UWHARRIE CAPITAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009

OR

For the transition period from              to             .

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-22062

UWHARRIE CAPITAL CORP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s Telephone number, including area code: (704) 983-6181

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the classes of common stock issuer’s as of the latest practicable date: 7,593,929 shares of common stock outstanding as of May 7, 2009.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

-2-

Table of Contents

Uwharrie Capital Corp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 - Financial Statements

See accompanying notes

-3-

Table of Contents

Uwharrie Capital Corp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes

-4-

Table of Contents

Uwharrie Capital Corp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes

-5-

Table of Contents

Uwharrie Capital Corp and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes

-6-

Table of Contents

UWHARRIE CAPITAL CORP AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The financial statements and accompanying notes are presented on a consolidated basis including Uwharrie Capital Corp (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, Bank of Stanly (“Stanly”), Anson Bank & Trust Co. (“Anson”), Cabarrus Bank & Trust Company (“Cabarrus”), Strategic Investment Advisors, Inc., (“SIA”), and Uwharrie Mortgage Inc. Stanly consolidates its subsidiaries, the Strategic Alliance Corporation, BOS Agency, Inc. and Gateway Mortgage, Inc., each of which is wholly-owned by Stanly.

The information contained in the consolidated financial statements is unaudited. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and material adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of results of interim periods, all of which are of a normal recurring nature, have been made. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for an entire year. Management is not aware of economic events, outside influences or changes in concentrations of business that would require additional clarification or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

The organization and business of the Company, accounting policies followed by the Company and other information are contained in the notes to consolidated financial statements filed as part of the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. This Quarterly report should be read in conjunction with such Annual Report.

Note 2 – Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.

-7-

Table of Contents

Note 3 – Per Share Data

On November 3, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a 3% stock dividend payable on December 4, 2008 to shareholders of record on November 17, 2008. All information presented in the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements regarding earnings per share and weighted average number of shares outstanding has been computed giving effect to this stock dividend.

Basic and diluted net income per common share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period after retroactively adjusting for stock dividends. Diluted net income per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the net income of the Company. There were no anti-dilutive shares on March 31, 2009 or 2008.

Basic and diluted net income per common share have been computed based upon net income available to common shareholders as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding or assumed to be outstanding. The computation of basic and dilutive earnings per share is summarized below:

Note 4 – Investment Securities

Securities available for sale are summarized below:

Management has evaluated these securities to determine whether they should be considered other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009. This evaluation considered, among other things, the extent and duration of the impairment, current and expected future yields, the Company’s ability to continue to hold these securities in its portfolio and the issuers’ credit

-8-

Table of Contents

ratings. The majority of the gross unrealized losses are related to mortgage-backed securities portfolio. Further evaluations were made on these investments including analyzing prepayment rates, general market data, delinquency rates on the underlying mortgage loans and current and anticipated losses in foreclosure.

Based on these evaluations, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009. Management expects to collect all contractual interest and principal payments and that recovery of these temporarily impaired securities will occur within a reasonable time frame. Management will continue to evaluate these securities on an ongoing basis, and if it is subsequently determined that an other than temporary impairment has occurred, the Company will record any such impairment as a charge to earnings.

Note 5 – Loans

Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies

The subsidiary banks are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of their customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, lines of credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve elements of credit risk in excess of amounts recognized in the accompanying financial statements.

The banks’ risk of loss with the unfunded loans and lines of credit or standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The banks use the same credit policies in making commitments under such instruments as they do for on-balance sheet instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being

-9-

Table of Contents

drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Credit card commitments are unsecured. At March 31, 2009, outstanding financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk were approximately:

Note 7 – Fair Value Disclosures

The Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Statements (SFAS) No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) and SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities (SFAS 159) on January 1, 2008.

SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements, but clarifies and standardizes some divergent practices that have emerged since prior guidance was issued. SFAS 157 creates a three-level hierarchy under which individual fair value estimates are to be ranked based on the relative reliability of the inputs used in the valuation.

SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which those assets or liabilities are sold and considers assumptions that market participants would use when pricing those assets or liabilities. Fair values determined using Level 1 inputs rely on active and observable markets to price identical assets or liabilities. In situations where identical assets and liabilities are not traded in active markets, fair values may be determined based on Level 2 inputs, which exist when observable data exists for similar assets and liabilities. Fair values for assets and liabilities for which identical or similar assets and liabilities are not actively traded in observable markets are based on Level 3 inputs, which are considered to be unobservable.

Among the Company’s assets and liabilities, investment securities available for sale are reported at their fair values on a recurring basis. Certain other assets are adjusted to their fair value on a nonrecurring basis, including loans held for sale, which are carried at the lower of cost or market, loan servicing rights, where fair value is determined using similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions, foreclosed real estate, which is carried at lower of cost or fair market value and goodwill, which is periodically tested for impairment. Deposits, short-term borrowings and long-term obligations are not reported at fair value.

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, (SFAS 114). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At December 31, 2008, substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. In

-10-

Table of Contents

accordance with SFAS 157, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

For assets and liabilities carried at fair value, the following table provides fair value information as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:

Investment securities available for sale having a Level 3 value of $188,000 at December 31, 2008 were disposed of during the three months ended March 31, 2009 without significant gain or loss.

Prices for US Treasury and government agency securities are readily available in the active markets in which those securities are traded, and the resulting fair values are shown in the ‘Level 1 input’ column. Prices for mortgage-backed securities and for state, county and municipal securities are obtained for similar securities, and the resulting fair values are shown in the ‘Level 2 input’ column. Prices for all other non-marketable investments are determined based on various assumptions that are not observable. The fair values for these investment securities are shown in the ‘Level 3 input’ column. Non-marketable investment securities, which are carried at their purchase price, include those that may only be redeemed by the issuer.

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively.

-11-

Table of Contents

SFAS 159 allows an entity to elect to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the income statement each period. The statement also requires additional disclosures to identify the effects of an entity’s fair value election on its earnings. Upon the adoption of SFAS 159, the Company did not elect to report any assets and liabilities at fair value.

Note 8 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

SFAS 159

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective of this standard is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted under certain circumstances. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

SFAS 161

In March of 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (“SFAS 161”), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirement of Statement No. 133 for derivative instruments and hedging activities to provide users of financial statements with an enhanced understanding of the derivative instrument’s purpose, how it is accounted for, and its impact on the financial statements. The adoption of SFAS 161 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

SFAS 162

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162 (“SFAS 162”), The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting by identifying a

-12-

Table of Contents

consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for nongovernmental entities. Prior to the issuance of SFAS No. 162, GAAP hierarchy was defined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 69, The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SAS 69 has been criticized because it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity. SFAS No. 162 addresses these issues by establishing that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, the initial application of SFAS No. 162 will not have an impact on our financial statements

FSP EITF 99-20-1

On January 12, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position, Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 99-20-1, Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20. FSP EITF 99-20-1 addresses certain practice issues in EITF No. 99-20, “Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,” by making its other-than-temporary impairment assessment guidance consistent with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” FSP EITF 99-20-1 removes the reference to the consideration of a market participant’s estimates of cash flows in EITF 99-20, and instead requires an assessment of whether it is probable, based on current information and events, that the holder of the security will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms. If it is probable that there has been an adverse change in estimated cash flows, another-than-temporary impairment is deemed to exist, and a corresponding loss shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s carrying value and its fair value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment is made. This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008, and shall be applied prospectively. The impact of adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued the following three FASB Staff Positions intended to provide additional application guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairments of securities:

FSP No. FAS 157-4

FSP No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” provide additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have decreased significantly. FSP FAS 157-4 also provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The provisions of FSP FAS 157-4 are effective for the Company’s interim period ending on June 30, 2009. Management is currently evaluating the effect that the provisions of FSP FAS 157-4 may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1

FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies that were previously only required to be disclosed in annual financial statements. The provisions of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for the Company’s interim period ending on June 30, 2009. As FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends only the disclosure requirements about fair value of financial instruments in interim periods, the adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 is not expected to affect the Company’s statement of operations and balance sheet.

-13-

Table of Contents

FSP Nos. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2

FSP Nos., FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments,” amends current other-than-temporary impairment guidance in GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities.

The provisions of FSP Nos., FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 are effective for the Company’s interim period ending on June 30, 2009. Management is currently evaluating the effect that the provisions of FSP Nos., FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

From time to time the FASB issues exposure drafts of proposed statements of financial accounting standards. Such exposure drafts are subject to comment from the public, to revisions by the FASB and to final issuance by the FASB as statements of financial accounting standards. Management considers the effect of the proposed statements on the consolidated financial statements of the Company and monitors the status of changes to and proposed effective dates of exposure drafts.

-14-

Table of Contents

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain certain forward-looking statements consisting of estimates with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of the Company that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from these estimates. These factors include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions, changes in interest rates, deposit flows, loan demand, real estate values, and competition; changes in accounting principles, policies, or guidelines; changes in legislation or regulation; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting the Company’s operations, pricing, products and services.

Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company’s total assets increased $9.3 million, from $452.5 million to $461.8 million. During the three months, securities available for sale increased $7.2 million or 10.5%, from $68.8 million at December 31, 2008 to $76.1 million at March 31, 2009. This increase, however, was offset by a decline in loans held for investment of $2.7 million.

Cash and cash equivalents increased $391 thousand during the three months ended March 31, 2009. Cash and due from banks increased $6.9 million, while interest-earning deposits with banks declined $6.5 million.

Investment securities increased $7.2 million or 10.5% for the three months. Market values that had declined at December 31, 2008 to $2.5 million in net unrealized losses due to the recent downturn in the investment markets experienced an improvement of $1.2 million during the first quarter. The total unrealized loss at March 31, 2009 was $1.2 million. Management believes this decline in investment market values is only temporary and does not expect to incur a loss at this time. The Company purchased $10.6 million in new securities during the period and sold $1.7 million in securities at a realized loss of $40 thousand.

As previously stated, loans held for investment decreased $2.7 million to $338.1 million during the period ended March 31, 2009. The Company has experienced positive growth trends in the commercial and real estate commercial areas of its loan portfolio. These areas experienced growth of 3.0% and 2.4%, respectively. The remainder areas of the loan portfolio declined during the first quarter of 2009. Loans held for sale increased 47.1% or $1.3 million during the period. The allowance for loan losses was $4.6 million at March 31, 2009 which represents 1.35% of the loan portfolio.

Other changes in our consolidated assets related to premises and equipment, interest receivable, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, bank owned life insurance, other real estate owned and other assets. The Company completed the purchase of a tract of land for a future branch expansion. These purchases were the leading factors in the increase of $1.0 million in fixed assets. Interest receivable increased $62 thousand, bank owned life insurance increased $46 thousand and other real estate owned increased $443 thousand. Other assets increased $816 thousand, resulting primarily from a receivable set up for the proceeds from the sale of certain investments that were not received until after quarter-end. The Company did have an investment in common stock of Silverton Bank of $172 thousand. On May 1, 2009, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency closed Silverton Bank and the FDIC was appointed receiver. The Company has written off this investment as of March 31, 2009. Federal Home Loan Bank stock increased $952 thousand. Federal Home Loan Bank stock ownership is a requirement for member banks that utilize Federal Home Loan Bank for borrowing funds. The amount of stock owned by each member bank is based primarily on the amount of borrowings outstanding.

-15-

Table of Contents

Customer deposits, our primary funding source, experienced an $8.8 million increase during the three months ended March 31, 2009, increasing from $353.6 million to $362.4 million. Demand, noninterest-bearing accounts increased $1.2 million, while savings deposits grew $3.9 million. Time deposits over $100,000 and other time deposits experienced positive growth of $3.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively. These increases were offset by a decline in interest checking and money market accounts of $1.0 million.

Total borrowings decreased $1.5 million for the period. Borrowings consist of both short-term and long-term borrowed funds. The Company utilizes both short-term and long-term advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank. At March 31, 2009, $33.9 million of the total borrowings of $53.2 million were comprised of Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The Company did payoff a $2.6 million short-term note to a correspondent bank.

Other liabilities increased from $2.4 million at December 31, 2008 to $2.8 million at March 31, 2009, an increase of $441 thousand.

At March 31, 2009, total shareholders’ equity was $42.8 million, an increase of $1.6 million from December 31, 2008. Net income for the period was $905 thousand. Unrealized losses on investment securities, net of tax improved $800 thousand. The Company also recorded $162 in preferred stock dividends for the quarter. At March 31, 2009, the Company and its subsidiary banks exceeded all applicable regulatory capital requirements.

Comparison of Results of Operations For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

Net Income and Net Income Available to Common Shareholders

Uwharrie Capital Corp reported net income of $905 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2009, as compared to $775 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of $130 thousand. Net income available to common shareholders was $743 thousand or $0.10 per common share at March 31, 2009, compared at $775 thousand or $0.10 per common share at March 31, 2008. Net income available to common shareholders is net income less any dividends paid on preferred stock during the period.

Net Interest Income

As with most financial institutions, the primary component of earnings for our banks, is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, principally from loan and investment securities portfolios, and interest expense, principally on customer deposits and borrowings. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume, spread and margin. For this purpose, volume refers to the average dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, spread refers to the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities, and margin refers to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets. Margin is influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as by levels of noninterest-bearing liabilities and capital.

Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $4.3 million as compared with $3.9 million during the quarter ending March 31, 2008, resulting in an increase of $394 thousand, or 10.1%. During the quarter ending March 31, 2009 our growth in the volume of interest-earning assets outpaced the growth in interest-bearing liabilities by $502 thousand. The average yield on our interest–earning assets decreased 115 basis points to 6.07%, while the average rate we paid for our interest-bearing liabilities decreased 118 basis points. The Company’s assets that are interest rate sensitive adjust at the time the Federal Reserve adjusts interest rates, while, interest-bearing time deposits adjust at the time of maturity. The

-16-

Table of Contents

aforementioned decreases resulted in an increase of 3 basis points in our interest rate spread, from 3.79% in 2008 to 3.82% in 2009. Our net interest margin was 4.11% and 4.23% for the comparable periods in 2009 and 2008 respectively.

The following table presents average balance sheets and a net interest income analysis for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:

Average Balance Sheet and Net Interest Income Analysis

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

(in thousands)

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $372 thousand for the three months ending March 31, 2009 compared to $86 thousand for the same period in 2008. There were net loan charge-offs of $160 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared with net loan charge-offs of $13 thousand during the same period of 2008. Refer to the Asset Quality discussion on page 18 for further information.

Noninterest Income

The Company generates most of its revenue from net interest income; however, like all financial institutions, diversification of our earnings base is of major importance in our long term success. Total noninterest income increased $459 thousand for the three month period ending March 31, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008. Income from mortgage loan sales increased $995 thousand from $441 thousand for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 to $1.4 million for the same period in 2009. The recent decline in interest rates was the leading factor in this increase, as customers were able to refinance again at a lower rate. Service charges on deposit accounts produced earnings of $568 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2009. Other service fees and commissions experienced a 38.9% decrease for the comparable three month period. Income generated from brokerage commissions and asset management fees declined $106 thousand, while income from mortgage servicing rights decreased $158 thousand as a result of heavy mortgage refinancing volume during the first quarter of 2009. The investment the Company had in Silverton stock that was a nonmarketable security was written off as of March 31, 2009.

-17-

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was $4.9 million compared to $4.5 million for the same period of 2008, an increase of $356 thousand. Salaries and employee benefits, the largest component of noninterest expense, increased $236 thousand, from $2.6 million for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 to $2.9 million for the same period in 2009. Net occupancy expense and equipment expense had a combined increase of $63 thousand. Other noninterest expense increased $54 thousand for the comparable three month periods. The table below reflects the composition of other noninterest expense.

Other noninterest expense

Income Tax Expense

The Company had income tax expense of $455 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2009 resulting in an effective tax rate of 33.5% compared to income tax expense of $374 thousand and an effective rate of 32.6% in the 2008 period. Income taxes computed at the statutory rate are reduced primarily by the eligible amount of interest earned on state and municipal securities, tax free municipal loans and income earned on bank owned life insurance. The increase in the effective tax rate resulted primarily from the decrease in the level of such tax free income as a percentage of income before income taxes in the current year quarter compared to the 2008 quarter.

Asset Quality

The Company’s allowance for loan losses is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operations and by recoveries of amounts previously charged off, and reduced by loans charged off. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance at least quarterly. In evaluating the adequacy of the allowance, management considers the growth, composition and industry diversification of the portfolio; historical loan loss experience; current delinquency levels; adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay; estimated value of any underlying collateral; prevailing economic conditions and other relevant factors. The Company’s credit administration function, through a review process, validates the accuracy of the initial risk grade assessment. In addition, as a given loan’s credit quality improves or deteriorates, the credit administration department has the responsibility to change the borrower’s risk grade accordingly. For loans determined to be impaired, the allowance is based either on discounted cash flows using the loan’s initial effective interest rate or on the fair value of the collateral for certain collateral dependent loans. This evaluation is inherently subjective, as it requires

-18-

Table of Contents

material estimates, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans, which may be susceptible to significant change. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses and may require additions for estimated losses based upon judgments different from those of management.

Management uses the risk-grading program to facilitate the evaluation of probable inherent loan losses and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. In this program, risk grades are initially assigned by loan officers and reviewed and monitored by credit administration. The Company strives to maintain its loan portfolio in accordance with conservative loan underwriting policies that result in loans specifically tailored to the needs of its market area. Every effort is made to identify and minimize the credit risks associated with such lending strategies. The Company has no foreign loans and does not engage in significant lease financing or highly leveraged transactions. The Company follows a loan review program designed to evaluate the credit risk in the loan portfolio. This process includes the maintenance of an internally classified watch list that helps management assess the overall quality of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. In establishing the appropriate classification for specific assets, management considers, among other factors, the estimated value of the underlying collateral, the borrower’s ability to repay, the borrower’s payment history and the current delinquent status. As a result of this process, certain loans are categorized as substandard, doubtful or loss and reserves are allocated based on management’s judgment and historical experience.

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of an appropriate amount to provide for known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio in the normal course of business. While management believes that it uses the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary and results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while management believes it has established the allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Company’s portfolio, will not require an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary, should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed herein. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The provision for loan losses was $372 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to $86 thousand for the same period in 2008. Additionally, the allowance expressed as a percentage of loans held for investment was 1.35% at March 31, 2009 compared to 1.28% December 31, 2008. During the first three months of 2009 the levels of our impaired loans, which includes all loans in nonaccrual status and other loans deemed by management to be impaired, were $18.6 million compared to $12.5 million at December 31, 2008, an increase of $6.1 million. The increase in the level of impaired loans resulted from three customer relationships that are included in impaired loans totaling $5.1 million. One of these relationships was for $840 thousand and this relationship paid out in the second quarter of 2009. Total nonaccrual loans, which are a component of impaired loans, increased from $3.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $5.6 million at March 31, 2009. The Company had net loan charge-offs in the first quarter of 2009 of $160 thousand compared to net loan charge-offs of $13 thousand for the same period in 2008.

The allowance expressed as a percentage of gross loans held for investment increased 7 basis points from 1.28% at December 31, 2008 to 1.35% at March 31, 2009. The allowance, as a percentage of total impaired loans, decreased from 53.3% at December 31, 2008 to 50.6% at

-19-

Table of Contents

March 31, 2009. Likewise, the portion of the allowance specifically allocable to impaired loans decreased from 18.5% at December 31, 2008 to 12.5% at March 31, 2009. Nonperforming loans, which consist solely of nonaccrual loans, were $5.6 million at March 31, 2009 as compared to $3.9 million at December 31, 2008. Nonperforming loans to total loans increased from 1.14% at December 31, 2008, to 1.56% at March 31, 2009. The total allowance relative to non-performing loans decreased from 111.87% at the end of 2008 to 82.2% at March 31, 2009. During the quarter the Company had an increase in other real estate owned of $443 thousand. Management believes the current level of allowance for loan losses to be adequate at this time.

The following nonperforming loan table shows the comparison for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to December 31, 2008:

Nonperforming Assets

(dollars in thousands)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The objective of the Company’s liquidity management policy is to ensure the availability of sufficient cash flows to meet all financial commitments and to capitalize on any opportunities for expansion. Liquidity management addresses the ability to meet deposit withdrawals on demand or at contractual maturity, to repay borrowings as they mature and to fund new loans and investments as opportunities arise.

The Company’s primary sources of internally generated funds are principal and interest payments on loans, cash flows generated from operations and cash flow generated by investments. Growth in deposits is typically the primary source of funds for loan growth. The Company and its subsidiary banks have multiple funding sources in addition to deposits that can be used to increase liquidity and provide additional financial flexibility. These sources are the subsidiary banks’ established federal funds lines with correspondent banks aggregating $20.9 million at March 31, 2009, with available credit of $20.9 million, established borrowing relationships with the Federal Home Loan Bank, with available credit of $38.9 million, access to borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank discount window, and the sale of securities under agreements to repurchase. In addition, the Company issues commercial paper and has secured

-20-

Table of Contents

long-term debt from other sources. Total debt from these sources aggregated $53.2 million at March 31, 2009, compared to $54.8 million at December 31, 2008.

The Company’s subsidiary banks currently have federal funds purchased lines of credit with Silverton Bank for $10.4 million. As referenced previously, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency took control of Silverton Bank on May 1, 2009 and appointed the FDIC receiver. At this time the lines are still fully operational if needed by the subsidiary banks. Management is continuing to monitor the Silverton Bank situation closely and is seeking to replace these federal funds lines of credit with another source.

Banks and bank holding companies, as regulated institutions, must meet required levels of capital. The Federal Reserve, the primary federal regulator of the Company and its subsidiary banks, has adopted minimum capital regulations or guidelines that categorize components and the level of risk associated with various types of assets.

Regulatory guidelines require a minimum of total capital to risk-adjusted assets ratio of 8 percent and a Tier I leverage ratio of 4 percent. Banks, which meet or exceed a Tier I ratio of 6 percent, a total capital ratio of 10 percent and a Tier I leverage ratio of 5 percent are considered “well capitalized” by regulatory standards. Financial institutions are expected to maintain a level of capital commensurate with the risk profile assigned to their assets in accordance with those guidelines.

Both the Company and its subsidiary banks have maintained capital levels exceeding minimum levels for “well capitalized” banks and bank holding companies. The Company expects to continue to exceed these minimums without altering current operations or strategy. The Company completed a private placement of subordinated debt during 2008 that qualifies as regulatory capital. At March 31, 2009, the Company had $7.4 million in subordinated debt.

Accounting and Regulatory Matters

Management is not aware of any known trends, events, uncertainties or current recommendations by regulatory authorities that will have or that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on the Company’s liquidity, capital resources, or other operations.

The Company’s primary market risk is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the result of differing maturities or repricing intervals of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the fact that rates on these financial instruments do not change uniformly. These conditions may impact the earnings generated by the Company’s interest earning assets or the cost of its interest-bearing liabilities, thus directly impacting the Company’s overall earnings. The Company’s management actively monitors and manages interest rate risk. One way this is accomplished is through the development of and adherence to the Company’s asset/liability policy. This policy sets forth management’s strategy for matching the risk characteristics of the Company’s interest-earning assets and liabilities so as to mitigate the effect of changes in the rate environment. The Company’s market risk profile has not changed significantly since December 31, 2008.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

At the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the

-21-

Table of Contents

design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15.

Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective (1) to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company has evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a -15(f) and 15d – 15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the first quarter of 2009. In connection with such evaluation, the Company has determined that there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company reviews its disclosure controls and procedures, which may include its internal control over financial reporting, on an ongoing basis, and may from time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness and to ensure that the Company’s systems evolve with its business.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries, nor any of their properties are subject to any legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their business.