VIDLER WATER RESOURCES, INC. - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
(X)
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
OR
(
) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
Transition Period from
to
Commission
File Number: 0-18786
PICO
HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
California
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
94-2723335
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
875
Prospect Street, Suite 301
La
Jolla, California 92037
(858)
456-6022
(Address
and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate
by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes R
No
£
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer £ Accelerated
filer R Non-accelerated
filer £
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes £
No
R
The
number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value,
was 18,704,293 as of March 31, 2007, excluding 3,218,408 shares of common stock
held by the registrant’s subsidiaries.
PICO
HOLDINGS, INC.
FORM
10-Q
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
Page
No.
|
|
|
|
|
Part
I: Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1:
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2:
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3:
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4:
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Part
II: Other Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1:
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1A:
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2:
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3:
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4:
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Item
5:
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6:
|
14
|
1
Part
I: Financial
Information
Item
I: Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
PICO
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
March
31, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
||
ASSETS
|
|||
Investments
|
$
322,900,266
|
$
271,961,941
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
182,745,681
|
136,621,578
|
|
Notes
and other receivables, net
|
16,792,410
|
17,177,827
|
|
Reinsurance
receivables
|
17,053,308
|
17,290,039
|
|
Real
estate and water assets, net
|
119,171,157
|
102,538,859
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
502,495
|
518,564
|
|
Other
assets
|
4,107,278
|
2,934,131
|
|
Total
assets
|
$
663,272,595
|
$
549,042,939
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
||
Unpaid
losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
$
40,341,259
|
$
41,083,301
|
|
Deferred
compensation
|
54,006,494
|
49,776,043
|
|
Bank
and other borrowings
|
12,753,003
|
12,720,558
|
|
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
21,645,681
|
17,952,916
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
20,618,217
|
22,282,822
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
149,364,654
|
143,815,640
|
|
|
|||
Commitments
and Contingencies (Note 4)
|
|||
|
|||
Common
stock, $.001 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares,
|
|||
23,129,923
issued in 2007 and 20,306,923 issued in 2006
|
23,130
|
20,307
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
431,758,353
|
331,582,308
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
69,213,273
|
60,950,679
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
91,196,414
|
90,968,815
|
|
592,191,170
|
483,522,109
|
||
Treasury
stock, at cost (common shares: 4,425,630 in 2007 and 4,426,465
in
2006)
|
(78,283,229)
|
(78,294,810)
|
|
Total
shareholders' equity
|
513,907,941
|
405,227,299
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
663,272,595
|
$
549,042,939
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
PICO
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
Revenues:
|
|||
Net
investment income
|
$
3,812,067
|
$
2,072,326
|
|
Net
realized gain on investments
|
1,407,908
|
14,685,947
|
|
Sale
of real estate and water assets
|
2,308,998
|
1,256,335
|
|
Rents,
royalties and lease income
|
150,158
|
186,855
|
|
Other
|
135,577
|
45,176
|
|
Total
revenues
|
7,814,708
|
18,246,639
|
|
Costs
and Expenses:
|
|
||
Operating
and other costs
|
5,326,580
|
|
4,158,274
|
Cost
of real estate and water assets sold
|
766,864
|
379,886
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
276,412
|
312,563
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
99,538
|
|
Total
costs and expenses
|
6,369,856
|
|
4,950,261
|
Income
before income taxes and minority interest
|
1,444,852
|
13,296,378
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
923,908
|
4,549,314
|
|
Income
before minority interest
|
520,944
|
8,747,064
|
|
Minority
interest in loss of subsidiaries
|
|
12,459
|
|
Income
from continuing operations
|
520,944
|
|
8,759,523
|
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(1,541,322)
|
||
Net
income
|
$
520,944
|
$
7,218,201
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
Net
income per common share - basic:
|
|
||
Income
from continuing operations
|
$
0.03
|
$
0.66
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
|
(0.12)
|
|
Net
income per common share
|
$
0.03
|
|
$
0.54
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
16,882,284
|
|
13,271,440
|
|
|||
Net
income per common share - diluted:
|
|
||
Income
from continuing operations
|
$
0.03
|
$
0.66
|
|
Discontinued
operations
|
(0.12)
|
||
Net
income per common share
|
$
0.03
|
$
0.54
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
17,071,198
|
13,271,440
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
PICO
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||
Net
cash used by operating activities - continuing operations
|
$(6,683,702)
|
$(14,331,744)
|
||
Net
cash used by operating activities - discontinued
operations
|
(1,545,782)
|
|||
|
(6,683,702)
|
(15,877,526)
|
||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
||||
Purchases
of investments
|
(43,221,699)
|
(8,376,341)
|
||
Proceeds
from sale of investments
|
2,702,089
|
17,705,434
|
||
Proceeds
from maturity of investments
|
3,959,300
|
26,217,857
|
||
Purchases
of property and equipment and costs capitalized to water
infrastructure
|
(10,710,767)
|
(2,422,847)
|
||
Cash
used in investing activities - discontinued operations
|
(587,927)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(47,271,077)
|
32,536,176
|
||
|
||||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
||
Proceeds
from common stock offering, net
|
100,161,057
|
|||
Sale
of treasury stock for deferred compensation plans
|
29,392
|
|||
Cash
used in financing activities - discontinued operations
|
(498,272)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
100,190,449
|
(498,272)
|
||
|
||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(111,567)
|
(238,362)
|
||
|
||||
INCREASE
IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
46,124,103
|
15,922,016
|
||
|
|
|
||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
136,621,578
|
37,794,416
|
||
|
|
|
||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$182,745,681
|
$53,716,432
|
||
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$125,523
|
$99,422
|
||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$2,032,900
|
$2,053,000
|
||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||
Change
in capitalized costs included in other liabilities
|
$5,896,849
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
PICO
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of PICO
Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company” or “PICO”) have been prepared in
accordance with the interim reporting requirements of Form 10-Q, pursuant to
the
rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“US GAAP”) for complete consolidated financial statements.
In
the
opinion of management, all adjustments and reclassifications considered
necessary for a fair and comparable presentation of the financial statements
presented have been included and are of a normal recurring nature. Operating
results presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2007.
These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto, contained in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed
with the SEC.
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
for
each reporting period. The significant estimates made in the preparation of
the
Company’s consolidated financial statements relate to the assessment of the
carrying value of investments, unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses,
reinsurance receivables, real estate and water assets, deferred income taxes
and
contingent liabilities. While management believes that the carrying value of
such assets and liabilities are appropriate as of March 31, 2007 and December
31, 2006, it is reasonably possible that actual results could differ from the
estimates upon which the carrying values were based.
Stock-Based
Compensation:
On
January 1, 2006, PICO adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (FAS 123(R)) using the modified
prospective method which requires the application of the accounting standard
as
of January 1, 2006. In accordance with the modified prospective method, the
consolidated financial statements for prior periods have not been restated
to
reflect, and do not include, the impact of FAS 123(R). However, as PICO had
no unvested stock options outstanding as of January 1, 2006, the adoption of
SFAS 123R had no impact on the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements. FAS 123R will be applied to new awards granted from the date of
adoption.
The
Company did not grant any awards, and therefore did not recognize any stock
based compensation for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006.
Stock-Based
Plans Outstanding:
Stock
Settled Stock Appreciation Rights:
At
March
31, 2007 the Company had one share-based payment arrangement. The PICO
Holdings, Inc. 2005 Long Term Incentive Plan (the "2005 Plan").
The
2005 Plan provides for the grant or award of various equity incentives to PICO
employees, non-employee directors and consultants. A total of 2,654,000 shares
of common stock are issuable under the 2005 Plan and it provides for the
issuance of incentive stock options, non-statutory stock options, free-standing
stock-settled stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, performance
shares, performance units, restricted stock units, deferred compensation awards
and other stock-based awards. The plan allows for broker assisted cashless
exercises and net-settlement of income taxes and employee withholding taxes
required. At March 31, 2007 2,185,965 stock-settled SARs were outstanding (all
issued in 2005) with a strike price of $33.76. The awards are fully vested
and
exercisable at any time before December 12, 2015. Upon exercise, the employee
will receive newly issued shares of PICO Holdings common stock equal to the
in-the-money value of the award, less applicable federal, state and local
withholding and income taxes. No compensation expense was recorded under this
plan for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Deferred
Compensation:
At
March
31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company had $54 million and $49.8 million,
respectively recorded as deferred compensation payable to various members of
management and certain non-employee directors of the Company. The assets of
the
plan are held in Rabbi Trust accounts which are invested consistent with the
Company’s investment policy. The investments are held in separate accounts,
accounted for as available for sale securities, and are reported in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets within the line item “Investments”.
Assets of the trust will be distributed according to predetermined payout
elections established by each employee.
The
Company applies the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force No. 97-14,
Accounting
for Deferred Compensation Arrangements Where Amounts Earned Are Held in a Rabbi
Trust and Invested.
In
summary, investment returns generated are reported within the Company’s
financial statements (with a corresponding increase in the trust assets) and
an
expense is recorded within the caption, “Operating and other costs” for
increases in the market value of the assets held with a corresponding increase
in the deferred compensation liability (except in the case of PICO stock, which
is reported as Treasury Stock, at cost). In the event the trust assets decline
in value, the Company will reverse previously expensed
compensation.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company sold 835 shares of PICO
common stock that were held as trust assets and distributed cash proceeds of
$29,000 to a director of the Company in satisfaction of deferred compensation
obligations.
Notes
and other
receivables primarily consist of installment notes from the sale of real estate.
These notes generally have terms ranging from three to ten years, with interest
rates of 7% to 10%. The Company records a provision for doubtful accounts to
allow for any specific accounts which may be unrecoverable and is based upon
an
analysis of the Company's prior collection experience, customer
creditworthiness, and current economic trends and circumstances. For the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, no provision was required.
Accounting
for Income Taxes:
We
adopted the
provisions of Financial Standards Accounting Board Interpretation No. 48,
“Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”
(“FIN
48”) an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“SFAS 109”) on January 1,
2007. As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, we recognized a $293,000
increase in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits through opening
retained earnings. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, we had provided
for
$3.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits, $2.5 million of which would affect
our effective tax rate if recognized. At March 31, 2007, there was no
significant increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
We
recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income
tax expense. As of March 31, 2007, we had provided approximately $309,000 of
accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions. The
tax
years 2002-2006 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions
to
which we are subject.
Reclassifications:
HyperFeed
revenues
of $998,000, expenses of $3.4 million and a tax benefit of $866,000 in the
financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2006, have been
reclassified to discontinued operations.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS
155
- In
February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.
155 (SFAS 155), "Accounting
for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments - an amendment of FASB Statements
No.
133 and 140."
SFAS
155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted
for as a whole, eliminating the need to separate the derivative from its host,
if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis.
This new accounting standard is effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of
SFAS
155 did not have an impact on PICO’s financial statements.
SFAS
157
- In
September 2006, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
157
(SFAS 157), "Fair
Value Measurements."
This
Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures
about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having
previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is
the
relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require
any
new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of
this
Statement will change current practice. This Statement is effective on January
1, 2008. PICO is currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the
consolidated financial statements.
SFAS
159
-
In
February 2007, the FASB issued FASB
issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (SFAS
159),
“The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”.
This
Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and
certain other items at fair value. This Statement is effective for PICO on
January 1, 2008 (early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal
year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also elects
to apply the provisions of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements). PICO
is
currently evaluating the impact of this pronouncement on the consolidated
financial statements.
5
2. Net
Income Per Share
Basic
earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted
earnings per share is computed similarly to basic earnings per share except
the
weighted average shares outstanding are increased to include additional shares
from the assumed exercise of any common stock equivalents - PICO’s stock-settled
stock appreciation rights (SARs) are considered common stock equivalents for
this purpose - using the treasury method, if dilutive. The number of additional
shares is calculated by assuming that the SARs were exercised, and that the
proceeds were used to acquire shares of common stock at the average market
price
during the period.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2007 the Company’s stock-settled SARs were included
in the diluted per share calculation using the treasury stock method.
For
the
three months ended March 31, 2006, the Company stock-settled stock appreciation
rights outstanding are not included in the diluted per share calculation because
they were out-of-the-money and consequently, their effect on earning per share
is anti-dilutive.
3.
Comprehensive Income
The
Company applies the provisions of SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive
Income.” Comprehensive income for the Company includes foreign currency
translation and unrealized holding gains and losses on available for sale
securities.
The
components of comprehensive income are as follows:
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
||
Net
income
|
$
520,944
|
$
7,218,201
|
|
Net
change in unrealized appreciation
|
|||
(depreciation)
on available for sale investments
|
7,804,376
|
(5,607,260)
|
|
Net
change in foreign currency translation
|
458,218
|
(281,478)
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
8,783,538
|
$
1,329,463
|
Other
comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 is
net
of deferred income tax charge of $4.7 million and a deferred income tax benefit
of $5.1 million, respectively.
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive income:
March
31, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
||
Unrealized
appreciation on available for sale investments
|
$
73,997,804
|
$
66,193,428
|
|
Foreign
currency translation
|
(4,784,531)
|
|
(5,242,749)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
$
69,213,273
|
$
60,950,679
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income is net of deferred income tax liabilities of $41.7
million and $37.1 million at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively.
At
March
31, 2007, the Company had $113.6 million of unrealized gains before tax and
$1.3
million of unrealized losses before tax.
Marketable
equity securities: The
Company’s $228.1 million investments in marketable equity securities at March
31, 2007 consist primarily of investments in common stock of other publicly
traded companies. The gross unrealized gains and losses on equity securities
were $113.2 million and $681,000 respectively, at March 31, 2007 and $100.3
million and $701,000, respectively at December 31, 2006. The fair value of
the
majority of the securities with unrealized losses was continuously below
cost for less than 12 months.
Corporate
Bonds and US Treasury Obligations:
At
March 31, 2007, the bond portfolio consisted of $92.8 million of publicly traded
corporate bonds and $2 million United States Treasury obligations. The total
bond portfolio had gross unrealized gains and losses of $416,000 and $618,000,
respectively at March 31, 2007. At March 31, 2007, $288,000 of the gross loss
related to bonds with a fair value that was continuously below amortized cost
for greater than 12 months. The Company does not consider these investments
to
be other than temporarily impaired because of its intent and ability to hold
these bonds until recovery of fair value, which may be maturity. The impairment
is mostly due to interest rate fluctuations rather than deterioration of the
underlying issuer of the particular bonds.
6
4.
Commitments and Contingencies
The
Company has capitalized approximately $44.2 million on construction of the
pipeline project to convey water from the Fish Springs Ranch to a storage tank
near Reno, Nevada. The total cost of the pipeline project is estimated to be
between $78 million to $83 million, and the balance of the remaining expenditure
will be incurred over the next 6 to 9 months. At March 31, 2007 Vidler has
remaining commitments for future capital expenditure of approximately $16.4
million. The final regulatory approval required for the pipeline project is
a
Record of Decision (“ROD”) for a right of way, which was granted on May 31,
2006. Subsequently, there were two protests against the ROD, and the
matter was appealed to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”). During
the third quarter, the IBLA dismissed the two protests. However, in October
2006, one protestant filed an action with the U.S. District Court against the
BLM and US Department of the Interior. In the legal challenge by the Protestant
(i.e., the Pyramid Lake Indian Tribe) to the ROD, the Federal District
Court has focused the area of inquiry on what the Tribe claims
was “informational harm” due to inadequate discussion of the wastewater
treatment options in the Truckee Meadows. Pending a hearing on the matter,
as of April 30, 2007, construction on the Project is restricted to the
private lands involved in the pipeline route and the existing open trench on
the
public lands. Of the thirty eight miles of total pipeline, there are
approximately ten miles of pipeline remaining to be constructed on public lands.
A hearing has been set for June 2007 to determine if the BLM complied with
the “hard look” requirements before issuing the ROD.
Vidler
management believes that the Tribe’s claim is without merit. This is
the same protest and request for stay that was dismissed by the IBLA. There
are
nearly 9,000 pages of administrative record supporting the BLM’s required “hard
look” at the project including the wastewater that might be generated by the
“imported” water (i.e., the water brought in from Fish Springs). Also,
members of the Tribe have for years served as members of the Washoe County
Regional Water Planning Commission, having full knowledge of all of the various
reports and data that they now claim to be the basis for their “informational
harm”. Furthermore, the Tribe has been a previous litigant with the
Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility, resulting in the 1996 Truckee River
Water Quality Settlement Act which specifically deals with the treatment of
wastewater in the Truckee Meadows. Moreover, the existing and any future
wastewater discharges are the subject of an existing 42 page permit (effective
October 15, 2003), issued by the State of Nevada pursuant to its delegated
authority under the Clean Water Act, providing ample and multiple levels of
protection to the Truckee River, the environment, and the public.
Management
believes that the pipeline will be completed in accordance with the permits,
within the expected pipeline project timetable.
The
Company is subject to various litigation that arises in the ordinary course
of
its business. Although the outcome is uncertain, based upon information
presently available, management is of the opinion that such litigation will
not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows of the Company.
5.
Segment Reporting
|
PICO
Holdings, Inc. is a diversified holding company engaged in four major operating
segments: Water Resource and Water Storage Operations, Real Estate Operations,
Business Acquisitions and Financing, and Insurance Operations in Run Off.
The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described
in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Management analyzes segments
using the following information:
Segment
assets:
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Water
Resource and Water Storage Operations
|
$1,075,671
|
$308,296
|
Real
Estate Operations
|
3,506,420
|
1,765,332
|
Business
Acquisitions and Financing
|
1,176,406
|
8,972,688
|
Insurance
Operations in Run Off
|
2,056,211
|
7,200,323
|
Total
Revenues
|
$7,814,708
|
$18,246,639
|
|
|
|
Income
(Loss) Before Taxes and Minority Interest:
|
|
|
Water
Resource and Water Storage Operations
|
$(381,051)
|
$(1,178,896)
|
Real
Estate Operations
|
2,200,019
|
926,854
|
Business
Acquisitions and Financing
|
(2,074,965)
|
6,747,814
|
Insurance
Operations in Run Off
|
1,701,849
|
6,800,606
|
Income
Before Taxes and Minority Interest
|
$1,444,852
|
$13,296,378
|
6.
Private Placement of Common
Stock
|
On
February 28, 2007, the Company closed a Securities Purchase Agreement to sell
2,823,000 shares of newly issued common stock to institutional investors at
a
price of $37 per share. After placement costs, the net proceeds to the Company
were $100.2 million. The Company was obligated under the Securities Purchase
Agreement to file a registration statement on Form S-3 to register the shares
under the Securities Act of 1933. Such statement became effective on April
13,
2007.
7
Item
2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
The
following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included elsewhere in this
report and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included
in
our annual report on Form 10-K.
This
Form 10-Q (including the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” section) contains “forward-looking
statements” regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations,
and prospects, including, without limitation, statements about our expectations,
beliefs, intentions, anticipated developments, and other information concerning
future matters. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,”
“believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and similar expressions or variations of such
words are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but are not the
exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q.
Although
forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q represent the good faith judgment
of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors
currently known by us. Consequently, forward-looking statements are inherently
subject to risks and uncertainties, and the actual results and outcomes could
differ from those discussed in or anticipated by the forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and
outcomes include, without limitation, those discussed under the heading “Risk
Factors” and elsewhere in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Readers are urged
not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to revise
or
update any forward-looking statement in order to reflect any event or
circumstance which may arise after the date of this Form 10-Q. Readers are
urged
to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this Form
10-Q
and our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which attempt to advise interested
parties of the risks and factors which may affect our business, financial
condition, results of operations, and prospects.
INTRODUCTION
PICO
Holdings, Inc. (PICO and its subsidiaries are collectively referred to as “PICO”
and “the Company,” and by words such as “we” and “our”) is a diversified holding
company. We seek to build and operate businesses where significant value can
be
created from the development of unique assets, and to acquire businesses which
we identify as undervalued and where our participation can aid in the
recognition of the business’s fair value, as well as create additional value.
Our
objective is to maximize long-term shareholder value. We manage our
operations to achieve a superior return on net assets over the long term,
as opposed to short-term earnings.
Our
business is separated into four major operating segments:
· |
Water
Resource and Water Storage
Operations;
|
· |
Real
Estate Operations;
|
· |
Business
Acquisitions & Financing (which contains businesses, interests in
businesses, and other parent company assets);
and
|
· |
Insurance
Operations in “Run Off”.
|
Currently
our major consolidated subsidiaries are:
· |
Vidler
Water Company, Inc. (“Vidler”), a business which we started more than 10
years ago, which develops and owns water resources and water storage
operations in the southwestern United States, primarily in Nevada
and
Arizona;
|
· |
Nevada
Land & Resource Company, LLC (“Nevada Land”), an operation that we
built since we acquired the company more than 10 years ago, which
owns
approximately 535,000 acres of land in Nevada, and certain mineral
rights
and water rights related to the property;
|
· |
Physicians
Insurance Company of Ohio (“Physicians”), which is “running off” its
medical professional liability insurance loss reserves, and was our
original business historically;
|
· |
Citation
Insurance Company (“Citation”), which is “running off” its historic
property & casualty insurance and workers’ compensation loss reserves.
Citation was acquired because it was complimentary to our other insurance
operations at the time;
|
· |
Global
Equity AG, which holds our interest in Jungfraubahn Holding AG
(“Jungfraubahn”). Jungfraubahn is a public company that operates railway
and related tourism and transport activities in the Swiss Alps.
Jungfraubahn’s shares trade on the SWZ Swiss Exchange. We believe that
Jungfraubahn was significantly undervalued at the time we acquired
our
interest, which was primarily between 1999 and
2003.
|
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS--THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND 2006
Shareholders’
Equity
At
March
31, 2007, PICO had shareholders’ equity of $513.9 million ($27.48 per share),
compared to $405.2 million ($25.52 per share) at December 31, 2006, and $302.2
million ($22.77 per share) at March 31, 2006. Book value per share increased
by
$1.96, or 7.7%, during the first quarter of 2007.
Shareholders’
equity increased by $108.7 million during the first quarter of 2007, primarily
due to a $7.8 million net increase in unrealized appreciation in
available-for-sale securities (after-tax), and the issuance of 2.8 million
new
shares at $37 per share, for net proceeds of $100.2 million (after placement
costs).
Comprehensive
Income
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, “Reporting
Comprehensive Income,” PICO reports comprehensive income as well as net income
from the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Comprehensive income
measures changes in shareholders’ equity from non-owner sources, and includes
unrealized items which are not recorded in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations, for example, foreign currency translation and the change in
investment gains and losses on available-for-sale securities.
For
the
first quarter of 2007, PICO recorded comprehensive income of $8.8 million,
which
consisted of a $7.8 million net increase in unrealized appreciation in
investments, the quarter’s net income of $521,000, and a $458,000 foreign
currency translation credit.
At
March
31, 2007, on a consolidated basis, available-for-sale investments showed a
net
unrealized gain of $74 million after-tax, consisting of approximately $74.8
million in gains, partially offset by $843,000 in losses. This compares to
a net
unrealized gain of $66.2 million after-tax at December 31, 2006.
On
a
pre-tax basis, net unrealized appreciation in available-for-sale securities
was
$112.3 million at March 31, 2007, compared to $99.7 million at December 31,
2006. During the first quarter of 2007, gains of $1.4 million were realized
and
recognized as income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Segment
Results of Operations
Segment
revenues and income (loss) before taxes and minority interest for the first
quarter of 2007 and 2006 were:
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Water
Resource and Water Storage Operations
|
$1,076,000
|
$
308,000
|
Real
Estate Operations
|
3,506,000
|
1,765,000
|
Business
Acquisitions and Financing
|
1,177,000
|
8,973,000
|
Insurance
Operations in Run Off
|
2,056,000
|
7,200,000
|
Total
Revenues
|
$7,815,000
|
$18,246,000
|
|
|
|
Income
(Loss) Before Taxes and Minority Interest:
|
|
|
Water
Resource and Water Storage Operations
|
$(381,000)
|
$(1,179,000)
|
Real
Estate Operations
|
2,200,000
|
927,000
|
Business
Acquisitions and Financing
|
(2,075,000)
|
6,747,000
|
Insurance
Operations in Run Off
|
1,701,000
|
6,801,000
|
Income
Before Taxes and Minority Interest
|
$1,445,000
|
$13,296,000
|
8
First
Quarter Net Income
First
quarter revenues were $7.8 million in 2007, compared to $18.2 million in
2006, a decrease of $10.4 million year over year. Revenues from the Business
Acquisitions and Financing segment decreased $7.8 million, principally as a
result of 2006 segment revenues including realized gains of $8.2 million,
compared to zero in 2007. Revenues from the Insurance Operations in Run Off
segment decreased $5.1 million, primarily due to $5.3 million lower realized
gains year over year. These decreases were partially offset by revenue increases
in Real Estate Operations, and Water Storage and Water Operations. Real Estate
Operations revenues increased by $1.7 million year over year, primarily due
to
$1.1 million higher land sales and $478,000 higher net investment income. Water
Storage and Water Operations revenues increased by $768,000, principally as
a
result of higher net investment income.
First
quarter costs and expenses were $6.4 million in 2007, compared to $5
million in 2006.
PICO
recorded income before taxes and minority interest of $1.4 million in the first
quarter of 2007, compared to income before taxes and minority interest of $13.3
million in the first quarter of 2006. The $11.9 million year over year decrease
in first quarter income before taxes and minority interest primarily resulted
from $8.8 million lower Business Acquisitions and Financing segment income,
primarily due to a $8.2 million decrease in realized gains as discussed above.
Similarly, Insurance Operations in Run Off segment income decreased $5.1
million, principally due to $5.3 million lower realized gains. Real Estate
Operations segment income increased $1.3 million, primarily due to $683,000
higher gross margin from the sale of former railroad land, and $478,000 higher
net investment income. The Water Storage and Water Operations segment result
improved by $798,000, principally as a result of higher net investment
income.
After
a
provision for taxes of $924,000, PICO reported net income of $521,000 ($0.03
per
share) for the first quarter of 2007. The effective tax rate for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 is 63.9% compared to the federal corporate income
tax rate of 35%, primarily due to the write-off of a $314,000 foreign income
tax
credit.
For
the
first quarter of 2006, PICO recorded net income of $7.2 million ($0.54 per
share), consisting of income of $8.7 million ($0.66 per share) from continuing
operations, partially offset by a loss from discontinued operations of $1.5
million after-tax ($0.12 per share). The effective tax rate for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 was 34.2%, slightly below the 35% federal
rate.
WATER
RESOURCE AND WATER STORAGE OPERATIONS
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Sale
of Real Estate and Water Assets
|
$3,000
|
$28,000
|
Net
Investment Income
|
960,000
|
307,000
|
Other
|
113,000
|
(27,000)
|
Segment
Total Revenues
|
$1,076,000
|
$308,000
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Cost
of Real Estate and Water Assets
|
$(1,000)
|
$(9,000)
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
(261,000)
|
(266,000)
|
Overhead
|
(537,000)
|
(488,000)
|
Project
Expenses
|
(658,000)
|
(724,000)
|
Segment
Total Expenses
|
$(1,457,000)
|
$(1,487,000)
|
|
|
|
Loss
Before Tax
|
$(381,000)
|
$(1,179,000)
|
Over
the
past 6 years, several large sales of real estate and water assets have generated
the bulk of Vidler’s revenues. Since the date of closing generally
determines the accounting period in which the sales revenues and cost of sales
are recorded, Vidler’s reported revenues and income fluctuate from quarter to
quarter depending on the dates when specific transactions close.
Consequently, sales of real estate and water assets for any individual quarter
are not indicative of likely revenues for future quarters or the full financial
year.
Segment
Results
In
the
first quarter of 2007, Vidler generated $1.1 million in revenues. Net investment
income of $960,000 was earned, primarily interest from the temporary investment
of cash proceeds from the May 2006 and February 2007 equity offerings by PICO.
In aggregate, the stock offerings raised net proceeds of $174.1 million, which
were principally allocated to Vidler for existing and new projects, including
the design and construction of a pipeline to convey water from Fish Springs
Ranch to Reno. See
"Fish Springs Ranch” below. After
other revenues of $116,000 and segment total expenses $1.5 million, Vidler
incurred a loss before taxes of $381,000 for the first quarter of 2007.
In
the
first quarter of 2006, Vidler generated $308,000 in revenues. The largest
revenue item was $307,000 of net investment income, primarily interest from
the
temporary investment of funds to be expended on the Fish Springs pipeline
project in money market funds and fixed-income securities. After segment total
expenses of $1.5 million, Vidler generated a loss before taxes of $1.2 million
for the first quarter of 2006.
Overhead
Expenses consist of costs which are not related to the development of specific
water resources, such as salaries and benefits, rent, and audit fees.
Project
Expenses consist of costs related to the development of existing water
resources, such as maintenance and professional fees. Project Expenses
are expensed as appropriate under GAAP, and could fluctuate from period to
period depending on activity within Vidler’s various water resource projects.
Costs related to the development of water resources which meet the criteria
to
be recorded as assets in our financial statements are capitalized as part of
the cost of the asset, and charged to cost of sales when revenue is
recognized. Project Expenses principally relate to:
·
|
the
operation and maintenance of the Vidler Arizona Recharge
Facility;
|
·
|
the
development of water rights in the Tule Desert groundwater basin
(part of
the Lincoln County agreement);
|
·
|
the
utilization of water rights at Fish Springs Ranch as future municipal
water supply for the north valleys of the Reno, Nevada area;
and
|
·
|
the
operation of Fish Springs Ranch, and maintenance of the associated
water
rights.
|
Both
Overhead Expenses and Project Expenses were little changed year over year.
Overhead Expenses were $537,000 in the first quarter of 2007, compared to
$488,000 in the first quarter of 2006. Project Expenses were $658,000 in the
first quarter of 2007, compared to $724,000 in the first quarter of
2006.
The
$798,000 year over year improvement in the segment result is principally due
to
interest earned in the first quarter of 2007 being $653,000 higher than in
the
first quarter of 2006.
Fish
Springs Ranch
Vidler
has a 51% membership interest in, and is the managing partner of, Fish Springs
Ranch LLC (“Fish Springs”). Vidler is constructing a pipeline to convey
8,000 acre-feet of water annually from Fish Springs Ranch to a central storage
tank in northern Reno, Nevada, which could supply water to the new projects
of
several developers in the northern valleys.
The
current market value of water in the area greatly exceeds the total estimated
cost of the pipeline and the water to be supplied. To date, Vidler has entered
into agreements to sell approximately 117.5 acre-feet of water at a price of
$45,000 per acre-foot, as and when water can be delivered through the completed
pipeline.
During
2006, we completed design of the pipeline project, and began construction of
the
pipeline and a plant to generate the electricity which will be required to
pump
the water. As of March 31, 2007, approximately 55% of the project has been
completed, on time and on budget. We anticipate being able to deliver water
in
late 2007 or early 2008.
The
total
cost of the pipeline project is estimated to be in the $78 million to $83
million range, which will be outlaid over the next 9 to 12 months. As of
March 31, 2007, approximately $44.2 million of costs related to the design
and
construction of the pipeline have been capitalized (i.e., recorded as an asset
on our balance sheet, in the line “Real estate and water assets”). As of March
31, 2007, Vidler has commitments for future capital expenditure amounting to
$16.4 million, related to the Fish Springs pipeline.
The
final
regulatory approval required for the pipeline project was a Record of Decision
(“ROD”) for a right of way, which was granted in May 2006. Subsequently,
there were two protests against the ROD, and the matter was appealed to the
Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”). The IBLA refused to stay the ROD.
However,
in
October
2006, one protestant filed an action with the U.S. District Court against the
Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Department of the Interior. In
the
legal challenge by the Protestant (i.e., the Pyramid Lake Indian Tribe)
to the ROD, the Federal District Court has focused the area of inquiry
on what the Tribe claims was “informational harm” due to inadequate
discussion of the wastewater treatment options in the Truckee Meadows.
Pending a hearing on the matter, as of April 30, 2007, construction on the
Project is restricted to the private lands involved in the pipeline route
and the existing open trench on the public lands. Of the thirty eight
miles of total pipeline, there are approximately ten miles of pipeline remaining
to be constructed on public lands. A hearing has been set for June 2007 to
determine if the BLM complied with the “hard look” requirements before issuing
the ROD.
Vidler
management believes that the Tribe’s claim is without merit. This is
the same protest and request for stay that was dismissed by the IBLA. There
are
nearly 9,000 pages of administrative record supporting the BLM’s required “hard
look” at the project including the wastewater that might be generated by the
“imported” water (i.e., the water brought in from Fish Springs). Also,
members of the Tribe have for years served as members of the Washoe County
Regional Water Planning Commission, having full knowledge of all of the various
reports and data that they now claim to be the basis for their “informational
harm”. Furthermore, the Tribe has been a previous litigant with the
Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility, resulting in the 1996 Truckee River
Water Quality Settlement Act which specifically deals with the treatment of
wastewater in the Truckee Meadows. Moreover, the existing and any future
wastewater discharges are the subject of an existing 42 page permit (effective
October 15, 2003), issued by the State of Nevada pursuant to its delegated
authority under the Clean Water Act, providing ample and multiple levels of
protection to the Truckee River, the environment, and the public.
Management
believes that the pipeline will be completed in accordance with the permits,
within the expected pipeline project timetable.
Coyote
Springs
During
2006, hearings were
completed on applications for new water rights at Kane Springs, Nevada, which
were jointly filed by the Lincoln County Water District and Vidler
(“Lincoln/Vidler”). In January 2007, Lincoln/Vidler was awarded 1,000 acre-feet
of new water rights, which will be supplied to the Coyote Springs development.
Once the final permit is received and a right of way has been obtained, the
sale
to Coyote Springs is scheduled to close in 30 days. We expect to obtain the
right of way later in 2007. The current price for the water is $6,655 per
acre-foot. We will continue to pursue additional water from this particular
groundwater basin where Lincoln/Vidler maintains priority applications for
approximately 17,375 acre-feet of water. The actual permits received may
be for
a lesser quantity, which cannot be accurately predicted.
Western
Nevada
Vidler
is
developing water resources in the Carson City and Lyon County areas of western
Nevada, to help resolve system demand and water shortage issues.
During
2006, Vidler
participated in Carson City's Request For Proposals, which culminated in
Vidler
entering into a water resource teaming agreement with Carson City in December
2006. Carson City and Vidler are working towards an expansion of water resource
treatment options, and obtaining the requisite approvals from Nevada permitting
authorities, which could initially result in the creation of 2,000 acre-feet
of
new water supply. Carson City and Vidler are negotiating a project agreement,
which will further define their public-private partnership.
In
addition, and
separately from our agreement with Carson City, Vidler has obtained an option
to
acquire 1,000 acre-feet of agricultural water rights, which we intend to
deliver
to municipal users. Once the water rights have been permitted, we intend
to
exercise the option and Vidler will construct the infrastructure required
to
deliver the water to municipal use. Vidler is looking to acquire additional
water rights in the Carson City and Lyon County areas, and expects to acquire
approximately 200 acre-feet of water rights on the same terms in a separate
transaction.
9
REAL
ESTATE OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||
|
2007
|
2006
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Sale
of former Railroad Land
|
$2,306,000
|
$1,228,000
|
Net
Investment Income
|
857,000
|
379,000
|
Other
|
343,000
|
158,000
|
Segment
Total Revenues
|
$3,506,000
|
$1,765,000
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Cost
of former Railroad Land Sold
|
$
(766,000)
|
$(371,000)
|
Operating
Expenses
|
(540,000)
|
(467,000)
|
Segment
Total Expenses
|
$(1,306,000)
|
$(838,000)
|
|
|
|
Income
Before Tax
|
$2,200,000
|
$927,000
|
The
largest business in the Real Estate Operations segment is Nevada Land &
Resource Company, LLC (“Nevada Land”).
Nevada
Land recognizes revenue from land sales when a sale transaction closes. On
closing, the entire sales price is recorded as revenue, and the associated
cost
basis is reported as cost of land sold. Since the date of closing determines
the
accounting period in which the revenue and cost of land are recorded, Nevada
Land’s reported results fluctuate from quarter to quarter, depending on the
dates when transactions close. Consequently, results for any one quarter are
not
necessarily indicative of likely results for future quarters or the full
financial year. In the following, gross margin is defined as revenue less cost
of sales, and gross margin percentage is defined as gross margin divided by
revenue.
During
the first quarter of 2007, we commenced two new real estate operations through
two wholly-owned subsidiary companies, Bedrock Land Development, Inc.
(“Bedrock”) and Global Equity Corporation (“Global Equity”). The new real estate
operations generated minimal revenues in the first quarter of 2007.
Bedrock
has been formed with the objective of acquiring attractive and well-located
developable land, partially developed lots, or finished lots, in select
California markets, where medium-sized regional developers and homebuilders
may
have run into liquidity challenges as a result of the downturn in the housing
market. During the first quarter of 2007, Bedrock agreed to buy 167 lots in
east
Fresno, California for approximately $3.7 million. The City of Fresno is located
in the Central Valley of California, an area where housing is affordable and
which is forecast to experience strong population growth over the next 20 years.
Bedrock paid a deposit of $500,000 during the first quarter, and closed the
purchase in April 2007 (after the end of the first quarter). Bedrock is actively
reviewing other opportunities, and is taking a highly selective approach to
acquisitions.
Global
Equity is a Canadian company which is managing the Phoenix Capital Income Trust
and its subsidiary Phoenix Capital, Inc. (collectively “Phoenix”). Phoenix is in
the business of acquiring interests in privately-traded Canadian real estate
partnerships and syndicates (collectively “partnership units”) at an appropriate
discount to reflect the lack of a public trading market for the partnership
units. Global Equity is managing the existing portfolio of partnership units
owned by Phoenix, and Global Equity will be the vehicle through which new
partnership units will be acquired. As of March 31, 2007, Global Equity had
not
purchased any partnership units.
In
the
first quarter of 2007, segment total revenues were $3.5 million. Nevada Land
sold approximately 25,784 acres of former railroad land for $2.3 million. The
average sales price was $89 per acre, and our average basis in the land sold
was
$30 per acre. The gross margin on land sales was $1.5 million, which represents
a gross margin percentage of 66.8%. Net investment income, representing interest
earned on the proceeds from land sales and on land sales contracts where Nevada
Land has provided vendor financing, was $857,000, and other revenues (primarily
lease and royalty income from the former railroad land) were $343,000. After
segment operating expenses of $540,000, Real Estate Operations generated segment
income of $2.2 million for the first three months of 2007.
In
the
first quarter of 2006, segment total revenues were $1.8 million. Nevada Land
sold approximately 14,363 acres of land for $1.2 million. The average sales
price was $85 per acre, and our average basis in the land sold was $26 per
acre.
The gross margin on land sales was $857,000, which represents a gross margin
percentage of 69.8%. Net investment income was $379,000, and other revenues
were
$158,000. After segment operating expenses of $467,000, Real Estate Operations
generated segment income of $927,000 for the first three months of 2006.
The
first
quarter segment result improved by $1.3 million year over year. This was
principally due to a $683,000, or 80%, increase in gross margin from land sales
year over year, primarily as a result of an 80% increase in the volume of land
sold year over year. In addition, net investment income was $478,000 higher
year
over year, primarily as a result of increased interest income earned on liquid
funds, which were significantly higher as a result of the receipt of proceeds
from land sold in the last three quarters of 2006 and first quarter of 2007.
BUSINESS
ACQUISITIONS AND FINANCING
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Realized
Gains on Sale of Holdings
|
$8,157,000
|
|
Net
Investment Income
|
$1,177,000
|
715,000
|
Other
|
101,000
|
|
Segment
Total Revenues
|
$1,177,000
|
$8,973,000
|
|
|
|
Segment
Total Expenses
|
$(3,252,000)
|
$(2,226,000)
|
Income
(Loss) Before Tax
|
$(2,075,000)
|
$6,747,000
|
This
segment contains businesses, interests in businesses, and other parent company
assets. Revenues and results in this segment vary considerably from period
to
period, primarily due to fluctuations in net realized gains or losses on the
sale of holdings, and are not necessarily comparable from year to year.
The
largest holding in this segment is Jungfraubahn Holding AG, which has a market
value and carrying value of $51.1 million (before taxes) at March 31, 2007.
For
the
first quarter of 2007, Business Acquisitions and Financing segment revenues
were
$1.2 million, principally represented by net investment income of $1.2 million.
After total expenses of $3.3 million, the segment incurred a loss income before
taxes of $2.1 million for the first quarter of 2007.
In
the
first quarter of 2006, Business Acquisitions and Financing segment revenues
were
$9 million. Realized gains on the sale of holdings were $8.2 million, primarily
represented by gains of $6.8 million on the sale of our holding in
Anderson-Tully Company, and $986,000 on the sale of part of our holding in
Raetia Energie AG. Net investment income was $715,000, and other revenues were
$101,000. After total expenses of $2.2 million, the segment recorded income
before taxes of $6.7 million for the first quarter of 2007.
First
quarter segment revenues decreased $7.8 million year over year, primarily due
to
$8.2 million lower realized gains. No gains were realized in the first quarter
of 2007, compared to $8.2 million in gains in the first quarter of 2006.
First
quarter segment expenses increased $1 million year over year. The expenses
recorded in this segment primarily consist of holding company costs which are
not allocated to our other segments, for example, rent for our head office.
The
bulk of the year over year increase in segment expenses is due to legal expenses
related to HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. See
Item 1, “Legal Proceedings” in “Part II: Other Information.”
Certain
of our interests in Swiss public companies are held by PICO European Holdings,
LLC (“PICO European Holdings”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Physicians
Insurance Company of Ohio. Part of PICO European Holdings’ funding comes from a
loan from PICO Holdings, Inc. which is denominated in Swiss Francs. As a result,
under GAAP the U.S. dollar is the functional currency and we are required
to record a benefit (expense) through the statement of operations to reflect
fluctuation in the exchange rate between the Swiss Franc and the U.S. dollar,
although there is no net impact on consolidated shareholders’ equity before
related tax effects. An exchange rate benefit of $397,000, which reduced segment
expenses, was recorded in PICO’s statement of operations in the first quarter of
2007, compared to a $244,000 exchange rate benefit in the first quarter of
2006.
10
INSURANCE
OPERATIONS IN RUN OFF
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
Net
Investment Income
|
$816,000
|
$671,000
|
Realized
Gains on Sale of Investments
|
1,228,000
|
6,529,000
|
Other
|
12,000
|
|
Segment
Total Revenues
|
$2,056,000
|
$7,200,000
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
Operating
and Underwriting Expenses
|
$(355,000)
|
$(399,000)
|
Segment
Total Expenses
|
$(355,000)
|
$(399,000)
|
|
|
|
Income
Before Taxes:
|
|
|
Physicians
Insurance Company of Ohio
|
$1,249,000
|
$5,293,000
|
Citation
Insurance Company
|
452,000
|
1,508,000
|
Income
Before Tax
|
$1,701,000
|
$6,801,000
|
This
segment consists of Physicians Insurance Company of Ohio and Citation Insurance
Company. Both Physicians and Citation are in “run off.” This means that the
companies are handling and resolving claims on expired policies, but not writing
new business.
Once
an
insurance company has gone into “run off” and the last of its policies have
expired, typically most revenues come from net investment income and realized
gains or losses on the sale of the securities investments which correspond
to
the insurance company’s reserves and shareholders’ equity.
Revenues
and results in this segment vary considerably from period to period and are
not
necessarily comparable from year to year, primarily due to fluctuations in
net
realized investment gains, and favorable or unfavorable development in our
loss
reserves.
The
Insurance Operations in Run Off segment generated total revenues of $2 million
in the first quarter of 2007, compared to $7.2 million in the first quarter
of
2006. Realized investment gains were $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2007,
compared to $6.5 million in the first quarter of 2006. Net investment income
was
$816,000 in the first quarter of 2007, compared to $671,000 in the first quarter
of 2006. Operating and underwriting expenses were $355,000 in the first quarter
of 2007, compared to $399,000 in the first quarter of 2006. Consequently,
segment income decreased from $6.8 million in the first quarter of 2006 to
$1.7
million in the first quarter of 2007, primarily due to a $5.3 million decrease
in realized gains. Realized gains in the first quarter of 2006 were unusually
large, due to the inclusion of $6.1 million from the sale of our holdings in
two
unrelated domestic stocks which, prior to their sale, comprised relatively
large
portions of our equity portfolio and unrealized appreciation.
On
February 7, 2005, we reported on Schedule 13G that Physicians and Citation
own a
total of 310,000 common shares of Consolidated-Tomoka Land Co. (Amex: CTO),
representing approximately 5.5% of CTO. Consolidated-Tomoka owns approximately
12,000 acres of land in and around Daytona Beach, Florida, and a portfolio
of
income properties in the southeastern United States. The investment was
purchased between September 2002 and February 2004 at a cash cost of $6.5
million, or approximately $20.90 per CTO share. At March 31, 2007, the market
value and carrying value of the investment was $23.3 million (before
taxes).
No
other
investments of the insurance companies have reached a threshold requiring public
disclosure under the securities laws of the countries where the investments
are
held.
Physicians
Insurance Company of Ohio
During
the first quarter of 2007, Physicians generated total revenues of $1.4 million,
including realized gains of $925,000. Operating and underwriting expenses were
$195,000, resulting in income before taxes of $1.2 million.
PHYSICIANS
INSURANCE COMPANY OF OHIO -- LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE RESERVES
(In
Millions)
|
||
|
||
|
March
31, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
Direct
Reserves
|
$10.3
|
$10.4
|
Ceded
Reserves
|
(
1.0)
|
(1.0)
|
Net
Medical Professional Liability Insurance Reserves
|
$9.3
|
$9.4
|
At
March
31, 2007, Physicians’ loss and loss adjustment reserves were $9.3 million, net
of reinsurance, compared to $9.4 million at December 31, 2006. Reserves
decreased by $101,000 during the first quarter of 2007, due to the payment
of
$101,000 in direct losses and loss adjustment expenses. No unusual trends in
claims were noted.
Citation
Insurance Company
During
the first quarter of 2007, Citation generated total revenues of $612,000,
including realized gains of $303,000. Operating and underwriting expenses were
$160,000, resulting in income before taxes of $452,000.
CITATION
INSURANCE COMPANY -- LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSE RESERVES
(In
Millions)
|
||
|
||
|
March
31, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
Property
& Casualty Insurance
|
|
|
Direct
Reserves
|
$6.5
|
$6.6
|
Ceded
Reserves
|
(1.6)
|
(1.5)
|
Net
Property & Casualty Insurance Reserves
|
$4.9
|
$5.1
|
|
|
|
Workers’
Compensation
|
|
|
Direct
Reserves
|
$23.6
|
$24.1
|
Ceded
Reserves
|
(14.3)
|
(14.5)
|
Net
Workers’ Compensation Insurance Reserves
|
$9.3
|
$9.6
|
|
|
|
Total
Reserves
|
$14.2
|
$14.7
|
At
March
31, 2007, Citation’s claims reserves were $14.2 million, net of reinsurance,
consisting of $4.9 million in net property and casualty insurance reserves
and
$9.3 million in net workers’ compensation reserves. At December 31, 2006,
Citation’s claims reserves were $14.7 million, net of reinsurance, consisting of
$5.1 million in net property and casualty insurance reserves and $9.6 million
in
net workers’ compensation reserves. There were no unusual trends in claims
during the first quarter of 2007.
During
the first three months of 2007, Citation’s net property and casualty insurance
reserves declined by $214,000, due to the payment of $173,000 in direct losses
and loss adjustment expenses and a $41,000 adjustment to reinsurance.
During
the first three months of 2007, Citation’s net workers’ compensation reserves
declined by $299,000 due to the payment of $469,000 in direct losses and loss
adjustment expenses, partially offset by the recovery of approximately $170,000
from reinsurance companies.
11
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS - HYPERFEED TECHNOLOGIES
|
Three
months ended March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Loss
Before Income Taxes
|
$(2,572,000)
|
|
Income
Tax Benefit
|
866,000
|
|
Gain
On Sale of HyperFeed’s Discontinued Operations, net
|
165,000
|
|
Net
Loss After Tax
|
$(1,541,000)
|
In
the
first quarter of 2006, we reported a $1.5 million net loss after-tax from
HyperFeed, comprised of a $2.6 million net loss, which was partially offset
by
an $866,000 income tax benefit, and a $165,000 after-tax gain on Hyperfeed’s
sale of operations in previous years.
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, Hyperfeed filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 7
of
the Bankruptcy Code. After the bankruptcy filing, HyperFeed was removed from
PICO’s financial statements as a consolidated entity, so there were no
Discontinued Operations related to HyperFeed in the first quarter of
2007.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES—THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2007 AND
2006
Cash
Flow
PICO’s
assets primarily consist of our operating subsidiaries, holdings in public
companies, and cash and cash equivalents. On a consolidated basis, the Company
had $182.7 million in cash and equivalents at March 31, 2007, compared to $136.6
million at December 31, 2006. The increase in cash and cash equivalents during
the first three months of 2007 was primarily due to the February 2007 sale
of
2.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock for net proceeds of $100.2
million.
Our
cash
flow position fluctuates depending on the requirements of our operating
subsidiaries for capital, and activity in our insurance company investment
portfolios. Our primary sources of funds include cash balances, cash flow from
operations, the sale of holdings, and the proceeds of borrowings or offerings
of
equity and debt.
In
broad
terms, the cash flow profile of our principal operating subsidiaries
is:
· |
As
Vidler’s water assets are monetized, Vidler is generating free cash flow
as receipts from the sale of real estate and water assets have overtaken
maintenance capital expenditure, development costs, financing costs,
and
operating expenses;
|
· |
Nevada
Land is actively selling land which has reached its highest and best
use.
Nevada Land’s principal sources of cash flow are the proceeds of
cash sales, and collections of principal and interest on sales
contracts where Nevada Land has provided vendor financing. These
receipts
and other revenues exceed Nevada Land’s operating and development costs,
so Nevada Land is generating strong cash flow;
and
|
· |
Investment
income more than covers the operating expenses of the “run off” insurance
companies, Physicians and Citation. The funds to pay claims come
from the
maturity of fixed-income securities, the realization of fixed-income
investments and stocks held in their investment portfolios, and recoveries
from reinsurance companies.
|
The
Departments of Insurance in Ohio and California prescribe minimum levels of
capital and surplus for insurance companies, set guidelines for insurance
company investments, and restrict the amount of profits which can be distributed
as dividends.
Typically,
our insurance subsidiaries structure the maturity of fixed-income securities
to
match the projected pattern of claims payments. When interest rates are at
very
low levels, to insulate the capital value of the bond portfolios against a
decline in value which would be brought on by a future increase in interest
rates, the bond portfolios may have a shorter duration than the projected
pattern of claims payments.
As
shown
in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow, cash and cash equivalents
increased by $46.1 million in the first quarter of 2007, compared to a $15.9
million net increase in the first quarter of 2006.
During
the first quarter of 2007, Operating Activities used $6.7 million in cash.
The
principal operating cash inflow was land sales by Nevada Land. The principal
operating cash outflows include overhead expenses, tax payments, and the payment
of management incentive compensation related to 2006 performance.
During
the first quarter of 2006, the Operating Activities of continuing operations
used cash of $14.4 million. The principal operating cash inflow was the
collection of principal on collateralized notes related to Vidler’s sale of
assets at Big Springs Ranch and West Wendover in previous years. The principal
operating cash outflows include overhead expenses, the payment of management
incentive compensation related to 2005 performance, tax payments, and the
payment of claims by our insurance companies. In addition, the operating
activities of discontinued operations used cash of $1.5 million
Investing
Activities used $47.3 million of cash in the first quarter of 2007. The
principal investing use of cash was a $31.7 million net increase in fixed-income
securities, which represents the temporary investment of a portion of the
proceeds of the February 2007 stock offering. In addition, we outlaid $10.7
million for property and equipment, primarily related to the Fish Springs
pipeline project, and $3.6 million net was invested in stocks.
In
the
first quarter of 2006, the Investing Activities of continuing operations
generated cash of $33.1 million. This primarily represented cash inflows of
$17.7 million from the sale of stocks (partially offset by $5 million in
purchases), and $26.2 million from the maturity of fixed-income securities
(partially offset by $3.3 million in purchases). In the first quarter of 2006,
the
investing activities of discontinued operations used cash of
$588,000.
Financing
Activities provided $100.2 million of cash in the first quarter of 2007. This
primarily represented the sale of 2.8 million newly-issued shares of PICO common
stock for net proceeds of $100.2 million. In the first quarter of 2006, there
were no cash flows from financing activities for continuing operations, and
the
financing activities of discontinued operations used $498,000 of cash.
During
the first three months of 2007, we continued construction of a pipeline to
convey water from the Fish Springs Ranch to a storage tank near Reno, Nevada,
and continued construction of a plant to generate the electricity which will
be
required to pump the water. As of March 31, 2007, approximately $35.8 million
of
the costs related to the design and construction of the Fish Springs Ranch
pipeline project had been paid, out of the estimated total cost of $78 million
to $83 million. The remaining expenditure will be incurred over the next 6
to 9
months. Vidler has commitments for future capital expenditure amounting to
approximately $16.4 million.
Share
Repurchase Program
In
October 2002, PICO’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10
million of PICO common stock. The stock purchases may be made from time to
time
at prevailing prices through open market or negotiated transactions, depending
on market conditions, and will be funded from available cash.
As
of
March 31, 2007, no stock had been repurchased under this
authorization.
12
Item
3: Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
PICO’s
balance sheets include a significant amount of assets and liabilities whose
fair
value are subject to market risk. Market risk is the risk of loss arising from
adverse changes in market interest rates or prices. PICO currently has interest
rate risk as it relates to its fixed maturity securities and mortgage
participation interests, equity price risk as it relates to its marketable
equity securities, and foreign currency risk as it relates to investments
denominated in foreign currencies. Generally, PICO’s borrowings are short to
medium term in nature and therefore approximate fair value. At March 31, 2007,
PICO had $94.8 million of fixed maturity securities, $228.1 million of
marketable equity securities that were subject to market risk, of which $130.7
million were denominated in foreign currencies, primarily Swiss francs. PICO’s
investment strategy is to manage the duration of the portfolio relative to
the
duration of the liabilities while managing interest rate risk.
PICO
uses
two models to report the sensitivity of its assets and liabilities subject
to
the above risks. For its fixed maturity securities, and mortgage participation
interests, PICO uses duration modeling to calculate changes in fair value.
The
sensitivity analysis duration model calculates the price of a fixed maturity
assuming a theoretical 100 basis point increase in interest rates and compares
that to the actual quoted price if the security. At March 31, 2007, the model
calculated a loss in fair value of $1.7 million. For its marketable securities,
PICO uses a hypothetical 20% decrease in the fair value to analyze the
sensitivity of its market risk assets and liabilities. For investments
denominated in foreign currencies, PICO uses a hypothetical 20% decrease in
the
local currency of that investment. Actual results may differ from the
hypothetical results assumed in this disclosure due to possible actions taken
by
management to mitigate adverse changes in fair value and because the fair value
of securities may be affected by credit concerns of the issuer, prepayment
rates, liquidity, and other general market conditions. The hypothetical 20%
decrease in fair value of PICO’s marketable equity securities produced a loss in
fair value of $45.6 million that would impact the unrealized appreciation in
shareholders’ equity, before the related tax effect. The hypothetical 20%
decrease in the local currency of PICO’s foreign denominated investments
produced a loss of $23.6 million that would impact the foreign currency
translation in shareholders’ equity.
Item
4: Controls
and Procedures
Under
the
supervision of and with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined
under Rules 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as
amended. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. There
were no material changes in our internal controls over financial reporting
for
the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Part
II: Other Information
Item
1: Legal
Proceedings
The
Company is subject to various litigation arising in the ordinary course of
its
business. Members of PICO’s insurance group are frequently a party in claims
proceedings and actions regarding insurance coverage, all of which PICO
considers routine and incidental to its business. Based upon information
presently available, management is of the opinion that such litigation will
not
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows of the Company.
Neither
PICO nor its subsidiaries are parties to any potentially material pending legal
proceedings other than the following.
Exegy
Litigation:
On
November 7, 2006 Exegy Incorporated (“Exegy”) sent letters to PICO Holdings,
Inc. (“PICO”) and HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. (HyperFeed”), purporting to
terminate the August 25, 2006 Contribution Agreement among PICO, HyperFeed,
and
Exegy. The Contribution Agreement contemplated a transaction between the
parties whereby the common stock of HyperFeed owned by PICO would have been
contributed to Exegy in exchange for Exegy’s issuance to PICO of certain Exegy
stock.
On
November 13, 2006 Exegy filed a lawsuit against PICO and HyperFeed in state
court in Missouri seeking a declaratory judgment that Exegy’s purported November
7, 2006 termination of the August 25, 2006 Contribution Agreement was
valid. In the event that Exegy’s November 7, 2006 letter is not determined
to be a valid termination of the Contribution Agreement, Exegy seeks a
declaration that PICO and HyperFeed have materially breached the Contribution
Agreement, for which Exegy seeks monetary damages and an injunction
against further material breach. Finally, Exegy seeks a declaratory
judgment that if its November 7, 2006 notice of termination was not valid,
and that if PICO and HyperFeed did materially breach the Contribution Agreement
but that a continuing breach cannot be remedied or enjoined, then Exegy
seeks a declaration that Exegy should be relieved of further performance under
the Contribution Agreement due to alleged HyperFeed actions deemed by Exegy
to
be inconsistent with the Contribution Agreement. On December 15, 2006 the
lawsuit filed by Exegy on November 13, 2006 was removed from Missouri state
court to federal court. On February 2, 2007, this case was transferred to the
United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware.
On
November 17, 2006 HyperFeed and PICO filed a lawsuit against Exegy in
state court in Illinois. PICO and HyperFeed allege that Exegy, after the
November 7, 2006 letter purporting to terminate the Contribution Agreement,
used
and continues to use HyperFeed’s confidential and proprietary information in an
unauthorized manner and without HyperFeed’s consent. PICO and HyperFeed are also
seeking a preliminary injunction enjoining Exegy from disclosing, using, or
disseminating HyperFeed’s confidential and proprietary information, and from
continuing to interfere with HyperFeed’s business relations. PICO and
HyperFeed also seek monetary damages from Exegy. On January 18, 2007 this case
was removed from Illinois state court to federal bankruptcy court in Illinois.
On February 6, 2007 this case was transferred to the United States Bankruptcy
Court, District of Delaware.
The
United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware has accepted both cases
and
both cases will continue as adversary proceedings.
Fish
Springs Ranch, LLC:
The
final regulatory approval required for the Fish Springs pipeline project is
a
Record of Decision (“ROD”) for a right of way, which was granted on May 31,
2006. Subsequently, there were two protests against the ROD, and the matter
was
appealed to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (“IBLA”). During the third
quarter of 2006, the IBLA refused to stay the ROD.
However,
in October 2006, one protestant filed an action with the U.S. District Court
against the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and the U.S. Department of the
Interior. In the legal challenge by the Protestant (i.e., the Pyramid Lake
Indian Tribe) to the ROD, the Federal District Court has focused the area
of inquiry on what the Tribe claims was “informational harm” due to
inadequate discussion of the wastewater treatment options in the Truckee
Meadows. Pending a hearing on the matter, as of April 30, 2007,
construction on the Project is restricted to the private lands involved in
the pipeline route and the existing open trench on the public lands. Of
the thirty eight miles of total pipeline, there are approximately ten miles
of
pipeline remaining to be constructed on public lands. A hearing has been
set for June 2007 to determine if the BLM complied with the “hard look”
requirements before issuing the ROD.
Vidler
management believes that the Tribe’s claim is without merit. This is
the same protest and request for stay that was dismissed by the IBLA. There
are
nearly 9,000 pages of administrative record supporting the BLM’s required “hard
look” at the project including the wastewater that might be generated by the
“imported” water (i.e., the water brought in from Fish Springs). Also,
members of the Tribe have for years served as members of the Washoe County
Regional Water Planning Commission, having full knowledge of all of the various
reports and data that they now claim to be the basis for their “informational
harm”. Furthermore, the Tribe has been a previous litigant with the
Truckee Meadows Water Reclamation Facility, resulting in the 1996 Truckee River
Water Quality Settlement Act which specifically deals with the treatment of
wastewater in the Truckee Meadows. Moreover, the existing and any future
wastewater discharges are the subject of an existing 42 page permit (effective
October 15, 2003), issued by the State of Nevada pursuant to its delegated
authority under the Clean Water Act, providing ample and multiple levels of
protection to the Truckee River, the environment, and the public.
Management
believes that the pipeline will be completed in accordance with the permits,
within the expected pipeline project timetable.
13
There
are
no material changes to our risk factors described in our Form 10-K for the
year
ended December 31, 2006, as filed on March 12, 2007.
Item
2: Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On
February 28, 2007, the Company completed a private placement of 2,823,000
newly-issued common shares to accredited investors at a price of $37.00 per
share, for net proceeds of $100,227,450. ThinkEquity Partners, LLC served as
placement agent for the transaction. The aggregate offering price was
$104,451,000 and the aggregate commissions were $4,223,550. The sale of these
shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
of
1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof. Under the terms of the
agreement between the Company and the accredited investors, the Company filed
a
Registration Statement on Form S-3 with the SEC to register these 2,823,000
common shares for resale and naming the accredited investors as Selling
Shareholders therein. The SEC declared the registration statement effective
April 13, 2007. The Selling Shareholders table from the registration statement
is incorporated by reference into this Item 2 of Part II of this
report.
Item
3: Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
None
Item
4: Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item
5: Other
Information
None
Item
6: Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
3(i)
|
|
Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation of PICO.(1)
|
3(ii)
|
|
Amended
and Restated By-laws of PICO. (2)
|
4.1
|
|
Form
of Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2007
between
PICO Holdings, Inc. and the Purchasers. (3)
|
10.12
|
|
Form
of Form of Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 28, 2007
between
PICO Holdings, Inc. and the Purchasers. (3)
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as
adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) as
adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section
906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (Section
906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference to exhibit of same number filed with Form 8-K dated
December
4, 1996.
|
|
(2)
|
Filed
as Appendix to the prospectus in Part I of Registration Statement
on Form
S-4 (File No. 333-06671).
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.11 filed with Form 8-K dated March 2,
2007.
|
14
PICO
HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
PICO
HOLDINGS, INC.
Dated:
May 9, 2007
By:
/s/
Maxim C. W. Webb
Maxim
C.
W. Webb
Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer and Authorized Signatory)