Annual Statements Open main menu

Vyant Bio, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2018 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 
FORM 10-Q
 
 
 
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018
Or
 
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 001-35817
 
CANCER GENETICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 
 
Delaware
 
04-3462475
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
201 Route 17 North 2nd Floor
Rutherford, NJ 07070
(201) 528-9200
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨


Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
 
Large accelerated filer
 
¨
  
Accelerated filer
 
¨
 
 
 
 
Non-accelerated filer
 
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  
Smaller reporting company
 
x
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Emerging growth company
 
x
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý
As of August 6, 2018, there were 27,746,497 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 of Cancer Genetics, Inc. outstanding.
 


Table of Contents

CANCER GENETICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 
 
 



Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
Item 1.    Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except par value)
 
June 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
ASSETS
 
 
 
CURRENT ASSETS
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
1,601

 
$
9,541

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of 2018 $7,401; 2017 $6,539
9,357

 
10,958

Other current assets
3,245

 
2,707

Total current assets
14,203

 
23,206

FIXED ASSETS, net of accumulated depreciation
4,742

 
5,550

OTHER ASSETS
 
 
 
Restricted cash
350

 
350

Patents and other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
4,276

 
4,478

Investment in joint venture
243

 
246

Goodwill
17,257

 
17,992

Other
300

 
399

Total other assets
22,426

 
23,465

Total Assets
$
41,371

 
$
52,221

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
$
9,778

 
$
8,715

Obligations under capital leases, current portion
322

 
272

Deferred revenue
2,004

 
516

Line of credit
3,438

 
4,137

Term note, current portion
6,000

 
6,000

Total current liabilities
21,542

 
19,640

Obligations under capital leases
564

 
624

Deferred rent payable and other
304

 
360

Warrant liability
1,134

 
4,403

Deferred revenue, long-term
547

 
429

Total Liabilities
24,091

 
25,456

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
Preferred stock, authorized 9,764 shares, $0.0001 par value, none issued

 

Common stock, authorized 100,000 shares, $0.0001 par value, 27,726 and 27,754 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively
3

 
3

Additional paid-in capital
162,575

 
161,527

Accumulated other comprehensive income
134

 
69

Accumulated (deficit)
(145,432
)
 
(134,834
)
Total Stockholders’ Equity
17,280

 
26,765

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
$
41,371

 
$
52,221


See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

Table of Contents

Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) 
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Revenue
$
7,036

 
$
6,604

 
$
14,703

 
$
13,570

Cost of revenues
4,853

 
4,034

 
9,935

 
8,243

Gross profit
2,183

 
2,570

 
4,768

 
5,327

Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Research and development
673

 
989

 
1,354

 
2,099

General and administrative
5,419

 
3,529

 
10,679

 
7,006

Sales and marketing
1,341

 
1,165

 
2,932

 
2,136

Total operating expenses
7,433

 
5,683

 
14,965

 
11,241

Loss from operations
(5,250
)
 
(3,113
)
 
(10,197
)
 
(5,914
)
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense
(578
)
 
(253
)
 
(817
)
 
(447
)
Interest income

 
10

 
21

 
27

Change in fair value of acquisition note payable
64

 
13

 
81

 
(219
)
Change in fair value of warrant liability
2,154

 
577

 
2,846

 
(6,717
)
Other income (expense)
(23
)
 

 
(23
)
 
(46
)
Total other income (expense)
1,617

 
347

 
2,108

 
(7,402
)
Loss before income taxes
(3,633
)
 
(2,766
)
 
(8,089
)
 
(13,316
)
Income tax (benefit)

 

 

 
(970
)
Net (loss)
$
(3,633
)
 
$
(2,766
)
 
$
(8,089
)
 
$
(12,346
)
Basic net (loss) per share
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.14
)
 
$
(0.30
)
 
$
(0.64
)
Diluted net (loss) per share
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.16
)
 
$
(0.30
)
 
$
(0.64
)
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
27,049

 
19,697

 
27,049

 
19,301

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
27,049

 
20,663

 
27,049

 
19,301

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net (loss)
$
(3,633
)
 
$
(2,766
)
 
$
(8,089
)
 
$
(12,346
)
        Foreign currency translation gain
85

 

 
65

 

Comprehensive (loss)
$
(3,548
)
 
$
(2,766
)
 
$
(8,024
)
 
$
(12,346
)
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

Table of Contents

Cancer Genetics, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) 
(in thousands)
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Net (loss)
$
(8,089
)
 
$
(12,346
)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used in) operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation
879

 
981

Amortization
269

 
166

Provision for bad debts
862

 
236

Stock-based compensation
542

 
876

Change in fair value of acquisition note payable
(81
)
 
219

Change in fair value of warrant liability
(2,846
)
 
6,717

Amortization of debt issuance costs

 
31

Amortization of discount on debt

 
48

Gain on sale of India subsidiary
(9
)
 

Modification of 2017 Debt warrants
83

 

Loss in equity method investment
3

 
19

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 
78

Changes in:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
374

 
(1,638
)
Other current assets
(467
)
 
(370
)
Other non-current assets
1

 
38

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue
421

 
(2,361
)
Deferred rent payable and other
(43
)
 
(83
)
Net cash (used in) operating activities
(8,101
)
 
(7,389
)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Purchase of fixed assets
(529
)
 
(400
)
Patent costs
(63
)
 
(63
)
Purchase of cost method investment

 
(200
)
Cash received in the sale of India subsidiary, net of cash transferred
1,551

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
959

 
(663
)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
(160
)
 
(101
)
Proceeds from warrant exercises

 
1,771

Proceeds from option exercises

 
4

Proceeds from borrowings on Silicon Valley Bank line of credit
3,162

 
2,000

Repayment of borrowings on Silicon Valley Bank line of credit
(3,861
)
 

Proceeds from Partners for Growth IV, L.P. term note

 
6,000

Principal payments on Silicon Valley Bank term note

 
(4,667
)
Payment of debt issuance costs and loan fees

 
(287
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
(859
)
 
4,720

Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
61

 

Net (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
(7,940
)
 
(3,332
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
 
 
 
Beginning
9,891

 
9,502

Ending
$
1,951

 
$
6,170



3

Table of Contents

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
$
638

 
$
410

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
Fixed assets acquired through capital lease arrangements
$
150

 
$
567

Derivative warrants issued with debt

 
1,004

Fair value of warrants reclassified from liabilities to equity
423

 

Sale of India subsidiary:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, net
$
365

 
$

Other current assets
(71
)
 

Fixed assets, net
608

 

Goodwill
735

 

Other noncurrent assets
98

 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue
(180
)
 

Deferred rent and other
(13
)
 

Gain on sale of India subsidiary
9

 

Cash received in the sale of India subsidiary, net of cash transferred
$
1,551

 
$


See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.     Organization, Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, Recently Adopted Accounting Standards, Acquisition, Reclassifications and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We are an emerging leader in the field of precision medicine, enabling individualized therapies in the field of oncology through our tests, services and molecular markers. We develop, commercialize and provide molecular- and biomarker-based tests and services, including proprietary preclinical oncology and immuno-oncology services, that enable biotech and pharmaceutical companies engaged in oncology and immuno-oncology trials to better select candidate populations and reduce adverse drug reactions by providing information regarding genomic and molecular factors influencing subject responses to therapeutics. Through our clinical services, we enable physicians to personalize the clinical management of each individual patient by providing genomic information to better diagnose, monitor and inform cancer treatment. We have a comprehensive, disease-focused oncology testing portfolio, and extensive set of anti-tumor referenced data based on predictive xenograft and syngeneic tumor models. Our tests and techniques target a wide range of indications, covering all ten of the top cancers in prevalence in the United States, with additional unique capabilities offered by our FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test for identifying difficult to diagnose tumor types or poorly differentiated metastatic disease. Following the acquisition of vivoPharm, Pty Ltd. (“vivoPharm”) we provide contract research services, focused primarily on unique specialized studies to guide drug discovery and development programs in the oncology and immuno-oncology fields.

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware on April 8, 1999 and have offices and laboratories located in New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Australia. Our laboratories comply with the highest regulatory standards as appropriate for the services we deliver including CLIA, CAP, New York State and California State, and are regularly audited by our biopharmaceutical customers under strict requirements for drug discovery and development. Our services are built on a foundation of world-class scientific knowledge and intellectual property in solid tumor and blood-borne cancers, as well as strong academic relationships with major cancer centers such as Memorial Sloan-Kettering, Mayo Clinic, and the National Cancer Institute. We offer preclinical services such as predictive tumor models, human orthotopic xenografts and syngeneic immuno-oncology relevant tumor models in our Hershey, Pennsylvania facility, and we are a leader in the field of immuno-oncology preclinical services in the United States. This service is supplemented with GLP toxicology and extended bioanalytical services in our Australian based facility in Bundoora VIC.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions for interim reporting as prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary to make the financial statements not misleading have been included. As such, the information included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2018. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, included herein was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date, but does not include all disclosures including notes required by GAAP. Interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future interim period or for the year ending December 31, 2018.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The guidance requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to a customer. The ASU replaces most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date” which defers the effective date for ASU 2014-09 by one year. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Gross versus Net),” which clarifies the implementation guidance in ASU 2014-09 relating to principal versus agent considerations. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which clarifies guidance related to the impact of goods and services on a performance obligation and timing and pattern of recognition issues related to intellectual property contracts. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” which clarifies certain narrow provisions of ASU 2014-09. On January 1, 2018, we adopted these ASUs using the modified retrospective method. We

5

Table of Contents

recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit. Financial information for the six months ended June 30, 2017 has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for that period.

The transition adjustment resulted in a net reduction to the opening balance of accumulated deficit of $2.5 million on January 1, 2018 and increased deferred revenue associated with Biopharma Services and Discovery Services by $1.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, due to a change in our policies for recognized revenue for performance obligations fulfilled over time. In our Clinical Services area, the majority of the amounts historically charged as a provision for bad debts are now considered an implicit price concession in determining net revenue under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606. Accordingly, we now report uncollectible balances as a reduction in the transaction price, and therefore, as a reduction in net revenues rather than a component of selling, general and administrative expenses.

The following table presents the amounts by which each line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss was affected by adopting the new revenue recognition guidance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
 
As Reported
 
ASC 606 Adjustments
 
Balances Without Adoption
 
As Reported
 
ASC 606 Adjustments
 
Balances Without Adoption
Revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Biopharma Services
 
$
3,591

 
$
(455
)
 
3,136

 
7,249

 
$
(762
)
 
6,487

Clinical Services
 
2,122

 

 
2,122

 
4,464

 

 
4,464

Discovery Services
 
1,323

 
(131
)
 
1,192

 
2,990

 
(650
)
 
2,340

 
 
$
7,036

 
$
(586
)
 
$
6,450

 
$
14,703

 
$
(1,412
)
 
$
13,291


The following table presents the amounts by which each line item in the Consolidated Balance Sheet was affected by adopting the new revenue recognition guidance at June 30, 2018 (in thousands):
 
 
June 30, 2018
 
 
As Reported
 
ASC 606 Adjustments
 
Balances Without Adoption
CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
Biopharma Services
 
$
1,161

 
$
(1,092
)
 
$
69

Clinical Services
 

 

 

Discovery Services
 
843

 

 
843

 
 
$
2,004

 
$
(1,092
)
 
$
912

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 
Biopharma Services
 
$
532

 
$

 
$
532

Clinical Services
 

 

 

Discovery Services
 
15

 

 
15

 
 
$
547

 
$

 
$
547

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated (deficit)
 
$
(145,432
)
 
$
1,092

 
$
(144,340
)

Restricted Cash


6

Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2016-18, which requires companies to include restricted cash accounts with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning of period and end of period total amounts shown on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Acquisition of vivoPharm
On August 15, 2017, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of vivoPharm, with its principal place of business in Victoria, Australia, in a transaction valued at approximately $1.6 million in cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $8.1 million based on the closing price of the stock on August 15, 2017. The Company has deposited in escrow 20% of the stock consideration until the expiration of twelve months from the closing date to serve as the initial source for any indemnification claims and adjustments.
Prior to the acquisition, vivoPharm was a contract research organization (“CRO”) that specialized in planning and conducting unique, specialized studies to guide drug discovery and development programs with a concentration in oncology and immuno-oncology. The transaction is being accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations in accordance with GAAP. Under this method, the total consideration transferred to consummate the acquisition is being allocated to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values as of the closing date of the acquisition. The acquisition method of accounting requires extensive use of estimates and judgments to allocate the consideration transferred to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Accordingly, the allocation of the consideration transferred is preliminary and will be adjusted upon completion of the final valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The final valuation is expected to be completed as soon as practicable but no later than twelve months after the closing date of the acquisition. As of June 30, 2018, the valuation of the lab supplies, deferred revenue and deferred taxes is provisional.

The estimated allocation of the purchase price as of August 15, 2017 consists of the following (in thousands):
Cash
 
$
544

Accounts receivable
 
905

Lab supplies
 
350

Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
60

Fixed assets
 
765

Intangible assets
 
3,160

Goodwill
 
5,960

Accounts payable and accrued expenses
 
(913
)
Deferred revenue
 
(814
)
Deferred rent and other
 
(222
)
Obligations under capital leases
 
(76
)
Total purchase price
 
$
9,719


The following table provides certain pro forma financial information for the Company as if the acquisition of vivoPharm discussed above occurred on January 1, 2017 (in thousands except per share amounts):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2017
Revenue
$
7,933

 
$
16,070

Net loss
(2,850
)
 
(12,642
)
 
 
 
 
Basic net loss per share
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.57
)
Dilutive net loss per share
(0.14
)
 
(0.57
)

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 include the operations of vivoPharm, which accounted for approximately $1,280,000 and $2,708,000 of the Company’s consolidated Discovery Services revenue, respectively. The net income (loss) of vivoPharm cannot be determined, as its operations were integrated with Cancer Genetics.

7

Table of Contents


Restructuring

During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the Company adopted a plan to migrate its California operations to its New Jersey and North Carolina locations and to permanently close its California laboratory. The Company incurred approximately $733,000 of restructuring costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, which are included in general and administrative expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance codified in ASC 842, Leases, which supersedes the guidance in former ASC 840, Leases, to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. The standard will become effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The guidance is required to be adopted at the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. We plan to adopt this guidance on the effective date. We are currently evaluating the impact the provisions will have on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. Going Concern

At June 30, 2018, our cash position and history of losses required management to assess our ability to continue operating as a going concern, according to FASB ASC 205-40, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The Company does not have sufficient cash at June 30, 2018 to fund normal operations for the next twelve months. In addition, the Company was in violation of certain financial covenants under its debt agreements at April 30, 2018. These covenant violations were waived on May 14, 2018 by Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”) and Partners for Growth IV, L.P. (“PFG”). The SVB and PFG loan covenants were modified on June 21, 2018 and June 30, 2018, respectively; however, the Company was in violation of certain of the modified covenants at May 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018 and expects to be in violation of these covenants at July 31, 2018. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to obtain waivers of its covenant violations, modify its existing debt, raise additional equity or debt capital or spin-off non-core assets to raise additional cash. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Net cash used in operating activities was $8.1 million and $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $1.6 million at June 30, 2018, a reduction from $9.5 million at December 31, 2017. The Company has negative working capital at June 30, 2018 of $7.3 million.

The Company currently requires a significant amount of additional capital to fund operations and pay its accounts payable, and its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise such additional capital and achieve profitability. If the Company is not able to raise such additional capital on a timely basis or on favorable terms, the Company may need to scale back or, in extreme cases, discontinue its operations or liquidate its assets.

We have hired Raymond James & Associates, Inc. as our financial advisor to assist with evaluating strategic options. Such options could include raising more capital, the acquisition of another company and/or complementary assets, the sale of the Company or another type of strategic partnership. We can provide no assurances that our current actions will be successful or that additional sources of financing with be available to us on favorable terms, if at all.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3.     Revenue and Accounts Receivable

Revenue by service type for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 is comprised of the following (in thousands): 


8

Table of Contents

 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Biopharma Services
$
3,591

 
$
3,288

 
7,249

 
$
7,007

Clinical Services
2,122

 
3,053

 
4,464

 
6,007

Discovery Services
1,323

 
263

 
2,990

 
556

 
$
7,036

 
$
6,604

 
$
14,703

 
$
13,570

The table above includes approximately $1,280,000 and $2,708,000 of Discovery Services revenue from our acquisition of vivoPharm for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

Accounts receivable by service type at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consists of the following (in thousands): 


June 30,
2018
 
December 31,
2017
Biopharma Services
$
3,350

 
$
3,746

Clinical Services
12,292

 
12,205

Discovery Services
1,116

 
1,546

Allowance for doubtful accounts
(7,401
)
 
(6,539
)

$
9,357

 
$
10,958


Revenue for Biopharma Services are customized solutions for patient stratification and treatment selection through an extensive suite of DNA-based testing services. Biopharma Services are billed to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Clinical Services are tests performed to provide information on diagnosis of cancers to guide patient management. Clinical Services tests can be billed to Medicare, another third party insurer or the referring community hospital or other healthcare facility, or directly to patients. Discovery Services are services that provide the tools and testing methods for companies and researchers seeking to identify new DNA-based biomarkers for disease. The breakdown of our Clinical Services revenue (as a percent of total revenue) is as follows:

 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Medicare
9%
 
16%
 
11%
 
15%
Other third party payors
21%
 
30%
 
19%
 
29%
 
30%
 
46%
 
30%
 
44%
We have historically derived a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of test ordering sites. Test ordering sites account for all of our Clinical Services revenue. Our test ordering sites are largely hospitals, cancer centers, reference laboratories, physician offices and biopharmaceutical companies. Oncologists and pathologists at these sites order the tests on behalf of the needs of their oncology patients or as part of a clinical trial sponsored by a biopharmaceutical company in which the patient is being enrolled. We generally do not have formal, long-term written agreements with such test ordering sites, and, as a result, we may lose a significant test ordering site at any time, except with biopharmaceutical companies.

During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we began using our billing system to calculate test counts as opposed to our laboratory information systems, as we believe it more closely aligns the volume of tests with the tests on which we calculate expected collection prices. The billing software may count a test differently than our laboratory information systems have in prior periods. The top five test ordering sites during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 accounted for approximately 30% and 50% of our testing volumes, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, there were no customers that accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, there was one biopharmaceutical company which accounted for approximately 12% of our total revenue.

The top five test ordering sites during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 accounted for approximately 31% and 41% of our testing volumes, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, there were no customers that accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, there was one biopharmaceutical company which accounted for approximately 11% of our total revenue.


9

Table of Contents

We record deferred revenues (contract liabilities) when cash payments are received or due in advance of our performance, including amounts which are refundable.

Performance Obligations:

 
Biopharma Services
 
Clinical Services
 
Discovery Services
Performance Obligation Satisfaction and Revenue Recognition:
Performance obligations are satisfied at a point in time as the Company processes samples delivered by the customer. Project level activities, including study setup and project management, are satisfied over the life of the contract. Revenues are recognized at a point in time when the test results or other deliverables are reported to the customer. Project level fee revenue is recognized ratably over the life of the contract.
 
Performance obligations are satisfied at a point in time when the tests are reported to the customer. Revenues are recognized at a point in time when the test results are reported to the ordering site.
 
Performance obligations are satisfied over time and revenue is recognized using the time elapsed method as the Company delivers study results to the customers.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Significant Payment Terms:
Monthly invoices at a contractual rate are generated as services are delivered for work completed during the prior month. Some contracts have prepayments prior to services being rendered that are recorded as deferred revenue.
 
The Company invoices at its list price or contractually negotiated price. Payments realized vary from amounts invoiced. Accordingly, the Company estimates the variable consideration it expects to collect.
 
As results are delivered, the invoices are generated based on contractual rates. Some contracts have prepayments prior to services being rendered that are recorded as deferred revenue.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nature of Services:
Biopharma testing services, study setup and study management
 
Clinical testing services
 
Discovery services

Remaining Performance Obligations:

Services offered under the Biopharma and Discovery Services frequently take time to complete under their respective contacts. These times vary depending on specific contract arrangements like the length of the study in the case of Discovery Services and how samples are delivered to us for processing in the case of Biopharma Services. In the case of Clinical Services and Discovery Services, the duration of performance obligation is less than one year. As of June 30, 2018 the Company had approximately $15.3 million in remaining performance obligations in the Biopharma Services area. We expect to recognize the remaining performance obligations over the next two years.

Practical Expedients:

Our customer arrangements in Biopharma Services and Discovery Services do not contain any significant financing component (interest). We have not recognized the financing component in the case of Clinical Services, as the payment plans we may grant to our self-pay customers do not to exceed six months.
We do not incur any incremental costs to obtain or fulfill our customer contracts that require capitalization under the new revenue standard and have elected the practical expedient afforded by the new revenue standard to expense such costs as incurred.
We exclude from the measurement of the transaction price all taxes that we collect from customers that are assessed by governmental authorities and are both imposed on and concurrent with specific revenue-producing transactions.
Note 4.     Sale of India Subsidiary

On April 26, 2018, we sold our India subsidiary, BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Private Limited (“BioServe”) to Reprocell, Inc., for $1.9 million, including $1.6 million in cash at closing and up to an additional $300,000, which is recorded in other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2018. The additional $300,000 is contingent upon the India subsidiary meeting a specified revenue target in 2018. As a result of this transaction, we recognized a gain of approximately $9,000 on the disposal of BioServe, which is included in other income (expense) in our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss.

10

Table of Contents


Note 5.     Earnings Per Share

For purposes of this calculation, stock warrants, outstanding stock options and unvested restricted shares are considered common stock equivalents using the treasury stock method, and are the only such equivalents outstanding.

Basic net loss and diluted net loss per share data were computed as follows (in thousands except per share data):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
2017
2018
2017
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
Net (loss) for basic earnings per share
$
(3,633
)
$
(2,766
)
$
(8,089
)
$
(12,346
)
Change in fair value of warrant liability

577



Net (loss) for diluted earnings per share
$
(3,633
)
$
(3,343
)
$
(8,089
)
$
(12,346
)
Denominator:
 
 
 
 
Weighted-average basic common shares outstanding
27,049

19,697

27,049

19,301

Assumed conversion of dilutive securities:
 
 

 
Common stock purchase warrants

966



Potentially dilutive common shares

966



Denominator for diluted earnings per share – adjusted weighted-average shares
27,049

20,663

27,049

19,301

Basic net (loss) per share
$
(0.13
)
$
(0.14
)
$
(0.30
)
$
(0.64
)
Diluted net (loss) per share
$
(0.13
)
$
(0.16
)
$
(0.30
)
$
(0.64
)

The following table summarizes equivalent units outstanding that were excluded from the earnings per share calculation because their effects were anti-dilutive (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Common stock purchase warrants
10,055

 
4,163

 
10,055

 
6,599

Stock options
3,085

 
2,578

 
3,085

 
2,578

Restricted shares of common stock
57

 
75

 
57

 
75

 
13,197

 
6,816

 
13,197

 
9,252


Note 6. Debt

Term Note and Line of Credit

On March 22, 2017, we entered into a two year asset-based revolving line of credit agreement (“ABL”) with SVB. The SVB credit facility provides for an ABL for an amount not to exceed the lesser of (a) $6.0 million or (b) 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus the lesser of 50% of the net collectible value of third party accounts receivable or three (3) times the average monthly collection amount of third party accounts receivable over the previous quarter. The ABL requires monthly interest payments at the Wall Street Journal prime rate plus 1.50% (6.50% at June 30, 2018) and matures on March 22, 2019. We also pay a fee of 0.25% per year on the average unused portion of the ABL. At June 30, 2018, we have borrowed approximately $3.4 million on the ABL, which is the maximum amount allowed based on eligible accounts receivable.
We concurrently entered into a three year $6.0 million term loan agreement (“PFG Term Note”) with PFG. The PFG Term Note is an interest only loan with the full principal and any outstanding interest due at maturity on March 22, 2020. Interest is payable monthly at a rate of 11.5% per annum. We may prepay the PFG Term Note in whole or part at any time without penalty.

Both loan agreements require us to comply with certain financial covenants, including minimum adjusted EBITDA, revenue and liquidity covenants, and restrict us from, among other things, paying cash dividends, incurring debt and entering into certain transactions without the prior consent of the lenders. Repayment of amounts borrowed under the new loan agreements may be accelerated if an event of default occurs, which includes, among other things, a violation of such financial covenants

11

Table of Contents

and negative covenants. As of April 30, 2018, we were in violation of certain financial covenants. These covenant violations were waived on May 14, 2018 by SVB and PFG. The SVB and PFG loan covenants were modified on June 21, 2018 and June 30, 2018, respectively; in conjunction with these modifications. The Company incurred approximately $208,000 of debt modification costs that were expensed due to violating the modified covenants as of May 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018. In addition, the Company expects to be in violation of certain of the modified covenants at July 31, 2018. The Company is in discussions with its lenders to obtain waivers of these loan covenants.

Our obligations to SVB under the ABL facility are secured by a first priority security interest on substantially all of our assets, and our obligations under the PFG Term Note are secured by a second priority security interest subordinated to the SVB lien.

In connection with the PFG Term Note, we issued seven year warrants to the lenders to purchase an aggregate of 443,262 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.82 per share (the “PFG Warrants”). On June 30, 2018, the PFG Warrants were amended to reduce the exercise price to $0.92 per share.

At June 30, 2018, the principal amount of the PFG Term Note of $6,000,000 is due in 2020. Because we are in violation of certain financial covenants at May 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018 and have not obtained waivers from our lenders, the PFG Term Note is presented as a current liability.

Convertible Debt

On July 17, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement pursuant to which the Company issued a convertible promissory note to an institutional accredited investor in the initial principal amount of $2,625,000. The Company received consideration of $2,500,000, reflecting an original issue discount of $100,000 and expenses payable by the Company of $25,000. The convertible note has an 18 month term and carries interest at 10% per annum. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.80 per share. See Note 14 for additional information.

Note 7. Stock-Based Compensation

We have two equity incentive plans: the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”, and together with the 2008 Plan, the “Stock Option Plans”). The Stock Option Plans are meant to provide additional incentive to officers, employees and consultants to remain in our employment. Options granted are generally exercisable for up to 10 years.

At June 30, 2018, 145,753 shares remain available for future awards under the 2011 Plan. Effective April 9, 2018, the Company is no longer able to issue options from the 2008 Plan.

A summary of employee and non-employee stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2018 is as follows:
 
Options Outstanding
 
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in thousands)
 
Number of
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Outstanding January 1, 2018
2,844

 
$
7.00

 
6.96
 
$
4

Granted
657

 
0.89

 
 
 
 
Cancelled or expired
(416
)
 
5.98

 
 
 
 
Outstanding June 30, 2018
3,085

 
$
5.84

 
6.34
 
$

Exercisable June 30, 2018
1,776

 
$
8.70

 
4.18
 
$


Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the fair value of our common stock and the exercise price of outstanding, in-the-money options.

As of June 30, 2018, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted to employees was $1,546,522 which we expect to recognize over the next 2.97 years.

The fair value of options granted to employees is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. This valuation model requires us to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the calculation, including the expected term (the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding), the volatility of our common stock, a

12

Table of Contents

risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. Forfeitures will be recorded when they occur. No compensation cost is recorded for options that do not vest. We use the simplified calculation of expected life described in the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment, and volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the expected life of the option. We use an expected dividend yield of zero, as we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future.

The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options granted to employees during the periods presented:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Volatility
77.81
%
 
76.91
%
 
77.81
%
 
74.31
%
Risk free interest rate
2.89
%
 
1.87
%
 
2.89
%
 
1.99
%
Dividend yield
0.00
%
 
0.00
%
 
0.00
%
 
0.00
%
Term (years)
6.49

 
5.90

 
6.49

 
5.98

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period
$
0.63

 
$
2.75

 
$
0.63

 
$
1.88


In May 2014, we issued 200,000 options to a Director with an exercise price of $15.89. See Note 12 for additional information. The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the fair value of options reaching their measurement date for non-employees during the periods presented:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2017
Volatility
76.39
%
 
76.90
%
Risk free interest rate
2.19
%
 
2.21
%
Dividend yield
0.00
%
 
0.00
%
Term (years)
6.89

 
7.02


Restricted stock awards have been granted to employees, directors and consultants as compensation for services. At June 30, 2018, there was $117,763 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock granted to employees and directors; we expect to recognize the cost over 1.13 years.

The following table summarizes the activities for our non-vested restricted stock awards for the six months ended June 30, 2018:
 
Non-vested Restricted Stock Awards
 
Number of
Shares
(in thousands)
 
Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Non-vested at January 1, 2018
91

 
$
4.21

Vested
(11
)
 
4.58

Cancelled
(23
)
 
6.66

Non-vested at June 30, 2018
57

 
$
3.16


The following table presents the effects of stock-based compensation related to stock option and restricted stock awards to employees and non-employees on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss during the periods presented (in thousands):

13

Table of Contents

 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2018
 
2017
Cost of revenues
$
90

 
$
69

 
$
181

 
$
128

Research and development
16

 
49

 
31

 
99

General and administrative
140

 
293

 
298

 
593

Sales and marketing
22

 
30

 
32

 
56

Total stock-based compensation
$
268

 
$
441

 
$
542

 
$
876


Note 8. Warrants

The following table summarizes the warrant activity for the six months ended June 30, 2018 (in thousands, except exercise price): 
Issued With / For
Exercise
Price
 
Warrants
Outstanding
January 1,
2018
 
Transfer Between Derivative Warrants and Non-Derivative Warrants
 
Warrants Outstanding June 30, 2018
Non-Derivative Warrants:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financing
$
10.00

  
243

 

 
243

Financing
15.00

  
276

 

 
276

2015 Offering
5.00

  
3,450

 

 
3,450

2017 Debt
0.92

B

 
443

 
443

Total non-derivative warrants
5.49

C
3,969

 
443

 
4,412

Derivative Warrants:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016 Offerings
2.25

A
1,968

 

 
1,968

2017 Debt
2.82

B
443

 
(443
)
 

2017 Offering
2.35

A
3,500

 

 
3,500

2017 Offering
2.50

A
175

 

 
175

Total derivative warrants
2.32

C
6,086

 
(443
)
 
5,643

Total
$
3.71

C
10,055

 

 
10,055


A
These warrants are subject to fair value accounting and contain a contingent net cash settlement feature. See Note 9.
B
These warrants were subject to fair value accounting until the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants became fixed on April 2, 2018. Effective June 30, 2018, the exercise price was reduced from $2.82 per share to $0.92 per share. See Note 9.
C
Weighted-average exercise prices are as of June 30, 2018.

Note 9. Fair Value of Warrants

The following table summarizes the derivative warrant activity subject to fair value accounting for the six months ended June 30, 2018 (in thousands):
Issued with/for
Fair value of warrants
outstanding as of
December 31, 2017
 
Change in fair
value of warrants
 
Reclassification of warrants from liability to equity
 
Fair value of warrants
outstanding as of
June 30, 2018
2016 Offerings
$
1,929

 
$
(1,091
)
 
$

 
$
838

2017 Debt
501

 
(78
)
 
(423
)
 

2017 Offering
1,973

 
(1,677
)
 

 
296

 
$
4,403

 
$
(2,846
)
 
$
(423
)
 
$
1,134


The derivative warrants issued as part of the 2016 Offerings are valued using a probability-weighted Binomial model, while the derivative warrants issued as part of the 2017 Debt refinancing were valued using a Monte Carlo model. The derivative warrants issued in conjunction with the 2017 Offering are valued using a Black-Scholes model. Effective April 2, 2018, the

14

Table of Contents

number of shares issuable under the 2017 Debt refinancing became fixed at 443,262, causing the warrants to be reclassified to equity. The following tables summarize the assumptions used in computing the fair value of derivative warrants subject to fair value accounting at the date of issue, exercise or reclassification to equity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

 
 
 
 
 
Exercised During the
2016 Offerings
As of June 30, 2018
 
As of December 31, 2017
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Exercise price
$
2.25

 
$
2.25

 
$
2.25

 
$
2.25

Expected life (years)
3.58

 
4.08

 
4.51

 
4.79

Expected volatility
100.00
%
 
73.44
%
 
77.11
%
 
76.29
%
Risk-free interest rate
2.63
%
 
2.11
%
 
1.80
%
 
1.94
%
Expected dividend yield
%
 
%
 
%
 
%

2017 Debt
As of December 31, 2017
 
Reclassified to Equity During the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
 
Issued During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Exercise price
$
2.82

 
$
2.82

 
$
2.82

Expected life (years)
6.22

 
5.97

 
7.00

Expected volatility
74.18
%
 
73.40
%
 
74.61
%
Risk-free interest rate
2.33
%
 
%
 
2.22
%
Expected dividend yield
%
 
2.55
%
 
%

2017 Offering
As of June 30, 2018
 
As of December 31, 2017
Exercise price
$
2.36

 
$
2.36

Expected life (years)
0.94

 
1.43

Expected volatility
89.49
%
 
77.55
%
Risk-free interest rate
2.33
%
 
1.83
%
Expected dividend yield
%
 
%

Note 10. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, the Topic establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that give the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.


15

Table of Contents

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The following table summarizes the financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (in thousands):
 
June 30, 2018
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Warrant liability
$
1,134

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,134

Note payable
75

 

 

 
75

 
$
1,209

 
$

 
$

 
$
1,209

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
Total
 
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Warrant liability
$
4,403

 
$

 
$

 
$
4,403

Note payable
156

 

 

 
156

 
$
4,559

 
$

 
$

 
$
4,559

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had a liability payable to VenturEast from a prior acquisition. The ultimate payment to VenturEast will be the fair value of 84,278 shares of our common stock at the time of payment. During the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we recognized a gain of approximately $64,000 and $13,000, respectively, due to the change in value of the note. During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we recognized a gain of approximately $81,000 and a loss of approximately $219,000, respectively, due to changes in our stock price.

At June 30, 2018, the warrant liability consists of stock warrants issued as part of the 2016 Offerings and 2017 Offering that contain contingent redemption features. In accordance with derivative accounting for warrants, we calculated the fair value of warrants and the assumptions used are described in Note 9, “Fair Value of Warrants.” During the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we recognized gains of approximately $2,154,000 and $577,000, respectively, on the derivative warrants due to the decrease in our stock price. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we recognized a gain of approximately $2,846,000 on the derivative warrants due to changes in our stock price. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded a loss of approximately $6,717,000 on the derivative warrants due to changes in our stock price.

Realized and unrealized gains and losses related to the change in fair value of the VenturEast note and warrant liability are included in other income (expense) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss.

The following table summarizes the activity of the note payable to VenturEast and of our derivative warrants, which was measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs (in thousands):
 
Note Payable
 
Warrant
 
to VenturEast
 
Liability
Fair value at December 31, 2017
$
156

 
$
4,403

Fair value of warrants reclassified to equity

 
(423
)
Change in fair value
(81
)
 
(2,846
)
Fair value at June 30, 2018
$
75

 
$
1,134


Note 11. Joint Venture Agreement

In November 2011, we entered into an affiliation agreement with the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (“Mayo”), subsequently amended. Under the agreement, we formed a joint venture with Mayo in May 2013 to focus on

16

Table of Contents

developing oncology diagnostic services and tests utilizing next generation sequencing. The joint venture is a limited liability company, with each party initially holding fifty percent of the issued and outstanding membership interests of the new entity (the “JV”).

The agreement requires aggregate capital contributions by us of up to $6.0 million, of which $2.0 million has been paid to date. The timing of the remaining installments is subject to the JV's achievement of certain operational milestones agreed upon by the board of governors of the JV. In exchange for its membership interest, Mayo’s capital contribution takes the form of cash, staff, services, hardware and software resources, laboratory space and instrumentation, the fair market value of which will be approximately equal to $6.0 million. Mayo’s continued contribution will also be conditioned upon the JV’s achievement of certain milestones.

Our share of the JV’s net loss was approximately $1,000 and $7,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and is included in research and development expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss. Our share of the JV’s net loss was approximately $3,000 and $19,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and is included in research and development expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss. We have a net receivable due from the JV of approximately $10,000 at June 30, 2018, which is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The joint venture is considered a variable interest entity under ASC 810-10, but we are not the primary beneficiary as we do not have the power to direct the activities of the JV that most significantly impact its performance. Our evaluation of ability to impact performance is based on our equal board membership and voting rights and day-to-day management functions which are performed by the Mayo personnel.

Note 12. Related Party Transactions

We have a consulting agreement with Equity Dynamics, Inc. (“EDI”), an entity controlled by John Pappajohn, effective April 1, 2014 pursuant to which EDI receives a monthly fee of $10,000. Total expenses for each of the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were $30,000. Total expenses for each of the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were $60,000. As of June 30, 2018, we owed EDI $50,000.

Pursuant to a consulting and advisory agreement that ended December 31, 2016, Dr. Chaganti received an option to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $15.89 per share vesting over a period of four years. Total non-cash stock-based compensation recognized under the consulting agreement for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0 and $23,875, respectively. Total non-cash stock-based compensation recognized under the consulting agreement for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was $0 and $49,500, respectively.
 
Note 13. Contingencies

On April 5, 2018 and April 12, 2018, purported stockholders of the Company filed nearly identical putative class action lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, against the Company, Panna L. Sharma, John A. Roberts, and Igor Gitelman, captioned Ben Phetteplace v. Cancer Genetics, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-05612 and Ruo Fen Zhang v. Cancer Genetics, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-06353, respectively. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 based on allegedly false and misleading statements and omissions regarding our business, operational, and financial results. The lawsuits seek, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages in connection with purchases of our stock between March 23, 2017 and April 2, 2018, as well as interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions and therefore cannot estimate possible losses or ranges of losses, if any.

Note 14. Subsequent Events

On July 17, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company issued a convertible promissory note (the “Note”) to an institutional accredited investor (the “Investor”) in the initial principal amount of $2,625,000. The Investor gave consideration of $2,500,000, reflecting original issue discount of $100,000 and expenses payable by the Company of $25,000. The Company anticipates to use the proceeds for general working capital.

The Note is the general unsecured obligation of the Company and is subordinated in right of payment to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement between the Company, certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries and SVB, dated March 22, 2017, as amended, and to the Loan and Security Agreement between the Company, certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries and PFG, dated March 22, 2017, as amended. Interest accrues on the outstanding balance of the Note at 10% per annum, and

17

Table of Contents

the Note has an 18 month term. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, interest accrues at the lesser of 22% per annum or the maximum rate permitted by applicable law. The Note contains customary default provisions, including provisions for potential acceleration.

The Investor may convert all or any part the outstanding balance of the Note into shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”) at an initial conversion price of $0.80 per share (the “Conversion Price”), at any time after the issue date upon five trading days’ notice, subject to certain adjustments and ownership limitations specified in the Note. The Note provides for liquidated damages upon failure to deliver Common Stock within specified timeframes.

The Investor may redeem any portion of the Note, at any time after six months from the issue date upon five trading days’ notice, subject to a maximum monthly redemption amount of $650,000, with the Company having the option to pay such redemptions in cash, in Common Stock at the Conversion Price, or by a combination thereof, subject to certain conditions specified in the Note. The Company may prepay the outstanding balance of the Note, in part or in full, at a 10% premium to par value if prior to the one year anniversary of the date of issuance and at par if prepaid thereafter. At maturity, the Company may pay the outstanding balance of the Note in cash, in Common Stock, or by a combination thereof, subject to certain conditions specified in the Note.

Item 2.        Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

As used herein, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar terms, refer to Cancer Genetics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries at June 30, 2018: Cancer Genetics Italia, S.r.l., Gentris, LLC, and vivoPharm Pty, Ltd, except as expressly indicated or unless the context otherwise requires. The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help facilitate an understanding of our financial condition and our historical results of operations for the periods presented. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 2, 2018. This MD&A may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below.

Overview

We are an emerging leader in precision medicine, enabling individualized therapies in the field of oncology through tests, services and molecular markers. We develop, commercialize and provide molecular- and biomarker-based tests and services, including proprietary preclinical oncology and immuno-oncology services, that enable biotech and pharmaceutical companies engaged in oncology trials to better select candidate populations and reduce adverse drug reactions by providing information regarding genomic factors influencing subject responses to therapeutics. Through our clinical services, we enable physicians to personalize the clinical management of each individual patient by providing genomic information to better diagnose, monitor and inform cancer treatment. We have a comprehensive, disease-focused oncology testing portfolio, and an extensive set of anti-tumor referenced data based on predictive xenograft and syngeneic tumor models. Our tests and techniques target a wide range of indications, covering all ten of the top cancers in prevalence in the United States, with additional unique capabilities offered by our FDA-cleared Tissue of Origin® test for identifying difficult to diagnose tumor types or poorly differentiated metastatic disease.

We are currently executing a strategy of partnering with pharmaceutical and biotech companies and clinicians as oncology diagnostic specialists by supporting therapeutic discovery, development and patient care from bench to bedside. Pharmaceutical and biotech companies are increasingly attracted to work with us to provide molecular profiles on clinical trial participants. Similarly, we believe the oncology industry is undergoing a rapid evolution in its approach to diagnostic, prognostic and treatment outcomes (theranostic) testing, embracing precision medicine and individualized testing as a means to drive higher standards of patient treatment and disease management. These profiles may help identify biomarker and genomic variations that may be responsible for differing responses to oncology therapies, thereby increasing the efficiency of trials while lowering costs. We believe tailored and combination therapies can revolutionize oncology care through molecular- and biomarker-based testing services, enabling physicians and researchers to target the factors that make each patient and disease unique.

We believe the next shift in cancer management will bring together testing capabilities for germline, or inherited mutations, and somatic mutations that arise in tissues over the course of a lifetime. We have created a unique position in the industry by providing both targeted somatic analysis of tumor sample cells alongside germline analysis of an individual's non-cancerous cells' molecular profile as we attempt to continue achieving milestones in precision medicine.

Our clinical offerings include our portfolio of proprietary tests targeting hematological, urogenital and HPV-associated cancers, in conjunction with ancillary non-proprietary tests. Our proprietary tests target cancers that are difficult to prognose and predict treatment outcomes through currently available mainstream techniques. We provide our proprietary tests and

18

Table of Contents

services, along with a comprehensive range of non-proprietary oncology-focused tests and laboratory services, to oncologists and pathologists at hospitals, cancer centers, and physician offices, as well as biotech and pharmaceutical companies to support their clinical trials. Our proprietary tests are based principally on our expertise in specific cancer types, test development methodologies and proprietary algorithms correlating genetic events with disease specific information. Our portfolio primarily includes comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) microarrays and next generation sequencing (NGS) panels, gene expression tests, and DNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) probes.

The non-proprietary testing services we offer are focused in part on specific oncology categories where we are developing our proprietary tests. We believe that there is significant synergy in developing and marketing a complete set of tests and services that are disease focused and delivering those tests and services in a comprehensive manner to help with treatment decisions. The insight that we develop in delivering the non-proprietary services are often leveraged in the development of our proprietary programs and now increasingly in the validation of our proprietary programs, such as MatBA and Focus::NGS.

Net cash used in operating activities was $8.1 million and $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $1.6 million at June 30, 2018, a reduction from $9.5 million at December 31, 2017. The Company has negative working capital at June 30, 2018 of $7.3 million.

The Company currently requires a significant amount of additional capital to fund operations and pay its accounts payable, and its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise such additional capital and achieve profitability. If the Company is not able to raise such additional capital on a timely basis or on favorable terms, the Company may need to scale back or, in extreme cases, discontinue its operations or liquidate its assets.

While we have implemented an aggressive consolidation strategy to reduce our operating costs in 2018, we expect to continue to incur significant losses for the near future. We incurred losses of $20.9 million and $15.8 million for fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $8.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018

As of June 30, 2018, we had an accumulated deficit of $145.4 million

Acquisition

On August 15, 2017, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of vivoPharm, with its principal place of business in Victoria, Australia, in a transaction valued at approximately $1.6 million in cash and $8.1 million in the Companys common stock based on the closing price of the stock on August 15, 2017.

Disposal

On April 26, 2018, we sold our India subsidiary, BioServe Biotechnologies (India) Private Limited (“BioServe”) to Reprocell, Inc., for $1.9 million, including $1.6 million in cash at closing and up to an additional $300,000, which is recorded in other current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2018. The additional $300,000 is contingent upon the India subsidiary meeting a specified revenue target in 2018.

Key Factors Affecting our Results of Operations and Financial Condition

Our overall long-term growth plan is predicated on our ability to develop or acquire technology solutions to accelerate the penetration into the Biopharma community to achieve more revenue supporting clinical trials and develop and commercialize unique or proprietary services and tests to achieve sustainable organic growth. Our proprietary tests include CGH microarrays, NGS panels, and DNA FISH probes. We continue to develop additional proprietary tests. To facilitate market adoption of our proprietary tests, we anticipate having to successfully complete additional studies with clinical samples and publish our results in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Our ability to complete such studies is dependent upon our ability to leverage our collaborative relationships with leading institutions to facilitate our research and obtain data for our quality assurance and test validation efforts.

We believe that the factors discussed in the following paragraphs have had and are expected to continue to have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Revenues

Our revenue is generated through our Biopharma Services, Discovery Services and Clinical Services. Biopharma Services are billed to the customer directly. While we have agreements with our Biopharma clients, volumes from these clients are subject

19

Table of Contents

to the progression and continuation of the clinical trials which can impact testing volume. We also derive revenue from Discovery Services, which are services provided in the development of new testing assays and methods and include pre-clinical toxicology and efficacy studies. Discovery Services are billed directly to the customer. Our Clinical Services can be billed to Medicare, another third party insurer or the referring community hospital or other healthcare facility, or patients in accordance with state and federal law.

We have historically derived a significant portion of our revenue from a limited number of test ordering sites, although the test ordering sites that generate a significant portion of our revenue have changed from period to period. Test ordering sites account for all of our Clinical Services revenue along with a portion of the Biopharma Services revenue. Our test ordering sites are hospitals, cancer centers, reference laboratories, physician offices, and pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Oncologists and pathologists at these sites order the tests on behalf of their oncology patients or as part of a clinical trial sponsored by a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company in which the patient is being enrolled.

The top five test ordering sites during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 accounted for approximately 30% and 50% of our testing volumes, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, no individual customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenue. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, one Biopharma client accounted for approximately 12% of our revenue.

The top five test ordering sites during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 accounted for approximately 31% and 41% of our testing volumes, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, no individual customer accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, there was one biopharmaceutical company which accounted for approximately 11% of our total revenue.

We receive revenue for our Clinical Services from Medicare, other insurance carriers and other healthcare facilities.  Some of our customers choose, generally at the beginning of our relationship, to pay for laboratory services directly as opposed to having patients (or their insurers) pay for those services and providing us with the patients’ insurance information.  A hospital may elect to be a direct bill customer and pay our bills directly, or may provide us with patient information so that their patients pay our bills, in which case we generally expect payment from their private insurance carrier or Medicare. In a few instances, we have arrangements where a hospital may have two accounts with us, so that certain tests are billed directly to the hospital, and certain tests are billed to and paid by a patient’s insurer. The billing arrangements generally are dictated by our customers and in accordance with state and federal law.

For the three months ended June 30, 2018, Medicare and other third party payors accounted for approximately 9% and 21% of our total revenue, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, Medicare and other third party payors accounted for approximately 11% and 19% of our total revenue, respectively.

Cost of Revenues

Our cost of revenues consists principally of internal personnel costs, including non-cash stock-based compensation, laboratory consumables, shipping costs, overhead and other direct expenses, such as specimen procurement and third party validation studies. We are pursuing various strategies to reduce and control our cost of revenues, including automating our processes through more efficient technology and attempting to negotiate improved terms with our suppliers. In 2017, we purchased all of the outstanding stock of vivoPharm. Overall we have made significant progress with integrating our resources and services and leveraging enterprise wide purchasing power to gain supplier discounts, in an effort to reduce costs. We will continue to assess other possible advantages to help us improve our cost structure.

Operating Expenses

We classify our operating expenses into three categories: research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative. Our operating expenses principally consist of personnel costs, including non-cash stock-based compensation, outside services, laboratory consumables and overhead, development costs, marketing program costs and legal and accounting fees.

Research and Development Expenses. We incur research and development expenses principally in connection with our efforts to develop our proprietary tests. Our primary research and development expenses consist of direct personnel costs, laboratory equipment and consumables and overhead expenses. All research and development expenses are charged to operations in the periods they are incurred.


20

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses consist principally of personnel-related expenses, professional fees, such as legal, accounting and business consultants, occupancy costs, bad debt and other general expenses. We have incurred increases in our general and administrative expenses and anticipate further increases as we expand our business operations.

Sales and Marketing Expenses. Our sales and marketing expenses consist principally of personnel and related overhead costs for our sales team and their support personnel, travel and entertainment expenses, and other selling costs including sales collaterals and trade shows. We expect our sales and marketing expenses to increase as we expand into new geographies and add new clinical tests and services.

Seasonality

Our business experiences decreased demand during spring vacation season, summer months and the December holiday season when patients are less likely to visit their health care providers. We expect this trend in seasonality to continue for the foreseeable future.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our results of operations for the periods shown: 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
(dollars in thousands)
2018
 
2017
 
$
 
%
Revenue
$
7,036

 
$
6,604

 
$
432

 
7
 %
Cost of revenues
4,853

 
4,034

 
819

 
20
 %
Research and development expenses
673

 
989

 
(316
)
 
(32
)%
General and administrative expenses
5,419

 
3,529

 
1,890

 
54
 %
Sales and marketing expenses
1,341

 
1,165

 
176

 
15
 %
Loss from operations
(5,250
)
 
(3,113
)
 
(2,137
)
 
69
 %
Interest income (expense)
(578
)
 
(243
)
 
(335
)
 
138
 %
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable
64

 
13

 
51

 
392
 %
Change in fair value of warrant liability
2,154

 
577

 
1,577

 
273
 %
Other income (expense)
(23
)
 

 
(23
)
 
N/A

Net (loss)
$
(3,633
)
 
$
(2,766
)
 
$
(867
)
 
31
 %

Non-GAAP Financial Information

In addition to disclosing financial results in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the table below contains non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are helpful in understanding and comparing our past financial performance and our future results. The non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by the Company exclude the non- operating changes in the fair value of derivative instruments. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, and the financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP and reconciliations from these results should be carefully evaluated. Management believes that these non-GAAP measures provide useful information about the Company’s core operating results and thus are appropriate to enhance the overall understanding of the Company’s past financial performance and its prospects for the future. The non-GAAP financial measures in the table below include adjusted net (loss) and the related adjusted basic and diluted net (loss) per share amounts.

Reconciliation from GAAP to Non-GAAP Results (in thousands, except per share amounts):

21

Table of Contents

 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
Reconciliation of net (loss):
 
 
 
 
Net (loss)
 
$
(3,633
)
 
$
(2,766
)
Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable
 
(64
)
 
(13
)
Change in fair value of warrant liability
 
(2,154
)
 
(577
)
Adjusted net (loss)
 
$
(5,851
)
 
$
(3,356
)
Reconciliation of basic net (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
Basic net (loss) per share
 
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.14
)
Adjustments to net (loss)
 
(0.09
)
 
(0.03
)
Adjusted basic net (loss) per share
 
$
(0.22
)
 
$
(0.17
)
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
 
27,049

 
19,697

Reconciliation of diluted net (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
Diluted net (loss) per share
 
$
(0.13
)
 
$
(0.16
)
Adjustments to net (loss)
 
(0.09
)
 

Adjusted diluted net (loss) per share
 
$
(0.22
)
 
$
(0.16
)
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
 
27,049

 
20,663


Adjusted net (loss) increased 74% to $5.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018, from an adjusted net (loss) of $3.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2017. Adjusted basic net (loss) per share increased 29% to $0.22 during the three months ended June 30, 2018, from $0.17 during the three months ended June 30, 2017. Adjusted diluted net (loss) per share increased 38% to $0.22 during the three months ended June 30, 2018, from $0.16 during the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Revenue

The breakdown of our revenue is as follows:
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
$
 
%
 
$
 
%
 
$
 
%
Biopharma Services
$
3,591

 
51
%
 
$
3,288

 
50
%
 
$
303

 
9
 %
Clinical Services
2,122

 
30
%
 
3,053

 
46
%
 
(931
)
 
(30
)%
Discovery Services
1,323

 
19
%
 
263

 
4
%
 
1,060

 
403
 %
Total Revenue
$
7,036

 
100
%
 
$
6,604

 
100
%
 
$
432

 
7
 %

Revenue increased 7%, or $0.4 million, to $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, from $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to an increase in Discovery Services of $1.1 million and an increase in our Biopharma Services of $0.3 million, offset by a decline in Clinical Services revenue of $0.9 million.

During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we began using our billing system to calculate test counts as opposed to our laboratory information systems, as we believe it more closely aligns the volume of tests with the tests on which we calculate expected collection prices. The billing software may count a test differently than our laboratory information systems have in prior periods. Test volume decreased by 18% from 20,007 tests for the three months ended June 30, 2017 to 16,485 tests for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Our average revenue per test decreased to $129 per test for the three months ended June 30, 2018 from $153 per test for the three months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to changes in the amount expected to be collected for our tests.

Revenue from Biopharma Services increased 9%, or $0.3 million, to $3.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, from $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as a result of the Company’s efforts to expand its business in this area. Revenue from Clinical Services customers decreased by $0.9 million, or 30%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, due to changes in the amount expected to be collected for our tests and a decline in overall test volume processed.

22

Table of Contents

Revenue from Discovery Services increased 403%, or $1.1 million, during the three months ended June 30, 2018 due to the acquisition of vivoPharm, which accounted for $1.3 million of the increase, offset in part by the decrease in revenue reported by our India subsidiary, due to its sale in April 2018.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues increased 20%, or $0.8 million, for the three months ended June 30, 2018, principally due to increased payroll and benefit costs of $0.5 million, increased shipping costs of $0.2 million and increased cost of outsourcing of $0.1 million. These increases encompass the incremental costs associated with the vivoPharm operations acquired in August 2017 now consolidated into the Company’s results. Gross margin decreased to 31% during the three months ended June 30, 2018 down from 39% for the three months ended June 30, 2017.

Operating Expenses

Research and development expenses decreased 32%, or $0.3 million, to $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, from $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to a $0.4 million decrease in payroll and benefit costs due to the shift in our staffing costs as we reduced the amount of research and development initiatives and concentrated our staff on the delivery of our services. Given the current financial condition of the Company, we are limiting our spending for research and development expenses to our most promising projects.

General and administrative expenses increased 54%, or $1.9 million, to $5.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, from $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to restructuring costs of $0.7 million, an increase in our professional fees of $0.5 million, and an increase in our bad debt expense of $0.2 million. These increases encompass the incremental costs associated with the vivoPharm operations acquired in August 2017 now consolidated into the Company’s results.

Sales and marketing expenses increased 15%, or $0.2 million, to $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, from $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to increased compensation costs of $0.1 million. These increases encompass the incremental costs associated with the vivoPharm operations acquired in August 2017 now consolidated into the Company’s results.

Interest Income (Expense)

Net interest expense increased 138%, or $0.3 million, to $0.6 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 due to increased borrowings on our ABL, debt modification costs incurred and paying interest at the default rate.

Change in Fair Value of Acquisition Note Payable

The change in fair value of acquisition note payable resulted in approximately $64,000 and $13,000 of non-cash income for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, as a consequence of a decrease in our stock price.

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability

Changes in fair value of some of our common stock warrants may impact our quarterly results.  Accounting rules require us to record certain of our warrants as a liability, measure the fair value of these warrants each quarter and record changes in that value in earnings. As a result of a decrease in our stock price, we recognized non-cash income of $2.2 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In the future, if our stock price increases, with all other factors being equal, we would record a non-cash charge as a result of changes in the fair value of our common stock warrants. Alternatively, if the stock price decreases, with all other factors being equal, we may record non-cash income.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

The following table sets forth certain information concerning our results of operations for the periods shown: 

23

Table of Contents

 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
(dollars in thousands)
2018
 
2017
 
$
 
%
Revenue
$
14,703

 
$
13,570

 
$
1,133

 
8
 %
Cost of revenues
9,935

 
8,243

 
1,692

 
21
 %
Research and development expenses
1,354

 
2,099

 
(745
)
 
(35
)%
General and administrative expenses
10,679

 
7,006

 
3,673

 
52
 %
Sales and marketing expenses
2,932

 
2,136

 
796

 
37
 %
Loss from operations
(10,197
)
 
(5,914
)
 
(4,283
)
 
72
 %
Interest income (expense)
(796
)
 
(420
)
 
(376
)
 
90
 %
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable
81

 
(219
)
 
300

 
(137
)%
Change in fair value of warrant liability
2,846

 
(6,717
)
 
9,563

 
(142
)%
Other income (expense)
(23
)
 
(46
)
 
23

 
(50
)%
Loss before income taxes
(8,089
)
 
(13,316
)
 
5,227

 
(39
)%
Income tax provision (benefit)

 
(970
)
 
970

 
n/a

Net (loss)
$
(8,089
)
 
$
(12,346
)
 
$
4,257

 
(34
)%

Non-GAAP Financial Information

In addition to disclosing financial results in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the table below contains non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are helpful in understanding and comparing our past financial performance and our future results. The non-GAAP financial measures disclosed by the Company exclude the non- operating changes in the fair value of derivative instruments. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP, and the financial results calculated in accordance with GAAP and reconciliations from these results should be carefully evaluated. Management believes that these non-GAAP measures provide useful information about the Company’s core operating results and thus are appropriate to enhance the overall understanding of the Company’s past financial performance and its prospects for the future. The non-GAAP financial measures in the table below include adjusted net (loss) and the related adjusted basic and diluted net (loss) per share amounts.

Reconciliation from GAAP to Non-GAAP Results (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
2018
 
2017
Reconciliation of net (loss):
 
 
 
 
Net (loss)
 
$
(8,089
)
 
$
(12,346
)
Adjustments:
 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of acquisition note payable
 
(81
)
 
219

Change in fair value of warrant liability
 
(2,846
)
 
6,717

Adjusted net (loss)
 
$
(11,016
)
 
$
(5,410
)
Reconciliation of basic and diluted net (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
Basic and diluted net (loss) per share
 
$
(0.30
)
 
$
(0.64
)
Adjustments to net (loss)
 
(0.11
)
 
0.36

Adjusted basic and diluted net (loss) per share
 
$
(0.41
)
 
$
(0.28
)
Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
 
27,049

 
19,301


Adjusted net (loss) increased 104% to $11.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, up from an adjusted net (loss) of $5.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Adjusted basic and diluted net (loss) per share increased 46% to $0.41 during the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $0.28 during the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Revenues

The breakdown of our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

24

Table of Contents

 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Change
 
2018
 
2017
 
 
 
 
(dollars in thousands)
$
 
%
 
$
 
%
 
$
 
%
Biopharma Services
7,249

 
50
%
 
$
7,007

 
52
%
 
$
242

 
3
 %
Clinical Services
4,464

 
30
%
 
6,007

 
44
%
 
(1,543
)
 
(26
)%
Discovery Services
2,990

 
20
%
 
556

 
4
%
 
2,434

 
438
 %
Total Revenue
$
14,703

 
100
%
 
$
13,570

 
100
%
 
$
1,133

 
8
 %

Revenue increased 8%, or $1.1 million, to $14.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, from $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to an increase in Discovery Services of $2.4 million, offset by a decrease of $1.5 million in our Clinical Services.

During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we began using our billing system to calculate test counts as opposed to our laboratory information systems, as we believe it more closely aligns the volume of tests with the tests on which we calculate expected collection prices. The billing software may count a test differently than our laboratory information systems have in prior periods. Test volume decreased by 4% from 38,489 tests for the six months ended June 30, 2017 to 37,121 tests for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Our average revenue per test decreased to $120 per test for the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $156 per test for the six months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to changes in the amount expected to be collected for our tests.

Revenue from Biopharma Services increased 3%, or $0.2 million, to $7.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, from $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 due to the Company’s efforts to expand its business in this area. Revenue from Clinical Services customers decreased by $1.5 million, or 26%, for the six months ended June 30, 2018 due to changes in the amount expected to be collected for our tests and a decline in overall test volume processed. Revenue from Discovery Services increased 438%, or $2.4 million, during the six months ended June 30, 2018 due to our acquisition of vivoPharm in August 2017, which accounted for $2.7 million, offset, in part, by a decline in revenue reported from our India subsidiary, due to its sale in April 2018.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues increased $1.7 million to $9.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 from $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to increased payroll and benefit costs of $1.0 million and increased shipping costs of $0.6 million. Gross margin declined to 32% during the six months ended June 30, 2018 from 39% during the six months ended June 30, 2017, due to a shift in our staffing costs as we reduced the amount of research and development initiatives and concentrated our staff on the delivery of our services. These increases encompass the incremental costs associated with the vivoPharm operations acquired in August 2017 now consolidated into the Company’s results.

Operating Expenses

Research and development expenses decreased 35%, or $0.7 million, to $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, from $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to reduced payroll and benefit costs of $0.8 million due to the shift in our staffing costs as we reduced the amount of research and development initiatives and concentrated our staff on the delivery of our services. Given the current financial condition of the Company, we are limiting our spending for research and development expenses to our most promising projects.

General and administrative expenses increased 52%, or $3.7 million, to $10.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, from $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to increased payroll and benefit costs of $0.8 million, including approximately $0.5 million of severance expense incurred in the first quarter of 2018, increased professional service fees of $0.7 million primarily related to our compliance requirements to adopt ASC 606, increased software costs of $0.1 million due to migrating our California location to the New Jersey laboratory information system, increased depreciation and amortization of $0.1 million due to the purchase of vivoPharm, a net increase in our bad debt reserve of $0.9 million relating to prior year uncollectible revenues, a net increase in Delaware franchise taxes of $0.2 million and restructuring costs of $0.7 million. These increases encompass the incremental costs associated with the vivoPharm operations acquired in August 2017 now consolidated into the Company’s results.

Sales and marketing expenses increased 37%, or $0.8 million, to $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, from $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, principally due to increased payroll and benefit costs of $0.7 million as we

25

Table of Contents

had ramped up sales personnel in our Clinical Services business in the second half of 2017. These increases encompass the incremental costs associated with the vivoPharm operations acquired in August 2017 now consolidated into the Company’s results.

Interest Income (Expense)

Net interest expense increased 90%, or $0.4 million, due to increased borrowings and a higher effective interest rate on the debt we refinanced in late March 2017. We also incurred debt modification costs of approximately $0.2 million in June 2018 and paid interest at the default rate.
 
Change in Fair Value of Acquisition Note Payable

The change in fair value of note payable resulted in $81,000 in non-cash income for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to non-cash expense of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The fair value of the note decreased during the six months ended June 30, 2018 as a consequence of a decrease in our stock price.

Change in Fair Value of Warrant Liability

Changes in fair value of some of our common stock warrants may impact our quarterly results.  Accounting rules require us to record certain of our warrants as a liability, measure the fair value of these warrants each quarter and record changes in that value in earnings. As a result of a decrease in our stock price, we recognized non-cash income of $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as opposed to a non-cash charge of $6.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 that resulted from an increase in our stock price. Consequently, we may be exposed to non-cash charges, or we may record non-cash income, as a result of this warrant exposure in future periods.

Income Taxes

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we received approximately $1.0 million of net proceeds from the sale of state NOL’s and state research and development credits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

Our primary sources of liquidity have been funds generated from our debt financings and equity financings. In addition, we have generated funds from the following sources: (i) cash collections from customers and (ii) cash received from sale of state NOL’s. On April 26, 2018, we sold our India subsidiary for $1.9 million, including $1.6 million in cash at closing and up to an additional $300,000.

In general, our primary uses of cash are providing for operating expenses, working capital purposes and servicing debt.

Cash Flows

Our net cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities for the periods below were as follows:
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
(in thousands)
2018
 
2017
Cash provided by (used in):
 
 
 
Operating activities
$
(8,101
)
 
$
(7,389
)
Investing activities
959

 
(663
)
Financing activities
(859
)
 
4,720

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
61

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$
(7,940
)
 
$
(3,332
)

We had cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash of $2.0 million at June 30, 2018, and $9.9 million at December 31, 2017.


26

Table of Contents

The $7.9 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended June 30, 2018, principally resulted from net cash used in operations of $8.1 million, offset in part by net proceeds from the sale of our India subsidiary of $1.6 million.

The $3.3 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the six months ended June 30, 2017, principally resulted from net cash used in operations of $7.4 million and principal payments made on the Silicon Valley Bank term note of $4.7 million, partially offset by proceeds from the exercise of warrants of $1.8 million, proceeds from refinancing our debt of $6.0 million and borrowings on our line of credit of $2.0 million.

At June 30, 2018, we had total indebtedness of $9.4 million, excluding capital lease obligations.

Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $8.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018. We used $8.4 million in net cash to fund our core operations, which included $0.6 million in cash paid for interest, and another $0.5 million to purchase other current assets, offset by a net increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue of $0.4 million and a net reduction in accounts receivable of $0.4 million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, we used $7.4 million in operating activities. We used $3.0 million in net cash to fund our core operations, which included $0.4 million in cash paid for interest. We incurred additional uses of cash when adjusting for working capital items as follows: a net increase in accounts receivable of $1.6 million, an increase in other assets of $0.4 million, a net decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue of $2.4 million and a decrease in deferred rent payable and other of $0.1 million.

Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities was $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and principally resulted from net cash received from the sale of our India subsidiary of $1.6 million, offset in part by fixed asset purchases of $0.5 million and patent costs of $0.1 million.

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and resulted from the purchase of fixed assets of $0.4 million, patent costs of $0.1 million and investing $0.2 million in a cost method investment

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and resulted from the repayment of borrowings on our SVB asset-based line of credit (“ABL”) of $3.9 million and principal payments on capital lease obligations of $0.2 million, offset by borrowings on the ABL of $3.2 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and principally resulted from proceeds received from warrants exercised of $1.8 million, proceeds from refinancing our debt of $6.0 million and proceeds from borrowing $2.0 million on our line of credit, offset by principal payments made on our Silicon Valley Bank term note of $4.7 million, capital lease payments of $0.1 million and debt issuance costs and loan fees of $0.3 million related to our refinanced debt.

Capital Resources and Expenditure Requirements

We expect to continue to incur material operating losses in the future. It may take several years, if ever, to achieve positive operational cash flow. We may need to raise additional capital to fund our current operations, to repay certain outstanding indebtedness and to fund expansion of our business to meet our long-term business objectives through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, borrowings or strategic partnerships coupled with an investment in our company or a combination thereof. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of convertible debt securities, or other debt securities, these securities could be secured and could have rights senior to those of our common stock. In addition, any new debt incurred by the Company could impose covenants that restrict our operations and increase our interest expense. The issuance of any new equity securities will also dilute the interest of our current stockholders. Given the risks associated with our business, including our unprofitable operating history and our ability to develop additional proprietary tests, additional capital may not be available when needed on acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, we will need to curb our expansion plans or further limit our research and development activities, which may have a material adverse impact on our business prospects and results of operations. Due to the terms of the ABL, we have reached the borrowing limit based on eligible accounts receivable at June 30, 2018. In addition, we were in violation of certain financial covenants with SVB and PFG as of April 30, 2018. On

27

Table of Contents

May 14, 2018, the Company received a waiver from its senior lenders for its failure to comply with certain financial covenants for the month of April 30, 2018. The Company concurrently amended its debt agreements with SVB and PFG, respectively; the new agreements required the Company to raise $2,500,000 through the sale of its equity securities or issuance of subordinated debt (in the case of the agreement with SVB, to investors accepted to SVB), which occurred on July 17, 2018, when the Company entered into an agreement pursuant to which the Company issued a convertible promissory note to an institutional accredited investor in the initial principal amount of $2,625,000. The Company received consideration of $2,500,000, reflecting an original issue discount of $100,000 and expenses payable by the Company of $25,000. The convertible note has an 18 month term and carries interest at 10% per annum. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.80 per share. See Note 14 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Effective June 21, 2018 and June 30, 2018, the loan covenants were modified with respect to the debt owed to SVB and PFG, respectively, and the exercise price of the PFG Warrants was reduced as of June 30, 2018. At May 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018, we were in violation of certain of the modified financial covenants, and we expect to be in violation of certain of the modified financial covenants at July 31, 2018. We are currently working with our lenders to obtain waivers for these defaults.

Net cash used in operating activities was $8.1 million and $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $1.6 million at June 30, 2018, a reduction from $9.5 million at December 31, 2017. The Company has negative working capital at June 30, 2018 of $7.3 million.

The Company currently requires a significant amount of additional capital to fund operations and pay its accounts payable, and its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise such additional capital and achieve profitability. If the Company is not able to raise such additional capital on a timely basis or on favorable terms, the Company may need to scale back or, in extreme cases, discontinue its operations or liquidate its assets.

We do not believe that our current cash will support operations for at least the next 12 months from the date of this report unless we raise additional equity or debt capital or spin-off non-core assets to raise additional cash. We have hired Raymond James & Associates Inc. as our financial advisor to assist with evaluating strategic options. Such options could include raising more capital, the acquisition of another company and / or complementary assets, the sale of the Company or another type of strategic partnership. There is no assurance that the review of strategic alternatives will result in the Company changing its business plan, pursuing any particular transaction, if any, or, if it pursues any such transaction, that it will be completed.

Meanwhile we are taking steps to improve our operating cash flow, including the consolidation of our laboratory operations and reductions in the number of staff. We can provide no assurances that our current actions will be successful or that any additional sources of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all, when needed. Our cash position, recurring losses from operations and negative cash flows from operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, and as a result, our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph in its report on our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 with respect to this uncertainty. This going concern opinion, and any future going concern opinion, could materially limit our ability to raise additional capital. The perception that we may not be able to continue as a going concern may cause potential partners or investors to choose not to deal with us due to concerns about our ability to meet our contractual and financial obligations. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our stockholders may lose their entire investment in our common stock.

Our forecast of the period of time through which our current financial resources will be adequate to support our operations and our expected operating expenses are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could vary materially and negatively as a result of a number of factors, including:
 
our ability to obtain waivers from PFG and SVB for our loan covenant violations for periods subsequent to April 30, 2018;
our ability to achieve revenue growth and profitability;
our ability to secure financing and the amount thereof;
the costs for funding the operations we recently acquired and our ability to realize anticipated benefits from the vivoPharm acquisition;
our ability to save money by moving our California operations to New Jersey and North Carolina;
our ability to improve efficiency of billing and collection processes;
our ability to obtain approvals for our new diagnostic tests;
our ability to execute on our marketing and sales strategy for our tests and services and gain acceptance of our tests and services in the market;
our ability to obtain adequate reimbursement from governmental and other third-party payors for our tests and services;

28

Table of Contents

our ability to maintain our present customer base and obtain new customers;
our ability to clinically validate our pipeline of tests currently in development;
the costs of operating and enhancing our laboratory facilities;
our ability to succeed with our cost control initiative;
our ability to satisfy US (FDA) and international regulatory regiments with respect to our tests and services, many of which are new and still evolving;
the costs of maintaining, expanding and protecting our intellectual property portfolio, including potential litigation costs and liabilities;
our ability to manage the costs of manufacturing our tests;
our rate of progress in, and cost of research and development activities associated with, products in research and early development;
the effect of competing technological and market developments;
costs related to expansion; and
other risks and uncertainties discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as updated in other reports, as applicable, we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

We expect that our operating expenses and capital expenditures may increase in the future as we expand our business. We plan to take additional steps to decrease our sales and marketing expenses related to our clinical tests and services, and will continue trimming our research and development expenditures for all projects that are not expected to be profitable in the near future. For example, in 2011 we entered into an affiliation agreement to form a joint venture with the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research pursuant to which we made an initial $1.0 million capital contribution in October 2013 and $1.0 million in the third quarter of 2014. We do not expect to make additional capital contributions to the joint venture entity’s operational activities. Until we can generate a sufficient amount of revenues to finance our cash requirements, which we may never do, we may need to raise additional capital to fund our operations.

Subject to the availability of financing, we may use significant cash to fund acquisitions.

The consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2018 were prepared on the basis of a going concern, which contemplates that the Company will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, they do not give effect to adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be required to liquidate its assets.  The ability of the Company to meet its obligations, and to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the availability of future funding and the continued growth in revenues.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

Income Taxes

Over the past several years we have generated operating losses in all jurisdictions in which we may be subject to income taxes. As a result, we have accumulated significant net operating losses and other deferred tax assets. Because of our history of losses and the uncertainty as to the realization of those deferred tax assets, a full valuation allowance has been recognized. We do not expect to report a benefit related to the deferred tax assets until we have a history of earnings, if ever, that would support the realization of our deferred tax assets.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Since inception, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet activities as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgment and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and make various assumptions, which management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, which form the basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an “emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise

29

Table of Contents

apply to private companies. However, we have chosen to “opt out” of such extended transition period, and as a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

The notes to our audited consolidated financial statements in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 contain a summary of our significant accounting policies. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2016-18 are discussed in Note 1 of Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. We consider the following accounting policies critical to the understanding of the results of our operations:
 
Revenue recognition;
Accounts receivable and bad debts;
Stock-based compensation; and
Warrant liability.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995

This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 under Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “potential,” or the negative of those terms, and similar expressions and comparable terminology intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events. There are a number of important factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by us. These factors include, but are not limited to:
 
our ability to obtain waivers from PFG and SVB for our loan covenant violations for periods subsequent to April 30, 2018;
our ability to achieve revenue growth and profitability;
our ability to secure financing and the amount thereof;
our ability to save money by moving our California operations to New Jersey and North Carolina;
our ability to achieve profitability by increasing sales of our laboratory tests and services and to continually develop and commercialize novel and innovative laboratory tests and services focused on oncology and immuno-oncology;
our ability to improve efficiency of billing and collection processes;
with respect to our Clinical Services, our ability to obtain reimbursement from governmental and other third-party payors for our tests and services;
our ability to clinically validate our pipeline of tests currently in development;
our ability to execute on our marketing and sales strategy for our tests and services and gain acceptance of our tests and services in the market;
our ability to keep pace with rapidly advancing market and scientific developments;
our ability to satisfy U.S. (including FDA) and international regulatory requirements with respect to our tests and services, many of which are new and still evolving;
our ability to raise additional capital to meet our liquidity needs;
competition from clinical laboratory services companies, tests currently available or new tests that may emerge;
our ability to maintain our clinical collaborations and enter into new collaboration agreements with highly regarded organizations in the cancer field so that, among other things, we have access to thought leaders in the field and to a robust number of samples to validate our tests;
our ability to maintain our present customer base and obtain new customers;
potential product liability or intellectual property infringement claims;
our dependency on third-party manufacturers to supply or manufacture our tests;
our ability to attract and retain a sufficient number of scientists, clinicians, sales personnel and other key personnel with extensive experience in oncology and immuno-oncology, who are in short supply;
our ability to obtain or maintain patents or other appropriate protection for the intellectual property in our proprietary tests and services;
our dependency on the intellectual property licensed to us or possessed by third parties;

30

Table of Contents

our ability to expand internationally and launch our tests and services in emerging markets, such as China and Japan;
our ability to adequately support future growth; and
the risk factors discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, as updated in other reports, as applicable, that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or review publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise after the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. You should read this quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the documents referenced herein and filed as exhibits completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

Item 3.        Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.        Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), as amended, as of June 30, 2018, the end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer) has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level at June 30, 2018 because of the material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that existed at December 31, 2017 and has not been fully remediated by the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. 

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have been met.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our internal control policies changed during the six months ended June 30, 2018 to accommodate the implementation of ASC 606. Other than changes to accommodate the implementation of ASC 606 and the remediation activities discussed below, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Subsequent to the evaluation made in connection with filing our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, management has begun the process of remediation of the material weakness. The remediation was conducted as part of the ASC 606 implementation that involves design changes to our internal controls over revenue recognition. We believe these actions to be sufficient to remediate the identified material weakness and to enhance our internal control over financial reporting. However the new enhanced controls have not operated long enough to conclude at the time of this filling that the material weakness was fully remediated.


31

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.        Legal Proceedings

On April 5, 2018 and April 12, 2018, purported stockholders of the Company filed nearly identical putative class action lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, against the Company, Panna L. Sharma, John A. Roberts, and Igor Gitelman, captioned Ben Phetteplace v. Cancer Genetics, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-cv-05612 and Ruo Fen Zhang v. Cancer Genetics, Inc. et al., No. 2:18-06353, respectively. The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 based on allegedly false and misleading statements and omissions regarding our business, operational, and financial results. The lawsuits seek, among other things, unspecified compensatory damages in connection with purchases of our stock between March 23, 2017 and April 2, 2018, as well as interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs. The Company is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions and therefore cannot estimate possible losses or ranges of losses, if any.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A, of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

We are not currently in compliance with the continued listing requirements for NASDAQ. If the price of our common stock continues to trade below $1.00 per share for a sustained period or we do not meet other continued listing requirements, our common stock may be delisted from the NASDAQ Capital Market, which could affect the market price and liquidity for our common stock and reduce our ability to raise additional capital.
 
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market. In order to maintain that listing, we must satisfy minimum financial and other requirements including, without limitation, a requirement that our closing bid price be at least $1.00 per share. On August 6, 2018, we received a written notice from NASDAQ indicating that we are not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market. We have 180 calendar days in which to regain compliance. We can regain compliance if at any time during this 180 day period the bid price of our common stock closes at or above $1.00 per share for a minimum of ten consecutive business days.
 
We intend to monitor the closing bid price of our common stock and consider our available options to resolve our noncompliance with the minimum bid price requirement, which may include submitting for approval by our stockholders a proposal to grant discretionary authority to our board of directors to amend our certificate of incorporation to effect a reverse split of our outstanding shares of common stock within an appropriate range, with the exact reverse split ratio to be decided and publicly announced by the board of directors prior to the effective time of the amendment to our certificate of incorporation. No determination regarding our response has been made at this time. There can be no assurance that we will be able to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement or we will otherwise be in compliance with other NASDAQ listing criteria. If we fail to regain compliance with the minimum bid requirement or to meet the other applicable continued listing requirements for the NASDAQ Capital Market in the future and NASDAQ determines to delist our common stock, the delisting could adversely affect the market price and liquidity of our common stock and reduce our ability to raise additional capital. In addition, if our common stock is delisted from NASDAQ and the trading price remains below $5.00 per share, trading in our common stock might also become subject to the requirements of certain rules promulgated under the Exchange Act, which require additional disclosure by broker-dealers in connection with any trade involving a stock defined as a “penny stock” (generally, any equity security not listed on a national securities exchange or quoted on NASDAQ that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions). 

We will need to raise additional capital to fund our operations.

We will need to raise additional financing to fund our operations. At June 30, 2018, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $1.6 million. Net cash used in operating activities was $8.1 million and $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The Company has retained Raymond James & Associates, Inc. as a financial advisor to assist the Company in its evaluation of a broad range of financial and strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value, including additional capital raising transactions, the acquisition of another company or complementary assets or the potential sale or merger of the Company or another type of strategic partnership. There is no assurance that the review of strategic alternatives will result in the Company changing its business plan, pursuing any particular transaction, if any, or, if it pursues any such transaction, that it will be completed. The Company does not expect to make further public comment regarding the strategic review until the Board of Directors has approved a specific transaction or otherwise deems disclosure of significant developments is appropriate.

32

Table of Contents


We currently have no availability under our asset-based revolving line of credit agreement with Silicon Valley Bank due to the technical defaults for May and June 2018. We are in process of negotiating waivers for this in order to open up the line again. We can provide no assurance that any additional sources of financing will be available to us on favorable terms, if at all, when needed. Our forecast of the period of time through which our current financial resources will be adequate to support our operations and the costs to support our general and administrative, sales and marketing and research and development activities are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties. Absent sufficient additional financing, we may be unable to remain a going concern.

Item 2.        Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds from Sales of Registered Securities

Not applicable.

Item 3.        Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.        Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.        Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6.        Exhibits

See the Index to Exhibits following the signature page hereto, which Index to Exhibits is incorporated herein by reference.



33

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cancer Genetics, Inc.
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
 
Date: August 14, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ John A. Roberts
 
 
 
 
 
 
John A. Roberts
 
 
 
 
 
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: August 14, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
/s/ Igor Gitelman
 
 
 
 
 
 
Igor Gitelman
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

34

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 
Exhibit
No.
  
Description
 
 
 
4.1
 
 
 
 
10.1
 
 
 
 
10.2
 
 
 
 
10.3
 
 
 
 
10.4
 
 
 
 
10.5
 
 
 
 
31.1
  
 
 
32.1
  
 
 
101
  
The following materials from the Registrant’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31, 2017, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Loss for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (unaudited) and (iv) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
 
 
 
*
 
Filed herewith.
**
 
Furnished herewith.
 




35