U.S. NeuroSurgical Holdings, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

or

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from                     to                     .

Commission file number:  0-15586

U.S. Neurosurgical Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

2400 Research Blvd, Suite 325, Rockville, Maryland 20850

(Address of principal executive offices)

(301) 208-8998

(Registrant's telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐ (do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  ☐  No ☒

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of June 30, 2017 was 7,792,185.

 

---

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

U.S. NEUROSURGICAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof

 

U.S. NEUROSURGICAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.

 

U.S. NEUROSURGICAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof.

 

U.S. NEUROSURGICAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part hereof

 

U.S. NEUROSURGICAL HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of U.S. Neurosurgical Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2017 and 2016, are unaudited.  However, in the opinion of management, such statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the information presented therein.  The balance sheet at December 31, 2016 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Pursuant to accounting requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes do not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.  Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's most recent annual financial statements.

Consolidated results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those to be achieved for full fiscal years.

In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued accounting standards update (“ASU”) 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires entities to present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Previously, entities were required to separately present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The ASU was effective in the first quarter of 2017. We adopted the guidance related to balance sheet classification on a prospective basis. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which in part requires entities to assess whether distributions of cash from unconsolidated entities represent a return on the investment or a return of the investment, to appropriately classify the distributions in the statement of cash flows. We have made an accounting policy election to use the cumulative earnings approach to determine that the distributions were returns on the investment and accordingly classified them as operating cash flows. Under the cumulative earnings approach, distributions received from the unconsolidated entity are presumed to be a return on the investment unless the distributions received by the investor, less distributions received in prior periods that were deemed to be returns of investment, exceed cumulative equity in earnings recognized by the investor. Although the ASU is effective in the first quarter of 2018, we have early adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2017 due to the ongoing applicability of the new standard to the Company’s financial statements and have retrospectively adjusted our 2016 cash flow statement to conform to the 2017 presentation. This adjustment results in an increase in net cash provided by operating activitites, and a decrease in net cash provided by investing activities, of $306,000, compared with the amounts previously reported for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

 

U.S. NeuroSurgical, Inc. (“USN”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of U.S. Neurosurgical Holdings, Inc., opened its New York gamma knife treatment center in July 1997 on the campus of New York University (“NYU”) Medical Center.  USN installed a new Leksell gamma knife, the PERFEXION model, at the NYU Medical Center in March 2009 in replacement of the older gamma knife equipment.  In connection with this upgrade, USN modified its arrangement with NYU to extend the term for 12 years from March 2009.

In October 2012, USN’s facility at NYU was totally destroyed as a result of flooding from Hurricane Sandy. The gamma knife had to be removed to prevent any cobalt leakage that might occur due to rusting of the equipment. The removal cost was $525,000. USN paid a lease settlement of the outstanding principal balance only and received from insurance coverage $930,000 above the lease principal payments and removal costs.

USN finalized arrangements with NYU regarding the restored gamma knife center and USN’s long term contract with NYU in early 2014. USN’s new facility, with the Leksell PERFEXION gamma knife, is located in the Tisch Hospital of NYU Langone Medical Center. The facility reopened and began receiving patients at the end of April 2014.

The Company entered into a six year lease in the amount of $4.7 million for the purchase of the replacement equipment and associated leasehold improvements. The first payment of $78,000 was made on September 1, 2014, including $18,000 of interest, and the final payment is due on May 1, 2020. The Company entered into a second two year lease in the amount of $250,000 for the cost of the construction required at the relocated site. The first payment of $12,000 was made on November 1, 2014, and the final payment was made in July 2016.

In April 2016 USN entered into an agreement with Elekta for the installation of new ICON imaging technology for the NYU Gamma Knife equipment with a total cost, including sales taxes, of approximately $816,000. This ICON technology was installed during the month of July 2016 and the gamma knife center reopened on August 5, 2016. The Company has obtained lease financing of approximately $900,000 at an interest rate of approximately 4.45% to finance the acquisition of the ICON technology and associated installation costs. The monthly lease payment is approximately $20,500 which commenced October 2016, with the final payment scheduled for September 2020. A monthly maintenance agreement will commence a year after the installation date and is estimated to be about $6,000 per month.

In July 2016, USN entered into an agreement with NYU relating to the newly installed ICON imaging technology, increasing the monthly payment due to the Company by $30,000 for the remaining term of the agreement. A final payment of $17,000 will be made for the partial month of operations at the end of the term in March 2021.

The agreement with NYU continues in effect through the end of March 2021.  The Company is responsible for the maintenance and insurance for the gamma knife equipment at the NYU facility and is reimbursed for use of the gamma knife based on a fee per procedure performed with the equipment.  NYU provides the medical and technical staff to operate the facility.  At the end of the contract term, costs associated with closing and restoring the NYU facility to its original condition are the responsibility of USN.

 

During 2007, the Company managed the formation of the Southern California Regional Gamma Knife Center at San Antonio Regional Hospital (“SARH”) in Upland, California.  The Company participates in the ownership and operation of the center through its wholly-owned subsidiary, USN Corona, Inc. (“USNC”).  Corona Gamma Knife, LLC (“CGK”) is party to a 14-year agreement with SARH to renovate space in the hospital and install and operate a Leksell PERFEXION gamma knife.  CGK leases the gamma knife from NeuroPartners LLC, which holds the gamma knife equipment.  In addition to returns on its ownership interests, USNC expects to receive fees for management services relating to the facility.

USNC is a 20% owner of NeuroPartners LLC and owns 39% of CGK.

USNC was a 20% guarantor on NeuroPartners LLC’s seven-year lease with respect to the gamma knife equipment and certain leasehold improvements at SARH.  In February 2016, NeuroPartners LLC negotiated a new five- year lease to fund the reloading of cobalt and related construction services.  The new lease of $1,663,000 includes a balance of $668,000 from the prior lease obligations.  This new lease will be paid over 60 months.  The first payment of $31,000 was paid on April 1, 2016 and the final payment will be due on March 1, 2021.  The Company continues to be a 20% guarantor on the new lease and expects any potential obligations from this guarantee would be reduced by the recovery of the related collateral, and  thus expects any exposure from this guarantee to be remote.

Construction of the SARH gamma knife center was completed in December 2008 and the first patient was treated in January 2009.  The project has been funded principally by outside investors.  While the Company has led the effort in organizing the business and overseeing the development and operation of the SARH center, its investment to date in the SARH center has been minimal.

The Company’s share of cumulative losses associated with its investment in NeuroPartners LLC and CGK has exceeded its investment.  Due to the outstanding loans made to NeuroPartners LLC and CGK, NeuroPartners LLC and CGK are considered to be variable interest entities of the Company.  However, as the Company is not deemed to be the primary beneficiary of NeuroPartners LLC and CGK, since it does not have the power to direct the operating activities that most significantly affect NeuroPartners LLC’s and CGK’s economic performance, these entities are not consolidated, but certain disclosures are provided herein.

At June 30, 2017, the Company has $42,000 of remaining advances recorded to NeuroPartners LLC and CGK. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company’s equity in earnings of NeuroPartners LLC and CGK was $31,000, but was not recorded due to prior losses.

 

The following tables present the aggregation of summarized financial information of NeuroPartners LLC and CGK:

NeuroPartners, LLC and CGK Condensed Income Statement Information

NeuroPartners, LLC and CGK Condensed Balance Sheet Information

 

During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company participated in the formation of Florida Oncology Partners, LLC (“FOP”) and Florida Oncology Partners RE, LLC (“FOPRE”), which operates a cancer center located in West Kendall (Miami), Florida.  The center diagnoses and treats patients utilizing a Varian Rapid Arc linear accelerator and a GE CT scanner. USNC originally invested $200,000 for 20% ownership interest in FOP and FOPRE. The remaining 80% was owned by other outside investors. In January of 2015, one of the investors relinquished its ownership interest in both FOP and FOPRE, and that interest was distributed among the remaining members in relationship to their percentages owned. This distribution resulted in an increase of ownership interest for the Company of 4% in each of FOP and FOPRE.  As of January 1, 2015, the Company holds a 24% ownership in both FOP and FOPRE.

The center opened and treated its first patient in May 2011. During 2012 and 2013, FOP made several distributions that reduced the Company’s investment significantly.  The Company’s recorded investment in FOP and FOPRE is $243,000 and $303,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Amounts due from FOP and FOPRE included in due from related parties total $22,000 and $4,000 June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

During 2011, Florida Oncology Partners, LLC entered into a seven year capital lease with Key Bank for approximately $5,800,000.  Under the terms of the capital lease, USN agreed to guarantee a maximum of $1,433,000, approximately 25% of the original lease obligation in the event of default.  USN is a guarantor jointly with most of the other members of FOP (except USNC, which is not a named guarantor).  The outstanding balance on the lease obligation was $1,010,000 at June 30, 2017.  The Company expects any potential liability from this guarantee to be reduced by the recoveries of the respective collateral, but has recorded a liability of $11,000 associated with this guarantee at June 30, 2017.

In June 2012, FOPRE financed the purchase of the building that is occupied by FOP.  The amount of the loan was $1,534,000 and was to be paid at a monthly rate of approximately $8,500 for 120 months with the final payment due on June 15, 2022.  In December 2015, FOPRE sold the building, for a gain on sale of $577,000.  The Company’s share of the gain was $139,000.  The related mortgage was repaid upon closing of the sale.

In December 2015, FOP entered into an agreement with 21^st Century Oncology for the sale of FOP’s Varian Rapid Arc linear accelerator and other medical equipment at the FOP location.  21^st Century Oncology paid FOP $1,000,000 as a down payment for the equipment and from January 2016 until May 2017 made monthly payments of $172,000 for the equipment and all monthly payments due under the capital lease. As of this date, 21^st Century Oncology has not yet satisfied all of the terms of the rental agreement and for the months of May, June, and July of 2016 it paid an additional $30,000 in accelerated payments, and has paid $50,000 in accelerated payments each month from August 2016 until May 2017. These accelerated payments have been recorded as unearned revenue by FOP. In late May 2017, 21^st Century Oncology filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and FOP is not a secured creditor. As a result, FOP did not receive the agreed additional rental payments beyond the monthly payment for the capital lease in  June 2017. FOP will continue to monitor the impact of 21^st Century’s bankruptcy, but expects to recognize the remaining unearned revenue at May 31, 2017 over the final 12 months of the equipment lease.

 

In June 2017, FOP entered into an agreement with a third party owner of radiation therapy center located in Miami, Florida, whereby FOP will take over the operation of the center effective September 1. 2017 for a ten year initial term, and up to three additional terms of five years each. The Company is currently evaluating the accounting implications of this agreement.

The following tables present the aggregation of summarized financial information of FOP and FOPRE:

FOP and FOPRE Condensed Income Statement Information

FOP and FOPRE Condensed Balance Sheet Information

 

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company participated in the formation of Boca Oncology Partners, LLC (“BOP”), for the purpose of owning and operating a cancer center in Boca Raton, Florida.  In June 2011, Boca Oncology Partners RE, LLC (“BOPRE”), an affiliated entity, purchased a 20% interest in Boca West IMP, LLC (“Boca West IMP”), owner of a medical office building in West Boca, Florida in which BOP operates.  BOP occupies approximately 6,000 square feet of the 32,000 square foot building.  The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, USNC invested $225,000 initially and had a 22.5% interest in BOP and BOPRE.

In January 2012, an additional investor purchased 50% of the partnership reducing the Company’s ownership to 11.25%.  The Company loaned the proceeds of $56,250 back to BOP as a 5 year note at 7% interest. The remaining 88.75% was owned by other outside investors.  In June 2012, BOPRE purchased an additional 3.75% of Boca West IMP from another investor bringing its total interest to 23.75%. BOPRE accounts for this investment under the cost method since it does not exercise significant influence over Boca West, IMP. Then the members of BOPRE sold 31.5% of their interests in BOPRE to a new investor. The proceeds of $28,000 were loaned to BOP and USNC’s investment in BOPRE was reduced to 15.4%.  The center opened in August 2012.  In February 2014, the Company and other members sold their interests in BOP.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2017, several investors relinquished part of their ownership interest in BOPRE, and those interests were distributed among the remaining investors in relationship to their percentages owned. As a result, the Company now holds a 20.65% ownership interest in BOPRE.

The Company’s recorded investment in BOPRE is $154,000 and $144,000 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

USNC is a 10% guarantor of 50% of the outstanding balance of Boca West IMP’s ten-year mortgage.  This mortgage had an original balance of $3,000,000 and is secured by the medical office building in which BOP operates. The outstanding balance on the mortgage is $2,473,000 at June 30, 2017.  Any liability from this guarantee would be mitigated by the recovery from the underlying real estate, and the Company expects its potential exposure from this guarantee to be remote.

 

The following tables present the summarized financial information of BOPRE:

BOPRE Condensed Income Statement Information

BOPRE Condensed Balance Sheet Information

 

In April 2015 Medical Oncology Partners, LLC (“MOP”), was formed in partnership with local physicians and other investors. MOP was established to acquire a 100% equity interest in United Oncology Medical Associates of FL, LLC (“UOMA”). USNC was not a member of MOP at the time of formation as it was not able to participate due to the fact that USNC was not a physician. Nevertheless, USNC wished to eventually obtain an equity interest in MOP and loaned Dr. Jaime Lozano, the principal investor in MOP and a co-investor in FOP, $173,000.  Dr. Lozano used these funds, along with an equal amount of his own funds (a total of $345,000), to purchase a 76.67% interest in MOP. Other investors paid a further $105,000 for the remaining equity in MOP. MOP used the $450,000 of financing to acquire a 100% equity interest in UOMA.  An application was filed for a waiver to allow USNC to hold an equity interest notwithstanding the physician requirement and on December 22, 2016, USNC was cleared to become a part owner of MOP. Dr. Lozano agreed to exchange half of his membership interest to USNC in settlement of the note to USNC.  USNC and Dr. Lozano also agreed to share equally in providing a 5% equity interest in MOP to an additional investor as a consulting fee for services rendered in the administration of MOP and UOMA. At December 22, 2016 USNC owned 35.83% of MOP with an initial carrying value of $161,000. The Company has recorded its share of losses of $12,000 for the period from December 22, 2016 to December 31, 2016, against its investment which resulted in a reduction of its equity investment to $149,000.

Due to increasing costs, continued net losses since April 2015, and reliance on related party and other debt for operating cash flows, the fair value of UOMA is less than its carrying amount. The Company tested its investment for impairment at December 31, 2016 and determined that the investment was impaired and an impairment loss was recorded against the entire equity balance in MOP, as well as loans from USN and USNC to MOP and UOMA.

 

The following table present the summarized financial information of MOP:

MOP Condensed Consolidated Income Statement Information

MOP Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Information

 

The Company’s income tax rate, which includes federal and state income taxes, was approximately 38%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Company recorded a tax charge of $236,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

 

Item 2.

Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The condensed consolidated financial statements of U.S. Neurosurgical Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  As such, some accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements.  A summary of those significant accounting policies can be found in Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  In particular, judgment is used in areas such as determining and assessing possible asset impairments and determination of the asset retirement obligation.

In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued accounting standards update (“ASU”) 2015-17, Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which requires entities to present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Previously, entities were required to separately present deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as current and noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The ASU was effective in the first quarter of 2017. We adopted the guidance related to balance sheet classification on a prospective basis. Prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which in part requires entities to assess whether distributions of cash from unconsolidated entities represent a return on the investment or a return of the investment, to appropriately classify the distributions in the statement of cash flows. We have made an accounting policy election to use the cumulative earnings approach to determine that the distributions were returns on the investment and accordingly classified them as operating cash flows. Under the cumulative earnings approach, distributions received from the unconsolidated entity are presumed to be a return on the investment unless the distributions received by the investor, less distributions received in prior periods that were deemed to be returns of investment, exceed cumulative equity in earnings recognized by the investor. Although the ASU is effective in the first quarter of 2018, we have early adopted the guidance in the first quarter of 2017 due to the ongoing applicability of the new standard to the Company’s financial statements and have retrospectively adjusted our 2016 cash flow statement to conform to the 2017 presentation. This adjustment results in an increase in net cash provided by operating activitites, and a decrease in net cash provided by investing activities, of $306,000, compared with the amounts previously reported for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

The following discussion and analysis provides information which the Company’s management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.

 

Three months ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

Patient revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $840,000, a increase of 8% compared to $775,000 the previous year. This increase in revenue was largely due to an increased number of procedures at NYU. Patient expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 were $356,000, an increase of 24% as compared to the $288,000 reported for the comparable period in the previous year. This increase in patient expenses was primarily due to higher depreciation expense following the installation of the ICON equipment in August 2016.

Selling, general and administrative expense of $354,000 for the second quarter of 2017 was similar to the $351,000 incurred during the comparable period in 2016.

The Company incurred $36,000 of interest expense in the second quarter of 2017 related to the capital lease. Interest expense for the same period in 2016 was $39,000.

During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized an income tax charge of $87,000 compared to $105,000 for the same period the prior year. The tax expense is due to the Company’s successful operations at NYU during 2017, partly offset by lower income in unconsolidated entities.

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company reported a net income of $136,000 as compared to a net income of $177,000 for the same period a year earlier. The decrease in net income is primarily due to lower income from investments in unconsolidated entities.

Six months ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Patient revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $1,824,000, an increase of 14% compared to $1,607,000 the previous year. This increase in revenue was largely due to an increased number of procedures at NYU. Patient expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 were  $724,000, an increase of 18% as compared to $612,000 reported for the comparable period in the previous year. This increase in patient expenses was largely due to increased depreciation due to the new ICON equipment and expenses related to the gamma knife equipment.

Selling, general and administrative expense of $649,000 for the first six months of 2017 was 2% lower than the $661,000 incurred during the comparable period in 2016.  The decrease in SG&A expenses was mostly due to lower consulting fees, travel fees, and accounting fees.

The Company incurred $77,000 of interest expense in the first half of 2017 related to the capital lease. Interest expense for the same period in 2016 was $80,000.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized an income tax charge of $236,000 compared to $223,000 for the ame period a year earlier.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company reported a net income of $379,000 as compared to a net income of $375,000 for the same period a year earlier.

At June 30, 2017, the Company had working capital of $1,907,000 as compared to $1,419,000 at December 31, 2016.  This increase was primarily due to the successful operations at NYU. Cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2017 were $3,674,000 as compared to $1,962,000 at December 31, 2016.

Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $2,290,000 as compared to $1,791,000 in the same period a year earlier. The increase was primarily due to cash inflows from the operation of the new gamma knife center, net of working capital requirements. Accounts receivable decreased by $654,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to a decrease of $478,000 the previous year.

With respect to financing activities, the Company paid $505,000 towards its capital lease obligations during the first six months of 2017, compared with $459,000 in 2016.

USN entered into a six year lease in the amount of $4.7 million for the purchase of the replacement Leksell PERFEXION gamma knife at the NYU Medical Center. The first payment of $78,000 was made on September 1, 2014, and the final payment is due on May 1, 2020.

In April 2016 USN entered into an agreement with Elekta for the installation of new ICON imaging technology for the NYU Gamma Knife equipment with a total cost, including sales taxes, of approximately $816,000. This ICON technology was installed during the month of July 2016 and the gamma knife center reopened on August 5, 2016. The Company has obtained lease financing of approximately $900,000 at an interest rate of approximately 4.45% to finance the acquisition of the ICON technology and associated installation costs. The monthly lease payment is approximately $20,500 which commenced October 2016, with the final payment scheduled for September 2020. A monthly maintenance agreement will commence August 2017, and is estimated to be about $6,000 per month.

In July 2016, USN entered into an agreement with NYU relating to the newly installed ICON imaging technology, increasing the monthly payment due to the Company by $30,000 for the remaining term of the agreement. A final payment of $17,000 will be made for the partial month of operations at the end of the term in March 2021.

The agreement with NYU continues in effect through the end of March 2021.  The Company is responsible for the maintenance and insurance for the gamma knife equipment at the NYU facility and is reimbursed for use of the gamma knife based on a fee per procedure performed with the equipment.  NYU provides the medical and technical staff to operate the facility.  At the end of the contract term, costs associated with closing and restoring the NYU facility to its original condition are the responsibility of USN.

 

We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  The following factors, as well as the factors listed under the caption “Risk Factors” in Annual Report on our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, have affected or could affect our actual results and could cause such results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us.  Investors should carefully consider these risks and speculative factors inherent in and affecting our business and an investment in our common stock.

Reliance on Business of the New York University Gamma Knife Center; Recent Destruction of Equipment and Discontinuation of Business at NYU.  While it is the Company’s objective to expand activities to additional cancer centers that rely on a broad range of diagnostic and radiation treatments, the Company has relied on the NYU gamma knife for substantially all of its revenue.  In recent periods, services provided at NYU have represented over 90% of the Company’s revenues.  Unless and until the Company is successful in building its activities at other centers and at new locations, disruptions at NYU could have a materially adverse effect on the Company.

Availability of Working Capital.  To date, we have earned sufficient income from operations to fund periodic operating losses and support efforts to pursue new gamma knife or other types of cancer treatment centers.

The Securities and Exchange Commission encourages companies to disclose forward looking information so that investors can better understand a company's future prospects and make informed investment decisions.  This document contains such "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, particularly statements anticipating future growth in revenues and cash flow.  Words such as "anticipates," "estimates," "expects," "projects," "targets," "intends," "plans," "believes," "will be," "will continue," "will likely result," and words and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance identify such forward-looking statements.  Those forward-looking statements are based on management's present expectations about future events.  As with any projection or forecast, they are inherently susceptible to uncertainty and changes in circumstances, and the Company is under no obligation to (and expressly disclaims any such obligation to) update or alter its forward-looking statements whether as a result of such changes, new information, future events or otherwise.

The Company operates in a highly competitive and rapidly changing environment and in businesses that are dependent on our ability to: achieve profitability; increase revenues; sustain our current level of operations; maintain satisfactory relations with business partners; attract and retain key personnel; maintain and expand our strategic alliances; and protect our intellectual property.  The Company's actual results could differ materially from management's expectations because of changes in such factors.  New risk factors can arise and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on the Company's business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.  Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

 

Investors should also be aware that while the Company might, from time to time, communicate with securities analysts, it is against the Company's policy to disclose to them any material non-public information or other confidential commercial information. Accordingly, investors should not assume that the Company agrees with any statement or report issued by any analyst irrespective of the content of the statement or report. Furthermore, the Company has a policy against issuing or confirming financial forecasts or projections issued by others.  Thus, to the extent that reports issued by securities analysts or others contain any projections, forecasts or opinions, such reports are not the responsibility of the Company.

In addition, the Company’s overall financial strategy, including growth in operations, maintaining financial ratios and strengthening the balance sheet, could be adversely affected by increased interest rates, construction delays or other transactions, economic slowdowns and changes in the Company’s plans, strategies and intentions.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.  We do realize that we are a very small company and as a small company with only the officers and directors participating in the day to day management, with the ability to override controls, each officer and director has multiple positions and responsibilities that would normally be distributed among several employees in larger organizations with adequate segregation of duties to ensure the appropriate checks and balances.  Because the Company does not currently have a separate chief financial officer, the Chief Executive Officer performs these functions with the support of one of the Company’s outside directors who assists in the reporting and disclosure process (the “Lead Director”).

 

Our management evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based upon that evaluation the Company’s Chief Executive Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report for the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, due to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

 

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2017, A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with the assessment described above, management identified the following material weakness as of June 30, 2017: the Company did not maintain sufficient qualified personnel with the appropriate level of knowledge, experience and training in the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in internal controls over financial reporting commensurate with its financial reporting requirements. Specifically, effective controls were not designed and in place to ensure that the Company maintained, or had access to, appropriate resources with adequate experience and expertise in the area of financial reporting for transactions such as investments in unconsolidated entities and income taxes. The Company is in the process of developing efficient approaches to remediate this material weakness.  To do this in a cost-effective manner, considering the current extent of the Company’s operations, management is making arrangements with consultants and advisors to assist on an as-needed basis.

While there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2017, management is in the process of developing plans to remediate the material weakness identified above.

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

None

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6.

Exhibits

31.1         Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

32.1         Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.

101          Interactive Data Files providing financial information from the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language).  Pursuant to Regulation 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are otherwise not subject to liability.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

---