UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 1-9321

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

UNIVERSAL CORPORATE CENTER

367 SOUTH GULPH ROAD

KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (610) 265-0688

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer”, Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated Filer  x    Non-accelerated filer  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act)    Yes  ¨    No  x

Number of common shares of beneficial interest outstanding at July 31, 2007 – 11,835,180

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

Part I. Financial Information

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

Universal Health Realty Income Trust

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(amounts in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

June 30, 2007

(unaudited)

(1) General

This Report on Form 10-Q is for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2007. In this Quarterly Report, “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Trust” refer to Universal Health Realty Income Trust.

You should carefully review all of the information contained in this Quarterly Report, and should particularly consider any risk factors that we set forth in this Quarterly Report and in other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In this Quarterly Report, we state our beliefs of future events and of our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify those so-called “forward-looking statements” by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “appears,” “projects” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense. You should be aware that those statements are only our predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating those statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined in Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under Forward Looking Statements and Certain Risk Factors. Those factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any of our forward-looking statements.

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the term “revenues” does not include the revenues of the unconsolidated limited liability companies in which we have various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 99%. We currently account for our share of the income/loss from these investments by the equity method (see Note 7). As of June 30, 2007, we had investments or commitments in twenty-four limited liability companies (“LLCs”), twenty-three of which are accounted for by the equity method and one that is currently consolidated in our financial statements.

The financial statements included herein have been prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which, in our opinion, are necessary to fairly present results for the interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although we believe that the accompanying disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements, accounting policies and the notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year financial statement presentation.

(2) Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) and Related Party Transactions

Leases: We commenced operations in 1986 by purchasing certain assets from subsidiaries from UHS and immediately leasing the properties back to the respective subsidiaries. Most of the leases were entered into at the time we commenced operations and provided for initial terms of 13 to 15 years with up to six additional 5-year renewal terms, with base rents set forth in the leases effective for all but the last two renewal terms. In 1998, the lease for McAllen Medical Center was amended to provide that the last two renewal terms would also be fixed at the initial agreed upon base rental. This lease amendment was in connection with certain concessions granted by UHS with respect to the renewal of other leases. The base rents are paid monthly and each lease also provides for additional or bonus rents which are computed and paid on a quarterly basis based upon a computation that compares current quarter revenue to a corresponding quarter in the base year. The leases with subsidiaries of UHS are unconditionally guaranteed by UHS and are cross-defaulted with one another.

Pursuant to the Master Lease Document by and among us and certain subsidiaries of UHS, dated December 24, 1986 (the “Master Lease”), which governs the leases of all hospital properties with subsidiaries of UHS, UHS has the option to renew the leases at the lease terms described below by providing notice to us at least 90 days prior to the termination of the then current term. In addition, UHS has rights of first refusal to: (i) purchase the respective leased facilities during and for 180 days after the lease terms at the same price, terms and conditions of any third-party offer, or; (ii) renew the lease on the respective leased facility at the end of, and for 180 days after, the lease term at the same terms and conditions pursuant to any third-party offer. UHS also has the right to purchase the respective leased facilities at the end of the lease terms or any renewal terms at the appraised fair market value. In addition, during 2006, as part of the overall exchange and substitution proposal relating to Chalmette Medical Center (“Chalmette”), as well as the early five year lease renewals on Southwest Healthcare System-Inland Valley Campus (“Inland Valley”), Wellington Regional Medical Center (“Wellington”), McAllen Medical Center (“McAllen”) and The Bridgeway (“Bridgeway”), we agreed to amend the Master Lease to include a change of control provision. The change of control provision grants UHS the right, upon one month’s notice should a change of control of the Trust occur, to purchase any or all of the four leased hospital properties at their appraised fair market value purchase price.

6

Table of Contents

During the third quarter of 2005, Chalmette, a 138-bed acute care hospital located in Chalmette, Louisiana, was severely damaged and closed as a result of Hurricane Katrina. At that time, the majority of the real estate assets of Chalmette were leased from us by a subsidiary of UHS and, in accordance with the terms of the lease, and as part of an overall evaluation of the leases between subsidiaries of UHS and us, UHS offered substitution properties rather than exercise its right to rebuild the facility or offer cash for Chalmette. Independent appraisals were obtained by us and UHS which indicated that the pre-hurricane fair market value of the leased facility was $24.0 million.

During the third quarter of 2006, we completed the asset exchange and substitution pursuant to the Asset Exchange and Substitution Agreement with UHS whereby we agreed to terminate the lease between us and Chalmette and to transfer the real property assets and all rights attendant thereto (including insurance proceeds) of Chalmette to UHS in exchange and substitution for newly constructed real property assets owned by UHS (“Capital Additions”) at Wellington, Bridgeway and Inland Valley, in satisfaction of the obligations under the Chalmette lease. The Capital Additions consist of properties which were recently constructed on, or adjacent to, facilities already owned by us as well as a recently constructed Capital Addition at Inland Valley which was completed and opened during the third quarter of 2007. In the event the ultimate construction costs related to the Inland Valley Capital Addition exceed $11.0 million, the excess will be paid in cash by us to UHS and UHS will pay incremental rent on the excess at a rate equal to the prevailing five-year treasury rate plus 200 basis points at the time of funding (minimum rate 6.75%). The table below details the renewal options and terms for each of the four UHS hospital facilities:

We cannot predict whether the leases with subsidiaries of UHS, which have renewal options at existing lease rates, or any of our other leases, will be renewed at the end of their lease terms. If the leases are not renewed at their current rates, we would be required to find other operators for those facilities and/or enter into leases on terms potentially less favorable to us than the current leases.

The combined revenues generated from the leases on the UHS hospital facilities accounted for approximately 57% and 48% of our total revenue for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Including 100% of the revenues generated at the unconsolidated LLCs in which we have various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 99%, the leases on the four UHS hospital facilities accounted for approximately 23% and 24% of the combined consolidated and unconsolidated revenue for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, six medical office buildings (“MOBs”) (plus two additional MOBs currently under construction) owned by LLCs in which we hold various non-controlling equity interests, include tenants which are subsidiaries of UHS.

We are committed to invest up to $6.6 million ($250,000 in equity, $243,000 of which has been funded as of June 30, 2007, and $6.3 million in debt financing or equity, none of which has been funded as of June 30, 2007) in exchange for a 95% non-controlling equity interest in a limited liability company that will develop, construct, own and operate the Centennial Hills Medical Office Building I, located in Las Vegas, Nevada, on the campus of a UHS hospital. This MOB will be 60% master leased by Valley Health System (“VHS”), a majority-owned subsidiary of UHS, on a triple net basis. The master lease for each suite will be cancelled at such time that the suite is leased for a minimum term of five years, to another tenant acceptable to the LLC and VHS. The LLC has a $15.7 million construction loan commitment from a third-party, which is non-recourse to us. At June 30, 2007, $8.2 million of third-party debt has been drawn against this $15.7 million construction loan commitment. This building, tenants of which may include subsidiaries of UHS, is scheduled to be completed and opened during the third quarter of 2007.

Additionally, we are committed to invest up to $4.3 million in equity, of which $86,000 has been funded as of June 30, 2007, in exchange for a 95% non-controlling equity interest in a limited liability company that will develop, construct, own and operate the

7

Table of Contents

Palmdale Medical Plaza, located in Palmdale, California, on the campus of a UHS hospital currently under construction. This MOB will be 75% master leased by UHS of Palmdale, Inc., a subsidiary of UHS, on a triple net basis. The master lease for each suite will be cancelled at such time that the suite is leased for a minimum term of five years, to another tenant acceptable to the LLC and UHS of Palmdale. The LLC has a $9.9 million construction loan commitment from a third-party, which is non-recourse to us. At June 30, 2007, $4.1 million of third-party debt has been drawn against this $9.9 million construction loan commitment. This building, tenants of which may include subsidiaries of UHS, is scheduled to be completed and opened during the fourth quarter of 2007.

We are also committed to invest up to $12.3 million ($3.4 million in equity, $79,000 of which has been funded as of June 30, 2007, and $8.9 million in debt financing, $7.3 million of which has been funded as of June 30, 2007) in exchange for a 95% non-controlling interest in a limited liability company that developed, constructed, owns and operates the Spring Valley Medical Office Building II, a second MOB on the campus of a UHS Hospital located in Las Vegas Nevada. This MOB was completed and opened during the second quarter of 2007.

UHS Legal Proceedings: We have been advised by UHS that UHS, together with its South Texas Health System affiliates, which operate McAllen Medical Center, were served with a subpoena dated November 21, 2005, issued by the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”). At that time, the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s office in Houston, Texas indicated that the subpoena was part of an investigation under the False Claims Act of compliance with Medicare and Medicaid rules and regulations pertaining to the employment of physicians and the solicitation of patient referrals from physicians from January 1, 1999 to the date of the subpoena related to the South Texas Health System. On March 9, 2007, an additional subpoena was served upon UHS by the OIG requesting documents concerning the Medicare cost reports for the South Texas Health System affiliates. UHS has informed us that, to the best of their knowledge, they have provided the documents requested in connection with both subpoenas and that they continue to cooperate in the investigation. On February 16, 2007, UHS’s South Texas Health System affiliates were served with a search warrant in connection with what UHS has been advised is a related criminal Grand Jury investigation concerning the production of documents. At that time, the government obtained various documents and other property related to the facilities. Follow-up Grand Jury subpoenas for documents and witnesses and other requests for information were subsequently served on South Texas Health System facilities and certain UHS employees, and UHS is cooperating with this Grand Jury investigation. UHS has advised us that it is unable to evaluate the existence or extent of any potential financial exposure in connection with this matter at this time.

UHS has advised us that it monitors all aspects of its business and that it has developed a comprehensive ethics and compliance program that is designed to meet or exceed applicable federal guidelines and industry standards. Because the law in this area is complex and constantly evolving, governmental investigation or litigation may result in interpretations that are inconsistent with industry practices, including UHS’s. Although UHS believes their policies, procedures and practices comply with governmental regulations, no assurance can be given that UHS will not be subjected to further inquiries or actions, or that UHS will not be faced with sanctions, fines or penalties in connection with the investigation of our South Texas Health System affiliates. Even if UHS were to ultimately prevail, the government’s inquiry and/or action in connection with this matter could have a material adverse effect on UHS’s future operating results and on the future operating results of McAllen Medical Center. While the base rentals are guaranteed by UHS through the end of the lease term, should this matter adversely impact the future revenues and/or operating results of McAllen Medical Center, the future bonus rental earned by us on this facility may be materially, adversely impacted. Bonus rental revenue earned by us from McAllen Medical Center amounted to $1.9 million during 2006. We can provide no assurance that this matter will not have a material adverse impact on underlying value of McAllen Medical Center or on the future base rental earned on this facility after the December, 2011 scheduled expiration of the existing lease term.

Advisory Agreement: UHS of Delaware, Inc. (the “Advisor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, serves as Advisor to us under an Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) dated December 24, 1986. Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is obligated to present an investment program to us, to use its best efforts to obtain investments suitable for such program (although it is not obligated to present any particular investment opportunity to us), to provide administrative services to us and to conduct our day-to-day affairs. In performing its services under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor may utilize independent professional services, including accounting, legal, tax and other services, for which the Advisor is reimbursed directly by us. The Advisory Agreement expires on December 31 of each year; however, it is renewable by us, subject to a determination by the Trustees who are unaffiliated with UHS (the “Independent Trustees”), that the Advisor’s performance has been satisfactory. The Advisory Agreement may be terminated for any reason upon sixty days written notice by us or the Advisor. The Advisory Agreement has been renewed for 2007. All transactions between us and UHS must be approved by the Independent Trustees.

The Advisory Agreement provides that the Advisor is entitled to receive an annual advisory fee equal to 0.60% of our average invested real estate assets, as derived from our consolidated balance sheet. The advisory fee is payable quarterly, subject to adjustment at year-end based upon our audited financial statements. In addition, the Advisor is entitled to an annual incentive fee equal to 20% of the amount by which cash available for distribution to shareholders for each year, as defined in the Advisory Agreement, exceeds 15% of our equity as shown on our consolidated balance sheet, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles without reduction for return of capital dividends. The Advisory Agreement defines cash available for

8

Table of Contents

distribution to shareholders as net cash flow from operations less deductions for, among other things, amounts required to discharge our debt and liabilities and reserves for replacement and capital improvements to our properties and investments. Advisory fees incurred and paid (or payable) to UHS amounted to $356,000 and $355,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $707,000 and $702,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. No incentive fees were paid in either period.

Officers and Employees: Our officers are all employees of UHS and although we have no salaried employees, our officers do receive stock-based compensation from time-to-time.

Share Ownership: As of June 30, 2007, and 2006, UHS owned 6.7% of our outstanding shares of beneficial interest.

SEC reporting requirements of UHS: UHS is subject to the reporting requirements of the SEC and is required to file annual reports containing audited financial information and quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information. Since the leases on the hospital facilities leased to wholly-owned subsidiaries of UHS comprised approximately 57% and 56% of our consolidated revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively, and since UHS is also our Advisor, you are encouraged to obtain the publicly available filings for UHS, Inc. from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. These filings are the sole responsibility of UHS and are not incorporated by reference herein

(3) Dividends

A dividend of $.575 per share or $6.8 million in the aggregate was declared by the Board of Trustees on June 1, 2007 and was paid on June 29, 2007 to shareholders of record as of June 15, 2007.

(4) Acquisitions and Dispositions

During the second quarter of 2007, we completed the sale of the Fresno-Herndon Medical Plaza, a medical office building located in Fresno, California. The financial results of this property are reflected as discontinued operations on our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. This transaction resulted in a gain of $2.3 million which is included in “Income from discontinued operations, net” on our condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.

During the six months ended June 30, 2007, RioMed Investments, a LLC in which we had an 80% non-controlling equity interest, sold the real property of Rio Rancho Medical Center, located in Gilbert, Arizona. Our share of the net proceeds from this divestiture was $1.1 million. This transaction resulted in a $252,000 gain which is included in “Equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs” on our condensed consolidated statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

(5) Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income represents net income plus the results of certain equity changes not reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of income. The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):

(6) Stock-Based Compensation

Compensation costs of $37,000 and $21,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $61,000 and $42,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were recognized related to outstanding stock options

9

Table of Contents

and Dividend Equivalent Rights (“DERs”) that were granted or have vestings after December 31, 2005. As of June 30, 2007, there was approximately $410,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested options and DERs which is expected to be recognized over the vesting period. During the first six months of 2007, there were 24,000 stock options and DERs issued under the 1997 Incentive Plan with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $14.70 per option.

The 1997 Incentive Plan expired on June 22, 2007. Awards granted on or before the termination date shall remain exercisable, in accordance with their respective terms, after the termination of the Plan.

During the second quarter of 2007, our Board of Trustees approved and adopted the Universal Health Realty Income Trust 2007 Restricted Stock Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan was also approved by our shareholders during the second quarter of 2007. A total of 75,000 shares have been authorized for issuance under the 2007 Plan and there have been no shares issued under the 2007 Plan at June 30, 2007. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2007, the Board of Trustees approved the termination of the Universal Health Realty Income Trust’s Share Compensation Plan for outside Trustees.

(7) Summarized Financial Information of Equity Affiliates

Our consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of our controlled investments and those investments that meet the criteria of a variable interest entity where we are the primary beneficiary as a result of our level of investment in the entity. In accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 78-9 “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures” as amended by FASB Staff Position SOP 78-9-1 “Interaction of AICPA Statement of Position 78-9 and EITF Issue No. 04-5” and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 96-16, “Investor’s Accounting for an Investee When the Investor Has a Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights”, we account for our unconsolidated investments in LLCs which we do not control using the equity method of accounting. The third-party members in these investments have equal voting rights with regard to issues such as, but not limited to: (i) divestiture of property; (ii) annual budget approval, and; (iii) financing commitments. These investments, which represent 33% to 99% non-controlling ownership interests, are recorded initially at our cost and subsequently adjusted for our net equity in the net income, cash contributions to, and distributions from, the investments. Pursuant to certain agreements, allocations of profits and losses of some of the LLC investments may be allocated disproportionately as compared to ownership interests after specified preferred return rate thresholds have been satisfied.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51”. This Interpretation, as revised (“FIN 46R”), addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities as defined in the Interpretation. As a result of our related party relationship with UHS, and certain master lease, lease assurance or lease guarantee arrangements between UHS and various properties owned by three LLCs in which we own non-controlling ownership interests ranging from 95% to 99%, these three LLCs were considered to be variable interest entities. In addition, we were the primary beneficiary of these three LLC investments. Upon the adoption of FIN 46R on March 31, 2004, we began consolidating the results of operations of these three LLC investments in our consolidated financial statements.

As a result of the expiration of the master lease arrangements between subsidiaries of UHS and two of these three LLCs, during the fourth quarter of 2006, we began recording the financial results of two LLCs on an unconsolidated basis in our consolidated financial statements. Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2006, the revenues and expenses of these two LLCs are no longer included in our consolidated revenues and expenses; instead, the net income generated from each of these two LLCs is included in our consolidated statements of income as “Equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs”. The revenues and expenses for these two LLCs related to the periods prior to the fourth quarter of 2006 are included in our revenues and expenses in our consolidated statements of income. There was no impact on our net income as a result of recording of the financial results of these LLCs on a consolidated or an unconsolidated basis. The other LLCs in which we hold various non-controlling ownership interests are not variable interest entities and therefore are not subject to the consolidation requirements of FIN 46R.

Rental income is recorded by our consolidated and unconsolidated MOBs relating to leases in excess of one year in length using the straight-line method under which contractual rents are recognized evenly over the lease term regardless of when payments are due. The amount of rental revenue resulting from straight-line rent adjustments is dependent on many factors, including the nature and amount of any rental concessions granted to new tenants, scheduled rent increases under existing leases, as well as the acquisition and sales of properties that have existing in-place leases with terms in excess of one year. As a result, the straight-line adjustments to rental revenue may vary from period-to-period. Pursuant to certain agreements, allocations of profits and losses of some of the LLC investments may be allocated disproportionately as compared to ownership interest after specified preferred return rate thresholds have been satisfied.

10

Table of Contents

Since January 1, 1995 through June 30, 2007, we have invested $62.1 million of cash (including advances to various LLCs) in LLCs in which we own various non-controlling equity interests ranging from 33% to 99% (consolidated and unconsolidated), before reductions for cash distributions received from the LLCs. As of June 30, 2007, short-term unsecured advances aggregated $12.9 million due from four LLCs. Including the cumulative adjustments for our share of equity in the net income of the LLCs and cash contributions to and distributions from these investments, our net investment in these LLCs was $46.9 million, as reflected on our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007.

As of June 30, 2007, we had investments or commitments in twenty-four LLCs, twenty-three of which are accounted for by the equity method and one that is consolidated into the results of our operations. The following tables represent summarized financial and other information related to the LLCs which were accounted for under the equity method:

11

Table of Contents

Below are the combined statements of income for the LLCs accounted for under the equity method:

As mentioned above, during the fourth quarter of 2006, we began recording the financial results of two LLCs on an unconsolidated basis pursuant to the provisions of FIN 46R. For comparative purposes, during the first three months ended June 30, 2006, on a combined basis, these entities generated approximately $1.2 million of revenue, $220,000 of depreciation and amortization expense, $452,000 of other operating expenses and $227,000 of interest expense. During the six month period ending June 30, 2006, these entities generated, on a combined basis, approximately $2.4 million of revenue, $439,000 of depreciation and amortization expense, $917,000 of other operating expenses and $454,000 of interest expense. There was no impact on our net income as a result of recording these two LLCs on an unconsolidated basis.

12

Table of Contents

Below are the combined balance sheets for the LLCs accounted for under the equity method:

Pursuant to the operating agreements of the LLCs, the third-party member and the Trust, at any time, have the right to make an offer (“Offering Member”) to the other member(s) (“Non-Offering Member”) in which it either agrees to: (i) sell the entire ownership interest of the Offering Member to the Non-Offering Member (“Offer to Sell”) at a price as determined by the Offering Member (“Transfer Price”), or; (ii) purchase the entire ownership interest of the Non-Offering Member (“Offer to Purchase”) at the equivalent proportionate Transfer Price. The Non-Offering Member has 60 days to either: (i) purchase the entire ownership interest of the Offering-Member at the Transfer Price, or; (ii) sell its entire ownership interest to the Offering Member at the equivalent proportionate Transfer Price. The closing of the transfer must occur within 60 days of the acceptance by the Non-Offering Member.

The LLCs in which we have invested maintain property insurance on all properties. Although we believe that generally our properties are adequately insured, three of the LLCs in which we own various non-controlling equity interests, own properties, including one under construction, in California that are located in earthquake zones. These properties, in which we have invested a total of $5.2 million, are no longer covered by earthquake insurance since earthquake insurance is no longer available at rates which are economical in relation to the risks covered.

(8) Segment Reporting

Our primary business is investing in and leasing healthcare and human service facilities through direct ownership or through joint ventures, which aggregate into a single reportable segment under SFAS 131. We actively manage our portfolio of healthcare and human service facilities and may from time to time make decisions to sell lower performing properties not meeting our long-term investment objectives. The proceeds of sales are typically reinvested in new developments or acquisitions, which we believe will meet our planned rate of return. It is our intent that all healthcare and human service facilities will be owned or developed for investment purposes. Our revenue and net income are generated from the operation of our investment portfolio.

Our portfolio is located throughout the United States; however, we do not distinguish or group our operations on a geographical basis for purposes of allocating resources or measuring performance. We review operating and financial data for each property on an individual basis, therefore we define an operating segment as our individual properties. Individual properties have been aggregated into one reportable segment based upon their similarities with regard to both the nature and economics of the facilities, tenants and operational processes, as well as long-term average financial performance.

13

Table of Contents

Overview

We are a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that commenced operations in 1986. We invest in healthcare and human service related facilities including acute care hospitals, behavioral healthcare facilities, rehabilitation hospitals, sub-acute facilities, surgery centers, childcare centers and medical office buildings. As of June 30, 2007, we have forty-three real estate investments or commitments located in fourteen states consisting of:

Forward Looking Statements and Certain Risk Factors

This report contains “forward-looking statements” that reflect our current estimates, expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, the information concerning our possible future results of operations, business and growth strategies, financing plans, expectations that regulatory developments or other matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition, our competitive position and the effects of competition, the projected growth of the industry in which we operate, and the benefits and synergies to be obtained from our completed and any future acquisitions, and statements of our goals and objectives, and other similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “appears,” “projects” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by which, such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking information is based on information available at the time and/or our good faith belief with respect to future events, and is subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in the statements. Such factors include, among other things, the following:

14

Table of Contents

Given these uncertainties, risks and assumptions, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Our actual results and financial condition, including the operating results of our lessees and the facilities leased to subsidiaries of UHS, could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date the statements are made. We assume no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information, except as may be required by law. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.

We consider our critical accounting policies to be those that require us to make significant judgments and estimates when we prepare our financial statements, including the following:

Revenue Recognition — Our revenues consist primarily of rentals received from tenants, which are comprised of minimum rent (base rentals), bonus rentals and reimbursements from tenants for their pro-rata share of expenses such as common area maintenance costs, real estate taxes and utilities.

The minimum rent for all hospital facilities is fixed over the initial term or renewal term of the respective leases. Rental income recorded by our consolidated and unconsolidated MOBs relating to leases in excess of one year in length, is recognized using the straight-line method under which contractual rents are recognized evenly over the lease term regardless of when payments are due. The amount of rental revenue resulting from straight-line rent adjustments is dependent on many factors including the nature and amount of any rental concessions granted to new tenants, scheduled rent increases under existing leases, as well as the acquisitions and sales of properties that have existing in-place leases with terms in excess of one year. As a result, the straight-line adjustments to rental revenue may vary from period-to-period. Bonus rents are recognized when earned based upon increases in each facility’s net revenue in excess of stipulated amounts. Bonus rentals are determined and paid each quarter based upon a computation that compares the respective facility’s current quarter’s net revenue to the corresponding quarter in the base year. Tenant reimbursements for operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the same period the related expenses are incurred.

Investments in Limited Liability Companies (“LLCs”) — Our consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of our controlled investments and those investments that meet the criteria of a variable interest entity where we are the primary beneficiary. In accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position 78-9 “Accounting for Investments in Real Estate Ventures” as amended by FASB Staff Position SOP 78-9-1 “Interaction of AICPA Statement of Position 78-9 and EITF Issue No. 04-5”, Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) 96-16, “Investor’s Accounting for an Investee When the Investor Has a Majority of the Voting Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval or Veto Rights” and EITF 04-5 “Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights” we account for our unconsolidated investments in LLCs which we do not control using the equity method of accounting. The third-party members in these investments have equal voting rights with regards to issues such as, but not limited to: (i) divestiture of property; (ii) annual budget approval, and; (iii) financing commitments. These investments, which represent 33% to 99% non-controlling ownership interests, are recorded initially at our cost and subsequently adjusted for our net equity in the net income, cash contributions to, and distributions from, the investments. Pursuant to certain agreements, allocations of profits and losses of some of the LLC investments may be allocated disproportionately as compared to ownership interests after specified preferred return rate thresholds have been satisfied.

15

Table of Contents

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51. This Interpretation, as revised (“FIN 46R”), addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities as defined in the Interpretation. As a result of our related party relationship with UHS, and certain master lease, lease assurance or lease guarantee arrangements between UHS and various properties owned by three LLCs in which we own non-controlling ownership interests ranging from 95% to 99%, these three LLCs were considered to be variable interest entities. In addition, we were the primary beneficiary of these three LLC investments. Upon the adoption of FIN 46R on March 31, 2004, we began consolidating the results of operations of these three LLC investments in our consolidated financial statements.

As a result of the expiration of the master lease arrangements between subsidiaries of UHS and two of these three LLCs, during the fourth quarter of 2006, we began recording the financial results of two LLCs on an unconsolidated basis in our consolidated financial statements. Beginning with the fourth quarter of 2006, the revenues and expenses of these two LLCs are no longer included in our consolidated revenues and expenses; instead, our share of the net income generated from each of these two LLCs is included in our consolidated statements of income as “Equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs”. The revenues and expenses for these two LLCs related to the periods prior to the fourth quarter of 2006 are included in our revenues and expenses in our consolidated statements of income. There was no impact on our net income as a result of the change in accounting for these LLCs.

The other LLCs in which we hold various non-controlling ownership interests are not variable interest entities and therefore are not subject to the consolidation requirements of FIN 46R.

Federal Income Taxes — No provision has been made for federal income tax purposes since we qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and intend to continue to remain so qualified. As such, we are exempt from federal income taxes and we are required to distribute at least 90% of our real estate investment taxable income to our shareholders.

We are subject to a federal excise tax computed on a calendar year basis. The excise tax equals 4% of the amount by which 85% of our ordinary income plus 95% of any capital gain income for the calendar year exceeds cash distributions during the calendar year, as defined. No provision for excise tax has been reflected in the financial statements as no tax was due.

Earnings and profits, which determine the taxability of dividends to shareholders, will differ from net income reported for financial reporting purposes due to the differences for federal tax purposes in the cost basis of assets and in the estimated useful lives used to compute depreciation and the recording of provision for investment losses.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements — In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The provisions for SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except in limited circumstances including certain positions in financial instruments that trade in active markets as well as certain financial and hybrid financial instruments initially measured under SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 133”) using the transaction price method. In these circumstances, the transition adjustment, measured as the difference between the carrying amounts and the fair values of those financial instruments at the date SFAS No. 157 is initially applied, shall be recognized as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings for the fiscal year in which SFAS No. 157 is initially applied. We do not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” (“SFAS No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits a company to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates. Most of the provisions in SFAS No. 159 are elective; however, it applies to all companies with available-for-sale and trading securities. A company will report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings (or another performance indicator if the company does not report earnings) at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option: (a) may be applied instrument by instrument, with a few exceptions, such as investments otherwise accounted for by the equity method; (b) is irrevocable (unless a new election date occurs), and; (c) is applied only to entire instruments and not to portions of instruments. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of a company’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating this statement and have not yet determined the impact of such on our results of operations or financial position.

16

Table of Contents

Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) — UHS of Delaware, Inc. (the “Advisor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UHS, serves as Advisor to us under an Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) dated December 24, 1986. Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is obligated to present an investment program to us, to use its best efforts to obtain investments suitable for such program (although it is not obligated to present any particular investment opportunity to us), to provide administrative services to us and to conduct our day-to-day affairs. Our officers are all employees of UHS and although we have no salaried employees, our officers do receive stock-based compensation from time-to-time.

We commenced operations in 1986 by purchasing certain assets from subsidiaries from UHS and immediately leasing the properties back to the respective subsidiaries. Most of the leases were entered into at the time we commenced operations and provided for initial terms of 13 to 15 years with up to six additional 5-year renewal terms. Certain subsidiaries of UHS lease four hospital facilities from us and are tenants in several medical office buildings owned by limited liability companies in which we hold non-controlling ownership interests.

For additional disclosure related to our relationship with UHS, please refer to Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements—Relationship with Universal Health Services, Inc. (“UHS”) and Related Party Transactions.

Results of Operations

As a result of the expiration of the master lease arrangements between subsidiaries of UHS and two LLCs in which we own non-controlling ownership interests of 95% and 99%, during the fourth quarter of 2006, we began recording the financial results of these LLCs on an unconsolidated basis. Prior to the fourth quarter 2006, these LLCs were included in our financial results on a consolidated basis in accordance with Financial Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51, (“FIN 46R”). Commencing in the fourth quarter of 2006, the revenues and expenses of these LLCs are no longer included in our consolidated revenues and expenses, but instead, our share of the net income generated from each of these LLCs is included in our consolidated statements of income as “Equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs”. There was no impact on our net income as a result of the change in accounting for these two LLCs. The following tables show the combined operating results for these two LLCs during the periods the results were recorded on a consolidated basis. The “As Adjusted” column on the tables below presents our consolidated income statement for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 as if we deconsolidated these two LLCs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. For comparative purposes, the amounts in the “As Adjusted” column are used in the discussions below (amounts in thousands).

Three Months Ended:

17

Table of Contents

Six Months Ended:

For the quarters ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, income from continuing operations totaled $5.6 million and $6.8 million, or $.47 and $.57 per diluted share, respectively. Income from discontinued operations totaled $2.4 million, or $.20 per diluted share, during the second quarter of 2007 and $78,000, or $.01 per diluted share, during the second quarter of 2006. Favorably impacting income from discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2007 was a gain of $2.3 million, or $.19 per diluted share, realized on the sale of a medical office building. Net income was $8.0 million, or $.67 per diluted share, during the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $6.9 million, or $.58 per diluted share, during the comparable prior year quarter. The decrease of $1.2 million, or $.10 per diluted share, in income from continuing operations during the second quarter of 2007, as compared to the second quarter of 2006, was primarily attributable to:

For the six month period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, income from continuing operations was $11.3 million and $11.7 million, or $.95 and $.98 per diluted share, respectively. Income from discontinued operations totaled $2.5 million, or $.21 per diluted share for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $166,000 or $.02 per diluted share, for the six month period ended June 30, 2006. Included in income from discontinued operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2007 was a gain of $2.3 million, or $.19 per diluted share, realized on the sale of a medical office building. The decrease of $403,000, or $.03 per diluted share, in income from continuing operations during the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the comparable 2006 period was primarily attributable to:

18

Table of Contents

Total revenue decreased $1.1 million and $2.2 million during the three and six months ending June 30, 2007, respectively, as compared to the comparable prior year periods, primarily due to the recording of two LLCs on an unconsolidated basis during 2007, as indicated above.

Other operating expenses decreased $461,000 and $939,000 during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2007, respectively, as compared to the comparable prior year periods, due primarily to the $452,000 and $917,0007, respectively, of expenses related to the LLC impact, as detailed above. Included in our other operating expenses are expenses related to the consolidated medical office buildings, which totaled $783,000 and $1.3 million for the three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $1.6 million and $2.7 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. A portion of the expenses associated with our consolidated medical office buildings is passed on directly to the tenants. Tenant reimbursements for operating expenses are accrued as revenue in the same period the related expenses are incurred and are included as tenant reimbursement revenue in our condensed consolidated statements of income.

Interest expense, net of interest income, (after adjusting for the $227,000 LLC impact as indicated above), increased $25,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the comparable prior year quarter, and decreased $107,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2007, as compared to the prior year period (after adjusting for the $454,000 LLC impact for the six month period, as indicated above). The $107,000 decrease in interest expense for the six month period ending June 30, 2007, as compared to the prior year period, is due primarily to a decrease in our average outstanding borrowings.

During the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recorded equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs of $701,000 and $2.5 million, respectively. After giving effect to the $301,000 LLC impact, as indicated above, the equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs decreased by approximately $2.1 million during the second quarter of 2007, as compared to the comparable prior year quarter, due primarily to: (i) the recognition of a previously deferred gain of $1.9 million during the second quarter of 2006, and; (ii) $200,000 of other combined unfavorable changes resulting primarily from increased interest and depreciation expense.

During the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recorded equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs of $1.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively. After giving effect to the $567,000 LLC six month impact, as indicated above, the equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs decreased by approximately $2.2 million during the six month period of 2007, as compared to the comparable 2006 period, due primarily to: (i) the recognition of a previously deferred gain of $1.9 million during the six month period of 2006; (ii) a $252,000 gain recorded on the sale of real property by a LLC during the first six months of 2007, and; (iii) $550,000 of other combined unfavorable changes resulting primarily from increased interest and depreciation expense.

19

Table of Contents

Funds from operations (“FFO”), is a widely recognized measure of REIT performance. Although FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure, we believe that information regarding FFO is helpful to shareholders and potential investors. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other REITs that do not compute FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, or that interpret the NAREIT definition differently than we interpret the definition. To facilitate a clear understanding of our historical operating results, FFO should be examined in conjunction with net income, determined in accordance with GAAP. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered to be an alternative to net income determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, FFO should not be used as: (i) an indication of our financial performance determined in accordance with GAAP; (ii) as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP; (iii) as a measure of our liquidity; (iv) nor is FFO an indicator of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions to shareholders.

Below is a reconciliation of our reported net income to FFO for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $11.4 million and $13.2 million for six month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

The $1.8 million net decrease was attributable to:

The $677,000 unfavorable change in net income plus or minus the adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to a $576,000 decrease in equity in income of unconsolidated LLCs, resulting primarily from increased interest and depreciation expense during the first six months of 2007 as compared to the comparable prior year period. (excludes the gains recorded in the six month periods of 2007 and 2006, and the LLC impact as indicated above).

The $1.1 million unfavorable change in accrued expenses and other liabilities is primarily the result of the exercise and settlement of an aggregate of 50,000 Dividend Equivalent Rights (“DERs”), which were scheduled to expire during the second quarter of 2007, by each of our executive officers and one Trustee. Under our 1997 Incentive Plan, the holder of a DER is credited with amounts equal to the dividends payable with respect to the number of shares of beneficial interest covered by the award as if such shares had been issued and outstanding on the record date related to such dividend. The total DER settlement during the second quarter of 2007 was $951,000. The DER cash settlement, after withholding taxes, if applicable, was returned to us to satisfy the cost of stock option exercises, which were also transacted during the second quarter of 2007, and is reflected in “Cash flows from financing activities” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

20

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities

Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities was $7.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to ($4.4 million) during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2007, we funded $638,000 of equity investments, funded $15.5 million of advances to LLCs and spent $496,000 on capital additions to certain of our real estate investments. Also during the six month period ended June 30, 2007, we received: (i) $9.8 million from LLCs for repayments of advances; (ii) $7.3 million from the sale of real property; (iii) $5.5 million related to debt refinancing by LLCs; (iv) $1.1 million of cash proceeds related to the sale of real property by a LLC, and; (v) $536,000 of cash distributions in excess of income from our unconsolidated LLCs.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, we funded equity investments of $4.8 million, issued $3.8 million of advances to LLCs and spent $638,000 on capital additions to certain of our real estate investments. Also during the six month period ended June 30, 2006, we received: (i) $1.1 million from a LLC for a partial repayment of an advance; (ii) $3.1 million of cash proceeds related to the sale of our interest in a LLC; (iii) $371,000 of other cash distributions in excess of income from our unconsolidated LLCs, and; (iv) $304,000 of cash proceeds related to debt refinancing by LLCs.

Net cash used in financing activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $18.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and $9.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006.

During the six month period ended June 30, 2007, we had net debt repayments of $5.3 million on our revolving line of credit, paid $527,000 in financing fees related to our new revolving credit agreement, paid $13.5 million of dividends, paid $164,000 on mortgage notes payable that are non-recourse to us and generated $674,000 of net cash from the issuance of shares of beneficial interest. During the six month period ended June 30, 2006, we had net debt borrowings of $4.3 million on our revolving line of credit, paid $13.3 million in dividends, paid $321,000 on mortgage notes payable that are non-recourse to us and generated $143,000 of cash from the issuance of shares of beneficial interest.

A dividend of $.575 per share was paid on June 29, 2007 to shareholders of record as of June 15, 2007.

We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through our available working capital and net cash provided by operations. We believe that our net cash provided by operations will be sufficient to allow us to make any distributions necessary to enable us to continue to qualify as a REIT under Section 856 to 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Credit facilities and mortgage debt

In January 2007, we entered into a new unsecured $100 million revolving credit agreement (the “Agreement”) which expires on January 19, 2012. We have a one-time option, which can be exercised at any time, subject to bank approval, to increase the amount by $50 million for a total commitment of $150 million. The Agreement provides for interest at our option, at the Eurodollar rate plus .75% to 1.125% or the prime rate plus zero to .125%. A fee of .15% to .225% is paid on the unused portion of the commitment. The margins over the Eurodollar rate, prime rate and the commitment fee are based upon our debt to total capital ratio as defined by the Agreement. As of June 30, 2007, the applicable margin over the Eurodollar rate was .75% and over the prime rate was zero. The commitment fee was 0.15%.

At June 30, 2007, we had $8.3 million of outstanding borrowings and $17.4 million of letters of credit outstanding against the Agreement. There are no compensating balance requirements. The Agreement contains a provision whereby the commitments will be reduced by 50% of the proceeds generated from any new equity offering. At June 30, 2007, we had $74.3 million of available borrowing capacity under this agreement.

Covenants relating to the revolving credit facility require the maintenance of a minimum tangible net worth and specified financial ratios, limit our ability to incur additional debt, limit the aggregate amount of mortgage receivables and limit our ability to increase dividends in excess of 95% of cash available for distribution, unless additional distributions are required to comply with the applicable section of the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations governing real estate investment trusts. We are in compliance with all of the covenants at June 30, 2007. The carrying value of this instrument approximates fair value.

21

Table of Contents

We have two mortgages, which are non-recourse to us, included in our consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007 with a combined outstanding balance of $12.6 million. Both mortgages carry an interest rate of 8.3% and both have maturity dates in 2010. The mortgages are secured by the real property of the buildings as well as property leases and rents. The following table summarizes these outstanding mortgages at June 30, 2007 (amounts in thousands):

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2007, we were party to certain off balance sheet arrangements consisting of standby letters of credit and construction commitments. Our outstanding letters of credit at June 30, 2007 totaled $17.4 million consisting of: (i) $901,000 related to Arlington Medical Properties; (ii) $1.3 million related to Sierra Medical Properties; (iii) $6.0 million related to Centennial Medical Properties; (iv) $5.3 million related to Canyon Healthcare Properties; and, (v) $3.9 million related to Palmdale Medical Properties. The $901,000 letter of credit for Arlington Medical Properties is related to our construction commitment to Arlington Medical Properties, of which a net of $5.2 million has been funded. The $1.3 million letter of credit for Sierra Medical Properties is the remaining amount of our construction commitment to Sierra Medical Properties, of which $2.6 million has been funded. The $6.0 million letter of credit for Centennial Medical Properties is related to our construction commitment to Centennial Medical Properties of which $243,000 has been funded. The $5.3 million letter of credit is related to our construction commitment to Canyon Healthcare Properties of which $209,000 has been funded. The $3.9 million letter of credit for Palmdale Medical Properties is related to our construction commitment to the Palmdale Medical Plaza of which $86,000 has been funded.

There have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures during the first six months of 2007. Reference is made to Item 7A in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

As of June 30, 2007, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Trust’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), we performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d—15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported by management on a timely basis in order to comply with our disclosure obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the SEC rules thereunder.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors during the second quarter of 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

UNIVERSAL HEALTH REALTY INCOME TRUST

There have been no material changes in our risk factors from those set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K dated December 31, 2006.

The following information related to matters submitted to the shareholders of Universal Health Realty Income Trust at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on June 1, 2007.

At the meeting, the following proposals, as described in the proxy statement delivered to all of our shareholders, were voted upon as set forth below:

22

Table of Contents

Election by shareholders of two Class III Trustees:

The approval of the Universal Health Realty Income Trust 2007 Restricted Stock Plan:

The consideration of one shareholder proposal:

10.1 Universal Health Realty Income Trust 2007 Restricted Stock Plan, previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated April 27, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference.

10.2 Form of Restricted Stock Agreement, previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 27, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference.

31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

23

Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.