Umatrin Holding Ltd - Quarter Report: 2011 April (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 333-153261

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	87-0814235

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

520 S. Snowmass Circle, Superior, Colorado, 80027

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

(303) 494-5889

(Registrant’s Telephone Number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock as of May 30, 2011 was 28,570,000 shares of common stock.

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

April 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	F-1

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6

Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	6

PART II— OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	7

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	7

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	7

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	7

Item 5.	Other Information	7

Item 6.	Exhibits	7

SIGNATURES		8

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION

(A development stage company)

BALANCE SHEETS

	April 30, 2011			January 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash	$	2,184		$	68

Total Current Assets		2,184			68

TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,184		$	68

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses	$	8,421		$	6,275
Notes payable - stockholders		99,335			92,724

Total Current Liabilities		107,756			98,999

TOTAL LIABILITIES		107,756			98,999

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Common stock: par value $0.001; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 28,570,000 and 28,570,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		28,570			28,570

Additional paid-In capital		1,063,886			1,063,191
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(1,198,028	)		(1,190,692	)

Total Stockholders' Deficit		(105,572	)		(98,931	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	2,184		$	68

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-1

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION

(A development stage company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

							For the Period from
	Three Months			Three Months			February 2, 2005
	Ended			Ended			(inception) through
	April 30, 2011			April 30, 2010			April 30, 2011
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)

REVENUE	$	-		$	-		$	-

COST OF SERVICES		-			-			-

GROSS PROFIT		-			-			-

OPERATING EXPENSES:

PROFESSIONAL FEES		2,146			1,291			56,675
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES		4,495			6,418			116,022
STOCK COMPENSATION		-			640,000			1,020,100

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		6,641			647,709			1,192,797

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(6,641	)		(647,709	)		(1,192,797	)

OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSES

INTEREST EXPENSE - STOCKHOLDER		695			547			5,231

TOTAL OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSES, NET		695			547			5,231

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES		(7,336	)		(648,256	)		(1,198,028	)

INCOME TAXES		-			-			-

NET LOSS	$	(7,336	)	$	(648,256	)	$	(1,198,028	)

Net Loss Per Common Share - basic & diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.08	)

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
- basic & diluted		28,570,000			28,345,200			14,666,696

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-2

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION

(A development stage company)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

For the Period from February 2, 2005 (inception) through April 30, 2011

							Deficit accumulated
					Additionsal		during the			Total
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Development			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Stage			Deficit

Shares issued on acceptance of incorporation expenses upon formation		100,000	$	100	$	-	$	-		$	100

Net Loss								(2,225	)		(2,225	)

Balance, January 31, 2006		100,000		100		-		(2,225	)		(2,125	)

Shares issued on acceptance of expenses paid on July 30, 2006		275,000		275		2475					2,750

Shares issued on acceptance of expenses paid on August 15, 2006		1,250,000		1,250		11,250					12,500

Net Loss								(17,250	)		(17,250	)

Balance, January 31, 2007		1,625,000		1,625		13,725		(19,475	)		(4,125	)

Capital contribution						100					100

Shares issued as compensation at $0.001 per share on November 1, 2007		20,000,000		20,000		180,000					200,000

Shares issued for cash at $0.025 per share on November 13, 2007		1,000,000		1,000		24,000					25,000

Shares issued for cash at $0.025 per share on November 23, 2007		600,000		600		14,400					15,000

Shares issued for cash at $0.025 per share on November 29, 2007		180,000		180		4,320					4,500

Shares issued for cash at $0.025 per share on January 22, 2008		40,000		40		960					1,000

Net Loss								(204,937	)		(204,937	)

Balance, January 31, 2008		23,445,000		23,445		237,505		(224,412	)		36,538

Interest as in-kind contribution						534					534

Shares issued as compensation at $0.16 per share on January 2, 2009		1,125,000		1,125		178,875					180,000

Net Loss								(270,426	)		(270,426	)

Balance, January 31, 2009		24,570,000		24,570		416,914		(494,838	)		(53,354	)

Interest as in-kind contribution						1,644					1,644

Other expenses as in-kind contribution						6,275					6,275

Net Loss								(26,654	)		(26,654	)

Balance, January 31, 2010		24,570,000		24,570		424,833		(521,492	)		(72,089	)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-3

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION

(A development stage company)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

For the Period from February 2, 2005 (inception) through April 30, 2011

(Continued)

							Deficit accumulated
					Additionsal		during the			Total
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Development			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Stage			Deficit

Interest as in-kind contribution						2,358					2,358

Shares issued as compensation at $0.16 per share on February 5, 2010		4,000,000		4,000		636,000					640,000

Net Loss								(669,200	)		(669,200	)

Balance, January 31, 2011		28,570,000		28,570		1,063,191		(1,190,692	)		(98,931	)

Interest as in-kind contribution						695					695

Net Loss (unaudited)								(7,336	)		(7,336	)

Balance, April 30, 2011		28,570,000	$	28,570	$	1,063,886	$	(1,198,028	)	$	(105,572	)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-4

GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION

(A development stage company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

							For the Period from
	Three Months			ThreeMonths			February 2, 2005
	Ended			Ended			(inception) through
	April 30, 2011			April 30, 2010			April 30, 2011
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net loss	$	(7,336	)	$	(648,256	)	$	(1,198,028	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Interest contribution		695			547			5,231
Other expenses contribution		-			-			6,275
Stock issued for acceptance of expenses paid		-			-			15,250
Stock issued as compensation		-			640,000			1,020,100
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued expenses		2,146			803			8,421

Net cash used in operating activities		(4,495	)		(6,906	)		(142,751	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchase of intangile assets		-			-			-

Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities		-			-			-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from notes payable - stockholder		6,611			6,881			99,335
Proceeds from sale of common shares		-			-			45,500
Capital contribution		-			-			100

Net cash flows provided by financing activities		6,611			6,881			144,935

NET CHANGE IN CASH		2,116			(25	)		2,184

CASH BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		68			10			-

CASH BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD	$	2,184		$	(15	)	$	2,184

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:

Interest paid	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial statements

F-5

Golden Opportunities Corporation

(a development stage company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

April 30, 2011

NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION

Golden Opportunities Corporation (the “Company”), formally known as 51147, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Delaware as of February 2, 2005. The Company was originally incorporated in order to locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with The Company. The Company currently will leverage the talents of its sole executive and will implement its Plan as a business partner with an active company in the Services, Manufacturing, Financial or Public Relations market, i.e. assisting clients in their IPO and other types of fund raising activities (the “Affiliated Partner(s)”).

In doing so, the Company will not need to merge into nor will it be required to acquire clients or services in order to engage in active business. The Company will establish its initial offices in Hong Kong and/or Shenzhen, China—expand into emerging markets in Asia.

The comprehensive scope of the Company’s professional services (the “Plan of Operations”) will include:

Professional strategic analysis and recommendation;

Professional legal or human resources provision;

Professional Strategic corporate consulting;

Formulation of overall corporate growth or IPO strategy;

Execution of investor relations campaigns;

Formulation of media promotion strategy;

Road show organization;

Formulation of contingency liquidation solutions;

Preparation of corporate promotional materials.

Michael Zahorik is the sole officer and director, and has an operational background in the legal, securities, financial and corporate industries. Mr. Zahorik has been actively consulting in Asia since 1989 and is managing director of Zahorik Professional Group. Mr. Zahorik has extensive knowledge, contacts and a professional network in the corporate and financial services industry within Hong Kong, Mainland China and other emerging markets, including, Macau, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam (collectively, but not exclusively, the “Emerging Markets”).

The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, which contemplates continuation as a going concern.

We have not generated any operating revenue, expect to generate operating losses during some or all of our planned development stage, and have a negative cash flow from operations, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In view of these matters, our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to meet our financial requirements, raise additional capital, and the success of our future operations.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCONTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of (a) the result of operations for the three month periods ended April 30, 2011 and 2010 and from February 2, 2005 (date of inception) through April 30, 2011; (b) the financial position at April 30, 2011; and (c) cash flows for the three month periods ended April 30, 2011 and 2010 and from February 2, 2005 (date of inception) through April 30, 2011, have been made.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period information presented for the purpose of comparison.

Development stage company

The Company is a development stage company as defined by section 915-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company's development stage activities.

F-6

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Due to the limited level of operations, the Company has not had to make material assumptions or estimates other than the assumption that the Company is a going concern.

Fiscal year end

The Company elected January 31 as its fiscal year end upon its formation.

Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company does not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or a non-recurring basis, consequently, the Company did not have any fair value adjustments for assets and liabilities measured at fair value at April 30, 2011, nor gains or losses are reported in the statement of operations that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and liabilities still held at the reporting date for the periods ended April 30, 2011 and 2010 or for the period from February2, 2005 (inception) through April 30, 2011.

Revenue recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

F-7

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.

Net loss per common share

Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive outstanding shares of common stock during each period. There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding for the periods ended April 30, 2011 and 2010, or for the period from February 2, 2005 (inception) through April 30, 2011.

Commitments and contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Cash flows reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Common Stock Recorded as Compensation

The Company does not have an employee stock compensation package set up at this time. The stock compensation that has been granted falls under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933. Compliance with Rule 144 is discussed in the following paragraph.

In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person who has beneficially owned shares of a company's common stock for at least one year is entitled to sell within any three month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:

1. 1% of the number of shares of the company's common stock then outstanding.

2. The average weekly trading volume of the company's common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on form 144 with respect to the sale.

Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of current public information about the company.

F-8

Effective February 15, 2008, the holding period requirement under Rule 144 for ‘‘restricted securities’’ of issuers that are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is shortened to six months.

Restricted securities of issuers that are not subject to the Exchange Act reporting requirements will continue to be subject to a one-year holding period prior to any public resale.

The Company issues restricted stock to for various services. Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock is measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. The Company recognized compensation expenses and a corresponding increase to additional paid-in-capital related to stock issued for services. Stock compensation for the periods presented were issued for past services provided, accordingly, all shares issued are fully vested, and there is no unrecognized compensation associated with these transactions.

Subsequent events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $1,198,027 at April 30, 2011, a net loss of $7,336 and cash used in operations of $4,495 for the three months period then ended, with no revenues earned during the period.

While the Company is attempting to commence operations and produce revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company's financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern in the development stage, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At this time The Company has not identified the business that it wishes to engage in.

The Company's shareholders fund The Company's activities while The Company takes steps to locate and negotiate with a business entity for combination; however, there can be no assurance these activities will be successful. There is no agreement or commitment from the shareholders to continue funding the operations.

On June 30, 2006, the Company issued 275,000 shares at $0.01 per share to its President in acceptance of travel and administrative expenses paid on behalf of the Company.

On August 15, 2006, the Company issued 1,250,000 shares at $0.01 per share to its President in acceptance of travel and administrative expenses paid on behalf of the Company.

On November 1, 2007, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock as compensation to an officer of the Company for a value of $30,000 or $0.01 per share.

On November 1, 2007, the Company issued 700,000 shares at $0.01 per share to related party in acceptance of third party contract services.

On January 2, 2009, the Company issued 1,125,000 shares of common stock as compensation to an officer of the Company for a value of $180,000 or $0.16 per share.

F-9

On February 5, 2010, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock as compensation to an officer of the Company for a value of $640,000 or $0.16 per share.

From inception to April 30, 2011, a related party has also loaned the Company money in the form of loans payable totaling in $99,335. The loan was created as a demand note with no interest stated. The Company imputes a nominal percentage of interest which is accounted for as a contribution to paid-in-capital.

NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred stock includes 50,000,000 shares authorized at a par value of $0.001, of which none are issued or outstanding.

On February 2, 2005, common stock includes 100,000,000 shares authorized at a par value of $0.001, of which 100,000 have been issued for the amount of $100 in acceptance of the incorporation expenses for the Company.

On July 30, 2006, the Company issued 275,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 for a value of $2,750. The shares were issued to a related party in acceptance of expenses paid on behalf of the Company. (note 2)

On August 15, 2006, the Company issued 1,250,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 for a value of $12,500. The shares were issued to a related party in acceptance of expenses paid on behalf of the Company. (note 2)

On November 1, 2007, the Company issued 3,700,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 for a value of $37,000. The shares were issued to related parties for compensation or third party contract services. (note 2)

On November 1, 2007, the Company issued 16,300,000 shares of common stock at $0.01 for a value of $163,000. The shares were issued for compensation and third party contract services.

On November 13, 2007, the Company undertook a Section 4(2) registration under the Securities Act of 1933 to raise $25,000 in the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.025 per share. The Company’s management considers this offering to be exempt under the Securities Act of 1933.

On November 23, 2007, the Company undertook a Section 4(2) registration under the Securities Act of 1933 to raise $14,500 in the issuance of 600,000 shares of common stock at $0.025 per share. The Company’s management considers this offering to be exempt under the Securities Act of 1933.

On November 29, 2007, the Company undertook a Section 4(2) registration under the Securities Act of 1933 to raise $4,500 in the issuance of 180,000 shares of common stock at $0.025 per share. The Company’s management considers this offering to be exempt under the Securities Act of 1933.

On January 22, 2007, the Company undertook a Section 4(2) registration under the Securities Act of 1933 to raise $1,000 in the issuance of 40,000 shares of common stock at $0.025 per share. The Company’s management considers this offering to be exempt under the Securities Act of 1933.

On January 2, 2009, the Company issued 1,125,000 shares of common stock as compensation to an officer of the Company for a value of $180,000 or $0.16 per share.

On February 5, 2010, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock as compensation to an officer of the Company for a value of $640,000 or $0.16 per share.

NOTE 6 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” For reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts, if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, ASU 2010-28 requires performance of an additional test to determine whether goodwill has been impaired and to calculate the amount of impairment. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that impairment may exist. ASU 2010-28 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU 2009-28 in the first quarter of 2011 and the impact of adopting ASU 2010-28 will not be known until evaluations for goodwill impairment are performed at our annual impairment testing date or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist.

F-10

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations. ASU 2010-29 specifies that for material business combinations when comparative financial statements are presented, revenue and earnings of the combined entity should be disclosed as though the business combination had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. ASU 2010-29 also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations with an acquisition date on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted this standard in 2011, and noted it had no impact on its disclosures through April 30, 2011.

Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company. Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.

NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.

F-11

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Form 10-Q may contain “forward-looking statements”. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements about the Company’s market opportunities, strategies, competition and expected activities and expenditures, and at times may be identified by the use of words such as “may”, “will”, “could”, “should”, “would”, “project”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “plan”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “potential”, “intend”, “continue” and variations of these words or comparable words. Forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to the risks described below under “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements for revisions or changes after the date of this Form 10-Q.

Overview

Golden Opportunities Corporation (the “Company”), was incorporated in the state of Delaware as of February 2, 2005 as 51147, Inc., on June 10, 2008 we filed a certificate of amendment changing our name to Golden Opportunities Corporation. We were originally incorporated as a blank check company to locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with us. In November 2007, we changed our business model to use the experiences of our sole executive and commenced implementing our plan as a business partner with active companies in the marketing or financial public relations market such as, assisting our clients in the process of going public and other types of fund raising activities. We also work with other companies actively engaged in the professional services market or in the sales and /or manufacture and distribution of products or services in Asia.

The world-wide impact of the economic recession of 2009 and continuing through 2011 has delayed the execution of our business plan. However, we continue to seek out the best potential opportunity for the shareholders. While we will not need to merge or acquire companies we will remain open to any sound business combination to achieve success. We intend to establish our initial offices in Hong Kong (SAR), China, or Shenzhen, China—and expand into emerging markets in Asia.

In light of the current economic situation, we are evaluating a number of temporary-to-permanent office locations in Hong Kong central to many businesses operating in Asia. Rent has become more competitive over last 12 months and we are looking for the most favorable situation for the Company.

The comprehensive scope of our professional services will include:

·	Professional strategic analysis and recommendation;

·	Formulation of overall promotion strategy;

·	Execution of investor relations campaigns;

·	Formulation of media promotion strategy;

·	Road show organization;

·	Formulation of contingency solutions;

·	Preparation of corporate promotional materials;

The financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, which contemplates continuation as a going concern. However, we have not generated any operating revenue, expect to generate operating losses during some or all of our planned development stages, and have a negative cash flow from operations, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In view of these matters, our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to meet our financial requirements, raise additional capital, and the success of our future operations.

Creditor

Results of Operations

The Company did not have any operating income from inception through April 30, 2011. For the quarter ended April 30, 2011, the registrant recognized a net loss of $7,336 and for the period from inception through April 30, 2011, the registrant recognized a net less of $1,198,028. Some general and administrative expenses during the quarter were accrued. Expenses for the quarter were comprised of costs mainly associated with travel, legal and accounting.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

As of April 30, 2011, we had $2,184 in cash. We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any significant equipment outside of personal computing, mobile and organizational tools. If adequate financing is raised, we may add additional management/consultant personnel.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

At April 30, 2011, the Company had some capital resources and will rely upon the issuance of common stock and additional capital contributions from shareholders to fund administrative expenses pending acquisition of an operating company.

We believe we can satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months with our current cash, shareholder advances, Company shares and expected revenues. However, completion of our Plan of Operations is subject to attaining adequate revenue. We cannot assure investors that adequate revenues will be generated. In the absence of our projected revenues, we may be unable to proceed with our Plan of Operations. Even without adequate revenues within the next twelve months, we still anticipate being able to continue with our present activities, but we may require additional financing.

The exact allocation, purposes and timing of any monies raised in subsequent private financings may vary significantly depending upon the exact amount of funds raised and our progress with the execution of our Plan of Operations.

In the event we are not successful in reaching our initial revenue targets, additional funds may be required, and we may not be able to proceed with our business plan for the development of identified services. Should this occur, we would likely seek additional financing to support the continued operation of our business. It is foreseeable that we could continue to incur future operating losses.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenues and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51”. This statement improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting standards that require; the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest be clearly identified and presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained non-controlling equity investment in the former subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, entities provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. SFAS No. 160 affects those entities that have an outstanding non-controlling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS 161). This statement is intended to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures of an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 applies to all derivative instruments within the scope of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133) as well as related hedged items, bifurcated derivatives, and non-derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS 161 must provide more robust qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating the disclosure implications of this statement.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) SFAS No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R, and other GAAP. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS FSP 142-3, but does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. This statement shall be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s amendments to AU section 411, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 162, but does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. This results in inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities. This Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided to users of financial statements. The adoption of FASB 163 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is subject to certain market risks, including changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. The Company does not undertake any specific actions to limit those exposures.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-14(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), within 90 days of the filing date of this report. In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applied its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that as of April 30, 2010, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will necessarily prevent all fraud and material errors. An internal control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations on all internal control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of internal control is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in circumstances, and/or the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective internal control system, financial reporting misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected on a timely basis.

There have been no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referenced in the above paragraph.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Currently we are not aware of any litigation pending or threatened by or against the Company

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

No applicable for smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

32.1	Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	GOLDEN OPPORTUNITIES CORPORATION

Date: May 30, 2011	By:	/s/ Michael A. Zahorik
		Michael A. Zahorik
		Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
		Officer & Director