining when excess tax benefits will be realized. We are subject to income tax in many jurisdictions, including the United States, various states and localities. At any point in time, we may not be subject to audit by any of the various jurisdictions; however, we record estimated reserves for uncertain tax benefits for potential domestic tax audits. The timing of these audits and negotiations with taxing authorities may affect the ultimate settlement of these issues. If different assumptions had been used, our tax expense or benefit, assets and liabilities could have varied from recorded amounts. If actual results differ from estimated results or if we adjust these assumptions in the future, we may need to adjust our reserves for uncertain tax benefits or our deferred tax assets or liabilities, which could impact our effective tax rate.

Off‑Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off‑balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2020.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at June 30, 2020 and the effects that such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in thousands):    

32

Contractually required payments for maintenance, insurance and taxes on our leased properties are estimated as a percentage of rent based on historical trends. These amounts can vary based on multiple factors including inflation, macroeconomic conditions, various local tax rates and appraised values of our rental properties. The operating lease obligations include the lease obligations of our new, additional distribution center in Phoenix, Arizona opened in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016. We do not consider most merchandise purchase orders to be contractual obligations due to designated cancellation dates on the face of the purchase order.

Commitment fees and interest on the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement were calculated based on contractual commitment fees, standby letter of credit fees, and interest based on outstanding balances.  As of June 30, 2020, the outstanding balance on the Pre-Petition ABL Credit Agreement was $0.1 million and was no longer subject to unused commitment fees and interest.

Commitment fees and interest on the DIP ABL Credit Agreement are calculated based on contractual commitment fees, standby letter of credit fees, and interest based on any outstanding balances on the DIP ABL Credit Agreement.  As of June 30, 2020, there were no balances outstanding and letters of credit totaled 8.8 million. See "Liquidity and Capital Resources" above.  The interest and commitment fees on our DIP ABL Credit Agreement reflect the future cash requirements for interest payments until maturity and incorporates the interest rates in effect as of June 30, 2020. The interest on the letter of credit utilization and unused commitments are fixed at 3.125% and 0.5%, respectively.

We have not included other long-term liabilities related to self-insurance reserves in the contractual obligations table, as they do not represent cash requirements arising from contractual payment obligations. While self-insurance reserves represent an estimate of our future obligation and not a contractual payment obligation, we have disclosed our self-insurance reserves under "Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates - Insurance and Self-Insurance Reserves."

Quarterly Results and Seasonality

The tables in Note 10 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth certain quarterly financial data for the eight quarters ended June 30, 2020. The quarterly information is unaudited, but has been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10‑K. We believe that all necessary adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) have been included to present fairly the unaudited quarterly results when read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10‑K. The results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.  Please refer to Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate based upon such factors as the number and timing of store openings, the amount of net sales contributed by new and existing stores, the mix of merchandise sold, pricing, store closings or relocations, competitive factors and general economic and weather‑related conditions. The timing of advertised and promotional events could impact the weighting of sales between quarters. We expect to continue to experience seasonal fluctuations in our business, with a significant percentage of our net sales and operating income being generated in the quarter ending December 31, which includes the holiday selling season.  Our results for the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2020 were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inflation

In our opinion, the overall impact of inflation has not had a material effect on our results of operations in any of the fiscal years of 2020, 2019, or 2018. We cannot assure that inflation will not materially affect our results of operations in the future.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

33

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required.

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The following consolidated financial statements of Tuesday Morning Corporation and its subsidiaries and Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm are included in this Form 10‑K and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2020.  The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2020, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below in “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of Tuesday Morning is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a‑15(f) or Rule 15(d)‑15(f) under the Exchange Act. Tuesday Morning’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that: (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and the dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with appropriate authorizations; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of an evaluation of effectiveness for future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

34

Our management (with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer) assessed the effectiveness of Tuesday Morning’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, and the material weakness identified below, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2020, Tuesday Morning did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting.

A material weakness (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

We identified a material weakness in internal control related to ineffective assessment of impairment of long-lived assets.  Management’s estimation of fair value did not appropriately utilize market participant assumptions.   The material weakness resulted in a material misstatement in our June 30, 2020 financial statements which was identified and corrected prior to filing.  There were no restatements of prior period financial statements and no change in previously released financial results were required as the result of the control deficiency.

We are committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment and implementing measures designed to help ensure that control deficiencies contributing to the material weakness are remediated.  We are designing and implementing our remediation plan for the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above, which includes steps to improve the operation and monitoring of control activities and procedures associated with our impairment assessment.  We will consider the material weakness remediated after the applicable controls operate for a sufficient period of time, and management has concluded, through testing, that the controls are operating effectively.

Following identification of the material weakness and prior to filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we completed additional procedures for the year ended June 30, 2020.  Based on these procedures, management believes that our consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have certified that, based on their knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Form 10-K, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Form 10-K. Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an unqualified opinion on our financial statements, which is included in page F‑2 of this Form 10‑K.

Ernst & Young LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020. The report follows on the next page.

35

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Tuesday Morning Corporation

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited Tuesday Morning Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, Tuesday Morning Corporation (the Company) has not maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2020, based on the COSO criteria.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment: Management has identified a material weakness in controls related to the Company’s impairment assessment of long-lived assets.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of June 30, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2020, and the related notes. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the fiscal year 2020 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated September 14, 2020, which expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas

September 14, 2020

36

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements

The report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the consolidated financial statements is included in page F‑2 of this Form 10‑K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Other than the identification of the material weakness discussed above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B.  Other Information

Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.

On September 8, 2020, Trent E. Taylor, provided the Company with notice of his resignation as Chief Information Officer and Executive Vice President, Supply Chain and Inventory Management, effective September 25, 2020.

37

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors of the Company

Terry Burman, age 74, joined the Board of Tuesday Morning as a director in February 2013, and has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company since December 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Burman served as Lead Independent Director and a member of the Office of the Chairman from September 2015 to December 2015. Mr. Burman has served as the Non‑Executive Chairman of the Board of Abercrombie & Fitch Co., a clothing retailer, since February 2018 and prior to that as Lead Independent Director since May 2017 and on the Board of Directors of Abercrombie & Fitch Co. since January 2014. He has been a director of Learning Care Group, a privately‑held company operating over 900 learning and daycare centers in the United States, since July 2014. He has been a board member of the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Board of Governors since July 2004 and has served as Chairman of the Board since July 1, 2020. Mr. Burman has also served as a board member of ALSAC, the fundraising organization of St. Jude, since July 2004 and on the Board of Trustees of the Norman Rockwell Museum since September 2016. Mr. Burman served as Chairman of the Board and a director of Zale Corporation, a jewelry retailer, from May 2013 until it was acquired in May 2014 and served on the Board of Directors of YCC Holdings LLC, a retailer of candles, fragrances and other products, from October 2007 until it was acquired in October 2013. From March 2001 to January 2011, Mr. Burman was the Chief Executive Officer of Signet Jewelers Limited (“Signet”), a specialty jewelry retailer. Mr. Burman joined Signet in 1995 as the Chairman and CEO of Sterling Jewelers, Inc., a U.S. division of Signet. Mr. Burman also served on the Board of Directors of Signet until January 2011. Prior to joining Signet, Mr. Burman held various senior executive positions of increasing responsibility with Barry’s Jewelers, Inc., which now does business as Samuels Jewelers, from 1980 to 1995, including President and Chief Executive Officer from 1993 to 1995. Prior to that, Mr. Burman was a partner with Roberts Department Stores, a regional department store chain specializing in apparel. In nominating Mr. Burman to serve as a director of the Company, the Board of Directors considered his extensive executive, financial and management expertise and experience, his experience as a chief executive officer in the retail industry, his significant international management experience, and his general business and financial acumen.

Steven R. Becker, age 53, has served as a director of Tuesday Morning since July 2012 and was appointed its Chief Executive Officer in December 2015. Prior to becoming CEO of Tuesday Morning, Mr. Becker served as Chairman of the Board of the Company from July 2012 until September 2015 and as Executive Chairman and head of the Office of the Chairman from September 2015 until December 2015. Prior to becoming CEO of Tuesday Morning, Mr. Becker spent 20 years in the investment management industry with a focus on investing in middle market public companies. Mr. Becker has extensive public company board experience having previously served as a board member at a variety of public companies including, Hot Topic, Inc., an apparel retailer, Ruby Tuesday, a national restaurant company, Emcore, a semiconductor producer, Plato Learning, an educational software company, Pixelworks, a semiconductor producer, Fuel Systems Solutions, a manufacturer of alternative energy systems, and Special Diversified Opportunities, a holding company that owns businesses in a variety of industries, among others. Prior to becoming CEO of Tuesday Morning, Mr. Becker was the co‑managing partner at Becker Drapkin Asset Management, whose predecessor, Greenway Capital, he founded in 2005. From 1997 to 2004, Mr. Becker was a partner at Special Situations Funds, a New York City based asset manager. Prior to joining Special Situations Funds, Mr. Becker was a part of the distressed debt and leveraged equities research team at Bankers Trust Securities. Mr. Becker began his career at Manley Fuller Asset Management in New York as a small cap analyst. In nominating Mr. Becker to serve as a director of the Company, the Board of Directors considered the insights Mr. Becker brings through his prior service as a director of the Company, his demonstrated leadership and experience as Chief Executive Officer and his extensive financial experience, in both public and private companies, which provides the Board with valuable expertise in corporate finance, strategic planning, and corporate governance.

James T. Corcoran, age 37, has served as a director of Tuesday Morning since November 2017. He is a Partner at AREX Capital Management, LP, an investment management firm focused on special situations, activism and catalyst-driven investing. He founded Purple Mountain Capital Partners LLC, a private investment firm, in 2017 and remains Chief Executive Officer. Prior to founding Purple Mountain Capital Partners LLC, he served as a Principal at Highfields Capital Management, a value-oriented investment management firm in Boston, from 2010 to 2016. Mr. Corcoran worked as an investment banking analyst for Credit Suisse (USA), Inc. in its leveraged finance and restructuring group, from 2006 to 2008, in addition to working in its hedge funds investment group, from 2005 to 2006. Mr. Corcoran received his MBA from the Harvard Business School and his AB with honors in Economics and Political Science from the University of Chicago and is a CFA charterholder. Mr. Corcoran was nominated by the Board pursuant to the terms of a Cooperation Agreement entered into with certain Company stockholders to settle a contested election for directors at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders for the Company.

38

Barry S. Gluck, age 68, has served as a director of Tuesday Morning since January 2017. Mr. Gluck served in various senior management positions with Ross Stores Inc. (“Ross”) from 1989 to 2007, most recently as Executive Vice President of Merchandising, Marketing and Store Planning and Allocation. Prior to joining Ross, Mr. Gluck was with Today’s Man as Vice President, General Merchandise Manager and Chief Merchandising Officer and with Macy’s Department Stores as Vice President Divisional Merchandising Manager. Since 2012, Mr. Gluck has served as the Founder and Managing Director of Gluck Consulting LLC, a management consultant group which focuses primarily on off‑price/value channels. In nominating Mr. Gluck to serve as a director of the Company, the Board considered his 32 years of off‑price and value channel experience, his extensive executive, marketing and management expertise having served as a chief merchandising officer in the retail industry, and his general business and financial acumen.

Frank M. Hamlin, age 52, has served as a director of Tuesday Morning since April 2014. Mr. Hamlin is currently Executive Vice President, Chief Customer Officer of GameStop Corporation (“GameStop”), a global, multichannel video game, consumer electronics and wireless services retailer. Mr. Hamlin had previously served as Chief Marketing Officer of GameStop from June 2014 to August 2016. Mr. Hamlin served as Chief Marketing Officer of Spence Diamonds from May 2018 to August 2018 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer for Tailored Brands, Inc., a leading national menswear retailer from September 2017 to May 2018. Mr. Hamlin previously served as Executive Vice President and GM, Marketing and E‑Commerce of Guitar Center, Inc., a musical instruments retailer, from June 2010 until May 2014, and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of E‑Miles, LLC, an interactive marketing company, from February 2007 to June 2010. From July 2004 until February 2007, he was Director of Marketing, Central Market Division for H.E. Butt Grocery, a fresh, specialty and prepared foods retailer. Prior to that time, Mr. Hamlin held various positions with Brierley & Partners, E‑Rewards, Inc., Arista Records and The Walt Disney Company. In nominating Mr. Hamlin to serve as a director of the Company, the Board of Directors considered the various senior executive‑level positions he previously held with retail service companies, as well as his extensive experience in marketing, branding strategy and customer engagement.

Reuben E. Slone, age 57, has served as a director of Tuesday Morning since June 2019. Mr. Slone is currently Executive Vice President, Supply Chain at Advance Auto Parts, Inc. (NYSE: AAP) and sat on the Board of Directors from March 2016 to October 2018. Mr. Slone is a seasoned supply chain executive with experience across multiple consumer‑facing industry sectors at best‑in‑class companies. Previous to Advance Auto Parts Inc., Mr. Slone was Senior Vice President, Supply Chain at Walgreens, a pharmaceutical retailer from May 2012 to October 2018. From November 2004 until May 2012, Mr. Slone was Executive Vice President, Supply Chain, and General Manager, Services at Office Max. From April 2000 to November 2004, Mr. Slone held various positions at Whirlpool Corporation including Vice President Global Supply Chain, Vice President North American Region Supply Chain and Vice President, Global eBusiness. From February 1997 to March 2000, Mr. Slone was eGM Director, Global eSales and Director, Global Manufacturing Strategic Process and System Alignment at General Motors Corporation. Prior to that time, Mr. Slone held various positions with Federal‑Mogul Corporation, Electronic Data Systems, Ernst & Young and Engineering Technology LTD. In nominating Mr. Slone to serve as a director of the Company, the Board of Directors considered his leadership qualities developed from his experience while serving as a senior supply chain executive with Advance Auto Parts, Walgreens, Office Max and Whirlpool, his other board experience, as well as his general business and financial acumen.

Sherry M. Smith, age 59, has served as a director of Tuesday Morning since April 2014. Ms. Smith served in various positions with SUPERVALU, Inc., a grocery retailer and food distributor, from 1987 to 2013. Ms. Smith served as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of SUPERVALU, Inc. from December 2010 until August 2013, and she previously served as Senior Vice President, Finance from 2006 until 2010, Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer from 2002 until 2005, and in various other capacities with SUPERVALU, Inc. prior to 2002. Ms. Smith has served on the Board of Directors of Deere & Company, a manufacturer and distributor of agricultural, turf, construction and forestry equipment, since December 2011, and currently serves as a member of the audit committee and finance committee. Ms. Smith has also served on the Board of Directors of Realogy Holdings Corporation since December 2014, and currently serves on its audit committee and nominating and governance committee. Ms. Smith has served on the Board of Directors of Piper Sandler Corp since January 2016, and currently serves on its compensation committee and audit committee. From January 2015 to December 2018, Ms. Smith served on the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (FASAC), a group that advises the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on strategic issues, project priorities and other matters. In nominating Ms. Smith to serve as a director of the Company, the Board of Directors considered her leadership qualities developed from her experience while serving as a senior executive and as Chief Financial Officer of SUPERVALU, Inc., the breadth of her experiences in auditing, finance, accounting, compensation, strategic planning, and other areas of oversight, and her subject matter knowledge in the areas of finance and accounting and other board experience.

Richard S Willis, age 60, has served as a director of Tuesday Morning since July 2012. Since January 2016, Mr. Willis has served as the Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director of Pharmaca Integrative Pharmacies, an innovative retail pharmacy that combines traditional pharmacy services with natural health and beauty products and expert practitioners. From September 2011 through December 2015, Mr. Willis served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Speed Commerce, Inc. (formerly Navarre Corporation), one of the nation’s largest omni channel, pure play, end‑to‑end e‑commerce solution providers.

39

Mr. Willis previously served as the Executive Chairman of Charlotte Russe, a mall‑based specialty retailer of fashionable, value‑priced apparel and accessories, from January 2011 to September 2011. From 2009 to 2011, Mr. Willis served as President of Shoes for Crews, a seller of slip resistant footwear. From 2003 to 2007, Mr. Willis was President and Chief Executive Officer of Baker & Taylor Corporation, a global distributor of books, DVDs and music. Previously, Mr. Willis served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Troll Communications and President and Chief Executive Officer of Bell Sports. Mr. Willis served four terms as Chairman of the Board of Regents at Baylor University. In nominating Mr. Willis to serve as a director of the Company, the Board of Directors considered his considerable executive leadership experience across multiple industries, including distribution businesses that serve retailers and their suppliers, and his significant expertise in operating businesses and directing transformative plans, including executive level experiences of more than 20 years in retail and manufacturing industries.

There have been no changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend candidates for our Board of Directors.

Executive Officers

Stacie R. Shirley

Ms. Shirley, age 51, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2016.  Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Shirley served as an executive director of Neiman Marcus Group LTD LLC, a luxury fashion retailer, serving as Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer from September 2010 until December 2015 and Vice President, Finance and Treasurer from December 2001 until September 2010. In her most recent position with Neiman Marcus Group, Ms. Shirley’s areas of responsibility included finance, capital markets, treasury operations, capital planning and forecasting, credit operations, investor relations, risk management and internal audit.  Prior to joining Neiman Marcus Group, Ms. Shirley served in various capacities at CompUSA Inc. from 1993 to 2001, including service as Vice President, Finance and Treasurer from 1999 for 2001. Ms. Shirley began her career as an accountant with Ernst &Young in 1990 and is a certified public accountant.

Phillip D. Hixon

Mr. Hixon, age 66, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Store Operations since September 2015 and served as a member of the Office of the Chairman from September 2015 until the dissolution of that office in December 2015.  From June 2014 to September 2015, Mr. Hixon served as the Company’s Store Vice President, Store Operations, and from September 2013 to June 2014, Mr. Hixon served as the Company’s Vice President, Store Planning.   Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Hixon served as Vice President of Business Development of Merchco Services, Inc., a provider of retail store development and support services, from June 2012 until August 2013. From 2011 until 2012 and 2005 until 2006, Mr. Hixon owned and served as principal of Diversified Resources LLC, where he developed and implemented programs for clients in the areas of strategic planning, effective business practices, process enhancement and organizational effectiveness. From 2009 until 2011, Mr. Hixon served in the Department of Strategy and Innovation at Petco Animal Supplies Inc., a specialty retailer of pet supplies.  From 2006 until 2009, Mr. Hixon held various executive positions with DuckWall-Alco Stores, Inc., a retail chain, including Senior Vice President, Store Operations, Real Estate, Store Development and Senior Vice President, Merchandising.  Mr. Hixon served as Vice President, Store Development for Michaels Stores, Inc., a national arts and crafts specialty retailer, from 1987 until 2005.

Trent E. Taylor

Mr. Taylor, age 63, has served as the Company’s Chief Information Officer and Executive Vice President, Supply Chain and Inventory Management since March 2018.  From June 2017 to February 2018, he served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Information and Inventory Management Officer, from January 2017 to June 20017 as Senior Vice President, Chief Information Officer and Supply Chain Officer, and from April 2016 to January 2017, as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Chief Information Office and Supply Chain Officer.  Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Taylor served as an executive officer of hhgregg, a retailer of consumer electronics and home appliances as Chief Information Officer from September 2011 until March 2016. On March 6, 2017, hhgregg filed for a voluntary petition under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. From November 1992 until 2009, Mr. Taylor served in various roles for the Walgreen Company including Chief Information Officer and Executive Vice President of e-commerce.  On September 8, 2020, Mr. Taylor provided the Company with notice of his resignation as an office of the Company, effective September 25, 2020.

Bridgett C. Zeterberg

Ms. Zeterberg, age 57, has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President Human Resources, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary responsible for the Company’s legal matters and oversight of the human resources, risk management and loss prevention functions since February 2019.  From April 2017 to February 2019, she served as the Company’s Senior Vice President Human Resources, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. From July 2016 to April 2017, she served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary.  Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Zeterberg served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Zale Corporation, and as Senior Vice President, General Counsel of Total Wine & More. Ms. Zeterberg served in various roles for hospitality company Accor North America including Vice President, Assistant General Counsel and Vice President of Human Resources for the Motel 6 Division.

40

Cooperation Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of a Cooperation Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2017 (the “Cooperation Agreement”), among the Company, Jeereddi II, LP, Purple Mountain Capital Partners LLC and certain of their affiliates, the Company agreed to nominate James T. Corcoran for election to the Board at the 2017 Annual Meeting. Under the terms of the Cooperation Agreement, Mr. Corcoran agreed to offer his resignation to the Board if at any time the Jeereddi/PMCP Group no longer beneficially owned at least 533,344 shares of the Company’s common stock (subject to adjustment for stock splits, reclassifications, combinations and similar adjustments, the “Minimum Ownership Threshold”). In addition, so long as the Jeereddi/PMCP Group met the Minimum Ownership Threshold, the Jeereddi/PMCP Group was entitled to certain replacement rights during the Standstill Period (as defined below) in the event Mr. Corcoran is unable to serve as a director.

Also under the terms of the Cooperation Agreement, Jeereddi II agreed to irrevocably withdraw its notice of nomination of candidates for election at the 2017 Annual Meeting

Further, under the terms of the Cooperation Agreement, each member of the Jeereddi/PMCP Group agreed to certain normal and customary standstill provisions during a standstill period, which was defined as the period beginning on the date of the Cooperation Agreement and through the later of (x) the date that is the first day to submit stockholder nominations for the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders pursuant to the Company’s Bylaws (the “2019 Advance Notice Date”) and (y) the date that Mr. Corcoran no longer serves on the Board; provided, however, that if Mr. Corcoran resigned for any reason prior to the 2019 Advance Notice Date, the Standstill Period would continue until the 2019 Advance Notice Date (the “Standstill Period”).

Among other things, the standstill provisions provided that, during the Standstill Period, each member of the Jeereddi/PMCP Group would not, among other things, solicit proxies or consents regarding any matter to come before any annual or special meeting of stockholders, or enter into a voting agreement or any group with stockholders other than affiliates of the Jeereddi/PMCP Group and current group members. In addition, each member of the Jeereddi/PMCP Group would not seek to make, or encourage any third party in making, any offer or proposal with respect to any tender offer, merger, acquisition, amalgamation, recapitalization, restructuring, disposition, spin‑off, asset sale, joint venture or other business combination involving the Company and will not seek, or encourage any person, to submit nominees in furtherance of a contested solicitation for the election or removal of directors.

Each of the parties also agreed to certain mutual non‑disparagement obligations, and the Company agreed to reimburse the Jeereddi/PMCP Group for its reasonable, documented out‑of‑pocket fees and expenses, including legal expenses, occurred in connection with the matters related to the negotiation and execution of the Cooperation Agreement, up to a maximum of $25,000.

On July 24, 2019, the Parties amended and restated the cooperation agreement (“A&R Cooperation Agreement”) to extend the term of the Standstill Period during which the Jeereddi/PMCP Group will remain subject to certain previously disclosed normal and customary standstill provisions, and extend and continue certain other matters related to annual meetings of the stockholders and the continuing service of James T. Corcoran on the Board.  Mr. Corcoran was nominated for election as a director at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders pursuant to the terms of the A&R Cooperation Agreement.

On May 6, 2020, the Company was notified that Jeereddi II, LP had reduced its ownership of the Company’s common stock such that the ownership of the Jeereddi/PMCP Group was below the Minimum Ownership Threshold. In accordance with the terms of the Cooperation Agreement, on May 6, 2020, Mr. Corcoran offered to resign from his position as a director of the Company. Mr. Corcoran informed the Company that his beneficial ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock had not changed from that reported in his most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 22, 2019. On May 8, 2020, the Board of Directors decided not to accept Mr. Corcoran’s offer to resign, and Mr. Corcoran continues to serve as a director of the Company.

Board of Directors’ Role in Risk Oversight

In the normal course of business, our Company faces a variety of enterprise risks, including operational risks, cyber security risks and liquidity risk. In fulfilling its risk oversight role, the Board focuses on the adequacy of the Company’s risk management process and overall risk management system. The Board believes an effective risk management system will (1) adequately identify the material risks that the Company faces in a timely manner, (2) implement appropriate risk management strategies that are responsive to the Company’s risk profile and specific material risk exposures, (3) integrate consideration of risk and risk management into business decision‑making throughout the Company and (4) include policies and procedures that adequately transmit necessary information with respect to material risks to senior executives and, as appropriate, to the Board or relevant committee.

41

The Board of Directors oversees the Company’s strategic direction and its policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, as well as major risk exposures and the process used to manage those exposures. Accordingly, the Board of Directors periodically reviews the risks associated with the various departments within the Company, in addition to its other duties. The Board of Directors receives information from Board committees, management and advisors regarding the Company’s risk management process and system, the nature of the material risks the Company faces and the adequacy of the Company’s policies and procedures designed to respond to and mitigate these risks.

Code of Business Conduct

We have adopted a “Code of Business Conduct” that establishes the business conduct to be followed by all of our officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions (the “Senior Financial Officers”), and all of our employees and members of our Board and embodies the Company’s principles and practices relating to the ethical conduct of the Company’s business and its long‑standing commitment to honesty, fair dealing and full compliance with all laws affecting the Company’s business. This policy is reviewed by the Board annually. Amendments to and waivers from the Code of Conduct with respect to the Senior Financial Officers will be posted on our website within four business days after approval by the Board. Any waiver from the Code of Conduct with respect to our Senior Financial Officers requires approval by the Board. There were no waivers from the Code of Conduct with respect to the Senior Financial Officers during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. The Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.tuesdaymorning.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Documents.”

Meetings and Committees of the Board of Directors

Each director is expected to devote sufficient time, energy and attention to ensure diligent performance of his or her duties and to attend all Board, committee and stockholder’s meetings. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Board of Directors held 17 meetings. Each of our directors attended more than 75% of the Board and committee meetings held during the fiscal year (or portion of the fiscal year during which he or she served as a director or committee member). Directors are encouraged to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. All Directors attended the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on November 20, 2019.

The Board has established an Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee.

Audit Committee

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Audit Committee had four members and met seven times. Such members were Richard S Willis, as Chair, Frank M. Hamlin, James T. Corcoran and Reuben E. Slone. All Audit Committee members were non‑employee directors and the Board has determined all were independent pursuant to Nasdaq independence standards and satisfy the SEC requirements relating to the independence of audit committee members. The Board also determined that all the members of the Audit Committee had the ability to read and understand fundamental financial statements.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Board of Directors determined that Mr. Willis qualified as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by applicable SEC rules and designated him as the Company’s audit committee financial expert. The Board has adopted a charter for the Audit Committee, which is available on the Company’s website at www.tuesdaymorning.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Documents.” The Audit Committee Charter is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy from the Secretary of the Company at 6250 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75240.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has three members and met six times during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of non‑employee directors, all of whom the Board has determined are independent pursuant to Nasdaq independence standards.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020, the Compensation Committee was comprised of Sherry M. Smith, as Chair, Frank M. Hamlin and Barry S. Gluck. The Board adopted a charter for the Compensation Committee, which is available on the Company’s website at www.tuesdaymorning.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Documents.” The Compensation Committee Charter is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy from the Secretary of the Company at 6250 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75240.

42

Nominating and Governance Committee

The Nominating and Governance Committee has four members and met four times during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020. The Nominating and Governance Committee is comprised solely of non‑employee directors, all of whom the Board has determined are independent pursuant to Nasdaq independence standards.

The Nominating and Governance Committee is currently comprised of Terry Burman, as Chair, Richard S Willis, Barry S. Gluck and James T. Corcoran. The Board adopted a charter for the Nominating and Governance Committee, which is available on the Company’s website at www.tuesdaymorning.com under “Investor Relations—Corporate Governance—Corporate Governance Documents.” The Nominating and Governance Committee Charter is also available in print to any stockholder who requests a copy from the Secretary of the Company at 6250 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas 75240.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our Common Stock to report their initial ownership of our Common Stock and any subsequent changes in that ownership to the SEC. Specific due dates have been established by the SEC for the filing of these reports, and we are required to disclose in this statement any failure to file by these dates. The SEC’s rules require such persons to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports that they file. Based solely on our review of these reports and on written representations from the reporting persons that no report was required, we believe that the applicable Section 16(a) reporting requirements were complied with for all transactions which occurred during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The table below summarizes the total compensation of each of the NEOs for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 and 2019:

43

A portion of the amounts reflected under stock awards for fiscal 2020 for Mr. Becker includes the value of performance‑based restricted stock awards (assuming target level performance), with a value of $455,000 for Mr. Becker.  The value of these performance‑based restricted awards at the grant date assuming the highest level of performance was achieved is $910,000 for Mr. Becker.

NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE TO SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Employment Agreements or Arrangements

Employment Agreement with Mr. Becker

In connection with Mr. Becker’s appointment as Chief Executive Officer, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Becker on December 11, 2015, which was amended in May 2018. In the Becker Employment Agreement, Mr. Becker agreed to serve as Chief Executive Officer for an initial term which ended June 30, 2019. The initial term of employment automatically renews for successive one‑year periods unless either party provides notice of non‑renewal at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the then current employment term.  Mr. Becker’s Agreement has been renewed through June 30, 2021.

Under the Becker Employment Agreement, Mr. Becker is entitled to, among other things, an annual base salary of not less than $700,000. The base salary payable to Mr. Becker is intended to provide a fixed component of compensation reflecting his skill set, experience, role and responsibilities. In addition, Mr. Becker also is eligible for annual equity grants under the 2014 Plan, with the actual amounts subject to the approval of the Board’s Compensation Committee. Mr. Becker also is eligible to earn an annual bonus each fiscal year under the Company’s Annual Cash Incentive Plan with a threshold opportunity equal to 25% of his base salary, a target opportunity equal to 100% of his base salary and a maximum opportunity equal to 200% of his base salary. No payments were made to Mr. Becker under the Company’s Annual Cash Incentive Plan for fiscal 2016, fiscal 2017, fiscal 2018 or fiscal 2020 as the    threshold performance levels for each fiscal year were not achieved. In fiscal 2019, a formulaic payment of $1,000,280 was earned.  

In the Becker Employment Agreement, Mr. Becker has agreed to certain restrictive covenants during the employment term and for one year thereafter (or 18 months if Mr. Becker is terminated for any reason on or within 12 months following a change in control).

Under the Becker Employment Agreement, the amendment and the agreements governing Mr. Becker’s equity awards, Mr. Becker is entitled to certain severance benefits as discussed below under “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control.”

44

Executive Retention Agreements

On May 1, 2018, the Compensation Committee, following consultation with its independent compensation consultant, also approved Retention Agreements with Stacie R. Shirley and Trent E. Taylor taking into account, among other things, the competitive pressures in the retail industry and competitive hiring pressures in the Dallas‑Fort Worth market. In exchange for each executive’s agreement to remain employed with the Company through December 31, 2019, the Company agreed to pay the following retention amounts to each executive who entered into a Retention Agreement, less all applicable payroll and other tax withholdings (the “Retention Payment”): $800,000 to Ms. Shirley, and $500,000 to Messr. Taylor. Each Retention Payment was payable in two installments: 30% of the Retention Payment was paid on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following January 1, 2019 (the “First Retention Date”), and the remaining 70% of the Retention Payment was paid on the first regularly scheduled payroll date following January 1, 2020 (the “Second Retention Date”), provided the executive has remained employed by the Company through each applicable retention date.

Under the terms of the Retention Agreements, in the event an executive received payment of all or a portion of the Retention Payment and subsequently violates any of the Retention Agreement’s restrictive covenants during the applicable restrictive covenant period (as set forth in the Retention Agreements), then the executive would have forfeited any unpaid portion of the Retention Payment and would have immediately repaid the full amount of the Retention Payment previously paid to the executive, less any taxes originally withheld by us from the payment.

Special Bonus Award

On May 22, 2020, the Compensation Committee, recognizing that it needed consistent, experienced strong leaders focused on assisting the Company with meeting the daily responses to the COVID 19 pandemic as well as to retain their services during the reopening process, the bankruptcy reorganization proceedings and beyond, and following consultation with its independent compensation consultants and bankruptcy advisors, granted a Special Bonus Award and entered into retention letters (the “Retention Letters”) with Mr.  Becker, Ms. Shirley and Mr. Taylor.  The Retention Letters provided for the payment on May 22, 2020 of retention awards in the following amounts: $600,000 to Mr. Becker; $250,000 to each of Ms. Shirley and Mr. Taylor.  

Under the terms of each Retention Letter, 50% of the retention award will vest on February 1, 2021 (the “Time-Based Vesting Date”), and 50% of the retention award will vest on the earlier of (1) a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets as a going concern in an event that constitutes a “change in control” under the Company’s 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan or (2) in the event the Company files a plan of reorganization (and not a plan of liquidation), the date of confirmation by the applicable court of such plan of reorganization (the “Performance-Based Vesting Date”).  Under each Retention Letter, the applicable officer will be required to repay the portion of the retention award that has not yet vested within 10 days of the first to occur of the following: (1) with respect to 100% of such officer’s retention award, the termination of such officer’s employment by the Company for cause or such officer’s voluntary resignation; or (2) with respect to the portion of the retention award eligible to vest on the Performance-Based Vesting Date, a sale of assets or liquidation other than a sale of assets as a going concern.

Other Agreements

Except as disclosed above, the Company is not a party to other employment agreements with any other current or former NEOs identified in the Summary Compensation Table other than at‑will employment arrangements. Named executive officers are participants in the Severance Plan as discussed further below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each named executive officer, each in a form approved by the Board and previously disclosed by the Company. The Company has also entered into a form of the indemnification agreement with each of its directors. The Board has further authorized the Company to enter into the form of indemnification agreement with future directors and executive officers of the Company and other persons or categories of persons that may be designated from time to time by the Board. The indemnification agreement supplements and clarifies existing indemnification provisions of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and, in general, provides for indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by law, subject to the terms and conditions provided in the indemnification agreement. The indemnification agreement also establishes processes and procedures for indemnification claims, advancement of expenses and costs and other determinations with respect to indemnification.

Awards under Equity Plans

The equity award granted to the NEOs during fiscal 2020 were made as part of the annual LTI grant process. Such awards require that the named executive officer remain employed by the Company until the respective dates listed in the table (or provide consulting services if no longer employed by the Company) and, in the case of performance-based awards, that certain performance metrics be achieved, in each case, subject to the acceleration of vesting in certain circumstances described below under “Potential Payments upon Termination of Change of Control.”

45

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL 2020 YEAR-END