W&T OFFSHORE INC - Quarter Report: 2013 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

OR

For the transition period from _______________ to ________________

Commission File Number 1-32414

W&T OFFSHORE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(713) 626-8525

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

Yes  þ  No  ¨  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  þ  No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company.  Yes  ¨  No  þ  

As of August 6, 2013, there were 75,277,080 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.00001.

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 1 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 2 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 3 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 4 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.  Basis of Presentation

Operations.  W&T Offshore, Inc. and subsidiaries, referred to herein as “W&T” or the “Company,” is an independent oil and natural gas producer focused primarily in the Gulf of Mexico and onshore Texas.  The Company is active in the exploration, development and acquisition of oil and natural gas properties.

Interim Financial Statements.  The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim periods and the appropriate rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  Accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements for annual periods.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.  These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Reclassifications.  Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ financial statements to conform to the current presentation.  Income taxes was combined with Accrued liabilities on the Balance Sheet and changes in Other liabilities was combined with the changes in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Statement of Cash Flows.    

Use of Estimates.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Developments.  In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities which applies to certain items in the statement of financial position (balance sheet), and was further clarified in January 2013 by ASU 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210):Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarified the scope of ASU 2011-11 to derivative instruments, repurchase agreements and securities lending transactions.  The effective date for the amendments is for annual periods beginning after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.  ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures of the gross and net amounts for items eligible for offset in the balance sheet.  Although the Company’s derivative financial instruments are subject to master netting agreements, the Company records its derivative financial instruments on a gross basis by contract; therefore, the ASUs did not significantly affect the Company’s disclosures.  Other items of the ASUs were not applicable to the Company.     

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation is Fixed at the Reporting Date, which requires an entity that is joint and severally liable to measure the obligation as the sum of the amount the entity has agreed with co-obligors to pay and any additional amount it expects to pay on behalf of one or more co-obligors.  Required disclosures include a description of the nature of the arrangement, how the liability arose, the relationship with co-obligors and the terms and conditions of the arrangement.  The effective date for the amendment is for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.  The amendment is to be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented.  The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2013-04 to determine the effects on the balance sheet and disclosures, if any.

 5 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

2.  Acquisitions and Divestitures

2012 Acquisition.  On October 5, 2012, we acquired from Newfield Exploration Company and its subsidiary, Newfield Exploration Gulf Coast LLC (together, “Newfield”) certain oil and gas leasehold interests in the Gulf of Mexico (the “Newfield Properties”).  The Newfield Properties consist of leases covering 78 offshore blocks on approximately 416,000 gross acres (268,000 net acres) (excluding overriding royalty interests), comprised of 65 blocks in the deepwater, six of which are producing, 10 blocks on the conventional shelf, four of which are producing, and an overriding royalty interest in three deepwater blocks, two of which are producing.  Including adjustments from an effective date of July 1, 2012, the adjusted purchase price was $205.7 million and we assumed the future asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) associated with the Newfield Properties.  The purchase price was finalized during the second quarter of 2013 and no further adjustments are expected.  Adjustments to the purchase price of a net increase of $0.2 million were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2013.  The acquisition was funded from borrowings under our revolving bank credit facility and cash on hand.  Subsequently in the same month, the amounts borrowed under our revolving bank credit facility were paid down with funds provided from the issuance of long-term debt in October 2012.  See Note 6 for information on long-term debt.

The following table presents the purchase price allocation, including adjustments, for the acquisition of the Newfield Properties (in thousands):

The acquisition was recorded at fair value, which was determined by applying the market and income approaches using Level 3 inputs.  The Level 3 inputs were: (i) analysis of comparable transactions obtained from various third-parties, (ii) estimates of ultimate recoveries of reserves and (iii) estimates of discounted cash flows based on estimated reserve quantities, reserve categories, timing of production, costs to produce and develop reserves, future prices, ARO and discount rates.  The estimates and assumptions were determined by management and third-parties.  The fair value is based on subjective estimates and assumptions, which are inherently imprecise, and the actual realized values could vary significantly from these estimates.  No goodwill was recorded for the Newfield Properties acquisition.

Revenue, Net Income and Pro Forma Financial Information — Unaudited

The Newfield Properties were not included in our consolidated results until the closing date of October 5, 2012.  For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Newfield Properties accounted for $33.7 million of revenue, $7.6 million of direct operating expenses, $15.8 million of depreciation, depletion, amortization and accretion (“DD&A”) and $3.6 million of income taxes, resulting in $6.7 million of net income.  For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Newfield Properties accounted for $62.3 million of revenue, $14.1 million of direct operating expenses, $26.4 million of DD&A and $7.6 million of income taxes, resulting in $14.2 million of net income.  The net income attributable to these properties does not reflect certain expenses, such as general and administrative (“G&A”) expense and interest expense; therefore, this information is not intended to report results as if these operations were managed on a stand-alone basis.  In addition, the Newfield Properties are not recorded in a separate entity for tax purposes; therefore, income tax was estimated using the federal statutory tax rate.  There were no expenses associated with acquisition activities and transition activities related to the acquisition of the Newfield Properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Consistent with the computation of pro forma financial information presented in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year end December 31, 2012, the unaudited pro forma financial information was computed as if the acquisition of the Newfield Properties had been completed on January 1, 2011.  The financial information was derived from W&T’s audited historical consolidated financial statement for annual periods, W&T’s unaudited historical condensed consolidated financial statement for the interim periods, the Newfield Properties’ audited historical financial statement for 2011 and the Newfield Properties’ unaudited historical financial statements for the 2012 interim periods.

The pro forma adjustments were based on estimates by management and information believed to be directly related to the purchase of the Newfield Properties.  The pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations had the purchase occurred on January 1, 2011.  If the transaction had been in effect for the periods indicated, the results may have been substantially different.  For example, we may have operated the assets differently than Newfield;

 6 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

realized sales prices for oil, natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and natural gas may have been different; and costs of operating the Newfield Properties may have been different.  

The following table presents a summary of our pro forma financial information (in thousands except earnings per share):

For the pro forma financial information, certain information was derived from financial records and certain information was estimated.  

The following table presents incremental items included in the pro forma information reported above for the Newfield Properties (in thousands):

2012 Divestiture.   On May 15, 2012, we sold our 40%, non-operated working interest in the South Timbalier 41 field located in the Gulf of Mexico for $30.5 million with an effective date of April 1, 2012.  The transaction was structured as a like-kind exchange under the Internal Revenue Service Code (“IRC”) Section 1031 and other applicable regulations, with

 7 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

funds held by a qualified intermediary until replacement purchases could be executed.  Replacement purchases were consummated during 2012.  In connection with this sale, we reversed $4.0 million of ARO.   

3.  Hurricane Remediation and Insurance Claims

During the third quarter of 2008, Hurricane Ike caused substantial damage to certain of our properties and we continue to incur costs and submit claims to our insurance underwriters related to repairing such damage.  Our insurance policies in effect on the occurrence date of Hurricane Ike had a retention requirement of $10.0 million per occurrence, which has been satisfied, and coverage policy limits of $150.0 million for property damage due to named windstorms (excluding damage at certain facilities) and $250.0 million for, among other things, removal of wreckage if mandated by any governmental authority.   

We recognize insurance receivables with respect to capital, repair and plugging and abandonment costs as a result of hurricane damage when we deem those to be probable of collection, which arises when our insurance underwriters’ adjuster reviews and approves such costs for payment by the underwriters.  Claims that have been processed in this manner have customarily been paid on a timely basis.  

 From the third quarter of 2008 through June 30, 2013, we have received $147.2 million from our insurance underwriters related to Hurricane Ike.  To the extent that additional remediation costs or plug and abandonment costs are incurred that are not covered by insurance, we expect that our available cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations and the availability under our revolving bank credit facility will be sufficient to meet necessary expenditures that may exceed our insurance coverage for damages incurred as a result of Hurricane Ike.  See Note 4 for additional information about the impact of hurricane related items on our ARO.   See Note 12 for information regarding legal actions taken by certain insurers and the Company.

4.  Asset Retirement Obligations

Our ARO primarily represents the estimated present value of the amount we will incur to plug, abandon and remediate our producing properties at the end of their productive lives in accordance with applicable laws.  

A summary of the changes to our ARO is as follows (in thousands):

5.  Derivative Financial Instruments

Our market risk exposure relates primarily to commodity prices and interest rates. From time to time, we use various derivative instruments to manage our exposure to commodity price risk from sales of oil and natural gas and interest rate risk from floating interest rates on our revolving bank credit facility. Our derivative financial instruments currently consist of crude oil swap contracts.  All of the derivative counterparties are also lenders or affiliates of lenders participating in our revolving bank credit facility.  We are exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the derivative counterparties; however, we currently anticipate that each of our derivative counterparties will be able to fulfill their contractual obligations. Additional collateral is not required by us due to the derivative counterparties’ collateral rights as lenders and we do not require collateral from our derivative counterparties.

 8 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

In accordance with GAAP, we record each derivative contract on the balance sheet as an asset or a liability at its fair value.  We have elected not to designate our commodity derivative contracts as hedging instruments; therefore, all changes in the fair value of derivative contracts are recognized currently in earnings. For additional information about fair value measurements, refer to Note 7.

Commodity Derivatives.  We have entered into commodity swap contracts to manage a portion of our exposure to commodity price risk from sales of oil through December 2014.  While these contracts are intended to reduce the effects of price volatility, they may also limit future income from favorable price movements.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, our derivative contracts consisted entirely of crude oil contracts.  The crude oil swap contracts are comprised of a portion based on Brent crude oil prices and a portion based on West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) crude oil prices.  The Brent based swaps are priced off the Brent crude oil price quoted on the IntercontinentalExchange, known as ICE.  The WTI based swaps are priced off the New York Mercantile Exchange, known as NYMEX.  Although our Gulf of Mexico crude oil is based off the WTI crude oil price plus a premium, the realized prices received for our Gulf of Mexico crude oil have been closer to the Brent crude oil price because of competition with foreign supplied crude oil, which is based off the Brent crude oil price.  Therefore, a portion of the swap oil contracts are priced off the Brent crude oil price to mitigate a portion of the price risk associated with our Gulf of Mexico crude oil production.

As of June 30, 2013, our open commodity derivatives contracts were as follows:  

   Bbls = barrels

The following balance sheet line items included amounts related to the estimated fair value of our open derivative contracts as indicated in the following table (in thousands):

Changes in the fair value of our commodity derivative contracts are recognized currently in earnings and were as follows (in thousands):

Offsetting Commodity Derivatives.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, all of our derivative agreements allowed for netting of derivative gains and losses upon settlement.  In general, the terms of the agreements provide for offsetting of amounts payable or receivable between us and the counterparty, at the election of both parties, for transactions that occur on the same date and in the same currency.  If an event of default were to occur causing an acceleration of payment under our revolving bank credit facility, that event may also trigger an acceleration of settlement of our derivative instruments.   If we

 9 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

were required to settle all of our open derivative instruments, we would be able to net payments and receipts per counterparty pursuant to the derivative agreements.  Although our derivative agreements allow for netting, which would allow for recording assets and liabilities per counterparty on a net basis, we account for our derivative contracts on a gross basis per contract as either an asset or liability.  

The following table presents disclosures required by ASU 2011-11 and ASU 2013-01 and provides a reconciliation of the gross assets and liabilities reflected in the balance sheet and the potential effects of master netting agreements on the fair value of open derivative contracts as of June 30, 2013.

There were no potential effects of master netting agreements on the fair value of open derivative contracts as of December 31, 2012 due to all open derivative contracts being valued as liabilities.

6.  Long-Term Debt

Our long-term debt was as follows (in thousands):

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the balance outstanding of our senior notes, which bear an annual interest rate of 8.50% and mature on June 15, 2019 (the “8.50% Senior Notes”), was classified as long-term at their carrying value.  Interest on the 8.50% Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15.  The estimated annual effective interest rate on the 8.50% Senior Notes is 8.4%, which includes amortization of debt issuance costs and premiums.  We are subject to various financial and other covenants under the indenture governing the 8.50% Senior Notes and we were in compliance with those covenants as of June 30, 2013.  

The Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) governs our revolving bank credit facility and terminates on May 5, 2015.  Borrowings under our revolving bank credit facility are secured by our oil and natural gas properties.  Availability under such facility is subject to a semi-annual redetermination of our borrowing base that occurs in the spring and fall of each year and is calculated by our lenders based on their evaluation of our proved reserves and their own internal criteria.  

At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had $0.1 million of letters of credit outstanding under the revolving bank credit facility.  The estimated annual effective interest rate was 4.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2013 for borrowings under the revolving bank credit facility.  The estimated annual effective interest rate includes amortization of debt issuance costs and excludes commitment fees and other costs.  As of June 30, 2013, our borrowing base was $800.0 million and our borrowing availability was $616.9 million.  

Under the Credit Agreement, we are subject to various financial covenants calculated as of the last day of each fiscal quarter, including a minimum current ratio and a maximum leverage ratio, each as defined in the Credit Agreement.  We were in compliance with all applicable covenants of the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2013.

For information about fair value measurements for our 8.50% Senior Notes and revolving bank credit facility, refer to Note 7.  

 10 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

7.  Fair Value Measurements

We measure the fair value of our derivative financial instruments by applying the income approach, using models with inputs that are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy.  The inputs used for the fair value measurement of our derivative financial instruments are the exercise price, the expiration date, the settlement date, notional quantities, the implied volatility, the discount curve with spreads and published commodity futures prices.  The fair value of our 8.50% Senior Notes is based on quoted prices and the market is not an active market; therefore, the fair value is classified within Level 2.  The carrying amount of debt under our revolving bank credit facility approximates fair value because the interest rates are variable and reflective of market rates.

The following table presents the fair value of our derivative financial instruments, 8.50% Senior Notes and revolving bank credit facility for the periods indicated (in thousands).

As described in Note 5, our derivative financial instruments are reported in the balance sheet at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized currently in earnings.  The 8.50% Senior Notes and revolving bank credit facility are reported in the balance sheet at their carrying value as described in Note 6.  

8.  Share-Based Compensation and Cash-Based Incentive Compensation

In 2010, the W&T Offshore, Inc. Amended and Restated Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) was approved by our shareholders and amendments to the Plan were approved by our shareholders on May 7, 2013.  As allowed by the Plan, in 2013, 2012 and in 2011, the Company granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to certain of its employees.  RSUs are a long-term compensation component of the Plan, which are granted to only certain employees, and are subject to adjustments at the end of the applicable performance period based on the achievement of certain predetermined criteria.  Certain RSUs granted in 2013 (the “2013 RSUs”) are subject to performance criteria of Adjusted EBITDA, defined as net income before income tax expense, net interest expense, depreciation, depletion, amortization, accretion and certain other items, adjusted EBITDA as a percent of total revenue (“Adjusted EBITDA Margin”) and total shareholder return (“TSR”).  The RSUs granted in 2012 (the “2012 RSUs”) are subject to performance criteria of earnings per share and TSR, while the RSUs granted in 2011 (the “2011 RSUs”) are subject to only earnings per share performance measurement.  In 2013 and in prior years, restricted stock was granted to the Company’s non-employee directors under the Director Compensation Plan.  The restricted stock and RSUs each vest at the end of specified service periods.  In addition to share-based compensation, the Company may grant to its employees cash-based incentive awards, which are a short-term component of the Plan and are based on the Company and the employee achieving certain predetermined performance criteria.

We recognize compensation cost for share-based payments to employees and non-employee directors over the period during which the recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the award, based on the fair value of the equity instrument on the date of grant.  We are also required to estimate forfeitures, resulting in the recognition of compensation cost only for those awards that are expected to actually vest.

On May 7, 2013, after receiving shareholder approval, 4,000,000 shares of common stock were added to the amount available for issuance under the Plan.  At June 30, 2013, there were 5,393,602 shares of common stock available for issuance in satisfaction of awards under the Plan and 519,379 shares of common stock available for issuance in satisfaction of awards under the Director Compensation Plan. The shares available for both plans are reduced when restricted stock is granted.  RSUs will reduce the shares available in the Plan only when RSUs are settled in shares of common stock.  Although the Company has the option to settle RSUs in stock or cash at vesting, only common stock has been used to settle vested RSUs to date.   

Restricted Stock.   As of June 30, 2013, all of the unvested restricted shares outstanding were issued to the non-employee directors.  Restricted shares are subject to forfeiture until vested and cannot be sold, transferred or disposed of during the restricted period. The holders of restricted shares generally have the same rights as a shareholder of the Company with

 11 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

respect to such shares, including the right to vote and receive dividends or other distributions paid with respect to the shares.  The fair value of restricted stock was estimated by using the Company’s closing price on the grant date.

A summary of activity related to restricted stock is as follows:

Subject to the satisfaction of service conditions, the outstanding restricted shares issued to the non-employee directors as of June 30, 2013 are expected to vest as follows:

The grant date fair value of restricted shares granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.  The fair value of restricted shares that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock Units.  As of June 30, 2013, the Company had outstanding RSUs issued to certain employees.  Certain 2013 RSUs are subject to pre-defined share performance measures comprised of Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin for 2013 and TSR for defined periods in 2013, 2014 and 2015; therefore, no portion has been determined to be eligible for vesting as of June 30, 2013.  A portion of the 2012 RSUs remains subject to the certain pre-defined performance measures of TSR for the defined periods in 2013 and 2014; therefore, this portion will be determined whether eligible for vesting at the end of the respective performance periods.  TSR is determined based upon the change in the entity’s stock price and dividends for the performance period.  The TSR targets are the ranking of the Company’s TSR compared to the TSR of certain peer companies.  The TSR components have an issuance scale from 0% to 200%.  The portion of RSUs subject to TSR performance measurement is disclosed in the second table below.  

The fair value for the 2013 RSUs was determined separately for the component related to the Company specific performance measures (Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin) and the component related to TSR targets.  The fair value of the 2013 RSUs component related to the Company specific performance measures was determined using the Company’s closing price on the grant date.  The fair value for the 2013 RSUs component related to TSR targets was determined by using a Monte Carlo simulation probabilistic model.  The inputs used in the probabilistic model for the Company and the peer companies were: average closing stock prices during January 2013; risk-free interest rates using the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) ranging from 0.27% to 0.91% over the service period; expected volatilities ranging from 30% to 63%; expected dividend yields ranging from 0.0% to 3.1%; and correlation factors ranging from (84%) to 95%.  The expected volatilities, expected dividends and correlation factors were developed using historical data.

A methodology similar to that employed  for the 2013 RSUs was used to determine the fair value for the 2012 RSUs.  The inputs used in the probabilistic model for the Company and the peer companies were: average closing stock prices during January 2012; risk-free interest rates using the LIBOR ranging from 0.15% to 0.72% over the service period; expected volatilities ranging from 33% to 74%; expected dividend yields ranging from 0.0% to 2.5%; and correlation factors ranging from (67%) to 94%.  The expected volatilities, expected dividends and correlation factors were developed using historical data.  The fair value of the 2011 RSUs, which contained only Company-specific performance measures, was estimated by using the Company’s closing price on the grant date.

The majority of RSUs are subject to predetermined performance criteria and all RSUs are subject to service requirements prior to vesting.  All RSUs awarded are subject to forfeiture until vested and cannot be sold, transferred or otherwise disposed

 12 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

of during the restricted period.  Dividend equivalents are earned at the same rate as dividends paid on our common stock after achieving the specified performance requirement for that component of the RSUs.

A summary of activity related to RSUs is as follows:

Subject to the satisfaction of service conditions, the RSUs outstanding as of June 30, 2013 are eligible to vest in the year indicated in the table below:    

The grant date fair value of RSUs granted during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $12.8 million and $14.1 million, respectively.  During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, there was no vesting of RSUs.

Share-Based Compensation.  

A summary of incentive compensation expense under share-based payment arrangements and the related tax benefit is as follows (in thousands):  

Unrecognized Share-Based Compensation.  As of June 30, 2013, unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to our outstanding restricted shares and RSUs was $0.7 million and $19.2 million, respectively.   Unrecognized share-based compensation expense will be recognized through April 2016 for restricted shares and November 2015 for RSUs.

 13 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Cash-Based Incentive Compensation.  As defined by the Plan, annual incentive awards may be granted to eligible employees payable in cash.  These awards are performance-based awards consisting of one or more business criteria or individual performance criteria and a targeted level or levels of performance with respect to each of such criteria.  Generally, the performance period is the calendar year and determination and payment is made in cash in the first quarter of the following year.

Share-Based Compensation and Cash-Based Incentive Compensation Expense.  

A summary of incentive compensation expense is as follows (in thousands):  

9.  Income Taxes  

Income tax expense of $12.4 million and $27.3 million was recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.  Our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was 35.7% and 35.8%, respectively, and differed from the federal statutory rate of 35.0% primarily as a result of state income taxes.  Income tax expense of $34.2 million and $36.1 million was recorded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.  Our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was 38.9% for both periods, and differed from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the recapture of deductions for qualified domestic production activities under Section 199 of the IRC as a function of loss carrybacks to prior years.  Income taxes receivables as of June 30, 2013 are comprised of $44.7 million of refunds related to tax loss carrybacks to 2010 and 2011, which are partially offset by $5.1 million of accrued taxes payable related to 2013 alternative minimum tax.

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we did not have any unrecognized tax benefit recorded.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had a valuation allowance related to state net operating losses.  The realization of these assets depends on recognition of sufficient future taxable income in specific tax jurisdictions in which those temporary differences or net operating losses are deductible.  The tax years from 2009 through 2012 remain open to examination by the tax jurisdictions to which we are subject.

 14 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

10.  Earnings Per Share

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (in thousands, except per share amounts):

11.  Dividends

During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we paid regular cash dividends per common share of $0.17 and $0.16, respectively.   On August 7, 2013, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.09 per common share, payable on September 12, 2013 to shareholders of record on August 22, 2013.

12.  Contingencies

Cameron Parish Louisiana Claim.  Since 2009, certain Cameron Parish landowners have filed suits in the 38th Judicial District Court, Cameron Parish, Louisiana against the Company and its Chief Executive Officer, Tracy W. Krohn, as well as several other defendants unrelated to us.  In their lawsuits, plaintiffs alleged that property they own has been contaminated or otherwise damaged by the defendants’ oil and gas exploration and production activities and they are seeking compensatory and punitive damages.  During 2012 and for the six months ended June 30, 2013, we settled claims with certain landowners and paid $11.3 million.      

Qui Tam Litigation.  On September 21, 2012, the Company was served with a complaint in a qui tam action filed under the federal False Claims Act by an employee of a Company contractor.  The lawsuit, United States ex rel. Comeaux v. W&T Offshore, Inc., et al.; CA No. 10-494, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, against the Company and three other working interest owners related to claims associated with three of the Company’s operated production platforms.  A qui tam action, also known as a “whistleblower” action, is a lawsuit brought by a private citizen seeking civil penalties or damages against a person or company on behalf of the government for alleged violations of law.  If the claims are successful, the person filing the suit may recover a percentage of the damages or penalty from the lawsuit as a reward for exposing a wrongdoing and recovering funds on behalf of the government.  The complaint was originally filed in 2010 but kept under confidential seal in order for the federal government to decide if it wished to intervene and take over the prosecution of the qui tam action.  The government declined to intervene in this suit and the complaint was unsealed and made public in June 2012, thereby giving the plaintiff the opportunity to pursue the claims on behalf of the government.  The plaintiff is pursuing the claim.  

The complaint alleges that environmental violations at three of the Company’s operated production platforms in the Gulf of Mexico violate the federal offshore lease provisions so that the Company, among other things, wrongfully retained benefits under the applicable leases.  The alleged environmental violations include allegations of discharges of relatively small amounts of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, the failure to report and record such discharges, and falsification of certain produced water samples and related reports required under federal law.  The events are alleged to have occurred in 2009.  These are largely the same underlying environmental allegations that resulted in the plea agreement described in the audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.  The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claims.  The plaintiff dismissed his claims against the three other working interest owners after they filed motions to dismiss.  The plaintiff conceded that certain of his claims should be dismissed in his reply to the Company’s motion to dismiss.  By order dated August 6, 2013, the court granted the Company’s

 15 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims without prejudice and allowed plaintiff twenty days to amend his complaint to remedy the deficiencies in his claims.  The court will dismiss with prejudice if the plaintiff cannot or does not correct the deficiencies in his claims.

The Company intends to vigorously defend the claims made in this lawsuit.  While the Company has determined that the likelihood of an adverse outcome may be reasonably possible, the range of potential loss cannot yet be estimated, and accordingly, no accrual has been made.

Insurance Claims. During the fourth quarter of 2012, underwriters of W&T’s excess liability policies (“Excess Policies”) (Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, New York Marine & General Insurance Company, Navigators Insurance Company, XL Specialty Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.) filed declaratory judgment actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas seeking a determination that our Excess Policies cover removal of wreck and debris claims arising from Hurricane Ike to the extent we have first exhausted the limits of our Energy Package (defined as certain insurance policies relating to our oil and gas properties) with only removal of wreck and debris claims.  The court consolidated the various suits filed by the underwriters.  W&T has not yet filed any claim under such Excess Policies. As of June 30, 2013, we have spent $44.5 million and expect to incur an additional $2.6 million of costs for removal of wreck associated with platforms damaged by Hurricane Ike. In January 2013, we filed a motion for summary judgment seeking the court’s determination that such Excess Policies do not require us to exhaust the limits of our Energy Package policies with only removal of wreck and debris claims.  On July 31, 2013, the District Court ruled in favor of the underwriters, adopting their position that the Excess Policies cover removal of wreck and debris claims only to the extent the limits of our Energy Package policies have been exhausted with removal of wreck and debris claims.  We disagree with the Court’s ruling and intend to appeal the decision.  Removal of wreck costs are recorded in Oil and natural gas properties and equipment on the Balance Sheet.  If we are successful in our appeal, any recoveries from claims made on these Excess Policies related to this issue will be recorded as reductions in this line item, which will reduce the Company’s DD&A rate.  

Royalties.  In 2009, the Company recognized $5.3 million in allowable reductions of cash payments for royalties owed to the Office of Natural Resources Revenue (the “ONRR”) for transportation of their deepwater production through our subsea pipeline systems.  In 2010, the ONRR audited the calculations and support related to this usage fee, and in the third quarter of 2010, we were notified that the ONRR had disallowed approximately $4.7 million of the reductions taken.  We recorded a reduction to other revenue of $4.7 million in the third quarter of 2010 to reflect this disallowance; however, we disagree with the position taken by the ONRR and we are pursuing our claim to resolve the matter.

Other Claims.  We are a party to various pending or threatened claims and complaints seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations and other matters in the ordinary course of our business.  In addition, claims or contingencies may arise related to matters occurring prior to our acquisition of properties or related to matters occurring subsequent to our sale of properties.  In certain cases, we have indemnified the sellers of properties we have acquired, and in other cases, we have indemnified the buyers of properties we have sold.  We are also subject to federal and state administrative proceedings conducted in the ordinary course of business.  Although we can give no assurance about the outcome of pending legal and federal or state administrative proceedings and the effect such an outcome may have on us, management believes that any ultimate liability resulting from the outcome of such proceedings, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Contingent Liability Recorded.  Recognized expenses related to accrued and settled claims, complaints and fines were less than $ 0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $8.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  These expenses are reported in General and administrative expenses on the statement of income and reflect the items noted above and other various claims and complaints.  As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we have recorded $0.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively, which are included in Accrued liabilities on the balance sheet, for the loss contingencies matters that include the events described above and other minor environmental and litigation matters which we are addressing in the normal course of business.

13.  Supplemental Guarantor Information

Our payment obligations under the 8.50% Senior Notes and the Credit Agreement (see Note 6) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, including W&T Energy VI, LLC and W&T Energy VII, LLC (together, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”).  W&T Energy VII, LLC does not currently have any active operations.  Guarantees of the 8.50% Senior Notes will be released under certain circumstances, including:

 16 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

(1) in connection with any sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of a Guarantor Subsidiary (including by way of merger or consolidation) to a person that is not (either before or after giving effect to such transaction) the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary (as such term is defined in the indenture governing the 8.50% Senior Notes) of the Company, if the sale or other disposition does not violate the “Asset Sales” provisions of the indenture;

(2) in connection with any sale or other disposition of the capital stock of such Guarantor Subsidiary to a person that is not (either before or after giving effect to such transaction) the Company or a Restricted Subsidiary of the Company, if the sale or other disposition does not violate the “Asset Sales” provisions of the indenture and the Guarantor Subsidiary ceases to be a subsidiary of the Company as a result of such sales or disposition;

(3) if such Guarantor Subsidiary is a Restricted Subsidiary and the Company designates such Guarantor Subsidiary as an Unrestricted Subsidiary in accordance with the applicable provisions of the indenture;

(4) upon Legal Defeasance or Covenant Defeasance (as such terms are defined in the indenture) or upon satisfaction and discharge of the indenture;

(5) upon the liquidation or dissolution of such Guarantor Subsidiary, provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing; or

(6) at such time as such Guarantor Subsidiary is no longer required to be a Guarantor Subsidiary of the 8.50% Senior Notes as described in the indenture, provided no event of default has occurred and is continuing.

The following unaudited condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of W&T Offshore, Inc. (the “Parent Company”) and the Guarantor Subsidiaries, together with consolidating adjustments necessary to present the Company’s results on a consolidated basis.

 17 

W&T OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
(Unaudited)

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2013