UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS INC - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2012

OR

For the Transition Period from              to             

Commission File Number 000-25032

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY

PRODUCTS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

600 Mayer Street

Bridgeville, PA 15017

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(412) 257-7600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of July 31, 2012, there were 6,875,929 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that reflect the current views of Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (the “Company”) with respect to future events and financial performance. Statements looking forward in time, including statements regarding future growth, cost savings, expanded production capacity, broader product lines, greater capacity to meet customer quality reliability, price and delivery needs, enhanced competitive posture, effect of new accounting pronouncements and no material financial impact from litigation or contingencies are included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

The Company’s actual results may be affected by a wide range of factors including future compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; the concentrated nature of the Company’s customer base to date and the Company’s dependence on its significant customers; the receipt, pricing and timing of future customer orders; changes in product mix; the limited number of raw material and energy suppliers and significant fluctuations that may occur in raw material and energy prices; risks related to property, plant and equipment, including the Company’s reliance on the continuing operation of critical manufacturing equipment; risks associated with labor matters; the Company’s ongoing requirement for continued compliance with laws and regulations, including applicable safety and environmental regulations; the ultimate outcome of the Company’s current and future litigation matters; risks related to acquisitions that the Company may make; and the impact of various economic, credit and market risk uncertainties. Many of these factors are not within the Company’s control and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause the Company’s actual results in future periods to be materially different from any future performance suggested herein. Any unfavorable change in the foregoing or other factors could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, the Company operates in an industry sector where securities values may be volatile and may be influenced by economic and other factors beyond the Company’s control.

i

Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Information)

(Unaudited)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in Thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

UNIVERSAL STAINLESS & ALLOY PRODUCTS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(Dollars in Thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and statements of comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, balance sheets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, have been prepared by Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (the “Company”) in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP has been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements, and notes thereto, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, all of which were of a normal, recurring nature, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 and the consolidated results of operations and of cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). This amendment provides a consistent definition of fair value and ensures that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between GAAP and IFRS. The amendment clarifies the application of existing fair value measurements and disclosures, and changes certain principles or requirements for fair value measurements and disclosures. The Company adopted these provisions during the six months ended June 30, 2012. This amendment did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets, results of operations or cash flows.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2012 presentation.

Note 2 – Acquisition

On August 18, 2011, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of Patriot Special Metals, Inc. and RSM Real Estate Holding, Inc., consisting of a specialty steel manufacturing facility located in North Jackson, Ohio (the “North Jackson Facility”). The North Jackson Facility began forging and finishing operations in September 2011. In December 2011, the North Jackson Facility performed the first melts on its new vacuum induction melting (VIM) furnace and two vacuum arc remelting (VAR) furnaces. The aggregate purchase price for the North Jackson Facility was $111.3 million, which was comprised of a $40.0 million term loan, $40.0 million in borrowings under a revolving credit facility, $20.0 million in aggregate principal amount of convertible promissory notes issued to the sellers of the North Jackson Facility and the remainder from cash on-hand prior to the acquisition. The term loan and revolving credit facility were subsequently amended during the three months ended March 31, 2012, which is discussed further in Note 5. At closing, the Company entered into an escrow agreement with the sellers, pursuant to which $2.5 million of the purchase price was placed in escrow. The escrow agreement expires on February 18, 2013.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $496,000 and $915,000, respectively, of acquisition related costs which are included as a component of selling and administrative expenses on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company did not incur any acquisition related costs in 2012.

4

Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following table summarizes the preliminary acquisition-date fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in connection with the North Jackson Facility acquisition (dollars in thousands):

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition have been recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Preliminary fair values were determined by management based, in part, on independent valuations performed by third party valuation specialists. The above preliminary fair values are subject to change based upon the finalization of the valuations. Under GAAP, the measurement period shall not exceed one year from the acquisition date. The Company will finalize the above amounts as the information necessary to complete the analysis is obtained. The fair value assigned to the non-compete agreement is subject to amortization over the five year life of the agreement.

Goodwill is calculated as the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired and represents the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired that could not be individually identified and separately recognized. Among the factors that contributed to a purchase price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired were the acquisition of an assembled workforce and the expected synergies and other benefits as a result of combining the operations of the North Jackson Facility with the Company’s other operations. Goodwill related to the North Jackson Facility acquisition was recorded in the Company’s Universal Stainless & Alloy Products reportable segment. There was no goodwill recognized for income tax purposes as a result of the North Jackson Facility acquisition.

The following is a summary of the changes in the carrying value of goodwill, from December 31, 2011 through June 30, 2012 (dollars in thousands):

As previously mentioned, the Company incurred debt in the form of a term loan, borrowings under a revolving credit facility and convertible notes issued to acquire the North Jackson Facility. In accordance with GAAP, the Company recorded this debt at fair value as of the acquisition date. The fair value of the term loan and borrowings under the revolving credit facility were determined to be the par value of the debt. The terms of the convertible notes were designed to and resulted in the fair value of the option to convert and the debt component aggregating to the par amount of the convertible notes.

The operating results of the North Jackson Facility have been included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date.

The following unaudited pro forma information presents the combined results as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2011. The unaudited pro forma financial information was prepared to give effect to events that are (1) directly attributable to the acquisition; (2) factually supportable; and (3) expected to have a continuing impact on the combined company’s results. Pro forma adjustments have been made to reflect the incremental impact on earnings of amortization expense related to the acquired intangible asset and income tax expense. The Company has calculated the 2011 pro forma results using a 36.4% effective tax rate from January 1, 2011. As a result of no assets being placed in service prior to the acquisition date, the Company has not included any incremental interest expense resulting from the debt incurred to finance the acquisition. All incurred interest would have been capitalized prior to placing the assets in service. The Company has not included the dilutive effect of the convertible notes on the unaudited pro forma information. Due to the level of completion of the North Jackson Facility on January 1, 2011, it is highly unlikely that the acquisition

5

Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

would have been partially financed through the issuance of convertible notes. Prior to the acquisition, the North Jackson Facility’s only sales were derived from scrap sales. Pro forma adjustments were made to eliminate one-time acquisition related costs. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect any cost savings, operating synergies or revenue enhancements that the combined company may achieve as a result of the acquisition or the costs to integrate the operations or the costs necessary to achieve cost savings, operating synergies or revenue enhancements. The pro forma results are not indicative of how the results will appear in the future.

Note 3 – Net Income per Common Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share:

Options not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 to purchase 5,000 and 48,300 shares of Common Stock at an average price of $42.50 and $38.86, respectively, per common share were outstanding at June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These outstanding options were not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because their respective exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the Common Stock.

6

Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 4 – Inventory

The major classes of inventory were as follows:

Note 5 – Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

Amended Credit Facility

On August 18, 2011, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) which provides for a senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”) and a senior secured term loan facility (the “Term Loan” and together with the Revolver, the “Facilities”). On March 19, 2012, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Credit Agreement (together with the Credit Agreement, the “Amended Credit Agreement”). The Amended Credit Agreement provides for a $105.0 million Revolver and a $20.0 million Term Loan. PNC Bank, National Association serves as Administrative Agent with respect to the Facilities. The Amended Credit Agreement extends the expiration date from August 2016 to March 2017, provides additional availability under the Facilities and reduces fees and interest rates. The Facilities are collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, except that no real property other than the North Jackson Facility is collateral under the Facilities. Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., Dunkirk Specialty Steel, LLC and North Jackson Specialty Steel, LLC are co-borrowers under the Facilities. The co-borrowers’ obligations under the Facilities have been guaranteed by USAP Holdings, Inc. In conjunction with the amendment to the Credit Agreement, the Company recorded additional deferred financing costs of $348,000 during 2012. Deferred financing costs are included on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as a component of other long-term assets.

At any time prior to August 18, 2015, the Company may make up to two requests to increase the maximum aggregate principal amount of borrowings under the Revolver by at least $10.0 million, with the maximum aggregate principal amount of borrowings under the Revolver not to exceed $130.0 million in any event. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee of 0.25% based on the daily unused portion of the Revolver. The Revolver also provides for up to $7.0 million of swing loans so long as the sum of the outstanding swing loans and the outstanding borrowings under the Revolver does not exceed $105.0 million at any given time. The Term Loan is payable in quarterly installments in the principal amount of $750,000 beginning on July 1, 2013, with the balance of the Term Loan payable in full on March 19, 2017.

Amounts outstanding under the Facilities, at the Company’s option, will bear interest at either a base rate or a LIBOR-based rate (the “LIBOR Option”), in either case calculated in accordance with the terms of the Amended Credit Agreement. The Company elected to use the LIBOR Option during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, which was 2.0% for the Term Loan and revolving credit facility and 2.46% for the swing loan at June 30, 2012. Interest on the Facilities is payable monthly.

7

Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Amended Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain a leverage ratio not exceeding a ratio decreasing from 3.25 to 1.00 to 2.75 to 1.00 during the term of the Facilities and a fixed charge coverage ratio not less than 1.20 to 1.00. At June 30, 2012, the Company was obligated to maintain a leverage ratio not exceeding 3.25 to 1.00. The Company was in compliance with all covenants contained in the Amended Credit Agreement at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Convertible Notes

In connection with the acquisition of the North Jackson Facility, on August 18, 2011, the Company issued $20.0 million in convertible notes (the “Notes”) to the sellers of the North Jackson Facility as partial consideration of the acquisition. The Notes are subordinated obligations of the Company and rank junior to the Facilities. The Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 4.0% per annum, payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on each June 18 and December 18, beginning on December 18, 2011. Unless earlier converted, the Notes mature and the unpaid principal balance is due on August 17, 2017. The Notes and any accrued and unpaid interest are convertible into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at the option of the holder at an initial conversion price of $47.1675 per share of Common Stock. The conversion price associated with the Notes may be adjusted in certain circumstances. The Company may prepay any outstanding Notes, in whole or in part on any date after August 17, 2014 during a fiscal quarter if the Company’s share price is greater than 140% of the current conversion price for at least twenty of the trading days in the thirty consecutive trading day period ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter. The Company evaluated the conversion feature of the Notes upon issuance and determined that no beneficial conversion feature existed.

Aggregate maturities of long-term debt are as follows:

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements

The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the inputs used to determine fair value, which are as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.

Level 2 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that cannot be corroborated by observable market data and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.

The fair value hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. In instances where the inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the fair value measurement has been determined based on the lowest level input significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular item to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, including the consideration of inputs specific to the asset or liability.

Financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, short-term debt and other current liabilities. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximated fair value at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 due to their short-term maturities. The fair value of the Term Loan, revolving credit facility and swing loans at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 approximated the carrying amount as the interest rate is based upon floating short-term interest rates. At June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the fair value of the Notes approximated the carrying amount. The fair value of the Term Loan, revolving credit facility, swing loans and Notes were determined on a Level 2 measurement.

8

Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 7 – Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, various lawsuits and claims have been or may be asserted against the Company relating to the conduct of its business, including routine litigation involving commercial and employment matters. The ultimate cost and outcome of any litigation or claim cannot be predicted with certainty. Management believes, based on information presently available, that the likelihood that the ultimate outcome of any such pending matter will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, or liquidity or a material impact to the results of operations is remote, however the resolution of one or more of these matters may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations for the period in which the resolution occurs.

Note 8 – Income Taxes

Management estimates the annual effective income tax rate quarterly, based on current annual forecasted results. Items unrelated to current year ordinary income are recognized entirely in the period identified as a discrete item of tax. The quarterly income tax provision is comprised of tax on ordinary income provided at the most recent estimated annual effective tax rate, increased or decreased for the tax effect of discrete items.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the estimated annual effective tax rate applied to ordinary income was 35.1% and 35.0%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012, which reflects federal and state taxable income, includes a net discrete tax benefit of $578,000 for state income taxes and research and development tax credits, partially offset by a net operating loss carryback. Including the effect of the discrete tax items, the Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 31.4%. For the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company’s effective tax rate was 33.0% and 35.0%, respectively.

Note 9 – Business Segments

The Company is comprised of two reportable business segments. The Bridgeville, North Jackson and Titusville facilities have been aggregated into one reportable segment, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products (“USAP”). Dunkirk Specialty Steel represents the second reportable segment.

From the North Jackson acquisition date through June 30, 2012, the Company has included the results of North Jackson in the USAP segment. North Jackson was included in the USAP reporting segment as a result of North Jackson having consistent characteristics as identified in ASC Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”, with the USAP segment. As a result of the North Jackson acquisition, the Company’s operating facilities have become more integrated, resulting in the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) viewing the Company as one unit. As North Jackson becomes fully integrated within the Company, it is expected that the Company will move to one reportable segment to more accurately reflect the information and measures used by the Company’s CODM to make key decisions.

9

Table of Contents

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The segment data are as follows:

The following table presents total assets by segment:

10

Table of Contents

Overview

The following Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand the results of operations and financial condition of Universal Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc. (the “Company”). This MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

We manufacture and market semi-finished and finished specialty steel products, including stainless steel, tool steel and certain other alloyed steels. Our manufacturing process involves melting, remelting, heat treating, hot and cold rolling, forging, machining and cold drawing of semi-finished and finished specialty steels. Our products are sold to service centers, forgers, rerollers, original equipment manufacturers and wire redrawers. Our customers further process our products for use in a variety of industries, including the aerospace, power generation, oil and gas and heavy equipment manufacturing industries. We also perform conversion services on materials supplied by customers that lack certain of our production capabilities or are subject to their own capacity constraints.

We recognized net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 of $4.5 million, or $0.62 per diluted share, compared with net income of $5.5 million, or $0.79 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Our net sales increased from $63.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $67.9 million for the current quarter. This $4.6 million, or 7%, increase is largely due to increased volume recognized in the current quarter as compared to the second quarter of 2011. Tons shipped increased by 5% in the current quarter when compared to the prior year second quarter.

Our backlog was $89.0 million at June 30, 2012 as compared to $102.6 million at December 31, 2011.

During the current quarter, we continued to increase production at our North Jackson facility, which was acquired in the third quarter of 2011. In addition to conversion services provided to external customers, the North Jackson operation has provided increasing forging and remelting activities on products for our other facilities, as well as providing our legacy operations with operating synergies. Early in the second quarter of 2012, we began remelting around the clock on the facility’s two vacuum arc remelting (VAR) furnaces. Melting in the facility’s vacuum induction melting (VIM) furnace increased throughout the second quarter of 2012. Material produced in the VIM is now being qualified for future customer orders and we expect to begin selling this material late in the third quarter of 2012.

Our cost of products sold increased from $51.1 million for the second quarter of 2011 to $56.3 million in the current quarter. This $5.2 million, or 10%, increase is primarily due to the aforementioned 7% increase in net sales. In addition, our operations costs, which include certain infrastructure costs such as overhead and depreciation, increased on a percentage of sales basis from 40% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to 46% for the current quarter. We have placed a substantial amount of fixed assets in service over the past three quarters, primarily at our North Jackson facility, which has increased our depreciation expense. The higher depreciation expense, coupled with developing production at our North Jackson facility, had a negative impact on our operations costs as a percentage of sales in the current period. As we continue to increase production at our North Jackson facility, we believe that our operations costs as a percentage of sales will decrease from current levels.

Selling and administrative (“S&A”) expenses increased from $3.7 million in the second quarter of 2011 to $4.3 million in the current quarter. Included in our S&A expenses were $0.5 million related to the North Jackson facility acquisition for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and $0.6 million related to our North Jackson operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. Excluding the North Jackson S&A related expenses, our S&A expenses as a percentage of sales remained consistent between the second quarter of 2011 and 2012 at 5%.

Interest expense increased from $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $0.6 million in the same period of 2012. This increase is primarily due to the higher debt balance maintained in the current year to finance the North Jackson facility acquisition. During the first quarter of 2012 we amended our credit facility which, among other benefits, reduced our interest rate.

Our effective tax rate for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was 33% and 35%, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 reflects a net discrete tax benefit for research and development tax credits, partially offset by a net operating loss (“NOL”) carryback. Our estimated annual effective tax rate on ordinary income for 2012 is 35.1%.

11

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011

An analysis of the Company’s operations for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Market Segment Information

Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased $4.5 million as compared to the similar period in 2011. The increase reflects a 7% increase, for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, in consolidated shipments and a change in product mix. Shipments of aerospace products, service center plate and conversion services increased 21%, 15% and 44%, respectively, and were partially offset by decreases in power generation, oil and gas and heavy equipment manufacturing products of 14%, 5%, and 34%, respectively, for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, compared to the prior year second quarter.

Cost of products sold, as a percentage of sales, was 83% and 81% for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in cost of products sold is primarily due to increased operations costs as a percentage of sales incurred in the current quarter as compared to the prior year second quarter. This increase is largely due to the aforementioned increased infrastructure costs, primarily related to our North Jackson facility. The increase in operations cost as a percentage of sales is partially offset by lower material costs as a percentage of sales in the current quarter, primarily due to reduced raw material prices.

12

Table of Contents

S&A expense increased by $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the similar period in 2011. S&A expenses as a percentage of net sales was 6% for the quarters ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. This increase primarily relates to the S&A expenses associated with the operations of the North Jackson facility. Our S&A expense in the second quarter of 2011 included $0.5 million of acquisition costs related to the North Jackson facility acquisition. There were no similar costs in the second quarter of 2012. Our S&A expenses were favorably impacted by reduced variable incentive compensation costs, which decreased by $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011.

Business Segment Results

We are comprised of four operating locations and a corporate headquarters. For segment reporting, our Bridgeville, North Jackson and Titusville facilities have been aggregated into one reportable segment, Universal Stainless & Alloy Products (“USAP”). Our Dunkirk Specialty Steel facility is our second reportable segment.

We have included the results of our North Jackson operation in the USAP segment as a result of North Jackson having consistent characteristics as identified in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 280, “Segment Reporting”, with the USAP segment. As a result of the North Jackson acquisition, our operating facilities have become more integrated, resulting in our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) viewing the Company as one unit. As North Jackson becomes fully integrated within the Company, we expect to move to one reportable segment to more accurately reflect the information and measures which are used by our CODM to make key decisions.

An analysis of net sales and operating income for our reportable segments for the three month ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Universal Stainless & Alloy Products Segment

13

Table of Contents

Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2012 for the Universal Stainless & Alloy Products segment increased by $1.4 million, or 2%, in comparison to the quarter ended June 30, 2011. The increases reflect a 2% increase in shipments for the three months ended June 30, 2012, as well as a change in product mix. Increases in shipments of aerospace products, conversion services, and service center plate products of 9%, 73%, and 20%, respectively, were partially offset by a decrease in power generation, heavy equipment manufacturing and oil and gas products of 13%, 51% and 3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2012.

Although net sales increased during quarter ended June 30, 2012, operating income declined by $2.0 million as compared to the prior year second quarter. This reduction in operating income is primarily a result of higher operations costs per sales dollar, partially offset by decreased material costs per sales dollar. Operation costs per sales dollar increased from 33% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to 38% for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Material cost of sales, as a percentage of net sales, decreased from 53% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 to 50% for current quarter. Material costs decreased as a result of a decrease in raw material costs in the current period. Additionally, segment results for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were unfavorably impacted by an increase in S&A expenses of $0.4 million.

Dunkirk Specialty Steel Segment

Net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2012 for the Dunkirk Specialty Steel segment decreased by $0.3 million, or 1%, in comparison to the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease in sales is largely a result of a 5% decrease in shipments for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as well as a change in product mix. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, decreases in shipments of conversion services, oil and gas and power generation products of 84%, 20% and 19% were partially offset by increases in aerospace, service center plate and heavy equipment manufacturing products of 9%, 16% and 2%, respectively.

Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 decreased by $0.3 million as compared to the similar period in 2011. The decrease during the second quarter is primarily due to an increase in operation costs per sales dollar from 22% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to 25% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, partially offset by lower material costs in relation to net sales, which decreased from 61% to 58% in the same period. Total cost of products sold as a percentage of sales remained consistent between periods at 83%.

14

Table of Contents

Six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011

An analysis of the Company’s operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Market Segment Information