Vystar Corp - Quarter Report: 2015 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015

For the transition period from ____________________to____________________

Commission File Number 000-53754

VYSTAR CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES ☐    NO  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES  ☒   NO  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)  YES ☐  NO ☒

As of September 3, 2015, there were 85,137,312 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding.

INFORMATION RELATING TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In addition to historical information, this Form 10-Q contains statements relating to our future results (including certain projections and business trends) that are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are subject to the “safe harbor” created by those sections. The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”). This Report contains certain forward-looking statements and the Company’s future operating results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Our disclosure and analysis included in this Report concerning our operations, cash flows and financial position, including, in particular, the likelihood of our success in expanding our business and raising debt and capital securities include forward-looking statements. Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, “estimate”, “may”, “project”, “will likely result”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including prevailing market conditions and are more fully described under “Part I, Item 1A – Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. In any event, these and other important factors, including those set forth in Item 1A – “Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by our forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that these statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, we cannot guarantee future results and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date of this filing. There can be no assurance that (i) we have correctly measured or identified all of the factors affecting our business or the extent of these factors’ likely impact, (ii) the available information with respect to these factors on which such analysis is based is complete or accurate, (iii) such analysis is correct or (iv) our strategy, which is based in part on this analysis, will be successful. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements.

All references to “we”, “us”, “our”, “Vystar”, or “Kiron” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q mean Vystar Corporation, its subsidiaries and affiliates.

Vystar Corporation

Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2015

Index

Part I.       FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VYSTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

VYSTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

VYSTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

VYSTAR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1      DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Vystar Corporation (“Vystar”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) is the creator and exclusive owner of the innovative technology to produce Vytex® Natural Rubber Latex (“NRL”). On September 13, 2012, the Company acquired SleepHealth, LLC and SleepHealth North Carolina, LLC (“SleepHealth”), privately-held sleep diagnostic companies that were headquartered in Monroe, Georgia. SleepHealth provided sleep lab management services to physicians’ offices, specialty and multi-specialty clinics in Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina. On June 28, 2013, Vystar Corporation completed the acquisition of Kiron Clinical Sleep Lab, LLC (“Kiron”) a vertically integrated sleep diagnostic practice located in Durham, NC. Due to poor performance and as part of the Company’s strategy to focus on realizing the potential of the Vytex foam business in the pillow and mattress markets, the Company made the decision to discontinue the operations of the SleepHealth subsidiary in January of 2014. As a result of the acquisitions and the discontinued operations of SleepHealth, Vystar Corporation is comprised of two segments, a Vytex Division, focused on expanding the licensing and utilization of its proprietary source natural rubber latex technology and a Kiron Division focused on the sleep diagnostic and Durable Medical Equipment (“DME”) businesses. Vystar has also expanded into the consumer arena with an introduction into the mattress, mattress topper and pillow arenas aligning with key foam manufacturers, mattress, mattress toppers and pillow producers, and furniture stores in specific areas of the Unites States. This additional focus was noted in a press release dated March 19, 2014. On January 22, 2015, Vystar announced the signing of an exclusive domestic distribution agreement with Worcester, MA based Nature’s Home Solutions (NHS) who sources eco-friendly materials and technologies for use in furnishings and other markets. On March 4, 2015, the Company announced that Hartford, CT based Gold Bond formed a strategic alliance with NHS to produce and market the world’s first Vytex NRL based mattress which was introduced at the High Point (NC) Market mid-April 2015. In June 2015, the first mattresses made with Vytex (hybrid and pure Vytex) were placed on the sales floor at Rotman’s Furniture and Carpet Store in Worcester , MA using the “Evaya” brand and Gold Bond had shipped four versions of their “Brilliance” inner coil and pure foam mattresses (Emerald, Ruby, Sapphire Plush and Sapphire Firm) to over 30 stores from Maine to Florida.

NOTE 2      BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information.  Accordingly, certain information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements may be condensed or omitted.  These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  In the opinion of Vystar management, these consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which comprise only normal and recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations as of and for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures.  Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future, actual results could differ from these estimates. Examples include valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, provisions for bad debts, and fair values of share-based compensation.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Certain financial instruments potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk.  These consolidated financial instruments consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable.  Cash held in banks in many cases exceeds the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, insurance limits.  While we monitor our cash balances on a regular basis and adjust the balances as appropriate, these balances could be impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail.  To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to our cash; however, we can provide no assurances that access to our cash will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets.

Inventory

Inventory consisting of Vytex NRL is stated at the lower of cost or market and cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Loss Per Share

Because the Company reported a net loss for the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, common stock equivalents, including stock options and warrants, were anti-dilutive; therefore, the amounts reported for basic and dilutive loss per share were the same.  Excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share were options outstanding to purchase 8,444,906 shares and 6,488,239 shares of common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.  Warrants to purchase 21,240,616 shares and 20,838,430 shares of common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, were also excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Revenues

The Vytex segment derives revenue from license fees of Vytex NRL raw material to manufacturers and distributors of rubber and rubber end products such as the foam used in the pillows and mattresses. Revenue is recognized when the licensee confirms payment and pays Vystar.

The Kiron segment bills insurance providers and patients directly and is dependent on the practice’s ability to collect from healthcare insurance providers and from its patients. The Kiron segment recognizes revenue each month for sleep services as services are provided and DME as it is prescribed by the sleep physician. In some instances, DME is approved on a rental basis for the first few months in which case DME revenue is recognized as the DME rental is billed.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, line of credit and shareholder notes payable.  The carrying values of all the Company’s financial instruments approximate fair value because of their short maturities. In addition to the short maturities, the carrying amounts of our line of credit and shareholder notes payable approximate fair value because the interest rates at June 30, 2015 approximate market interest rates for the respective borrowings.

In specific circumstances, certain assets and liabilities are reported or disclosed at fair value.  Fair value is the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date in the Company’s principal market for such transactions.  If there is not an established principal market, fair value is derived from the most advantageous market.

Valuation inputs are classified in the following hierarchy:

Highest priority is given to Level 1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.  Acceptable valuation techniques include the market approach, income approach, and cost approach.  In some cases, more than one valuation technique is used.

NOTE 3      LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business.  However, the Company has incurred significant losses and experienced negative cash flow since its inception.  At June 30, 2015, the Company had cash of $39,038 and a deficit in working capital of $2,161,171.  Further, at June 30, 2015, the accumulated deficit amounted to $25,135,174.  As a result of the Company’s history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

A successful transition to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon obtaining sufficient financing to fund the Company’s planned expenses and achieving a level of revenue adequate to support the Company’s cost structure. Management plans to finance future operations through the use of cash on hand, increased revenue from better utilization of existing Kiron facilities, increased revenue from Vytex division license fees, our credit facility, stock warrant exercises from existing shareholders, raising capital through private placements of capital stock and debt.

Our future expenditures will depend on numerous factors, including: the rate at which we can introduce and license Vytex NRL to manufacturers; the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights; market acceptance of our products and services; competing technological developments; and the rate at which we are able to build Kiron’s Sleep Diagnostic business. As we expand our activities and operations, our cash requirements are expected to increase at a rate consistent with revenue growth after we have achieved sustained revenue generation.

There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve its projected level of revenue in 2015 and beyond. If the Company is unable to achieve its projected revenue and is not able to obtain alternate additional financing of equity or debt, the Company would need to significantly curtail or reorient its operations during 2015, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives and as a result may require the Company to file for bankruptcy or cease operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts classified as liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be forced to take any such actions.

NOTE 4      PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following:

Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $379 and $702. Depreciation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $962 and $1,463, respectively.

NOTE 5      INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Patents represent legal and other fees associated with the registration of patents.  The Company has two patents and two provisional patent submissions with the United States Patent and Trade Office (USPTO), as well as an international PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) patent.

Intangible assets are as follows:

Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $3,920. Amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was $7,840.

NOTE 6      INCOME TAXES

There is no income tax benefit recorded for the losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 since management has determined that the realization of the net deferred tax asset is not assured and has created a valuation allowance for the entire amount of the net deferred tax asset.

NOTE 7      NOTES PAYABLE AND LOAN FACILITY

Related Party Line of Credit (CMA Note Payable)

On April 29, 2011, the Company executed with CMA Investments, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“CMA”), a line of credit with a principal amount of up to $800,000 (the “CMA Note”). CMA is a limited liability company of which three of the directors of the Company (“CMA directors”) were initially the members. Pursuant to the terms of the CMA Note, the Company may draw up to a maximum principal amount of $800,000. Interest, is computed at LIBOR plus 5.25% (5.44% at June 30, 2015), on amounts drawn and fees. The weighted average interest rate in effect on the borrowings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 was 5.44%.

Other terms of the CMA Note include:

On September 14, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors approved increasing the line of credit with CMA by $200,000 to a maximum principal amount of $1,000,000 and the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer became a member of CMA. As compensation to the CMA Directors for increasing the amount available under the CMA Note, the Board of Directors approved modifying the exercise price for the 2,600,000 compensatory stock purchase warrants previously issued to the Directors from $0.45 to $0.27 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date and the Company also issued warrants to purchase an additional 1,600,000 shares of the Company’s stock at $0.27 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on September 14, 2011, which vest upon the original terms of the CMA Note. The costs incurred in the modification of the exercise price of the 2,600,000 compensatory stock purchase warrants issued on April 29, 2011 and the additional 1,600,000 warrants issued on September 14, 2011 are being amortized on a straight line basis over the remaining term of the CMA Note.

On November 2, 2012, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the CMA line of credit from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000. As compensation to the CMA Directors for increasing the amount available under the CMA Note, warrants to purchase an additional 2,100,000 shares of the Company’s stock at $0.35 per share were issued and recorded as deferred financing cost to be amortized through interest expense over the remaining term of the CMA Note. There was no amortization of the financing costs associated with the CMA Note for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014

On April 29, 2013, the maturity date of the CMA Note was extended to April 29, 2014. As compensation to the CMA Directors for extending the maturity date of the CMA Note, the Board of Directors approved modifying the exercise price for the 6,300,000 compensatory stock purchase warrants previously issued to the Directors to $0.10 per share and the CMA Directors forfeited 630,000 of the warrants. Amortization of the financing costs associated with extending the CMA Note was amortized through interest expense.

On April 30, 2014 the maturity date of the CMA Note was extended to April 30, 2015. No consideration was awarded the CMA members based on this extension. A further extension application is currently awaiting CMA member signatures to take the maturity date to April 30, 2016.

Shareholder Notes Payable

The following table summarizes the shareholder notes payable:

Such notes are (i) unsecured, (ii) bear interest at an annual rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, and (iii) are convertible into shares of common stock at a conversion rate ranging between $0.05 and $0.10 of principal and interest for each such share.

The current average conversion price for the above referenced Shareholder and Promissory Notes with an outstanding balance as of June 30, 2015 of $842,834 including accrued interest, is approximately $0.05 per share or 15,406,942 shares of the Company’s common stock. The face value of the Shareholder Notes at June 30, 2015 is $662,568.

NOTE 8      STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

As part of a September 2014 Private Placement Memorandum, updated in February 2015, the Company sold 5,700,000 shares of Common Stock for net proceeds of $285,000.

On February 26, 2015, the Company issued 420,000 common shares as compensation for an extension to the Company’s Consulting Agreement executed in December 2013 as amended in February 2014 with Jason Leaf and 1,440,000 common shares as compensation for an extension to the Company’s Business Development Agreement with Blue Oar Consulting, Inc. executed in March 2013 as amended in August 2013 and amended February 2014.

On March 6, 2015, the Company issued 1,560,000 common shares as compensation for a public relations contract with Accentuate PR.

During June 2015, the Company’s Board offered the investors from the November 2013 Private Placement holding common stock warrants an incentive to exercise their $0.05 warrants for $0.03 per common stock share. The Company had investors exercise 2,157,868 warrants at $0.03 for net proceeds of $64,736. This incentive resulted in an expense of $15,899 appearing as other expense on the Company’s Statement of Operations. The Company also had 20,000 warrants exercised at $0.05 for $1,000. As part of the September 2014 Private Placement Memorandum, updated in June 2015, the Company issued 1,110,000 shares for net proceeds of $55,500. The Company also issued 200,000 shares as compensation to third-party contractors in lieu of cash compensation.

In July 2015, the Company had investors exercise 127,778 warrants at $0.03 for net proceeds of $3,833.

Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock

On May 2, 2013, the Company began a private placement offering to sell up to 200,000 shares of the Company’s 10% Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Under the terms of the offering, the Company offered to sell up to 200,000 shares of preferred stock at $10.00 per share for a value of $2,000,000. The preferred stock accumulates a 10% per annum dividend and was convertible at a conversion price of $0.075 per common share at the option of the holder after a six month holding period. The conversion price was lowered to $0.05 per common share for those holders who invested an additional $25,000 or more in the Company’s common stock in the aforementioned September 2014 Private Placement. The holder may convert up to 5% of the shares to common shares per month. The preferred shares have full voting rights as if converted and have a fully participating liquidation preference.

On February 25, 2015, 16,257 outstanding shares of preferred stock and their accumulated undeclared dividends of $29,530 were converted to 3,841,997 shares of common stock.

At June 30, 2015, the 13,828 shares of outstanding preferred stock had accumulated undeclared dividends of approximately $28,954, and could be converted into 3,344,683 shares of common stock, at the option of the holder.

NOTE 9      SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Generally accepted accounting principles require share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, warrants, and common stock to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values at the date of grant, net of estimated forfeitures.

In total, the Company recorded $72,313 and $152,962 of stock-based compensation expense for the three month period ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $272,968 and $268,855 of stock-based compensation expense for the six month period ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, related to employee and board member stock options and common stock and warrants issued to nonemployees.  As of June 30, 2015, $232,759 of unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested share-based awards remains to be recognized over a period of approximately four years.

Options and Warrants

The Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant-date fair value of option and warrant awards granted. The following assumptions were used for option and warrant awards during the six months ended June30, 2015:

Options

During 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a stock option plan (the “Plan”) and authorized up to 4,000,000 shares to be issued under the Plan.  In April 2009, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an increase in the number of shares to be issued under the Plan to 10,000,000 shares, which was also approved by the Company’s shareholders, and to include the independent Board members in the plan in lieu of continuing the previous practice of granting warrants each quarter to independent board members for services.  At June 30, 2015, there were 1,555,094 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan.  The Plan is intended to permit stock options granted to employees to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Incentive Stock Options”).  All options granted under the Plan that are not intended to qualify as Incentive Stock Options are deemed to be non-qualified options.  Stock options are typically granted at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, typically vest over periods up to 4 years and are typically exercisable up to 10 years.

The weighted-average assumptions used in the option pricing model for stock option grants were as follows:

The following table represents the Company’s warrant activity for the six months ended June 30, 2015:

The Company issued 500,000 options for services during the six months ended June 30, 2015 at an exercise price of $0.08 per share, exercisable over a period of ten years from the grant date.  The options vest 25,000 options per quarter over a period of five years.  The fair value of the warrants was calculated as of the date of the grant utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model and assumptions as detailed above.  The total amount of the fair value was $39,185 and is recorded as noncash share-based compensation expense as vesting occurs.

Warrants

Warrants are issued to employees for expenses and for compensation in lieu of cash as well as to third parties as payment for services and in conjunction with the issuance of common stock.  The fair value of each common stock warrant issued for services is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The weighted-average assumptions used in the option pricing model for stock warrant grants were as follows:

The following table represents the Company’s warrant activity for the six months ended June 30, 2015:

The Company issued 1,731,453 warrants for services during the six months ended June 30, 2015 at exercise prices from $0.05 to $1.00 per share, exercisable over a period from two to ten years from the grant date.  All of the warrants with the exception of 1,061,182 vested immediately with the 1,061,182 warrants vesting one-twelfth per month over a one year period. The fair value of the warrants was calculated as of the date of the grant utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model and assumptions as detailed above.  The total amount of the fair value was $80,440 and is recorded as noncash share-based compensation expense as vesting occurs.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Vystar Corporation (“Vystar”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, or “our”) is the creator and exclusive owner of the innovative technology to produce Vytex® Natural Rubber Latex (“NRL”). This technology reduces antigenic protein and non-rubbers in natural rubber latex to virtually undetectable levels. With non-latex products growing at a rapid rate, the costs for these alternative materials incurred by the manufacturers of these many different products have greatly decreased with nearly all substitute materials being more expensive than NRL. This fact has changed in the past year as NRL prices have decreased and continue to fluctuate in the low price zone. Supply for nitrile and neoprene has grown dramatically in the past year as additional facilities have come on line mostly in Southeast Asia. We have introduced Vytex NRL, our “ultra-low protein” natural rubber latex, throughout the worldwide marketplace that uses NRL or latex substitutes as a component of manufactured products and we have recently approved an ultra-low ammonia version for limited exposure on the workers in the manufacturing world. Recent industry estimates have the total rubber market at 11 million dry metric tons of which just over 1.2 million tons are in liquid latex form. There are more than 40,000 products made from the liquid latex while the other eight million plus tons are used to produce tires and other hard rubber products. Natural rubber latex is used in an extensive range of products including balloons, textiles, footwear and clothing (threads), adhesives, foams, furniture, carpet, paints, coatings, protective equipment, sporting equipment, and specialty health care products such as condoms, surgical and exam gloves, catheters and other items.

We expanded our operations, particularly increasing market acceptance and sales of Vytex NRL through our operating agreement with CT Group (“CT”). As we conclude the second year of this agreement we have handled the consistent orders by utilizing CT’s ability to hedge raw material pricing, consistently produce larger quantities, store the various forms of Vytex NRL effectively, package and ship, collect and pay Vystar its royalties. CT has handled regular shipments to a major producer of adhesives for use in a few different industries such as shoe adhesives and food labeling. The decision to convert to Vytex NRL is impacted by many functional areas including research and development, manufacturing, sales, marketing, purchasing and finance. Each of these areas has a significantly different decision-making role per company thus the large difference in the sales cycle. If the product is regulated and requires regulatory clearances or approvals prior to commercialization, the sales cycle could be extended by another nine to twelve months for testing, filing and agency review. By diversifying the target product categories we believe this balanced approach will reduce our exposure to individual market fluctuations and increase our aggregate revenues. Our focus on the consumer foam arena will greatly increase the global production and use of Vytex NRL and includes other licensees as well as the CT Group. The CT Group was recently purchased by Halcyon Agri, based out of Singapore.

As noted in a press release issued March 19, 2014 and two subsequent releases, Vystar announced a strategic directional shift that has taken it into the multi-billion dollar foam market using its patented Vytex NRL raw material. The raw material is then transformed by its Guatemalan partner, Islatex, and potentially other companies into foam that is whiter, lighter weight and free of the off-gassing common among competitors’ memory foam products. Because Vytex NRL results in a more translucent and cleaner latex following the removal of proteins and non-rubbers, manufacturers’ production costs are decreased by utilizing less chemicals, water, and processing to remove proteins, and less dyes and perfumes to cover up the yellow color and odor of non-Vytex natural rubber latex.

As noted in the opening paragraphs, Vystar’s alliances have been formed to include mattress and pillow producers in the United States, business development strategists, and selected retailers that have received containers of foam pillow and mattress cores for showroom analysis, market research and select early sales efforts. Through these broad alliances, Vystar is offering a broad array of mattress and pillow cores to meet consumer needs across the board.

Vystar has moved into a targeted role in the North American foam industry with specific large retail outlets identified for Vytex foam but key markets and online retailers are ready to start offering mattresses and pillows for their customers. This is the first time that Vystar is participating directly in end product sales.

Recent Developments

As previously noted, Vystar remains in discussions with parties in the alternate rubber arena to license its technologies for removal of proteins from alternate latex sources that have been shown to contain similar proteins. These discussions have intensified as this alternate industry has added companies that show strong potential to fill a possible void in future demand.

Recently, after two presentations to technical audiences and much publicity surrounding the foam line launch, Vystar has been approached by companies with novel ideas that include the use of its Vytex NRL raw material. Also Vystar has also completed trials with European and Indian makers of foam products to use its Vytex NRL raw material in their current offerings in their own areas as well as to supply added needs for foam cores in both the mattress and topper arenas. Vystar has also completed a trial to procure pillows made with Vytex NRL for global and domestic use with another trial planned for SE Asia. Vystar entered into discussions in July 2015 with a large international maker of natural rubber latex foam cores, who has an American subsidiary and distribution center to supply foam of varying thicknesses and firmness to handle global and domestic business for retail outlets and its online offerings. Vytex NRL is in the first trial phase at the American facility.

Board of Directors Member and Research & Development Director Ranjit K. Matthan, Ph.D., revealed ongoing developments in the formulation of Vytex NRL with reduced or no ammonia and nitrosamines at the International Latex Conference (ILC) session titled “Advances in Environmentally Friendly Ultra Low Protein Natural Rubber Specialty Latices” on August 12, 2015. The significant advances in aluminum hydroxide-treated Vytex NRL properties and applications are potential game-changers for the issues of volatile organic content and nitrosamines for some critical latex products, such as balloons, catheters, condoms, and other medical devices, as well as enabling cleaner and more sustainable work environments. The expanded Vystar product grades make it applicable in a wider range of latex products with the advantage of improved environmental impact through reduced leachables/extractables. The advances deliver a simplified, sustainable, totally safe raw material that Vystar can offer for several applications without reservations about nitrosamines. 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 with the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 from the consolidated Company were $122,694 and $175,050, respectively, for a decrease of $52,356 or 29.9%. The decrease in revenues from operations was due to a decrease of $67,919 in fees from Kiron offset by an increase in Vytex licensing fees of $15,564. The decrease in fee revenue from Kiron was due to a number of factors, principal of which was the decrease in reimbursement for DME sales and a reduction in physician referrals during the quarter ended June 30, 2015. For the consolidated Company, gross profit decreased from $100,584 for the period ended June 30, 2014 to $60,062 for the period ended June 30, 2015 for a reduction of $40,522 or 40.3%.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s consolidated operating expenses consist of general and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and support costs for management and administrative staff, and for other general and administrative costs, including professional fees related to accounting, finance, and legal services as well as other operating expenses. Operating expenses were $359,174 and $367,795 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for a decrease of $8,621 or 2.3%.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) for the three months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of interest expense of $38,460 and interest income of $3. During June 2015, the Company’s Board offered the investors from the November 2013 Private Placement holding common stock warrants an incentive to exercise their $0.05 warrants for $0.03 per common stock share. The Company had investors exercise 2,157,868 warrants at $0.03 for net proceeds of $64,736 which resulted in an expense of $15,899. This compares to $44,340 of interest expense, $6,730 of other income and interest income of $3 for the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Net Loss

Net loss was $353,468 and $287,512 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, an increase of $65,956 or 22.9% in the net loss.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 with the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014

Revenues

Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 from the consolidated Company were $222,586 and $386,869, respectively, for a decrease of $164,283 or 42.5%. The decrease in revenues from operations was due to a decrease of $168,099 in fees from Kiron offset by an increase in Vytex licensing fees of $3,817. The decrease in fee revenue from Kiron was due to a number of factors, principal of which was the decrease in reimbursement for DME sales and a reduction in physician referrals during the six months ended June 30, 2015. For the consolidated Company, gross profit decreased from $230,555 for the period ended June 30, 2014 to $93,499 for the period ended June 30, 2015 for a reduction of $137,056 or 59.4%.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s consolidated operating expenses consist of general and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and support costs for management and administrative staff, and for other general and administrative costs, including professional fees related to accounting, finance, and legal services as well as other operating expenses. Operating expenses were $788,798 and $691,498 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, for an increase of $97,300 or 14.1%. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to a $30,495 of bad debt expense at Kiron and an increase of $49,251 in accounting expense due to the hiring of a third party providing Chief Financial Officer services in the first three months of 2015.

Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted of interest expense of $69,543 and interest income of $39. During June 2015, the Company’s Board offered the investors from the November 2013 Private Placement holding common stock warrants an incentive to exercise their $0.05 warrants for $0.03 per common stock share. The Company had investors exercise 2,157,868 warrants at $0.03 for net proceeds of $64,736 which resulted in an expense of $15,899. This compares to $84,892 of interest expense, $6,780 of other income and interest income of $12 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Net Loss

Net loss was $780,701 and $561,059 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, an increase of $219,642 or 39.2% in the net loss.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At June 30, 2015, the Company had cash of $39,038 and a deficit in working capital of $2,161,171.  Further, at June 30, 2015, the accumulated deficit amounted to $25,135,174.  As a result of the Company’s history of losses and financial condition, there is substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

A successful transition to attaining profitable operations is dependent upon obtaining sufficient financing to fund the Company’s planned expenses and achieving a level of revenue adequate to support the Company’s cost structure. Management plans to finance future operations through the use of cash on hand, increased revenue from better utilization of existing Kiron facilities, increased revenue from Vytex division license fees, our credit facility, stock warrant exercises from existing shareholders, raising capital through private placements of capital stock and debt.

Our future expenditures will depend on numerous factors, including: the rate at which we can introduce and license Vytex NRL to manufacturers; the costs of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights; market acceptance of our products and services; competing technological developments; and the rate at which we are able to build Kiron’s Sleep Diagnostic business. As we expand our activities and operations, our cash requirements are expected to increase at a rate consistent with revenue growth after we have achieved sustained revenue generation.

There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve its projected level of revenue in 2015 and beyond. If the Company is unable to achieve its projected revenue and is not able to obtain alternate additional financing of equity or debt, the Company would need to significantly curtail or reorient its operations during 2015, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to achieve its business objectives and as a result may require the Company to file for bankruptcy or cease operations. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts classified as liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be forced to take any such actions.

Sources and Uses of Cash

For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, net cash used in operations was $440,968 and $392,048 respectively.  The negative cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2015 resulted primarily from the net loss of $780,701 and a decrease in accounts payable of $100,519 offset by non-cash charges related to non-cash share-based compensation expense of $272,968, allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable of $29,753, and accrued compensation and expenses of $32,315. The negative cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2014 resulted primarily from the net loss of $561,059, allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable of $217,026, a decrease in accounts payable of $86,679, a decrease of accrued compensation of $18,907 and a gain on extinguishment of debt of $96,949 offset by non-cash charges related to non-cash share-based compensation expense of $268,855, loss on disposal of equipment of $105,931 and a reduction in accounts receivable of $156,637.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015 the company had no investing activity. Net cash provided by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $44,593 from the disposal of the furniture and equipment from the discontinued SleepHealth division.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $406,236 in proceeds from the sale of common stock and the exercise of warrants. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $313,089 comprised of $360,568 in proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrants offset by $47,479 for the retirement of the A/R financing facility.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that may be reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations.

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains not only statements that are historical facts, but also statements that are forward-looking (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Forward-looking statements are, by their very nature, uncertain and risky. These risks and uncertainties include international, national and local general economic and market conditions; demographic changes; our ability to sustain, manage, or forecast growth;  product development, introduction and acceptance; existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other risks that might be detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Although the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by them. Consequently, and because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, the actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements. You are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports as we attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and prospects.

ITEM 3.         QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

None

ITEM 4.         CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(A)     Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2015.  Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q has been appropriately recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to the reasonable assurance level.

(B)     Changes in internal control over financial reporting

We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment.  Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes.

The company has re-engaged its relationship with an external accounting group upon the mutual agreement to end its contract with the former acting CFO. This will bridge the gap to enhance the control structure thus attempting to mitigate any existing internal control weaknesses.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.         LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

At the closing of the Kiron Clinical Sleep Lab, LLC acquisition, the Company and Michael Soo, MD, the Seller, entered into an agreement (“Contract”) pursuant to which the Michael Soo, MD, through his medical practice, Durham Neurology, PLLC, a wholly owned professional limited liability company would provide ongoing clinical and medical services to the Company and Kiron as Medical Director. The Seller subsequently dissolved Durham Neurology, PLLC on September 13, 2013 leaving Kiron without a Medical Director. On March 10, 2014, Vystar and Kiron filed Civil Suit 74A-07997-1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA against Michael Soo, MD and Durham Neurology, PLLC for multiple breaches of the Agreement and Contract. Potential settlement discussions have taken place with a targeted close for this case in September 2015.

ITEM 2.         UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Set forth below is information regarding shares of common stock, warrants and options to purchase common stock issued by the Company in the Quarter Ended June 30, 2015, that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Also included is the consideration, if any, received by the Company for such shares, warrants and options and information relating to the section of the Securities Act, or rule of the Securities and Exchange Commission, under which exemption from registration was claimed.

(a)      Common Stock Financings

From December 31, 2014 through June 30, 2015, the Company issued 6,810,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.05 per share.

(b)      Stock Option Grants

From December 31, 2014 through June 30, 2015, the Company issued 500,000 options to purchase the Company’s common stock at $0.08 per share.

(c)      Application of Securities Laws and Other Matters

No underwriters were involved in the foregoing sales of securities. The securities described in section (a) of this Item 2 were issued to investors in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, as set forth in Section 4(2) under the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as applicable, relative to sales by an issuer not involving any public offering, to the extent an exemption from such registration was required.

All of the foregoing securities are deemed restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act. All certificates representing the issued shares of common stock, warrants and options described in this Item 2 included appropriate legends setting forth that the securities had not been registered and the applicable restrictions on transfer.

ITEM 3.         DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4.         MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable

ITEM 5.         OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6.         EXHIBITS

Exhibit Index

* Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.