Umatrin Holding Ltd - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 000-51190

(866)-874-4888

Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of August 10, the registrant had 82,444,266 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value per share, issued and outstanding.

UMATRIN HOLDING LIMITED

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

The following unaudited interim financial statements of Umatrin Holding Limited (referred to herein as the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) are included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q:

UMATRIN HOLDING LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to financial statements

See accompanying notes to financial statements

UMATRIN HOLDING LIMITED

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes to financial statements

UMATRIN HOLDINGS LTD.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2017

(UNAUDITED)

1. ORGANIZATION

Umatrin Holding Limited (formerly known as Golden Opportunities Corporation) (“UMHL”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on February 2, 2005. UMHL was originally incorporated in order to locate and negotiate with a targeted business entity for the combination of that target company with the Company.

On January 6, 2016, UMHL acquired 80% of the equity interests of U Matrin Worldwide SDN. BHD. ("Umatrin") in exchange for the issuance of a total of 100,000,000 shares of its common stock to the two holders of Umatrin, Dato' Sri Eu Hin Chai and Dato' Liew Kok Hong. Immediately following the Share Exchange, the business of Umatrin became the business of UMHL.

U Matrin Worldwide SDN BHD, formerly known as OLC Worldwide SDN. BHD., was incorporated in Malaysia on July 22, 1993. The principal activities of Umatrin is direct selling and trading on beauty and personal care products, and investment holding.

UMHL entered into a share exchange agreement with Umatrin whereas the acquisition was accounted under US GAAP as a business combination under common control with UMHL being the acquirer as both entities were owned by the same controlling shareholders. Prior to the business combination, Dato' Sri Eu Hin Chai, through Umatrin Group Ltd., held 76% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. Dato' Sri Eu Hin Chai and Dato' Liew Kok Hong beneficially owned 61.25% and 38.75% of Umatrin immediately prior to the closing. Accordingly, historical cost will be the basis for transfer of assets and liabilities in the business combination in accordance with ASC 805-50-30-5.

Umatrin Holding Limited and its subsidiary U Matrin Worldwide SDN. BHD. shall be referred as the “Company”.

The organization structure as follows:

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("US GAAP").

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. Significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

In accordance with ASC 805-50-45-5, for transactions between entities under common control, financial statements and financial information presented for prior periods have been be retroactively adjusted to furnish comparative information. The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented retrospectively as though the share exchange agreement between the UMHL and Umatrin occurred at the beginning of the first period presented.

Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) applicable to interim financial information and the requirements of Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosure required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been included. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, as not all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles for annual financial statements are presented. The interim financial statements follow the same accounting policies and methods of computations as the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported net income or losses.

Functional and presentation currency

The functional currency of Umatrin is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company operates which is Malaysia Ringgit (“MYR”).

Transactions in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency are recorded at the rates of exchange prevailing on the date of the transaction. At the end of each reporting period, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates prevailing at the end of the reporting periods. Exchange differences arising on the settlement of monetary items and on translation of monetary items at period-end are included in income statement of the period.

For the purpose of presenting these financial statements, the Company’s assets and liabilities are expressed in US$ at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date, stockholder’s equity accounts are translated at historical rates, and income and expense items are translated at the weighted average exchange rate during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are reported under accumulated other comprehensive income in the stockholder’s equity section of the balance sheets.

Exchange rate used for the translation as follows:

Fair value of financial instruments

The Company’s balance sheet includes financial instruments, including cash, term loan, accounts payable, accrued expenses, amounts due to related party and convertible notes payable to a related party. The carrying amounts of current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization.

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2017. The respective carrying value of certain amounts on the balance sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Related parties

The Company adopted ASC 850, Related Party Disclosures, for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Risks and Uncertainties

The Company’s operations are subject to significant risks and uncertainties including financial, operational and regulatory risks, including the potential risk of business failure.

Commitments and contingencies

The Company adopted ASC 450-20, Loss Contingencies, to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

The cash and cash equivalents for the periods ended June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $66,443 and $133,269 respectively.

Trade Receivables

Trade receivables are carried at anticipated realizable value. Bad debts are written off in the period in which they are identified. An estimate is made for doubtful debts based on a review of all outstanding amounts at the balance sheet date.

Bad debt expenses were $nil and $nil for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company did not have any outstanding trade receivables.

Inventories

Inventories, which are primarily comprised of finished goods for sale, are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, using the first-in first-out (FIFO) method. The Company evaluates the need for reserves associated with obsolete, slow-moving and non-salable inventory by reviewing net realizable values on a periodic basis. Only defects products could be return to our suppliers.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any.

Depreciation is calculated under the straight-line method to write off the cost of the assets over their estimated useful lives.

An item of equipment is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected from its use. Any gain or loss arising from de-recognition of asset is recognized in profit or loss.

Expenditures for repairs and maintenance, which do not improve or extend the expected useful lives of the assets, are expensed as incurred while major replacements and improvements are capitalized.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

In accordance with ASC Topic 360, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, or at least annually. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value. The Company recorded no impairment charge for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generally recognizes product sales revenue when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred pursuant to Malaysia law, including such factors as when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, sales and value-added tax laws have been complied with, and collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company’s revenue recognition policy for both retail customers and authorized dealer customers is the same. Sales are considered final when possession of the product is passed to the customer. There is no policy for dealers to return any unsold products unless it the product was defective; accordingly, the Company does not accrue for expected returns.

Commission

The Company expenses commission costs as incurred and includes it in selling expenses. The Company expenses commission costs as incurred and includes it in selling expenses. The Company grants commission to dealers and promoters to promote and sell the products. Amount of commission is based upon agreed value between the Company and the dealers and promoters as there is no fix basis for such amount.

Advertising

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred and includes it in selling expenses. The Company recorded $3,418 and $0 for advertising and promotions expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Income taxes and valuation allowance

The Company follows ASC 740, Income Taxes. The Company records deferred tax assets and liabilities for future income tax consequences that are attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their income tax bases. The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities is based on enacted tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income in the year when settlement or recovery of those temporary differences is expected to occur. The Company recognizes the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of any change in income tax rates in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

A tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities. The determination is based on the technical merits of the position and presumes that the relevant taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information will examine each uncertain tax position. Although the Company believes the estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final outcome of these matters will not be different than what is reflected in the historical income tax provisions and accruals.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company follows the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) ASC 220 Reporting Comprehensive Income, and establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances in a full set of general purpose financial statements. The Company’s comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments.

Segment Information

The Company adopted ASC-280, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, which requires certain financial and supplementary information to be disclosed on an annual and interim basis for each reportable segment of an enterprise. The Company believes that it operates in one business segment (marketing and sales) and in one geographical segment Malaysia, because all of the Company’s current operations are conducted in Malaysia.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which revises the accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. The ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. The new guidance requires the fair value measurement of investments in equity securities and other ownership interests in an entity, including investments in partnerships, unincorporated joint ventures and limited liability companies (collectively, equity securities) that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method. Entities will need to measure these investments and recognize changes in fair value in net income. Entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities they classify under current guidance as available for sale in other comprehensive income (OCI). They also will no longer be able to use the cost method of accounting for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. Instead, for these types of equity investments that do not otherwise qualify for the net asset value practical expedient, entities will be permitted to elect a practicability exception and measure the investment at cost less impairment plus or minus observable price changes (in orderly transactions). The ASU also establishes an incremental recognition and disclosure requirement related to the presentation of fair value changes of financial liabilities for which the fair value option (FVO) has been elected. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to separately present in OCI the portion of the total fair value change attributable to instrument-specific credit risk as opposed to reflecting the entire amount in earnings. For derivative liabilities for which the FVO has been elected, however, any changes in fair value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk would continue to be presented in net income, which is consistent with current guidance. The standard is effective beginning January 1, 2018 via a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings, except for guidance relative to equity securities without readily determinable fair values which is applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing this ASU’s impact on the consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, replacing existing lease accounting guidance. The new standard introduces a lessee model that would require entities to recognize assets and liabilities for most leases, but recognize expenses on their income statements in a manner similar to current accounting. The ASU does not make fundamental changes to existing lessor accounting. However, it modifies what qualifies as a sales-type and direct financing lease and related accounting and aligns a number of the underlying principles with those of the new revenue standard, ASU No. 2014-09, such as evaluating how collectability should be considered and determining when profit can be recognized. The guidance eliminates existing real estate-specific provisions and requires expanded qualitative and quantitative disclosures. The standard requires modified retrospective transition by which it is applied at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the year of adoption. The ASU is effective January 1, 2019. The Company is currently assessing this ASU’s impact on the consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting, which eliminates the existing requirement to apply the equity method of accounting retrospectively (revising prior periods as if the equity method had always been applied) when an entity obtains significant influence over a previously held investment. The new guidance would require the investor to apply the equity method prospectively from the date the investment qualifies for the equity method. The investor would add the carrying value of the existing investment to the cost of any additional investment to determine the initial cost basis of the equity method investment. This ASU is effective January 1, 2017 on a prospective basis, with early adoption permitted. The Company would apply this guidance to investments that transition to the equity method after the adoption date.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”. The amendments in this ASU are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations by amending certain existing illustrative examples and adding additional illustrative examples to assist in the application of the guidance. The effective date and transition of these amendments is the same as the effective date and transition of ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. Public entities should apply the amendments in ASU 2014-09 for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods therein. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The amendments are effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of the adoption on its financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard provides guidance in a number of situations including, among others, settlement of zero-coupon bonds, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, and distributions received from equity method investees. The ASU also provides guidance for classifying cash receipts and payments that have aspects of more than one class of cash flows. The ASU is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. deferred from past intercompany transactions involving non-inventory assets to opening retained earnings. In addition, an entity would record deferred tax assets with an offset to opening retained earnings for amounts that entity had previously not recognized under existing guidance 2016-16, Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which modifies existing guidance and is intended to reduce diversity in practice with respect to the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets. The ASU indicates that the current exception to income tax accounting that requires companies to defer the income tax effects of certain intercompany transactions would apply only to intercompany inventory transactions. That is, the exception would no longer apply to intercompany sales and transfers of other assets (e.g., intangible assets). Under the existing exception, income tax expense associated with intra-entity profits in an intercompany sale or transfer of assets is eliminated from earnings. Instead, that cost is deferred and recorded on the balance sheet (e.g., as a prepaid asset) until the assets leave the consolidated group. Similarly, the entity is prohibited from recognizing deferred tax assets for the increases in tax bases due to the intercompany sale or transfer. The ASU is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted as of January 1, 2017. The standard requires modified retrospective transition with a cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening retained earnings in the period of adoption. Upon adoption, a company would write off any income tax effects that had been but would recognize under the new guidance.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-17, Interests Held through Related Parties That Are under Common Control, which modifies existing guidance with respect to how a decision maker that holds an indirect interest in a variable interest entity (VIE) through a common control party determines whether it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE as part of the analysis of whether the VIE would need to be consolidated. Under the ASU, a decision maker would need to consider only its proportionate indirect interest in the VIE held through a common control party. Previous guidance had required the decision maker to treat the common control party’s interest in the VIE as if the decision maker held the interest itself. As a result of the ASU, in certain cases, previous consolidation conclusions may change. The standard is effective January 1, 2017 with retrospective application to January 1, 2016. The Company does not have significant involvement with entities subject to consolidation considerations impacted by VIE model factors. As a result, the Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash, which clarifies guidance on the classification and presentation of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. Under the ASU, changes in restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents would be included along with those of cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities would no longer present transfers between cash/equivalents and restricted cash/equivalents in the statement of cash flows. In addition, a reconciliation between the balance sheet and the statement of cash flows would be disclosed when the balance sheet includes more than one line item for cash/equivalents and restricted cash/equivalents. The ASU is effective January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Entities are required to apply the standard’s provisions on a retrospective basis. The Company does not expect this ASU to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The ASU requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities (collectively, the set) is not a business. To be considered a business, the set would need to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The standard also narrows the definition of outputs. The definition of a business affects areas of accounting such as acquisitions, disposals and goodwill. Under the new guidance, fewer acquired sets are expected to be considered businesses. The ASU is effective January 1, 2018 on a prospective basis with early adoption permitted. The Company would apply this guidance to applicable transactions after the adoption date.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. Under the new standard, goodwill impairment would be measured as the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. This ASU eliminates existing guidance that requires an entity to determine goodwill impairment by calculating the implied fair value of goodwill by hypothetically assigning the fair value of a reporting unit to all of its assets and liabilities as if that reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. For 3M, this ASU is effective prospectively to impairment tests beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted. 3M would apply this guidance to applicable impairment tests after the adoption date.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes ASC 840, Leases. This ASU is based on the principle that entities should recognize assets and liabilities arising from leases. The ASU does not significantly change the lessees’ recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows from the previous accounting standard. Leases are classified as finance or operating. The ASU’s primary change is the requirement for entities to recognize a lease liability for payments and a right of use asset representing the right to use the leased asset during the term on operating lease arrangements. Lessees are permitted to make an accounting policy election to not recognize the asset and liability for leases with a term of twelve months or less. Lessors’ accounting under the ASC is largely unchanged from the previous accounting standard. In addition, the ASU expands the disclosure requirements of lease arrangements. Lessees and lessors will use a modified retrospective transition approach, which includes a number of practical expedients. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2020 with early adoption permitted. Management continues to assess the overall impact the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on the Company’s financial statements.

3. GOING CONCERN

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had accumulated deficit of $2,590,715 as of June 30, 2017 which include a loss of $191,156 for the period ended June 30, 2017.

The Company ability to generate profit in the next 12 months is uncertain given that the market in which it operates is facing an economic slowdown. Management's plans include the raising of capital through the equity markets to fund future operations, seeking additional acquisitions, and generating profits through its business operations; however, there can be no assurances the Company will be successful in its efforts to secure additional equity financing and obtaining sufficient profit. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

4. LAND, PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT

Land, property & equipment consist of the following:

The depreciation expense charged to general and administrative expenses were $33,183 and $22,555 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

5. RELATED PARTIES TRANSACTIONS

Due from related parties consists of the following:

Due to related parties consists of the following:

The related parties’ relationship to the Company as follows:

The amounts due from or due to related parties’ were unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

The Company purchased its inventory from its suppliers SKH Media Sdn. Bhd. and Creative Iconic Sdn. Bhd. The amounts of inventory purchased from these suppliers were $nil and $166,451 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company leased an office space from SKH Media Sdn. Bhd. The rent expenses were $13,674 and $14,647 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company had recognized imputed interest expense on advances from Michael A. Zahorik, former director, in the amounts of $0 and $13,212 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These amounts were recognized as interest expense and a corresponding contribution to capital.

6. CONVERTIBLE NOTE PAYABLE

On September 15, 2013, $164,994 of shareholder advances payable to the Company's sole officer and majority owner were re-structured into two notes in equal amounts of $82,497, each convertible into the Company's common stock at rates of $0.005 and $0.01 per share respectively. The notes are convertible on demand of the holder, bear no interest, have a maturity date of September 15, 2023.

The Company discounted the non-interest bearing note at 3.24% interest rate, in accordance with the Applicable Federal Rate. Based on the intrinsic value of the conversion feature, the Company determined that there was a beneficial conversion feature associated with two notes payable. As a result of the beneficial conversion feature exceeding the proceeds received from the promissory notes, management discounted the notes 100% as a debt discount and will amortize this discount over the 10-year lives of the notes on the interest rate method.

On March 29, 2015, two notes in equal amounts of $82,497 were converted by the new controlling shareholders on March 29, 2015 into 16,499,400 shares of common stock at $0.005 per share and 8,249,700 shares of common stock at $0.01 per share.

The interest expense amortized for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were $0 and $13,212, respectively. The Company recognized total debt discount amortized of $13,608 as interest expenses from the day the notes were issued till the day the notes were converted.

7. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

On February 20, 2015, the majority shareholders voted on and approved an increase of the number of authorized common shares from 100,000,000 to 500,000,000 and a decrease in par value from $0.001 to $0.00001. The majority shareholders also voted on and approved a designation of 10,000,000 preferred shares with no series and a par value of $0.00001. The financial statements presented have been retroactively restated to present the change in authorized and par value.

Equity –Common Stock

The Company has 182,444,266 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017.

On December 30, 2016, the Company issued 480,000 shares at $0.02 a share and totaling $9,600. On January 12, 2017, the Company issued 8,957,372 shares at $0.02 a share and totaling $179,147. On May 8, 2017, the Company issued 14,687,794 shares at $0.02 a share and totaling $293,756.

On March 29, 2015, the Company issued 16,499,400 shares at $0.005 a share and totaling $82,497 and 8,249,700 shares at $0.01 a share and totaling $82,497 as conversions of two promissory notes payable for past advances and loans. (Refer to Note 7)

Equity – Additional Paid-In Capital

The Company recognized imputed interest expense on related party advances in the amounts of $2,168 for the year ended December 31, 2015 as corresponding contribution to capital.

Stock options

On July 30, 2011, the Company issued an option to purchase 8,000,000 common shares to an officer of the Company in consideration for services at $0.10 per share valued at nil on the date of grant as compensation.

The fair value of the option grant estimated on the date of grant uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

__________________

* As a thinly traded public entity, it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected two (2) comparable companies to calculate the expected volatility. The Company calculated two (2) comparable companies' historical volatility over the expect life of the share options of eight (8) years and averaged the two (2) comparable companies' historical volatility as its expected volatility.

The fair value of the stock options issued on July 31, 2011 using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model was $504,024 at the date of grant. On August 22, 2015, all the remaining unvested stock options became vested

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, $nil and $nil respectively, was recognized as compensation expense for stock options issued.

Summary of Compensation Expense-Options

8. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES, RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Operating Lease Commitments

The Company entered into a property lease agreement for office space which started on December 1, 2014 and expired on October 31, 2015 for monthly payment of MYR10,000 (approximately $2,250). The lease was not renewed and the Company continues to rent the property on a month to month basis.

The rent expenses were $13,674 and $14,647 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Concentration and Credit risk

Cash deposits with banks are held in financial institutions in Malaysia, which are federally insured with deposit protection up to MYR250,000 (approximately $56,592). Accordingly, the Company has a concentration of credit risk related to the uninsured part of bank deposits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to significant credit risk.

The Company had no concentration in demand for its products.

The Company depends on few supplier for its products. Accordingly, the Company has a concentration risk related to these suppliers. Failure to maintain existing relationships with the suppliers or to establish new relationships in the future could negatively affect the Company’s ability to obtain products sold to customers in a timely manner. If the Company is unable to obtain ample supply of products from existing suppliers or alternative sources of supply, the Company may be unable to satisfy the orders from its customers, which could materially and adversely affect revenues.

Contingent Liability

A former Director of the Company represents that the Company owes back compensation for services he believes he rendered to the Company and expenses he paid on behalf of the Company. The Company believes all balances owed to him have been settled in prior periods. The Company asserts that a claim has not be filed against the Company for potential damages; accordingly, the Company is unable to reasonably estimate a potential loss or liability in this matter including related legal costs. In the event that a claim is filed against the Company, the Company will provide further disclosure.

9. TERM LOAN

On December 23, 2014, MYR2,300,000 (approximately $657,507) term loan was granted to the Company for the purchase of a four-story office with a repayment period of 240 months.

The term loan was secured by the title deed for the said property and guaranteed by directors of the Company. The term loan is subject to an interest charges at 2.10% per annum below the Bank’s Base Lending Rate (“BLR”) with daily rests. The BLR is currently at 6.85% for June 30, 2017.

On July 27, 2015, the Company made a drawdown of MYR2,300,000 (approx. $609,554) on the term loan. The repayment started effectively on September 1, 2015 with a fixed installment of MYR14,863.14 (approx. $3,582) for 240 installments.

The outstanding balance of the term loan is $507,571, of which $19,130 is due within one operating period and classified as short term, and $488,441 is due after one operating period, and has classified as long term.

Interest expenses were $11,486 and $16,112 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on our evaluation, no events have occurred which require adjustment or disclosure.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The information set forth in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, among others (i) expected changes in our revenue and profitability, (ii) prospective business opportunities and (iii) our strategy for financing our business. Forward-looking statements are statements other than historical information or statements of current condition. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by use of terms such as "believes", "anticipates", "intends" or "expects". These forward-looking statements relate to our plans, liquidity, ability to complete financing and purchase capital expenditures, growth of our business including entering into future agreements with companies, and plans to successfully develop and obtain approval to market our product. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs.

Although we believe that our expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, in light of the risks and uncertainties inherent in all future projections, the inclusion of forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved.

We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting forward-looking statements.

Our revenues and results of operations could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the following: the risk of significant natural disaster, the inability of our company to insure against certain risks, inflationary and deflationary conditions and cycles, currency exchange rates, and changing government regulations domestically and internationally affecting our products and businesses.

You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with the Financial Statements and Notes attached hereto, and the other financial data appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

US Dollars are denoted herein by "USD", "$" and "dollars".

Overview

Umatrin Holding Limited (formerly known as Golden Opportunities Corporation) (“UMHL”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on February 2, 2005. UMHL was originally incorporated in order to locate and negotiate with a targeted business entity for the combination of that target company with the Company.

On January 6, 2016, UMHL acquired 80% of the equity interests of U Matrin Worldwide SDN. BHD. ("Umatrin") in exchange for the issuance of a total of 100,000,000 shares of its common stock to the two holders of Umatrin, Dato' Sri Eu Hin Chai and Dato' Liew Kok Hong. Immediately following the Share Exchange, the business of Umatrin became the business of UMHL. The Company’s operation office remained in Malaysia and the business market will remain focus in Asia.

Umatrin, formerly known as OLC Worldwide SDN. BHD., was incorporated in Malaysia on July 22, 1993. Umatrin has curated non-toxic beauty, personal care to health and wellness products. We market our products through three primary methods: direct contact, online distribution and/or by our dealer program. We apply leading O2O (Online to Offline) marketing strategy to both retail and wholesale trade. We provide technology and services to enable consumers, merchants and other participants to conduct business in our cloud-based trading system. We use advanced network technology and rigorous management system to create unlimited business brand space. Without allocating large sums of operating cost, it continuously introduces new products, combined with O2O internet business model and career opportunities.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the results of our operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

Comparison for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Sales

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company generated $367,695 in revenues, which was a decrease of $246,079, or 40% compared to $613,774 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 as the operating sector is currently facing economic slowdown which adversely affects the purchasing power of the consumer.

Gross profit and gross margin

The Company was able to generate a gross profit margin of $281,307 for the three months ended June 30, 2017, which was a decrease of $255,098 or 48% as compared to $536,405 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 as the operating sector is currently facing economic slowdown which adversely affects the purchasing power of the consumer.

Selling, general and administrative costs

Major operating costs include salaries and wages, sales commission and advertising and promotional costs for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. Selling, general and administrative costs decreased from $424,208 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 to $310,218 for the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Net income

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company had $34,727 in net loss as compared to $70,324 in net profit for the three months ended June 30, 2016, which was an increase in net loss of $105,051. The Company will continue to implement new marketing strategies to improve its financial position.

Comparison for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

Sales

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company generated $510,632 in revenues, which was a decrease of $561,836, or 52% compared to $1,072,468 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 as the operating sector is currently facing economic slowdown which adversely affects the purchasing power of the consumer.

Gross profit and gross margin

The Company was able to generate a gross profit margin of $406,537 for the six months ended June 30, 2017, which was a decrease of $499,480 or 55% as compared to $906,017 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 as the operating sector is currently facing economic slowdown which adversely affects the purchasing power of the consumer.

Selling, general and administrative costs

Major operating costs include salaries and wages, sales commission and advertising and promotional costs for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. Selling, general and administrative costs decreased from $813,193 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to $586,207 for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Net income

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company had $191,156 in net loss as compared to $29,723 in net profit for the six months ended June 30, 2016, which was an increase in net loss of $220,879. The Company will continue to implement new marketing strategies to improve its financial position.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We had cash and cash equivalent of $66,443 and $133,269 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Our company's operations have been funded through an equity financing and a series of debt transactions, primarily with shareholders, directors, and officers of our company and affiliated entities. These related party debt transactions such as sales purchases of inventory and advances have operated as informal lines of credit since the inception of our company, and related parties have extended credit as needed which our company has repaid at its convenience. We anticipate that we will incur operating losses in the foreseeable future and we believe we will need additional cash to support our daily operations while we are attempting to execute our business plan and produce revenues. If our related parties are unable or unwilling to provide additional capital, we would likely require financing from third parties. There can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to us, on terms we believe to be favorable or at all. The inability to obtain additional capital would have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition and could force us to curtail or discontinue operations entirely and/or file for protection under bankruptcy laws.

The following table sets forth information about our net cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

Operating Activities

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 we used $119,737 in operating activities as compared to generating $1,477 in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016. The movement in net cash used in operating activities resulted from the movement in inventory, prepaid tax, other receivables and deposits, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other payables.

Investing Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2017 we used $1,999 in investing activities as compared to using $72,157 in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016. The movement in net cash used in investing activity resulted from the movement in purchase of property and equipment as the Company expanded its operation and advances made to related parties.

Financing Activities

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we generated $56,436 in financing activities as compared to using $78,325 in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the net cash provided by financing activities resulted from proceeds from common stock issued and to be issued of $263,144, net repayment to related party of $198,251 and net repayment to term loan of $8,457.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the net cash provided by financing activities resulted from net repayment to related party of $56,554 and net repayment to term loan of $21,771.

Loan Commitment

On December 23, 2014, MYR 2,300,000 (approximately $657,507) term loan was granted to Umatrin for the purchase of a four-story office located at No.32, 32-1, 32-2, 32-3, Jalan Radin Bagus 3, Bandar Baru Seri Petaling, 57000, Kuala Lumpur with a repayment period of 240 months. This term loan was (i) secured by title deed for the said property, and (ii) guaranteed by directors of the Company. This term loan is subject to an interest charges at 2.10% per annum below the Bank's Base Lending Rate ("BLR") with daily rests. The BLR is currently at 6.85% for June 30, 2017.

On July 27, 2015, a drawdown of MYR2,300,000 (approximately $609,554) on the term loan was made and repayment effectively started on September 1, 2015 with a fixed installment of MYR14,863.14 (approximately $4,249) for 240 installments.

The outstanding balance of the term loan is $507,571, of which $19,130 is due within one operating period and classified as short term, and $488,441 is due after one operating period, and has classified as long term.

Interest expenses were $11,486 and $16,112 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

We have no known demands or commitments and we are not aware of any events or uncertainties as of June 30, 2017 that will result in or that are reasonably likely to materially increase or decrease our current liquidity.

We had no material commitments for capital expenditure for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 except mentioned above.

Going Concern

Our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had accumulated deficit of $2,590,715 as of June 30, 2017 which include a loss of $191,156 for the period ended June 30, 2017. We expect to finance our operations primarily through our existing cash, our operations and any future financing. However, there exists substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern because we will be required to obtain additional capital in the future to continue our operations and there is no assurance that we will be able to obtain such capital, through equity or debt financing, or any combination thereof, or on satisfactory terms or at all. Additionally, no assurance can be given that any such financing, if obtained, will be adequate to meet our capital needs. If adequate capital cannot be obtained on a timely basis and on satisfactory terms, our operations would be materially negatively impacted. Therefore, our auditor has substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to complete additional offerings is dependent on the state of the debt and/or equity markets at the time of any proposed offering, and such market's reception of the Company and the offering terms. There is no assurance that capital in any form would be available to us, and if available, on terms and conditions that are acceptable.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We believe it is helpful for investors to understand the critical accounting policies underlying our financial statements. Please refer to Note 2 of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this quarter report for details of our critical accounting policies.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2017, we do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, sales or expenses, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures, or capital resources that are material to an investment in our securities.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Not required because we are a smaller reporting company.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members; lack of a majority of outside directors on board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives and affecting the functions of authorization, recordkeeping, custody of assets, and reconciliation; and, management dominated by a single individual/small group without adequate compensating controls.

Management believes that the material weaknesses did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

Changes in internal controls over financial reporting

There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II— OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There are no other actions, suits, proceedings, inquiries or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries' officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not applicable because we are a smaller reporting company.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

There were no unregistered sales of the Company's equity securities during the three months ended June 30, 2017, that were not otherwise disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2017.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

There is no other information required to be disclosed under this item which was not previously disclosed.

Item 6. Exhibits

_____________

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.