UNIVERSAL CORP /VA/ - Quarter Report: 2018 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2018 | ||
OR | ||
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ______________TO_______________ |
Commission File Number: 001-00652
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Virginia (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 54-0414210 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) | |
9201 Forest Hill Avenue, Richmond, Virginia (Address of principal executive offices) | 23235 (Zip Code) |
804-359-9311
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting company o | Emerging growth company o |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 3, 2018, the total number of shares of common stock outstanding was 24,957,418.
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item No. | Page | |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
1. | ||
2. | ||
3. | ||
4. | ||
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION | ||
1. | ||
2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues | $ | 379,719 | $ | 284,622 | ||||
Costs and expenses | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 307,498 | 230,765 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses | 63,852 | 47,480 | ||||||
Operating income | 8,369 | 6,377 | ||||||
Equity in pretax earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates | 539 | (435 | ) | |||||
Other non-operating income (expense) | 190 | 178 | ||||||
Interest income | 512 | 670 | ||||||
Interest expense | 3,949 | 3,932 | ||||||
Income before income taxes and other items | 5,661 | 2,858 | ||||||
Income taxes | (5,399 | ) | (463 | ) | ||||
Net income | 11,060 | 3,321 | ||||||
Less: net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | 2,119 | 256 | ||||||
Net income attributable to Universal Corporation | $ | 13,179 | $ | 3,577 | ||||
Earnings per share: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.14 | ||||
Diluted | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.14 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: | ||||||||
Basic | 25,064,420 | 25,407,293 | ||||||
Diluted | 25,284,700 | 25,632,157 | ||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes | $ | (2,477 | ) | $ | 9,109 | |||
Less: comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of income taxes | 2,278 | 304 | ||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation, net of income taxes | $ | (199 | ) | $ | 9,413 | |||
Dividends declared per common share | $ | 0.75 | $ | 0.54 |
See accompanying notes.
3
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of dollars)
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Current assets | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 66,008 | $ | 128,605 | $ | 234,128 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net | 247,812 | 209,321 | 377,119 | |||||||||
Advances to suppliers, net | 70,731 | 58,218 | 122,786 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable—unconsolidated affiliates | 101,483 | 62,239 | 2,040 | |||||||||
Inventories—at lower of cost or net realizable value: | ||||||||||||
Tobacco | 947,520 | 917,945 | 679,428 | |||||||||
Other | 73,358 | 74,628 | 69,301 | |||||||||
Prepaid income taxes | 20,242 | 16,523 | 16,032 | |||||||||
Other current assets | 71,511 | 71,823 | 88,209 | |||||||||
Total current assets | 1,598,665 | 1,539,302 | 1,589,043 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment | ||||||||||||
Land | 23,041 | 22,787 | 23,180 | |||||||||
Buildings | 268,789 | 267,740 | 271,757 | |||||||||
Machinery and equipment | 636,425 | 606,473 | 634,660 | |||||||||
928,255 | 897,000 | 929,597 | ||||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation | (604,765 | ) | (580,927 | ) | (605,803 | ) | ||||||
323,490 | 316,073 | 323,794 | ||||||||||
Other assets | ||||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangibles | 98,892 | 99,023 | 98,927 | |||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates | 83,327 | 82,645 | 89,302 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 19,162 | 25,451 | 17,118 | |||||||||
Other noncurrent assets | 45,632 | 42,494 | 50,448 | |||||||||
247,013 | 249,613 | 255,795 | ||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,169,168 | $ | 2,104,988 | $ | 2,168,632 |
See accompanying notes.
4
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of dollars)
June 30, | June 30, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||||||||
Notes payable and overdrafts | $ | 73,291 | $ | 45,064 | $ | 45,421 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 199,214 | 189,676 | 163,763 | |||||||||
Accounts payable—unconsolidated affiliates | — | 869 | 16,072 | |||||||||
Customer advances and deposits | 3,414 | 1,841 | 7,021 | |||||||||
Accrued compensation | 20,969 | 19,404 | 27,886 | |||||||||
Income taxes payable | 6,813 | 2,132 | 7,557 | |||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt | — | — | — | |||||||||
Total current liabilities | 303,701 | 258,986 | 267,720 | |||||||||
Long-term debt | 369,174 | 368,821 | 369,086 | |||||||||
Pensions and other postretirement benefits | 60,360 | 77,312 | 64,843 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 45,628 | 31,189 | 45,955 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes | 28,033 | 46,836 | 35,726 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | 806,896 | 783,144 | 783,330 | |||||||||
Shareholders’ equity | ||||||||||||
Universal Corporation: | ||||||||||||
Preferred stock: | ||||||||||||
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, no par value, 500,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding | — | — | — | |||||||||
Common stock, no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized 24,957,418 shares issued and outstanding (25,325,595 at June 30, 2017, and 24,930,725 at March 31, 2018) | 322,889 | 321,215 | 321,559 | |||||||||
Retained earnings | 1,072,230 | 1,024,567 | 1,080,934 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (73,442 | ) | (63,723 | ) | (60,064 | ) | ||||||
Total Universal Corporation shareholders' equity | 1,321,677 | 1,282,059 | 1,342,429 | |||||||||
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries | 40,595 | 39,785 | 42,873 | |||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 1,362,272 | 1,321,844 | 1,385,302 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | $ | 2,169,168 | $ | 2,104,988 | $ | 2,168,632 |
See accompanying notes.
5
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of dollars)
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 11,060 | $ | 3,321 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used by operating activities: | ||||||||
Depreciation | 8,645 | 8,818 | ||||||
Net provision for losses (recoveries) on advances and guaranteed loans to suppliers | (797 | ) | 1,290 | |||||
Foreign currency remeasurement (gain) loss, net | (943 | ) | (5,917 | ) | ||||
Other, net | (6,928 | ) | (1,944 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net | (179,366 | ) | (122,647 | ) | ||||
Net cash used by operating activities | (168,329 | ) | (117,079 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | (11,018 | ) | (6,356 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | 589 | 206 | ||||||
Net cash used by investing activities | (10,429 | ) | (6,150 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | ||||||||
Issuance (repayment) of short-term debt, net | 28,978 | (16,058 | ) | |||||
Repurchase of common stock | (1,443 | ) | — | |||||
Dividends paid on common stock | (13,712 | ) | (13,649 | ) | ||||
Other | (2,656 | ) | (2,827 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities | 11,167 | (32,534 | ) | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash | (529 | ) | 375 | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (168,120 | ) | (155,388 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 234,128 | 283,993 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 66,008 | $ | 128,605 |
See accompanying notes.
6
UNIVERSAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Universal Corporation, which together with its subsidiaries is referred to herein as “Universal” or the “Company,” is the leading global leaf tobacco supplier. Because of the seasonal nature of the Company’s business, the results of operations for any fiscal quarter will not necessarily be indicative of results to be expected for other quarters or a full fiscal year. All adjustments necessary to state fairly the results for the period have been included and were of a normal recurring nature. Certain amounts in prior year statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.
NOTE 2. ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” and all related supplemental amendments (“ASU 2014-09”) effective April 1, 2018, the beginning of the current fiscal year. ASU 2014-09 superseded substantially all of the current revenue recognition guidance under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), and was developed under a joint project with the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) to improve and converge the existing revenue recognition accounting guidance in U.S. GAAP and International Accounting Standards. Under ASU 2014-09, the central underlying principle is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers at an amount determined by the consideration a company expects to receive for those goods or services. The guidance outlines a five-step process for determining the amount and timing of revenue to be recognized from those arrangements. ASU 2014-09 and the supplemental amendments were codified into the U.S. GAAP hierarchy in Section 606 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC 606”). The Company's implementation process for ASU 2014-09 included a comprehensive assessment of its contractual arrangements with customers that involved classifying those arrangements by specific revenue streams, documenting the relevant terms and conditions of the contracts, and determining the appropriate revenue recognition for those contracts under the new guidance. Through this process, the Company determined in all cases that revenue recognition under the new guidance based on the transfer of its goods and services to customers was substantially the same as under the prior guidance. Accordingly, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 had no impact on the amount and timing of revenue recognized, and no adjustment for the cumulative effect of implementing the new guidance was required under the modified retrospective transition adoption method selected by the Company. The disclosures required for revenue recognition under the new guidance are provided in Note 3.
The Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-07, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)" ("ASU 2017-07") effective April 1, 2018. ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component of pension or other postretirement benefits expense in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. With the adoption of ASU 2017-07, the service cost component of net periodic benefits cost continues to be reported in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income, or in cost of goods sold for the portion that is recorded as a component of the cost of inventory sold or services provided to customers. The other components of net benefit cost, which include interest cost, expected return on plan assets, and the net amortization and deferral of actuarial gains and losses, are included in other non-operating income (expense) in the consolidated statements of income. The financial statement presentation for comparative prior periods has been reclassified accordingly using amounts previously disclosed for net periodic benefit cost as a practical expedient. The components of net periodic benefit cost and other disclosures related to the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plans are provided in Note 9.
The Company also adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" ("ASU 2016-15") effective April 1, 2018. ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on the disclosure and classification of certain items within the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted ASU 2016-15 using the retrospective approach. The adoption did not have an effect on the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
The Company further adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments-Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” ("ASU 2016-01") effective April 1, 2018. ASU 2016-01 requires all equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income (other than those
7
accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee). The adoption of ASU 2016-01 did not have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.
Finally, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-06, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory" ("ASU 2016-16") effective April 1, 2018. ASU 2016-16 requires companies to recognize the income tax effects of intercompany sales or transfers of assets other than inventory in the income statement as income tax expense in the period the sale or transfer occurs, rather than deferring those tax effects until the asset has been sold to a third-party or otherwise recognized in earnings through depreciation, amortization, or impairment. In prior fiscal reporting periods, various subsidiaries of the Company have sold tobacco processing equipment to other subsidiaries, and the related income effects have been deferred as required under the previous accounting guidance. Under the modified retrospective transition method required by the guidance, upon the adoption of ASU 2016-16, the Company recorded a $1.9 million reduction to retained earnings in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 for the cumulative effect of recognizing the deferred income tax effects on all prior intercompany sales of equipment as of the date of adoption.
Pronouncements to be Adopted in Future Periods
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to recognize lease payment obligations as a lease liability and the corresponding right-of-use asset as a leased asset in the balance sheet for the term of the lease. This guidance supersedes Topic 840 “Leases” and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2016-02 effective April 1, 2019, which is the beginning of its fiscal year ending March 31, 2020. The Company has collected information on its leasing arrangements for all subsidiaries and operating locations and is currently in the process of reviewing the individual lease contracts, selecting and implementing third-party software that will be used to track its leasing arrangements and account for the right-of-use assets and related lease obligations, and evaluating whether it will elect to adopt certain practical expedients for implementation that are provided for under the new guidance. The Company has not yet developed an estimate of the total right-of-use asset and lease obligation balances that will be recorded upon the implementation of ASU 2016-02.
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)" ("ASU 2017-04"). Under current accounting guidance, the fair value of a reporting unit to which a specific goodwill balance relates is first compared to its carrying value in the financial statements (Step 1). If that comparison indicates that the goodwill is impaired, an implied fair value for the goodwill must then be calculated by deducting the individual fair values of all other assets and liabilities, including any unrecognized intangible assets, from the total fair value of the reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting guidance by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test and using the fair value of the reporting unit determined in Step 1 to measure the goodwill impairment loss. The updated guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company will be required to adopt ASU 2017-04 effective April 1, 2020, which is the beginning of its fiscal year ending March 31, 2021, and is currently evaluating the impact that the updated guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
The majority of the Company’s consolidated revenue consists of sales of processed leaf tobacco to customers. The Company also earns revenue from processing leaf tobacco owned by customers and from various other services provided to customers. Payment terms with customers vary depending on customer creditworthiness, product types, services provided, and other factors. Contract durations and payment terms for all revenue categories generally do not exceed one year. Therefore, the Company has applied a practical expedient to not adjust the transaction price for the effects of financing components, as the Company expects that the period from the time the revenue for a transaction is recognized to the time the customer pays for the related good or service transferred will be one year or less. Below is a description of the major revenue generating categories from contracts with customers.
Tobacco Sales
The majority of the Company’s business involves purchasing leaf tobacco from farmers in the origins where it is grown, processing and packaging the tobacco in its factories, and then transferring ownership and control of the tobacco to customers. On a much smaller basis, the Company also sources processed tobacco from third-party suppliers for re-sale to customers. The contracts for tobacco sales with customers create a performance obligation to transfer tobacco to the customer. Transaction prices for the sale of tobaccos are primarily based on negotiated fixed prices, but the Company does have a small number of cost-plus contracts with certain customers. Cost-plus arrangements provide the Company reimbursement of the cost to purchase and process the tobacco, plus a contractually agreed-upon profit margin. The Company utilizes the most likely amount methodology under
8
the accounting guidance to recognize revenue for cost-plus arrangements with customers. Shipping and handling costs under tobacco sales contracts with customers are treated as fulfillment costs and included in the transaction price. Taxes assessed by government authorities on the sale of leaf tobacco products are excluded from the transaction price. At the point in time that the customer obtains control over the tobacco, which is typically aligned with physical shipment under the contractual terms with the customer, the Company completes its performance obligation and recognizes the revenue for the sale.
Processing Revenue
Processing and packing of customer-owned leaf tobacco is a short-duration process. Processing charges are primarily based on negotiated fixed prices. Under normal operating conditions, customer-owned raw tobacco that is placed into the production line exits as processed and packed tobacco within one hour and is then later transported to customer-designated storage facilities. The revenue for these services is recognized when the performance obligation is satisfied, which is generally when processing is completed. The Company’s operating history and contract analyses indicate that customer requirements for processed tobacco are consistently met upon completion of processing.
Other Revenue
From time to time, the Company enters into various arrangements with customers to provide other value-added services that may include blending, chemical and physical testing of tobacco, and service cutting for select manufacturers. These other arrangements are a much smaller portion of the Company’s business, are typically less frequent, and are separate and distinct contractual agreements from the Company’s tobacco sales or processing arrangements with customers. The transaction prices and timing of revenue recognition of these items are determined by the specifics of each contract.
Disaggregation of Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The following table disaggregates the Company’s revenue by significant revenue-generating category for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Tobacco sales | $ | 345,137 | $ | 257,221 | ||||
Processing revenue | 21,707 | 13,354 | ||||||
Other sales and revenue from contracts with customers | 8,126 | 8,736 | ||||||
Total revenue from contracts with customers | 374,970 | 279,311 | ||||||
Other operating sales and revenues | 4,749 | 5,311 | ||||||
Consolidated sales and other operating revenues | $ | 379,719 | $ | 284,622 |
Other operating sales and revenues consists principally of interest on advances to suppliers and dividend income from unconsolidated affiliates.
NOTE 4. GUARANTEES, OTHER CONTINGENT LIABILITIES, AND OTHER MATTERS
Guarantees and Other Contingent Liabilities
Guarantees of Bank Loans and Other Contingent Liabilities
Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers for crop financing have long been industry practice in Brazil and support the farmers’ production of tobacco there. The Company's operating subsidiary in Brazil had guarantees outstanding at June 30, 2018, all of which expire within one year. The subsidiary withholds payments due to the farmers on delivery of tobacco and forwards those payments to the third-party banks. Failure of farmers to deliver sufficient quantities of tobacco to the subsidiary to cover its obligations to the third-party banks could result in a liability for the subsidiary under the related guarantees; however, in that case, the subsidiary would have recourse against the farmers. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company’s subsidiary could be required to make at June 30, 2018, was the face amount, $3 million including unpaid accrued interest ($3 million at June 30, 2017, and $20 million at March 31, 2018). The fair value of the guarantees was a liability of approximately $1 million
9
at June 30, 2018 ($1 million at June 30, 2017, and $1 million at March 31, 2018). In addition to these guarantees, the Company has other contingent liabilities totaling approximately $2 million at June 30, 2018, primarily related to outstanding letters of credit.
Value-Added Tax Assessments in Brazil
As further discussed below, the Company’s local operating subsidiaries pay significant amounts of value-added tax (“VAT”) in connection with their operations, which generate tax credits that they normally are entitled to recover through offset, refund, or sale to third parties. In Brazil, VAT is assessed at the state level when green tobacco is transferred between states. The Company’s operating subsidiary there pays VAT when tobaccos grown in the states of Santa Catarina and Parana are transferred to its factory in the state of Rio Grande do Sul for processing. The subsidiary has received assessments for additional VAT plus interest and penalties from tax authorities for the states of Santa Catarina and Parana based on audits of the subsidiary’s VAT filings for specified periods. In June 2011, tax authorities for the state of Santa Catarina issued assessments for tax, interest, and penalties for periods from 2006 through 2009 totaling approximately $12 million. In September 2014, tax authorities for the state of Parana issued an assessment for tax, interest, and penalties for periods from 2009 through 2014 totaling approximately $14 million. Those amounts are based on the exchange rate for the Brazilian currency at June 30, 2018. Management of the operating subsidiary and outside counsel believe that errors were made by the tax authorities for both states in determining all or significant portions of these assessments and that various defenses support the subsidiary’s positions.
With respect to the Santa Catarina assessments, the subsidiary took appropriate steps to contest the full amount of the claims. As of June 30, 2018, a portion of the subsidiary’s arguments had been accepted, and the outstanding assessment had been reduced. The reduced assessment, together with the related accumulated interest through the end of the current reporting period, totaled approximately $13 million (at the June 30, 2018 exchange rate). The subsidiary is continuing to contest the full remaining amount of the assessment. While the range of reasonably possible loss is zero up to the full $13 million remaining assessment with interest, based on the strength of the subsidiary’s defenses, no loss within that range is considered probable at this time and no liability has been recorded at June 30, 2018.
With respect to the Parana assessment, management of the subsidiary and outside counsel challenged the full amount of the claim. A significant portion of the Parana assessment was based on positions taken by the tax authorities that management and outside counsel believe deviate significantly from the underlying statutes and relevant case law. In addition, under the law, the subsidiary’s tax filings for certain periods covered in the assessment were no longer open to any challenge by the tax authorities. In December 2015, the Parana tax authorities withdrew the initial claim and subsequently issued a new assessment covering the same tax periods. The new assessment totaled approximately $4 million at the June 30, 2018 exchange rate, reflecting a substantial reduction from the original $14 million assessment. Notwithstanding the reduction, management and outside counsel continue to believe that the new assessment is not supported by the underlying statutes and relevant case law and have challenged the full amount of the claim. The range of reasonably possible loss is considered to be zero up to the full $4 million assessment. However, based on the strength of the subsidiary's defenses, no loss within that range is considered probable at this time and no liability has been recorded at June 30, 2018.
In both states, the process for reaching a final resolution to the assessments is expected to be lengthy, and management is not currently able to predict when either case will be concluded. Should the subsidiary ultimately be required to pay any tax, interest, or penalties in either case, the portion paid for tax would generate VAT credits that the subsidiary may be able to recover.
Tanzania Fair Competition Commission Proceeding
In June 2012, the Company’s Tanzanian subsidiary, Tanzania Leaf Tobacco Company Ltd. (“TLTC”), entered into a two crop-year supply agreement for unprocessed “green” tobacco with a newly-formed Tanzanian subsidiary of one of the Company’s major customers. The agreement involved green tobacco purchases from four of the approximately 400 grower cooperatives in Tanzania, which allowed the customer and its Tanzanian subsidiary on a small test basis to evaluate whether it would be a viable alternative for the customer to establish its own vertically integrated supply operations in that market. Prior to that time, the customer’s subsidiary did not exist, and it only purchased processed Tanzanian tobacco from tobacco dealers in specified amounts and only for certain grades and stalk positions. In contrast, the agreement with TLTC required the customer’s subsidiary to purchase green tobacco on a “run of crop” basis. “Run of crop” requires the purchase of all green tobacco produced on the tobacco plant, regardless of grade or stalk position. The agreement, therefore, enabled the customer’s subsidiary on a small test basis to evaluate the quality of green tobacco purchased on a “run of crop” basis and to assess how such tobacco would be suited to the customer's tobacco requirements. The customer unilaterally elected to establish its own vertically integrated supply operations in Tanzania after the expiration of the agreement, and its subsidiary began purchasing green tobacco directly from Tanzanian grower cooperatives during the second crop year thereafter.
Despite the pro-competitive object and effect of the agreement between TLTC and the customer’s subsidiary, in October 2016, the Tanzania Fair Competition Commission (“FCC”) notified TLTC and the customer’s subsidiary that it reviewed the agreement
10
and provisionally concluded that it infringed Tanzania antitrust law by having the object and effect of preventing competition in the purchase of unprocessed green tobacco in the area in which the four grower cooperatives were located. The FCC also provisionally concluded that the Company’s U.S. subsidiary, Universal Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. (“ULT”), and additional subsidiaries of the customer, were jointly and severally liable for the actions of TLTC and the customer’s Tanzanian subsidiary, respectively. TLTC and ULT submitted a written response contesting the FCC’s allegations, and on February 27, 2018, the FCC issued its decision to TLTC and ULT which confirmed its initial conclusion that the agreement infringed Tanzanian antitrust law. In its decision, the FCC concluded incorrectly that the parties to the agreement unfairly benefited in the amount of $105 thousand. The FCC arbitrarily assessed a fine jointly against TLTC and ULT of approximately $197 million and a fine jointly against the customer’s Tanzanian subsidiary and another subsidiary of the customer exceeding $1 billion.
TLTC and ULT have worked closely with expert legal advisors and economists on this matter. Based on these engagements and consultations, the Company firmly believes the FCC’s allegations are frivolous and clearly without merit or support from the facts, law or economic analysis. The Company further believes the FCC’s proceedings were rife with irregularities and did not comply with applicable legal and regulatory procedures with respect to this matter, including failing to establish jurisdiction over ULT or to offer a legal justification for including ULT in the proceeding. To the contrary, the Company believes the facts, law, and economic analysis clearly support the legality and pro-competitive nature of the agreement and support a proper conclusion that there was no infringement of Tanzania antitrust law, and the agreement had no negative impact on the Tanzania tobacco market. The Company further believes the FCC’s proposed fine is ludicrous, unwarranted, and contrary to Tanzania law. TLTC and ULT immediately appealed the FCC findings to the Tanzania Fair Competition Tribunal, which immediately stayed the execution of any FCC fines. The Company is unable to predict how long the appeal process will take; however, the Company believes it could last several years. At this time, the Company believes that the likelihood of incurring any material liability in this matter is remote, and no amount has been recorded.
Other Legal and Tax Matters
Various subsidiaries of the Company are involved in litigation and tax examinations incidental to their business activities. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management is vigorously defending the matters and does not currently expect that any of them will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial position. However, should one or more of these matters be resolved in a manner adverse to management’s current expectation, the effect on the Company’s results of operations for a particular fiscal reporting period could be material.
Advances to Suppliers
In many sourcing origins where the Company operates, it provides agronomy services and seasonal advances of seed, seedlings, fertilizer, and other supplies to tobacco farmers for crop production, or makes seasonal cash advances to farmers for the procurement of those inputs. These advances are short term, are repaid upon delivery of tobacco to the Company, and are reported in advances to suppliers in the consolidated balance sheets. In several origins, the Company has made long-term advances to tobacco farmers to finance curing barns and other farm infrastructure. In some years, due to low crop yields and other factors, individual farmers may not deliver sufficient volumes of tobacco to fully repay their seasonal advances, and the Company may extend repayment of those advances into future crop years. The long-term portion of advances is included in other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Both the current and the long-term portions of advances to suppliers are reported net of allowances recorded when the Company determines that amounts outstanding are not likely to be collected. Short-term and long-term advances to suppliers totaled $94 million at June 30, 2018, $89 million at June 30, 2017, and $150 million at March 31, 2018. The related valuation allowances totaled $19 million at June 30, 2018, $29 million at June 30, 2017, and $22 million at March 31, 2018, and were estimated based on the Company’s historical loss information and crop projections. The allowances were reduced by net recoveries of approximately $0.8 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 and increased by net provisions of $1.3 million in the three-month period ended June 30, 2017. These net provisions and recoveries are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income. Interest on advances is recognized in earnings upon the farmers’ delivery of tobacco in payment of principal and interest.
Recoverable Value-Added Tax Credits
In many foreign countries, the Company’s local operating subsidiaries pay significant amounts of value-added tax (“VAT”) on purchases of unprocessed and processed tobacco, crop inputs, packing materials, and various other goods and services. In some countries, VAT is a national tax, and in other countries it is assessed at the state level. Items subject to VAT vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, as do the rates at which the tax is assessed. When tobacco is sold to customers in the country of origin, the operating subsidiaries generally collect VAT on those sales. The subsidiaries are normally permitted to offset their VAT payments against the collections and remit only the incremental VAT collections to the tax authorities. When tobacco is sold for export, VAT is normally not assessed. In countries where tobacco sales are predominately for export markets, VAT collections generated on downstream
11
sales are often not sufficient to fully offset the subsidiaries’ VAT payments. In those situations, unused VAT credits can accumulate. Some jurisdictions have procedures that allow companies to apply for refunds of unused VAT credits from the tax authorities, but the refund process often takes an extended period of time and it is not uncommon for refund applications to be challenged or rejected in part on technical grounds. Other jurisdictions may permit companies to sell or transfer unused VAT credits to third parties in private transactions, although approval for such transactions must normally be obtained from the tax authorities, limits on the amounts that can be transferred may be imposed, and the proceeds realized may be heavily discounted from the face value of the credits. Due to these factors, local operating subsidiaries in some countries can accumulate significant balances of VAT credits over time. The Company reviews these balances on a regular basis and records valuation allowances on the credits to reflect amounts that are not expected to be recovered, as well as discounts anticipated on credits that are expected to be sold or transferred. At June 30, 2018, the aggregate balance of recoverable tax credits held by the Company’s subsidiaries totaled approximately $53 million ($56 million at June 30, 2017, and $49 million at March 31, 2018), and the related valuation allowances totaled approximately $16 million ($15 million at June 30, 2017, and $15 million at March 31, 2018). The net balances are reported in other current assets and other noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE 5. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(in thousands, except share and per share data) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share | ||||||||
Numerator for basic earnings per share | ||||||||
Net income attributable to Universal Corporation | $ | 13,179 | $ | 3,577 | ||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | 25,064,420 | 25,407,293 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.53 | $ | 0.14 | ||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share | ||||||||
Numerator for diluted earnings per share | ||||||||
Net income attributable to Universal Corporation | $ | 13,179 | $ | 3,577 | ||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share: | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding | 25,064,420 | 25,407,293 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities | ||||||||
Employee share-based awards | 220,280 | 224,864 | ||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share | 25,284,700 | 25,632,157 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.14 |
NOTE 6. INCOME TAXES
The Company operates in the United States and many foreign countries and is subject to the tax laws of many jurisdictions. Changes in tax laws or the interpretation of tax laws can affect the Company’s earnings, as can the resolution of pending and contested tax issues. The Company's consolidated effective income tax rate is affected by a number of factors, including the mix of domestic and foreign earnings and the effect of exchange rate changes on deferred taxes.
In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was passed by the United States Congress and signed into law by the President. This new law made significant changes to U.S. income taxation at the federal level for individuals, pass-through entities, and corporations. For corporations, the changes included a reduction in the statutory rate on taxable income from 35% to 21% and a move from a worldwide tax system to a territorial tax system for companies with foreign operations. Under the territorial system, except in limited situations or for limited types of income, earnings from foreign operations are generally no longer subject to U.S. taxation. To accommodate the move from the previous worldwide tax system, the law provides for a one-time transition tax on the undistributed post-1986 earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of either November 2, 2017 or December 31, 2017, whichever
12
undistributed earnings amount is greater. Other provisions of the new law allow for immediate expensing of investments in property, plant, and equipment and impose limitations on the deductibility of interest, executive compensation, and meals and entertainment expense. For tax years beginning after the date of enactment, the new law requires that certain income earned by foreign subsidiaries, referred to in the law as global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI"), be included in the U.S. taxable income of the parent company. The Company has made an accounting policy election to account for any additional tax resulting from the GILTI provisions in the year in which it is incurred and has not recorded any deferred taxes on temporary book-tax differences related to this income. For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, the Company’s U.S. federal statutory tax rate is the 21% rate under the new law. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018, the Company's U.S. federal statutory tax rate was 31.5%, reflecting a portion of the year at the 35% rate under the old law and a portion at the 21% rate under the new law. As under the prior tax law, the Company continues to assume repatriation of all undistributed earnings of its consolidated foreign subsidiaries and has therefore provided for expected foreign withholding taxes on the distribution of those earnings where applicable, net of any U.S. tax credit attributable those withholding taxes.
The Company accounted for the effects of the changes in the U.S. tax law in the period in which they were enacted, which was the third quarter of fiscal year 2018. Due to the complexities associated with understanding and applying various aspects of the new law and quantifying or estimating amounts upon which calculations required to account for new law are based, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) recognized that it would be difficult for many companies to complete the determination of all accounting effects of the new law within the available time frame for issuing their financial statements for the period of enactment. As a result, the SEC provided guidance permitting corporations to record and report specific items impacted by the new law on the basis of reasonable estimates where final amounts had not been determined and designate them as provisional amounts, or to continue to account for specific items under the previous law if it was not possible to develop reasonable estimates within the time frame for issuance of the financial statements for the period of enactment. As the accounting for provisional amounts is refined or finalized in subsequent reporting periods, companies are expected to record appropriate adjustments to the initial accounting, removing the provisional designation on an item in the period that the accounting for that item is completed. A measurement period of no more than one year from the date of enactment of the new law is provided under the SEC guidance to complete all such adjustments.
For the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company reported a net tax benefit on pretax earnings due to a $6.9 million benefit from reversing a portion of the liability previously recorded for dividend withholding taxes on the cumulative retained earnings of a foreign subsidiary. The reversal followed the resolution of uncertainties with the local country taxing authorities with respect to the inclusion of the tax under a tax holiday applicable to the subsidiary and was attributable to the portion of cumulative retained earnings that the Company expects to distribute prior to the expiration of the holiday. Without the dividend withholding tax reversal, income taxes for the quarter would have been expense of approximately $1.5 million, or a consolidated effective tax rate of approximately 27%. Consolidated income taxes for the period were generally based on the mix of U.S. and foreign earnings at the projected effective tax rates for fiscal year 2019 across all subsidiaries in their respective tax jurisdictions, plus certain incremental U.S. taxes applicable to a portion of the Company’s foreign earnings under the new tax law. The 27% effective tax rate without the dividend withholding tax reversal benefited from several smaller items that were also accounted for as discrete tax benefits in the quarter.
For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company also reported a net tax benefit on pretax earnings, determined under the prior U.S. tax law. Income taxes for the period were favorably impacted by several items that were accounted for as discrete tax benefits during the quarter, including a lower effective tax rate on dividend income from unconsolidated operations and excess tax deductions related to stock-based compensation awards that vested during the quarter. Without the benefit from the discrete items, income taxes for the quarter would have been expense of approximately $1 million, or a consolidated effective tax rate of about 34%.
All components of the Company’s consolidated tax position have been accounted for based on the new tax law, and no specific items are being accounted for under the previous tax law as permitted by the SEC guidance. However, the Company continues to review the primary effects of the new law on its financial statements. In addition, the Company continues to analyze certain aspects of the new law, and future treasury regulations, tax law technical corrections, notices, rulings, and other guidance issued by the government could result in changes or refinements to the amounts currently recorded. These include potential refinements of the amounts by which deferred tax assets and liabilities and the U.S. tax liability for undistributed foreign earnings were adjusted for the effects of the new law, which could be revised based on continuing review of the Company's calculation of the one-time transition tax, including further analysis of the undistributed earnings amounts represented by cash and other specified assets held by its foreign subsidiaries. As a result, those amounts continue to be classified as provisional, and additional adjustments, which could be material, may be recorded in future reporting periods within the allowed one-year measurement period as the final accounting is completed.
13
NOTE 7. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Universal is exposed to various risks in its worldwide operations and uses derivative financial instruments to manage two specific types of risks – interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. Interest rate risk has been managed by entering into interest rate swap agreements, and foreign currency exchange rate risk has been managed by entering into forward and option foreign currency exchange contracts. However, the Company’s policy also permits other types of derivative instruments. In addition, foreign currency exchange rate risk is also managed through strategies that do not involve derivative instruments, such as using local borrowings and other approaches to minimize net monetary positions in non-functional currencies. The disclosures below provide additional information about the Company’s hedging strategies, the derivative instruments used, and the effects of these activities on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and the consolidated balance sheets. In the consolidated statements of cash flows, the cash flows associated with all of these activities are reported in net cash provided by operating activities.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy for Interest Rate Risk
In January 2015, the Company entered into receive-floating/pay-fixed interest rate swap agreements that were designated and qualified as hedges of the exposure to changes in interest payment cash flows created by fluctuations in variable interest rates on two outstanding non-amortizing bank term loans. Although no significant ineffectiveness is expected with this hedging strategy, the effectiveness of the interest rate swaps is evaluated on a quarterly basis. At June 30, 2018, the total notional amount of the interest rate swaps was $370 million, which corresponded with the aggregate outstanding balance of the term loans.
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy for Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Related to Forecast Purchases of Tobacco and Related Processing Costs
The majority of the tobacco production in most countries outside the United States where Universal operates is sold in export markets at prices denominated in U.S. dollars. However, purchases of tobacco from farmers and most processing costs (such as labor and energy) in those countries are usually denominated in the local currency. Changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the local currencies where tobacco is grown and processed affect the ultimate U.S. dollar cost of the processed tobacco. From time to time, the Company enters into forward and option contracts to sell U.S. dollars and buy the local currency at future dates that coincide with the expected timing of a portion of the tobacco purchases and processing costs. This strategy offsets the variability of future U.S. dollar cash flows for tobacco purchases and processing costs for the foreign currency notional amount hedged. This hedging strategy has been used mainly for tobacco purchases and processing costs in Brazil. The aggregate U.S. dollar notional amount of forward and option contracts entered for these purposes during the first three months of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 was as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(in millions of dollars) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Tobacco purchases | $ | 59.8 | $ | 18.5 | ||||
Processing costs | 16.5 | 6.8 | ||||||
Total | $ | 76.3 | $ | 25.3 |
The increased U.S. dollar notional amounts for tobacco purchases and processing costs hedged during the three months ended June 30, 2018 primarily reflect variations in the timing of fixed-price orders from customers for their purchases from the respective crop years. All contracts related to tobacco purchases were designated and qualify as hedges of the future cash flows associated with the forecast purchases of tobacco. As a result, changes in fair values of the forward and option contracts have been recognized in comprehensive income as they occurred, but only recognized in earnings upon sale of the related tobacco to third-party customers. Forward and option contracts related to processing costs have not been designated as hedges, and gains and losses on those contracts have been recognized in earnings on a mark-to-market basis.
For substantially all hedge gains and losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2018, the Company expects to complete the sale of the tobacco and recognize the amounts in earnings during fiscal year 2019. Purchases of the 2018 Brazilian crop are expected to be completed by August 2018, and all forward contracts to hedge these purchases will mature and be settled by that time.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2018, the Company elected to early adopt recently-issued changes to the accounting guidance for derivatives and hedging activities (ASU 2017-12) to allow the application of the updated guidance to all forward foreign
14
currency exchange contracts entered to hedge exchange rate risk on the 2018 Brazilian crop purchases. The updated guidance simplifies the designation of those contracts as hedges, as well as the ongoing assessment of hedge effectiveness, but did not otherwise materially impact the Company's accounting for those contracts.
Hedging Strategy for Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Related to Net Local Currency Monetary Assets and Liabilities of Foreign Subsidiaries
Most of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries transact the majority of their sales in U.S. dollars and finance the majority of their operating requirements with U.S. dollar borrowings, and therefore use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. These subsidiaries normally have certain monetary assets and liabilities on their balance sheets that are denominated in the local currency. Those assets and liabilities can include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, advances to farmers and suppliers, deferred income tax assets and liabilities, recoverable value-added taxes, and other items. Net monetary assets and liabilities denominated in the local currency are remeasured into U.S. dollars each reporting period, generating gains and losses that the Company records in earnings as a component of selling, general, and administrative expenses. The level of net monetary assets or liabilities denominated in the local currency normally fluctuates throughout the year based on the operating cycle, but it is most common for monetary assets to exceed monetary liabilities, sometimes by a significant amount. When this situation exists and the local currency weakens against the U.S. dollar, remeasurement losses are generated. Conversely, remeasurement gains are generated on a net monetary asset position when the local currency strengthens against the U.S. dollar. To manage a portion of its exposure to currency remeasurement gains and losses, the Company enters into forward contracts to buy or sell the local currency at future dates coinciding with expected changes in the overall net local currency monetary asset position of the subsidiary. Gains and losses on the forward contracts are recorded in earnings as a component of selling, general, and administrative expenses for each reporting period as they occur, and thus directly offset the related remeasurement losses or gains in the consolidated statements of income for the notional amount hedged. The Company does not designate these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. The contracts are generally arranged to hedge the subsidiary's projected exposure to currency remeasurement risk for specified periods of time, and new contracts are entered as necessary throughout the year to replace previous contracts as they mature. The Company is currently using forward currency contracts to manage its exposure to currency remeasurement risk in Brazil. The total notional amounts of contracts outstanding at June 30, 2018 and 2017, and March 31, 2018, were approximately $24.9 million, $15.8 million, and $27.3 million, respectively. To further mitigate currency remeasurement exposure, the Company’s foreign subsidiaries may utilize short-term local currency financing during certain periods. This strategy, while not involving the use of derivative instruments, is intended to minimize the subsidiary’s net monetary position by financing a portion of the local currency monetary assets with local currency monetary liabilities, thus hedging a portion of the overall position.
Several of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries transact the majority of their sales and finance the majority of their operating requirements in their local currency, and therefore use their respective local currencies as the functional currency for reporting purposes. From time to time, these subsidiaries sell tobacco to customers in transactions that are not denominated in the functional currency. In those situations, the subsidiaries routinely enter into forward exchange contracts to offset currency risk for the period of time that a fixed-price order and the related trade account receivable are outstanding with the customer. The contracts are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes.
15
Effect of Derivative Financial Instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income
The table below outlines the effects of the Company’s use of derivative financial instruments on the consolidated statements of income for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Cash Flow Hedges - Interest Rate Swap Agreements | ||||||||
Derivative | ||||||||
Effective Portion of Hedge | ||||||||
Gain (loss) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | 1,556 | $ | (1,512 | ) | |||
Gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | $ | 291 | $ | (564 | ) | |||
Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | Interest expense | |||||||
Ineffective Portion of Hedge | ||||||||
Gain (loss) recognized in earnings | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Location of gain (loss) recognized in earnings | Selling, general and administrative expenses | |||||||
Hedged Item | ||||||||
Description of hedged item | Floating rate interest payments on term loan | |||||||
Cash Flow Hedges - Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | ||||||||
Derivative | ||||||||
Effective Portion of Hedge | ||||||||
Gain (loss) recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss | $ | (3,031 | ) | $ | (1,592 | ) | ||
Gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | ||
Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings | Cost of goods sold | |||||||
Ineffective Portion and Early De-designation of Hedges | ||||||||
Gain (loss) recognized in earnings | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | |||
Location of gain (loss) recognized in earnings | Selling, general and administrative expenses | |||||||
Hedged Item | ||||||||
Description of hedged item | Forecast purchases of tobacco in Brazil | |||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedges - Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | ||||||||
Gain (loss) recognized in earnings | $ | (5,445 | ) | $ | (563 | ) | ||
Location of gain (loss) recognized in earnings | Selling, general and administrative expenses |
For the interest rate swap agreements, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and any ineffective portion is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. For the forward and option foreign currency exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges of tobacco purchases in Brazil, a net hedge loss of approximately $3.1 million remained in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2018. That balance reflects gains and losses on contracts related to the 2018 crop, less the amount reclassified to earnings related to tobacco sold through June 30, 2018. The majority of the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss is expected to be recognized in earnings as a component of cost of goods sold in fiscal year 2019 as the 2018 Brazilian crop tobacco is sold to customers. Based on the hedging strategy, as the gain or loss is recognized in earnings, it is expected to be offset by a change in the direct cost for the tobacco or by a change in sales prices if the strategy has been mandated by the customer. Generally, margins on the sale of the tobacco will not be significantly affected.
16
Effect of Derivative Financial Instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
The table below outlines the effects of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2018 and 2017, and March 31, 2018:
Derivatives in a Fair Value Asset Position | Derivatives in a Fair Value Liability Position | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value as of | Balance Sheet Location | Fair Value as of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 | March 31, 2018 | June 30, 2018 | June 30, 2017 | March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements | Other non-current assets | $ | 9,527 | $ | 1,201 | $ | 8,262 | Other long-term liabilities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | Other current assets | — | 3 | 19 | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 193 | 479 | 123 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 9,527 | $ | 1,204 | $ | 8,281 | $ | 193 | $ | 479 | $ | 123 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | Other current assets | $ | 10 | $ | 623 | $ | 341 | Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 1,298 | $ | 468 | $ | 269 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 10 | $ | 623 | $ | 341 | $ | 1,298 | $ | 468 | $ | 269 |
Substantially all of the Company's forward and option foreign exchange contracts are subject to master netting arrangements whereby the right to offset occurs in the event of default by a participating party. The Company has elected to present these contracts on a gross basis in the consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE 8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Universal measures certain financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities at fair value based on applicable accounting guidance. The financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value include money market funds, trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans, interest rate swap agreements, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers. The application of the fair value guidance to nonfinancial assets and liabilities primarily includes the determination of fair values for goodwill and long-lived assets when indicators of potential impairment are present.
Under the accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The framework for measuring fair value is based on a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between observable inputs and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs are based on market data obtained from independent sources. Unobservable inputs require the Company to make its own assumptions about the value placed on an asset or liability by market participants because little or no market data exists. There are three levels within the fair value hierarchy:
Level | Description | |
1 | quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the reporting date; | |
2 | quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; and | |
3 | unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. |
As permitted under the accounting guidance, the Company uses net asset value per share ("NAV") as a practical expedient to measure the fair value of its money market funds. The fair values for those funds are presented under the heading "NAV" in the tables that follow in this disclosure. In measuring the fair value of liabilities, the Company considers the risk of non-performance
17
in determining fair value. Universal has not elected to report at fair value any financial instruments or any other assets or liabilities that are not required to be reported at fair value under current accounting guidance.
At June 30, 2018 and 2017, and at March 31, 2018, the Company had certain financial assets and financial liabilities that were required to be measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis. These assets and liabilities are listed in the tables below and are classified based on how their values were determined under the fair value hierarchy or the NAV practical expedient:
June 30, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Hierarchy | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | NAV | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 1,700 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,700 | ||||||||||
Trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans | — | 16,910 | — | — | 16,910 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements | — | — | 9,527 | — | 9,527 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | — | — | 10 | — | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial assets measured and reported at fair value | $ | 1,700 | $ | 16,910 | $ | 9,537 | $ | — | $ | 28,147 | ||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,201 | $ | 1,201 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | — | — | 1,491 | — | 1,491 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities measured and reported at fair value | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,491 | $ | 1,201 | $ | 2,692 |
June 30, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Hierarchy | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | NAV | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 22,209 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 22,209 | ||||||||||
Trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans | — | 17,273 | — | — | 17,273 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements | — | — | 1,201 | — | 1,201 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | — | — | 626 | — | 626 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial assets measured and reported at fair value | $ | 22,209 | $ | 17,273 | $ | 1,827 | $ | — | $ | 41,309 | ||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,169 | $ | 1,169 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | — | — | 947 | — | 947 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities measured and reported at fair value | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 947 | $ | 1,169 | $ | 2,116 |
18
March 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Hierarchy | ||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | NAV | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Money market funds | $ | 89,767 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 89,767 | ||||||||||
Trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans | — | 17,519 | — | — | 17,519 | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap agreements | — | — | 8,262 | — | 8,262 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | — | — | 360 | — | 360 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial assets measured and reported at fair value | $ | 89,767 | $ | 17,519 | $ | 8,622 | $ | — | $ | 115,908 | ||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 974 | $ | 974 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts | — | — | 392 | — | 392 | |||||||||||||||
Total financial liabilities measured and reported at fair value | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 392 | $ | 974 | $ | 1,366 |
Money market funds
The fair value of money market funds, which are reported in cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets, is based on NAV, which is the amount at which the funds are redeemable and is used as a practical expedient for fair value. These funds are not classified in the fair value hierarchy, but are disclosed as part of the fair value table above.
Trading securities associated with deferred compensation plans
Trading securities represent mutual fund investments that are matched to employee deferred compensation obligations. These investments are bought and sold as employees defer compensation, receive distributions, or make changes in the funds underlying their accounts. Quoted market prices (Level 1) are used to determine the fair values of the mutual funds.
Interest rate swap agreements
The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are determined based on dealer quotes using a discounted cash flow model matched to the contractual terms of each instrument. Since inputs to the model are observable and significant judgment is not required in determining the fair values, interest rate swaps are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Foreign currency exchange contracts
The fair values of forward and option foreign currency exchange contracts are also determined based on dealer quotes using a discounted cash flow model matched to the contractual terms of each instrument. Since inputs to the model are observable and significant judgment is not required in determining the fair values, forward and option foreign currency exchange contracts are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers
The Company guarantees bank loans to tobacco growers in Brazil for crop financing. In the event that the farmers default on their payments to the banks, the Company would be required to perform under the guarantees. The Company regularly evaluates the likelihood of farmer defaults based on an expected loss analysis and records the fair value of its guarantees as an obligation in its consolidated financial statements. The fair value of the guarantees is determined using the expected loss data for all loans outstanding at each measurement date. The present value of the cash flows associated with the estimated losses is then calculated at a risk-adjusted interest rate that is aligned with the expected duration of the liability and includes an adjustment for nonperformance risk. This approach is sometimes referred to as the “contingent claims valuation method.” Although historical loss data is an observable input, significant judgment is required in applying this information to the portfolio of guaranteed loans outstanding at each measurement date and in selecting a risk-adjusted interest rate. Significant increases or decreases in the risk-adjusted interest rate may result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. The guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers are therefore classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
19
A reconciliation of the change in the balance of the financial liability for guarantees of bank loans to tobacco growers (Level 3) for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 is provided below.
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 974 | $ | 1,177 | ||||
Payments under the guarantees and transfers to allowance for loss on direct loans to farmers (removal of prior crop year loans from portfolio) | 348 | — | ||||||
Provision for loss or transfers from allowance for loss on direct loans to farmers (addition of current crop year loans) | 35 | 28 | ||||||
Change in discount rate and estimated collection period | 36 | 15 | ||||||
Currency remeasurement | (192 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 1,201 | $ | 1,169 |
Long-term Debt
The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion, was approximately $370 million at each of the balance sheet dates June 30, 2018, June 30, 2017, and March 31, 2018. The Company estimates the fair value of its long-term debt using Level 2 inputs which are based upon quoted market prices for the same or similar obligations or on calculations that are based on the current interest rates available to the Company for debt of similar terms and maturities.
NOTE 9. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The Company sponsors several defined benefit pension plans covering U.S. salaried employees and certain foreign and other employee groups. These plans provide retirement benefits based primarily on employee compensation and years of service. The Company also sponsors defined benefit plans that provide postretirement health and life insurance benefits for eligible U.S. employees attaining specific age and service levels, although postretirement life insurance is no longer provided for active employees.
The components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||||||||
Service cost | $ | 1,455 | $ | 1,311 | $ | 59 | $ | 64 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 2,481 | 2,434 | 340 | 383 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (3,694 | ) | (3,717 | ) | (25 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||
Net amortization and deferral | 902 | 815 | (194 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 1,144 | $ | 843 | $ | 180 | $ | 354 | ||||||||
As discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-07, "Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)" effective April 1, 2018. Under the provisions of ASU 2017-07, the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost is reported in the same line of the consolidated income statement as other compensation costs attributable to the covered employees (primarily selling, general and administrative expense). The other components of net periodic benefit cost (interest cost, expected return on plan assets, and net amortization and deferral) are now reported separately below the total for operating income in other non-operating income (expense). Amounts have been reclassified accordingly for the comparative prior reporting period.
During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company made contributions of approximately $3.4 million to its pension plans. Additional contributions of approximately $12.0 million are expected during the remaining nine months of fiscal year 2019.
20
NOTE 10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Universal’s shareholders have approved Executive Stock Plans (“Plans”) under which officers, directors, and employees of the Company may receive grants and awards of common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance share awards (“PSAs”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), incentive stock options, and non-qualified stock options. The Company’s practice is to award grants of stock-based compensation to officers on an annual basis at the first regularly-scheduled meeting of the Executive Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”) in the fiscal year following the public release of the Company’s financial results for the prior year. The Compensation Committee administers the Company’s Plans consistently, following previously defined guidelines. In recent years, the Compensation Committee has awarded only grants of RSUs and PSAs. Awards of restricted stock, RSUs, and PSAs are currently outstanding under the Plans. The RSUs vest five years from the grant date and are then paid out in shares of common stock. Under the terms of the RSU awards, grantees receive dividend equivalents in the form of additional RSUs that vest and are paid out on the same date as the original RSU grant. The PSAs vest at the end of a three-year performance period that begins with the year of the grant, are paid out in shares of common stock shortly after the vesting date, and do not carry rights to dividends or dividend equivalents prior to vesting. Shares ultimately paid out under PSA grants are dependent on the achievement of predetermined performance measures established by the Compensation Committee and can range from zero to 150% of the stated award. The Company’s outside directors automatically receive restricted stock units following each annual meeting of shareholders and previously received restricted stock. RSUs awarded to outside directors vest three years after the grant date, and restricted shares vest upon the individual’s retirement from service as a director.
During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, Universal issued the following stock-based awards, representing the regular annual grants to officers and outside directors of the Company:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||
RSUs: | ||||||||
Number granted | 59,150 | 48,700 | ||||||
Grant date fair value | $ | 66.00 | $ | 66.90 | ||||
PSAs: | ||||||||
Number granted | 53,250 | 39,100 | ||||||
Grant date fair value | $ | 57.17 | $ | 60.37 |
Fair value expense for stock-based compensation is recognized ratably over the period from grant date to the earlier of: (1) the vesting date of the award, or (2) the date the grantee is eligible to retire without forfeiting the award. For employees who are already eligible to retire at the date an award is granted, the total fair value of all non-forfeitable awards is recognized as expense at the date of grant. As a result, Universal typically incurs higher stock compensation expense in the first quarter of each fiscal year when grants are awarded to officers than in the other three quarters. For PSAs, the Company generally recognizes fair value expense ratably over the performance and vesting period based on management’s judgment of the ultimate award that is likely to be paid out based on the achievement of the predetermined performance measures. The Company accounts for forfeitures of stock-based awards as they occur. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense of approximately $4.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The Company expects to recognize stock-based compensation expense of approximately $3.7 million during the remaining nine months of fiscal year 2019.
21
NOTE 11. OPERATING SEGMENTS
The principal approach used by management to evaluate the Company’s performance is by geographic region, although the dark air-cured and oriental tobacco businesses are each evaluated on the basis of their worldwide operations. The Company evaluates the performance of its segments based on operating income after allocated overhead expenses (excluding significant non-recurring charges or credits), plus equity in the pretax earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates.
Operating results for the Company’s reportable segments for each period presented in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
SALES AND OTHER OPERATING REVENUES | ||||||||
Flue-Cured and Burley Leaf Tobacco Operations: | ||||||||
North America | $ | 115,556 | $ | 53,324 | ||||
Other Regions (1) | 207,932 | 184,412 | ||||||
Subtotal | 323,488 | 237,736 | ||||||
Other Tobacco Operations (2) | 56,231 | 46,886 | ||||||
Consolidated sales and other operating revenue | $ | 379,719 | $ | 284,622 | ||||
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS) | ||||||||
Flue-Cured and Burley Leaf Tobacco Operations: | ||||||||
North America | $ | 8,952 | $ | 2,330 | ||||
Other Regions (1) | (2,017 | ) | 3,944 | |||||
Subtotal | 6,935 | 6,274 | ||||||
Other Tobacco Operations (2) | 1,973 | (332 | ) | |||||
Segment operating income | 8,908 | 5,942 | ||||||
Deduct: Equity in pretax (earnings) loss of unconsolidated affiliates (3) | (539 | ) | 435 | |||||
Consolidated operating income | $ | 8,369 | $ | 6,377 |
(1) | Includes South America, Africa, Europe, and Asia regions, as well as inter-region eliminations. |
(2) | Includes Dark Air-Cured, Special Services, and Oriental, as well as inter-company eliminations. Sales and other operating revenues for this reportable segment include limited amounts for Oriental because the business is accounted for on the equity method and its financial results consist principally of equity in the pretax earnings (loss) of an unconsolidated affiliate. |
(3) | Equity in pretax earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates is included in segment operating income (Other Tobacco Operations segment), but is reported below consolidated operating income and excluded from that total in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. |
22
NOTE 12. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The following table summarizes the changes in the accumulated balances for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | (23,942 | ) | $ | (33,138 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation: | ||||||||
Net gain (loss) on foreign currency translation (net of tax expense of $(3,311) in 2017) | (10,783 | ) | 6,148 | |||||
Less: Net loss on foreign currency translation attributable to noncontrolling interests | 159 | 48 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation, net of income taxes | (10,624 | ) | 6,196 | |||||
Balance at end of period | $ | (34,566 | ) | $ | (26,942 | ) | ||
Foreign currency hedge: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | (35 | ) | $ | (258 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation: | ||||||||
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments (net of tax benefit of $613 and $44) | (4,475 | ) | (81 | ) | ||||
Reclassification of (gain) loss to earnings (net of tax expense (benefit) of $(4) and $27) (1) | 146 | (50 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation, net of income taxes | (4,329 | ) | (131 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period | $ | (4,364 | ) | $ | (389 | ) | ||
Interest rate hedge: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 6,528 | $ | 1,398 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation: | ||||||||
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments (net of tax (expense) benefit of $(327) and $529) | 1,229 | (983 | ) | |||||
Reclassification of (gain) loss to earnings (net of tax expense (benefit) of $61 and $(197)) (2) | (230 | ) | 367 | |||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation, net of income taxes | 999 | (616 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 7,527 | $ | 782 | ||||
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans: | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | (42,615 | ) | $ | (37,561 | ) | ||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation: | ||||||||
Amortization included in earnings (net of tax benefit of $(156) and $(209)) (3) | 576 | 387 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Universal Corporation, net of income taxes | 576 | 387 | ||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | (42,039 | ) | $ | (37,174 | ) | ||
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of period | $ | (73,442 | ) | $ | (63,723 | ) |
(1) | Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges related to forecast purchases of tobacco is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to cost of goods sold when the tobacco is sold to customers. See Note 7 for additional information. |
(2) | Gain (loss) on interest rate cash flow hedges is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense when the related interest payments are made on the underlying debt or upon termination of the interest rate swap agreements prior to their scheduled maturity dates. See Note 7 for additional information. |
(3) | This accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component is included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 9 for additional information. |
23
NOTE 13. CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS IN SUBSIDIARIES
A reconciliation of the changes in Universal Corporation shareholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands of dollars) | Universal Corporation | Non-controlling Interests | Total | Universal Corporation | Non-controlling Interests | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year | $ | 1,342,429 | $ | 42,873 | $ | 1,385,302 | $ | 1,286,489 | $ | 40,089 | $ | 1,326,578 | ||||||||||||
Changes in common stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (397 | ) | — | (397 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Accrual of stock-based compensation | 4,198 | — | 4,198 | 2,660 | — | 2,660 | ||||||||||||||||||
Withholding of shares from stock-based compensation for grantee income taxes | (2,656 | ) | — | (2,656 | ) | (2,827 | ) | — | (2,827 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividend equivalents on RSUs | 185 | — | 185 | 175 | — | 175 | ||||||||||||||||||
Changes in retained earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 13,179 | (2,119 | ) | 11,060 | 3,577 | (256 | ) | 3,321 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock | (18,718 | ) | — | (18,718 | ) | (13,676 | ) | — | (13,676 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (1,046 | ) | — | (1,046 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Dividend equivalents on RSUs | (185 | ) | — | (185 | ) | (175 | ) | — | (175 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Adoption of FASB Accounting Standards Update 2016-16 eliminating deferred income taxes on unrecognized gains on intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory | (1,934 | ) | — | (1,934 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | (13,378 | ) | (159 | ) | (13,537 | ) | 5,836 | (48 | ) | 5,788 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 1,321,677 | $ | 40,595 | $ | 1,362,272 | $ | 1,282,059 | $ | 39,785 | $ | 1,321,844 |
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things, these statements relate to the Company’s financial condition, results of operation, and future business plans, operations, opportunities, and prospects. In addition, the Company and its representatives may from time to time make written or oral forward-looking statements, including statements contained in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in reports to shareholders. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by the use of words such as we “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “could,” “should,” “may,” “plan,” “will,” “predict,” “estimate,” and similar expressions or words of similar import. These forward-looking statements are based upon management’s current knowledge and assumptions about future events and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any anticipated results, prospects, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, anticipated levels of demand for and supply of our products and services; costs incurred in providing these products and services; timing of shipments to customers; changes in market structure; government regulation; product taxation; industry consolidation and evolution; changes in exchange rates and interest rates; changes in U.S. federal income tax rates and legislation; regulation and litigation impacts on our customers; and general economic, political, market, and weather conditions. For a further description of factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements, see Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements as these statements speak only as of the date when made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this report. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2018.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our first fiscal quarter is usually a period of significant working capital investment in both Africa and South America as crops are delivered by farmers. We funded our working capital needs in the quarter ended June 30, 2018, using a combination of cash on hand, short-term borrowings, customer advances, and operating cash flows. We expect shipments to continue to be weighted to the second half of the fiscal year.
Our liquidity and capital resource requirements are predominantly short term in nature and relate to working capital for tobacco crop purchases. Working capital needs are seasonal within each geographic region. The geographic dispersion and the timing of working capital needs permit us to predict our general level of cash requirements, although crop size, prices paid to farmers, shipment and delivery timing, and currency fluctuations affect requirements each year. Peak working capital requirements are generally reached during the first and second fiscal quarters. Each geographic area follows a cycle of buying, processing, and shipping tobacco, and in many regions, we also provide agricultural materials to farmers during the growing season. The timing of the elements of each cycle is influenced by such factors as local weather conditions and individual customer shipping requirements, which may change the level or the duration of crop financing. Despite a predominance of short-term needs, we maintain a portion of our total debt as long-term to reduce liquidity risk. We also periodically have large cash balances that we utilize to meet our working capital requirements.
Operating Activities
We used $168.3 million in net cash flows to fund our operations during the quarter ended June 30, 2018. That amount was $51.3 million higher than during the same period last fiscal year, largely due to the timing of crop purchases and shipments. Tobacco inventory levels increased by $268.1 million from March 31, 2018 levels to $947.5 million at June 30, 2018, on seasonal leaf purchases. Tobacco inventory levels were $29.6 million above June 30, 2017 levels, mainly due to larger carryover crop stocks in North America and Africa and higher dark tobacco wrapper inventories, partially offset by lower stock levels in Brazil from stronger carryover crop sales and slower current crop purchases in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. We generally do not purchase material quantities of tobacco on a speculative basis. However, when we contract directly with farmers, we are often obligated to buy all stalk positions, which may contain less marketable leaf styles. At June 30, 2018, our uncommitted inventories were $107.6 million, or about 11% of total tobacco inventory, compared to $107.2 million, or about 16% of our March 31, 2018 inventory, and $158.4 million, or about 17% of our June 30, 2017 inventory. The level of these uncommitted inventory percentages is influenced by timing of farmer deliveries of new crops, as well as the receipt of customer orders.
25
Our balance sheet accounts reflected seasonal patterns in the quarter ended June 30, 2018, on deliveries of crops by farmers in both South America and Africa. Cash and cash equivalent balances and accounts receivable decreased by $168.1 million and $129.3 million, respectively, from March 31, 2018 levels, as we used cash, including collections on receivables, to fund seasonal working capital needs. Advances to suppliers were $70.7 million at June 30, 2018, a reduction of $52.1 million from March 31, 2018, as crops were delivered in payment of those balances, net of new advances on current crops. Notes payable and overdrafts and accounts payable and accrued expenses were up $27.9 million and $35.5 million, respectively, from March 31, 2018 levels, on seasonal increases.
Accounts receivable of $247.8 million at June 30, 2018, increased by $38.5 million compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, primarily on carryover crop shipments in North America. Accounts receivable - unconsolidated affiliates were up $39.2 million at June 30, 2018, compared to June 30, 2017, on larger crops and accelerated crop purchases.
Investing Activities
Our capital allocation strategy focuses on four strategic priorities: strengthening and investing for growth in our core tobacco business; increasing our strong dividend; exploring growth opportunities in adjacent industries and markets that utilize our assets and capabilities; and returning excess capital to our shareholders. In deciding where to invest capital resources, we look for opportunities where we believe we can earn an adequate return, leverage our assets and expertise, and enhance our farmer base. Our capital expenditures are generally limited to those that add value, replace or maintain equipment, increase efficiency, or position us for future growth. During the quarters ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we invested about $11.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively, in our property, plant and equipment. Depreciation expense was approximately $8.6 million and $8.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Generally, our capital spending on maintenance projects is at a level below depreciation expense in order to maintain strong cash flow. In addition, from time to time, we undertake projects that require capital expenditures when we identify opportunities to improve efficiencies, add value for our customers, and position ourselves for future growth. We currently plan to spend approximately $35 to $45 million over the next twelve months on capital projects for maintenance of our facilities and other investments to grow and improve our businesses. We expect that about 25% of those capital expenditures will be for non-maintenance investments in our business.
Our Board of Directors approved our current share repurchase program in November 2017. The program expires in November 2019 and authorizes the purchase of up to $100 million of our common stock. Under the current authorization, we may purchase shares from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions at prices not exceeding prevailing market rates. Repurchases of shares under the repurchase program may vary based on management discretion, as well as changes in cash flow generation and availability. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we purchased 30,777 shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $1.4 million (average price per share of $46.87). As of June 30, 2018, approximately 25.0 million shares of our common stock were outstanding and our available authorization under our current share repurchase program was $89.6 million.
Financing Activities
We consider the sum of notes payable and overdrafts, long-term debt (including any current portion), and customer advances and deposits, less cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments on our balance sheet to be our net debt. We also consider our net debt plus shareholders' equity to be our net capitalization. Net debt as a percentage of net capitalization of approximately 22% at June 30, 2018, was up from the June 30, 2017 level of approximately 18% and the March 31, 2018 level of approximately 12%. The increase primarily reflects lower cash balances and slightly higher seasonal working capital requirements in the quarter ended June 30, 2018. As of June 30, 2018, we had $66.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, our short-term debt totaled $73.3 million, and we were in compliance with all covenants of our debt agreements, which require us to maintain certain levels of tangible net worth and observe restrictions on debt levels.
As of June 30, 2018, we had $424 million available under a committed revolving credit facility that will mature in December 2019, and we had about $195 million in unused, uncommitted credit lines. We also maintain an effective, undenominated universal shelf registration that provides for future issuance of additional debt or equity securities. We have no long-term debt maturing in fiscal year 2019. Our seasonal working capital requirements typically increase significantly between March and September and decline after mid-year. Available capital resources from our cash balances, committed credit facility, and uncommitted credit lines exceed our normal working capital needs and currently anticipated capital expenditure requirements over the next twelve months.
Derivatives
From time to time, we use interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates. At June 30, 2018, the fair value of our outstanding interest rate swap agreements was an asset of about $9.5 million, and the notional amount
26
swapped was $370 million. We entered into these agreements to eliminate the variability of cash flows in the interest payments on our variable-rate term loans. Under the swap agreements we receive variable rate interest and pay fixed rate interest. The swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
We also enter forward contracts from time to time to hedge certain foreign currency exposures, primarily related to forecast purchases of tobacco and related processing costs in Brazil, as well as our net monetary balance sheet exposures in local currency there. We generally account for our hedges of forecast tobacco purchases as cash flow hedges. At June 30, 2018, the fair value of our open hedges was an immaterial net liability. We had forward and option contracts outstanding that were not designated as hedges, and the fair value of those contracts was a net liability of about $1.3 million at June 30, 2018.
Results of Operations
Amounts described as net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per diluted share in the following discussion are attributable to Universal Corporation and exclude earnings related to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries. The total for segment operating income (loss) referred to in the discussion below is a non-GAAP financial measure. This measure is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as a substitute for net income (loss), operating income (loss), cash from operating activities or any other operating performance measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and it may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. We have provided a reconciliation of the total for segment operating income (loss) to consolidated operating income (loss) in Note 11. "Operating Segments" to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1. We evaluate our segment performance excluding certain significant charges or credits. We believe this measure, which excludes these items that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results, provides investors with important information that is useful in understanding our business results and trends.
Net income was $13.2 million, or $0.52 per diluted share, for the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, which ended on June 30, 2018. Those results were up $9.6 million compared with net income of $3.6 million, or $0.14 per diluted share, for the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. The first quarter of fiscal year 2019 included a non-recurring tax benefit from the reversal of a previously recorded foreign dividend withholding tax liability that reduced income taxes and increased net income by $6.9 million, or $0.27 per diluted share. Operating income of $8.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, improved $2.0 million, or 31%, compared to operating income of $6.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017. Similarly, segment operating income was $8.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, up $3.0 million compared to the same period last fiscal year, mainly as a result of earnings improvements in the North America and Other Tobacco Operations segments, partially offset by earnings declines in the Other Regions segment. Revenues of $379.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, increased by $95.1 million, or 33%, on higher total volumes and processing revenues and a more favorable product mix.
Flue-cured and Burley Leaf Tobacco Operations
Other Regions
The Other Regions segment operating loss of $2.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, was down $5.9 million compared with the prior year’s first fiscal quarter operating income of $3.9 million. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, the segment benefited from higher carryover crop sales, mainly in Africa, and higher processing volumes in both Europe and South America. Despite these volume improvements and higher gross margins, results for the segment were down on higher selling, general and administrative costs, largely from lower currency remeasurement gains and higher currency exchange losses and higher customer claim costs, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year. In South America, volumes were flat, but the product mix was more favorable for the first fiscal quarter of 2019 compared to the prior year, as higher carryover crop sales offset lower current crop shipments. Results for Asia were negatively impacted by lower sales volumes and higher currency remeasurement losses. Revenues for the Other Regions segment of $207.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, were up about 13% compared to the same period last year, on higher volumes largely from carryover sales, processing revenues, and a better product mix.
North America
Operating income for the North America segment for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, was $9.0 million, up $6.6 million from the comparable prior year period, mainly on higher carryover crop sales volumes. The increased volumes included some shipments delayed from earlier in the calendar year due to reduced transportation availability. In addition, current crop tobaccos in Mexico shipped earlier this fiscal year compared to the prior fiscal year. Selling, general, and administrative costs for the North America segment were relatively flat, compared to the prior year’s first fiscal quarter. Revenues for this segment increased by $62.2 million to $115.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, compared to the same period in the prior fiscal year, on the higher sales volumes and a more favorable product mix.
27
Other Tobacco Operations
The Other Tobacco Operations segment operating income of $2.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 reflected an increase of about $2.3 million, compared with an operating loss of $0.3 million for this segment in the same period last year. Results for the dark tobacco operations were up for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, bouyed by higher sales from strong wrapper tobacco demand. Despite slightly lower sales volumes, results for the oriental joint venture were up for its seasonally weak first fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018, compared to the prior fiscal year. The increase was due to a favorable currency remeasurement variance caused by the devaluation of the Turkish Lira during the first fiscal quarter. Revenues for this segment in the quarter ended June 30, 2018, increased by $9.3 million to $56.2 million on the higher wrapper tobacco sales. Selling, general, and administrative costs for the segment were flat compared with the prior year's first fiscal quarter.
Other Items
Cost of goods sold in the quarter ended June 30, 2018, of $307.5 million was up by about 33% compared with the same period last year, consistent with the similar percentage increase in revenues for the current period. Selling, general, and administrative costs for the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 increased by $16.4 million to $63.9 million, mainly driven by negative foreign currency remeasurement and exchange variances of about $10 million, primarily in Mozambique and Brazil, higher customer claim costs, and higher compensation and incentive benefit accruals in the quarter ended June 30, 2018, compared with the same period in the prior year.
For the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company reported a net tax benefit on pretax earnings due to a $6.9 million benefit from reversing a portion of a liability previously recorded for dividend withholding taxes on the cumulative retained earnings of a foreign subsidiary. The reversal followed the resolution of uncertainties with local taxing authorities with respect to the inclusion of the tax under a tax holiday applicable to a subsidiary and was attributable to the portion of cumulative retained earnings that the Company expects to distribute prior to the expiration of the holiday. Without the dividend withholding tax reversal, income taxes for the quarter would have been expense of approximately $1.5 million, or a consolidated effective tax rate of approximately 27%.
Income taxes for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, were favorably impacted by a lower effective tax rate on dividend income from unconsolidated operations and by excess tax deductions related to stock-based compensation awards that vested during the quarter. Under the tax law in effect at that time, both of these items were accounted for as discrete tax benefits during the quarter, resulting in a net tax benefit on pretax earnings for the period. Without the benefit from the discrete items, income taxes for the quarter would have been expense of approximately $1 million, or a consolidated effective tax rate of about 34%.
General Overview
We are off to a strong start to what we believe will be a good year. Our first quarter results benefited from higher carryover crop sales in several origins, particularly in our North America segment where sales volumes in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2018 were hampered by shipping delays from reduced transportation availability in the United States. We are also continuing to see robust demand for both wrapper style tobaccos and related value-added processing services. We have increased our offerings to meet demand for natural wrappers in both the United States and Europe and continue to be a leading wrapper tobacco supplier.
Crop purchases are progressing as anticipated with purchasing effectively complete in Brazil and well underway in Africa. We are not seeing any significant supply disruptions thus far this year. Burley production volumes have recovered in Africa, and crop sizes there for both flue-cured and burley tobaccos are coming in somewhat higher than previous estimates.
Although it is still early in our fiscal year, we are pleased with our results to date and continue to expect that our volumes will be above those achieved last fiscal year. We are also focused on our enhanced capital allocation strategy that reflects the strength of our balance sheet and demonstrates our commitment to sustainable shareholder value creation. As announced in conjunction with our 36% dividend increase in May 2018, our strategy has four key priorities: strengthening and investing for growth in our core tobacco business; increasing our strong dividend; exploring growth opportunities in adjacent industries that would utilize our assets and capabilities; and returning excess capital to our shareholders. In line with this strategy, we are positioning our Company for ongoing success as we continue to identify areas where we can provide additional value and expand the services we provide customers in our core tobacco business.
28
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Currency
The international leaf tobacco trade generally is conducted in U.S. dollars, thereby limiting foreign exchange risk to that which is related to leaf purchase and production costs, overhead, and income taxes in the source country. We also provide farmer advances that are directly related to leaf purchases and are denominated in the local currency. Any currency gains or losses on those advances are usually offset by decreases or increases in the cost of tobacco, which is priced in the local currency. However, the effect of the offset may not occur until a subsequent quarter or fiscal year. Most of our tobacco operations are accounted for using the U.S. dollar as the functional currency. Because there are no forward foreign exchange markets in many of our major countries of tobacco origin, we often manage our foreign exchange risk by matching funding for inventory purchases with the currency of sale, which is usually the U.S. dollar, and by minimizing our net local currency monetary position in individual countries. We are vulnerable to currency remeasurement gains and losses to the extent that monetary assets and liabilities denominated in local currency do not offset each other. In addition to foreign exchange gains and losses, we are exposed to changes in the cost of tobacco due to changes in the value of the local currency in relation to the U.S. dollar. We routinely enter forward currency exchange contracts to hedge against the effects of currency movements on purchases of tobacco to reduce the volatility of costs. In addition, from time-to-time we enter forward contracts to hedge balance sheet exposures.
In certain tobacco markets that are primarily domestic, we use the local currency as the functional currency. Examples of these markets are Poland and the Philippines. In other markets, such as Western Europe, where export sales have been primarily in local currencies, we also use the local currency as the functional currency. In each case, reported earnings are affected by the translation of the local currency into the U.S. dollar.
Interest Rates
We generally use both fixed and floating interest rate debt to finance our operations. Changes in market interest rates expose us to changes in cash flows for floating rate instruments and to changes in fair value for fixed-rate instruments. We normally maintain a proportion of our debt in both variable and fixed interest rates to manage this exposure, and from time to time we may enter hedge agreements to swap the interest rates. In addition, our customers may pay market rates of interest for inventory purchased on order, which could mitigate a portion of the floating interest rate exposure. We also periodically have large cash balances and may receive deposits from customers, both of which we use to fund seasonal purchases of tobacco, reducing our financing needs. Excluding our bank term loans which were converted to fixed-rate borrowings with interest rate swaps in January 2015, debt carried at variable interest rates was approximately $73 million at June 30, 2018. Although a hypothetical 1% change in short-term interest rates would result in a change in annual interest expense of approximately $0.7 million, that amount would be at least partially mitigated by changes in charges to customers.
Derivatives Policies
Hedging interest rate exposure using swaps and hedging foreign exchange exposure using forward contracts are specifically contemplated to manage risk in keeping with management's policies. We may use derivative instruments, such as swaps, forwards, or futures, which are based directly or indirectly upon interest rates and currencies to manage and reduce the risks inherent in interest rate and currency fluctuations. When we use foreign currency derivatives to mitigate our exposure to exchange rate fluctuations, we may choose not to designate them as hedges for accounting purposes, which may result in the effects of the derivatives being recognized in our earnings in periods different from the items that created the exposure.
We do not utilize derivatives for speculative purposes, and we do not enter into market risk-sensitive instruments for trading purposes. Derivatives are transaction specific so that a specific debt instrument, forecast purchase, contract, or invoice determines the amount, maturity, and other specifics of the hedge. We routinely review counterparty risk as part of our derivative program.
29
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports we file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer (our Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (our Principal Financial Officer), as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated, with the participation of other members of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
30
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Tanzania Fair Competition Commission Proceeding
In June 2012, our Tanzanian subsidiary, Tanzania Leaf Tobacco Company Ltd. (“TLTC”), entered into a two crop-year supply agreement for unprocessed “green” tobacco with a newly-formed Tanzanian subsidiary of one of our major customers. The agreement involved green tobacco purchases from four of the approximately 400 grower cooperatives in Tanzania, which allowed the customer and its Tanzanian subsidiary on a small test basis to evaluate whether it would be a viable alternative for the customer to establish its own vertically integrated supply operations in that market. Prior to that time, the customer’s subsidiary did not exist, and it only purchased processed Tanzanian tobacco from tobacco dealers in specified amounts and only for certain grades and stalk positions. In contrast, the agreement with TLTC required the customer’s subsidiary to purchase green tobacco on a “run of crop” basis. “Run of crop” requires the purchase of all green tobacco produced on the tobacco plant, regardless of grade or stalk position. The agreement, therefore, enabled the customer’s subsidiary on a small test basis to evaluate the quality of green tobacco purchased on a “run of crop” basis and to assess how such tobacco would be suited to the customer's tobacco requirements. The customer unilaterally elected to establish its own vertically integrated supply operations in Tanzania after the expiration of the agreement, and its subsidiary began purchasing green tobacco directly from Tanzanian grower cooperatives during the second crop year thereafter.
Despite the pro-competitive object and effect of the agreement between TLTC and the customer’s subsidiary, in October 2016, the Tanzania Fair Competition Commission (“FCC”) notified TLTC and the customer’s subsidiary that it reviewed the agreement and provisionally concluded that it infringed Tanzania antitrust law by having the object and effect of preventing competition in the purchase of unprocessed green tobacco in the area in which the four grower cooperatives were located. The FCC also provisionally concluded that our U.S. subsidiary, Universal Leaf Tobacco Company, Inc. (“ULT”), and additional subsidiaries of the customer, were jointly and severally liable for the actions of TLTC and the customer’s Tanzanian subsidiary, respectively. TLTC and ULT submitted a written response contesting the FCC’s allegations, and on February 27, 2018, the FCC issued its decision to TLTC and ULT which confirmed its initial conclusion that the agreement infringed Tanzanian antitrust law. In its decision, the FCC concluded incorrectly that the parties to the agreement unfairly benefited in the amount of $105 thousand. The FCC arbitrarily assessed a fine jointly against TLTC and ULT of approximately $197 million and a fine jointly against the customer’s Tanzanian subsidiary and another subsidiary of the customer exceeding $1 billion.
TLTC and ULT have worked closely with expert legal advisors and economists on this matter. Based on these engagements and consultations, we firmly believe the FCC’s allegations are frivolous and clearly without merit or support from the facts, law or economic analysis. We further believe the FCC’s proceedings were rife with irregularities and did not comply with applicable legal and regulatory procedures with respect to this matter, including failing to establish jurisdiction over ULT or to offer a legal justification for including ULT in the proceeding. To the contrary, we believe the facts, law and economic analysis clearly support the legality and pro-competitive nature of the agreement and support a proper conclusion that there was no infringement of Tanzania antitrust law, and the agreement had no negative impact on the Tanzania tobacco market. We further believe the FCC’s proposed fine is ludicrous, unwarranted and contrary to Tanzania law. TLTC and ULT immediately appealed the FCC findings to the Tanzania Fair Competition Tribunal, which immediately stayed the execution of any FCC fines. We are unable to predict how long the appeal process will take; however, we believe it could last several years. At this time, we believe that the likelihood of incurring any material liability in this matter is remote, and no amount has been recorded.
Other Legal Matters
Some of our subsidiaries are involved in litigation or legal matters incidental to their business activities. While the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we are vigorously defending them and do not currently expect that any of them will have a material adverse effect on our business or financial position. However, should one or more of these matters be resolved in a manner adverse to our current expectation, the effect on our results of operations for a particular fiscal reporting period could be material.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
As of the date of this report, there are no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2018 (the "2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K"). In evaluating our risks, readers should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or operating results, in addition to the other information set forth in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
31
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The following table sets forth our repurchases of shares of our common stock during the three-month period ended June 30, 2018:
Period (1) | Total Number of Shares Repurchased | Average Price Paid Per Share (2) | Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (3) | Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (3) | ||||||||||
April 1-30, 2018 | 9,685 | $ | 46.95 | 9,685 | $ | 90,574,248 | ||||||||
May 1-31, 2018 | 21,092 | 46.84 | 21,092 | 89,586,294 | ||||||||||
June 1-30, 2018 | — | — | — | 89,586,294 | ||||||||||
Total | 30,777 | $ | — | 30,777 | $ | 89,586,294 |
(1) | Repurchases are based on the date the shares were traded. This presentation differs from the consolidated statement of cash flows, where the cost of share repurchases is based on the date the transactions were settled. |
(2) | Amounts listed for average price paid per share include broker commissions paid in the transactions. |
(3) | A stock repurchase plan, which was authorized by our Board of Directors, became effective and was publicly announced on November 7, 2017. This stock repurchase plan authorized the purchase of up to $100 million in common and/or preferred stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions and other factors. This stock repurchase program will expire on the earlier of November 15, 2019, or when we have exhausted the funds authorized for the program. |
32
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
12 | ||
31.1 | ||
31.2 | ||
32.1 | ||
32.2 | ||
101 | Interactive Data File (Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language)).* | |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2018, June 30, 2017, and March 31, 2018, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
__________
*Filed herewith
33
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: | August 7, 2018 | UNIVERSAL CORPORATION | |
(Registrant) | |||
/s/ David C. Moore | |||
David C. Moore, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | |||
(Principal Financial Officer) | |||
/s/ Robert M. Peebles | |||
Robert M. Peebles, Vice President and Controller | |||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
34
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No. | Description | |
12 | ||
31.1 | ||
31.2 | ||
32.1 | ||
32.2 | ||
101 | Interactive Data File (Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language)).* | |
Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2018, June 30, 2017, and March 31, 2018, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
__________
*Filed herewith
35