UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark
One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 1-31923
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
86-0226984 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
16220 North Scottsdale Road, Suite 100
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254
(Address of principal executive offices)
Scottsdale, Arizona 85254
(Address of principal executive offices)
(623) 445-9500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At July 22, 2011, there were 24,578,849 shares outstanding of the registrants common stock.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
Table of Contents
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking information about our financial results, estimates and
our business prospects that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. From time to time, we
also may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the
public. Forward-looking statements are expressions of our current expectations or forecasts of
future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to
historical or current facts. They often include words such as anticipate, estimate, expect,
project, intend, plan, believe, will, and other words and terms of similar meaning in
connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these
include statements relating to future actions, future regulatory initiatives, future performance or
results, expenses, the outcome of contingencies, such as legal proceedings, and financial results.
We cannot guarantee any forward-looking statement will be realized, although we believe we
have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Achievement of future results is subject to risks,
uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary
materially from past results and those anticipated, estimated or projected. Investors should bear
this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements.
Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised,
however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our Form 10-Q, 8-K and
10-K reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Form 10-K that we filed with
the SEC on December 1, 2010 listed various important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from expected and historical results. We note these factors for investors as
permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers can find them under the
heading Risk Factors in the Form 10-K and investors should refer to them. You should understand
that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not
consider any such list to be a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties. Our filings
with the SEC may be accessed at the SECs web site at
www.sec.gov.
ii
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
June 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
($s in thousands) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 37,141 | $ | 48,974 | ||||
Investments, current portion |
40,391 | 28,528 | ||||||
Receivables, net |
16,620 | 19,253 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
6,348 | 8,840 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
10,867 | 9,836 | ||||||
Total current assets |
111,367 | 115,431 | ||||||
Investments, less current portion |
8,954 | 3,596 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
103,472 | 99,040 | ||||||
Goodwill |
20,579 | 20,579 | ||||||
Other assets |
5,241 | 3,853 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 249,613 | $ | 242,499 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 33,417 | $ | 53,906 | ||||
Deferred revenue |
57,309 | 63,276 | ||||||
Accrued tool sets |
5,064 | 5,066 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
77 | 66 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
95,867 | 122,314 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
2,233 | 933 | ||||||
Deferred rent liability |
10,507 | 5,621 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
5,996 | 5,239 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
114,603 | 134,107 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
29,375,001 shares issued and 24,504,775 shares outstanding
at June 30, 2011 and 29,148,585 shares issued and 24,278,359
shares
outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
3 | 3 | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued
and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
155,343 | 150,012 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 4,870,226 shares at June 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010 |
(76,506 | ) | (76,506 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
56,170 | 34,883 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
135,010 | 108,392 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 249,613 | $ | 242,499 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 108,934 | $ | 107,525 | $ | 340,542 | $ | 316,678 | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Educational services and facilities |
57,990 | 53,712 | 169,518 | 154,232 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
44,238 | 43,956 | 136,075 | 127,649 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
102,228 | 97,668 | 305,593 | 281,881 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
6,706 | 9,857 | 34,949 | 34,797 | ||||||||||||
Other income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income, net |
56 | 77 | 199 | 195 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
90 | 105 | 345 | 356 | ||||||||||||
Total other income |
146 | 182 | 544 | 551 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
6,852 | 10,039 | 35,493 | 35,348 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2,816 | 3,753 | 14,206 | 13,736 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,036 | $ | 6,286 | $ | 21,287 | $ | 21,612 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.26 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.90 | ||||||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.86 | $ | 0.88 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
24,462 | 24,146 | 24,370 | 23,976 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
24,765 | 24,730 | 24,688 | 24,511 | ||||||||||||
Special cash dividend declared per common share |
$ | | $ | 1.50 | $ | | $ | 1.50 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-in | Treasury Stock | Retained | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Shares | Amount | Earnings | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
29,149 | $ | 3 | $ | 150,012 | 4,870 | $ | (76,506 | ) | $ | 34,883 | $ | 108,392 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 21,287 | 21,287 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
under employee plans |
275 | | 690 | | | | 690 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares withheld for payroll
taxes |
(49 | ) | | (922 | ) | | | | (922 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from employee
stock plans |
| | 754 | | | | 754 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 4,809 | | | | 4,809 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
29,375 | $ | 3 | $ | 155,343 | 4,870 | $ | (76,506 | ) | $ | 56,170 | $ | 135,010 | |||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 21,287 | $ | 21,612 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
18,409 | 13,559 | ||||||
Amortization of held-to-maturity investments |
789 | 1,133 | ||||||
Bad debt expense |
5,450 | 4,583 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
4,771 | 4,690 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
(795 | ) | (1,786 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,792 | (2,149 | ) | |||||
Loss on disposal of property and equipment |
921 | 160 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Receivables |
(422 | ) | (6,821 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(1,189 | ) | (752 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
(1,397 | ) | 36 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(17,645 | ) | (813 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
(5,967 | ) | 5,726 | |||||
Income tax receivable |
(1,641 | ) | (1,999 | ) | ||||
Accrued tool sets and other current liabilities |
9 | 812 | ||||||
Deferred rent liability |
4,886 | (81 | ) | |||||
Other liabilities |
359 | (298 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
31,617 | 37,612 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(26,067 | ) | (26,555 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
64 | 1 | ||||||
Purchase of investments |
(57,555 | ) | (33,702 | ) | ||||
Proceeds received upon maturity of investments |
39,545 | 21,382 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(44,013 | ) | (38,874 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee plans |
690 | 3,917 | ||||||
Payment of payroll taxes on stock-based compensation through shares withheld |
(922 | ) | (1,606 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
795 | 1,786 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
563 | 4,097 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(11,833 | ) | 2,835 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
48,974 | 56,199 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 37,141 | $ | 59,034 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Dividends payable |
$ | | $ | 36,333 | ||||
Taxes paid |
$ | 12,056 | $ | 17,913 | ||||
Training equipment obtained in exchange for services |
$ | 1,227 | $ | 848 | ||||
Accrued capital expenditures |
$ | (2,844 | ) | $ | 870 | |||
Capitalized stock-based compensation |
$ | 38 | $ | 56 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Nature of the Business
We are the leading provider of postsecondary education for students seeking careers as
professional automotive, diesel, collision repair, motorcycle and marine technicians as measured by
total average undergraduate full-time student enrollment and graduates. We offer undergraduate
degree, diploma and certificate programs at 11 campuses across the United States under the banner
of several well-known brands, including Universal Technical Institute, Motorcycle Mechanics
Institute and Marine Mechanics Institute and NASCAR Technical Institute. We also offer
manufacturer-specific training programs including both student paid electives at our campuses and
manufacturer or dealer sponsored training at dedicated training centers.
We work closely with leading original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in the automotive,
diesel, motorcycle and marine industries to understand their needs for qualified service
professionals. Through our relationships with OEMs, we are able to continuously refine and expand
our programs and curricula. We believe our industry-oriented educational philosophy and national
presence have enabled us to develop valuable industry relationships which provide us with
significant competitive strength and support our market leadership.
2. Government Regulation and Financial Aid
On October 29, 2010, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) issued new regulations pertaining
to certain aspects of the administration of Title IV Programs, regulations which, with minor
exceptions, became effective July 1, 2011. Since the publication of the new regulations in
October, ED has issued interpretive guidance on the final regulations in the form of multiple Dear
Colleague Letters to institutions. The letters provide sub-regulatory guidance on certain areas of
final regulations which assists institutions with understanding the regulations in these areas.
However, there remains uncertainty in how various aspects of the new regulations will be
interpreted and applied, which could increase the risk that ED could seek to impose monetary or
other sanctions on us if it believed we were not in full compliance with all aspects of the new
regulations. Additionally, on June 13, 2011, ED published final regulations related to the metrics
for determining whether an academic program prepares students for gainful employment, which become
effective July 1, 2012.
We have devoted significant effort to understanding the effects of the new regulations on our
business and to developing compliant solutions that are also congruent with our business, culture
and mission to serve our students and industry partners. However, these solutions, related to
implementation and compliance with these final rules, including but not limited to gainful
employment, compensation, the definition of a credit hour, state authorization and the broadened
definition of misrepresentation, may have a material impact on the manner in which we conduct our
business, our student populations, and the nature of our programs, financial condition, cash flows,
results of operations and stock price. Furthermore, the solutions may require further analysis
based on the uncertainty noted above and any additional interpretive guidance that is provided.
On July 1, 2011, consistent with EDs Gainful Employment Disclosure Requirements, issued on
October 29, 2010, we established a webpage to disclose to the general public certain information
about our programs, including recognized occupations, costs, completion rate, graduate employment
rate and median loan debt of program completers.
This requirement for reporting information relating to our programs to assist prospective students
in making informed decisions has increased our administrative burdens. These reporting and the
other procedural changes resulting from the new rules may impact student populations in ways that
we cannot now predict which may have a material impact on the manner
in which we conduct our business, the nature of our programs, financial condition, cash flows,
results of operations and stock price.
5
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
ED promulgated final regulations on June 13, 2011, which will become effective on July 1,
2012, imposing additional Title IV Program eligibility requirements on certain educational
programs. Our programs are subject to ED requirements that the programs prepare students for
gainful employment in a recognized occupation. The gainful employment regulations published on
June 13, 2011 establish metrics for determining whether a program will qualify as such an
educational program. Specifically, a program will qualify as leading to gainful employment in a
recognized occupation if we can establish that the program meets at least one of three annual,
program-level student metrics: (i) debt repayment rate which requires that at least 35 percent of
the programs former students are successfully repaying their loans, as defined by the regulation;
(ii) debt-to-discretionary income ratio, which requires that the estimated annual loan payment of
a typical graduate of the program does not exceed 30 percent of her or his discretionary income; or
(iii) debt-to-total earnings ratio which requires that the estimated annual loan payment of the
typical graduate does not exceed 12 percent of her or his total earnings. A graduates loan debt
is calculated based upon the programs median debt, including federal and private loans. The
earnings used will generally be based on information received from the Social Security
Administration. All three metrics will generally examine student information in their third and
fourth year after graduation, with certain exceptions. If an academic program fails all three
metrics in a year, the institution must disclose the amount by which the program missed the minimum
acceptable performance and the institutions plan to improve the program. Also, the institution
must establish a three-day waiting period before students can enroll. If an academic program fails
all three metrics in two out of three years, the institution must inform students in the failing
program that their debts may be unaffordable and the program may become ineligible to participate
in Title IV Program funding, and must describe for students their available transfer options. If an
academic program fails all three metrics in three out of four years, the academic program would
become ineligible to participate in Title IV Program funding for at least three years. The gainful
employment standards will be calculated on a fiscal year basis beginning with federal fiscal year
2012. The first year for which eligibility could be lost for a program is 2015, which would occur
if the program fails all three standards for each of 2012, 2013, and 2014. At this time, and based
on our preliminary analysis as measured in the manner set forth in the final gainful employment
regulations and information currently available, we believe that our programs prepare students for
gainful employment for purposes of continued eligibility to participate in federal student
financial aid programs.
Although the final rules regarding gainful employment metrics provide opportunities to address
program deficiencies before the loss of Title IV eligibility, the continuing eligibility of our
educational programs for Title IV funding is at risk due to factors beyond our control, such as
changes in the actual or deemed income level of our graduates, changes in student borrowing levels,
increases in interest rates, changes in the federal poverty income level relevant for calculating
discretionary income, changes in the percentage of our former students who are current in repayment
of their student loans, and other factors. In addition, even though deficiencies in the metrics may
be correctible on a timely basis, the disclosure requirements to students following a failure to
meet the standards may adversely impact enrollment in that program and may adversely impact the
reputation of our educational institutions.
As we discussed in previous filings, we made modifications to our employee compensation
structures to comply with the elimination of the safe harbors in the regulations in place prior to
July 1, 2011. Such modifications were effective prior to July 1, 2011. Other companies in the
industry have experienced and reported material adverse impacts to their business when changes to
compensation have been implemented, but we cannot fully predict whether we will experience a
similar impact given our dissimilar solutions, culture and timing, nor can we predict how
significant any such impact will be. Our operating costs have and will continue to change
materially based on these adjustments to compensation that we believe to be fair and compliant.
6
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
On March 18, 2011, ED issued a Dear Colleague Letter that provided guidance concerning, but
also created open questions and interpretive issues with respect to, the final regulations related
to determining what will constitute a credit hour and whether an institutions educational programs
are appropriately offered in credit hours. In these regulations, ED has defined a credit hour,
mandating the Carnegie Unit or its equivalent. We continue to request guidance from our accreditor
on the credit hour definition for our degree programs. Students attending credit hour programs of
study that do not meet the measurements under the Carnegie definition or its equivalent may receive
less funds from the Title IV Programs to pay their cost of education with respect to those programs
of study.
On April 15, 2011, President Obama signed the fiscal year 2011 spending bill, also known as
the Continuing Resolution, which permanently eliminated year-round Pell Grant awards beginning with
the 2011-2012 award year. The year-round Pell Grant program had been in effect during the preceding
two award years and we believe that the increase in Pell Grant funds positively impacted our show
rates during those periods. However, the elimination of the year-round Pell Grant could negatively
impact our show rates in the future. Additionally, the reduction may increase the funding gap for
certain students which could result in increased usage of our proprietary loan program. The
Continuing Resolution maintains the $5,550 maximum annual Pell Grant for the 2011-2012 award year.
However, because the federal Pell Grant program is one of the largest non-defense discretionary
spending programs in the federal budget, it is a target for reduction as Congress addresses the
budget deficit. The Obama Administration did not include cuts in the Pell Grant program in its
proposed fiscal year 2012 budget, but there have been proposals in Congress to roll back the Pell
Grant program to 2008 funding levels, which would reduce the maximum annual Pell Grant by $800 from
its current maximum level of $5,550, perhaps as early as July 2012. In addition to possible
reductions in federal student financial aid, we believe that the availability of state-funded
student financial aid will continue to decline as states deal with historic budget shortfalls.
These reductions may reduce our enrollment and, to the extent that Title IV funds replace any state
funding sources for our students, may adversely impact our 90/10 Rule calculation. We cannot
predict the outcome of the federal or state budget negotiations.
Interpretation of the new regulations is subject to change as ED provides further guidance and
clarification. Existing or future understandings could be different from EDs interpretations and
thus lead to repayments, restrictions, fines or litigation, and such further guidance or
differences could require us to make additional changes in our operations and could reduce our
student populations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price.
3. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for
interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, our condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all
normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the
interim periods have been included. Operating results for the three months and nine months ended
June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending September 30, 2011. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our
2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 1, 2010.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Universal
Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) and our wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
7
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
We lease substantially all of our administrative and educational facilities under operating
lease agreements. Some lease agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, free rent periods
or rent escalation clauses. In instances where one or more of these items are included in a lease
agreement, we record a deferred rent liability on the consolidated balance sheets and record rent
expense evenly over the initial term of the lease.
In September 2010, we entered into leasing arrangements to relocate our headquarters during
the three months ended March 31, 2011. The arrangements included incentives such as a leasehold
improvement allowance, moving allowance, and free rent periods which will be recognized on a
straight-line basis over the initial lease term resulting in deferred rent of $4.9 million at June
30, 2011.
4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance which eliminates
the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of
changes in equity. The guidance requires all nonowner changes in stockholders equity to be
presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but
consecutive statements, and requires presentation on the face of the financial statements of
reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net
income. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The
adoption of this standard will not impact our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance and clarification about the application of existing fair
value measurements and disclosure requirements. This guidance will be effective for interim and
fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2011. We will review the requirements under the
standard to determine what impacts, if any, the adoption would have on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance which modifies the requirements of Step 1 of the
goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. This guidance
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. We will review the requirements
under the standard to determine what impacts, if any, the adoption would have on our condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance on the disclosure of supplemental pro forma
information for business combinations. This guidance is effective for fiscal periods beginning
after December 15, 2010. We will review the requirements under the standard to determine what
impacts, if any, the adoption would have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
5. Investments
We invest in pre-funded municipal bonds which are generally secured by escrowed-to-maturity
U.S. Treasury notes. Municipal bonds represent debt obligations issued by states, cities, counties,
and other governmental entities, which earn interest that is exempt from federal income taxes.
Additionally, we invest in certificates of deposit issued by financial institutions and corporate
bonds from large cap industrial and selected financial companies with a minimum credit rating of A.
We have the ability and intent to hold our investments until maturity and therefore classify these
investments as held-to-maturity and report them at amortized cost. We measure fair value for these
instruments using quoted market prices for identical assets (Level 1).
8
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
The amortized cost and estimated fair market value for investments classified as
held-to-maturity at June 30, 2011 are as follows:
Estimated | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Gross Unrealized | Fair Market | ||||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit due in less than
1 year |
$ | 10,343 | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | 10,344 | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit due in 1- 2 years |
6,320 | | (1 | ) | 6,319 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds due in less than 1 year |
13,390 | 1 | (10 | ) | 13,381 | |||||||||||
Municipal bonds due 1-2 years |
2,634 | | | 2,634 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds due in less than 1 year |
16,658 | | (19 | ) | 16,639 | |||||||||||
$ | 49,345 | $ | 2 | $ | (30 | ) | $ | 49,317 | ||||||||
Investments are exposed to various risks, including interest rate, market and credit risk
and as a result, it is possible that changes in the values of these investments may occur and that
such changes could affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and
condensed consolidated statements of income.
6. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. As
such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The valuation techniques used to
determine fair value are consistent with either the market approach, income approach and/or cost
approach. The following three-tier fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used in the
valuation techniques to measure fair value:
Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect quoted market prices (unadjusted) for identical
assets and liabilities in active markets; |
Level 2 Observable inputs, other than quoted market prices, that are either directly or
indirectly observable in the marketplace for identical or similar assets and liabilities,
quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and
liabilities; and |
||
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity that are
significant to the fair value of assets or liabilities. |
Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We use prices and inputs that are current as of the
measurement date, including during periods of market volatility. Therefore, classification of
inputs within the hierarchy may change from period to period depending upon the ability to observe
those prices and inputs. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair
value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value for certain assets
and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy.
9
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
At June 30, 2011, we held $26.1 million in money market mutual funds, municipal bonds and
certificates of deposit which are classified within cash and cash equivalents in our consolidated
balance sheet. We measure fair value for these instruments using quoted market prices for
identical assets (Level 1).
7. Postemployment Benefits
We implemented a nationwide reduction in workforce and provided postemployment benefits to the
approximately 195 impacted employees in June 2011. Additionally, we periodically enter into
agreements which provide postemployment benefits to personnel whose employment has been terminated.
We recognized total postemployment benefit charges of approximately $4.3 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2011. The postemployment benefit liability, which is included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, will be
paid out ratably over the terms of the agreements, which range from 1 to 9 months, with the final
agreement expiring in March 2012.
The following table summarizes the postemployment benefit charge activity for the nine months
ended June 30, 2011:
Liability Balance at | Postemployment | Other | Liability Balance at | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | Benefit Charges | Cash Paid | Non-cash(1) | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Severance |
$ | 578 | $ | 4,047 | $ | (1,024 | ) | $ | (84 | ) | $ | 3,517 | ||||||||
Other |
20 | 613 | (81 | ) | (24 | ) | 528 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 598 | $ | 4,660 | $ | (1,105 | ) | $ | (108 | ) | $ | 4,045 | ||||||||
(1) | Primarily relates to the expiration of benefits not used within the time offered
under the separation agreement and non-cash severance. |
8. Earnings per Share
Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number
of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share reflects the assumed conversion
of all dilutive securities. For the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011, 1,038,759
shares and 1,014,443 shares, respectively, and for the three months and nine months ended June 30,
2010, 262,712 shares and 564,773 shares, respectively, which could be issued under outstanding
stock-based grants, were not included in the determination of our diluted shares outstanding as
they were anti-dilutive.
10
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
The calculation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used in computing basic
and diluted net income per share is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares |
||||||||||||||||
Basic shares outstanding |
24,462 | 24,146 | 24,370 | 23,976 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect related
to employee stock plans |
303 | 584 | 318 | 535 | ||||||||||||
Diluted shares outstanding |
24,765 | 24,730 | 24,688 | 24,511 | ||||||||||||
9. Property and Equipment, net
Property and equipment, net consist of the following:
Depreciable | June 30, | September 30, | ||||||||
Lives (in years) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||
Land |
| $ | 1,456 | $ | 1,456 | |||||
Building and building improvements |
35 | 13,624 | 13,269 | |||||||
Leasehold improvements |
1-28 | 44,496 | 37,806 | |||||||
Training equipment |
3-10 | 77,916 | 71,255 | |||||||
Office and computer equipment |
3-10 | 40,179 | 38,397 | |||||||
Software developed for internal use |
3-5 | 11,277 | 11,292 | |||||||
Curriculum development |
5 | 18,261 | 14,726 | |||||||
Vehicles |
5 | 884 | 726 | |||||||
Construction in progress |
| 894 | 3,032 | |||||||
208,987 | 191,959 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization |
(105,515 | ) | (92,919 | ) | ||||||
$ | 103,472 | $ | 99,040 | |||||||
11
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
10. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following: |
June 30, | September 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 5,737 | $ | 9,147 | ||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
20,237 | 35,854 | ||||||
Other accrued expenses |
7,443 | 8,905 | ||||||
$ | 33,417 | $ | 53,906 | |||||
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Legal
In the ordinary conduct of our business, we are periodically subject to lawsuits,
investigations and claims, including, but not limited to, claims involving students or graduates
and routine employment matters. Based on internal review, we record reserves using our best
estimate of the probable and reasonably estimable contingent liabilities. Although we cannot
predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted
against us, we do not believe that any currently pending legal proceeding to which we are a party
will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition.
Proprietary Loan Program
In order to provide funding for students who are not able to fully finance the cost of their
education under traditional governmental financial aid programs, commercial loan programs or other
alternative sources, we established a private loan program with a national chartered bank in 2008.
Under terms of the related agreement, the bank originates loans for our students who meet our
specific credit criteria with the related proceeds used exclusively to fund a portion of their
tuition. We then purchase all such loans from the bank on a monthly basis and assume all of the
related credit risk. The loans bear interest at market rates; however, principal and interest
payments are not required until six months after the student completes or withdraws from his or her
program. After the deferral period, monthly principal and interest payments are required over the
related term of the loan.
The bank agreed to provide these services in exchange for a fee equivalent to 0.4% of the
principal balance of each loan and related fees. Under the terms of the related agreement, we have
a $2.0 million deposit with the bank in order to secure our related loan purchase obligation. This
balance is classified as other assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
In substance, we provide the students who participate in this program with extended payment
terms for a portion of their tuition and as a result, we account for the underlying transactions in
accordance with our tuition revenue recognition policy. However, due to the nature of the program
coupled with the extended payment terms required under the student loan agreements, collectability
is not reasonably assured. Accordingly, we recognize tuition revenue and loan origination fees
financed by the loan and any related interest income required under the
loan when such amounts are collected. We will reevaluate this policy on the basis of our
historical collection experience under the program and will accelerate recognition of the related
revenue if appropriate. All related expenses incurred with the bank or other service providers are
expensed as incurred and were approximately $0.2 million and $0.6 million during the three months
and nine months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.6 million during the
three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Since loan collectability is not
reasonably assured, the loans and related deferred tuition revenue are presented net and therefore
are effectively not recognized in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Our presentation will
be reevaluated when sufficient collection history has been obtained.
12
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table aggregates the impact of our proprietary loan program on tuition revenue
and interest income in our condensed consolidated income statements from inception through the
periods indicated:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | Inception | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | to date | ||||||||||||||||
Tuition revenue and interest
income
excluded |
$ | 2,268 | $ | 2,860 | $ | 6,658 | $ | 8,791 | $ | 27,285 | ||||||||||
Amounts collected and recognized |
(249 | ) | (67 | ) | (598 | ) | (150 | ) | (912 | ) | ||||||||||
Amounts written-off |
(1,135 | ) | (661 | ) | (4,058 | ) | (1,331 | ) | (6,479 | ) | ||||||||||
Aggregate amount
excluded during the period |
$ | 884 | $ | 2,132 | $ | 2,002 | $ | 7,310 | $ | 19,894 | ||||||||||
Our Board of Directors authorized the extension of up to an aggregate of $40.0 million of
credit under our proprietary loan program. At June 30, 2011, we have used approximately $29.3
million by either providing or committing to provide loans to our students. We monitor the
aggregate amount approved under this program and may make changes in future periods.
The balance outstanding under the program includes loans outstanding and interest and
origination fees which are not reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
13
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the activity in our proprietary loan program for the period
indicated:
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 23,301 | $ | 14,671 | ||||
Loans extended |
4,707 | 7,143 | ||||||
Interest accrued |
1,615 | 1,288 | ||||||
Amounts collected and recognized |
(598 | ) | (150 | ) | ||||
Amounts written off |
(4,058 | ) | (1,331 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 24,967 | $ | 21,621 | ||||
12. Common Shareholders Equity
Common Stock
Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the
Board of Directors and have the right to one vote per share on all matters requiring shareholder
approval.
Stock Repurchase Program
In previous years, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $70.0 million of
our common stock. Through June 30, 2011, we have purchased 3.4 million shares at an average price
per share of $13.50 and a total cost of approximately $46.4 million under this program. We did
not make any purchases during the nine months ended June 30, 2011.
14
Table of Contents
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
($s in thousands, except per share amounts)
13. Segment Information
Our principal business is providing postsecondary education. We also provide
manufacturer-specific training, and these operations are managed separately from our campus
operations. These operations do not currently meet the quantitative criteria for segments and
therefore are reflected in the Other category. Corporate expenses are allocated to Postsecondary
Education and the Other category based on compensation expense.
Summary information by reportable segment is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Postsecondary education |
$ | 106,802 | $ | 105,651 | $ | 334,245 | $ | 310,042 | ||||||||
Other |
2,132 | 1,874 | 6,297 | 6,636 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 108,934 | $ | 107,525 | $ | 340,542 | $ | 316,678 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
||||||||||||||||
Postsecondary education |
$ | 7,969 | $ | 10,629 | $ | 38,118 | $ | 37,088 | ||||||||
Other |
(1,263 | ) | (772 | ) | (3,169 | ) | (2,291 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 6,706 | $ | 9,857 | $ | 34,949 | $ | 34,797 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
||||||||||||||||
Postsecondary education |
$ | 6,030 | $ | 4,605 | $ | 17,974 | $ | 13,104 | ||||||||
Other |
151 | 120 | 435 | 455 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 6,181 | $ | 4,725 | $ | 18,409 | $ | 13,559 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Postsecondary education |
$ | 4,781 | $ | 6,731 | $ | 23,145 | $ | 22,933 | ||||||||
Other |
(745 | ) | (445 | ) | (1,858 | ) | (1,321 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 4,036 | $ | 6,286 | $ | 21,287 | $ | 21,612 | ||||||||
Goodwill |
||||||||||||||||
Postsecondary education |
$ | 20,579 | $ | 20,579 | $ | 20,579 | $ | 20,579 | ||||||||
Other |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 20,579 | $ | 20,579 | $ | 20,579 | $ | 20,579 | ||||||||
Total assets |
||||||||||||||||
Postsecondary education |
$ | 246,853 | $ | 253,360 | $ | 246,853 | $ | 253,360 | ||||||||
Other |
2,760 | 2,341 | 2,760 | 2,341 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
$ | 249,613 | $ | 255,701 | $ | 249,613 | $ | 255,701 | ||||||||
15
Table of Contents
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and related notes included in this report and those in our 2010 Annual Report on Form
10-K filed with the SEC on December 1, 2010. This discussion contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not
limited to those described under Risk Factors in our Form 10-K and included in Part II, Item IA
of this report.
2011 Overview
Operations
Our revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $108.9 million, an increase of
$1.4 million, or 1.3%, from the prior year. The minimal increase was a result of an increase in
tuition rates, offset by a decrease in our average undergraduate full-time student enrollment of
3.8% to 17,200 students for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Our revenues for the nine months
ended June 30, 2011 were $340.5 million, an increase of $23.8 million, or 7.5%, from the prior
year. This increase was a result of an increase in our average undergraduate full-time student
enrollment of 2.7% to 18,800 students for the nine months ended June 30, 2011. Tuition rates
increased between 4% and 7%, depending on the program, which contributed to revenue growth for the
three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Our net income for the three
months and nine months ended June 30, 2011 was $4.0 million and $21.3 million, respectively,
decreases of $2.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, from the prior year. Our revenues for
the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011 excluded $1.7 million and $5.0 million,
respectively, of tuition related to students participating in our proprietary loan program.
Our operating results were impacted by an overall increase in compensation and benefits for
the nine months ended June 30, 2011 due to an increase in our staffing levels to meet the increase
in our average undergraduate full-time student enrollment. On June 30, 2011, we announced a
reduction in our workforce of approximately 195 employees nationwide, which resulted in severance
costs of $4.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The reduction in our workforce
is expected to provide an expense savings in compensation and related benefits in fiscal 2012 of
approximately $12.4 million. This increase in compensation and benefits was partially offset by a
decrease during the nine months ended June 30, 2011 of $2.0 million, related to modifications made
to our compensation plans in response to the final regulations issued by the Department of
Education (ED) in October 2010 which became effective July 1, 2011, and are discussed in the
Regulatory Environment section below.
Student starts for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011 were 2,700 and 9,600,
respectively, decreases of 32.5% and 20.0%, respectively, as compared to 4,000 and 12,000 for the
three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The decrease in starts was
partially due to a decrease in student applications in the prior year and also the result of
certain economic and regulatory challenges. The general U.S. economic conditions, including the
depth and longevity of unemployment impacting our typical student demographic, may be negatively
impacting our operating results. We anticipate new students for the year will be below fiscal 2010
levels producing single-digit revenue growth for the year. With a heightened focus on improving
efficiencies and cost containment we still expect operating margins for the year in the range of
11% to 13%, excluding the $4.3 million in severance charges. This guidance excludes any
impact from new regulations which we cannot estimate at this time. Due to the seasonality of our
business and normal fluctuations in student populations, we would expect volatility in our
quarterly results.
16
Table of Contents
Regulatory Environment
On October 29, 2010, the U.S. Department of Education (ED) issued new regulations pertaining
to certain aspects of the administration of Title IV Programs, regulations which, with minor
exceptions, became effective July 1, 2011. Since the publication of the new regulations in
October, ED has issued interpretive guidance on the final regulations in the form of multiple Dear
Colleague Letters to institutions. The letters provide sub-regulatory guidance on certain areas of
final regulations which assists institutions with understanding the regulations in these areas.
However, there remains uncertainty in how various aspects of the new regulations will be
interpreted and applied, which could increase the risk that ED could seek to impose monetary or
other sanctions on us if it believed we were not in full compliance with all aspects of the new
regulations. Additionally, on June 13, 2011, ED published final regulations related to the metrics
for determining whether an academic program prepares students for gainful employment, which become
effective July 1, 2012.
We have devoted significant effort to understanding the effects of the new regulations on our
business and to developing compliant solutions that are also congruent with our business, culture
and mission to serve our students and industry partners. However, these solutions, related to
implementation and compliance with these final rules, including but not limited to gainful
employment, compensation, the definition of a credit hour, state authorization and the broadened
definition of misrepresentation, may have a material impact on the manner in which we conduct our
business, our student populations, and the nature of our programs, financial condition, cash flows,
results of operations and stock price. Furthermore, the solutions may require further analysis
based on the uncertainty noted above and any additional interpretive guidance that is provided.
On July 1, 2011, consistent with EDs Gainful Employment Disclosure Requirements, issued on
October 29, 2010, we established a webpage to disclose to the general public certain information
about our programs, including recognized occupations, costs, completion rate, graduate employment
rate and median loan debt of program completers. The webpage is located at www.uti.edu/disclosure.
This requirement for reporting information relating to our programs to assist prospective students
in making informed decisions has increased our administrative burdens. These reporting and the
other procedural changes resulting from the new rules may impact student populations in ways that
we cannot now predict which may have a material impact on the manner in which we conduct our
business, the nature of our programs, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and
stock price.
ED promulgated final regulations on June 13, 2011, which will become effective on July 1,
2012, imposing additional Title IV Program eligibility requirements on certain educational
programs. Our programs are subject to ED requirements that the programs prepare students for
gainful employment in a recognized occupation. The gainful employment regulations published on
June 13, 2011 establish metrics for determining whether a program will qualify as such an
educational program. Specifically, a program will qualify as leading to gainful employment in a
recognized occupation if we can establish that the program meets at least one of three annual,
program-level student metrics: (i) debt repayment rate which requires that at least 35 percent of
the programs former students are successfully repaying their loans, as defined by the regulation;
(ii) debt-to-discretionary income ratio, which requires that the estimated annual loan payment of
a typical graduate of the program does not exceed 30 percent of her or his discretionary income; or
(iii) debt-to-total earnings ratio which requires that the estimated annual loan payment of the
typical graduate does not exceed 12 percent of her or his total earnings. A graduates loan debt
is calculated based upon the programs median debt, including federal and private loans. The
earnings used will generally be based on information received from the Social Security
Administration. All three metrics will generally examine student information in their third and
fourth year after graduation, with certain exceptions. If an academic program fails all three
metrics in a year, the institution must disclose the amount by which the program missed the minimum
acceptable performance and the institutions plan to improve the program. Also, the institution
must establish a three-day waiting period before students can enroll. If an academic program fails
all three metrics in two out of three years, the institution must inform students in the failing
program that their debts may be unaffordable and the program may become ineligible to participate
in Title IV Program funding, and must describe for students their available transfer options. If an
academic program fails
all three metrics in three out of four years, the academic program would become ineligible to
participate in Title IV Program funding for at least three years. The gainful employment standards
will be calculated on a fiscal year basis beginning with federal fiscal year 2012. The first year
for which eligibility could be lost for a program is 2015, which would occur if the program fails
all three standards for each of 2012, 2013, and 2014. At this time, and based on our preliminary
analysis as measured in the manner set forth in the final gainful employment regulations and
information currently available, we believe that our programs prepare students for gainful
employment for purposes of continued eligibility to participate in federal student financial aid
programs.
17
Table of Contents
Although the final rules regarding gainful employment metrics provide opportunities to address
program deficiencies before the loss of Title IV eligibility, the continuing eligibility of our
educational programs for Title IV funding is at risk due to factors beyond our control, such as
changes in the actual or deemed income level of our graduates, changes in student borrowing levels,
increases in interest rates, changes in the federal poverty income level relevant for calculating
discretionary income, changes in the percentage of our former students who are current in repayment
of their student loans, and other factors. In addition, even though deficiencies in the metrics may
be correctible on a timely basis, the disclosure requirements to students following a failure to
meet the standards may adversely impact enrollment in that program and may adversely impact the
reputation of our educational institutions.
As we discussed in previous filings, we made modifications to our employee compensation
structures to comply with the elimination of the safe harbors in the regulations in place prior to
July 1, 2011. Such modifications became effective prior to July 1, 2011. Other companies in the
industry have experienced and reported material adverse impacts to their business when changes to
compensation have been implemented, but we cannot fully predict whether we will experience a
similar impact given our dissimilar solutions, culture and timing, nor can we predict how
significant any such impact will be. Our operating costs have and will continue to change
materially based on these adjustments to compensation that we believe to be fair and compliant
(please see Overview; Operations).
On March 18, 2011, ED issued a Dear Colleague Letter that provided guidance concerning, but
also created open questions and interpretive issues with respect to, the final regulations related
to determining what will constitute a credit hour and whether an institutions educational programs
are appropriately offered in credit hours. In these regulations, ED has defined a credit hour,
mandating the Carnegie Unit or its equivalent. We continue to request guidance from our accreditor
on the credit hour definition for our degree programs. Students attending credit hour programs of
study that do not meet the measurements under the Carnegie definition or its equivalent may receive
less funds from the Title IV Programs to pay their cost of education with respect to those programs
of study.
On April 15, 2011, President Obama signed the fiscal year 2011 spending bill, also known as
the Continuing Resolution, which permanently eliminated year-round Pell Grant awards beginning with
the 2011-2012 award year. The year-round Pell Grant program had been in effect during the preceding
two award years and we believe that the increase in Pell Grant funds positively impacted our show
rates during those periods. However, the elimination of the year-round Pell Grant could negatively
impact our show rates in the future. Additionally, the reduction may increase the funding gap for
certain students which could result in increased usage of our proprietary loan program. The
Continuing Resolution maintains the $5,550 maximum annual Pell Grant for the 2011-2012 award year.
However, because the federal Pell Grant program is one of the largest non-defense discretionary
spending programs in the federal budget, it is a target for reduction as Congress addresses the
budget deficit. The Obama Administration did not include cuts in the Pell Grant program in its
proposed fiscal year 2012 budget, but there have been proposals in Congress to roll back the Pell
Grant program to 2008 funding levels, which would reduce the maximum annual Pell Grant by $800 from
its current maximum level of $5,550, perhaps as early as July 2012. In addition to possible
reductions in federal student financial aid, we believe that the availability of state-funded
student financial aid may continue to decline as states deal with historic budget shortfalls.
These reductions may reduce our enrollment and, to the extent that Title IV funds replace any state
funding sources for our students, may adversely impact our 90/10 Rule calculation. We cannot
predict the outcome of the federal or state budget negotiations.
18
Table of Contents
Interpretation of the new regulations is subject to change as ED provides further guidance and
clarification. Existing or future understandings could be different from EDs interpretations and
thus lead to repayments, restrictions, fines or litigation, and such further guidance or
differences could require us to make additional changes in our operations and could reduce our
student populations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows and stock price.
Curriculum Transformation
We are transforming our Automotive Technology and Diesel Technology program curricula to a
blend of daily instructor-led theory and hands-on lab training complemented by interactive
web-based learning, which is reflective of current industry training methods and standards. In
addition to improving the overall educational experience for our students, the new curricula offer
more convenience and training flexibility for our students while meeting industry standards. We
began offering the new curricula at the Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas campus at the time of opening and
we intend to integrate the new curricula at our other campuses as early as the second quarter of
2012, starting with one of our other campuses which teaches Automotive/Diesel Technology programs.
To date we have capitalized approximately $18.7 million for this transformation and anticipate
capitalizing within the range of $0.4 million to $0.7 million during the remainder of 2011.
Graduate Employment
Securing employment opportunities in industry for our graduates is critical to our ability to
help our graduates benefit from their education. Accordingly, we dedicate significant resources to
maintaining an effective graduate employment team. Our campus-based staff instruct active students
on employment search and interviewing skills, facilitate employer visits to campuses, provide
access to reference materials and assist with the composition of resumes. We also have a
centralized department whose focus is to develop job opportunities and referrals. We believe that
our employment services program provides our students with a more compelling value proposition and
enhances the employment opportunities for our graduates. Although employment remains challenging
in certain geographies and for motorcycle, collision and marine segments, we are seeing growth in
the auto and diesel programs. Our consolidated employment rate for 2010 graduates improved 730
basis points during the three months ended June 30, 2011 when compared to the employment rate for
2009 graduates during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
19
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth selected statements of operations data as a percentage of net
revenues for each of the periods indicated.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net Revenues |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Educational services and facilities |
53.2 | % | 50.0 | % | 49.7 | % | 48.7 | % | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
40.6 | % | 40.8 | % | 40.0 | % | 40.3 | % | ||||||||
Total operating
expenses |
93.8 | % | 90.8 | % | 89.7 | % | 89.0 | % | ||||||||
Income from operations |
6.2 | % | 9.2 | % | 10.3 | % | 11.0 | % | ||||||||
Interest income |
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||||
Other income |
0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||||
Total other income |
0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
6.3 | % | 9.3 | % | 10.4 | % | 11.2 | % | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
2.6 | % | 3.5 | % | 4.1 | % | 4.4 | % | ||||||||
Net income |
3.7 | % | 5.8 | % | 6.3 | % | 6.8 | % | ||||||||
We opened a new campus in Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas in June 2010. For the three months and
nine months ended June 30, 2011, this campus had revenues of $3.1 million and $7.4 million,
respectively, and operating expenses of $3.6 million and $10.5 million, respectively, including
corporate allocations of $1.5 million and $4.6 million, respectively. For the three months and
nine months ended June 30, 2010, this campus had revenues of $0.1 million, operating expenses of
$2.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively, including corporate allocations of $1.0 million and
$2.0 million, respectively.
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) for the three months
and nine months ended June 30, 2011 were $13.2 million and $54.4 million, respectively, as compared
to $14.9 million and $49.4 million for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure which is provided to supplement, but not
substitute for, the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
20
Table of Contents
EBITDA reconciles to net income as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,036 | $ | 6,286 | $ | 21,287 | $ | 21,612 | ||||||||
Interest income, net |
(56 | ) | (77 | ) | (199 | ) | (195 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
2,816 | 3,753 | 14,206 | 13,736 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
6,425 | 4,934 | 19,070 | 14,254 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 13,221 | $ | 14,896 | $ | 54,364 | $ | 49,407 | ||||||||
Return on equity for the trailing four quarters ended June 30, 2011 was 24.0% compared
to 25.6% for the trailing four quarters ended September 30, 2010. Return on equity is calculated
as the sum of net income for the last four quarters divided by the average of our total
shareholders equity balances at the end of each of the last five quarters. We choose to disclose
to investors these non-GAAP financial measures because it provides an additional analytical tool to
clarify our results from operations and helps to identify underlying trends. Additionally, such
measures help compare our performance on a consistent basis across time periods. To obtain a
complete understanding of our performance, these measures should be examined in connection with net
income determined in accordance with GAAP. Since the items excluded from these measures are
significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance under GAAP, these
measures should not be considered to be an alternative to net income as a measure of our operating
performance or profitability. Exclusion of items in our non-GAAP presentation should not be
construed as an inference that these items are unusual, infrequent or non-recurring. Other
companies, including other companies in the education industry, may calculate EBITDA and Return on
Equity differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure across companies.
Investors are encouraged to use GAAP measures when evaluating our financial performance.
Capacity utilization is the ratio of our average undergraduate full-time student enrollment to
total seats available. Total seats available represents our maximum capacity; however, due to
certain dynamics, our operating capacity tends to be lower. The following table sets forth our
average capacity utilization during each of the periods indicated and the total seats available at
the end of each of the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Average undergraduate
full-time student
enrollment |
17,200 | 17,900 | 18,800 | 18,300 | ||||||||||||
Total seats available |
29,600 | 26,800 | 29,600 | 26,800 | ||||||||||||
Average capacity utilization |
58.1 | % | 66.8 | % | 63.5 | % | 68.3 | % |
The increase in our total seats available was primarily due to classrooms transferred to
our Automotive Technology programs as a result of reductions in and discontinuation of training for
certain manufacturer specific training programs and the opening of our Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas
campus. We continue to seek alternate uses for our underutilized space at existing campuses.
Alternate uses may include subleasing space to third parties,
allocating space for use by our manufacturer specific advanced training programs, adding new
industry relationships or consolidating administrative functions into campus facilities.
21
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues. Our revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $108.9 million,
representing an increase of $1.4 million, or 1.3%, as compared to revenues of $107.5 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was a result of tuition rate increases between
4% and 7%, depending on the program, offset by a decrease in the average undergraduate full-time
student enrollment of 3.8%. Our revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
excluded $1.7 million and $2.4 million, respectively, of tuition related to students
participating in our proprietary loan program. In accordance with our accounting policy, we will
recognize the related revenue as payments are received from the students participating in this
program. We recognized $0.2 million of revenue and interest under the program during the three
months ended June 30, 2011 and a minimal amount during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Our revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 were $340.5 million, representing an
increase of $23.8 million, or 7.5%, as compared to net revenues of $316.7 million for the nine
months ended June 30, 2010. This increase was a result of an increase in the average undergraduate
full-time student enrollment of 2.7% as well as tuition increases between 4% and 7%, depending on
the program. Our revenues for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 excluded $5.0 million
and $7.5 million, respectively, of tuition related to students participating in our
proprietary loan program. We recognized revenue and interest of $0.5 million under the program
during the nine months ended June 30, 2011, and minimal amounts during the nine months ended June
30, 2010.
Educational services and facilities expenses. Our educational services and facilities
expenses for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011 were $58.0 million and $169.5
million, respectively, an increase of $4.3 million and $15.3 million, respectively, as compared to
$53.7 million and $154.2 million for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. Our educational services and facilities expenses for the three months and nine
months ended June 30, 2011 for our Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas campus were $2.1 million and $5.7
million, respectively, including corporate allocations of $0.3 million and $0.8 million,
respectively; for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010, the expenses were $1.1
million and $1.5 million, respectively, including corporate allocations of $0.1 million and $0.2
million, respectively.
22
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the significant components of our educational services and
facilities expenses:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries expense |
$ | 26,371 | $ | 23,066 | $ | 74,375 | $ | 65,665 | ||||||||
Employee benefits and tax |
5,692 | 4,275 | 15,150 | 12,930 | ||||||||||||
Bonus expense |
389 | 1,101 | 2,915 | 2,687 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
213 | 175 | 692 | 518 | ||||||||||||
Compensation and related costs |
32,665 | 28,617 | 93,132 | 81,800 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy costs |
9,168 | 8,937 | 27,294 | 26,711 | ||||||||||||
Other educational services and
facilities expenses |
6,028 | 6,765 | 17,483 | 17,812 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
4,772 | 3,652 | 14,033 | 10,832 | ||||||||||||
Tools and training aids
expense |
2,682 | 2,836 | 8,965 | 8,585 | ||||||||||||
Supplies and maintenance |
2,675 | 2,905 | 8,611 | 8,492 | ||||||||||||
$ | 57,990 | $ | 53,712 | $ | 169,518 | $ | 154,232 | |||||||||
Compensation and related costs increased $4.0 million and $11.3 million during the three
months and nine months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. The increase was primarily due to
approximately $2.3 million of compensation related costs in connection with our reduction in
workforce, hiring additional staff dedicated to student employment, the addition of instructors to
support our higher average undergraduate full-time student enrollments that occurred earlier in the
fiscal year, and an increase in self-insured employee benefit plans as well as the modifications to
our compensation plans discussed previously. Compensation and related costs for our Dallas/Ft.
Worth, Texas campus were $0.8 million and $2.3 million for the three months and nine months ended
June 30, 2011, including corporate allocations of $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively;
compensation and related costs were $0.2 million, including minimal corporate allocations for the
Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas campus for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010.
Depreciation expense increased $1.1 million and $3.2 million for the three months and nine
months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, and was primarily due to the addition of assets related
to our Automotive Technology and Diesel Technology II curriculum project and the opening of our
Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas campus in June 2010. Depreciation expense related to our Automotive
Technology and Diesel Technology II curriculum was $0.7 million and $2.1 million for the three
months and nine months ended June 30, 2011, respectively and for our Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas campus
was $0.3 million and $0.9 million for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. Our selling, general and administrative
expenses for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2011 were $44.2 million and $136.1
million, respectively, representing an increase of $0.3 million and $8.4 million, respectively, as
compared to $44.0 million and $127.6 million for the three months and nine months ended June 30,
2010, respectively. Our selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months and nine
months ended June 30, 2011 for our Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas campus were $1.6 million and $4.8
million, respectively, including corporate allocations of $1.2 million
and $3.8 million, respectively; for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010, the
expenses were $1.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively, including corporate allocations of $0.9
million and $1.8 million, respectively.
23
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the significant components of our selling, general and
administrative expenses:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Salaries expense |
$ | 17,742 | $ | 16,455 | $ | 51,145 | $ | 47,201 | ||||||||
Employee benefits and tax |
4,335 | 3,718 | 11,993 | 11,584 | ||||||||||||
Bonus expense |
1,781 | 3,511 | 6,975 | 10,444 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,043 | 1,173 | 4,079 | 4,172 | ||||||||||||
Compensation and related costs |
24,901 | 24,857 | 74,192 | 73,401 | ||||||||||||
Advertising expense |
8,099 | 8,781 | 24,865 | 23,670 | ||||||||||||
Other selling, general and
administrative expenses |
5,974 | 5,273 | 19,931 | 16,675 | ||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
1,649 | 1,604 | 5,450 | 4,583 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
1,651 | 1,280 | 5,030 | 3,415 | ||||||||||||
Contract services expense |
1,348 | 1,594 | 4,118 | 4,196 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy costs |
616 | 567 | 2,489 | 1,709 | ||||||||||||
$ | 44,238 | $ | 43,956 | $ | 136,075 | $ | 127,649 | |||||||||
While compensation and related costs increased by a minimal amount for the three months
ended June 30, 2011, we did expense approximately $1.4 million of related costs in connection with
our reduction in workforce. That expense was primarily offset by a decrease related to the
modifications to our compensation plans discussed previously. Compensation and related costs for
the nine months ended June 30, 2011 increased approximately $0.8 million as a result of an increase
in the number of staff to support the transformation of our Automotive Technology and Diesel
Technology II program curricula. Our compensation and related costs for the three months and nine
months ended June 30, 2011 for our Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas campus were $0.6 million and $1.9
million, respectively, including corporate allocations of $0.4 million and $1.1 million,
respectively; for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010, the expenses were $0.6
million and $1.3 million, respectively, including corporate allocations of $0.4 million and $0.9
million, respectively.
Advertising expense increased $1.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 due to an
increase in our spending on internet media, our continued investment in local markets and an
overall shift in strategy to higher quality inquiries. We expect our advertising expense to remain
in the range of approximately 7% 8% of revenues for the full year.
Depreciation expense increased $1.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2011 primarily
related to the addition of software developed for internal use, acceleration of depreciation
related to the relocation of our headquarters in March 2011 and investments in information
technology infrastructure.
Income taxes. Our provision for income taxes for the three months and nine months ended June
30, 2011 was $2.8 million, or 41.1% of pre-tax income, and $14.2 million, or 40.0% of pre-tax
income, respectively. Our provision for income taxes for the three months and nine months ended
June 30, 2010 was $3.8 million, or 37.4% of pre-tax income, and $13.7 million, or 38.9% of pre-tax
income, respectively. The effective income tax rate in each period differed from the federal
statutory tax rate of 35% primarily as a result of state income taxes, net of related federal
income tax benefits.
24
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash flows from
operations, cash on hand and investments will satisfy our working capital needs, capital
expenditures, commitments, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations
through the next 12 months.
We believe that the strategic use of our cash resources includes funding our new campus as
well as subsidizing funding alternatives for our students. In addition, we evaluate the repurchase
of our common stock, payment of dividends, consideration of strategic acquisitions and other
potential uses of cash. To the extent that potential acquisitions are large enough to require
financing beyond cash from operations, we may issue debt resulting in increased interest expense.
Our aggregate cash and cash equivalents and current investments were $77.5 million at June 30,
2011.
Our principal source of liquidity is operating cash flows. A majority of our net revenues is
derived from Title IV Programs. Federal regulations dictate the timing of disbursements of funds
under Title IV Programs. Students must apply for a new loan for each academic year consisting of
thirty-week periods. Loan funds are generally provided by lenders in two disbursements for each
academic year. The first disbursement is usually received within 30 days of the start of a
students academic year and the second disbursement is typically received at the beginning of the
sixteenth week from the start of the students academic year. We established a proprietary loan
program in which we bear all credit and collection risk and students are not required to begin
repayment until six months after the student completes or withdraws from his or her program. These
factors, together with the timing of when our students begin their programs, affect our operating
cash flow.
Operating Activities
Nine months ended June 30, 2011
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, our cash flows provided by operating activities were
$31.6 million resulting from net income of $21.3 million with adjustments of $33.3 million for
non-cash and other items which were offset by $23.0 million related to the change in our operating
assets and liabilities.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, the primary adjustments to our net income for
non-cash and other items were depreciation and amortization of $18.4 million, substantially all of
which was depreciation, bad debt expense of $5.5 million, stock-based compensation of $4.8 million,
and deferred income taxes of $3.8 million.
Nine months ended June 30, 2010
For the nine months ended June 30, 2010, our cash flows provided by operating activities were
$37.6 million resulting from net income of $21.6 million with adjustments of $20.2 million for
non-cash and other items which were offset by $4.2 million related to the change in our operating
assets and liabilities.
For the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the primary adjustments to our net income for
non-cash and other items were depreciation and amortization of $13.6 million, substantially all of
which was depreciation, bad debt expense of $4.6 million, and stock-based compensation of $4.7
million.
25
Table of Contents
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Nine months ended June 30, 2011
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, changes in our operating assets and liabilities
resulted in cash outflows of $23.0 million and were primarily attributable to changes in accounts
payable and accrued expenses and deferred revenue, partially offset by changes in deferred rent.
The decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses resulted in a use of cash of $17.6
million and was primarily due to the timing of our payroll cycle, payments of 2010 bonuses and the
modifications to our compensation plans, which resulted in accelerated bonus payments in June.
The decrease in deferred revenue resulted in cash used of $6.0 million. The decrease was
primarily attributable to the timing of student starts, the number of students in school and where
they were at period end in relation to the completion of their program at June 30, 2011 compared to
September 30, 2010.
In September 2010, we entered into a leasing arrangement to relocate our headquarters during
the second quarter of 2011. The lease included incentives such as a leasehold improvement
allowance, moving allowance, and free rent periods which will be recognized on a straight-line
basis over the initial lease term resulting in a $4.9 million increase in deferred rent.
Nine months ended June 30, 2010
For the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the changes in our operating assets and liabilities
resulted in cash outflows of $4.2 million. The outflows were primarily attributable to a $6.8
million increase in receivables due to an increase in our average undergraduate full-time student
enrollment at June 30, 2010 when compared to September 30, 2009. Additionally, we were in a
receivable position for income taxes at June 30, 2010 instead of a payable position at September
30, 2009 due to the timing of tax payments which resulted in cash outflows of $2.0 million. These
items were partially offset by a $5.7 million increase in deferred revenue primarily due to the
timing of student starts, the number of students in school and where they were at period end in
relation to the completion of their program.
Investing Activities
Nine months ended June 30, 2011
For the nine months ended June 30, 2011, cash used in investing activities was $44.0 million
and was primarily related to our investment of $26.1 million in office leasehold improvements, our
Automotive Technology and Diesel Technology II program curricula and in new and replacement
training equipment for our ongoing operations. We had cash outflows of $57.6 million for purchases
of investments, and cash inflows of $39.5 million from proceeds received upon maturity of
investments.
Nine months ended June 30, 2010
For the nine months ended June 30, 2010, cash used in investing activities was $38.9 million
and was primarily related to our investment of $26.6 million for the purchase of property and
equipment for the curriculum transformation, our new Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas campus and ongoing
replacement of equipment used in student training. Additionally, we invested $33.7 million in
pre-funded municipal bonds and certificates of deposit partially offset by $21.4 million of
proceeds received upon the maturity of investments.
26
Table of Contents
Financing Activities
Nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
During the nine months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, cash provided by financing activities was
primarily attributable to activity in our stock-based compensation plans.
Seasonality and Trends
Our revenues and operating results normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variations in
our business, principally due to changes in total student population and costs associated with
opening or expanding our campuses. Student population varies as a result of new student
enrollments, graduations and student attrition. Historically, our schools have had lower student
populations in our third quarter than in the remainder of our year because fewer students are
enrolled during the summer months. Additionally, our schools have had higher student populations
in our fourth quarter than in the remainder of the year because more students enroll during this
period. Our expenses, however, do not vary significantly with changes in student population and
revenues and, as a result, such expenses do not fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis. We
expect quarterly fluctuations in operating results to continue as a result of seasonal enrollment
patterns. Such patterns may change, however, as a result of new school openings, new program
introductions, increased enrollments of adult students or acquisitions. In addition, our revenues
for the first quarter ending December 31 are impacted by the closure of our campuses for a week in
December for a holiday break and, accordingly, we do not earn revenue during that closure period.
Operating income is negatively impacted during the initial start up of new campus openings. We
incur sales and marketing costs as well as campus personnel costs in advance of the campus opening.
Typically we begin to incur such costs approximately 12 to 15 months in advance of the campus
opening, with the majority of the costs being incurred in the nine month period prior to a campus
opening.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed
with the SEC on December 1, 2010. During the nine months ended June 30, 2011 there have been no
significant changes in our critical accounting policies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements, see Note 4 to our
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements within Part I, Item 1 of this report.
Item 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
There have been no significant changes to our market risk since September 30, 2010. For a
discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with
the SEC on December 1, 2010.
27
Table of Contents
Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act), pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 as of the end of the period covered
by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that (i)
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified
in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d) that occurred during the
three months ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
In the ordinary conduct of our business, we are periodically subject to lawsuits,
investigations and claims including, but not limited to, claims involving students or graduates and
routine employment matters. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of
lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently
pending legal proceeding to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Item 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, including the information
contained in Part I, Item 3, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item IA
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 1, 2010 and as updated below,
which could materially affect our business, financial condition or operating results. The risks
described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating
results.
We rely heavily on the reliability, security and performance of an internally developed student
management and reporting system, and any difficulties in maintaining this system may result in
service interruptions, decreased customer service, or increased expenditures.
The software that underlies our student management and reporting has been developed primarily
by our own employees. The reliability and continuous availability of this internal system is
critical to our business. Any interruptions that hinder our ability to timely deliver our
services, or that materially impact the efficiency or cost with which we provide these services, or
our ability to attract and retain computer programmers with knowledge of the appropriate computer
programming language, would adversely affect our reputation and profitability and our ability to
conduct business and prepare financial reports. In addition, many of the software systems we
currently use will need to be enhanced over time or replaced with equivalent commercial products,
either of which could entail considerable effort and expense.
Our computer systems as well as those of our service providers are vulnerable to interruption,
malfunction or damage due to events beyond our control, including malicious human acts, natural
disasters, and network and communications failures. Moreover, despite network security measures,
some of our servers are potentially
vulnerable to physical or electronic unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses,
malicious code, organized cyber attacks and other security problems and system disruptions.
Despite the precautions we have taken, unanticipated problems may nevertheless cause failures in
our information technology systems. Sustained or repeated system failures that interrupt our
ability to process information in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our
operations.
28
Table of Contents
Item 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. |
The following table summarizes the purchase of equity securities for the three months ended
June 30, 2011:
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(d) Approximate Dollar | ||||||||||||||||
(c) Total Number | Value of Shares that | |||||||||||||||
(a) Total | of Shares | May Yet Be Purchased | ||||||||||||||
Number of | (b) Average | Purchased as | Under the Plans Or | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Part of Publicly | Programs | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased(1) | per Share | Announced Plans | (In thousands)(2) | ||||||||||||
April 2011 |
| $ | | | $ | 23,660 | ||||||||||
May 2011 |
| $ | | | $ | 23,660 | ||||||||||
June 2011 |
30,786 | $ | 18.63 | | $ | 23,660 | ||||||||||
Total |
30,786 | | $ | 23,660 | ||||||||||||
(1) | Represents shares of common stock withheld by us as payment of taxes on the vesting
of shares of our common stock which were granted subject to forfeiture restrictions
under our 2003 Incentive Compensation Plan. |
|
(2) | Our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to $70.0 million of
our common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. |
29
Table of Contents
Item 6. | EXHIBITS |
Number | Description | |||
10.1 | Form of Retention/Recognition Bonus Agreement.
(Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K filed by
Registrant on June 13, 2011.) |
|||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed
herewith.) |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed
herewith.) |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.) |
|||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.) |
|||
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document |
|||
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|||
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|||
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|||
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|||
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
* | This information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement
or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise
is not subject to liability under these sections. |
30
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE, INC. |
||||
Dated: July 28, 2011 | By: | /s/ Eugene S. Putnam, Jr. | ||
Eugene S. Putnam, Jr. | ||||
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
31