Viewbix Inc. - Annual Report: 2015 (Form 10-K)

Holders of Common Stock

As of December 31, 2015, our shares of common stock were held by approximately 2,540 stockholders of record. Our transfer agent is Transfer Online, 512 SE Salmon Street, Portland, OR 97214-3444, Phone: (503) 227-2950.

The following plan of operation provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read along with our financial statements and notes thereto. This section includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which refer to future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our predictions.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we did not have any contractual obligations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, and are included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Note 1. The Company and Significant Accounting Policies.

Organizational Background:

Emerald Medical Applications Corp. ("the Company") (f/k/a Zaxis International Inc.) was incorporated in Ohio in 1989. On August 25, 1995, Zaxis merged with a subsidiary of The InFerGene Company ("InFerGene") and InFerGene changed its name to Emerald Medical Applications Corp. InFerGene was incorporated in California in 1984 and subsequently changed its domicile in connection with the merger into Zaxis to Delaware in 1985. Operations ceased operations in 2002. In November 2002, the Company and its subsidiaries filed a petition for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court Northern District of Ohio. On October 13, 2004, the Company emerged from bankruptcy.

The MOU provides that the Registrant and Emerald will enter into a reverse merger (the "Reverse Merger"), subject to the execution of a definitive agreement (the "Definitive Agreement"). The execution of Definitive Agreement and the closing of the Reverse Merger will be subject to the Registrant's raise of $800,000 from third party investors, including but not limited to the Registrant's existing stockholders (the "Investors"), at terms and conditions to be agreed upon by the Registrant and Emerald.

Upon the closing, the holders of Emerald's capital stock will receive in exchange a number of shares of the Registrant's common stock equal to 45% of the Registrant's issued and outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis as at immediately following the closing of the Reverse Merger, excluding Registrant's securities to be issued to the Investors upon exercise of warrants issued to the Investors within the framework of the Reverse Merger. In addition, Emerald's holders will be issued up to an additional 21% of the Registrant's common stock in three equal tranches of 7% of the Registrant's issued and outstanding common stock as at immediately following the closing of the Reverse Merger, subject to Emerald's achievement of certain milestones to be set forth in the Definitive Agreement.

On July 14, 2015 the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement was held (the "Closing") and as a result, Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant.

Utilizing capital raised prior to and subsequent to the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, Emerald completed the development of a commercial model of its DermaCompare Product and has commenced marketing efforts. Emerald is continuing to negotiate additional distribution agreements for territories including North America, Latin America, Southern Africa, Israel and elsewhere in Europe, among other countries and regions. Emerald expects to generate significant revenues from its DermaCompare Technology commencing in the first half of fiscal 2016. Emerald is continuing to work on development of the "next generation" DermaCompare Technology, with enhanced features.

Subsequently to the Closing Mr. Lior Wayn has been appointed as the Company's CEO, and has been granted considerable influence on the appointment of new directors thereby creating a new management structure for the company replacing the old management. Additionally Mr. Wayn is to receive additional shares in the future contingent on the Company achieving commercial milestone. Thus the new management, headed by Mr. Wayn, is considered to be in control of more than 50% of the company and with the ability to make all management decisions.

Emerald is a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel on February 17, 2010. Emerald is digital health Startup Company engaged in the development, sale and service of imaging solutions utilizing its proprietary DermaCompare software that it developed for use in derma imaging and analytics ("DermaCompare"). Emerald believes that its proprietary DermaCompare software represents an advancement in skin cancer screening that should enable physicians to more readily identify and monitor changes in their patients' skin characteristics.

Emerald's DermaCompare solution allows dermatologists and other medical care professionals, using a set of 25 total body photography ("TBP"), to capture sets of skin lesion images with, among other devices, digital cameras, camera-equipped smartphones or tablets. These images are then transmitted online and are remotely analyzed by professionals using our DermaCompare software.

Emerald's sales and marketing plan is to sell licenses for our imaging software to: NHSs, HMOs, health insurance companies, hospitals and medical clinics through distributers, health care channel partners or directly through independent salespersons and/or web purchase to dermatologists and other physicians (GPs) that we expect to purchase licenses based on the number of potential numbers of patients.

Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs, and as such, has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as of December 31, 2015, the cash resources of the Company were insufficient to meet its current business plan, and the Company had negative working capital. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

For financial statement presentation purposes, the Company considers those short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash or cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Property and Equipment:

New property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 5 years. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. Expenditures for minor items, repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Gain or loss upon sale or retirement due to obsolescence is reflected in the operating results in the period the event takes place.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets: 

We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets including equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. Our primary measure of fair value is based on discounted cash flows. The measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long-lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations.

Stock Based Compensation: 

Stock-based awards are accounted for using the fair value method in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments. Our primary type of share-based compensation consists of stock options. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model in valuing options. The inputs for the valuation analysis of the options include the market value of the Company's common stock, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock, the exercise price of the warrants and the risk free interest rate.

Accounting For Obligations And Instruments Potentially To Be Settled In The Company's Own Stock:

We account for obligations and instruments potentially to be settled in the Company's stock in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments. This issue addresses the initial balance sheet classification and measurement of contracts that are indexed to, and potentially settled in, the Company's own stock.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments: FASB ASC 825, "Financial Instruments," requires entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. FASB ASC 825 defines fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the carrying value of certain financial instruments (cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses.) approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments or interest rates, which are comparable with current rates.

Fair Value Measurements:

The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company values its derivative instruments related to embedded conversion features and warrants from the issuance of convertible debentures in accordance with the Level 3 guidelines. For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015, 2015 and 2014, the following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances for financial instruments that are recognized at fair value in these consolidated financial statements. The fair value of embedded conversion features that have floating conversion features and tainted common stock equivalents (warrants and convertible debt) are estimated using a Binomial Lattice model. The key inputs to this valuation model as of December 31, 2014, were: Volatility of 143.9% for the twelve-period ended December 31, 2015 and 132.4% for the twelve months period ending December 31, 2014, inherent term of instruments equal to the remaining contractual term, quoted closing stock prices on valuation dates, and various settlement scenarios and probability percentages summing to 100%.

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014

Changes in the unobservable input values would likely cause material changes in the fair value of the Company's Level 3 financial instruments. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement is the estimation for probability percentages assigned to future expected settlement possibilities. A significant increase (decrease) in this distribution of percentages would result in a higher (lower) fair value measurement.

The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 and the years then ended on a recurring basis:

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015

The following schedule summarizes the valuation of financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014

The fair values of our debts are deemed to approximate book value, and are considered Level 2 inputs as defined by ASC Topic 820-10-35.

There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

The Company had no other assets or liabilities valued at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014.

Income Taxes: 

We have adopted FASB ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. Pursuant to ASC 740, we are required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using the tax rates and laws in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not to occur. Realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our generating sufficient taxable income in future years in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize benefit from the reversal of temporary differences and from net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. We have determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against substantially all of our net deferred tax asset. Management will continue to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax asset and its related valuation allowance. If our assessment of the deferred tax assets or the corresponding valuation allowance were to change, we would record the related adjustment to income during the period in which we make the determination. Our tax rate may also vary based on our results and the mix of income or loss in domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions in which we operate.

In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and to the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we will reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We will record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

ASC 740 which requires recognition of estimated income taxes payable or refundable on income tax returns for the current year and for the estimated future tax effect attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards. Measurement of deferred income tax is based on enacted tax laws including tax rates, with the measurement of deferred income tax assets being reduced by available tax benefits not expected to be realized.

Uncertain Tax Positions:

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC 740-10, Accounting for Uncertain Income Tax Positions, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above should be reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

Our federal and state income tax returns are open for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2011. We are not under examination by any jurisdiction for any tax year. At December 31, 2015 we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required under FIN 48.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805) ("ASU 2015-16"). Topic 805 requires that an acquirer retrospectively adjust provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, during the measurement period. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts, the amendments in the Update require that the acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amount is determined. The acquirer is required to also record, in the same period's financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. In addition an entity is required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes to the financial statements the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-016 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date ("ASU 2015-14"). The amendment in this ASU defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities for one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods with that reporting period.

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) ("ASU 2015-03"), which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. ASU 2015-03 requires an entity to present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The new guidance will be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2015-03 on its balance sheets.

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16-Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17-Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.

On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management's plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management's plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-10, "Development Stage Entities". The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP.  In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Note 2. Going Concern.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs, and as such, has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as of December 31, 2015 the cash resources of the company were insufficient to meet its current business plan and the company has negative working capital. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

Note 3. Stockholders' Equity.

On January 8, 2015 the shareholders approved a resolution to increase the authorized common shares from 100,000,000 to 490,000,000 shares. All other provisions of the common shares remain unchanged. Also on that date, the Company declared a reverse split of common stock at the ration of 1:4. The stock split was effective January 8, 2015 for holders of record as of that date. Except as otherwise noted, all share, option and warrant numbers have been restated to give retroactive effect to this split. All per share disclosures retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the reverse split had occurred at January 1, 2012.

Recent Issuances of Common Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2014 we issued 4,125,000 shares of our common stock (16,500,000 pre-reverse stock split) in exchange for converting $125,000 of promissory notes.

Between January 15, 2015 and March 15, 2015 the Company sold a total of 2,052,000 units for cash consideration of $780,000 at a price of $0.40 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $351,433 for the common stock and $428,567 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with 153% volatility and discount rates ranging between 0.44% to 0.7%. These units were issued as stock payable and the cash from sale of units was not received for the sale of stock pre-reverse merger.

Between April 1, 2015 and June 29, 2015 the Company sold a total of 1,012,500 units for cash consideration of $405,000 at a price of $0.40 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $158,123 for the common stock and $246,877 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility ranging between163% - 177% and discount rates ranging between 0.54% to 0.71%. These units were issued as stock payable and the cash from sale of units was not received for the sale of stock pre-reverse merger.

On July 21, 2015 the Company sold a total of 140,000 units for cash consideration of $15,000 at price of $0.107 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $4,294 for the common stock and $10,706 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility of 153% and discount rates of 0.61%. These units were issued as stock payable and the cash from sale of units was not received for the sale of stock pre-reverse merger.

Between July 1, 2015 and September 30, 2015 the Company sold a total of 862,500 units for cash consideration of $345,000 at price of $0.40 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $118,415 for the common stock and $226,585 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility ranging between 153% - 182% and discount rates ranging between 0.54% to 0.71%. Of these units $65,000 were issued as stock payable and the cash from sale of units was not received for the sale of stock pre-reverse merger and $280,000 cash was received subsequent to Closing of the reverse merger.

On July 31, 2015 and July 30, 2015 the Company issued 517,900 shares to one service provider and a total of 100,000 shares to two service providers, respectively, for services valued at a total value of $617,900, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $1.00 per Nasdaq.com.

On July 16, 2015 five Emerald debt holders in amount of $87,910 converted their debt into 274,719 units at a conversion price of $0.32 per unit, each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The Loss on Settlement of Debt recorded is $678,027.

On July 14, 2015 the Company issued Emerald's CEO and founder, Lior Wayn, 5,474,545 shares as per the share purchase agreement valued at $877,380, valued on the date of grant for the price of common stock.

On July 16, 2015 consultants were issued 2,500,000 Class B Warrants exercisable for a two-year period to acquire one (1) share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share; The fair value of these warrants is $2,199,507. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility of 182% and discount rate of 0.67%. The Class B warrants are fully vested and were accordingly included in expenses as stock based compensation.

On July 16, 2015 consultants were issued 2,536,247 Class C Warrants exercisable for a 90 day period, commencing 90 days after the effective date of this Registration Statement, at an exercise price of $0.40 to acquire one (1) share of Common Stock and one (1) Class A Warrant at an exercise price of $0.80. The fair value of these warrants is $3,143,581. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility of 182% and discount rate of 0.67%. The Class C warrants are fully vested and were accordingly included in expenses as stock based compensation.

On November 17, 2015, the Company sold 250,000 units for cash consideration of $100,000 at price of $0.40 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $41,304 for the common stock and $58,696 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility of 149% and a discount rate of 0.50%.

Between November 5, 2015 and November 16, 2015 the Company issued 268,084 shares to three service providers and for services valued at a total value of $268,084, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $1.00 per Nasdaq.com.

On October 1, 2015 the company granted a total of 534,400 stock options (the "Options") to three company employees. The options vest over 5 quarters and are exercisable at prices ranging from $0.01 to $0.40 per Share. The options were valued using the Black-Scholes model with 149% volatility and 0.67% discount rate for a total value of $528,857. Of this amount, $397,547 was expensed in Q4 2015 with the remaining balance to be expensed in 2016.

Recent Option Grants

During 2015, we granted 534,400 options at an exercise price ranging between $0.01 and $0.40.

(1) Options were granted to these employees, none of which have been exercised to date.

Note 4. Related Party Transactions.

On March 25, 2014, our President and principal shareholder assigned accumulated advances and accruals totaling $124,229, to an unaffiliated third party. The advances carry no specific terms of repayment. On December 15, 2014, $22,375 of the then outstanding balance was converted to a promissory note (see Note 4 below). A summary of transactions is as follows:

There was no stated term of interest associated with this obligation. Accordingly, the company imputed interest at an appropriate rate estimated at 8% as prescribed under FASB ASC 835. For the period ending December 31, 2014 the resultant charge of $11,210 to interest expense was considered a contribution of capital.

During the second quarter an agreement was reached with the holder of a $120,979 advance payable note to settle the full amount due for $30,000, and interest due. The settlement with all note holders resulted in $528 loss on debt settlement due to the payment being higher than principal and accrued interest as of the settlement date as well as a charge of $90,979, that was considered a contribution of capital due to the fact that note holder, IMWT, was a related party.

Former CEO of the Company whom during November 2014 loaned amount to company of $19,521, an interest rate of 8% per annum converted the balance to shares as described in Note 3.

On July 16, 2015 five Emerald debt holders in amount of $87,910 converted their debt into 274,719 units at a conversion price of $0.32 per unit, each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term of 24 month. The Loss on Settlement of Debt recorded is $678,027, on the income statement.

On July 14, 2015 the Company issued Emerald's CEO and founder, Lior Wayn, 5,474,545 shares as per the share purchase agreement valued at $877,380, valued on the date of grant using the closing price of common stock on that date.

The Company's CEO, Lior Wayn was owed $3,480 and $0 payable as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Following the closing of the reverse merger, the $490,000 loan from Emerald Medical Applications Corp. to Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. was rendered an intercompany loan and as such was written off.

Note 5. Employee Payable.

For the periods ended December 31, 2015, the Company had a total of $29,092 of which $3,480 were related party and $25,612 were unrelated party employee payable related to the monthly wages payable to the Company's employees. For the periods ended December 31, 2014, the Company had $0 in employee payable related to the monthly wages payable to the Company's employees.

Note 6. Notes Payable.

Convertible Notes Payable

In accordance to ASC #815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, we evaluated the holder's non-detachable conversion right provision and liquidated damages clause, contained in the terms governing the Note to determine whether the features qualify as an embedded derivative instruments at issuance. Such non-detachable conversion right provision and liquidated damages clause did not need to be accounted for as derivative financial instruments. Additionally, since the conversion price of the note was lower that the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the time of issuance, no beneficial conversion feature exists if the lender elected to convert. Based on that decision, no beneficial conversion feature was reflected in the financial statements.

On July 8, 2014, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Axel Springer Plug & Play Accelerator GmbH (the "Holder"), in the amount of $29,719. During 2014 and 2015 we recorded $9,555 and $0, respectively, in amortization of debt discount. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had accrued interest of $2,013 and $19,285, respectively.

The Convertible Note is convertible at the lessor of a market based discounted and a fixed rate derived from a fixed market cap. The Holders have the right following the Date of Issuance, and until any time until the convertible Promissory Note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of the Convertible Promissory Note, and accrued interest, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock. Holder was not issued warrants with the Convertible Promissory Note. See Note 7 for description of derivative testing.

Note Payable - Not Convertible

On December 15, 2014, we issued a promissory note in the amount of $22,375 to a related party in consideration for payments made on behalf of the Company for service provided to the Company (the "December 2014 Note"). The December 2014 Note bears interest at the rate of 1% per annum, is due and payable on May 12, 2015. On April 21, 2015 this promissory note with interest due was repaid in full.

On January 14 and 16, 2015, we issued two promissory notes in the amount of $15,000 each to two different unrelated parties in consideration for cash transferred to the Company (the "January 2015 Notes"). The Notes were issued to unrelated parties and due to the low interest rate an imputed interest expense was calculated. The January 2015 Notes bears interest at the rate of 1% per annum, are due and payable on January 14 and 16, 2016 and are not convertible to common stock.

One of the notes was repaid in full on March 3, 2015 with interest due waived the by the debtor, and the second note was repaid on April 22, 2015 with interest due waived the by the debtor.

During the second quarter an agreement was reached with the holder of a $120,979 advance payable note to settle the full amount due for $30,000, and interest due. The settlement with all note holders resulted in $528 loss on debt settlement due to the payment being higher than principal and accrued interest as of the settlement date as well as a charge of $90,979, that was considered a contribution of capital due to the fact that note holder, IMWT, was a related party.

We concluded that these notes have a stated rate of interest that is different from the rate of interest that is appropriate for this type of debt at the date of the transaction. Accordingly, the company imputed interest at an appropriate rate estimated at 8% as prescribed under FASB ASC 835. The resultant charge of $6,280 for the period ending December 31, 2014 and $4,113 for the period ending December 31, 2015 to interest expense was considered a contribution of capital and was recorded in additional paid in capital.

On November 16, 2014 four individuals loaned a total amount of $87,910 to the Company with maturity dates of November 16, 2015 and bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum. These notes were fully converted on July 16, 2015 to Company shares of commons stock and warrants as described in Note 3 resulting in a $678,027 loss on settlement of debt.

Between March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2015 the Chief Scientist Ministry of Israel loaned the company an amount of $119,974. The loan bears 17% interest and shall be due and payable when the company generates sales revenue from products in development.

For the periods ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 the Company has recognized $19,285 and $2,013, respectively, in accrued interest expense related to the stated interest rate on the notes. Interest expense for the periods ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, were $30,604 and $5,605 of which $9,555 and $0 is from the amortization of debt discount.

Note 7. Derivative Liabilities from Convertible Note.

On July 8, 2014 the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Axel Springer Plug & Play Accelerator GmbH (the "Holder"), in the amount of $29,719.

The Convertible note is convertible at the lessor of a market based discounted and a fixed rate derived from a fixed market cap. The Holder has the right following the Date of Issuance, and until any time until the convertible Promissory Note is fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of the Convertible Promissory Note, and accrued interest, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock. The Holder was not issued warrants with the Convertible Promissory Note.

As of December 31, 2015 the note is no longer convertible since pursuant to the loan agreement prior to December 31,2015 (the "Maturity Date"), the Company consummated a financing round led by unaffiliated investors in the amount of at least 200,000 Euro, at a Company pre-money valuation on a fully diluted basis of at least 750,000 Euro (a "Qualified Round"), the Holder shall be entitled (but not obligated) to convert the entire loan amount into the most senior class of shares of the Company issued in such Qualified Round, based on a price per share equal to the lower of the price per share reflected by a Company pre-money valuation on a fully diluted basis calculated at the time of conversion equal to 1,500,000 Euro; or - price per share which reflects a 20% discount on the lowest price per share issued pursuant to such Qualified Round and upon the occurrence of such event, the note holder elected not to convert upon receiving notice of such event and the loan became non-convertible.

The following shows the changes in the derivative liability measured on a recurring basis for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, and year ended December 31, 2014.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company has a $20,532 derivative liability and a $20,164 convertible note payable, net of discount of $9,555. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has $0 derivative liability and $29,719 convertible note payable, net of discount of $0.

In accordance to ASC #815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, we evaluated the holder's non-detachable conversion right provision and liquidated damages clause, contained in the terms governing the Note to determine whether the features qualify as an embedded derivative instruments at issuance. Such non-detachable conversion right provision and liquidated damages clause did not need to be accounted for as derivative financial instruments. Additionally, since the conversion price of the notes represented the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the time of issuance, no beneficial conversion feature exists. No beneficial conversion feature was reflected in the financial statements because at the time of the agreement the FMV of the shares, if converted, were less than the original note amount and the $20,532 extinguishment of derivative was reflected in the equity and cash flow statements as a non-cash transfer from liabilities to equity.

Note 8. Other Receivables.

As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 the Company had other receivables of $25,797 and $6,718, respectively, which represent VAT refunds claimed resulting from excess VAT paid over VAT received from the Israeli government.

Note 9. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities.

As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 the Company had accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $90,705 and $2,577, respectively, which mainly represent accrued expenses such as accrued vacation and deferred salary.

Note 10. Litigation Accruals.

On November 9, 2015, the Company received a notice of claim from Tomer Maharshak & Co., Israel, the Company's former attorneys, for legal fees allegedly owed by the Company and its wholly owned Israeli subsidiary, Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. On December 12, 2015 and December 23, 2015 the litigation was settled for cash payment and the Company recorded neither a gain nor a loss on the settlement. As of December 31, 2015 the litigation accrual balance is zero and there are currently no ongoing litigations against the Company.

Note 11. Income Taxes.

We have adopted ASC 740 which provides for the recognition of a deferred tax asset based upon the value the carry-forwards will have to reduce future income taxes and management's estimate of the probability of the realization of these tax benefits. Our net operating loss carryovers incurred prior to 2014 considered available to reduce future income taxes were reduced or eliminated through our recent change of control (I.R.C. Section 382(a)) and the continuity of business limitation of I.R.C. Section 382(c).

We have a current operating loss carry-forward of $1,941,140 resulting in deferred tax assets of $679,399. We have determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against substantially all our net deferred tax asset.

Future utilization of currently generated federal and state NOL and tax credit carry forwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of NOL and tax credit carry forwards before full utilization.

The Company is not under examination by any jurisdiction for any tax year. Our federal and state income tax returns are open for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2011.

Note 12. Subsequent Events.

During Q1 2016 throughout the date of the filing of Form 10-K. the following subsequent events occurred:

On January 26, 2016 and after receiving conversion notices from Class B warrant holders, the Company's board of directors approved issuance of 1,928,572 shares for the cashless conversion of Class B warrants. On February 18, 2016, the Company's board of directors approved the issuance of 1,195,000 shares as compensation to three acting company directors: Mrs. Estery Giloz-Ran, Mr. Yair Fudim and Mr. Baruch Kfir. On February 17, 2016 and March 17, 2016, the Company board of directors approved the issuance of 175,000 shares for services to two investor relations service providers.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Back to Table of Contents

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Back to Table of Contents

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of December 31, 2015, the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the  Exchange Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the fiscal year 2015 under the COSO framework.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of those internal controls. As defined by the SEC, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, who is also the sole member of our Board of Directors, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

None.

The following table depicts the total compensation that we have paid or that has accrued on behalf of our chief executive officer and other executive officers during the fiscal years ending December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Executive Employment Agreements

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS Back to Table of Contents

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTORS INDEPENDENCE Back to Table of Contents

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES Back to Table of Contents

Independent Public Accountants

The Registrant's Board of Directors has appointed M&K CPAS PLLC as independent public accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

Principal Accounting Fees

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned.

EMERALD MEDICAL APPLICATIONS CORP.

By: /s/ Lior Wayn
Lior Wayn
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 31, 2016

By: /s/ Oded Gilboa
Oded Gilboa
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: March 31, 2016

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: /s/ Yair Fudim
Yair Fudim
Chairman
Date: March 31, 2016

By: /s/ Lior Wayn
Lior Wayn
Director
Date: March 31, 2016