VERITEC INC - Annual Report: 2012 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

_________________

FORM 10-K

_________________

þ     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: June 30, 2012

or

o     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _______ to ______

_________________

VERITEC INC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_________________

2445 Winnetka Avenue N. Golden Valley, MN 55427
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(763)-253-2670
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, .01 Par Value

Title of Class

_________________

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes  o     No  þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.     Yes  o    No þ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ     No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ     No  o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.       þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.    Yes    þ   No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
  Yes    o   No  þ 

The aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the average bid price of the common stock on December 31, 2011, was approximately $1,415,927.

Number of shares outstanding as of June 30, 2012 was: 15,920,088.

VERITEC, INC.

 FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), the other reports, statements, and information that we have previously filed or that we may subsequently file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and public announcements that we have previously made or may subsequently make include, may include, incorporate by reference or may incorporate by reference certain statements that may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report and those reports, statements, information and announcements address activities, events or developments that Veritec, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries hereinafter referred to as “we,” “us,” “our”, the "Company" or “Veritec”) expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future. Any statements in this document about expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not historical facts and are forward-looking statements. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “will likely result,” “expect,” “will continue,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “would” and “outlook,” and similar expressions. Accordingly, these statements involve estimates, assumptions and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in them. Any forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed throughout this document. All forward-looking statements concerning economic conditions, rates of growth, rates of income or values as may be included in this document are based on information available to us on the dates noted, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1 BUSINESS

Summary

The Company is primarily engaged in the development, marketing, sales and licensing of products and rendering of professional services related thereto in the following two fields of technology: (1) proprietary two-dimensional matrix symbology (also commonly referred to as “two-dimensional barcodes” or “2D barcodes”), and (2) mobile banking solutions.

In this Form 10-K, the Company’s two-dimensional matrix symbology technology will hereafter be referred to as the Company’s “Barcode Technology”, and the Company’s mobile banking technology will hereafter be referred to as its “Mobile Banking Technology”.

Company History

Veritec, Inc. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 8, 1982 for the purpose of development, marketing and sales of a line of microprocessor based encoding and decoding system products that utilize matrix symbology technology, a two-dimensional barcode technology originally invented by the founders of Veritec under United States patents 4,924,078, 5,331,176, 5,612,524 and 7,159,780.

In 1995, an involuntary proceeding under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code was commenced against Veritec. The proceeding was subsequently converted to a Chapter 11 proceeding and a plan of reorganization was confirmed on April 23, 1997. The Chapter 11 plan was successfully completed and the proceeding was closed on October 13, 1999.

In November 2003, Veritec formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Vcode, Inc., to which it assigned its United States patents 4,924,078, 5,331,176 and 5,612,524, together with all corresponding patent applications, foreign patents, foreign patent applications, and all continuations, continuations in part, divisions, extensions, renewals, reissues and re-examinations. Vcode in turn entered into an Exclusive License Agreement with VData LLC (VData), an Illinois limited liability company unrelated to Veritec. The purpose of the incorporation of Vcode and the Exclusive Licensing Agreement was to allow VData to pursue enforcement and licensing of the patents against parties who wrongfully exploit the technology of such patents. VData is the wholly owned subsidiary of Acacia Research Corporation (NASDAQ: ACTG). The Exclusive License Agreement provided that all expenses related to the enforcement and licensing of the patents will be the responsibility of VData, with the parties sharing in the net proceeds, as specified under the terms of the agreement, arising from enforcement or licensing of the patents. In November 2008, VData and Vcode mutually agreed to terminate the Exclusive License Agreement between the two companies. As a result of the termination of the Exclusive License Agreement and conclusion of all lawsuits and enforcement activities by VData, infringement revenue has ceased.

In February 2005, an adverse ruling was made in the arbitration proceeding against Veritec in favor of Mitsubishi. This ruling compelled Veritec to file a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court (Bankruptcy Court) for the District of Minnesota on February 28, 2005. After reaching an agreement with Mitsubishi and other creditors, in April 2006, Veritec’s Third Amended Plan of Reorganization was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court. On August 8, 2006, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order and Final Decree and closed the Chapter 11 case. In connection with the settlement with Mitsubishi, Veritec obtained a license to certain Mitsubishi EDAC technology and Veritec granted Mitsubishi a license to Veritec’s proprietary VeriCode^® Barcode Technology software.

Pursuant to an April 27, 2007 agreement between Veritec and RBA International, Inc. (“RBA”), Veritec acquired from RBA the source code, documentation and software to RBA’s Java and IVR software (used for the RBA banking system). In furtherance of such agreement, RBA granted Veritec a perpetual royalty-free non-exclusive worldwide license to use, modify and distribute such software, without restriction, to any existing or future customers. Veritec’s development under this license, as well as Veritec’s independent development of its own mobile banking applications and components, and integration of such items comprises Veritec’s Mobile Banking Technology.

On January 12, 2009, Veritec formed a wholly owned subsidiary, Veritec Financial Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, to bring its Mobile Banking Technology, products and related professional services to market. In May 2009 Veritec was registered by Security First Bank in Visa’s Third Party Registration Program as a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization and Third-Party Servicer. As a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization, Veritec was able to promote and sell Visa branded card programs. As a Third-Party Servicer, Veritec provided back-end cardholder transaction processing services for Visa branded card programs on behalf of Security First Bank. As of October 2010 the Company’s registration with Security First Bank terminated. As of April 2011, the Company signed an ISO and processor agreement with Palm Desert National Bank (which was later assigned to First California Bank) to market and process the Company’s Visa branded card program on behalf of the bank.

Our Products and Solutions

Based on our proprietary Barcode Technology, we developed and are marketing the following main products:

Our principal licensed product to date that contains our VeriCode^® barcode technology has been a Product Identification system for identification and tracking of manufactured parts, components and products. This technology has been licensed by the Company to manufacturers in the LCD screen manufacturing industry for many years. Licensing revenue for this product has come from the Asia-Pacific region.

The VeriCode® symbol is a two-dimensional high data density machine-readable symbol that can contain up to approximately 500 bytes of data. The VeriCode® symbol is based on a matrix pattern. The matrix is made up of data cells, which are light and dark contrasting squares. This part of the symbol looks like a scrambled chessboard. The matrix is enclosed within at least one or more solid lines and/or a solid border. Surrounding the solid border is a quiet zone of empty cells. This simple structure is the basis for the space efficiency of the symbol.

The size of the VeriCode® symbol is variable and can be increased or decreased depending on application requirements. The symbol can be configured to fit virtually any space. The data capacity of the symbol is also variable. By using a greater or smaller number of data cells, more or less information can be stored in the symbol.

Special orientation for reading the symbol is not necessary. The VeriCode® symbol can be read at high degrees of angularity from vertical, in any direction relative to the reader. Veritec’s symbology and reading software presently employs Error Detection and Correction (EDAC) technology of our own design. That means if a symbol is partially damaged or obscured, the complete data set stored in the symbol might be recovered. EDAC lowers the symbol’s data capacity, but it can permit data recovery if up to 25% of the symbol is damaged. With EDAC, the code will return either accurate information or no information, but it will not return false or wrong information.

The VeriCode® symbol offers high degrees of security and the level of this security can be specified depending on the user’s requirements. For any specific application or organization, a unique encryption algorithm can be created so that only authorized persons can create or read a VeriCode® symbol within the user’s application.

The VeriCode^® symbol can hold any form of binary information that can be digitized including numbers, letters, images and the minutia for biometric information to the extent of its data storage capacity.

The VSCode^® is a derivative of the VeriCode^® symbol with the ability to encrypt a greater amount of data by increasing data density. The VSCode^® is a data storage “container” that offers a high degree of security and which can also be tailored to the application requirements of the user. The VSCode^® symbol can hold any form of binary information that can be digitized, including numbers, letters, images, photos, graphics, and the minutia for biometric information, including fingerprints and facial image data, to the extent of its data storage capacity, that are likewise limited by the resolution of the marking and reading devices employed by the user. VSCode^® is ideal for secure identification documents (such as national identification cards, drivers licenses, voter registration cards), financial cards, medical records and other high security applications. Because the code may be encrypted on the card it can be an independent portable database containing non-duplicative information that is unique to the individual owner of the data or account information and/or the data can be verified through a central database while maintaining high security for the card issuer without the need of a PIN.

Secure Bio-ID cards contain the cardholder’s picture, fingerprint minutia and other pertinent data that can be produced in either a soft or hard card material. In fiscal 2008, the Company sold its first ID card printing system to an Indian tribe living in the U.S. that frequently crosses the U.S./Canadian border. The card printing system, which produces the ID card inclusive of the individual’s picture and Veritec’s VSCode^®, allows the Indian tribe to produce identification cards that enable them to enroll tribal members and their descendants. The ID card includes the individual’s personal information and fingerprint, and can also store their facial image, all of which is stored inside the VSCode^® in about the size of a postage stamp.

The FCR-100 is a compact fingerprint and card reader used to read and decode the VSCode^® symbol and can be modified to meet specific application needs. The FCR-100 can be designed to work on most PC based operating systems, including the full suite of Windows^® operating systems. This allows the operating system to function with the many different types of VSCode^® applications such as bankcards, access control, personnel identification, border control, and hospital identification cards. The FCR–100 is connected and powered by a USB cable connection to a PC or server. The FCR-100 can be utilized with wireless applications and will allow multiple reading stations to be connected to a single computer.

Our VeriSuite™ card enrollment system was released in July 2009. The VeriSuite™ system is a user friendly and cost effective solution that gives governments and businesses the ability to provide cardholders with an identity card containing Veritec’s VSCode®. The VSCode® may have multiple encryption layers and the symbol has enough capacity to store personal data, fingerprint and/or facial image data, and other identifying information utilizing Veritec’s custom templates for each card type. The VeriSuite™ system includes the system software, facial image camera, fingerprint sensor, card reader, and an optional electronic signature pad. The system components are adaptable to be compliant with applicable government identity and financial card standards. The system supports magnetic stripe encoding for numerous applications including: financial cards, rewards programs, internal financial transactions (i.e. school lunch programs), and track three rewritable agency functions. It can also enable identity cards to link to Veritec’s unique real time, web based, PCI compliant processing capabilities to empower card issuers with Veritec’s sophisticated closed looped debit payment card infrastructure. The VeriSuite™ system provides secure Bio-ID Cards such as citizen identification, employee cards, health benefit cards, border control cards, financial cards, and more.

In its PhoneCodes™ product platform, Veritec developed software to send, store, display, and read a VeriCode^® symbol on the LCD screen of a mobile phone. With the electronic media that provide the ease of transferring information over the web, Veritec’s PhoneCodes™ technology enables individuals and companies to receive or distribute gift certificates, tickets, coupons, receipts, or engage in banking transactions using the VeriCode^® technology via wireless phone or PDA.

The GiftCode™ allows an individual to purchase, by phone, by internet or in person a gift card for a specific dollar amount from a retailer. The gift card can be sent to the recipient via wireless phone and include a message and a two-dimensional matrix code that has the detailed information of the gift card including the amount, the retailer, etc. That recipient can redeem the gift card by selecting merchandise from the retailer and redeeming the gift card value via a code reader at the register at the time of checkout.

TicketCode™ for concerts, sporting events, theme parks, etc. can be purchased by phone or internet and received via wireless phone. The TicketCode™ also has the capabilities of including a message and the two-dimensional matrix code along with the event information (date, time, row, seat number, etc.) When arriving at the event, the wireless phone can be scanned at the gate via a code reader allowing immediate entrance.

The CouponCode™ is a means for a retailer to increase sales through personalized targeted marketing campaigns. The retailer can tailor the CouponCode™ with company graphics, text messages and the two-dimensional matrix code and send it directly to the customer’s wireless phone. The customer redeems the coupon by passing the wireless phone over the code reader and crediting the coupon value against the purchase.

The ReceiptCode™ is the means for financial institutions, retailers and consumers to add security to electronic on-line transactions by sending a receipt electronically in the form of a 2-D barcode. One example, banking over the Internet, the present system allows a purchase to take place by simply filling out the credit card number, expiration date and the three digit code on the back of the plastic card. Presently, the cardholder receives notification of the transaction at much later time via mail or Internet. A ReceiptCode™ would help prevent the fraudulent use of the card by notifying all parties involved instantly in real time by way of an electronic 2-D barcode which can be received over the cell phone.

The Company believes that its Mobile Banking Technology platform and its MTC™ Program is a significant advance in mobile banking technology and is capable of bringing significant value to card issuing and sponsoring organizations, whether they be commercial or government.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company announced the release of its Mobile Toggle Card (MTC™) Program on the Company’s mobile banking software platform. Veritec’s mobile banking software platform is a debit based, pre-paid and gift card solution that is licensed by Veritec’s wholly owned subsidiary, Veritec Financial Systems, Inc. to debit card issuers and sponsoring organizations. Under the MTC™ Program, card issuers and sponsors may provide the MTC™ branded debit or gift cards to individuals with and without demand deposit accounts (e.g., the latter the “under-banked”). The MTC™ card may be part of a Visa® branded program and, as such, the cards are accepted anywhere in the world that Visa cards are accepted.

With an MTC™ card, the cardholders are empowered to combat unpermitted and fraudulent use of their debit cards by “toggling” their cards “on” and “off” with their mobile phones. Cardholders no longer have to completely rely on their card issuers to monitor possible fraudulent activity on their accounts. Cardholders can now de-activate their cards themselves, in real time, any time they choose to do so. In addition to this toggling feature, cardholders may apply for their cards online, arrange for direct deposits to be made to their cards, and transfer money to their card from another account. Cardholders may also elect to receive various alerts on their mobile phones about activity on their card. In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company began accepting applications for the MTC™ card from individual applicants and issuing live Visa® branded debit cards under the MTC Mobile Toggle Card Program.

In addition to the MTC™ branded program, the Company enables card issuers and sponsors to issue debit, pre-paid and gift cards under their own branded programs through licensed use of the mobile banking platform and the Company’s provision of related professional services.

Veritec’s mobile banking solution also enables debit card programs to be processed in either an open or closed loop processing environment. In addition to its front-end licensing and professional services, the Company also provides back-end card processing services to the card issuing institutions for all cardholder transactions on the licensed platform. The Company’s Mobile Banking Technology resides within a Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliant data processing center.

Intellectual Property Rights

The Company was founded upon its intellectual property and in our opinion its intellectual property will give the Company a commercial advantage in the global marketplace. The Company relies on patent, trade secret, copyright and trademark law, as well as the company’s contractual terms with its customers, to define, maintain and enforce the Company’s intellectual property rights in its Barcode Technology, Mobile Banking Technology and other technologies and relationships.

The Company has a portfolio of five United States and seven foreign patents. In addition, we have seven U.S. and twenty-nine foreign pending patent applications.

A significant amount of the Company’s intellectual property takes the form of trade secrets and copyrighted works of authorship. The Company treats the source code to its Barcode Technology and Mobile Banking Technology as trade secrets, and its licensed software applications are copyrightable subject matter.

We have a portfolio of registered and pending trademarks in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, including registrations for the marks “VSCode” and “VeriCode”. The Company uses “Veritec” as a trade mark and service mark, as well as it serving as the Company’s trade name.

Major Customers

The Company’s four biggest customers in fiscal 2012 represented an aggregate of 65% of our revenue. During fiscal 2012 and 2011, 56% and 98% respectively, of our revenue was from customers outside the United States.

Engineering, Research and Development

As of June 30, 2012, the Company employed one engineer and engaged five engineering independent contractors. During the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2012, we concentrated on several projects which included the continued development of the FCR-500 fingerprint and card reader, the Verisuite Bio-ID software platform, the PhoneCodes software platform, and the Mobile Banking Technology platform.

All of these projects are currently in various stages of development or have been completed.

Competition

Our Barcode Technology (e.g., VeriCode^® and VSCode^®) competes with alternative machine-readable codes such as conventional one dimensional and two dimensional bar code systems, including Data Matrix, QR, CP, Maxi Code, PDF-417, RF-ID and smart cards (e.g., cards with integrated circuits). We think that the Company’s Barcode Technology is far better than the 2D barcode competition because the competition here is a commodity focused principally on convenience. Our Barcode Technology is much more robust in terms of data storage and much more secure, due in part to the source code being kept as a trade secret. The Company’s Barcode Technology is far better than RF-ID and smart cards because it is far less expensive and it is not susceptible to breaking. Competitors offering alternative symbologies include Motorola Inc (NYSE: MOT); Zebra Technologies Corporation (NASDAQ: ZBRA); and Siemens Energy and Automation, Inc., a subsidiary of Siemens AG (NYSE: SI).

Many two-dimensional matrix symbology codes such as Data Matrix, QR Code and PDF-417 are “public domain” and are readily available on the Internet. As public domain technology, the source code containing the methods for writing and reading these codes are in the public domain and therefore known to developers and technology “hackers”. Veritec’s Barcode Technology remains proprietary; its source code is kept as a trade secret and thus is more secure than any such public domain code. Veritec believes that while many potential customers and users of symbology prefer to use a system that is believed to be in the public domain with open source code software applications, other companies, especially those requiring high security encoding and decoding capability will prefer to purchase “closed” or proprietary systems. Our technology may be the technology of choice for these potential customers.

Our Mobile Banking Technology competes with other independent sales organizations and third party services of Visa branded card programs, including TransCash Corporation, Ready Debit Card by MetaBank, Millenium Advantage Card by New Millenium Bank, and Wired Plastic by Bancorp Bank. The Company believes, however, that there are very few companies that have the Company’s collective attributes of (1) being an independent sales organization of Visa branded prepaid card programs, (2) being a third party servicer (e.g., back end processor) for banks issuing Visa branded prepaid card programs, (3) being the developer, marketer and licensor of the mobile banking platform on which Visa branded card program cardholder transactions take place, and (4) having a mobile banking platform that enables real-time transaction processing and enabling cardholders to manage their accounts by enabling cardholders to toggle their cards and their website accounts on and off via their mobile phones.

Employees

As of June 30, 2012, the Company employed five employees and six independent contractor consultants.

Financial Information about Geographic Areas

For the fiscal year ended, June 30, 2012, United States customers accounted for 44% (2% in fiscal 2011) of the Company’s total revenue. The remaining revenue of 56% (98% in fiscal 2011) was from foreign customers. Our foreign revenues in all periods have been concentrated in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, China and Germany.

ITEM 2 PROPERTIES

We lease approximately 4,200 square feet of office and laboratory space at 2445 Winnetka Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota, which serves as our primary place of business. This lease is with Van Thuy Tran, the
Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Our lease requires monthly payments of $4,200 which ran through June 30, 2012, and was automatically extended for two one-year term.

The Company leased on a month-to-month basis, a single-family residence located at 2415 Winnetka Ave. N., Golden Valley, Minnesota in order to provide business housing for the Company’s business visitors, consultants and employees from outside the State of Minnesota. The lease required a monthly payment of $1,200. The residence is owned by Larry Johanns, a principal of The Matthew Group, LLC and significant shareholder of the Company. This lease was terminated on October 31, 2010.

ITEM 3 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we are a party to claims and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Our management evaluates our exposure to these claims and proceedings individually and in the aggregate and provides for potential losses on such litigation if the amount of the loss is estimable and the loss is probable.

On February 15, 2011, the Company filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota against Aurora Financial Systems, Inc. (“Aurora”) for declaratory judgment, tortious interference and other related claims concerning assertions by Aurora regarding United States Patent No. 7,229,006. The complaint related to Aurora’s improper and unlawful assertions of patent against certain software owned by the Company which was lawfully acquired from the software’s owner and inventor before the purported assignment of any patent rights to Aurora. Even though Aurora was aware of the lawful acquisition yet they have made repeated claims about the Company’s purported patent infringement relating to the Company’s use and licensing of the software to various financial institutions with which the Company has sought business relationship. The Company was seeking a declaration of non-infringement based on legal estoppel and implied license as well as a judgment that Aurora has committed tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, false advertising under the Lanham Act and has violated Minnesota’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. As of June 30, 2011, the case was in discovery and Aurora did not countersue. On May 4, 2012 the case was dismissed with prejudice with the each party bearing its own fees and costs.

Except as set forth above, there are no material litigation matters at the current time.

ITEM 4 MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5 MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol VRTC. Prior to that, our common stock was quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. Prior to September 4, 2009, our common stock was traded in the over the counter markets and quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets. The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid quotes of our common stock per quarter as provided by the National Quotation Bureau (which reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions).

Shareholders

As of June 30, 2012, there were approximately 798 shareholders of record, inclusive of those brokerage firms and/or clearinghouses holding our common shares for their clientele.

Dividend Information

We have not paid or declared any dividends upon our common stock since our inception and, by reason of our present financial status and contemplated financial requirements, we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

During 2012, the Company issued to The Matthews Group and some individuals unsecured and convertible related party demand notes payable totaling $46,000 at interest rates ranging from 5% to 10%. In addition in July 2012 through October 2012 the Company issued unsecured convertible demand note payable totaling $81,000, bearing interest rate of 10% per annum to a related party and an individual.

On August 29, 2011, the Company granted 25,000 shares of its common stock to each of its three directors (75,000 shares in the aggregate).

The issuances described above were issued pursuant to exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

During fiscal year 2012, we did not issue any other equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information with respect to shares of common stock issuable under outstanding awards granted pursuant to our equity compensation plan.

ITEM 6 SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The Company, as a smaller reporting company, is not required to provide disclosure under this Item 6.

ITEM 7 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations – June 30, 2012 compared to June 30, 2011

We had a net loss of $846,461 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 compared to a net loss of $990,197 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.

Revenues

Details of revenues are as follows:

License and hardware revenues are derived from our Product Identification systems sold principally to customers in the LCD manufacturing industry. Identification Card revenues in these periods were a result of sales of identification card systems.

The license revenue decrease was mainly attributable to reduction in demand for LCD screens. Revenues from the LCD market remain unpredictable as they are generated when customers open new production facilities or update production equipment; however, for now the Company continues to experience relatively low demand for product identification product licenses in the LCD industry. A large portion of our license sales are concentrated in the Asia-Pacific market, which decreased $549,394 in Taiwan, Germany, and Korea. The largest increase of our license sales for the year ended June 30, 2012, was in China, which increased $15,150.

The significant increase in debit card revenue during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 compared to prior year was mainly attributable to large orders from a customer for the Company’s prepaid debit card.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of sales for the year ended June 30, 2012, totaled $244,687 and for the year ended June 30, 2011, cost of sales was $347,400, a decrease of $102,713. As a percentage of revenue, for the year ended June 30, 2012, cost of sales was 41.7% compared to 39.2% for the year ended June 30, 2011. The increase in the cost of sales as a percentage of revenue was principally the result of decreases in revenues. Charges of $216,431 and $277,755 for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively for a designated site and maintenance services of a computer database to store information in conjunction with our Independent Sales Organization (ISO) license, purchased in December 2006, accounted for 88% and 80% of the total cost of goods sold for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Included in the cost of goods sold for the year ended June 30, 2012, were network and consulting fees of $1,323 for the mobile debit card, and freight and handling expense of $2,795. Cost of goods sold associated with the license, hardware and identification revenue was $28,257 or 4.8% of total licensing, hardware, identification card revenue, and debit card revenue for the year ended June 30, 2012, compared to $69,644 or 7.9% for the year ended June 30, 2011.

Operating Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 were $605,721, compared to $986,130 for fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $380,409. The decrease was the result of decreases in salaries and payroll related costs by $33,640, health insurance by $17,804, audit fees by $39,261, depreciation expense by $12,788, legal fees by $179,558, patent renewal costs by $26,533, travel costs by $7,811, bad debt expense by $54,546, and payroll interest and penalties by $23,586 compared to the year ended June 30, 2011. Significant increases during the year ended June 30, 2012, compared to the prior year included increases in administrative consultants’ expenses by $30,611 and bank charges by $3,808.

Sales and marketing expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 was $144,965 compared to $162,614 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $17,649. The Company’s sales and marketing payroll and related costs decreased by $11,892 for the year ended June 30, 2012 as a result of the Company’s cost reduction strategy.

Research and development expense for the year ended June 30, 2012 totaled $206,748 versus $219,334 for the year ended June 30, 2011 a decrease of $12,586. This cost savings was the result of reduction in research and development staff level. Consultant and project costs were $136,889 for the year ended June 30, 2012 compared to $58,013 for the year ended June 30, 2011, a difference of $78,876.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest income for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 was $111 compared to $0 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $111. The increase was a result of the interest earned on the Company’s restricted cash with one financial institution. Interest expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 was $231,235 compared to $160,125 in fiscal year 2011 an increase of $71,110. Apart from the additional financing activities in fiscal 2012 that attracted higher interest rates most of the increased interest expense over prior year was due to the amortization of discount on notes payable.

Capital Expenditures and Commitments

We made no capital purchases in fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Liquidity

Our increase in cash and cash equivalent to $62,115 at June 30, 2012 compared to $14,996 at June 30, 2011 was the result of $471,546 used in operating activities; $11,668 used in investing activities; and $530,333 provided by financing activities. Net cash used in operations during 2012 was $471,546 compared with $91,619 used in operations during the same period in 2011. Cash used in operations during 2012 was primarily due to the net loss in the period. Net cash used in investing activities of $11,668 during 2012 compared with $60,000 during 2011 was primarily the result of payment on note receivable. Net cash provided by financing activities of $530,333 during 2012 was primarily due to proceeds from notes payable of $535,217 and payment of $4,884 on note payable. During the same period in 2011, the net cash provided by financing activities of $134,700 was from proceeds from notes payable of $134,700.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company had a net loss of $846,461 and used cash in operations of $471,546. At June 30, 2012, the Company had a working capital deficit of $4,283,981 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $4,283,337. The Company is also delinquent in payment of certain amounts due of $521,568 for payroll taxes and accrued interest and penalties as of June 30, 2012.  The Company believes its cash and forecasted cash flow from operations will not be sufficient to continue operations through fiscal 2013 without continued external investment. The Company believes it will require additional funds to continue its operations through fiscal 2013 and to continue to develop its existing projects and plans to raise such funds by finding additional investors to purchase the Company’s securities, generating sufficient sales revenue, implementing dramatic cost reductions or any combination thereof. There is no assurance that the Company can be successful in raising such funds, generating the necessary sales or reducing major costs. Further, if the Company is successful in raising such funds from sales of equity securities, the terms of these sales may cause significant dilution to existing holders of common stock. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from this uncertainty. Our auditor has issued a “going concern” qualification as part of their opinion in the Audit Report for the year ended June 30, 2012.

The Company has traditionally been dependent on The Matthews Group, LLC, a related party, for its financial support. The Matthews Group is owned 50% by Van Tran, the Company’s CEO/Executive Chair and a director, and 50% by Larry Johanns, a significant Company stockholder. In fiscal 2012, The Matthews Group loaned the Company $46,000 mostly in the form of convertible demand notes payable. Through June 30, 2011 The Matthews Group, LLC, Company executives, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, and other individuals loaned $2,240,661 to the Company. Included in this amount was $550,000 made under a subscription agreement form of private offering. Subsequent to fiscal 2012 and through October 2012 the Company issued to The Matthews Group and certain individual unsecured and convertible demand notes totaling $81,000 at an interest rate of 10% per annum. However additional capital most likely will be required to continue the Company’s business, and the Company has no guarantee that The Matthews Group, LLC, the executives, Board member, and other individuals will continue to provide funding. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had $62,115 in cash and a ($4,283,981) working capital deficit. The Company will require additional funds to continue its operations through fiscal year 2013 and continue to develop its existing and future projects by obtaining investment funds, generating sufficient sales revenue, implementing dramatic cost reductions or any combination thereof. However, there is no assurance that the Company can be successful in raising such funds, generating the necessary sales or reducing major costs.

Further, due to the Company’s prior bankruptcies and history of losses, it may be difficult for the Company to raise additional funds, if required. If the Company cannot raise such capital, or if the cost of such capital is too high, we may be unable to successfully launch or continue development of new products. If losses continue, we may be unable to continue in business.

Commitments and Contractual Obligations

The Company has one annual lease commitment of $50,400 for the corporate office building, which is leased from Ms. Tran, our chief executive officer, that expired June 30, 2012 which was automatically extended for two one-year term. The commitment is for the corporate offices at 2445 Winnetka Avenue North, Golden Valley, Minnesota. The total amount of the two-year lease commitment is $100,800.

VTFS entered into a thirteen-month processing center contract beginning April 19, 2011, with monthly commitments of approximately $10,434. The term of the agreement is through May 2012 with automatic monthly extensions.

Subsequent to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, the Company entered into consulting and confidentiality agreements with various entities. There was no future commitment under these agreements. The Company also entered into sales and confidentiality agreements with various entities for the marketing of its mobile debit card in return for commissions from sales revenue from its debit card transactions. Subsequent to year end and through October 2012, the Company borrowed additional $81,000 with annual interest at 10%, due to a related party and an individual, convertible into common stock at prices ranging from $0.10 to $0.15 per share, and due on demand.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies

Stock-Based Compensation:

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in capital raising transactions, for services and for financing costs.  Stock-based compensation for employees is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period.  Options vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date. The value of the stock compensation to non-employees is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.

We estimate volatility and forfeitures based upon historical data. As permitted by the authoritative guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, we use the “simplified” method to determine the expected life of an option due to the Company’s lack of sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis, which is a result of the relative high turnover rates experienced in the past for positions granted options. All of these variables have an effect on the estimated fair value of our share-based awards.

Revenue Recognition

The Company accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101 "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements" and related amendments. Revenues for the Company are classified into four separate products; license revenue (Veritec’s Multi-Dimensional matrix symbology), hardware revenue, identification card revenue, and debit card revenue. Revenues from licenses, hardware, and identification cards are recognized when the product is shipped and collection is reasonably assured. The process typically begins for license and hardware revenue with a customer purchase order detailing its hardware specifications so the Company can import its software into the customer's hardware. Once importation is completed, if the customer only wishes to purchase a license, the Company typically transmits the software to the customer via the Internet. Revenue is recognized at that point. If the customer requests both license and hardware products, once the software is imported into the hardware and the process is complete, the product is shipped and revenue is recognized at time of shipment. Once the software and/or hardware are either shipped or transmitted, the customers do not have a right of refusal or return. Under some conditions, the customers remit payment prior to the Company having completed importation of the software. In these instances, the Company delays revenue recognition and reflects the prepayments as customer deposits.

The process for identification cards begins when a customer requests, via the Internet, an identification card. The card is reviewed for design and placement of the data, printed and packaged for shipment. At the time the identification cards are shipped and collection is reasonably assured, revenue is recognized.

The Company, as a processor and a distributor, recognizes revenue from transaction fees charged cardholders for the use of its issued mobile debit cards. The fees are recognized on a monthly basis after all cardholder transactions have been summarized and reconciled with third party processors.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-4, which amends the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) to help achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-4 does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt the ASU as required. The ASU will affect the Company’s fair value disclosures, but will not affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-5, which amends the Comprehensive Income Topic of the ASC. The ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity, and instead requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income either in a continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU No. 2011-5 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt the ASU as required. It will have no affect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the Securities Exchange Commission (the "SEC") did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.

ITEM 8 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Veritec, Inc.

Golden Valley, Minnesota

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Veritec, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficiency and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Veritec, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has had recurring losses from operations and had a stockholders’ deficiency as of June 30, 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning this matter are also described in Note 2. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW

INFORMATION

VERITEC, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

The Company 

The Company refers to Veritec, Inc. (Veritec) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Vcode Holdings, Inc. (Vcode), and Veritec Financial Systems, Inc. (VTFS).

Nature of Business

The Company is primarily engaged in the development, marketing, sales and licensing of products and rendering of professional services related thereto in the following two fields of technology: (1)  proprietary two-dimensional matrix symbology (also commonly referred to as “two-dimensional barcodes” or “2D barcodes”), and (2) mobile banking solutions.

The Company’s two-dimensional matrix symbology technology will hereafter be referred to as the Company’s “Barcode Technology”, and the Company’s mobile banking technology will hereafter be referred to as its “Mobile Banking Technology”.

The Company’s Barcode Technology was originally invented by the founders of Veritec under United States patents 4,924,078, 5,331,176, 5,612,524 and 7,159,780.  Our principal licensed product to date that contains our VeriCode ® Barcode Technology has been a product identification system for identification and tracking of manufactured parts, components and products. The VeriCode® symbol is a two-dimensional high data density machine-readable symbol that can contain up to approximately 500 bytes of data.

The Company’s VSCode® Barcode Technology is a derivative of the VeriCode® symbol with the ability to encrypt a greater amount of data by increasing data density.  The VSCode ® is a data storage “container” that offers a high degree of security and which can also be tailored to the application requirements of the user. The VSCode ® symbol can hold any form of binary information that can be digitized, including numbers, letters, images, photos, graphics, and the minutia for biometric information, including fingerprints and facial image data, to the extent of its data storage capacity, that are likewise limited by the resolution of the marking and reading devices employed by the user.  VSCode ® is ideal for secure identification documents (such as national identification cards, driver’s licenses, and voter registration cards), financial cards, medical records and other high security applications.

In its PhoneCodes™ product platform, Veritec developed software to send, store, display, and read a VeriCode® Barcode Technology symbol on the LCD screen of a mobile phone. With the electronic media that provide the ease of transferring information over the web, Veritec’s PhoneCodes™ technology enables individuals and companies to receive or distribute gift certificates, tickets, coupons, receipts, or engage in banking transactions using the VeriCode ® technology via wireless phone or PDA.

On January 12, 2009, Veritec formed VTFS, a Delaware corporation, to bring its Mobile Banking Technology, products and related professional services to market.  In May 2009 Veritec was registered by Security First Bank in Visa’s Third Party Registration Program as a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization and Third-Party Servicer.  As a Cardholder Independent Sales Organization, Veritec was able to promote and sell Visa branded card programs.  As a Third-Party Servicer, Veritec provided back-end cardholder transaction processing services for Visa branded card programs on behalf of Security First Bank. As of October 2010 the Company’s registration with Security First Bank terminated. As of April 2011 the Company signed an ISO and processor agreement with Palm Desert National Bank (which was later assigned to First California Bank) to market and process the Company’s Visa branded card program on behalf of the bank.

Our VeriSuite™ card enrollment system was released in July 2009.  The VeriSuite™ system is a user friendly and cost effective solution that gives governments and businesses the ability to provide cardholders with an identity card containing Veritec’s VSCode® Barcode Technology.  The VeriSuite™ system provides secure Bio-ID Cards such as citizen identification, employee cards, health benefit cards, border control cards, financial cards, and more.

The Company has a portfolio of five United States and eight foreign patents. In addition, we have seven U.S. and twenty-eight foreign pending patent applications.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Veritec, Vcode, and VTFS. Intercompany transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Those estimates and assumptions include estimates for reserves of uncollectible accounts, analysis of impairments of long lived assets, accruals for potential liabilities and assumptions made in valuing stock instruments issued for services.

Accounts Receivable

The Company sells to domestic and foreign companies and grants uncollateralized credit to customers, but require deposits on unique orders. Management periodically reviews its accounts receivable and provides an allowance for doubtful accounts after analyzing the age of the receivable, payment history and prior experience with the customer. The estimated loss that management believes is probable is included in the allowance for doubtful accounts.

While the ultimate loss may differ, management believes that any additional loss will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position. Due to uncertainties in the settlement process, however, it is at least reasonably possible that management's estimate will change during the near term.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting of purchased components for resale, are stated at the lower of cost or market, applying the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventory is net of reserves of $23,900 as of June 30, 2012 and 2011.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 3 to 7 years. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; significant renewals and betterments are capitalized.

Management regularly reviews property, equipment and other long-lived assets for possible impairment. This review occurs quarterly, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If there is indication of impairment, management prepares an estimate of future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If these cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to write down the asset to its estimated fair value. Based upon management’s assessment, there were no indicators of impairment at June 30, 2012 or 2011.

Concentrations

The Company’s cash balances on deposit with banks are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company may be exposed to risk for the amounts of funds held in one bank in excess of the insurance limit. In assessing the risk, the Company’s policy is to maintain cash balances with high quality financial institutions. The Company had cash balance in excess of the guarantee during the year ended June 30, 2012.

Major Customers:

Customers in excess of 10% of total revenues were as follows:

As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company had approximately $6,050 (25%), $10,025 (42%) and $6,050 (16%), $10,963 (29%), $10,025 (27%) and $5,300 (14%), respectively, of accounts receivable due from its major customers.

Foreign Revenues:

Foreign revenues accounted for 56% of the Company’s total revenues in fiscal 2012 and 98% in fiscal 2011. (41% Korea, 10% Taiwan, and 5% others in fiscal 2012 and 21% Taiwan, 74% Korea, and 3% others in fiscal 2011.)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair Value Measurements are adopted by the Company based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, with the exception of the application of the statement to non-recurring, non-financial assets and liabilities as permitted. The adoption based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board did not have a material impact on the Company's fair value measurements. Based on the authoritative guidance provided by the Financial Accounting Standards Board defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB authoritative guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into three broad levels as follows:

The Company had no such assets or liabilities recorded to be valued on the basis above at June 30, 2012 or 2011.

Revenue Recognition 

The Company accounts for revenue recognition in accordance with guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Revenues for the Company are classified into four separate products: license revenue (Veritec’s Multi-Dimensional matrix symbology), hardware revenue, identification card revenue, and debit card revenue.

Revenues from licenses, hardware, and identification cards are recognized when the product is shipped and collection is reasonably assured. The process typically begins for license and hardware revenue with a customer purchase order detailing its hardware specifications so the Company can import its software into the customer's hardware. Once importation is completed, if the customer only wishes to purchase a license, the Company typically transmits the software to the customer via the Internet. Revenue is recognized at that point. If the customer requests both license and hardware products, once the software is imported into the hardware and the process is complete, the product is shipped and revenue is recognized at time of shipment. Once the software and/or hardware are either shipped or transmitted, the customers do not have a right of refusal or return. Under some conditions, the customers remit payment prior to the Company having completed importation of the software. In these instances, the Company delays revenue recognition and reflects the prepayments as customer deposits.

The process for identification cards begins when a customer requests, via the Internet, an identification card. The card is reviewed for design and placement of the data, printed and packaged for shipment. At the time the identification cards are shipped and collection is reasonably assured, revenue is recognized.

The Company, as a processor and a distributor, recognizes revenue from transaction fees charged cardholders for the use of its issued mobile debit cards. The fees are recognized on a monthly basis after all cardholder transactions have been summarized and reconciled with third party processors.

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

For the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, shipping and handling fees billed to customers of $3,156 and $777, respectively were included in revenues and shipping and handling costs of $2,988 and $3,087, respectively were included in cost of sales.

Research and Development

Research and development costs were expensed as incurred.

Loss per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to Common Stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to Common Stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued, using the treasury stock method. Potential common shares are excluded from the computation as their effect is antidilutive.

For the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share are the same because potential dilutive securities would have an anti-dilutive effect.

The potentially dilutive securities consisted of the following as of: 

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in capital raising transactions, for services and for financing costs.  Stock-based compensation for employees is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. Options vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date. The value of the stock compensation to non-employees is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.

Income Taxes

Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is established for the expected future consequences of temporary differences in the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company considers future taxable income and ongoing, prudent and feasible tax planning strategies, in assessing the value of its deferred tax assets. If the Company determines that it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized, the Company will reduce the value of these assets to their expected realizable value, thereby decreasing net income. Evaluating the value of these assets is necessarily based on the Company’s judgment. If the Company subsequently determined that the deferred tax assets, which had been written down, would be realized in the future, the value of the deferred tax assets would be increased, thereby increasing net income in the period when that determination was made.

Recently Issued Accounting Standard 

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-4, which amends the Fair Value Measurements Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) to help achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-4 does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt the ASU as required. The ASU will affect the Company’s fair value disclosures, but will not affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-5, which amends the Comprehensive Income Topic of the ASC. The ASU eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity, and instead requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income either in a continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU No. 2011-5 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt the ASU as required. It will have no affect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its Emerging Issues Task Force), the AICPA, and the Securities Exchange Commission (the "SEC") did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company's present or future financial statements.

NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company had a net loss of $846,461 and used cash in operations of $471,546. At June 30, 2012, the Company had a working capital deficit of $4,283,981 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $4,283,337. The Company is also delinquent in payment of certain amounts due of $521,568 for payroll taxes and accrued interest and penalties as of June 30, 2012.  The Company believes its cash and forecasted cash flow from operations will not be sufficient to continue operations through fiscal 2013 without continued external investment. The Company believes it will require additional funds to continue its operations through fiscal 2013 and to continue to develop its existing projects and plans to raise such funds by finding additional investors to purchase the Company’s securities, generating sufficient sales revenue, implementing dramatic cost reductions or any combination thereof. There is no assurance that the Company can be successful in raising such funds, generating the necessary sales or reducing major costs. Further, if the Company is successful in raising such funds from sales of equity securities, the terms of these sales may cause significant dilution to existing holders of common stock. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from this uncertainty.

The Company has relied on The Matthews Group, LLC (TMG), a related party owned 50% by Van Tran, the Company’s CEO/Executive Chair and a director, and 50% by Larry Johanns, a significant Company’s stockholder for funding. Through June 2012, TMG, executives, and some individuals have funded $3,033,835 mostly in the form of convertible notes payable. During fiscal year 2012, TMG and some individuals funded $46,000, mostly in the form of convertible notes payable.

Subsequent to June 30, 2012, the Company has received additional notes payable financing of $81,000 through October 2012 (see Note 11).

NOTE 3 – RESTRICTED CASH

The Company entered into a Store Value Prepaid Card Sponsorship Agreement (the “Agreement”) with a Bank. Whereas the Company has developed for marketing and management purposes, store value prepaid card programs (the “Programs”) which will be marketed and managed daily at the direction of the Bank. In connection with the agreement with the Bank, the Company established a Reserve Account controlled by the bank in the amount of $500,000. Since this amount is restricted for the purposes related to the Programs, it is classified as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet.

NOTE 4 – NOTES RECEIVABLE

In August 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Global TV, Inc. for the purpose of forming a strategic partnership to raise capital for the implementation and promotion of private-labeled debit card programs. The Company was initially to make funds available to Global TV in the amount of $70,000 and agreed to make another $30,000 available to Global TV if the Company successfully raised $2,000,000 in additional capital, provided certain conditions were met. As of December 31, 2010, the agreement terminated as a result of the failure to meet the conditions stipulated by the agreement.

In accordance with this agreement during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 the Company entered into various short-term notes receivable agreements totaling $60,000 with Global TV. The notes were to accrue interest at a rate of 10%, were due September through October 2010, and were secured by certain fixed and other assets of Global TV. The notes remained unpaid as of June 30, 2012, and the Company is negotiating an extension of the due dates. However, the Company has provided a full reserve against the notes as of June 30, 2011.

In April 2012 the Company made a short-term loan of $1,500 to a certain individual who was assisting the Company with raising working capital. The arrangement did not materialize and the loan remained unpaid as of the end of the fiscal year. The Company has fully provided an allowance for the loan as collection was not expected.

During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company made short-term loans totaling $10,168 to a certain individual. As mutually agreed between the parties the Company offset the total loan against notes payable from this individual to the Company.

NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following as of:

Depreciation expense for the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $15,824 and $28,611, respectively.

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 the Company received various unsecured, non-interest bearing, due on demand advances from its CEO Ms. Van Tran, a related party. These advances have been classified as accounts payable, related party on the balance sheet. The Company also leases its office facilities from Ms. Van Tran.

NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable consists of the following as of:

NOTE 8 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Preferred Stock

The articles of incorporation of Veritec authorize 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $1.00 per share. The Board of Directors is authorized to determine any number of series into which shares of preferred stock may be divided and to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to any series of the preferred stock.

In 1999, a new Series H convertible preferred stock was authorized. Each share of Series H convertible preferred stock is convertible into 10 shares of the Veritec’s common stock at the option of the holder. As of June 30, 2012 and 2011, there were 1,000 shares of Series H convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

Common stock consists of $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 15,920,088 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 and 2011.

In June 2010, by unanimous action of the Board of Directors and majority shareholders’ consent the Company increased its authorized common shares from 30 million to 50 million. 

Shares issued for settlement of accrued expenses

On August 29, 2011, the Company granted 25,000 shares of its common stock to each of its three directors (75,000 shares in the aggregate). The shares were valued in the aggregate at $3,000, based upon the stock price of the shares on the date of board approval. These shares were unissued as of June 30, 2012.

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Stock Options

The Board of Directors authorized the CEO to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in the form of options or stock bonuses to employees and consultants.

The Company has agreements with certain employees that provide for five years of annual grants of options, on each employment anniversary date, to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The option price is determined based on the market price on the date of grant, the options vest one year from the date of grant, and the options expire five years after vesting. The Company granted 0 and 10,000 options under this arrangement in 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $2 and $1,546 during the years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, there was no remaining unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options. Based upon the trading value of the common shares, there was no intrinsic value of these options as of June 30, 2012.

The weighted-average grant date fair value for options granted in fiscal 2011 was $0.14. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model that uses the weighted-average assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the options is based on the U. S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant. Volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The Company estimated the expected life of options based on historical experience and other averaging methods.

A summary of stock options as of June 30, 2012 and for the two years then ended is as follows:

The weighted-average remaining contractual life of stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2012 is 2.1 years.

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares granted under the Company’s stock option plan as of June 30, 2012 and changes during the two years then ended is presented below:

Additional information regarding options outstanding as of June 30, 2012 is as follows:

Stock Warrant

The Company issued 275,000 shares of warrants related to notes payable issued in fiscal year 2009. The fair value of the warrants allocated to notes payable was $20,981 or $0.08 per share. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the warrants at June 30, 2012 is 2.5 years. The warrants are fully vested, have a five year term and are exercisable at $2 per share. Based upon the trading value of the common shares, there was no intrinsic value of these warrants as of June 30, 2012.

The weighted-average fair value of warrants granted was estimated at grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: 2.03% risk-free interest rates, 0% dividend yields, 166.53% volatility, and 3.0 years weighted average expected life.

NOTE 10 - INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes are provided on the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. 

Veritec, VTFS and Vcode file a consolidated income tax return in the United States.

It is the Company’s practice to recognize penalties and/or interest related to income tax matters in the interest and penalties expense. There are no interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated statement of operations or accrued on the consolidated balance sheets.

The company is subject to U.S. federal, state, or local income tax examination by tax authorities for all years for which a loss carry forward is utilized in subsequent periods.

A reconciliation between the expected federal income tax rate and the actual tax rate is as follows:

The following is a summary of the deferred tax assets (separate disclosure of state deferred taxes has not been presented as such disclosure is not considered to be material):

Deferred income tax assets have been reduced by a valuation allowance as it is more likely than not that they will not be realized.

Veritec has net operating loss carryforwards of $9,482,000 for federal purposes and $5,942,000 for state purposes available to offset future taxable income that expire in varying amounts through 2032. The ability to utilize the net operating loss carry forwards could be limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code which limits their use if there is a change in control (generally a greater than 50% change in ownership).

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

The Company leases its U.S. office facilities from its CEO/Executive Chair under a lease that expired June 30, 2012, that was automatically extended for a 2-year extension, requiring monthly payments of $4,200 plus common area costs. In January 2009, the Company began leasing a single-family residence in Golden Valley, Minnesota on a month-to-month basis at $1,200 per month from a principal of The Matthews Group for purposes of housing customers, guests and consultants. This lease was terminated on October 31, 2010. Rent expense, included in operating cost, to related parties was $49,350 and $55,800 in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Future annual minimum lease payments are $50,400 in each fiscal year through 2014 totaling $100,800.

Strategic Partnership Agreements

The Company signed a 5-year agreement with Antero Payment Solutions for the use of each others’ technologies among other things and to promote and market each others’ prepaid debit card programs. Under the terms of the agreement the Company received $25,000 as an up front license fee, which the Company has reflected as deferred revenue to be amortized over the term of the agreement. The agreement has a 5-year automatic renewal clause unless terminated by a written consent of both parties. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized revenue of $4,083 relating to this agreement. As of June 30, 2012, the balance remaining to be recognized was $20,917.

The Company also signed a 5-year strategic agreement with National Identity Solutions (NIS) for the promotion and marketing of the Company’s prepaid debit card program and NIS’ identity theft solutions. The agreement requires NIS to pay an up front license fee of $250,000 of which $125,000 was paid as of September 30, 2011 with the remaining balance of $125,000 paid as of December 31, 2011. Both payments have been reflected as deferred revenue to be amortized over the term of the agreement. The agreement automatically renews annually unless terminated by either party. During the year ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized revenue of $34,653 relating to this agreement. As of June 30, 2012, the balance remaining to be recognized was $215,347.

Incentive Compensation Bonus Plan

On December 5, 2008, the Company adopted an incentive compensation bonus plan to provide payments to key employees in the aggregated amount of 10% of pre-tax earnings in excess of $3,000,000 after the end of each fiscal year to be distributed annually to employees.

Processing Center Agreement

VTFS entered into a twelve-month processing center contract beginning February 1, 2009, with monthly commitments of approximately $34,200. On April 1, 2010, the Company signed another twelve-month agreement with monthly commitments of approximately $19,955. This agreement ended in March 2011. Beginning April 19, 2011 the Company entered into a thirteen-month agreement with monthly commitments of approximately $10,434. The term of the agreement is through May 2012 with automatic monthly extensions.

Contingencies

 On February 15, 2011, the Company filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota against Aurora Financial Systems, Inc. (“Aurora”) for declaratory judgment, tortious interference and other related claims concerning assertions by Aurora regarding United States Patent No. 7,229,006. The complaint related to Aurora’s improper and unlawful assertions of patent against certain software owned by the Company which was lawfully acquired from the software’s owner and inventor before the purported assignment of any patent rights to Aurora. Even though Aurora was aware of the lawful acquisition yet they have made repeated claims about the Company’s purported patent infringement relating to the Company’s use and licensing of the software to various financial institutions with which the Company has sought business relationship. The Company is seeking a declaration of non-infringement based on legal estoppel and implied license as well as a judgment that Aurora has committed tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, false advertising under the Lanham Act and has violated Minnesota’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act. As of June 30, 2011 the case has been in discovery and Aurora has not countersued. On May 4, 2012 the case was dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing its own fees and costs.

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 Subsequent to year end and through October 2012, the Company borrowed additional $81,000 with annual interest at 10%, due to a related party and an individual, convertible into common stock at prices ranging from $0.10 to $0.15 per share, and due on demand. The Company entered into consulting and confidentiality agreements with various entities. There was no future commitment under these agreements. The Company also entered into sales and confidentiality agreements with various entities for the marketing of its mobile debit card in return for commissions from sales revenue from its debit card transactions.

ITEM 9 CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 

None

ITEM 9A CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Managements’ Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired objectives, and we necessarily are required to apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. It was concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, because certain deficiencies involving internal control over financial reporting constituted material weaknesses, as identified below. The material weaknesses identified did not result in the restatement of any previously reported financial statements or any other related financial disclosures, nor does management believe that it had any effect on the accuracy of our financial statements for the current reporting period.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process, under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our internal control over financial reporting include those policies and procedures that:

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, our management concluded that there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The material weaknesses relate to limited oversight from our audit committee on the external financial reporting process and internal control over financial reporting and lack of segregation of duties. Under the segregation of duties issues, our Chief Financial Officer was the sole preparer of the financial statements and periodic SEC reports with limited separate independent detailed review to prevent material errors.  Also the Chief Executive Officer has had authority to enter into significant contracts, as well as authority to sign checks, which could result in material fraud.

We are undergoing ongoing evaluation and improvements in our internal control over financial reporting.  Regarding our identified weaknesses, we have performed the following remediation efforts:

In order to mitigate these material weaknesses to the fullest extent possible, the Company has assigned its audit committee with oversight responsibilities. Financial statements, periodic SEC reports and monthly bank statement and imaged checks are continuously reviewed by the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Executive Officer.  In addition all significant contracts are now being reviewed and signed off by the Company’s board of directors in conjunction with the Chief Executive Officer.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, issued by COSO.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm, pursuant to provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

This report shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any other changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 ITEM 9B OTHER INFORMATION:

None

PART III

ITEM 10 DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The members of the present Board of Directors and Officers are:

Each director will serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders, or until their respective successors have been elected and duly qualified. Directors serve one-year terms. The Board of Directors appoints officers.

Ms. Van Thuy Tran was elected as the Chief Executive Officer of the company since December 23, 2009 and has served as Chairman of the Board of the Company since December 5, 2008. Ms. Tran was President of Asia Consulting and Trading Company from 1979 to 1999, a company dealing with trade in the Pacific Rim countries. In 1995, she founded Circle of Love, a non-profit providing mission work in Vietnam. In 1993, she founded Equal Partners, Inc., a construction and building company in Minnesota. Ms. Van Tran has a medical degree from Bethel College/University of Minnesota and worked in the medical field as a Technologist/Hematologist for over 17 years.

Laird E. Powers was appointed as a member of our Board on March 4, 2008. He is a private investor in emerging technology companies. He has been involved with Veritec since its early stages in 1986. In addition, for the past 25 years, he has been the president and owner of L.E. Powers Construction, a construction company in the Silicon Valley of California. He holds BS degree in Psychology with a Math minor from California State University - Hayward.

John Quentin was elected as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company on December 8, 2009. Mr. Quentin has over 15 years of accounting and auditing experience obtained mostly from the public accounting industry where his clients’ base ranged from public reporting companies to private entities. Before joining Veritec, Inc. he was a senior auditor with Lurie Besikof Lapidus and Company, LLP for 4 years from 2004 to 2008. Prior to joining Lurie Besikof Lapidus and Company, LLP Mr. Quentin was an auditor with Rogers & Company, a local CPA firm that specialized in nonprofit auditing, accounting, and taxes where he worked on various clients including the University of Minnesota and the Metropolitan Airport Commission in conjunction with Deloitte Touche. Before joining Rogers & Company Mr. Quentin was with Ernst & Young, LLP, from 1994 to 2001. He holds BS degree in Accounting from Metropolitan State University.

Ms. Sandra Hartfield was appointed as a member of the Board and the Company’s audit committee on August 29, 2011.  Ms. Hartfield has over 37 years of banking knowledge and leadership experience.  Ms. Hartfield is the President and Chief Executive officer of Hartfield Financial Services.  Prior to that Ms. Hartfield was the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Electronic Banking Division of Palm Desert National Bank from 1994 to 2008.  Prior to that Ms. Hartfield was the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer of Palm Desert National Bank from 1989 to 1994.  Ms. Hartfield served other leadership roles in the banking industry for over 18 years before joining Palm Desert National Bank.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires our directors and executive officers and beneficial holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our equity securities.

To our knowledge, based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to Veritec under 17 CFR 240.16a-3(e) during our most recent fiscal year and Forms 5 and amendments thereto furnished to Veritec with respect to our most recent fiscal year or written representations from the reporting persons, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2011 our directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

Committee and Board Meetings

One meeting of our Board of Directors was held in fiscal 2012. Although we had no standing audit, nominating or compensation committees of our Board or committees performing similar functions during fiscal 2011, we have an audit committee during the fiscal year 2012. The directors have regularly communicated to discuss our affairs in addition to formal board meetings to transact and approve appropriate business.

As of August 29, 2011, our Boardhas formed an audit committee composed of two of the current board members. The board of directors has determined that two members of the Audit Committee are independent under the rules of the SEC and the Nasdaq National Market and that Sandra Hartfield qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the rules of the SEC. Our board of directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee meeting applicable standards of the SEC and the Nasdaq Capital Market.

Director Independence

The board of directors has determined that two members of our board of directors, Laird Powers and Sandra Hartfield, are independent under the revised listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. We intend to maintain at least two independent directors on our board of directors in the future.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics, which is available on our website at http://www.veritecinc.com/about_veritecInc.html. Our code of ethics applies to all of our employees, including our CEO, CFO and directors. If our Board grants any waivers of, or amendments to, the code of ethics to any of our executive officers or directors, we will disclose these matters through our website.

None of our directors or executive officers are related to one another.

Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our executive officers or directors are parties to any material proceedings adverse to Veritec, have any material interest adverse to Veritec or have, during the past ten years:

Corporate Governance

We are committed to having sound corporate governance principles. We believe that such principles are essential to running our business efficiently and to maintaining our integrity in the marketplace.

There have been no changes to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend nominees to our Board of

Directors.

Director Qualifications

We believe that our directors should have the highest professional and personal ethics and values, consistent with our longstanding values and standards. They should have broad experience at the policy-making level in business or banking. They should be committed to enhancing stockholder value and should have sufficient time to carry out their duties and to provide insight and practical wisdom based on experience. Their service on other boards of public companies should be limited to a number that permits them, given their individual circumstances, to perform responsibly all director duties for us. Each director must represent the interests of all stockholders. When considering potential director candidates, the board of directors also considers the candidate’s character, judgment, diversity, age and skills, including financial literacy and experience in the context of our needs and the needs of the board of directors.

ITEM 11 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes all compensation for fiscal years 2012 and 2011 received by individuals that served as our principal executive officer and principal financial officer during the last fiscal year, who are the only executive officers of the Company, our “Named Executive Officers”.

Employment Agreements

On December 5, 2008, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Van Thuy Tran providing for an annual base salary of $150,000 and customary medical and other benefits. The agreement may be terminated by either party upon 30 days’ notice. In the event the Company terminates the agreement without cause, Ms. Tran will be entitled to $1,000,000 payable upon termination. If Ms. Tran is terminated by the Company without cause, she will be entitled to severance equal to 12 months compensation and benefits. The Company has also agreed to indemnify Ms. Tran against any liability or damages incurred within the scope of her employment.

On May 29, 2009, the Company entered into an employment agreement with John Quentin providing for an annual base salary of $45,000 (subject to annual review), customary medical and other benefits and customary confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions. Mr. Quentin’s salary has since been increased by the Board of Directors.

Director Compensation

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to our directors for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012: 

Directors currently receive fees of $500 per meeting attended, plus expenses.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

None of our Named Executive Officers has outstanding equity awards received as compensation, including unexercised options, stock that has not vested or equity incentive plan awards, as of the end of the Company's last completed fiscal year.

ITEM 12 SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of October 2012 are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of the stockholder holding the options or warrants but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other stockholder. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table, we believe stockholders named in the table have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite such stockholder’s name. Percentage of ownership is based on approximately 15,920,088 shares of common stock outstanding as of October 3, 2012.

The following table reflects, as of the date of this Annual Report, the beneficial common stock ownership of: (a) each of our directors, (b) each of our current named executive officers, (c) each person known by us to be a beneficial holder of 5% or more of our common stock, and (d) all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

Except as otherwise indicated below, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock held by them. Unless otherwise indicated, the principal address of each listed executive officer and director is 2445 Winnetka Avenue North, Golden Valley, MN 55427.

ITEM 13 CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Company's transactions with its officers, directors and affiliates have been and such future transactions will be, on terms no less favorable to the Company than could have been realized by the Company in arms-length transactions with non-affiliated persons and will be approved by the board of directors.

The Company leases its U.S. office facilities from its Chief Executive Officer under a lease that expired June 30, 2012 that was automatically extended for two one-year term and requiring monthly payments of $4,200 plus common area costs. In January 2009, the Company began leasing a single-family residence in Golden Valley, Minnesota on a month-to-month basis at $1,200 per month from a principal of The Matthews Group for purposes of housing customers, guests and consultants. This lease was terminated in October 2010. Rent expense, included in operating cost, to related parties was $49,350 and $55,800 in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Future annual minimum lease payments total is $100,800 through 2014.

During 2012, the Company issued to The Matthews Group and some individuals unsecured and convertible related party demand notes payable totaling $46,000 at interest rates ranging from 5% to 10%. In addition in July 2012 through October 3, 2012 the Company issued unsecured convertible demand note payable totaling $81,000, bearing interest rate of 10% per annum to a related party and an individual.

In 2011, the Company issued to The Matthew Group, and an individual unsecured and secured, unconvertible and convertible notes payable totaling $134,700 at interest rates ranging from 8% to 10%, due on demand.

In 2010, the Company issued to The Matthew Group, members of the Board of Directors, and an individual unsecured and secured, unconvertible and convertible notes payable totaling $1,036,750 (net of payment $65,000) at interest rates ranging from 8% to 10%, that matured July 2010 through January 2011. Included in the notes payable financing during fiscal 2010 was $291,000 due on demand and $956,750 was due to related parties. In addition in July 2010 through September 2010 the Company issued unsecured convertible demand notes payable totaling $100,000, bearing interest rate of 8% per annum to a related party. In 2010 the Company repaid $65,000 to related parties. The Company converted $70,000 note payable by issuing 70,000 shares of its common stock in payment of the note.

In fiscal 2009, pursuant to the terms of a Subscription Agreement and Investment of Intent (the “Subscription Agreement”) the Company issued to The Matthews Group, individuals, and employees of the Company unsecured convertible notes payable totaling $550,000, at an interest rate of 8% for a period of eighteen months. Included in this convertible notes payable was $450,000 to related parties. Under the terms of the note interest is accrued on the principal and becomes payable at maturity. The holders of the note have option to convert the note into whatever form of security offered by the Company if there is subsequent financing. As part of Subscription Agreement, the holders of the notes also received warrants to purchase one share of common stock of the Company for every $2.00 of investment, at an exercise price of $2.00 per warrant share. The Company recorded a $20,981 discount on the notes payable for the value of the warrants issued. The discount was fully amortized over the term of the notes payable. Unamortized discount was $0 at June 30, 2012. In addition the Company issued unsecured notes payable to related parties and certain individual totaling $355,000 bearing an annual interest rate of 8% and matured November 2009 and July 2010. Included in the unsecured notes payable was $335,000 issued to related parties.

Item 14 Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by Weinberg & Company, P.A. for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, including reviews of the interim consolidated financial statements, for fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 was $53,903. The aggregate fees billed by Lurie Besikof Lapidus & Company, LLP and Weinberg & Company, P.A. for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, including reviews of the interim consolidated financial statements, for fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 was $7,610 and $54,720, respectively.

Audit Related Fees

None.

Tax Fees

Weinberg & Company, P.A. was paid $5,289 and $4,980 for preparation of income tax return for fiscal year ended 2012 and 2011, respectively.

All Other Fees

None.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Under the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm in order to ensure that they do not impair the auditors’ independence. The Commission’s rules specify the types of non-audit services that an independent auditor may not provide to its audit client and establish the Audit Committee’s responsibility for administration of the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm.

Consistent with the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee review and pre-approve all audit services and permitted non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm to us or any of our subsidiaries. The Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to a member of the Audit Committee and if it does, the decisions of that member must be presented to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. Accordingly, all audit services and non-audit services described in this Item 14 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

There were no hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

PART IV

ITEM 15 EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

See Index to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

All other financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

See the Exhibit Index which follows the signature page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference.

See Item 15(a) (3) above.

See Item 15(a) (2) above.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

VERITEC, INC.,

a Nevada corporation

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

EXHIBIT INDEX

10.10* Employment Agreement by and between Veritec, Inc. and John Quentin dated May 29, 2009 (incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,2011, as filed on October 13, 2011).

* Management compensatory plan or arrangement.