UAS Drone Corp. - Annual Report: 2020 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File No. 000-55504

UAS Drone Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Etgar 1 St.

Tirat Carmel, Israel, 3903212

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s Telephone Number: 011-972-4-8124101

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

NONE

Securities Registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐  No ☒

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐  No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒  No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of ‘‘large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,’’ “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐  No ☒

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $ 5,271,643.

As of March 30, 2021, there were 41,169,035 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001, of the registrant issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated By Reference: None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”), contains “forward-looking statements,” which includes information relating to future events, future financial performance, financial projections, strategies, expectations, competitive environment and regulation. Words such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and may not be accurate indications of when such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information we have when those statements are made or management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

The foregoing does not represent an exhaustive list of matters that may be covered by the forward-looking statements contained herein or risk factors that we are faced with that may cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements. Please see “Risk Factors” for additional risks that could adversely impact our business and financial performance.

Moreover, new risks regularly emerge and it is not possible for our management to predict or articulate all the risks we face, nor can we assess the impact of all risks on our business or the extent to which any risk, or combination of risks, may cause actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report are based on information available to us on the date of this Annual Report. Except to the extent required by applicable laws or rules, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained above and throughout this Annual Report.

In this Annual Report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars. Except as otherwise indicated by the context, references in this Annual Report to “UAS,” “we,” “us” and “our” are references to UAS Drone Corp., a Nevada corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries.

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Corporate Overview

We are a robotics company dedicated to the development of an advanced robotics system that enables remote, real-time, pinpoint accurate firing of small arms and light weapons. Our advanced robotics system is able to achieve pinpoint accuracy regardless of the movement of the weapons platform or the target.

We were founded in 2014 as Unlimited Aerial Systems, LLP (“UAS LLP”), and until the consummation of the Share Exchange Agreement (as hereinafter defined), we were a developer and manufacturer of commercial unmanned aerial systems, or drones, with the goal of providing a superior Quadrotor aerial platform at an affordable price point in the law enforcement and first responder markets.

On March 9, 2020, we closed on the Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to which Duke Robotics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Duke”) became our majority-owned subsidiary (the “Share Exchange”). Such closing date is referred to as the “Effective Time.” As a result of the Share Exchange, the Company adopted the business plan of Duke.

On April 29, 2020, we, Duke, and UAS Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and our wholly-owned subsidiary (“UAS Sub”), executed an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which UAS Sub was to merge, upon the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, with and into Duke, with Duke surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Short-Form Merger”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, we intended to acquire the remaining outstanding shares of Duke held by those certain Duke shareholders that did not participate in the Share Exchange. On June 25, 2020, Duke filed a Certificate of Merger with the State of Delaware, and consequently, Duke became our wholly-owned subsidiary and the Short-Form Merger was consummated.

Duke has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Duke Airborne Systems Ltd. (“Duke Israel”), which was formed under the laws of the State of Israel in March 2014 and became the sole subsidiary of Duke after its incorporation. Our mailing address is 1 Etgar Street (1st Floor), Tirat-Carmel, Israel 3903212, and our telephone number is 011-972-4-8124101. Our web site address is https://dukeroboticsys.com/.

Company Overview

Until the consummation of the Share Exchange, we were a developer and manufacturer of commercial unmanned aerial systems, or drones, with the goal of providing a superior Quadrotor aerial platform at an affordable price point in the law enforcement and first responder markets. Following the Share Exchange, we adopted the business plan of Duke. Duke is a robotics company dedicated to the development of an advanced robotics stabilization system that enables remote, real-time, pinpoint accurate firing of small arms and light weapons. Our advanced robotics system is able to achieve pinpoint accuracy regardless of the movement of the weapons platform or the target.

In late 2016, we began working with a flight training company in the western U.S. We sent one of our inventory Quadrotors to them with the intention of: (1) allowing them to use our drone in their training courses, specifically with law enforcement and first responder professionals; (2) obtaining feedback on performance and operating characteristics of our drone with the intention of improving the product for future generations; and (3) seeking sales of additional Quadrotors to this company or its clients. During 2018 and 2019, the Company did not sell any drones.

Although the first product has been designed to be used by an unmanned aerial system (a “UAS”), the robotic solutions are also adaptable to other military vehicles, boats and stationary environments, as well as civilian purposes, such as, high definition, high-end stabilized cameras. We believe that the system is to small arms and light weapons (e.g., weapons weighing less than 9 kilograms, or kg, or approximately 19.9 pounds) as drones are to air-to-ground missiles.

We have completed our first generation of our robotic systems. Prior to marketing our systems to potential customers, for security reasons, we are required to obtain various governmental approvals for each sale. We have filed marketing applications with the Israeli Ministry of Defense (“IMOD”) and as a result thereof, currently hold marketing approvals for about 50 countries, including the United States. Currently, our commercialization efforts are primarily focused on the U.S. market, with secondary efforts outside of the United States focused primarily on Western Europe.

On January 29, 2021, we, through Duke Israel, and Elbit Systems Land Ltd., an Israeli corporation (“Elbit”), entered into a collaboration agreement (the “Collaboration Agreement”) for the global marketing and sales, and the production and further development of our developed advanced robotic system mounted on an UAS, armed with lightweight firearms, which we market under the commercial name “TIKAD.”

Market Opportunity

The classic confrontation of army against army has become rare, while guerilla (or asymmetric) warfare has unfortunately become commonplace. Further, the foreign policy of the United States and other countries is increasingly designed around the parameter of not employing “boots on the ground” while at the same time minimizing collateral damage. The United States and other countries around the world have significantly increased their use of UASs for intelligence gathering, surveillance and tactical applications, such as delivery of heavy ordnance bombs and missiles. The use of UASs to fire small arms and light weapons from the air, however, has not yet become a viable option. Our technology thus addresses a crucial need of modern warfare to bring a wide range of weapons other than bombs and missiles to bear on remote hostile targets without risk to the military personnel deploying the weapons, while at the same time minimizing collateral damage. In addition, the rapid evolution of small unmanned air systems (“sUAS”) technologies, along with their size and low cost, enables novel concepts of employment that present challenges to current defense systems, creating new asymmetric threats for warfighters. Our system also addresses this crucial need for counter sUAS solutions and offers a kinetic interception, or “drone kill drone,” capability for defeating enemy sUAS.

Our system was designed with input from veterans of Israel’s elite special mission units. It is operated intuitively via a touch-based tablet, which serves as its control unit. Minimal prior training is required in order to operate the robot. In June 2016, our robot mounted on our UAS Octocopter platform was awarded the top prize at the Combating Terrorism Technology Conference sponsored by the United States Defense Department’s Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office, Israel’s Ministry of Defense Directorate of Defense Research and Development and the MIT Enterprise Forum of Israel.

Products

UAS Octocopter Integrated with Six Degrees of Freedom (“6 DOF”) Robotic Gimbal

Our special purpose UAS Octocopter (DK-HIPPOGRIFF) integrates for operational usage with our 6 DOF robot and is intended primarily for Military and homeland security purposes. Our lightweight robot allows accurate firing from various configurations consisting of UAS-mounted, land-mounted on light all-terrain vehicles and sea-mounted on boats. The robot is mounted on our UAS Octocopter platform, a combined system which we market under the commercial name “TIKAD.”

In addition to the various configurations and mounting options, the robots also permit the utilization of a wide range of small arms, light weapons and shotguns, with lethal and less lethal ammunition, with a maximum weight of nine (9) kilograms (approximately twenty (20) pounds). The combination of our robot, along with our stabilization platform and software, provides a unique firing platform that permits precision firing regardless of weather conditions or other variables.

Additionally, our robot may also be utilized as a ground sniper platform. Since the robot is a standalone unit, it can be mounted on a patrol or attack vehicle or be positioned at a strategic location. The capability of remote operation without the need to expose the operator to tactical danger can replace troops in different settings. This capability may reduce the number of casualties due to “friendly fire” incidents and may also significantly reduce exposure and risk to combat troops. Our robot is controlled by a remote-control device that permits the user to exert full control over its functions, including arming the robot as well as control the firing mechanism.

Our lightweight robot can also be used for civilian purposes and bring solutions that do not yet exist for different tasks that require high-end stabilization, such as: vertical takeoff and landing (“VTOL”) robotic landing gear for drones, VTOL aircrafts and medical aid robotic uses. We do not initially intend to focus on the sale of the robot for civilian purposes but expect our sales of the robot to increase as additional product options expand. We will also address, as needed, evolving regulation of civilian UASs.

TIKAD mounted with M4 5.56mm Assault Rifle and the Control Unit

Assembly and Testing

Currently, we assemble both our robots and UAS Octocopter at our facilities in Israel. We outsource the production of certain components to third-party manufacturers, from which we purchase supplies and custom-made machined parts required for the production of our robots and UAS Octocopter, all of which we assemble with the final product in our facilities. We currently source our parts and materials from approximately twenty (20) suppliers located primarily in the United States, Europe, Israel and China. We are not, however, dependent on any single manufacturer. In addition, while the components we purchase are built according to our specific designs and requests, we believe the components and materials we purchase are common in nature and can easily be obtained from alternative suppliers, if necessary. Components are tested and approved against the expected points of failure during extended and aggressive operations. For example, we test items such as the load carrying capacity of our products as well as various software components. After the lab testing phase, the robot and UASs undergoes a series of field tests which examine the operation of each function. Results are combined with multi-phased airborne testing.

In addition, we have not executed supply agreements with our third-party suppliers. More importantly, our proprietary and confidential complex kinematic algorithms and control software is our most valuable intellectual property. We have built an in-house laboratory to support the assembly and commercialization of our products. We believe that the current size and capacity of our in-house laboratory, located at our facilities in Israel, will be sufficient to support all of our commercialization activities in the near future.

Market Strategy

We expect that our growth will initially derive from sales of TIKAD (our robot mounted on UAS Octocopter platform), and later from sales of our robot mounted on other platforms, such as light all-terrain vehicles and sea-mounted on boats.

Intellectual Property

Our success depends, at least in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property, and to operate without infringing or violating the proprietary rights of others. We rely on a combination of trade-secrets, know-how, and other contractual rights (including confidentiality and invention assignment agreements) to protect our intellectual property rights. We also restrict access to our sensitive intellectual property information to our most senior management.

To protect certain key technologies, we have submitted a U.S. patent Application for stabilization system patents, which is pending. We do not know whether any of our current or future patent applications will result in the issuance of any patents.

Sales and Marketing

Marketing and sales efforts are currently concentrated on TIKAD. Our robot has been designated as a unique system by the IMOD and has received official approval as the sole supplier of this solution to the IMOD. The IMOD has also publicly endorsed our combined robotic and UAS system, which we market under the commercial name TIKAD, as an innovative future battlefield technology that may be implemented by the Israeli Defense Forces (the “IDF”).

We are currently in the process of building up our sales and marketing infrastructure primarily in the United States. This includes cooperation with agents, distributors and resellers of products that are experienced in our market. We have engaged an experienced U.S.-based strategic consultant for U.S. Government and Customer relations with a proven track record in the Defense market. We intend to focus our sales efforts in the United States because the U.S. military in general and special operation forces units in particular are expected to be our largest customers, both in our early commercialization stage and for the foreseeable future.

On January 29, 2021 we, through Duke Israel, and Elbit entered in the Collaboration Agreement. Pursuant to the Collaboration Agreement, Duke Israel has granted Elbit a worldwide exclusive license for the use of Duke Israel’s know-how and intellectual property and the marketing, sales, production, and further development of the TIKAD for military, defense, homeland security, and para-military uses. As consideration for granting the worldwide exclusive license, Elbit will pay Duke Israel royalties from revenues received from worldwide sales of TIKAD, with royalty rates ranging from low to mid-double-figure percentages, depending on the tiers of the selling price of TIKAD, for a period starting from the date of the Collaboration Agreement until 15 years following receipt of $50 million in cumulative revenues from sales of TIKAD units. In addition, Duke Israel agreed to pay Elbit similar rates of royalties for revenues received by Duke from sales of its advanced robotic system for civil use, if such systems will include new know-how developed by Elbit.

Competition

While we believe that our products are novel, and that we have unique knowledge of military operational demands and challenges and years of developing complex military airborne systems and advanced robotics, the defense industry is a competitive environment. Competition is based on product and program performance, price, reputation, reliability, life cycle costs, overall value to the customer and responsiveness to customer requirements. This includes the ability to respond to rapid changes in technology. In addition, our competitive position sometimes may be affected by specific requirements in particular geographic and product markets.

Continuing consolidation in the defense industry has affected competition. In addition, many major prime contractors are increasing their in-house capabilities. These factors have decreased the number but increased the relative size and resources of our competitors. We plan to continually adapt to market conditions by adjusting our business strategy to changing market conditions. In addition, we plan to seek to enter into strategic partnership and cooperation agreements that we believe can assist us in overcoming the challenges of competing in our industry. We also anticipate continued competition in defense markets due to declining defense budgets in many countries.

Our competitors, either alone or through their strategic partners, might have substantially greater name recognition and financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing and human resources than we do. These entities may also have significantly greater experience and infrastructure in commercializing defense products, obtaining regulatory approval for those products and commercializing those products around the world.

Government Regulation

Government Contracting Regulations. We operate under laws, regulations and administrative rules governing defense and other government contracts, mainly in Israel and the United States. Some of these carry major penalty provisions for non-compliance, including disqualification from participating in future contracts. In addition, our participation in governmental procurement processes in Israel, the United States and other countries is subject to specific regulations governing the conduct of the process of procuring defense and homeland security contracts.

Israeli Export Regulations. Israel’s defense export policy regulates the sale of a number of our systems and products. Current Israeli policy encourages exports to approved customers of defense systems and products such as ours, as long as the export is consistent with Israeli government policy. Subject to certain exemptions, a license is required to initiate marketing activities. We also must receive a specific export license for defense related hardware, software and technology exported from Israel. Israeli law also regulates export of “dual use” items (items that are typically sold in the commercial market but that also may be used in the defense market). We have filed marketing applications with the IMOD and have already received marketing approvals for about fifty (50) countries including the U.S. It is expected that in the mid-term more than seventy-five (75%) of our revenue will be derived from exports subject to Israeli export regulations.

Approval of Israeli Defense Acquisition. The Israeli Defense Entities Law (Protection of Defense Interests) establishes conditions for the approval of an acquisition or transfer of control of an entity that is determined to be an Israeli “defense entity” under the terms of the law. Designation as a “defense entity” is to occur through an order to be issued jointly by the Israeli Prime Minister, Defense Minister and Economy Minister. Although no such orders relating to us have been issued as of the date hereof, it is possible that our Israeli subsidiary may be designated as a “defense entity” under the law. An order (pursuant to the law) would establish conditions and restrictions regarding non-Israeli control of our Israeli subsidiary. For example, Israeli government approval might be required for acquisition of twenty-five percent (25%) or more of the voting securities or a smaller percentage of shares of common stock that grant “means of control” in the Company, if such were to directly affect the control of our Israeli subsidiary. Means of Control for the purposes of the law includes the right to control the vote at a shareholders’ meeting or to appoint a director.

Approval of U.S. and Other Defense Acquisitions. Many countries in addition to Israel also require governmental approval of acquisitions of local defense companies or assets by foreign entities. Mergers and acquisitions of certain types of defense related businesses in the U.S. are subject to the Foreign Investment and National Security Act (“FINSA”). Under FINSA, foreign acquisitions of certain types of defense related businesses in the U.S. require review, and in some cases approval, by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). In that regard, if a foreign entity attempts to acquire us or all of our domestic assets, such transactions may be subject to FINSA, and in certain instances CFIUS has the authority to order divestment and cancellation of the transaction.

“Buy American” Laws. The U.S. “Buy American” laws impose price differentials or prohibitions on procurement of products purchased under U.S. government programs. The price differentials or prohibitions apply to products that are not made in the United States or that do not contain U.S. components making up at least fifty percent (50%) of the total cost of all components in the product. However, a Memorandum of Agreement between the United States and Israeli governments waives the “Buy American” laws for specified products, including most of the products we are currently selling in the United States.

Procurement Regulations. Solicitations for procurements by governmental purchasing agencies in Israel, the United States and other countries are governed by laws, regulations and procedures relating to procurement integrity, including avoiding conflicts of interest, corruption, human trafficking and conflict minerals in the procurement process. Such regulations also include provisions relating to information assurance and for the avoidance of counterfeit parts in the supply chain.

Anti-Bribery Regulations. We conduct operations in a number of markets that are considered high risk from an anti-bribery compliance perspective. Laws and regulations such as the Israel Penal Code, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (“OECD”) Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act and corresponding legislation in other countries, prohibit providing personal benefits or bribes to government officials in connection with the governmental procurement process. Israeli defense exporters, like ourselves, are required to maintain an anti-bribery compliance program, including specific procedures, record keeping and training.

Audit Regulations. The IMOD may audit our books and records relating to its contracts with us. Our books and records and other aspects of projects that will be related to the U.S. defense contracts will be subject to audit by U.S. government audit agencies. Such audits review compliance with government contracting cost accounting and other applicable standards. If discrepancies are found this could result in a downward adjustment of the applicable contract’s price. Some other customers have similar rights under specific contract provisions.

Civil Aviation Regulations. Several of our products for commercial aviation applications are subject to flight safety and airworthiness standards of the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration and similar civil aviation authorities in Israel, Europe and other countries.

Environmental, Health and Safety Regulations. We are subject to a variety of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we have operations. This includes regulations relating to air, water and ground contamination, hazardous waste disposal and other areas with a potential environmental or safety impact.

Employees

We currently have one full-time employees and have three (3) executive officers, our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Technology Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. We hire freelance contractors and consultants in order to limit our operating expenses and therefore allowing us to scale as necessary. We maintain long-term relationships with these freelance contractors and consultants.

All of our consulting agreements include undertakings with respect to non-competition and assignment to us of intellectual property rights developed in the course of employment and confidentiality. The enforceability of such provisions is limited for some employees by Israeli law.

Emerging Growth Company

We are and we will remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), until the earliest to occur of (i) the last day of the fiscal year during which our total annual revenues equal or exceed $1.07 billion (subject to adjustment for inflation), (ii) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of our initial public offering, (iii) the date on which we have, during the previous three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities, or (iv) the date on which we are deemed a “large accelerated filer” (with at least $700 million in public float) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

As an “emerging growth company,” we may take advantage of specified reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

We have taken advantage of some of these reduced burdens, and thus the information we provide stockholders may be different from what you might receive from other public companies in which you hold shares.

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. However, we are choosing to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

Notwithstanding the above, we are also currently a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that we are not an investment company, an asset-backed issuer, or a majority-owned subsidiary of a parent company that is not a smaller reporting company and have a public float of less than $75 million and annual revenues of less than $50 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. In the event that we are still considered a “smaller reporting company”, at such time as we cease being an “emerging growth company”, the disclosure we will be required to provide in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) will increase, but will still be less than it would be if we were not considered either an “emerging growth company” or a “smaller reporting company.” Specifically, similar to “emerging growth companies,” “smaller reporting companies” are able to provide simplified executive compensation disclosures in their filings; are exempt from the provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) requiring that independent registered public accounting firms provide an attestation report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting; and have certain other decreased disclosure obligations in their SEC filings, including, among other things, only being required to provide two years of audited financial statements in annual reports.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The following risk factors, among others, could affect our actual results of operations and could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements made by us. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and except as required by law we assume no obligation to update this information. You should carefully consider the risks described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. Our common stock is considered speculative and the trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The following risk factors are not the only risk factors facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business.

Risks Related to our Business and Industry

We have a limited operating history and have generated limited revenues to date.

Our limited operating history makes evaluating the business and future prospects difficult, and may increase the risk of your investment. Our operating subsidiary in Israel was formed in March 2014. To date, we have generated limited revenues and have not yet begun meaningful commercialization efforts with respect to our products. We intend in the long-term to derive substantial revenues from the sales of our products as well as future models of other robots and our UAS platforms for both military and civilian use, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so.

We may not be able to obtain adequate financing to continue our operations.

We expect that we will need to raise additional funds to continue the design, manufacture, sale and servicing of our TIKAD as well as develop future robot products and other platforms for the implementation of our robot. We believe that we will need to raise additional capital in the future to fund our research and development and commercialization efforts. If we seek to raise additional capital, we may do so through the issuance of equity, equity-related, or debt securities or through obtaining credit from government or financial institutions or other persons. This capital will be necessary to fund ongoing operations, continue research, development and design efforts, establish a sales infrastructure and make the investments in tooling and equipment required to develop and manufacture our products. Moreover, the terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of holders of our securities and the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our common shares to decline. The New Debentures and the terms of the Convertible Loan Agreements (as such terms are defined below) each include terms that could create further dilution to other holders if we were to raise capital at a lower price per share or upon other terms, which could also make closing any such future financing, if any, more difficult. The incurrence of indebtedness could result in increased fixed payment obligations, and we may be required to agree to certain restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. We could also be required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or otherwise at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable, and we may be required to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or product candidates or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects. Even if we believe that we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations.

We may face business disruption and related risks resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our operations and business may have been disrupted and potentially adversely affected by COVID-19. The pandemic has caused states of emergency to be declared in various countries, travel restrictions imposed globally, quarantines established in certain jurisdictions and various institutions and companies being closed. COVID-19 has also adversely affect our ability to conduct our business effectively due to disruptions to our capabilities, availability and productivity of personnel, while we simultaneously attempt to comply with rapidly changing restrictions, such as travel restrictions, curfews and others. In particular, on January 24, 2021, the Government of Israel announced that effective January 26, 2021 non-Israeli residents or citizens, except for non-nationals whose lives are based in Israel, are not allowed to enter Israel, and the number of Israeli citizens permitted to enter the country per day will be capped at 3,000. In addition, the Ministry of Health in the State of Israel issued guidelines on March 11, 2020, which were most recently updated in March 2021, recommending people avoid gatherings in one space and providing that no gathering of more than 20 people should be held under any circumstances.

Employers (including us) are also required to prepare and increase as much as possible the capacity and arrangement for employees to work remotely. In addition, on January 25, 2021, the President of the United States issued a proclamation to restrict travel to the United States from foreign nationals who have recently been in China, Iran, South Africa, and certain European and Latin America countries. Although to date these restrictions have not impacted our operations, the effect on our business, from the spread of COVID-19 and the actions implemented by the governments of the State of Israel, the United States and elsewhere across the globe, may worsen over time.

The spread of COVID-19 may also result in the inability of our manufacturers to deliver components or finished products on a timely basis and may also result in the inability of our suppliers to deliver the parts required by our manufacturers to complete manufacturing of components or finished products. In addition, governments may divert spending from other budgeted resources as they seek to reduce and/or stop the spread of COVID-19. Such events may result in a period of business and manufacturing disruption, and in reduced operations, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts our business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. We are actively monitoring the pandemic and we are taking any necessary measures to respond to the situation in cooperation with the various stakeholders.

We have inadequate capital and need for additional financing to accomplish our business and strategic plans. Terms of subsequent financing, if any, may adversely impact your investment.

We have very limited funds, and such funds are not adequate to develop our current business plan. Our ultimate success may depend on our ability to raise additional capital. In the absence of additional financing or significant revenues and profits, the Company will have to approach its business plan from a much different and much more restricted direction, attempting to secure additional funding sources to fund its growth, borrowing money from lenders or elsewhere or to take other actions to attempt to provide funding.

We may have to engage in common equity, debt, or preferred stock financings in the future. Your rights and the value of your investment in the common stock could be reduced by the dilution caused by future equity issuances. Interest on debt securities could increase costs and negatively impact operating results. In the event we are permitted to issue preferred stock pursuant to the terms of our articles of incorporation, preferred stock could be issued in series from time to time with such designation, rights, preferences, and limitations as needed to raise capital. The terms of preferred stock would be more advantageous to those investors than to the holders of common stock. In addition, if we need to raise more equity capital from the sale of common stock, institutional or other investors may negotiate terms possibly less favorable to us, or which trigger dilutive issuances of our common stock to the holders of the New Debentures or the Primary Lenders (as such terms are defined below), and thereby adversely impact your investment. Shares of common stock which we sell from time to time could be sold into any market that develops, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Duke’s independent auditor firm has expressed in its report to Duke’s 2020 audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, a substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

We only recently entered the commercialization stage and the development and commercialization of our products are uncertain and expected to require substantial expenditures. We have not yet generated sufficient revenues from our operations to fund our activities, and are therefore dependent upon external sources for financing our operations. There is a risk that we will be unable to obtain necessary financing to continue our operations on terms acceptable to us or at all. As a result, Duke’s independent auditor firm has expressed in its auditors’ report on the financial statements for December 31, 2020, a substantial doubt regarding Duke’s ability to continue as a going concern. Duke’s financial statements for December 31, 2020, do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the uncertainty regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. This going concern opinion could materially limit our ability to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or debt securities or otherwise. Future reports on our financial statements may include an explanatory paragraph with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our stockholders may lose their entire investment in the common stock.

Our revenues will depend heavily on government contracts

We expect to derive most of our future revenues directly or indirectly from government agencies, mainly the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”). In addition, we offer our products to IMOD and intend to offer these to other governmental and quasi-governmental agencies around the world, including U.S. allies such as the NATO and equivalent authorities of various countries pursuant to contracts awarded to us under defense and homeland security-related programs. Technology products from foreign countries have an inherent disadvantage against domestic offerings. The funding of government programs could be reduced or eliminated due to numerous factors, including geo-political events and macro-economic conditions that are beyond our control. Reduction or elimination of government spending under our contracts would imperil the sales of our products and may cause a negative effect on our revenues, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.

We face other risks in our expected international sales.

We expect to derive a significant portion of our revenues ultimately from international sales. Changes in international, political, economic or geographic events could cause significant reductions in our revenues, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition to the other risks from international operations set forth elsewhere in these Risk Factors, some of the risks of doing business internationally include imposition of tariffs and other trade barriers and restrictions, political and economic instability in the countries of our customers and suppliers, changes in diplomatic and trade relationships and increasing instances of terrorism worldwide. Due to our subsidiary being located in the State of Israel, some of these risks may be affected by Israel’s overall political situation. (See “Risks Related to Israeli Law and Our Operations in Israel” below.)

We may experience production delays if suppliers fail to make compliant or timely deliveries.

The manufacturing process for some of our products largely consists of the assembly, integration and testing of purchased components. If a supplier stops delivery of such components, finding another source could result in added cost and manufacturing delays. Moreover, if our subcontractors fail to meet their design, delivery schedule or other obligations we could be held liable by our customers, and we may be unable to obtain full or partial recovery from our subcontractors for those liabilities. The foregoing risks could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

If we fail to manage growth or to prepare for product scalability effectively, it could have an adverse effect on our employee efficiency, product quality, working capital levels and results of operations.

Any significant growth in the market for our products or our entry into new markets may require an expansion of our employee base for managerial, operational, financial, and other purposes. As of March 30, 2021, we had only one (1) employee. During any period of growth, we may face problems related to our operational and financial systems and controls, including quality control and delivery and service capacities. We would also need to continue to expand, train and manage our employee base. Continued future growth will impose significant added responsibilities upon the members of management to identify, recruit, maintain, integrate, and motivate new employees.

Aside from increased difficulties in the management of human resources, we may also encounter working capital issues, as we will need increased liquidity to finance the development of new products, and the hiring of additional employees. For effective growth management, we will be required to continue improving our operations, management, and financial systems and controls. Our failure to manage growth effectively may lead to operational and financial inefficiencies that will have a negative effect on our profitability. We cannot assure investors that we will be able to timely and effectively meet that demand and maintain the quality standards required by our existing and potential customers.

We have applied for a patent for certain of our key technologies and may apply for additional patents in the future. Our ability to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology is uncertain and may be inadequate, which may have a material and adverse effect on us.

Our success depends significantly on our ability to protect our proprietary rights to the technologies used in our products. We applied for a patent with the United States Office Patent and Trademark Office to protect certain of our key technologies, however, we cannot assure you that we will be able to control all of the rights for all of our intellectual property. We do not know whether any of our current or future patent applications, if any, will result in the issuance of any patents. Even issued patents may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Patents may not provide a competitive advantage or afford protection against competitors with similar technology. Competitors or potential competitors may have filed applications for, or may have received patents and may obtain additional and proprietary rights to compounds or processes used by or competitive with ours. Both the patent application process and the process of managing patent disputes can be time-consuming and expensive. Competitors may be able to design around our patents or develop products which provide outcomes which are comparable or may even be superior to ours.

In the event a competitor infringes upon our intellectual property rights, enforcing those rights may be costly, uncertain, difficult and time consuming. Even if successful, litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our patents against challenge could be expensive and time consuming and could divert our management’s attention. We may not have sufficient resources to enforce our intellectual property rights or to defend our patents rights against a challenge. The failure to obtain patents and/or protect our intellectual property rights could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, we have taken steps to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology, including entering into confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with all of our executive officers, employees, consultants and advisors, however, such agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements. Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. However, we have not executed confidentiality agreement or non-compete agreements with our third-party suppliers and there is no restriction on their working with our competitors or selling our component designs to other parties. In that regard, we deem our complex kinematic algorithms and control software to be our most valuable intellectual property and is done in-house only with no sub-contractor involved.

We may become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit us from developing our products, require us to obtain licenses from third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives and subject us to substantial monetary damages.

Third parties could, in the future, assert infringement or misappropriation claims against us with respect to products we develop. Whether a product infringes a patent or misappropriates other intellectual property involves complex legal and factual issues, the determination of which is often uncertain. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual property rights of others. Our potential competitors may assert that some aspect of our product infringes their patents. Because patent applications may take years to issue, there also may be applications now pending of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patents upon which our products could infringe. There also may be existing patents or pending patent applications of which we are unaware upon which our products may inadvertently infringe.

Any infringement or misappropriation claim could cause us to incur significant costs, place significant strain on our financial resources, divert management’s attention from our business and harm our reputation. If the relevant patents in such claim were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found to infringe them, we could be prohibited from selling any product that is found to infringe unless we could obtain licenses to use the technology covered by the patent or are able to design around the patent. We may be unable to obtain such a license on terms acceptable to us, if at all, and we may not be able to redesign our products to avoid infringement. A court could also order us to pay compensatory damages for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest and could, in addition, treble the compensatory damages and award attorney fees. These damages could be substantial and could harm our reputation, business, financial condition and operating results. A court also could enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily or permanently enjoin us and our customers from making, using, or selling products, and could enter an order mandating that we undertake certain remedial activities. Depending on the nature of the relief ordered by the court, we could become liable for additional damages to third parties.

The sale of our products is subject to various regulatory requirements of the Israeli Ministry of Defense and will also be subject to regulatory requirements in countries in which we seek to sell our products.

Due to the fact that we sell products used that may be purchased in the defense and/ or military industry, and otherwise conduct business with the IMOD, we may be required to obtain approval from the IMOD with respect to each agreement for the sale of our products. In that regard, we are required to secure the approval of the IMOD prior to offering the sale of our products to any third party. In addition, we are required to obtain approvals from the IMOD prior to the execution and performance of any such agreement. If we fail to obtain approvals in the future, if approvals previously obtained are revoked or expire and are not renewed or if government policies change, our ability to sell our products and services to customers would be impacted, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, revenues, assets, liabilities and results of operations.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

In connection with the Share Exchange, Duke obtained a ruling (the “Ruling”) from the Israeli Tax Authority with regard to the exemption of the Share Exchange from being considered as a tax event for Israeli stockholder of Duke. The Ruling we obtained in connection with the Share Exchange imposes conditions that may limit our flexibility in operating our business and our ability to enter into certain corporate transactions.

The Ruling we obtained in connection with the Share Exchange imposes a number of conditions that limit our flexibility in operating our business and in engaging in certain corporate transactions. In accordance with the terms of the Ruling, until the two year anniversary of the Effective Time, we agreed to maintain (and, to the extent that our operations expand, likewise expand) the same economic activity for the Company after the Share Exchange as conducted by Duke prior to such transaction and that the Israeli Duke stockholders continue to hold at least twenty-five percent (25%) of their holding in the Company’s issued and outstanding stock at the Effective Time. Under certain circumstances, these conditions may not allow us the flexibility that we need to operate our business and may prevent us from taking advantage of strategic opportunities that would benefit our business and our stockholders.

Our executive officer, directors and certain stockholders who are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common shares possess the majority of our voting power, and through this ownership, have the ability to control our Company and our corporate actions.

Following the Share Exchange, our current executive officer and directors hold approximately 30% of the issued and outstanding voting power of the Company’s outstanding shares. These persons have a controlling influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors, and other significant corporate actions. As such, our directors and executive officer may have the power, acting alone or together, to prevent or cause a change in control; therefore, without their consent we could be prevented from entering into transactions that could be beneficial to us. The interests of our executive officer may give rise to a conflict of interest with the Company and the Company’s shareholders.

In addition, we have a number of stockholders who are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common shares, as of the Effective Time, including one such shareholder who beneficially owns approximately 19% of our issued and outstanding shares, and as such, also may have the ability to prevent us from entering into transactions that could be beneficial to us and/or other shareholders. In addition, we have four additional non-affiliated stockholders who are beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common shares. Although none of these non-affiliated stockholders currently have a controlling influence in determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including mergers, consolidations and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors, and other significant corporate actions, obtaining their vote on certain matters may be necessary to effect certain actions that our management and directors otherwise deem to be in the best interests of the Company.

There is a substantial lack of liquidity of our common stock and volatility risks.

Our common stock is traded on the over-the-counter market with quotations published on the OTC Markets Group, Inc.’s OTCQB tier Venture Market, under the symbol “USDR.” The trading volume of our common stock historically has been limited and sporadic, and the stock prices have been volatile. As a result of the limited and sporadic trading activity, the quoted price for our common stock on the over-the-counter market is not necessarily a reliable indicator of its fair market value. The price at which our common stock will trade in the future may be highly volatile and may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including, without limitation, any potential business combination that we announce, as well as the number of shares available for sale in the market.

The trading volume of our common stock may be limited and sporadic. This situation is attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk-averse and would be reluctant to follow an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common stock will develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained. As a result of such trading activity, the quoted price for our common stock on the OTCQB may not necessarily be a reliable indicator of our fair market value. In addition, if our shares of common stock cease to be quoted, holders would find it more difficult to dispose of or to obtain accurate quotation as to the market value of, our common stock and as a result, the market value of our common stock likely would decline.

Other factors that could have a similar impact include, but are not limited to:

Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common stock will be at any time, including as to whether our common stock will sustain current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common stock for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.

Because we became public by means of a “reverse merger,” we may not be able to attract the attention of major brokerage firms.

There may be risks associated with us becoming public through a “reverse merger.” Securities analysts of major brokerage firms and securities institutions may not provide coverage of us because there were no broker-dealers who sold our stock in a public offering that would be incentivized to follow or recommend the purchase of our common stock. The absence of such research coverage could limit investor interest in our common stock, resulting in decreased liquidity. No assurance can be given that established brokerage firms will, in the future, want to cover our securities or conduct any secondary offerings or other financings on our behalf.

Our common stock may never be listed on a major stock exchange.

While we may seek the listing of our common stock on a national or other securities exchange at some time in the future, we currently do not satisfy the initial listing standards and cannot ensure that we will be able to satisfy such listing standards or that our common stock will be accepted for listing on any such exchange. Should we fail to satisfy the initial listing standards of such exchanges, or our common stock is otherwise rejected for listing, the trading price of our common stock could suffer, the trading market for our common stock may be less liquid, and our common stock price may be subject to increased volatility.

Our common stock is subject to price volatility unrelated to us or our operations.

The market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially due to a variety of factors, including quarterly operating results of other companies in the same industry, changes in general conditions in the economy and the financial markets, including COVID-19 or other developments affecting the Company’s competitors. In addition, the OTCQB is subject to extreme price and volume fluctuations in general. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market price of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their operating performance and could have the same effect on our common stock.

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Sales of our currently issued and outstanding stock may become freely tradable pursuant to Rule 144 and may dilute the market for your shares and have a depressive effect on the price of the shares of our common stock.

A substantial portion of the outstanding shares of common stock are “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the Securities Act (“Rule 144”). As restricted shares, these shares may be resold only pursuant to an effective registration statement or under the requirements of Rule 144 or other applicable exemptions from registration under the Securities Act and as required under applicable state securities laws. Rule 144 provides in essence that a non-affiliate who has held restricted securities for a period of at least six (6) months may sell their shares of common stock. Under Rule 144, affiliates who have held restricted securities for a period of at least six (6) months may, under certain conditions, sell every three months, in brokerage transactions, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of 1% of a company’s outstanding shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume during the four calendar weeks prior to the sale (the four calendar week rule does not apply to companies quoted on the OTCQB). A sale under Rule 144 or under any other exemption from the Securities Act, if available, or pursuant to subsequent registrations of our shares of common stock, may have a depressive effect upon the price of our shares of common stock in any active market that may develop.

The securities issued in connection with the Share Exchange are restricted securities and may not be transferred in the absence of registration or the availability of a resale exemption.

The shares of common stock being issued in connection with the Share Exchange are being issued in reliance on an exemption from the registration requirements under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Consequently, these securities will be subject to restrictions on transfer under the Securities Act and may not be transferred in the absence of registration or the availability of a resale exemption. In particular, in the absence of registration, such securities cannot be resold to the public until certain requirements under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act have been satisfied, including certain holding period requirements. As a result, a purchaser who receives any such securities issued in connection with the Share Exchange may be unable to sell such securities at the time or at the price or upon such other terms and conditions as the purchaser desires, and the terms of such sale may be less favorable to the purchaser than might be obtainable in the absence of such limitations and restrictions.

We do not plan to declare or pay any dividends to our stockholders in the near future.

We have not declared any dividends in the past, and we do not intend to distribute dividends in the near future. The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be made at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, the results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, operating and capital requirements, and other factors as the board of directors considers relevant. There is no assurance that future dividends will be paid, and if dividends are paid, there is no assurance with respect to the amount of any such dividend.

“Penny Stock” rules may make buying or selling our common stock difficult.

Trading in our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These rules require that any broker-dealer that recommends our common stock to persons other than prior customers and accredited investors, must, prior to the sale, make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to execute the transaction. Unless an exception is available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with trading in the penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers must disclose commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities they offer. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common stock, which could severely limit the market price and liquidity of our common stock.

The sales practice requirements of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted Rule 2111 that requires a broker-dealer to have reasonable grounds for believing that an investment is suitable for a customer before recommending the investment. Prior to recommending speculative low-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy the Company’s common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell the Company’s stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

Risks Related to Israeli Law and Our Operations in Israel

We have offices and other significant operations are located in Israel, and, therefore, our results may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel.

While our executive offices are located in the United States, we maintain offices in Israel. In addition, many of our officers and directors are residents of Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel may directly affect our business. Any armed conflicts, political instability, terrorism, cyberattacks or any other hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade between Israel and its present trading partners could affect adversely our operations. Ongoing and revived hostilities in the Middle East or other Israeli political or economic factors, could harm our operations and solution development and cause any future sales to decrease.

In addition, instability in the region may lead to deterioration in the political and trade relationships that exist between the State of Israel and certain other countries. Any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region could adversely affect business conditions, could harm our results of operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital. Parties with whom we do business may sometimes decline to travel to Israel during periods of heightened unrest or tension, forcing us to make alternative arrangements when necessary in order to meet our business partners face to face. Several countries, principally in the Middle East, still restrict doing business with Israel and Israeli companies, and additional countries may impose restrictions on doing business with Israel and Israeli companies if hostilities in Israel or political instability in the region continues or increases. Similarly, Israeli companies are limited in conducting business with entities from several countries. For instance, in 2008, the Israeli legislature passed a law forbidding any investments in entities that transact business with Iran. In addition, the political and security situation in Israel may result in parties with whom we have agreements involving performance in Israel claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions in such agreements.

Our commercial insurance does not cover losses that may occur as a result of events associated with war and terrorism. Although the Israeli government currently covers the reinstatement value of direct damages that are caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war, we cannot assure you that this government coverage will be maintained or that it will sufficiently cover our potential damages. Any losses or damages incurred by us could have a material adverse effect on our business. Any armed conflicts or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect business conditions and could harm our results of operations.

Further, in the past, the State of Israel and Israeli companies have been subjected to economic boycotts. Several countries still restrict business with the State of Israel and with Israeli companies. These restrictive laws and policies may have an adverse impact on our operating results, financial conditions or the expansion of our business. A campaign of boycotts, divestment and sanctions has been undertaken against Israel, which could also adversely impact our business.

In addition, Israel is experiencing a level of unprecedented political instability. The Israeli government has been in a transitionary phase since December 2018, when the Israeli Parliament, or the Knesset, first resolved to dissolve itself and call for new general elections. Since then, Israel held general elections four times – in April and September of 2019, in March of 2020 and in March of 2021. The Knesset has not passed a budget for the year 2021, and certain government ministries, which may be critical to the operation of our business, are without necessary resources and may not receive sufficient funding moving forward. In the event that the current political stalemate is not resolved during 2021, our ability to conduct our business effectively may be adversely affected.

Finally, many Israeli citizens are obligated to perform several days, and in some cases more, of annual military reserve duty each year until they reach the age of 40 (or older, for reservists who are military officers or who have certain occupations) and, in the event of a military conflict, may be called to active duty. In response to increases in terrorist activity, there have been periods of significant call-ups of military reservists. It is possible that there will be military reserve duty call-ups in the future. Our operations could be disrupted by such call-ups, which may include the call-up of members of our management. Such disruption could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Our operations are subject to currency and interest rate fluctuations.

We incur expenses in U.S. dollars and NIS, but our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars. The U.S. dollar is our functional currency. However, as we also incur expenses in NIS, we are affected by foreign currency exchange fluctuations through both translation risk and transaction risk. As a result, we are exposed to the risk that the NIS may appreciate relative to the dollar, or, if the NIS instead devalues relative to the dollar, that the inflation rate in Israel may exceed such rate of devaluation of the NIS, or that the timing of such devaluation may lag behind inflation in Israel. In any such event, the dollar cost of our operations in Israel would increase and our dollar-denominated results of operations would be adversely affected.

It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of a United States court against us and our officers and directors to assert United States securities laws claims in Israel or to serve process on our officers and directors and these experts.

Our executive office, corporate headquarters and manufacturing facilities are located in Israel. In addition, all of our officers and directors are residents of Israel. All of our assets and most of the assets of these persons are located in Israel. Service of process upon us or our non-U.S. resident directors and officers and enforcement of judgments obtained in the United States against us or our non-U.S. our directors and executive officers may be difficult to obtain within the United States. We have been informed by our legal counsel in Israel that it may be difficult to assert claims under U.S. securities laws in original actions instituted in Israel, or obtain a judgment based on the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws. Israeli courts may refuse to hear a claim based on a violation of U.S. securities laws against us or our non-U.S. officers and directors because Israel may not be the most appropriate forum to bring such a claim. In addition, even if an Israeli court agrees to hear a claim, it may determine that Israeli law and not U.S. law is applicable to the claim. If U.S. law is found to be applicable, the content of applicable U.S. law must be proved as a fact, which can be a time-consuming and costly process. Certain matters of procedure will also be governed by Israeli law. There is little binding case law in Israel addressing the matters described above. Israeli courts might not enforce judgments rendered outside Israel, which may make it difficult to collect on judgments rendered against us or our non-U.S. officers and directors.

Moreover, an Israeli court will not enforce a non-Israeli judgment if it was given in a state whose laws do not provide for the enforcement of judgments of Israeli courts (subject to exceptional cases), if its enforcement is likely to prejudice the sovereignty or security of the State of Israel, if it was obtained by fraud or in the absence of due process, if it is at variance with another valid judgment that was given in the same matter between the same parties, or if a suit in the same matter between the same parties was pending before a court or tribunal in Israel at the time the foreign action was brought.

Our operations may be disrupted as a result of the obligation of management or key personnel to perform military service.

Our employees and consultants in Israel, including members of our senior management, may be obligated to perform one month, and in some cases longer periods, of military reserve duty until they reach the age of 40 (or older, for citizens who hold certain positions in the Israeli armed forces reserves) and, in the event of a military conflict, may be called to active duty. In response to increases in terrorist activity, there have been periods of significant call-ups of military reservists. It is possible that there will be similar large-scale military reserve duty call-ups in the future. Our operations could be disrupted by the absence of a significant number of our officers, directors, employees and consultants. Such disruption could materially adversely affect our business and operations.

General Risk Factors

We operate in a competitive industry.

While we believe that we are the only developer and manufacturer of UASs capable of pinpoint accurate firing of light weapons, the UAS market generally in which we participate is highly competitive and becoming more so. This market is also characterized by rapid and innovative technological change. If we are unable to improve existing systems and products and develop new systems and technologies in order to meet evolving customer demands, our business could be adversely affected. In addition, our competitors could introduce new products with innovative capabilities, which could adversely affect our business. We compete with many large and mid-tier defense companies on the basis of system performance, cost, overall value, delivery and reputation. Many of these competitors are larger and have greater resources than us, and therefore may be better positioned to take advantage of economies of scale and develop new technologies.

Undetected problems in our products could impair our financial results and give rise to potential product liability claims.

If there are defects in the design, production or testing of our products and systems, we could face substantial repair, replacement or service costs, potential liability and damage to our reputation. Defects or malfunctioning of our products, if they were to occur, would likely result in significant damage and loss of life. We may not be able to obtain product liability or other insurance to fully cover such risks, and our efforts to implement appropriate design, testing and manufacturing processes for our products or systems may not be sufficient to prevent such occurrences, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business depends on proprietary technology that may be infringed.

Many of our systems and products depend on our proprietary technology for their success. Like other technology-oriented companies, we rely on a combination of trade secrets, copyrights and trademarks, together with non-disclosure agreements, confidentiality provisions in sales, procurement, employment and other agreements and technical measures to establish and protect proprietary rights in our products. While we are in the process of seeking patents for our technology, there is no guarantee that such patents will be granted. Our ability to successfully protect our technology may be limited because:

In addition, various parties may assert infringement claims against us. The cost of defending against infringement claims could be significant, regardless of whether the claims are valid. If we are not successful in defending such claims, we may be prevented from the use or sale of certain of our products, or liable for damages and required to obtain licenses, which may not be available on reasonable terms, any of which may have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operation or financial condition.

Potential product liability claims could adversely affect our future earnings and financial condition.

We face an inherent business risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of our products results in adverse effects. We may not be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance for these liabilities at reasonable cost and/or reasonable terms. Excessive insurance costs or uninsured claims would add to our future operating expenses and adversely affect our financial condition.

We rely on highly skilled personnel and, if we are unable to retain or motivate key personnel or hire additional qualified personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively.

Our performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate, and retain highly skilled personnel for all areas of our organization. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to retain and motivate existing employees. Due to our reliance upon skilled laborers, the failure to attract, integrate, motivate, and retain current and/or additional key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. We do not maintain key person life insurance for any of our employees.

Our management team may not be able to successfully implement our business strategies.

If our management team is unable to execute on its business strategies, then our development, including the establishment of revenues and our sales and marketing activities would be materially and adversely affected. In addition, we may encounter difficulties in effectively managing the budgeting, forecasting and other process control issues presented by any future growth. We may seek to augment or replace members of our management team or we may lose key members of our management team, and we may not be able to attract new management talent with sufficient skill and experience.

Significant disruptions of our information technology systems or breaches of our data security could adversely affect our business.

A significant invasion, interruption, destruction or breakdown of our information technology systems and/or infrastructure by persons with authorized or unauthorized access could negatively impact our business and operations. We could also experience business interruption, information theft and/or reputational damage from cyber-attacks, which may compromise our systems and lead to data leakage either internally or at our third party providers. Our systems have been, and are expected to continue to be, the target of malware and other cyber-attacks. Although we have invested in measures to reduce these risks, we cannot assure that these measures will be successful in preventing compromise and/or disruption of our information technology systems and related data.

A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise working capital and adversely impact our ability to continue operations.

A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. A decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our liquidity and our operations. Such reductions may force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and may have a significant negative effect on our business plan and operations, including our ability to develop new services and continue our current operations. If our common stock price declines, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations. If we are unable to raise sufficient capital in the future, we may not be able to have the resources to continue our normal operations.

The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and distract management.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. These requirements are extensive. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting.

We may incur significant costs associated with our public company reporting requirements and costs associated with applicable corporate governance requirements. We expect all of these applicable rules and regulations to significantly increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time consuming and costly. This may divert management’s attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We also expect that these applicable rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified individuals to serve on our board of directors or as executive officers. We are currently evaluating and monitoring developments with respect to these rules, and we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur or the timing of such costs.

Future changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse unexpected financial reporting fluctuations and affect reported results of operations.

A change in accounting standards or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct business.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 2. Properties.

Our principal executive office is currently located at 1 Etgar Street, Tirat-Carmel, Israel. In July 2018 and June 2019, Duke Israel executed two independent lease agreements (the “2018 Lease” and the “2019 Lease”) to lease separate spaces at the address of our principal executive office. The July 2018 Lease was in effect until June 30, 2020 and afterwards continues on a monthly basis, subject to a 60 days’ prior notice of termination, while the June 2019 Lease is in effect for 12 months from the date thereof and includes two successive optional extension periods of 12 months each. In addition, pursuant to an agreement entered into by Duke, we have the right to use office space and receive other administrative services at a location in the State of Florida.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

On February 14, 2018, a complaint was filed against the: (i) Duke, (ii) Duke Israel, (iii) Aphek Trading Kadosh and Razi Ltd. (“Aphek”) an Israeli corporation owned by Raziel Atuar and Amir Kadosh, and (iv) Mr. Sagiv Aharon, currently, Duke’s CTO and Director by Blackhawk Laboratories (the “Plaintiff”), a U.S. based company, in the Central District of Israel (Case No. 31727-02-18). Following a procedural agreement between the Plaintiff and defendants, the complaint was transferred to the District Court in Tel Aviv.

The complaint asserts a claim for breach of contract, breach of duty, negligence and unjust enrichment with regards to a services agreement dated June 13, 2014, between the Plaintiff and Duke Israel. The complaint asserts that Duke Israel agreed to pay for certain services alleged to have been performed by the Plaintiff and that the Plaintiff was entitled to receive 8% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Duke Israel over a 12 month period from June 2014 to June 2015.

The Plaintiff’s complaint seeks an order requiring either Duke Israel to issue to the Plaintiff 8% of its issued and outstanding shares of our common stock; or alternatively for Duke to issue to the plaintiff 4.8% of its issued and outstanding shares of our common stock; or alternatively for Aphek and Mr. Aharon Sagiv to transfer 8% of their shareholdings in Duke to the Plaintiff.

The defendants believe the Plaintiff’s complaint has no merit and they intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Duke does not believe the lawsuit will have a material effect on the Company as Mr. Raziel Atuar, Mr. Amir Kadosh and Mr. Sagiv Aharon have agreed to indemnify the Company and Duke Israel for any losses to the Company and Duke Israel as a result thereof, including, but not limited to monetary damages and be responsible for the issuance of any shares of common stock of Duke Israel or Duke in the event the Plaintiff is successful in its lawsuit.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “USDR.” As of March 30, 2021, there were 143 holders of record of our common stock. This figure includes an indeterminate number of stockholders who hold their shares in “street name.”

We have not declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and do not intend to declare dividends in the foreseeable future. Management intends to use all available funds for the development of our plan of operation.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our audited annual consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report. All amounts are in U.S. dollars and rounded.

Company Overview

On March 9, 2020, Duke and certain shareholders of Duke entered into the Share Exchange with the Company, pursuant to which approximately 99% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Duke were purchased by the Company in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock, resulting in Duke becoming a subsidiary of the Company. Following the Share Exchange, the Company has adopted the business plan of Duke.

On April 29, 2020, the Company, Duke, and UAS Sub, entered into the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which UAS Sub was to merge, upon the satisfaction of customary closing conditions, with and into Duke. Upon closing of the Short-Form Merger, each outstanding share of UAS Sub’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, was to be converted into and become one share of common stock of Duke, with Duke surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company intended to acquire the remaining outstanding shares of Duke held by certain stockholders of Duke that did not participate in the Share Exchange Agreement. At the closing of the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the Company was to issue 63,856 shares to certain Duke stockholders, and Duke will become a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On June 25, 2020, Duke filed a Certificate of Merger with the State of Delaware, and consequently, Duke became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the Short-Form Merger was consummated.

As the result of the Share Exchange and the change in business and operations of the Company, a discussion of the past financial results of the Company is not pertinent, and under applicable accounting principles the historical financial results of Duke, the accounting acquirer, prior to the Share Exchange are considered the historical financial results of the Company.

Operating Results

The selected historical financial information presented below is derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 and Duke’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. The data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes elsewhere in this prospectus.

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2020 to the year ended December 31, 2019

Revenues. We had no revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we derived revenues from demonstrations of our technology to a potential customer of $112,000.

Cost of Revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we had no cost of revenues expenses, compared to $105,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019, which consisted primarily of direct costs relating to the demonstration projects including components and equipment purchased from suppliers, sub-contractors and labor costs. The decrease in our cost of revenues expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, is mainly as a result of the Company’s efforts towards the consummation of the Share Exchange, the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-1 and the consummation of the Short-Form Merger pursuant to which Duke became our wholly-owned subsidiary, resulting in a temporary freeze of our operations.

Research and Development. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we had no research and development expenses, compare to $75,000 in research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2019. Our research and development expenses, for the year ended December 31, 2019, consisted primarily of salaries and related expenses and professional services. The decrease in our research and development expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, is mainly as a result of the Company’s efforts towards the consummation of the Share Exchange, the filing of a Registration Statement on Form S-1 and the consummation of the Short-Form Merger pursuant to which Duke became our wholly-owned subsidiary, resulting in a temporary freeze of our research and development operations.

General and Administrative Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our general and administrative expenses amounted to $1,305,000, of which $645,000 were related to stock-based compensation expenses, and were $961,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019, of which $540,000 related to stock-based compensation expenses. This increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 was mainly due to an increase in stock-based compensation of $105,000 and of legal and other professional expenses of $309,000, and offset by a decrease in rent and office maintenance of $82,000.

Financial Expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, our financial expense amounted to $63,000 and $82,000, respectively.

Net Loss. For the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we recorded a net loss of $1,368,000 and $1,111,000, respectively, which represented an increase compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, of $257,000.

Critical Accounting Policies

This MD&A of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). In connection with the preparation of our financial statements, we were required to make assumptions and estimates about future events, and apply judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and the related disclosures. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material. As applicable to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus, the most significant estimates and assumptions relate to the going concern assumptions, convertible loans Derivative Liabilities and Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Instruments with Down Round Features.

Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the notes to consolidated financial statement, which are incorporated by reference into this prospectus. Our management believes that, as for the financial statements for the periods included in this prospectus, the “going concern” assessment and accounting for Derivative Liabilities and Fair Value of Financial Instruments are critical accounting policies. However, due to the early stage of operations of our Company, there are no other accounting policies that are considered to be critical accounting policies by management.

Going Concern Uncertainty

The development and commercialization of our product will require substantial expenditures. We have not yet generated any material revenues and have incurred substantial accumulated deficit and negative operating cash flows. We currently have no sources of recurring revenue and are therefore dependent upon external sources for financing its operations. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in obtaining the necessary financing to continue our operations. As a result, our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, we have devoted substantially all our efforts to research and development and is still in the development stage. We have incurred accumulated losses since inception of $5,131,000 and the extent of its future operating losses and the timing of becoming profitable are uncertain. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate as a going concern. Our ability to continue operating as a “going concern” is dependent on several factors, among them is the ability to raise sufficient additional funding. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, our loss of $1,368,000 included non-cash stock-based compensation of $645,000. As of December 31, 2020, we had a negative working capital of $1,176,000, as compared to a negative working capital of $1,491,000 as of December 31, 2019.

As of December 31, 2020, we had a cash balance of $105,000 compared to the cash balance of $23,000 as of December 31, 2020. We have no cash equivalents.

Since our inception we and Duke have funded our operations through bank loans, loans provided by its shareholders and demonstration projects of its technology to potential customers.

On August 5, 2015, Duke obtained a loan from an Israeli bank pursuant to which NIS 250,000 ($65,000) was provided at a variable annual rate of 3.6%. The loan was repaid in August 2020.

On February 29, 2016, Duke signed a loan agreement with an Israeli bank pursuant to which NIS 500,000 ($128,000) was provided at a variable annual rate of 4.25%. The loan was repaid in full in February 2021.

As of December 31, 2020, the outstanding balance of the bank loans stood at $6,000 and as of December 31, 2019 at $37,000.

Since Duke’s inception until 2017, certain Duke stockholders provided loans (“Stockholders’ Loans”) on an as needed basis. Loans in the amount of $685,000 bear an annual fixed interest of 3% and loans in the amount of $313,000 bear an annual interest rate as defined in Section 3(j) of the Israeli tax ordinance, which is currently at 2.62%.

Before entering into the Share Exchange, Duke entered into debt cancellation letters (the “Debt Cancellation Letters”) with regard to the Stockholders Loans. Pursuant to the Debt Cancellation Letters the accumulated interest on the Stockholders’ Loans was waived and 842,135 shares of Duke’s common stock were issued in exchange for the cancellation of $623,180 in debt, leaving $280,000 of outstanding Stockholders Loans (the “Outstanding Stockholders’ Loans”). The Outstanding Stockholders’ Loans, including the accumulated interest amount, shall be repaid on the earlier of the following: (i) three years after the Effective Date; or (ii) Duke raised capital amounting to at least $15 million following the Effective Date and the Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization of Duke has reached an amount of $3 million.

As of December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, the outstanding balances of such stockholders’ loans were $288,000 and $1,006,000, respectively.

In connection with the Share Exchange, immediately prior to the Effective Time, we entered into the Convertible Loan Agreements. The terms of the Convertible Loan Agreements require repayment of the borrowed amount by the one-year anniversary of the Effective Time, unless, at our discretion, and subject to our compliance with any and all terms of the material terms of the Convertible Loan Agreements, the term of such loans is extended for an additional twelve (12) month period. The terms of the Convertible Loan Agreements also provide that we may repay any portion of the remaining outstanding loan amount, without penalty, provided, however, that we provide the specific lender with three business days’ written notice prior to such repayment, during which time the lender may elect to convert any or all of the outstanding loan amount into shares of our common stock. The Convertible Loan Agreements bear simple interest at a rate equal to 15% per annum, payable on the 15th day of each calendar month. On December 9, 2020, we utilized our rights under the Convertible Loan Agreements and extended the terms of the loans for an additional twelve months.

The lenders will have the option to convert the unpaid balance of their respective Convertible Loans into shares of our common stock based on the lower of (A) lowest effective price per share set in connection with any funds raised by our during the six (6) months following the Effective Time. “Effective price” per share means (i) if only shares of our common stock are sold in a transaction, the amount actually received in cash by our and (ii) if shares of our common stock are sold in a transaction and, in connection therewith additional securities or rights are sold or otherwise issued, the amount actually received in cash by us, for the shares of our common stock and such additional rights upon their issuance, reduced by the aggregate fair market value of the additional rights (as determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model or another method determined by us in good faith), in each case divided by the number of shares of our common stock issued in such transaction; (B) 80% of the lowest effective price per share set in connection with any funds raise by USDR at any time subsequent to six (6) months following the Effective Time until such time as the loans outstanding under all of the Convertible Loan Agreements are fully repaid or otherwise converted provided, however, that such price per share shall not be available in the event of an issuance of Alternative Securities to the lender); (C) a price per share reflecting our post-money valuation of $15,000,000 following the next investment in us following the Effective Time; or (D) the conversion price, as adjusted for a Dilutive Event, under the New Debentures. The conversion price is currently $0.374. As of March 30, 2021, the Convertible Loan Agreements have an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $835,000.

Also, in connection with the Share Exchange, we entered into the Alpha Agreement and GBC Agreement, pursuant to which it issued to each party shares of common stock and the New Debentures in the aggregate amount of $400,000, which mature three years from the Effective Time and have an interest rate of 8% per year. The New Debentures have an Original Conversion Price but may be adjusted in the event of a Dilutive Event. As of March 30, 2021, the New Debentures have an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $200,000.

The spread of COVID-19 throughout the world may result in a period of business and manufacturing disruption, and in reduced operations, any of which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations especially regarding its ability to obtain the necessary finance to continue Duke’s operations. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Company’s business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others.

We intend to continue to undertake efforts to raise additional funding; provided, however, that there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise capital, or that any capital raise will be on favorable terms or on terms that do not create further dilution to our stockholders. In addition, we do not know if the COVID-19 pandemic will have a material effect on our ability to raise capital or if this will require us to raise capital on terms less favorable to us as a result of global market conditions or as a result of the direct effect, if any, of COVID-19 on our business.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

All information required by this item is included in Item 15 of Part IV of this Annual Report and is incorporated into this item by reference.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

During the year ended December 31, 2020, there were no changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosures or otherwise.

Effective March 9, 2020, and in connection with the closing of the Share Exchange, the Company’s board of directors effected a change to its independent registered public accounting firm from D. Brooks and Associates CPAs, P.A. (the “Former Auditor”) to Halperin Ilanit CPA (the “New Auditor”).

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the subsequent interim period through March 9, 2020, there were (i) no “disagreements” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) between the Company and the Former Auditor on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of the Former Auditor, would have caused the Former Auditor to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in its reports on the Company’s financial statements and (ii) no “reportable events” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions), except for the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives and ineffective controls over period-end financial reporting and disclosure processes, as disclosed in Item 9A of each of the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

The Company provided the Former Auditor with a copy of the Current Report on Form 8-K that it filed on March 10, 2020, which contained the above disclosure, prior to filing with the SEC and requested that the Former Auditor furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether the Former Auditor agrees with the statements in the Current Report on Form 8-K that was filed on March 10, 2020. The letter from the Former Auditor was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 10, 2020 and it is incorporated by reference into this prospectus.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the subsequent interim period through March 9, 2020, neither the Company, nor anyone on its behalf, consulted the New Auditor regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company by the New Auditor that the New Auditor concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a “disagreement” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a “reportable event” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our then CEO and CFO, as in place as of December 31, 2020, evaluated, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2020, pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act. This evaluation included a review of the controls’ objectives and design, the operation of the controls, and the effect of the controls on the information presented in this Annual Report. Our management, including the then CEO and CFO, do not expect that disclosure controls can or will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud, if any. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide such reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Also, the projection of any evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures to future periods is subject to the risk that the disclosure controls and procedures may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Based on their review and evaluation, and subject to the inherent limitations described above, our then CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were not effective as of December 31, 2020, at the above-described reasonable assurance level.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, management identified the following weaknesses, which were deemed to be material weaknesses in internal controls:

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even internal controls determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations, including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the possibility of human error, and the risk of fraud. The projection of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies may deteriorate. Because of these limitations, there can be no assurance that any system of internal control over financial reporting will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud or in making all material information known in a timely manner to the appropriate levels of management.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Commission that exempt from this requirement issuers that are neither accelerated filers nor large accelerated filers.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2020, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Based on this assessment, management, as in place as of December 31, 2020, determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, was not effective.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.

Our directors and executive officer and their ages as of March 30, 2021, are as follows:

Yariv Alroy, Director and Chairman. Mr. Yariv Alroy is the Managing Director of T.N.S.A Consulting and Management LTD., a private consulting services and investments firm. From 1989 to 1993 Mr. Alroy worked for an Israeli law firm, with his last position as a partner. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Alroy served as COO of SHAHAL Medical Services, and from 1997 to 2000 as Managing Director of SHL International Ltd. From 2000 until January 2016 Mr. Alroy served as Co-CEO of SHL Telemedicine LTD a company in the field of medical technology development and provision of global telemedicine services, including in the United States, Germany, India, Japan and Israel, traded in the Swiss Stock exchange (SWX:SHLTN). In December 2018 Mr. Alroy was nominated as member of the board of directors and Chairman of SHL Telemedicine. Yariv Alroy holds an LL.B from Tel Aviv University.

Yossi Balucka, CEO and President. Mr. Yossef Balucka has been serving as CEO and President of our Company, Duke and Duke Israel since March 2021. Prior to entering the private sector, Mr. Balucka served for twenty-five years in various field and headquarters positions in the Israeli Navy and retired as Colonel. Following his retirement from the Israeli Navy, between 2014 to 2016, Mr. Balucka served as a senior executive and management member for retail and customer service at Partner Communications Ltd. (TASE:PTNR), one of the leading mobile telecommunications companies in Israel. From 2017 to 2019 Mr. Balucka served as the CEO of Electra Technologies Ltd., a division of Electra Ltd. (TASE:ELTR), which is active in the fields of integrated electro-mechanical and construction. Since 2019 Mr. Balucka is the owner of T.R. Eshkolot Com Services Ltd., providing global strategic consulting services. Mr. Balucka holds a BA in Economics and Business Administration and an MA in Social Sciences from the Haifa University, and MA in Public Administration from the Bar Ilan University.

Sagiv Aharon, CTO and Director. Mr. Sagiv Aharon co-founded Duke Israel and served as the Company’s CEO from March 2020 until March 2021. From 2008 to 2010, Mr. Aharon worked at the Israeli Aerospace Industry as a structural design engineer on a classified hybrid structure (composite/metal) air vehicle. From 2010 to 2011, Mr. Aharon worked at Rafael Advanced Weapon Systems Ltd. as a mechanical design engineer for complex active/reactive armor solutions for land vehicles. From 2011 to 2012, Mr. Aharon worked for Elbit Systems Ltd. (NASDAQ:ESLT) as a mechanical design engineer and a system integrator at several remotely operated weapon systems upon land vehicles. Mr. Aharon also serves as the CEO of Axis Aerospace Mechanical Design Ltd., a company working in the field of airborne structural projects and flight experiments, following strict aerospace level quality standards (AS9100). Mr. Aharon holds a B.Sc. in mechanical engineering with specialty in control and robotics from the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.

Erez Nachtomy, Director, Vice Chairman of the Board. Mr. Erez Nachtomy is the Managing Director of Ermi Nachtomy Assets Ltd., a private consulting services and investments firm. Since May 2020 Mr. Nachtomy is the Acting CEO of SHL Telemedicine Ltd. (SWX:SHLTN). From 1989 until 2001, Mr. Nachtomy practiced law as an associate in one of the leading law firms in Israel, becoming a partner in the firm in 1994 and later on promoted to a senior partner. In March 2001, Mr. Nachtomy joined the executive team of SHL Telemedicine Ltd. (SWX:SHLTN), as Vice President, and from January 2005 to December 2016 he served as Executive Vice President. SHL Telemedicine Ltd. is active in the field of medical technology development and provision of global telemedicine services, including in the United States, Germany, India and Japan. In December 2018 Mr. Nachtomy was nominated as Member of the Board of SHL Telemedicine, and since May 2021 Mr. Nachtomy has been serving as the acting CEO of SHL Telemedicine Ltd. Mr. Nachtomy holds an LL.B. from Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Eran Antebi, Director. Mr. Antebi is the Finance Director Omrix Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (a Johnson & Johnson company) since February 2017. Prior to that he was CFO of SHL Telemedicine Ltd. (SWX:SHLTN) since 2008. Mr. Antebi joined SHL in May 2004 as CFO of Shahal Israel. Prior to joining SHL, from 2000 to 2004, Mr. Antebi was a manager with Ernst & Young in Israel. Mr. Antebi is a certified public accountant (CPA) in Israel and holds a B.A. in Accounting and Economics from Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Shlomo Zakai, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Zakai brings extensive and proven experience in similar positions with companies operating in international markets and related industries. Prior to joining the Company Mr. Zakai served as the Chief Financial Officer of Save Foods, Inc. (SAFO:OTC) (August 2017 to date), Sonovia Ltd. (NNTTF:OTC) (October 2014 to August 2020), Blue Sphere Corp. (BLSP:OTC) (January 2012 till May 2016) and of Todos Medical Ltd. (TOMDF:OTC) (February 2017 till January 2018). Prior to that, Mr Zakai worked as an accountant for nine years at Kost, Forer, Gabbay & Kasierer, an independent registered public accounting firm and a member firm of Ernst & Young Global, where he last served as a Senior Manager and worked with technology companies publicly traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Mr. Zakai holds a B.A. in accounting from the College of Management in Rishon Le’Zion, Israel.

Family Relationship

There is no family relationship among the directors and officers of the Company.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Over the past ten (10) years, none of our directors or our executive officer have been (i) involved in any petition under Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law, (ii) convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses), (iii) subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from (a) acting as a future’s commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity, (b) engaging in any type of business practice, or (c) engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws, or (d) subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right to engage in any activity described in (iii)(a), (iv) found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the SEC has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated, (v) found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated. (vi) subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of (a) any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation, (b) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, or (c) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity, or (vii) the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member. Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Transactions with Related Persons; Promoters and Certain Control Persons; Director Independence,” none of our directors, director nominees or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Code of Ethics

We uphold a set of basic values to guide our actions and are committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance. Effective March 9, 2020, we adopted an Amended and Restated Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors, officers (including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer) and employees, which, in conjunction with our Certificate of Incorporation, and Bylaws, as amended (the “Bylaws”) form the framework for governance of UAS. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, Bylaws and Article of Incorporation are available at our corporate offices. Stockholders may request free printed copies of these documents from:

UAS Drone Corp.

Attn: CFO

Etgar 1 St.

Tirat Carmel, Israel, 3903212

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the SEC and to provide us with copies of those filings.

We have reviewed all forms provided to us or filed with the SEC. Based on that review and on written information given to us by our executive officers and directors, we believe that all Section 16(a) filings during the past fiscal year were filed on a timely basis and that all directors, executive officers and 10% beneficial owners have fully complied with such requirements during the past fiscal year, except as follows:

Committees of the Board of Directors

We do not have an audit or compensation committee and have no independent directors that examines transactions of the nature described herein this item. We do not have any audit or compensation committee. the board of directors performs these functions as a whole. Thus, there is a potential conflict in that board members who are also part of management will participate in discussions concerning management compensation and audit issues that may affect management decisions. To the extent possible, a majority of the disinterested members of our board of directors will approve future affiliated transactions. Additionally, because the Company’s Common Stock is not listed for trading or quotation on a national securities exchange, we are not required to have such committees.

Nominees to the Board of Directors

During the Company’s 2020 fiscal year, there were no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the board of directors.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Summary Compensation Table

The following sets forth the compensation of UAS’s Chief Executive Officer during fiscal 2020, and the other persons who served as executive officers during the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2020. Unless otherwise noted, the amounts shown represent what was earned in the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE – FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020

Restricted Stock Awards

There were no shares of restricted stock awarded during the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth information concerning outstanding equity awards for the named executives as of December 31, 2020. Note that the 5,000 shares expiring on December 31, 2019 were granted prior to expiration in conjunction with the Share Exchange.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT DECEMBER 31, 2020

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

There are no outstanding equity awards for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2020

There were no plan-based equity awards made to our executive officers during fiscal 2020.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

There are no option exercises and restricted stock that vested during fiscal 2020 for our named executives.

Pension Benefits

The Company does not have any plans that provide for payments or other benefits at, following, or in connection with retirement.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The Company does not have a Deferred Compensation Plan for its executive officers.

Other Potential Post-Employment Payments

As of December 31, 2020, there were no named executives with employment contracts that require or required severance or other post-employment payments.

Summary Information about Equity Compensation Plans

As of December 31, 2020, we had no stock option plans.

No Loans for Option Exercises. It is our policy to not make loans to employees or officers for the purpose of paying for the exercise of stock options.

Director Compensation

We reimburse directors for out-of-pocket expenses they incur when attending meetings of the board of directors. On April 12, 2020, effective as of March 1, 2020, our board of directors approved payment of certain fees to our directors in the amounts of $4,980, $4,980 and $6,950 per month to our directors, Yariv Alroy, Sagiv Aharon and Erez Nachtomy (each, an “Active Director”), respectively. On April 12, 2020, we also enacted a policy to pay each director (that is not otherwise an Active Director) an amount of $1,500 for each calendar quarter and $400 for attendance of each meeting of the board of directors. These amounts are exclusive of Israeli VAT, if applicable.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 30, 2021 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock, for:

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities. Except as otherwise indicated, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our capital shown as beneficially owned, subject to applicable community property laws.

In computing the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by a person, shares that may be acquired by such person within 60 days of the date of this prospectus are counted as outstanding, while these shares are not counted as outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed below is c/o Duke Robotics, 1 Etgar Street (1st Floor), Tirat-Carmel, Israel 3903212.

We relied on information received from each stockholder as to beneficial ownership, including information contained on Schedules 13D and 13G and Forms 3, 4 and 5. As of March 30, 2021, there were 41,169,035 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Changes in Control

There are no arrangements known to the Company, including any pledge by any person of securities of the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Currently, there is no equity compensation plan in place.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Transactions with Related Persons

Loan Agreements

On January 1, 2015 the Duke executed a Loan Agreement with Aphek, whereby Aphek agreed to provide a loan up to an amount of approximately $132,000 (the “Aphek Loan”). On January 1, 2015 Duke executed a Loan Agreement with Sagiv Aharon whereby he agreed to provide a loan of approximately $55,000 (the “Sagiv Loan”). The Aphek Loan and Sagiv Loan bear interest rates as defined in Section 3(j) of the Israeli tax ordinance (the interest rate for 2015 is 3.05% and 2.56% for 2016). On June 5, 2016, Duke executed a Loan Agreement with Iki Alroy Investment Ltd., Erez Alroy Investment Ltd. and Ermi Nachtomy Assets Ltd. (collectively, the “Lenders”), whereby the Lenders agreed to provide a loan in an aggregate amount of $100,000 to $500,000 in the aggregate (the “Group Loan”). Pursuant to the terms of the Group Loan, the Lenders were scheduled to provide monthly installments of between $20,000 and $40,000, subject to the Lender’s discretion. The Group Loan bears an annual fixed interest rate of 3%. Any additional amounts lent to Duke in 2017 by Aphek, Sagiv or the Lenders, over the amounts stated in the Aphek Loan and Sagiv Loan agreements or the Group Loan agreement, were made available to Duke on the same terms as stated in the respective agreements.

On November 20, 2017, Duke Israel made available to Mr. Sagiv Aharon, Duke’s CEO and CTO and Director, a loan in the amount of $10,000. This loan shall bear interest rates as defined in the Israeli tax ordinance. The Loan, including the accumulated interest amount, shall be repaid at the earlier of the following dates: (i) December 31, 2019; or (ii) at the date of repayment of the loan made available by Mr. Aharon to Duke according to a loan agreement dated January 1, 2015; or (iii) from any dividend or other distribution to be made by Duke to its shareholders. Mr. Aharon is entitled to repay the outstanding amount of the loan at any time.

On November 20, 2017, Duke made available to Mr. Raziel Atuar, then Duke’s CEO, a loan in the amount of $10,000. The loan shall bear an annual fixed interest of 3.25%. This loan, including the accumulated interest, shall be repaid at the earlier of the following dates: (i) December 31, 2019; or (ii) at the date of repayment of the loan made available by Aphek to Duke Israel, according to a loan agreement dated January 1, 2015; (iii) from any dividend or other distribution to be made by Duke to its shareholders. Mr. Atuar is entitled to prepay the outstanding amount of the loan at any time.

The loans made from Duke to each of Messrs. Aharon and Atuar were extinguished in connection with the Debt Cancellation Letters (as defined below) and are referred to as the Personal Loans.

Before entering into the Share Exchange Agreement, Duke entered into debt cancellation letters (the “Debt Cancellation Letters”) with each of the Lenders who are parties to the Group Loan and with each of Aphek and Sagiv Aharon under each of the Aphek and Sagiv Loans and their respective Personal Loans. Pursuant to the Debt Cancellation Letters, (i) 166,602 shares of Duke common stock were issued in exchange for the cancellation of $123,286 in debt, leaving $55,394 outstanding under the Aphek Loan, (i) 75,059 shares of Duke common stock were issued in exchange for the cancellation of $55,544 in debt, leaving $24,956 outstanding under the Sagiv Loan and (i) 600,474 shares of Duke common stock were issued in exchange for the cancellation of $444,350 in debt, leaving $199,650 outstanding under the Group Loan (collectively, the “Outstanding Duke Debt”).

The Outstanding Duke Debt, including interest (which shall bear an annual fixed interest rate of 3% as of January 1, 2020), shall be repaid at the date upon which Duke or the Company raises at least $15 million and has achieved earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization of $3 million, but not before the three year anniversary of the Effective Time and the full repayment of the amounts outstanding under the Convertible Loan Agreements, unless such repayment is otherwise waived by the parties to the Convertible Loan Agreements.

Registration Rights Agreement

The Company entered into the Registration Rights Agreement with, among others, Alpha, GBC, the Primary Lenders, to permit them to have their securities in the Company included in a registration statement for resale by the holder when filed by the Company on a piggyback basis and one demand registration right. The Company is responsible for bearing the costs of any of these acts of registration of the securities. The Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the SEC, which was declared effective on June 19, 2020, in compliance with the requirements of the Registration Rights Agreement.

Director Independence

The board of directors has not determined that we have any independent directors.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The following is a summary of the fees billed by our principal auditor during the calendar years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

Audit fees - Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal auditor for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q or services that are normally provided by our principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-related fees - Consists of fees for assurance and related services by our principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of UAS’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit fees.”

Tax fees - Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All other fees - Consists of fees for products and services provided by our principal accountants, other than the services reported under “Audit fees,” “Audit-related fees” and “Tax fees” above.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Financial Statements.

(b) Exhibits.

Exhibit

(c) Financial Statement Schedules.

The following documents are filed as part of this Report:

See Index to Financial Statements

All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is presented in the financial statements or the notes to the financial statements.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

UAS DRONE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020

UAS DRONE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF

UAS DRONE CORP., INC.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of UAS Drone Corp. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years in the period ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year in the period ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has not yet generated material revenues from its operations to fund its activities and is therefore dependent upon external sources for financing its operations. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has incurred accumulated deficit of $5,131 thousands and negative operating cash flows. These factor among others, as discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of’ these uncertainties. This matter is also described in the “Critical Audit Matters” section of our report.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Going concern assessment

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has not yet generated material revenues from its operations to fund its activities and is therefore dependent upon external sources for financing its operations. As of December 31, 2020, the Company has incurred accumulated deficit of $5,131 thousands and negative operating cash flows. These factor among others, as discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1 to the financial statements. This matter is also described in the “Emphasis of Matter – Going Concern” section of our report.

We identified management’s assumptions used to assess the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern as a critical audit matter due to inherent complexities and uncertainties related to the Company’s Management’s plans. Auditing this assumptions involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

Fair value measurement of Level 3 liabilities

As discussed in Notes 2M and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company entered into several Convertible Loan Agreements and in accordance with ASC 815-15-25, the conversion feature was considered an embedded derivative instrument, and is to be recorded at its fair value as its fair value can be separated from the convertible loan and its conversion is independent of the underlying note value. The Company recorded finance expenses in respect of the convertible component in the convertible loan in the excess amount of the convertible component fair value over the face loan amount.

The fair value of the convertible component was estimated by third party appraiser using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, to compute the fair value of the derivative and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, these convertible component are generally classified as Level 3 convertible component.

We identified Level 3 convertible component as a critical audit matter because of the complex proprietary models and unobservable inputs management uses to estimate the fair value. This evaluation required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our internal valuation specialists who possess significant quantitative and modeling expertise, to audit and evaluate the appropriateness of these models and inputs.

Our audit procedures related to the complex proprietary models and unobservable inputs used by management to estimate the fair value of Level 3 convertible component included the following, among others: 

/s/ Halperin Ilanit.

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Tel Aviv, Israel

March 30, 2021

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019

UAS DRONE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(USD in thousands except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

UAS DRONE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(USD in thousands except share and per share data)

UAS DRONE CORP.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(USD in thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

UAS DRONE CORP.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(USD in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 1 – GENERAL

UAS Drone Corp. (“the Company” or “USDR”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on February 4, 2015. Prior to the Company’s formation, the operations were functioning under Unlimited Aerial Systems, LLP (“UAS LLP”). UAS LLP was formed under the laws of the State of Louisiana on August 22, 2014. Effective March 31, 2015, the Company completed a reverse merger with UAS LLP. The reverse merger was accounted for as a reverse capitalization.

On March 9, 2020, the Company closed on the Share Exchange Agreement (as defined hereunder), pursuant to which, Duke Robotics, Inc. (“Duke Inc.”) a corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware, became a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company. Duke Inc. has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Duke Airborne Systems Ltd. (“Duke Israel,” and collectively with Duke Inc., “Duke”), which was formed under the laws of the State of Israel in March 2014 and became the sole subsidiary of Duke after its incorporation.

On April 29, 2020, the Company, Duke Inc., and UAS Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“UAS Sub”), executed an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which UAS Sub merged with and into Duke Inc. Upon closing of the Short-Form Merger (as defined hereunder), each outstanding share of UAS Sub’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, was converted into and became one share of common stock of Duke Inc., with Duke Inc. surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company intended to acquire the remaining outstanding shares of Duke Inc. held by certain stockholders of Duke Inc. that did not participate in the Share Exchange Agreement (as defined hereunder).

On April 30, 2020, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1, which was declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on June 19, 2020, to register: (i) 63,856 shares of common stock of the Company that were issued to certain stockholders of Duke Inc. upon the consummation of the Short-Form Merger; (ii) 14,614,751 shares of common stock of the Company of certain selling stockholders named in the S-1 Registration Statement; and (iii) 3,649,733 shares of common stock of the Company issuable upon conversion of Convertible Notes (see Note 6 below).

On June 25, 2020, at the closing of the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 63,856 shares to certain Duke Inc. stockholders, and Duke Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

The Company (collectively with Duke, the “Group”) is a robotics company dedicated to the development of an advanced robotics stabilization system that enables remote, real-time, pinpoint accurate firing of small arms and light weapons. The Company’s advanced robotics system is able to achieve pinpoint accuracy regardless of the movement of the weapons platform or the target.

On January 29, 2021, the Company, through Duke Israel, and Elbit Systems Land Ltd., an Israeli corporation, entered into a collaboration agreement for the global marketing and sales, and the production and further development of our developed advanced robotic system mounted on an UAS, armed with lightweight firearms, which we market under the commercial name “TIKAD.” 

Effective October 22, 2020, Company’s common stock in quoted on the OTC Markets Group, Inc.’s OTCQB® tier Venture Market, under the symbol “USDR”.

Merger Transaction

On March 4, 2020, USDR entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with Duke Inc., and certain shareholders of Duke Inc. who executed and delivered the Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to which Duke Inc. became a majority-owned subsidiary of USDR (the “Share Exchange”). The Share Exchange closed on March 9, 2020. Such closing date is referred to as the “Effective Time.”

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 1 – GENERAL (continue)

Before entering into the Share Exchange Agreement: (i) Duke entered into debt cancellation letters (the “Debt Cancellation Letters”) with each of its Stockholders with regard to the Stockholders Loans.

Pursuant to the Debt Cancellation Letters, 842,135 shares of the Duke Inc. common stock (1,046,016 shares post Exchange Ratio) were issued in exchange for the cancellation of $623 in debt, leaving $280 of outstanding Stockholders Loans. These Stockholders Loans, including interest (which shall bear an annual fixed interest rate of 3% as of January 1, 2020), shall be repaid at the date upon which the Company raises at least $15 million and has achieved earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization of $3 million, but not before the three year anniversary of the Effective Time and the full repayment of the amounts outstanding under certain convertible loan agreements in the aggregate amount of $965 (each, a “Convertible Loan Agreement”) (see Note 6B) entered into at the Effective Time, unless such repayment is otherwise waived by the parties to the Investors’ Loan; (ii) Loans made from Duke to an executive officer and a former executive officer, who are also stockholders were extinguished in connection with the Debt Cancellation Letters; (iii) Duke issued a consultant 1,146,005 shares of the Duke Inc. common stock (1,423,453 shares post Exchange Ratio), at par value, regarding services rendered to Duke Inc. The fair value of the shares issued was estimated at $429 and were recorded to share based compensation expenses.; and (iv) a convertible loan agreement in amount of $400 bearing an annual interest rate of 6%, including accumulated interest in amount of $48, was converted into 700,000 shares of Duke Inc. common stock (869,470 shares post Exchange Ratio).

In conjunction with the consummation of the Share Exchange, and as a condition thereof, the USDR entered into the agreements listed below:

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 1 – GENERAL (continue)

Pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, at the Effective Time, the Company issued an aggregate of 28,469,065 shares of its common stock to the Duke Inc. stockholders in exchange for 22,920,107 shares of Duke’s Inc. issued and outstanding shares of common stock, representing approximately 99% of Duke’s Inc. issued and outstanding shares of common stock. Accordingly, each outstanding share of Duke Inc. common stock was exchanged for the right to receive 1.2421 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Exchange Ratio”). Of the shares of Duke Inc. common stock that were exchanged for shares of the Company’s common stock, 51,410 (representing 63,856 shares of the Company’s common stock post-Share Exchange) were issued but remained in escrow until the Company completed the Short-Form Merger (as defined hereunder). On June 25, 2020, at the closing of the transaction contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the Company released the shares in escrow.

As such, at the Effective Time, the Duke stockholders owned an equivalent of approximately 71% of the Company’s common stock. After giving effect to the Share Exchange, Duke became a subsidiary of the Company. Following the Share Exchange, the Company adopted the business plan of Duke.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 1 – GENERAL (continue)

The transaction was accounted for as a reverse asset acquisition in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Under this method of accounting, Duke was deemed to be the accounting acquirer for financial reporting purposes. This determination was primarily based on the facts that, immediately following the Merger: (i) Duke’s stockholders owned a substantial majority of the voting rights in the combined company, (ii) Duke designated a majority of the members of the initial board of directors of the combined company, and (iii) Duke’s senior management holds all key positions in the senior management of the combined company. As a result of the Recapitalization Transaction, the shareholders of Duke received the largest ownership interest in the Company, and Duke was determined to be the “accounting acquirer” in the Recapitalization Transaction. As a result, the historical financial statements of the Company were replaced with the historical financial statements of Duke. The number of shares prior to the reverse capitalization have been retroactively adjusted based on the equivalent number of shares received by the accounting acquirer in the Recapitalization Transaction.

On April 29, 2020, the Company, Duke Inc. and UAS Sub, executed the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which UAS Sub merged with and into Duke, with Duke surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Short-Form Merger”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on June 25, 2020, the Company acquired the remaining outstanding shares of Duke held by those certain Duke shareholders that did not participate in the Share Exchange.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused states of emergency to be declared in various countries, travel restrictions imposed globally, quarantines established in certain jurisdictions and various institutions and companies being closed. COVID-19 has also adversely affect the Group’s ability to conduct its business effectively due to disruptions to its capabilities, availability and productivity of personnel, while the Group simultaneously attempts to comply with rapidly changing restrictions, such as travel restrictions, curfews and others. In particular, on January 24, 2021, the Government of Israel announced that effective January 26, 2021, non-Israeli residents or citizens, except for non-nationals whose lives are based in Israel, are not allowed to enter Israel, and the number of Israeli citizens permitted to enter the country per day will be capped at 3,000. In addition, the Ministry of Health in the State of Israel issued guidelines on March 11, 2020, which were most recently updated in March 2021, recommending people avoid gatherings in one space and providing that no gathering of more than 20 people should be held under any circumstances. Employers (including the Group) are also required to prepare and increase as much as possible the capacity and arrangement for employees to work remotely. In addition, on January 25, 2021, the President of the United States issued a proclamation to restrict travel to the United States from foreign nationals who have recently been in China, Iran, South Africa, and certain European and Latin America countries. Although to date these restrictions have not impacted the Group’s operations, the effect on its business, from the spread of COVID-19 and the actions implemented by the governments of the State of Israel, the United States and elsewhere across the globe, may worsen over time. The spread of COVID-19 may also result in the inability of the Group’s manufacturers to deliver components or finished products on a timely basis and may also result in the inability of the Group’s suppliers to deliver the parts required by its manufacturers to complete manufacturing of components or finished products. In addition, governments may divert spending from other budgeted resources as they seek to reduce and/or stop the spread of COVID-19. Such events may result in a period of business and manufacturing disruption, and in reduced operations, any of which could materially affect the Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The extent to which COVID-19 impacts the Group’s business will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of COVID-19 and the actions to contain COVID-19 or treat its impact, among others. The Group is actively monitoring the pandemic and it is taking any necessary measures to respond to the situation in cooperation with the various stakeholders.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 1 – GENERAL (continue)

Going Concern

Since inception, the Group has devoted substantially all its efforts to research and development. The Group is still in its development stage and the extent of the Group’s future operating losses and the timing of becoming profitable, if ever, are uncertain. As of December 31, 2020, the Group had $105 in cash and cash equivalents, net losses of $1,368, an accumulated deficit of $5,131, and a negative working capital of $1,176.

The Group will need to secure additional capital in the future in order to meet its anticipated liquidity needs primarily through the sale of additional Common Stock or other equity securities and/or debt financing. Funds from these sources may not be available to the Group on acceptable terms, if at all, and the Group cannot give assurance that it will be successful in securing such additional capital.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Group’s ability to continue to operate as a “going concern.” The Company’s ability to continue operating as a going concern is dependent on several factors, among them is the ability to raise sufficient additional funding.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Risk factors

The Group faces a number of risks, including uncertainties regarding finalization of the development process, demand and market acceptance of the Group’s products, the effects of technological changes, competition and the development of products by competitors. Additionally, other risk factors also exist, such as the ability to manage growth and the effect of planned expansion of operations on the Group’s future results. In addition, the Group expects to continue incurring significant operating costs and losses in connection with the development of its products and marketing efforts. The Group has not yet generated significant revenues from its operations to fund its activities, and therefore the continuance of its activities as a going concern depends on the receipt of additional funding from its current stockholders and investors or from third parties.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 2– SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. As applicable to these financial statements, the most significant estimates and assumptions relate to the going concern assumptions and convertible loans.

A majority of the Group’s expected revenues is generated in dollars. In addition, most of the Group’s costs are denominated and determined in dollars and in new Israeli shekels. Management believes that the dollar is the currency in the primary economic environment in which the Group operates. Thus, the functional and reporting currency of the Group is the dollar.

Accordingly, monetary accounts maintained in currencies other than the dollar are remeasured into dollars in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 830, “Foreign Currency Matters.” All transaction gains and losses of the remeasured monetary balance sheet items are reflected in the statements of operations as financial income or expenses, as appropriate.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries Duke Inc., UAS Sub and Duke Israel. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments which include short term bank deposits (up to three months from date of deposit), that are not restricted as to withdrawals or use that are readily convertible to cash with maturities of three months or less as of the date acquired.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 2– SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continue)

The Group’s long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC Topic 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. No impairment expenses were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019.

The Group accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC Topic 740-10”). Accordingly, deferred income taxes are determined utilizing the asset and liability method based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial accounting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities under the applicable tax law. Deferred tax balances are computed using the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these differences reverse. Valuation allowances in respect of deferred tax assets are provided for, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts more likely than not to be realized.

The Group accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC Topic 740-10, which prescribes detailed guidance for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. According to ASC Topic 740-10, tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold. The Company’s accounting policy is to classify interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions under income taxes, however the Company did not recognize such items in its fiscal 2020 and 2019 financial statements and did not recognize any liability with respect to an unrecognized tax position in its balance sheets.

Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred.

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss for the period applicable to shareholders, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Securities that may participate in dividends with the shares of common stock (such as the convertible preferred) are considered in the computation of basic loss per share under the two class method. However, in periods of net loss, only the convertible preferred shares are considered, since such shares have a contractual obligation to share in the losses of the Company.

In computing diluted loss per share, basic loss per share is adjusted to reflect the potential dilution that could occur upon the exercise of potential shares. Accordingly, in periods of net loss, no potential shares are considered.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 2– SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continue)

The Company measures and recognizes the compensation expense for all equity-based payments to employees based on their estimated fair values in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation.” Share-based payments including grants of stock options are recognized in the statement of comprehensive loss as an operating expense based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant. The fair value of stock options granted is estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company has expensed compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, applying the accelerated vesting method, over the requisite service period or over the implicit service period when a performance condition affects the vesting, and it is considered probable that the performance condition will be achieved.

Share-based payments awarded to consultants (non-employees) are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees.”

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents as well as certain other current assets that do not amount to a significant amount. Cash and cash equivalents, which are primarily held in Dollars and New Israeli Shekels, are deposited with major banks in Israel and the United States. Management believes that such financial institutions are financially sound and, accordingly, minimal credit risk exists with respect to these financial instruments. The Company does not have any significant off-balance-sheet concentration of credit risk, such as foreign exchange contracts, option contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements.

The Company records accruals for loss contingencies arising from claims, litigation and other sources when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessments change or additional information becomes available. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.

Fair value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or equity instruments and measurement of their fair value for accounting purposes. In assessing the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional convertible debt under ASC 470, the Company will continue its evaluation process of these instruments as derivative financial instruments under ASC 815. 

Once determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an adjustment to fair value of derivatives.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 2– SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continue)

Fair value of certain of the Company’s financial instruments including cash, accounts receivable, account payable, accrued expenses, notes payables, and other accrued liabilities approximate cost because of their short maturities. The Company measures and reports fair value in accordance with ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure” (“ASC 820”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value investments.

Fair value, as defined in ASC 820, is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of an asset should reflect its highest and best use by market participants, principal (or most advantageous) markets, and an in-use or an in-exchange valuation premise. The fair value of a liability should reflect the risk of non-performance, which includes, among other things, the Company’s credit risk.

Valuation techniques are generally classified into three categories: the market approach; the income approach; and the cost approach. The selection and application of one or more of the techniques may require significant judgment and are primarily dependent upon the characteristics of the asset or liability, and the quality and availability of inputs. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. ASC 820 also provides fair value hierarchy for inputs and resulting measurement as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that are supported by little or no market activity, and that are significant to the fair values.

Fair value measurements are required to be disclosed by the Level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall. Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (in Level 3 measurements) are subject to expanded disclosure requirements including a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances, separately presenting changes during the period attributable to the following: total gains or losses for the period (realized and unrealized), segregating those gains or losses included in earnings, and a description of where those gains or losses included in earning are reported in the statement of income.

The Company records a debt discount related to the issuance of convertible debts that have conversion features at adjustable rates. The debt discount for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds as an increase in additional paid-in capital and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the fair value of the conversion features. The debt discount will be accreted by recording additional non-cash gains and losses related to the change in fair values of derivative liabilities over the life of the convertible notes.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 2– SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continue)

The Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

The following table presents the changes in fair value of the level 3 liabilities for the Year ended December 31, 2020:

The Company accounts Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features based on ASU 2017-11, “Earnings per share: I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features,” which allows companies to exclude a down round feature when determining whether a financial instrument is considered indexed to the entity’s own stock. As a result, financial instruments with down round features may no longer be required to be accounted classified as liabilities. A company will recognize the value of a down round feature only when it is triggered, and the strike price has been adjusted downward. For equity-classified freestanding financial instruments, such as warrants, an entity will treat the value of the effect of the down round, when triggered, as a dividend and a reduction of income available to common shareholders in computing basic earnings per share.

Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2020

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued an ASU that supersedes the existing impairment model for most financial assets to a current expected credit loss model. The new guidance requires an entity to recognize an impairment allowance equal to its current estimate of all contractual cash flows the entity does not expect to collect. The Group adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2020, with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This guidance replaces the current incurred loss impairment methodology. Under the new guidance, on initial recognition and at each reporting period, an entity is required to recognize an allowance that reflects its current estimate of credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the financial instrument based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 2– SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continue)

The guidance became effective on January 1, 2020, including interim periods within that year and requires a modified retrospective transition approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated. The Company has performed its analysis of the impact on its financial instruments that are within the scope of this guidance and has concluded that there was no material impact to its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure

Framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement” (“ASU No. 2018-13”) as part of the FASB’s broader disclosure framework project. ASU No. 2018-13 removes, modifies and adds certain disclosures, providing greater focus on requirements that clearly communicate the most important information to the users of the financial statements with respect to fair value measurements. The adoption of ASU No. 2018-13 as of January 1, 2020 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): “Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes, eliminates certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and clarifies certain aspects of the current guidance to improve consistent application among reporting entities. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2022, though early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period for which financial statements have not yet been issued. This standard is not expected to have a material impact to the Company’s consolidated financial statements after evaluation.

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, “Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options” (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. ASU 2020-06 will simplify the accounting for convertible instruments by reducing the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock. Limiting the accounting models results in fewer embedded conversion features being separately recognized from the host contract as compared with current GAAP. Convertible instruments that continue to be subject to separation models are (1) those with embedded conversion features that are not clearly and closely related to the host contract, that meet the definition of a derivative, and that do not qualify for a scope exception from derivative accounting and (2) convertible debt instruments issued with substantial premiums for which the premiums are recorded as paid-in capital. ASU 2020-06 also amends the guidance for the derivatives scope exception for contracts in an entity’s own equity to reduce form-over-substance-based accounting conclusions. ASU 2020-06 will be effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2020-06 will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Other new pronouncements issued but not effective as of December 31, 2020 are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 3 – OTHER CURRENT ASSTES

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

In the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, depreciation was US$ 5 and US$ 2 respectively.

NOTE 5 –OTHER ACCOUNTS LIABILITIES

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE LOANS

In accordance with ASC 815-15-25, the conversion feature was considered an embedded derivative instrument, and is to be recorded at its fair value as its fair value can be separated from the convertible loan and its conversion is independent of the underlying note value. The Company recorded finance expenses in respect of the convertible component in the convertible loan in the excess amount of the convertible component fair value over the face loan amount. The conversion liability is then marked to market each reporting period with the resulting gains or losses shown in the statements of operations.

The fair value of the convertible component was estimated by third party appraiser using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, to compute the fair value of the derivative and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company has estimated the fair value of such derivative at a value of $132 at the date of issuance and at a value of $26 as of December 31, 2020. The following are the data and assumptions used as of the balance sheet date:

The fair value allocated to loans out of the New Debentures was estimated by third party appraiser based on the debentures’ and market interest’ rates and was estimated at a value of $332 at the issuance date. The access of the calculated fair values of the loan and the convertible components over the loan face amounted to $67, and was recorded as interest expenses.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES (continue)

The lenders will have the option to convert the unpaid balance of their respective Convertible Loans into shares of Company’s common stock based on the lower of (A) lowest effective price per share set in connection with any funds raised by the Company during the six (6) months following the Effective Time. “Effective price” per share means (i) if only shares of Company’s common stock are sold in a transaction, the amount actually received in cash by the Company, and (ii) if shares of Company’s common stock are sold in a transaction and, in connection therewith additional securities or rights are sold or otherwise issued, the amount actually received in cash by the Company, for the shares of Company’s common stock and such additional rights upon their issuance, reduced by the aggregate fair market value of the additional rights (as determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model or another method determined by the Company in good faith), in each case divided by the number of shares of Company’s common stock issued in such transaction; (B) 80% of the lowest effective price per share set in connection with any funds raise by the Company at any time subsequent to six (6) months following the Effective Time until such time as the loans outstanding under all of the Convertible Loan Agreements are fully repaid or otherwise converted provided, however, that such price per share shall not be available in the event of an issuance of Alternative Securities to the lender); (C) a price per share reflecting a post-money valuation of the Company of $15million following the next investment in the Company following the Effective Time; or (D) the conversion price, as adjusted for a Dilutive Event, under the New Debentures. The conversion price is currently $0.374. As of March 30, 2021, the Convertible Loan Agreements have an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $835 as a result of the conversions of certain Convertible Loan Agreements (see note 15 below).

In accordance with ASC 815-15-25, the conversion feature was considered an embedded derivative instrument, and is to be recorded at its fair value as its fair value can be separated from the convertible loan and its conversion is independent of the underlying note value. The Company recorded finance expenses in respect of the convertible component in the convertible loan in the excess amount of the convertible component fair value over the face loan amount. The conversion liability is then marked to market each reporting period with the resulting gains or losses shown in the statements of operations.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES (continue)

The fair value of the convertible component was estimated by third party appraiser using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, to compute the fair value of the derivative and to mark to market the fair value of the derivative at each balance sheet date. The Company has estimated the fair value of such derivative at a value of $144 at the date of issuance and at a value of $22 as of December 31, 2020. The following are the data and assumptions used as of the balance sheet date:

The fair value allocated to loans net of the convertible component was estimated at a value of $822 at the issuance date.

NOTE 7 - STOCKHOLDERS LOANS

Since Duke’s inception and until 2017, certain Duke affiliates provided loans to Duke from time to time, as needed. Some of the Stockholders Loans bear an annual fixed interest at 3.00% and some of the Stockholders Loans bear an annual interest rate as defined in section 3(j) of the Israeli tax ordinance (the interest rate 2019 was set on 2.56% per annum). The Stockholders’ loans, including the accumulated interest amount, were to be repaid in full within 7-15 days from any capital raised by the Company or related parties of the Company, whether by a stock offering and / or loans in excess of NIS 10 million (approximately $2.5 million).

As detailed in note 1 above, before entering into the Share Exchange Agreement: (i) Duke entered into Debt Cancellation Letters with each of its Stockholders with regard to the Stockholders Loans noted above. Pursuant to the Debt Cancellation Letters, 842,135 shares of the Duke Inc. common stock (1,046,016 shares post Exchange Ratio) were issued in exchange for the cancellation of $623 in debt, waiving $83 of accrued interest and leaving $280 of outstanding Stockholders Loans. These Stockholders Loans, including interest (which shall bear an annual fixed interest rate of 3% as of January 1, 2020), shall be repaid at the date upon which the Company raises at least $15 million and has achieved earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization of $3 million, but not before the three year anniversary of the Effective Time and the full repayment of the amounts outstanding under certain convertible loan agreements in the aggregate amount of $965 (see additional information in Note 6B).

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 8 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Description of the rights attached to the Shares in the Company:

The holders of shares of Common Stock vote together as one class on all matters as to which holders of Common Stock are entitled to vote. Except as otherwise required by applicable law and subject to the preferential rights of any outstanding preferred stock, all voting rights are vested in and exercised by the holders of Common Stock with each share of our Common Stock being entitled to one vote, including in all elections of directors. The Company does not have a classified board of directors (the “Board”). Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding preferred stock, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board out of legally available funds therefore. In the event of the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of the Common Stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to prior liquidation rights of preferred stock, if any, then outstanding. The Common Stock has no cumulative voting rights and no preemptive or other rights to subscribe for shares of the Company. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the Common Stock. All shares of Common Stock currently outstanding are fully paid and non-assessable.

Transactions:

On June 1, 2018, the Company granted an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock to a consultant at a value of $3.00 per share of common stock in exchange for consulting services. The stock will be issued to the consultant over a 3-year vesting period. On June 1, 2019 the Company issued to the consultant the first tranche of 66,667 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2020 the Company recorded compensation expenses in regard to such offering in the amount of $108.

Refer to notes 1 above regarding shares issued during 2020.

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS

The following table presents Duke Inc.’s stock option activity the year ended December 31, 2020:

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands)

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS (continue)

The aggregate intrinsic value of the awards outstanding as of December 31, 2020 is $0. These amounts represent the total intrinsic value, based on the Company’s stock price of $0.374 as of December 31, 2020, less the weighted exercise price. This represents the potential amount received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date.

The stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2020, have been separated into exercise prices, as follows:

The stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2019, have been separated into exercise prices, as follows:

Compensation expense recorded by the Company in respect of its stock-based compensation awards for the period ended December 31, 2020 was $108 and are included in General and Administrative expenses in the Statements of Operations

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands , except share and per share data)

NOTE 10 – GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

NOTE 11 – LITIGATION

On February 14, 2018, a complaint was filed against the: (i) Duke Inc., (ii) Duke Israel, (iii) Aphek Trading Kadosh and Razi Ltd. (“Aphek”) an Israeli corporation owned by Raziel Atuar and Amir Kadosh, and (iv) Mr. Aharon Sagiv, currently, the Chief Technology Officer and Director of the Company, by Blackhawk Laboratories (the “Plaintiff”), a U.S. based company, in the Tel Aviv District of Israel (Case No. 31727-02-18). The complaint asserts a claim for breach of contract, breach of duty, negligence and unjust enrichment with regard to a services agreement dated June 13, 2014 between the Plaintiff and Duke. The complaint asserts that Duke Israel agreed to pay for certain services alleged to have been performed by the Plaintiff and that the Plaintiff was entitled to receive 8% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of, over a 12 month period from June 2014 to June 2015. The Plaintiff’s complaint seeks an order requiring either Duke Israel to issue to the Plaintiff 8% of its issued and outstanding shares of our common stock; or alternatively for Duke Inc. to issue to the Plaintiff 4.8% of its issued and outstanding shares of our common stock; or alternatively for Aphek and Mr. Aharon Sagiv to transfer 8% of their shareholdings in the Company to the Plaintiff.

The defendants believe the Plaintiff’s complaint has no merit and they intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The Company and Duke Inc. do not believe the lawsuit will have a material effect on the Company as all three co-founders of the Company (Raziel Atuar, Amir Kadosh and Sagiv Aharon) have agreed to indemnify the Group for any losses resulting from the lawsuit, including taking responsibility for the issuance of any shares of the Group’s common stock in the event the Plaintiff is successful in its lawsuit.

UAS DRONE CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(USD in thousands , except share and per share data)

NOTE 12 – INCOME TAX

U.S. resident companies are taxed on their worldwide income for corporate income tax purposes at a statutory rate of 21% this reflect certain effects of the Act which includes a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% as well as other changes. No further taxes are payable on this profit unless that profit is distributed. If certain conditions are met, income derived from foreign subsidiaries is tax exempt in the US under applicable tax treaties to avoid double taxation.

Income of the Israeli company is taxable from 2018 onwards, at corporate tax rate of 23%.

The Company and subsidiaries have not received final tax assessments since its inception.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company and subsidiaries had carry forward losses for tax purposes of approximately $1,225 and $2,813, respectively, which can be offset against future taxable income, if any.