VERITEC INC - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)

veritec10q51111.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM l0-Q

(Mark One)

[ x ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934 for the quarterly period ended MARCH 31, 2011

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE AC T OF 1934 for the transition period from ________________ to ___________________.

Commission File Number. 0-15113

VERITEC, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada	95-3954373
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

2445 Winnetka Avenue N. Golden Valley, MN	55427
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (763) 253-2670

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [ ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule l2b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]

As of March 31, 2011, there were 15,920,088 shares of the issuer’s common stock outstanding.

VERITEC, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS
			Page No.
PART I

	Item 1	Financial Statements	2

	Item 2	Managements Discussion and Analysis of FInancial Condition and Results of Operations	10

	Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	12

	Item 4	Controls and Procedures	12

Part II

	Item 1	Legal Proceedings	12

	Item 1A	Risk Factors	12

	Item 2	Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and use of Proceeds	12

	Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	12

	Item 4	(Removed and Reserved)	12

	Item 5	Other Information	12

	Item 6	Exhibits	12

	Signatures		13

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 2 of Part I of this report include forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by forward-looking statements.

In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "proposed," "intended," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. You should read statements that contain these words carefully, because they discuss our expectations about our future operating results or our future financial condition or state other "forward-looking" information. There may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or control. Before you invest in our securities, you should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in this Quarterly Report could substantially harm our business, results of operations and financial condition, and that upon the occurrence of any of these events, the trading price of our securities could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, growth rates, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report to conform these statements to actual results.

PART I

ITEM 1 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	March 31,			June 30,
	2011			2010
ASSETS		(Unaudited)

Current Assets:
Cash	$	21,939		$	31,915
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $8,650		25,631			76,363
Inventories		6,317			3,394
Prepaid expenses		29,906			29,781
Employee advances		3,037			5,037
Total Current Assets		86,830			146,490

Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $211,763 and $190,305, respectively		23,620			45,079
Total Assets	$	110,450	$		191,569

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current Liabilities:
Notes payable, net of discount of $0 and $1,003, respectively	$	150,075	$		140,964
Notes payable, related party, net of discount of $0 and $6,310, respectively		2,045,740			1,802,096
Accounts payable		706,910			518,215
Payroll tax liabilities		294,858			103,002
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		258,725			205,450
Total Current Liabilities		3,456,308			2,769,727

Commitments and Contingencies

Stockholders’ Deficit:
Convertible preferred stock, par value $1.00; authorized 10,000,000 shares, 276,000 shares of Series H authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding		1,000			1,000
Common stock, par value $.01; authorized 50,000,000 shares, 15,920,088 shares issued and outstanding		159,201			159,201
Additional paid-in capital		14,282,739			14,281,531
Accumulated deficit		(17,788,798	)		(17,019,890	)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		( 3,345,858	)		( 2,578,158	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$	110,450	$		191,569

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2011			2010

License and other revenue	$	212,851		$	318,963
Cost of Sales		83,714			150,962
Gross Profit		129,137			168,001

Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		274,596			216,139
Research and development		38,896			115,195
Total Operating Expenses		313,492			331,334

Loss from Operations		(184,355	)		(163,333	)

Interest expense, including $36,192 and $31,748, respectively, to related parties		(39,041	)		(37,926	)

Net Loss	$	(223,396	)	$	(201,259	)

Loss Per Common Share,
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding,
Basic and Diluted			15,920,088				15,868,190

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Nine months ended March 31,
	2011			2010

License and other revenue	$	678,919		$	638,621
Cost of Sales		260,468			439,846
Gross Profit		418,451			198,775

Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		883,033			1,171,087
Research and development		183,720			455,176
Total Operating Expenses		1,066,753			1,626,263

Loss from Operations		(648,302	)		(1,427,488	)

Other Income(Expense):
Interest income		--			30
Interest expense, including $108,135 and $81,295, respectively, to related parties		(120,606	)		(100,105	)
Total Other Income(Expense)		(120,606	)		(100,075	)

Net Loss	$	(768,908	)	$	(1,527,563	)

Loss Per Common Share,
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.09	)

Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding,
Basic and Diluted			15,920,088				16,126,876

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(Unaudited)

`									Additional
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Paid-in		Accumulated
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Total
Balance, July 1, 2010		1,000	$	1,000		15,920,088	$	159,201	$	14,281,531	$	(17,019,890	)	$	(2,578,158	)
Stock Based Compensation										1,208					1,208
Net Loss for the Period		-		-		-		-		-		(768,908	)		(768,908	)

Balance, March 31, 2011		1,000	$	1,000		15,920,088	$	159,201	$	14,282,739	$	(17,788,798	)	$	(3,345,858	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine months ended March 31,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(768,908	)	$	(1527,563	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation		21,458			37,697
Amortization of discount on notes payable		7,312			17,894
Fair value of stock options issued to employees		1,208			73,536
Fair value of stock issued for services		--			153,950
Allowance for note receivable		60,000			--
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		50,732			(8,783)
Inventories		(2,923	)		(1,219)
Employee advances		2,000			2,862
Prepaid expenses		(125)			(6,625)
Accounts payables and accrued expenses		433,826			265,290
Interest accrued on notes payable		116,244			89,588

Net cash used by operating activities		(79,176	)		(903,373	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of note receivable		(60,000)			(10,000)
Net cash used by investing activities		(60,000)			(10,000)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from notes payable		129,200			946,960
Payments on notes payable		--			(65,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities		129,200			881,960

NET DECREASE IN CASH		(9,976)			(31,413)
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		31,915			50,019
CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	21,939		$	18,606

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest	$	606		$	536

NONCASH ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common stock for accrued expenses	$	--		$	37,500
Issuance of common stock in repayment of note payable		--			70,000

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

VERITEC, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited)

A. NATURE OF BUSINESS

References to the “Company” in this Form 10-Q refer to Veritec, Inc. (“Veritec”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries VCode Holdings, Inc. (“VCode”) and Veritec Financial Systems, Inc. (“VTFS”).

The Company is primarily engaged in the development, marketing, sales and licensing of products and rendering of professional services related thereto in the following two fields of technology: (1) proprietary two-dimensional matrix symbology (also commonly referred to as “two-dimensional barcodes” or “2D barcodes”) and (2) mobile banking solutions.

The Company’s two-dimensional matrix symbology technology will hereafter be referred to as the Company’s “Barcode Technology”, and the Company’s mobile banking technology will hereafter be referred to as its “Mobile Banking Technology”.

The Company’s Barcode Technology was originally invented by the founders of Veritec under United States patents 4,924,078, 5,331,176, 5,612,524 and 7,159,780. Our principal licensed product to date that contains our VeriCode® Barcode Technology has been a product identification system for identification and tracking of manufactured parts, components and products. The VeriCode® symbol is a two-dimensional high data density machine-readable symbol that can contain up to approximately 500 bytes of data.

The Company’s VSCode® Barcode Technology is a derivative of the VeriCode® symbol with the ability to encrypt a greater amount of data by increasing data density. The VSCode® is a data storage “container” that offers a high degree of security and which can also be tailored to the application requirements of the user. The VSCode® symbol can hold any form of binary information that can be digitized, including numbers, letters, images, photos, graphics, and the minutia for biometric information, including fingerprints and facial image data, to the extent of its data storage capacity, that are likewise limited by the resolution of the marking and reading devices employed by the user. VSCode® is ideal for secure identification documents (such as national identification cards, driver’s licenses, and voter registration cards), financial cards, medical records and other high security applications.

In its PhoneCodes™ product platform, Veritec developed software to send, store, display, and read a VeriCode® Barcode Technology symbol on the LCD screen of a mobile phone. With the electronic media that provide the ease of transferring information over the web, Veritec’s PhoneCodes™ technology enables individuals and companies to receive or distribute gift certificates, tickets, coupons, receipts, or engage in banking transactions using the VeriCode® technology via wireless phone or PDA.

On January 12, 2009, Veritec formed VTFS, a Delaware corporation, to bring its Mobile Banking Technology, products and related professional services to market. In May 2009 Veritec was registered by Security First Bank in Visa’s Third Party Registration Program as a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization and Third-Party Servicer. As a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization, Veritec was able to promote and sell Visa branded card programs. As a Third-Party Servicer, Veritec provided back-end cardholder transaction processing services for Visa branded card programs on behalf of Security First Bank. As of October 2010 the Company’s registration with Security First Bank terminated.

Our VeriSuite™ card enrollment system was released in July 2009. The VeriSuite™ system is a user friendly and cost effective solution that gives governments and businesses the ability to provide cardholders with an identity card containing Veritec’s VSCode® Barcode Technology. The VeriSuite™ system provides secure Bio-ID Cards such as citizen identification, employee cards, health benefit cards, border control cards, financial cards and more.

The Company has a portfolio of five United States and eight foreign patents. In addition, we have seven U.S. and twenty-eight foreign pending patent applications.

B. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States of America generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required for complete financial statements.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2011. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2010 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of such date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes thereto included in our Form 10-K as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Those estimates and assumptions include estimates for reserves of uncollectible accounts, accruals for potential liabilities and assumptions made in valuing stock instruments issued for services.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Veritec, VCode, and VTFS. All inter-company transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, the Company had a net loss of $768,908 and used cash in operations of $79,176. At March 31, 2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $3,369,478 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $3,345,858. The Company is delinquent or in default of $2,079,401 of its notes payable and is delinquent in payment of certain amounts due of $294,858 for payroll taxes and accrued interest and penalties as of March 31, 2011. The Company believes its cash and forecasted cash flow from operations will not be sufficient to continue operations through fiscal 2011 without continued external investment. The Company will require additional funds to continue its operations through fiscal 2011 and to continue to develop its existing projects and plans to raise such funds by finding additional investors to purchase the Company’s securities, generating sufficient sales revenue, implementing dramatic cost reductions or any combination thereof. There is no assurance that the Company can be successful in raising such funds, generating the necessary sales or reducing major costs. Further, if the Company is successful in raising such funds from sales of equity securities, the terms of these sales may cause significant dilution to existing holders of common stock. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from this uncertainty.

C. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Net Loss per Common Share:

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued, using the treasury stock method. Potential common shares are excluded from the computation as their effect is antidilutive.

For the three and the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share are the same because potential dilutive securities would have an anti-dilutive effect.

There were 6,547,987 and 5,446,235 potentially dilutive securities as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Concentrations

During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had four customers of which two customers accounted for approximately 13% each with the remaining two accounting for approximately 15% and 38% of sales in 2011, and three customers that accounted for approximately 13%, 18% and 33% of sales in 2010, respectively. During the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had four customers that accounted for approximately 12%, 13%, 16% and 29% of the sales in 2011, and four customers accounted for approximately 10%, 11%, 22% and 25% of sales in 2010, respectively. No other customers accounted for more than 10% of sales in either period. As of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, the Company had approximately $4,025 (12%), $6,050 (18%), $8,775 (26%) and $11,363 (33%) and $11,600 (14%), $20,025 (24%) and $23,550 (28%), respectively, of accounts receivable from its major customers.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, foreign revenues accounted for 87% (72% Korea and 15% Taiwan) and 96% (83% Korea, 9% Taiwan and 4% others) of the Company’s total revenues respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, foreign revenues accounted for 93%, (72% Korea, 19% Taiwan and 2% others) and 82% (66% Korea, 12% Taiwan, 3% Japan and 1% others) of the Company’s total revenue respectively.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new accounting guidance to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which requires new disclosures regarding transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, as well as requiring presentation on a gross basis of information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance also clarifies existing disclosures regarding level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. The new guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. Disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. As this guidance requires only additional disclosure, there should be no impact on the financial statements of the Company upon adoption.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”)and the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.

D. NOTES RECEIVABLE

In August 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Global TV, Inc. for the purpose of forming a strategic partnership to raise capital for the implementation and promotion of private-labeled debit card programs. The Company was initially to make funds available to Global TV in the amount of $70,000 and agreed to make another $30,000 available to Global TV if the Company successfully raised $2,000,000 in additional capital, provided certain conditions were met. As of December 31, 2010, the agreement terminated as a result of the failure to meet the conditions stipulated by the agreement.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company entered into various short-term notes receivable agreements totaling $60,000 with Global TV. The notes were to accrue interest at a rate of 10%, were due September through October 2010, and were secured by certain fixed and other assets of Global TV. The notes remained unpaid as of March 31, 2011, and the Company is negotiating an extension of the due dates. However, the Company has provided a full reserve against the notes as of March 31, 2011.

E. NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable consist of the following:

	March 31, 2011	June 30, 2010
	(UNAUDITED)
Convertible notes payable (includes $114,904 and $107,897, respectively, to non-related parties), unsecured, interest at 8%, due September 2010 through November 2010. The principal and accrued interest are convertible at a conversion price of $0.30. The principal and interest is due immediately on the event of default or change of control. The holders also received warrants to purchase one share of common stock for every $2 of investment. The Company recorded a $20,981 discount on the notes payable for the value of the warrants issued. The discount was amortized over the term of the notes payable. The unamortized discount as of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, was $0 and $3,758, respectively. The notes are now in default.	$ 640,659	$ 603,871

Convertible notes payable to related parties, unsecured, principal and interest are convertible into common stock at $0.30 to $0.33 per share, interest at 8 % to 10%, due July to November 2010. The notes are now in default.	747,384	578,166

Convertible note payable to related party, secured by the Company’s intellectual property, principal and interest are convertible into common stock at $0.25 per share subject to board of directors’ approval, interest at 8%. The note was due November 2, 2010 and is now in default.	222,838	208,814

Note payable to related party, secured by the Company’s intellectual property, interest at 8% due August 2010 and is now is default.	433,350	408,732

Notes payable to related parties, unsecured, interest at 0% to 8%, due on demand.	116,414	110,408

Note payable, unsecured, interest at 10%, due January 2010 and is now in default.	22,663	21,162

Convertible note payable, unsecured, principal and interest are convertible into common stock at $0.30 per share subject to board of directors’ approval, interest at 8%, due January 2011 and is now in default.	10,984	10,384

Convertible note payable, unsecured, principal and interest are convertible into common stock at $1.00 per share subject to board of directors’ approval, interest at 8% due November 2009 and is now in default.	1,523	1,523

Total	$ 2,195,815	$ 1,943,060

For the purposes of Balance Sheet presentation notes payable have been grouped as follows:

	March 31,		June 30,
	2011		2010
Notes payable	$	150,075	$	140,964
Notes payable, related party		2,045,740		1,802,096
	$	2,195,815	$	1,943,060

F. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Stock options

The Company has agreements with certain of its employees and independent contractor consultants that provide grants of options to purchase the Company’s common stock.

A summary of stock options as of March 31, 2011 and for the nine months then ended is as follows:

	Number of	Weighted - Average
	Shares	Exercise Price

Outstanding at June 30, 2010	814,249	$	0.47
Granted	10,000	$	0.13
Outstanding at March 31, 2011	824,249	$	0.47
Exercisable at March 31, 2011	814,249	$	0.47

The weighted-average remaining contractual life of stock options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2011 is 3.1 years.

The weighted-average fair value of options granted for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $0.14 and $0.34, respectively. The weighted average fair value of options granted during the nine months ended March 31, 2011, was determined using a Black Scholes pricing model with the following assumptions: expected term of 3 years, volatility of 185% and discount rate of 1.80%.

Stock-based compensation expense was $338 and $8,090 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Stock based compensation expense was $1,208 and $73,536 during the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, there was $338 of unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over the next two quarters. The options had no intrinsic value as of March 31, 2011.

Warrants

In connection with the issuance of certain convertible notes payable, the Company has outstanding 275,000 warrants to acquire its common stock at an exercise price of $2 per share. The warrants expire in 2014. The warrants have no intrinsic value at March 31, 2011.

G. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent to the quarter ended March 31, 2011, the Company signed an ISO and processor agreement with Palm Desert National Bank (which was later assigned to First California Bank) to market and process the Company’s Visa branded card program on behalf of the bank.

H. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On February 15, 2011, the Company filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota against Aurora Financial Systems, Inc. (“Aurora”) for declaratory judgment, tortious interference and other related claims concerning assertions by Aurora regarding United States Patent No. 7,229,006. The complaint related to Aurora’s improper and unlawful assertions of patent against certain software owned by the Company which was lawfully acquired from the software’s owner and inventor before the purported assignment of any patent rights to Aurora. Even though Aurora was aware of the lawful acquisition yet they have made repeated claims about the Company’s purported patent infringement relating to the Company’s use and licensing of the software to various financial institutions with which the Company has sought business relationship. The Company is seeking a declaration of non-infringement based on legal estoppel and implied license as well as a judgment that Aurora has committed tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, false advertising under the Lanham Act and has violated Minnesota’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. As of March 31, 2011 Aurora has not countersued and no court date has been set. In addition to the preceding lawsuit, the Company is subject to various legal proceedings from time to time in the ordinary course of business, none of which is required to be disclosed.

ITEM 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations – March 31, 2011 compared to March 31, 2010

We had a net loss of $223,396 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to a net loss of $201,259 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011, we had a net loss of $768,908 compared to a net loss of $1,527,563 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010.

Revenue

License and other revenues are derived from our product identification systems sold principally to customers in the LCD monitor industry. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, license and other revenue was $212,851 compared to $318,963 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of $106,112. The license and other revenue decreases are attributable to the decrease in demand for LCD screens during the quarter. Revenues from the LCD market remain unpredictable as they are generated when customers open new production facilities or update production equipment; however, in the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company experienced a decrease in demand for product identification licenses in the LCD industry. The decrease is a result of various customers purchasing less in the current period than in the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, license and other revenues was $678,919 and $638,621, respectively. The increase was due to a sharp increase in the LCD screen demand.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011 totaled $83,714 and for the three months ended March 31, 2010, cost of sales were $150,962, a decrease of $67,248. The decrease in cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was the result of a reduction in the cost of maintaining the Company’s data processing center for its mobile banking operations, which made up 84% of the total cost of sales in the current period compared to 82% in the quarter ended March 31, 2010. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011, the cost of sales totaled $260,468 compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2010 of $439,846. The net decrease of $179,378 was mainly due to a reduction in cost of maintaining the Company’s data processing center for its mobile banking operations. This decrease was partially offset by increases in cost of licenses that went up by $174.

Operating Expenses

Research and development expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 totaled $38,896 versus $115,195 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease of $76,299 was principally the result of reduction in consulting costs that decreased by $14,533 and payroll and related costs that decreased by $60,591. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011, research and development costs was $183,720 compared to $455,176 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, a difference of $271,456. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011, engineering payroll costs decreased by $185,730 due to a reduction in staff levels and consulting costs declined by $78,698 in response to the Company’s current financial condition.

Sales and marketing expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $38,717 compared to $35,670 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of $3,047. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company had one direct sales staff person. The Company, for the three months ended March 31, 2011, paid out commissions of $185 compared to $314 for the three month period ended March 31, 2010. Sales and marketing expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 was $114,474 compared to $125,353 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, a difference of $10,879. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011, the Company had one direct sales staff that accounted for $3,157 increased payroll costs compared to the same nine months period ended March 31, 2010.

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $235,879 compared to $180,469 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of $55,410 over the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was mainly the result of increases in some of the expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. Legal fees increased by $79,585 due to additional legal fees incurred resulting from a lawsuit discussed under legal proceedings. The Company also saw increases of $6,000 in professional fees and $6,633 in penalty and interest. These increases were offset by reduction in payroll and related costs of $12,914, stock compensation of $7,752, rent expense of $6,600, depreciation expense of $5,413, and bank charges of $4,068 over the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011, general and administrative expenses were $768,559 versus $1,045,734 for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of $277,175. The reduction was mainly the result of decreases in most of the expenditures for the nine months ended March 31, 2011. Payroll expense decreased by $92,793 due to a reduction in staff levels. The Company also saw decreases of $226,278 in stock compensation expense, $23,380 in consulting costs, $16,600 in rent, $18,576 in health insurance costs, $66,898 in professional fees, $35,847 in public company fees and $16,238 in depreciation expense. These decreases were offset by increases in penalty and interest of $47,516, bad debt expense of $60,000 and patent expense of $52,247.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $39,041 compared to $37,926 in the same period ended March 31, 2010. The increase was the result of issuance of notes payable. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 interest income was $0 and $30, respectively. The decrease was a result of the Company’s need for cash to fund operations thus drawing down on cash reserves and in so doing earning less interest. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 interest expense was $120,606 and $100,105, respectively. The increase was the result of issuance of notes payable.

Liquidity

Our decrease in cash and cash equivalent to $21,939 at March 31, 2011 compared to $31,915 at June 30, 2010 was the result of $79,176 used in operating activities; $60,000 used in investing activities; and $129,200 provided by financing activities. Net cash used in operations during 2011 was $79,176 compared with $903,373 used in operations during the same period in 2010. Cash used in operations during 2011 was primarily due to the net loss in the period offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses. Net cash used in investing activities of $60,000 during 2011 compared with $10,000 during 2010 was primarily the result of payment on note receivable. Net cash provided by financing activities of $129,200 during 2011 was due to proceeds from notes payable of $129,200. During the same period in 2010, the net cash provided by financing activities of $881,960 was from net proceeds from notes payable.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. During the nine months ended March 31, 2011, the Company had a net loss of $768,908 and used cash in operations of $79,176. At March 31, 2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $3,369,478 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $3,345,858. The Company is delinquent or in default of $2,079,401 of its notes payable and is delinquent in payment of certain amounts due of $294,858 for payroll taxes and accrued interest and penalties as of March 31, 2011. The Company’s operations are currently being supported by borrowings from affiliated parties, and its cash and forecasted cash flow from operations will not be sufficient to continue operations without continued external investment. The Company believes it will require additional funds in the near future to continue its operations and to continue to develop its existing projects and plans to raise such funds by finding additional investors to purchase the Company’s securities, generating sufficient sales revenue, implementing further dramatic cost reductions or any combination thereof. There is no assurance that the Company can be successful in raising such funds, generating the necessary sales or reducing major costs. Further, if the Company is successful in raising funds from sales of equity securities, the terms of these sales may cause significant dilution to existing holders of common stock. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from this uncertainty.

If the Company is not successful in raising additional funds, generating sufficient revenues or implementing sufficient cost reductions, the Company may be forced to suspend or discontinue its operations or seek relief from its debt obligations under the United States Bankruptcy Code. Any of these actions is likely to result in a common stockholder’s loss of his or her complete investment in the Company’s common stock.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2010, the FASB issued new accounting guidance to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity's equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Stock-Based Compensation:

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in capital raising transactions, for services and for financing costs. Stock-based compensation for employees is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Options vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date. The value of the stock compensation to non-employees is based upon the measurement date as determined at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.

We estimate volatility and forfeitures based upon historical data. As permitted by the authoritative guidance issued by the FASB, we use the “simplified” method to determine the expected life of an option due to the Company’s lack of sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis, which is a result of the relative high turnover rates experienced in the past for positions granted options. All of these variables have an effect on the estimated fair value of our share-based awards.

Revenue Recognition:

The Company accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101 "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" and related amendments. Revenues for the Company are classified into four separate products; license revenue (Veritec’s Multi-Dimensional matrix symbology), hardware revenue, identification card revenue, and debit card revenue. Revenues from licenses, hardware, and identification cards are recognized when the product is shipped and collection is reasonably assured. The process typically begins for license and hardware revenue with a customer purchase order detailing its hardware specifications so the Company can import its software into the customer's hardware. Once importation is completed, if the customer only wishes to purchase a license, the Company typically transmits the software to the customer via the Internet. Revenue is recognized at that point. If the customer requests both license and hardware products, once the software is imported into the hardware and the process is complete, the product is shipped and revenue is recognized at time of shipment. Once the software and/or hardware are either shipped or transmitted, the customers do not have a right of refusal or return. Under some conditions, the customers remit payment prior to the Company having completed importation of the software. In these instances, the Company delays revenue recognition and reflects the prepayments as customer deposits.

The process for identification cards begins when a customer requests, via the Internet, an identification card. The card is reviewed for design and placement of the data, printed and packaged for shipment. At the time the identification cards are shipped and collection is reasonably assured, revenue is recognized.

The Company, as a processor and a distributor, recognizes revenue from transaction fees charged cardholders for the use of its issued mobile debit cards. The fees are recognized on a monthly basis after all cardholder transactions have been summarized and reconciled with third party processors.

ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item 3.

ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) Rules 13a-15(e) and 15-d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of March 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described in our Form 10-K at June 30, 2010, as amended on Form 10K/A on February 22, 2011.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

In our Form 10-K at June 30, 2010, as amended on Form 10K/A on February 22, 2011,we identified certain matters that constitute material weaknesses (as defined under the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 2) in our internal control over financial reporting as discussed on Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. We are undergoing ongoing evaluation and improvements in our internal control over financial reporting. Regarding our identified weaknesses, we have performed the following remediation efforts:

§	We have assigned our audit committee with oversight responsibilities.

§	Our financial statements, periodic reports filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, our monthly bank statements and imaged checks are now continuously reviewed by our chief financial officer and chief executive officer.

§	All significant contracts are now being reviewed and approved by our board of directors in conjunction with the chief executive officer.

There was no other change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

ITEM 1 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1A

RISK FACTORS

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3 DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

The Company is in default on its various notes payable totaling $2,079,401 representing principal and accrued interest as of the date of filing this report.

ITEM 4 (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

ITEM 5 OTHER INFORMATION

The Company is delinquent in payment of $294,858 for payroll taxes and accrued interest and penalties as of March 31, 2011.

ITEM 6

EXHIBITS

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1**	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2**	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

**	The certifications attached as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 accompany the Quarterly on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed “filed” by Veritec, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

VERITEC, INC.

By /s/ Van Tran May 10, 2011

Van Tran

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

By /s/ John Quentin May 10, 2011

John Quentin

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)