USA TRUCK INC - Quarter Report: 2013 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
[ X ]
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
OR
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File Number 0-19858
USA TRUCK, INC.
|
||
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
Delaware
|
71-0556971
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. employer identification no.)
|
3200 Industrial Park Road
|
||
Van Buren, Arkansas
|
72956
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip code)
|
(479) 471-2500
|
||
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
|
||
Not applicable
|
||
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer _____ Accelerated Filer Non-Accelerated Filer _____ Smaller Reporting Company__X__
(Do not check if a Smaller Reporting Company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01, as of April 29, 2013 is 10,509,443.
USA TRUCK, INC.
|
||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
||||
Item No.
|
Caption
|
Page
|
||
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||
1.
|
Financial Statements
|
|||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) – Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012
|
4
|
|||
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (unaudited) – Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012
|
5
|
|||
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited) – Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
|
6
|
|||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) – Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012
|
7
|
|||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
8
|
|||
2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
18
|
||
3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
30
|
||
4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
30
|
||
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
30
|
||
1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
31
|
||
2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
31
|
||
3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
31
|
||
4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
31
|
||
5.
|
Other Information
|
31
|
||
6.
|
Exhibits
|
32
|
||
Signatures
|
33
|
2
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
USA TRUCK, INC.
|
|||||
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|||||
(in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
(unaudited)
|
(audited)
|
||||
Assets
|
|||||
Current assets:
|
|||||
Cash
|
$
|
312
|
$
|
1,742
|
|
Accounts receivable:
|
|||||
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $298 in 2013 and $423 in 2012
|
65,871
|
64,491
|
|||
Other
|
3,160
|
2,089
|
|||
Inventories
|
1,233
|
1,790
|
|||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
16,861
|
15,415
|
|||
Total current assets
|
87,437
|
85,527
|
|||
Property and equipment:
|
|||||
Land and structures
|
31,483
|
31,478
|
|||
Revenue equipment
|
370,364
|
362,007
|
|||
Service, office and other equipment
|
15,152
|
14,770
|
|||
Property and equipment, at cost
|
416,999
|
408,255
|
|||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(165,498)
|
(164,641)
|
|||
Property and equipment, net
|
251,501
|
243,614
|
|||
Note receivable
|
1,997
|
1,979
|
|||
Other assets
|
363
|
374
|
|||
Total assets
|
$
|
341,298
|
$
|
331,494
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ equity
|
|||||
Current liabilities:
|
|||||
Bank drafts payable
|
$
|
4,749
|
$
|
5,150
|
|
Trade accounts payable
|
27,992
|
22,484
|
|||
Current portion of insurance and claims accruals
|
7,780
|
6,915
|
|||
Accrued expenses
|
9,301
|
7,710
|
|||
Note payable
|
903
|
1,352
|
|||
Current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases
|
14,399
|
14,403
|
|||
Deferred income taxes
|
2,141
|
1,304
|
|||
Total current liabilities
|
67,265
|
59,318
|
|||
Deferred gain
|
671
|
646
|
|||
Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities
|
130,005
|
122,530
|
|||
Deferred income taxes
|
33,526
|
35,953
|
|||
Commitments and contingencies
|
--
|
--
|
|||
Insurance and claims accruals, less current portion
|
2,963
|
3,617
|
|||
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|||||
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
--
|
--
|
|||
Preferred Share Purchase Rights, $0.01 par value; 150,000 shares authorized; none issued
|
--
|
--
|
|||
Common Stock, $.01 par value; authorized 30,000,000 shares; issued 11,882,423 shares in 2013 and 11,770,265 shares in 2012
|
119
|
118
|
|||
Additional paid-in capital
|
65,302
|
65,259
|
|||
Retained earnings
|
63,293
|
65,767
|
|||
Less treasury stock, at cost (1,364,789 shares in 2013 and 1,337,568 shares in 2012)
|
(21,846)
|
(21,714)
|
|||
Total stockholders’ equity
|
106,868
|
109,430
|
|||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
341,298
|
$
|
331,494
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
USA TRUCK, INC.
|
||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
||||||
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||
Three Months Ended
|
||||||
March 31,
|
||||||
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
Revenue:
|
||||||
Trucking revenue
|
$
|
79,793
|
$
|
75,937
|
||
Strategic Capacity Solutions revenue
|
21,459
|
17,595
|
||||
Intermodal revenue
|
3,635
|
4,291
|
||||
Base revenue
|
104,887
|
97,823
|
||||
Fuel surcharge revenue
|
27,140
|
25,850
|
||||
Total revenue
|
132,027
|
123,673
|
||||
Operating expenses and costs:
|
||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits
|
35,567
|
35,514
|
||||
Fuel and fuel taxes
|
35,595
|
34,770
|
||||
Purchased transportation
|
30,478
|
26,978
|
||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
10,915
|
11,157
|
||||
Operations and maintenance
|
11,508
|
10,931
|
||||
Insurance and claims
|
5,389
|
4,882
|
||||
Operating taxes and licenses
|
1,007
|
1,507
|
||||
Communications and utilities
|
1,086
|
1,023
|
||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net
|
(389)
|
(542)
|
||||
Other
|
3,698
|
4,089
|
||||
Total operating expenses and costs
|
134,854
|
130,309
|
||||
Operating loss
|
(2,827)
|
(6,636)
|
||||
Other expenses (income):
|
||||||
Interest expense
|
837
|
986
|
||||
Other, net
|
(54)
|
(75)
|
||||
Total other expenses, net
|
783
|
911
|
||||
Loss before income taxes
|
(3,610)
|
(7,547)
|
||||
Income tax benefit
|
(1,136)
|
(2,674)
|
||||
Net loss
|
$
|
(2,474)
|
$
|
(4,873)
|
||
Net loss per share information:
|
||||||
Average shares outstanding (Basic)
|
10,305
|
10,300
|
||||
Basic loss per share
|
$
|
(0.24)
|
$
|
(0.47)
|
||
Average shares outstanding (Diluted)
|
10,305
|
10,300
|
||||
Diluted loss per share
|
$
|
(0.24)
|
$
|
(0.47)
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
USA TRUCK, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
|||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
|||||
(in thousands)
|
|||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||
March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Net loss
|
$
|
(2,474)
|
$
|
(4,873)
|
|
Reclassification to the statement of operations
|
--
|
--
|
|||
Total comprehensive loss
|
$
|
(2,474)
|
$
|
(4,873)
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
USA TRUCK, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|||||||||||||||
Par
|
Retained
|
Treasury
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Value
|
Earnings
|
Stock
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
11,770
|
$
|
118
|
$
|
65,259
|
$
|
65,767
|
$
|
(21,714)
|
$
|
109,430
|
|||||
Transfer of stock into (out of) Treasury Stock
|
--
|
--
|
132
|
--
|
(132)
|
--
|
||||||||||
Stock-based compensation
|
--
|
--
|
(88)
|
--
|
--
|
(88)
|
||||||||||
Restricted stock award grant
|
112
|
1
|
(1)
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
||||||||||
Forfeited restricted stock
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
||||||||||
Net share settlement related to restricted stock vesting
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
||||||||||
Net loss
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
(2,474)
|
--
|
(2,474)
|
||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2013
|
11,882
|
$
|
119
|
$
|
65,302
|
$
|
63,293
|
$
|
(21,846)
|
$
|
106,868
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
USA TRUCK, INC.
|
||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||
(UNAUDITED)
|
||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||
Three Months Ended
|
||||||
March 31,
|
||||||
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
Operating activities:
|
||||||
Net loss
|
$
|
(2,474)
|
$
|
(4,873)
|
||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
10,915
|
11,157
|
||||
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
(125)
|
62
|
||||
Deferred income taxes
|
(1,590)
|
(2,674)
|
||||
Stock-based compensation
|
(89)
|
8
|
||||
Gain on disposal of assets, net
|
(389)
|
(542)
|
||||
Deferred gain
|
25
|
(2)
|
||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(2,326)
|
(5,033)
|
||||
Inventories and prepaid expenses
|
(889)
|
(2,465)
|
||||
Trade accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(549)
|
4,572
|
||||
Insurance and claims accruals
|
658
|
760
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
3,167
|
970
|
||||
Investing activities:
|
||||||
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(2,791)
|
(341)
|
||||
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
2,160
|
5,860
|
||||
Change in other assets
|
(7)
|
(42)
|
||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(638)
|
5,477
|
||||
Financing activities:
|
||||||
Borrowings under long-term debt
|
31,128
|
51,557
|
||||
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
(26,704)
|
(44,857)
|
||||
Principal payments on capitalized lease obligations
|
(7,534)
|
(11,100)
|
||||
Principal payments on note payable
|
(448)
|
(455)
|
||||
Net (decrease) increase in bank drafts payable
|
(401)
|
54
|
||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(3,959)
|
(4,801)
|
||||
(Decrease) increase in cash
|
(1,430)
|
1,646
|
||||
Cash:
|
||||||
Beginning of period
|
1,742
|
2,659
|
||||
End of period
|
$
|
312
|
$
|
4,305
|
||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
||||||
Cash paid during the period for:
|
||||||
Interest
|
$
|
935
|
$
|
995
|
||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
|
||||||
Liability incurred for leases on revenue equipment
|
10,275
|
10,686
|
||||
Purchases of revenue equipment included in accounts payable
|
7,648
|
--
|
||||
Purchases of fixed assets included in long-term debt
|
295
|
--
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
USA TRUCK, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
March 31, 2013
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013. For further information, refer to the financial statements, and footnotes thereto, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Our business is classified into three operating and reportable segments: our Trucking operating segment consisting primarily of our Truckload and Dedicated Freight service offerings; our Strategic Capacity Solutions (“SCS”) operating segment consisting entirely of our freight brokerage service offering; and our rail Intermodal operating segment.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2012, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
By agreement with our customers, and consistent with industry practice, we add a graduated fuel surcharge to the rates we charge our customers as diesel fuel prices increase above an agreed-upon baseline price per gallon. Base revenue in the consolidated statements of operations represents revenue excluding this fuel surcharge revenue.
NOTE 2 – REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue generated by our Trucking operating segment is recognized in full upon completion of delivery of freight to the receiver’s location. For freight in transit at the end of a reporting period, we recognize revenue pro rata based on relative transit time completed as a portion of the estimated total transit time. Expenses are recognized as incurred.
Revenue generated by our SCS and Intermodal operating segments is recognized upon completion of the services provided. Revenue is recorded on a gross basis, without deducting third party purchased transportation costs, because we have responsibility for billing and collecting such revenue.
Management believes these policies most accurately reflect revenue as earned and direct expenses, including third party purchased transportation costs, as incurred.
NOTE 3 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The USA Truck, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the granting of incentive or nonqualified options or other equity-based awards covering up to 1,100,000 shares of Common Stock to directors, officers and other key employees. No options were granted under this 2004 Equity Incentive Plan for less than the fair market value of the Common Stock as defined in the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan at the date of the grant. Options granted under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan generally vest ratably over three to ten years. The option price under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan is the fair market value of our Common Stock at the date the options were granted. The exercise prices of outstanding options granted under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan range from $2.85 to $22.54 as of March 31, 2013. At March 31, 2013, 529,115 shares were available for granting future options or other equity awards under this 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The Company issues new shares upon the exercise of stock options.
8
Compensation expense related to incentive and nonqualified stock options granted under the Company’s plans is included in salaries, wages and employee benefits in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The amount of compensation expense recognized, net of forfeiture recoveries, is reflected in the table below for the periods indicated.
(in thousands)
|
|||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||
March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Compensation expense
|
$
|
15
|
$
|
11
|
The table below sets forth the assumptions used to value stock options granted during the periods indicated:
2013
|
2012
|
||
Dividend yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
35.6%
|
29.8% – 64.0%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.2%
|
0.5% – 0.7%
|
|
Expected life (in years)
|
6.25
|
3.75 – 4.25
|
The expected volatility is a measure of the expected fluctuation in our share price based on the historical volatility of our stock. The risk-free interest rate is based on an implied yield on United States zero-coupon treasury bonds with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the outstanding options. Expected life represents the length of time we anticipate the options to be outstanding before being exercised. In addition to the above, we also include a factor for anticipated forfeitures, which represents the number of shares under options expected to be forfeited over the expected life of the options.
Information related to option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2013 is as follows:
Number of Options
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)
|
|||||||
Outstanding – December 31, 2012
|
112,151
|
$
|
12.54
|
|||||||
Granted
|
42,910
|
4.83
|
||||||||
Exercised
|
--
|
--
|
$
|
--
|
||||||
Cancelled/forfeited
|
(827)
|
12.46
|
||||||||
Expired
|
(15,458)
|
15.87
|
||||||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2013
|
138,776
|
$
|
9.78
|
4.9
|
$
|
23,139
|
||||
Exercisable at March 31, 2013
|
54,817
|
$
|
14.25
|
1.5
|
$
|
--
|
||||
(1)
|
The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options is determined based on the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the option. The per share market value of our Common Stock, as determined by the closing price on March 28, 2013 (the last trading day of the quarter), was $4.91.
|
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awarded under the Company’s plans is included in salaries, wages and employee benefits in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The compensation expense recognized is based on the market value of our Common Stock on the date the restricted stock award is granted and is not adjusted in subsequent periods. The amount to be recognized, net of forfeiture recoveries, is amortized over the vesting period. The amount of compensation expense (credit) recognized is reflected in the table below for the periods indicated.
(in thousands)
|
|||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||
March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Compensation expense (credit)
|
$
|
(104)
|
$
|
(3)
|
9
Information related to the restricted stock awarded under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2013, is as follows:
Number of Shares
|
Weighted Average Grant Price (1)
|
|||
Nonvested shares – December 31, 2012
|
113,458
|
$
|
10.35
|
|
Granted
|
113,168
|
4.88
|
||
Forfeited
|
1,010
|
6.72
|
||
Vested
|
--
|
--
|
||
Nonvested shares – March 31, 2013
|
225,616
|
$
|
7.62
|
(1)
|
The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the dates of the awards.
|
On July 16, 2008, the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, pursuant to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, granted thereunder awards totaling 200,000 restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock to certain officers of the Company. The grants were made effective as of July 18, 2008 and were valued at $12.13 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on that date. Each officer’s restricted shares of Common Stock will vest in varying amounts over the ten year period beginning April 1, 2011, subject to the Company’s attainment of defined retained earnings growth. Management must attain an average five-year trailing retained earnings annual growth rate of 10.0% (before dividends) in order for the shares to qualify for full vesting (pro rata vesting will apply down to 50.0% at a 5.0% annual growth rate). Any shares which fail to vest as a result of the Company’s failure to attain a performance goal will be forfeited and result in the recovery of the previously recorded expense. These forfeited shares will revert to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan where they will remain available for grants under the terms of that Plan until that Plan expires in 2014. During the second quarter of 2011, management determined that the performance criteria would not be met for the shares that were scheduled to vest on April 1, 2012 and April 1, 2013. At that time, these shares were deemed forfeited and recorded as Treasury Stock. During the first quarter of 2013, management determined that it is probable that the performance criteria would not be met for the shares that were scheduled to vest on April 1, 2014, April 1, 2015 and April 1, 2016. Accordingly, the shares remain outstanding until their scheduled vesting dates, at which time their forfeitures become effective and the shares revert to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The table below sets forth the information relating to the forfeitures of these shares.
July 16, 2008 Restricted Stock Award Forfeitures
|
|||||||||
Scheduled Vest Date
|
Date Deemed Forfeited and Recorded as Treasury Stock
|
Shares Forfeited
(in thousands)
|
Expense Recovered
(in thousands)
|
Date Shares Returned to Plan
|
|||||
April 1, 2011
|
June 30, 2010
|
9
|
$
|
70
|
April 1, 2011
|
||||
April 1, 2012
|
June 30, 2011
|
8
|
66
|
April 1, 2012
|
|||||
April 1, 2013
|
June 30, 2011
|
15
|
101
|
April 1, 2013
|
|||||
April 1, 2014
|
February 28, 2013
|
9
|
78
|
April 1, 2014
|
|||||
April 1, 2015
|
February 28, 2013
|
9
|
65
|
April 1, 2015
|
|||||
April 1, 2016
|
February 28, 2013
|
9
|
56
|
April 1, 2016
|
|||||
On January 30, 2013, the Executive Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors granted Restricted Stock Awards (“RSAs”) in an amount equal to a percentage of the recipient’s annual salary. The value of the RSAs was based on the closing price of the Company’s Common Stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market on February 1, 2013 ($4.98) and a total of 36,961 restricted shares were issued. The shares were issued from the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. The RSAs will vest one-fourth each year beginning February 1, 2014, conditioned on continued employment and certain other forfeiture provisions. In addition, the Executive Compensation Committee approved the USA Truck, Inc. Management Bonus Plan. Plan participants, consisting of executive and other key management personnel, will be paid a cash percentage and an equity percentage of their base salaries corresponding with the achievement of certain levels of consolidated 2013 pretax income.
10
On February 15, 2013, in connection with his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. John M. Simone was granted 75,000 shares of restricted stock, to vest in equal 25% installments over four years, beginning February 18, 2014. He was also granted 42,910 non-qualified stock options with an exercise price of $4.83, which was the closing price of the Company's Common Stock February 19, 2013, to vest in equal 25% installments over four years, beginning February 18, 2014. Both awards are conditioned on continued employment and certain other forfeiture provisions.
Information set forth in the following table is related to stock options and restricted stock as of March 31, 2013.
(in thousands, except weighted average data)
|
|||||
Stock Options
|
Restricted Stock
|
||||
Unrecognized compensation expense
|
$
|
35
|
$
|
908
|
|
Weighted average period over which unrecognized compensation expense is to be recognized (in years)
|
1.2
|
3.6
|
NOTE 4 – SEGMENT REPORTING
The service offerings we provide relate to the transportation of truckload quantities of freight for customers in a variety of industries. The services generate revenue, and to a great extent incur expenses, primarily on a per mile basis.
Percent of Total Base Revenue
|
||||||||
Trucking
|
SCS
|
Intermodal
|
||||||
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
March 31, 2013
|
76.1
|
%
|
20.5
|
%
|
3.5
|
%
|
||
March 31, 2012
|
77.6
|
%
|
18.0
|
%
|
4.4
|
%
|
Except with respect to the components of our operations that do not involve the use of our trucks, key operating statistics for all three operating segments include, for example, revenue per mile and miles per tractor per week. While the operations of our SCS segment typically do not involve the use of our equipment and drivers, we nevertheless provide truckload freight services to our customers through arrangements with third party carriers who are subject to the same general regulatory environment and cost sensitivities imposed upon our Trucking operations. Our Intermodal business does involve the use of our equipment as we utilize our trailers and leased containers, as well as some of our tractors, to provide this service. Accordingly, the operations of this segment are subject to the same general regulatory environment and cost sensitivities imposed upon our Trucking operations.
Assets are not allocated to our SCS segment, as our SCS operations provide truckload freight services to our customers through arrangements with third party carriers who utilize their own equipment. Assets are not allocated to our Intermodal segment, as our Intermodal containers are utilized under operating leases with a railroad, which are not capitalized. To the extent our Intermodal operations require the use of Company-owned tractors or trailers, they are obtained from our Trucking segment on an as-needed basis. Accordingly, we allocate all of our assets to our Trucking segment. However, depreciation and amortization expense is allocated to our SCS and Intermodal segments based on the various assets specifically utilized to generate revenue. All intercompany transactions between segments are consummated at rates similar to those negotiated with independent third parties. All other expenses are allocated to our SCS and Intermodal segments based on headcount and specifically identifiable direct costs, as appropriate.
11
A summary of base revenue and fuel surcharge revenue by reportable segments is as follows: |
(in thousands)
|
||||
Revenue
|
|||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||
March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Base revenue
|
|||||
Trucking
|
$
|
79,803
|
$
|
75,937
|
|
SCS
|
23,043
|
22,318
|
|||
Intermodal
|
3,744
|
4,406
|
|||
Eliminations
|
(1,703)
|
(4,838)
|
|||
Total base revenue
|
104,887
|
97,823
|
|||
Fuel surcharge revenue
|
|||||
Trucking
|
22,225
|
21,031
|
|||
SCS
|
4,320
|
4,026
|
|||
Intermodal
|
1,057
|
1,302
|
|||
Eliminations
|
(462)
|
(509)
|
|||
Total fuel surcharge revenue
|
27,140
|
25,850
|
|||
Total revenue
|
$
|
132,027
|
$
|
123,673
|
A summary of operating (loss) income by reportable segments is as follows: |
(in thousands)
|
||||
Operating (loss) income
|
|||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||
March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Operating (loss) income
|
|||||
Trucking
|
$
|
(3,978)
|
$
|
(7,956)
|
|
SCS
|
1,282
|
1,544
|
|||
Intermodal
|
(131)
|
(224)
|
|||
Operating loss
|
$
|
(2,827)
|
$
|
(6,636)
|
A summary of assets by reportable segments is as follows: |
(in thousands)
|
||||
Total Assets
|
|||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Total Assets
|
|||||
Trucking
|
$
|
226,194
|
$
|
218,145
|
|
Corporate and Other
|
115,104
|
113,349
|
|||
Total Assets
|
$
|
341,298
|
$
|
331,494
|
A summary of amortization and depreciation by reportable segments is as follows: |
(in thousands)
|
||||
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||
March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|||||
Trucking
|
$
|
10,254
|
$
|
10,407
|
|
SCS
|
30
|
27
|
|||
Intermodal
|
49
|
93
|
|||
Corporate and Other
|
582
|
630
|
|||
Total Depreciation and Amortization
|
$
|
10,915
|
$
|
11,157
|
12
NOTE 5 – LEASE RECEIVABLES
During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company began entering into lease-purchase agreements with certain of its drivers to allow them the opportunity to purchase a Company-owned tractor while concurrently becoming an independent contractor. At March 31, 2013, the Company had entered into 20 such agreements and had approximately $1.1 million included in Other Accounts Receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company believes these receivables are adequately collateralized; however, it has recorded an allowance for uncollectability in the approximate amount of $31,000 to cover any expenses it would incur in the event of a default.
NOTE 6 – NOTE RECEIVABLE
During November 2010, the Company sold its terminal facility in Shreveport, Louisiana. In connection with this sale, the buyer gave the Company cash in the amount of $0.2 million and a note receivable in the amount of $2.1 million. The note receivable bears interest at an annual rate of 7.0%, matures in five years and has scheduled principal and interest payments based on a 30-year amortization schedule. A balloon payment in the approximate amount of $1.9 million is payable to the Company when the note matures in 2015. Accordingly, the Company deferred the approximate $0.7 million gain on the sale of this facility, and records this gain into earnings as payments on the note receivable are received. During the three month periods ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, the Company recognized approximately $1,770 and approximately $1,650, respectively, of this gain. The Company believes the note receivable balance at March 31, 2013, in the approximate amount of $2.0 million, is fully collectible and accordingly has not recorded any valuation allowance against the note receivable.
NOTE 7 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
We review our long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with Topic ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. This authoritative guidance provides that whenever there are certain significant events or changes in circumstances the value of long-lived assets or groups of assets must be tested to determine if their value can be recovered from their future cash flows. In the event undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are less than the carrying amount, the asset or group of assets must be evaluated to determine if an impairment of value exists. Impairment exists if the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.
In light of the sustained general economic downturn in the United States and world economies, the decline in our market capitalization and our net operating losses in recent years, triggering events and changes in circumstances have occurred, which required us to test our long-lived assets for recoverability at March 31, 2013.
We test for the recoverability of all of our long-lived assets as a single group at the entity level and examine the forecasted future cash flows generated by our revenue equipment, including its eventual disposition, to determine if those cash flows exceed the carrying value of our long-lived assets. At March 31, 2013, we determined that no impairment of value existed.
NOTE 8 – CLAIMS LIABILITIES
We are self-insured up to certain limits for bodily injury, property damage, workers’ compensation, cargo loss and damage claims and medical benefits. Provisions are made for both the estimated liabilities for known claims as incurred and estimates for those incurred but not reported.
Our self-insurance retention levels are $0.5 million for workers’ compensation claims per occurrence, $0.05 million for cargo loss and damage claims per occurrence and $1.0 million for bodily injury and property damage claims per occurrence. For medical benefits, the Company self-insures up to $0.25 million per plan participant per year with an aggregate claim exposure limit determined by our year-to-date claims experience and the number of covered lives. We are completely self-insured for physical damage to our own tractors and trailers, except that we carry catastrophic physical damage coverage to protect against natural disasters. We maintain insurance above the amounts for which we self-insure, to certain limits, with licensed insurance carriers. We have excess general, auto and employer’s liability coverage in amounts substantially exceeding minimum legal requirements.
We record claims accruals at the estimated ultimate payment amounts based on information such as individual case estimates or historical claims experience. The current portion reflects the amounts of claims expected to be paid in the next twelve months. In making the estimates of ultimate payment amounts and the determinations of the current portion of each claim we rely on past experience with similar claims, negative or positive developments in the case and similar factors. We re-evaluate these estimates and determinations each reporting period based on developments that occur and new information that becomes available during the reporting period.
13
NOTE 9 – ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
(in thousands)
|
||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits
|
$
|
4,333
|
$
|
3,779
|
||
Other (1)
|
4,968
|
3,931
|
||||
Total accrued expenses
|
$
|
9,301
|
$
|
7,710
|
|
(1)
|
As of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, no single item included within other accrued expenses exceeded 5.0% of our total current liabilities.
|
NOTE 10 – NOTE PAYABLE
On October 11, 2012, the Company entered into an unsecured note payable of $1.8 million. The note, which is scheduled to mature on September 1, 2013, is payable in monthly installments of principal and interest of approximately $0.2 million and bears interest at 1.8%. The balance of the note payable at March 31, 2013 was $0.9 million. The note is being used to finance a portion of the Company’s annual insurance premiums and is payable to a third party other than the insurance company.
NOTE 11 – LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
(in thousands)
|
||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
|||||
Revolving credit agreement (1)
|
$
|
88,000
|
$
|
83,513
|
||
Capitalized lease obligations and other long-term debt (2)
|
56,404
|
53,420
|
||||
144,404
|
136,933
|
|||||
Less current maturities
|
(14,399)
|
(14,403)
|
||||
Long-term debt and capital leases, less current maturities
|
$
|
130,005
|
$
|
122,530
|
||
(1)
|
On August 24, 2012, we entered into a $125.0 million revolving credit agreement (the “Revolver”) with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent, and PNC Bank, as Syndication Agent. The Revolver, which expires in 2017, is secured by substantially all of our assets, and includes letters of credit not to exceed $15.0 million. In addition, the $125.0 million Revolver has an accordion feature whereby we may elect to increase the size of the Revolver by up to $50.0 million, subject to customary conditions and lender participation. The Revolver is governed by a borrowing base with advances against eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable and eligible revenue equipment, and has a first priority perfected security interest in all of the business assets (excluding tractors and trailers financed through capital leases and real estate) of the Company. Proceeds from the Revolver were used to pay off the outstanding balance of our credit agreement with a different lender. Proceeds were also used to fund certain fees and expenses associated with the Revolver and will be used to finance working capital, capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes.
|
The Revolver contains a minimum excess availability requirement equal to 15.0% of the maximum revolver amount (currently $18.75 million) and an annual capital expenditure limit ($71.0 million effective January 1, 2013, with increases thereafter). If a collateral cushion, referred to as suppressed availability, of at least $30.0 million in excess of the maximum facility size is not maintained, the advance rate on eligible revenue equipment is reduced by 5.0% and the value attributable to eligible revenue equipment starts to decline in monthly increments. The Revolver contains a total capital expenditure limitation. The Revolver does not contain any financial maintenance covenants.
The Revolver bears interest at rates typically based on the Wells Fargo prime rate or LIBOR, in each case plus an applicable margin. The Base Rate is equal to the greatest of (a) the prime lending rate as publicly announced from time to time by Wells Fargo Bank N.A., (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.0%, and (c) the three month LIBOR Rate plus 1.0%. The Base Rate at March 31, 2013 was 1.5%. The LIBOR Rate is the rate at which dollar deposits are offered to major banks in the London interbank market two business days prior to the commencement of the requested interest period. Most borrowings are expected to be based on the LIBOR rate option. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25% to 2.75% based on average excess availability and at March 31, 2013 it was 2.5%.
The Revolver includes usual and customary events of default for a facility of this nature and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuation of an event of default, payment of all amounts payable under the Revolver may be accelerated, and the lenders’ commitments may be terminated. The Revolver contains certain restrictions and covenants relating to, among other things, dividends, liens, acquisitions and dispositions, affiliate transactions and share repurchases. At March 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of the Revolver.
14
Applicable Margin means, as of any date of determination, the following margin based upon the most recent average excess availability calculation; provided, however, that for the period from the closing date through the testing period ended March 31, 2013, the Applicable Margin was at Level II and at any time that an Event of Default exists, the Applicable Margin shall be at Level III.
Level
|
Average Excess Availability
|
Applicable Margin in respect of Base Rate Loans under the Revolver
|
Applicable Margin in respect of LIBOR Rate Loans under the Revolver
|
I
|
≥ $50,000,000
|
1.25%
|
2.25%
|
II
|
< $50,000,000 but ≥ $30,000,000
|
1.50%
|
2.50%
|
III
|
< $30,000,000
|
1.75%
|
2.75%
|
We paid a $1.5 million closing fee. In addition, the Company is required to pay a fee on the unused amount of the Revolver as set forth in the table below, which is due and payable monthly in arrears. For the period from the closing date through March 31, 2013, the unused fee was at Level II.
Level
|
Average Used Portion of the Revolver plus Outstanding Letters of Credit
|
Applicable Unused Revolver Fee Margin
|
I
|
> $60,000,000
|
0.375%
|
II
|
< $60,000,000
|
0.500%
|
The interest rate on our overnight borrowings under the Revolver at March 31, 2013 was 4.8%. The interest rate including all borrowings made under the Revolver at March 31, 2013 was 2.9%. The weighted average interest rate on the Company’s borrowings under the agreement for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was 3.1%. A quarterly commitment fee is payable on the unused portion of the credit line and at March 31, 2013, the rate was 0.5% per annum. The Revolver is collateralized by all non-leased revenue equipment having a net book value of approximately $164.2 million at March 31, 2013, and all billed and unbilled accounts receivable. As the Company reprices its debt on a monthly basis, the borrowings under the Revolver approximate its fair value. At March 31, 2013, the Company had outstanding $3.0 million in letters of credit and had approximately $15.2 million available under the Revolver (net of the minimum availability we are required to maintain of approximately $18.75 million).
(2)
|
Capitalized lease obligations in the amount of $55.9 million have various termination dates extending through November 2016 and contain renewal or fixed price purchase options. The effective interest rates on the leases range from 1.6% to 4.0% at March 31, 2013. The lease agreements require us to pay property taxes, maintenance and operating expenses.
|
In May 2012, the Company entered into a long-term financing agreement in the amount of approximately $360,000 for the purchase of information technology related hardware. The agreement, which is scheduld to mature on May 31, 2014, is payable in annual installments of principal and interest of approximtaely $122,000 due on May 31, 2013 and 2014, and bears imputed interest at 3.16%. The balance of the agreement at March 31, 2013 was approximately $240,000.
In January 2013, the Company entered into a long-term financing agreement in the amount of approximately $295,000 for the purchase of information technology related hardware. The agreement, which is scheduled to mature on January 31, 2017, is payable in annual installments of principal and interest of approximately $63,000, due on January 31st of each year, and bears imputed interest at 3.05%. The balance of the agreement at March 31, 2013 was approximately $234,000.
|
The current maturities of the above financing agreements amount to approximately $174,000.
|
In April 2013, the Company entered into a long-term financing agreement in the amount of approximately $300,000 for the purchase of information technology related hardware. The agreement, which is scheduled to mature on March 31, 2018, is payable in monthly installments of principal and interest of approximately $5,600 and bears interest at 4.492%. The initial monthly payment of this financing agreement is due on May 1, 2013.
15
NOTE 12 – LEASES AND COMMITMENTS
We lease certain revenue equipment under capital leases with terms of 36, 42 or 45 months. Balances related to these capitalized leases are included in property and equipment in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and are set forth in the table below for the periods indicated.
(in thousands)
|
|||||||||
Capitalized Costs
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net Book Value
|
|||||||
March 31, 2013
|
$
|
73,143
|
$
|
13,191
|
$
|
59,952
|
|||
December 31, 2012
|
$
|
67,788
|
$
|
16,366
|
$
|
51,422
|
We have entered into leases with lenders who participate in the Revolver. Those leases contain cross-default provisions with the Revolver. We have also entered into leases with other lenders who do not participate in our Revolver. Multiple leases with lenders who do not participate in our Revolver generally contain cross-default provisions.
We routinely monitor our equipment acquisition needs and adjust our purchase schedule from time to time based on our analysis of factors such as new equipment prices, the condition of the used equipment market, demand for our freight services, prevailing interest rates, technological improvements, fuel efficiency, equipment durability, equipment specifications, our operating performance and the availability of qualified drivers.
As of March 31, 2013, for the remainder of 2013, we had no commitments for purchases of non-revenue equipment and commitments for the purchases of revenue equipment in the amount of approximately $43.8 million, $22.8 million of which is cancelable by us upon 75 days advance written notice. We anticipate taking delivery of these purchases throughout the remainder of 2013.
NOTE 13 – INCOME TAXES
During the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, our effective tax rates were 31.5% and 35.4%, respectively. Income tax expense varies from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal tax rate to income before income taxes primarily due to state income taxes, net of federal income tax effect, adjusted for permanent differences, the most significant of which is the effect of the per diem pay structure for drivers. Drivers may elect to receive non-taxable per diem pay in lieu of a portion of their taxable wages. This per diem program increases our drivers’ net pay per mile, after taxes, while decreasing gross pay, before taxes. As a result of the per diem program, salaries, wages and employee benefits are slightly lower than they otherwise would be, and our effective income tax rate is higher than the statutory rate. Generally, as pre-tax income increases, the impact of the driver per diem program on our effective tax rate decreases because aggregate per diem pay becomes smaller in relation to pre-tax income. Due to the partially nondeductible effect of per diem pay, our tax rate will fluctuate in future periods based on fluctuations in earnings and in the number of drivers who elect to receive this pay structure.
We account for any uncertainty in income taxes by determining whether it is more likely than not that a tax position we have taken in a tax return will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position. In that regard, we have analyzed filing positions in our federal and applicable state tax returns as well as in all open tax years. The only periods subject to examination for our federal returns are the 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years and, in February 2013, we received notice that our 2011 federal tax return is being examined. We believe that our income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and do not anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material change to our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In conjunction with the above, our policy is to recognize interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense and penalties as operating expenses. We have not recorded any unrecognized tax benefits through March 31, 2013.
16
NOTE 14 – LOSS PER SHARE
Basic loss per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed by adjusting the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding by Common Stock equivalents attributable to dilutive stock options and restricted stock. The computation of diluted loss per share does not assume conversion, exercise, or contingent issuance of securities that would have an antidilutive effect on loss per share.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||
March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Numerator:
|
|||||
Net loss
|
$
|
(2,474)
|
$
|
(4,873)
|
|
Denominator:
|
|||||
Denominator for basic loss per share – weighted average shares
|
10,305
|
10,300
|
|||
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|||||
Employee stock options and restricted stock
|
--
|
--
|
|||
Denominator for diluted loss per share – adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions
|
10,305
|
10,300
|
|||
Basic per share
|
$
|
(0.24)
|
$
|
(0.47)
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
$
|
(0.24)
|
$
|
(0.47)
|
|
Weighted average anti-dilutive employee stock options and restricted stock
|
242
|
177
|
NOTE 15 – LITIGATION
We are party to routine litigation incidental to our business, primarily involving claims for personal injury and property damage incurred in the transportation of freight. We maintain insurance to cover liabilities in excess of certain self-insured retention levels. Though management believes these claims to be routine and immaterial to our long-term financial position, adverse results of one or more of these claims could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations in any given reporting period.
On July 28, 2008, a former commission sales agent, Mr. William Blankenship (“Blankenship”), filed an action in the United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas entitled William Blankenship, Jr. v. USA Truck, Inc., asking the court to set aside a previously consummated settlement agreement between the parties. The matter was dismissed by the District Court based upon our Motion to Dismiss, but was later reinstated by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals and set for trial in the United States District Court in Fort Smith, Arkansas. In October 2011, the trial was held in the United States District Court and the jury returned a favorable verdict for the Company on all counts and determined that the Company had no additional liability in this matter. On December 13, 2011, the Court entered an order awarding the Company its costs and attorney’s fees incurred in defending the case totaling approximately $0.2 million. Blankenship has now appealed the jury verdict and Court order, and the matter is once again pending before the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals.
NOTE 16 – STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS PLAN
On November 7, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (a "Right") for each outstanding share of the Company's Common Stock, which was paid on November 21, 2012 to stockholders of record at the close of business on such date. The Board of Directors also adopted the Rights Agreement by and between the Company and Registrar and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent (the "Rights Agreement").
The Rights will become exercisable (subject to customary exceptions) only if a person or group acquires 15% or more of the Company's Common Stock. At a designated time after a person or group becomes an acquiring person, upon payment of the exercise price of $12.00 per Right, a holder (other than an acquiring person) will be entitled to purchase $24.00 worth of shares of the Company's Common Stock (or under certain circumstances, the common stock of an entity that completes a business combination with the Company) at a 50% discount. The Rights Agreement is set to expire on November 21, 2014; however, the Rights Agreement will continue after the Company's 2014 Annual Meeting only upon stockholder approval at such meeting. The Company may redeem the Rights for nominal consideration before the Rights become exercisable.
17
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking Statements
|
This report contains certain statements that may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and such statements are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical or current fact, are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including without limitation: any projections of earnings, revenues, or other financial items; any statement of plans, strategies, and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; and any statements of belief and any statement of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Such statements may be identified by their use of terms or phrases such as “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “potential,” “continue,” “future” and similar terms and phrases. Forward-looking statements are based on currently available operating, financial, and competitive information. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified, which could cause future events and actual results to differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section entitled "Item 1.A., Risk Factors," in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Readers should review and consider the factors that may affect future results and other disclosures by the Company in its press releases, Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
All such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in the events, conditions, or circumstances on which any such information is based.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.
References to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and words of similar import refer to USA Truck, Inc. and its subsidiary.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and other financial information that appears elsewhere in this report.
Overview
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand USA Truck, Inc., our operations and our present business environment. MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and other financial information that appears elsewhere in this report. This overview summarizes the MD&A, which includes the following sections:
Our Business – a general description of our business, the organization of our operations and the service offerings that comprise our operations.
Results of Operations – an analysis of our consolidated results of operations for the periods presented in our consolidated financial statements and a discussion of seasonality, the potential impact of inflation and fuel availability and cost.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – a discussion of significant financial arrangements, if any, that are not reflected on our balance sheet.
Liquidity and Capital Resources – an analysis of cash flows, sources and uses of cash, debt, equity and contractual obligations.
Critical Accounting Estimates – a discussion of accounting policies that require critical judgment and estimates.
Our Business
We operate primarily in the for-hire truckload segment of the trucking industry. Customers in a variety of industries engage us to haul truckload quantities of freight, with the trailer we use to haul that freight being assigned exclusively to that customer’s freight until delivery. Our business is classified into three operating and reportable segments: our Trucking operating segment consisting primarily of our Truckload and Dedicated Freight service offerings; our SCS operating segment consisting entirely of our freight brokerage service offering; and our rail Intermodal operating segment.
Substantially all of our base revenue from the three reportable segments is generated by transporting, or arranging for the transportation of, freight for customers and is predominantly affected by the rates per mile received from our customers and similar operating costs.
18
The following tables present the base revenue of our three segments, net of intercompany transactions:
Trucking
|
|||||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
March 31,
|
|||||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
Base revenue (in thousands)
|
$
|
79,793
|
$
|
75,937
|
|||
Percent of revenue
|
76.1
|
%
|
77.6
|
%
|
SCS
|
|||||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
March 31,
|
|||||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
Base revenue (in thousands)
|
$
|
21,459
|
$
|
17,595
|
|||
Percent of revenue
|
20.5
|
%
|
18.0
|
%
|
Intermodal
|
|||||||
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
March 31,
|
|||||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
Base revenue (in thousands)
|
$
|
3,635
|
$
|
4,291
|
|||
Percent of revenue
|
3.5
|
%
|
4.4
|
%
|
We generally charge customers for our services on a per-mile basis. The expenses which have a major impact on our profitability are the variable costs of transporting freight for our customers. The variable costs include fuel expense, insurance and claims and driver-related expenses, such as wages and benefits.
Trucking. Trucking includes the following primary service offerings provided to our customers:
·
|
Truckload. Our Truckload service offering provides truckload freight services as a medium-haul common carrier. We have provided Truckload services since our inception and we derive the largest portion of our revenue from these services.
|
·
|
Dedicated Freight. Our Dedicated Freight service offering is a variation of our Truckload service, whereby we agree to make our equipment and drivers available to a specific customer for shipments over particular routes at specified times. In addition to serving specific customer needs, our Dedicated Freight service offering also aids in driver recruitment and retention.
|
Strategic Capacity Solutions. Our SCS operating segment consists entirely of our freight brokerage service offering which matches customer shipments with available equipment of authorized carriers and provides services that complement our Trucking operations. We provide these services primarily to our existing Trucking customers, many of whom prefer to rely on a single carrier, or a small group of carriers, to provide all their transportation needs. To date, a majority of the customers of SCS have also engaged us to provide services through one or more of our Trucking service offerings.
Intermodal. Our rail Intermodal service offering provides our customers cost savings over Truckload with a slightly slower transit speed, while allowing us to reposition our equipment.
Results of Operations
Executive Overview
Financial Results
Base revenue of $104.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, increased 7.2 % from $97.8 million for the same quarter of 2012. We incurred a net loss of $2.5 million ($0.24 per share) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, compared to a net loss of $4.9 million ($0.47 per share) for the same quarter of 2012.
19
Operating Environment
Base revenue improved by 7.2% and operating costs were held to an increase of 3.5%, thus improving operating margin by over 400 basis points. Our operational execution continues to improve, helping us overcome difficult weather conditions across our operating areas and fewer business days due to leap year and an early Easter. We are pleased with our progress, and our top priority is returning to profitability as quickly as possible and restoring shareholder value.
Asset-Based Trucking Operations
Our Trucking segment led the way with a 50.0% improvement in operating results on revenue growth of 5.1% while expenses grew at 1.0%, yielding a 550 basis point improvement.
The yield management initiatives we began implementing during 2012 are gradually improving our freight network. Our loaded length-of-haul increased by 11.8%, and our rate per total mile simultaneously improved by 2.7%. Operationally, we executed better, improving miles per seated truck per week by 2.7%, as we continue to focus on asset productivity.
Most costs associated with our Trucking segment were lower due to a variety of cost control initiatives, including efforts to reduce driver turnover which improved by 22.6 percentage points year over year. We believe significant opportunities exist to remove costs from our operations. Those opportunities are in the areas of equipment operating costs, fuel consumption and safety (in fact, most of the year-over-year increase in insurance and claims dollars was the result of a single claim occurring on the final working day of the quarter). We are conducting a broad assessment of our processes in those three areas, among others, and are designing and deploying initiatives that we believe will unlock the earnings leverage in our Trucking model.
Non-Asset Based Operations
Our SCS segment produced operating income of $1.3 million, and experienced 22.0% base revenue growth, when compared to the same quarter of the prior year. However, less favorable conditions in the marketplace, particularly among seasonal spring shippers, led to slightly compressed gross margins (14.1% vs. 14.4%). Operating margins were further eroded due to an expanded infrastructure to facilitate long-term growth, and we experienced elevated bad debt expense during the quarter. Intermodal experienced better year-over-year results, but remained immaterial to our overall financial results.
Balance Sheet and Liquidity
We believe our balance sheet and sources of liquidity remain adequate to support our operating needs for the foreseeable future. At March 31, 2013, our outstanding debt, less cash, represented 57.5% of our total capitalization, compared to 48.9% at March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013, we were in compliance with our five-year $125.0 million revolving credit facility and had approximately $15.2 million of available borrowing capacity (net of the minimum availability we are required to maintain of approximately $18.8 million). For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we incurred net capital expenditures of approximately $11.0 million. Our 2013 operating plan anticipates capital expenditures, net of proceeds on sale of assets, of approximately $36.3 million for the remainder of the year.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2012
Results of Operations – Combined Services
Total base revenue increased 7.2% to $104.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 from $97.8 million for the same quarter of 2012. We reported a net loss of $2.5 million ($0.24 per share) for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, compared to a net loss of $4.9 million ($0.47 per share) for the comparable prior year period.
Our effective tax rate was 31.5% for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, compared to 35.4% for the same quarter of 2012. Income tax expense varies from the amount computed by applying the federal tax rate to income before income taxes primarily due to state income taxes, net of federal income tax effect, adjusted for permanent differences, the most significant of which is the effect of the per diem pay structure for drivers. Due to the partially nondeductible effect of per diem payments, our tax rate will vary in future periods based on fluctuations in earnings and in the number of drivers who elect to receive this pay structure.
20
Results of Operations – Trucking
Relationship of Certain Items to Base Revenue
The following table sets forth the percentage relationship of certain items to base revenue of our Trucking operating segment for the periods indicated. Fuel and fuel taxes are shown net of fuel surcharges.
Three Months Ended
|
|||||
March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Base Trucking revenue
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
Operating expenses and costs:
|
|||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits
|
41.4
|
43.8
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization
|
13.6
|
14.5
|
|||
Operations and maintenance
|
13.9
|
13.5
|
|||
Fuel and fuel taxes
|
16.7
|
17.8
|
|||
Purchased transportation
|
6.3
|
7.0
|
|||
Insurance and claims
|
6.7
|
6.3
|
|||
Operating taxes and licenses
|
1.2
|
1.8
|
|||
Communications and utilities
|
1.2
|
1.2
|
|||
Gain on disposal of revenue equipment, net
|
(0.5)
|
(0.7)
|
|||
Other
|
4.5
|
5.3
|
|||
Total operating expenses and costs
|
105.0
|
110.5
|
|||
Operating loss
|
(5.0)
|
%
|
(10.5)
|
%
|
Key Operating Statistics:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|||||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
Operating loss (in thousands) (1)
|
$
|
(3,978)
|
$
|
(7,956)
|
|||
Operating ratio (2)
|
105.0
|
%
|
110.5
|
%
|
|||
Total miles (in thousands) (3)
|
54,618
|
53,360
|
|||||
Empty mile factor (4)
|
11.0
|
%
|
11.8
|
%
|
|||
Base Trucking revenue per loaded mile
|
$
|
1.642
|
$
|
1.613
|
|||
Average number of tractors in service (5)
|
2,206
|
2,230
|
|||||
Unseated tractor percentage
|
4.1
|
%
|
5.9
|
%
|
|||
Average number of seated tractor (6)
|
2,116
|
2,099
|
|||||
Average miles per seated tractor per week
|
2,008
|
1,955
|
|||||
Base Trucking revenue per seated tractor per week
|
$
|
2,933
|
$
|
2,783
|
|||
Average loaded miles per trip
|
589
|
527
|
(1)
|
Operating loss is calculated by deducting total operating expenses from total revenues.
|
(2)
|
Operating ratio is calculated by dividing total operating expenses, net of fuel surcharge, by base revenue.
|
(3)
|
Total miles include both loaded and empty miles.
|
(4)
|
The empty mile factor is the number of miles traveled for which we are not typically compensated by any customer as a percent of total miles traveled.
|
(5)
|
Tractors include Company-operated tractors in-service plus tractors operated by independent contractors.
|
(6)
|
Seated tractors are those occupied by drivers.
|
21
Our base Trucking revenue increased 5.1% from $75.9 million to $79.8 million and our operating loss decreased 50.0% from ($8.0 million) to ($3.9 million). The increased revenue was a result of 5.4% more base revenue per seated tractor per week, which was driven by a 2.7% improvement in miles per seated tractor per week and a 2.7% increase in base Trucking revenue per mile. Our yield management initiative implemented during the first quarter of 2013 has resulted in a 62-mile, or 11.8%, increase in our average loaded length-of-haul, which helped us improve operational efficiency. Longer lengths-of-haul, within a regional model, typically require less time in metropolitan areas and at loading and unloading docks, and more time on the road generating revenue.
Overall, our operating ratio improved by 5.5 percentage points of base revenue to 105.0% from 110.5% as a result of the following factors:
·
|
Salaries, wages and employee benefits expense decreased by 2.4 percentage points of base Trucking revenue. The improvement was primarily the result of our improved base revenue per mile and miles per seated tractor per week and, to a lesser extent, the result of a 13.1% decrease in our non-driver employee headcount as we work to improve process efficiency throughout our Trucking segment and our tractor-to-non-driver employee ratio. Those improvements were offset by an increase in our driver employee compensation per mile, which we attribute to a highly competitive environment for hiring and retaining qualified drivers in the truckload industry.
|
·
|
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by 0.9 percentage points of base Trucking revenue. The decrease was primarily the result of our improved base revenue per mile and miles per seated tractor per week. Depreciation and amortization expense may be affected in the future as equipment manufacturers change prices and if the prices of used equipment fluctuate.
|
·
|
Operations and maintenance expense increased by 0.4 percentage points. The increase was primarily due to an increase in maintenance costs on our tractors and trailers. Our average tractor fleet age has increased from 27.9 months to 30.8 months, and our average trailer fleet has increased from 73.5 months to 77.0 months. The year-over-year increase in the average age resulted in higher operating costs and lower warranty recovery.
|
·
|
Fuel and fuel taxes expense decreased 1.1 percentage points of base Trucking revenue. The decrease was primarily due to the increase in our base Trucking revenue per mile. Additionally, our fuel price per gallon, net of fuel surcharge revenue, was 5.4% lower due to improved fuel surcharge recoveries and lower market prices for fuel. Market pricing for fuel is volatile and we expect this expense to fluctuate accordingly in future periods. To help us offset those fluctuations, we are implementing internal initiatives that we anticipate will reduce our fuel consumption through various fuel economy initiatives and a concentrated effort to reduce our empty and out-of-route miles.
|
·
|
Purchased transportation expense, which is comprised of independent contractor compensation and fees paid to Mexican carriers, decreased by 0.7 percentage points of base Trucking revenue. The decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in the fees paid to independent contractors due to the lower fuel prices (we pay our independent contractors 100% of the fuel surcharge associated with the trips they haul).
|
·
|
Other expenses decreased 0.8 percentage points of base Trucking revenue primarily as a result of lower driver recruiting expenses, and to a lesser extent, our improved base revenue per mile and miles per seated tractor per week. During 2012, we reengineered our driver recruiting process, which we believe will reduce costs and improve efficiency.
|
22
Results of Operations – Strategic Capacity Solutions
The following table sets forth certain information relating to our SCS segment for the periods indicated:
(in thousands, except gross margin)
|
|||||||
Three Months Ended
March 31,
|
|||||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
Total SCS revenue (1)
|
$
|
27,363
|
$
|
26,344
|
|||
Intercompany revenue
|
(2,015)
|
(5,192)
|
|||||
Net revenue
|
$
|
25,348
|
$
|
21,152
|
|||
Operating income
|
$
|
1,282
|
$
|
1,544
|
|||
Gross margin (2)
|
14.1
|
%
|
14.4
|
%
|
(1)
|
Includes fuel surcharge revenue.
|
(2)
|
Gross margin is calculated by taking total SCS revenue less purchased transportation and dividing that amount by total SCS revenue. This calculation includes intercompany revenue and expenses.
|
SCS net revenue increased 19.8% to $25.3 million from $21.2 million, while operating income decreased 17.0% to $1.3 million from $1.5 million. The decrease in operating income was partially a result of greater purchased transportation cost. Conditions in the marketplace were less favorable, which required us to pay more for transportation services relative to the price paid by our customers. We also incurred $0.2 million of expense related to accounts receivable deemed uncollectible.
Results of Operations – Intermodal Operations
The following table sets forth certain information relating to our Intermodal operating segment for the periods indicated:
(in thousands, except gross margin)
|
|||||||
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||||
Total Intermodal revenue (1)
|
$
|
4,801
|
$
|
5,708
|
|||
Intercompany revenue
|
(140)
|
(155)
|
|||||
Net revenue
|
$
|
4,661
|
$
|
5,553
|
|||
Operating loss
|
$
|
(131)
|
$
|
(224)
|
|||
Gross margin (2)
|
14.0
|
%
|
21.5
|
%
|
(1)
|
Includes fuel surcharge revenue.
|
(2)
|
Gross margin is calculated by taking total Intermodal revenue less purchased transportation and dividing that amount by total Intermodal revenue. This calculation includes intercompany revenue and expenses.
|
Total net revenue from our Intermodal operating segment decreased 16.0% to $4.7 million from $5.6 million. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we began transitioning our Intermodal operating model from an asset-based model using 500 containers leased from a railroad to an asset-light model using our own trailers and containers owned by various railroads. That transition was completed late in the first quarter 2013. While revenue decreased, we reduced our operating loss 41.8% from $0.22 million to $0.13 million by reducing our operating costs by 17.0% as we migrated to the new model. We are focused on revenue growth now that the transition to the new model is complete.
23
Seasonality
In the trucking industry, revenue generally decreases as customers reduce shipments during the winter holiday season and as inclement weather impedes operations. At the same time, operating expenses increase due primarily to decreased fuel efficiency and increased maintenance costs. Future revenue could be impacted if customers, particularly those with manufacturing operations, reduce shipments due to temporary plant closings. Historically, many of our customers have closed their plants for maintenance or other reasons during January and July.
Inflation
Most of our operating expenses are inflation sensitive, and we have not always been able to offset inflation-driven cost increases through increases in our revenue per mile and our cost control efforts. The effect of inflation-driven cost increases on our overall operating costs is not expected to be greater for us than for our competitors.
Fuel Availability and Cost
The motor carrier industry is dependent upon the availability of fuel. Fuel shortages or increases in fuel taxes or fuel costs have adversely affected our profitability and will continue to do so. Fuel prices have fluctuated widely, and fuel prices and fuel taxes have generally increased in recent years. We have not experienced difficulty in maintaining necessary fuel supplies. Typically, we are not able to fully recover increases in fuel prices through rate increases and fuel surcharges, primarily because those items do not provide any benefit with respect to empty and out-of-route miles, for which we typically do not receive compensation from customers. We do not have any long-term fuel purchase contracts and we have not entered into any other hedging arrangements that protect us against fuel price increases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not currently have off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our consolidated financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. From time to time, we enter into operating leases related to facilities and office equipment that are not reflected in our balance sheet.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On August 24, 2012, we entered into a $125.0 million Revolver with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent and PNC Bank, as Syndication Agent. The Revolver, which expires in 2017, is secured by substantially all of our assets, and can be expanded up to $175.0 million, subject to customary conditions and lender participation. Proceeds received under the Revolver were used, in part, to repay the approximately $75.9 million then outstanding under a credit agreement with a different lender.
During the first quarter of 2013, the maximum amount borrowed under the Revolver, including letters of credit, reached approximately 74.0% of the total amount available at its highest point. We ended the quarter with outstanding borrowings, including letters of credit, equal to approximately 72.8% of the total amount available under the Revolver. The maximum amount borrowed and the percentage of the amount available excluded the accordion feature. In January 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the use of up to $45.0 million in new capital leases under existing facilities through 2013, and at March 31, 2013, we had approximately $34.7 million of availability. At March 31, 2013, we had approximately $15.2 million available under our Revolver (net of the minimum availability we are required to maintain of approximately $18.75 million). Our balance sheet debt, less cash, represents 57.5% of our total capitalization, and we have no material off-balance sheet debt. Our capital leases currently represent 38.5% of our total debt and carry an average fixed rate of 2.2%. Not only does that provide us with a natural hedge against recent London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) volatility, but it has also freed up availability on our Revolver. We produced $2.5 million in free cash flow (cash flow from operations less cash used in investing activities) during the first quarter of 2013, which was approximately $3.9 million less than the same period in 2012.
24
The nature of our business requires significant investments in new revenue equipment. We have financed new tractor and trailer purchases predominantly with cash flows from operations, the proceeds from sales or trades of used equipment, borrowings under our Revolver, and capital lease purchase arrangements. We have historically met our working capital needs with cash flows from operations and with borrowings under financing arrangements. We use these financing arrangements, in addition to our Revolver, to minimize fluctuations in cash flow needs and to provide flexibility in financing revenue equipment purchases.
During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we incurred net capital expenditures of approximately $11.0 million, which included $10.8 million for the purchase of revenue equipment and $0.2 million for facility expansions and other expenditures. We expect our net capital expenditures for the remainder of 2013 will be approximately $36.3 million.
Management is not aware of any known trends or uncertainties that would cause a significant change in our sources of liquidity. We expect our principal sources of capital to be sufficient to finance our operations, annual debt maturities, lease commitments, letter of credit commitments, stock repurchases and capital expenditures over the next twelve months. There can be no assurance, however, that such sources will be sufficient to fund our operations and all expansion plans for the next several years, or that any necessary additional financing will be available, if at all, in amounts required or on terms satisfactory to us, especially in light of our continuing net losses.
If the credit markets erode or we are unable to comply with the requirements of our Revolver, we may not be able to access our current sources of credit and our lenders may not have the capital to fund those sources. We may need to incur additional indebtedness or issue debt or equity securities in the future to refinance existing debt, fund working capital requirements, and for general corporate purposes. As a result of contractions in the credit market, as well as other economic trends in the credit market industry, we may not be able to secure financing for future activities on satisfactory terms, or at all. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining sufficient financing because we are unable to access the capital markets on acceptable terms, it could impact our ability to provide services to our customers and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial results, and results of operations.
Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|||||
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||
2013
|
2012
|
||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
3,167
|
$
|
970
|
|
Net cash used in (provided by) investing activities
|
(638)
|
5,477
|
|||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(3,959)
|
(4,801)
|
Cash generated from operations increased $2.2 million during the first three months of 2013 as compared to the same time period of 2012, primarily due to the net effect of the following factors:
·
|
Net loss was reduced by $2.4 million primarily due to improved operational performance.
|
·
|
A decrease of $1.1 million in our deferred tax benefit.
|
·
|
A $2.7 million decrease in cash resulted from an increase in accounts receivable. The increase in accounts receivables resulted from an $8.4 million increase in freight revenue. This increase was partially offset by a decline in Days Sales Outstanding. In addition, other receivables increased $1.1 million due to an expansion of our internal tractor lease-purchase program.
|
·
|
A $1.6 million decrease in cash used in our inventories, prepaid and other current assets primarily due to the timing of revenue equipment purchases.
|
·
|
A $5.1 million increase in cash used in trade accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily due to the timing of revenue equipment purchases.
|
25
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was $0.6 million, compared to $5.5 million of cash provided for the same period of 2012. The $6.1 million increase in cash used in investing activities primarily resulted from an increase in purchases of property and equipment. Cash used to purchase property and equipment increased $2.5 million during the first three months of 2013 as compared to the same period of 2012. This increase was primarily due to the number of tractors we purchased; through the first three months of 2013, we purchased 150 tractors and 125 trailers compared to 65 tractors and zero trailers for the comparable prior year period. In addition to the increase in purchases, we experienced a $3.7 million decline in the proceeds from the number of units sold.
Cash used in financing activities decreased $0.8 million during the first quarter of 2013 as compared to the same time period in 2012. The primary reason for the decrease in cash provided was due to cash used for the principal payment on capitalized lease obligations. The decrease in payments was due to the expiration of various leases for revenue equipment. During the first quarter of 2013, we paid $4.5 million in terminal rental adjustments, which allows us to buy the equipment associated with the lease as compared to $8.3 million during the first quarter of 2012. The reduction in payments related to capitalized lease obligations was partially offset by a decrease in net borrowing on our credit facility. We borrowed a net amount on our credit facility of $4.4 million in 2013 compared to $6.7 million in net borrowings in 2012.
Debt
On August 24, 2012, we entered into a $125.0 million Revolver with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC, as Administrative Agent, and PNC Bank, as Syndication Agent. The Revolver, which expires in 2017, is secured by substantially all of our assets, and includes letters of credit not to exceed $15.0 million. In addition, the $125.0 million Revolver has an accordion feature whereby we may elect to increase the size of the Revolver by up to $50.0 million, subject to customary conditions and lender participation. The Revolver is governed by a borrowing base with advances against eligible billed and unbilled accounts receivable and eligible revenue equipment, and has a first priority perfected security interest in all of the business assets (excluding tractors and trailers financed through capital leases and real estate) of the Company. Proceeds from the Revolver were used to pay off the outstanding balance of our credit agreement with a different lender. Proceeds were also used to fund certain fees and expenses associated with the Revolver and will be used to finance working capital, capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes.
The Revolver contains a minimum excess availability requirement equal to 15.0% of the maximum revolver amount (currently $18.75 million) and an annual capital expenditure limit ($71.0 million in 2013 and increases thereafter). If a collateral cushion, referred to as suppressed availability, of at least $30.0 million in excess of the maximum facility size is not maintained, the advance rate on eligible revenue equipment is reduced by 5.0%, and the value attributable to eligible revenue equipment starts to decline in monthly increments. The Revolver contains a total capital expenditure limitation. The Revolver does not contain any financial maintenance covenants.
The Revolver bears interest at rates typically based on the Wells Fargo prime rate or LIBOR, in each case plus an applicable margin. The Base Rate is equal to the greatest of (a) the prime lending rate as publicly announced from time to time by Wells Fargo Bank N.A., (b) the Federal Funds Rate plus 1.0%, and (c) the three month LIBOR Rate plus 1.0%. The Base Rate at December 31, 2012 was 1.5%. The LIBOR Rate is the rate at which dollar deposits are offered to major banks in the London interbank market two business days prior to the commencement of the requested interest period. Most borrowings are expected to be based on the LIBOR rate option. The applicable margin ranges from 2.25% to 2.75% based on average excess availability and at March 31, 2013 it was 2.5%.
The Revolver includes usual and customary events of default for a facility of this nature and provides that, upon the occurrence and continuation of an event of default, payment of all amounts payable under the Revolver may be accelerated, and the lenders’ commitments may be terminated. Although there are no negative covenants relating to financial ratios or minimum balance sheet requirements, the Revolver contains certain restrictions and covenants relating to, among other things, dividends, liens, acquisitions and dispositions outside of the ordinary course of business, affiliate transactions and share repurchases. At March 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of the Revolver.
Applicable Margin means, as of any date of determination, the following margin based upon the most recent average excess availability calculation; provided, however, that for the period from the closing date through the testing period ended March 31, 2013, the Applicable Margin was at Level II and at any time that an Event of Default exists, the Applicable Margin shall be at Level III.
26
Level
|
Average Excess Availability
|
Applicable Margin in respect of Base Rate Loans under the Revolver
|
Applicable Margin in respect of LIBOR Rate Loans under the Revolver
|
I
|
≥ $50,000,000
|
1.25%
|
2.25%
|
II
|
< $50,000,000 but ≥ $30,000,000
|
1.50%
|
2.50%
|
III
|
< $30,000,000
|
1.75%
|
2.75%
|
We paid a $1.5 million closing fee. In addition, we are required to pay a fee on the unused amount of the Revolver as set forth in the table below, which is due and payable monthly in arrears. For the period from the closing date through March 31, 2013, the unused fee was at Level II.
Level
|
Average Used Portion of the Revolver plus Outstanding Letters of Credit
|
Applicable Unused Revolver Fee Margin
|
I
|
> $60,000,000
|
0.375%
|
II
|
< $60,000,000
|
0.500%
|
The interest rate on our overnight borrowings under the Revolver at March 31, 2013 was 4.8%. The interest rate including all borrowings made under the Revolver at March 31, 2013 was 2.9%. The weighted average interest rate on our borrowings under the agreements for the year ended March 31, 2013 was 3.1%. A quarterly commitment fee is payable on the unused portion of the credit line and at March 31, 2013, the rate was 0.5% per annum. The Revolver is collateralized by all non-leased revenue equipment having a net book value of approximately $164.2 million at March 31, 2013, and all billed and unbilled accounts receivable. As we reprice our debt on a monthly basis, the borrowings under the Revolver approximate its fair value. At March 31, 2013, we had outstanding $3.0 million in letters of credit and had approximately $15.2 million available under the Revolver (net of the minimum availability we are required to maintain of approximately $18.75 million).
Equity
At March 31, 2013, we had stockholders’ equity of $106.9 million and total debt including current maturities of $145.3 million, resulting in a total debt, less cash, to total capitalization ratio of 57.5% compared to 55.1% at December 31, 2012.
Purchases and Commitments
We have updated our capital expenditures forecast and as of March 31, 2013, we anticipate purchases of property and equipment to exceed proceeds from the sale of property and equipment by approximately $36.3 million for the remainder of 2013. We may change the amount of the capital expenditures based on operating performance. Should we further decrease our capital expenditures for tractors and trailers, we would expect the age of our equipment to increase.
We routinely evaluate our equipment acquisition needs and adjust our purchase and disposition schedules from time to time based on our analysis of factors such as freight demand, driver availability and the condition of the used equipment market. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we incurred net capital expenditures of approximately $11.0 million, which included approximately $0.5 million for facility expansions and other expenditures.
27
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our assumptions, estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends and other factors that management believes to be relevant at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could be material.
The most significant accounting policies and estimates that affect our financial statements include the following:
·
|
Revenue recognition and related direct expenses based on relative transit time in each period. Revenue generated by our Trucking operating segment is recognized in full upon completion of delivery of freight to the receiver’s location. For freight in transit at the end of a reporting period, we recognize revenue pro rata based on relative transit time completed as a portion of the estimated total transit time. Expenses are recognized as incurred.
|
Revenue generated by our SCS and Intermodal operating segments is recognized upon completion of the services provided. Revenue is recorded on a gross basis, without deducting third party purchased transportation costs because we have responsibility for billing and collecting such revenue.
Management believes these policies most accurately reflect revenue as earned and direct expenses, including third party purchased transportation costs, as incurred.
·
|
Estimated useful lives and salvage values for purposes of depreciating tractors and trailers. We operate a significant number of tractors and trailers in connection with our business. We may purchase this equipment or acquire it under leases. We depreciate purchased equipment on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life down to an estimated salvage or trade-in value. We initially record equipment acquired under capital leases at the net present value of the minimum lease payments and amortize it on the straight-line method over the lease term. Depreciable lives of tractors and trailers range from three years to ten years. We estimate the salvage value at the expected date of trade-in or sale based on the expected market values of equipment at the time of disposal.
|
We make equipment purchasing and replacement decisions on the basis of various factors, including, but not limited to, new equipment prices, used equipment market conditions, demand for our freight services, prevailing interest rates, technological improvements, fuel efficiency, equipment durability, equipment specifications and driver availability. Therefore, depending on the circumstances, we may accelerate or delay the acquisition and disposition of our tractors and trailers from time to time, based on an operating principle whereby we pursue trade intervals that economically balance our maintenance costs and expected trade-in values in response to the circumstances existing at that time. Such adjustments in trade intervals may cause us to adjust the useful lives or salvage values of our tractors or trailers. By changing the relative amounts of older equipment and newer equipment in our fleet, adjustments in trade intervals also increase and decrease the average age of our tractors and trailers, whether or not we change the useful lives or salvage values of any tractors or trailers. We also adjust depreciable lives and salvage values based on factors such as changes in prevailing market prices for used equipment. We periodically monitor these factors in order to keep salvage values in line with expected market values at the time of disposal. Adjustments in useful lives and salvage values are made as conditions warrant and when we believe that the changes in conditions are other than temporary. These adjustments result in changes in the depreciation expense we record in the period in which the adjustments occur and in future periods. These adjustments also impact any resulting gain or loss on the ultimate disposition of the revenue equipment. Management believes our estimates of useful lives and salvage values have been materially accurate as demonstrated by the insignificant amounts of gains and losses on revenue equipment dispositions in recent periods. However, management will continually review salvage values to assure that book values do not exceed market values.
To the extent depreciable lives and salvage values are changed, such changes are recorded in accordance with the applicable generally accepted accounting principles existing at the time of change.
28
·
|
Estimates of accrued liabilities for claims involving bodily injury, physical damage losses, employee health benefits and workers’ compensation. We record both current and long-term claims accruals at the estimated ultimate payment amounts based on information such as individual case estimates, historical claims experience and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported. The current portion of the accrual reflects the amounts of claims expected to be paid in the next twelve months. In making the estimates, we rely on past experience with similar claims, negative or positive developments in the case and similar factors. We do not discount our claims liabilities. See our Claims Liabilities disclosure elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
|
·
|
Stock option valuation. The assumptions used to value stock options are dividend yield, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, expected life and anticipated forfeitures. As we have not paid any dividends on our Common Stock, the dividend yield is zero. Expected volatility represents the measure used to project the expected fluctuation in our share price. We use the historical method to calculate volatility with the historical period being equal to the expected life of each option. This calculation is then used to determine the potential for our share price to increase over the expected life of the option. The risk-free interest rate is based on an implied yield on United States zero-coupon treasury bonds with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the outstanding options. Expected life represents the length of time we anticipate the options to be outstanding before being exercised. Based on historical experience, that time period is best represented by the option’s contractual life. Anticipated forfeitures represent the number of shares under options we expect to be forfeited over the expected life of the options.
|
·
|
Accounting for income taxes. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities represent items that will result in taxable income or a tax deduction in future years for which we have already recorded the related tax expense or benefit in our consolidated statements of operations. Deferred tax accounts arise as a result of timing differences between when items are recognized in our consolidated financial statements compared to when they are recognized in our tax returns, and from net operating loss carry forwards. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes and in determining whether deferred tax assets will be realized in full or in part. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We periodically assess the likelihood that all or some portion of deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent we believe recovery is not probable, a valuation allowance is established for the amount determined not to be realizable. We have not recorded a valuation allowance at March 31, 2013, as all deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized.
|
We believe that we have adequately provided for our future tax consequences based upon current facts and circumstances and current tax law. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we made no material changes in our assumptions regarding the determination of income tax liabilities. However, should our tax positions be challenged, different outcomes could result and have a significant impact on the amounts reported through our consolidated statements of operations.
·
|
Prepaid tires. Commencing when replacement tires, including recaps, are placed into service, we account for them as prepaid expenses and amortize their cost over varying time periods, ranging from 18 to 30 months depending on the type of tire.
|
·
|
Impairment of long-lived assets. We review our long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with Topic ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. This authoritative guidance provides that whenever there are certain significant events or changes in circumstances, the value of long-lived assets or groups of assets must be tested to determine if their value can be recovered from their future cash flows. In the event that undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are less than the carrying amount, the asset or group of assets must be evaluated to determine if an impairment of value exists. Impairment exists if the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.
|
In light of the sustained general economic downturn in the United States and world economies, the decline in our market capitalization and our net operating losses in recent years, triggering events and changes in circumstances have occurred, which required us to test our long-lived assets for recoverability at March 31, 2013.
We test for the recoverability of all of our long-lived assets as a single group at the entity level and examine the forecasted future cash flows generated by our revenue equipment, including its eventual disposition, to determine if those cash flows exceed the carrying value of our long-lived assets. At March 31, 2013, we determined that no impairment of value existed.
We periodically reevaluate these policies as circumstances dictate. Together these factors may significantly impact our consolidated results of operations, financial position and cash flow from period to period.
29
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not required.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
We have confidence in our internal controls and procedures. Nevertheless, our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure procedures and controls or our internal controls will prevent all errors or intentional fraud. An internal control system, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of such internal controls are met. Further, the design of an internal control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all internal control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all our control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are party to routine litigation incidental to our business, primarily involving claims for personal injury and property damage incurred in the transportation of freight. We maintain insurance to cover liabilities in excess of certain self-insured retention levels. Though management believes these claims to be routine and immaterial to our long-term financial position, adverse results of one or more of these claims could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations in any given reporting period.
30
On July 28, 2008, a former commission sales agent, Mr. William Blankenship (“Blankenship”), filed an action in the United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas entitled William Blankenship, Jr. v. USA Truck, Inc., asking the court to set aside a previously consummated settlement agreement between the parties. The matter was dismissed by the District Court based upon our Motion to Dismiss, but was later reinstated by the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals and set for trial in the United States District Court in Fort Smith, Arkansas. In October 2011, the trial was held in the United States District Court and the jury returned a favorable verdict for the Company on all counts and determined that the Company had no additional liability in this matter. On December 13, 2011, the Court entered an order awarding the Company its costs and attorney’s fees incurred in defending the case totaling approximately $0.2 million. Blankenship has now appealed the jury verdict and Court order, and the matter is once again pending before the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
While we attempt to identify, manage, and mitigate risks and uncertainties associated with our business, some level of risk and uncertainty will always be present. Our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, in the section entitled Item 1A. Risk Factors, describes some of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, projected results, and future prospects. We do not believe there have been any material changes in these risks during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(a) Recent unregistered sales of securities.
None.
(b) Use of proceeds from registered sales of securities.
None.
(c) Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers.
On October 21, 2009, our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock which expired on October 21, 2012. Subject to applicable timing and other legal requirements, repurchases could have been made on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions on terms approved by our Chairman of the Board or President. Repurchased shares may be retired or held in treasury for future use for appropriate corporate purposes including issuance in connection with awards under our employee benefit plans. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, we did not repurchase any shares of our Common Stock. Currently, we do not have an approved repurchase authorization. We are currently restricted from purchasing shares without the consent of lenders under our Revolver.
We may reissue repurchased shares under our equity compensation plans or as otherwise directed by the Board of Directors.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
31
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a)
3.1
|
#
|
Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as currently in effect.
|
3.2
|
Amended Bylaws of the Company as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
|
|
3.3
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed March 17, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 1992).
|
|
3.4
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed April 29, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 2, 1997 [the “Form 8-A/A”]).
|
|
3.5
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed May 13, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6 to the Form 8-A/A).
|
|
3.6
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 3, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).
|
|
3.7
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2012).
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen certificate evidencing shares of the Common Stock, $.01 par value, of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-1).
|
|
4.2
|
#
|
Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as currently in effect.
|
4.3
|
Amended Bylaws of the Company as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
|
|
4.4
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed March 17, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 1992).
|
|
4.5
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed April 29, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to the Form 8-A/A).
|
|
4.6
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed May 13, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6 to the Form 8-A/A).
|
|
4.7
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed May 3, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).
|
|
4.8
|
Instruments with respect to long-term debt not exceeding 10.0% of the total assets of the Company have not been filed. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
|
|
4.9
|
Rights Agreement, dated November 12, 2012, by and between the Company and Registrar and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2012).
|
|
10.1
|
#
|
Employment Agreement dated February 11, 2013, by and between the Company and John M. Simone.
|
10.2
|
#
|
Management Bonus Plan.
|
10.3
|
#
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
|
31.1
|
#
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
#
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
#
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
#
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
101.INS
|
*
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
101.SCH
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
101.CAL
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
101.DEF
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
101.LAB
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
101.PRE
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
References:
|
||
*
|
In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed to be “furnished” and not “filed.”
|
|
#
|
Filed herewith.
|
32
SIGNATURES
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
USA Truck, Inc.
|
||||
(Registrant)
|
||||
Date:
|
May 8, 2013
|
By:
|
/s/ John M. Simone
|
|
John M. Simone
|
||||
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||||
33
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
USA TRUCK, INC.
Exhibit Number
|
Exhibit
|
|
3.1
|
#
|
Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as currently in effect.
|
3.2
|
Amended Bylaws of the Company as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
|
|
3.3
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed March 17, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 1992).
|
|
3.4
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed April 29, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 2, 1997 [the “Form 8-A/A”]).
|
|
3.5
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed May 13, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6 to the Form 8-A/A).
|
|
3.6
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company dated May 3, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).
|
|
3.7
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2012).
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen certificate evidencing shares of the Common Stock, $.01 par value, of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-1).
|
|
4.2
|
#
|
Restated and Amended Certificate of Incorporation of the Company as currently in effect.
|
4.3
|
Amended Bylaws of the Company as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).
|
|
4.4
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed March 17, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Amendment No. 1 to the Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 1992).
|
|
4.5
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed April 29, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 5 to the Form 8-A/A).
|
|
4.6
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed May 13, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 6 to the Form 8-A/A).
|
|
4.7
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of the Company filed May 3, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).
|
|
4.8
|
Instruments with respect to long-term debt not exceeding 10.0% of the total assets of the Company have not been filed. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
|
|
4.9
|
Rights Agreement, dated November 12, 2012, by and between the Company and Registrar and Transfer Company, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2012).
|
|
10.1
|
#
|
Employment Agreement dated February 11, 2013, by and between the Company and John M. Simone.
|
10.2
|
#
|
Management Bonus Plan.
|
10.3
|
#
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement.
|
31.1
|
#
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
#
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
#
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
#
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
101.INS
|
*
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
101.SCH
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
101.CAL
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
101.DEF
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
101.LAB
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
101.PRE
|
*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
References:
|
||
*
|
In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed to be “furnished” and not “filed.”
|
|
#
|
Filed herewith.
|