VNUE, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 March (Form 10-Q)

U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File No. 000-53462

104 West 29th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10001

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Issuer’s Telephone Number: 857-777-6190

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes ¨     No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One)

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

March 31, 2017

Common Voting Stock: 653,709,302

VNUE, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q FILING

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Therefore, they do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and stockholders’ equity in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations and financial position have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the interim period ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017.

VNUE, INC.

March 31, 2017 and 2016

Index to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

VNUE, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

VNUE, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

VNUE, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

VNUE, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 VNUE, Inc.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Organization and Basis of Presentation

History and Organization

VNUE, Inc. (formerly Tierra Grande Resources, Inc.) (“VNUE”, “TGRI”, or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on April 4, 2006.

On May 29, 2015, VNUE, Inc. entered into a merger agreement with VNUE Washington, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, all of the outstanding shares of any class or series of VNUE Washington were exchanged for an aggregate of 507,629,872 shares of TGRI common stock. As a result of the Merger, VNUE Washington became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and the transaction was accounted for as a reverse merger with VNUE Washington deemed the acquiring company for accounting purposes, and the Company deemed the legal acquirer.

The Company is developing a technology driven solution for Artists, Venues and Festivals to automate the capturing, publishing and monetization of their content.

Basis of Presentation

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and reclassifications and non-recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are ordinary and necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures required under the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The condensed consolidated balance sheet information as of December 31, 2016 was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 14, 2017 (the “2016 Annual Report”). These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 and notes thereto included in the 2016 Annual Report. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or for any other period.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit of $2,073,179 at March 31, 2017, and incurred a net loss of $352,647, and used net cash in operating activities of $110,502 for the reporting period then ended. Certain of the Company’s notes payable are also past due and in default. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

As a result, management has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date that the consolidated financial statements were issued. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, in their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, has expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management estimates that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations through June 2017. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to execute its strategy and in its ability to raise additional funds. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of equity securities for cash to operate our business. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in case or equity financing.

Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

Principles of Consolidation

The Company consolidates all wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries in which the Company’s power to control exists. The Company consolidates the following subsidiaries and/or entities:

VNUE Technology, Inc. and VNUE Media, Inc. were inactive corporations at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the assumptions used to value the derivative liabilities, the valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset and the accruals for potential liabilities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The three levels of fair value hierarchy are described below.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, including cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The fair value of the derivative liabilities of $566,215 and $508,107 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were valued using Level 2 inputs.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Loss per Common Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to Common Stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) applicable to Common Stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued, using the treasury stock method. Potential common shares are excluded from the computation as their effect is antidilutive.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the calculations of basic and diluted loss per share are the same because potential dilutive securities would have an anti-dilutive effect. As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, we excluded the outstanding securities summarized below, which entitle the holders thereof to acquire shares of common stock, from our calculation of earnings per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. Under ASU 2014-09, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services and is recognized in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has recently issued ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-11, ASU 2016-12, and ASU 2016-20 all of which clarify certain implementation guidance within ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted only in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods therein. The standard can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method). The Company is currently in the process of analyzing the information necessary to determine the impact of adopting this new guidance on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The Company will adopt the provisions of this statement in the first quarter of fiscal 2018.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires a lessee to record a right of use asset and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. ASU 2016-02 is effective for all interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the standard could have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, the FASB issued the ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in this ASU require, among other things, that all income tax effects of awards be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. The ASU also allows for an employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares than it can today for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the standard could have on its financial statements and related disclosures.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements. 

Note 3 - Related Party Transactions

Note payable to President, CEO and Significant Stockholder

On December 31, 2014 the Company entered into a note payable agreement with its President, CEO and significant stockholder of the Company. The note is unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on December 31, 2024. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the note payable to the officer was $74,131 and $74,131, respectively. 

Advances from Stockholders / Employees

From time to time, employees of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purposes. The advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the advances from the employees were $14,720 and $14,720, respectively.

Convertible Notes Payable to the Officers and Directors

In August 2014 the Company issued non-interest bearing convertible notes to certain Officers and Directors of the Company for working capital purposes. The notes are convertible at variable prices and payable on demand at any time after the earlier of (i) 36 months following the note issuance or (ii) the consummation of a corporate transaction if not previously converted. See further discussion in Note 5.

Transactions with Louis Mann

On August 26, 2015, the Company entered into an Advisory Agreement with Louis Mann (“MANN”), a former officer and director with the Company who resigned from his officer and director on August 26, 2015. The Advisory Agreement provided for MANN’s continued and ongoing advisory services to the Company until December 31, 2015 and MANN was to be paid $25,000 for providing such advisory services, which was due and payable on or before December 31, 2015. Such amount is included in accrued expenses at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Note 4 – Notes Payable

Notes payable as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consist of the following

________________ 

Note 5 – Convertible Notes Payable

Convertible notes payable consist of the following:

______________ 

The Company considered the current FASB guidance of “Contracts in Entity’s Own Stock” which indicates that any adjustment to the fixed amount (either conversion price or number of shares) of the instrument regardless of the probability of whether or not within the issuers’ control means the instrument is not indexed to the issuer’s own stock. Accordingly, the Company determined that the conversion prices of the Notes were not a fixed amount because they were subject to an adjustment based on the occurrence of future offerings or events. As a result, the Company determined that the conversion features of the Notes were not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and characterized the fair value of the conversion features as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The Company determined that upon issuance of the Notes, the initial fair value of the embedded conversion feature was recorded as debt discount offsetting the fair value of the Notes and the remainder recorded as financing costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. The discount is being amortized using the effective interest rate method over the life of the debt instruments.

As of December 31, 2016, the unamortized debt discount was $244,534. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued $103,000 of convertible notes and created a derivative liability upon issuance with a fair value of $176,520, of which $103,000 was recorded as a valuation discount, and the remaining $73,520 was recorded as a financing cost. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, amortization of debt discount was $56,581. The unamortized balance of the debt discount was $290,953 as of March 31, 2017.

For the purposes of Balance Sheet presentation, convertible notes payable have been presented as follows:

Note 6 – Derivative Liability

The FASB has issued authoritative guidance whereby instruments which do not have fixed settlement provisions are deemed to be derivative instruments. The conversion prices of the Notes described in Note 5 were not a fixed amount because they were either subject to an adjustment based on the occurrence of future offerings or events or they were variable. Since the number of shares is not explicitly limited, the Company is unable to conclude that enough authorized and unissued shares are available to settle the conversion option. In accordance with the FASB authoritative guidance, the conversion features have been characterized as derivative liabilities to be re-measured at the end of every reporting period with the change in value reported in the statement of operations.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the derivative liabilities were valued using a probability weighted average Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model with the following assumptions:

The risk-free interest rate was based on rates established by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Company uses the historical volatility of its common stock to estimate the future volatility for its common stock. The expected life of the conversion feature of the notes was based on the remaining term of the notes. The expected dividend yield was based on the fact that the Company has not customarily paid dividends in the past and does not expect to pay dividends in the future.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recognized $103 as other income, compared to $231,852 as other income during the three months ended March 31, 2016, which represented the change in the fair value of the derivative from the respective prior period. In addition, the Company recognized derivative liabilities of $176,520 upon issuance of convertible notes during the period and a gain of $118,309 during the three months ended March 31, 2017 which represented the extinguishment of derivative liabilities related to conversion of notes to common stock.

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Deficit

Common stock returned by officer

On March 15, 2017, a Company officer voluntarily returned 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock held by him to the Company for no consideration. The shares were subsequently cancelled.

Shares issued for services

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 25,750,000 shares of its common stock to certain employees and contractors for services valued at $95,125, based upon the closing market price on the date the shares were authorized to be issued.

Equity Purchase Agreement with Tarpon Bay Partners, LLC

On June 15, 2015, the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Equity Purchase Agreement”) with Tarpon Bay Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Tarpon”). Under the terms of the Equity Purchase Agreement, Tarpon was to purchase, at the Company’s election, up to $5,000,000 of the Company’s registered common stock (the “Shares”). On February 18, 2016, the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Equity Purchase Agreement”) with Tarpon Bay Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Tarpon”). Under the terms of the Equity Purchase Agreement, Tarpon will purchase, at the Company’s election, up to $10,000,000 of the Company’s registered common stock (the “Shares”). The February 18, 2016 Purchase Agreement for $10,000,000 effectively supersedes and terminates the prior Equity Purchase Agreement with Tarpon dated June 15, 2015, which was for $5,000,000.

During the term of the Equity Purchase Agreement, the Company may at any time deliver a “put notice” to Tarpon thereby requiring Tarpon to purchase a certain dollar amount of the Shares. Simultaneous with the delivery of such Shares, Tarpon shall deliver payment for the Shares. Subject to certain restrictions, the purchase price for the Shares shall be equal to 125% of the lowest Closing Price during the Valuation Period as such capitalized terms are defined in the Agreement.

The number of Shares sold to Tarpon shall not exceed the number of such shares that, when aggregated with all other shares of common stock of the Company then beneficially owned by Tarpon, would result in Tarpon owning more than 9.99% of all of the Company’s common stock then outstanding. Additionally, Tarpon may not execute any short sales of the Company’s common stock. Further, the Company has the right, but never the obligation to draw down.

The Equity Purchase Agreement shall terminate (i) on the date on which Tarpon shall have purchased Shares pursuant to the Equity Purchase Agreement for an aggregate Purchase Price of $10,000,000, or (ii) on the date occurring 24 months from the date on which the Equity Purchase Agreement was executed and delivered by the Company and Tarpon.

As a condition for the execution of the Equity Purchase Agreements by Tarpon, the Company issued Promissory Notes to Tarpon on June 15, 2015 and February 18, 2016 in the principal amounts of $50,000 and $25,000 with interest rates of 10% per annum. The maturity date of the note issued on June 15, 2015 was December 31, 2015 which was extended to December 31, 2016 as part of the note amendment on February 26, 2016. The maturity date of the note issued on February 18, 2016 is August 31, 2016. The issuance of the notes was recorded as a finance cost in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the period ending March 31, 2016.

In addition, on February 18 2016, the Company and Tarpon entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Agreement”). Under the terms of the Registration Agreement the Company agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Shares within 120 days of February 18, 2016. The Company is obligated to keep such registration statement effective until (i) three months after the last closing of a sale of Shares under the Purchase Agreement, (ii) the date when Tarpon may sell all the Shares under Rule 144 without volume limitations, or (iii) the date Tarpon no longer owns any of the Shares. As of March 31, 2017, Tarpon had not purchased any shares under this agreement.

Note 8 - Commitment and Contingencies

Litigation – Hughes Media Law Group, Inc.

On December 11, 2015, Hughes Media Law Group, Inc. (“HLMG”) filed a lawsuit against VNUE, Inc. in the Superior Court of King County, Washington, under case number 15-2-30108-0. HMLG claims damages of $130,552.78 for unpaid legal fees HMLG alleges are owed pursuant to an April 4, 2014 agreement with VNUE Washington, for legal work performed by HMLG for VNUE Washington prior to the Merger. The Complaint sets forth no legal basis for a lawsuit against VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) and does not, in fact, sue VNUE Washington, HMLG’s former client. The Company believes that VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) is not the proper party for this lawsuit, and reserves all available defenses and counterclaims. Under Washington Superior Court rules, VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) if service of process takes place outside of Washington, a defendant has Sixty (60) days from the date on which it was served the Complaint, to file a response setting forth its defenses. On July 25, 2016, the court issued judgment awarding HLMG $133,482.12 with interest at a rate of 12% per annum. The judgment stipulated that $12,000 be paid within five days of the judgment and payments of $4,000 per month to start in October, 2016. The amount of the settlement has been recorded in accounts payable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Note 9 – Subsequent Events

On April 10, 2017, the Company received an additional borrowing of $25,000 from Ylimit, LLC under the terms of the amended note payable agreement dated March 8, 2017 (see Note 5).

On May 2, 2017, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a 1-for-10 reverse stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. The reverse stock split has taken effect in the State of Nevada as of April 17, 2017 but has not been approved by FINRA as of the date of this report, and therefore, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have not been updated to reflect the reverse stock split.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

The statements in this quarterly report that are not reported financial results or other historical information are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. These statements appear in a number of different places in this report and can be identified by words such as “estimates”, “projects”, “expects”, “intends”, “believes”, “plans”, or their negatives or other comparable words. Also look for discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include, among others, statements regarding our business plans and availability of financing for our business.

You are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees and may involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements due to risks facing us or due to actual facts differing from the assumptions underlying our estimates. Some of these risks and assumptions include those set forth in reports and other documents we have filed with or furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We advise you that these cautionary remarks expressly qualify in their entirety all forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf. Unless required by law, we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking statements based on unanticipated events or changed expectations. However, you should carefully review the reports and other documents we file from time to time with the SEC.

Presentation of Information

As used in this annual report, the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and the “Company” mean VNUE, Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.

All dollar amounts in this annual report refer to US dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Overview

We were incorporated as a Nevada corporation on April 4, 2006.

Overview of our Current Business

Through VNUE, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, we now carry on business as a live entertainment music technology company which brings bands and fans together by capturing professional quality audio and video recordings of live performances and delivers the experience of a venue to your home and hand.

By streamlining the processes of curation, clearing, capturing, distribution and monetization of music performances, VNUE manages and simplifies the complexities of the music ecosystem. 

VNUE produces and captures rich content through its Front of House mobile application and provides world-wide distribution and monetization of live concerts and other events through a suite of mobile, web administration applications, allowing an artist to seamlessly deliver and sell their live performances directly to the fans who attend their shows. 

While VNUE will primarily be used in live music venues, we are also branching into many other entertainment experiences such as comedy, plays, musicals, university lectures, professional demonstrations and panel discussions, as well as action sports and religious events.

VNUE’s business model is based on the business to consumer VNUE software application, now in beta testing, as well as business to business monetization of our back end rights clearing system software, which is currently in development with projected beta testing beginning some time during the second quarter 2017.

We are a relatively new company and to date we have received no revenues from our operations. VNUE, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, only recently commenced operations and we have undertaken only organizational activities and software application development. Our independent auditors have raised substantial doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern without significant additional financing. Accordingly, for the foreseeable future, we will continue to be dependent on additional debt and equity financing in order to maintain our operations and continue with our development activities.

Acquisitions will be pursued where the Directors consider that there is clear value through the addition of expertise, customers, monetization potential or geographic footprint.

Our principal offices are located at 104 W. 29th Street, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10001. Our telephone number is 857-777-6190. The live music and entertainment space is constantly searching for new monetization outlets; VNUE has a solution that melds content and technology in almost any venue in the world. This befits not only artist, labels, publishers and live venues but the fan.

Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition for the three months ended March 31, 2017 should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this report. We are in the process of completing development of our products and services and therefore do not have revenues or income.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016

Software Development

Our software development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 amounted to $43,421 compared to $766,776 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease in software development expenses relative to last year was due to $699,788 in stock based compensation expense recorded last year relating to shares issued to certain employees and contractors for services received as compared to $18,500 recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Excluding stock based compensation expense, our software development expenses decreased $42,067 reflecting the decrease in salaries for full time personnel and contract labor caused by our lack of sufficient working capital.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 amounted to $280,407 compared to $182,741 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase in general and administrative expenses relative to last year was due primarily to $76,625 in stock based compensation expense relating to shares issued to certain employees and contractors for services received. Excluding the increased stock based compensation expense, our general and administrative expenses increased $21,041 reflecting an increase in professional fees offset by a decrease in salaries for full time personnel and contract labor caused by our lack of sufficient working capital.

Other Income (Expenses), Net

We recorded other expense, net for the three months ended March 31, 2017 of $28,819 compared to other income, net of $183,928 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The change in other income (expenses), net, was primarily due to increased financing costs of $77,999, offset by the decrease in the gain in fair value of derivative liability as compared to last year.

Net Loss from Operations

As a result of the foregoing software development expenses, general and administrative expenses, and other income (expenses), net, our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $352,647, compared to our net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $765,589.

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

Since our inception, we have funded our operations primarily through private offerings of our equity securities and loans.

As of March 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $7,450.

We had negative cash flows from operating activities of $110,502 for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared with negative cash flows from operating activities of $29,253 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase in our negative cash flows from operating activities for the period is primarily due to changes in our working capital accounts.

We had positive cash flows from financing activities of $100,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $21,465 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The cash flows from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was due to $100,000 in proceeds from convertible notes. The cash flows from financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was primarily due to $16,465 in advances received from stockholders and $5,000 received on the sale of common shares.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. As reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company had a stockholders’ deficit of $2,073,179 at March 31, 2017, and incurred a net loss of $352,647, and used net cash in operating activities of $100,502 for the reporting period then ended. Certain of the Company’s notes payable are also past due and in default. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements were issued. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Management estimates that the current funds on hand will be sufficient to continue operations through June 30, 2017. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to execute its strategy and in its ability to raise additional funds. Management is currently seeking additional funds, primarily through the issuance of equity securities for cash to operate our business. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company is able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in case or equity financing.

We have not generated revenues, have incurred losses since our inception, and rely upon the sale of our common stock and loans from related and other parties to fund our operations. We do not anticipate generating any revenues in the foreseeable future, and if we are unable to raise equity or secure alternative financing, we may not be able to pursue our plans and our business may fail.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in the notes to our financial statements appearing elsewhere in this prospectus, we believe that the accounting policies discussed below are critical to our financial results and to the understanding of our past and future performance, as these policies relate to the more significant areas involving management’s estimates and assumptions. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if: (1) it requires us to make assumptions because information was not available at the time or it included matters that were highly uncertain at the time we were making our estimate; and (2) changes in the estimate could have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. See Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices herein.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include the assumptions used to value the derivative liabilities, the valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset and the accruals for potential liabilities.

Internal Software Development Costs

Development costs incurred in the research and development of new software products and enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility has been established. The Company considers technological feasibility to be established when all planning, designing, coding and testing has been completed according to design specifications. After technological feasibility is established, any additional costs are capitalized. Through March 31, 2017, technological feasibility of the Company’s software had not been established; and, accordingly, no costs have been capitalized to date.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company evaluates its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company periodically issues stock options and warrants to employees and non-employees in non-capital raising transactions for services and for financing costs. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to employees based on the authoritative guidance provided by FASB where the value of the award is measured on the date of grant and recognized as compensation expense on the straight-line basis over the vesting period. The Company accounts for stock option and warrant grants issued and vesting to non-employees in accordance with the authoritative guidance of the FASB where the value of the stock compensation is based upon the measurement date as determined at either a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached, or b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete. Options granted to non-employees are revalued each reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense in the respective period. As the options vest, they are valued on each vesting date and an adjustment is recorded for the difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of vesting. In certain circumstances where there are no future performance requirements by the non-employee, option grants are immediately vested and the total stock-based compensation charge is recorded in the period of the measurement date.

The fair value of the Company’s stock option and warrant grants are estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, which uses certain assumptions related to risk-free interest rates, expected volatility, expected life of the stock options or warrants, and future dividends. Compensation expense is recorded based upon the value derived from the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model, and based on actual experience. The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes-Merton Option Pricing model could materially affect compensation expense recorded in future periods.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 of the condensed consolidated financial statement for management’s discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2017. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on that evaluation, and the material weaknesses outlined below under Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, that, due to weaknesses in our internal controls described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information may not be accumulated and communicated to our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Under the supervision of our principal executive officer and principal accounting officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 using the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, the Company determined that there were deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.

Management is currently evaluating remediation plans for the above control deficiencies.

In light of the existence of these material weaknesses, management concluded that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls. As a result, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

Weinberg & Company, an independent registered public accounting firm, is not required to and has not issued a report concerning the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 pursuant to rules of the SEC.

Changes in Internal Control

During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. Other than described herein, neither the Company, nor its officers or directors are involved in, or the subject of, any pending legal proceedings or governmental actions the outcome of which, in management’s opinion, would be material to our financial condition or results of operations. 

On December 11, 2015, Hughes Media Law Group, Inc. filed a lawsuit against VNUE, Inc. in the Superior Court of King County, Washington, under case number 15-2-30108-0. HMLG claims damages of $130,552.78 for unpaid legal fees HMLG alleges are owed pursuant to an April 4, 2014 agreement with VNUE Washington, for legal work performed by HMLG for VNUE Washington prior to the Merger. The Complaint sets forth no legal basis for a lawsuit against VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) and does not, in fact, sue VNUE Washington, HMLG’s former client. The Company believes that VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) is not the proper party for this lawsuit, and reserves all available defenses and counterclaims. Under Washington Superior Court rules, VNUE, Inc. (Nevada) if service of process takes place outside of Washington, a defendant has Sixty (60) days from the date on which it was served the Complaint, to file a response setting forth its defenses. The lawsuit was amended by HMLG, and now includes VNUE Media, Inc. and VNUE Technology, Inc. as additional parties. On July 25, 2016, the court issued judgment awarding HLMG $133,482.12 with interest at a rate of 12% per annum. The judgment stipulated that $12,000 be paid within five days of the judgment and payments of $4,000 per month to start in October, 2016. The amount of the settlement has been recorded in accounts payable in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

There were no defaults upon senior securities during the period ended March 31, 2017.

ITEM 4. MINING SAFETY DISCLOSURES

N/A

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

The Board of Directors of Vnue, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), has approved a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), at a ratio of 1 for 10 of each share issued and outstanding on the effective date of April 15, 2017 (the “Reverse Stock Split”).

Reason for the Reverse Stock Split

The Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company to reverse split the common stock of the Company on a one (1) for ten (10) basis because the Company’s stock is currently quoted with no Bid and a very low ask affording little or no liquidity for the shareholders. It is the belief of the Board that the reverse split will cause the Bid and Ask prices to increase, creating the possibility for the stock to trade at more reasonable prices and a more reasonable spread between the Bid and Ask prices. The Company would also have sufficient authorized shares to be able to acquire additional capital.

The Board of Directors of the Company have the right to reverse split the stock of the Company in accordance with the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS Section 78.207 and NRS Section 78.209) to effect a reverse stock split of the Common Stock and the By Laws of the Company do not preclude the Board of Directors from taking such action. The reverse split became effective at the opening of business on April 15, 1017 with the State of Nevada however the reverse split has not become effective as to FINRA and the marketplace until FINRA completes their review of the corporate action taken by the Company authorizing the reverse split.

Effects of the Reverse Stock Split

The Company is currently authorized to issue 750,000,0000 shares of Common Stock. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the authorized shares will not be changed.

As of April 4, 2017 prior to the reverse there were approximately 653,709,302 outstanding. After the 1 for 10 reverse split the number of shares outstanding is 65,370,931.

Effective Date; Symbol; CUSIP Number

The Reverse Stock Split becomes effective with FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) and in the marketplace upon FINRA’s approval of our corporate action which is currently pending. Upon the effective date the shares of common stock will begin trading on a split-adjusted basis and the Company’s trading symbol will change to “VNUED” for a period of 20 business days, after which the “D” will be removed from the Company’s trading symbol, which will revert to the original symbol of “VNUE”. A new CUSIP number has been issued and will be placed on all stock certificates going forward.

Split Adjustment; No Fractional Shares

On the Effective Date, the total number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock held by each stockholder will be converted automatically into the number of whole shares of Common Stock equal to (i) the number of issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock held by such stockholder immediately prior to the reverse stock split, divided by (ii) 10. No fractional shares will be issued, and no cash or other consideration will be paid. Instead, the Company will issue one whole share of the post-Reverse Stock Split Common Stock to any stockholder who otherwise would have received a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

State Filing

The Reverse Stock Split was effected by the Company filing a Certificate of Change (the “Certificate”) pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) Section 78.207 and Section 78.209 with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on April 4, 2017. The Certificate became effective with the Nevada Secretary of State on April 15, 2017. Under Nevada law, no amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation is required in connection with the Reverse Stock Split.

No Stockholder Approval Required

Under Nevada law, because the Reverse Stock Split was approved by the Board of Directors of the Company in accordance with NRS Section 78.207. No stockholder approval is required. NRS Section 78.207 provides that the Company may affect the reverse stock split without stockholder approval . Company does not pay money or issue scrip to stockholders who would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. As described herein, the Company has complied with these requirements.

Capitalization

The Reverse Stock Split does not affect the Company’s authorized preferred stock. There are no outstanding shares of the Company’s preferred stock. After the Reverse Stock Split, the Company’s authorized preferred Stock of 20,000,000 shares will remain unchanged.

Immediately after the Reverse Stock Split, each stockholder’s percentage ownership interest in the Company and proportional voting power will remain virtually unchanged except for minor changes and adjustments that will result from rounding fractional shares into whole shares. The rights and privileges of the holders of shares of Common Stock will be substantially unaffected by the reverse stock split.

All options, warrants and convertible securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split that have a fixed conversion price will be appropriately adjusted by dividing the number of shares of Common Stock into which the options, warrants and convertible securities are exercisable or convertible by 10 and multiplying the exercise or conversion price thereof by 10, as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits

______________

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.