ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Forward Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains some forward-looking statements. Forward-looking
statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can
identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to
historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding, among
other things, (a) our projected sales, profitability, and cash flows, (b) our
growth strategies, (c) anticipated trends in our industries, (d) our future
financing plans and (e) our anticipated needs for working capital. They are
generally identifiable by use of the words may, will,
should, anticipate, estimate,
plans, potential, projects,
continuing, ongoing, expects,
management believes, we believe, we intend
or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable
terminology. These statements may be found under Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
Description of Business, as well as in this Form 10-Q generally. In
particular, these include statements relating to future actions, prospective
products or product approvals, future performance or results of current and
anticipated products, sales efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such
as legal proceedings, and financial results.
Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report may turn out to be inaccurate. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks or uncertainties. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future results may vary materially as a result of various factors, including, without limitation, the risks outlined under Risk Factors and matters described in this Form 10-Q generally. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements contained in this filing will in fact occur. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except to the extent required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as the result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Organizational History
We were formed as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of New
York on June 17, 2005 as Vycor Medical LLC. On August 14, 2007, we
converted into a Delaware corporation and changed our name to Vycor
Medical, Inc. (Delaware Corporation). Our sole reason for
conversion to the Delaware Corporation was to facilitate the raising of
additional capital, as prospective investors had expressed resistance to
investing in the Company as the NY LLC. At August 14, 2007, we had approximately
1,122 membership units of the NY LLC issued and outstanding. The managing
members of the NY LLC determined, in their reasonable business judgment, that
such units, in the aggregate, should convert to an aggregate of 17,999,999
shares of common stock of the Delaware Corporation. On this basis, we adopted a
conversion ratio of 16,048 shares of common stock of the Delaware Corporation
for each former unit of the NY LLC. Likewise, all conversion rights, options,
warrants and any other rights to acquire units of the NY LLC (including but not
limited to units issuable pursuant to the terms of the Fountainhead Bridge Loan
Debenture, Fountainhead Warrant to purchase 50.22 units of the NY LLC, the
Companys Option Agreement with Fountainhead dated December 14, 2006), were
converted to conversion rights, options, warrants and rights to acquire common
shares of the Delaware Corporation, based on the same conversion ratio. The
action authorizing the conversion was adopted by the unanimous consent of the
Managing Members of the NY LLC pursuant to the terms of the NY LLC Operating
Agreement.
Overview of Business
We are a developer of neurosurgical medical devices. We have been conducting research, developing, prototyping, and producing mold development work for the Brain Access System. This product is designed to assist the neurosurgeon with brain surgery. It allows the surgeon to gain access to various regions in the brain through a working channel.
We are in the process of marketing our first series of products to the marketplace. Our first product line that we introduced to the market is a new type of self retaining brain retractor called the ViewSite Brain Access System. We started marketing the Brain Access System in September 2008 and started shipping all sizes in November 2008. The product line consists of various port sizes and lengths to allow the surgeon to use the device for various regions of the brain and different procedures.
16
The second product in our pipeline is the Cervical Access System, which, pending receipt of additional funding and successful market testing, is planned for launch during 2010 pending funding. Like the Brain Access System, this product is designed to assist the surgeon in cervical surgeries, allowing the surgeon to gain access to the anterior cervical surgery site.
We have received FDA 510(k) clearance for both our Brain Access System and Cervical Access System products. Section 510(k) of the United States Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act requires medical device manufacturers to register with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of their intent to market a medical device at least 90 days in advance. The 510(k) submission allows the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to determine whether a device is generally equivalent to any similar product already on the market. With the FDA 510(k) clearance, we are authorized to take our products to market in the U.S. without further approvals.
We have also received CE Marking for our products in September 2006 and are able to sell them in member countries of the European Union. The European Medical Device Directive makes it mandatory to fulfill CE certification requirements in order to export medical devices of Class I, IIa, IIb, and III to any country within the European community.
We believe that our Brain Access System and Cervical Access System products will replace standard retraction devices to establish a new standard of care in neurosurgery, leading to a broad and rapid adoption of our products.
Our Products
Our initial product applications for the retractor technology will be in neurological surgeries involving brain and spinal access.
We believe our Brain Access System offers several advantages over the brain retractor systems, commonly known as ribbon or blade retractors that are metallic and non transparent. When designing the products, we felt that if we can incorporate certain features into our products, the surgeon reaction and acceptance would be favorable. We attempted to incorporate the following features:
| |
·
| gently separate delicate tissue;
|
·
| improve surgical outcomes (reducing potential surgeon and hospital liability), for example, decreased insertion tissue trauma, less need for readjustment during surgery and minimum interface surface pressures;
|
·
| increase surgical site access;
|
·
| provide superior field of vision and lighting;
|
·
| minimal invasive surgery;
|
The Brain Access System and Cervical Access System were invented by Dr. John Mangiardi. Dr. Mangiardi assigned the rights to the Brain Access System and Cervical Access System to Sawmill Trust on September 17, 2005 pursuant to an assignment agreement on the same date. Sawmill Trust then, in turn, assigned the same rights to us on September 17, 2005 pursuant to another assignment agreement dated the same date.
Brain Access System Products
The Brain Access System series of disposable products are used by the neurosurgeon to access the surgical site. This is done by inserting the Brain Access System through the brain tissue and then removing the Brain Access System introducer, leaving the remaining hollow working channel in place to provide the surgeon with access to the precise location desired for surgery.
The Brain Access System is available in multiple sizes and is a single-use product. We have designed multiple sizes and intend to add additional sizes in the future. During our design process we listed what product benefits would be of value to the neurosurgeons when using a retractor system. We then designed our product with the following intent:
| |
| To minimize brain disruption during surgery by utilizing a tapered forward edge;
|
| To minimize venous pressure in the brain;
|
| To reduce target shift to allow the surgeon to reach the site accurately;
|
| To minimize off site healthy tissue damage;
|
| To allow for accurate neuronavigational image guidance systems (IGS) performance;
|
| To integrate with the leading surgical IGS systems such as Medtronics® and BrainLab®
|
| To allow for easier positioning during surgery;
|
| To reduce damage to healthy brain tissue leading to shorter post-op recovery and reduced hospital stay; and
|
| To allow direct surgical visualization of brain tissue via optically transparent construction;
|
17
The extent to which we are successful in achieving the above objectives will be judged by the acceptance of the devices in the market.
The Brain Access System products have the potential to significantly reduce brain tissue trauma resulting from the currently used retractors and standard access procedures. First, the unique design of the product minimizes the size of the brain entry access necessary for surgical procedures, and in turn the amount of brain tissue exposed. For instance, a typical brain procedure involving the removal of a 7cm cystic astrocyctoma would result in an access site (corticotomy) of approximately 20mm. However, the same procedure that was performed utilizing the Companys Brain Access System product required a corticotomy of only 2mm.
Furthermore, retractors that are currently in use are metallic and non-transparent. This requires the surgical team to maintain the retracted surface, typically by packing gauze around the access edges increasing movement and pressures over a greater portion of the brain and extending overall elapsed surgery times. We believe that the Brain Access System product eliminates this process, while providing better visibility for the surgeon and lower pressures on the retracted brain tissue.
Product shortcomings
Our products have a few shortcomings:
| |
| One of the shortcomings of our products as compared to existing blade retractors is that our device diameter is fixed as opposed to variable. This gives the surgeon less flexibility once he is at the location unless he knows where he needs to go in the brain first.
|
| Another shortcoming is that the diameters and lengths of our devices are set to specific measurements, which limits the surgeon to these specific sizes.
|
| Depending on the case, usage of a disposable product may be viewed as costing more over time and may not be accepted by our potential customers.
|
IGS Opportunity for the Brain Access System
The VBAS product has the potential to significantly improve surgical acceptance and use of IGS (Image Guidance Systems) used in many surgeries, by addressing the two substantial IGS-related problems of target shifting and the lack of real-time retractor positioning data during procedures:
The normal surgical procedure utilizing standard retractors in brain surgery require pulling away the healthy tissue to expose the targeted region of the brain located underneath. However, in many cases, the amount of pulling required causes the targeted area to shift away from what is shown on the IGS system. This target shifting then requires the surgeon to cause additional trauma to healthy tissue and spend additional time as the shifted target area is located and the retractor is repositioned. The VBAS system is designed to minimize or eliminate target shift, as the elliptical shape of the product distributes relatively uniform pressure on the surrounding brain tissue.
| |
| Real-Time Retractor Positioning Data
|
Current retractor technology (commonly known as ribbon or blade retractors) is not well integrated with IGS systems. During insertion, the surgeon typically does not have real-time data to allow visualization of retractor insertion on the IGS monitor. The VBAS product line has been designed to adapt entirely to IGS systems, such that the use of a Brain Access System unit will allow the surgeon to see on the surgical monitor, in real-time, exactly where the retractor is in relation to critical brain structures and underlying pathologies. With the IGS enabled unit, the tip of the introducer is literally the pointer on the IGS system.
We plan on offering a version of all Brain Access System models that are IGS-friendly.
Brain Access System Product Models
The Brain Access System products consists of two models initially, namely, TC-VBAS and EC-VBAS and any additional models in the future, each designed to allow the surgeon the choice for specific brain surgeries for various procedures. Each of these models will be manufactured in various lengths to accommodate different depths for surgical access.
18
The series consist of twelve disposable products, offered in four different port diameters of 12mm, 17mm, 21mm, and 28mm and a choice of three lengths for each of 3, 5, and 7cm.
At present, this is available only in one size 34mm x 5cm.
Cervical Access Products
The Cervical Access System products are to be used by the neurological surgeon to access the anterior cervical surgical site (the uppermost vertebrae located in the neck). This type of surgery is near very critical and delicate structures such as the larynx, esophagus and carotid artery. The shape of the Cervical Access System with the introducer lets the surgeon carefully place the device and the unique anchor screws then safely hold the access channel in place during the procedure. The clear body of the retractor allows the surgeon to see the entire field both during the insertion process as well as throughout the surgical procedure.
We have designed the Cervical Access System to:
| |
| reduce the possibility of surrounding anatomic tissue damage, which include the trachea, esophagus, carotid artery, recurrent laryngeal and sympathetic nerve;
|
| minimize skin disruption with the utilization of tapered outward edges;
|
| eliminate retractor induced electrocautery burn injuries because it is made with surgical grade plastic materials;
|
| enable stable fixation (directly to the spinal column) in order to avoid accidental displacement and surrounding tissue creep and
|
| allow for direct visualization of underlying anatomic structures using optically clear plastic.
|
Because our products have not been brought to market yet, there is no guarantee that any of the abovementioned features would prove effective and even so, be welcomed by the consumer.
Cervical Access System Product Models
The plan for the Cervical Access System series will consist of disposable products. The widths are able to accommodate from one to three levels of the cervical spine, from 26mm to 54mm. We are also evaluating a telescoping design that would reduce the number of sizes necessary and a version that incorporates a distractor. Further research and development is needed for a market-ready product.
Brain Retractors
Future plans include developing additional Brain Access System retractors to allow for access to various regions of the brain. This allows us to target more diverse neurosurgical specialties. We anticipate research and developing work starting in 2009 and estimate a research and development budget of $1,000,000 for 2009 and 2010, pending future funding.
Our plans are to eventually include retractor lines that are designed for the requirements of specific surgical applications like aneurisms, tumors and endoscopic work.
19
Intellectual Property
Patent Applications
Below is a table setting out the status and particulars of our patent applications:
| | | |
| | | | |
Filing Date
|
| Application No.
|
| Country
|
| Title
|
| Status
|
June 22, 2005
|
| 60/692,959
|
| US provisional
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use
with Spinal or Orthopedic
Surgery (Cervical)
|
| Converted to PCT
|
June 22, 2006
|
| PCT/US06/24243
|
| PCT
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Spinal or Orthopedic
Surgery (Cervical)
|
| Entered National Phase
|
June 22, 2005
|
| 11/155,175
|
| US utility
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Delicate Tissues (Brain)
|
| Pending
|
November 27, 2006
|
| PCT/US06/61246
|
| PCT
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Delicate Tissues (Brain)
|
| Pending National Phase Entry on May 27, 2009
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
|
| Canada
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Spinal or Orthopedic
Surgery
|
| Pending
|
June 22, 2006
|
| 06785312.7
|
| Europe
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Spinal or Orthopedic
Surgery
|
| Pending
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
|
| India
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Spinal or Orthopedic
Surgery
|
| Pending
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
|
| Israel
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Spinal or Orthopedic
Surgery
|
| Pending
|
June 22, 2006
|
|
|
| Japan
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Spinal or Orthopedic
Surgery
|
| Pending
|
December 20, 2007
|
| 11/993,280
|
| US
|
| Surgical Access
Instruments for Use with
Spinal or Orthopedic
Surgery
|
| Pending
|
The above-indicated patent applications were invented by Dr. John Mangiardi, who
assigned the rights to the Sawmill Trust on September 17, 2005 under the terms
of an assignment agreement between the parties. The Sawmill Trust then, in turn,
assigned the same rights to us on September 17, 2005 pursuant to an assignment
agreement between the Sawmill Trust and the Company dated the same date. The
consideration for such assignment was the issuance of one-third of the initial
equity of our predecessor (Vycor Medical, LLC) and the inclusion of certain
rights in favor or the Sawmill Trust, including but not limited to certain
supermajority voting rights and the right to appoint members of the board of
managers, which were incorporated in the Operating Agreement of such entity. Dr.
Mangiardis wife, Pascale Mangiardi, who is a director of the Company, was
the Settlor of the Sawmill Trust and Dr and Mrs. Mangiardi are both
beneficiaries of the Sawmilll Trust. The Sawmill Trust is an irrevocable trust
and A. Mitchell Green is the sole Trustee and has sole voting power and
investment power with respect to the assets of the trust.
Trademarks
VYCOR MEDICAL is a registered trademark and VYCOR VIEWSITE is both pending registration as a trademark with the United States Patent Office
20
Results of Operations
The following table presents the dollar amount changes from period to period of the line-items included in our Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
Three months ended:
|
| 2009
|
|
| 2008
|
|
| Increase/
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
| $
| 70,088
|
|
| $
| -
|
|
| $
| 70,088
|
|
|
|
Cost of Goods Sold
|
|
| 9,503
|
|
|
| -
|
|
|
| 9,503
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
| 60,585
|
|
|
| -
|
|
|
| 60,585
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
| -
|
|
|
| 6,333
|
|
|
| (6,333
| )
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
| 341,965
|
|
|
| 478,628
|
|
|
| (136,663
| )
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
| (281,380
| )
|
|
| (484,961
| )
|
|
| 203,581
| |
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
| 138,754
|
|
|
| 93,499
|
|
|
| 45,255
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
| $
| (420,134
| )
|
| $
| (578,460
| )
|
| $
| 158,326
| |
|
|
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Revenue:
The company recorded revenue of $70,088, after posting no revenue from the sale of our products in the three months ended March 31, 2009. The company has acquired sufficient inventory, affected a
meaningful product launch, and has sold various quantities of each of the twelve sizes of its Brain Access System product to both domestic and international customers.
Research and Development Expenses:
Research and development expenses decreased from $6,333 to $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. This decrease can be attributed to the ceasing of research and development activities on the existing product line.
General and Administrative Expenses:
General and administrative expenses decreased by 28.55%, or $136,663 from $478,628 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $341,965 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease was attributable to the elimination of certain nonrecurring legal and consulting costs related to the companys capital transactions in 2008.
Interest Expense (Income):
The company recorded interest expense of $138,754 and $93,499 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase is related to the companys increased principal balances on convertible debt agreements, generating both increased accrued interest and increased recognition of debt discounts. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, interest expense was offset with interest income of $201 and $1,704, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
On February 15, 2008, the company entered into a transaction with Regent Private
Capital, LLC, whereby Regent Private Capital, LLC agreed to invest $1,000,000 in
the purchase of the companys Convertible Debenturessuch investment
to be made in two tranches of $500,000 each. These Convertible Debentures
have a term of one year and are convertible into shares of the our common stock
at a price of approximately $.123 per share. If fully converted, the Convertible
Debentures would result in the issuance of 8,129,529 shares to Regent Private
Capital, LLC. On April 22, 2008 Regent Private Capital assigned $250,000
of the principal amount of the Convertible Debentures representing the first
tranche to Derek Johannson and $100,000 of the principal amount of the
Convertible Debentures to Altcar Investments Ltd. On December 2, 2008
Derek Johannson converted $250,000 of his debenture to 2,032,520 shares of
common stock of the company. On March 23, 2009, Altcar Investments converted
$100,000 of the debenture plus accrued interest of $6,625 into 866,867 shares of
common stock.
21
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued common stock valued at $5,000 for consulting services. During the same period, share-based compensation of $60,069 was recognized relating to previously executed consulting agreements and the vesting of employee-held options.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company realized a reduction in cash and cash equivalents of $103,596. This amount was entirely attributable to cash used in operating activities, as there was no cash used in or provided by either investing or financing transactions during the period.
The company believes that its existing cash, cash equivalents and available
borrowings will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working
capital and capital expenditures for approximately 2 months. No assurances can
be made that this will be the case or that assumptions regarding sales and
expenses underlying this belief will be accurate. The company will need to seek
additional funding through public or private financings or other arrangements
during this period and thereafter. Adequate funds may not be available when
needed or may not be available on terms favorable to us. If additional funds are
raised by issuing equity securities, dilution to existing stockholders may
result. If the company raises additional funds by obtaining loans from third
parties, the terms of those financing arrangements may include negative
covenants or other restrictions on our business that could impair our
operational flexibility, and would also require us to fund additional interest
expense. If funding is insufficient at any time in the future, the company may
be unable to develop or enhance our products, take advantage of business
opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Going Concern
Our independent auditors have added an explanatory paragraph to their audit
issued in connection with the financial statements for the period ended December
31, 2008, relative to our ability to continue as a going concern. This means
that there is substantial doubt that the company can continue as an ongoing
business for the next 12 months. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the uncertainty about our ability to continue
our business. The company has incurred losses since inception, including net
losses of $2,381,295 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and $420,134 for the
three months ended march 31, 2009, and expects to incur substantial additional
losses, including additional development costs, costs related to clinical trials
and manufacturing expenses. The company has incurred negative cash flows from
operations since inception. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
company had stockholders deficiencies of $1,169,868 and $921,427,
respectively, and cash and cash equivalents balance of $92,592 and $196,138 at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company also has certain
debt obligations that were not paid by their respective due dates. Since there
is no record of profitable operations, there is high a possibility that you may
suffer a complete loss of your investment. Because our auditors have
issued a going concern opinion, there is substantial uncertainty we will
continue operations in which case you could lose your investment. In
these circumstances the Company believes it may not have enough cash to meet its
various cash needs through June 2009 unless the Company is able to obtain
additional cash from the issuance of debt or equity securities. There is
no assurance that additional funds from the issuance of equity will be available
for the Company to finance its operations on acceptable terms. These conditions
raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the
possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or
the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome
of this uncertainty.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has adopted all recently issued accounting pronouncements. The adoption of the accounting pronouncements, including those not yet effective, is not anticipated to have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Uses of estimates in the preparation of financial statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Currently, the Company estimates depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, and the fair values of options and warrants.
22
The most critical estimates that impact the financial position and results of operation of the company have to do with the methodologies and assumptions used in determining the fair value of various debt estimates. These include assumptions associated with warrants, options and stock issued in conjunction with such debt. Additionally, the Black-Scholes option pricing model and its related assumptions of volatility, risk free interest, stock price also significantly impacted share based compensation and the results of operations.
Research and Development
The Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the amounts charged to research and development expenses were $ 0 and $6,333, respectively.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid debt investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts approximate fair market value because of the short maturity. The Company maintains cash balances at various financial institutions. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company's accounts at these institutions may, at times, exceed the federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments
At March 31, 2009 and 2008, fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, convertible promissory notes, and options and warrants approximate their carrying amount due to the short period of time to maturity and various fair value model calculations.
Property and equipment
The Company records property and equipment at cost and calculates depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, which is estimated to be between three and ten years.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This statement prescribes the use of the liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liability account balances are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company provides a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value.
Patents
The Company capitalizes legal and related costs associated with the establishment of patents for its products. Costs associated with the development of the patented item or process are charged to research and development costs as incurred. The costs associated with the establishment of the patents are amortized over the life of the patent.
The Company reviews existing patents as well as those in the approval process for impairment on an annual basis using a present value, cash flow method pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Since the Companys patents are either very new or still in the process of approval, the Company does not believe that any impairment of these amounts exists.
Revenue Recognition
The Company records revenue at the time, pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13(a), that a completed contract for the sale exists, title transfers to the buyer and the product is invoiced and shipped to the customer. The Company intends to sell a surgical access system which has already cleared the U.S. FDA 510(k) review process. It has been granted a 510(k) number to market to hospitals and other medical professionals. The Company does not expect the need to provide for product returns or warrantee costs but will review such potential costs after the commencement of sales.
Educational and marketing expenses
The Company may incur costs for the education of customers on the uses and benefits of its products. The Company will expense such costs as a component of selling, general and administrative costs as such costs are incurred.
23
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not applicable
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, the Companys principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are subject from time to time to litigation, claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of March 31, 2009, we were not a party to any material litigation, claim or suit whose outcome could have a material effect on our financial statements.
ITEM 2 UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
ITEM 3 DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not Applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Index to Exhibits
| |
31.1
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Rule 13(a) - 14(a) of the Exchange Act.
|
31.2
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Rule 13(a) - 14(a) of the Exchange Act.
|
32
| Certification of CEO and CFO under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
|
24
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on May 15, 2009.
| | | |
| VYCOR MEDICAL, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| By:
| /s/ Kenneth T. Coviello
|
|
|
| Kenneth T. Coviello
|
|
|
| Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| By:
| /s/ Heather N. Jensen
|
|
|
| Heather N. Jensen
|
|
|
| President, Founder and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
| |
25