VERU INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)

fhco2qform10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-13602

The Female Health Company

(Name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Wisconsin		39-1144397
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

515 N. State Street, Suite 2225 Chicago, IL		60654
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

312-595-9123

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

	Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨
	Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as determined by rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of August 5, 2010, the registrant had 27,483,424 shares of $0.01 par value common stock outstanding.

THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	PAGE

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward Looking Statements	3

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009	4

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income -

Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009	5
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009	6

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009	7

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8

Management's Discussion and Analysis	21

Controls and Procedures	38

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Items 1 – 5	39

Exhibits	40

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q which are not statements of historical fact are intended to be, and are hereby identified as "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company cautions readers that forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievement expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: the Company's inability to secure adequate capital to fund working capital requirements and advertising and promotional expenditures; factors related to increased competition from existing and new competitors including new product introduction, price reduction and increased spending on marketing; limitations on the Company's opportunities to enter into and/or renew agreements with international partners, the failure of the Company or its partners to successfully market, sell and deliver its product in international markets, and risks inherent in doing business on an international level, such as laws governing medical devices that differ from those in the U.S., unexpected changes in the regulatory requirements, political risks, export restrictions, tariffs and other trade barriers and fluctuations in currency exchange rates; the disruption of production at the Company's manufacturing facilities due to raw material shortages, labor shortages and/or physical damage to the Company's facilities; the Company's inability to manage its growth and to adapt its administrative, operational and financial control systems to the needs of the expanded entity and the failure of management to anticipate, respond to and manage changing business conditions; the loss of the services of executive officers and other key employees and the Company's continued ability to attract and retain highly-skilled and qualified personnel; the costs and other effects of litigation, governmental investigations, legal and administrative cases and proceedings, settlements and investigations; payment of dividends is in the discretion of the Board of Directors and the Company may not have sufficient cash flows to continue to pay dividends; and developments or assertions by or against the Company relating to intellectual property rights.

THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS	June 30, 2010			September 30, 2009
Current Assets:
Cash	$	3,815,256		$	2,810,197
Restricted cash		99,456			105,074
Accounts receivable, net		1,307,196			7,806,007
Income tax receivable		68,106			68,106
Inventories, net		2,551,092			1,203,063
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		318,746			429,602
Deferred income taxes		2,181,000			2,181,000
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		10,340,852			14,603,049

Other Assets		169,361			87,621

EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE AND FIXTURES
Equipment not yet in service		-			166,226
Equipment, furniture and fixtures		3,854,108			7,037,099
Total equipment, furniture and fixtures		3,854,108			7,203,325
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1,355,954	)		(4,381,709	)
		2,498,154			2,821,616

Deferred income taxes – LT		1,028,149			1,028,149

TOTAL ASSETS	$	14,036,516		$	18,540,435

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	616,797		$	602,196
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		735,955			1,420,099
Accrued compensation		392,360			1,597,662
Restructuring accrual		28,488			1,116,911
Deferred gain on sale of facility		-			657,605
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		1,773,600			5,394,473

Obligations under capital leases		16,254			34,428
Deferred grant income		138,520			157,143
TOTAL LIABILITIES		1,928,374			5,586,044

Commitments and Contingencies		-			-

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Convertible preferred stock, Class A, Series 1		-			-
Convertible preferred stock, Class A, Series 3		-			-
Common stock		293,675			283,828
Additional paid-in-capital		67,247,370			66,395,902
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(581,519	)		(581,519	)
Accumulated deficit		(48,680,426	)		(47,143,309	)
Treasury stock, at cost		(6,170,958	)		(6,000,511	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		12,108,142			12,954,391
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	14,036,516		$	18,540,435

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009

Product sales	$	1,742,961		$	6,884,937
Royalty income		11,250			81,830
Net revenues		1,754,211			6,966,767

Cost of sales		814,764			3,619,120

Gross profit		939,447			3,347,647

Advertising and promotion		38,029			35,188
Selling, general and administrative		922,024			1,816,488
Research and development		-			10,280
Restructuring costs, net		(41,656	)		-

Total operating expenses		918,397			1,861,956

Operating income		21,050			1,485,691

Non-operating (income) loss:
Interest, net and other (income) expense		(10,566	)		455
Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss		(17,190	)		816,148
		(27,756	)		816,603

Income before income taxes		48,806			669,088

Income tax (benefit) expense		(26,353	)		20,832

Net income		75,159			648,256

Preferred dividends, Class A, Series 3		-			21,815

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	75,159		$	626,441

Basic earnings per common share outstanding	$	0.00		$	0.02

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		27,216,798			25,453,243

Diluted earnings per common share outstanding	$	0.00		$	0.02

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		28,819,516			27,775,458

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009

Product sales	$	14,410,669		$	19,470,963
Royalty income		11,363			160,151
Net revenues		14,422,032			19,631,114

Cost of sales		6,099,701			9,949,338

Gross profit		8,322,331			9,681,776

Advertising and promotion		197,190			136,359
Selling, general and administrative		4,910,689			5,265,256
Research and development		381			105,055
Restructuring costs		1,926,444			-

Total operating expenses		7,034,704			5,506,670

Operating income		1,287,627			4,175,106

Non-operating loss (income):
Interest, net and other income		(27,904	)		(7,844	)
Foreign currency transaction loss (gain)		62,259			(183,672	)
		34,355			(191,516	)

Income before income taxes		1,253,272			4,366,622

Income tax expense		31,931			110,411

Net income		1,221,341			4,256,211

Preferred dividends, Class A, Series 3		-			69,170

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	1,221,341		$	4,187,041

Basic earnings per common share outstanding	$	0.05		$	0.16

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding		26,906,295			25,588,734

Diluted earnings per common share outstanding	$	0.04		$	0.15

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		28,491,308			27,863,338

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009
OPERATIONS
Net income	$	1,221,341		$	4,256,211
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		319,482			164,555
Amortization of deferred gain on sale/leaseback		(657,605	)		(64,979	)
Amortization of deferred income from grant – BLCF		(18,623	)		(17,793	)
Interest added to certificate of deposit		(2,091	)		(2,014	)
Employee stock compensation		371,524			254,000
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		-			6,619
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		2,163,261			1,444,992
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,397,289			6,041,591

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Decrease in restricted cash		5,618			102,853
Proceeds from disposal of fixed assets		-			31,452
Capital expenditures		(25,575	)		(1,257,968	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(19,957	)		(1,123,663	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		157,900			63,000
Proceeds from exercise of warrants		725,600			135,000
Taxes paid in lieu of shares		(313,760	)		-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			1,860
Purchases of common stock for treasury shares		(170,447	)		(3,252,322	)
Dividends paid on preferred stock		-			(72,423	)
Dividends paid on common stock		(2,749,258	)		-
Payment on capital lease obligations		(22,308	)		(29,057	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,372,273	)		(3,153,942	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		-			(340,606	)

Net increase in cash		1,005,059			1,423,380
Cash at beginning of period		2,810,197			1,922,148

CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	3,815,256		$	3,345,528

Schedule of noncash financing and investing activities:
Income taxes paid	$	103,931		$	110,411
Reduction of accrued expense upon issuance of shares		92,180			72,688
Dividends declared (unpaid dividend on restricted stock)		9,200			-
Preferred dividends declared		-			21,815
Foreign currency translation adjustment		-			(389,840	)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed financial statements are unaudited but in the opinion of management contain all the adjustments (consisting of those of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary to present fairly the financial position and the results of operations and cash flow for the periods presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

Operating results for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

Principles of Consolidation and Nature of Operations

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Female Health Company – UK, and its wholly owned subsidiaries, The Female Health Company - UK, plc and The Female Health Company (M) SDN.BHD. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. The Female Health Company ("FHC" or the "Company") is currently engaged in the marketing, manufacture and distribution of a consumer health care product, the FC2 Female Condom ("FC2"). The Female Health Company - UK, is the holding company of The Female Health Company - UK, plc, which is located in a 6,398 sq. ft. leased office facility located in London, England. The Female Health Company (M) SDN.BHD leases a 16,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility located in Selangor D.E., Malaysia.

The FC2 Female Condom is currently sold or available in either or both commercial (private sector) and public sector markets in 107 countries. The product is marketed directly to consumers in 11 countries by various country-specific commercial partners. The Company's standard credit terms vary from 30 to 90 days, depending on the class of trade and customary terms within a territory, so accounts receivable is affected by the mix of purchasers within the quarter. As is typical in the Company's business, extended credit terms may occasionally be offered as a sales promotion. For the past twelve months, the Company's average days sales outstanding has averaged approximately 70 days. Over the past five years, the Company’s bad debt expense has been less than .01% of product sales.

The Company also derives revenue from licensing its intellectual property under an agreement with its business partner, Hindustan Lifecare Limited (“HLL”). HLL is authorized to manufacture FC2 at HLL's facility in Kochi, India for sale in India. HLL is the Company's exclusive distributor in India and the Company receives a royalty based on the number of units sold by HLL in India. Such revenue appears as royalty income on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and is recognized in the period in which the sale is made by HLL.

Restricted cash

Restricted cash relates to security provided to one of the Company’s U.K. banks for performance bonds issued in favor of customers. Such security has been extended infrequently and only on occasions where it has been a contract term expressly stipulated as an absolute requirement by the funds provider. The expiration of the bond is defined by the completion of the event such as, but not limited to, delivery of goods or at a period of time after product has been distributed.

Settlement of Intercompany Loan

In December 2008, a long term intercompany loan from the U.S. parent to the U.K. subsidiary in the amount of $3,572,733 was retired in exchange for a reduction in the intercompany trade accounts payable to the U.K. subsidiary from the U.S. parent company. The settlement of this long term intercompany loan resulted in a foreign currency translation loss of approximately $135,000 which was recognized as a decrease to other comprehensive income.

Foreign Currency and Change in Functional Currency

In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 830, Foreign Currency Matters, the Company considered various economic factors (i.e., cash flow, sales price, sales market, expenses, financing, intercompany transactions and arrangements), both individually and collectively, in determining the functional currency of its subsidiaries. The Company’s first generation product, the FC1 Female Condom, was produced by its UK subsidiary in its London manufacturing facility. FC1’s sales were denominated in both U.S. dollars and British pounds sterling. The Company’s second generation product, the FC2 Female Condom, is manufactured by the UK’s Malaysia subsidiary in Kuala Lumpur. Unlike the first generation product, FC2 sales have been denominated only in U.S. dollars. Prior to October 1, 2009, each subsidiary’s functional currency was its respective local currency (British pound sterling and Malaysian ringgit). Effective October 1, 2009, the Company determined that there were significant changes in facts and circumstances, triggering an evaluation of the subsidiaries’ functional currency. The evaluation indicated that the U.S. dollar is the currency with the most significant influence upon the subsidiaries. Because all of the Company's U.K. subsidiary's future sales and cash flows would be denominated in U.S. dollars following the October 2009 cessation of FC1 production, the U.K. subsidiary adopted the U.S. dollar as its functional currency effective October 1, 2009. As the Malaysia subsidiary is a direct and integral component of the U.K. parent’s operations, it, too, adopted the U.S. dollar as its functional currency as of October 1, 2009. Due to the change in functional currency discussed above and lower volatility in foreign currency exchange rates for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized a foreign currency transaction gain of $17,190 and a loss of $62,259 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to a loss of $816,148 and gain of $183,672 recognized for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The consistent use of the U.S. dollar as functional currency across the Company reduces its foreign currency risk and stabilizes its operating results.

NOTE 2 – Earnings per Share

Basic EPS is computed by dividing income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In the diluted earnings per share calculation, the numerator is the sum of net income attributable to common stockholders and preferred dividends. Diluted EPS is computed giving effect to all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Dilutive potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred shares and the exercise of stock options and warrants and unvested shares granted to employees, as well as the incremental common shares issuable upon conversion of convertible preferred shares.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares
outstanding – basic		27,216,798		25,453,243		26,906,295		25,588,734
Net effect of dilutive securities:
Options		1,325,378		947,058		1,308,276		945,802
Warrants		62,090		875,917		61,487		829,562
Convertible preferred stock		-		276,058		-		276,058
Unvested restricted shares		215,250		223,182		215,250		223,182
Total net effect of dilutive securities		1,602,718		2,322,215		1,585,013		2,274,604
Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		28,819,516		27,775,458		28,491,308		27,863,338
Earnings per common share – basic	$	0.00		0.02	$	0.05		0.16
Earnings per common share – diluted	$	0.00		0.02	$	0.04		0.15

All the outstanding warrants and stock options were included in the computation of diluted net income per share during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and during the three months ended June 30, 2009. For the nine months ended June 30, 2009, outstanding stock options to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.92 were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share for that period because the effect was anti-dilutive.

NOTE 3 - Comprehensive Income

Total comprehensive income was $75,159 and $1,221,341 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as there was no foreign currency effect in the current period. Total comprehensive income was $1,545,617 and $3,866,371 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

NOTE 4 - Inventories

The components of inventory consist of the following:

	June 30, 2010			September 30, 2009
Raw material and work in process	$	612,361		$	824,824
Finished goods		1,968,731			474,239
Inventory, gross		2,581,092			1,299,063
Less: inventory reserves		(30,000	)		(96,000	)
Inventory, net	$	2,551,092		$	1,203,063

NOTE 5 – Line of Credit

The Company’s credit agreement with Heartland Bank (the "Bank") does not contain any financial covenants that require compliance with ratios or amounts. The line of credit consists of a revolving note for up to $1,000,000 with borrowings limited to 50% of eligible accounts receivable and a revolving note for up to $1,000,000 with borrowings limited to the amount of supporting letters of credit issued by The World Bank or another issuer of equivalent credit quality approved by the Bank. Significant restrictive covenants include prohibitions on any merger, consolidation or sale of all or a substantial portion of the Company’s assets and limits on the payments of dividends or the repurchase of shares. Dividends and share repurchases are permitted as long as after giving effect to the dividend or shares repurchase the Company has at least $1,000,000 of available cash and a ratio of total liabilities to total stockholders’ equity of at least 1:1. The two revolving notes with the Bank will expire July 1, 2011. When renewed on July 1, 2010, the revolving credit line collateralized by accounts receivable was increased from $500,000 to $1,000,000. Both lines of credit were renewed at an interest rate of base rate plus 0.5%. No new warrants were issued as part of the extension of these notes. These notes are collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company. No amounts were outstanding under the revolving notes at June 30, 2010

NOTE 6 – Share-Based Compensation

In March 2008, the Company’s shareholders approved the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan which will be utilized to provide equity opportunities and performance–based incentives to attract, retain and motivate those persons who make (or are expected to make) important contributions to the Company. A total of 2,000,000 shares are available for issuance under the plan. As of June 30, 2010, 412,182 shares had been issued under the plan; no shares were issued in the quarter then ended.

Stock Option Plans

Under the Company’s previous share based long-term incentive compensation plan, the 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Company granted non-qualified stock options to employees. There are no shares available for grant under the plan which expired on December 31, 2006. Options issued under that plan expire in 10 years and generally vested 1/36 per month, with full vesting after three years.

Compensation expense is recognized only for share-based payments expected to vest. The Company estimates forfeitures at the date of grant based on historical experience and future expectations. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense for stock options of approximately $23,000 and $70,000 in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $19,000 and $43,000 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

In May 2009, the Company granted 150,000 stock options under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan to its independent board members. The options will vest over 36 months at a rate of 1/36 of the grant per month. The options have a ten year life. The Company did not grant any options during the nine months ended June 30, 2010.

The following table summarizes the Company’s option activity during the nine months ended June 30, 2010:

Option Activity:

	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding at September 30, 2009		2,269,000		$	1.58
Granted		-			-
Exercised		(435,000	)		1.43
Expired or forfeited		-			-
Outstanding at June 30, 2010		1,834,000		$	1.61

During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, a number of stock option holders exercised 30,000 and 325,000 stock options, respectively, using the cashless exercise option available under the plan which entitled them to 20,962 and 186,220 shares of common stock, respectively. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, proceeds of $157,900 were received from the exercise of 110,000 stock options. The intrinsic value of the options exercised was $116,000 and $1,792,000 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, proceeds of $23,100 and $63,000 were received from the exercise of 16,500 and 45,000 stock options, respectively. The intrinsic value of the options exercised was $43,030 and $100,595 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. There was no realized tax benefit from options exercised for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 based on the “with and without” approach.

The following table summarizes the stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2010:

	Number Outstanding At 06/30/10	Wghted. Avg. Remaining Life	Wghted. Avg. Exercise Price	Aggregate Intrinsic Value	Number Exercisable At 06/3010	Wghted Avg. Remaining Life	Wghted. Avg. Exercise Price	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Total	1,834,000	3.62	$1.61	$6,565,060	1,738,167	3.33	$1.48	$6,443,352

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before income taxes, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $5.19 as of the last business day of the period ended June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of approximately $173,000 related to unvested stock options. These expenses will be recognized over approximately 1.92 years. The deferred tax asset and realized benefit from stock options exercised and other share-based payments for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was not recognized, based on the Company’s election of the “with and without” approach.

Restricted Stock

The Company issues restricted stock to employees and consultants. Such issuances may have vesting periods that range from one to three years and/or the issuances may be contingent on continued employment for periods that range from one to three years.

The Company granted 35,250 shares of restricted stock during the nine months ended June 30, 2010. The fair value of the awards granted was approximately $166,000. All such shares of restricted stock vest in September 2010, provided the grantee has not voluntarily terminated service or been terminated for cause prior to the vesting date. The Company granted 7,000 and 223,000 shares of restricted stock during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The fair value of the awards granted was approximately $33,000 and $702,000 for the respective periods. All such shares of restricted stock vest between September 2009 and December 2011, provided the grantee has not voluntarily terminated service or been terminated for cause prior to the vesting date. No shares of restricted stock were forfeited during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 or June 30, 2009. The Company recognized share-based compensation expense for restricted stock of approximately $100,000 and $301,000 ($172,000 of which is included in accrued expenses at June 30, 2010 since the related shares have not been issued) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and $86,000, and $211,000 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income for those periods. As of June 30, 2010, there was approximately $243,000, representing 72,378 unvested shares, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock compensation arrangements. The expense will be recognized over the weighted average period of approximately 1.02 years.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

No warrants were issued in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 or June 30, 2009.

During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, a warrant holder exercised 30,000 warrants using the cashless exercise option available within the warrant agreements which entitled the warrant holder to 23,085 shares of common stock. During the nine months ended June 30, 2010, warrant holders exercised 626,500 warrants which provided proceeds of $725,600. During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2009, warrant holders exercised 50,000 warrants for cash, which provided proceeds of $135,000. During that same period, warrant holders exercised 40,000 warrants using the cashless exercise option available within the warrant agreements which entitled them to 26,021 shares of common stock.

At June 30, 2010, 80,000 warrants were outstanding and exercisable with weighted average remaining contractual lives of 6.04 years. The aggregate intrinsic value was approximately $311,000 based on the Company’s closing stock price of $5.19 as of the last business day of the period ended June 30, 2010. There is no unrecognized compensation cost related to warrants as of June 30, 2010.

NOTE 7 - Stock Repurchase Program

On January 17, 2007, the Company announced a Stock Repurchase Program under the terms of which up to a million shares of its common stock could be purchased during the subsequent twelve months. In late March 2008, the Board approved expansion of the repurchase program up to a total of 2,000,000 shares to be acquired through December 31, 2009. In February 2009, the Board further expanded the repurchase program to a maximum of 3,000,000 shares to be acquired through December 31, 2010. On March 25, 2010, the Board extended the buyback period through December 31, 2011. From the program’s onset through June 30, 2010, the total number of shares repurchased by the Company is 1,874,611. The Stock Repurchase Program authorizes purchases in privately negotiated transactions as well as in the open market.

In October 2008 the Company's board of directors authorized repurchases in private transactions under the Stock Repurchase Program of shares issued under the Company's equity compensation plans to directors, employees and other service providers at the market price on the effective date of the repurchase request. Total repurchases under this amendment are limited to an aggregate of 250,000 shares per calendar year and to a maximum of 25,000 shares annually per individual. Purchases under this amendment for calendar year 2010 and 2009 were 20,800 and 162,650 shares, respectively. There were no share repurchases under this amendment in calendar year 2008.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:	Details of Treasury Stock Purchases to Date through June 30, 2010
Period:	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Program		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program
Period:
January 1, 2007 – March 31, 2010		1,868,611	$	3.27		1,868,611		1,131,389
April 1, 2010 – April 30, 2010		-		-		1,868,611		1,131,389
May 1, 2010 – May 31, 2010		-		-		1,868,611		1,131,389
June 1, 2010 – June 30, 2010		6,000		5.85		1,874,611		1,125,389
Quarterly Subtotal		6,000		5.85		6,000
Total		1,874,611	$	3.27		1,874,611		1,125,389

NOTE 8 - Industry Segments and Financial Information About Foreign and Domestic Operations

The Company currently operates primarily in one industry segment which includes the development, manufacture and marketing of consumer health care products.

The Company operates in foreign and domestic regions. Information about the Company's operations by geographic area is as follows:

	(Amounts in thousands)
	Product Sales to External Customers For The Nine Months Ended June 30,						Long-Lived Assets As of
							June 30,		September 30,
		2010			2009			2010		2009
South Africa	$	2,543	(1)	$	2,013	(1)	$	-	$	-
Zimbabwe		1,105			4,414	(1)		-		-
United States		1,017			2,001	(1)		289		342
Brazil		*			1,135			-		-
Malawi		1,941	(1)		*			-		-
Nigeria		810			*			-		-
Papua New Guinea		*			894			-		-
Mozambique		870			*			-		-
India		*			*			115		133
United Kingdom		*			*			195		214
Malaysia		*			*			2,069		2,220
Tanzania		*			865			-		-
D.R. of Congo		*			657			-		-
Other		6,125			7,492			-		-
	$	14,411		$	19,471		$	2,668	$	2,909
* Less than 5 percent of total product sales (1) Comprised of a customer that is considered to be a major customer (exceeds 10% of product sales).

NOTE 9 – Contingent Liabilities

The testing, manufacturing and marketing of consumer products by the Company entail an inherent risk that product liability claims will be asserted against the Company. The Company maintains product liability insurance coverage for claims arising from the use of its products. The coverage amount is currently $5,000,000 for FHC's consumer health care product.

NOTE 10 – Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets or liabilities for the tax-effected temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of its assets and liabilities, and for net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

The Company completes a detailed analysis of its deferred income tax valuation allowances on an annual basis or more frequently if information comes to our attention that would indicate that a revision to its estimates is necessary. In evaluating the Company’s ability to realize its deferred tax assets, management considers all available positive and negative evidence on a country by country basis, including past operating results and forecast of future taxable income. In determining future taxable income, management makes assumptions to forecast U.S. federal and state, U.K. and Malaysia operating income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the implementation of any feasible and prudent tax planning strategies. These assumptions require significant judgment regarding the forecasts of the future taxable income in each tax jurisdiction, and are consistent with the forecasts used to manage the Company’s business. It should be noted that the Company realized significant losses through 2005 on a consolidated basis. The Company has a history of taxable income for three consecutive years in the U.K. and two consecutive years in the U.S., which was used to determine the amount of time the Company can reasonably expect to generate taxable income in the future. In management’s analysis to determine the amount of the deferred tax asset to recognize, management projected future taxable income for the subsequent two years for each tax jurisdiction. There is a full valuation allowance on the Malaysia deferred tax asset, as there is not sufficient history of taxable income in that tax jurisdiction.

As of June 30, 2010, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $37,393,000 and $28,224,000, respectively, for income tax purposes expiring in years 2010 to 2028. The Company’s U.K. subsidiary, The Female Health Company-UK, plc, has U.K. net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $68,790,000 as of June 30, 2010. These U.K. net operating loss carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely to offset future U.K. taxable income. The Company’s Malaysian subsidiary has net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $352,000 as of June 30, 2010, which can be carried forward indefinitely to offset future Malaysian taxable income. With the increasing demand for and profitability of the FC2 Female Condom, the Company expects utilization of its net operating losses in both the U.K. and the U.S. will continue. However, because some of the U.S. Federal tax losses have a net loss carryforward limitation of fifteen years, it is possible that some of the Company’s early losses carried forward in the U.S. will not be fully utilized. The U.K. net operating losses do not expire. The losses incurred in Malaysia are related to the recent start-up and are expected to be utilized over the next several years.

A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) and the amount computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate to income before taxes for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30 ,						Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Income tax expense at statutory rates	$	16,000		$	228,000		$	426,000		$	1,485,000
State income tax, net of federal benefits		2,000			36,000			66,000			231,000
Effect of AMT expense (benefit)		(34,140	)		12,152			8,860			87,541
Non-deductible expenses		1,000			(19,000	)		3,000			(57,000	)
Effect of foreign income tax - Malaysia		7,787			8,680			23,071			22,870
Utilization of NOL carryforwards		(22,000	)		(243,000	)		(728,000	)		(1,376,000	)
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance		3,000			(2,000	)		233,000			(283,000	)
Income tax (benefit) expense	$	(26,353	)	$	20,832		$	31,931		$	110,411

NOTE 11 – FC1/FC2 Transition - Restructuring Costs

On August 5, 2009, the Company announced to its U.K. employees that the Company would evaluate the future of its U.K. facility following the decision of two of its largest customers to switch their purchases from the first generation product, FC1, manufactured in the U.K. facility, to the second generation product, FC2, which is manufactured in Malaysia. As is required by British labor law, the Company went through an evaluation process, working in tandem with employee representatives, in which various manufacturing alternatives were considered.

In September 2009, the process concluded when management and the labor representatives were unable to identify a viable alternative. In late September, production employees were notified of the redundancy (plan to terminate their employment) and of the one-time termination payments due them, a total of $1,116,911. Manufacturing ceased in mid-October 2009. Following manufacturing cessation, production employees were no longer required to report for work. In compliance with British labor law, the termination payments were made in late November 2009. The liability for the termination payments was properly recognized at the communication date (in September 2009).

In fiscal 2009, the Company incurred a one-time charge of $1,496,624 for restructuring costs related to the cessation of FC1 manufacturing at its U.K. facility. This was comprised of $1,116,911 termination costs, $181,340 facility exit costs, $104,247 consulting costs and $94,126 inventory write-downs. These other related costs fall under the scope of other associated costs of an exit activity, as suggested by the Interpretive Response in Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5(P)(4), including footnote 17. These costs were recognized in the period in which the related cost was incurred in accordance with ASC 420-10-25-15, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations.

Normal manufacturing and distribution costs, including materials, labor and overhead, related to the production and selling of product through the cessation date are not a component of the one-time termination payments and were accounted for when incurred rather than included in the restructuring accrual as of September 30, 2009.

In November 2009, following the cessation of FC1 manufacturing in the U.K. facility, the Company entered into an agreement with the new owner of the U.K. manufacturing facility to surrender its existing property lease, which would have expired in December 2016, in exchange for a lease surrender fee of $1,490,716 and a new short-term lease. On November 2, 2009, the new agreements were executed. Per the terms of the agreement, the Company was responsible for removing certain leasehold improvements from the property (dilapidations) prior to termination of the lease. Upon execution of the new agreements, the Company deposited the new annual rent of approximately $484,049, as required by the lease terms. From a cash flow perspective, replacing the previous lease at this time eliminated future payments of approximately $4.3 million (for rent and related expenses) over the remaining term of the previous lease, producing a positive net impact of $2.8 million (after deducting the lease surrender payments).

Upon cessation of manufacturing in the U.K. facility, the Company charged $605,025 to restructuring charges related to excess capacity of the facility, as was reported in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. This was determined by multiplying 82%, the portion of the building previously used for manufacturing activities, to the total lease expenses for the period beginning when manufacturing ended through the end of the lease. This calculation reflected the guidance of ASC Topic 420-10-25-11 through 420-10-25-13, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities.

The cost for dilapidation and related expenses was estimated based on bids from independent contractors to provide the services necessary to rid the premises of leasehold improvements, as is required by the lease terms.

On April 27, 2010, the Company signed two related agreements, with the former and new landlords of the U.K. facility, which terminated the current U.K. lease and granted the Company rent-free occupation of the premises from April 28, 2010 through June 30, 2010. Per the terms of these agreements, the Company agreed to a lease exit fee of $216,000 and a $248,000 payment in lieu of dilapidations. Those obligations were fulfilled by a cash payment of $234,000 and by surrendering the remaining rent prepayment of $230,000, which had been held in trust since November 2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company made redundancy payments of $127,087. The early termination of the lease (April 2010 versus November 1, 2010) resulted in the reversal of $302,342 in excess capacity costs in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

The components of the restructuring expenses recognized in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
Lease surrender payments and related costs	$	243,783		$	1,734,496
(Reversal) recognition of excess capacity costs through November 1, 2010		(302,342	)		302,683
Offset: By proportionate recognition of deferred gain on original sale/leaseback of plant		-			(653,706	)
Dilapidations and related costs		16,903			542,971
Total	$	(41,656	)	$	1,926,444

Recap of Restructuring Accrual for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
Restructuring accrual balance at September 30, 2009				$	1,116,911

Restructuring costs incurred during the nine months ended June 30, 2010					1,926,444
Less:
Termination payments	$	1,293,826
Lease surrender payments		1,734,496
Lease exit payments		640,251
Reversal of deferred gain		(653,706	)
					(3,014,867	)
Restructuring accrual balance at June 30, 2010				$	28,488

All of the Company’s other significant U.K. operations are ongoing. The functions include, but are not limited to, global sales and marketing of the FC2 Female Condom, management and direction of Global Manufacturing Operations, management and direction of the Global Technical Support Team, and product development.

On June 10, 2010, the Company entered a new lease agreement for 6,398 square feet of office space located in London, England. The lease requires quarterly payments of approximately $13,500 through December 2011 and quarterly payments of approximately $27,000 from January 2012 through June 2015. The lease stipulates that after 5 years (June 2015) the principal rent will be reviewed and adjusted to the higher of the principal rent immediately prior to review date or the market rate. The Company has the option to terminate this lease in June 2015 by giving the landlord no less than six months prior notice in writing. Per the terms of the lease agreement, the Company was also required to make a security deposit equivalent to six months’ rent (approximately $66,000).

Note 12 – Dividends

On January 14, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share. The dividend was paid on February 16, 2010 to stockholders of record as of January 29, 2010. The cash dividend was the first in the Company’s history. Prior to the dividend declaration, the Company sought and was granted an amendment to its Heartland Bank credit facility, to allow the Company to pay cash dividends. The Company paid approximately $1.4 million in dividends in February from its cash on hand.

On March 25, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share. The Company paid, from its cash on hand, approximately $1.4 million pursuant to the dividend on May 12, 2010 to stockholders of record as of April 23, 2010.

NOTE 13 – Subsequent Events

USAID I DELIVER Order

The Company supplies FC2 Female Condoms funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through the USAID I DELIVER PROJECT implemented by John Snow, Inc. (JSI). In July 2010, the Company announced that JSI had recently amended its contract for the supply of FC2 Female Condoms from 12 million units to 24 million units. JSI will direct delivery of the units during a specific period of time which concludes September 30, 2011. The order expansion indicates that JSI will remain a significant customer during fiscal year 2011. JSI is entitled to further expand the quantity purchased, at its discretion. The FC2 Female Condoms will be used in HIV/AIDS prevention programs supported by USAID in developing countries worldwide.

Dividend Declaration

On July 22, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.05 per share. The Company expects to pay, from its cash on hand, approximately $1.4 million pursuant to the dividend on August 11, 2010, to stockholders of record as of August 4, 2010.

Any future quarterly dividends and the record date for such dividends will be approved each quarter by the Company’s Board of Directors and announced by the Company. Payment of future dividends is in the discretion of the Board of Directors and the Company may not have sufficient cash flows to continue to pay dividends.

NOTE 14 - Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On October 1, 2009, The Company adopted ASC Topic 810, which establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. This Standard also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures to clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The adoption of this Standard had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On October 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC Topic 805 related to accounting for business combinations using the acquisition method of accounting (previously referred to as the purchase method). This Standard establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. This Standard also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. Should the Company enter into any business combination, this Standard will have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB updated ASC Topic 505 (Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash) effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009. The update clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per share prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share). Should the Company make a distribution of stock and cash to its shareholders, this Standard could have an impact on its financial statements.

THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

General

The Female Health Company ("FHC" or the "Company") manufactures, markets and sells the FC2 Female Condom, the only currently available product under a woman's control that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FC2 provides dual protection against unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections ("STIs"), including HIV/AIDS. In October 2009, the Company completed the transition from its first generation product, FC1, to its second generation product, FC2, and production of FC1 ceased. Although FC1 production has ceased, the Company retains its ownership of certain world-wide rights to FC1, as well as various patents, regulatory approvals and other intellectual property related to FC1.

In 2005, the Company announced it had developed a second-generation product, FC2. The Company had four reasons for developing a second-generation product:

1.		Increase women’s access to prevention that they could initiate through a lower public sector price
2.		Increase HIV/AIDS prevention
3.		Lower health care costs
4.		Increase gross margins

FC2 was first marketed internationally in March 2007. FC2 was introduced in the U.S. in August 2009, after receiving FDA approval in March 2009.

Certain studies have shown that the design and method of use of FC2 is similar to FC1 and that FC2 performs in a comparable manner to FC1 in terms of safety, failure rates and acceptability. FC2 is currently available in approximately 107 countries. It is sold directly to consumers in 11 countries.

On March 10, 2009, FC2 received FDA approval as a Class III medical device and became available in the United States in August 2009. In addition to FDA approval, the FC2 Female Condom has been approved by other regulatory agencies, including the European Union, India and Brazil. In 2006, based on a rigorous scientific review, the World Health Organization (WHO) agreed that FC2 does perform in the same manner as FC1 and cleared FC2 for purchase by UN agencies. From its introduction in 2007 through June 30, 2010, approximately 65 million FC2 Female Condoms have been distributed in 107 countries. The FDA approval permitted the Company to transition from FC1 to FC2. The last shipments of FC1 were made in October 2009.

Products

Currently, there are only three FDA approved products marketed that prevent the transmission of HIV/AIDS through sexual intercourse: the male latex condom, the male polyurethane condom, and the FC2 nitrile polymer Female Condom. The FC2 Female Condom is currently the only FDA approved and marketed product controlled by women that prevents sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS. Used consistently and correctly, it provides women dual protection against STI’s (including HIV/AIDS) and unintended pregnancy. The FC2 Female Condom is an alternative to either unprotected sex or to male condom usage, and is not viewed as competing with the male condom.

Numerous clinical and behavioral studies have been conducted regarding use of the Female Condom. Studies show that the Female Condom is found acceptable by women and their partners in many cultures. Importantly, studies also show that when the Female Condom is made available with male condoms there is a significant increase in protected sex acts. The increase in protected sex acts varies by country and averages between 10% and 35%.

In September 2005, FHC completed development of FC2, its second generation Female Condom. FC2 has basically the same physical design, specifications, safety and efficacy profile as FC1. Manufactured from a nitrile polymer, FC2 can be produced more economically than the first generation product made from polyurethane, a more costly raw material. FC2 consists of a soft, loose fitting sheath that lines the vagina and two flexible O rings. One of the rings is used to insert the device and holds it in place internally. The other ring remains outside the vagina after insertion.

The raw material of which FC2 is manufactured offers a number of benefits over latex, the material that is most commonly used in male condoms. Its nitrile polymer is stronger than latex, reducing the probability that the Female Condom sheath will tear during use. Unlike latex, FC2’s nitrile polymer quickly transfers heat. So, upon insertion, the FC2 Female Condom quickly warms to body temperature, which may enhance pleasure and sensation during use. Unlike the male condom, FC2 may be inserted in advance of arousal, eliminating disruption during sexual intimacy. FC2 offers an alternative to latex sensitive users (7% to 20% of the population) who are unable to use male condoms without irritation. To the Company's knowledge, no allergy to the nitrile polymer has been reported to date.

FC2 is pre-lubricated and disposable and is recommended for use during a single sex act. FC2 is not reusable.

Raw Materials

The principal raw material used to produce FC2 is a nitrile polymer. This raw material is a unique nitrile formulation, developed by the technical market leader in synthetic polymers, ideally suited to the bio-compatibility and functional needs of a Female Condom. The supplier has agreed that the Company is the sole and exclusive owner of the unique polymer formulation that was developed for FC2.

Global Market Potential

The only means of preventing sexual transmission of HIV/AIDS, besides abstinence, is condoms, male and female. In recent years, scientists have sought to develop alternative means of preventing HIV/AIDS. Unfortunately, the development attempts have not been successful to date: several microbicides have failed in late stage development and the most promising HIV/AIDS vaccine under development has also failed. Thus, prevention of sexually transmitted HIV/AIDS is focused on condoms, male and female. The Company’s Female Condom is the only product, when used consistently and correctly, that gives a woman control over her sexual health by providing dual protection against sexually transmitted infections (including HIV/AIDS) and unintended pregnancy.

The first clinical evidence of AIDS was noted more than twenty-five years ago. Since then, HIV/AIDS has become the most devastating pandemic facing humankind in recorded history. On November 9, 2009, WHO released statistics indicating that on a world-wide basis, HIV/AIDS is now the leading cause of death in women aged 15 to 44 years old. According to a November 2009 AIDS update by the Joint United Nations Joint Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), about 2/3 of new cases globally occur from sex between men and women.

In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to report that the HIV/AIDS epidemic is taking an increasing toll on women and girls. Women of color, particularly black women, have been especially hard hit and represent the majority of new HIV and AIDS cases among women, and the majority of women living with the disease.

Most HIV/AIDS diagnoses among women are due to high-risk heterosexual contact (80% in 2005). The rate of new HIV infection for black women was approximately 15 times the rate for white women, while the new infection rate among Hispanic women was more than four times that of white women. In 2007, the AIDS diagnoses rate for black women in the United States was 22 times the rate for white women. In the United States, it is estimated that one in 30 black women will be diagnosed with HIV, compared to the one in 588 incidence rate amongst white women.

In March 2008, the CDC announced that a recent study indicated that 26% of female adolescents in the United States have at least one of the most common sexually transmitted infections (STI’s). Led by the CDC’s Sara Forhan, the study is the first to examine the combined national prevalence of common STI’s among adolescent women in the United States.

In addition to overall STI prevalence, the study found that by race, African American teenage girls had the highest prevalence, with an overall prevalence of 48 percent compared to 20 percent among both whites and Mexican Americans. Overall, approximately half of all the teens in the study reported ever having sex. Among these girls, the STI prevalence was 40 percent.

In July 2010, President Barack Obama launched a new comprehensive strategy, with an emphasis on prevention, to curb the spread of HIV/AIDS in the United States. His policy builds on previous efforts and seeks to bind state, federal and private efforts. It aims, by 2015, to reduce the number of new infections by 25 percent, decrease the number of people living with HIV by 30% and increase the number of people aware of their positive status from 79% to 90%. Currently, the only products available to help achieve the prevention goal of reducing new infections by 25 % are male and female condoms. “Reducing new HIV infections, improving care for people living with HIV/AIDS, narrowing health disparities - these are the central goals of our national strategy,” Obama said. The President also called for more private-public partnerships like the one between Washington, D.C., and the MAC AIDS fund to distribute free female condoms around the city.

The Condom Market

The global male condom market (public and private sector) is estimated to be $3 billion annually. The global public sector market for male condoms is estimated to have been greater than 10 billion units annually since 2005. Given the rapid spread of HIV/AIDS in India and China, UNAIDS estimates that the annual public sector demand for condoms, both male and female, will reach 19 billion units within the next ten years.

The FC Female Condom and the Male Condom

Currently, there are only three FDA approved products marketed that prevent the transmission of HIV/AIDS through sexual intercourse: the male latex condom, the male polyurethane condom, and the FC2 Female Condom, made of a nitrile polymer. The FC2 Female Condom is currently the only FDA approved and marketed product controlled by women that prevents sexually transmitted infections including HIV/AIDS. Used consistently and correctly, it provides women dual protection against STI’s (including HIV/AIDS) and unintended pregnancy. The FC2 Female Condom does not compete with the male condom, but is an alternative to either unprotected sex or to male condom usage.

Studies show that FC2’s nitrile polymer is a safe, strong material with a method failure rate similar to that of male condoms. FC2 Female Condom offers a number of benefits over natural rubber latex, the material that is most commonly used in male condoms. Unlike natural rubber latex, the nitrile polymer quickly transfers heat, immediately warming to body temperature when it is inserted, which may enhance pleasure and sensation during use. Since the FC2 Female Condom is not dependent on the male erection, it may be inserted in advance of arousal, eliminating disruption during sexual intimacy. FC2 does not require immediate withdrawal and is not tight or constricting. The FC2 Female Condom can be used with both oil and water-based lubricants, unlike natural rubber latex male condoms which can be used with water-based lubricants only. The FC2 Female Condom also offers an alternative to those sensitive to natural rubber latex (7% to 20% of the population), who are unable to use male condoms without irritation. To the Company's knowledge, there is no reported allergy to the FC2 nitrile polymer.

Numerous clinical and behavioral studies have been conducted regarding use of FC Female Condoms (FC1 and FC2). Studies show that the Female Condoms are found acceptable by women and their partners in many cultures. Importantly, studies also show that when the Female Condoms are made available as an option to using male condoms there is a significant increase in protected sex acts. The increase in protected sex acts varies by country and averages between 10% and 35%.

Strategy

The Company’s strategy is to more fully develop the market for the FC2 Female Condoms on a global basis. Since the introduction of its first generation product, FC1, the Company has developed contacts and relationships with global public health sector organizations such as WHO, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), UNAIDS, USAID, country-specific health ministries and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and commercial partners in various countries. To provide its customers with prevention programs and technical product support, the Company has placed representatives in the major regions of the world: Asia, Africa, Europe, North America and Latin America. The Company manufactured the first generation product, FC1, in London, England. To make its Female Condom more accessible to women, the Company developed FC2, a nitrile polymer product. FC2, more economical to produce, is available at a unit price nearly 30% less than that of its predecessor, FC1. The Company made its first substantial sales of FC2 in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. FC2 is produced at the Company’s facility in Selangor D.E., Malaysia and in Kochi, India, in conjunction with FHC’s business partner, HLL. The transition from FC1 to FC2 was completed in October 2009. All of the Company’s sales are now FC2.

With the product’s primary market currently being the public sector, the Company incurs minimal sales and marketing expense. Thus, as the public sector demand for the FC2 Female Condom continues to grow, the Company’s operating expenses are likely to grow at a slower rate than that of unit volume.

Commercial Markets - Direct to Consumers

The Company has distribution agreements and other arrangements with commercial partners which market FC2 directly to consumers in 11 countries, including India, France and Brazil. These agreements are generally exclusive for a single country. Under these agreements, the Company manufactures and sells the FC2 Female Condom to the distributor partners, who, in turn market and distribute the product to consumers in the established territory.

Relationships with Public Sector Organizations

The Company’s customers are primarily governments, ministries of health and large global agencies which purchase and distribute the FC2 Female Condom for use in HIV/AIDS prevention programs. The Company offers uniform, volume-based pricing to such agencies, rather than entering into long-term agreements to supply FC2 to global agencies. In the United States, FC2 is sold to city and state public health clinics as well as not-for-profit organizations such as Planned Parenthood. FC2 is being distributed as part of New York City’s Female Condom Education and Distribution Project being conducted by the Bureau of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control. FC2 is currently available in 286 locations in New York City including both community based organizations and the N.Y.C. Department of Health and Mental Hygiene units.

Manufacturing Facilities

The Company leases 16,000 sq. ft. of production space in Selangor D.E., Malaysia for the production of FC2. In fiscal 2009, after the FDA approved FC2 for distribution in the U.S., capacity was expanded to the current level of approximately 75-80 million units annually.

The Company’s India-based FC2 end-stage production capacity is located at a facility owned by its business partner, HLL in the Cochin Special Export Zone. Production began at that facility in December 2007 with an initial capacity of 7.5 million units per year. Two NACO orders of 1.5 million units each have been produced in that facility for distribution in NACO’s prevention program in India.

FHC’s total FC2 production capacity is approximately 80-85 million units annually. The Company intends to expand its capacity at existing locations and/or manufacture at additional locations as the demand for FC2 develops.

Government Regulation

In the U.S., FC2 is regulated by the FDA. In 1989, female condoms as a group were classified by the FDA as a Class III medical device. Class III medical devices are deemed by the FDA to carry potential risks with use which must be tested prior to FDA approval, referred to as Premarket Approval (PMA), for sale in the U.S. As FC2 is a Class III medical device, prior to selling FC2 in the U.S., the Company was required to submit a PMA application containing technical information on the use of FC2 such as pre clinical and clinical safety and efficacy studies which were gathered together in a required format and content.

FC2 received PMA as a Class III Medical Device from the FDA in March 2009. FC2 received the CE Mark which allows it to be marketed throughout the European Union. FC2 has also been approved by regulatory authorities in Brazil, India and other jurisdictions.

The Company believes that FC2’s PMA and FDA classification as a Class III medical device create a significant barrier to entry in the U.S. market. The Company estimates that it would take a minimum of four to six years to implement, execute and receive FDA approval of a PMA to market another type of Female Condom.

Pursuant to section 515(a)(3) of the Safe Medical Amendments Act of 1990 (the "SMA Act"), the FDA may temporarily suspend approval and initiate withdrawal of the PMA if the FDA finds that FC2 is unsafe or ineffective, or on the basis of new information with respect to the device, which, when evaluated together with information available at the time of approval, indicates a lack of reasonable assurance that the device is safe or effective under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended or suggested in the labeling. Failure to comply with the conditions of FDA approval invalidates the approval order. Commercial distribution of a device that is not in compliance with these conditions is a violation of the SMA Act.

The FDA’s approval order for FC2 includes conditions that relate to product labeling, including information on the package itself and instructions for use called a “package insert” which accompanies each product. The Company believes it is in compliance with the FDA approval order.

The Company believes there are no material issues or material costs associated with the Company's compliance with environmental laws related to the manufacture and distribution of FC1 and FC2.

Competition

The Company's FC2 Female Condom participates in the same market as male condoms but is not seen as directly competing with male condoms. Rather, the Company believes that providing FC2 is additive in terms of prevention and choice. Male condoms cost less and have brand names that are more widely recognized than FC2. In addition, male condoms are generally manufactured and marketed by companies with significantly greater financial resources than the Company.

Medtech Products Ltd. ("MP"), a male latex condom company with a manufacturing facility in Chennai, India, has developed a natural latex Female Condom. MP's Female Condom has been marketed under various names including V-Amour, VA Feminine Condom and L’Amour. The MP product’s manufacturing process has a CE mark for distribution in Europe and may be available in other countries. MP received the Indian Drug Controller approval in January 2003. PATH, an international, nonprofit organization based in the United States, has a Female Condom product in phase 2/3 development. Neither the MP female condom nor the PATH Woman’s Condom have received FDA approval or have been listed as essential products for procurement by WHO.

It is possible that other parties may develop a Female Condom. These competing products could be manufactured, marketed and sold by companies with significantly greater financial resources than those of the Company.

Patents and Trademarks

FC2 patents have been issued by the United States, the European Union, Canada, Australia, South Africa, The People’s Republic of China, Greece, Turkey, Spain and Japan. Patent applications for FC2 are pending in various other countries around the world through the Patent Cooperation Treaty. The applications cover the key aspects of the second generation Female Condom, including its overall design and manufacturing process. There can be no assurance that these patents provide the Company with protection against copycat products entering markets during the pendency of the patents.

The Company has the registered trademark “FC2 Female Condom” in the United States. The Company has also secured, or applied for, 12 trademarks in 22 countries to protect the various names and symbols used in marketing the product around the world. These include "femidom" and "femy," “Reality” and others. In addition, the experience that has been gained through years of manufacturing the FC Female Condoms (FC1 and FC2) has allowed the Company to develop trade secrets and know-how, including certain proprietary production technologies that further protect its competitive position.

Overview

During 2003, the Company began development of its second generation Female Condom, FC2, which was completed in 2005. In August, 2006, after a stringent technical review, WHO cleared FC2 for purchase by UN agencies. The first substantial sales of FC2 occurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. On March 10, 2009, FC2 received FDA approval as a Class III medical device and FC2 became available in the United States in August 2009. In addition to FDA approval, the FC2 Female Condom has been approved by other regulatory agencies, including the European Union, India, and Brazil. From its introduction in 2007 through June 30, 2010, approximately 65 million FC2 Female Condoms have been distributed in 107 countries. The FDA approval permitted the Company to transition from FC1 to FC2. The last shipment of FC1 was produced in October 2009. All current and future orders will be for FC2.

Revenues

Most of the Company's revenues have been derived from sales of the FC Female Condoms (FC1 and FC2), and are recognized upon shipment of the product to its customers. Beginning in fiscal 2008, revenue is also being derived from licensing its intellectual property to its business partner in India, HLL. Such revenue appears as royalties on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

The Company's strategy is to develop a global market and distribution network for its product by maintaining relationships with public sector groups and completing partnership arrangements with companies with the necessary marketing and financial resources and local market expertise. The Company's customers include the following:

●		The Company sold the FC1 Female Condom to the global public sector under the umbrella of its agreement with UNAIDS. This agreement facilitated the availability and distribution of the Female Condom at a reduced price based on the Company's cost of production. FC1 is no longer being produced. Since its introduction, the Company has offered FC2 to the global public sector at uniform, volume-based prices, rather than entering into long term contracts.

●		During fiscal 2009, the Company sold FC1 Female Condoms to USAID for use in its prevention programs in developing countries. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, USAID transitioned to FC2 and, through its procurement agent, John Snow, Inc. (JSI) placed its first FC2 order for 12 million units. In July 2010, the Company announced that JSI had recently amended its contract for the supply of FC2 Female Condoms from 12 million units to 24 million units. JSI will direct delivery of the units during a specific period of time which concludes September 30, 2011. JSI is entitled to further expand the quantity purchased at its discretion.

●		The Company sells the FC2 Female Condoms in the United States, both directly and through distributors, to city and state public health clinics as well as not-for-profit organizations such as Planned Parenthood.

Occasionally, significant quarter to quarter variations may occur due to the timing and shipment of large orders, not from any fundamental change in the Company's business. Because the Company manufactures FC2 in a leased facility located in Malaysia, a portion of the Company's operating costs are denominated in foreign currencies. While a material portion of the Company's future sales are likely to be in foreign markets, all sales are denominated in United States dollars. In July 2009, the Company contributed capital to a subsidiary to reduce its exposure to future currency gains or losses between the entities. Effective October 1, 2009, the Company’s U.K. and Malaysia subsidiaries adopted the U.S. dollar as their functional currency, further reducing the Company’s foreign currency risk.

While our second generation product, FC2, generally is sold at a lower price per unit than FC1 was sold, FC2 is less costly to produce than was FC1. As a result, sales of FC2 generally have a higher gross margin than FC1 had. Changes in the sales mix of FC2 as compared to FC1 affect our net revenues and gross profit.

Expenses

The Company manufactured FC1 at its facility located in the United Kingdom and manufactures FC2 at its facility located in Selangor D.E., Malaysia. The Company's cost of sales consists primarily of direct material costs, direct labor costs and indirect production and distribution costs. Direct material costs include raw materials used to make the Female Condom, principally polyurethane for FC1 and a nitrile polymer for FC2. Indirect product costs include logistics, quality control and maintenance expenses, as well as costs for helium, nitrogen, electricity and other utilities. All of the key components for the manufacture of the FC2 Female Condom are essentially available from either multiple sources or multiple locations within a source.

In November 2009, following the cessation of FC1 manufacturing in the U.K. facility, the Company entered into an agreement with the new owner of the U.K. manufacturing facility to surrender its existing property lease, which would have expired in December 2016, in exchange for a lease surrender fee of $1,490,716 and a new short-term lease. On November 2, 2009, the new agreements were executed. Per the terms of the agreement, the Company was responsible for removing certain leasehold improvement from the property (dilapidations) prior to termination of the lease. Upon execution of the new agreements, the Company deposited the new annual rent of approximately $484,049, as required by the lease terms. From a cash flow perspective, replacing the previous lease at this time eliminated future payments of approximately $4.3 million (for rent and related expenses) over the remaining term of the previous lease, producing a positive net impact of $2.8 million (after deducting the lease surrender payments).

On April 27, 2010, the Company signed two related agreements, with the former and new landlords of the U.K. facility, which terminated the current U.K. lease and granted the Company rent-free occupation of the premises from April 28, 2010 through June 30, 2010. Per the terms of these agreements, the Company agreed to a lease exit fee of $216,000 and a $248,000 payment in lieu of dilapidations Those obligations were fulfilled by a cash payment of $234,000 and by surrendering the remaining rent prepayment of $230,000, which had been held in trust since November 2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company made redundancy payments of $127,087. The early termination of the lease (April 2010 versus November 1, 2010) resulted in the reversal of $302,342 in excess capacity costs in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

The components of the restructuring expenses recognized in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2010 are as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
Lease surrender payments and related costs	$	243,783		$	1,734,496
(Reversal) recognition of excess capacity costs through November 1, 2010		(302,342	)		302,683
Offset: By proportionate recognition of deferred gain on original sale/leaseback of plant		-			(653,706	)
Dilapidations and related costs		16,903			542,971
Total	$	(41,656	)	$	1,926,444

Recap of Restructuring Accrual for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2010
Restructuring accrual balance at September 30, 2009				$	1,116,911

Restructuring costs incurred during the nine months ended June 30, 2010					1,926,444
Less:
Termination payments	$	1,293,826
Lease surrender payments		1,734,496
Lease exit payments		640,251
Reversal of deferred gain		(653,706	)
					(3,014,867	)
Restructuring accrual balance at June 30, 2010				$	28,488

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

The Company had net revenues of $1,754,211 and net income attributable to common stockholders of $75,159, or $0.00 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net revenues of $6,966,767 and net income attributable to common stockholders of $626,441, or $0.02 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2009. This reduction in net revenues is due to the timing of receipt and shipment of large orders. The Company’s customer base consists primarily of public sector purchasers, such as large global organizations, ministries of health, state and local governments and non-governmental agencies. A limited number of customers purchase large orders (in excess of 1 million units) and account for a significant portion of total revenue. The lower results for the third quarter were due to the concurrent delay in two multi-million unit orders in process with public sector purchasers. The Company has previously disclosed the possibility of such delays in both its SEC filings and earnings releases. Historically, such orders are not lost, they are merely delayed. Delays such as these, which generally result from bureaucracy, politics and/or changes in personnel, generally may last from several weeks to six months or more. The Company cannot predict exactly when these pending orders will be received or which quarters they will impact. The Company does not believe the delay reflects a fundamental change in the Company’s business or demand for FC2. Strong demand for FC2 was evident in USAID/JSI's recent doubling of its pervious 12 million unit order to 24 million units, deliverable over the period ending September 30, 2011.

Gross profit decreased $2,408,200, or 72%, to $939,447 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from $3,347,647 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 54% of net revenues versus 48% for the same period last year. Gross profit was positively impacted by 100% of unit sales being the higher margin FC2 versus the same period last year during which approximately 49% of sales mix were FC2.

Net revenues decreased $5,212,556, or 75%, on a 75% decrease in unit volume for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared with the same period last year, due to the timing and shipment of large orders. The revenue decrease was further impacted by 100% of the 2010 units being the lower-priced FC2 versus the same period last year during which approximately 49% were FC2. The FC2 average sales price per unit increased 5% compared with the same period last year due to pricing mix.

Significant quarter to quarter variations result from time to time due to the timing and shipment of large orders and production scheduling rather than from any fundamental changes in the business.

Cost of sales decreased $2,804,356, or 78%, to $814,764 on a 75% decrease in unit volume in the three months ended June 30, 2010 from $3,619,120 for the same period last year. The third quarter cost of sales was further reduced by all of the 2010 sales units being the lower cost FC2.

Advertising and promotion expenditures were $38,029 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 versus $35,188 for the same period last year. The 2010 expenditures relate to the new U.S. training program in which health care providers are equipped to educate their clients in the usage of the FC2 Female Condom.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $894,464, or 49%, to $922,024 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from $1,816,488 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease is comprised of the following: a reduction in compensation expenses ($995,000) related to performance bonuses, partially offset by increased audit and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance expenses ($62,000), higher consulting fees ($29,000) and increased administrative costs ($10,000).

Research and development costs were zero versus $10,280 in the same period last year. The costs for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 pertained to finalizing product labeling related to FC2’s FDA approval and finalization of U.S. labeling.

Operating expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, were $918,397, a $943,559 decrease from $1,861,956 in the same quarter in fiscal year 2009.

Operating income for the three months ended June 30, 2010, was $21,050 versus $1,485,691 in the same period last year, a decrease of $1,464,641 or 99%. The decrease is due to a reduction in units sold resulting from the temporary fluctuation in the receipt and shipment of large orders described above.

Interest, net and other income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $10,566, an increase of $11,021 from the same period in fiscal year 2009, when net interest expense was $455. The impact of foreign currency transactions for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was a gain of $17,190 compared to a loss of $816,148 for the same period last year. In fiscal year 2009, in accordance with ASC Topic 830, Foreign Currency Translation, the financial statements of the Company’s international subsidiaries were translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities, the historical exchange rate for stockholders’ equity and a weighted average exchange rate for each period for revenues, expenses, gains and losses. Translation adjustments on intercompany trade accounts were recorded in earnings as the local currency was the functional currency. Beginning October 1, 2009, both the Company’s U.K. and Malaysia subsidiaries adopted the U.S. dollar as their functional currency and began to report their financial results in U.S. dollars. The subsidiaries' adoption of the U.S. dollar as their functional currency reduces the Company’s exposure to foreign currency risk. Assets located outside the United States totaled approximately $6.9 million and $9.6 million at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Under the guidance of ASC Topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, an entity is able to recognize a tax benefit for current or past losses when it can demonstrate that the tax loss carryforward will be utilized before expiration. Management believes that the Company's recent and projected future growth and profitability has made it more likely than not that the Company will utilize its net operating loss carryforwards in the future. The Company will evaluate at the end of each fiscal year and, if appropriate, record a tax benefit.

NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009

The Company had net revenues of $14,422,032 and net income attributable to common stockholders of $1,221,341, or $0.04 per diluted share, for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net revenues of $19,631,114 and net income attributable to common stockholders of $4,187,041, or $0.15 per diluted share, for the nine months ended June 30, 2009.

Gross profit decreased $1,359,445, or 14%, to $8,322,331 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 from $9,681,776 for the nine months ended June 30, 2009. Gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, was 58% for the nine months ended June 30, 2010, versus 49% for the nine months ended June 30, 2009. Gross profit was positively impacted by a sales mix that was 97% of the higher margin FC2 versus 47% for the same period last year.

Net revenues decreased $5,209,082, or 27%, on a 12% decrease in unit volume for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 compared with the same period last year due to a change in the sales mix from year to year. In the nine months ended June 30, 2010, 97% of unit sales were the lower price FC2 Female Condoms versus 47% for the same period last year. The FC2 average sales price per unit decreased 3% compared with the same period last year as a result of volume commitments.

Significant quarter to quarter variations result from time to time due to the timing and shipment of large orders and production scheduling rather than fundamental changes in the business.

Cost of sales decreased $3,849,637, or 39%, to $6,099,701 on a 12% decrease in unit volume for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 from $9,949,338 for the same period last year. The decrease results from 97% of the units sold during the period being the lower cost FC2 versus 47% FC2 unit sales in the nine months ended June 30, 2009.

Advertising and promotion expenditures increased $60,831 to $197,190 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 from $136,359 for the same period in the prior year. The increase is due to both the initiation of a new U.S. training program in which health care providers are equipped to educate their clients in the usage of the FC2 Female Condom and a public relations campaign to support the FC2 public sector launches in Washington, D.C. and Chicago, Illinois.

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $354,567, or 7%, to $4,910,689 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 from $5,265,256 for the nine months ended June 30, 2009. The major components of the year to year change are a reduction in incentive costs ($846,000) related to performance bonuses, partially offset by an increase in employment costs ($236,000 total, including $102,000 resulting from a reclassification of U.K. personnel previously included in cost of sales), increased legal and consulting fees ($107,000 total, including a reduction in Sarbanes-Oxley consulting fees of $34,000), increased insurance costs ($47,000), higher rent and utilities expenses ($86,000), and miscellaneous other expense increases ($15,000).

Research and development cost decreased $104,674 to $381 for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 from $105,055 for the same period in the prior year. The costs for fiscal year 2009 relate to preparation and support of the FC2 PMA submission and expenses related to finalization of U.S. labeling, including certain one-time expenses that did not recur in fiscal year 2010.

The Company's operating income decreased $2,887,479 to $1,287,627 in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 from $4,175,106 in the same period of the prior year, mainly due to the one-time restructuring costs of $1,926,444. Exclusive of the one-time restructuring costs, operating income decreased 23% in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 to $3,214,071 from $4,175,106 in the same period in fiscal 2009. Operating income exclusive of the one-time restructuring costs constitutes non-GAAP financial information. See discussion of "Non-GAAP Financial Information" below.

Following is a reconciliation of the Non-GAAP financial measure of operating income exclusive of restructuring charge to the nearest GAAP financial measure of operating income for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

	For the Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009
Operating income	$	1,287,627	$	4,175,106
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Restructuring costs		1,926,444		-
Non-GAAP adjusted operating income	$	3,214,071	$	4,175,106

Interest, net and other income for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was $27,904, an increase of $20,060 from the same period in fiscal year 2009, when interest, net and other income was $7,844. The impact of foreign currency transactions for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 was a loss of $62,259 compared to a gain of $183,672 for the same period last year. In fiscal 2009, the financial statements of the Company’s international subsidiaries were translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities, the historical exchange rate for stockholders’ equity and a weighted average exchange rate for each period for revenues, expenses, gains and losses. Translation adjustments on intercompany trade accounts were recorded in earnings as the local currency was the functional currency. Beginning October 1, 2009, both the Company’s U.K. and Malaysia subsidiaries adopted the U.S. dollar as their functional currency and began to report their financial results in U.S. dollars. The subsidiaries' adoption of the U.S. dollar as their functional currency reduces the Company’s exposure to foreign currency risk.

The Company's net income attributable to common stockholders decreased $2,965,700 to $1,221,341 in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 from $4,187,041 in the same period of the prior year, due to the one-time restructuring costs of $1,926,444 as well the lower unit sales in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 versus the same period of the prior year.

Non-GAAP Financial Information

This section includes non-GAAP financial information, specifically operating income exclusive of the restructuring charge of $1,926,444 in the nine months ended June 30, 2010. Management believes that the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure provides useful information to investors because this information may allow investors to better evaluate ongoing business performance and certain components of the Company's results. In addition, because the restructuring charge related to a non-recurring event in the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company believes that the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure enhances an investor's ability to make period-to-period comparisons of the Company's operating results. This information should be considered in addition to the results presented in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered a substitute for the GAAP results.

Factors That May Affect Operating Results and Financial Condition

The Company's future operating results and financial condition are dependent on the Company's ability to increase demand for the FC2 Female Condom and to cost-effectively manufacture sufficient quantities of the FC2 Female Condom. Inherent in this process are a number of factors that the Company must successfully manage in order to achieve favorable future results and improve its financial condition.

Reliance on a Single Product

The Company expects to derive the vast majority, if not all, of its future revenues from the FC2 Female Condom, currently its only product. While management believes the global potential for the FC2 Female Condom is significant, the ultimate level of consumer demand around the world is not yet known.

Distribution Network

The Company's strategy is to develop a global distribution network for FC2 by entering into partnership arrangements with financially secure companies with appropriate marketing expertise. This strategy has resulted in numerous in-country distributions in the public sector, particularly in Africa, Latin America and India. The Company has also entered into several partnership agreements for the commercialization of the FC2 Female Condoms in consumer sector markets around the world. However, the Company is dependent on country governments, global donors, as well as U.S. municipal and state public health departments to continue AIDS/HIV/STI prevention programs that include FC2 as a component of such programs. The Company’s commercial market penetration is dependent on its ability to identify appropriate business partners who will effectively market and distribute FC2 within its contractual territory. Failure by the Company's partners to successfully market and distribute the FC2 Female Condom or failure of donors and/or country governments to establish and sustain HIV/AIDS prevention programs which include distribution of FC2 Female Condoms, the Company’s inability to secure additional agreements with global AIDS prevention organizations, or the Company’s inability to secure agreements in new markets, either in the public or private sectors, could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Inventory and Supply

All of the key components for the manufacture of the FC2 Female Condom are essentially available from either multiple sources or multiple locations within a source.

Global Market and Foreign Currency Risks

Until October 2009, the Company manufactured FC1 in a leased facility located in London, England. The Company manufactures FC2 in a leased facility located in Malaysia. Although a material portion of the Company's future sales are likely to be in foreign markets, FC2 sales are denominated in U.S. dollars only. As both the Company’s U.K. and Malaysia subsidiaries adopted the U.S. dollar as their functional currency as of October 1, 2009, the Company’s foreign currency risk is minimal.

Government Regulation

Female condoms as a group were classified by FDA as Class III medical devices in 1989. Class III medical devices are deemed by the FDA to carry potential risks with use which must be tested prior to FDA approval, referred to as Premarket Approval (PMA), for sale in the U.S. As FC2 is a Class III medical device, prior to selling FC2 in the U.S., the Company was required to submit a PMA application containing technical information on the use of FC2 such as pre-clinical and clinical safety and efficacy studies which were gathered together in a required format and content. FC2 received PMA as a Class III medical device from the FDA in March 2009.

The FC2 Female Condoms are subject to regulation by the FDA pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the "FDC Act"), and by other state and foreign regulatory agencies. Under the FDC Act, medical devices must receive FDA clearance before they can be sold. FDA regulations also require the Company to adhere to certain current "Good Manufacturing Practices," which include testing, quality control and documentation procedures. The Company's compliance with applicable regulatory requirements is monitored through periodic inspections by the FDA. The conditions of the FDA’s approval order relate to product labeling, including information on the package itself and instructions for use called a “package insert” which accompanies each product. The failure to comply with applicable regulations may result in fines, delays or suspensions of clearances, seizures or recalls of products, operating restrictions, withdrawal of FDA approval and criminal prosecutions. The Company's operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected in the event of a withdrawal of approval from the FDA.

Liquidity and Sources of Capital

In the nine months ended June 30, 2010, the Company generated positive cash flow from operations of $3.4 million. During that period, the Company funded a number of large cash payments including termination payments to U.K. employees (approximately $1.3 million), a U.K. lease exit payment (approximately $1.7 million), payment of various employee incentives ($1.2 million) and two cash dividends ($2.7 million). During the first nine months of fiscal 2009, cash provided by operations was $6.0 million.

Accounts receivable decreased from $7,806,007 at September 30, 2009 to $1,307,194 at June 30, 2010. The reduction is the result of two factors: the timing of large orders and FC2’s lower sales price per unit. FC2 comprised 97% of the sales mix in the nine months ended June 30, 2010 versus 47% of the sales mix in the same period of the prior year. In the nine months ended June 30, 2010, shipments were weighted most heavily in the first six months of the period versus during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, when certain large orders shipped near quarter end. The Company’s credit terms vary from 30 to 90 days, depending on the class of trade and customary terms within a territory, so the accounts receivable balance is also impacted by the mix of purchasers within the quarter. As is typical in the Company's business, extended credit terms may occasionally be offered as a sales promotion. For the past twelve months, the Company's average days sales outstanding has been approximately 70 days. Over the past five years, the Company’s bad debt expense has been less than .01% of product sales.

During fiscal 2010, the Company commenced paying quarterly cash dividends. The Company’s Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.05 per share in January 2010 and March 2010. Total dividends paid during the nine months ended June 30, 2010 were $2.7 million. The third quarter dividend of $0.05 per share was declared by the Board of Directors on July 22, 2010, payable on August 11, 2010, to holders of record as of August 4, 2010. Any future quarterly dividends and the record date for such dividends will be approved each quarter by the Company’s Board of Directors and announced by the Company. Payment of future dividends is in the discretion of the Board of Directors and the Company may not have sufficient cash flows to continue to pay dividends. The Company expects to pay approximately $1.4 million pursuant to the dividend in August, which will be paid from its cash on hand.

At June 30, 2010, the Company had working capital of $8.6 million and stockholders’ equity of $12.1 million compared to working capital of $9.2 million and stockholders’ equity of $13.0 million as of September 30, 2009.

The Company believes its current cash position is adequate to fund operations of the Company for at least the next twelve months, although no assurances can be made that such cash will be adequate. However, the Company may sell equity securities to raise additional capital and may borrow funds under its Heartland Bank credit facility.

Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Company's Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on this evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective. It should be noted that in designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company has designed its disclosure controls and procedures to reach a level of reasonable assurance of achieving desired control objectives and, based on the evaluation described above, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective at reaching that level of reasonable assurance.

There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the Company's most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEMS 1-5

Item 2(c) –

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities:	Details of Treasury Stock Purchases to Date through June 30, 2010
Period:	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share			Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Program		Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Program
Period:
January 1, 2007 – March 31, 2010		1,868,611		$	3.27		1,868,611		1,131,389
April 1, 2010 – April 30, 2010		-			-		1,868,611		1,131,389
May 1, 2010 – May 31, 2010		-			-		1,868,611		1,131,389
June 1, 2010 – June 30, 2010		6,000	(1)		5.85		1,874,611		1,125,389
Quarterly Subtotal		6,000			5.85		6,000
Total		1,874,611	(2)	$	3.27		1,874,611		1,125,389

(1)	Consists of shares repurchased pursuant to the authorization to repurchase shares issued to directors, employees and other service providers under the Company's equity incentive plans.

(2)	Includes 183,450 shares repurchased pursuant to the authorization to repurchase shares issued to directors, employees and other service providers under the Company's equity incentive plans. The other shares were repurchased in the open market pursuant to the Share Repurchase Program.

Item 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit

Number Description

3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. (1)

3.2	Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock to 27,000,000 shares. (2)

3.3	Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock to 35,500,000 shares. (3)

3.4	Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock to 38,500,000 shares. (4)

3.5	Amended and Restated By-Laws. (5)

4.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (same as Exhibit 3.1).

4.2	Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (same as Exhibit 3.2).

4.3	Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock to 35,500,000 shares (same as Exhibit 3.3).

4.4	Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company increasing the number of authorized shares of common stock to 38,500,000 shares (same as Exhibit 3.4).

4.5	Articles II, VII and XI of the Amended and Restated By-Laws (included in Exhibit 3.5).

10.1	Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2010, between the Company and Heartland Bank.

10.2	First Amendment to Commercial Security Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2010, between the Company and Heartland Bank.

10.3	Form of Promissory Note for Loan Number Two for up to $1,000,000 from the Company to Heartland Bank.


10.4	Form of Promissory Note for Loan Number Three for up to $1,000,000 from the Company to Heartland Bank.

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (6)

_____________________________

(1)	Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19, 1999.

(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 21, 2000.

(3)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 6, 2002.

(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.

(5)	Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-18, as filed with the securities and Exchange Commission on May 25, 1990.

(6)	This certification is not "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

THE FEMALE HEALTH COMPANY

DATE: August 6, 2010

/s/ O.B. Parrish

O.B. Parrish, Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

DATE: August 6, 2010

/s/ Donna Felch

Donna Felch, Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer