UTG INC - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
[X]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 AND 15(d)
|
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31,
2009
OR
[
]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
|
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
transition period from _____________ to ____________
Commission
File No. 0-16867
UTG,
INC.
|
||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
||
Delaware
|
20-2907892
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
5250
SOUTH SIXTH STREET
|
||
P.O.
BOX 5147
|
||
SPRINGFIELD,
IL 62705
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
|
||
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code: (217) 241-6300
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a small reporting
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Non-accelerated
filer [ ]
|
Smaller
reporting company [X]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company.
|
Yes
[ ]
|
No
[X]
|
The
number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of April 30,
2009, was 3,837,830.
UTG,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(The
“Company”)
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
…………………………………………………………………………..…...
|
3
|
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS..……………………………………………………………………………..…
|
3
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets of
March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008………….……………………..….
|
3
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations for three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008……………..….
|
4
|
Consolidated Statement of
Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive
Income
|
|
For
the three months ended March 31,
2009…..………..………………………………………………………..
|
5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008.........……
|
6
|
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements …………………………………………………………………….….
|
7
|
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND
|
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS…………………………………..………………………………………………….……
|
15
|
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK.…………………..….
|
20
|
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES..…………………………………………………………….…………..
|
21
|
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION…..……………………….………………………………………………………….
|
22
|
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
…………………………………………………………….……………………….
|
22
|
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS………………………………………………………………………………………………
|
22
|
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS………………...…
|
22
|
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR
SECURITIES…………………………………………………………………
|
22
|
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
.……………………………….
|
22
|
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION..……………………………………………………………………………………..
|
22
|
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM
8-K..………………………………………………………………..
|
23
|
SIGNATURES..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
|
24
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
|
25
|
PART
1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
||||||||
UTG,
Inc.
|
||||||||
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
2009
|
2008*
|
||||||
Investments:
|
||||||||
Investments held for sale:
|
||||||||
Fixed maturities, at market (cost $180,990,874 and
$175,053,102)
|
$
|
186,049,899
|
$
|
178,689,861
|
||||
Equity securities, at market (cost $29,987,189 and
$32,171,722)
|
30,059,710
|
30,636,500
|
||||||
Mortgage loans on real estate at amortized cost
|
40,892,053
|
42,472,916
|
||||||
Investment real estate, at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation
|
41,812,551
|
41,780,466
|
||||||
Policy loans
|
14,574,045
|
14,632,855
|
||||||
313,388,258
|
308,212,598
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
29,553,567
|
39,995,875
|
||||||
Securities
of affiliate
|
5,000,000
|
4,000,000
|
||||||
Accrued
investment income
|
2,423,763
|
2,049,173
|
||||||
Reinsurance
receivables:
|
||||||||
Future policy benefits
|
69,723,936
|
70,610,348
|
||||||
Policy
claims and other benefits
|
5,266,775
|
5,262,560
|
||||||
Cost
of insurance acquired
|
23,191,883
|
24,293,914
|
||||||
Deferred
policy acquisition costs
|
771,984
|
813,470
|
||||||
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
|
1,647,437
|
1,672,968
|
||||||
Income
taxes receivable, current
|
33,607
|
422,915
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
4,904,794
|
445,483
|
||||||
$
|
455,906,004
|
$
|
457,779,304
|
|||||
Total assets
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Policy
liabilities and accruals:
|
||||||||
Future policy benefits
|
$
|
339,839,045
|
$
|
340,883,754
|
||||
Policy claims and benefits payable
|
4,002,826
|
3,885,282
|
||||||
Other
policyholder funds
|
1,299,768
|
1,187,870
|
||||||
Dividend and endowment accumulations
|
14,146,802
|
14,129,025
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
14,767,353
|
14,693,795
|
||||||
Notes
payable
|
14,428,282
|
15,616,766
|
||||||
Other
liabilities
|
7,872,625
|
8,087,571
|
||||||
Total liabilities
|
396,356,701
|
398,484,063
|
||||||
Minority
interests in consolidated subsidiaries
|
12,833,377
|
13,050,030
|
||||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock - no par value, stated value $.001 per share
|
||||||||
Authorized 7,000,000 shares - 3,838,409 and 3,834,031 shares
issued
|
||||||||
after deducting treasury shares of 400,315 and 400,315
|
3,829
|
3,834
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
41,869,858
|
41,943,229
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
1,759,235
|
3,028,744
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
3,083,004
|
1,269,404
|
||||||
Total shareholders' equity
|
46,715,926
|
46,245,211
|
||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
455,906,004
|
$
|
457,779,304
|
||||
*
Balance sheet audited at December 31, 2008.
|
See accompanying notes
UTG,
Inc.
|
||||
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
||||
Three
Months Ended
|
||||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||
2009
|
2008
|
|||
Revenues:
|
||||
Premiums and policy fees
|
$
|
5,162,397
|
$
|
5,395,495
|
Reinsurance premiums and policy fees
|
(963,826)
|
(1,468,316)
|
||
Net
investment income
|
3,443,283
|
4,605,634
|
||
Realized investment gains (losses), net
|
(126,868)
|
20,183
|
||
Other income
|
517,880
|
504,399
|
||
8,032,866
|
9,057,395
|
|||
Benefits
and other expenses:
|
||||
Benefits, claims and settlement expenses:
|
||||
Life
|
7,261,725
|
6,596,187
|
||
Reinsurance benefits and claims
|
(941,876)
|
(729,963)
|
||
Annuity
|
305,188
|
84,194
|
||
Dividends to policyholders
|
263,487
|
300,229
|
||
Commissions and amortization of deferred
|
||||
policy acquisition costs
|
127,078
|
(459,371)
|
||
Amortization of cost of insurance acquired
|
1,102,031
|
1,003,919
|
||
Operating expenses
|
1,809,819
|
2,034,227
|
||
Interest expense
|
138,836
|
288,553
|
||
10,066,288
|
9,117,975
|
|||
Loss
before income taxes, minority interest
|
||||
and equity in earnings of investees
|
(2,033,422)
|
(60,580)
|
||
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
483,987
|
(65,552)
|
||
Minority
interest in gain (loss) of
|
||||
consolidated subsidiaries
|
279,926
|
(14,420)
|
||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
(1,269,509)
|
$
|
(140,552)
|
Basic
(loss) per share from continuing
|
||||
operations
and net (loss)
|
$
|
(0.33)
|
$
|
(0.04)
|
Diluted(loss)
per share from continuing
|
||||
operations and net (loss)
|
$
|
(0.33)
|
$
|
(0.04)
|
Basic
weighted average shares outstanding
|
3,838,409
|
3,847,839
|
||
Diluted
weighted average shares outstanding
|
3,838,409
|
3,847,839
|
See
accompanying notes
UTG,
Inc.
|
|||||||
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive
Income
|
|||||||
March
31, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
Common
stock
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|||||
Balance,
beginning of year
|
$
|
3,834
|
|||||
Issued
during year
|
(5)
|
||||||
Purchase
treasury shares
|
0
|
||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
3,829
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|||||||
Balance,
beginning of year
|
41,943,229
|
||||||
Issued
during year
|
(73,371)
|
||||||
Purchase
treasury shares
|
0
|
||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
41,869,858
|
||||||
Retained
Earnings
|
|||||||
Balance,
beginning of year
|
3,028,744
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
(1,269,509)
|
||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
1,759,235
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|||||||
Balance,
beginning of year
|
1,269,404
|
||||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
|||||||
Unrealized
holding gains on securities
|
|||||||
net
of minority interest,
|
|||||||
reclassification
adjustment and taxes
|
1,813,600
|
||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
3,083,004
|
||||||
Total
shareholders' equity, end of period
|
$
|
46,715,926
|
|||||
Comprehensive
income
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(1,269,509)
|
|||||
Unrealized
holding gains on securities
|
|||||||
net
of minority interest,
|
|||||||
reclassification
adjustment and taxes
|
1,813,600
|
||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
544,091
|
|||||
See
accompanying notes
UTG,
Inc.
|
|||||||
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
||||||
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net (loss)
|
$ (1,269,509)
|
$ (140,552)
|
|||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
|
|||||||
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|||||||
Amortization/accretion of fixed maturities
|
11,456
|
56,326
|
|||||
Realized investment gains
|
126,868
|
(20,183)
|
|||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
|
41,486
|
46,237
|
|||||
Amortization
of cost of insurance acquired
|
1,102,031
|
1,003,919
|
|||||
Depreciation
|
698,069
|
295,903
|
|||||
Minority interest
|
(279,926)
|
14,420
|
|||||
Change in accrued investment income
|
(374,590)
|
58,001
|
|||||
Change in reinsurance receivables
|
882,197
|
747,671
|
|||||
Change in policy liabilities and accruals
|
(508,213)
|
(833,743)
|
|||||
Charges for mortality and administration of
|
|||||||
universal life and annuity products
|
(2,043,696)
|
(2,121,354)
|
|||||
Interest credited to account balances
|
1,546,884
|
1,413,611
|
|||||
Change in income taxes receivable/payable
|
(475,046)
|
(393,953)
|
|||||
Change in other assets and liabilities, net
|
(4,882,371)
|
(115,427)
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(5,424,360)
|
10,876
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds from investments sold and matured:
|
|||||||
Fixed
maturities held for sale
|
18,027,892
|
3,972,415
|
|||||
Equity securities
|
25,128,906
|
165,585
|
|||||
Mortgage loans
|
1,580,863
|
1,873,483
|
|||||
Real estate
|
27,850
|
406,987
|
|||||
Policy loans
|
1,005,165
|
1,140,656
|
|||||
Total
proceeds from investments sold and matured
|
45,770,676
|
7,559,126
|
|||||
Cost
of investments acquired:
|
|||||||
Fixed maturities held for sale
|
(28,228,243)
|
0
|
|||||
Equity securities
|
(18,826,433)
|
(708,281)
|
|||||
Mortgage loans
|
0
|
(2,410,123)
|
|||||
Real estate
|
(715,865)
|
(1,491,592)
|
|||||
Policy loans
|
(946,355)
|
(1,116,034)
|
|||||
Total cost of investments acquired
|
(48,716,896)
|
(5,726,030)
|
|||||
Purchase of securities of affiliate
|
(1,000,000)
|
0
|
|||||
Purchase of property and equipment
|
(17,403)
|
(93,695)
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(3,963,623)
|
1,739,401
|
|||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Policyholder
contract deposits
|
1,964,487
|
2,067,942
|
|||||
Policyholder contract withdrawals
|
(1,756,952)
|
(1,361,520)
|
|||||
Payments on notes payable
|
(1,188,484)
|
(1,211,625)
|
|||||
Purchase
of minority interest in consolidated subsidiary
|
0
|
(1,487,170)
|
|||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(73,376)
|
(26,560)
|
|||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(1,054,325)
|
(2,018,933)
|
|||||
Net
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(10,442,308)
|
(268,656)
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
39,995,875
|
17,746,468
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ 29,553,567
|
$ 17,477,812
|
See accompanying notes
UTG,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
|
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared by UTG, Inc.
(“UTG”) and its consolidated subsidiaries (“Company”) pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although the
Company believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented
not be misleading, it is suggested that these consolidated financial statements
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31,
2008.
The
information furnished reflects, in the opinion of the Company, all adjustments
(which include only normal and recurring accruals) necessary for a fair
presentation of the results of operations for the periods
presented. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of operating results to be expected for the year or of the Company’s
future financial condition.
This
document at times will refer to the Registrant’s largest shareholder, Mr. Jesse
T. Correll and certain companies controlled by Mr. Correll. Mr.
Correll holds a majority ownership of First Southern Funding LLC (“FSF”), a
Kentucky corporation, and First Southern Bancorp, Inc. (“FSBI”), a financial
services holding company that owns 100% of First Southern National Bank
(“FSNB”), which operates in the State of Kentucky. Mr. Correll is
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of UTG and is
currently UTG’s largest shareholder through his ownership control of FSF,
FSBI and affiliates. At March 31, 2009 Mr. Correll owns or controls
directly and indirectly approximately 63% of UTG’s outstanding
stock.
UTG,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements - Continued
At March
31, 2009 consolidated subsidiaries of UTG, Inc. were as depicted on the
following organizational chart.
2.
|
INVESTMENTS
|
As of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, fixed maturities and fixed maturities
held for sale represented 59% and 58%, respectively, of total invested
assets. As prescribed by the various state insurance department statutes
and regulations, the insurance companies’ investment portfolio is required to be
invested in investment grade securities to provide ample protection for
policyholders. In light of these statutes and regulations, and the Company’s
business and investment strategy, the Company generally seeks to invest in
United States government and government agency securities and other high quality
low risk investments. As of March 31, 2009, the carrying value of
fixed maturity securities in default as to principal or interest was immaterial
in the context of consolidated assets, shareholders’ equity or results from
operations. The investments held for sale are carried at market, with
changes in market value directly charged to shareholders’
equity. During the first quarter of 2008, management decided that the
remaining fixed maturity investments categorized as held to maturity should be
classified as available for sale to provide additional flexibility and
liquidity. As such, all fixed maturity investments are available for
sale. The remaining fixed maturities in the held to maturity category
had become relatively small over recent years. Management determined
it would be in the Company’s best interest to be in a position to sell any fixed
maturity holding should a need arise rather than having to chose only from a
portion of the portfolio.
3.
|
NOTES
PAYABLE
|
At March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $14,428,282 and
$15,616,766, respectively of long-term debt outstanding.
On
December 8, 2006, UTG borrowed funds from First Tennessee Bank National
Association through execution of an $18,000,000 promissory note. The
note is secured by the pledge of 100% of the common stock of UG. The
promissory note carries a variable rate of interest based on the 3 month LIBOR
rate plus 180 basis points. The initial rate was
7.15%. Interest is payable quarterly. Principal is payable
annually beginning at the end of the second year in five installments of
$3,600,000. The loan matures on December 7, 2012. The Company
borrowed $0 and has made $0 in principal payments in 2009. At March 31, 2009 the
outstanding principal balance on this debt was $10,494,454. The next required
principal payment on this debt is due in December of 2010.
In
addition to the above promissory note, First Tennessee Bank National Association
also provided UTG, Inc. with a $5,000,000 revolving credit note. This
note is for a one-year term and may be renewed by consent of both
parties. The credit note is to provide operating liquidity for UTG,
Inc. and replaces a previous line of credit provided by Southwest
Bank. Interest bears the same terms as the above promissory
note. The collateral held on the above note also secures this credit
note. During 2009, UTG, Inc had no borrowings from the note and the
Company had no outstanding balance attributable to this note.
On
June 1, 2005, UG was extended a $3,300,000 line of credit from the First
National Bank of Tennessee. The LOC is for a one-year term from the
date of issue. The interest rate on the LOC is variable and indexed
to be the lowest of the U.S. prime rates as published in the Wall Street
Journal, with any interest rate adjustments to be made
monthly. During 2009, UG had no borrowings from the LOC and the
Company had no outstanding balance attributable to this LOC.
In
November 2007, UG became a member of the FHLB. This membership allows
UG access to additional credit up to a maximum of 50% of the total assets of
UG. To be a member of the FHLB, UG was required to purchase shares of
common stock of FHLB. Borrowing capacity is based on 50 times each
dollar of stock acquired in FHLB above the “base membership”
amount. UG’s current LOC with the FHLB is
$15,000,000. During 2009, UG had no borrowings on the LOC. At March
31, 2009 UG has no outstanding balance attributable to this LOC.
In
January 2007, UG became a 51% owner of the newly formed RLF Lexington Properties
LLC (“Lexington”). The entity was formed to hold, for investment purposes,
certain investment real estate acquired. As part of the purchase price of the
real estate owned by Lexington, the seller provided financing through the
issuance of five promissory notes of $1,200,000 each totaling $6,000,000. The
notes bear interest at the fixed rate of 5%. The notes came due beginning on
January 5, 2008, and each January 5 thereafter until 2012 when the final note is
repaid. As of March 31, 2009 the outstanding balance was
$3,600,000.
On
February 7, 2007, HPG Acquisitions (“HPG”), a 74% owned affiliate of the
Company, borrowed funds from First National Bank of Midland, through execution
of a $373,862 promissory note. The note is secured by real estate owned by HPG.
The note bears interest at a fixed rate of 5%. The first payment was due January
15, 2008. There will be 119 regular payments of $3,965 followed by one irregular
last payment estimated at $32,424. At March 31, 2009, the outstanding balance on
this debt was $333,828.
The
consolidated scheduled principal reductions on the notes payable for the next
five years are as follows:
Year
|
Amount
|
|
2009
|
$
|
23,099
|
2010
|
$
|
4,824,978
|
2011
|
$
|
4,827,008
|
2012
|
$
|
4,523,661
|
2013
|
$
|
31,586
|
2014
|
$
|
34,154
|
4.
|
CAPITAL
STOCK TRANSACTIONS
|
A.
|
Employee
and Director Stock Purchase Program
|
On March
26, 2002, the Board of Directors of UTG adopted, and on June 11, 2002, the
shareholders of UTG approved, the UTG, Inc. Employee and Director Stock Purchase
Plan. The plan’s purpose is to encourage ownership of UTG stock by
eligible directors and employees of UTG and its subsidiaries by providing them
with an opportunity to invest in shares of UTG common stock. The plan
is administered by the Board of Directors of UTG. A total of 400,000
shares of common stock may be purchased under the plan, subject to appropriate
adjustment for stock dividends, stock splits or similar recapitalizations
resulting in a change in shares of UTG. The plan is not intended to
qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Internal
Revenue Code.
The
purchase price of shares repurchased under the stock restriction and buy-sell
agreement shall be computed, on a per share basis, equal to the sum of (i) the
original purchase price(s) paid to acquire such shares from the Holding Company
at the time they were sold pursuant to the Plan and (ii) the consolidated
statutory net earnings (loss) per share of such shares during the period from
the end of the month next preceding the month in which such shares were acquired
pursuant to the plan, to the end of the month next preceding the month in which
the closing sale of such shares to UTG occurs. The consolidated
statutory net earnings per Share shall be computed as the net income of the
Holding Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis in accordance with
statutory accounting principles applicable to insurance companies, as computed
by the Holding Company, except that earnings of insurance companies or block of
business acquired after the original plan date, November 1, 2002, shall be
adjusted to reflect the amortization of intangibles established at the time of
acquisition in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP),
less any dividends paid to shareholders. The calculation of net earnings per
Share shall be performed on a monthly basis using the number of common shares of
the Holding Company outstanding as of the end of the reporting period. The
purchase price for any Shares purchased hereunder shall be paid in cash within
60 days from the date of purchase subject to the receipt of any required
regulatory approvals as provided in the Agreement.
The
original issue price of shares at the time this program began was established at
$12.00 per share. At March 31, 2009, UTG had 104,941 shares
outstanding that were issued under this program with a value of $17.01 per
share pursuant to the above formula.
B.
|
Stock
Repurchase Program
|
On
June 5, 2001, the Board of Directors of UTG authorized the repurchase in
the open market or in privately negotiated transactions of up to $1 million of
UTG's common stock. On June 16, 2004, an additional $1 million
was authorized for repurchasing shares. On April 18, 2006, an
additional $1 million was authorized for repurchasing
shares. Repurchased shares are available for future issuance for
general corporate purposes. This program can be terminated at any
time. Open market purchases are generally limited to a maximum per
share price of $8.00. Through May 4, 2009, UTG has spent $2,782,795
in the acquisition of 401,116 shares under this program.
C.
|
Earnings
Per Share Calculations
|
Earnings
per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during each period, retroactively adjusted to give effect to all stock splits,
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
128. At March 31, 2009, diluted earnings per share were the same as
basic earnings per share since the Company had no dilutive instruments
outstanding.
5.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
The
insurance industry has experienced a number of civil jury verdicts which have
been returned against life and health insurers in the jurisdictions in which the
Company does business involving the insurers' sales practices, alleged agent
misconduct, failure to properly supervise agents, and other
matters. Some of the lawsuits have resulted in the award of
substantial judgments against the insurer, including material amounts of
punitive damages. In some states, juries have substantial discretion
in awarding punitive damages in these circumstances.
Under the
insurance guaranty fund laws in most states, insurance companies doing business
in a participating state can be assessed up to prescribed limits for
policyholder losses incurred by insolvent or failed insurance
companies. Although the Company cannot predict the amount of any
future assessments, most insurance guaranty fund laws currently provide that an
assessment may be excused or deferred if it would threaten an insurer's
financial strength. Mandatory assessments may be partially recovered
through a reduction in future premium tax in some states. The Company does not
believe such assessments will be materially different from amounts already
provided for in the financial statements, though the Company has no control over
such assessments.
On
June 10, 2002, UTG and Stone River formed an alliance between their
respective organizations to provide third party administration (TPA) services to
insurance companies seeking business process outsourcing
solutions. Stone River is responsible for the marketing and sales
function for the alliance, as well as providing the operations processing
service for the Company. The Company will staff the administration
effort. Stone River is an independent, full-service provider of
integrated data processing and information management systems to the financial
industry, headquartered in Brookfield, Wisconsin.
In June
2002, the Company entered into a five-year contract with Stone River for
services related to its purchase of the “ID3” software system. The
contract was amended during 2006 for a five year period ended
2011. Under the contract, the Company is required to pay $8,333 per
month in software maintenance costs and a minimum charge of $14,000 per month in
offsite data center costs, for a five-year period ending in 2011.
UTG and
its subsidiaries are named as defendants in a number of legal actions arising as
a part of the ordinary course of business relating primarily to claims made
under insurance policies. Those actions have been considered in
establishing the Company’s liabilities. Management is of the opinion
that the settlement of those actions will not have a material adverse effect on
the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
UG
currently has an unresolved dispute with one of its outside
reinsurers. The issue relates to reinsurance premiums. The reinsurer
claims UG owes for years 2005 through 2007 in the amount of
$987,000. In early 2008, the reinsurer billed UG for these amounts,
providing no information or explanation. The related treaty was
originally with another outside reinsurer and was acquired by the current
reinsurer in a reinsurance block acquisition. The treaty is a yearly
renewable term (“YRT”) cession based treaty. UG maintains it has no
liability relating to the back billed premium. UG has initiated
arbitration according to the treaty to bring resolution to this
matter. Final resolution is not anticipated until sometime mid
2009. UG has established a contingent liability of $500,000 relating
to this matter to cover costs including legal and arbitration
costs.
6.
|
OTHER
CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE
|
On a cash
basis, the Company paid $161,537 and $531,677 in interest expense during the
first three months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company paid
$0 and $446,715 in federal income tax during the first three months of 2009 and
2008, respectively.
7.
|
CONCENTRATION
OF CREDIT RISK
|
The
Company maintains cash balances in financial institutions that at times may
exceed federally insured limits. The Company maintains its primary
operating cash accounts with First Southern National Bank, an affiliate of UTG,
and its largest shareholder, Chairman and CEO, Jesse Correll. The
Company’s cash and cash equivalents are on deposit with various domestic
financial institutions. At times, bank deposits may be in excess of federally
insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such
accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash
and cash equivalents.
8.
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
Tax
|
|||||||
Before-Tax
|
(Expense)
|
Net
of Tax
|
|||||
March 31,
2009
|
Amount
|
or
Benefit
|
Amount
|
||||
Unrealized
holding losses during
|
|||||||
Period
|
$
|
641,882
|
$
|
(224,659)
|
$
|
417,223
|
|
Less:
reclassification adjustment
|
|||||||
for
losses realized in net income
|
195,182
|
(68,314)
|
126,868
|
||||
Net
unrealized gain
|
837,064
|
(292,973)
|
544,091
|
||||
Change
in other comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
837,064
|
$
|
(292,973)
|
$
|
544,091
|
|
9.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157 which requires enhanced
disclosures of assets and liabilities carried at fair value. SFAS 157
established a hierarchical disclosure framework based on the priority of the
inputs to the respective valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the
highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs
(Level 3). An asset or liability’s classification within the fair value
hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its
valuation. SFAS 157 defines the input levels as
follows:
Level 1 –
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. U.S. treasuries are in Level 1 and valuation is based on
unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in active markets that the Company
can access. Equity securities that are actively traded and exchange
listed in the U.S. are also included in Level 1. Equity security
valuation is based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in active
markets that the Company can access.
Level 2 -
Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable
either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities other than quoted prices in Level 1; quoted
prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or
can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2
assets consist of fixed income investments valued based on quoted prices for
identical or similar assets in markets that are not active and investments
carried as equity securities that do not have an actively traded market that are
valued based on their audited GAAP book value.
Level 3 -
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs
reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Level 3 assets
and liabilities include financial instruments whose values are determined using
pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as
well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires
significant management judgment or estimation. The Company does not
have any Level 3 financial assets or liabilities.
The
following table presents the level within the hierarchy at which the Company’s
financial assets and financial liabilities are measured on a recurring basis as
of March 31, 2009.
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
||||
Fixed
Maturities, available for sale
|
$7,872,233
|
$178,177,666
|
$-
|
$186,049,899
|
Equity
Securities, available for sale
|
32,409,626
|
2,650,084
|
-
|
35,059,710
|
Total
Financial Assets
Carried
at Fair Value
|
$40,281,859
|
$180,827,750
|
$-
|
$221,109,609
|
10.
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
|
The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 163,
Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts — an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 60 Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial
guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No.
60, Accounting and
Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. That diversity results in
inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities because
of differing views about when a loss has been incurred under FASB Statement No.
5, Accounting for Contingencies. This
Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability
prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit
deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement
also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for
premium revenue and claim liabilities. Those clarifications will increase
comparability in financial reporting of financial guarantee insurance contracts
by insurance enterprises. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about
financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure
requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided
to users of financial statements. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all
interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not
believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
The FASB
also issued Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. This Statement identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used
in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in
the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement is effective 60 days
after the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to the auditing literature. The Company does not believe
the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial condition
or results of operations.
The FASB
also issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 this Statement requires enhanced disclosures
about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the
transparency of financial reporting. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company does not
believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
The FASB
also issued Statement No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement applies to all
entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding
non-controlling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a
subsidiary. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The Company does not believe the adoption will have a material
impact on its consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
The FASB
issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS
No. 159”). The Statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The
objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. The Statement was effective as of the
beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15,
2007. The Company chose not to elect the fair value option –
therefore, SFAS No. 159 did not impact its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
The FASB
issued Statement No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. The Statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February of 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff position 157-2 which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for
non-financial assets and liabilities which are not measured at fair value on a
recurring basis (at least annually) until fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008. Adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on its
consolidated financial position, results from operation, or cash
flow.
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
purpose of this section is to discuss and analyze the Company's consolidated
results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and capital
resources. This analysis should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes that appear elsewhere in
this report. The Company reports financial results on a consolidated
basis. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
UTG and its subsidiaries at March 31, 2009.
Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Any
forward-looking statement contained herein or in any other oral or written
statement by the Company or any of its officers, directors or employees is
qualified by the fact that actual results of the Company may differ materially
from any such statement due to the following important factors, among other
risks and uncertainties inherent in the Company's business:
1.
|
Prevailing
interest rate levels, which may affect the ability of the Company to sell
its products, the market value of the Company's investments and the lapse
ratio of the Company's policies, notwithstanding product design features
intended to enhance persistency of the Company's
products.
|
|
2.
|
Changes
in the federal income tax laws and regulations which may affect the
relative tax advantages of the Company's products.
|
|
3.
|
Changes
in the regulation of financial services, including bank sales and
underwriting of insurance products, which may affect the competitive
environment for the Company's products.
|
|
4.
|
Other
factors affecting the performance of the Company, including, but not
limited to, market conduct claims, insurance industry insolvencies,
insurance regulatory initiatives and developments, stock market
performance, an unfavorable outcome in pending litigation, and investment
performance.
|
Update on Critical
Accounting Policies
In our
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, we identified the
accounting policies that are critical to the understanding of our results of
operations and our financial position. They relate to deferred
acquisition costs (DAC), cost of insurance acquired, assumptions and judgments
utilized in determining if declines in fair values of investments are
other-than-temporary, and valuation methods for investments that are not
actively traded.
We
believe that these policies were applied in a consistent manner during the first
three months of 2009.
Results of
Operations
(a)
|
Revenues
|
The
Company experienced an increase of approximately $271,000 in premiums and policy
fee revenues, net of reinsurance premiums and policy fees, when comparing the
first three months of 2009 to the same period in 2008. The increase
primarily relates to the termination of TI’s reinsurance agreement in April of
2008. The Company currently writes little new
business. Unless the Company acquires a block of in-force business
management expects premium revenue to continue to decline on the existing block
of business at a rate consistent with prior experience.
The
Company’s primary source of new business production comes from internal
conservation efforts. Several of the customer service representatives
of the Company are also licensed insurance agents, allowing them to offer other
products within the Company’s portfolio to existing
customers. Additionally, efforts continue to be made in policy
retention through more personal contact with the customer including telephone
calls to discuss alternatives and reasons for a customer’s request to surrender
their policy.
Net
investment income decreased approximately 25% when comparing the first three
months of 2009 to the same period in 2008. This decrease is primarily
related to the Company holding fewer fixed maturity investments and carrying
cash balances earning lower rates of interest compared to a year
ago. As the bursting of the housing bubble ripples through the global
economy, Management has taken steps to avoid catastrophic future
losses. As part of this portfolio evaluation process, certain
investments were subsequently sold, particularly during the third and fourth
quarters of 2008. This has resulted in a higher cash balance earning
extremely low rates of interest which will have an immediate impact on
income. The Company has begun the process of identifying suitable
fixed maturity investments and re-deploying this excess cash, which will have a
direct positive impact on net income going forward.
The
Company continues to leverage its affiliation with FSNB through the investment
in mortgage loans. This has allowed the Company to obtain higher
yields than available in the bond market, lengthen the overall portfolio average
life and still maintain a conservative investment portfolio. However,
due to the decline of the economy and credit crunch, new mortgage loan issues
slowed significantly in 2008, and as such this line item is also expected to
decline in 2009. A portion of the mortgage loan portfolio contains
floating interest rates. With the current state of the U.S. economy
and general interest rate cuts, management anticipates yields of its floating
rate investments to decline during 2009.
The
Company's investments are generally managed to match related insurance and
policyholder liabilities. The comparison of investment return with
insurance or investment product crediting rates establishes an interest
spread. The Company monitors investment yields, and when necessary
adjusts credited interest rates on its insurance products to preserve targeted
interest spreads, ranging from 1% to 2%. Interest crediting rates on
adjustable rate policies have been reduced to their guaranteed minimum rates,
and as such, cannot lower them any further. Policy interest crediting
rate changes and expense load changes become effective on an individual policy
basis on the next policy anniversary. Therefore, it takes a full year
from the time the change was determined for the full impact of such change to be
realized. If interest rates decline in the future, the Company won’t
be able to lower rates and both net investment income and net income will be
impacted negatively.
The
Company had realized investment losses of $(126,868) in the first three months
of 2009 compared to net realized investment gains of $20,183 for the same period
in 2008. With 2008 experiencing one of the largest financial crises in our
nation’s history and 2009 remaining weak, Management has refused to sit on the
sidelines hoping for a recovery and spent a significant amount of time analyzing
the Company’s investment holdings and reducing risk. As a result of
this, certain fixed maturity investments that were deemed too risky, primarily
those related to commercial real estate and financial institutions were sold,
predominantly at losses. These losses totaled approximately
$(4,200,000). Included in these losses is an approximate $(700,000)
loss from writing down a structured security containing trust preferred issues
from banks. Amid growing global economic distress, the Company
established a defensive posture in exchange traded funds. These
investments resulted in gains of approximately $3,500,000, helping to offset the
majority of the realized losses. The Company also realized gains on
sales of energy related common stocks and in the continued unwinding of its
investment in CSI common stock.
With the
continued turmoil in financial markets and general decline of the economy,
Management continues to view the Company’s investment portfolio with utmost
priority. Significant time has been spent internally researching the Company’s
risk and communicating with outside investment advisors about the current
investment environment and ways to ensure preservation of capital and mitigate
any losses. Management has put extensive efforts into evaluating the
investment holdings. Additionally, members of the Company’s board of
directors and investment committee have been solicited for advice and provided
with information. Management has reviewed the Company’s entire
portfolio on a security level basis to be sure all understand our holdings,
potential risks and underlying credit supporting the
investments. Management intends to continue its close monitoring of
its bond holdings and other investments for additional deterioration or market
condition changes. Future events may result in Management’s
determination certain current investment holdings may need to be sold which
could result in gains or losses in future periods. Such future events
could also result in other than temporary declines in value that could result in
future period impairment losses.
There are
a number of significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the process of
monitoring impairments and determining if impairment is other-than-temporary.
These risks and uncertainties related to management’s assessment of other than
temporary declines in value include but are not limited to: The risk that
Company's assessment of an issuer's ability to meet all of its contractual
obligations will change based on changes in the credit characteristics of that
issuer; The risk that the economic outlook will be worse than expected or
have more of an impact on the issuer than anticipated; The risk that fraudulent
information could be provided to the Company's investment professionals who
determine the fair value estimates.
Other
income has remained consistent over the periods presented. Other
income primarily represents revenues received relating to the performance of
administrative work as a TPA for unaffiliated life insurance
companies. The Company receives monthly fees based on policy in force
counts and certain other activity indicators such as number of policies
issued. The Company has not had any substantial change in its TPA
client base or activity related fees of existing clients during the periods
presented in the financial statements. Management remains committed
to the pursuit of additional TPA clients and believes this area continues to
show potential for growth.
(b)
|
Expenses
|
Life
benefits, claims and settlement expenses net of reinsurance benefits and claims,
increased approximately 8% in the first three months of 2009 compared to the
same period in 2008. Policy claims vary from period to period and
therefore, fluctuations in mortality are to be expected and are not considered
unusual by management. Overall, reserves continue to increase on
in-force policies as the average age of the insured increases.
Commissions
and amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs increased approximately
$587,000 in the first three months of 2009 compared to the same period in
2008. AC and TI reinsurance agreements that are in place with outside
companies drive the majority of this number. TI’s reinsurance
agreement terminated in April of 2008. Another significant factor is
attributable to the Company paying fewer commissions since the Company writes
very little new business and renewal premiums on existing business continue to
decline. Most of the Company’s agent agreements contained vesting
provisions, which provide for continued compensation payments to agents upon
their termination subject to certain minimums and often limited to a specific
period of time. Another factor is attributable to normal amortization
of the deferred policy acquisition costs asset. The Company reviews
the recoverability of the asset based on current trends and known events
compared to the assumptions used in the establishment of the original
asset. No impairments were recorded in any of the periods
presented.
Operating
expenses decreased 11% in the first three months of 2009 compared to the same
period in 2008. The Company continually monitors expenditures looking
for savings opportunities. Management places significant emphasis on
expense monitoring and cost containment. Maintaining administrative
efficiencies directly impacts net income.
(c)
|
Net
income
|
The
Company had a net loss of $(1,269,509) in the first three months of 2009
compared to a net loss of $(140,552) for the same period in 2008. The
decrease over the same period last year is mainly attributable to lower
investment income.
Financial
Condition
Total
shareholders’ equity increased approximately $471,000 as of March 31, 2009
compared to December 31, 2008. The increase is primarily
attributable to an increase in the market value of the Company’s fixed maturity
and common stock investments that was included in the accumulated other
comprehensive income.
Investments
represent approximately 69% and 67% of total assets at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Accordingly, investments are
the largest asset group of the Company. The Company's insurance
subsidiaries are regulated by insurance statutes and regulations as to the type
of investments that they are permitted to make and the amount of funds that may
be used for any one type of investment. In light of these statutes
and regulations, the majority of the Company’s investment portfolio is invested
in high quality, low risk investments.
As of
March 31, 2009, the carrying value of fixed maturity securities in default as to
principal or interest was immaterial in the context of consolidated assets,
shareholders’ equity or results from operations. To provide
additional flexibility and liquidity, the Company has identified all fixed
maturity securities as "investments held for sale". Investments held
for sale are carried at market, with changes in market value charged directly to
shareholders' equity.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
The
Company has three principal needs for cash - the insurance companies'
contractual obligations to policyholders, the payment of operating expenses and
debt service. Cash and cash equivalents as a percentage of total
assets were approximately 6% and 9% as of March 31, 2009, and December 31,
2008, respectively. Fixed maturities as a percentage of total assets
were approximately 41% and 39% as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
The
Company currently has access to funds for operating liquidity. UTG
has a $5,000,000 revolving credit note with First Tennessee Bank National
Association. UG has a $3,300,000 line of credit with First National
Bank of Tennessee. In addition, UG is also a member of the FHLB which
allows UG access to credit. UG’s current line of credit with the FHLB
is $15,000,000. At March 31, 2009, there were no outstanding
borrowings attributable to the lines of credit.
Future
policy benefits are primarily long-term in nature and therefore, the Company's
investments are predominantly in long-term fixed maturity investments such as
bonds and mortgage loans which provide sufficient return to cover these
obligations.
Many of
the Company's products contain surrender charges and other features which reward
persistency and penalize the early withdrawal of funds. With respect
to such products, surrender charges are generally sufficient to cover the
Company's unamortized deferred policy acquisition costs with respect to the
policy being surrendered.
Net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities was $(5,424,360) and $10,876 for the
three months ending March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities was $(3,963,623) and $1,739,401 for
the three month periods ending March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The most significant aspects of cash used in investing
activities are the fixed maturity transactions. The Company purchased
fixed maturities in the amount of $28,228,243 and $0 in the first three months
of 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, the Company purchased
$18,826,433 and $708,281 of fixed maturities in 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Net cash
(used in) financing activities was $(1,054,325) and $(2,018,933) for the three
month period ending March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The most
significant factor in cash used in financing activities was payments on notes
payable. The Company made payments on notes payable in the amount of $1,188,484
and 1,211,625 in the first three months of 2009 and 2008
respectively.
At
March 31, 2009, the Company had $14,428,282 of long-term debt
outstanding. At March 31, 2008, the Company had $18,702,721 of
debt outstanding. The debt is mainly attributable to the acquisition
of Acap at the end of 2006.
UTG is a
holding company that has no day-to-day operations of its own. Funds
required to meet its expenses, generally costs associated with maintaining the
company in good standing with states in which it does business and the servicing
of its debt, are primarily provided by its subsidiaries. On a parent
only basis, UTG's cash flow is dependent on management fees received from its
insurance subsidiaries, stockholder dividends from its subsidiaries and earnings
received on cash balances. At March 31, 2009, substantially all of
the consolidated shareholders equity represents net assets of its
subsidiaries. The Company's insurance subsidiaries have maintained
adequate statutory capital and surplus. The payment of cash dividends
to shareholders by UTG is not legally restricted. However, the state
insurance department regulates insurance company dividend payments where the
company is domiciled. No dividends were paid to shareholders in 2008
or the first three months of 2009.
UG is an
Ohio domiciled insurance company, which requires five days prior notification to
the insurance commissioner for the payment of an ordinary
dividend. Ordinary dividends are defined as the greater
of: a) prior year statutory earnings or b) 10% of statutory capital
and surplus. At December 31, 2008 UG statutory shareholders'
equity was $27,483,161. At December 31, 2008, UG statutory net
income was $4,825,058. Extraordinary dividends (amounts in excess of
ordinary dividend limitations) require prior approval of the insurance
commissioner and are not restricted to a specific calculation. There
were no dividends paid during 2009.
AC and TI
are Texas domiciled insurance companies, which requires eleven days prior
notification to the insurance commissioner for the payment of an ordinary
dividend. Ordinary dividends are defined as the greater
of: a) prior year statutory earnings or b) 10% of statutory capital
and surplus. At December 31, 2008 AC and TI statutory
shareholders' equity was $7,345,919 and $2,565,614, respectively. At
December 31, 2008, AC and TI statutory net income was $1,164,325 and
$48,944, respectively. Extraordinary dividends (amounts in excess of
ordinary dividend limitations) require prior approval of the insurance
commissioner and are not restricted to a specific calculation. There
were no dividends paid during 2009.
Management
believes the overall sources of liquidity available will be sufficient to
satisfy the Company’s financial obligations.
Accounting
Developments
The
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Statement No. 163,
Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts — an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 60 Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial
guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No.
60, Accounting and
Reporting by Insurance Enterprises. That diversity results in
inconsistencies in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities because
of differing views about when a loss has been incurred under FASB Statement No.
5, Accounting for Contingencies. This
Statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability
prior to an event of default (insured event) when there is evidence that credit
deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement
also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for
premium revenue and claim liabilities. Those clarifications will increase
comparability in financial reporting of financial guarantee insurance contracts
by insurance enterprises. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about
financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure
requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided
to users of financial statements. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all
interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not
believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
The FASB
also issued Statement No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. This Statement identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used
in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in
the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). This Statement is effective 60 days
after the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to the auditing literature. The Company does not believe
the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial condition
or results of operations.
The FASB
also issued Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 this Statement requires enhanced disclosures
about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities and thereby improves the
transparency of financial reporting. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November
15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company does not
believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
The FASB
also issued Statement No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51. This Statement applies to all
entities that prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an outstanding
non-controlling interest in one or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a
subsidiary. This Statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods
within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The Company does not believe the adoption will have a material
impact on its consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
The FASB
issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS
No. 159”). The Statement permits entities to choose to measure many
financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The
objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. The Statement was effective as of the
beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15,
2007. The Company chose not to elect the fair value option –
therefore, SFAS No. 159 did not impact its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
The FASB
issued Statement No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements. The Statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February of 2008, the FASB
issued FASB Staff position 157-2 which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for
non-financial assets and liabilities which are not measured at fair value on a
recurring basis (at least annually) until fiscal years beginning after November
15, 2008. Adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on its
consolidated financial position, results from operation, or cash
flow.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Market
risk relates, broadly, to changes in the value of financial instruments that
arise from adverse movements in interest rates, equity prices and foreign
exchange rates. The Company is exposed principally to changes in
interest rates, which affect the market prices of its fixed maturities available
for sale and its variable rate debt outstanding. The Company’s
exposure to equity prices and foreign currency exchange rates is
immaterial. The information presented below is in U.S. dollars, the
Company’s reporting currency.
Interest
rate risk
The
Company’s exposure to interest rate changes results from a significant holding
of fixed maturity investments and mortgage loans on real estate, all of which
comprised approximately 72% of the investment portfolio as of March 31,
2009. These investments are mainly exposed to changes in treasury
rates. The fixed maturities investments include U.S. government
bonds, securities issued by government agencies, mortgage-backed bonds and
corporate bonds. Approximately 70% of the fixed maturities we owned at
March 31, 2009 are instruments of the United States government or are backed by
U.S. government agencies or private corporations carrying the implied full faith
and credit backing of the U.S. government.
To manage
interest rate risk, the Company performs periodic projections of asset and
liability cash flows to evaluate the potential sensitivity of the investments
and liabilities. Management assesses interest rate sensitivity with
respect to the available-for-sale fixed maturities investments using
hypothetical test scenarios that assume either upward or downward 100-basis
point shifts in the prevailing interest rates. The following tables
set forth the potential amount of unrealized gains (losses) that could be caused
by 100-basis point upward and downward shifts on the available-for-sale fixed
maturities investments as of March 31, 2009:
Decreases in Interest Rates
|
Increases in Interest
Rates
|
200
Basis
Points
|
100
Basis
Points
|
100
Basis
Points
|
200
Basis
Points
|
$
12,255,000
|
$
5,804,000
|
$
(5,472,000)
|
$
(12,874,000)
|
While the
test scenario is for illustrative purposes only and does not reflect our
expectations regarding future interest rates or the performance of fixed-income
markets, it is a near-term change that illustrates the potential impact of such
events. Due to the composition of the Company’s book of insurance
business, management believes it is unlikely that the Company would encounter
large surrender activity due to a significant interest rate
increase. Such an increase would force the Company to dispose fixed
maturities at a loss.
There are
no fixed maturities or other investments that management classifies as trading
instruments. At March 31, 2009 there was one investment in a derivative
instrument carried at $305,000. At December 31, 2008, there were
no investments in derivative instruments.
The
Company had no capital lease obligations, material operating lease obligations
or purchase obligations outstanding as of March 31, 2009.
The
Company currently has $14,428,282 of debt outstanding.
Equity
risk
Equity
risk is the risk that the Company will incur economic losses due to adverse
fluctuations in a particular stock. As of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, the fair value of our equity securities was $30,059,710 and
$30,636,500, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, a 10% decline in the
value of the equity securities would result in an unrealized loss of $3,005,971,
as compared to an estimated unrealized loss of $3,063,650 as of December 31,
2008. The selection of a 10% unfavorable change in the equity markets
should not be construed as a prediction by the Company of future market events,
but rather as an illustration of the potential impact of such an
event.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Within
the 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report, an evaluation was
performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's
management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer (the "CEO") and
the Chief Financial Officer (the "CFO"), of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on that evaluation, the Company's management, including the CEO and CFO,
concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective
in alerting them on a timely basis to material information relating to the
Company required to be included in the Company’s periodic reports filed or
submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. There have been
no significant changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of the
evaluation.
ITEM
4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Not
applicable at this time.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
NONE
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
NONE
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
NONE
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
NONE
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
NONE
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
NONE
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Jesse T. Correll, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
UTG, as
required
pursuant to Section 302
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Theodore C. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and
Corporate Secretary of UTG, as required pursuant to Section
302
|
32.1
|
Certificate
of Jesse T. Correll, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
UTG, as required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
32.2
|
Certificate
of Theodore C. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and
Corporate Secretary of UTG, as required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350
|
REPORTS
ON FORM 8-K
NONE
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
UTG,
INC.
(Registrant)
Date:
|
May
14, 2009
|
By
|
/s/James P. Rousey | |
James
P. Rousey
|
||||
President,
and Director
|
Date:
|
May
14, 2009
|
By
|
/s/Theodore C. Miller | |
Theodore
C. Miller
|
||||
Senior
Vice President
|
||||
and
Chief Financial Officer
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Jesse T. Correll, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
UTG, as
required
pursuant to Section 302
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Theodore C. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and
Corporate Secretary of UTG, as required pursuant to Section
302
|
32.1
|
Certificate
of Jesse T. Correll, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of
UTG, as required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
32.2
|
Certificate
of Theodore C. Miller, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and
Corporate Secretary of UTG, as required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350
|