TWIN DISC INC - Quarter Report: 2009 May (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarter ended March 27, 2009
Commission
File Number 1-7635
TWIN
DISC, INCORPORATED
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin
|
39-0667110
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
Incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
1328
Racine Street, Racine, Wisconsin 53403
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(262)
638-4000
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes
√ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
Accelerated
Filer Accelerated Filer √ Non-accelerated
filer
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes No √
At April
30, 2009, the registrant had 11,029,344 shares of its common stock
outstanding.
TWIN
DISC, INC. - FORM 10-Q
FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 27, 2009
PART
I.
|
|||
Item
1.
|
3
|
||
Item
2.
|
13
|
||
Item
3.
|
21
|
||
Item
4.
|
22
|
||
PART
II.
|
|||
Item
1.
|
22
|
||
Item
1(A).
|
22
|
||
Item
2.
|
22
|
||
Item
3.
|
23
|
||
Item
4.
|
23
|
||
Item
5.
|
23
|
||
Item
6.
|
23
|
||
24
|
Part
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements
TWIN
DISC, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In
Thousands, Unaudited)
March
27,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 12,303 | $ | 14,447 | ||||
Trade
accounts receivable, net
|
55,102 | 67,611 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
97,906 | 97,691 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
6,265 | 6,297 | ||||||
Other
|
8,780 | 9,649 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
180,356 | 195,695 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
63,548 | 67,855 | ||||||
Goodwill,
net
|
16,651 | 18,479 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
5,045 | 5,733 | ||||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
7,366 | 9,589 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
6,039 | 7,277 | ||||||
$ | 279,005 | $ | 304,628 | |||||
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Short-term
borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt
|
$ | 2,313 | $ | 1,730 | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
31,808 | 37,919 | ||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
37,615 | 49,939 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
71,736 | 89,588 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
55,695 | 48,227 | ||||||
Accrued
retirement benefits
|
32,713 | 34,325 | ||||||
Other
long-term
|
1,224 | 2,163 | ||||||
161,368 | 174,303 | |||||||
Minority
interest
|
677 | 679 | ||||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
shares authorized: 30,000,000;
|
||||||||
issued:
13,099,468; no par value
|
14,225 | 14,693 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
148,776 | 142,361 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(15,785 | ) | 2,446 | |||||
147,216 | 159,500 | |||||||
Less
treasury stock, at cost
|
||||||||
(2,070,124
and 1,929,354 shares, respectively)
|
30,256 | 29,854 | ||||||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
116,960 | 129,646 | ||||||
$ | 279,005 | $ | 304,628 |
The notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these
statements.
TWIN
DISC, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In
Thousands Except Per Share Data, Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
Mar.
27,
|
Mar.
28,
|
Mar.
27,
|
Mar.
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 69,292 | $ | 85,838 | $ | 223,562 | $ | 241,345 | ||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
50,141 | 59,211 | 161,386 | 165,522 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
19,151 | 26,627 | 62,176 | 75,823 | ||||||||||||
Marketing,
engineering and administrative expenses
|
14,517 | 14,969 | 47,843 | 47,041 | ||||||||||||
Earnings
from operations
|
4,634 | 11,658 | 14,333 | 28,782 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
526 | 757 | 1,837 | 2,325 | ||||||||||||
Other
expense, net
|
1,049 | 194 | 37 | 368 | ||||||||||||
1,575 | 951 | 1,874 | 2,693 | |||||||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes and minority interest
|
3,059 | 10,707 | 12,459 | 26,089 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
362 | 2,719 | 3,639 | 8,686 | ||||||||||||
Earnings
before minority interest
|
2,697 | 7,988 | 8,820 | 17,403 | ||||||||||||
Minority
interest
|
153 | (59 | ) | (72 | ) | (160 | ) | |||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 2,850 | $ | 7,929 | $ | 8,748 | $ | 17,243 | ||||||||
Dividends
per share
|
$ | 0.0700 | $ | 0.0700 | $ | 0.2100 | $ | 0.1950 | ||||||||
Earnings
per share data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.79 | $ | 1.52 | ||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.26 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 1.51 | ||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding data:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
shares outstanding
|
11,006 | 11,198 | 11,127 | 11,318 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
stock awards
|
35 | 112 | 70 | 129 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
shares outstanding
|
11,041 | 11,310 | 11,197 | 11,447 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 2,850 | $ | 7,929 | $ | 8,748 | $ | 17,243 | ||||||||
Adjustment
for amortization of net actuarial loss
|
||||||||||||||||
and
prior service cost
|
470 | 231 | 1,412 | 694 | ||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
(1,119 | ) | 4,799 | (19,643 | ) | 11,884 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ | 2,201 | $ | 12,959 | $ | (9,483 | ) | $ | 29,821 |
The notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these
statements.
TWIN
DISC, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In
Thousands, Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
March
27,
|
March
28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 8,748 | $ | 17,243 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to
|
||||||||
net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
7,308 | 5,426 | ||||||
Other
non-cash changes, net
|
417 | 2,391 | ||||||
Net
change in working capital, excluding cash
|
(15,973 | ) | (13,908 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
500 | 11,152 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Acquisitions
of fixed assets
|
(6,631 | ) | (10,605 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of fixed assets
|
56 | 263 | ||||||
Other,
net
|
1,111 | (337 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
(5,464 | ) | (10,679 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in notes payable, net
|
898 | (98 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from long-term debt
|
7,939 | 12,880 | ||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
110 | 133 | ||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(1,813 | ) | (15,643 | ) | ||||
Dividends
paid
|
(2,333 | ) | (2,220 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(252 | ) | 19 | |||||
Net
cash provided (used) by financing activities
|
4,549 | (4,929 | ) | |||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(1,729 | ) | 1,888 | |||||
Net
change in cash
|
(2,144 | ) | (2,568 | ) | ||||
Cash
balance:
|
||||||||
Beginning
of period
|
14,447 | 19,508 | ||||||
End
of period
|
$ | 12,303 | $ | 16,940 |
The notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these
statements.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
A. Basis
of Presentation
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the
Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) and, in the opinion of the Company, include all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for a fair presentation of
results for each period. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such
SEC rules and regulations. The Company believes that the disclosures
made are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included in the Company's latest Annual Report. The year-end
condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but
does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
Certain
balances in the prior fiscal year have been reclassified to conform to the
presentation adopted in the current year. This reclassification
impacted the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow, resulting
in a transfer of $337,000 from operating activities to investing
activities.
New Accounting
Releases
In April
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff
Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides additional
clarification on the determination of fair value, including illustrative
examples. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending
after March 15, 2009, and is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” This FSP provides guidance on
determining whether an impairment is other than temporary, provides examples to
be considered and identifies reporting requirements related to such
impairments. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for
periods ending after March 15, 2009, and is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP requires disclosure
about the fair value of financial instruments whenever summarized financial
information for interim periods is issued, and requires disclosure of the fair
value of all financial instruments (where practicable) in the body or
accompanying notes of interim and annual financial statements. FSP
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim periods beginning after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009, and
is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements
.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and
Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies.” This FSP requires that assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be
recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated, and
eliminates the requirement to disclose an estimate of the range of outcomes of
recognized contingencies at the acquisition date. This FSP is
effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. Adoption of this FSP is not expected to have a material impact
on the Company’s financial statements.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FSP 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosure about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” This FSP provides guidance on an
employer’s disclosures regarding plan assets of a defined benefit pension or
other postretirement plan. The objectives of the disclosures required
under this FSP are to provide users of financial statements with an
understanding of:
a)
|
How
investment allocation decisions are
made;
|
b)
|
The
major categories of plan
assets;
|
c)
|
The
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan
assets;
|
d)
|
The
effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on
changes in plan assets for the period;
and
|
e)
|
Significant
concentrations of risk within plan
assets.
|
The
disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP are required for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2009, and earlier application is
permitted. This FSP is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets.” This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of
a recognized intangible asset under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The intent
of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash
flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R),
“Business Combinations,” and other U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. This FSP is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.” This statement enhances the disclosures regarding derivatives
and hedging activities by requiring:
·
|
Disclosure
of the objectives for using derivative instruments in terms of underlying
risk and accounting designation;
|
·
|
Disclosure
of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in
a tabular format;
|
·
|
Disclosure
of information about credit-risk-related contingent features;
and
|
·
|
Cross-reference
from the derivative footnote to other footnotes in which
derivative-related information is
disclosed.
|
SFAS No.
161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 161 in its fiscal third
quarter, however these disclosures were considered immaterial due to the nature
and fair value of the derivatives held by the Company at March 27,
2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business
Combinations.” This statement will significantly change the
accounting for business combinations, requiring the acquiring entity to
recognize the acquired assets and liabilities at the acquisition date fair value
with limited exceptions. The statement also includes a substantial
number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R) applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual report period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. Accordingly, the Company will be subject to SFAS No.
141(R) beginning on July 1, 2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS
No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary, and includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the
interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. Adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have a
material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115.” This standard permits an entity to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 159 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 with no material impact
to the financial statements. The Company has currently chosen not to
elect the fair value option for any items that are not already required to be
measured at fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements.” This statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. On February
12, 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2 which delays the effective date of SFAS No.
157 for one year, for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS No. 157 and FSP
157-2 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 in the
first quarter of fiscal 2009 for those assets and liabilities not subject to the
one year deferral granted in FSP 157-2, with no material impact to the financial
statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS No. 157 for the assets and liabilities subject to the one year
deferral granted under FSP 157-2, for which SFAS No. 157 will become effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
In
September 2006 and March 2007, respectively, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues
Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements” and Issue No. 06-10, “Accounting for Collateral Assignment
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” These EITF’s address the
possible recognition of a liability and related compensation costs for
split-dollar life insurance policies that provide a benefit to an employee that
extends to postretirement periods. EITF 06-4 and 06-10 are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, including interim periods
within those years. The Company adopted these EITF’s in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 with no material impact to the financial
statements.
During
June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109.” FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits
claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the
financial statements by standardizing the level of confidence needed to
recognize uncertain tax benefits and the process for measuring the amount of
benefit to recognize. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN
48 as of July 1, 2007, with no material impact to the Company’s financial
statements.
B. Inventory
The major
classes of inventories were as follows (in thousands):
March
27,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Inventories:
|
||||||||
Finished
parts
|
$ | 61,793 | $ | 53,697 | ||||
Work
in process
|
12,174 | 20,725 | ||||||
Raw
materials
|
23,939 | 23,269 | ||||||
$ | 97,906 | $ | 97,691 |
The year
end fiscal 2008 figures were revised to reflect subcomponents in raw materials
rather than finished parts. Finished parts now more properly reflects
goods in a saleable state.
C. Warranty
The
Company engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including
actively monitoring and evaluating the quality of its
suppliers. However, its warranty obligation is affected by product
failure rates, the extent of the market affected by the failure and the expense
involved in satisfactorily addressing the situation. The warranty
reserve is established based on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to
settle future and existing claims on products sold as of the balance sheet
date. When evaluating the adequacy of the reserve for warranty costs,
management takes into consideration the term of the warranty coverage,
historical claim rates and costs of repair, knowledge of the type and volume of
new products and economic trends. While we believe the warranty
reserve is adequate and that the judgment applied is appropriate, such amounts
estimated to be due and payable in the future could differ materially from what
actually transpires. The following is a listing of the activity in
the warranty reserve during the three and nine month periods ended March 27,
2009 and March 28, 2008 (in thousands).
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
Mar.
27,
|
Mar.
28,
|
Mar.
27,
|
Mar.
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Reserve
balance, beginning of period
|
$ | 8,231 | $ | 7,802 | $ | 8,125 | $ | 7,266 | ||||||||
Current
period expense
|
2,068 | 1,191 | 4,175 | 3,333 | ||||||||||||
Payments
or credits to customers
|
(2,372 | ) | (1,151 | ) | (3,928 | ) | (3,089 | ) | ||||||||
Translation
|
(161 | ) | 279 | (606 | ) | 611 | ||||||||||
Reserve
balance, end of period
|
$ | 7,766 | $ | 8,121 | $ | 7,766 | $ | 8,121 |
D. Contingencies
The
Company is involved in litigation of which the ultimate outcome and liability to
the Company, if any, is not presently determinable. Management
believes that final disposition of such litigation will not have a material
impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash
flows.
E. Business
Segments
Information
about the Company’s segments is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
Mar.
27,
|
Mar.
28,
|
Mar.
27,
|
Mar.
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Manufacturing
segment sales
|
$ | 65,931 | $ | 78,689 | $ | 201,308 | $ | 214,881 | ||||||||
Distribution
segment sales
|
25,741 | 28,702 | 83,712 | 84,328 | ||||||||||||
Inter/Intra
segment elimination - manufacturing
|
(16,738 | ) | (16,014 | ) | (45,973 | ) | (44,469 | ) | ||||||||
Inter/Intra
segment elimination - distribution
|
(5,642 | ) | (5,539 | ) | (15,485 | ) | (13,395 | ) | ||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 69,292 | $ | 85,838 | $ | 223,562 | $ | 241,345 | ||||||||
Manufacturing
segment earnings
|
$ | 3,165 | $ | 9,033 | $ | 11,608 | $ | 25,849 | ||||||||
Distribution
segment earnings
|
1,531 | 2,011 | 7,026 | 7,251 | ||||||||||||
Corporate
and eliminations
|
(1,637 | ) | (337 | ) | (6,175 | ) | (7,011 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
||||||||||||||||
and
minority interest
|
$ | 3,059 | $ | 10,707 | $ | 12,459 | $ | 26,089 | ||||||||
Mar.
27,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
Assets
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||
Manufacturing
segment assets
|
$ | 351,988 | $ | 369,842 | ||||||||||||
Distribution
segment assets
|
66,268 | 67,223 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate
assets and elimination
|
||||||||||||||||
of
inter-company assets
|
(139,251 | ) | (132,437 | ) | ||||||||||||
$ | 279,005 | $ | 304,628 |
F. Stock-Based
Compensation
In fiscal
2009 and 2008, the Company granted a target number of 88,500 and 52,758
performance stock unit awards, respectively, to various employees of the
Company, including executive officers. The performance stock unit
awards granted in fiscal 2009 will vest if the Company achieves a specified
target objective relating to consolidated economic profit (as defined in the
Performance Stock Unit Award Grant Agreement) in the cumulative three fiscal
year period ending June 30, 2011. The performance stock unit awards
granted in fiscal 2009 are subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic
profit for the period falls below or exceeds the specified target objective, and
the maximum number of performance stock units that can be awarded if the target
objective is exceeded is 106,200. Based upon actual results
to
date, the
Company is accruing the performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2009 at
the target payout level. The performance stock unit awards granted in
fiscal 2008 will vest if the Company achieves a specified target objective
relating to consolidated economic profit (as defined in the Performance Stock
Unit Award Grant Agreement) in the cumulative three fiscal year period ending
June 30, 2010. The performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal
2008 are subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic profit for the period
falls below or exceeds the specified target objective, and the maximum number of
performance stock units that can be awarded if the target objective is exceeded
is 63,310. Based upon actual results to date, the Company is accruing
the performance stock unit awards granted in fiscal 2008 at the targeted payout
level. There were 214,300 and 202,178 unvested stock unit awards
outstanding at March 27, 2009 and March 28, 2008, respectively. The
performance stock unit awards are remeasured at fair-value (based upon the
Company’s stock price) at the end of each reporting period. The
fair-value of the stock unit awards are expensed over the performance period for
the shares that are expected to ultimately vest. Compensation expense
(income) for the three and nine months ended March 27, 2009, related to the
performance stock unit awards, approximated $64,000 and $(607,000),
respectively. Compensation (income) for the three and nine months
ended March 28, 2008, related to the performance stock unit awards, approximated
$(1,888,000) and $(638,000), respectively.
In fiscal
2009 and 2008, the Company granted a target number of 66,500 and 37,310
performance stock awards, respectively, to various employees of the Company,
including executive officers. The performance stock awards granted in
fiscal 2009 will vest if the Company achieves a specified target objective
relating to consolidated economic profit (as defined in the Performance Stock
Award Grant Agreement) in the cumulative three fiscal year period ending June
30, 2011. The performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2009 are
subject to adjustment if the Company’s economic profit for the period falls
below or exceeds the specified target objective, and the maximum number of
performance shares that can be awarded if the target objective is exceeded is
79,800. Based upon actual results to date, the Company is accruing
the performance stock awards granted in 2009 at the targeted payout
level. The performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2008 will vest
if the Company achieves a specified target objective relating to consolidated
economic profit (as defined in the Performance Stock Award Grant Agreement) in
the cumulative three fiscal year period ending June 30, 2010. The
performance stock awards granted in fiscal 2008 are subject to adjustment if the
Company’s economic profit for the period falls below or exceeds the specified
target objective, and the maximum number of performance shares that can be
awarded if the target objective is exceeded is 44,772. Based upon
actual results to date, the Company is accruing the performance stock awards
granted in fiscal 2008 at the target payout level. There were 176,868
and 218,558 unvested stock awards outstanding at March 27, 2009 and March 28,
2008, respectively. The fair value of the stock awards (on the date
of grant) is expensed over the performance period for the shares that are
expected to ultimately vest. Compensation expense for the three and nine
months ended March 27, 2009, related to performance stock awards, approximated
$320,000 and $920,000, respectively. Compensation expense for the
three and nine months ended March 28, 2008, related to performance stock awards,
approximated $244,000 and $695,000, respectively.
In
addition to the performance shares mentioned above, the Company has unvested
restricted stock outstanding that will vest if certain service conditions are
fulfilled. The fair value of the restricted stock grants is recorded
as compensation expense over the vesting period, which is generally 1 to 4
years. During fiscal 2009 and 2008, the Company granted 17,700 and
7,200 service based restricted shares, respectively, to employees and
non-employee directors in each year. There were 23,700 and 20,000
unvested shares outstanding March 27, 2009 and March 28, 2008,
respectively. Compensation expense for the three and nine months
ended March 27, 2009, related to restricted stock grants, approximated $43,000
and $164,000, respectively. Compensation expense for the three and
nine months ended March 28, 2008, related to restricted stock grants,
approximated $43,000 and $111,000, respectively.
G. Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
The
Company has non-contributory, qualified defined benefit plans covering
substantially all domestic employees hired prior to October 1, 2003 and certain
foreign employees. Additionally, the Company provides health care and
life insurance benefits for certain domestic retirees. Components of
net periodic benefit cost for the defined benefit pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plan are as follows (in thousands):
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
Mar.
27,
|
Mar.
28,
|
Mar.
27,
|
Mar.
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Pension
Benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 298 | $ | 305 | $ | 885 | $ | 896 | ||||||||
Interest
cost
|
1,769 | 1,738 | 5,296 | 5,190 | ||||||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(2,237 | ) | (2,411 | ) | (6,698 | ) | (7,206 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
(180 | ) | (180 | ) | (539 | ) | (539 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization
of transition obligation
|
17 | 21 | 48 | 52 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of net loss
|
801 | 428 | 2,402 | 1,282 | ||||||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost (income)
|
$ | 468 | $ | (99 | ) | $ | 1,394 | $ | (325 | ) | ||||||
Postretirement
Benefits:
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 28 | $ | 28 | ||||||||
Interest
cost
|
325 | 341 | 973 | 1,025 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of net loss
|
137 | 133 | 412 | 399 | ||||||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 471 | $ | 483 | $ | 1,413 | $ | 1,452 |
The
Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended June
30, 2008, that it expected to contribute $302,000 to its pension plan in fiscal
2009. As of March 27, 2009, $227,000 in contributions have been
made.
10
H. Income
Taxes
The
Company has approximately $797,000 of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 27,
2009 which, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective tax
rate. We anticipate the decline of approximately $90,000 of
unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months.
During
the three months ended March 27, 2009, unrecognized tax benefits increased
approximately $172,000 due mainly to a change in the estimated realization
of research and development credits.
Annually,
we file income tax returns in various taxing jurisdictions inside and outside
the United States. In general, the tax years that remain subject to
examination are 2003 through 2008 for our major operations in the U.S., Italy,
Belgium, and Japan. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service is currently
auditing our consolidated income tax return for fiscal 2006. Other
audits currently underway include those in Singapore and Italy. It is
reasonably possible that at least one of these audit cycles will be completed
during fiscal 2009.
We
recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
income tax expense. As of March 27, 2009, total accrued interest and
penalties with respect to income taxes was approximately $102,000 that would
favorably affect the effective tax rate if recognized.
I.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles
The
changes in the carrying amount of goodwill, substantially all of which is
allocated to the manufacturing segment, for the nine months ended March 27, 2009
were as follows (in thousands):
Balance
at June 30, 2008
|
$ | 18,479 | ||
Translation
adjustment
|
(1,828 | ) | ||
Balance
at March 27, 2009
|
$ | 16,651 |
The gross
carrying amount and accumulated amortization of the Company’s intangible assets
that have defined useful lives and are subject to amortization as of March 27,
2009 and June 30, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
March
27,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Intangible
assets with finite lives:
|
||||||||
Licensing
agreements
|
$ | 3,015 | $ | 3,015 | ||||
Non-compete
agreements
|
2,050 | 2,050 | ||||||
Other
|
5,991 | 5,991 | ||||||
11,056 | 11,056 | |||||||
Accumulated
amortization
|
(5,936 | ) | (5,176 | ) | ||||
Translation
adjustment
|
207 | 1,235 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 5,327 | $ | 7,115 |
The
weighted average remaining useful life of the intangible assets included in the
table above is approximately 8 years.
Intangible
amortization expense was $244,000 and $760,000 for the three and nine months
ended March 27, 2009, respectively, and $242,000 and $712,000 for the three and
nine months ended March 28, 2008, respectively. Estimated intangible
amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2009 and each of the next five
fiscal years is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal
Year
|
|||
2009
|
$ | 232 | |
2010
|
724 | ||
2011
|
724 | ||
2012
|
724 | ||
2013
|
682 | ||
2014
|
682 |
The gross
carrying amount of the Company’s intangible assets that have indefinite lives
and are not subject to amortization as of March 27, 2009 and June 30, 2008 are
$2,039,000 and $2,474,000, respectively. These assets are comprised
of acquired tradenames.
J. Long-term
Debt
Notes
payable and long-term debt at March 27, 2009 and June 30, 2008 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
March
27,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revolving
loan
|
$ | 28,300 | $ | 19,700 | ||||
10-year
unsecured senior notes
|
25,000 | 25,000 | ||||||
Notes
payable
|
- | 1,010 | ||||||
Other
|
4,708 | 4,247 | ||||||
Subtotal
|
58,008 | 49,957 | ||||||
Less:
current maturities and short-term borrowings
|
(2,313 | ) | (1,730 | ) | ||||
Total
long-term debt
|
$ | 55,695 | $ | 48,227 |
At March
27, 2009, the Company is in compliance with all covenants and other requirements
set forth in its revolving loan and note agreements.
K. Shareholders'
Equity
In
October 2007, the Board of Directors approved a two-for-one stock split of the
Company’s outstanding common stock. The split was issued on December
31, 2007 to shareholders of record at the close of business on December 10,
2007. The split increased the number of shares outstanding to
approximately 11.4 million from approximately 5.7 million. The
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto, including all
share and per share data, have been restated as if the stock split had occurred
as of the earliest period presented.
On July
27, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 200,000 shares
of Common Stock at market values. This resolution superseded the
resolution previously adopted by the Board in January 2002. On August
14, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of an additional
200,000 shares of Common Stock at market values. On February 1, 2008,
the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of an additional 500,000 shares
of Common Stock at market values. The Company purchased 250,000
shares of its outstanding Common Stock in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 at
an average price of $7.25 per share for a total cost of
$1,813,000. In fiscal 2008, the Company repurchased 660,000 shares of
its outstanding Common Stock at an average price of $23.70 per share at a total
cost of $15,643,000.
In the
financial review that follows, we discuss our results of operations, financial
condition and certain other information. This discussion should be
read in conjunction with our consolidated fiscal 2008 financial statements and
related notes.
Some of
the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are “forward looking
statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. Forward-looking statements include the Company’s description of
plans and objectives for future operations and assumptions behind those
plans. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,”
and “expects,” or similar anticipatory expressions, usually identify
forward-looking statements. In addition, goals established by Twin
Disc, Incorporated should not be viewed as guarantees or promises of future
performance. There can be no assurance the Company will be successful
in achieving its goals.
In
addition to the assumptions and information referred to specifically in the
forward-looking statements, other factors, including but not limited to those
factors discussed under Item 1A, Risk Factors, of the Company’s
Annual
Report
filed on Form 10-K for June 30, 2008 could cause actual results to be materially
different from what is presented here.
Results of
Operations
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March
27,
|
March
28,
|
March
27,
|
March
28,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 69,292 | $ | 85,838 | $ | 223,562 | $ | 241,345 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
50,141 | 59,211 | 161,386 | 165,522 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
19,151 | 27.6 | % | 26,627 | 31.0 | % | 62,176 | 27.8 | % | 75,823 | 31.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing,
engineering and
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
administrative
expenses
|
14,517 | 21.0 | 14,969 | 17.4 | 47,843 | 21.4 | 47,041 | 19.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings
from operations
|
$ | 4,634 | 6.7 | $ | 11,658 | 13.6 | $ | 14,333 | 6.4 | $ | 28,782 | 11.9 |
Comparison of the Third
Quarter of FY 2009 with the Third Quarter of FY 2008
Net sales
for the third quarter decreased 19.3%, or $16.5 million, to $69.3 million from
$85.8 million in the same period a year ago. Compared to the third
quarter of fiscal 2008, the U.S. Dollar strengthened against the Euro and Asian
currencies. The translation effect of this strengthening on foreign
operations was to decrease revenues by approximately $2.9 million versus the
prior year, before eliminations. Adjusting for the impact of foreign
currency translation on the third fiscal quarter, sales would have been down
just under 16% versus the same period last fiscal year. The decline
in sales for the fiscal 2009 third quarter was primarily due to lower sales of
products to customers in the mega yacht, oil and gas, and industrial
markets. This was partially offset by higher sales to customers in
the commercial marine, land-based military and airport rescue fire fighting
(ARFF) markets.
Sales at
our manufacturing segment were down 16.2%, or $12.8 million, to $65.9 million
from $78.7 million in the same period last year. Compared to the
third quarter of fiscal 2008, the U.S. Dollar strengthened against the Euro and
Asian currencies. The translation effect of this strengthening on
foreign manufacturing operations was to decrease revenues by approximately $3.0
million versus the prior year, before eliminations. Sales at our U.S.
domestic manufacturing locations were down just under 7%. Continued
softening in transmission sales for the land-based oil and gas market, and lower
propulsion system and industrial product shipments were only partially offset by
improved shipments for the commercial marine product markets. Sales
at our Belgian manufacturing location were down approximately 12% over the same
period last year. Adjusting for the negative translation effect of a
weakening Euro versus the U.S. Dollar, sales were down just over
2%. Our Italian manufacturing operations saw a nearly 46% decrease in
sales compared to fiscal 2008’s third quarter. The majority of this
decrease is due to decreased sales of low horsepower marine transmissions and
propulsion systems for the Italian and European pleasure craft and mega yacht
markets. In addition, there was a softening in industrial product
markets in the Italian and European market. Just under one-fifth of
the decrease can be attributed to the translation effect of a
strengthening
U.S. Dollar versus the third quarter of last fiscal year. The
Company’s Swiss manufacturing operation, which manufactures propellers for
high-end pleasure craft and military patrol boat applications, experienced a 38%
decrease in sales versus the prior year’s third fiscal quarter. The
Company continued to experience a decrease in order activity, cancellations and
retiming of orders for pleasure craft marine transmission, boat management and
propulsion systems for the global mega yacht market.
Our
distribution segment experienced a decrease of 10.3% in sales, or $3.0 million,
to $25.7 million from $28.7 million in the same period a year
ago. Compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008, the U.S. Dollar
strengthened against the Euro and Asian currencies. The translation
effect of this strengthening on foreign distribution operations was to decrease
revenues by approximately $1.5 million versus the prior year, before
eliminations. The Company’s distribution operations in Italy and
Australia saw double digit decreases in pleasure craft marine transmission and
boat management system product sales. This was partially offset by
continued strength in commercial marine transmission sales at the Company’s
distribution operations in Asia.
The
elimination for net inter/intra segment sales increased $0.8 million, accounting
for the remainder of the net change in sales versus the same period last
year. This change is primarily due to an increase in shipments from
our Japanese joint venture to our distributor in Singapore, due to strong demand
in the Asia Pacific region for the high horsepower marine transmissions produced
in Japan.
Gross
profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 27.6% of sales, compared to 31.0%
of sales for the same period last year. This 340 basis point
deterioration can be attributed to reduced sales of higher margin products,
higher sales of lower margin products, increased warranty costs ($0.9 million),
and an increase in domestic pension expense ($0.4 million). In
addition, the Company’s Belgian operation’s gross profit was favorably affected
by the continued relative strength of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, when
compared to the average rate in fiscal 2008. This operation
manufactures with Euro-based costs and sells more than a third of its production
into the U.S. market at U.S. Dollar prices. It is estimated that the
year-over-year effect of the stronger U.S. Dollar was to improve margins at our
Belgian subsidiary by over $0.8 million in the third fiscal quarter versus the
same period a year ago. Compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008,
the U.S. Dollar strengthened against the Euro and Asian
currencies. The translation effect of this strengthening on foreign
operations was to decrease gross margin by approximately $0.9 million versus the
prior year, before eliminations.
Marketing,
engineering, and administrative (ME&A) expenses were 3.0% lower compared to
last year’s third fiscal quarter. However, due to lower sales volume,
ME&A expenses as a percentage of sales were up 3.6 percentage points to
21.0% of sales versus 17.4% of sales in the third quarter of fiscal
2008. For the third quarter of fiscal 2009, stock based compensation
expense totaled $0.4 million compared to income of $1.6 million for the third
quarter of fiscal 2008, for a net year-over-year increase of $2.0
million. Fiscal 2008’s third quarter included a $2.3 million reversal
of stock based compensation expense, which reflected the decline of the
Company’s stock price during that quarter a year ago. In addition,
expenses related to the Company’s corporate and domestic incentive programs
decreased $1.5 million versus the third quarter of fiscal 2008, due to the
overall decline in financial performance year-over-year. This was
partially offset by increased IT costs of $0.3 million, primarily depreciation
expense, associated with the Company’s new ERP system and higher domestic
pension expenses of $0.2 million. The net impact of foreign currency
translation from overseas operations reduced ME&A expenses by approximately
$0.8 million when compared to the same period of the prior fiscal
year.
Interest
expense of $0.5 million was down over 30% compared to fiscal 2008’s third
quarter. In the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and 2008, the Company
incurred interest of $0.4 million on the $25 million of Senior Notes that were
entered into in April 2006. In addition, for the third quarter of
fiscal 2008, the interest rate on the Company’s revolving credit facility was in
the range of 4.36% to 5.85%, whereas for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 the
range was 1.67% to 1.75%. At the same time, the average balance of
the Company’s revolving credit facility increased slightly versus the prior
year. However, as a result of the lower interest rate, total interest
on the revolver decreased just over $0.2 million.
Other
expense of $1.0 million for the quarter was up approximately $0.9 million from
the prior year primarily due to exchange losses caused by the strengthening of
the U.S. Dollar versus the Japanese Yen.
The
effective tax rate for 2009’s third fiscal quarter of 11.8 percent improved over
the prior year rate of 25.4 percent due primarily to a 5.9 percent reduction in
the Italian corporate tax rate effective with the start of fiscal 2009, a shift
in earnings to lower tax subsidiaries, the impact of foreign tax credits on the
domestic tax rate and provision to return adjustments recorded in the third
quarter based on changes in estimates. These favorable items were
partially
offset by
an additional reserve recorded due to a change in the estimate of realization of
research and development tax credits during the fiscal 2009 third
quarter.
Comparison of the First Nine
Months of FY 2009 with the First Nine Months of FY 2008
Net sales
for the first nine months of fiscal 2009 decreased 7.4%, or $17.8 million, to
$223.6 million from $241.3 million in the same period a year
ago. Compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2008, the Euro and
Asian currencies weakened, on average, against the U.S. Dollar. The
translation effect of this weakening on foreign operations was to decrease
revenues by approximately $1.4 million versus the prior year. The
Company’s North American manufacturing operations saw a continued softening in
demand for the Company’s oil and gas transmission products and saw continued
weakness in its marine propulsion system shipments for the mega yacht segment of
the marine pleasure craft market. This was partially offset by
year-over-year increases in the Company’s industrial product and commercial
marine transmission sales. In addition, vehicular transmission sales
for the airport rescue and fire fighting (ARFF) and military markets remained
steady. Overseas, the Company experienced particularly strong
increases in sales at our distribution operations in Asia, which serve
commercial marine markets. However, significant softening was
experienced in the third fiscal quarter for propulsion and boat management
systems for the global mega yacht segment of the pleasure craft
market. As a result, through nine months these product markets are
now experiencing a year-over-year decline.
Sales at
our manufacturing segment were down 6.3%, or $13.6 million, to $201.3 million
from $214.9 million in the same period last year. Year-to-date, sales
at our U.S. domestic manufacturing locations were down almost
8%. This was primarily due to the continued slow down in sales of
land based transmissions for the oil and gas markets and lower sales of
propulsion systems for the European mega yacht. This was partially
offset by improved year-over-year sales of commercial marine
transmissions. On a year-to-date basis, sales of industrial products
as well as vehicular transmissions for the ARFF and military markets remained
steady. Sales at the Company’s Belgian manufacturing operation are up
nearly 4% through the first nine months. The prior fiscal year’s
first nine months was unfavorably affected by material shortages and equipment
downtime, as progress continued on the plant re-layout associated with the June
2007 restructuring program. Our Italian manufacturing operations saw
a significant decrease in sales in the third fiscal quarter compared to the
prior fiscal year, as noted above. As a result, sales for the first
nine months are down over 17% versus the first nine months of fiscal
2008. The decrease can be primarily attributed to decreased sales of
low horsepower marine transmissions for the Italian and European pleasure craft
as well as lower sales of boat management systems for the Italian mega yacht
market. The Company’s Swiss manufacturing operation, which
manufactures propellers for high end pleasure craft and military patrol boat
applications, experienced a 9.0% increase in sales versus the prior year’s first
nine months. However, as noted above there was a significant fall off
in third quarter shipments versus the prior fiscal year’s third
quarter. As noted above, the Company did experience a decrease in
order activity, cancellations and retiming of orders for pleasure craft marine
transmission, boat management and propulsion systems for the global mega yacht
market starting late in the second fiscal quarter of 2009, which accelerated in
the third fiscal quarter of 2009.
Our
distribution segment experienced a slight decrease of 0.7% in sales, or $0.6
million, to $83.7 million from $84.3 million in the same period a year
ago. The Company’s Asian distribution operations in Singapore and
joint venture in Japan saw significant growth in the commercial marine
transmission markets. Partially offsetting these increases, the
Company’s distribution operations in Italy and Australia saw double digit
decreases in pleasure craft marine transmission and boat management system
product sales. Compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2008, the
Euro and Asian currencies weakened, on average, against the U.S.
Dollar. The translation effect of this weakening on foreign
distribution operations was to decrease revenues by approximately $0.7 million
versus the prior year, before eliminations.
The
elimination for net inter/intra segment sales increased $3.6 million, accounting
for the remainder of the net change in sales versus the same period last
year. This change is primarily due to an increase in shipments from
our Japanese joint venture to our distributor in Singapore, due to strong demand
in the Asia Pacific region for the high horsepower marine transmissions produced
in Japan.
Gross
profit as a percentage of sales decreased to 27.8% of sales, compared to 31.4%
of sales for the same period last year. This 360 basis point
deterioration can be attributed to reduced sales of higher margin products,
higher sales of lower margin products, increased warranty costs ($0.8 million),
and an increase in domestic pension expense ($1.2 million) partially offset by
higher pricing and expanded outsourcing. In addition, the Company’s
Belgian operation’s gross profit was favorably affected by the continued
relative strength of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, when compared to the
average rate in fiscal 2008. This operation manufactures with
Euro-based costs and
sells
more than a third of its production into the U.S. market at U.S. Dollar
prices. It is estimated that the year-over-year effect of the
stronger U.S. Dollar was to improve margins at our Belgian subsidiary by over
$1.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2009 versus the same period a
year ago. Compared to the first nine months of fiscal 2008, the U.S.
Dollar strengthened against the Euro and Asian currencies. The
translation effect of this strengthening on foreign operations was to decrease
gross margin by approximately $1.8 million versus the prior year, before
eliminations.
Marketing,
engineering, and administrative (ME&A) expenses were 1.7% higher compared to
last year’s first nine months. ME&A expenses as a percentage of
sales were up 1.9 percentage points to 21.4% of sales versus 19.5% of sales in
the first nine months of fiscal 2008. On a year-to-date basis,
expenses related to the Company’s corporate and domestic incentive programs
decreased $2.3 million versus the first nine months of fiscal 2008, due to the
overall decline in financial performance year-over-year. This was
offset by increased IT costs of $1.4 million, primarily depreciation expense,
associated with the Company’s new ERP system and higher domestic pension
expenses of $0.5 million. In addition, there were severance costs of
$1.3 million booked in the second fiscal quarter of 2009. For the
first nine months of fiscal 2009, stock based compensation expense totaled $0.5
million compared to $0.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal
2008. As noted above, fiscal 2008’s third quarter included a $2.3
million reversal of stock based compensation expense, which reflected the
decline of the Company’s stock price during that quarter a year
ago. The net impact of foreign currency translation from overseas
operations reduced ME&A expenses by approximately $0.8 million when compared
to the same period of the prior fiscal year.
Interest
expense of $1.8 million was down 21% compared to fiscal 2008’s first nine
months. In the first nine months of fiscal 2009 and 2008, the Company
incurred interest of $1.1 million on the $25 million of Senior Notes that were
entered into in April 2006. In addition, for the first nine months of
fiscal 2008, the interest rate on the Company’s revolving credit facility was in
the range of 4.36% to 6.97%, whereas for the first nine months of fiscal 2009
the range was 1.67% to 4.00%. At the same time, the average balance
of the Company’s revolving credit facility increased slightly versus the prior
year. However, as a result of the lower interest rate, total interest
on the revolver decreased just over $0.5 million.
Year-to-date,
the effective tax rate of 29.2 percent improved over the prior year rate of 33.3
percent due primarily to a 5.9 percent reduction in the Italian corporate tax
rate effective with the start of fiscal 2009, a shift in earnings to lower tax
subsidiaries and the impact of foreign tax credits on the domestic tax
rate.
Financial Condition,
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Comparison between March 27,
2009 and June 30, 2008
As of
March 27, 2009, the Company had net working capital of $108.6 million, which
represents an increase of $2.5 million, or 2%, from the net working capital of
$106.1 million as of June 30, 2008.
Cash
decreased 14.8% to $12.3 million as of March 27, 2009. The majority
of the cash as of March 27, 2009 is at the Company’s overseas operations in
Europe and Asia-Pacific. Of the nearly $2.1 million decrease since
the start of the fiscal year, roughly $1.7 million can be attributed to effect
of exchange rate changes on cash.
Trade
receivables of $55.1 million were down $12.5 million from last fiscal
year-end. The effect of foreign currency translation due to the
strengthening U.S. Dollar versus the Euro and Asian currencies was to decrease
trade accounts receivables by just under $7.2 million versus the end of the
prior fiscal year. The overall decrease in accounts receivable was
consistent with the lower sales volume experienced in the last two fiscal
quarters. Due to the global economic slowdown, the Company began to
see an increase in requests for extended payment terms beyond its customary
practice in the second fiscal quarter and into the third fiscal
quarter. Management continues to actively monitor accounts
receivables and work with customers on a global basis.
Net
inventory increased by $0.2 million, or 0.2%, versus June 30, 2008 to $97.9
million. The effect of foreign currency translation due to the
strengthening U.S. Dollar versus the Euro and Asian currencies was to decrease
net inventories by just under $12 million versus the end of the prior fiscal
year. The majority of the net increase in inventory, after the effect
of foreign exchange, came at the Company’s domestic manufacturing location and
Asian distribution operation. The increase at the Company’s domestic
manufacturing operation is the result of customer reschedules and the impact of
dual sourcing of component parts as we transition to low-cost
suppliers. The increase at the Asian distribution operation can be
attributed to the timing of shipments to customers. On a consolidated
basis, as of March 27, 2009, the Company’s backlog of orders to be shipped over
the next six months approximates
$81.5
million, down 33% since the year began and 35% compared with the same period a
year ago. Of the $39.2 million decrease experienced since the
beginning of the fiscal year, approximately $4.7 million can be attributed to
the effect of foreign currency translation. The reduction of
inventory levels at both the Company’s manufacturing and distribution operations
around the world continues to be a priority for the balance of fiscal 2009 and
beyond.
Net
property, plant and equipment (PP&E) decreased $4.3 million versus June 30,
2008. This includes the addition of $6.6 million in capital
expenditures, primarily at the Company’s domestic and Belgian manufacturing
operations, which was offset by depreciation of $6.5 million. The net
remaining decrease of $4.4 million is due to the effects of foreign currency
translation. As a result of current external business factors, the
Company has revised its capital expenditure projection for the year and now
expects to invest between $10 and $12 million in capital assets in fiscal 2009,
compared to its prior estimate of between $15 and $17 million. The
quoted lead times on certain manufacturing equipment purchases may push some of
the capital expenditures into the next fiscal year. This compares to
$15.0 million in capital expenditures in fiscal 2008, $15.7 million in fiscal
2007 and $8.4 million in fiscal 2006. The Company’s capital program
is focusing on modernizing key core manufacturing, assembly and testing
processes at its facilities around the world as well as the implementation of
the global ERP system.
Accounts
payable as of March 27, 2009 of $31.8 million were down $6.1 million, or 16.1%,
from June 30, 2008. The effect of foreign currency translation due to
the strengthening U.S. Dollar versus the Euro and Asian currencies was to
decrease accounts payable by just under $2.7 million versus the end of the prior
fiscal year. The net remaining decrease after adjusting for the
impact of foreign currency translation is primarily the result of the overall
downturn in business, decrease in the order backlog and the focus on reducing
inventory levels.
Total
borrowings, notes payable and long-term debt, as of March 27, 2009 increased by
$8.1 million, or 16%, to $58.0 million versus June 30, 2008. This
increase was driven by the increase in working capital, primarily inventory, the
payment of annual incentive and bonus awards for fiscal 2008 performance in the
first fiscal quarter of 2009 and a $1.8 million stock repurchase in the fiscal
second quarter, partially offset by net cash provided by operating
activities. In the second fiscal quarter, the Company repurchased
250,000 shares of its outstanding common stock at an average price of $7.25 per
share. For the balance of fiscal 2009, the Company is not required to
make any additional contributions to its domestic defined benefit
plans. However, based on overall financial performance and cash
flows, the Company may elect to make further contributions beyond those
required. At March 27, 2009, the Company is in compliance with all
covenants and other requirements set forth in its revolving loan and note
agreements. The first installment of $3.6 million on the Company’s
unsecured $25 million 6.05% Senior Notes is due in April 2010.
Total
shareholders’ equity decreased by $12.7 million to a total of $117.0
million. Retained earnings increased by $6.4 million. The
net increase in retained earnings included $8.7 million in net earnings reported
year-to-date, offset by $2.3 million in dividend payments. Net
unfavorable foreign currency translation of $19.6 million was reported as the
U.S. Dollar strengthened against the Euro and Asian currencies during the first
nine months of fiscal 2009. The remaining movement of $1.4 million
represents an adjustment for the amortization of net actuarial loss and prior
service cost on the Company’s pension plans.
The
Company’s balance sheet remains strong, there are no off-balance-sheet
arrangements, and we continue to have sufficient liquidity for near-term
needs. As of March 27, 2009, the Company had available borrowings
under its $35 million revolving line of credit of nearly $7
million. Furthermore, the Company has over $12 million in cash at its
subsidiaries around the world, approximately 45% of which is considered
permanently reinvested. Management believes that available cash, our
revolver facility, cash generated from operations, existing lines of credit and
access to debt markets will be adequate to fund our capital requirements for the
foreseeable future.
As of
March 27, 2009, the Company has obligations under non-cancelable operating lease
contracts and a senior note agreement for certain future payments. A
summary of those commitments follows (in thousands):
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
year
|
1-3
Years
|
3-5
Years
|
After
5
Years
|
Short-term
borrowing
|
$1,652
|
$1,652
|
|||
Revolver
borrowing
|
$28,300
|
$28,300
|
|||
Long-term
debt
|
$28,056
|
$661
|
$4,421
|
$8,584
|
$14,390
|
Operating
leases
|
$12,992
|
$3,250
|
$5,812
|
$3,637
|
$293
|
Total
obligations
|
$71,000
|
$5,563
|
$38,533
|
$12,221
|
$14,683
|
New Accounting
Releases
In April
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff
Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides additional
clarification on the determination of fair value, including illustrative
examples. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods
beginning after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending
after March 15, 2009, and is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” This FSP provides guidance on
determining whether an impairment is other than temporary, provides examples to
be considered and identifies reporting requirements related to such
impairments. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for
periods ending after March 15, 2009, and is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP requires disclosure
about the fair value of financial instruments whenever summarized financial
information for interim periods is issued, and requires disclosure of the fair
value of all financial instruments (where practicable) in the body or
accompanying notes of interim and annual financial statements. FSP
FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is effective for interim periods beginning after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009, and
is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements
.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and
Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies.” This FSP requires that assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies be
recognized at fair value if fair value can be reasonably estimated, and
eliminates the requirement to disclose an estimate of the range of outcomes of
recognized contingencies at the acquisition date. This FSP is
effective for assets or liabilities arising from contingencies in business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. Adoption of this FSP is not expected to have a material impact
on the Company’s financial statements.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FSP 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosure about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” This FSP provides guidance on an
employer’s disclosures regarding plan assets of a defined benefit pension or
other postretirement plan. The objectives of the disclosures required
under this FSP are to provide users of financial statements with an
understanding of:
a)
|
How
investment allocation decisions are
made;
|
b)
|
The
major categories of plan assets;
|
c)
|
The
inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan
assets;
|
d)
|
The
effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on
changes in plan assets for the period;
and
|
e)
|
Significant
concentrations of risk within plan
assets.
|
The
disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP are required for fiscal years
ending after December 15, 2009, and earlier application is
permitted. This FSP is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s financial statements.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FSP 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets.” This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in
developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of
a recognized intangible asset under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The intent
of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash
flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R),
“Business Combinations,” and other U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. FSP 142-3 is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. This FSP is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.” This statement enhances the disclosures regarding derivatives
and hedging activities by requiring:
·
|
Disclosure
of the objectives for using derivative instruments in terms of underlying
risk and accounting designation;
|
·
|
Disclosure
of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in
a tabular format;
|
·
|
Disclosure
of information about credit-risk-related contingent features;
and
|
·
|
Cross-reference
from the derivative footnote to other footnotes in which
derivative-related information is
disclosed.
|
SFAS No.
161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 161 in its fiscal third
quarter, however these disclosures were considered immaterial due to the nature
and fair value of the derivatives held by the Company at March 27,
2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business
Combinations.” This statement will significantly change the
accounting for business combinations, requiring the acquiring entity to
recognize the acquired assets and liabilities at the acquisition date fair value
with limited exceptions. The statement also includes a substantial
number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R) applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after the beginning of the first annual report period beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. Accordingly, the Company will be subject to SFAS No.
141(R) beginning on July 1, 2009.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – An Amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS
No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary, and includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the
interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is
prohibited. Adoption of SFAS No. 160 is not expected to have a
material impact on the financial statements of the Company.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115.” This standard permits an entity to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s
first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company
adopted SFAS No. 159 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 with no material impact
to the financial statements. The Company has currently chosen not to
elect the fair value option for any items that are not already required to be
measured at fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements.” This statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles,
and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. On February
12, 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2 which delays the effective date of SFAS No.
157 for one year, for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,
except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). SFAS No. 157 and FSP
157-2 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 in the
first quarter of fiscal 2009 for those assets and liabilities not subject to the
one year deferral granted in FSP 157-2, with no material impact to the financial
statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS No. 157 for the assets and liabilities subject to
the
one year
deferral granted under FSP 157-2, for which SFAS No. 157 will become effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
In
September 2006 and March 2007, respectively, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues
Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements” and Issue No. 06-10, “Accounting for Collateral Assignment
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” These EITF’s address the
possible recognition of a liability and related compensation costs for
split-dollar life insurance policies that provide a benefit to an employee that
extends to postretirement periods. EITF 06-4 and 06-10 are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, including interim periods
within those years. The Company adopted these EITF’s in the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 with no material impact to the financial
statements.
During
June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109.” FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits
claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the
financial statements by standardizing the level of confidence needed to
recognize uncertain tax benefits and the process for measuring the amount of
benefit to recognize. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN
48 as of July 1, 2007, with no material impact to the Company’s financial
statements.
Critical Accounting
Policies
The
preparation of this Quarterly Report requires management’s judgment to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the
financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results
will not differ from those estimates.
The
Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note A of the
Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for June 30, 2008. Not all
of these significant accounting policies require management to make difficult,
subjective, or complex judgments or estimates. However, the policies
management considers most critical to understanding and evaluating our reported
financial results are the following:
Revenue
Recognition
Twin Disc
recognizes revenue from product sales at the time of shipment and passage of
title. While we respect the customer’s right to return products that
were shipped in error, historical experience shows those types of adjustments
have been immaterial and thus no provision is made. With respect to
other revenue recognition issues, management has concluded that its policies are
appropriate and in accordance with the guidance provided by the Securities and
Exchange Commissions’ Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, “Revenue
Recognition.”
Accounts
Receivable
Twin Disc
performs ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and adjusts credit limits
based on payment history and the customer’s credit-worthiness as determined by
review of current credit information. We continuously monitor
collections and payments from our customers and maintain a provision for
estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and any specific
customer-collection issues. In addition, senior management reviews
the accounts receivable aging on a monthly basis to determine if any receivable
balances may be uncollectible. Although our accounts receivable are
dispersed among a large customer base, a significant change in the liquidity or
financial position of any one of our largest customers could have a material
adverse impact on the collectibility of our accounts receivable and future
operating results.
Inventory
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost has been determined
by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for the majority of the inventories
located in the United States, and by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method for
all other inventories. Management specifically identifies obsolete
products and analyzes historical usage, forecasted production based on future
orders, demand forecasts, and economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of
the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. The adjustments to the
reserve are estimates that could vary
significantly,
either favorably or unfavorably, from the actual requirements if future economic
conditions, customer demand or competitive conditions differ from
expectations.
Goodwill
In
conformity with U.S. GAAP, goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an impairment
might exist. The Company performs impairment reviews for its
reporting units using a fair-value method based on management’s judgments and
assumptions or third party valuations. The Company is subject to
financial statement risk to the extent the carrying amount of a reporting unit
exceeds its fair value. The impairment testing performed by the
Company at June 30, 2008 indicated that the estimated fair value of each
reporting unit exceeded its corresponding carrying value, including goodwill and
as such, no impairment existed at that time. While the Company
believes its judgments and assumptions were reasonable, different assumptions,
economic factors and/or market indicators could change the estimated fair values
of the Company’s reporting units and, therefore, impairment charges could be
required in the future.
As
indicated above, the Company tests for goodwill impairment between annual tests
if an event occurs or circumstances change that would "more likely than not"
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below the unit’s carrying
amount. In our evaluation of interim triggering events, we
considered, among others, the decline in the Company's stock price since June
30, 2008. The Company concluded that these events did not constitute
triggering events as it would be more likely than not that the fair value of the
reporting unit would still exceed its carrying amount as of March 27,
2009.
Warranty
Twin Disc
engages in extensive product quality programs and processes, including actively
monitoring and evaluating the quality of its suppliers. However, its
warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, the extent of the
market affected by the failure and the expense involved in satisfactorily
addressing the situation. The warranty reserve is established based
on our best estimate of the amounts necessary to settle future and existing
claims on products sold as of the balance sheet date. When evaluating
the adequacy of the reserve for warranty costs, management takes into
consideration the term of the warranty coverage, historical claim rates and
costs of repair, knowledge of the type and volume of new products and economic
trends. While we believe the warranty reserve is adequate and that
the judgment applied is appropriate, such amounts estimated to be due and
payable in the future could differ materially from what actually
transpires.
Pension and Other Postretirement
Benefit Plans
The
Company provides a wide range of benefits to employees and retired employees,
including pensions and postretirement health care coverage. Plan
assets and obligations are recorded annually based on the Company’s measurement
date utilizing various actuarial assumptions such as discount rates, expected
return on plan assets, compensation increases, retirement and mortality tables,
and health care cost trend rates as of that date. The approach used
to determine the annual assumptions are as follows:
·
|
Discount rate – based
on Moody’s AA Corporate Bond rate, with appropriate consideration of
pension plans’ participants’ demographics and benefit payment
terms.
|
·
|
Expected Return on Plan
Assets – based on the expected long-term average rate of return on
assets in the pension funds, which is reflective of the current and
projected asset mix of the funds and considers historical returns earned
on the funds.
|
·
|
Compensation Increase –
reflect the long-term actual experience, the near-term outlook and assumed
inflation.
|
·
|
Retirement and Mortality
Rates – based upon the Generational Mortality Table for fiscal 2008
and the UP 1994 Mortality Table for all prior years
presented.
|
·
|
Health Care Cost Trend
Rates – developed based upon historical cost data, near-term
outlook and an assessment of likely long-term
trends.
|
Measurements
of net periodic benefit cost are based on the assumptions used for the previous
year-end measurements of assets and obligations. The Company reviews
its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and makes modifications to the
assumptions when appropriate. As required by U.S. GAAP, the effects
of the modifications are recorded currently or amortized over future
periods. Based on information provided by its independent actuaries
and other relevant sources, the Company believes that the assumptions used are
reasonable;
however,
changes in these assumptions could impact the Company’s financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting
for Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized
for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which
those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The Company’s policy is to remit earnings from foreign
subsidiaries only to the extent any resultant foreign taxes are creditable in
the United States. Accordingly, the Company does not currently
provide for additional United States and foreign income taxes which would become
payable upon repatriation of undistributed earnings of foreign
subsidiaries.
The
Company is exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates, commodities
and foreign exchange. To reduce such risks, the Company selectively
uses financial instruments and other pro-active management
techniques. All hedging transactions are authorized and executed
pursuant to clearly defined policies and procedures, which prohibit the use of
financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest
rate risk - The Company’s earnings exposure related to adverse movements of
interest rates is primarily derived from outstanding floating rate debt
instruments that are indexed to the prime and LIBOR interest
rates. In accordance with the $35,000,000 revolving loan agreement
expiring October 31, 2010, the Company has the option of borrowing at the prime
interest rate or LIBOR plus an additional “Add-On”, between 1% and 2.75%,
depending on the Company’s Total Funded Debt to EBITDA ratio. Due to
the relative stability of interest rates, the Company did not utilize any
financial instruments at March 27, 2009 to manage interest rate risk
exposure. A 10 percent increase or decrease in the applicable
interest rate would result in a change in annual pretax interest expense of
approximately $50,000.
Commodity
price risk - The Company is exposed to fluctuation in market prices for such
commodities as steel and aluminum. The Company does not utilize
commodity price hedges to manage commodity price risk exposure.
Stock
market risk – The Company’s earnings are exposed to stock market risk relative
to the Performance Stock Unit Awards. These are cash based awards
which are revalued at the end of each reporting period based upon the Company’s
closing stock price as of the end of the period. A one dollar
increase or decrease in the Company’s
stock
price would result in a decrease or increase, respectively, in earnings from
operations of approximately $117,000. These awards were valued at the
Company’s March 27, 2009 closing stock price of $6.46.
Currency
risk - The Company has exposure to foreign currency exchange
fluctuations. Approximately 33% of the Company’s revenues in the nine
months ended March 27, 2009 were denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
Dollar. Of that total, approximately 87% was denominated in Euro with
the balance composed of Japanese Yen, the Swiss Franc and the Australian and
Singapore Dollars. The Company does not hedge the translation
exposure represented by the net assets of its foreign
subsidiaries. Foreign currency translation adjustments are recorded
as a component of shareholders’ equity. Forward foreign exchange
contracts are used to hedge the currency fluctuations on significant
transactions denominated in foreign currencies.
Derivative
financial instruments - The Company has written policies and procedures that
place all financial instruments under the direction of the company corporate
treasury and restrict derivative transactions to those intended for hedging
purposes. The use of financial instruments for trading purposes is
prohibited. The Company uses financial instruments to manage the
market risk from changes in foreign exchange rates.
The
Company primarily enters into forward exchange contracts to reduce the earnings
and cash flow impact of non-functional currency denominated receivables and
payables. These contracts are highly effective in hedging the cash
flows attributable to changes in currency exchange rates. Gains and
losses resulting from these contracts offset the foreign exchange gains or
losses on the underlying assets and liabilities being hedged. The
maturities of the forward exchange contracts generally coincide with the
settlement dates of the related transactions. Gains and losses on
these contracts are recorded in Other income (expense), net in the Consolidated
Statement of Operations as the
changes
in the fair value of the contracts are recognized and generally offset the gains
and losses on the hedged items in the same period. The primary
currency to which the Company was exposed in fiscal 2009 and 2008 was the
Euro. At March 27, 2009, the Company had net outstanding forward
exchange contracts to purchase Euros in the value of $150,000 with a weighted
average maturity of 57 days. The fair value of the Company’s
contracts was a gain of approximately $4,000 at March 27, 2009. At
June 30, 2008, the Company had net outstanding forward exchange contracts to
purchase Euros in the value of $752,000 with a weighted average maturity of 34
days. The fair value of the Company’s contracts was a minimal gain at
June 30, 2008.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures
The
Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(“the Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such
period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting, on a timely basis,
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files
or submits under the Exchange Act, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely discussions regarding required
disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
Management
of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(f). During the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company
implemented a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system at its North
American manufacturing operation. As a result of the implementation,
the Company initiated a process to review and redesign, as necessary, the
controls impacted by the new ERP system, which was substantially completed by
the end of the second fiscal quarter. Further testing and validation
of the revised controls continued through the third quarter, with final testing
to be completed in the fourth quarter. Despite the process to review,
redesign and test controls, as necessary, management believes adequate
disclosure controls and procedures remained in place during the quarter covered
by this report.
Part
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
Twin Disc
is a defendant in several product liability or related claims considered either
adequately covered by appropriate liability insurance or involving amounts not
deemed material to the business or financial condition of the
Company.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in
response to Item 1A to Part I of our 2008 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
There
were no securities of the Company sold by the Company during the nine months
ended March 27, 2009, which were not registered under the Securities Act of
1933, in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4 (2)
of the Act.
During
the period covered by this report, the Company offered participants in the Twin
Disc, Incorporated - The Accelerator 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”) the option
to invest their Plan accounts in a fund comprised of Company
stock. Participation interests of Plan participants in the Plan,
which may be considered securities, were not registered with the
SEC. Participant accounts in the Plan consist of a combination of
employee deferrals, Company matching contributions, and, in some cases,
additional Company profit-sharing contributions. No underwriters were
involved in these transactions. On September 6, 2002, the Company
filed a Form S-8 to register
200,000
shares of Company common stock offered through the Plan, as well as an
indeterminate amount of Plan participation interests.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Period
|
(a)
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
(b)
Average Price Paid per Share
|
(c)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
|
(d)
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Programs
|
December
27, 2008 – January 30, 2009
|
0
|
NA
|
0
|
250,000
|
January
31, 2009 – February 27, 2009
|
0
|
NA
|
0
|
250,000
|
February
28, 2009 – March 27, 2009
|
0
|
NA
|
0
|
250,000
|
Total
|
0
|
0
|
On
February 1, 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to
500,000 shares of Common Stock at market values.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
None.
Item
5. Other Information
None.
Item
6. Exhibits
31a
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
31b
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
32a
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
32b
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
TWIN
DISC, INCORPORATED
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May
6, 2009
|
/s/ JEFFREY S.
KNUTSON
|
Jeffrey
S. Knutson
|
|
Corporate
Controller
|
|
Chief
Accounting Officer
|
24