UNIFIRST CORP - Quarter Report: 2006 May (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission file number: 1-8504

UNIFIRST CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(978) 658-8888

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x       No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

The number of outstanding shares of UniFirst Corporation Common Stock and Class B Common Stock at June 23, 2006 were 9,832,080 and 9,415,068, respectively.

UniFirst Corporation

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Quarter ended May 27, 2006

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

consolidated financial statements.

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

consolidated financial statements.

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these

consolidated financial statements.

UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands, except per share and common stock options data)

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business Description

UniFirst Corporation (the “Company”) is one of the largest providers of workplace uniforms and protective clothing in the United States. The Company designs, manufactures, personalizes, rents, cleans, delivers, and sells a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, lab coats, smocks and aprons, and also rents industrial wiping products, floor mats, facility service products, other non-garment items, and provides first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies.

The Company serves businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. Typical customers include automobile service centers and dealers, delivery services, food and general merchandise retailers, food processors and service operations, light manufacturers, maintenance facilities, restaurants, service companies, soft and durable goods wholesalers, transportation companies, and others who require employee clothing for image, identification, protection or utility purposes.

At certain specialized facilities, the Company also decontaminates and cleans work clothes that may have been exposed to radioactive materials and services special cleanroom protective wear. Typical customers for these specialized services include government agencies, research and development laboratories, high technology companies and utilities operating nuclear reactors.

As discussed and described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has five reporting segments, US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, Manufacturing (“MFG”), Specialty Garments Rental and Cleaning (“Specialty Garments”), First Aid and Corporate. The operations of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment are referred to by the Company as its “industrial laundry operations” and the locations related to this reporting segment are referred to as “industrial laundries”. The Company refers to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, MFG, and Corporate reporting segments combined as its “core laundry operations”.

Interim Financial Information

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations; however, the Company believes that the information furnished reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim period. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes, thereto, included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005. Results for an interim period are not indicative of any future interim periods or for an entire fiscal year.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of UniFirst’s foreign operations is the local country’s currency. Transaction gains and losses, including gains and losses on intercompany transactions, are included in selling and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during each month of the fiscal period. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The Company reported in selling and administrative expenses, net, foreign currency transaction gains totaling $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006, respectively, and foreign currency transaction losses totaling $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2005, respectively.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. There have been no changes in judgments or the method of determining estimates that had a material effect on our consolidated financial statements for the periods presented.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in August. For financial reporting purposes, fiscal 2006 will have 52 weeks, as did fiscal 2005.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and bank short-term investments with maturities of less than ninety days.

Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments, which may expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, notes payable and long-term obligations. Each of these financial instruments is recorded at cost, which approximates its fair value.

Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company recognizes revenue from rental operations in the period in which the services are provided. Direct sale revenue is recognized in the period in which the product is shipped. Management’s judgment and estimates are used in determining the collectability of accounts receivable and evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company considers specific accounts receivable and historical bad debt experience, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and the age of outstanding balances as part of its evaluation. Changes in estimates are reflected in the period in which they become known. If the financial condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Material changes in the Company’s estimates may result in significant differences in the amount and timing of bad debt expense recognition for any given period.

Inventories and Rental Merchandise in Service

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, net of any reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the likelihood that new goods on hand can be sold to customers or used in rental operations. Historical inventory usage and current revenue trends are considered in estimating both excess and obsolete inventories. If actual product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. The Company uses the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method to value its inventories. Inventories primarily consist of finished goods.

Rental merchandise in service is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the merchandise, which range from 6 to 36 months. In establishing estimated lives for merchandise in service, management considers historical experience and the intended use of the merchandise. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of operating profit for any period if management makes significant changes to these estimates.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. The Company provides for depreciation using the straight-line method based on the following estimated useful lives:

Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. The Company recorded as depreciation expense $29.1 million and $28.5 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 and May 28, 2005, respectively, and $9.9 million and $9.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 and May 28, 2005, respectively.

In accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets, including property and equipment, are evaluated for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired. There have been no material impairments of property and equipment in the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 or the year ended August 27, 2005.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized. SFAS No. 142 requires that companies test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. In addition, SFAS No. 142 also requires that companies test goodwill if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned below its carrying amount. The Company’s evaluation considers changes in the operating environment, competitive information, market trends, operating performance and cash flow modeling. Management completes its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and there have been no impairments of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets in the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 or the year ended August 27, 2005. Future events could cause management to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill or other intangibles associated with previously acquired businesses are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over useful lives, which are based on management estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. Definite-lived intangible assets are also evaluated for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144. There have been no impairments of definite-lived intangible assets in the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 or the year ended August 27, 2005.

The Company recorded amortization expense of $4.6 million and $4.4 million for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 and May 28, 2005, respectively, and $1.6 million and $1.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 and May 28, 2005, respectively.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Under this accounting method, the Company recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Company depreciates, on a straight-line basis, the amount added to property and equipment and recognizes accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the various remaining lives which range from approximately four to twenty-five years. The estimated liability has been based on historical experience in decommissioning nuclear laundry facilities, estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, external vendor estimates as to the cost to decommission these assets in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements.

Insurance

The Company self-insures for certain obligations related to health, workers’ compensation, vehicles and general liability programs. The Company also purchases stop-loss insurance policies to protect itself from catastrophic losses. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the potential value associated with reported claims and for events that have occurred, but have not been reported. The Company’s estimates consider historical claims experience and other factors. The Company’s liabilities are based on estimates, and, while the Company believes that its accruals are adequate, the ultimate liability may be significantly different from the amounts recorded. Changes in claim experience, the Company’s ability to settle claims or other estimates and judgments used by management could have a material impact on the amount and timing of expense for any period.

Environmental and Other Contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including environmental matters, personal injury, customer contract matters and employment claims. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered before a contingent liability is recorded. The Company records accruals for environmental and other contingencies based on enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, the Company’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments, and the input of outside consultants and attorneys.

The estimated liability for environmental contingencies has been discounted using risk-free interest rates ranging from 4% to 5% over periods ranging from ten to thirty years. The estimated current costs, net of legal settlements with insurance carriers, have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, management’s estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities. Refer to Note 7 of these consolidated financial statements for additional discussion and analysis.

Pensions

The calculation of pension expense and the corresponding liability requires the use of a number of critical assumptions, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from these assumptions. Pension expense increases as the expected rate of return on pension plan assets decreases. Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in our pension plans will impact the Company’s future pension expense and liabilities. The Company cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the amounts recognized for income tax and financial reporting purposes at currently enacted tax rates. The Company computes income tax expense by jurisdiction based on its operations in each jurisdiction.

The Company is periodically reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, the Company records estimated reserves for probable exposures, in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.

The Company’s effective income tax rate was 39.1% and 38.5% for the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006, respectively, as compared to 38.0% for the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2005. The increase in the effective income tax rate was primarily due to $0.3 million of tax reserves booked in the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 related to tax exposure identified by the Company.

Net Income Per Share

The Company follows the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FAS 128, in determining when the two-class method, as defined in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, must be utilized in calculating earnings per share. The Common Stock of the Company has a 25% dividend preference to the Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock, which has ten votes per share as opposed to one vote per share for the Common Stock, is not freely transferable but may be converted at any time on a one-for-one basis into Common Stock at the option of the holder of the Class B Common Stock. EITF Issue No. 03-6 requires the income per share for each class of common stock to be calculated assuming 100% of the Company’s earnings are distributed as dividends to each class of common stock based on their respective dividend rights, even though the Company does not anticipate distributing 100% of its earnings as dividends. The effective result of EITF Issue No. 03-6 is that the earnings per share for the Common Stock will be 25% greater than the earnings per share of the Class B Common Stock.

Basic earnings per share for the Company’s Common Stock and Class B Common Stock is calculated by dividing net income allocated to Common Stock and Class B Common Stock by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding, respectively. Diluted earnings per share for the Company’s Common Stock assumes the conversion of all the Company’s Class B Common Stock into Common Stock and the exercise of outstanding stock options under the Company’s stock based employee compensation plans, when dilutive.

For the basic earnings per share calculation, net income available to the Company’s shareholders is allocated among the Company’s two classes of common stock: Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. The allocation among each class is based upon the two-class method. The following table shows how net income is allocated using this method:

The diluted earnings per share calculation assumes the conversion of all the Company’s Class B Common Stock into Common Stock, so no allocation of earnings to Class B Common Stock is required.

The following table illustrates the weighted average number of Common and Class B Common shares outstanding during the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 and May 28, 2005 and is utilized in the calculation of earnings per share:

Stock options to purchase 70,900 shares of Common Stock were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 because they were anti-dilutive.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans which are described in Note 8 to these consolidated financial statements.

Prior to August 28, 2005, the Company accounted for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value-based method as prescribed by APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, no compensation expense was recognized because the exercise price of the Company’s stock options was equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant.

Effective August 28, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, under the modified prospective method as described in SFAS No. 123R. Under this transition method, compensation expense recognized in the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 includes compensation expense for all stock-based payments granted subsequent to the Company’s adoption of SFAS 123R and for all stock-based payments granted prior to August 28, 2005, but which were not yet fully vested as of that date, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123. Accordingly, prior period financial statements have not been restated. The total amount of compensation expense recognized in the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 was $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, which was recorded in the consolidated statement of operations in both operating costs and selling and administrative expenses. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R had no effect on the Company’s cash flows for the thirty-nine or thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006.

As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123R on August 28, 2005, the Company’s income before income taxes and net income were lower for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 by $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and were lower for the thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 by $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, than if it had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB No. 25. Basic earnings per share for Common Stock and Class B Common Stock and diluted earnings per share for Common Stock were all lower for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 by $0.02 than if the Company had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB No. 25. Basic earning per share for Class B Common Stock was lower for the thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 by $0.01 than if the Company had continued to account for share-based compensation under APB No. 25. The adoption of SFAS 123R had no effect on basic or diluted earnings per share for Common Stock for the thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006.

The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair-value recognition provisions required by SFAS No. 123R for the thirty-nine and thirteen weeks ended May 28, 2005.

As prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. For the thirty-nine weeks ended May 27, 2006 and May 28, 2005, the following weighted average assumptions were used:

There were no options granted during either the thirteen weeks ended May 27, 2006 or May 28, 2005.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. These reclassifications did not impact current or historical net income or shareholders’ equity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On October 13, 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payments, which requires companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments, including employee stock options. SFAS No. 123R was effective as of the first fiscal period beginning after June 15, 2005. In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107 regarding the SEC’s interpretation of SFAS No. 123R and the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The Company adopted SFAS No. 123R on August 28, 2005, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. See “Stock Based Compensation” above for further discussion regarding stock based compensation.

2. Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income are as follows: