VALERO ENERGY CORP/TX - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 1-13175
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 74-1828067 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
One Valero Way
San Antonio, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
78249
(Zip Code)
San Antonio, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
78249
(Zip Code)
(210) 345-2000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants only class of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding
as of October 26, 2010 was 566,210,629.
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Millions of Dollars, Except Par Value)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments |
$ | 2,352 | $ | 825 | ||||
Receivables, net |
4,240 | 3,773 | ||||||
Inventories |
4,804 | 4,863 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
100 | 888 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
184 | 180 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
172 | 383 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
| 157 | ||||||
Assets related to discontinued operations |
25 | 67 | ||||||
Total current assets |
11,877 | 11,136 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
29,930 | 28,463 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(6,340 | ) | (5,592 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
23,590 | 22,871 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
224 | 227 | ||||||
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
1,585 | 1,395 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 37,276 | $ | 35,629 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations |
$ | 523 | $ | 237 | ||||
Accounts payable |
6,096 | 5,760 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
548 | 514 | ||||||
Taxes other than income taxes |
561 | 725 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
74 | 95 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
322 | 253 | ||||||
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
89 | 225 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
8,213 | 7,809 | ||||||
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion |
7,513 | 7,163 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,430 | 4,063 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
1,720 | 1,869 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,200,000,000 shares authorized;
673,501,593 and 673,501,593 shares issued |
7 | 7 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
7,839 | 7,896 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost; 107,172,932 and 108,798,847 common shares |
(6,615 | ) | (6,721 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
13,855 | 13,178 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
314 | 365 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
15,400 | 14,725 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 37,276 | $ | 35,629 | ||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Millions of Dollars, Except per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Operating revenues (1) |
$ | 22,210 | $ | 18,573 | $ | 63,628 | $ | 49,277 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
20,023 | 17,212 | 57,479 | 44,430 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Refining |
817 | 772 | 2,405 | 2,355 | ||||||||||||
Retail |
192 | 182 | 552 | 522 | ||||||||||||
Ethanol |
96 | 59 | 267 | 102 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
139 | 167 | 367 | 434 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
372 | 361 | 1,096 | 1,072 | ||||||||||||
Asset impairment loss |
| 58 | 2 | 199 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
21,639 | 18,811 | 62,168 | 49,114 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
571 | (238 | ) | 1,460 | 163 | |||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
18 | 8 | 30 | (16 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest and debt expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Incurred |
(145 | ) | (150 | ) | (430 | ) | (387 | ) | ||||||||
Capitalized |
26 | 19 | 68 | 92 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
470 | (361 | ) | 1,128 | (148 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
178 | (18 | ) | 407 | 22 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
292 | (343 | ) | 721 | (170 | ) | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income
taxes |
| (286 | ) | 41 | (404 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 292 | $ | (629 | ) | $ | 762 | $ | (574 | ) | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.52 | $ | (0.61 | ) | $ | 1.27 | $ | (0.32 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
| (0.51 | ) | 0.07 | (0.76 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 0.52 | $ | (1.12 | ) | $ | 1.34 | $ | (1.08 | ) | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (in millions) |
564 | 561 | 563 | 534 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming dilution: |
||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.51 | $ | (0.61 | ) | $ | 1.27 | $ | (0.32 | ) | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
| (0.51 | ) | 0.07 | (0.76 | ) | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 0.51 | $ | (1.12 | ) | $ | 1.34 | $ | (1.08 | ) | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding
assuming dilution (in millions) |
568 | 561 | 567 | 534 | ||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.45 | ||||||||
Supplemental information: |
||||||||||||||||
(1) Includes excise taxes on sales by
our U.S. retail system |
$ | 234 | $ | 226 | $ | 667 | $ | 659 |
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Millions of Dollars)
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 762 | $ | (574 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
1,096 | 1,156 | ||||||
Asset impairment loss |
2 | 575 | ||||||
Gain on sale of Delaware City Refinery assets |
(92 | ) | | |||||
Noncash interest expense and other income, net |
8 | 26 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
32 | 35 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
285 | (302 | ) | |||||
Changes in current assets and current liabilities |
592 | 1,154 | ||||||
Changes in deferred charges and credits and other operating activities, net |
(63 | ) | (130 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
2,622 | 1,940 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(1,226 | ) | (1,820 | ) | ||||
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
(410 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||
Purchase of
ethanol plants |
(260 | ) | (556 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of the Delaware City Refinery assets and associated
terminal and pipeline assets |
220 | | ||||||
Minor acquisitions |
| (29 | ) | |||||
Other investing activities, net |
15 | 23 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,661 | ) | (2,683 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Non-bank debt: |
||||||||
Borrowings |
1,244 | 998 | ||||||
Repayments |
(517 | ) | (209 | ) | ||||
Accounts receivable sales program: |
||||||||
Proceeds
from the sale of receivables |
1,225 | 500 | ||||||
Repayments |
(1,325 | ) | (500 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net of issuance costs |
| 799 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock in connection with employee benefit plans |
12 | 7 | ||||||
Common stock dividends |
(85 | ) | (239 | ) | ||||
Debt issuance costs |
(10 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Other financing activities, net |
3 | (5 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
547 | 1,343 | ||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
19 | 65 | ||||||
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
1,527 | 665 | ||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period |
825 | 940 | ||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period |
$ | 2,352 | $ | 1,605 | ||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Millions of Dollars)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 292 | $ | (629 | ) | $ | 762 | $ | (574 | ) | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
100 | 214 | 63 | 324 | ||||||||||||
Pension and other postretirement benefits: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss arising during the period, net of income
tax benefit of $-, $-, $-, and $- |
| | (21 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net gain reclassified into income, net of income
tax expense of $2, $1, $2, and $1 |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss on pension and other
postretirement benefits |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | (25 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Derivative instruments designated and qualifying
as cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) arising during the period, net of income
tax (expense) benefit of $-, $(12), $1, and $(46) |
| 24 | (1 | ) | 87 | |||||||||||
Net gain reclassified into income, net of income
tax expense of $13, $29, $47, and $89 |
(24 | ) | (54 | ) | (88 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss on cash flow hedges |
(24 | ) | (30 | ) | (89 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
74 | 183 | (51 | ) | 244 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 366 | $ | (446 | ) | $ | 711 | $ | (330 | ) | ||||||
See Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION, PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION, AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
As used in this report, the terms Valero, we, us, or our may refer to Valero Energy Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or all of them taken as a whole.
As used in this report, the terms Valero, we, us, or our may refer to Valero Energy Corporation, one or more of its consolidated subsidiaries, or all of them taken as a whole.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Valero and subsidiaries
in which Valero has a controlling interest. Intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Investments in significant non-controlled entities are accounted for
using the equity method.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for
complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a
normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. Financial information for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 included in these Condensed Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements is derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements. Operating
results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial
statements as of that date. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
We have evaluated subsequent events that occurred after September 30, 2010 through the filing of
this Form 10-Q. Any material subsequent events that occurred during this time have been properly
recognized or disclosed in our financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, we
review our estimates based on currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances
may result in revised estimates.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.
As
discussed in Note 4, we permanently shut down our Delaware City Refinery in the fourth quarter
of 2009, and our board of directors approved a plan of sale for the shutdown refinery assets,
excluding certain miscellaneous assets, and the associated terminal and pipeline assets at Delaware
City in the first quarter of 2010. As a result, these assets have been presented in the
consolidated balance sheet as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2009. The miscellaneous
assets excluded from the plan of sale and all
7
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
liabilities of the Delaware City Refinery have been
presented in the consolidated balance sheets as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. In
addition, the results of operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been presented as
discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented.
2. ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Transfers of Financial Assets
In June 2009, Topic 860 of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), Transfers and Servicing, was modified to clarify the requirements for derecognizing transferred financial assets, remove the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and related exceptions, and require additional disclosures related to transfers of financial assets. This guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November 15, 2009, and earlier application was prohibited. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not affect our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, Topic 860 of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), Transfers and Servicing, was modified to clarify the requirements for derecognizing transferred financial assets, remove the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and related exceptions, and require additional disclosures related to transfers of financial assets. This guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November 15, 2009, and earlier application was prohibited. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not affect our financial position or results of operations.
Variable Interest Entities
In June 2009, ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, was amended to modify provisions related to variable interest entities to include entities previously considered qualifying special-purpose entities, as the concept of these entities was eliminated. This modification also clarifies consolidation requirements and expands disclosure requirements related to variable interest entities. This guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November 15, 2009, and earlier application was prohibited. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not affect our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, ASC Topic 810, Consolidation, was amended to modify provisions related to variable interest entities to include entities previously considered qualifying special-purpose entities, as the concept of these entities was eliminated. This modification also clarifies consolidation requirements and expands disclosure requirements related to variable interest entities. This guidance was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after November 15, 2009, and earlier application was prohibited. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not affect our financial position or results of operations.
3. ACQUISITIONS
The acquired ethanol businesses discussed below involve the production and marketing of ethanol and
its co-products, including distillers grains. The operations of our ethanol business complement
our existing clean motor fuels business.
Acquisitions of ASA and Renew Assets
In December 2009, we signed an agreement with ASA Ethanol Holdings, LLC (ASA) to buy two ethanol plants located in Linden, Indiana and Bloomingburg, Ohio and made a $20 million advance payment towards the purchase of these plants. On January 13, 2010, we completed the acquisition of these plants, including certain inventories, for a total purchase price of $202 million.
In December 2009, we signed an agreement with ASA Ethanol Holdings, LLC (ASA) to buy two ethanol plants located in Linden, Indiana and Bloomingburg, Ohio and made a $20 million advance payment towards the purchase of these plants. On January 13, 2010, we completed the acquisition of these plants, including certain inventories, for a total purchase price of $202 million.
Also
in December 2009, we received approval from a bankruptcy court
to acquire an ethanol plant
located near Jefferson, Wisconsin from Renew Energy LLC (Renew) and made a $1 million advance
payment towards the purchase of this plant. We completed the
acquisition of this plant,
including certain receivables and inventories, on February 4, 2010 for a total purchase price of
$79 million.
8
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The assets acquired from ASA and Renew were recognized at acquisition-date fair values as
determined by independent appraisals and other evaluations as follows (in millions):
Current assets, primarily inventory |
$ | 11 | ||
Property, plant and equipment |
269 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets |
1 | |||
Total consideration |
$ | 281 | ||
Neither goodwill nor a gain from a bargain purchase was recognized in conjunction with the ASA and
Renew acquisitions, and no contingent assets or liabilities were acquired or assumed. Because
these acquisitions were not material to our results of operations, we have not presented pro forma
results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, or actual results of operations from the acquisition dates through
September 30, 2010. The consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 includes the results of the ASA and Renew acquisitions from their acquisition dates in the
first quarter of 2010.
Acquisition of VeraSun Assets
In the second quarter of 2009, we acquired seven ethanol plants and a site under development from VeraSun Energy Corporation (VeraSun). The acquisition of these ethanol plants (referred to as the VeraSun Acquisition) was completed under three separate closing transactions. The purchase price for the VeraSun Acquisition was $477 million plus $79 million primarily for inventory and certain other working capital.
In the second quarter of 2009, we acquired seven ethanol plants and a site under development from VeraSun Energy Corporation (VeraSun). The acquisition of these ethanol plants (referred to as the VeraSun Acquisition) was completed under three separate closing transactions. The purchase price for the VeraSun Acquisition was $477 million plus $79 million primarily for inventory and certain other working capital.
The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recognized at their acquisition-date fair values
as determined by an independent appraisal and other evaluations as follows (in millions):
Current assets, primarily inventory |
$ | 77 | ||
Property, plant and equipment |
491 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets |
1 | |||
Current liabilities |
(10 | ) | ||
Other long-term liabilities |
(3 | ) | ||
Total consideration |
$ | 556 | ||
Neither goodwill nor a gain from a bargain purchase was recognized in conjunction with the VeraSun
Acquisition, and no contingent assets or liabilities were acquired or assumed.
9
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The consolidated statements of income include the results of operations of the ethanol plants
commencing on their closing dates in the second quarter of 2009. The pro forma information (in
millions, except per share amount) presented below for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
assumes that the VeraSun Acquisition occurred on January 1, 2009 and that the purchase price was
funded with proceeds from the issuance of $556 million of debt on January 1, 2009.
Actual results of operations from acquired business from the closing dates through September 30, 2009: |
||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 673 | ||
Net income |
42 | |||
Consolidated pro forma results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2009: |
||||
Operating revenues |
49,500 | |||
Loss from continuing operations |
(177 | ) | ||
Loss per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution |
(0.33 | ) |
4. DISPOSITIONS
Sale of Delaware City Refinery Assets and Associated Terminal and Pipeline Assets
On November 20, 2009, we announced the permanent shutdown of our Delaware City Refinery, and in the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded a pre-tax loss of $1.9 billion, of which $1.4 billion represented the write-down of the book value of the refinery assets to net realizable value. The results of operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented because of the permanent shutdown of the refinery. The terminal and pipeline assets associated with the refinery were not shut down and continued to be operated until the date of their sale as described below. The results of their operations are reflected in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented due to our post-closing participation in a terminalling agreement related to our continued use of those assets.
On November 20, 2009, we announced the permanent shutdown of our Delaware City Refinery, and in the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded a pre-tax loss of $1.9 billion, of which $1.4 billion represented the write-down of the book value of the refinery assets to net realizable value. The results of operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented because of the permanent shutdown of the refinery. The terminal and pipeline assets associated with the refinery were not shut down and continued to be operated until the date of their sale as described below. The results of their operations are reflected in continuing operations in the consolidated statements of income for all periods presented due to our post-closing participation in a terminalling agreement related to our continued use of those assets.
In the first quarter of 2010, our board of directors approved a plan of sale for our shutdown
refinery assets, excluding certain miscellaneous assets, and the associated terminal and pipeline
assets at Delaware City. Effective June 1, 2010, we sold these assets to wholly owned subsidiaries
of PBF Energy Partners LP (PBF) for $220 million of cash proceeds. The sale resulted in a gain of
$92 million related to the shutdown refinery assets and a gain of $3 million related to the
terminal and pipeline assets. The gain on the sale of the shutdown refinery assets primarily
resulted from receiving proceeds related to the scrap value of the assets and the reversal of
certain liabilities recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the
refinery, which we will not incur because of the sale. This gain is presented in income (loss)
from discontinued operations, net of income taxes in the consolidated statement of income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The shutdown refinery assets and the associated terminal and pipeline assets that were sold on
June 1, 2010 have been presented in the consolidated balance sheet as assets held for sale as of
December 31, 2009. Certain miscellaneous assets and all liabilities of the shutdown refinery that
were not sold are presented in the consolidated balance sheets as assets and liabilities related to
discontinued operations as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 as follows (in millions).
10
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Assets
Held for Sale |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
||||||||
Refinery |
$ | | $ | 16 | ||||
Terminal and pipeline |
| 141 | ||||||
Current assets |
$ | | $ | 157 | ||||
Assets and Liabilities Related to
Discontinued Operations |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Receivables, net |
$ | 6 | $ | 6 | ||||
Inventories |
| 4 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
19 | 57 | ||||||
Current assets |
$ | 25 | $ | 67 | ||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 5 | $ | 36 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
84 | 189 | ||||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 89 | $ | 225 | ||||
Results of operations of the Delaware City Refinery prior to its sale, excluding the gain on the
sale, are summarized as follows (in millions):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | 916 | $ | | $ | 1,961 | ||||||||
Loss before
income taxes |
| (454 | ) | (33 | ) | (663 | ) |
Subsequent Disposition of Investment
In October 2010, we signed an agreement to sell our 50% interest in Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline Company (CHOPS) to Genesis Energy, L.P. for $330 million in cash proceeds. The sale was approved by our board of directors in October, and we expect the closing to occur before the end of 2010. Our investment in CHOPS was $274 million as of September 30, 2010.
In October 2010, we signed an agreement to sell our 50% interest in Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline Company (CHOPS) to Genesis Energy, L.P. for $330 million in cash proceeds. The sale was approved by our board of directors in October, and we expect the closing to occur before the end of 2010. Our investment in CHOPS was $274 million as of September 30, 2010.
11
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
5. IMPAIRMENTS
General
Due to the economic slowdown that persisted throughout 2009 and its negative impact on the refining industry, we evaluated our refining operating assets for potential impairment in 2009. Those evaluations were based on expected future cash flows for each of our refineries using significant estimates and assumptions about the future operations of those refineries, including overall throughput volumes, types of crude oil processed, types of products produced, and prices for crude oil and refined products. Prices for crude oil and refined products fluctuate significantly based on market factors, including geopolitical matters. Prices, in turn, impact refinery throughput assumptions. We determined that there was no impairment of any of our refining operating assets as of December 31, 2009.
Due to the economic slowdown that persisted throughout 2009 and its negative impact on the refining industry, we evaluated our refining operating assets for potential impairment in 2009. Those evaluations were based on expected future cash flows for each of our refineries using significant estimates and assumptions about the future operations of those refineries, including overall throughput volumes, types of crude oil processed, types of products produced, and prices for crude oil and refined products. Prices for crude oil and refined products fluctuate significantly based on market factors, including geopolitical matters. Prices, in turn, impact refinery throughput assumptions. We determined that there was no impairment of any of our refining operating assets as of December 31, 2009.
The economy and refining industry fundamentals have generally improved throughout 2010 compared to
2009, but refining industry fundamentals continue to be negatively impacted by the economic
slowdown that began in 2008, and the refining industry outlook remains uncertain. Therefore, we
continued to update our evaluation of potential impairments of our refining operating assets as of
September 30, 2010, and we have determined that there continues to be no impairment of these
assets. Our cash flow estimates are based on expected improvements in refined product prices
resulting from the slowly improving economy. Estimates related to our Paulsboro and Aruba
Refineries are particularly sensitive to assumptions regarding specific matters affecting those
refineries, and those matters and our assumptions are described below. We believe that our
estimates regarding expected cash flows are reasonable, but future cash flows will differ from our
estimates and such differences may be material.
Paulsboro Refinery
On September 24, 2010, we signed an agreement to sell our Paulsboro Refinery to PBF Holding Company LLC (PBF Holding), for $363 million plus net working capital, and our board of directors approved the sale on October 5, 2010. PBF Holding is related to the buyer of our recently sold Delaware City Refinery assets and associated terminal and pipeline assets, as discussed in Note 4. The proceeds will consist of a $180 million note secured by the Paulsboro Refinery, with the remaining amount, including net working capital, paid in cash. The note will mature one year from the closing date and will bear interest at LIBOR plus 700 basis points; however, PBF Holding may extend the note for an additional six months at its option, during which time the note will bear interest at LIBOR plus 900 basis points. Net working capital excludes crude oil, other feedstock and finished product inventories, as well as miscellaneous supplies inventories associated with the Paulsboro Refinery. We anticipate entering into a separate agreement to sell the crude oil, other feedstock and finished product inventories to PBF Holding.
On September 24, 2010, we signed an agreement to sell our Paulsboro Refinery to PBF Holding Company LLC (PBF Holding), for $363 million plus net working capital, and our board of directors approved the sale on October 5, 2010. PBF Holding is related to the buyer of our recently sold Delaware City Refinery assets and associated terminal and pipeline assets, as discussed in Note 4. The proceeds will consist of a $180 million note secured by the Paulsboro Refinery, with the remaining amount, including net working capital, paid in cash. The note will mature one year from the closing date and will bear interest at LIBOR plus 700 basis points; however, PBF Holding may extend the note for an additional six months at its option, during which time the note will bear interest at LIBOR plus 900 basis points. Net working capital excludes crude oil, other feedstock and finished product inventories, as well as miscellaneous supplies inventories associated with the Paulsboro Refinery. We anticipate entering into a separate agreement to sell the crude oil, other feedstock and finished product inventories to PBF Holding.
A closing date has not been set and our ability to close the sale is conditioned upon, among other
requirements, securing a modified emissions permit for a certain processing unit at the refinery
from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). If these conditions are not met or waived by the parties on or before
December 1, 2010, the agreement to sell the Paulsboro Refinery will automatically terminate on
December 1, 2010. Due to the public comment process and regular administrative review, we believe
that it is unlikely that we will obtain the modified permit prior to December 1, 2010. As such,
there is significant uncertainty as to the eventual consummation of the sale to PBF Holding.
12
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2010, the Paulsboro Refinery was classified as held and used because our
board of directors had not yet approved the plan of disposition of the refinery and because it was
not probable that the sale of the Paulsboro Refinery would be consummated within a one-year period.
However, because of the possibility that the refinery will be sold, as well as continuing
depressed refining industry fundamentals, we evaluated the refinery for potential impairment as of
September 30, 2010. We developed expected future cash flows for the refinery based on our
assessment of the likelihood of selling the refinery to PBF Holding or continuing to operate it.
Expected future cash flows associated with the continued operations of the refinery were developed
using significant estimates and assumptions about the future operations of the refinery, including
overall throughput volumes, types of crude oil processed, types of products produced, and prices
for crude oil and refined products. Our assessment of the likelihood of selling the refinery to
PBF Holding considered, among other factors, our belief that it is unlikely that
we will
obtain the modified permit from the NJDEP and the EPA before December 1, 2010, and we concluded
that there is significant uncertainty of the sale to PBF Holding. Based on our assumptions, our
tests indicated that the Paulsboro Refinery was not impaired as of September 30, 2010. However, if
we sell the refinery to PBF Holding in accordance with the terms of the sale agreement, we will
recognize a loss of approximately $920 million.
Aruba Refinery
Our Aruba Refinery was shut down in July 2009 because narrow sour crude oil differentials made the refinery uneconomical to operate. However, in the third quarter of 2010, we commenced refinery-wide maintenance to prepare the refinerys production units for restart due to improved sour crude oil differentials and a general improvement in refining economics, and we expect the refinery to restart in December 2010. We considered these positive developments in our updated impairment evaluation of the Aruba Refinery, and that evaluation indicated that there was no impairment. The Aruba Refinery, however, is particularly sensitive to sour crude oil differentials, and our cash flow estimates are based on our expectation that such differentials will return to amounts experienced prior to the economic slowdown that began in 2008. This expectation is based on our belief that the economy will continue to improve and that the demand for refined products, and therefore crude oil, will increase and cause sour crude oil differentials to widen. Should differentials fail to widen or fail to widen to amounts experienced in prior years, our cash flows estimates will be negatively impacted and we could ultimately determine that the refinery is impaired. The Aruba Refinery had a net book value of $962 million as of September 30, 2010; therefore, an impairment loss could be material to our results of operations.
Our Aruba Refinery was shut down in July 2009 because narrow sour crude oil differentials made the refinery uneconomical to operate. However, in the third quarter of 2010, we commenced refinery-wide maintenance to prepare the refinerys production units for restart due to improved sour crude oil differentials and a general improvement in refining economics, and we expect the refinery to restart in December 2010. We considered these positive developments in our updated impairment evaluation of the Aruba Refinery, and that evaluation indicated that there was no impairment. The Aruba Refinery, however, is particularly sensitive to sour crude oil differentials, and our cash flow estimates are based on our expectation that such differentials will return to amounts experienced prior to the economic slowdown that began in 2008. This expectation is based on our belief that the economy will continue to improve and that the demand for refined products, and therefore crude oil, will increase and cause sour crude oil differentials to widen. Should differentials fail to widen or fail to widen to amounts experienced in prior years, our cash flows estimates will be negatively impacted and we could ultimately determine that the refinery is impaired. The Aruba Refinery had a net book value of $962 million as of September 30, 2010; therefore, an impairment loss could be material to our results of operations.
For further information regarding impairments, see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
13
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Refinery feedstocks |
$ | 2,650 | $ | 2,124 | ||||
Refined products and blendstocks |
1,715 | 2,317 | ||||||
Ethanol feedstocks and products |
144 | 141 | ||||||
Convenience store merchandise |
97 | 96 | ||||||
Materials and supplies |
198 | 185 | ||||||
Inventories |
$ | 4,804 | $ | 4,863 | ||||
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the replacement cost (market value) of LIFO
inventories exceeded their LIFO carrying amounts by approximately $4.9 billion and $4.5 billion,
respectively.
7. DEBT
Non-Bank Debt
In March 2009, we issued $750 million of 9.375% notes due March 15, 2019 and $250 million of 10.5% notes due March 15, 2039. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled $998 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and other issuance costs of $8 million.
In March 2009, we issued $750 million of 9.375% notes due March 15, 2019 and $250 million of 10.5% notes due March 15, 2039. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled $998 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and other issuance costs of $8 million.
In April 2009, we made scheduled debt repayments of $200 million related to our 3.5% notes and
$9 million related to our 5.125% Series 1997D industrial revenue bonds.
In February 2010, we issued $400 million of 4.50% notes due in February 2015 and $850 million of
6.125% notes due in February 2020. Proceeds from the issuance of these notes totaled
$1.244 billion, before deducting underwriting discounts and other issuance costs of $10 million.
In March 2010, we redeemed our 7.50% senior notes with a maturity date of June 15, 2015 for
$294 million, or 102.5% of stated value. These notes had a carrying amount of $296 million as of
the redemption date, resulting in a $2 million gain that was included in other income (expense)
in the consolidated statements of income.
In April 2010, we made scheduled debt repayments of $8 million related to our Series A 5.45%,
Series B 5.40%, and Series C 5.40% industrial revenue bonds.
14
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In May 2010, we redeemed our 6.75% senior notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2014 for
$190 million, or 102.25% of stated value. These notes had a carrying amount of $187 million as of
the redemption date, resulting in a $3 million loss that was included in other income (expense)
in the consolidated statements of income.
In June 2010, we made scheduled debt repayments of $25 million related to our 7.25% debentures.
Bank Credit Facilities
We have a revolving credit facility (the Revolver) that has a maturity date of November 2012. As of September 30, 2010, the Revolver had a borrowing capacity of $2.4 billion. The Revolver has certain restrictive covenants, including a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio of 60%. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our debt-to-capitalization ratios, calculated in accordance with the terms of the Revolver, were 27.0% and 30.9%, respectively. We believe that we will remain in compliance with this covenant.
We have a revolving credit facility (the Revolver) that has a maturity date of November 2012. As of September 30, 2010, the Revolver had a borrowing capacity of $2.4 billion. The Revolver has certain restrictive covenants, including a maximum debt-to-capitalization ratio of 60%. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, our debt-to-capitalization ratios, calculated in accordance with the terms of the Revolver, were 27.0% and 30.9%, respectively. We believe that we will remain in compliance with this covenant.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we had no borrowings or repayments under our
Revolver or other revolving bank credit facilities. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, we had no borrowings outstanding under these committed revolving bank credit facilities.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had $285 million and $259 million, respectively,
of letters of credit outstanding under our uncommitted short-term bank credit facilities and
$215 million and $299 million, respectively, of letters of credit outstanding under our U.S.
committed revolving credit facilities. Under our Canadian committed revolving credit facility, we
had Cdn. $20 million and Cdn. $22 million of letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively.
In June 2010, we entered into a one-year committed revolving letter of credit facility under which
we may obtain letters of credit of up to $300 million to support certain of our crude oil
purchases. This agreement matures in June 2011.
Accounts Receivable Sales Facility
We have an accounts receivable sales facility with a group of third-party entities and financial institutions to sell on a revolving basis up to $1 billion of eligible trade receivables. We amended our agreement in June 2010 to extend the maturity date to June 2011. As of December 31, 2009, the amount of eligible receivables sold was $200 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we sold $1.2 billion of eligible receivables and repaid $1.3 billion. As of September 30, 2010, the amount of eligible receivables sold was $100 million. Proceeds from the sale of receivables under this facility are reflected as debt in our consolidated balance sheets.
We have an accounts receivable sales facility with a group of third-party entities and financial institutions to sell on a revolving basis up to $1 billion of eligible trade receivables. We amended our agreement in June 2010 to extend the maturity date to June 2011. As of December 31, 2009, the amount of eligible receivables sold was $200 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we sold $1.2 billion of eligible receivables and repaid $1.3 billion. As of September 30, 2010, the amount of eligible receivables sold was $100 million. Proceeds from the sale of receivables under this facility are reflected as debt in our consolidated balance sheets.
Other Disclosures
The estimated fair value of our debt, including the current portion, was as follows (in millions):
The estimated fair value of our debt, including the current portion, was as follows (in millions):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Carrying amount (excluding capital leases) |
$ | 7,998 | $ | 7,364 | ||||
Fair value |
9,595 | 8,228 |
15
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
8. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Treasury Stock
No significant purchases of our common stock were made during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we issued 1.6 million shares and 0.9 million shares from treasury, respectively, for our employee benefit plans.
No significant purchases of our common stock were made during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we issued 1.6 million shares and 0.9 million shares from treasury, respectively, for our employee benefit plans.
Common Stock Dividends
On November 3, 2010, our board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per common share payable on December 15, 2010 to holders of record at the close of business on November 17, 2010.
On November 3, 2010, our board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per common share payable on December 15, 2010 to holders of record at the close of business on November 17, 2010.
Common Stock Offering
On June 3, 2009, we sold in a public offering 46 million shares of our common stock, which included 6 million shares related to an overallotment option exercised by the underwriters, at a price of $18.00 per share and received proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and other issuance costs, of $799 million.
On June 3, 2009, we sold in a public offering 46 million shares of our common stock, which included 6 million shares related to an overallotment option exercised by the underwriters, at a price of $18.00 per share and received proceeds, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and other issuance costs, of $799 million.
16
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
9. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
Earnings (loss) per common share amounts were computed as follows (dollars and shares in millions,
except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted | Common | Restricted | Common | |||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Stock | Stock | |||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 292 | $ | (343 | ) | |||||||||||
Less dividends paid: |
||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
28 | 84 | ||||||||||||||
Nonvested restricted stock |
| | ||||||||||||||
Undistributed earnings (loss) |
$ | 264 | $ | (427 | ) | |||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
3 | 564 | 2 | 561 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributed earnings |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||||
Undistributed earnings (loss) |
0.47 | 0.47 | | (0.76 | ) | |||||||||||
Total earnings (loss) per common share
from continuing operations |
$ | 0.52 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.15 | $ | (0.61 | ) | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 292 | $ | (343 | ) | |||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
564 | 561 | ||||||||||||||
Common equivalent shares: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
3 | | ||||||||||||||
Performance awards and unvested
restricted stock |
1 | | ||||||||||||||
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding assuming dilution |
568 | 561 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution |
$ | 0.51 | $ | (0.61 | ) | |||||||||||
17
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted | Common | Restricted | Common | |||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Stock | Stock | |||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 721 | $ | (170 | ) | |||||||||||
Less dividends paid: |
||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
85 | 238 | ||||||||||||||
Nonvested restricted stock |
| 1 | ||||||||||||||
Undistributed earnings (loss) |
$ | 636 | $ | (409 | ) | |||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
3 | 563 | 2 | 534 | ||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Distributed earnings |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.45 | ||||||||
Undistributed earnings (loss) |
1.12 | 1.12 | | (0.77 | ) | |||||||||||
Total earnings (loss) per common share
from continuing operations |
$ | 1.27 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 0.44 | $ | (0.32 | ) | |||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 721 | $ | (170 | ) | |||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
563 | 534 | ||||||||||||||
Common equivalent shares: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
3 | | ||||||||||||||
Performance awards and unvested
restricted stock |
1 | | ||||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding -
assuming dilution |
567 | 534 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share from
continuing operations assuming dilution |
$ | 1.27 | $ | (0.32 | ) | |||||||||||
The following table reflects potentially dilutive securities (in millions) that were excluded from
the calculation of earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations assuming
dilution as the effect of including such securities would have been antidilutive. These
potentially dilutive securities included common equivalent shares (primarily stock options), which
were excluded due to the loss from continuing operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, and stock options for which the exercise prices were greater than the average
market price of our common shares during each respective reporting period.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Common equivalent shares |
| 4 | | 4 | ||||||||||||
Stock options |
17 | 10 | 14 | 10 |
18
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
10. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
In
order to determine net cash provided by operating activities, net
income (loss) is adjusted by, among
other things, changes in current assets and current liabilities as follows (in millions):
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Decrease (increase) in current assets: |
||||||||
Receivables, net |
$ | (516 | ) | $ | (966 | ) | ||
Inventories |
79 | 198 | ||||||
Income taxes receivable |
787 | 137 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
111 | 106 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
358 | 1,466 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
(51 | ) | 94 | |||||
Taxes other than income taxes |
(168 | ) | 54 | |||||
Income taxes payable |
(8 | ) | 65 | |||||
Changes in current assets and current liabilities |
$ | 592 | $ | 1,154 | ||||
The above changes in current assets and current liabilities differ from changes between amounts
reflected in the applicable consolidated balance sheets for the respective periods for the
following reasons:
| the amounts shown above exclude changes in cash and temporary cash investments, deferred
income taxes, and current portion of debt and capital lease obligations, as well as the
effect of certain noncash investing and financing activities discussed below; |
||
| the amounts shown above exclude the current assets and current liabilities acquired in
connection with the acquisitions of the ASA and Renew assets and the VeraSun Acquisition; |
||
| amounts accrued for capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs are
reflected in investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows when such
amounts are paid; |
||
| changes in assets and liabilities related to the discontinued operations of the Delaware
City Refinery prior to its shutdown are reflected in the line items to which the changes
relate in the table above; and |
||
| certain differences between consolidated balance sheet changes and the changes reflected
above result from translating foreign currency denominated amounts at different exchange
rates. |
There were no significant noncash investing or financing activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Cash flows related to interest and income taxes were as follows (in millions):
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Interest paid in excess of amount capitalized |
$ | (302 | ) | $ | (232 | ) | ||
Income taxes received, net |
645 | 134 |
19
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash flows related to the discontinued operations of the Delaware City Refinery have been combined
with the cash flows from continuing operations within each category in the consolidated statements
of cash flows for both periods presented and are summarized as follows (in millions):
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash used in operating activities |
$ | (76 | ) | $ | (203 | ) | ||
Cash used in investing activities |
| (119 | ) |
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
A fair value hierarchy (Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3) is used to categorize fair value amounts
based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value. Accordingly, fair values determined by
Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Fair
values determined by Level 2 inputs are based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include
situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. We use
appropriate valuation techniques based on the available inputs to measure the fair values of our
applicable assets and liabilities. When available, we measure fair value using Level 1 inputs
because they generally provide the most reliable evidence of fair value.
The tables below present information (in millions) about our financial assets and liabilities
measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the fair value hierarchy of
the inputs utilized by us to determine the fair values as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009.
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Prices | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
in Active | Observable | Unobservable | Total as of | |||||||||||||
Markets | Inputs | Inputs | September 30, | |||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity derivative contracts |
$ | 45 | $ | 79 | $ | | $ | 124 | ||||||||
Nonqualified benefit plans |
98 | | 10 | 108 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity derivative contracts |
13 | 9 | | 22 | ||||||||||||
Nonqualified benefit plans |
32 | | | 32 |
20
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Prices | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
in Active | Observable | Unobservable | Total as of | |||||||||||||
Markets | Inputs | Inputs | December 31, | |||||||||||||
(Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity derivative contracts |
$ | 10 | $ | 349 | $ | | $ | 359 | ||||||||
Nonqualified benefit plans |
99 | | 10 | 109 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity derivative contracts |
100 | 9 | | 109 | ||||||||||||
Nonqualified benefit plans |
34 | | | 34 |
The valuation methods used to measure our financial instruments at fair value are as follows:
| Commodity derivative contracts, consisting primarily of exchange-traded futures and
swaps, are measured at fair value using the market approach. Exchange-traded futures are
valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair
value hierarchy.
Swaps are priced using third-party broker quotes, industry pricing services, and
exchange-traded curves, with appropriate consideration of counterparty credit risk, but
since they have contractual terms that are not identical to exchange-traded futures
instruments with a comparable market price, these financial instruments are categorized in
Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. |
||
| The nonqualified benefit plan assets and nonqualified benefit plan liabilities
categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a
market approach based on quotations from national securities exchanges. The nonqualified
benefit plan assets categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy represent insurance
contracts, the fair value of which is provided by the insurer. |
As of September 30, 2010, cash collateral deposits of $29 million with brokers under master netting
arrangements is included in the fair value of the commodity derivatives reflected in Level 1. As
of December 31, 2009, cash received from brokers of $64 million, resulting from the equity in
broker accounts covered by master netting arrangements exceeding the minimum margin requirements
for such accounts, is netted against the fair value of the commodity derivatives reflected in Level
1. Certain of our commodity derivative contracts under master netting arrangements include both
asset and liability positions. We have elected to offset the fair value amounts recognized for
multiple similar derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty, including any related
cash collateral asset or obligation.
21
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances (in millions) for fair value
measurements developed using significant unobservable inputs for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Earn-Out | Nonqualified | |||||||||||||||
Agreement | Benefit Plans | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | | $ | 38 | $ | 10 | $ | | ||||||||
Total losses included in earnings |
| (5 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Settlement |
| (33 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | | $ | | $ | 10 | $ | | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | | $ | 13 | $ | 10 | $ | | ||||||||
Total gains included in earnings |
| 20 | | | ||||||||||||
Settlement |
| (33 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | | $ | | $ | 10 | $ | | ||||||||
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were no unrealized gains or losses
included in total gains (losses) included in earnings in the table above related to nonqualified
benefit plan assets still held as of September 30, 2010.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
the amounts reflected in total gains
(losses) included in earnings in the table above
related to the earn-out agreement are
reported in other income (expense), net in the
consolidated statements of income. We entered into the earn-out
agreement with Alon Refining Krotz Springs Inc. in connection with the sale
of our Krotz Springs Refinery in 2008. We also entered into commodity derivative instruments to hedge the
risk of changes in the fair value of the earn-out agreement, and the gains (losses) associated
with these instruments are also reported in other income (expense), net.
12. PRICE RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of commodities, interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and we enter into derivative instruments to manage those
risks. We also enter into derivative instruments to manage the price risk on other contractual
derivatives into which we have entered. The only types of derivative instruments we enter into are
those related to the various commodities we purchase or produce, interest rate swaps, and foreign
currency exchange and purchase contracts, as described below. All derivative instruments are
recorded on our balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair values.
When we enter into a derivative instrument, it is designated as a fair value hedge, a cash flow
hedge, an economic hedge, or a trading activity. The gain or loss on a derivative instrument
designated and qualifying as a fair value hedge, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the
hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized currently in income in the same period.
The effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative instrument designated and qualifying as
a cash flow hedge is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and is then
recorded in income in the period or periods during
22
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
which the hedged forecasted transaction affects
income. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the cash flow derivative instrument, if
any, is recognized in income as incurred. For our economic hedging relationships (hedges not
designated as fair value or cash flow hedges) and for derivative instruments entered into by us for
trading purposes, the derivative instrument is recorded at fair value and changes in the fair value
of the derivative instrument are recognized currently in income. The cash flow effects of all of
our derivative contracts are reflected in operating activities in the consolidated statements of
cash flows for both periods presented.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to the price of crude oil, refined products (primarily gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), and natural gas used in our refining operations. To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we use commodity derivative instruments, including swaps, futures, and options. We use the futures markets for the available liquidity, which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations. We use swaps primarily to convert our floating price exposure to a fixed price. Our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors.
We are exposed to market risks related to the price of crude oil, refined products (primarily gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), and natural gas used in our refining operations. To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we use commodity derivative instruments, including swaps, futures, and options. We use the futures markets for the available liquidity, which provides greater flexibility in transacting our hedging and trading operations. We use swaps primarily to convert our floating price exposure to a fixed price. Our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been approved by our board of directors.
For risk management purposes, we use fair value hedges, cash flow hedges, and economic hedges. In
addition to the use of derivative instruments to manage commodity price risk, we also enter into
certain commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes. Our objective for entering into
each type of hedge or trading activity is described below.
Fair Value Hedges
Fair value hedges are used to hedge certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories. The level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our operating inventories, and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our previous year-end LIFO inventory levels.
Fair value hedges are used to hedge certain refining inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories. The level of activity for our fair value hedges is based on the level of our operating inventories, and generally represents the amount by which our inventories differ from our previous year-end LIFO inventory levels.
As of September 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that
were entered into to hedge crude oil and refined product inventories. The information presents the
notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes in
thousands of barrels).
Notional Contract | ||||
Volumes by | ||||
Year of Maturity | ||||
Derivative Instrument | 2010 | |||
Crude oil and refined products: |
||||
Futures long |
32,560 | |||
Futures short |
47,123 |
23
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash Flow Hedges
Cash flow hedges are used to hedge certain forecasted feedstock and refined product purchases, refined product sales, and natural gas purchases. The objective of our cash flow hedges is to lock in the price of forecasted feedstock, refined product or natural gas purchases or refined product sales at existing market prices that we deem favorable.
Cash flow hedges are used to hedge certain forecasted feedstock and refined product purchases, refined product sales, and natural gas purchases. The objective of our cash flow hedges is to lock in the price of forecasted feedstock, refined product or natural gas purchases or refined product sales at existing market prices that we deem favorable.
As of September 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that
were entered into to hedge forecasted purchases or sales of crude oil and refined products. The
information presents the notional volume of outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of
maturity (volumes in thousands of barrels).
Notional Contract | ||||
Volumes by | ||||
Year of Maturity | ||||
Derivative Instrument | 2010 | |||
Crude oil and refined products: |
||||
Swaps long |
10,650 | |||
Swaps short |
10,650 |
Economic Hedges
Economic hedges are hedges not designated as fair value or cash flow hedges that are used to (i) manage price volatility in certain refinery feedstock, refined product and corn inventories, and (ii) manage price volatility in certain forecasted refinery feedstock, refined product and corn purchases, refined product sales, and natural gas purchases. Our objective in entering into economic hedges is consistent with the objectives discussed above for fair value hedges and cash flow hedges. However, the economic hedges are not designated as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes, usually due to the difficulty of establishing the required documentation at the date that the derivative instrument is entered into that would allow us to achieve hedge deferral accounting.
Economic hedges are hedges not designated as fair value or cash flow hedges that are used to (i) manage price volatility in certain refinery feedstock, refined product and corn inventories, and (ii) manage price volatility in certain forecasted refinery feedstock, refined product and corn purchases, refined product sales, and natural gas purchases. Our objective in entering into economic hedges is consistent with the objectives discussed above for fair value hedges and cash flow hedges. However, the economic hedges are not designated as a fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes, usually due to the difficulty of establishing the required documentation at the date that the derivative instrument is entered into that would allow us to achieve hedge deferral accounting.
As of September 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that
were entered into as economic hedges. The information presents the notional volume of outstanding
contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes in thousands of barrels, except those
identified as corn contracts that are presented in thousands of bushels).
Notional Contract Volumes by | ||||||||||||
Year of Maturity | ||||||||||||
Derivative Instrument | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | |||||||||
Crude oil and refined products: |
||||||||||||
Swaps long |
70,768 | 110,222 | | |||||||||
Swaps short |
69,979 | 110,210 | | |||||||||
Futures long |
242,403 | 24,975 | | |||||||||
Futures short |
241,830 | 20,112 | | |||||||||
Options long |
6 | 2,410 | | |||||||||
Options short |
| 2,400 | | |||||||||
Corn: |
||||||||||||
Futures long |
9,120 | 375 | | |||||||||
Futures short |
30,135 | 20,865 | 420 |
24
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Trading Activities
Derivatives entered into for trading purposes represent commodity derivative instruments held or issued for trading purposes. Our objective in entering into commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes is to take advantage of existing market conditions related to crude oil and refined products that we perceive as opportunities to benefit our results of operations and cash flows, but for which there are no related physical transactions.
Derivatives entered into for trading purposes represent commodity derivative instruments held or issued for trading purposes. Our objective in entering into commodity derivative instruments for trading purposes is to take advantage of existing market conditions related to crude oil and refined products that we perceive as opportunities to benefit our results of operations and cash flows, but for which there are no related physical transactions.
As of September 30, 2010, we had the following outstanding commodity derivative instruments that
were entered into for trading purposes. The information presents the notional volume of
outstanding contracts by type of instrument and year of maturity (volumes represent thousands of
barrels, except those identified as natural gas contracts that are presented in billions of British
thermal units).
Notional Contract Volumes | ||||||||
by | ||||||||
Year of Maturity | ||||||||
Derivative Instrument | 2010 | 2011 | ||||||
Crude oil and refined products: |
||||||||
Swaps long |
16,579 | 13,695 | ||||||
Swaps short |
16,579 | 13,695 | ||||||
Futures long |
76,004 | 6,766 | ||||||
Futures short |
76,950 | 6,782 | ||||||
Options long |
200 | | ||||||
Options short |
150 | | ||||||
Natural gas: |
||||||||
Futures long |
4,370 | | ||||||
Futures short |
4,170 | |
Interest Rate Risk
Our primary market risk exposure for changes in interest rates relates to our debt obligations. We manage our exposure to changing interest rates through the use of a combination of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt. In addition, at times we have used interest rate swap agreements to manage our fixed to floating interest rate position by converting certain fixed-rate debt to floating-rate debt. These interest rate swap agreements are generally accounted for as fair value hedges. However, we have not had any outstanding interest rate swap agreements since 2006.
Our primary market risk exposure for changes in interest rates relates to our debt obligations. We manage our exposure to changing interest rates through the use of a combination of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt. In addition, at times we have used interest rate swap agreements to manage our fixed to floating interest rate position by converting certain fixed-rate debt to floating-rate debt. These interest rate swap agreements are generally accounted for as fair value hedges. However, we have not had any outstanding interest rate swap agreements since 2006.
Foreign Currency Risk
We are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations on transactions related to our Canadian operations. To manage our exposure to these exchange rate fluctuations, we use foreign currency exchange and purchase contracts. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, and therefore they are classified as economic hedges. As of September 30, 2010, we had commitments to purchase $308 million of U.S. dollars. These commitments matured on or before October 22, 2010.
We are exposed to exchange rate fluctuations on transactions related to our Canadian operations. To manage our exposure to these exchange rate fluctuations, we use foreign currency exchange and purchase contracts. These contracts are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes, and therefore they are classified as economic hedges. As of September 30, 2010, we had commitments to purchase $308 million of U.S. dollars. These commitments matured on or before October 22, 2010.
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments
The following tables provide information about the fair values of our derivative instruments as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in millions) and the line items in the balance sheet in which the fair values are reflected. See Note 11 for additional information related to the fair values of our derivative instruments. As indicated in Note 11, we net fair value amounts recognized for multiple similar derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under master netting arrangements.
The following tables provide information about the fair values of our derivative instruments as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in millions) and the line items in the balance sheet in which the fair values are reflected. See Note 11 for additional information related to the fair values of our derivative instruments. As indicated in Note 11, we net fair value amounts recognized for multiple similar derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under master netting arrangements.
25
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tables below, however, are presented on a gross asset and gross
liability basis, which results in the reflection of certain assets in liability accounts and
certain liabilities in asset accounts. In addition, in Note 11, we included cash collateral on
deposit with or received from brokers in the fair value of the commodity derivatives; these cash
amounts are not reflected in the tables below.
Fair Value as of | ||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Asset | Liability | ||||||||
Location | Derivatives | Derivatives | ||||||||
Derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts: |
||||||||||
Futures |
Receivables, net | $ | 14 | $ | 37 | |||||
Futures |
Accrued expenses | 315 | 400 | |||||||
Swaps |
Receivables, net | 74 | 76 | |||||||
Swaps |
Prepaid expenses and other | 130 | 71 | |||||||
Swaps |
Accrued expenses | 7 | 8 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 540 | $ | 592 | ||||||
Derivatives not
designated as
hedging instruments |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts: |
||||||||||
Futures |
Receivables, net | $ | 40 | $ | 66 | |||||
Futures |
Accrued expenses | 3,205 | 3,069 | |||||||
Swaps |
Receivables, net | 214 | 171 | |||||||
Swaps |
Prepaid expenses and other | 459 | 474 | |||||||
Swaps |
Accrued expenses | 7 | 15 | |||||||
Options |
Accrued expenses | | 5 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 3,925 | $ | 3,800 | ||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 4,465 | $ | 4,392 | ||||||
26
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair Value as of | ||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||
Balance Sheet | Asset | Liability | ||||||||
Location | Derivatives | Derivatives | ||||||||
Derivatives
designated as
hedging instruments |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts: |
||||||||||
Futures |
Receivables, net | $ | 1 | $ | 2 | |||||
Futures |
Accrued expenses | 13 | 37 | |||||||
Swaps |
Receivables, net | 308 | 271 | |||||||
Swaps |
Prepaid expenses and other | 579 | 415 | |||||||
Swaps |
Accrued expenses | 28 | 19 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 929 | $ | 744 | ||||||
Derivatives not
designated as
hedging instruments |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts: |
||||||||||
Futures |
Receivables, net | $ | 34 | $ | 29 | |||||
Futures |
Accrued expenses | 2,094 | 2,101 | |||||||
Swaps |
Receivables, net | 506 | 370 | |||||||
Swaps |
Prepaid expenses and other | 1,049 | 1,037 | |||||||
Swaps |
Accrued expenses | 46 | 62 | |||||||
Options |
Accrued expenses | | 1 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 3,729 | $ | 3,600 | ||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 4,658 | $ | 4,344 | ||||||
Market and Counterparty Risk
Our price risk management activities involve the receipt or payment of fixed price commitments into the future. These transactions give rise to market risk, which is the risk that future changes in market conditions may make an instrument less valuable. We closely monitor and manage our exposure to market risk on a daily basis in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors. Market risks are monitored by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy. Concentrations of customers in the refining industry may impact our overall exposure to counterparty risk because these customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, financial services companies are the counterparties in certain of our price risk management activities, and such financial services companies may be adversely affected by periods of uncertainty and illiquidity in the credit and capital markets.
Our price risk management activities involve the receipt or payment of fixed price commitments into the future. These transactions give rise to market risk, which is the risk that future changes in market conditions may make an instrument less valuable. We closely monitor and manage our exposure to market risk on a daily basis in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors. Market risks are monitored by a risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy. Concentrations of customers in the refining industry may impact our overall exposure to counterparty risk because these customers may be similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, financial services companies are the counterparties in certain of our price risk management activities, and such financial services companies may be adversely affected by periods of uncertainty and illiquidity in the credit and capital markets.
As of September 30, 2010, we had net receivables related to derivative instruments of $6 million
from counterparties in the refining industry and $38 million from counterparties in the financial
services industry. As of December 31, 2009, we had net receivables related to derivative
instruments of $19 million from counterparties in the refining industry and $157 million from
counterparties in the financial services industry. These amounts represent the aggregate amount
payable to us by companies in those industries, reduced by payables from us to those companies
under master netting arrangements that allow for the setoff of amounts receivable from and payable
to the same party. We do not require any
27
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
collateral or other security to support derivative
instruments into which we enter. We also do not have any derivative instruments that require us to
maintain a minimum investment-grade credit rating.
Effect of Derivative Instruments on Statements of Income and Statements of Comprehensive Income
The following tables provide information about the gain or loss recognized in income and other comprehensive income on our derivative instruments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in millions), and the line items in the financial statements in which such gains and losses are reflected.
The following tables provide information about the gain or loss recognized in income and other comprehensive income on our derivative instruments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in millions), and the line items in the financial statements in which such gains and losses are reflected.
Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of | Gain (Loss) | Gain (Loss) | Recognized in | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in | Gain (Loss) | Recognized in | Recognized in | Income for | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Recognized in | Income on | Income on | Ineffective Portion | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedging | Income on | Derivatives | Hedged Item | of Derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationships | Derivatives | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended
September 30: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Cost of sales | $ | 54 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (56 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Nine months ended
September 30: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity
contracts |
Cost of sales | 253 | (94 | ) | (247 | ) | 87 | 6 | (7 | ) |
For fair value hedges, no component of the derivative instruments gains or losses was excluded
from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. No amounts were recognized in income for hedged firm
commitments that no longer qualify as fair value hedges.
Gain (Loss) | Gain | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognized in | Reclassified from | Gain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in | OCI on | Location of Gain | Accumulated OCI into | Recognized in | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow | Derivatives | Recognized in | Income | Income on Derivatives | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedging | (Effective Portion) | Income on | (Effective Portion) | (Ineffective Portion) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Relationships | 2010 | 2009 | Derivatives | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended
September 30: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
$ | | $ | 36 | Cost of sales | $ | 37 | $ | 83 | $ | | $ | 6 | |||||||||||||
Nine months ended
September 30: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
(2 | ) | 133 | Cost of sales | 135 | 255 | | 5 |
For cash flow hedges, no component of the derivative instruments gains or losses was excluded
from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. For the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, cash flow hedges primarily related to forward sales of distillates and associated forward
purchases of crude oil, with $28 million of cumulative after-tax gains on cash flow hedges
remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income as of September 30, 2010. We expect that all
of the deferred gains as of
28
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2010 will be reclassified into cost of sales over the
next 12 months as a result of hedged transactions that are forecasted to occur. The amount
ultimately realized in income, however, will differ as commodity prices change. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, there were no amounts reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive income into income as a result of the discontinuance of cash flow hedge
accounting.
Amount of Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||
Derivatives Designated as | Location of Gain (Loss) | Recognized in | ||||||||
Economic Hedges and Other | Recognized in Income on | Income on Derivatives | ||||||||
Derivative Instruments | Derivatives | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Three months ended September 30: |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Cost of sales | $ | 22 | $ | (68 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency contracts |
Cost of sales | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | |||||
17 | (77 | ) | ||||||||
Earn-out agreement |
Other income (expense) | | (5 | ) | ||||||
Earn-out hedge (commodity contracts) |
Other income (expense) | | 1 | |||||||
| (4 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 17 | $ | (81 | ) | |||||
Nine months ended September 30: |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Cost of sales | $ | (93 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | |||
Foreign currency contracts |
Cost of sales | (2 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||
(95 | ) | (55 | ) | |||||||
Earn-out agreement |
Other income (expense) | | 20 | |||||||
Earn-out hedge (commodity contracts) |
Other income (expense) | | (62 | ) | ||||||
| (42 | ) | ||||||||
Total |
$ | (95 | ) | $ | (97 | ) | ||||
Amount of Gain | ||||||||||
Location of Gain | Recognized in Income on | |||||||||
Derivatives Designated as | Recognized in Income on | Derivatives | ||||||||
Trading Activities | Derivatives | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Three months ended September 30: |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Cost of sales | $ | 2 | $ | 9 | |||||
Nine months ended September 30: |
||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Cost of sales | 7 | 125 |
29
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
13. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Prior to the second quarter of 2009, we had two reportable segments, which were refining and
retail. As a result of the VeraSun Acquisition during the second quarter of 2009 (as discussed in
Note 3), ethanol is presented as a third reportable segment.
The following table reflects activity related to continuing operations (in millions):
Refining | Retail | Ethanol | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30,
2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues from external
customers |
$ | 19,006 | $ | 2,360 | $ | 844 | $ | | $ | 22,210 | ||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
1,576 | | 73 | | 1,649 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
571 | 105 | 47 | (152 | ) | 571 | ||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30,
2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues from external
customers |
16,016 | 2,147 | 410 | | 18,573 | |||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
1,388 | | 47 | | 1,435 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(219 | ) | 111 | 49 | (179 | ) | (238 | ) | ||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues from external
customers |
54,663 | 6,893 | 2,072 | | 63,628 | |||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
4,675 | | 184 | | 4,859 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,441 | 285 | 139 | (405 | ) | 1,460 | ||||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues from external
customers |
42,856 | 5,748 | 673 | | 49,277 | |||||||||||||||
Intersegment revenues |
3,676 | | 76 | | 3,752 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
331 | 232 | 71 | (471 | ) | 163 |
Total assets by reportable segment were as follows (in millions):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Refining |
$ | 31,346 | $ | 30,901 | ||||
Retail |
1,850 | 1,875 | ||||||
Ethanol |
902 | 654 | ||||||
Corporate |
3,178 | 2,199 | ||||||
Total consolidated assets |
$ | 37,276 | $ | 35,629 | ||||
Corporate assets primarily include cash, corporate office buildings, and income tax receivables
that may exist from time to time.
30
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The components of net periodic benefit cost related to our defined benefit plans were as follows
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in millions):
Other Postretirement | ||||||||||||||||
Pension Plans | Benefit Plans | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30: |
||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 22 | $ | 26 | $ | 3 | $ | 3 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
21 | 19 | 6 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(28 | ) | (27 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Amortization of: |
||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) |
1 | 1 | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss |
| 3 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 16 | $ | 22 | $ | 5 | $ | 6 | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30: |
||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 65 | $ | 78 | $ | 8 | $ | 9 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
62 | 59 | 19 | 19 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(84 | ) | (81 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Amortization of: |
||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) |
2 | 2 | (15 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss |
1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 46 | $ | 66 | $ | 15 | $ | 19 | ||||||||
During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we contributed $50 million and
$72 million, respectively, to our qualified pension plans. We currently anticipate contributing
$100 million to our qualified pension plans in December 2010.
In March 2010, a comprehensive health care reform package composed of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Health Care
Reform) was enacted into law. As a result of the Health Care Reform, the income tax expense
presented in our consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
includes a charge of $16 million related to the non-deductibility of certain retiree prescription
health care costs, to the extent of federal subsidies received. Although the tax change provisions
of the Health Care Reform are not effective until 2013, the effect of changes in tax laws or rates
on deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in the period that includes the enactment
date, even though the changes may not be effective until future periods. Other provisions of the
Health Care Reform are also expected to affect the future costs of our health care plans. An
estimate of the additional impacts of the Health Care Reform is not yet practicable due to the
number and complexity of the provisions; however, we are currently evaluating the potential impact
of the Health Care Reform on our financial position and results of operations.
31
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Tax Matters
We are subject to extensive tax liabilities, including federal, state, and foreign income taxes and
transactional taxes such as excise, sales/use, payroll, franchise, withholding, and ad valorem
taxes. New tax laws and regulations and changes in existing tax laws and regulations are
continuously being enacted or proposed that could result in increased expenditures for tax liabilities in the future. Many of
these liabilities are subject to periodic audits by the respective taxing authority. Subsequent
changes to our tax liabilities as a result of these audits may subject us to interest and
penalties.
Effective
June 1, 2010, the Government of Aruba (GOA) enacted a new tax regime applicable to refinery and terminal
operations in Aruba. Under the new tax regime, we are subject to a profit tax rate of 7% and a
dividend withholding tax rate of 0%. In addition, all imports and exports are exempt from turnover
tax and throughput fees. Beginning June 1, 2012, we will also make a minimum annual tax payment of
$10 million (payable in equal quarterly installments), with the ability to carry forward any excess
tax prepayments to future tax years.
The new tax regime was the result of a settlement agreement entered into on February 24, 2010
between the GOA and us that set the parties proposed terms for settlement of a lengthy and
complicated tax dispute between the parties. On May 30, 2010, the Aruban Parliament adopted
several laws that implemented the provisions of the settlement agreement, which became effective
June 1, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, we relinquished the provisions of
the previous tax holiday regime. On June 4, 2010, we made a payment to the GOA of $118 million
(primarily from restricted cash held in escrow) in consideration of a full release of all tax
claims prior to June 1, 2010. This settlement resulted in an after-tax gain of $30 million
recognized primarily as a reduction to interest expense of $8 million and an income tax benefit of
$20 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Environmental Matter
On June 30, 2010, the EPA formally disapproved the flexible permits program submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) in 1994 for inclusion in its clean-air implementation plan. The EPA determined that Texas flexible permit program did not meet several requirements under the federal Clean Air Act. Our Port Arthur, Texas City, Three Rivers, McKee and Corpus Christi East and West Refineries operate under flexible permits administered by the TCEQ. Accordingly, the permit status of these facilities has been called into question. Litigation against the EPA regarding its actions has been brought by multiple stakeholders, including trade associations. We are currently evaluating the impacts of this new regulatory action and cannot estimate the financial or operational impacts on our business. Depending on the final resolution, the EPAs actions could result in material increased compliance costs for us, costly remedial actions, increased capital expenditures, increased operating costs, and additional operating restrictions for our business, resulting in an increase in the cost of the products we produce, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.
On June 30, 2010, the EPA formally disapproved the flexible permits program submitted by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) in 1994 for inclusion in its clean-air implementation plan. The EPA determined that Texas flexible permit program did not meet several requirements under the federal Clean Air Act. Our Port Arthur, Texas City, Three Rivers, McKee and Corpus Christi East and West Refineries operate under flexible permits administered by the TCEQ. Accordingly, the permit status of these facilities has been called into question. Litigation against the EPA regarding its actions has been brought by multiple stakeholders, including trade associations. We are currently evaluating the impacts of this new regulatory action and cannot estimate the financial or operational impacts on our business. Depending on the final resolution, the EPAs actions could result in material increased compliance costs for us, costly remedial actions, increased capital expenditures, increased operating costs, and additional operating restrictions for our business, resulting in an increase in the cost of the products we produce, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.
Litigation
Retail Fuel Temperature Litigation
As of October 29, 2010, we were named in 21 consumer class action lawsuits relating to fuel temperature. We have been named in these lawsuits together with several other defendants in the retail and wholesale petroleum marketing business. The complaints, filed in federal courts in several states, allege that
Retail Fuel Temperature Litigation
As of October 29, 2010, we were named in 21 consumer class action lawsuits relating to fuel temperature. We have been named in these lawsuits together with several other defendants in the retail and wholesale petroleum marketing business. The complaints, filed in federal courts in several states, allege that
32
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
because fuel volume increases with fuel temperature, the defendants
have violated state consumer protection laws by failing to adjust the volume or price of fuel when
the fuel temperature exceeded 60 degrees Fahrenheit. The complaints seek to certify classes of
retail consumers who purchased fuel in various locations. The complaints seek an order compelling
the installation of temperature correction devices as well as monetary relief. The federal
lawsuits are consolidated into a multi-district litigation case in the U.S. District Court for the
District of Kansas (Multi-District Litigation Docket No. 1840, In re: Motor Fuel Temperature Sales
Practices Litigation). Discovery has commenced. In May 2010, the court issued an order in
response to the plaintiffs motion for class certification of the Kansas cases. The court
certified an injunction class covering nonmonetary relief but deferred ruling on a damages
class. The defendants request to appeal the courts certification order was recently denied. We
now await the lower courts plan of management for the docket. We believe that we have several strong
defenses to these lawsuits and intend to contest them. We have not recorded a loss contingency
liability with respect to this matter, but due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, we
believe that it is reasonably possible that we may suffer a loss with respect to one or more of the
lawsuits. An estimate of the possible loss or range of loss from an adverse result in all or
substantially all of these cases cannot reasonably be made.
Other Litigation
We are also a party to additional claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that there is only a remote likelihood that future costs related to known contingent liabilities related to these legal proceedings would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
We are also a party to additional claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that there is only a remote likelihood that future costs related to known contingent liabilities related to these legal proceedings would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial position.
16. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In conjunction with the acquisition of Premcor Inc. on September 1, 2005, Valero Energy Corporation
has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the following debt of The Premcor Refining Group Inc.
(PRG), a wholly owned subsidiary of Valero Energy Corporation, that was outstanding as of September
30, 2010:
| 6.75% senior notes due February 2011 and |
||
| 6.125% senior notes due May 2011. |
In addition, PRG has fully and unconditionally guaranteed all of the outstanding debt issued by
Valero Energy Corporation.
The following condensed consolidating financial information is provided for Valero and PRG as an
alternative to providing separate financial statements for PRG. The accounts for all companies
reflected herein are presented using the equity method of accounting for investments in
subsidiaries.
33
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2010
(Unaudited, In Millions)
(Unaudited, In Millions)
Valero | Other Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Energy | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | PRG | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments |
$ | 1,060 | $ | | $ | 1,292 | $ | | $ | 2,352 | ||||||||||
Receivables, net |
| 34 | 4,206 | | 4,240 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 42 | 4,762 | | 4,804 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes receivable |
| | 100 | | 100 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| | 184 | | 184 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
| 7 | 165 | | 172 | |||||||||||||||
Assets related to discontinued operations |
| 25 | | | 25 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
1,060 | 108 | 10,709 | | 11,877 | |||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
| 4,215 | 25,715 | | 29,930 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
| (471 | ) | (5,869 | ) | | (6,340 | ) | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| 3,744 | 19,846 | | 23,590 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
| | 224 | | 224 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in Valero Energy affiliates |
6,770 | 5,007 | 173 | (11,950 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term notes receivable from affiliates |
15,795 | | | (15,795 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax receivable |
594 | | | (594 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
224 | 131 | 1,230 | | 1,585 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 24,443 | $ | 8,990 | $ | 32,182 | $ | (28,339 | ) | $ | 37,276 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations |
$ | 8 | $ | 411 | $ | 104 | $ | | $ | 523 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
| 80 | 6,016 | | 6,096 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
184 | 134 | 230 | | 548 | |||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes |
| 22 | 539 | | 561 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
73 | | 1 | | 74 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
322 | | | | 322 | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
| 89 | | | 89 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
587 | 736 | 6,890 | | 8,213 | |||||||||||||||
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current portion |
7,479 | | 34 | | 7,513 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term notes payable to affiliates |
| 7,244 | 8,551 | (15,795 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 739 | 4,285 | (594 | ) | 4,430 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
977 | 98 | 645 | | 1,720 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
7 | | 1 | (1 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
7,839 | 3,719 | 6,892 | (10,611 | ) | 7,839 | ||||||||||||||
Treasury stock |
(6,615 | ) | | | | (6,615 | ) | |||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
13,855 | (3,540 | ) | 4,880 | (1,340 | ) | 13,855 | |||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
314 | (6 | ) | 4 | 2 | 314 | ||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
15,400 | 173 | 11,777 | (11,950 | ) | 15,400 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 24,443 | $ | 8,990 | $ | 32,182 | $ | (28,339 | ) | $ | 37,276 | |||||||||
34
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009
(In Millions)
(In Millions)
Valero | Other Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Energy | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | PRG | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments |
$ | 78 | $ | | $ | 747 | $ | | $ | 825 | ||||||||||
Receivables, net |
| 24 | 3,749 | | 3,773 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories |
| 420 | 4,443 | | 4,863 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes receivable |
858 | | 888 | (858 | ) | 888 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| | 180 | | 180 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
| 6 | 377 | | 383 | |||||||||||||||
Assets held for sale and assets related to
discontinued operations |
| 216 | 8 | | 224 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
936 | 666 | 10,392 | (858 | ) | 11,136 | ||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
| 4,100 | 24,363 | | 28,463 | |||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
| (401 | ) | (5,191 | ) | | (5,592 | ) | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| 3,699 | 19,172 | | 22,871 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
| | 227 | | 227 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in Valero Energy affiliates |
6,456 | 3,807 | 68 | (10,331 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Long-term notes receivable from affiliates |
14,181 | | | (14,181 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax receivable |
809 | | | (809 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred charges and other assets, net |
133 | 67 | 1,195 | | 1,395 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 22,515 | $ | 8,239 | $ | 31,054 | $ | (26,179 | ) | $ | 35,629 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of debt and capital lease
obligations |
$ | 33 | $ | | $ | 204 | $ | | $ | 237 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
52 | 133 | 5,575 | | 5,760 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
117 | 88 | 309 | | 514 | |||||||||||||||
Taxes other than income taxes |
| 19 | 706 | | 725 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
| | 953 | (858 | ) | 95 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
253 | | | | 253 | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities related to discontinued operations |
| 225 | | | 225 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
455 | 465 | 7,747 | (858 | ) | 7,809 | ||||||||||||||
Debt and capital lease obligations, less current
portion |
6,236 | 895 | 32 | | 7,163 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term notes payable to affiliates |
| 5,924 | 8,257 | (14,181 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 760 | 4,112 | (809 | ) | 4,063 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
1,099 | 127 | 643 | | 1,869 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
7 | | 1 | (1 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
7,896 | 3,719 | 6,887 | (10,606 | ) | 7,896 | ||||||||||||||
Treasury stock |
(6,721 | ) | | | | (6,721 | ) | |||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
13,178 | (3,644 | ) | 3,262 | 382 | 13,178 | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
365 | (7 | ) | 113 | (106 | ) | 365 | |||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
14,725 | 68 | 10,263 | (10,331 | ) | 14,725 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 22,515 | $ | 8,239 | $ | 31,054 | $ | (26,179 | ) | $ | 35,629 | |||||||||
35
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Unaudited, In Millions)
(Unaudited, In Millions)
Valero | Other Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Energy | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | PRG | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | 3,565 | $ | 20,913 | $ | (2,268 | ) | $ | 22,210 | |||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 3,940 | 18,351 | (2,268 | ) | 20,023 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
| 113 | 992 | | 1,105 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| 2 | 137 | | 139 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
| 40 | 332 | | 372 | |||||||||||||||
Asset impairment loss |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
| 4,095 | 19,812 | (2,268 | ) | 21,639 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
| (530 | ) | 1,101 | | 571 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
236 | 493 | 70 | (799 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
291 | (6 | ) | 193 | (460 | ) | 18 | |||||||||||||
Interest and debt expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Incurred |
(180 | ) | (131 | ) | (294 | ) | 460 | (145 | ) | |||||||||||
Capitalized |
| 2 | 24 | | 26 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
347 | (172 | ) | 1,094 | (799 | ) | 470 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
55 | (242 | ) | 365 | | 178 | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
292 | 70 | 729 | (799 | ) | 292 | ||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 292 | $ | 70 | $ | 729 | $ | (799 | ) | $ | 292 | |||||||||
36
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited, In Millions)
(Unaudited, In Millions)
Valero | Other Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Energy | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | PRG | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | 3,009 | $ | 17,533 | $ | (1,969 | ) | $ | 18,573 | |||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 3,514 | 15,667 | (1,969 | ) | 17,212 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
| 57 | 956 | | 1,013 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
1 | 39 | 127 | | 167 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
| 28 | 333 | | 361 | |||||||||||||||
Asset impairment loss |
| 11 | 47 | | 58 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
1 | 3,649 | 17,130 | (1,969 | ) | 18,811 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(1 | ) | (640 | ) | 403 | | (238 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
(650 | ) | 358 | (406 | ) | 698 | | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
309 | (6 | ) | 187 | (482 | ) | 8 | |||||||||||||
Interest and debt expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Incurred |
(176 | ) | (143 | ) | (313 | ) | 482 | (150 | ) | |||||||||||
Capitalized |
| 1 | 18 | | 19 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before
income tax expense (benefit) |
(518 | ) | (430 | ) | (111 | ) | 698 | (361 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
111 | (310 | ) | 181 | | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(629 | ) | (120 | ) | (292 | ) | 698 | (343 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
| (286 | ) | | | (286 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (629 | ) | $ | (406 | ) | $ | (292 | ) | $ | 698 | $ | (629 | ) | ||||||
37
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Unaudited, In Millions)
(Unaudited, In Millions)
Valero | Other Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Energy | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | PRG | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | 10,757 | $ | 62,882 | $ | (10,011 | ) | $ | 63,628 | |||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 11,825 | 55,665 | (10,011 | ) | 57,479 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
| 241 | 2,983 | | 3,224 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
| (31 | ) | 398 | | 367 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
| 111 | 985 | | 1,096 | |||||||||||||||
Asset impairment loss |
| | 2 | | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
| 12,146 | 60,033 | (10,011 | ) | 62,168 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
| (1,389 | ) | 2,849 | | 1,460 | ||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
583 | 1,201 | 104 | (1,888 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
858 | (30 | ) | 535 | (1,333 | ) | 30 | |||||||||||||
Interest and debt expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Incurred |
(524 | ) | (375 | ) | (864 | ) | 1,333 | (430 | ) | |||||||||||
Capitalized |
| 4 | 64 | | 68 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
917 | (589 | ) | 2,688 | (1,888 | ) | 1,128 | |||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
155 | (652 | ) | 904 | | 407 | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
762 | 63 | 1,784 | (1,888 | ) | 721 | ||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
| 41 | | | 41 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 762 | $ | 104 | $ | 1,784 | $ | (1,888 | ) | $ | 762 | |||||||||
38
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited, In Millions)
(Unaudited, In Millions)
Valero | Other Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Energy | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | PRG | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | | $ | 8,155 | $ | 49,003 | $ | (7,881 | ) | $ | 49,277 | |||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 8,993 | 43,318 | (7,881 | ) | 44,430 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
| 208 | 2,771 | | 2,979 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
2 | 40 | 392 | | 434 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
| 95 | 977 | | 1,072 | |||||||||||||||
Asset impairment loss |
| 99 | 100 | | 199 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
2 | 9,435 | 47,558 | (7,881 | ) | 49,114 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(2 | ) | (1,280 | ) | 1,445 | | 163 | |||||||||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries |
(728 | ) | 692 | (766 | ) | 802 | | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
853 | (47 | ) | 500 | (1,322 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest and debt expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Incurred |
(481 | ) | (385 | ) | (843 | ) | 1,322 | (387 | ) | |||||||||||
Capitalized |
| 12 | 80 | | 92 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
(358 | ) | (1,008 | ) | 416 | 802 | (148 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
216 | (646 | ) | 452 | | 22 | ||||||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations |
(574 | ) | (362 | ) | (36 | ) | 802 | (170 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
| (404 | ) | | | (404 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (574 | ) | $ | (766 | ) | $ | (36 | ) | $ | 802 | $ | (574 | ) | ||||||
39
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
(Unaudited, In Millions)
(Unaudited, In Millions)
Valero | Other Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Energy | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | PRG | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | 1,122 | $ | (813 | ) | $ | 2,313 | $ | | $ | 2,622 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| (149 | ) | (1,077 | ) | | (1,226 | ) | ||||||||||||
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
| (74 | ) | (336 | ) | | (410 | ) | ||||||||||||
Purchase of ethanol plants |
| | (260 | ) | | (260 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of the Delaware City Refinery
assets and associated terminal and pipeline assets |
| 210 | 10 | | 220 | |||||||||||||||
Net intercompany loan repayments |
(1,285 | ) | | | 1,285 | | ||||||||||||||
Return of investment |
10 | | | (10 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other investing activities, net |
| | 15 | | 15 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,275 | ) | (13 | ) | (1,648 | ) | 1,275 | (1,661 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-bank debt: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
1,244 | | | | 1,244 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments |
(33 | ) | (484 | ) | | | (517 | ) | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable sales program: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of receivables |
| | 1,225 | | 1,225 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments |
| | (1,325 | ) | | (1,325 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in connection with
employee benefit plans |
12 | | | | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends |
(85 | ) | | | | (85 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividend to parent |
| | (10 | ) | 10 | | ||||||||||||||
Debt issuance costs |
(10 | ) | | | | (10 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net intercompany borrowings |
| 1,310 | (25 | ) | (1,285 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Other financing activities, net |
7 | | (4 | ) | | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities |
1,135 | 826 | (139 | ) | (1,275 | ) | 547 | |||||||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
| | 19 | | 19 | |||||||||||||||
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
982 | | 545 | | 1,527 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments
at beginning of period |
78 | | 747 | | 825 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period |
$ | 1,060 | $ | | $ | 1,292 | $ | | $ | 2,352 | ||||||||||
40
Table of Contents
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(Unaudited, In Millions)
(Unaudited, In Millions)
Valero | Other Non- | |||||||||||||||||||
Energy | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporation | PRG | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (164 | ) | $ | (1,216 | ) | $ | 3,320 | $ | | $ | 1,940 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| (420 | ) | (1,400 | ) | | (1,820 | ) | ||||||||||||
Deferred turnaround and catalyst costs |
| (41 | ) | (260 | ) | | (301 | ) | ||||||||||||
Purchase of ethanol plants |
| | (556 | ) | | (556 | ) | |||||||||||||
Minor acquisitions |
| | (29 | ) | | (29 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net intercompany loan repayments |
(1,099 | ) | | | 1,099 | | ||||||||||||||
Other investing activities, net |
| | 23 | | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(1,099 | ) | (461 | ) | (2,222 | ) | 1,099 | (2,683 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-bank debt: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
998 | | | | 998 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments |
(209 | ) | | | | (209 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accounts receivable sales program: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of receivables |
| | 500 | | 500 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments |
| | (500 | ) | | (500 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of common stock, net of
issuance costs |
799 | | | | 799 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock dividends |
(239 | ) | | | | (239 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net intercompany borrowings (repayments) |
| 1,677 | (578 | ) | (1,099 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Other financing activities, net |
(3 | ) | | (3 | ) | | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
1,346 | 1,677 | (581 | ) | (1,099 | ) | 1,343 | |||||||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
| | 65 | | 65 | |||||||||||||||
Net increase in cash and temporary cash investments |
83 | | 582 | | 665 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments
at beginning of period |
215 | | 725 | | 940 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period |
$ | 298 | $ | | $ | 1,307 | $ | | $ | 1,605 | ||||||||||
41
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION
REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Form 10-Q, including without limitation our discussion below under the heading Overview and
Outlook, includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can identify our
forward-looking statements by the words anticipate, believe, expect, plan, intend,
estimate, project, projection, predict, budget, forecast, goal, guidance, target,
could, should, may, and similar expressions.
These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding:
| future refining margins, including gasoline and distillate margins; |
||
| future retail margins, including gasoline, diesel, home heating oil, and convenience
store merchandise margins; |
||
| future ethanol margins and the effect of the acquisition of ethanol plants on our
results of operations; |
||
| expectations regarding feedstock costs, including crude oil differentials, and operating
expenses; |
||
| anticipated levels of crude oil and refined product inventories; |
||
| our anticipated level of capital investments, including deferred refinery turnaround and
catalyst costs and capital expenditures for environmental and other purposes, and the
effect of those capital investments on our results of operations; |
||
| anticipated trends in the supply of and demand for crude oil and other feedstocks and
refined products in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere; |
||
| expectations regarding environmental, tax, and other regulatory initiatives; and |
||
| the effect of general economic and other conditions on refining, retail, and ethanol
industry fundamentals. |
We based our forward-looking statements on our current expectations, estimates, and projections
about ourselves and our industry. We caution that these statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that we cannot predict. In addition,
we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove
to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual results may differ materially from the future
performance that we have expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements. Differences
between actual results and any future performance suggested in these forward-looking statements
could result from a variety of factors, including the following:
| acts of terrorism aimed at either our facilities or other facilities that could impair
our ability to produce or transport refined products or receive feedstocks; |
||
| political and economic conditions in nations that consume refined products, including
the United States, and in crude oil producing regions, including the Middle East and South
America; |
||
| domestic and foreign demand for, and supplies of, refined products such as gasoline,
diesel fuel, jet fuel, home heating oil, and petrochemicals; |
||
| domestic and foreign demand for, and supplies of, crude oil and other feedstocks; |
||
| the ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
to agree on and to maintain crude oil price and production controls; |
||
| the level of consumer demand, including seasonal fluctuations; |
||
| refinery overcapacity or undercapacity; |
42
Table of Contents
| the actions taken by competitors, including both pricing and adjustments to refining
capacity in response to market conditions; |
||
| the level of foreign imports of refined products; |
||
| accidents or other unscheduled shutdowns affecting our refineries, machinery, pipelines,
or equipment, or those of our suppliers or customers; |
||
| changes in the cost or availability of transportation for feedstocks and refined
products; |
||
| the price, availability, and acceptance of alternative fuels and alternative-fuel
vehicles; |
||
| delay of, cancellation of, or failure to implement planned capital projects and realize
the various assumptions and benefits projected for such projects or cost overruns in
constructing such planned capital projects; |
||
| ethanol margins may be lower than expected; |
||
| earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, and irregular weather, which can unforeseeably
affect the price or availability of natural gas, crude oil, grain and other feedstocks, and
refined products and ethanol; |
||
| rulings, judgments, or settlements in litigation or other legal or regulatory matters,
including unexpected environmental remediation costs, in excess of any reserves or
insurance coverage; |
||
| legislative or regulatory action, including the introduction or enactment of federal,
state, municipal, or foreign legislation or rulemakings, including tax and environmental
regulations, such as those to be implemented under the California Global Warming Solutions
Act (also known as AB32), which may adversely affect our business or operations; |
||
| changes in the credit ratings assigned to our debt securities and trade credit; |
||
| changes in currency exchange rates, including the value of the Canadian dollar relative
to the U.S. dollar; and |
||
| overall economic conditions, including the stability and liquidity of financial markets. |
Any one of these factors, or a combination of these factors, could materially affect our future
results of operations and whether any forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be accurate.
Our forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results and
future performance may differ materially from those suggested in any forward-looking statements.
We do not intend to update these statements unless we are required by the securities laws to do so.
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting
on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. We undertake no
obligation to publicly release any revisions to any such forward-looking statements that may be
made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence
of unanticipated events.
43
Table of Contents
OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK
For the third quarter of 2010, we reported income from continuing operations of $292 million, or
$0.51 per share, compared to a loss from continuing operations of $343 million, or $0.61 per share,
for the third quarter of 2009. For the first nine months of 2010, we reported income from
continuing operations of $721 million, or $1.27 per share, compared to a loss from continuing
operations of $170 million, or $0.32 per share, for the first nine months of 2009. These results
were primarily due to our refining segment operations, which generated operating income of
$571 million in the third quarter of 2010 compared to an operating loss of $219 million in the
third quarter of 2009. Refining segment operating income was $1.4 billion for the first nine
months of 2010 and $331 million for the first nine months of 2009. The increase in refining
operating income for both comparable periods (2010 vs. 2009) was primarily due to improved margins
for the distillate products we produce and wider sour crude oil differentials. The sour crude oil
differential is the difference between the price of sweet crude oil and the price of sour crude
oil. We believe that the improved distillate margins are primarily due to an increase in the
demand for diesel in South America and Europe. Refinery shutdowns and other factors have
contributed to the increase in demand from South America, and declining inventories due to an
improving economy has contributed to the demand from Europe. In addition, there has been an
increase in the demand for diesel in the U.S. due to the improving economy. The demand for refined
products, however, has not returned to levels experienced prior to the economic slowdown that began
in 2008. Excess worldwide refinery capacity and high levels of refined product inventories
continue to constrain margins for refined products.
In response to the worldwide economic slowdown, and as a result of our assessment of the operating
performance and profitability of our refineries, we temporarily shut down our Aruba Refinery in
July 2009 and permanently shut down our Delaware City Refinery in November 2009. On June 1, 2010,
we completed the sale of our shutdown Delaware City Refinery assets and associated terminal and
pipeline assets for $220 million of cash proceeds. Our Aruba Refinery has remained shut because it
has been uneconomical to operate due to narrow sour crude oil differentials. However, in the third
quarter of 2010, we commenced refinery-wide maintenance to prepare the refinerys production units
for restart due to improved sour crude oil differentials and a general improvement in refining
economics, and we expect to restart the refinery in December 2010. There is no certainty, however,
that refining economics will recover sufficiently to justify restarting the refinery or that sour
crude oil differentials will remain at levels sufficient to justify operating the refinery in the
future (see Note 5 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for our discussion of
the Aruba Refinery).
On September 24, 2010, we signed an agreement to sell our Paulsboro Refinery for $363 million plus
net working capital, and our board of directors approved the sale on October 5, 2010. However,
before the sale can close, we must obtain a modified emissions permit related to a certain
processing unit at the refinery and meet other conditions on or before December 1, 2010, or the
agreement to sell the refinery will automatically terminate unless these conditions are waived by
the parties. We believe that it is unlikely that we will obtain the modified permit by December 1,
2010. However, if we eventually sell the refinery in accordance with the terms of the sale
agreement, we will recognize a loss of approximately $920 million (see Note 5 of Condensed Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for our discussion of the potential sale of our Paulsboro
Refinery).
In the second quarter of 2009, we entered the ethanol business through the acquisition of seven
ethanol plants, and we acquired three additional plants in the first quarter of 2010. We believe
that ethanol is a natural fit for us because we manufacture transportation fuels. During the third
quarter and first nine months of 2010, our ethanol segment generated operating income of
$47 million and $139 million, respectively, compared to $49 million and $71 million for the third
quarter and first nine months of 2009, respectively. The increase in ethanol operating income for
the first nine months of 2010 compared to the
44
Table of Contents
first nine months of 2009 is due primarily to a full nine months of operation of the seven ethanol
plants acquired in 2009 and the addition of the three ethanol plants acquired in early 2010.
Despite the addition of the three new plants in 2010, ethanol operating income for the third
quarter of 2010 decreased slightly from the third quarter of 2009 due to a decline in the margin
for ethanol. The ethanol business is dependent on margins between ethanol and corn feedstocks and
can be impacted by U.S. government subsidies and biofuels (including ethanol) mandates.
Our retail segment generated operating income of $105 million for the third quarter of 2010
compared to operating income of $111 million for the third quarter of 2009. Retail operating
income was $285 million for the first nine months of 2010, compared to $232 million for the
comparable period in 2009. The 2010 results benefited from the blending of ethanol with the
gasoline sold by our retail segment. Throughout most of 2010, ethanol was a lower cost product
than gasoline, and blending the lower cost ethanol resulted in an increase in retail fuel margins.
In September 2010, the price of ethanol exceeded the cost of gasoline; therefore, the benefit to
retail fuel margins from blending ethanol may not occur for the fourth quarter of 2010.
To support our financial strength and liquidity, we issued $1.25 billion in debt during the first
quarter of 2010 at interest rates favorable to those on our existing debt. We used a portion of
the proceeds to redeem our 7.50% senior notes for $294 million in March 2010, and our 6.75% senior
notes for $190 million in May 2010; the remainder was used for general corporate purposes.
We expect the U.S. and worldwide economies to continue to recover slowly, and we expect refined
product demand to increase accordingly. The increase in anticipated refined product demand is
expected to result in an increase in crude oil production, which we believe will result in the
production of more sour crude oils and continued improvement in sour crude oil differentials. The
expected increases in refined product demand and sour crude oil production should favorably impact
our refined product margins. However, we expect that the current surplus and growth in global
refining capacity will put pressure on refining margins and could result in ongoing production
constraints or refinery shutdowns in the refining industry. We will continue to optimize our
refining assets based on market conditions.
45
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables highlight our results of operations, our operating performance, and market
prices that directly impact our operations. The narrative following these tables provides an
analysis of our results of operations.
Third Quarter 2010 Compared to Third Quarter 2009
Financial Highlights (a) (b)
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 22,210 | $ | 18,573 | $ | 3,637 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
20,023 | 17,212 | 2,811 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Refining |
817 | 772 | 45 | |||||||||
Retail |
192 | 182 | 10 | |||||||||
Ethanol |
96 | 59 | 37 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
139 | 167 | (28 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense: |
||||||||||||
Refining |
322 | 317 | 5 | |||||||||
Retail |
27 | 25 | 2 | |||||||||
Ethanol |
10 | 7 | 3 | |||||||||
Corporate |
13 | 12 | 1 | |||||||||
Asset impairment loss (c) |
| 58 | (58 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
21,639 | 18,811 | 2,828 | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
571 | (238 | ) | 809 | ||||||||
Other income, net |
18 | 8 | 10 | |||||||||
Interest and debt expense: |
||||||||||||
Incurred |
(145 | ) | (150 | ) | 5 | |||||||
Capitalized |
26 | 19 | 7 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income tax expense (benefit) |
470 | (361 | ) | 831 | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
178 | (18 | ) | 196 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
292 | (343 | ) | 635 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
| (286 | ) | 286 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 292 | $ | (629 | ) | $ | 921 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share
assuming dilution: |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.51 | $ | (0.61 | ) | $ | 1.12 | |||||
Discontinued operations |
| (0.51 | ) | 0.51 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 0.51 | $ | (1.12 | ) | $ | 1.63 | |||||
See the footnote references on page 50. |
46
Table of Contents
Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel and per gallon amounts)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel and per gallon amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Refining (b): |
||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) (c) |
$ | 571 | $ | (219 | ) | $ | 790 | |||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 7.87 | $ | 5.08 | $ | 2.79 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 3.76 | $ | 3.76 | $ | | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.48 | 1.55 | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 5.24 | $ | 5.31 | $ | (0.07 | ) | |||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day): |
||||||||||||
Feedstocks: |
||||||||||||
Heavy sour crude |
443 | 430 | 13 | |||||||||
Medium/light sour crude |
511 | 489 | 22 | |||||||||
Acidic sweet crude |
53 | 24 | 29 | |||||||||
Sweet crude |
733 | 670 | 63 | |||||||||
Residuals |
242 | 159 | 83 | |||||||||
Other feedstocks |
124 | 176 | (52 | ) | ||||||||
Total feedstocks |
2,106 | 1,948 | 158 | |||||||||
Blendstocks and other |
258 | 280 | (22 | ) | ||||||||
Total throughput volumes |
2,364 | 2,228 | 136 | |||||||||
Yields (thousand barrels per day): |
||||||||||||
Gasolines and blendstocks |
1,153 | 1,137 | 16 | |||||||||
Distillates |
829 | 708 | 121 | |||||||||
Petrochemicals |
77 | 71 | 6 | |||||||||
Other products (e) |
337 | 327 | 10 | |||||||||
Total yields |
2,396 | 2,243 | 153 | |||||||||
Retail U.S.: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 72 | $ | 79 | $ | (7 | ) | |||||
Company-operated fuel sites (average) |
990 | 998 | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Fuel volumes (gallons per day per site) |
5,204 | 4,963 | 241 | |||||||||
Fuel margin per gallon |
$ | 0.210 | $ | 0.231 | $ | (0.021 | ) | |||||
Merchandise sales |
$ | 322 | $ | 315 | $ | 7 | ||||||
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
29.6 | % | 28.7 | % | 0.9 | % | ||||||
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
$ | 21 | $ | 22 | $ | (1 | ) | |||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 127 | $ | 120 | $ | 7 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
$ | 18 | $ | 17 | $ | 1 | ||||||
Retail Canada: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 33 | $ | 32 | $ | 1 | ||||||
Fuel volumes (thousand gallons per day) |
3,214 | 3,115 | 99 | |||||||||
Fuel margin per gallon |
$ | 0.263 | $ | 0.263 | $ | 0.000 | ||||||
Merchandise sales |
$ | 66 | $ | 58 | $ | 8 | ||||||
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
31.1 | % | 28.6 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||||
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
$ | 10 | $ | 10 | $ | | ||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 65 | $ | 62 | $ | 3 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
$ | 9 | $ | 8 | $ | 1 |
See the footnote references on page 50. |
47
Table of Contents
Operating Highlights (continued)
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Ethanol (a): |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 47 | $ | 49 | $ | (2 | ) | |||||
Ethanol production (thousand gallons per day) |
3,100 | 2,116 | 984 | |||||||||
Gross margin per gallon of ethanol production |
$ | 0.54 | $ | 0.59 | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
Operating costs per gallon of ethanol production: |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
0.03 | 0.03 | 0.00 | |||||||||
Total operating costs per gallon
of ethanol production |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||
See the footnote references on page 50. |
48
Table of Contents
Refining Operating Highlights by Region (f)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Gulf Coast: |
||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 388 | $ | (81 | ) | $ | 469 | |||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
1,336 | 1,238 | 98 | |||||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 8.34 | $ | 4.66 | $ | 3.68 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 3.65 | $ | 3.81 | $ | (0.16 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.54 | 1.57 | (0.03 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 5.19 | $ | 5.38 | $ | (0.19 | ) | |||||
Mid-Continent: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 131 | $ | 5 | $ | 126 | ||||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
422 | 374 | 48 | |||||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 8.06 | $ | 5.38 | $ | 2.68 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 3.34 | $ | 3.69 | $ | (0.35 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.33 | 1.53 | (0.20 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 4.67 | $ | 5.22 | $ | (0.55 | ) | |||||
Northeast (b): |
||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 17 | $ | (38 | ) | $ | 55 | |||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
354 | 334 | 20 | |||||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 5.26 | $ | 3.39 | $ | 1.87 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 3.47 | $ | 3.17 | $ | 0.30 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.27 | 1.45 | (0.18 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 4.74 | $ | 4.62 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||
West Coast: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 35 | $ | 67 | $ | (32 | ) | |||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
252 | 282 | (30 | ) | ||||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 8.66 | $ | 8.51 | $ | 0.15 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 5.42 | $ | 4.35 | $ | 1.07 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.74 | 1.58 | 0.16 | |||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 7.16 | $ | 5.93 | $ | 1.23 | ||||||
Operating income (loss) for regions above |
$ | 571 | $ | (47 | ) | $ | 618 | |||||
Asset impairment loss applicable to refining (c) |
| (58 | ) | 58 | ||||||||
Loss contingency accrual related to Aruba
tax matter (g) |
| (114 | ) | 114 | ||||||||
Total refining operating income (loss) |
$ | 571 | $ | (219 | ) | $ | 790 | |||||
See the footnote references on page 50. |
49
Table of Contents
Average Market Reference Prices and Differentials (h)
(dollars per barrel)
(dollars per barrel)
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Feedstocks: |
||||||||||||
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil |
$ | 76.08 | $ | 68.18 | $ | 7.90 | ||||||
WTI less sour crude oil at U.S. Gulf Coast (i) |
2.56 | 1.72 | 0.84 | |||||||||
WTI less Mars crude oil |
1.38 | 1.78 | (0.40 | ) | ||||||||
WTI less Maya crude oil |
8.47 | 5.02 | 3.45 | |||||||||
Products: |
||||||||||||
U.S. Gulf Coast: |
||||||||||||
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
6.93 | 7.85 | (0.92 | ) | ||||||||
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
11.69 | 6.97 | 4.72 | |||||||||
Propylene less WTI |
5.19 | 8.22 | (3.03 | ) | ||||||||
U.S. Mid-Continent: |
||||||||||||
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
9.20 | 8.11 | 1.09 | |||||||||
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
13.19 | 8.01 | 5.18 | |||||||||
U.S. Northeast: |
||||||||||||
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
6.70 | 8.34 | (1.64 | ) | ||||||||
No. 2 fuel oil less WTI |
9.15 | 4.95 | 4.20 | |||||||||
Lube oils less WTI |
59.71 | 28.89 | 30.82 | |||||||||
U.S. West Coast: |
||||||||||||
CARBOB 87 gasoline less WTI |
16.50 | 18.00 | (1.50 | ) | ||||||||
CARB diesel less WTI |
14.64 | 9.29 | 5.35 | |||||||||
New York Harbor corn crush (dollars per gallon) |
0.43 | 0.54 | (0.11 | ) | ||||||||
The following notes relate to references on pages 46 through 50.
(a) | We acquired seven ethanol plants in the second quarter of 2009 and three ethanol plants in
the first quarter of 2010. The information presented above includes the results of operations
of those plants commencing on their respective acquisition closing dates. The ethanol plants
acquired in 2009 were purchased from VeraSun Energy Corporation. Of the three plants acquired
in the first quarter of 2010, two were purchased from ASA Ethanol Holdings, LLC (ASA) and the
third was purchased from Renew Energy LLC (Renew). Ethanol production volumes reflected
herein are based on total production during each period divided by actual calendar days per
period. |
||
(b) | During the fourth quarter of 2009, we permanently shut down our refinery in Delaware City,
Delaware, and wrote down the book value of the refinery assets to net realizable value. On
June 1, 2010, we sold the shutdown refinery assets and the terminal and pipeline assets also
located in Delaware City to PBF Energy Partners LP (PBF) for $220 million of cash proceeds.
The results of operations of the shutdown refinery are reflected as discontinued operations
for both periods presented. The terminal and pipeline assets previously associated with the
refinery were not shut down and continued to be operated until the date of their sale. The
results of operations of those assets are reflected in continuing operations for both periods
presented. All refining operating highlights, both consolidated and for the Northeast Region,
exclude the Delaware City Refinery for both periods presented. |
||
(c) | The asset impairment loss for the three months ended September 30, 2009 relates primarily to
the permanent cancellation of certain capital projects classified as construction in
progress as a result of the unfavorable impact of the economic slowdown on refining industry
fundamentals. The asset impairment loss applicable to the refining
business segment has been
excluded from refining operating expenses in determining operating costs per barrel. |
||
(d) | Throughput margin per barrel represents operating revenues less cost of sales divided by
throughput volumes. |
||
(e) | Other products primarily include gas oils, No. 6 fuel oil, petroleum coke, and asphalt. |
||
(f) | The regions reflected herein contain the following refineries: the Gulf Coast refining region
includes the Corpus Christi East, Corpus Christi West, Texas City, Houston, Three Rivers,
St. Charles, Aruba, and Port Arthur Refineries; the Mid-Continent refining region includes the
McKee, Ardmore, and Memphis Refineries; the Northeast refining region includes the Quebec City
and Paulsboro Refineries; and the West Coast refining region includes the Benicia and
Wilmington Refineries. |
||
(g) | A loss contingency accrual of $140 million ($0.25 per share) was recorded in the third
quarter of 2009 related to our dispute with the Government of Aruba regarding a turnover tax
on export sales as well as other tax matters. The portion of the loss |
50
Table of Contents
contingency accrual that relates to the turnover tax was recorded in cost of sales for the three
months ended September 30, 2009, and therefore is included in refining operating income (loss)
but has been excluded in determining throughput margin per barrel. |
|||
(h) | The average market reference prices and differentials are based on posted prices from various
pricing services. The average market reference prices and differentials are presented to
provide users of the consolidated financial statements with economic indicators that
significantly affect our operations and profitability. |
||
(i) | The market reference differential for sour crude oil is based on 50% Arab Medium and 50% Arab
Light posted prices. |
General
Operating revenues increased 20% (or $3.6 billion) for the third quarter of 2010 compared to the
third quarter of 2009 primarily as a result of higher refined product prices and higher throughput
volumes between the two periods. Operating income increased $809 million and income from
continuing operations before taxes increased $831 million for the third quarter of 2010 compared to amounts
reported for the third quarter of 2009 primarily due to a $790 million increase in refining segment
operating income discussed below.
Refining
Results of operations of our refining segment increased from an operating loss of $219 million for
the third quarter of 2009 to operating income of $571 million for the third quarter of 2010. The
$790 million increase is due to an overall improvement in operating results ($618 million), reduced
asset impairment losses ($58 million), and no loss contingency accruals ($114 million). The asset
impairment loss recorded during the third quarter of 2009 related to our decision to permanently
cancel certain construction projects in response to the economic slowdown that began in 2008. We
continue to evaluate our ongoing construction projects, but the number and significance of projects
cancelled has substantially declined so far in 2010. The loss contingency accrual was recorded in
the third quarter of 2009 and related to our dispute of a turnover
tax on export sales in Aruba.
The $618 million improvement in operating results was primarily due to a 55% increase in throughput
margin per barrel (a $2.79 per
barrel increase between the comparable periods) combined with a 6%
increase in total throughput volumes (a 136,000 barrel per day increase between the comparable
periods). The increase in throughput margin per barrel was caused by a significant improvement in
distillate margins, but that improvement was somewhat offset by a decline in gasoline margins in
three of our four refining regions. Throughput margin per barrel also benefited from wider sour
crude oil differentials. The impact of these factors on our throughput margin per barrel is
described below.
Changes in the margin that we receive for our products have a material impact on our results of
operations. For example, the benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast ultra-low-sulfur
diesel, which is a type of distillate, was $11.69 per barrel for the third quarter of 2010,
compared to $6.97 per barrel for the third quarter of 2009, representing a favorable increase of
$4.72 per barrel. Similar increases in distillate margins were experienced in other regions. We
estimate that the increase in margin for distillates had a $411 million positive impact to our
overall refining margin, quarter versus quarter, as we produced 829,000 barrels per day of
distillates during the third quarter of 2010. Distillate margins were higher in the third quarter
of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009 due to an increase in the industrial demand for
these products resulting from the ongoing recovery of the U.S. and worldwide economies.
The benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast Conventional 87 gasoline (Gulf Coast 87
gasoline) was $6.93 per barrel for the third quarter of 2010, compared to $7.85 per barrel for the
third quarter of 2009, representing an unfavorable decrease of $0.92 per barrel. Conventional 87
gasoline benchmark
reference margins decreased quarter versus quarter to an even greater extent in the Northeast
region
51
Table of Contents
(a $1.64 per barrel unfavorable decrease), but the margins increased quarter versus quarter
in the Mid-Continent region (a $1.09 per barrel favorable increase). We estimate that the overall
decrease in gasoline margins had a $93 million negative impact to our overall refining margin,
quarter versus quarter, as we produced 1.15 million barrels per day of gasoline during the third
quarter of 2010. Gasoline margins were lower in the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third
quarter of 2009 despite an increase in gasoline prices in the third quarter of 2010. We believe
that the margins for gasoline were constrained due to continued weak consumer demand and high
levels of inventory. In addition, our downstream customers increased the use of ethanol as a
component in gasoline.
The cost of crude oil we process also has a material impact on our results of operations because
many of our refineries have been designed to process sour crude oils, which we typically can
purchase at a discount to sweet crude oils. For example, Maya crude oil, which is a type of sour
crude oil, sold at a discount of $8.47 per barrel to West Texas Intermediate crude oil, which is a
type of sweet crude oil, during the third quarter of 2010. This compares to a discount of $5.02
per barrel during the third quarter of 2009, representing a favorable increase of $3.45 per barrel.
We estimate that the wider discounts for all types of sour crude oil that we process had a
$125 million positive impact to our overall refining margin, quarter versus quarter, as we
processed 954,000 barrels per day of sour crude oils.
Retail
Retail operating income was $105 million for the third quarter of 2010 compared to $111 million for
the third quarter of 2009. This 5% (or $6 million) decrease was primarily due to higher operating
expenses of $10 million, which consisted of an increase in credit card fees of $3 million and
maintenance expenses of $2 million in our U.S. retail operations and $3 million related to the
strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar in our Canadian retail operations.
Ethanol
Ethanol operating income was $47 million for the third quarter of 2010 compared to $49 million for
the third quarter of 2009. The $2 million decrease in operating income resulted from a $35 million
increase in gross margin, offset by a $37 million increase in operating expenses.
Ethanol gross margin increased from the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of 2010 due an
increase in ethanol production (a 984,000 gallon per day increase between the comparable periods)
resulting from the operation of three additional plants acquired in the first quarter of 2010.
This increase, however, was negatively impacted by an 8% decrease in the gross margin per gallon of
ethanol production (a $0.05 per gallon decrease between the comparable periods). The decrease in
gross margin per gallon was primarily due to a decrease in the New York Harbor corn crush (Corn
Crush), which is the benchmark reference margin for ethanol. The Corn Crush was $0.43 per gallon
for the third quarter of 2010, compared to $0.54 per gallon for the third quarter of 2009,
representing an unfavorable decrease of $0.11 per gallon.
The increase in operating expenses was due primarily to $28 million in operating expenses related
to the operation of the three additional ethanol plants acquired in the first quarter of 2010.
Corporate Expenses and Other
General and administrative expenses decreased $28 million from the third quarter of 2009 to the
third quarter of 2010 primarily due to litigation costs of $40 million in the third quarter of
2009.
52
Table of Contents
Other income, net for the third quarter of 2010 increased $10 million from the third quarter of
2009 due mainly to the recognition of a $7 million gain from the dissolution and distribution from
an entity in which we had a minor investment.
Interest and debt expense for the third quarter of 2010 decreased $12 million from the third
quarter of 2009. This decrease is composed of a decrease in interest expense primarily due to a
$6 million charge in the third quarter of 2009 to write-off a pro rata portion of unamortized fair
value related to $76 million of 6.75% putable senior notes
that were subsequently redeemed in the fourth quarter of 2009,
and a $7 million increase in capitalized interest due
to a corresponding increase in capital expenditures between the quarters.
Income tax expense increased $196 million from the third quarter of 2009 to the third quarter of
2010 mainly as a result of higher operating income.
The loss from discontinued operations of $286 million for the third quarter of 2009 represents the
net loss from operations of our shutdown Delaware City Refinery. This refinery was sold in June
2010.
53
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Financial Highlights (a) (b)
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
(millions of dollars, except per share amounts)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 63,628 | $ | 49,277 | $ | 14,351 | ||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
57,479 | 44,430 | 13,049 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Refining |
2,405 | 2,355 | 50 | |||||||||
Retail |
552 | 522 | 30 | |||||||||
Ethanol |
267 | 102 | 165 | |||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
367 | 434 | (67 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense: |
||||||||||||
Refining |
951 | 951 | | |||||||||
Retail |
80 | 74 | 6 | |||||||||
Ethanol |
27 | 12 | 15 | |||||||||
Corporate |
38 | 35 | 3 | |||||||||
Asset impairment loss (c) |
2 | 199 | (197 | ) | ||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
62,168 | 49,114 | 13,054 | |||||||||
Operating income |
1,460 | 163 | 1,297 | |||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
30 | (16 | ) | 46 | ||||||||
Interest and debt expense: |
||||||||||||
Incurred |
(430 | ) | (387 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||
Capitalized |
68 | 92 | (24 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income tax expense |
1,128 | (148 | ) | 1,276 | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
407 | 22 | 385 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
721 | (170 | ) | 891 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of income taxes |
41 | (404 | ) | 445 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 762 | $ | (574 | ) | $ | 1,336 | |||||
Earnings (loss) per common share assuming
dilution: |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 1.27 | $ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 1.59 | |||||
Discontinued operations |
0.07 | (0.76 | ) | 0.83 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 1.34 | $ | (1.08 | ) | $ | 2.42 | |||||
See the footnote references on page 58. |
54
Table of Contents
Operating Highlights
(millions of dollars, except per barrel and per gallon amounts)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel and per gallon amounts)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Refining (b): |
||||||||||||
Operating income (c) |
$ | 1,441 | $ | 331 | $ | 1,110 | ||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 7.76 | $ | 6.23 | $ | 1.53 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Refining operating expenses |
$ | 3.89 | $ | 3.71 | $ | 0.18 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.54 | 1.50 | 0.04 | |||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 5.43 | $ | 5.21 | $ | 0.22 | ||||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day): |
||||||||||||
Feedstocks: |
||||||||||||
Heavy sour crude |
452 | 480 | (28 | ) | ||||||||
Medium/light sour crude |
499 | 536 | (37 | ) | ||||||||
Acidic sweet crude |
52 | 78 | (26 | ) | ||||||||
Sweet crude |
688 | 611 | 77 | |||||||||
Residuals |
197 | 168 | 29 | |||||||||
Other feedstocks |
127 | 171 | (44 | ) | ||||||||
Total feedstocks |
2,015 | 2,044 | (29 | ) | ||||||||
Blendstocks and other |
251 | 279 | (28 | ) | ||||||||
Total throughput volumes |
2,266 | 2,323 | (57 | ) | ||||||||
Yields (thousand barrels per day): |
||||||||||||
Gasolines and blendstocks |
1,111 | 1,110 | 1 | |||||||||
Distillates |
757 | 764 | (7 | ) | ||||||||
Petrochemicals |
74 | 67 | 7 | |||||||||
Other products (e) |
348 | 386 | (38 | ) | ||||||||
Total yields |
2,290 | 2,327 | (37 | ) | ||||||||
Retail U.S.: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 181 | $ | 140 | $ | 41 | ||||||
Company-operated fuel sites (average) |
990 | 1,001 | (11 | ) | ||||||||
Fuel volumes (gallons per day per site) |
5,115 | 5,022 | 93 | |||||||||
Fuel margin per gallon |
$ | 0.191 | $ | 0.157 | $ | 0.034 | ||||||
Merchandise sales |
$ | 910 | $ | 888 | $ | 22 | ||||||
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
29.2 | % | 29.2 | % | | % | ||||||
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
$ | 65 | $ | 66 | $ | (1 | ) | |||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 360 | $ | 349 | $ | 11 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
$ | 54 | $ | 52 | $ | 2 | ||||||
Retail Canada: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 104 | $ | 92 | $ | 12 | ||||||
Fuel volumes (thousand gallons per day) |
3,131 | 3,155 | (24 | ) | ||||||||
Fuel margin per gallon |
$ | 0.279 | $ | 0.255 | $ | 0.024 | ||||||
Merchandise sales |
$ | 179 | $ | 146 | $ | 33 | ||||||
Merchandise margin (percentage of sales) |
31.1 | % | 29.1 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||||
Margin on miscellaneous sales |
$ | 29 | $ | 25 | $ | 4 | ||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 192 | $ | 173 | $ | 19 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
$ | 26 | $ | 22 | $ | 4 |
See the footnote references on page 58. |
55
Table of Contents
Operating Highlights (continued)
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
(millions of dollars, except per gallon amounts)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Ethanol (a): |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 139 | $ | 71 | $ | 68 | ||||||
Ethanol production (thousand gallons per day) |
2,943 | 1,229 | 1,714 | |||||||||
Gross margin per gallon of ethanol production |
$ | 0.54 | $ | 0.55 | $ | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Operating costs per gallon of ethanol production: |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 0.33 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||||||
Total operating costs per gallon
of ethanol production |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||
See the footnote references on page 58. |
56
Table of Contents
Refining Operating Highlights by Region (f)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
(millions of dollars, except per barrel amounts)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Gulf Coast: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 1,027 | $ | 28 | $ | 999 | ||||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
1,268 | 1,316 | (48 | ) | ||||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 8.35 | $ | 5.22 | $ | 3.13 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 3.78 | $ | 3.65 | $ | 0.13 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.60 | 1.49 | 0.11 | |||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 5.38 | $ | 5.14 | $ | 0.24 | ||||||
Mid-Continent: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 271 | $ | 197 | $ | 74 | ||||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
392 | 381 | 11 | |||||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 7.59 | $ | 7.18 | $ | 0.41 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 3.63 | $ | 3.72 | $ | (0.09 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.42 | 1.57 | (0.15 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 5.05 | $ | 5.29 | $ | (0.24 | ) | |||||
Northeast (b): |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 43 | $ | 86 | $ | (43 | ) | |||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
347 | 345 | 2 | |||||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 5.51 | $ | 5.46 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 3.69 | $ | 3.22 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.36 | 1.32 | 0.04 | |||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 5.05 | $ | 4.54 | $ | 0.51 | ||||||
West Coast: |
||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 102 | $ | 331 | $ | (229 | ) | |||||
Throughput volumes (thousand barrels per day) |
259 | 281 | (22 | ) | ||||||||
Throughput margin per barrel (d) |
$ | 8.14 | $ | 10.59 | $ | (2.45 | ) | |||||
Operating costs per barrel (c): |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
$ | 5.08 | $ | 4.60 | $ | 0.48 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1.62 | 1.67 | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||
Total operating costs per barrel |
$ | 6.70 | $ | 6.27 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||
Operating income for regions above |
$ | 1,443 | $ | 642 | $ | 801 | ||||||
Asset impairment loss applicable to refining (c) |
(2 | ) | (197 | ) | 195 | |||||||
Loss contingency accrual related to Aruba
tax matter (g) |
| (114 | ) | 114 | ||||||||
Total refining operating income |
$ | 1,441 | $ | 331 | $ | 1,110 | ||||||
See the footnote references on page 58. |
57
Table of Contents
Average Market Reference Prices and Differentials (h)
(dollars per barrel)
(dollars per barrel)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
Feedstocks: |
||||||||||||
WTI crude oil |
$ | 77.52 | $ | 56.90 | $ | 20.62 | ||||||
WTI less sour crude oil at U.S. Gulf Coast (i) |
3.15 | 1.25 | 1.90 | |||||||||
WTI less Mars crude oil |
1.56 | 1.06 | 0.50 | |||||||||
WTI less Maya crude oil |
9.04 | 4.68 | 4.36 | |||||||||
Products: |
||||||||||||
U.S. Gulf Coast: |
||||||||||||
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
8.09 | 8.85 | (0.76 | ) | ||||||||
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
10.44 | 8.58 | 1.86 | |||||||||
Propylene less WTI |
9.63 | (3.05 | ) | 12.68 | ||||||||
U.S. Mid-Continent: |
||||||||||||
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
8.77 | 9.09 | (0.32 | ) | ||||||||
Ultra-low-sulfur diesel less WTI |
11.06 | 8.63 | 2.43 | |||||||||
U.S. Northeast: |
||||||||||||
Conventional 87 gasoline less WTI |
8.02 | 8.78 | (0.76 | ) | ||||||||
No. 2 fuel oil less WTI |
8.71 | 7.68 | 1.03 | |||||||||
Lube oils less WTI |
48.80 | 40.54 | 8.26 | |||||||||
U.S. West Coast: |
||||||||||||
CARBOB 87 gasoline less WTI |
14.53 | 18.40 | (3.87 | ) | ||||||||
CARB diesel less WTI |
12.51 | 10.30 | 2.21 | |||||||||
New York harbor corn crush (dollars per gallon) |
0.41 | 0.38 | 0.03 |
The following notes relate to references on pages 54 through 58.
(a) | We acquired seven ethanol plants in the second quarter of 2009 and three ethanol plants in
the first quarter of 2010. The information presented above includes the results of operations
of those plants commencing on their respective acquisition closing dates. The ethanol plants
acquired in 2009 were purchased from VeraSun Energy Corporation. Of the three plants acquired
in the first quarter of 2010, two were purchased from ASA and the third was purchased from
Renew. Ethanol production volumes reflected herein are based on total production during each
period divided by actual calendar days per period. |
||
(b) | During the fourth quarter of 2009, we permanently shut down our refinery in Delaware City,
Delaware, and wrote down the book value of the refinery assets to net realizable value. On
June 1, 2010, we sold the shutdown refinery assets and the terminal and pipeline assets also
located in Delaware City to PBF for $220 million of cash proceeds. The results of operations
of the shutdown refinery are reflected as discontinued operations for both periods presented.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, those results include a gain of $92 million ($58
million after taxes) on the sale of the refinery assets. The gain primarily resulted from
receiving proceeds related to the scrap value of the refinery assets and the reversal of
certain liabilities recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the
refinery, which will not be incurred because of the sale. The terminal and pipeline assets
previously associated with the refinery were not shut down and continued to be operated until
the date of their sale. The results of operations of those assets, including an insignificant
gain on sale, are reflected in continuing operations for both periods presented. All refining
operating highlights, both consolidated and for the Northeast Region, exclude the Delaware
City Refinery for both periods presented. |
||
(c) | The asset impairment loss relates primarily to the permanent cancellation of certain capital
projects classified as construction in progress as a result of the unfavorable impact of the
economic slowdown on refining industry fundamentals. The asset impairment loss applicable to
the refining business segment has been excluded from refining operating expenses in
determining operating costs per barrel. |
||
(d) | Throughput margin per barrel represents operating revenues less cost of sales divided by
throughput volumes. |
||
(e) | Other products primarily include gas oils, No. 6 fuel oil, petroleum coke, and asphalt. |
||
(f) | The regions reflected herein contain the following refineries: the Gulf Coast refining region
includes the Corpus Christi East, Corpus Christi West, Texas City, Houston, Three Rivers,
St. Charles, Aruba, and Port Arthur Refineries; the Mid-Continent refining region includes the
McKee, Ardmore, and Memphis Refineries; the Northeast refining region includes |
58
Table of Contents
the Quebec City and Paulsboro Refineries; and the West Coast refining region includes the
Benicia and Wilmington Refineries. |
|||
(g) | A loss contingency accrual of $140 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2009 related
to our dispute with the Government of Aruba regarding a turnover tax on export sales as well
as other tax matters. The portion of the loss contingency accrual that relates to the
turnover tax was recorded in cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and
therefore is included in refining operating income but has been excluded in determining
throughput margin per barrel. |
||
(h) | The average market reference prices and differentials are based on posted prices from various
pricing services. The average market reference prices and differentials are presented to
provide users of the consolidated financial statements with economic indicators that
significantly affect our operations and profitability. |
||
(i) | The market reference differential for sour crude oil is based on 50% Arab Medium and 50% Arab
Light posted prices. |
General
Operating revenues increased 29% (or $14.4 billion) for the first nine months of 2010 compared to
the first nine months of 2009 primarily as a result of higher refined product prices between the
two periods. Operating income and income from continuing operations before taxes increased $1.3 billion and
$1.3 billion, respectively, for the first nine months of 2010 compared to the amounts reported in
the first nine months of 2009 primarily due to a $1.1 billion increase in refining segment
operating income discussed below.
Refining
Operating income for our refining segment increased from $331 million for the first nine months of
2009 to $1.4 billion for the first nine months of 2010. The $1.1 billion increase is primarily due
to an improvement in operating results ($801 million), reduced asset impairment loss
($195 million), and no loss contingency accruals ($114 million). The asset impairment loss
recorded during the first nine months of 2009 related to our decision to permanently cancel certain
construction projects in response to the economic slowdown that began in 2008. We continue to
evaluate our ongoing construction projects, but the number and significance of projects cancelled
has substantially declined so far in 2010. The loss contingency accrual recorded in the third
quarter of 2009 related to our dispute of a turnover tax on export sales in Aruba.
The $801 million improvement in operating results was primarily due to a 25% increase in throughput
margin per barrel (a $1.53 per barrel increase between the comparable periods). The increase in
throughput margin per barrel was caused by a significant improvement in distillate margins and
petrochemical (primarily propylene) margins, but those improvements were somewhat offset by a
decline in gasoline margins in all of our refining regions. Throughput margin per barrel also
benefited from wider sour crude oil differentials. The impact of these factors on our throughput
margin per barrel is described below.
Changes in the margin that we receive for our products have a material impact on our results of
operations. For example, the benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast ultra-low-sulfur
diesel, which is a type of distillate, was $10.44 per barrel for the first nine months of 2010,
compared to $8.58 per barrel for the first nine months of 2009, representing a favorable increase
of $1.86 per barrel. Similar increases in distillate margins were experienced in other regions.
We estimate that the increase in margin for distillates had a $290 million positive impact to our
overall refining margin, nine months versus nine months, as we produced 757,000 barrels per day of
distillates during the first nine months of 2010. Similarly, the benchmark reference margin for
U.S. Gulf Coast propylene was $9.63 per barrel for the first nine months of 2010, compared to a
negative margin of $3.05 per barrel for the first nine months of 2009, representing a favorable
increase of $12.68 per barrel. We estimate that the increase in margin for petrochemicals
(primarily propylene) had a $179 million positive impact on our refining margin, nine months versus
nine months, as we produced 74,000 barrels per day of petrochemicals during the first nine
59
Table of Contents
months
of 2010. Distillate and propylene margins were higher in the first
nine months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of 2009 due to an increase in the industrial demand for these
products resulting from the ongoing recovery of the U.S. and worldwide economies.
The benchmark reference margin for U.S. Gulf Coast Conventional 87 gasoline (Gulf Coast 87
gasoline) was $8.09 per barrel for the first nine months of 2010, compared to $8.85 per barrel for
the first nine months of 2009, representing an unfavorable decrease of $0.76 per barrel.
Conventional 87 gasoline benchmark reference margins decreased nine months versus nine months to an
even greater extent in the West Coast region (a $3.87 per barrel unfavorable decrease). We
estimate that the decrease in gasoline margins had a $420 million negative impact to our overall
refining margin, nine months versus nine months, as we produced 1.11 million barrels per day of
gasoline during the first nine months of 2010. Gasoline margins were lower in the first nine
months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of 2009 despite an increase in gasoline prices
in the first nine months of 2010. We believe that the margins for gasoline were constrained due to
continued weak consumer demand and high levels of inventory. In addition, our downstream customers
increased the use of ethanol as a component in gasoline.
For the first nine months of 2010, the discount applicable to the price of sour crude oil as
compared to the price of sweet crude oil was wider than the discount for the first nine months of
2009. For example, Maya crude oil, which is a type of sour crude oil, sold at a discount of
$9.04 per barrel to West Texas Intermediate crude oil, which is a type of sweet crude oil, during
the first nine months of 2010. This compared to a discount of $4.68 per barrel during the first
nine months of 2009, representing a favorable increase of $4.36 per barrel. The benefit of this
wider discount, however, was offset by a reduction of 65,000 barrels per day of sour crude oil that
we processed during the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the first nine months of 2009. We
estimate that the wider discounts for all types of sour crude oil that we process, offset by
reduced throughput volumes, had a $375 million net positive impact to our overall refining margin,
nine months versus nine months, as we processed 951,000 barrels per day of sour crude oils.
Favorable increases in the margins we received for all other products we produced had a
$269 million favorable impact to the overall improvement in refining operating results.
Retail
Retail operating income was $285 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $232 million
for the first nine months of 2009. This 23% (or $53 million) increase was primarily due to
improved retail fuel margins of $67 million, partially offset by a $30 million increase in
operating expenses, $19 million of which relates to our Canadian retail operations. The
$11 million increase in U.S. operating expenses was due to increased credit card fees in our U.S.
retail operations, and the $19 million increase in Canadian operating expenses was due to the
strengthening of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar.
Retail fuel margins benefited from the blending of ethanol with the gasoline sold by our retail
segment. For substantially all of 2010, ethanol was a lower cost product than gasoline and this
lower cost resulted in an increase in retail fuel margins. For example, the Chicago Board of Trade
price for a gallon of ethanol was $0.34 less than a gallon of Gulf Coast 87 gasoline for the first
nine months of 2010, compared to $0.06 higher than a gallon of Gulf Coast 87 gasoline for the first
nine months of 2009. In addition, approximately 80% of the gasoline we sold during the first nine
months of 2010 contained 10% ethanol as compared to approximately 65% of the gasoline sold during
the first nine months of 2009. In September 2010, the price of ethanol exceeded the price of
gasoline; therefore, the benefit to retail fuel margins from blending ethanol may not occur for the
fourth quarter of 2010.
60
Table of Contents
Ethanol
Ethanol operating income was $139 million for the first nine months of 2010 compared to $71 million
for the first nine months of 2009. The increase of $68 million was due to a full nine months of
operation of the seven ethanol plants acquired in the VeraSun Acquisition in the second quarter of
2009 and the addition of three ethanol plants acquired in the first quarter of 2010, as described
in Note 3 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Corporate Expenses and Other
General and administrative expenses decreased $67 million from the first nine months of 2009 to the
first nine months of 2010 due mainly to a favorable settlement with an insurance company for
$40 million recorded in 2010 which offset an increase in litigation costs of $40 million recorded
in 2009.
Other income (expense), net for the first nine months of 2010 increased $46 million from the
first nine months of 2009 primarily due to a $42 million net loss in 2009 resulting from an
unfavorable change in fair value adjustments related to an earn-out agreement and associated
derivative instruments that were entered into in connection with the sale of our Krotz Springs
Refinery in 2008.
Interest and debt expense increased $67 million from the first nine months of 2009 to the first
nine months of 2010. This increase is composed of a $43 million increase in interest incurred on
$1.25 billion of debt issued in February 2010 and $1.0 billion of debt issued in March 2009 (see
Note 7 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) and a $24 million decrease in
capitalized interest due to a corresponding reduction in capital expenditures between the periods
and the temporary suspension of activity on certain construction projects. We will not capitalize
interest with respect to suspended construction projects until significant construction activities
resume.
Income tax expense increased $385 million from the first nine months of 2009 to the first nine
months of 2010 due to higher operating income.
Income from discontinued operations of $41 million for the first nine months of 2010 represents a
$58 million after-tax gain on the sale of the shutdown refinery assets at Delaware City, partially
offset by a $17 million net loss from the refinerys operations prior to the sale. The gain on the
sale of the shutdown refinery assets primarily resulted from receiving proceeds related to the
scrap value of the assets and the reversal of certain liabilities recorded in the fourth quarter of
2009 associated with the shutdown of the refinery, which we will not incur because of the sale.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows for the Nine months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
Net cash provided by operating activities for the first nine months of 2010 was $2.6 billion
compared to $1.9 billion for the first nine months of 2009. The increase in cash generated from
operating activities was primarily due to the receipt of a $923 million tax refund in 2010.
Changes in cash provided by or used for working capital during the first nine months of 2010 and
2009 are shown in Note 10 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The net cash generated from operating activities during the first nine months of 2010, combined
with $1.244 billion of net proceeds from the issuance of $400 million of 4.50% notes due in
February 2015 and $850 million of 6.125% notes due in February 2020, as discussed in Note 7 of
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and $220 million of proceeds from the sale of
the Delaware City
61
Table of Contents
Refinery assets and associated terminal and pipeline assets, as discussed in Note 4 of Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, were used mainly to:
| fund $1.6 billion of capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs; |
||
| redeem our 7.5% senior notes for $294 million and our 6.75% senior notes for
$190 million; |
||
| make scheduled long-term note repayments of $33 million; |
||
| make repayments under our accounts receivable sales facility of $100 million; |
||
| pay common stock dividends of $85 million; |
||
| purchase additional ethanol
plants for $260 million; and |
||
| increase available cash on hand by $1.5 billion. |
The net cash generated from operating activities during the first nine months of 2009, combined
with $998 million of net proceeds from the issuance of $1 billion of notes in March 2009, as
discussed in Note 7 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and $799 million of
net proceeds from the issuance of 46 million shares of common stock in June 2009, as discussed in
Note 8 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, were used mainly to:
| fund $2.1 billion of capital expenditures and deferred turnaround and catalyst costs; |
||
| fund the VeraSun Acquisition for $556 million; |
||
| make scheduled long-term note repayments of $209 million; |
||
| pay common stock dividends of $239 million; and |
||
| increase available cash on hand by $665 million. |
Capital Investments
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we expended $1.2 billion for capital expenditures
and $410 million for deferred turnaround and catalyst costs. Capital expenditures for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 included $575 million of costs related to environmental projects.
For 2010, we expect to incur approximately $2.3 billion for capital investments, including
approximately $1.8 billion for capital expenditures (approximately $780 million of which is for
environmental projects) and approximately $540 million for deferred turnaround and catalyst costs.
The capital expenditure estimate excludes expenditures related to strategic acquisitions. We
continuously evaluate our capital budget and make changes as economic conditions warrant.
In January 2010, we acquired two ethanol plants and inventories from ASA for a total purchase price
of $202 million. The plants are located in Linden, Indiana and Bloomingburg, Ohio. In February
2010, we acquired an additional ethanol plant located near Jefferson, Wisconsin from Renew plus
certain receivables and inventories for a total purchase price of $79 million. Of the $281 million
total purchase price paid for these acquisitions, $21 million was paid in the fourth quarter of
2009.
Effective June 1, 2010, we sold the shutdown Delaware City Refinery assets and associated terminal
and pipeline assets to PBF for $220 million of cash proceeds. The sale resulted in a gain of
$92 million related to the shutdown refinery assets and a $3 million gain related to the terminal
and pipeline assets. The gain on the sale of the shutdown refinery assets primarily resulted from
receiving proceeds related to the scrap value of the assets and the reversal of certain liabilities
recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 associated with the shutdown of the refinery, which we will
not incur because of the sale. This gain is presented in income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of income taxes in the consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
62
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations
As of September 30, 2010, our contractual obligations included debt, capital lease obligations,
operating leases, purchase obligations, and other long-term liabilities.
During 2010, the following activity occurred related to our non-bank debt:
| in February 2010, we issued $400 million of 4.50% notes due in February 2015 and
$850 million of 6.125% notes due in February 2020 for total net proceeds of $1.244 billion; |
||
| in March 2010, we redeemed our 7.50% senior notes with a maturity date of June 15, 2015
for $294 million, or 102.5% of stated value, resulting in a $2 million gain; |
||
| in April 2010, we made scheduled debt repayments of $8 million related to our Series A
5.45%, Series B 5.40%, and Series C 5.40% industrial revenue bonds; |
||
| in May 2010, we redeemed our 6.75% senior notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2014 for
$190 million, or 102.25% of stated value, resulting in a $3 million loss; and |
||
| in June 2010, we made scheduled debt repayments of $25 million related to our 7.25%
debentures. |
We have an accounts receivable sales facility with a group of third-party entities and financial
institutions to sell on a revolving basis up to $1 billion of eligible trade receivables, which
matures in June 2011. As of September 30, 2010, the amount of eligible receivables sold was $100
million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we had no material changes outside the ordinary
course of our business in capital lease obligations, operating leases, purchase obligations, or
other long-term liabilities.
Our agreements do not have rating agency triggers that would automatically require us to post
additional collateral. However, in the event of certain downgrades of our senior unsecured debt to
below investment grade ratings by Moodys Investors Service and Standard & Poors Ratings Services,
the cost of borrowings under some of our bank credit facilities and other arrangements would
increase. As of September 30, 2010, all of our ratings on our senior unsecured debt are at or
above investment grade level as follows:
Rating Agency | Rating | |
Standard & Poors Ratings Services |
BBB (negative outlook) | |
Moodys Investors Service |
Baa2 (negative outlook) | |
Fitch Ratings |
BBB (negative outlook) |
The ratings agencies have placed a negative outlook on the ratings, which we believe is a result of
the weak refining margin environment and general economic slowdown. We cannot provide assurance
that these ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these
ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency. We note that these credit
ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell, or hold our securities and may be revised or
withdrawn at any time by the rating agency. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any
other rating. Any future reduction or withdrawal of one or more of our credit ratings could have a
material adverse impact on our ability to obtain short- and long-term financing as well as the cost
of such financings.
63
Table of Contents
Other Commercial Commitments
As of September 30, 2010, our committed lines of credit were as follows:
Borrowing | ||||
Capacity | Expiration | |||
Letter of credit facility |
$300 million | June 2011 | ||
Revolving credit facility |
$2.4 billion | November 2012 | ||
Canadian revolving credit facility |
Cdn. $115 million | December 2012 |
As of September 30, 2010, we had $285 million of letters of credit outstanding under our
uncommitted short-term bank credit facilities and $215 million of letters of credit outstanding
under our U.S. committed revolving credit facilities. Under our Canadian committed revolving
credit facility, we had Cdn. $20 million of letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2010.
Our letters of credit expire during 2010 and 2011.
Stock Purchase Programs
As of September 30, 2010, we have approvals under common stock purchase programs previously
approved by our board of directors to purchase approximately $3.5 billion of our common stock.
Tax Matters
We are subject to extensive tax liabilities, including federal, state, and foreign income taxes and
transactional taxes such as excise, sales/use, payroll, franchise, withholding, and ad valorem
taxes. New tax laws and regulations and changes in existing tax laws and regulations are
continuously being enacted or proposed that could result in increased expenditures for tax
liabilities in the future. Many of these liabilities are subject to periodic audits by the
respective taxing authority. Subsequent changes to our tax liabilities as a result of these audits
may subject us to interest and penalties.
Effective June 1, 2010, the GOA enacted a new tax regime applicable to refinery and terminal
operations in Aruba. Under the new tax regime, we are subject to a profit tax rate of 7% and a
dividend withholding tax rate of 0%. In addition, all imports and exports are exempt from turnover
tax and throughput fees. Beginning June 1, 2012, we will also make a minimum annual tax payment of
$10 million (payable in equal quarterly installments), with the ability to carry forward any excess
tax prepayments to future tax years.
The new tax regime was the result of a settlement agreement entered into on February 24, 2010
between the GOA and us that set the parties proposed terms for settlement of a lengthy and
complicated tax dispute between the parties. On May 30, 2010, the Aruban Parliament adopted
several laws that implemented the provisions of the settlement agreement, which became effective
June 1, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, we relinquished the provisions of
the previous tax holiday regime. On June 4, 2010, we made a payment to the GOA of $118 million
(primarily from restricted cash held in escrow) in consideration of a full release of all tax
claims prior to June 1, 2010. This settlement resulted in an after-tax gain of $30 million
recognized primarily as a reduction to interest expense of $8 million and an income tax benefit of
$20 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
64
Table of Contents
Other Matters Impacting Liquidity and Capital Resources
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we contributed $50 million to our qualified
pension plans. We currently anticipate contributing $100 million to our qualified pension plans in
December 2010.
In April 2010, Somali pirates hijacked a South Korean supertanker off the East African coast with a
cargo of crude oil that we took title to in March upon loading into the vessel. The vessel and its
cargo are currently in the possession of the Somali pirates. We paid our crude oil supplier for
the cargo in April. We believe that we will ultimately regain possession of the cargo, and we do
not anticipate this matter will have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity.
Financial Regulatory Reform
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (Wall Street Reform Act). The Wall Street Reform Act, among many things, creates
new regulations for companies that extend credit to consumers and requires most derivative
instruments to be traded on exchanges and routed through clearinghouses. Rules to implement the
Wall Street Reform Act are being finalized and therefore, the impact to our operations is not yet
known. However, implementation could result in higher margin requirements, higher clearing costs,
and more reporting requirements with respect to our derivative activities.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations, including
those relating to the discharge of materials into the environment, waste management, pollution
prevention measures, greenhouse gas emissions, and characteristics and composition of gasolines and
distillates. Because environmental laws and regulations are becoming more complex and stringent
and new environmental laws and regulations are continuously being enacted or proposed, the level of
future expenditures required for environmental matters could increase in the future. In addition,
any major upgrades in any of our refineries could require material additional expenditures to
comply with environmental laws and regulations.
While debate continues in the U.S. Congress regarding the regulation of greenhouse gases,
discussions regarding the previously proposed federal cap-and-trade legislation appear to have
stalled. The regulation of greenhouse gases at the federal level has now shifted to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which will begin regulating greenhouse gases on January 2,
2011 under the Clean Air Act of 1990, as amended (Clean Air Act). According to statements by the
EPA, any new construction or material expansions will require that, among other things, a
greenhouse gas permit be issued at either or both the state or federal level in accordance with the
Clean Air Act and regulations and will be required to undertake a technology review to determine
appropriate controls to be implemented with the project in order to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions. At this date, the EPA has not issued detailed regulations regarding what it considers
to be appropriate controls for greenhouse gas emissions. Any such controls, however, could result
in material increased compliance costs, additional operating restrictions for our business, and an
increase in the cost of the products we produce, which could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.
In addition, certain states have pursued the regulation of greenhouse gases at the state level.
For example, in 2006, California enacted the California Global Warming Solutions Act, also known as
AB 32. AB 32 directed the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to develop and issue regulations
the goal of which are to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in California to 1990 levels by 2020.
CARB has proposed a variety of regulations aimed at reaching this goal, including a Low Carbon Fuel
Standard as well as a state-wide cap and trade program. While CARB has not yet issued
detailed regulations on the cap
and trade program, we believe it will require our California refineries to buy emission credits to
offset
65
Table of Contents
greenhouse gases emitted from our refineries. It is unclear if and when CARB would require
us to purchase emission credits for greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the fuels we sell in
California as well. Unless deferred, AB 32 implementation will begin as soon as 2011. Complying
with AB 32 could result in material increased compliance costs for us, increased capital
expenditures, increased operating costs, and additional operating restrictions for our business,
resulting in an increase in the cost of the products we produce, which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.
On June 30, 2010, the EPA formally disapproved the flexible permits program submitted by the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) in 1994 for inclusion in its clean-air implementation
plan. The EPA determined that Texas flexible permit program did not meet several requirements
under the federal Clean Air Act. Our Port Arthur, Texas City, Three Rivers, McKee and Corpus
Christi East and West Refineries operate under flexible permits administered by the TCEQ.
Accordingly, the permit status of these facilities has been called into question. Litigation
against the EPA regarding its actions has been brought by multiple stakeholders, including trade
associations. We are currently evaluating the impacts of this new regulatory action and cannot
estimate the financial or operational impacts on our business. Depending on the final resolution,
the EPAs actions could result in material increased compliance costs for us, costly remedial
actions, increased capital expenditures, increased operating costs, and additional operating
restrictions for our business, resulting in an increase in the cost of the products we produce,
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and
liquidity.
Other
We believe that we have sufficient funds from operations and, to the extent necessary, from
borrowings under our credit facilities, to fund our ongoing operating requirements. We expect
that, to the extent necessary, we can raise additional funds from time to time through equity or
debt financings in the public and private capital markets or the arrangement of additional credit
facilities. However, there can be no assurances regarding the availability of any future
financings or additional credit facilities or whether such financings or additional credit
facilities can be made available on terms that are acceptable to us.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts
reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Our critical accounting policies are disclosed in our annual report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
As discussed in Note 2 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, certain new
financial accounting pronouncements have been issued that have already been reflected in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
66
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of commodities, interest
rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and we enter into derivative instruments to manage those
risks. We also enter into derivative instruments to manage the price risk on other contractual
derivatives into which we have entered. The only types of derivative instruments we enter into are
those related to the various commodities we purchase or produce, interest rate swaps, and foreign
currency exchange and purchase contracts, as described below. All derivative instruments are
recorded on our balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at their fair values.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
We are exposed to market risks related to the price of crude oil, refined products (primarily
gasoline and distillate), grain (primarily corn), and natural gas used in our refining operations.
To reduce the impact of price volatility on our results of operations and cash flows, we enter into
commodity derivative instruments, including swaps, futures, and options to hedge:
| inventories and firm commitments to purchase inventories generally for amounts by which
our current year LIFO inventory levels differ from our previous year-end LIFO inventory
levels and |
||
| forecasted feedstock and refined product purchases, refined product sales, and natural
gas purchases to lock in the price of those forecasted transactions at existing market
prices that we deem favorable. |
We use the futures markets for the available liquidity, which provides greater flexibility in
transacting our hedging and trading operations. We use swaps primarily to convert our floating
price exposure to a fixed price. We also enter into certain commodity derivative instruments for
trading purposes to take advantage of existing market conditions related to crude oil and refined
products that we perceive as opportunities to benefit our results of operations and cash flows, but
for which there are no related physical transactions.
Our positions in commodity derivative instruments are monitored and managed on a daily basis by a
risk control group to ensure compliance with our stated risk management policy that has been
approved by our board of directors.
The following sensitivity analysis includes all positions at the end of the reporting period with
which we have market risk (in millions):
Derivative Instruments Held For | ||||||||
Non-Trading | Trading | |||||||
Purposes | Purposes | |||||||
September 30, 2010: |
||||||||
Gain (loss) in fair value due to: |
||||||||
10% increase in underlying commodity prices |
$ | (112 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | ||
10% decrease in underlying commodity prices |
105 | 8 | ||||||
December 31, 2009: |
||||||||
Gain (loss) in fair value due to: |
||||||||
10% increase in underlying commodity prices |
(6 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
10% decrease in underlying commodity prices |
6 | |
See Note 12 of Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for notional volumes associated
with these derivative contracts as of September 30, 2010.
67
Table of Contents
INTEREST RATE RISK
The following table provides information about our debt instruments (dollars in millions), the fair
values of which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Principal cash flows and related
weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates are presented. We had no interest rate
derivative instruments outstanding as of September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected Maturity Dates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There- | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | after | Total | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt (excluding capital leases): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
$ | | $ | 418 | $ | 759 | $ | 489 | $ | 209 | $ | 6,089 | $ | 7,964 | $ | 9,495 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
| % | 6.4 | % | 6.9 | % | 5.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 7.1 | % | 6.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Floating rate |
$ | | $ | 100 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 100 | $ | 100 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
| % | 0.8 | % | | % | | % | | % | | % | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected Maturity Dates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There- | Fair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | after | Total | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt (excluding capital leases): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
$ | 33 | $ | 418 | $ | 759 | $ | 489 | $ | 395 | $ | 5,126 | $ | 7,220 | $ | 8,028 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
6.8 | % | 6.4 | % | 6.9 | % | 5.5 | % | 5.7 | % | 7.5 | % | 7.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Floating rate |
$ | 200 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 200 | $ | 200 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate |
0.9 | % | | % | | % | | % | | % | | % | 0.9 | % |
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
As of September 30, 2010, we had commitments to purchase $308 million of U.S. dollars. Our market
risk was minimal on these contracts, as they matured on or before October 22, 2010, resulting in a
$4 million loss in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. |
|
Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the
period covered by this report, and has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of September 30, 2010. |
||
(b) | Changes in internal control over financial reporting. |
|
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. |
68
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information below describes new proceedings or material developments in proceedings that we
previously reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, or our
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010.
Litigation
For the legal proceedings listed below, we hereby incorporate by reference into this Item our
disclosures made in Part I, Item 1 of this Report included in Note 15 of Condensed Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements under the caption Litigation.
| Retail Fuel Temperature Litigation |
||
| Other Litigation |
Environmental Enforcement Matters
While it is not possible to predict the outcome of the following environmental proceedings, if any
one or more of them were decided against us, we believe that there would be no material effect on
our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We are reporting these proceedings
to comply with SEC regulations, which require us to disclose certain information about proceedings
arising under federal, state, or local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the
environment or protecting the environment if we reasonably believe that such proceedings will
result in monetary sanctions of $100,000 or more.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Corpus Christi West Refinery). In September
2010, the EPA issued a stipulated penalty demand of $120,885 to our Corpus Christi West Refinery
pertaining to three 2008 acid gas flaring events that we self-reported. We resolved this matter by
paying agreed upon penalties to the pertinent enforcement authorities.
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) (Corpus Christi West Refinery). In our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, we disclosed that we were negotiating
with the TCEQ regarding a collection of enforcement actions pertaining to our Corpus Christi West
Refinery which alleged excess air emissions, reporting errors, unauthorized tank emissions, and
waste violations. In the third quarter of 2010, we settled these matters pursuant to two agreed
orders with the TCEQ.
TCEQ (Corpus Christi East Refinery). In October 2010, we received a proposed agreed
order from the TCEQ relating to unauthorized air emissions during a flaring event and excess air
emissions from three plant boilers at our Corpus Christi East Refinery. The gross penalty demand
is stated to be $416,500, but is subject to reduction to $333,200 under certain circumstances. We
are evaluating the order and are considering our options in responding.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010.
69
Table of Contents
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities. Not applicable.
(b) Use of Proceeds. Not applicable.
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. The following table discloses purchases of shares
of our common stock made by us or on our behalf for the periods shown below.
Period | Total | Average | Total Number of | Total Number of | Maximum Number (or | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Price | Shares Not | Shares Purchased | Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Paid per | Purchased as Part | as Part of | Value) of Shares that | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchased | Share | of Publicly | Publicly | May Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Announced Plans | Announced Plans | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
or Programs (1) | or Programs | Programs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(at month end) (2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 2010 |
856 | $ | 17.58 | 856 | | $3.46 billion | |||||||||||||||||||||
August 2010 |
2,932 | $ | 16.94 | 2,932 | | $3.46 billion | |||||||||||||||||||||
September 2010 |
376 | $ | 16.92 | 376 | | $3.46 billion | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
4,164 | $ | 17.07 | 4,164 | | $3.46 billion | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | The shares reported in this column represent purchases settled in the third
quarter of 2010 relating to (a) our purchases of shares in open-market transactions
to meet our obligations under employee benefit plans, and (b) our purchases of shares
from our employees and non-employee directors in connection with the exercise of
stock options, the vesting of restricted stock, and other stock compensation
transactions in accordance with the terms of our incentive compensation plans. |
||
(2) | On April 26, 2007, we publicly announced an increase in our common stock
purchase program from $2 billion to $6 billion, as authorized by our board of
directors on April 25, 2007. The $6 billion common stock purchase program has no
expiration date. On February 28, 2008, we announced that our board of directors
approved a $3 billion common stock purchase program. This program is in addition to
the $6 billion program. This $3 billion program has no expiration date. |
70
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description | |
*12.01
|
Statements of Computations of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed
Charges and Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred
Stock Dividends. |
|
*31.01
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of principal executive officer. |
|
*31.02
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification (under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) of principal financial officer. |
|
*32.01
|
Section 1350 Certifications (as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). |
|
**101
|
The following materials from Valero Energy Corporations Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, formatted in
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements
of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, and
(v) Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
* | Filed herewith. |
|
** | Submitted electronically herewith. |
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL information in Exhibit 101 to this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or
other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as
shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
71
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION (Registrant)
|
||||
By: | /s/ Michael S. Ciskowski | |||
Michael S. Ciskowski | ||||
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
||||
Date: November 3, 2010
72